Part of my role is to curate and coordinate our campus grounds and environment teams, as such our recent cyclones and rain have come to be a pain.
However, they have also proven an unrivalled teaching tool for the crew, with many of our formerly planted 200-500L trees finally coming down, years after planting.
This has been a huge supporting factor in our push to use 45-100L trees in new landscapes, and no larger.
The concern, for those not adept in landscaping, is that as an “instant” trees size increases when moving from a 100L up to a 200 or even a 1000L pot, the depth does not comparatively improve.
The result are trees with poorly formed tap roots, their primary anchor, which often last years before the top weight is finally too much.
The other issue, was not excavating the required 2x depth minimum, and expecting new trees to “punch through”.
The final concern being the right tree for the right place, coupled with a past of not properly trimming specimen.
Though the tree hovering over the green walkway was not planted, it shows the issue to having large trees too close to confining infrastructure, creating a costly repair.
Just another learning curve on our organisations path to becoming a Botanic Garden, and one of many we now overcome with new approaches to management and capitol installations.
Zoology & Ecology, Conservationist | ADF Veteran
1yWhere was this trip mate?