03.04.2013 Views

Animals and Plants of Piccaninny Plains: - Shape our world

Animals and Plants of Piccaninny Plains: - Shape our world

Animals and Plants of Piccaninny Plains: - Shape our world

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Animals</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>:<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> a survey conducted October‐November 2008<br />

Jeff Middleton, Rigel Jensen, Ray Lloyd, John Kanowski <strong>and</strong> Sarah Legge<br />

Photographs by Wayne Lawler<br />

December 2008


Summary<br />

This report documents the rationale, methodology <strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>and</strong> plants at <strong>Piccaninny</strong><br />

<strong>Plains</strong>, a wildlife sanctuary located in Cape York Peninsula, north‐east Australia. The property was purchased in<br />

2008 by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy in partnership with WildlifeLink.<br />

The main objectives <strong>of</strong> the survey were as follows:<br />

• to inventory animals <strong>and</strong> plants at sites representing the major vegetation types on the property;<br />

• to obtain baseline data for monitoring management actions aimed at reducing the impacts <strong>of</strong>:<br />

o cattle grazing on grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong><br />

o pigs, cattle <strong>and</strong> horses on swamp habitats.<br />

Surveys were conducted for 4 weeks in October – November 2008, during the late dry season. A total <strong>of</strong> 41 sites<br />

were surveyed for birds, mammals, reptiles <strong>and</strong> frogs, as well as vegetation composition <strong>and</strong> structure, using<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardised methodologies. Additional data were obtained from opportunistic surveys that targeted particular<br />

habitat types <strong>and</strong> from incidental records obtained during the c<strong>our</strong>se <strong>of</strong> the survey.<br />

The key results were:<br />

• The survey confirmed that <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> harb<strong>our</strong>s high species richness:<br />

•<br />

o 231 vertebrate species were recorded in the survey, including<br />

18 species <strong>of</strong> mammals,<br />

153 species <strong>of</strong> birds,<br />

14 species <strong>of</strong> amphibians, <strong>and</strong><br />

46 species <strong>of</strong> reptiles.<br />

To place these figures in context, the number <strong>of</strong> bird species recorded on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> represents<br />

almost one‐fifth (18%) <strong>of</strong> the total Australian avifauna.<br />

• 216 plant species in 186 genera <strong>and</strong> 71 families were recorded in the survey.<br />

• Several <strong>of</strong> these records represent range extensions – either from the eastern coastal rainforests (e.g.,<br />

Southern Common Cuscus) or from woodl<strong>and</strong>s to the south (eg. Yellow‐tinted Honeyeater).<br />

• <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> protects a number <strong>of</strong> species listed as threatened by the Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Commonwealth governments:<br />

o f<strong>our</strong> bird species<br />

o two mammal species<br />

o five plant species<br />

DRAFT report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008


• There were marked differences in the faunal assemblages among habitat types. The avifauna <strong>of</strong> the<br />

riparian rainforests <strong>and</strong> deciduous vine thickets was particularly rich <strong>and</strong> resembled the avifauna <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Iron <strong>and</strong> McIlwraith Ranges to the east, which is itself heavily dominated by New Guinean elements.<br />

• The habitats <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> are in good condition. For example, only six weed species were<br />

recorded, <strong>of</strong> which just two species (both grasses) require particular management attention.<br />

The survey has confirmed the exceptional conservation value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> for the protection <strong>of</strong> species<br />

<strong>and</strong> ecosystems <strong>of</strong> northern Cape York Peninsula.<br />

Juvenile planigales caught in the cracking clay grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong><br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008


Contents<br />

Summary i<br />

Introduction 1<br />

Survey objectives 3<br />

Survey design 4<br />

Survey methods 6<br />

Results: fauna 11<br />

Significant fauna records 13<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> major habitat types 15<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s 17<br />

Results: vegetation 18<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s 23<br />

Weeds 23<br />

Recommendations for future monitoring 23<br />

Recommendations for management 24<br />

Survey participants 26<br />

Acknowledgements 26<br />

References 27<br />

Appendix 1: Fauna recorded at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> 28<br />

Appendix 2: <strong>Plants</strong> recorded at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> 39<br />

Appendix 3: Comparison <strong>of</strong> ground cover in major habitat types 45<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008


Introduction<br />

<strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> is a 170,000 ha property in northern Cape York Peninsula, Queensl<strong>and</strong>, Australia, purchased<br />

by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy in partnership with WildlifeLink in 2008. The property is <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

significance for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons:<br />

• It contains a diverse range <strong>of</strong> extensive <strong>and</strong> relatively intact ecosystems including open woodl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong>s, wetl<strong>and</strong>s, deciduous vine thickets <strong>and</strong> riparian gallery forests. These include the only<br />

known communities <strong>of</strong> deciduous vine thicket on cracking clay soils in the high rainfall zone (>1400 mm<br />

p.a.) <strong>of</strong> Queensl<strong>and</strong>, as well as most <strong>of</strong> the grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> more than a third <strong>of</strong> the open woodl<strong>and</strong>s on<br />

cracking clay soils in this rainfall zone.<br />

• It includes over 50 km frontage <strong>of</strong> the Archer River, one <strong>of</strong> the largest <strong>and</strong> least disturbed rivers on<br />

Cape York Peninsula. During the wet season, the Archer River floodplains are inundated to shallow<br />

depths by a vast body <strong>of</strong> slow moving water, up to 10 km wide. At other times, the floodplains support<br />

numerous ephemeral swamps <strong>and</strong> large permanent or semi‐permanent waterholes (Stanton <strong>and</strong><br />

Murphy 2006). The property also includes 20 km <strong>of</strong> the Wenlock River <strong>and</strong> its associated wetl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

• Based on known distribution <strong>and</strong> habitat preferences, <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> is expected to provide habitat<br />

for over 420 vertebrate species, including species endemic to Cape York Peninsula <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />

threatened taxa (Legge et al. 2007).<br />

• It enhances the connectivity <strong>of</strong> protected areas on Cape York Peninsula, by linking the eastern <strong>and</strong><br />

western sections <strong>of</strong> Mungkan K<strong>and</strong>ju National Park with the Aboriginal l<strong>and</strong>s surrounding Iron Range<br />

National Park on the east coast.<br />

Waterbirds on Green Swamp, a large permanent wetl<strong>and</strong> on the Archer River floodplain.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 1


Figure 1. Location <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>, in northern Cape York Peninsula<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 2


Survey objectives<br />

Wildlife surveys are an important part <strong>of</strong> AWC’s National Science Program. They allow us to measure progress<br />

against <strong>our</strong> mission (that is, to protect all <strong>of</strong> Australia’s wildlife <strong>and</strong> their habitats), <strong>and</strong> they provide baseline<br />

data for monitoring ecological change on sanctuaries, particularly the response <strong>of</strong> wildlife to conservation<br />

management practices.<br />

The particular objectives <strong>of</strong> the October‐November 2008 survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> were to:<br />

• compile an inventory <strong>of</strong> selected vertebrate faunal groups (birds, mammals, reptiles <strong>and</strong> frogs) at sites<br />

representing the major vegetation types on the property;<br />

• survey the floristic composition <strong>and</strong> vegetation structure <strong>of</strong> these sites;<br />

• obtain baseline data on the impacts <strong>of</strong> exotic vertebrates on native ecosystems, for subsequent<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> management actions aimed at reducing those impacts, namely:<br />

o the impacts <strong>of</strong> cattle grazing on two vegetation communities that are generally rare, but well‐<br />

represented on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>:<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong>s comprising Heteropogon triteceus, Themeda arguens, Sorghum plumosum<br />

<strong>and</strong> Piliostigma malabaricum; <strong>and</strong><br />

open woodl<strong>and</strong>s dominated by Euclayptus platyphylla <strong>and</strong> E. leptophleba<br />

o the impacts <strong>of</strong> feral ungulates (cattle, horses <strong>and</strong> pigs) on a large, permanent wetl<strong>and</strong> ‐ Green<br />

Swamp – on the Archer River floodplain.<br />

Additional research conducted during the survey included trials <strong>of</strong> various methods (camera traps, dung<br />

counts <strong>and</strong> line transect counts) for estimating Horse abundance, <strong>and</strong> trials <strong>of</strong> methods (camera traps <strong>and</strong><br />

s<strong>and</strong> traps) for estimating Cat <strong>and</strong> Dingo activity.<br />

Gina Barnett setting a cage trap in riparian forest.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 3


Survey Design<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 41 sites were surveyed using the st<strong>and</strong>ardised protocols described in detail in the following pages.<br />

The arrangement <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> sites in relation to the survey objectives were as follows (see also Figure 1):<br />

1. Inventory <strong>of</strong> key habitats on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>:<br />

• 5 sites in gallery rainforest along the Archer River;<br />

• 4 sites in gallery forest along the Wenlock River (a fifth site was dropped because it was on fire);<br />

• 5 sites in gallery forests <strong>and</strong> deciduous vine forests along <strong>Piccaninny</strong> Creek.<br />

2. Baseline data to monitor the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> management actions:<br />

(a) Reducing impacts <strong>of</strong> cattle grazing on high conservation value grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s:<br />

• 5 sites in grazed grassl<strong>and</strong><br />

• 5 sites in destocked grassl<strong>and</strong><br />

• 5 sites in grazed Eucalyptus platyphylla/E. leptophleba woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

• 5 sites in destocked E. platyphylla/E. leptophleba woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

(b) Reducing Impacts <strong>of</strong> pigs, cattle <strong>and</strong> horses on swamp habitats:<br />

• 5 sites adjacent to Green Swamp; <strong>and</strong><br />

• 2 sites adjacent to Bull Swamp, another comparable permanent wetl<strong>and</strong> on the Archer River<br />

floodplain.<br />

Sites were generally located at least 600 m apart to ensure nominal independence as replicate samples <strong>of</strong><br />

habitat. At any time, between 4 <strong>and</strong> 7 sites were surveyed concurrently.<br />

Ray Lloyd <strong>and</strong> Richard Johnson surveying reptiles in woodl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 4


Figure 2. Location <strong>of</strong> survey sites <strong>and</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> targeted vegetation types.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 5


Survey methods<br />

Bird surveys<br />

Birds were surveyed in a 2 ha plot established at each site. The shape <strong>of</strong> the plot varied according to the<br />

habitats being surveyed, for example, 100 m x200 m in the extensive open woodl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> habitats,<br />

but 50 m x 400 m in gallery forests along the Archer <strong>and</strong> the Wenlock Rivers.<br />

Each site was surveyed for 20 minutes by a single observer, on two occasions. Surveys were conducted<br />

between sunrise <strong>and</strong> 2 ½ h<strong>our</strong>s after sunrise. In each survey, observers recorded the presence <strong>and</strong>, where<br />

possible, the abundance <strong>of</strong> each species encountered using both observations <strong>and</strong> calls. Ancillary data were<br />

recorded on the start <strong>and</strong> finish time <strong>of</strong> each survey, <strong>and</strong> weather conditions (cloud cover, wind, <strong>and</strong> rain).<br />

For each bird observed, the following data were recorded:<br />

• species<br />

• type <strong>of</strong> observation (call/visual)<br />

• number <strong>of</strong> individuals observed (where possible)<br />

• substrate (ground, shrub‐layer, below canopy, above canopy)<br />

Brian Venables <strong>and</strong> Rigel Jensen at Green swamp (photo: J. Kanowski)<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 6


Live­trapping for reptiles <strong>and</strong> small to medium­sized mammals<br />

At each site, a total <strong>of</strong> 20 Elliot type ‘A’ aluminium live traps were set in two lines, spaced 20 – 30 m apart, with<br />

a 10 m intervals between traps. In addition, a total <strong>of</strong> 8 ‐ 10 wire‐cage traps were set at each site, spaced at 20<br />

m intervals along each trap line. Traps were baited with a mixture <strong>of</strong> rolled oats, peanut butter <strong>and</strong> sardines.<br />

Wire‐cage traps were covered with hessian.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 30 m drift fence was established at each site, usually at one end <strong>of</strong> the traplines. The drift fence<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> three 10 m fences arranged radially in a trefoil shape. F<strong>our</strong> 20 L bucket pitfall traps were set in<br />

conjunction with the drift fences, with one bucket in the centre <strong>and</strong> one bucket located approximately 2/3 <strong>of</strong><br />

the way along each <strong>of</strong> the three arms. In addition, a pair <strong>of</strong> shade‐mesh funnel traps was established along<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the drift fence arms. The funnel traps were covered with a layer <strong>of</strong> metallicized foam insulation to<br />

reduce heat stress on captured animals.<br />

Traps were operated for three consecutive nights. Elliot <strong>and</strong> wire‐cage traps were cleared each morning, closed<br />

during the heat <strong>of</strong> the day <strong>and</strong> reset late each afternoon. Pitfall <strong>and</strong> funnel traps were cleared each morning<br />

<strong>and</strong> afternoon.<br />

John Kanowski <strong>and</strong> Mark Antos checking pitfall traps in woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 7


Daytime active searches for reptiles<br />

Active searches were conducted for diurnal reptiles at each site, targeting suitable microhabitats (e.g. under<br />

fallen timber, exfoliating bark or rocks, within leaf litter, on tree trunks). These surveys were conducted in<br />

similar habitat adjacent to each <strong>of</strong> the marked sites, or on the site following the cessation <strong>of</strong> live‐trapping, to<br />

avoid interfering with the captures <strong>of</strong> animals within the marked sites.<br />

Active searches were conducted between 10 am <strong>and</strong> 3 pm. Each search comprised a total <strong>of</strong> 1 person h<strong>our</strong> per<br />

site (i.e. 3 persons searching for 20 minute), with one ‐ two surveys conducted at each site.<br />

Walking spotlight searches for nocturnal animals<br />

Henry Cook examining a skink.<br />

Spotlight searches for nocturnal animals were conducted along transects that were established within each <strong>of</strong><br />

the major habitat types. Surveys were conducted on foot by groups <strong>of</strong> 2 – 8 people, for approximately 30‐45<br />

minutes per site. Spotlight equipment included head‐torches <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>‐held torches. In dense habitats (e.g.<br />

vine thickets <strong>and</strong> riparian rainforests), transects were located along tracks or dry creek beds.<br />

Vehicle­based spotlight searches for nocturnal animals<br />

Vehicle‐based spotlighting transects were conducted opportunistically along sections <strong>of</strong> tracks that traversed<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> open woodl<strong>and</strong> habitats. The length <strong>of</strong> transects varied between sites. In each survey, the driver<br />

maintained a low speed while one or more observers searched suitable habitat with a 100 W spotlight for<br />

animal eye‐shine or movement. A GPS location was obtained for each record.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 8


Owl Call Playback Surveys<br />

Owls were surveyed opportunistically, using the following methodology. Pre‐recorded calls (from Fed Van<br />

Gessel’s CD: Australian Nightbirds – Owls, Nightjars <strong>and</strong> Frogmouths) <strong>of</strong> target species were broadcast through<br />

an amplification system (10 W Toa loud hailer) designed to project the sound for at least 1 km under still night<br />

conditions. Calls <strong>of</strong> each species were played for 5 minutes, followed by a 5 minute listening period. The<br />

surrounding area was searched by spotlight after a final ten minute listening period. Windy <strong>and</strong> rainy periods<br />

were avoided.<br />

Vegetation Surveys<br />

Vegetation data were collected at each <strong>of</strong> the 41 marked survey sites as follows:<br />

1. The Basal Area (BA) <strong>of</strong> woody vegetation was recorded in a 360° plotless sweep, centred on or near the<br />

middle <strong>of</strong> the pitfall trap array, using a bottle opener dendrometer (Universität Göttingen). Each plant tallied in<br />

the sweep was identified to species <strong>and</strong> categorised as a canopy tree, mid‐storey tree or shrub.<br />

2. Ground cover was assessed in 20 x 1 m 2 quadrats laid out at 5 m intervals along a 100 m transect, orientated<br />

between the two trap lines <strong>of</strong> the fauna survey. Each quadrat was subdivided into 25 subplots to facilitate<br />

repeatable estimation <strong>of</strong> cover. The following categories were assessed, summing to 100%:<br />

Leaf Litter (LL), including dead or dried, st<strong>and</strong>ing or lodged grass.<br />

Bare Ground (BG), including bare ground covered by any algal crusting.<br />

Rock, i.e., gravel, cobble, rock <strong>and</strong> boulders.<br />

Woody Debris (WD), any dead wood greater than 2.5 cm diameter.<br />

Vegetation cover, inclusive <strong>of</strong> any living green material.<br />

Animal sign (scat).<br />

Other, including other living material such as tree trunks, roots or vines.<br />

Subsets <strong>of</strong> the cover categories included the following:<br />

Grass cover, a subset <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover ( live grass only).<br />

Weeds, a subset <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover, inclusive <strong>of</strong> any exotic species recognised.<br />

Sedge, a subset <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover, mostly pertaining to swamp edges.<br />

Cracks, a subset <strong>of</strong> bare ground, a prominent feature <strong>of</strong> clay soils in the dry season.<br />

In addition, animal distubance (the proportion <strong>of</strong> each ground cover plot disturbed by hooves, pugging or<br />

rooting) was assessed on each plot.<br />

3. Canopy cover (CC) <strong>and</strong> Woody debris (WD) were assessed along the 100 m line transect. Canopy cover was<br />

assessed as projective crown cover above the transect, assuming the crown was opaque (Elzinga et al. 2001,<br />

Neldner et al. 2005). The volume <strong>of</strong> woody debris was assessed using a line intercept method (van Wagner<br />

1968), with debris assessed in the following size classes: 2.5 – 5 cm, 5 – 10 cm, 10 – 20 cm diameter. Debris >20<br />

cm diameter was measured precisely.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 9


At each site, notes were taken <strong>of</strong> soil type, cyclone damage, time since fire <strong>and</strong> other factors relevant to<br />

vegetation structure. Incidental species were also listed at most sites, <strong>and</strong> opportunistically across the<br />

property.<br />

Rigel Jensen <strong>and</strong> Charlie Nicholson assessing vegetation structure in woodl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Rigel Jensen collecting floristic samples in riparian rainforest.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 10


Results: fauna<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 231 vertebrate species were recorded in the survey, including 18 species <strong>of</strong> mammals, 153 species <strong>of</strong><br />

birds, 14 species <strong>of</strong> amphibians <strong>and</strong> 46 species <strong>of</strong> reptiles (Appendix 1). Six <strong>of</strong> these species (f<strong>our</strong> birds, two<br />

mammals) are listed as rare or threatened under Federal or State legislation (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Threatened vertebrates recorded during fauna surveys at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong><br />

Scientific Name Common name FAMILY Threat category:<br />

Federal 1 State 2<br />

Birds<br />

Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black‐necked Stork Ciconiidae Rare<br />

Ninox rufa Rufous Owl Strigidae Rare<br />

Probosciger aterrimus Palm Cockatoo Cacatuidae Rare<br />

Tadorna radjah Radjah Shelduck Anatidae Rare<br />

Mammals<br />

Spilocuscus maculatus Common Spotted Cuscus Phalangeridae Rare<br />

Pteropus conspicillatus Spectacled Flying‐fox Pteropodidae Vulnerable<br />

1 EPBC (2000); 2 Nature Conservation Act (Qld) 2007<br />

The survey recorded over half the 428 native vertebrate species predicted to occur on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> (with<br />

varying levels <strong>of</strong> confidence). In particular, the survey confirmed the presence <strong>of</strong> 60% <strong>of</strong> the native bird species,<br />

56% <strong>of</strong> native amphibians, 58% <strong>of</strong> native reptiles <strong>and</strong> 27% <strong>of</strong> native mammals predicted to occur on the<br />

property. The figure for mammals was lower than other vertebrate groups largely because Microchiropteran<br />

bats were not surveyed (25 species predicted for <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>). Excluding this group, the survey confirmed<br />

45% <strong>of</strong> the native mammal species predicted to occur on the property. Hot <strong>and</strong> dry weather conditions during<br />

the survey would have reduced recording rates for some taxa, such as myobatrachid frogs <strong>and</strong> elapid snakes.<br />

For birds, the number <strong>of</strong> species recorded on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> represents 18% <strong>of</strong> the total Australian avifauna;<br />

for other taxa, the records represent 4 ‐ 5% <strong>of</strong> the total Australian species in each group.<br />

F<strong>our</strong> species endemic to the Cape York bioregion were recorded during the survey, including Cape York<br />

Melomys (Melomys capensis), White‐streaked Honeyeater (Trichodere cockerelli) <strong>and</strong> two skinks, Carlia rimula<br />

<strong>and</strong> Carlia macfarlani. Fve other species endemic to the Cape York bioregion may also occur on the sanctuary<br />

including a microhylid frog Austrochaperina gracilipes; a gecko Nactus eboracensis; a skink Carlia sesbrauna; a<br />

blind snake Ramphotyphlops chamodracaena <strong>and</strong> the Green‐backed Honeyeater (Glycichaera fallax).<br />

Five exotic species were recorded during the survey including Asian House Gecko, Cat, Cattle, Horse <strong>and</strong> Pig.<br />

The House Mouse <strong>and</strong> Black Rat may also occur on the property. These species are widespread in many<br />

Australian ecosystems.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 11


Two <strong>of</strong> the rare fauna recorded at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>. Above: Palm Cockatoo (Probosciger<br />

aterrimus); Below: Common Spotted Cuscus (Spilocuscus maculatus).<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 12


Significant fauna records<br />

Mammals<br />

Birds<br />

• Three mammals endemic to Cape York Peninsula were recorded in riparian rainforests: Cape York<br />

Melomys (Melomys capensis), Southern Common Cuscus (Phalanger mimicus) <strong>and</strong> Common Spotted<br />

Cuscus (Spilocuscus maculatus). Both species <strong>of</strong> cuscus also occur in New Guinea. The record <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern Common Cuscus in the riparian rainforest along the Archer River is <strong>of</strong> particular significance<br />

as this species is typically associated with rainforests <strong>of</strong> the Iron <strong>and</strong> McIlwraith Ranges to the east <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> (Van Dyck <strong>and</strong> Strahan 2008).<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> Brush‐tailed Possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> is also significant.<br />

This species appears to have experienced a major reduction in its range on Cape York Peninsula.<br />

• The only bird species globally endemic to Cape York, the White‐streaked Honeyeater (Trichodere<br />

cockerelli), was recorded in riparian gallery forest. This species is usually associated with heaths <strong>and</strong><br />

heathy woodl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

• Seven other bird species endemic to Cape York (but found extra‐limitally in New Guinea) were<br />

recorded in the survey including the Magnificent Riflebird (Ptiloris magnificus), Palm Cockatoo <strong>and</strong><br />

Trumpet Manucode (Manucodia keraudrenii).<br />

Reptiles <strong>and</strong> frogs<br />

• Waterholes in the floodplains <strong>of</strong> the Archer <strong>and</strong> Wenlock Rivers were teeming with Freshwater<br />

Crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni), Arafura File Snakes (Acrochordus arafurae) <strong>and</strong> Northern Yellow‐<br />

faced Turtles (Emydura tanybaraga).<br />

• The cracking black soil grassl<strong>and</strong>s contained a high diversity <strong>and</strong> density <strong>of</strong> snakes, including the highly<br />

venomous Coastal Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus).<br />

• Grey’s Skink (Menetia greyii) was recorded in the grassl<strong>and</strong>s, a range extension for this species.<br />

• The Rainbow Skinks Carlia macfarlani (a Cape York endemic) <strong>and</strong> Carlia rimula were recorded on the<br />

property. These species are more commonly found on eastern Cape York. Two undescribed species <strong>of</strong><br />

rainbow skink from the Carlia aerata species complex were also recorded.<br />

• The Yellow‐spotted Monitor (Varanus panoptes) <strong>and</strong> Mertens’ Water Monitor (Varanus mertensi) were<br />

recorded in the surveys. These two goannas are susceptible to being poisoned after ingesting cane<br />

toads <strong>and</strong> have rapidly declined in the Northern Territory following the advent <strong>of</strong> cane toads. However,<br />

they are persisting at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 13


Above: Northern Death Adder (Acanthophis praelongus).<br />

Below: A juvenile Freshwater Crocodile (Crocodylus johnstoni) in a pool on the Wenlock River.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 14


Comparison <strong>of</strong> major habitat types.<br />

The major habitat types surveyed in the study were riparian rainforest (12 sites), deciduous vine thicket (2<br />

sites), swamp margins (7 sites); <strong>and</strong> 10 sites each in woodl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong>s. More detailed descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

these habitat types are provided in the results <strong>of</strong> vegetation surveys, below.<br />

The mean numbers <strong>of</strong> frog, bird, mammal <strong>and</strong> reptile species recorded in survey sites located in the major<br />

habitat types are presented in Figure 3. The results show that that riparian rainforests supported relatively high<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> species from all vertebrate groups. Deciduous vine thickets also supported a rich bird assemblage<br />

(essentially, the same assemblage found in the gallery rainforests). Bird species richness was intermediate in<br />

swamp margins <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> lowest in grassl<strong>and</strong>s. However, some birds were recorded only in<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong> habitats (e.g., Spotted Harrier Circus assimilis; Brown Songlark Cincloramphus cruralis). Reptiles were<br />

relatively species rich in woodl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> riparian rainforest sites, while frogs were mostly recorded in riparian<br />

rainforest <strong>and</strong> swamp margin sites.<br />

Mean no. species per site<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Riparian<br />

rainforests<br />

Deciduous<br />

vine thickets<br />

Swamp<br />

margins<br />

amphibians<br />

birds<br />

mammals<br />

reptiles<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong>s Grassl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Figure 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean species richness at sites surveyed in major habitat types. Error bars show<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard errors.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 15


The relative similarity <strong>of</strong> species assemblages in the major habitat types are depicted in the ordination below<br />

(Figure 4). This figure is like a ‘map’, where the similarity <strong>of</strong> sites in terms <strong>of</strong> species composition is reflected in<br />

their proximity n the ordination: i.e., sites which support similar species are located close to each other in the<br />

ordination.<br />

In the ordination, rainforests (riparian rainforests <strong>and</strong> deciduous vine thickets) are shown to support a suite <strong>of</strong><br />

species that is distinct from other habitat types on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>. For example, birds such as the Wompoo,<br />

Superb <strong>and</strong> Rose‐crowned Fruit‐doves (Ptilinopus magnificus, P. superbus <strong>and</strong> P. regina), Magnificent Riflebird<br />

(Ptiloris magnificus), Trumpet Manucode (Manucodia keraudrenii), Black Butcherbird (Cracticus quoyi) <strong>and</strong><br />

Papuan Frogmouth (Podargus papuensis) were characteristic <strong>of</strong> rainforest sites. Conversely, some species were<br />

only recorded away from rainforest, such as the Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus strigoides), Grey‐crowned<br />

Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis), Black‐throated Finch (Poephila cincta), Pied Butcherbird (Cracticus<br />

nigrogularis) <strong>and</strong> Golden‐headed Cisticola (Cisticola exilis). However, about one‐third <strong>of</strong> species occurred in<br />

rainforest <strong>and</strong> other habitat types. For example, the Pied Imperial‐pigeon (Ducula bicolor) foraged in rainforest,<br />

but roosted along the margins <strong>of</strong> swamps, while the Blue‐winged Kookaburra (Dacelo leachii) was ubiquitous<br />

on the property.<br />

DVT1<br />

DVT2<br />

RF11<br />

RF5<br />

RF12<br />

RF2<br />

RF3 RF9RF6<br />

RF1RF7<br />

RF4<br />

RF10RF8<br />

SW6<br />

SW4<br />

SW3<br />

SW7<br />

SW2<br />

W6<br />

SW1<br />

SW5<br />

W7<br />

W9<br />

W10<br />

W8<br />

G4<br />

G3<br />

Figure 4. Ordination <strong>of</strong> survey sites by all vertebrate species recorded in surveys. Habitat types: RF = gallery<br />

rainforest; DVT = deciduous vine thicket; SW = swamp margins; W = woodl<strong>and</strong>; G = grassl<strong>and</strong>. Numbers are<br />

replicate sites within each habitat type (e.g., there are 10 grassl<strong>and</strong> sites, numbered G1 to G10). This is a multi‐<br />

dimensional scaling plot (MDS), based on the Bray‐Curtis similarity metric, using presence‐absence data.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 16<br />

G8<br />

G7<br />

G5<br />

G1<br />

W1<br />

W5<br />

W4<br />

G9<br />

W2 W3<br />

G2<br />

G10<br />

2D Stress: 0.17<br />

G6


Comparison <strong>of</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

In the survey, baseline data were collected on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> vertebrates in grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked sites.<br />

More reptile species were recorded in destocked than grazed grassl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s sites, while more<br />

mammal species were recorded in destocked than grazed woodl<strong>and</strong>s (Figure 4). In contrast, more bird species<br />

were recorded in grazed than destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s. This last result may reflect potentially confounding habitat<br />

differences between grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong> sites: e.g., trees tended to be more prominent in the<br />

grazed grassl<strong>and</strong> sites (this point is discussed further in the vegetation results, below).<br />

Mean no. species per site<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Grassl<strong>and</strong> sites<br />

amphibians birds mammals reptiles<br />

Figure 4. Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean species richness for amphibians, birds, mammals <strong>and</strong> reptiles in<br />

grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked sites. Above: grassl<strong>and</strong> sites. Below: woodl<strong>and</strong> sites. Error bars show<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard errors. There were 5 sites in each treatment.<br />

Mean no. species per site<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong> sites<br />

amphibians birds mammals reptiles<br />

Grazed<br />

Destocked<br />

Grazed<br />

Destocked<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 17


Results: vegetation<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> the floristic surveys<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 216 plant species in 186 genera <strong>and</strong> 71 families were recorded on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> (Appendix 2).<br />

Five <strong>of</strong> these species are listed as rare under state (Qld) legislation. The most diverse genera were Ficus (7<br />

species), Acacia <strong>and</strong> Melaleuca (each 6 species), <strong>and</strong> Corymbia <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus (each 5 species). The most<br />

diverse families were Myrtaceae (27 species), Mimosaceae, Rubiaceae <strong>and</strong> Sapindaceae (each 10 species) <strong>and</strong><br />

Moraceae (8 species). The plant list is remarkably good, given that the survey was conducted at the height <strong>of</strong><br />

the dry season in one <strong>of</strong> the driest years in decades in the region.<br />

During the survey, 14 herbarium collections were made <strong>of</strong> fertile plant material. Of these, three collections<br />

were <strong>of</strong> special significance:<br />

• Cecarria obtusifolia ‐ the second record for Queensl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

• Anacolosa papuana ‐ the fifth record for Queensl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

• Pterocarpus sp. (Archer River B.P.Hyl<strong>and</strong> 3078) ‐ the ninth record for Queensl<strong>and</strong>, but the first<br />

fertile (fruiting) collection.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the survey results, the 41 monitoring sites were grouped into f<strong>our</strong> broad vegetation types:<br />

• Rainforest (14 sites),<br />

• Swamp margins (7 sites),<br />

• Grassl<strong>and</strong>s (10 sites, comprising 5 grazed <strong>and</strong> 5 destocked), <strong>and</strong><br />

• Woodl<strong>and</strong>s (10 sites, comprising 5 grazed <strong>and</strong> 5 destocked).<br />

Of these, rainforest was split into two distinct types:<br />

• Riparian rainforest (12 sites), <strong>and</strong><br />

• Deciduous vine thicket (DVT) (2 sites).<br />

Riparian rainforest<br />

Riparian rainforests are found along the Archer <strong>and</strong> Wenlock River systems, particularly amongst river channels<br />

where the forests are protected from fire. They <strong>of</strong>ten have a very gr<strong>and</strong> appearance with large diameter trees.<br />

The mean basal area <strong>of</strong> riparian rainforest sites was 33 m 2 /ha (range 19 ‐ 49 m 2 /ha). The average height <strong>of</strong><br />

canopy trees was 20 m, although the canopy was mostly uneven, with individual canopy trees ranging in height<br />

from 7 to 31 m. On average, 11 species (range 8 – 14) were recorded in basal area sweeps <strong>of</strong> the canopy <strong>of</strong><br />

rainforest sites. In most circumstances, two or three species dominated the canopy. The average canopy cover<br />

(projective crown cover) was 87% (range 72 – 100%). St<strong>and</strong>ing dead trees were a significant component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

forest, accounting for 8 % <strong>of</strong> all stems. The shrub layer was largely absent from the better developed st<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

but in canopy gaps or along edges, it <strong>of</strong>ten formed dense tangles <strong>of</strong> shrubs <strong>and</strong> vines. The volume <strong>of</strong> woody<br />

debris in riparian rainforests was relatively high (mean 42 m 3 /ha, range 10 – 113 m 3 /ha).<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 18


Rainforest on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>. Left: gallery rainforest along the Wenlock River. Right: deciduous vine<br />

thicket near <strong>Piccaninny</strong> Creek (photos: J. Kanowski).<br />

Deciduous Vine Thicket (DVT)<br />

Deciduous vine thickets, by definition, are largely leafless in the late dry season. These forests were generally<br />

associated with riparian systems; they were found adjacent to gallery rainforest along the Archer <strong>and</strong> Wenlock<br />

Rivers <strong>and</strong> along the smaller stream channels. The forest was mostly comprised <strong>of</strong> densely‐spaced small to<br />

medium‐sized stems, forming a relatively even canopy, with the occasional large emergent (see photo, above<br />

right). The mean basal area <strong>of</strong> vine thicket sites was 24 m 2 /ha (range 22 ‐ 26 m 2 /ha). The canopy varied in<br />

height from 11 to 14 m with an average height <strong>of</strong> 12 m. On average, 11 species were recorded in basal area<br />

sweeps <strong>of</strong> the canopy <strong>of</strong> vine thicket sites, although two species usually dominated. St<strong>and</strong>ing dead trees<br />

accounted for 7 % <strong>of</strong> all stems. The shrub layer was generally a continuum <strong>of</strong> the canopy <strong>and</strong> varied from<br />

sparse to dense, <strong>of</strong>ten fav<strong>our</strong>ing the later, making it hard to traverse a straight line in any direction. The<br />

average canopy cover (projective crown cover) was 87% (74 – 100%). On average, the volume <strong>of</strong> woody debris<br />

in vine thickets was low (8 m 3 /ha, range 4 – 11 m 3 /ha).<br />

Swamp margins<br />

The margins <strong>of</strong> Green Swamp <strong>and</strong> Bull Swamp were dominated by Melaleuca viridiflora var. viridiflora which<br />

formed forests or woodl<strong>and</strong>s on seasonally inundated shallow pans. The trees were mostly <strong>of</strong> even age <strong>and</strong><br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 19


size, though their distribution was <strong>of</strong>ten patchy, ranging from almost closed forest to patches <strong>of</strong> ground devoid<br />

<strong>of</strong> trees. The mean basal area <strong>of</strong> the swamp margin sites was 13 m 2 /ha (range 6 – 24 m 2 /ha). The trees were<br />

mostly <strong>of</strong> an even height, ranging from 12 to 16 m with an average <strong>of</strong> 13 m. The average canopy cover was 44%<br />

(17 – 81%) largely made up <strong>of</strong> one species. Structurally they were simple with little vegetation in the lower<br />

strata except for a grass/herb layer. The forests showed signs <strong>of</strong> disturbance from tropical cyclones,<br />

presumably Monica in 2006, as volumes <strong>of</strong> debris were relatively high (mean 29 m 3 /ha, range 5 – 54 m 3 /ha) ,<br />

while st<strong>and</strong>ing dead trees made up 15 % <strong>of</strong> stems counted.<br />

Grassl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Dense st<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca viridiflora on the margin <strong>of</strong> Green Swamp (photo: J. Kanowski)<br />

The grassl<strong>and</strong>s on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> rangedfrom almost treeless expanses on deeply gilgaied plains to gilgaied<br />

plains dotted with single trees or clumps <strong>of</strong> two or three trees. The average basal area was 1 m 2 /ha (0 – 2<br />

m 2 /ha) with an average tree height <strong>of</strong> 8.8 m (range 8 – 11 m), although 60% <strong>of</strong> the plots had no trees. The<br />

average canopy cover was 3% (0 – 15%) with only three species present: Piliostigma malabaricum, Corymbia<br />

papuana <strong>and</strong> Corymbia clarksoniana. These are species that can partially tolerate the shrinkage <strong>and</strong> cracking<br />

that occurs on these self mulching black soils. St<strong>and</strong>ing dead trees accounted for 20% <strong>of</strong> stems counted. There<br />

was little woody debris (range 0 – 3 m 3 /ha) in the grassl<strong>and</strong> sites.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 20


Woodl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Grassl<strong>and</strong> with scattered trees on cracking black soils (photo: J. Kanowski)<br />

The woodl<strong>and</strong>s were relatively homogeneous in structure. Average basal area was 8 m 2 /ha (range 3 – 12<br />

m 2 /ha), canopy height 13 m (range 10 ‐ 16 m) <strong>and</strong> canopy cover 27% (4 – 54%). The woodl<strong>and</strong>s were layered<br />

into two or three strata, generally with a subcanopy or a subdominant tree layer <strong>and</strong> a distinct shrub layer over<br />

grass. The canopy was generally made up <strong>of</strong> two to three species, with Eucalyptus leptophleba being dominant<br />

in a majority <strong>of</strong> cases. Woody debris averaged 6 m 3 /ha (1 – 31 m 3 /ha). Stags were 8% <strong>of</strong> stems counted.<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong> at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> (photo: J. Kanowski).<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 21


Summary <strong>of</strong> ground cover data<br />

Leaf litter <strong>and</strong> bare ground accounted for the majority <strong>of</strong> ground cover, with contrasting trends (Appendix 3).<br />

The ground cover <strong>of</strong> rainforests <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s was mostly leaf litter, whereas in grassl<strong>and</strong>s, leaf litter only<br />

comprised 40% <strong>of</strong> ground cover, the remainder being mostly bare ground. The swamp margins had much<br />

higher levels <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover, but also animal disturbance, than other sites.<br />

The low level <strong>of</strong> grass cover in most non‐rainforest sites was largely due to the conduct <strong>of</strong> surveys in the late<br />

dry season, when most grass present had cured or been burnt. The high disturbance score for the swamp<br />

margins was intrinsically related to their high cover <strong>of</strong> green vegetation. Stock <strong>and</strong> feral animals were attracted<br />

to this vegetation, the last <strong>of</strong> the green pick available in the late dry season.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the grassl<strong>and</strong> sites that were heavily grazed exhibited considerable recruitment <strong>of</strong> tree saplings, in<br />

particular Piliostigma malabaricum, <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent Corymbia papuana <strong>and</strong> Corymbia confertiflora. This<br />

is probably related to grazing reducing fuel levels below a threshold sufficient to support hot fires which might<br />

kill saplings <strong>of</strong> the more fire‐tolerant species.<br />

Bare ground was a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> the ground cover on most sites. While this might be construed as a<br />

negative, in terms <strong>of</strong> ecosystem health, in many cases the bare ground was covered by a biological soil crust<br />

(cryptogamic, cryptobiotic, microbiotic <strong>and</strong> microphytic). This crust is an integral part <strong>of</strong> a healthy ecosystem in<br />

semi‐arid ecosystems throughout the <strong>world</strong> (Belnap et al. 2001). I<br />

An unusual feature <strong>of</strong> the clay soils was the presence <strong>of</strong> many crab holes. These holes had occasionally been<br />

taken over by mygalomorph spiders (family Theraphosidae).<br />

Disturbance from pigs rooting around swamp margins on the Archer River floodplain (photo: J. Kanowski).<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 22


Comparison <strong>of</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

In the grassl<strong>and</strong>s, destocked sites supported much more leaf litter (st<strong>and</strong>ing or lodged dried grass), more<br />

vegetation cover (mostly grass), less bare ground <strong>and</strong> showed fewer signs <strong>of</strong> animal disturbance than sites in<br />

grazed paddocks. The woodl<strong>and</strong> sites, however, did not conform to this pattern. Destocked sites supported<br />

slightly less leaf litter <strong>and</strong> vegetation cover, <strong>and</strong> slightly more bare ground, than grazed sites.<br />

Unfortunately, comparison <strong>of</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked sites was partly confounded by several factors, including:<br />

• substrate: all the destocked woodl<strong>and</strong> sites were on laterite, whereas three <strong>of</strong> the grazed woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

sites were on black soils. Laterite sites generally have much patchier ground cover than black soil sites.<br />

• fire: all ten <strong>of</strong> the woodl<strong>and</strong> sites had been recently burnt, whereas only five <strong>of</strong> the grassl<strong>and</strong> sites had<br />

been burnt, <strong>and</strong> these were not evenly distributed across the grazing treatments.<br />

Weeds<br />

Six weed species were recorded during plant surveys: Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Hymenachne), Themeda<br />

quadrivalvis (grader grass), Mangifera indica (mango), Urena lobata (Congo jute), Hyptis capitata<br />

(knowbweed) <strong>and</strong> Hyptis suaveolens (horehound).<br />

Recommendations for future monitoring<br />

1. The survey recorded more than half the species predicted to occur on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>. Hence, there is<br />

scope for adding to the inventory <strong>of</strong> the property in future surveys, particularly by (i) increasing effort in<br />

undersampled habitats (identification <strong>of</strong> such habitats would be faciliated by the production <strong>of</strong> a detailed<br />

vegetation map for the property); (ii) conducting surveys in seasons other than the late dry: e.g.,<br />

amphibians would be more active after rain; <strong>and</strong> (iii) broadening the scope <strong>of</strong> surveys: e.g., amongst<br />

vertebrates, microchiropteran bats were not surveyed.<br />

2. The survey collected baseline data to examine the impacts <strong>of</strong> cattle grazing on rare grassl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

woodl<strong>and</strong> ecosystems. Future surveys should rectify potentially confounding factors in the comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked sites. In particular, grazed woodl<strong>and</strong> sites on black soils should have matching<br />

destocked replicates on black soils; <strong>and</strong> grazed <strong>and</strong> destocked grassl<strong>and</strong>s should, where possible, have<br />

similar levels <strong>of</strong> tree cover at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

3. The survey collected baseline data from 5 sites around Green Swamp <strong>and</strong> 2 sites around Bull Swamp, to<br />

examine the impacts <strong>of</strong> feral ungulates on swamp margins. If, in the future, ungulates were to be excluded<br />

from Green Swamp, it would be useful to survey additional control sites to the two located in Bull Swamp.<br />

Such sites may need to be located within the adjacent Mungkan K<strong>and</strong>ju National Park (e.g., Goose Swamp).<br />

4. Where possible, future surveys should focus on obtaining data that address specific questions related to<br />

the conservation management <strong>of</strong> Piccainny <strong>Plains</strong> (see discussion <strong>of</strong> management issues, below).<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 23


Recommendations for management<br />

An initial assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> by Legge et al. (2007) considered the property to be in relatively good<br />

condition, due to limited clearing, low stocking rates <strong>and</strong> few problem weeds. The results <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

detailed study support this assessment. Management issues raised by Legge et al. (2007) included:<br />

• Total grazing pressure,<br />

• Mismanaged fire,<br />

• Increasing risk <strong>of</strong> weed encroachment, <strong>and</strong><br />

• Threats from feral predators.<br />

These issues are discussed below.<br />

Total grazing pressure has been reduced on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> since its acquisition by AWC <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Link.<br />

Cattle have been mustered from the floodplains to fenced paddocks closer to the homestead. In 2008, large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> feral Horse have been shot. These actions will continue, but ongoing reduction in the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

feral Cattle <strong>and</strong> Horses on the floodplains <strong>of</strong> the Archer <strong>and</strong> Wenlock Rivers is likely to require co‐ordinated<br />

management by neighb<strong>our</strong>ing properties (National Park, Aboriginal l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> pastoral holdings).<br />

Feral Cattle in Green Swamp.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 24


Fire regimes across tropical savannas in northern Australia have changed as a result <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal dispossession<br />

<strong>and</strong> the advent <strong>of</strong> pastoralism (Woinarski et al. 2007). Typically, there are fewer small‐scale, early season fires,<br />

<strong>and</strong> more extensive late dry season fires. These changes can have pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on the ecological trajectory<br />

<strong>of</strong> savannas <strong>and</strong> on the availability <strong>of</strong> res<strong>our</strong>ces to wildlife. In some habitats, grazing has reduced fuel loads,<br />

leading to woody thickening. For example, on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>, there appears to be considerable recruitment<br />

<strong>of</strong> tree saplings to some <strong>of</strong> the black soil grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> extensive patches <strong>of</strong> coppicing in some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Melaleuca woodl<strong>and</strong>s. The establishment <strong>of</strong> a fire regime which promotes the maintenance <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong><br />

species diversity is a key challenge for management at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>, <strong>and</strong> will be a focus <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

planning in the coming years.<br />

Generally, <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> has few weeds. However, two <strong>of</strong> the six weed species recorded in the surveys are<br />

<strong>of</strong> management concern:<br />

• Hymenachne amplexicaulis is a rampant grass promoted as a ponded pasture, with the potential to<br />

choke the waterways <strong>and</strong> swamps on <strong>Piccaninny</strong>. It was located in the dam next to the homestead,<br />

from which it is being eradicated.<br />

• Themeda quadrivalvis (grader grass) is a noxious grass that was promoted as a pasture. it is currently<br />

limited in distribution at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> <strong>and</strong> efforts should be made to restrict its spread.<br />

A patch <strong>of</strong> Andropogon gayanus (gamba grass) had been located near the entrance to the property in earlier<br />

surveys. Gamba grass is a tall, rampant grass that can have a detrimental effect on woody vegetation by<br />

promoting excessively hot fires. This patch appears to have been eradicated.<br />

Feral predators are considered to be the predominant cause <strong>of</strong> mammal extinctions in Australia since<br />

European settlement (Johnson 2006). The interactions between predators can be complex, such that control<br />

efforts targetting one species (e.g., baiting <strong>of</strong> Dingos <strong>and</strong> feral Dogs) can lead to the irruption <strong>of</strong> smaller<br />

predators, such as the Red Fox <strong>and</strong> Cat. The interactions between predators <strong>and</strong> their impacts on prey species<br />

is a research question currently being pursued by AWC in its sanctuaries <strong>and</strong> by other researchers in tropical<br />

savannas. It would be useful to pursue this research on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>, so that management actions can be<br />

carefully targetted to control species <strong>of</strong> most concern to conservation. Other feral animals <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

management concern on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> include Pigs <strong>and</strong> the Cane Toad.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 25


Survey participants<br />

AWC staff:<br />

o Jeff Middleton (Wildlife Ecologist – Team Leader)<br />

o Rigel Jensen (Northeast Botanist)<br />

o Ray Lloyd (Wildlife Ecologist)<br />

o John Kanowski (Northeast Regional Ecologist)<br />

o Wayne Lawler (AWC Photographer)<br />

Survey support<br />

o Ge<strong>of</strong>f Kelly (Northeast Regional Manager)<br />

o Sarah Legge (National Conservation <strong>and</strong> Science Manager)<br />

o Carol Madden (Caretaker <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>)<br />

o Alyce Maddern, Tom <strong>and</strong> Mark.<br />

Volunteers<br />

o Mark Antos<br />

o Gina Barnett<br />

o Wayne Bleauglehole<br />

o Henry Cook<br />

o Bronwyn Gibbons<br />

o Stephane Guillou<br />

o Richard Johnston<br />

o Steven McBride<br />

o Leonie Mynott<br />

o Charlie Nicholson<br />

o Christine Nicholson<br />

o Dean Portelli<br />

o Brian Venables<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Funding for this survey was supported by the Queensl<strong>and</strong> Government represented by the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Natural Res<strong>our</strong>ces <strong>and</strong> Water.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 26


References<br />

Belnap, J., J.H. Kaltenecker, R. Rosentreter, J. Williams, S. Leonard, <strong>and</strong> D. Eldridge. 2001. Biological soil crusts:<br />

ecology <strong>and</strong> management. technical reference report BLM/ID/ST‐01/001+1730. USDI ‐ BLM/USGS, Denver. URL:<br />

http://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techref.htm<br />

Elzinga, Caryl L.; Salzer, Daniel W.; Willoughby, John W.; Gibbs, James P. (1998) Measuring <strong>and</strong> monitoring<br />

plant populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730‐1 BLM/RS/ST‐98/005+1730. URL:<br />

http://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techref.htm<br />

Johnson, C. (2006) Australia’s Mammal Extinctions: a 50,000 Year History. Cambridge University Press,<br />

Cambridge.<br />

Legge, S., Stanton, P. , Murphy, S. <strong>and</strong> Lloyd, R. (2007) <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> Conservation Assessment. AWC Report.<br />

Neldner, V.J., Wilson, B. A., Thompson, E.J. <strong>and</strong> Dillewaard, H.A. (2005) Methodology for Survey <strong>and</strong> Mapping <strong>of</strong><br />

Regional Ecosystems <strong>and</strong> Vegetation Communities in Queensl<strong>and</strong>. Version 3.1. Updated September 2005.<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong> Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane. 128 pp.<br />

Stanton, P. <strong>and</strong> Murphy, S. (2006) Report on an Inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> Pastoral Holding, Northern Cape<br />

Y<strong>our</strong> Peninsula. AWC Report.<br />

Van Dyck, S. <strong>and</strong> Strahan, R. (2008) The Mammals <strong>of</strong> Australia. Reed.<br />

van Wagner, C. E. (1968) The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science 14: 20‐26.<br />

Woinarski, J., Mackey, B., Nix, H. <strong>and</strong> Traill, B.J. (2007) The Nature <strong>of</strong> Northern Australia: Natural Values,<br />

Ecological Processes <strong>and</strong> Future Prospects. ANU Press, Canberra.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 27


Appendix 1. Fauna recorded at <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong><br />

Frogs<br />

Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Hylidae Cyclorana brevipes Short‐footed Frog Very likely<br />

Cyclorana manya Small Frog Very likely<br />

Cyclorana novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Possible<br />

Cyclorana alboguttata Striped Burrowing Frog<br />

Litoria bicolor Northern Dwarf Tree Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria caerulea Green Tree Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria dahlii Dahl's Tree Frog Possible<br />

Litoria gracilenta Dainty Tree Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria inermis Bumpy Rocket Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria infrafrenata Giant Tree Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria microbelos Possible<br />

Litoria nasuta Striped Rocket Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria nigr<strong>of</strong>renata Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria pallida Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria rothii Confirmed 2008<br />

Litoria rubella Desert Tree Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Microhylidae Austrochaperina gracilipes Possible<br />

Myobatrachidae Crinia remota Confirmed 2008<br />

Limnodynastes convexiusculus Marbled Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Limnodynastes terraereginae Northern Banjo Frog Possible<br />

Notaden melanoscaphus Northern Spadefoot Toad Very likely<br />

Opisthodon ornatus Ornate Burrowing Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Uperoleia lithomoda Very likely<br />

Uperoleia mimula Very likely<br />

Ranidae Rana daemeli Wood Frog Confirmed 2008<br />

Wood Frog (Rana daemeli) in the<br />

Wenlock River<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 28


Birds<br />

Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Accipitridae Accipiter cirrhocephalus Collared Sparrowhawk Confirmed 2008<br />

Accipiter fasciatus Brown Goshawk Possible<br />

Accipiter novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Grey Goshawk Possible<br />

Aquila audax Wedge‐tailed Eagle Possible<br />

Aviceda subcristata Pacific Baza Confirmed 2008<br />

Circus approximans Swamp Harrier Possible<br />

Circus assimilis Spotted Harrier Confirmed 2008<br />

Circus spilonotus Papuan Harrier Unlikely<br />

Elanus axillaris Black‐shouldered Kite Possible<br />

Elanus scriptus Letter‐winged Kite Possible<br />

Erythrotriorchis radiatus Red Goshawk Possible<br />

Haliaeetus leucogaster White‐bellied Sea‐Eagle Confirmed 2008<br />

Haliastur indus Brahminy Kite Possible<br />

Haliastur sphenurus Whistling Kite Confirmed 2008<br />

Hamirostra melanosternum Black‐breasted Buzzard Confirmed 2008<br />

Hieraaetus morphnoides Little Eagle Confirmed 2008<br />

Lophoictinia isura Square‐tailed Kite Possible<br />

Milvus migrans Black Kite Confirmed 2008<br />

P<strong>and</strong>ion haliaetus Osprey Possible<br />

Aegothelidae Aegotheles cristatus Australian Owlet‐nightjar Possible<br />

Alaudidae Mirafra javanica Horsfield's Bushlark Possible<br />

Alcedinidae Alcedo azurea Azure Kingfisher Confirmed 2008<br />

Alcedo pusilla Little Kingfisher Possible<br />

Anatidae Anas gracilis Grey Teal Confirmed 2008<br />

Anas superciliosa Pacific black duck Confirmed 2008<br />

Aythya australis Hardhead Confirmed 2008<br />

Dendrocygna arcuata W<strong>and</strong>ering Whistling‐Duck Confirmed 2008<br />

Dendrocygna eytoni<br />

Malacorhynchus<br />

Plumed Whistling‐Duck Confirmed 2008<br />

membranaceus Pink‐eared Duck Possible<br />

Nettapus corom<strong>and</strong>elianus Cotton Pygmy‐goose Possible<br />

Nettapus pulchellus Green Pygmy‐goose Confirmed 2008<br />

Tadorna radjah Radjah Shelduck Confirmed 2008<br />

Anhingidae Anhinga melanogaster Darter Confirmed 2008<br />

Anseranatidae Anseranas semipalmata Magpie Goose Confirmed 2008<br />

Apodidae Apus pacificus Fork‐tailed Swift Possible<br />

Collocalia esculenta Glossy Swiftlet Possible<br />

Hirundapus caudacutus White‐throated Needletail Confirmed 2008<br />

Ardeidae Ardea alba Great Egret Confirmed 2008<br />

Ardea garzetta Little Egret Possible<br />

Ardea ibis Cattle Egret Confirmed 2008<br />

Ardea intermedia Intermediate Egret Confirmed 2008<br />

Ardea pacifica White‐necked Heron Confirmed 2008<br />

Ardea picata Pied Heron Confirmed 2008<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 29


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Ardea sumatrana Great‐billed Heron Possible<br />

Egretta novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae White‐faced Heron Confirmed 2008<br />

Ixobrychus flavicollis Black Bittern Confirmed 2008<br />

Ixobrychus minutus Little Bittern Possible<br />

Nycticorax caledonicus Nankeen Night Heron Confirmed 2008<br />

Artamidae Artamus cinereus Black‐faced Woodswallow Possible<br />

Artamus minor Little Woodswallow Possible<br />

Cracticus mentalis Black‐backed Butcherbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Cracticus nigrogularis Pied Butcherbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Cracticus quoyi Black Butcherbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Gymnorhina tibicen Australian Magpie Possible<br />

Strepera graculina Pied Currawong Confirmed 2008<br />

Burhinidae Burhinus grallarius Bush Stone‐Curlew Confirmed 2008<br />

Cacatuidae Cacatua galerita Sulphur‐crested Cockatoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Cacatua sanguinea Little Corella Confirmed 2008<br />

Calyptorhynchus banksii Red‐tailed Black‐Cockatoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Probosciger aterrimus Palm Cockatoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Campephagidae Coracina lineata Barred Cuckoo‐shrike Possible<br />

Coracina novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Black‐faced Cuckoo‐shrike Confirmed 2008<br />

Coracina papuensis White‐bellied Cuckoo‐shrike Confirmed 2008<br />

Coracina tenuirostris Cicadabird Confirmed 2008<br />

Lalage leucomela Varied Triller Confirmed 2008<br />

Lalage sueurii White‐winged Triller Confirmed 2008<br />

Caprimulgidae Caprimulgus macrurus Large‐tailed Nightjar Confirmed 2008<br />

Eurostopodus argus Spotted Nightjar Possible<br />

Eurostopodus mystacalis White‐throated Nightjar Possible<br />

Casuariidae Dromaius novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Emu Confirmed 2008<br />

Centropodidae Centropus phasianinus Pheasant Coucal Confirmed 2008<br />

Charadriidae Charadrius ruficapillus Red‐capped Plover Possible<br />

Charadrius veredus Oriental Plover Possible<br />

Elseyornis melanops Black‐fronted Dotterel Confirmed 2008<br />

Vanellus miles Masked Lapwing Confirmed 2008<br />

Ciconiidae Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black‐necked Stork Confirmed 2008<br />

Climacteridae Climacteris picumnus Brown Treecreeper Possible<br />

Columbidae Chalcophaps indica Emerald Dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Ducula bicolor Pied Imperial‐Pigeon Confirmed 2008<br />

Geopelia cuneata Diamond Dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Geopelia humeralis Bar‐shouldered Dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Lopholaimus antarcticus Topknot Pigeon Possible<br />

Macropygia amboinensis Brown Cuckoo‐Dove Possible<br />

Ptilinopus magnificus Wompoo Fruit‐Dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Ptilinopus regina Rose‐crowned Fruit‐Dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Ptilinopus superbus Superb Fruit‐dove Confirmed 2008<br />

Coraciidae Eurystomus orientalis Dollarbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Cuculidae Cacomantis castaneiventris Chestnut‐breasted Cuckoo Possible<br />

Cacomantis flabelliformis Fan‐tailed Cuckoo Possible<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 30


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Cacomantis variolosus Brush Cuckoo Possible<br />

Chrysococcyx basalis Horsfield's Bronze‐Cuckoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Chrysococcyx lucidus Shining Bronze‐Cuckoo Possible<br />

Chrysococcyx minutillus Little Bronze‐Cuckoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Chrysococcyx osculans Black‐eared Cuckoo Possible<br />

Chrysococcyx russatus Gould's Bronze‐Cuckoo Possible<br />

Cuculus pallidus Pallid Cuckoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Cuculus saturatus Oriental Cuckoo Possible<br />

Eudynamys scolopacea Eastern Koel Confirmed 2008<br />

Scythrops novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Channel‐billed Cuckoo Confirmed 2008<br />

Dicaeidae Dicaeum hirundinaceum Mistletoebird Confirmed 2008<br />

Dicruridae Dicrurus bracteatus Spangled Drongo Confirmed 2008<br />

Grallina cyanoleuca Magpie Lark Confirmed 2008<br />

Machaerirhynchus flaviventer Yellow‐breasted Boatbill Confirmed 2008<br />

Microeca fascinans Jacky Winter Confirmed 2008<br />

Microeca flavigaster Lemon‐bellied Flycatcher Confirmed 2008<br />

Monarcha leucotis White‐eared Monarch Possible<br />

Monarcha melanopsis Black‐faced Monarch Possible<br />

Monarcha trivirgatus Spectacled Monarch Confirmed 2008<br />

Myiagra alecto Shining Flycatcher Confirmed 2008<br />

Myiagra cyanoleuca Satin Flycatcher Possible<br />

Myiagra inquieta Restless Flycatcher Possible<br />

Myiagra rubecula Leaden Flycatcher Confirmed 2008<br />

Rhipidura fuliginosa Grey Fantail Confirmed 2008<br />

Rhipidura leucophrys Willy Wagtail Confirmed 2008<br />

Rhipidura rufifrons Rufous Fantail Confirmed 2008<br />

Rhipidura rufiventris Northern Fantail Possible<br />

Falconidae Falco berigora Brown Falcon Confirmed 2008<br />

Falco cenchroides Nankeen Kestrel Confirmed 2008<br />

Falco longipennis Australian Hobby Confirmed 2008<br />

Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon Confirmed 2008<br />

Falco subniger Black Falcon Possible<br />

Glareolidae Glareola maldivarum Oriental Pratincole Possible<br />

Stiltia isabella Australian Pratincole Possible<br />

Gruidae Grus antigone Sarus Crane Confirmed 2008<br />

Grus rubicunda Brolga Confirmed 2008<br />

Halcyonidae Dacelo leachii Blue‐winged Kookaburra Confirmed 2008<br />

Dacelo novaeguineae Laughing Kookaburra Confirmed 2008<br />

Syma torotoro Yellow‐billed Kingfisher Confirmed 2008<br />

Todiramphus macleayii Forest Kingfisher Confirmed 2008<br />

Todiramphus pyrrhopygia Red‐backed Kingfisher Possible<br />

Todiramphus sanctus Sacred Kingfisher Possible<br />

Hirundinidae Hirundo ariel Fairy Martin Possible<br />

Hirundo neoxena Welcome Swallow Possible<br />

Hirundo nigricans Tree Martin Possible<br />

Jacanidae Irediparra gallinacea Comb‐crested Jacana Confirmed 2008<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 31


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Laridae<br />

Chlidonias hybridus Whiskered Tern Possible<br />

Larus novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Silver Gull Possible<br />

Sterna bergii Crested Tern Possible<br />

Sterna caspia Caspian Tern Possible<br />

Sterna nilotica Gull‐billedTern Confirmed 2008<br />

Maluridae Malurus amabilis Lovely Fairy‐wren Confirmed 2008<br />

Malurus melanocephalus Red‐backed Fairy‐wren Confirmed 2008<br />

Megapodiidae Alectura lathami Australian Brush Turkey Confirmed 2008<br />

Megapodius reinwardt Orange‐footed Scrubfowl Confirmed 2008<br />

Meliphagidae Certhionyx pectoralis B<strong>and</strong>ed Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Conopophila albogularis Rufous‐b<strong>and</strong>ed honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Conopophila rufogularis Rufous‐throated Honeyeater Possible<br />

Entomyzon cyanotis Blue‐faced Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Glycichaera fallax Green‐backed Honeyeater Unlikely<br />

Grantiella picta Painted Honeyeater Possible<br />

Lichenostomus chrysops Yellow‐faced Honeyeater Possible<br />

Lichenostomus flavescens Yellow‐tinted honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Lichenostomus flavus Yellow Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Lichenostomus unicolor White‐gaped Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Lichmera indistincta Brown Honeyeater Possible<br />

Meliphaga gracilis Graceful Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Meliphaga notata Yellow‐spotted Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Melithreptus albogularis White‐throated Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Melithreptus gularis Black‐chinned Honeyeater Possible<br />

Myzomela obscura Dusky Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Philemon argenticeps Silver‐crowned Friarbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Philemon buceroides Helmeted Friarbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Philemon citreogularis Little Friarbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Philemon corniculatus Noisy Friarbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Ramsayornis fasciatus Bar‐breasted Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Ramsayornis modestus Brown‐backed Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Trichodere cockerelli White‐streaked Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Xanthotis flaviventer Tawny‐breasted Honeyeater Confirmed 2008<br />

Meropidae Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee‐eater Possible<br />

Nectarinidae Nectarinia jugularis Yellow‐bellied Sunbird Possible<br />

Neosittidae Daphoenositta chrysoptera Varied Sittella Confirmed 2008<br />

Oriolidae Oriolus flavocinctus Yellow Oriole Confirmed 2008<br />

Oriolus sagittatus Olive‐backed Oriole Confirmed 2008<br />

Sphecotheres viridis Figbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Otididae Ardeotis australis Australian Bustard Confirmed 2008<br />

Pachycephalidae Colluricincla harmonica Grey Shrike‐Thrush Confirmed 2008<br />

Colluricincla megarhyncha Little Shrike‐Thrush Confirmed 2008<br />

Pachycephala rufiventris Rufous Whistler Confirmed 2008<br />

Pachycephala simplex Grey Whistler Confirmed 2008<br />

Paradisaeidae Manucodia keraudrenii Trumpet Manucode Confirmed 2008<br />

Ptiloris magnificus Magnificent Riflebird Confirmed 2008<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 32


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Pardalotidae Gerygone magnirostris Large‐billed Gerygone Confirmed 2008<br />

Gerygone olivacea White‐throated Gerygone Confirmed 2008<br />

Gerygone palpebrosa Fairy Gerygone Confirmed 2008<br />

Pardalotus rubricatus Red‐browed Pardalote Possible<br />

Pardalotus striatus Striated Pardalote Confirmed 2007<br />

Sericornis beccarii Tropical Scrubwren Confirmed 2008<br />

Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill Confirmed 2008<br />

Passeridae Lonchura castaneothorax Chestnut‐breasted Mannikin Confirmed 2008<br />

Neochmia phaeton Crimson Finch Possible<br />

Neochmia temporalis Red‐browed Finch Confirmed 2008<br />

Poephila cincta Black‐throated Finch Confirmed 2008<br />

Poephila personata Masked Finch Possible<br />

Taeniopygia bichenovii Double‐barred Finch Confirmed 2008<br />

Pelicanidae Pelecanus conspicillatus Australian Pelican Confirmed 2008<br />

Petroicidae Drymodes superciliaris Northen Scrub Robin Possible<br />

Poecilodryas superciliosa White‐browed Robin Confirmed 2008<br />

Tregellasia leucops White‐faced Robin Possible<br />

Phalacrocoracidae Phalacrocorax melanoleucos Little Pied Cormorant Confirmed 2008<br />

Phalacrocorax sulcirostris Little Black Cormorant Confirmed 2008<br />

Phalacrocorax varius Pied Cormorant Confirmed 2008<br />

Phasianidae Coturnix chinensis King Quail Possible<br />

Coturnix ypsilophora Brown Quail Confirmed 2008<br />

Pittidae Pitta versicolor Noisy Pitta Confirmed 2008<br />

Podargidae Podargus papuensis Papuan Frogmouth Confirmed 2008<br />

Podargus strigoides Tawny Frogmouth Confirmed 2008<br />

Podicipedidae Poliocephalus poliocephalus Hoary‐headed Grebe Possible<br />

Tachybaptus novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Australasian Grebe Confirmed 2008<br />

Pomatostomidae Pomatostomus temporalis Grey‐crowned Babbler Confirmed 2008<br />

Psittacidae Aprosmictus erythropterus Red‐winged Parrot Confirmed 2008<br />

Platycercus adscitus Pale‐headed Rosella Confirmed 2008<br />

Psitteuteles versicolor Varied Lorikeet Possible<br />

Trichoglossus chlorolepidotus Scaly‐breasted Lorikeet Possible<br />

Trichoglossus haematodus Rainbow Lorikeet Confirmed 2008<br />

Ptilonorhynchidae Chlamydera cerviniventris Fawn‐breasted Bowerbird Unlikely<br />

Chlamydera nuchalis Great Bowerbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Rallidae<br />

Amaurornis olivaceus Pale‐vented Bush Hen Possible<br />

Fulica atra Eurasian Coot Possible<br />

Gallirallus philippensis Buff‐b<strong>and</strong>ed Rail Possible<br />

Porphyrio porphyrio Purple Swamphen Possible<br />

Porzana cinerea White‐browed Crake Possible<br />

Porzana pusilla Baillon's Crake Possible<br />

Porzana tabuensis Spotless Crake Possible<br />

Rallina tricolor Red‐necked Crake Unlikely<br />

Recurvirostridae Himantopus himantopus Black‐winged Stilt Possible<br />

Rostratulidae Rostratula benghalensis Australian Painted Snipe Possible<br />

Scolopacidae Actitis hypoleucos Common S<strong>and</strong>piper Possible<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 33


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Calidris acuminata Sharp‐tailed S<strong>and</strong>piper Possible<br />

Calidris ferruginea Curlew S<strong>and</strong>piper Possible<br />

Calidris ruficollis Red‐necked Stint Possible<br />

Gallinago hardwickii Latham's Snipe Possible<br />

Limosa lapponica Bar‐tailed Godwit Possible<br />

Limosa limosa Black‐tailed Godwit Possible<br />

Numenius minutus Little Curlew Confirmed 2008<br />

Tringa glareola Wood S<strong>and</strong>piper Possible<br />

Tringa nebularia Common Greenshank Confirmed 2008<br />

Tringa stagnatilis Marsh S<strong>and</strong>piper Possible<br />

Strigidae Ninox connivens Barking Owl Possible<br />

Ninox novaeseel<strong>and</strong>iae Southern Boobook Owl Confirmed 2008<br />

Ninox rufa Rufous Owl Confirmed 2008<br />

Sturnidae Aplonis metallica Metalic Starling Possible<br />

Sylviidae Cisticola exilis Golden‐headed Cisticola Confirmed 2008<br />

Megalurus gramineus Little Grassbird Confirmed 2008<br />

Megalurus timoriensis Tawny Grassbird Possible<br />

Threskiornithidae Platalea flavipes Yellow‐billed Spoonbill Possible<br />

Platalea regia Royal Spoonbill Confirmed 2008<br />

Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Confirmed 2008<br />

Threskiornis molucca Australian White Ibis Confirmed 2008<br />

Threskiornis spinicollis Straw‐necked Ibis Confirmed 2008<br />

Turnicidae Turnix maculosa Red‐backed Button‐quail Possible<br />

Turnix olivii Buff‐breasted Button‐quail Possible<br />

Turnix pyrrhothorax Red‐chested Button‐quail Possible<br />

Tytonidae Tyto novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Masked Owl Possible<br />

Tyto capensis Eastern Grass Owl Possible<br />

Tyto javanica Pacific Barn Owl Confirmed 2008<br />

Tyto novaeholl<strong>and</strong>iae Masked Owl Possible<br />

Zosteropidae Zosterops lateralis Silvereye Possible<br />

Leaden Flycatcher<br />

(Myiagra rubecula)<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 34


Mammals<br />

Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Acrobatidae Acrobates pygmaeus Feathertail Glider Possible<br />

Dasyuridae Antechinus leo Cinnamon Antechinus Unlikely<br />

Dasyurus hallucatus Northern Quoll Possible<br />

Phascogale tapoatafa Brush‐tailed Phascogale Possible<br />

Planigale maculata Common Planigale Confirmed 2008<br />

Sminthopsis archeri Chestnut Dunnart Possible<br />

Sminthopsis virginiae Red‐cheeked Dunnart Possible<br />

Emaballonuridae Saccolaimus flaviventris Yellow‐bellied Sheath‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Saccolaimus mixtus Papuan Sheath‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Saccolaimus saccolaimus Bare‐rumped Sheath‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Hipposideridae Hipposideros ater Dusky Leaf‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Hipposideros cervinus Fawn Leaf‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Hipposideros diadema<br />

reginae<br />

Diadem Leaf‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Hipposideros semoni Semon’s Leaf‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Macropodidae Lagorchestes conspicillatus Spectacle Hare‐wallaby Possible<br />

Macropus agilis Agile Wallaby Confirmed 2008<br />

Macropus antilopinus Antilopine Wallaroo Confirmed 2008<br />

Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo Confirmed 2008<br />

Macropus robustus Common Wallaroo Possible<br />

Onychogalea unguifera Northern Nailtail Wallaby Possible<br />

Thylogale stigmatica Red‐legged Pademelon Possible<br />

Wallabia bicolor Swamp Wallaby Possible<br />

Megadermatidae Macroderma gigas Ghost Bat Possible<br />

Miniopteridae Miniopterus australis Little Bent‐winged Bat Possible<br />

Miniopterus schreibersii<br />

oceanensis<br />

Eastern Bent‐winged Bat Possible<br />

Mollosidae Chaerephon jobensis Northern Free‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Mormopterus ‘species 2’<br />

(Adams et al, 1988)<br />

Eastern Free‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Mormopterus beccarii Beccari’s Free‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Mormopterus loriae ridei<br />

(=Mormopterus 'species 5 (ST)<br />

in Adams et al (1988)).<br />

Eastern Little Free‐tailed Bat Possible<br />

Muridae Hydromys chrysogaster Water Rat Confirmed 2008<br />

Leggadina lakedownensis Lakel<strong>and</strong> Downs Mouse Confirmed 2008<br />

Melomys burtoni Grassl<strong>and</strong> Melomys Confirmed 2008<br />

Melomys capensis Cape York Melomys Confirmed 2008<br />

Mesembriomys gouldii Black‐footed Tree‐rat Possible<br />

Pseudomys delicatulus Delicate Mouse Confirmed 2008<br />

Rattus sordidus Canefield Rat Confirmed 2008<br />

Rattus tunneyi Pale Field Rat Confirmed 2008<br />

Uromys caudimaculatus Giant White‐tailed Rat Possible<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 35


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Peramelidae Echymipera rufescens Long‐nosed Echymipera Possible<br />

Isoodon macr<strong>our</strong>us Northern Brown B<strong>and</strong>icoot Possible<br />

Isoodon obesulus pennisular Southern Brown B<strong>and</strong>icoot Possible<br />

Perameles nasuta Long‐nosed B<strong>and</strong>icoot Possible<br />

Petauridae Dactylopsila trivirgata Striped Possum Possible<br />

Petaurus brevipes Sugar Glider Confirmed 2008<br />

Petaurus norfolkensis Squirrel Glider Possible<br />

Phalangeridae Phalanger mimicus Southern Common Cuscus Confirmed 2008<br />

Spilocuscus maculatus Common Spotted Cuscus Confirmed 2008<br />

Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum Confirmed 2008<br />

Pseudocheiridae Pseudocheirus peregrinus Common Ringtail Possum Possible<br />

Pteropodidae Dobsonia magna Bare‐backed Fruit Bat Possible<br />

Macroglossus minimus Northern Blossom Bat Possible<br />

Nyctimene robinsoni Eastern Tube‐nosed Bat Confirmed 2008<br />

Pteropus alecto Black Flying‐fox Possible<br />

Pteropus conspicillatus Spectacled Flying‐fox Confirmed 2008<br />

Pteropus scapulatus Little Red Flying‐fox Confirmed 2008<br />

Syconycteris australis Eastern Blossom Bat Possible<br />

Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus megaphyllus Eastern Horseshoe Bat Possible<br />

Rhinolophus philippinensis Large‐eared Horseshoe Bat Possible<br />

Verspertilionidae Chalinolobus nigrogriseus Hoary Wattle Bat Possible<br />

Kerivoula papuensis Golden‐tipped Bat Possible<br />

Murina florium Flute‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Myotis macropus Large‐footed Myotis Possible<br />

Nyctophilus bifax Eastern Long‐eared Bat Possible<br />

Pipistrellus adamsi Forest Pipistrelle Possible<br />

Scotorepens sanborni Northern Broad‐nosed Bat Possible<br />

Vespadelus troughtoni Eastern Cave Bat Possible<br />

Common Brushtail<br />

Possum (Trichosurus<br />

vulpecula) in woodl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 36


Reptiles<br />

Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Acrochordidae Acrochordus arafurae Arafura File Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Agamidae<br />

Amphibolurus temporalis Confirmed 2008<br />

Chlamydosaurus kingii Frill‐necked Lizard Confirmed 2008<br />

Diporiphora bilineata Two‐lined Dragon Confirmed 2008<br />

Chelidae<br />

Chelodina canni Cann’s Long‐necked Turtle Very likely<br />

Chelodina rugosa Northern Long‐necked Turtle Confirmed 2008<br />

Elseya latisternum Saw‐shelled Turtle Likely<br />

Emydura tanybaraga Northern Yellow‐faced Turtle Confirmed 2008<br />

Colubridae<br />

Boiga irregularis Brown Tree Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Dendrelaphis calligastra Northern Tree Snake Possible<br />

Dendrelaphis punctulata Common Tree Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Enhydris polylepis Macleay’s Water Snake Very likely<br />

Stegonotus cucullatus Slaty‐Grey Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Tropidonophis mairii Keelback Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Crocodylidae Crocodylus johnstoni Freshwater Crocodile Confirmed 2008<br />

Crocodylus porosus Estuarine Crocodile Possible<br />

Elapidae Acanthophis praelongus Northern Death Adder Confirmed 2008<br />

Antairoserpens warro Likely<br />

Brachyurophis semifasciatus Half‐girdled Snake Possible<br />

Cryptophis nigrostriatus Black‐striped Snake Very likely<br />

Demansia papuensis Papuan Whip Snake Very likely<br />

Demansia vestigiata Lesser Black Whip Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Furina ornata Orange‐naped Snake Confirmed 2008<br />

Furina tristis Brown‐headed Snake Very likely<br />

Oxyuranus scutellatus Taipan Confirmed 2008<br />

Pseudechis australis King Brown or Mulga Snake Very likely<br />

Pseudonaja nuchalis Western Brown Snake Very likely<br />

Pseudonaja textilis Eastern Brown Snake Likely<br />

Suta suta Myall Snake Possible<br />

Vermicella annulata B<strong>and</strong>y‐b<strong>and</strong>y Possible<br />

Geckonidae Cyrtodactylus louisiadensis Ring‐tailed Gecko Possible<br />

Gehyra dubia Confirmed 2008<br />

Heteronotia binoei Bynoe’s Gecko Confirmed 2008<br />

Nactus eboracensis Confirmed 2008<br />

Nephurus asper Possible<br />

Oedura castelnaui Northern Velvet Gecko Confirmed 2008<br />

Oedura rhombifer Confirmed 2008<br />

Pseudothecadactylus australis Giant Tree Gecko Possible<br />

Hemidactylus frenatus* House Gecko Confirmed 2008<br />

Pygopidae Delma tincta Confirmed 2008<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 37


Family Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood<br />

Lialis burtonis Burton’s Snake‐Lizard Confirmed 2008<br />

Pygopus steelscotti Northern Hooded Scaly Foot Very likely<br />

Pythonidae Antaresia maculosus Spotted Python Confirmed 2008<br />

Aspidites melanocephalus Black‐headed Python Confirmed 2008<br />

Liasis mackloti Water Python Confirmed 2008<br />

Morelia kinghorni Amethystine Python Confirmed 2008<br />

Morelia spilota Carpet Python Likely<br />

Scincidae<br />

Carlia sp. #1 (keys to C. aerata) Very likely<br />

Carlia sp. #2 (keys to C. aerata) Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia jarnoldae Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia longipes Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia macfarlani Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia munda Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia rimula Likely<br />

Carlia schmeltzii Possible<br />

Carlia sesbrauna Confirmed 2008<br />

Carlia storri Confirmed 2008<br />

Cryptoblepharus metallicus Very likely<br />

Cryptoblepharus pannosus Confirmed 2008<br />

Cryptoblepharus virgatus Confirmed 2008<br />

Ctenotus essingtonii Likely<br />

Ctenotus robustus Confirmed 2008<br />

Ctenotus spaldingi Possible<br />

Egernia frerei Confirmed 2008<br />

Glaphyromorphus crassicaudus Confirmed 2008<br />

Glaphyromorphus nigricaudis Confirmed 2008<br />

Glaphyromorphus pardalis Confirmed 2008<br />

Morethia taeniopleura Very likely<br />

Tiliqua scincoides Confirmed 2008<br />

Menetia greyii Possible<br />

Typhlopidae Ramphotyphlops chamodracaena Possible<br />

Ramphotyphlops leucoproctus Possible<br />

Ramphotyphlops polygrammicus Possible<br />

Ramphotyphlops unguirostris Possible<br />

Varanidae Varanus indicus Mangrove Monitor Confirmed 2008<br />

Varanus mertensi Merten’s Water Monitor Confirmed 2008<br />

Varanus panoptes Confirmed 2008<br />

Varanus scalaris Spotted Tree Monitor Very likely<br />

Varanus tristis Possible<br />

Varanus semiremex Rusty Monitor Possible<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 38


Appendix 2. Plant species recorded as occurring on <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong>.<br />

Status: R = rare; * = exotic<br />

Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

Abrus precatorius subsp. precatorius FABACEAE<br />

Abutilon auritum MALVACEAE<br />

Acacia auriculiformis MIMOSACEAE<br />

Acacia crassicarpa MIMOSACEAE<br />

Acacia flavescens MIMOSACEAE<br />

Acacia leptocarpa MIMOSACEAE<br />

Acacia midgleyi MIMOSACEAE<br />

Acacia polystachya MIMOSACEAE<br />

Achyranthes aspera AMARANTHACEAE chaff flower<br />

Adenanthera abrosperma MIMOSACEAE<br />

Aidia racemosa RUBIACEAE Archer berry<br />

Ailanthus triphysa SIMAROUBACEAE<br />

Alchornea rugosa EUPHORBIACEAE<br />

Alphitonia excelsa RHAMNACEAE<br />

Alstonia actinophylla APOCYNACEAE cape milkwood<br />

Alstonia scholaris APOCYNACEAE milky pine<br />

Alyxia spicata APOCYNACEAE chain fruit<br />

Amyema sanguinea var. sanguinea LORANTHACEAE<br />

Amylotheca dictyophleba LORANTHACEAE mistletoe<br />

Anacolosa papuana OLACACEAE R<br />

Antidesma ghaesembilla PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Antidesma parvifolium PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Archontophoenix alex<strong>and</strong>rae ARECACEAE Alex<strong>and</strong>ra palm<br />

Arytera bifoliolata SAPINDACEAE<br />

Arytera divaricata SAPINDACEAE rose tamarind, coogera<br />

Atalaya variifolia SAPINDACEAE<br />

Atractocarpus sessilis RUBIACEAE<br />

Barringtonia acutangula subsp.<br />

acutangula<br />

LECYTHIDACEAE<br />

Barringtonia calyptrata LECYTHIDACEAE cassowary pine, mango<br />

pine<br />

Beilschmiedia obtusifolia LAURACEAE blush walnut, nutwood<br />

Blepharocarya involucrigera ANACARDIACEAE<br />

Bombax ceiba var. leiocarpum BOMBACACEAE bombax or capok tree<br />

Brachychiton diversifolius subsp.<br />

orientalis<br />

STERCULIACEAE<br />

Brachychiton garrawayae STERCULIACEAE<br />

Brachychiton muellerianus STERCULIACEAE<br />

Breynia oblongifolia PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Buchanania arborescens ANACARDIACEAE<br />

Buchnera tetragona SCROPHULARIACEAE<br />

Bursaria tenuifolia PITTOSPORACEAE sweet blackthorn, slender<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 39


Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

bursaria<br />

Caesalpinia erythrocarpa CAESALPINIACEAE<br />

Calophyllum australianum CLUSIACEAE<br />

Canarium australianum BURSERACEAE<br />

Cansjera leptostachya OPILIACEAE<br />

Capparis lucida CAPPARACEAE<br />

Carallia brachiata RHIZOPHORACEAE carallia, corky bark<br />

Castanospermum australe FABACEAE black bean, Morton Bay<br />

chestnut<br />

Cathormion umbellatum subsp.<br />

moniliforme<br />

MIMOSACEAE<br />

Cecarria obtusifolia LORANTHACEAE R<br />

Celtis sp. (Cape Melville D.G.Fell+<br />

DGF3025)<br />

ULMACEAE<br />

Chionanthus ramiflora OLEACEAE northern olive, native olive<br />

Cissus opaca VITACEAE<br />

Citrus garrawayi RUTACEAE R<br />

Cleistanthus apodus PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Cleistanthus peninsularis PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Clerodendrum floribundum LAMIACEAE<br />

Cochlospermum gillivraei COCHLOSPERMACEAE<br />

Cordia dichotoma BORAGINACEAE<br />

Corymbia clarksoniana MYRTACEAE Clarkson's bloodwood<br />

Corymbia confertiflora MYRTACEAE broad‐leaved carbeen<br />

Corymbia papuana MYRTACEAE Cape York ghost gum<br />

Corymbia stockeri subsp. peninsularis MYRTACEAE<br />

Corymbia tessellaris MYRTACEAE Moreton Bay ash<br />

Corypha utan ARECACEAE<br />

Crateva religiosa CAPPARACEAE march dalur<br />

Croton arnhemicus EUPHORBIACEAE<br />

Croton multicaulis subsp. multicaulis EUPHORBIACEAE<br />

Croton mutabilis EUPHORBIACEAE<br />

Cryptocarya exfoliata LAURACEAE<br />

Cryptocarya hypospodia LAURACEAE northern laurel<br />

Cryptocarya triplinervis var. riparia LAURACEAE brown laurel<br />

Cupaniopsis anacardioides SAPINDACEAE<br />

Cupaniopsis fleckeri SAPINDACEAE<br />

Cyclophyllum brevipes RUBIACEAE<br />

Cymbidium canaliculatum ORCHIDACEAE<br />

Decaisnina brittenii subsp. brittenii LORANTHACEAE<br />

Dendrophthoe glabrescens LORANTHACEAE<br />

Desmos wardianus ANNONACEAE<br />

Dillenia alata DILLENIACEAE red beech<br />

Diospyros calycantha EBENACEAE cape ebony<br />

Diospyros humilis EBENACEAE black ebony, Australian<br />

ebony,<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 40


Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

Diplatia furcata LORANTHACEAE<br />

Drynaria quercifolia POLYPODIACEAE<br />

Drypetes deplanchei PUTRANJIVACEAE<br />

Dysoxylum oppositifolium MELIACEAE<br />

Elaeocarpus arnhemicus ELAEOCARPACEAE blue plum, Arnhem L<strong>and</strong><br />

qu<strong>and</strong>ong,<br />

Emmenosperma cunninghamii RHAMNACEAE<br />

Entada rheedii MIMOSACEAE<br />

Erythrina vespertilio FABACEAE<br />

Erythrophleum chlorostachys CAESALPINIACEAE<br />

Eucalyptus brassiana MYRTACEAE Cape York red gum<br />

Eucalyptus cullenii MYRTACEAE Cullen's ironbark<br />

Eucalyptus leptophleba MYRTACEAE Molloy red box<br />

Eucalyptus platyphylla MYRTACEAE poplar gum<br />

Eucalyptus tetrodonta MYRTACEAE Darwin stringybark<br />

Eustrephus latifolius LAXMANNIACEAE<br />

Everistia vacciniifolia forma crassa RUBIACEAE<br />

Evolvulus alsinoides var. decumbens CONVOLVULACEAE<br />

Exocarpos latifolius SANTALACEAE<br />

Ficus benjamina var. benjamina MORACEAE Benjamina fig, weeping fig<br />

Ficus congesta var. congesta MORACEAE<br />

Ficus drupacea MORACEAE hairy fig, red fig, drup fig<br />

Ficus microcarpa MORACEAE<br />

Ficus opposita MORACEAE<br />

Ficus racemosa var. racemosa MORACEAE<br />

Ficus virens var. sublanceolata MORACEAE<br />

Flagellaria indica FLAGELLARIACEAE whip vine, supplejack<br />

Ganophyllum falcatum SAPINDACEAE scaly ash, Daintree hickory<br />

Garcinia warrenii CLUSIACEAE<br />

Gardenia scabrella RUBIACEAE R<br />

Garuga floribunda var. floribunda BURSERACEAE<br />

Glossocarya hemiderma LAMIACEAE<br />

Glycosmis trifoliata RUTACEAE<br />

Gmelina dalrympleana LAMIACEAE grey teak, white beech<br />

Gossia floribunda MYRTACEAE<br />

Grevillea baileyana PROTEACEAE<br />

Grevillea glauca PROTEACEAE<br />

Grevillea parallela PROTEACEAE<br />

Grevillea striata PROTEACEAE<br />

Grewia retusifolia SPARRMANNIACEAE<br />

Hakea persiehana PROTEACEAE<br />

Heliotropium sarmentosum BORAGINACEAE<br />

Heteropogon contortus POACEAE black or bunch speargrass<br />

Heteropogon triticeus POACEAE giant speargrass<br />

Hippocratea barbata CELASTRACEAE knot vine<br />

Homalium brachybotrys FLACOURTIACEAE<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 41


Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

Hymenachne amplexicaulis POACEAE * hymenachne<br />

Hypserpa decumbens MENISPERMACEAE<br />

Hyptis capitata LAMIACEAE * knobweed<br />

Hyptis suaveolens LAMIACEAE * horehound<br />

Ichnocarpus frutescens APOCYNACEAE<br />

Ixora timorensis RUBIACEAE<br />

Jagera pseudorhus var. pseudorhus SAPINDACEAE<br />

Jasminum didymum subsp. didymum OLEACEAE<br />

Lagerstroemia archeriana subsp.<br />

archeriana<br />

LYTHRACEAE<br />

Leea indica VITACEAE<br />

Leptospermum madidum subsp. madidum MYRTACEAE<br />

Litsea glutinosa LAURACEAE<br />

Livistona muelleri ARECACEAE<br />

Lophostemon suaveolens MYRTACEAE swamp mahogany<br />

Luffa aegyptiaca CUCURBITACEAE<br />

Lygodium flexuosum SCHIZAEACEAE<br />

Macaranga tanarius EUPHORBIACEAE<br />

Mallotus philippensis EUPHORBIACEAE red kamala<br />

Mallotus polyadenos EUPHORBIACEAE kamala<br />

Mangifera indica ANACARDIACEAE * mango<br />

Maranthes corymbosa CHRYSOBALANACEAE<br />

Meiogyne cylindrocarpa subsp.<br />

trichocarpa<br />

ANNONACEAE<br />

Melaleuca fluviatilis MYRTACEAE<br />

Melaleuca leucadendra MYRTACEAE<br />

Melaleuca monantha MYRTACEAE<br />

Melaleuca nervosa subsp. nervosa MYRTACEAE<br />

Melaleuca viminalis MYRTACEAE weeping bottlebrush<br />

Melaleuca viridiflora var. viridiflora MYRTACEAE<br />

Melia azedarach MELIACEAE<br />

Memecylon pauciflorum var. pauciflorum MEMECYLACEAE<br />

Micromelum minutum RUTACEAE<br />

Miliusa traceyi ANNONACEAE<br />

Millettia pinnata FABACEAE<br />

Mischocarpus lachnocarpus SAPINDACEAE wooly pear fruit<br />

Morinda bracteata var. celebica RUBIACEAE<br />

Murraya ovatifoliolata RUTACEAE<br />

Nauclea orientalis RUBIACEAE Leichhardt tree<br />

Nymphaea violacea NYMPHAEACEAE<br />

Oryza australiensis POACEAE Australian wild rice<br />

Owenia vernicosa MELIACEAE<br />

Pachygone ovata MENISPERMACEAE<br />

Paraserianthes toona MIMOSACEAE acacia or Mackay cedar<br />

Parinari nonda CHRYSOBALANACEAE<br />

Parsonsia velutina APOCYNACEAE<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 42


Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

Pavetta australiensis RUBIACEAE<br />

Persicaria attenuata POLYGONACEAE<br />

Petalostigma banksii PICRODENDRACEAE quinine bush<br />

Petalostigma pubescens PICRODENDRACEAE<br />

Phaleria oct<strong>and</strong>ra THYMELAEACEAE<br />

Philydrum lanuginosum PHILYDRACEAE<br />

Phyllanthus lamprophyllus PHYLLANTHACEAE<br />

Piliostigma malabaricum CAESALPINIACEAE<br />

Planchonia careya LECYTHIDACEAE<br />

Pogonolobus reticulatus RUBIACEAE<br />

Polyalthia nitidissima ANNONACEAE<br />

Pouteria sericea SAPOTACEAE<br />

Premna limbata LAMIACEAE<br />

Pterocarpus sp. (Archer River B.P.Hyl<strong>and</strong><br />

3078)<br />

FABACEAE R<br />

Pycnarrhena novoguineensis MENISPERMACEAE<br />

Rhodamnia australis MYRTACEAE<br />

Rhodomyrtus macrocarpa MYRTACEAE<br />

Salacia disepala CELASTRACEAE<br />

Santalum lanceolatum SANTALACEAE<br />

Sarcopteryx sp. (McIlwraith Range BH SAPINDACEAE not recognised by BRI, but<br />

3261RFK)<br />

distinct<br />

Semecarpus australiensis ANACARDIACEAE tar tree<br />

Sesbania cannabina var. cannabina FABACEAE<br />

Siphonodon pendulus CELASTRACEAE<br />

Smilax australis SMILACACEAE austral sarsaparilla<br />

Stemona lucida STEMONACEAE<br />

Stenocarpus verticis PROTEACEAE<br />

Strychnos lucida LOGANIACEAE<br />

Syzygium angophoroides MYRTACEAE Yarrabah satinash<br />

Syzygium bamagense MYRTACEAE<br />

Syzygium forte subsp. potamophilum MYRTACEAE<br />

Syzygium suborbiculare MYRTACEAE<br />

Tabernaemontana orientalis APOCYNACEAE<br />

Terminalia sericocarpa COMBRETACEAE damson plum,<br />

sovereignwood<br />

Tetracera daemeliana DILLENIACEAE<br />

Tetrameles nudiflora DATISCACEAE<br />

Themeda quadrivalvis POACEAE * grader grass<br />

Themeda tri<strong>and</strong>ra POACEAE kangaroo grass<br />

Tinospora smilacina MENISPERMACEAE<br />

Toechima daemelianum SAPINDACEAE<br />

Tristaniopsis exiliflora MYRTACEAE<br />

Trophis sc<strong>and</strong>ens subsp. sc<strong>and</strong>ens MORACEAE burny vine, crow ash<br />

Urena lobata MALVACEAE *<br />

Vitex helogiton LAMIACEAE<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 43


Taxon Family (Qld) Status Common name<br />

Welchiodendron longivalve MYRTACEAE<br />

Wilkiea rigidifolia MONIMIACEAE<br />

Wrightia laevis APOCYNACEAE<br />

Ziziphus oenopolia RHAMNACEAE<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 44


Appendix 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> ground cover in major habitat types<br />

%<br />

%<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

N =<br />

N =<br />

Percent Leaf Litter<br />

100<br />

DVT<br />

ecosystem<br />

200<br />

Grasslan<br />

Percent Bare Ground<br />

100<br />

DV T<br />

ecosystem<br />

200<br />

Grasslan<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 45<br />

180<br />

Riparian<br />

180<br />

Riparian<br />

140<br />

Swamp<br />

140<br />

Sw amp<br />

200<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

200<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong>


%<br />

%<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

N =<br />

N =<br />

Vegetation Cover as % <strong>of</strong> ground cover<br />

100<br />

DVT<br />

ecosystem<br />

100<br />

200<br />

Grasslan<br />

200<br />

Report – <strong>Piccaninny</strong> <strong>Plains</strong> survey, Oct/Nov 2008 46<br />

180<br />

Riparian<br />

180<br />

140<br />

Swamp<br />

Disturbance as % <strong>of</strong> ground cover<br />

DVT<br />

ecosystem<br />

Grasslan<br />

Riparian<br />

140<br />

Swamp<br />

200<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

200<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!