Professional Documents
Culture Documents
151
MALAYSIA
RED LIST
Plants of Peninsular Malaysia
Volume 1, Part I
Yong, W.S.Y., Chua, L.S.L., Lau, K.H., Siti-Nur Fatinah, K., Cheah, Y.H., Yao, T.L.,
Chew, M.Y., Siti-Munirah, M.Y., Julius, A., Phoon, S.N., Sam, Y.Y., Nadiah, I., Ong, P.T.,
Sarah-Nabila, R., Suhaida, M., Muhammad-Alif Azyraf, A., Siti-Eryani, S., Yap, J.W.,
Jutta, M., Syazwani, A., Norzielawati, S., Kiew, R. and Chung, R.C.K.
²
7°30'N
THAILAND
Perlis
6°0'N
Kedah
South China
Sea
Penang Kelantan
Terengganu
Perak
4°30'N
Pahang
St
Selangor
ra
its
of
Kuala Lumpur
M
3°0'N
ala
cc
Negeri
a
Sembilan
Melaka
Johor
INDONESIA
1°30'N
(Sumatra)
SINGAPORE
Legend
State boundary
0 25 50 100 150
National boundary km
VOLUME 1, PART I
Produced with the financial support of
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA
RESEARCH PAMPHLET NO. 151
MALAYSIA
RED LIST
PLANTS OF
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
VOLUME 1, PART I
Yong, W.S.Y., Chua, L.S.L., Lau, K.H., Siti-Nur Fatinah, K., Cheah, Y.H., Yao, T.L.,
Rafidah, A.R., Lim, C.L., Syahida-Emiza, S., Ummul-Nazrah, A.R., Nor-Ezzawanis, A.T.,
Chew, M.Y., Siti-Munirah, M.Y., Julius, A., Phoon, S.N., Sam, Y.Y., Nadiah, I., Ong, P.T.,
Sarah-Nabila, R., Suhaida, M., Muhammad-Alif Azyraf, A., Siti-Eryani, S., Yap, J.W.,
Jutta, M., Syazwani, A., Norzielawati, S., Kiew, R. and Chung, R.C.K.
2021
©Forest Research Institute Malaysia 2021
Yong, W. S. Y.
MALAYSIA RED LIST: PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA. VOLUME 1,
PART I/ Yong, W.S.Y. [and 27 others] ; Editors: Chua, L.S.L. and Lau, K.H. ;
Series Editor: Ng, K.K.S.
(RESEARCH PAMPHLET; NO. 151)
Mode of access: Internet
eISBN 978-967-2810-02-5
1. Plant conservation--Malaysia--Classification.
2. Endemic plants--Malaysia--Classification.
3. Government publications--Malaysia.
4. Electronic books.
I. Lau, K. H. II. Chua, L. S. L.
III. Ng, K. K. S.
IV. Title. V. Series.
639.9909595
Page
Foreword ix
Acknowledgement xi
Executive Summary 1
1.0. Background 4
1.1 Introduction 4
1.2 Sources of Information 6
1.3 Assessment Method 7
1.4 Red List Report Format 11
2.0. Red List Summaries 11
3.0. Next Steps 35
4.0. Summary of Red List Status of Peninsular Malaysian Plants 38
List of References 104
Glossary 106
Appendix: Summary of the five criteria used to evaluate if a 107
taxon belongs in a threatened category
LIST OF TABLES
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
xi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Malaysia Plant Red List project was initiated in the 9th Malaysia Plan in 2005.
To date, more than 1,600 indigenous taxa had been assessed. The assessment
was conducted following the International Union for the Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1 (IUCN, 2012a) and
Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 14
(IUCN, 2019). Since 2010, the conservation assessment has been conducted
concurrently with the taxonomic revision for Flora of Peninsular Malaysia and
published in the corresponding series.
Peninsular Malaysia has, to date, at least 9,030 vascular plant taxa comprising
248 families and 1,651 genera including at least 149 new taxa discovered since
2005. This Red List presents the conservation assessment of 1,293 indigenous
taxa, covering 14.32% of the peninsula’s known flora. All indigenous taxa,
except Vatica rassak, were assessed using the IUCN categories and criteria.
Vatica rassak was Not Evaluated (NE) due to its doubtful occurrence in
Peninsular Malaysia. Sixty non-indigenous taxa were not assessed and listed
as Not Applicable (NA) in this publication. The remaining flora in Peninsular
Malaysia are in the process of assessment and periodic updates will be made
available.
Of the 1,292 taxa assessed, 77 taxa (5.96%) are Critically Endangered (CR),
120 taxa (9.29%) are Endangered (EN) and 173 taxa (13.39%) are Vulnerable
(VU). This brings the total number of threatened taxa to 370 taxa (28.64%).
Two endemic taxa, i.e., Oreogrammitis crispatula (Polypodiaceae) and
Oreogrammitis kunstleri (Polypodiaceae) are Extinct (EX) and one taxon
(Pisonia grandis, Nyctaginaceae) is Regionally Extinct (RE). Two hundred and
thirteen (16.49%) taxa are Near Threatened (NT) and 627 (48.53%) taxa are
Least Concern (LC). Seventy nine (6.11%) taxa are listed Data Deficient (DD)
due to lack of information on the distribution, population size and threats
needed to assess the risk of extinction using IUCN Red List Categories and
Criteria.
Of the 77 CR taxa, 29 taxa are endemic to Peninsular Malaysia with 17 taxa
only known from one location, e.g., Balanophora hansenii (Balanophoraceae),
Barringtonia maxwelliana (Lecythidaceae), Thottea kamarudiniana
(Aristolochiaceae) and Vatica kanthanensis (Dipterocarpaceae). Of the 120
EN taxa, 31 taxa are endemic and 36 taxa of the 173 VU taxa are endemic to
Peninsular Malaysia.
For this publication, 972 taxa assessed before 2016 were reassessed based
on current information available (i.e., population size and distribution, trend
on habitat loss and degradation, conservation measures in place). Following
the reassessment, 27 taxa from nine families were uplisted to a higher Red
List category from their last assessment. Of this, 15 (55.56%) taxa were
uplisted because of genuine change. Eighteen of the uplisted taxa (62.67%)
previously known to be not threatened, e.g., Chisocheton pentandrus subsp.
pentandrus (Meliaceae) was uplisted from NT to CR; Aristolochia foveolata
1
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
This Red List is a compilation of the updated conservation assessments for
taxa that were treated in Series I (Vol. 1–3) and II (Vol. 1–7) of the Flora of
Peninsular Malaysia (FPM) and Malaysia Plant Red List: Peninsular Malaysian
Dipterocarpaceae. Six new Dipterocarp taxa, namely Vatica abdulrahmaniana,
V. cuneata, V. kanthanensis, V. mizaniana, V. najibiana and V. spatulata that
were published after Chua et al. (2010) and one new record, Dipterocarpus
alatus, are included. A total of 1,353 taxa from 90 families and 308 genera
are listed here comprising 1,293 indigenous taxa and 60 non-indigenous taxa,
covering 14.32% of the peninsula’s known flora. All indigenous taxa, except
one, were assessed using the IUCN Categories and Criteria Version 3.1 (2012a).
It is reiterated that the category and criteria published here is updated and
confined to Peninsular Malaysia and, with the exception of endemic taxa, may
not necessarily be applicable to the taxon in its phytogeographical range.
Malaysia has an estimated 15,000 taxa of vascular plants comprising
angiosperms, gymnosperms and pteridophytes with the peninsula having
9,030 taxa and Sabah and Sarawak, collectively, having 12,000 taxa. Both
regions have their own distinct floristic components (Wong, 1998) and the
forest types and vegetation for Peninsular Malaysia have been extensively
described by Symington (1943), Wyatt-Smith (1963) and Saw (2004). Past
revisions on the flora of Peninsular Malaysia and regional flora had no threat
perspective ─ it was only fairly recently that inclusion of threat assessment
became compulsory due to the dramatic increase in threats experienced in
natural landscapes.
Conservation assessment, as an objective indicator of extinction risk, provides
the initial step towards prioritization for conservation. This approach is
particularly important for a megadiverse tropical country such as Malaysia
where resources are aplenty and its conservation is frequently and substantially
challenged by socio-economic priorities. Conservation trade-offs and conflicts
need to be clearly understood and appropriately factored into development
planning, implementation and mitigation. The immediate objectives of this
report are thus as followed:
• Assess the extinction risk of taxa;
• Identify taxa that are threatened and require urgent conservation
attention to prevent extinction;
• Provide baseline data and information on the conservation status
of plant taxa through an easier and more direct access to assist
conservation planning and implementation;
• Enhance the engagement of stakeholders’ in the conservation of
threatened taxa.
4
BACKGROUND
The Red Listing category serves as a guidance towards the setting of national
priorities for species conservation taking into consideration other factors such
as ecological and biological attributes. This publication contributes to the
Target 9 of the National Policy on Biological Diversity 2016–2025 which states
that “the National Red Data list on plants and animals is completed by 2020”.
The main threats to plant populations in Peninsular Malaysia are habitat
loss and degradation. Habitat loss is mainly caused by land use change due
to residential and commercial development, agriculture, infrastructure
development for transportation, forest plantations, quarrying and dam
construction (Figure 1). Land conversion mainly occurred between 1960
and 1980s. As of 2018, 43.59% (5,758,261 ha) of the land area in Peninsular
Malaysia remains forested (Anon., 2018). Of this, about 32% (1,839,933 ha)
are Protected Area (PA) which includes National Parks, State Parks, Wildlife
Sanctuaries, Protection Forests under the Permanent Forest Reserves and
other types of protected areas (Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources,
2019).
Efforts to list the endemic tree taxa into the IUCN Species Information Service
(SIS) database is currently on-going. These assessments are subjected to
consistency checks by Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI),
as part of the Global Tree Assessment project, and the IUCN Red List Unit to
ensure that the IUCN categories and criteria were applied correctly.
range were obtained from geo-referenced herbarium specimens that had been
reviewed by specialists and from published floristic accounts. Information on
areas under protection was obtained from institutional reports, government
gazettes and supporting policy documents; sources for other conservation
measures were wide-ranging with many publications appearing as grey
literature. Data on the extent of forest cover were obtained from published
reports, including annual reports, and National Forest Inventories. Although
forest cover extent in 2013 was published in the Fifth National Forest Inventory
(Anon, 2014), unresolved copyright issues had prevented the use of the data
in map form in a timely manner.
Threats were, where possible, ground-truthed and verified with local forest
offices and district councils; where this is not possible, the threats were
inferred from the examination of geographical and altitudinal ranges, habitat
specificity and other details in the herbarium labels. Demographic data was
obtained from long-term ecological plots, permanent sample plots, national
forest inventory data and growth and yield plots while information on
utilization was obtained from published reports and trade statistics. Data from
the Fifth National Forest Inventory (Anon, 2014) was consulted but not used
here because the abundance data was derived from basal area calculation
rather than direct observation. Expert knowledge was consulted where there
is significant uncertainty related to the estimation of the extent of occurrence
(EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). Care was taken to ensure that the category
was applied based on credible information.
Uncertainty in the data used for the assessment was unavoidable. Assessor
was thus encouraged to adopt a precautionary approach to risk instead of
evidentiary attitude when dealing with uncertainty. Extinction risk should
be evaluated based on realistic assumptions rather than worst-scenario case
reasoning, to avoid tendency for over-listing. This is especially desirable when
evaluating taxon known from one location, or from old historic collections,
occupy specific niches that are threatened and taxa that are confined to
favoured research sites.
Figure 2. The structure of the Red List categories used at the regional level.
represented only by old collections. Taxon that is not yet assessed for its
conservation status is classified as NE.
In the past, Malaysia had used a modified version of the IUCN Red List
Categories and Criteria, where an additional category labelled as “Rare” was
introduced (Chua, 2012). Rare (RA) was defined as “Taxon that is not exposed
to any known direct or plausible potential threat and does not qualify under
the five IUCN criteria and occurs in ≤ 2 sites or has an EOO ≤ 100 km2 or AOO
≤ 10 km2”. This category was introduced to cater for taxon that are presently
under no plausible threat. Taxa that are confined to certain protected areas
in Malaysia are believed not to be at risk of extinction because these areas
are governed by decades-old legislation, were in pristine condition when
established and remains so until today and protection is actively enforced. The
many decades of protection and pristine quality would have provided sufficient
opportunities for plants, even long-living perennials such as trees, to have
undergone at least one generation cycle. Despite this, we acknowledge that
this situation may change in the future given the taxon’s restricted distribution
and anthropogenic influences and these will elevate the extinction risk.
Since Malaysia is adopting the “IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version
3.1” without any reservation, taxa that had been assessed as RA were
reassessed. The revised status is presented here. In addition, reassessment
was carried out for taxa assessed before the year 2016−extinction risk of
the taxon was reassessed based on current habitat status and availability of
additional data collected after the first assessment. The reason for change
in category (if any) is coded as genuine or non-genuine change. Reasons for
genuine change (G) include change in population size, rate of decline or change
in population range and distribution since the last assessment. Reasons for
non-genuine change (N) include revision of criteria, improved knowledge of
the criteria, new information, taxonomic change and incorrect data used in
previous assessment.
For evaluation under criterion A, suspected population reduction can be
based on the reduction in EOO and AOO due to habitat loss. GeoCAT was
used to calculate reduction in EOO and AOO (Bachman et al., 2011), where
the habitat, now unsuitable, and its corresponding specimen were removed.
Understanding of the taxon and its relationship to its habitat were also taken
into consideration when evaluating taxa against criterion A.
Different assessors had applied the categories with differing levels of
confidence and degree of optimism about future trends. In a substantial
number of cases, different assessors had applied different categories based
on the same information. As required by IUCN, the taxon should be evaluated
against all criteria but only the highest category and criteria is listed (IUCN
2012b, 2019).
10
RED LIST SUMMARIES
It is reiterated that all taxa that appear in this publication were assessed
for Peninsular Malaysia. We recognize the need to conduct national level
assessments however we are limited by the availability of reliable species
checklist, in particular for non-trees, for Sabah and Sarawak. To date, only
about 61.3% of the trees for Sabah and Sarawak have been revised (Soepadmo
et al., 2014).
Assessors fully or partially contributed to the assessment and/or data that was
used in the assessment. The review of preliminary assessments was undertaken
by local experts and a member of IUCN Global Tree Specialist Group.
A total 1,293 indigenous taxa (82 families) and 60 naturalized taxa were
compiled in this Red List. Of this, 1,292 were assessed and one taxon (Vatica
rassak) is Not Evaluated (NE). Of the taxa assessed, 370 taxa are threatened,
of which 96 taxa (25.95%) are endemic to Peninsular Malaysia. Two endemic
taxa, namely Oreogrammitis crispatula (Polypodiaceae) and Oreogrammitis
kunstleri (Polypodiaceae) are Extinct in Peninsular Malaysia. One taxon, namely
Pisonia grandis (Nyctaginaceae) is Regionally Extinct. Of the 96 endemic taxa,
29 taxa are listed as CR, 31 are EN and 36 are VU (Table 1).
11
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
12
RED LIST SUMMARIES
13
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
Table 2. List of taxa with uplisted and downlisted Red List category.
Family Taxa New Previous Reason
Category Category for
change
A. Taxa uplisted
14
RED LIST SUMMARIES
B. Taxa downlisted
Reasons for change: G−Genuine change (i.e., change in population size, rate of decline or
population range and distribution since the last assessment); N−Non-genuine change (i.e.,
criteria revision, new information, taxonomy change, mistake, incorrect data).
15
16
Table 3. The number of taxa in Peninsular Malaysia, grouped according to family, under respective IUCN categories. Five families
having the largest number of threatened taxa in light red fill and five with highest proportion of threatened taxa are indicated in red
font.
Aristolochiaceae 0 0 5 3 3 2 7 2 0 0 22 55 (50–59)
Aspleniaceae 0 0 0 3 1 2 19 0 0 0 25 16 (16–16)
Balanophoraceae 0 0 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 7 71 (71–71)
Blechnaceae 0 0 1 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 9 44 (44–44)
Bonnetiaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Buxaceae 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 67 (67–67)
Cabombaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 n.a.
Casuarinaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Chloranthaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Chrysobalanaceae 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 2 0 0 17 20 (18–29)
Cibotiaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Family EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NA NE TOTAL Best estimate of percentage of threatened
taxa (Lower estimate–upper estimate)
*family that has no threatened taxon is noted with
n.a.
Cleomaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 n.a.
Clethraceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 n.a.
Convolvulaceae 0 0 1 4 6 7 38 8 15 0 79 20 (17–30)
Cruciferae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 n.a.
Crypteroniaceae 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 4 n.a.
Cryptogrammaceae 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Ctenolophonaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Cucurbitaceae 0 0 0 0 5 3 19 2 2 0 31 19(17–24)
Cyatheaceae 0 0 1 0 2 3 13 2 0 0 21 16 (14–24)
Cycadaceae 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 100
Daphniphyllaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 n.a.
Datiscaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Davalliaceae 0 0 0 0 2 1 10 0 1 0 14 15 (15–15)
Dipteridaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 n.a.
Dipterocarpaceae 0 0 17 37 37 34 42 6 0 1 174 54 (53–56)
Droseraceae 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 50 (33–67)
Elaeocarpaceae 0 0 1 2 10 11 18 2 1 0 45 31 (30–34)
Equisetaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Erythroxylaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 50 (50–50)
Gelsemiaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
RED LIST SUMMARIES
17
18
Family EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NA NE TOTAL Best estimate of percentage of threatened
taxa (Lower estimate–upper estimate)
*family that has no threatened taxon is noted with
n.a.
Goodeniaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Hypodematiaceae 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 4 33 (25–50)
Illiciaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 n.a.
Juglandaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 25 (25–25)
Lecythidaceae 0 0 5 3 7 1 11 2 0 0 29 56 (52–59)
Lomariopsidaceae 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Lycopodiaceae 0 0 2 2 4 1 10 1 0 0 20 42 (40–45)
Lygodiaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 13 (13–13)
Magnoliaceae 0 0 0 2 3 6 2 2 1 0 16 38 (33–47)
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
Malpighiaceae 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 7 33 (29–43)
Marattiaceae 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4 25 (25–25)
Matoniaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 50 (50–50)
Meliaceae 0 0 2 2 9 18 67 8 0 0 106 13 (12–20)
Memecylaceae 0 0 3 1 2 3 23 4 0 0 36 19 (17–28)
Monimiaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Myricaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Myristicaceae 0 0 3 4 8 20 37 0 0 0 72 21 (21–21)
Nelumbonaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 n.a.
Nepenthaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 10 10 (10–10)
Nephrolepidaceae 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 1 0 0 9 13 (11–22)
Family EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NA NE TOTAL Best estimate of percentage of threatened
taxa (Lower estimate–upper estimate)
*family that has no threatened taxon is noted with
n.a.
Nyctaginaceae 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 6 n.a.
Nymphaeaceae 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 20 (20–20)
Nyssaceae 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 7 29 (29–29)
Ochnaceae 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 7 14 (14–14)
Olacaceae 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 0 0 0 11 9(9–9)
Oleandraceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Onagraceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 n.a.
Opiliaceae 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 n.a.
Osmundaceae 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 50 (50–50)
Pandaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 4 n.a.
Parkeriaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 n.a.
Passifloraceae 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 3 0 10 43 (43–43)
Pedaliaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 n.a.
Pentaphylacaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Phytolaccaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 n.a.
Pittosporaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Plagiogyriaceae 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 50 (50–50)
Podocarpaceae 0 0 0 0 2 3 9 1 0 0 15 14 (13–20)
Podostemaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Polypodiaceae 2 0 10 10 16 13 57 14 0 0 122 34 (30–42)
RED LIST SUMMARIES
19
20
Family EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NA NE TOTAL Best estimate of percentage of threatened
taxa (Lower estimate–upper estimate)
*family that has no threatened taxon is noted with
n.a.
Portulacaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 n.a.
Psilotaceae 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 n.a.
Sapindaceae 0 0 1 4 4 4 34 2 1 0 50 19 (18–22)
Schisandraceae 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 n.a.
Schizaeaceae 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 7 14 (14–14)
Selaginellaceae 0 0 1 3 7 4 14 3 0 0 32 38 (34–44)
Sinopteridaceae 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6 33 (33–33)
Symplocaceae 0 0 0 4 7 13 5 1 1 0 31 38 (37–40)
Tetrameristaceae 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
Torricelliaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Trigoniaceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n.a.
Turneraceae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 n.a.
Viscaceae 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 8 13 (13–13)
TOTAL 2 1 77 120 173 213 627 79 60 1 1353
*IUCN categories: EX = Extinct; RE = Regionally Extinct; CR = Critically Endangered; EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened; LC = Least Concern; DD = Data
Deficient; NA = Not Applicable; NE = Not Evaluated.
RED LIST SUMMARIES
Across all families, criterion B is the most commonly used criterion in this
Red List, 299 (80.81%) of the 370 threatened taxa were listed under
criterion B (restricted geographic range) (Figures 4 and 5). Out of this, 76
taxa (25.42%) are endemic to Peninsular Malaysia with 18 taxa known
only from a single location. According to Bachman et al. (2011) and
Newton & Oldfield (2008), distribution data present in herbarium collection
labels are typically the most abundant resource available to experts
undertaking Red List assessments thus there is a tendency to rely on range
(criteria B1 and B2) to list a taxon on the Red List. We had benefited from the
taxonomic revision and had used range estimates based on herbarium
specimens with confidence, but knowing that the data is likely to under-
estimate the actual extent because of collection bias.
As for the other criteria, only 65 taxa (17.57%) were listed under criterion A
which is based on population size reduction. The lack of information on the
population reduction and generation length did not allow criterion A to be
widely used. Only three taxa were threatened under criterion C, namely,
Anisoptera marginata (Dipterocarpaceae), Cycas cantafolia (Cycadaceae)
and Dipterocarpus semivestitus (Dipterocarpaceae). Twenty four (6.49%)
taxa including Ptisana pellucida (Marattiaceae, CR D), Thottea praetermissa
(Aristolochiaceae, VU D2) and Dipterocarpus alatus (Dip terocarpaceae, VU D2)
were threatened under criterion D. No taxon was assessed against criterion E
due to the lack of sufficient data to conduct quantitative analysis and estimate
the probability that the population will become extinct.
Figure 4. Number of threatened taxa listed under each IUCN Red List criterion.
22
RED LIST SUMMARIES
Figure 5. Number of threatened taxa in each family under each of the IUCN
Red List criterion A−D. Families that do not have threatened taxa are excluded.
Seventy nine taxa (6.11%) of the 1292 taxa assessed were listed as DD. Of
this, 16 (20.25%) are endemic to Peninsular Malaysia (Table 4). Polypodiaceae
had the most number of DD taxa with 14 taxa, followed by Convolvulaceae
and Meliaceae with 8 taxa each and Dipterocarpaceae with 6 taxa (Table 3).
Most of the taxa had uncertainties in distribution, i.e., known only from the
type locality and old historical collections, population status and/or unknown
threats. There was inadequate information to make a direct or indirect
assessment of its extinction risk. Many collections made by Father Benedetto
Scortechini and Dr. King’s collectors, who were eminent field botanists and
collectors in the late 19th century, are in this category, including a substantial
number made by H.N. Ridley in the early 20th century.
23
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
FAMILY TAXA
Anisophylleaceae Anisophyllea reticulata
Chrysobalanaceae Atuna latifrons
Kostermanthus malayanus
Clethraceae Clethra symingtonii
Convolvulaceae Erycibe strigosa
Erycibe magnifica
Neuropeltis maingayi var. tomentosa
Dipterocarpaceae Shorea kuantanensis
Vatica cuneata
Vatica spatulata
Elaeocarpaceae Elaeocarpus ngii subsp. curtisii
Lecythidaceae Barringtonia glomerata
Meliaceae Aglaia densitricha
Memecylaceae Memecylon malaccense
Selaginellaceae Selaginella curtisii
Symplocaceae Symplocos crassipes var. crassipes
24
RED LIST SUMMARIES
26
RED LIST SUMMARIES
27
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
Based on this Red List, Pahang had the highest number of threatened taxa
with 198 taxa (20.20%) compared to other states in Peninsular Malaysia
(Figure 6 and Table 6). This was followed by Perak with 166 taxa (18.76%) and
Johor with 131 taxa (18.5%). Both Perak and Johor had one extinct taxon each,
namely Oreogrammitis kunstleri (Polypodiaceae) in Johor and Oreogrammitis
crispatula (Polypodiaceae) in Perak. Pahang and Terengganu had one taxon
assessed as Regionally Extinct (RE), namely Pisonia grandis (Nyctaginaceae).
Among the three states, Pahang and Perak had the highest number of CR taxa
with each having 21 taxa, followed by Johor with 15 CR taxa.
Pahang
Perak
Johor
Selangor
Terengganu
Kedah
Kelantan
Negeri Sembilan
Penang
Melaka
Perlis
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NE
Among the states, Pahang had the highest number of CR taxa with a single
location, i.e., 12 taxa (Table 7) and four of these are endemic. This was followed
by Perak, Terengganu and Johor with 5, 4, 1 endemic taxa respectively. Kedah
had 5 taxa, of which two are endemic. The high number of CR taxa among
endemic taxa that occur in single location is alarming and hence both in situ
and ex situ conservation are needed to protect them from extinction. It is
noted that most of these taxa do not occur in protected areas.
29
30
Table 6. The number of taxa in each state in Peninsular Malaysia under respective IUCN categories. States are arranged in descending
order by number of threatened species.
Forested
Number of
State Land area (ha) area (ha) as EX RE CR EN VU NT LC DD NE Total
threatened taxa (%)
of 2018*
Pahang 3,596,500 2,056,695 0 1 21 65 112 177 588 16 0 980 198 (20.20)
Perak 2,103,800 1,013,479 1 0 21 45 100 149 539 30 0 885 166 (18.76)
Johor 1,916,600 447,753 1 0 15 43 73 99 468 9 0 708 131 (18.50)
Selangor 793,020 251,489 0 0 3 25 70 115 496 2 0 711 98 (13.78)
Terengganu 1,297,400 651,248 0 1 8 25 60 78 409 5 1 587 93 (15.84)
Kedah 942,500 342,431 0 0 7 17 54 87 410 9 0 584 78 (13.36)
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
31
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
32
RED LIST SUMMARIES
33
PLANTS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOL. 1, PART I (2021)
34
RED LIST SUMMARIES
Increasing efforts in collections and inventory can further improve the degree
of rarity and understanding of habitat specialisation and population change.
Rivers et al. (2011) had suggested that for a Red List assessment at least ten
valid records are needed to carry out a range estimate of 90% accuracy.
Figure 7 illustrates the next steps that are necessary to mitigate the extinction
risk of plant taxa, in particular taxa that are threatened in Peninsular Malaysia.
37
38
4.0 SUMMARY OF RED LIST STATUS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIAN PLANTS
The distribution of each indigenous taxon within Peninsular Malaysia is summarized. Presence of respective taxon in each state
was indicated with ( / ). Distribution of non-indigenous taxa (listed as NA = Not Applicable) is not presented. The abbreviations for
each state are as followed: PS = Perlis; KD = Kedah; PN = Penang; KL = Kelantan; TG = Terengganu; PH = Pahang; PK = Perak; SL =
Selangor; NS = Negeri Sembilan; ML = Melaka; JH = Johor.
39
40
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
41
42
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
43
44
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
45
46
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
47
48
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
49
50
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
51
52
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
53
54
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
55
56
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
57
58
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
59
60
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
ferrugineus
Elaeocarpus ferrugineus subsp. Elaeocarpaceae LC Y
/ / / / / / / /
glabrescens
Elaeocarpus floribundus Elaeocarpaceae LC N / / / / / / / /
Elaeocarpus fraseri Elaeocarpaceae NT B2a; D2 Y /
Elaeocarpus grandiflorus Elaeocarpaceae NT B1a+2a N / / /
Elaeocarpus griffithii Elaeocarpaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Elaeocarpus knuthii subsp. cuspidatus Elaeocarpaceae VU B2ab(iii) Y / / / /
Elaeocarpus kunstleri Elaeocarpaceae CR A2c Y / /
Elaeocarpus macrocerus subsp. Elaeocarpaceae NT A4c N
/ / / / / /
macrocerus
Elaeocarpus mastersii Elaeocarpaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
61
62
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
63
64
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
65
66
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
67
68
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
/ /
subalpina
Horsfieldia sucosa subsp. sucosa Myristicaceae NT A4c N / / / / / / / /
Horsfieldia superba Myristicaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Horsfieldia tomentosa Myristicaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Horsfieldia wallichii Myristicaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Hunteria zeylanica Apocynaceae LC N / / / / / / / / / /
Huperzia serrata Lycopodiaceae VU A2c; B2ab(iii) N / / /
Hypodematium glabrius Hypodematiaceae CR B2b(ii)c(iii) N /
Ichnocarpus frutescens Apocynaceae LC N / / / / / / / / /
Illicium peninsulare Illiciaceae LC N / / / /
Illicium ridleyanum Illiciaceae LC Y / / / / / / / /
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
69
70
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
71
72
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
73
74
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
75
76
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
77
78
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
79
80
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
81
82
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
83
84
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
85
86
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
87
88
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
89
90
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
91
92
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
93
94
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
95
96
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
97
98
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
99
100
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
101
102
Taxa Family Peninsular Malaysia Endemic to States
Red List Status Peninsular Malaysia
(Y = Yes; N = No) PS KD PN KL TG PH PK SL NS ML JH
103
LIST OF REFERENCES
Anon. (2014). Laporan Inventori Hutan Nasional Kelima (IHN-5). Jabatan Perhutanan
Semenanjung Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 275 pp.
Anon. (2018). Annual Report of Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia. Jabatan
Perhutanan Semenanjung Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 90 pp.
Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A., de la Torre, J. & Scott, B. (2011). Supporting Red List
Threat Assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool. ZooKeys
150: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
Chan, Y.M. & Tnah, L.H. (2020). Rediscovery of Shorea kuantanensis, a Dipterocarp
believed extinct in Malaysia. Conservation Malaysia Issue No. 31.
Chua, L.S.L. & Saw, L.G. (2006). Malaysia Plant Red List. Guide for Contributors. Forest
Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 28 pp.
Chua, L.S.L., Suhaida, M., Hamidah, M. & Saw, L.G. (2010). Malaysia Plant Red List:
Peninsular Malaysian Dipterocarpaceae. Research Pamphlet No. 129. Forest Research
Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 210 pp.
Chua, L.S.L. (2012). Conservation. In: Kiew, R., Chung, R.C.K., Saw, L.G., Soepadmo,
E. & Boyce, P.C. (eds.), Flora of Peninsular Malaysia: Series II: Seed Plant. Vol. 2. Pp.
3–10. Malayan Forest Records No. 49. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong.
Chua, L.S.L., Nor-Ezzawanis, A.T., Yong, W.S.Y. & Hamidah, M. (2015). Two new species
of Vatica (Dipterocarpaceae) from Peninsular Malaysia. Phytotaxa 222(3): 229–237.
El-Taguri, H. & Latiff, A. (2012). Two New Species and Two New Records of Vatica L.
(Dipterocarpaceae) for Peninsular Malaysia. The Malaysian Forester 75(2): 127–134.
IPNI. (2020). International Plant Names Index. Published on the Internet http://www.
ipni.org. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries and
Australian National Botanic Gardens. [Retrieved 28 May 2020].
IUCN. (2012a). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition.
Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
IUCN. (2012b). Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and
National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. (2019). Guidelines for Using the IUCN
Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and
Petitions Committee. Downloadable from http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/
RedListGuidelines.pdf
Lincoln, R.J., Boxshall, G.A. & Clark, P.F. (1998). A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution and
Systematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 371 pp.
Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources. (2019). A Master List of Protected
Areas in Malaysia – A Tool for National Biodiversity Conservation Management and
Planning. Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 141 pp.
104
Mohd-Nasir, M., Richard, A.M., Nor-Akhirrudin, M., Endot, S. & Latiff, A. (2017). New
Discovery of Shorea kuantanensis Ashton (Dipterocarpaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia.
Malaysian Forester 80: 125–128.
Newton, A.C. & Oldfield, S. (2008). Red Listing the world’s tree species: a review of
recent progress. Endangered Species Research 6: 137–147.
Rivers, M.C., Taylor, L., Brummitt, N.A., Meagher, T.R., Roberts, D.L., & Lughadha, E.N.
(2011). How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species?
Biological Conservation 144(10): 2541–2547.
Saw, L.G. (2004). Tropical forests/Tropical moist forests. In: J. Burley (ed.), Encyclopedia
of Forest Sciences. Pp. 1775–1782. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
SIME DARBY. Jentar Plant-A-Tree. Sime Darby Plantation Berhad. 98 pp.
Soepadmo, E., Saw, L.G., Chung, R.C.K. & Kiew, K. (eds.). (2014). Tree Flora of Sabah
and Sarawak. Vol. 8. 248 pp. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong.
Symington, C.F. (1943). Foresters’ manual of Dipterocarps. Malayan Forest Records
No. 16. Syonan-Hakubutukan, Kuala Lumpur. 244 pp.
Wong, K.M. (1998). Patterns of Plant Endemism and Rarity in Borneo and the Malay
Peninsula: In Peng, C.I. & Lowryii, P.P. (eds.), Rare, threatened, and endangered floras
of Asia and the Pacific Rim. Academia Sinica Monograph Series No. 16: 139–169.
Wyatt-Smith, J. (1963). Manual of Malayan Silviculture of Inland Forest. Malayan
Forest Records No. 23. Vol. 1. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
105
GLOSSARY
Population “The term ‘population’ is used in a specific sense in the Red List Criteria that
is different to its common biological usage. Population is here defined as the
total number of individuals of the taxon. For functional reasons, primarily
owing to differences between life forms, population size is measured as
numbers of mature individuals only. In the case of taxa obligately dependent
on other taxa for all or part of their life cycles, biologically appropriate values
for the host taxon should be used.” (IUCN, 2012a). A population includes all
individuals of any life stages of the taxon throughout its distribution (IUCN,
2012b).
Population size “There are two important aspects of the definition of population size. First,
population size is measured only in terms of mature individuals. Thus, the
interpretation of this definition depends critically on an understanding of
the definition of ‘mature individuals’, which is given and discussed below in
section 4.3. Second, population size is defined as the total number of mature
individuals in all areas. Even if some of the taxon exists in subpopulations
that might be seen as distinct populations in a general biological sense, for
the purposes of the criteria, the total number of mature individuals in all
areas (or all subpopulations) is used to measure the “population size” of the
taxon.” (IUCN, 2012b).
106
APPENDIX: Summary of the five criteria (A–E) used to evaluate if a taxon belongs in
a threatened category (Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable) (available
from the IUCN website (http://www.iucn.org).
107
MALAYSIA RED LIST
Plants of Peninsular Malaysia
Volume 1, Part I
Malaysia Red List: Plant of Peninsular Malaysia, Vol. 1 listed 1,353 taxa
from 90 families, 308 genera comprising 1293 indigenous taxa and 60
non-indigenous taxa from Peninsular Malaysia. This publication consists
of two parts, Part I and Part II. Part I contains Introduction, summary
and analysis of the conservation status of all assessed taxa, and
recommendations. A full list of taxa and their IUCN Peninsular Malaysia
Red List status is also provided for quick reference. Part II includes
taxon assessment information for 1293 indigenous taxa. This Red List
contributes to Target 9 of the National Policy on Biological Diversity 2016–
2025 which aims to prevent the extinction of known threatened species
and to improve their conservation status by 2025.
e ISBN 978-967-2810-02-5