Asia | Nuclear decay

The Fukushima disaster was not the turning point many had hoped

Instead of spurring reform, the nuclear accident bred disillusionment

A dirty secret, but not a little one
|IITATE, OKUMA and TOKYO

IN THE HILLY village of Iitate, in Fukushima prefecture, stands a new community centre built with parts pulled from abandoned buildings. Windows from one, doors from another. A chalkboard from a beloved school with no children to attend it. One cloudy day last autumn, a crowd gathered to celebrate its opening. As an elderly woman in a green kimono sang folk tunes, her voice riding a beat or two behind the music, the audience, a mix of locals and Tokyo-ites involved in the centre’s design, feasted on chestnut-filled rice balls.

Iitate is a farming district once known for its fine beef and dried radish. In 2010 it qualified for membership of a club called “Most beautiful villages of Japan”. Yet its recent history has been far from bucolic. Some 35km to the south-east, across the verdant Abukuma mountains, stands the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. Opened in 1971, it was one of dozens built around Japan to power the post-war economy. The government offered municipalities generous subsidies for hosting the plants, and promised people that they posed no risks. By 2011 Japan had 54 working reactors, providing a third of the country’s electricity.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Nuclear decay"

Bouncing back: a safety net for the post-covid world

From the March 4th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Asia

Who could replace Narendra Modi?

A leadership struggle is brewing in India’s ruling party

In South-East Asia, the war in Gaza is roiling emotions

The governments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have responded very differently


India has quietly transformed its ports

That is good for trade, and a good sign for reform