Acta Bot. Croat. 79 (1), 78–86, 2020
DOI: 10.37427/botcro-2020-010
CODEN: ABCRA 25
ISSN 0365-0588
eISSN 1847-8476
Chemical and morphological diversity among wild
populations of Hypericum aviculariifolium Jaub.
et Spach subsp. depilatum (Freyn et Bornm.) N.
Robson var. depilatum
Cuneyt Cirak1*, Aysel Özcan2, Emine Yurteri2, Dursun Kurt1, Fatih Seyis2
1
2
Ondokuz Mayis University, Vocational High School of Bafra, Samsun, Turkey
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Rize, Turkey
Abstract – In this study, the chemical and morphological diversity among eleven wild populations of Hypericum
aviculariifolium Jaub. et Spach subsp. depilatum (Freyn et Bornm.) N. Robson var. depilatum, an endemic Turkish
species was studied. These populations were investigated for their contents of hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the chlorogenic, neochlorogenic, caffeic and 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acids, hyperoside, quercitrin, isoquercitrin, avicularin, 13,118 biapigenin, (+)-catechin and (–)-epicatechin as well as for their morphological traits, including density of leaf light and dark glands, leaf area, leaf length/width ratio and plant height. The top two-thirds
of the plants representing thirty individuals was harvested at full flowering from eleven sites and analyzed for the
content of bioactive compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography after being dried at room temperature. Morphological characterization of the wild populations was performed on twenty randomly selected individuals from each plant-growing locality. The content of the tested compounds, except for caffeic acid and avicularin, and some morphological traits, namely, the density of leaf translucent glands and black nodules and leaf
area varied significantly with the investigated populations. It was observed that hypericin and pseudohypericin
contents were connected positively with leaf black nodule density, but negatively with leaf area and the contents
of hyperforin, quercitrin and 13,118-biapigenin were correlated positively with leaf translucent gland density.
Data presented here could be useful in determining future targets for further wide-ranging studies on this endemic species as well as in identifying superior germplasm in terms of high chemical content.
Keywords: 13,118-biapigenin, chemical and morphological diversity, hyperforin, hypericin, Hypericum aviculariifolium,
phenolic acids, pseudohypericin, quercitrin
Introduction
Hypericum genus (Hypericaceae) includes over 400 species with world-wide distribution and is one of the 100 largest genera including twenty two percentage of angiosperm
variety (Carine and Christenhusz 2010). Among its members, only Hypericum perforatum L. has been investigated
widely so far. This species, herbal preparations of which have
been utilized largely as a medicine in the treatment of mild
to moderate depression, especially over the last three decades (Ng et al. 2017), is considered officinal. Hypericum species are well-known medicinal plants and have been used for
centuries as traditional healing agents owing to their large
number of pharmacological activities. All these species have
traditionally been used for sedative, wound healing, disinfectant and spasmolytic preparations in Turkish folk medicine with the local names of “sarıkantaron, askerotu, kılıç
otu, kanlıot and kuzu kıran”. Turkey is a centre of great extensity for the Hypericum genus and according to Güner et
al. (2012) there are a total of 96 Hypericum taxa in the Turkish flora, of which 46 are endemic. Hypericum aviculariifolium Jaub. et Spach subsp. depilatum (Freyn et Bornm.) N.
Robson var. depilatum [syn. Hypericum origanifolium var.
depilatum (Freyn et Bornm.) N. Robson, sensu WFO 2019]
is one of these endemic species (Davis 1988), growing wild
in arid, stony and limy areas of Northern Turkey. The distri-
* Corresponding author e-mail: kalinor27@gmail.com
78
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
CHEMICAL DIVERSITY AMONG HYPERICUM AVICULARIIFOLIUM POPULATIONS
quercitrin, quercetin and amentoflavone were also reported
significantly to promote the antidepressant (Tusevski et al.
2018), neuroprotective (Silva et al. 2008), antioxidant and
antimicrobial (Zorzetto et al. 2015) activities.
A great number of Hypericum species have been subjected to studies, documenting their chemical content/composition from Turkish flora as well as other growing localities
of the world such as Brazil, Iran, Jordan, Serbia, Italy, Portugal, Tunisia, Peru and Lithuania (Cirak et al. 2016, and
references therein).
Results from the former works revealed significant differences attributed to concentrations of the ingredients among
the various Hypericum species from several taxa (Cirak et
al. 2016); diversified populations of the same species from
various geographic regions (Nogueira et al. 2008), various
phenological stages of the same species (Abreu et al. 2004)
and between various shoots as well, regenerated from the
same in vitro culture (Cellarova et al. 1994). However, the
precise pattern of bioactive compound accumulations inside
and among members of Hypericum genus is not fully understood. It is not explained to what extent the chemical content
and composition bear upon specific genotypes within species. It is also not clarified how far plant geographic origin
affects the spectrum of phytochemicals.
In our previous works, we reported H. aviculariifolium
subsp. depilatum var. depilatum to include hypericins, hyperforins, various flavonoids and phenolics as
hyperoside, quercetine, chlorogenic acid, rutin, isoquercetine and quercitrine (Cirak et
al. 2007b, 2013). However, population variability of the chemical compounds as well
as of morphologic traits has not yet been
studied with respect to the endemic species.
Hence, in the present work, our intention has
been to specify for the first time the regional
variability in the content of hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the chlorogenic,
neochlorogenic, caffeic and 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acids, hyperoside, quercitrin, isoquercitrin, avicularin, (+)-catechin, (–)-epicatechin and 13,118-biapigenin as well as
five morphological traits including light and
dark gland density on leaves, leaf area, leaf
length/width ratio and plant height as well
as the correlations between the chemical and
morphological data among H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum populations from eleven localities in the Middle
Black Sea geographic region of Northern
Turkey. In addition, neochlorogenic, caffeic
and 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acids, 13,118-biapigenin, isoquercitrin, avicularin, (+)-catechin and (–)-epicatechin were not detected
previously in this endemic species. Hereby,
Fig. 1. Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum plant flowering in
we also report the first occurrence of the corits native habitat (a), and its aerial parts with typical dark glands, namely leaves and
responding compounds in H. aviculariifolistems (b), floral buds (c) and flowers (d, e). Dark and translucent glands on leaf under
um subsp. depilatum var. depilatum.
dissecting microscope (f). Scale bars = 5 cm (a) and 1 cm (b–f).
bution range of this endemic species is very localized by its
exogenously dormant seeds (Cirak et al. 2007a). Its shoots
are up to 30 cm in length with yellow inflorescence and typical dark glands on all aerial parts (Fig. 1). Results of recent
studies documenting the antibacterial (Gül et al. 2017) and
antioxidant (Maltas et al. 2013) properties of H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum indicate that this endemic species can be a substitute for widely known H. perforatum L.
Naphthodianthrones, principally represented by hypericin and psudohypericin, the phloroglucinol derivatives adhyperforin and hyperforin, flavonoids such as rutin, hyperoside, quercetin and quercitrin, phenolic acids and essential
oils with a wide range of bioactivities are considered to be
the principal constituents of Hypericum plant taxa (Zhao et
al. 2015). In the past, hypericins were indicated as the main
chemicals responsible for the antidepressant activity of Hypericum extracts; however, recent studies have proved that
antidepressant activity is revealed synergistically by both hypericins and hyperforin (Nabavi et al. 2018). Hyperforin and
its derivatives were also reported to induce antitumor, antiangiogenic and neuroprotective activities (Ma et al. 2018).
Although hyperforin and hypericin have been indicated as
providing essential support to the pharmacological activities of Hypericum-derived products, some other ingredients such as chlorogenic acid, quinic acid, hyperoside, rutin,
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
79
CIRAK C, ÖZCAN A, YURTERI E, KURT D, SEYIS F
Materials and methods
Plant materials
The plant materials were described in our previous studies (see Cirak et al. 2013, Cirak and Bertoli 2013). The species were identified by Dr. Samim Kayikci, Mustafa Kemal
University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Turkey. Voucher specimens were deposited in the
herbarium of Ondokuz Mayis University Vocational High
School of Bafra and the numbers of the voucher specimens
are given in Tab. 1.
Experimental procedures
The aerial parts of H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum
var. depilatum plants exemplify 30 shoots were harvested at
flowering stage from eleven localities in Middle Black Sea
geographic region of Northern Turkey (Tab. 1). The top two
thirds of the plants was reaped between 14:00 pm and 15:00
pm. Conditions on the day of collection were clear and sunny at all sites and temperatures varied between 28 and 30 °C.
The plant materials were dried at room temperature (20 ±
2 °C), and subsequently analyzed for chemical in gredients
by HPLC.
Morphological characterization of plants was made,
as described previously in our previous study (Cirak et al.
2007b), on 20 randomly selected plants from each growing locality according to plant height, leaf dark and translucent gland density, leaf area, and leaf length/width ratio.
Plant height was measured from the flowering crown of the
primary stem to the base of the plant. Leaf area, leaf length/
width ratio and the number of dark and light spheroid nodules, were measured on 10 leaves of each selected plant from
11 different sites. The number of leaf dark and translucent
glands was counted using a dissecting microscope (Fig. 1).
For leaf area and leaf length/width ratio calculations, leaves
were placed on aphotocopier, held flat and secure and copied onto an A3 sheet (at 1:1 ratio). Placom Digital Planimeter (Sokkisha Planimeter Inc., Model KP-90) was utilized
to measure the actual leaf area of the copy. Leaf width (cm)
was measured from tip-to-tip at the widest part of the lamina
and leaf length (cm) was measured from lamina tip to the
point of petiole intersection along the midrib.
Preparation of plant extracts
Air-dried plant material was mechanically ground using a laboratory mill to obtain a homogeneous drug powder. Samples of about 0.1 g (weighed with 0.0001 g precision)
were extracted in 10 mL of 100% methanol by ultrasonication at 40 °C for 60 min in an ultrasonic bath. The prepared
extracts were filtered through a membrane filter with a pore
size of 0.22 µm (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and
kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C until analysis. The extracts for
naphthodianthrones analyses were exposed to light under
xenon lamp (765 W/m2) for 8 min for the photoconversion
of protohypericins into hypericins.
HPLC Analyses and quantification
Separation of the flavanoids and phenolic acids tested
was carried out by using an RP-18 (5 µm, 250 4.0 mm) column in a Shimadzu LC-2030C-3D HPLC device equipped
with a DAD detector. The binary gradient elution method
was used for detection of corresponding compounds. The
mobile phase A consisted of water acidified with 0.3% phosphoric acid as eluent A and acetonitrile containing 0.3%
phosphoric acid as eluent B. The elution profile was used
as following: 0-10 min 10% B, 10-30 min 25% B, 30-38 min
60% B, 38-45 60% B and 45-45.01 min 1% B. Flow rate was
0.6 mL min–1 at 25 °C column temperature. The extract injection volume was 10 µL. The calibration of components
was obtained at 203 – 280 – 320 – 360 nm wavelengths using
5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 ppm standard solutions.
For hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin, the same
device, Shimadzu LC-2030C-3D HPLC equipped with a
DAD detector, was used. Separation of these chemicals was
carried out using an RP-18 (5 µm, 250 4.0 mm) column.
The mobile phase of isocratic solution consisted of ethyl acetate, aqueous 0.1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate solution
was adjusted to pH 2.0 by using phosphoric acid and methanol (39:41:160 v/v). The flow rate was 1 mL min–1 at 40 °C
column temperature. The volume of extract injected was 20
µL. The calibration of components was obtained at wavelengths 207 and 589 nm using 1, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 ppm
standard solutions. Analytical standards used for HPLC
analysis and validation values of the method are shown in
On-line Suppl. Tab. 1. The standards are also described in
On-line Suppl. Tab. 2.
Tab. 1. Geographical data and annual climatic conditions of Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum-growing localities from Northern Turkey. BMYO stands for “Bafra Meslek Yüksekokulu”, Vocational High School of Bafra, Turkey; Popul. - population;
Latit - latitude; Long - longitude Elev - elevation, T - mean annual temperature; P - mean annual precipitation
Collection
Voucher
Popul.
Latit (N) Long (E) Elev (m) T (°C)
P (mm)
Habitat
date
no.
1
June 03, 2018
BMYO # 27/1
40° 54΄
35° 25΄
1053
08.78
765
Rocky and open slopes
2
June 03, 2018
BMYO # 27/2
40° 54΄
35° 38΄
1075
08.52
782
Rocky and open slopes
3
June 03, 2018
BMYO # 27/3
40° 55΄
35° 25΄
1293
08.07
821
Rocky and open slopes
4
June 03, 2018
BMYO # 27/4
40° 55΄
35° 24΄
1452
07.52
875
Rocky and open slopes
5
June 03, 2018
BMYO # 27/5
40° 50΄
35° 09΄
952
09.29
922
Igneous slopes and rock ledges
6
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/6
40° 50΄
35° 10΄
882
11.53
937
Pinus woodland
7
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/7
40° 49΄
35° 09΄
989
10.64
932
Arid pasturelands
8
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/8
40° 45΄
35° 08΄
1243
09.11
856
Stony riverside
9
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/9
40° 45΄
35° 07΄
1373
08.77
872
Stony riverside
10
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/10
40° 45΄
35° 08΄
1262
08.92
727
Stony riverside
11
June 04, 2018
BMYO # 27/11
41° 25΄
36° 58΄
441
12.64
982
Igneous slopes and rock ledges
80
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
CHEMICAL DIVERSITY AMONG HYPERICUM AVICULARIIFOLIUM POPULATIONS
Tab. 2. Mean contents (mg g–1 DM) of different compounds: hypericin (a), pseudohypericin (b), hyperforin (c), chlorogenic acid (d),
neochlorogenic acid (e), caffeic acid (f), 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (g), 13,118-biapigenin (h), hyperoside (i), isoquercitrin (j), quercitrin (k), avicularin (l), (+)-catechin (m), (–)-epicatechin (n) in Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum populations
(Popul.) located in Northern Turkey. Values are means of three replications and those, followed by different small letters in each column
are significantly different (P < 0.01) according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test. Se = standard errors
Popul.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Se
Compounds
a
0.14 d
0.28 c
0.39 b
0.31 c
0.27 c
0.30 c
0.44 b
0.53 a
0.55 a
0.58 a
0.31 c
0.042
b
1.17 d
1.93 c
2.10 c
3.53 b
1.67 d
2.16 c
2.64 c
4.16 a
4.85 a
4.89 a
2.16 c
0.393
c
d
0.25 c 12.13 b
0.21 c
9.91 c
0.07 de 7.64 c
0.11 d
2.11 e
0.15 d
3.45 de
0.03 e
4.47 d
0.01 e
4.56 d
0.27 c 11.81 b
0.34 c
3.31 d
0.65 b
8.86 c
1.63 a 21.71 a
0.140
1.720
e
0.47 c
0.69 b
0.45 c
0.19 e
0.27 d
0.23 de
0.31 d
0.38 c
0.18 e
0.42 c
0.85 a
0.063
f
0.25
0.55
0.26
0.32
0.23
0.25
0.27
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.27
0.027
Data Analysis
Data of secondary metabolites contents and morphological characters of plant material were subjected to one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant differences
among mean values were tested with the Duncan Multiple
Range Test (P < 0.01). Correlation analysis was performed
to clarify the relationship between the chemical and morphological data, and principal component analysis (PCA)
was carried out to elucidate the relationship of investigated
populations regarding the chemical and morphological diversity they exhibited by using the statistical software package XLSTAT2010 Trial Version. PCA analysis is the twodimensional visualization of the position of investigated
accessions relative to each other. The principal components
represent the axes which are the orthogonal projections for
the values representing the highest possible variances in the
case of PC1 and PC2. The obtained data were used to create scatter plot diagrams (Backhaus et al. 1989). Therefore,
a factor analysis was performed, whereby each variable was
used to calculate relationships between variable and investigated factors. Based on the obtained data the cluster dendrogram was created.
Results
Results of the present study indicate that the contents of
hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the chlorogenic, neochlorogenic and 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acids, hyperoside,
quercitrin, isoquercitrin, (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin and
13,118-biapigenin in plants differed greatly by populations (P
< 0.01) whereas caffeic acid and avicularin were accumulated
at similar levels in all growing localities. Plants from population-11 supplied the highest accumulation level of hyperforin, chlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid, 13,118-biapigenin,
(+)-catechin and (–)-epicatechin (1.63, 21.71, 0.85, 2.09, 2.42
and 1.82 mg g–1 DM, respectively) whereas hypericin and
pseudohypericin were yielded in the highest level by plants of
population-10 (0.58 and 4.89 mg g–1 DM, respectively). 2,4-diACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
g
0.26 b
0.42 a
0.09 c
0.14 c
0.11 c
0.09 c
0.09 c
0.58 a
0.12 c
0.29 b
0.22 b
0.048
h
1.30 b
1.46 b
1.29 b
1.09 b
1.58 b
1.21 b
0.98 c
1.59 b
2.01 a
1.97 a
2.09 a
0.179
i
0.11 c
0.24 b
0.73 a
0.01 c
0.01 c
0.36 b
0.01 c
0.38 b
0.13 c
0.44 b
0.29 b
0.068
j
0.51 a
0.63 a
0.38 b
0.15 d
0.16 d
0.29 c
0.24 c
0.42 b
0.22 c
0.41 b
0.45 b
0.046
k
2.53 e
2.97 e
3.65 d
2.16 e
2.34 e
5.93 c
5.00 c
5.42 c
3.85 d
6.57 b
7.10 a
0.534
l
0.65
0.65
0.65
0.64
0.64
0.65
0.64
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.002
m
1.38 b
1.26 b
1.00 bc
0.47 c
0.62 c
0.68 c
0.69 c
1.65 b
0.68 c
1.10 b
2.42 a
0.173
n
1.05 b
0.79 c
0.69 c
0.21 d
0.11 d
0.19 d
0.12 d
1.94 a
0.21 d
1.11 b
1.82 a
0.202
hydroxybenzoic acid and quercitrin were accumulated at significantly higher levels by plants of population-8 (0.58 and
7.10 mg g–1 DM, respectively). The highest accumulation level
of hyperoside and isoquercitrin was reached in plants of population 3 and population 2 (0.73 and 0.63 mg g–1 DM, respectively) (Tab. 2). The present results also indicate that H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum accumulates lower
concentrations of hyperforin, hypericin, psedohypericin, neochlorogenic acid, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, (+)-catechin and
(-)-epicatechin, comparable concentrations of avicularin and
13,118-biapigenin and higher concentrations of chlorogenic
acid, caffeic acid, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid and quercitrin
when compared to H. perforatum, a well known commercial
source of the compounds examined (Tab. 3).
Significant variations (P < 0.01) were also observed in
mean values of leaf dark and translucent gland density and
leaf area among the investigated populations; however, leaf
length/width ratio and plant height did not vary with plant
growing localities (Tab. 4). Results of correlation analysis indicated an evident connection between leaf dark gland density/leaf area and hypericin/pseudohypericin contents of plants
and leaf translucent gland density and hyperforin, quercitrin
and 13,118-biapigenin contents of plants. No significant correlation was determined among the rest of the morphological traits and secondary metabolites tested (On-line Suppl.
Tab. 3).
The number of translucent glands and black nodules on
leaf and leaf area varied considerably with the investigated
populations. Leaf dark gland density was significantly higher in plants of the populations 10, 9 and 8 whose hypericin
and pseudoypericin contents were also found to be significantly higher. In a similar way, population 11, which accumulated the highest hyperforin, quercitrin and 13,118-biapigenin contents, was found to be superior to the others with
respect to leaf translucent gland density. Positive and significant relationships were determined between leaf dark gland
density and hypericin (r2 = 0.86, P < 0.01) / pseudohypercin
81
CIRAK C, ÖZCAN A, YURTERI E, KURT D, SEYIS F
Tab. 3. Comparison of the chemical content (mg g–1 DM) in Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum (in the present
study) and Hypericum perforatum, globally known commercial species of Hypericum genus (compiled from various relevant sources).
Compound
Hyperforin
Hypericin
Psedohypericin
H. aviculariifolium
subsp. depilatum H. perforatum
var. depilatum*
0.21–1.63
0.14–0.58
1.17–4.89
References
8.35–11.50
0.01–2.77
0.05–6.75
Greeson et al. 2001, Maggi et al. 2004, Couceiro et al. 2006
Sirvent et al. 2002, Southwell and Bourke 2001, Bagdonaite et al. 2010
Ayan and Cirak 2008, Bagdonaite et al. 2010, Büter and Büter 2002,
Bagdonaite et al. 2012
Chlorogenic acid
2.11–21.71
1.11–2.19
Maggi et al. 2004, Cirak et al. 2007b, c
Neochlorogenic acid
0.42–0.85
3.34–4.25
Jürgenliemk and Nahrstedt 2002
Caffeic acid
0.23–0.55
<0.01
Patocka 2003, Nahrstedt and Butterweck 1997
2,4–dihydroxybenzoic acid
0.09–0.58
trace
Jürgenliemk and Nahrstedt 2002
Hyperoside
0.01–0.73
2.07–7.69
Maggi et al. 2004, Bagdonaite et al. 2012
Quercitrin
2.16–7.10
0.05–4.77
Martonfi and Repcak 1994, Radusiene et al. 2004
Isoquercitrin
0.22–0.63
3.19–6.99
Jürgenliemk and Nahrstedt 2002
Avicularin
0.64–0.66
0.32–0.96
Wu et al. 2002, Wei et al. 2009
13,118–biapigenin
1.21–2.09
1.78–2.65
Jürgenliemk and Nahrstedt 2002, Nahrstedt and Butterweck 1997
(+)–catechin
0.62–2.42
1.41–8.70
Ploss et al. 2001, Kalogeropoulos et al. 2010
(–)–epicatechin
0.11–1.94
20.6–118.9 Ploss et al. 2001, Kalogeropoulos et al. 2010
*The lowest and highest contents of the corresponding compounds, observed in the present study.
(r2 = 0.92, P < 0.01) contents and leaf translucent gland density
and hyperforin (r2 = 0.75, P < 0.05), quercitrin (r2 = 0.71, P <
0.05) and 13,118-biapigenin (r2 = 0.77, P < 0.05) contents. As
for the leaf area, the highest and lowest values were detected
in population-1 and population-10 (11.38 and 4.82 cm2, respectively) yielding the highest and lowest levels of hypericin and pseudohypericin accumulations. Likewise, the populations producing higher amounts of hyperforin, quercitrin
and 13,118-biapigenin had lower values of leaf area. Leaf area
was found to be negatively correlated with the hypericin (r2 =
0.81, P < 0.01) and pseudohypericin (r2 = 0.86, P < 0.01) contents of plant material.
A two-dimensional (2D) visualization of the relative
position of the phytochemicals tested was created by using
the values of the principal components (the bioactive compounds examined here) relative to the investigated populations. This was provided by utilizing the principal component analysis (PCA). A biplot was created to see the
correlations between samples and the investigated traits. Results of biplot analysis revealed that the investigated populations could clearly be differentiated according to their chemical contents and morphological traits. Populations 3, 4, 5, 6,
7 and 9 were different in plant height and populations 1 and
2 were different with regards to caffeic acid content and leaf
Fig. 2. Principal component analysis biplot showing populations (1–11) and vectors of the chemicals and morphological traits based on
20 samples for each population.
82
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
CHEMICAL DIVERSITY AMONG HYPERICUM AVICULARIIFOLIUM POPULATIONS
Tab. 4. Mean values of the morphological characters evaluated in Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum populations located in Northern Turkey. Values are means of three replications and those, followed by different small letters in each column are
significantly different (P < 0.01) according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test. Se = standard errors.
Population
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Se
Dark glands (per mm2)
0.25 e
0.30 e
0.32 e
0.48 c
0.30 d
0.48 c
0.47 c
0.64 b
0.66 b
0.84 a
0.49 c
0.055
Light glands (per mm2)
5.81 c
5.01 c
4.20 d
4.83 d
5.07 c
4.34 d
3.42 e
6.42 b
6.51 b
6.84 b
7.30 a
0.371
area. With the first two principal components, 68.19% of the
present variation could be explained (Fig. 2).
Further, the investigated populations were differentiated
into two main groups namely, group A including populations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and group B consisting of populations 8, 10, 11, with respect to their chemical contents and
morphological traits on the dendogram, created by biplot
analysis. As shown in Fig. 3, populations 1 and 2 and populations 4 and 7 from group A were found to be similar chemically and morphologically.
Fig. 3. Dendrogram showing the differentiated groups of Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum populations
(Group A represents populations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9; Group
B represents populations 8, 10 and 11) regarding their chemical
contents and morphological traits.
Discussion
Among the factors contributing to the variations in the
phytochemical accumulation in the Hypericum genus, the
geographic origin of plants is of considerable importance as
the main environmental factors of a plant-growing habitat
such as altitude, temperature, soil etc. influencing synthesis
and accumulation of a given bioactive compound were diverse mainly according to the growing sites. The chemical
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
Leaf area (cm2)
11.38 a
10.39 b
8.33 c
6.35 e
10.62 b
7.99 c
6.88 e
7.59 d
5.67 f
4.82 g
7.69 d
0.631
Leaf length/width
2.20
2.71
2.27
2.29
2.11
2.36
2.33
2.04
2.36
2.04
2.30
0.056
Plant height (cm)
35
40
37
38
36
42
41
35
42
39
34
0.878
heterogeneity of Hypericum plants from different origins is
reported to influence the pharmacological activity of plant
extracts significantly and to pose a great risk to the standardization of final Hypericum-derived products (Costa et al.
2016). Hence, there have been many investigations regarding population variability of bioactive compounds from Hypericum species. In H. perforatum L., the most common and
commercially recognized species of the genus, wild populations of Turkey (Cirak et al. 2007c), Canada, Australia, Armenia and Lithuania (Bagdonaite et al. 2010, and references
therein) are shown to yield significantly different amounts
of hyperforin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin. Essential oil
composition is reported to differ significantly in accordance
with the geographic origin of wild accessions of H. pulchrum
L., H. humifusum L., H. perfoliatum L. and H. linarifolium
Vahl. (Nogueira et al. 2008).
Considerable differences were determined in concentrations of hypericins, hyperforin and various phenolics such as
rutin, hyperoside, amentoflavone and quercetin in the four
wild accessions of H. triquetrifolium Turra from Turkey. In a
similar way, eleven populations of H. orientale L. and five wild
populations of H. montbretii Spach and H. lydium Boiss. are
reported to yield different quantities of hypericins, hyperforins, phenolic acids and several flavonoids such as hyperoside, quercetin, amentoflavone, rutin, avicularin isoquercitrin and quercitrin (Cirak et al. 2015, and references therein).
Results of previous studies indicated the geographic origin of plants as a distinct factor influencing the observed
chemical variation among wild Hypericum populations. In a
similar way, we observed significant differences in accumulation levels of 14 bioactive compounds among H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum from eleven geographic
origins in the present work. Two populations of this endemic
species are also reported to yield quantitatively and qualitatively different amounts of essential oil (Cirak and Bertoli
2013). The investigated populations varied with the main
environmental factors creating different growing conditions
as they were located in different places of Northern Turkey
as shown in Table 1. The wide variation observed in accumulation levels of the bioactive compounds tested among
the populations could somewhat be attributed to adaptive
83
CIRAK C, ÖZCAN A, YURTERI E, KURT D, SEYIS F
strategies of wild plants to changing environmental factors.
It is also possible to evaluate the observed chemodiversity
among populations as a result of genetic distinctness, but data on the connection between the genetic and phytochemical
structures in Hypericum spp. is scant and results are typically
contradictory. For example, He and Wang (2013) reported
only a partial correlation between chlorogenic acid, quercetin, rutin and hyperoside concentrations and genetic data
of 12 wild H. perforatum populations from China. However, Tonk et al. (2011) detect significant connections between
hypericin content and random-amplified polymorphic DNA
(RAPD) data for 19 field-grown H. perforatum clones indicating the necessity for further chemical and molecular researches on the genus Hypericum to differentiate exactly the
genetic and environmental effects on the monitored chemical variation among wild populations.
The comparison of eleven wild populations of H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum revealed an intraspecific diversity in the distribution of light and dark glands
corresponding with the accumulation of hypericins, hyperforin, quercitrin and 13,118-biapigenin in the present study.
Hypericum plants are categorized generally by three types
of secretory structures namely, translucent glands, black or
dark nodules and secretory canals (Kimáková et al. 2018).
Among Hypericum chemicals, hypericins are reported to
accumulate most extensively in the black nodules of aerial
parts (Kornfeld et al. 2007) and previous results have proved
the localization of hypericin and pseudohypericin in the
dark glands of plant aerial parts in all species producing hypericins (Kusari et al. 2015, Kuchariková et al. 2016a, b). Besides, the absence of dark glands in aerial parts is described
as an accurate indication of the absence of hypericins in several species of Hypericum such as H. brasiliense Choisy, H.
caprifoliatum Cham. et Schltdl., H. carinatum Griseb. (Ferraz et al. 2002), H. androsaemum L., H. kouytchense Levl.,
H. monogynum L., H. stellatum N. Robson, and H. canariense L. (Kuchariková et al. 2016a). In previous researches,
a close relationship is observed between dark gland number
of leaf and total hypericin content of plants in H. perforatum (Southwell and Campbell, 1991) and H. lydium (Cirak
2006). In accordance with the previous results, we observed
a positive and significant relationship with high r2 values between leaf dark gland density and the plant content of hypericin and pseudohypercin in the present work. We also
detected that plant content of hypericins is negatively correlated with leaf area, as reported by Cirak et al. (2007c) for
H. perforatum. It may be speculated that in the enlargement
of leaf area concludes in a decrease of dark gland density
and that the inverse connection between leaf area and the
content of hypericins might be attributed to this decrease.
As for hyperforin, Soelberg et al. (2007) report that concentrations of the bioactive compound in translucent glands of
leaves surpassed that of original leaves by more than 100%
in H. perforatum. Based on these results, the authors indicate
translucent glands as the main site of hyperforin accumulation as confirmed latterly by Kusari et al. (2015). Hyperforin,
besides, is reported to accumulate primarily in translucent
84
glands of leaves in H. stellatum, H. annulatum Moris, H. androsaemum, H. kouytchense, H. monogynum, H. kalmianum
L., H. balearicum L. and H. canariense (Kuchariková et al.
2016b). However, no attempt has been undertaken so far to
investigate the correlation between number of translucent
glands and content of hyperforin. We report here for the first
time the significant and positive relationship between leaf
translucent gland number and hyperforin accumulation levels which can be useful to explain sites of hyperforin synthesis and function of the bioactive compound within the genus
Hypericum. As opposed to hypericins and hyperforin, it may
not be feasible to ascertain a pattern of localization for flavonoids as data on the localization of them on the aerial parts
are discrepant and vary with species. Hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercetin and quercitrin were accumulated mainly
in leaf dark glands of H. olympicum L., H. perforatum, and
H. rumeliacum Boiss. and rutin was accumulated only in
leaf black nodules of H. maculatum Crantz and H. erectum
Thunb. However quercetin, the most prevalent flavonoid is
reported to localize mainly in leaf translucent glands of H.
rumeliacum (Kusari et al. 2015, Kuchariková et al. 2016a).
Hyperoside and isoquercitrin, interestingly, are also reported to accumulate mainly in leaf translucent glands in H. kalmianum (Kuchariková et al. 2016a). By contrast, hyperoside,
isoquercitrin and quercitrin are accumulated primarily in
both dark and translucent glands in H. humifusum leaves
and quercetin and quercitin were accumulated principally
in translucent glands and non-secretory structures in leaves
of the species, namely, H. androsaemum, H. kouytchense, H.
monogynum, H. stellatum (Kuchariková et al. 2016a). In the
present study, we detected a positive and significant connection between leaf translucent gland density and the content
of quercitrin and 13,118-biapigenin indicating translucent
glands as the main site for the accumulation of corresponding compounds in H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var.
depilatum.
Principal component and cluster analyses are favored
means for characterization of genotypes and their grouping
on similarity. PCA is a beneficial statistical tool for the differentiation of plant materials, giving information on the variation in chemical content/composition of several species. A
combination of the two statistical tools provides broad information of the traits making significant contributions to
genetic diversity in crops. Biplot is another widely utilized
procedure for graphical display of accession groups with the
aim of searching for the relationships among agro-morphological characters in several cultivars (Malik et al. 2014). In
the present study, we used the above mentioned statistical
tools to evaluate the chemical and morphological data of
eleven H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum
populations from Turkish flora.
In conclusion, chemical and morphologic characterizations of wild plant populations seem to be first step to define superior germplasm and to provide improved chemical profiles. Results of the present study indicate substantial
correlations between hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, quercitrin and 13,118-biapigenin contents and densiACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
CHEMICAL DIVERSITY AMONG HYPERICUM AVICULARIIFOLIUM POPULATIONS
ty of leaf dark and translucent glands and leaf area. Thus,
these morphological characters could be utilized as selection criteria in identifying germplasm that is superior with
regard to high contents of the corresponding compounds.
Data presented here could also be useful in determining the
forthcoming goals for further wide-ranging studies on this
endemic species as well as enriching data of current literature on Hypericum chemistry.
References
Abreu, I.N., Porto, A.L.M., Marsaioli, A.J. Mazzafera. P., 2004:
Distrubution of bioactive substances from Hypericum brasiliense during plant growth. Plant Science 167, 949–954.
Ayan, A.K., Cirak, C., 2008: Hypericin and pseudohypericin contents in some Hypericum species growing in Turkey. Pharmaceutical Biology 46, 288–291.
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., Weiber, R., 1989: Multivariate analysis methods. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Bagdonaite, E., Martonfi, P., Repcak, M., Labokas, J., 2010: Variation in the contents of pseudohypericin and hypericin in Hypericum perforatum from Lithuania. Biochemical Systematics
and Ecology 38, 634–640.
Bagdonaite, E., Martonfi, P., Repcak, M., Labokas, J., 2012: Variation in concentrations of major bioactive compounds in Hypericum perforatum L. from Lithuania. Industrial Crops and
Products 35, 302–308.
Büter, K.B., Büter, B., 2002: Ontogenetic variation regarding hypericin and hyperforin levels in four accessions of Hypericum
perforatum L. Journal of Herbs Spices and Medicinal Plants
9, 95–100.
Carine, M.A., Christenhusz, M.J.M., 2010: About this volume,
the monograph of Hypericum by Norman Robson. Phytotaxa 4, 1–4.
Cellarova, E., Daxnerova, Z., Kimáková, K., Haluskova, J., 1994:
The variability of hypericin content in the regenerants of Hypericum perforatum. Acta Biotechnologica 14, 267–274.
Cirak, C., 2006: Hypericin in Hypericum lydium Boiss. growing
in Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 34, 897–899.
Cirak, C., Bertoli, A., 2013: Aromatic profiling of wild and rare
species growing in Turkey, Hypericum aviculariifolium Jaub.
and Spach subsp. depilatum (Freyn and Bornm.: Robson var.
depilatum and Hypericum pruinatum Boiss. and Bal. Natural
Product Research 27, 100–107.
Cirak, C., Kevseroğlu, K., Ayan, A.K., 2007a: Breaking of seed
dormancy in a Turkish endemic Hypericum species: Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum by light
and some pre-soaking treatments. Journal of Arid Environments 68, 159–164.
Cırak, C., Radusiene, J., Janulis, V., Ivanauskas, L., 2007b: Chemical constituents of some Hypericum species growing in Turkey. Journal of Plant Biology 50, 632–635.
Cirak, C., Radusiene, J., Sağlam, B., Janulis, V., 2007c: Variation of
bioactive substances and morphological traits in Hypericum
perforatum populations from Northern Turkey. Biochemical
Systematics and Ecology 35, 403–409.
Cirak, C., Radusiene, J., Camas, N., Çalışkan, Ö., Odabas, M.S.,
2013: Changes in the contents of main secondary metabolites
in two Turkish Hypericum species during plant development.
Pharmaceutical Biology 51, 391–399.
Cirak, C., Radusiene, J., Ivanauskas, L., Jakstas, V., Camas, N.,
2015: Changes in the content of bioactive substances among
Hypericum montbretii Spach (Hypericaceae: populations from
Turkey. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 24, 20–24.
Cirak, C., Radusiene, J., Jakstas, V., Ivanauskas, L., Seyis, F., Yayla,
F., 2016: Secondary metabolites of seven Hypericum species
growing in Turkey. Pharmaceutical Biology 54, 2244–2253.
Costa, J., Campos, B., Amaral, J.S., Nunes, M.E., Oliveira, B.P.P.,
Isabella, M., 2016: HRM analysis targeting ITS1 and matK loci
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020
as potential DNA mini-barcodes for the authentication of Hypericum perforatum and Hypericum androsaemum in herbal
infusions. Food Control 61, 105–114.
Couceiro, M.A., Afreen, F., Zobayed, S.M.A., Kozai, T., 2006:
Variation in concentrations of major bioactive compounds
of St. John's wort: Effects of harvesting time, temperature and
germplasm. Plant Science 170, 128–134.
Davis, P.H., 1988: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands.
Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Ferraz, A., Bordignon, S., Mans, D., Aline Schmitt, A., Ravazzolo,
A.P., von Poser, G.L. 2002: Screening for the presence of hypericins in southern Brazilian species of Hypericum (Guttiferae). Pharmaceutical Biology 40, 294–297.
Greeson, JM., Sanford, B., Monti, D.A., 2001: St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.), a review of the current pharmacological, toxicological and clinical literature. Psychopharmacology 153, 402–414.
Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M., Babaç, M.T., 2012: List
of Turkish flora (Vascular plants). Publication of Nezahat
Gökyiğit Botanical Garden and Flora Research Fondation,
İstanbul. Retrieved December 23, 2019 from http://www.bizimbitkiler.org.tr/v2/hiyerarsi.php?c=Hypericum
Gül, L.B., Özdemir, N., Gül, O., Cirak, C., Çon, A.H., 2017: Bioactive properties and antimicrobial activity of some Hypericum species growing wild in Black Sea region of Turkey. In:
Turker, S., Sahin, A.S., Ertekin, M., Soner, B.C., Unver, A.,
Dogu, S., Akyurek, H.E., Kozan, I. (eds.), Book of Abstract
of the 1st International Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Congress, 1336–1336. Konya, Turkey: Necmettin Erbakan University Publications.
He, M., Wang, Z., 2013: Genetic diversity of Hypericum perforatum collected from the Qinling Mountains of China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 50, 232–239.
Jürgenliemk, G., Nahrstedt, A., 2002: Phenolic Compounds from
Hypericum perforatum. Planta Medica 68, 88–91.
Kalogeropoulos, N., Yannakopoulou, K., Gioxari, A., Chiou, A.,
Makris, D. P., 2010: Polyphenol characterization and encapsulation in β-cyclodextrin of a flavonoid-rich Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort: extract, LWT). Food Science and
Technology 43, 882–889.
Kimáková, K, Petijová L, Bruňáková K, Čellárová E., 2018. Relation between hypericin content and morphometric leaf parameters in Hypericum spp.: A case of cubic degree polynomial function. Plant Science 271, 94–99.
Kornfeld, A., Kaufman, P.B., Lu, C.R., Gibson, D.M., Bolling, S.F.,
Warber, S.L., Chang, S.C., Kirakosyan, A., 2007: The production of hypericins in two selected Hypericum perforatum
shoot cultures is related to differences in black gland structure. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 45, 24–32.
Kuchariková, A., Kusari, S., Sezgin, S., Spiteller, M., Cellárová,
E., 2016a: Occurrence and distribution of phytochemicals in
the leaves of 17 in vitro cultured Hypericum spp. adapted to
outdoor conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1616–15.
Kuchariková, A., Kimáková, K., Janfelt, C., Cellárová, E., 2016b:
Interspecific variation in localization of hypericins and phloroglucinols in the genus Hypericum as revealed by desorption
electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Physiologia Plantarum 157, 2–12.
85
CIRAK C, ÖZCAN A, YURTERI E, KURT D, SEYIS F
Kusari, S., Sezgin, S., Nigutova, K., Cellarova, E., Spiteller, M.,
2015: Spatial chemo-profiling of hypericin and related phytochemicals in Hypericum species using MALDI-HRMS imaging. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 407, 4779–4791.
Ma, L., Pan, X., Zhou, F., Liu, K., Wang, L., 2018: Hyperforin protects against acute cerebral ischemic injury through inhibition of interleukin-17A-mediated microglial activation. Brain
Research 1678, 254–261.
Maggi, F., Ferretti, G., Pocceschi, N., Menghini, L., Ricciutelli, M.,
2004: Morphological, histochemical and phytochemical investigation of the genus Hypericum of the Central Italy. Fitoterapia 75, 702–711.
Malik, R., Sharma, H., Sharma, I., Kundu, S., Verma, A., Sheoran,
S., Kumar, R., Chatrath, R., 2014: Genetic diversity of agromorphological characters in Indian wheat varieties using GT
biplot. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8, 1266–1271.
Maltas, E., Uysal, A., Yildiztugay, E., Aladag, M.O., Yildiz, S.,
Kucukoduk, M., 2013: Investigation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of some Hypericum species. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 22, 862–869.
Martonfi, P., Repcak, M., 1994: Secondary metabolites during
flower ontogenesis of Hypericum perforatum L. Zahradnictvi 21, 37–44.
Nabavi, S.M., Nabavi, S.F., Sureda, A., Caprioli, G., Lannarelli, R.,
Sokeng, A.J.T., Braidy, N., Khanjani, S., Moghaddam, A.H.,
Atanasov, A.G., Daglia, M., Maggi, F., 2018. The water extract of tutsan (Hypericum androsaemum L.) red berries exerts antidepressive-like effects and in vivo antioxidant activity
in a mouse model of post-stroke depression. Biomedicine &
Pharmacotherapy 99, 290–298.
Nahrstedt, A., Butterweck, V., 1997: Biologically active and other
chemical constituents of the herb of Hypericum perforatum
L. Pharmacopsychiatry 30, 129–134.
Ng, Q.X., Venkatanarayanan, N., Ho, C.Y.X., 2017: Clinical use
of Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort: in depression: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 210, 211–221.
Nogueira, T.M.J., Marcelo-Curto, A., Figueiredo, C., Barroso, J.G.,
Pedro, L.G., Rubiolo, P., Bicchi, C., 2008: Chemotaxonomy
of Hypericum genus from Portugal, geographical distribution
and essential oils composition of Hypericum perfoliatum, Hypericum humifusum, Hypericum linarifolium and Hypericum
pulchrum. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36, 40–50.
Patocka, J., 2003: The chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology
of the biologically active constituents of the herb Hypericum
perforatum L. Journal of Applied Biomedicine 1, 61–70.
Ploss, O., Petereit, F., Nahrstedt, A., 2001: Procyanidins from the
herb of Hypericum perforatum. Pharmazie 56, 509–511.
86
Radusiene, J., Bagdonaite, E., Kazlauskas, S., 2004: Morphological
and chemical evaluation on Hypericum perforatum and H. maculatum in Lithuania. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 629, 55–62.
Silva, B., Oliveira, P.J., Dias, A., Malva, J.O., 2008: Quercetin,
kaempferol and biapigenin from Hypericum perforatum are
neuroprotective against excitotoxic insults. Neurotoxicity Research 13, 265–279.
Sirvent, T., Walker, L., Vance, N., Donna, G., 2002: Variation in hypericins from wild populations of Hypericum perforatum L. in
the Pasific Northwest of the U.S.A. Economic Botany 56, 41–49.
Soelberg, J., Jorgensen, L.B., Jager, A.K., 2007: Hyperforin accumulates in the traslucent glands of Hypericum perforatum.
Annals of Botany 99, 1097–1100.
Southwell, I.A., Bourke, C.A., 2001: Seasonal variation in hypericin content of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort). Phytochemistry 56, 437–441.
Southwell, I.A., Campbell, M.H., 1991: Hypericin content variation in Hypericum perforatum L. in Australia. Phytochemistry 30, 475–478.
Tonk, F.A., Giachino, R.R.A., Sönmez, Ç., Yüce, S., Bayram, E.,
Telci, İ., Furan, M.A., 2011: Characterization of various Hypericum perforatum clones by hypericin and RAPD analyses. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 13, 31–37.
Tusevski, O., Krstikj, M., Stanoeva, J.P., Stefova, M., Simic, S.G., 2018:
Phenolic profile and biological activity of Hypericum perforatum
L., Can roots be considered as a new source of natural compounds? South African Journal of Botany 117, 301–310.
Wei, Y., Xie, Q., Donga, W., Ito, Y., 2009: Separation of epigallocatechin and flavonoids from Hypericum perforatum L. byhigh-speed counter-current chromatography and preparativehigh-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of
Chromatography A 1216, 4313–4318.
WFO 2019: Hypericum origanifolium var. depilatum (Freyn et
Bornm.) N. Robson. Retreived December 27, 2019 from
http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000746600.
Wu, Y., Zhou, S.D., Li, P., 2002: Determination of flavonoids in
Hypericum perforatum by HPLC analysis. Yao Xue Xue Bao
2000: 37, 280–282.
Zhao, J., Liu, W., Wang, J., 2015: Recent advances regarding constituents and bioactivities of plants from the genus Hypericum. Chemistry & Biodiversity 12, 309–349.
Zorzetto, C., SAnchez-Mateo, C.C., Rabanal, R.M., Lupidi, G.,
Petrelli, D., Vitali, L.A., Bramucci, M., Quassinti, L., Caprioli,
G., Papa, F., Ricciutelli, M., Sagratini, G., Vittori, S., Maggi, F.,
2015: Phytochemical analysis and in vitro biological activity
of three Hypericum species from the Canary Islands (Hypericum reflexum, Hypericum canariense and Hypericum grandifolium. Fitoterapia 100, 95–109.
ACTA BOT. CROAT. 79 (1), 2020