http://www.diva-portal.org
Postprint
This is the accepted version of a paper published in Taxon. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does
not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.
Citation for the original published paper (version of record):
Swenson, U., Nylinder, S., Munzinger, J. (2013)
Towards a natural classification of Sapotaceae subfamily Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and
Southeast Asia based on nuclear sequence data.
Taxon, 63: 746-770
Access to the published version may require subscription.
N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper.
Permanent link to this version:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-55
DiVA (Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet)
Naturhistoriska riksmuseet
http://www.diva-portal.org
This is a pre-published version of an article appearing in Taxon.
Citation of the original published paper is:
Author(s): Swenson, U., S. Nylinder & J. Munzinger
Year: 2013
Title: Towards a natural classification of Sapotaceae subfamily Chrysophylloideae in Oceania
and Southeast Asia based on nuclear sequence data
Journal/Book: Taxon
Volume and pages: 63: 746–770.
doi:
Access to the published version, if not Open Access, requires subscription to the journal.
Please visit: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax
Towards a natural classification of Sapotaceae subfamily Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and Southeast
Asia based on nuclear sequence data
Ulf Swenson,1 Stephan Nylinder1 & Jérôme Munzinger2
1 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm,
Sweden
2 IRD, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, F-34000 France
Author of correspondence: Ulf Swenson, ulf.swenson@nrm.se
Suggested running title: Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and SE Asia
Abstract Generic limits within subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) from Oceania and Southeast Asia are
reconciled based on a molecular phylogeny. We analysed sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ETS, ITS) and
the nuclear gene RPB2 with BEAST and parsimony jackknifing, using a sample of 168 terminals. Eight
morphological characters were traced on a condensed majority-rule consensus tree to identify diagnostic
character combinations for the genera. Accepted genera with character support are Magodendron, Pichonia,
Planchonella, Pycnandra, Sersalisia, and Van-royena, while Beccariella and Niemeyera require amendment.
Beccariella, a widely distributed group, is an illegitimate later homonym and we propose that the genus
Pleioluma is resurrected in its place. The Australian genus Niemeyera is paraphyletic, but it is rendered
monophyletic by reinstating Amorphospermum for N. antiloga. Beauvisagea, Blabeia, Fontbrunea, and
Krausella are all segregates of Planchonella and rejected, while Wokoia is a later synonym of Pichonia.
Planchonella baillonii, an endemic species of New Caledonia, is the sole member of an old lineage and firmly
placed as the sister to a clade comprising the other congeners. Planchonella sandwicensis, a Hawaiian species,
previously proposed to be a distinct genus, is a member of Planchonella. In the Pacific, P. tahitensis (including
P. grayana) is a polymorphic species, widely distributed and adapted to a wide range of habitats. We provide a
generic key (excluding Xantolis), diagnostic character combinations for all genera, and the necessary taxonomic
combinations for Pichonia, Planchonella, Pleioluma, and Sersalisia to render each genus monophyletic.
Keywords Amorphospermum; Australasia; Ericales; morphology; Pacific Ocean; phylogeny; Pleioluma;
Sapotaceae
Supplementary Material Aligned data matrix is available as Supplementary Data of the online version of this
article (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax).
INTRODUCTION
Sapotaceae are an important component of the rainforests around the world. Its members are readily
identified based on the presence of white latex, malpighiaceous trichomes, simple and entire leaves, and flowers
in fascicles. Natural groups in the family have been difficult to circumscribe because of morphological
homoplasy. Various systems of classification recognizing anything from 53 to 122 genera have been proposed
(Lam, 1939; Aubréville, 1964; Baehni, 1965; Pennington, 1991). Recent phylogenetic analyses using molecular
data, often combined with morphological characters (Anderberg & Swenson, 2003; Smedmark & al., 2006),
have identified three major lineages, which now are formally recognized as subfamilies Chrysophylloideae,
Sapotoideae, and Sarcospermatoideae (Swenson & Anderberg, 2005). Chrysophylloideae are most diverse in
South America and Australasia, Sapotoideae in Africa and Asia, while Sarcospermatoideae are restricted to Asia.
Many systematic and biogeographic problems remain unsolved within each subfamily, and this paper focuses on
systematic issues in the Chrysophylloideae of Oceania and Southeast Asia.
All members of Chrysophylloideae in Australasia form a monophyletic group (Swenson & Anderberg,
2005; Bartish & al., 2005; Swenson & al., 2008b), and molecular dating suggests emergence in the area by the
Early Eocene, some 52 million years ago (Ma), with subsequent radiation, range expansion and multiple
dispersals to New Caledonia (Bartish & al., 2011). Phylogenetic analyses of the Australasian members (Bartish
& al., 2005; Triono & al., 2007; Swenson & al., 2007a) suggest that at least seven lineages can be delineated as
genera, which prompted Swenson & al. (2007a) to recognize Magodendron Vink, Niemeyera F. Muell. and
Pichonia Pierre, and to resurrect the Pouteria Aubl. segregates Beccariella Pierre, Planchonella Pierre,
Sersalisia R. Br. and Van-royena Aubrév. (Fig. 1). However, the phylogenetic study by Swenson & al. (2007a)
revealed several problems: (i) a large polytomy prevented them from conclusive hypotheses about intergeneric
relationships, (ii) Van-royena either grouped with the Australian species Niemeyera antiloga (F. Muell.) T.D.
Penn. or collapsed into a polytomy, and (iii) generic limits remained unclear within an Australian – New
Caledonian clade, the Niemeyera complex.
Generic limits in the Niemeyera complex have been assessed by phylogenetic analyses using nuclear (ETS,
ITS) and chloroplast (trnH–psbA, trnS–G) sequence data, as well as morphology (Swenson & al., 2008a). The
complex included seven genera in the classification by Aubréville (1964, 1967), a number that was decreased to
three by Pennington (1991). Both authors recognized Leptostylis Benth., a genus distinguished by opposite
(rather than alternate) leaves and four sepals (not five or more). There are two strongly supported clades in the
complex, one confined to Australia and another to New Caledonia, the latter with several subclades but with
weak internal node support. Two morphological characters traditionally used for generic recognition in the
Niemeyera complex are the anisomerous flower and the number of stamens inserted opposite each corolla lobe.
Both characters are highly homoplastic and are not diagnostic even for small subclades (Swenson & al., 2008a).
A generic framework based on a monophyletic criterion was proposed that allowed recognition of anywhere
from one to five genera, a framework differing from the concept used by Aubréville or Pennington. Nonetheless,
based on unpublished molecular data and the discovery of several new species, Swenson & Munzinger (2009)
found that a narrow generic concept was untenable and accepted Niemeyera for the species in Australia and
Pycnandra Benth. for the lineage confined to New Caledonia. The New Caledonian subclades were relegated to
subgeneric rank. However, it is still unclear if Leptostylis can be recognized at generic level or if it is better
subsumed in Pycnandra.
Beccariella and Planchonella are usually rainforest trees or shrubs in maquis vegetation. They are widely
distributed in Oceania and Southeast Asia and have convoluted taxonomic histories (Swenson and Morat, 2008;
Swenson and Tehler, 2009). As currently circumscribed, Beccariella includes some 20 species and Planchonella
about 60 species (Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b). Some outdated revisions are available for Malesia, but at that
time the species were distributed among Planchonella (99 spp.; van Royen, 1957), Krausella H.J. Lam (4 spp.;
Herrmann-Erlee & Lam, 1957), and Pouteria (28 spp.; Herrmann-Erlee & van Royen, 1957). Groups were so
poorly delimited that the revision of Pouteria treated taxa that now are firmly placed in Beccariella, Pichonia,
Planchonella, Pycnandra, and Sersalisia (Swenson & al. 2007a; Swenson & Munzinger, 2010a). Pouteria is a
genus restricted to South America (Swenson & al., 2008b). There are no unique synapomorphies for either
Beccariella or Planchonella, but they are distinguished based on character combinations. Common characters of
both genera include flowers with a corolla with staminodes, styles with stigmatic areas visible using a hand lens,
seeds with foliaceous cotyledons, a radicle that extends below the cotyledon commissure, and an endosperm.
Species of Beccariella are identified by areolate leaf venation (tertiaries or quaternaries), stamens inserted in the
middle or near the base of the corolla tube, a fruit with usually one (or two) seed(s), and a linear and shorter seed
scar that often is 50–75% of the length of the seed. Species of Planchonella are recognized by the lack of
areolate leaf venation, stamens that are inserted just below the tube orifice (with a few exceptions), a fruit having
up to five seeds, and a long seed scar that often is linear and covers 90–100% of the seed length. However, in
contention with this, a search (accessed March 2013) in the online World Checklist at the Royal Botanical
Garden, Kew (http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/home.do) for taxa in these genera (and native to Southeast Asia and
Oceania), revealed 17 species of Beccariella, 107 of Planchonella, and 28 of Pouteria, which we believe reflects
an unnatural classification.
Planchonella is the largest and most widely distributed genus of Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and
Southeast Asia. It has a circum-Pacific distribution extending from southern China, Thailand, south to Australia
and New Zealand, into the Pacific to include French Polynesia, Hawaii and back to Taiwan. New Caledonia is
recognized as an important hotspot of biodiversity (Myers & al., 2000; Lowry & al., 2004) and includes almost
40 species of Planchonella (Munzinger & Swenson, 2009). Species of this genus exhibit intriguing traits, such as
a gynomonoecious sexual system (Méndez & Munzinger, 2010), as well as being successful colonizers of the
Pacific islands (Bartish & al., 2005). One New Caledonian endemic species, P. baillonii (Zahlbr.) Dubard, is the
sole member of a lineage that is sister to the entire genus (Swenson & al., 2007a; Triono & al., 2007). This sister
position was maintained in a phylogenetic analysis using nine cpDNA and nrDNA loci (Swenson & al., 2008b),
but the study only included seven species of Planchonella. It is pertinent to address the phylogenetic position of
P. baillonii in a broader context because New Caledonia seems to have been submerged after rifting from
Australia and therefore unavailable for colonization before 37 Ma (Grandcolas & al., 2008), but see Heads
(2008) for an alternative view.
Apart from the species in New Caledonia, few studies have addressed problems concerning the
Planchonella species occurring in the Pacific. Here we will address phylogenetic relationships among taxa found
in Hawaii and French Polynesia. Planchonella sandwicensis (A. Gray) Pierre grows on all main islands of
Hawaii. It is an extremely variable species that has inspired some scholars to recognize up to six different species
(see Wagner & al., 1990). There are two widely different hypotheses on its relationships. Swenson & al. (2007a,
2007b) found a close relationship to taxa in Fiji. In contrast, Triono & al. (2007) found it as the sister species to
subfamily Chrysophylloideae, i.e., a possible member of Sapotoideae or Sarcospermatoideae. If the former is
correct, the species is most probably derived from a common ancestor within the Pacific region, which colonized
Hawaii from islands in the west, but if the latter is true, then the evolutionary lineage ought to be very old and its
origin is more difficult to explain, since the closest relatives are presently found in continental Southeast Asia.
However, the generated sequences by Triono & al. (2007) were never submitted to GenBank
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ last accessed March 2013), making them inaccessible for further testing.
Two Pacific species of Planchonella, P. grayana H. St.John and P. tahitensis (Nadeaud) Pierre ex Dubard
(Fig. 1J), are at odds with all other species of the genus by having stamens inserted near the base of the corolla
tube, rather than below the tube orifice as is diagnostic for the genus (Swenson & al., 2007b). Planchonella
grayana occurs from Vanuatu in the west to Tuamotu (French Polynesia) in the east, while P. tahitensis is
restricted to the Society Islands. Distinct morphological forms have also been described from Tahiti (Fosberg,
1992) or are possibly novel species, for instance from Raiatea (Society Islands). The phylogenetic positions of
these species are of interest due to their odd floral morphology, taxonomic status, and conservation status. The
native flora of the Society Islands, including P. tahitensis (Taputuari & Tchung, 2003; Pouteau & al., 2012), is
under threat from the invasive alien Miconia calvescens DC. (Melastomataceae; Meyer & Florence, 1996).
The present study aims to estimate phylogenetic relationships within Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and
Southeast Asia, excluding the distantly related Asian Xantolis ?? (Anderberg & Swenson, 2003; Swenson &
Anderberg, 2005), by using an extended taxon sample and nrDNA sequence data (ETS, ITS, RPB2), analysed
using Bayesian inference and parsimony jackknifing. Our primary goals are to: (i) resolve the backbone
polytomy; (ii) test the generic concept proposed by Swenson & al. (2007a); (iii) investigate the relationships of
Van-royena and Niemeyera antiloga; (iv) optimize diagnostic morphological characters on the phylogeny; (v)
solve the specific questions pertinent to Planchonella in French Polynesia, P. baillonii in New Caledonia, and P.
sandwicensis in Hawaii; and (vi) make nomenclatural changes as far as possible to obtain monophyletic genera.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nomenclature and taxon sampling. — We follow the subfamily classification of Swenson & Anderberg
(2005). The checklist of Sapotaceae (Govaerts & al., 2001) follows Pennington's (1991) generic classification
and includes a full list of published names, but accepted names are continuously updated online at the World
Checklist of Selected Plant Families, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew (http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/home.do). This
online resource follows the amended classification proposed by Swenson & al. (2007a), which we herein follow
and aim to test.
A total of 168 terminals were selected for this study, including all type species of the genera recognized to
date except for Leptostylis longiflora Benth. (probably conspecific with L. filipes Benth.) and Magodendron
(Appendix 1) as well as the generi-types of two Pouteria segregates: Blabeia Baehni (represented by
Planchonella endlicheri (Montrouz.) Guillaumin) and Fontbrunea Pierre (represented by Pouteria malaccensis
(C.B. Clarke) Baehni). We also included two species of Krausella, one of Beauvisagea Pierre, represented by
Pouteria maclayana (F. Muell.) Baehni (Govaerts & al., 2001), two unplaced species of Chrysophyllum L., and
finally three species of Leptostylis (Aubréville, 1967). The remaining terminals are names to be found online at
the World Checklist resource (accessed March 2013). A few taxa, however, are either novel or impossible to
determine and are therefore indicated by quotation marks. The systematic problem of Planchonella sandwicensis
is addressed using three accessions, two from Oahu and one from Kauai. The problem of French Polynesian
Planchonella is approached with seven accessions collected in Wallis and Futuna (a French territory northeast of
Fiji) and from several archipelagos of French Polynesia (Austral, Society, and Tuamotu Islands). Our sample
includes all accepted species of Beccariella and Niemeyera, 80% of Pichonia and Sersalisia, 72% of Pycnandra,
and 57% of Planchonella. In addition, nine accessions of Pouteria are included that are predicted to belong to
one or the other clade.
When an outgroup is selected it ought to be as closely related as possible, but not necessarily the sister
group to the ingroup, and it need not necessarily include more than one taxon (Nixon & Carpenter, 1993).
Xantolis and the Australasian clade represent Chrysophylloideae in Southeast Asia and Oceania; the latter has
been demonstrated monophyletic in all recent cladistic analyses using morphology and/or molecular evidence
(Bartish & al., 2005, 2011; Swenson & Anderberg; Swenson & al., 2007a, 2008b). Xantolis is sister to the entire
subfamily and strongly diverged from the Australasian taxa, and therefore not an appropriate outgroup. Genera
that form the sister clade to the Australasian taxa are all from South America, a clade that possibly includes the
African genus Aubregrinia Heine. We therefore selected two species of Ecclinusa, a genus suggested to be one
of the closest relatives to the Australasian taxa (Swenson & al., 2008b; Bartish & al., 2011). If any of the
additional taxa included here were not to be member of this clade, they are expected to fall between the outgroup
and the Australasian clade, not within it.
Molecular data. — Selection of molecular markers to provide a sufficient number of informative
characters needs consideration. Different cpDNA regions vary in their relative utility to resolve relationships
within angiosperm families (Shaw & al., 2005, 2007). Broad studies of Sapotaceae have used several coding and
noncoding cpDNA and nrDNA regions with varying success. Of the cpDNA regions used for phylogenetic
estimates (atpβ–rbcL, ndhF, petN–psbM, psbM–trnD, psbB–psbH, rpl20–rps12, trnC–petN, trnH–psbA, trnLtrnF, and trnS-trnG) the average number of informative substitutions is close to 3%, where trnS–trnG has 1%
(Swenson & al. 2008a) and trnH–psbA has 6% informative sites (Swenson & al., 2008b). In contrast, the nrDNA
loci ITS and ETS have proven to be much more useful with some 23–54% informative characters (Bartish & al.,
2005; Swenson & al., 2008b), which is why they were selected for this study.
Plant material for DNA extraction was collected either as silica gel dried leaf material or fragments
removed from herbarium specimens. New sequences of ITS1 and ITS2 were obtained from 61 accessions,
following the protocol for DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing described by Bartish & al. (2005), and
added to 106 previously published sequences. All primers are listed in Table 1. ETS sequences of 122 accessions
were obtained by using two primers, 18S-ETS (Baldwin and Markos, 1998) and Sap-1 (Swenson & al., 2008a),
following the touchdown PCR protocol: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 4 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s,
72°C for 1 min 15 s, 4 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min 15 s, and 32 cycles of 95°C for 30
s, 53°C for 30 s, 72°C 1 min 15 s followed by 72°C for 8 min. Both ITS and ETS may occur in multiple copies
in a genome, which can indicate hybrid origin of a taxon (Poczai and Hyvönen, 2010). We carefully checked the
sequences for double peaks in the proof reading procedure for the presence of multiple copies. Multiple copies of
ETS were detected in eight Planchonella species, all from a clade confined to New Caledonia, i.e. Clade D3b
identified by Swenson & al. (2007b). We decided to exclude these and reduced the clade to three species (P.
glauca, P. lauracea, and P. "Ile Yande") in order to minimize problems related to concerted evolution or lineage
sorting (Álvarez & Wendel, 2003).
We sought to include an additional nuclear marker and selected RPB2, which has proven to be useful for
phylogenetic estimates on high as well as low systematic level (Oxelman & Bremer, 2000; Oxelman & al., 2004;
Eggens & al., 2007). The RPB2 region for 161 accessions was amplified using the primers P6F and P7R (Denton
& al., 1998), and several herein designed primers to obtain sequences around poly-T-regions, followed by the
same PCR protocol described above. Purified products were sequenced using an ABI3130xl Automated DNA
Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA).
Alignment, gap coding, and model testing. — Alignments were performed on each separate sequenced
locus in MAFFT v.6.818b (Katoh & al., 2005) using the L-INS-i predefined parameter settings. Resulting
matrices were imported into MESQUITE (Maddison & Maddison, 2011) and minor manual adjustments were
made to the alignments. Following the method of Simmons and Ochoterena (2000), gaps for each locus were
manually scored as binary characters (present/absent) in separate partitions, disregarding uninformative deletions
or inserts. Each gene partition was tested for the best-fit substitution model using jModelTest (Posada, 2008)
under the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Schwartz 1978; Posada & Buckley, 2004) in order to minimize
the number of substitution rate parameters. Binary data (gaps) were assigned a simple substitution model
allowing unconstrained reversible gains/losses of characters.
Phylogenetic analyses. — Phylogenetic relationships were estimated with Bayesian inference (Rannala &
Yang, 1996; Yang & Rannala, 1997) and parsimony jackknifing (Farris & al., 1996). The aligned matrix was
prepared in BEAUti 1.6.2 (part of the BEAST package) as an output file for Bayesian inference in BEAST 1.6.2
(Drummond & Rambaut, 2007). Each locus was treated as a unique partition. Substitution models were set by
manual modification of the rate parameters. This study used the BEAST package to primarily derive a tree
topology, not divergence time estimates under a molecular clock assumption. The molecular clock was therefore
unconstrained and the root was fixed by using a normal prior with an arbitrary mean (100) and a narrow standard
deviation (0.1). The Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMC) were set to run five times, each for 100 million
generations, to assure independent convergence on all parameters (ESS values >200), sampling trees every
25.000 generations. Convergence and chain mixing were reviewed in Tracer v1.5 (Rambaut & Drummond,
2009). A proportion of the samples in each run were discarded as burn-in, and the posterior set of trees was
summarized in TreeAnnotator 1.6.2 (Drummond & Rambaut, 2007). The resulting tree was then visualized in
FigTree v1.3.1 (Rambaut, 2009).
Jackknife analysis, implemented in PAUP* 4.0 (Swofford, 2002), was also performed on the dataset to
retrieve parsimony support values. The settings were as follows: 1000 jackknife replicates with a single random
addition sequence, TBR branch swapping, collapsing branches of zero length, steepest descent not in effect, and
saving a maximum of 1000 trees in each replicate. The excluded fraction of characters in each replicate was set
to 37%.
Posterior probability (PP) and parsimony jackknife values (JK) below 0.8 and 50%, respectively, are not
reported. We consider PP values of 0.95 or more to be strong indicators of node support, whereas JK values of
50–74% are weak, 75–89% moderate, and 90–100% are considered strong. Nodes that receive less than JK 50%
and below PP 0.8 posterior support are collapsed in the phylogeny with one exception (the plausible position of
Van-royena).
Morphological data. — Morphology is highly homoplastic in Sapotaceae and unique generic
synapomorphies are absent or very rare. Swenson & al. (2007a) proposed that character state combinations ought
to be used for generic recognition. The morphological data used here have been gathered from earlier studies
(Swenson & Anderberg, 2005; Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b, 2008a, 2008b), revisions (van Royen, 1957;
Herrmann-Erlee & Lam, 1957; Herrmann-Erlee & van Royen, 1957) and herbarium material deposited at L,
MO, NOU, P, PAP, and S (abbreviations follow Holmgren & al., 1990). The morphological terminology follows
Harris & Harris (1997). We used MacClade 4.0 (Maddison & Maddison, 2000) to optimize the characters on the
maximum clade credibility tree (MCC) obtained from the BEAST analysis. We then condensed the phylogeny,
opting for genera to be in proportion to the number of the species, and traced eight characters of which seven
have been identified as useful for diagnostic purposes (Swenson & al., 2007a). One character, pubescence on
sepals, is used here for the first time. The condensed tree is designed to comprehensibly visualize the characters.
Character 1. — Tertiary leaf venation has been used for diagnostic purposes with variable success (van Royen,
1957; Pennington, 1991; Triono & al., 2007). A fine areolate venation, formed when higher orders of veins
anastomose and form a closed reticulate pattern, easily observed with a hand lens (Swenson & Munzinger,
2009), is diagnostic for Beccariella, Pichonia, and Sersalisia (Swenson & al., 2007a).
Character 2. — Malpighiaceous trichomes are usually present as an indument on sepals on inner, outer, or both
surfaces, but can also be secondarily lost. Revisional work has demonstrated that the distribution of trichomes
can indicate relationships. For example, sepals of Planchonella and Pycnandra are usually pubescent outside but
glabrous inside (Swenson & al., 2007b; Swenson & Munzinger, 2009), while members of Pichonia usually have
an indument on both sides of the sepals (Swenson & Munzinger, 2012). Thus, presence or absence of trichomes
on the inner surface may be congruent with clades.
Character 3. — The corolla of Sapotaceae is actinomorphic and partly sympetalous, comprising a tube and free
corolla lobes. Depending on the ratio between the length of the corolla tube and the lobes, and the corolla length
versus the calyx length, the corolla can be cup-shaped, urn-shaped, narrowly campanulate, or tubular. This
character is in fact a combination of different features and could be reductively coded for phylogenetic analyses,
but it is also homoplastic (Swenson & Anderberg, 2005; Swenson & al., 2007a, 2008b). There is no doubt that
flower types are frequently difficult to characterize, but we wanted to investigate their potential diagnostic value
as a character. The calyx of a cup-shaped flower is usually less than 50% of the length of the corolla, the corolla
tube is shorter than the lobes, and the lobes are spreading (Fig. 1A, D). The corolla of an urn-shaped flower
usually has a tube and corolla lobes of equal length (or slightly shorter lobes), and the calyx often extends above
the corolla tube orifice (Fig. 1 I–J). A campanulate flower is similar to an urn-shaped and/or a tubular flower, but
the corolla exerts slightly above the sepals and forms a small bell (Fig. 1L). Tubular flowers have a visible
corolla tube, longer than the sepals and clearly longer than the corolla lobes (Fig. 1F–H).
Character 4. — Stamens in Sapotaceae are inserted at different levels in the corolla tube. This character was
important for Aubréville (1964) and less so for Pennington (1991), but has been found to be diagnostic for
monophyletic groups (Swenson & al., 2007a). Hence, stamens are inserted in the tube orifice (Niemeyera,
Pichonia, and Pycnandra), just below the tube orifice (Planchonella), in the middle of the tube or near the
corolla base (Beccariella).
Character 5. — One entire style is always present in Sapotaceae, which may, however, differ at the apex. It has
either visible, small, round stigmatic areas readily identified with a hand lens (Fig. 1F), a character suggested
diagnostic for Beccariella, Planchonella, Sersalisia, and Van-royena (Swenson & al., 2007a). In contrast, if no
stigmatic areas are visible (Fig. 1A), the style apex is termed simple as in Niemeyera, Pichonia, and Pycnandra
(Pennington, 1991; Swenson & Anderberg, 2005).
Character 6–8. — A number of fruit characters show strong congruence and can be amalgamated to three
features: (i) cotyledons foliaceous, having a radicle extending below the cotyledon commissure, endosperm
present; (ii) plano-convex cotyledons without a visible radicle, endosperm absent; and (iii) plano-convex
cotyledons with an exserted radicle, endosperm absent.
RESULTS
Data. — The complete matrix contains 2563 characters, of which 2486 are from aligned nuclear sequences
and 77 are from three partitions of coded gaps (Table 2). ETS is represented by 403 nucleotides of which 198
(49.1%) are parsimony informative, ITS of 914 nucleotides of which 320 (35%) are parsimony informative, and
RPB2 of 1169 nucleotides of which 151 (12.9%) are parsimony informative.
The model test resulted in the selection of TrN+Γ for both ETS and ITS, and TPM1+Γ for RPB2. Initial
analyses revealed nested parameter ranges for ITS and ETS, and the two loci were therefore set to share the
substitution model in order to decrease the total number of parameters.
Tree topology. — Bayesian analysis and parsimony jackknifing of the molecular dataset recovered similar
tree topologies. Taxa not formerly analysed in any phylogenetic context are all recovered with maximum support
within the previously identified Australasian clade. After collapsing nodes with support below the defined
thresholds (0.8 PP and 50% JK), the tree topologies are close to identical (Fig. 2). Polytomies are mainly
restricted to terminal positions in each genus. One deep node receives only moderate JK support (83%) and no
Bayesian support. Similar to previous results, the placements of the Australian Van-royena and the New Guinean
Magodendron are still uncertain, and no other taxon is identified as closely related to these genera which, in
addition, have rather unusual diagnostic character combinations (Swenson & Anderberg, 2005; Swenson & al.,
2007a).
All species included in our analyses were dispersed across six distinct clades with strong Bayesian support
and frequently with moderate or strong jackknife support. Each of these clades include one generic type (from
top to bottom in Figure 2): Beccariella sebertii (Pancher) Pierre, Sersalisia sericea (Aiton) R. Br., Pichonia
balansana Pierre, Niemeyera prunifera (F. Muell.) F. Muell., Pycnandra benthamii Baill., and Planchonella
obovata (R. Br.) Pierre. Embedded in these six clades are species of Chrysophyllum, Krausella, Leptostylis,
Pouteria, and Planchonella (in Beccariella) and the genera can only be rendered monophyletic following
taxonomic transfers. However, Niemeyera is not monophyletic in its present circumscription since N. antiloga is
rendered sister to the two clades corresponding to Niemeyera and Pycnandra. Both genera are strongly
supported, but subclades relegated to subgeneric rank in the latter genus (Swenson & Munzinger, 2009) are all
recovered in a polytomy. All species of Leptostylis and the unplaced Chrysophyllum wagapense Guillaumin
form a clade that is sister, with weak support, to subgenus Sebertia (Pierre ex Engl.) Swenson & Munzinger
(Swenson & Munzinger, 2010a).
Planchonella is largely monophyletic with the exception of four species that are recovered in Beccariella
with strong support. Again, P. baillonii is sister to the entire genus. The unplaced Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii P.
Royen, the Pouteria segregate Krausella, and some species currently placed in Pouteria, are all embedded in
Planchonella. Overall, the clades identified by Swenson & al. (2007b; Clades D1, D2, and D3), are all strongly
supported in this phylogeny and mutual clade relationships find good support. Two widely distributed species in
Southeast Asia, Pouteria maclayana and P. malaccensis, are sisters to Clades D1 and D2. All three accessions of
P. sandwicensis from Hawaii group together within Planchonella, a group with close affinity to taxa from Fiji.
All accessions of P. grayana and P. tahitensis, from Alofi and Futuna in the west to Tuamotu in the east, are
found monophyletic with maximum support, but mutual molecular differences are small and accessions are not
reconciled to species or distribution. One clade circumscribes three accessions of P. linggensis (Burck) Pierre,
one of P. chartacea (F. Muell. ex Benth.) H.J. Lam (Australia), and one of P. solida P. Royen (New Guinea), in
which P. linggensis is polyphyletic.
Optimization of morphology. — Figure 3 shows the eight morphological characters optimized on the
majority-rule consensus tree obtained from the BEAST analysis of nuclear sequences of Chrysophylloideae in
Oceania and Southeast Asia. They show all high congruence with the generic concept proposed by Swenson &
al. (2007a), but some characters still show a degree of homoplasy. This will be discussed below.
DISCUSSION
Overall resolution. — Our phylogenetic analyses based on nuclear sequence data yielded improved
resolution and a better understanding of phylogenetic relationships within Chrysophylloideae (Bartish & al.,
2005; Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b, 2008a; Triono & al., 2007). Exact affinities of Magodendron and Vanroyena remain unclear and both genera, in principle, fall back to an unresolved polytomy. Nevertheless, our
current analyses find no close relationship between Van-royena and Niemeyera antiloga, since the latter is
strongly supported as the sister to Pycnandra and a narrowly defined Niemeyera (Fig. 2). The proposal that
Chrysophyllum and Pouteria are not present in Australasia (Swenson & al., 2007a, 2008b; Swenson &
Munzinger, 2009) finds strong phylogenetic support, because the included taxa are deeply embedded in different
Australasian groups. Instead, for this region, the genera Beccariella, Magodendron, Niemeyera, Pichonia,
Planchonella, Pycnandra, Sersalisia, and Van-royena are reconfirmed, and no other important lineage of the
subfamily is identified. Hence, members currently placed in Chrysophyllum or Pouteria need to be transferred.
Leptostylis need to be relegated to subgeneric level within Pycnandra, and a revision is under preparation.
However, two systematic problems remain to be solved: the polyphyly of Niemeyera and the unresolved
nomenclatural problem concerning the name Beccariella (Swenson & Tehler, 2009; Brummitt, 2011b).
The overall well resolved phylogeny brings to light interesting biogeographic perspectives, such as whether
New Caledonia hosts a relict biota or was submerged about 37 Ma and later emergent (Grandcolas & al., 2008);
and whether the Fijian flora is derived from immigrants from Asia, Australia, and/or New Caledonia (Keppel &
al., 2009) or evolved in situ (Heads, 2006). A detailed biogeographic study of this Australasian-Pacific group
will be addressed elsewhere.
Useful morphological characters. — Morphology has repeatedly been demonstrated to be homoplastic in
Sapotaceae. Examples of traditionally used characters believed useful but shown to be homoplastic include the
number of petals, the number of stamens opposite each corolla lobe, and the ratio between the length of the
corolla tube and the corolla lobes (Swenson & al., 2007a, 2008a, 2008b). Presence of staminodes in Sapotaceae
is a plesiomorphic feature, which has been reduced several times in Chrysophylloideae (Swenson & Anderberg,
2005; Swenson & al., 2008b) and Sapotoideae (Smedmark & al., 2006), but can be diagnostic for less inclusive
groups. Staminodes are present in most Chrysophylloideae in the studied group, but have been reduced once, in
the clade Niemeyera – Pycnandra. Hence, absence of staminodes is diagnostic for this clade. Another useful
character to distinguish between genera is where the flowers are born. All genera, except Magodendron and
Pycnandra, generally have axillary flowers, whereas the former is cauliflorous and the latter is usually
ramiflorous. Apart from morphology, geographic distribution is a very strong indicator of clade affinity, except
in the widespread genera Beccariella, Planchonella, and Sersalisia. In the discussion below of the eight
morphological characters used here, taxon names are ordered as they appear in Fig. 3 (not alphabetically).
Areolate venation is present in all species of Beccariella, Sersalisia, Pichonia, and Magodendron,
including all species of Planchonella and Pouteria that are recovered in these clades (Fig. 3A). In contrast,
members of Van-royena, Niemeyera, Pycnandra and Planchonella always lack areolate venation, and instead
have visible tertiary leaf venation, in agreement with the findings of Triono & al. (2007).
The sepals of most Chrysophylloideae taxa are pubescent on the outer surface, except when the indument is
secondarily lost, but presence or absence of indument on the inner surface seems to contain strong phylogenetic
information (Fig. 3B). In Beccariella and Van-royena, trichomes are always present on the sepals' inner surface,
often covering the entire area and forming a tomentose or even woolly indument. Sepal indument is homoplastic
in Sersalisia and Pichonia, and the sepals of P. balansana, P. deplanchei (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, and P.
lecomtei (Guillaumin) T.D. Penn. are glabrous inside. However, if an indument is present on the inner surface,
the trichomes are usually concentrated in the upper part of the sepals (Swenson & Munzinger, 2012). Sepals of
all other genera are glabrous inside, except in some species scattered in the Planchonella phylogeny (P. australis
(R. Br.) Pierre, P. chartacea, and P. cyclopensis P. Royen), in which the density of indument varies, often even
between sepals in the same flower.
Classification of floral types is partly subjective and sometimes difficult according to the definition above.
Nevertheless, the corolla can be termed narrowly campanulate in Beccariella, Van-royena, and some Sersalisia
(Fig. 3C). A cup-shaped corolla with spreading lobes is characteristic for Pichonia, Magodendron, Niemeyera,
and Pycnandra, and in the two latter the corolla lobes are frequently revolute (Fig. 1A, D). The type of corolla in
Planchonella is generally urn-shaped, where the calyx is more or less as long as, or slightly longer than, the
corolla tube (Fig. 1I–J). Urn-shaped flowers never have spreading or revolute corolla lobes comparable to the
cup-shaped flower. Exceptions to the urn-shaped flower in Planchonella are found in P. baillonii, P. ericiflora
Munzinger & Swenson and P. myrsinoides (Benth.) S.T. Blake ex Francis, species that are scattered across the
genus and have tubular flowers with a well-exposed corolla tube (Fig. 1G–H).
Stamens are inserted opposite the corolla lobes in Sapotaceae, and it has been controversial whether the
insertion point within the corolla tube carries any phylogenetic information. Both Aubréville (1967) and van
Royen (1957) used the character, as opposed to Pennington (1991) who could not find significant correlation
between the insertion point of stamens and other characters, perhaps because his circumscription of Pouteria was
an unnatural amalgamation of different lineages, which obscured character correlations. However, the
phylogenetic study by Swenson & al. (2007a) found strong correlation between stamen insertion and
monophyletic groups. Our analysis agrees with these previous findings, but, again, there are exceptions (Fig.
3D). All species of Beccariella (and Van-royena) have stamens inserted either in the middle or near the base of
the tube. Swenson & al. (2007a) reported that the species from Australia have stamens inserted near the base
whereas those from New Caledonia have the stamens inserted in the middle of the corolla tube. In fact, this
statement needs amendment, since there are species of Beccariella in Australia, New Caledonia, and New
Guinea that have stamens inserted either near the base or in the middle of the corolla tube. However, it is still
valid that no species of Beccariella have stamens inserted in or just below the tube orifice, character states that
are restricted to the other genera under study. Stamen insertion in Van-royena has been reported as basal
(Herrmann-Erlee & Lam, 1957; Aubréville, 1963; Swenson & al., 2007a), but the point of insertion is at or just
above the middle of the corolla tube, while the filament is attached to the tube and run down to the base. In
Sersalisia and Pycnandra the character varies, and exceptions in Pycnandra are P. atrofusca Swenson &
Munzinger, P. benthamii, P. carinocostata Vink, P. fastuosa (Baill.) Vink and P. kaalaensis Aubrév., species
that represent three subgenera and have stamens inserted just below the tube orifice. Leptostylis filipes, which
will be transferred to Pycnandra, has tubular flowers and stamens inserted in the middle of the corolla tube.
Pichonia, Magodendron, and Niemeyera have stamens inserted in the tube orifice. Finally, all except for some
species of Planchonella have stamens inserted just below the tube orifice. Stamens in P. aneityensis
(Guillaumin) H.J. Lam ex P.Royen are inserted in the middle of the corolla tube, and in P. grayana and P.
tahitensis the stamens are inserted at the corolla base, a unique position within the genus. These three taxa are all
found in the same clade of Pacific species.
Styles with several stigmatic areas at the apex, easy to identify with a hand lens, was suggested as an
important character to differentiate Beccariella, Van-royena, Sersalisia, Magodendron, and Planchonella from
the simple style without such clearly visible stigmatic areas in Pichonia, Niemeyera, and Pycnandra (Swenson &
al., 2007a). We found no deviation from this pattern in the sampled species and suggest that this character does
contain strong phylogenetic signal, useful in character combination for circumscribing groups, as well as in the
field (Fig. 3E).
The distribution of foliaceous or plano-convex cotyledons, absence or presence of an exserted radicle, and
absence or presence of an endosperm, are clearly correlated among members of the study group, and are reported
in a single figure (Fig. 3F). Three combinations of the characters are known: (i) seeds of Beccariella and
Planchonella have foliaceous cotyledons, an exserted radicle and an endosperm, (ii) Magodendron has planoconvex cotyledons, an exserted radicle and non-endospermous seeds, and (iii) all other genera have seeds with
plano-convex cotyledons, an included radicle and no endosperm. The character combination for Magodendron is
rare in Chrysophylloideae, only found in Chromolucuma Ducke and Pradosia Liais (Swenson & Anderberg,
2005), and in some species of Pouteria (South America) and Synsepalum (A.DC.) Daniell (Africa) sensu
Pennington (1991).
In summary, despite a high degree of morphological homoplasy in Chrysophylloideae, the characters here
overlaid in the condensed phylogeny show high or full congruence with the identified groups. We believe that
we have now arrived at a stage where unique character combinations can be used to identify natural groups
within Chrysophylloideae present in Oceania and Southeast Asia.
Resurrection of Amorphospermum. — Niemeyera and Amorphospermum F. Muell. were originally
described with one species each, N. prunifera and A. antilogum F. Muell. (Mueller, 1870), hence, these species
are the two generi-types. The genera were described as close relatives, Niemeyera being distinguished by its
berry-like fruit and thin seed coat (testa) in contrast to Amorphospermum with its drupe-like fruit and thick seed
coat. Both genera were later united with Chrysophyllum (Vink, 1958), but Aubréville (1964) resurrected them in
his system of classification, accepting two species in each genus. By contrast, Pennington (1991) accepted
Niemeyera but not Amorphospermum, and considered the seed coat differences to be merely of specific
importance. In fact, Niemeyera sensu Pennington was an unnatural assemblage of Australian species (now in
Niemeyera) and seven taxa from New Caledonia (now Pycnandra; Swenson & Munzinger, 2009, 2010a, 2010c).
Niemeyera antiloga, a species confined to the rainforest of Queensland, was unsatisfactorily accommodated
in Niemeyera, because phylogenetic analyses of nuclear sequences grouped it with Van-royena, in conflict with
combined morphological and molecular data, which grouped it with other species of Niemeyera (Swenson & al.,
2007a). The current phylogenetic study lends strong support to N. antiloga being the sister species of Niemeyera
plus Pycnandra. Our study demonstrates that the circle is now closed and we are back to the generic notion
Mueller (1870) suggested over 140 years ago. Therefore, we propose that Amorphospermum is resurrected,
presently as a monotypic genus. Apart from seed coat differences, Amorphospermum is readily distinguished
based on leaf characters. The texture is never translucent, the upper surface is glossy green while the lower is
paler with a persistent indument, and the tertiary venation is parallel (Fig. 1B). Species of Niemeyera have leaves
of similar colour on both surfaces, are usually glabrescent below, and have horizontal or oblique tertiary leaf
venation (Fig. 1A). Other floral and fruiting characters of Amorphospermum and Niemeyera share many
similarities.
Resurrection of Pleioluma (Baill.) Baehni. — Beccariella is strongly supported as an independent lineage
with maximum Bayesian and jackknife support. This relationship is fully congruent with earlier findings (Bartish
& al., 2005; Swenson & al., 2007a), and Clade C of Triono & al. (2007). The position within the Australasian
Chrysophylloideae is unambiguous but its sister relationship receives only moderate jackknife support. The
clade, however, is readily identified with a character combination of (i) leaves with areolate venation, (ii) sepals
that are pubescent on both surfaces, (iii) presence of staminodes, (iv) stamens inserted in the middle of the
corolla tube or near the base, (v) style with stigmatic areas, and (vi) seeds with foliaceous cotyledons, exserted
radicle, and endosperm (Fig. 3). The genus currently contains about 20 species and another seven species
(Planchonella firma (Miq.) Dubard, P. lamprophylla (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, P. ledermanii (K. Krause) H.J. Lam,
P. moluccana (Burck) H.J. Lam, Pouteria gillsonii Vink, P. richardii (F. Muell.) Baehni and P. wandae Vink)
are here recovered in this clade and need to be transferred to it, but the name Beccariella is a later homonym and
cannot be used (Swenson & Tehler, 2009; Brummitt, 2011b).
When Pierre (1890) described Beccariella in Sapotaceae he was probably unaware of the fact that the name
was already occupied for a fungal genus from Borneo. Hence, Beccariella became a later homonym and
illegitimate already at publication. Subsequent classification systems like Herrmann-Erlee & Lam (1957), van
Royen (1957), Baehni (1965), and Pennington (1991) have not used Beccariella or identified the assemblage as a
natural group. In contrast, Aubréville (1962) resurrected the genus and designated B. sebertii (included in this
study) as the generic type, and since then the name has been used in New Caledonia (Aubréville, 1964, 1967),
but not in Australia or New Guinea. Swenson & Tehler (2009) addressed this nomenclatural problem and
suggested conserving Beccariella Pierre (Sapotaceae) against the rarely used name Beccariella Ces.
(Podoscyphaceae), a proposal the Nomenclatural Committee for Vascular Plants was unable to agree upon
(Brummitt, 2011b). Thus, species belonging to Beccariella (or that clade) are currently left in limbo and need to
be accommodated under a valid name.
Several of the proposed Sapotaceae genera (Albertisiella Pierre ex Aubrév., Bureavella Pierre, Iteiluma
Baill., Peuceluma Baill., and Pyriluma Aubrév.) in Australasia are polyphyletic or embedded in Planchonella
(Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b). Some generic names are still in synonymy with Pouteria (Pennington, 1991;
Govaerts & al., 2001) and could be used instead of Beccariella if the generic type is demonstrated to be a
member of this clade. However, three generi-types are here recovered in Planchonella and cannot be used:
Beauvisagea that is united with Pouteria maclayana (Govaerts & al., 2001), Fontbrunea represented by Pouteria
malaccensis, and Blabeia represented by Planchonella endlicheri (Fig. 2). Three generic names remain to be
explored: Krausella, Pleioluma, and Wokoia Baehni.
The genus Krausella was described by Lam (1932) and believed to include four to six species from New
Guinea, but much of the studied material was incomplete or even sterile (Herrmann-Erlee & Lam, 1957). The
generic type K. polyneura (K. Krause) H.J. Lam is currently classified as Pouteria multinervis T.D. Penn. (see
Pennington, 1991: 202). After receiving permission from Kew Gardens, we removed a leaf fragment from the
type collection of K. polyneura and amplified most of ITS and ETS (unsuccessful with RPB2), as well as all
three markers for K. patentinervia (K. Krause) Erlee. These two species are embedded within Planchonella,
sister to P. torricellensis (K. Schum.) H.J. Lam (Fig. 2). In fact, the sequences of K. polyneura and K.
patentinervia are identical. We are confident that both species are members of Planchonella and not Beccariella
(or any other genus) since, in addition, the leaf venation is not areolate, the sepals are glabrous inside,
staminodes are present, stamens are inserted below the tube orifice, and the styles possess stigmatic areas. Thus,
Krausella is here united with Planchonella.
Pouteria rhopalocarpa P. Royen was described from New Guinea, but its status as a new genus was in
doubt because of a 3-merous flower, staminodes, and a peculiar fruit (van Royen, 1959). In any event, Baehni
(1964) described Wokoia and suggested a close relationship to the Malagasy genus Tsebona Capuron, a member
of tribe Omphalocarpeae sensu Pennington (1991), which is polyphyletic and subsumed in Chrysophylloideae
(Swenson & Anderberg, 2005). However, from the morphological description (van Royen, 1959; Vink, 2002)
and the generic framework here proposed, this species is clearly a member of Pichonia. The leaf venation is
areolate, sepals are glabrous on the inside at the base but tomentose on the upper part, flowers have staminodes,
anthers are inserted in the tube orifice, styles are simple without clear stigmatic areas, and the seeds have planoconvex cotyledons, an included radicle and lack endosperm. We therefore unite Wokoia with Pichonia, which
has nomenclatural priority.
The remaining option to accommodate the species of Beccariella is the genus Pleioluma (Baehni, 1965).
Pleioluma, first described as a section of Sersalisia (Baillon, 1891) and later transferred to a section of
Sideroxylon L. (Engler in Engler & Prantl, 1897), was based on Sideroxylon crebrifolium (Baill.) Engl. and has
never been used in any classification. In fact, Baehni (1965) simultaneously transferred this species to Pouteria
(p. 59) and in the same publication (p. 150) accepted it at generic level as Pleioluma with uncertain relationship.
Regardless of this confusion (his publication appeared after he had deceased), we demonstrate that Sideroxylon
(Beccariella) crebrifolium is deeply nested in the clade called Beccariella and we suggest, in accordance with
Article 11.3 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill & al., 2006), that Pleioluma is used
for this genus since it is the earliest legitimate name available. Indeed, it is an appropriate name since ‘pleio-’ is
of Greek origin and means ‘more’, whereas ‘luma’ (of unclear origin) means ‘cavity’, and could likely refer to
the areolate leaf venation.
Problems in Planchonella. — Planchonella is strongly supported as a monophyletic group. The genus can
be characterized by non-areolate leaf venation, sepals that are generally tomentulose on the outer surface but
glabrous inside, flowers with staminodes and stamens inserted just below the tube orifice, a style with stigmatic
areas, and seeds that have foliaceous cotyledons, an exserted radicle and an endosperm. Exceptions to this
character combination are few. Swenson & al. (2007b) accepted 60 species in Planchonella and another six taxa
are here recovered within the genus. Based on the above diagnostic character combination and available
herbarium material, it is safe to transfer several species that have not been available for molecular analysis (see
below). Hence, Planchonella contains approximately 110 known species, of which some are still to be described,
especially from New Caledonia.
Planchonella baillonii with its tubular, rather than urn-shaped, flowers is again found as sister to the rest of
the genus with strong to moderate support (PP 1; JK 88). We believe the species represents an old evolutionary
lineage, the sole extant member confined to New Caledonia. Planchonella baillonii is also the type species of
Iteiluma, a name rejected in favour of Planchonella (Swenson & Morat, 2008; Brummitt, 2011a), but
considering its phylogenetic position it is possible to recognize a monotypic genus. However, we reject this
solution since P. baillonii possesses the entire set of characters diagnostic for Planchonella.
Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii was described from New Guinea by van Royen (in Vink, 1958) as a close
relative of C. gordoniifolium S. Moore (now in Pycnandra) from New Caledonia, because of similar morphology
and alleged lack of staminodes. However, examination of one bud of the original material reveals presence of
staminodes and the remaining morphology falls within the concept of Planchonella. In addition our analyses
clearly recover it within the genus.
Planchonella sandwicensis is distributed across all main islands of Hawaii forming the north-eastern
outpost of the generic distribution in the Pacific. Triono & al. (2007) used two accessions that were recovered as
sisters, and found sister to the entire subfamily Chrysophylloideae, casting doubt on whether this species is a
member of Planchonella or even the subfamily. They further proposed that P. sandwicensis should be separated
and recognized on generic level. Our analysis of three accessions from Kauai and Oahu found maximum support
of monophyly and the species is retained inside Planchonella, with close affinity to taxa from Fiji, i.e. P. smithii
(P. Royen) A.C. Sm. and P. umbonata (P. Royen) A.C. Sm. This result is consistent with earlier findings using
nrDNA and morphology (Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b). The only reasonable explanation for Triono & al.
(2007) reporting a relationship outside the subfamily is that they possibly sequenced material of Sideroxylon
polynesicum (Hillebr.) Smedmark & Anderb., a species that is somewhat similar in leaf venation, but belongs to
Sapotoideae, not Chrysophylloideae (Smedmark & al., 2006; Smedmark & Anderberg, 2007).
Scattered over the Pacific islands is a polymorphic complex of Planchonella that has puzzled earlier
botanists. Lam (1942) accepted two varieties of Planchonella costata (Endl.) Pierre, a classification that van
Royen (1957) amended and extended to include another two varieties. Smith (1981) in his flora of Fiji accounted
for nine species of Planchonella, in which he treated all former varieties as separate species (P. grayana, P.
smithii, P. umbonata) and relegated P. costata to be restricted to New Zealand and Norfolk Island. The present
sample includes six accessions from Fiji (P. membranacea H.J. Lam, P. smithii, P. umbonata, P. vitiensis
Gillespie, P. "Munzinger 6490", and P. "Munzinger 6514"), as well as P. costata from New Zealand and seven
accessions of P. grayana and P. tahitensis gathered from Futuna in the west to French Polynesia in the east (but
not from Fiji). All of these taxa, except for P. grayana and P. tahitensis, are scattered throughout the
Planchonella phylogeny and their closest relatives are usually from another area. Hence, Smith's (1981) species
concept is easy to reconcile with the molecular phylogeny.
The two species Planchonella grayana and P. tahitensis have caused confusion as to whether one, two, or
several taxa should be recognized (Grant & al., 1974; Smith, 1981; J.-F. Butaud, pers. comm.). In Fiji, P.
grayana occurs from the coast to about 400 m altitude and usually forms trees 6–14 m tall, but can be stunted to
no more than one meter tall if growing on exposed sites (Smith, 1981). In French Polynesia, P. tahitensis occurs
as a small tree or up to 20 m tall, from sea level to 700 m altitude in Raiatea and Tahiti, on calcareous or various
volcanic soils, often in mesic to wet forests (Butaud & al., 2011; Pouteau & al., 2012). All seven accessions
analysed here are recovered in a single, strongly supported clade, with some support for internal resolution, and
all have a unique triple-T-insertion in the ITS sequence (positions 788–790). The clades, however, are
incongruent with species or area (archipelago) of origin. No qualitative morphological characters differ between
the suspected taxa. Both differ from all congeners in that the stamens are inserted near the base of the corolla
tube (not below the tube orifice). The small greenish (Fig. 1J) or somewhat whitish flowers are bisexual or
female, which possibly renders the species gynomonoecious, a sexual system found in Planchonella (Méndez &
Munzinger, 2010). Variable characters are restricted to the size of the foliage and the fruit. For example, leaves
of the sample from Futuna are elliptic and large (16–25 x 7–10 cm) in comparison to narrowly elliptic and small
(7–11 x 2–3 cm) in the closely related sample from Tahiti (P. grayana var. florencei Fosberg). Hence, we are
confident that this is one variable, widely distributed species, adapted to different soils, humidity and altitudes,
but we do not exclude the possibility that a subspecies concept could be applicable. In any event, the correct
name to be used is P. tahitensis.
Planchonella linggensis is a widely distributed species in Malesia and many islands in the Pacific. It grows
in fairly different habitats, such as low altitudinal forests on calcareous soil in Alofi (Wallis and Futuna) and
moist rainforests at about 800 m altitude on ultramafic substrate in New Guinea. Previous phylogenetic analyses
have rendered this species paraphyletic, possibly conspecific with P. chartacea, and it has been suggested to
form a complex of similar species with unclear species limits (Swenson & al., 2007a, 2007b). Here, we included
three accessions of P. linggensis, one each from Futuna, New Guinea and Vanuatu. All accessions group
together with maximum support but are intermingled with P. chartacea and P. solida (Fig. 2, Clade D2). A
cursory inspection of the accessions used reveals morphological similarities but also differences, such as
presence or absence of indument on different organs. A molecular study of a wider sample from different areas,
soil types and altitudes, together with a close examination of the morphology, ought to reveal species limits
within this clade.
Unplaced taxa. — Our present findings make significant progress towards an understanding of the natural
groups within subfamily Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and Southeast Asia, but there are several unplaced taxa
that are still unavailable for molecular analysis and are of special interest. We acknowledge that some of these
problems may remain unresolved because the plants are known from few old collections, often treated with
poison such as mercuric chloride. Because of large-scale deforestation, the relationships among these taxa may
never be known. Here, we mention three examples.
Boerlagella spectabilis (Miq.) H.J. Lam, the generic type of the family Boerlagellaceae (Lam, 1925), is still
an enigmatic taxon. It was originally described from only one leaf and its vein characters, accompanied by a
discussion of the axillary, 5-celled fruit with one seed that has an exserted radicle. This is fragmented
information, but Dubard (1912), as well as Pennington (1991), associated the species with Planchonella (or
Pouteria section Oligotheca). Despite the incomplete material, these characters are in full agreement with the
character combination of Planchonella. Our careful inspection of the available leaf and fruit (type material)
reveals the absence of areolate venation and an overall venation pattern that is similar to P. torricellensis, a
species we predict it is closely related to.
One species from New Guinea, currently classified as Planchonella kaernbachiana (Engl.) H.J. Lam, has a
character combination that is a mixture between Pichonia (sepals pubescent inside, stamens in the tube orifice
and simple style) and Planchonella (non-areolate venation, foliaceous cotyledons and an endosperm). It is
unclear if this taxon is simply another example of the homoplasy typical in Sapotaceae, a taxon of mixed
collections, or if it represents yet another evolutionary lineage in the area.
Pouteria celebica Erlee from Sulawesi (Celebes), collected in rainforest at 800 m altitude, is known only
from incomplete type material (floral buds). The overall morphology is very similar to the frequently cultivated
Neotropical P. multiflora (A.DC.) Eyma. However, the latter has four sepals (Pennington, 1990) rather than five
as in P. celebica (Herrmann-Erlee & van Royen, 1957). Future research will tell if this species represents an
early introduction or an extreme case of parallel evolution.
Towards a natural classification. — The present analyses reconcile earlier findings (Bartish & al., 2005;
Swenson & Anderberg, 2005; Swenson & al., 2007a) and strengthen the conclusion that there are nine lineages
of Chrysophylloideae in Oceania and Southeast Asia (ten with Xantolis) that warrant formal recognition. Below,
we provide a generic key using fertile and leaf material. In addition, each recognized genus is enumerated with
its synonyms, diagnostic character combination, number of recognized species, distribution, and necessary
combinations that render each genus monophyletic. Homotypic and heterotypic synonyms are cited for genera,
but only the basionym and homotypic synonyms are cited for species in order to save space. Type citations
follow the text on the label, or the original description if the type material has not been viewed (n.v.). For more
complete nomenclature, see Govaerts & al. (2001) and the World Checklist at the Royal Botanical Garden
(http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/home.do). On going floristic work in Australia appear in Flora of Australia, but the
volume of Sapotaceae is currently unpublished (L. Jessup, pers. comm.). Typifications of Australian species, if
needed, will appear in this flora. Typification of Pleioluma species occurring in New Caledonia will appear in an
upcoming revision we aim to publish in a near future. A summary of the proposed classification, including new
combinations, is shown in Fig. 4.
Key to the genera of Chrysophylloideae in Southeast Asia and Oceania (excluding Xantolis)
1. Staminodes absent ......................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Staminodes present ........................................................................................................................................ 4
2. Flowers usually along the branches; cotyledons red (or pinkish); New Caledonia ...................... Pycnandra
2. Flowers axillary; cotyledons white; Australia ............................................................................................... 3
3. Leaves below pubescent, not translucent; leaf venation brochidodromous ...................... Amorphospermum
3. Leaves below glabrous or glabrescent (except for veins), ± translucent; leaf venation eucamptodromous .....
................................................................................................................................................... Niemeyera
4. Tertiary or quaternary leaf venation areolate ................................................................................................ 5
4. Tertiary or quaternary leaf venation never areolate ...................................................................................... 8
5. Flowers born on trunk .............................................................................................................. Magodendron
5. Flowers axillary ............................................................................................................................................. 6
6. Stamens inserted in lower half of corolla tube; foliaceous cotyledons .......................................... Pleioluma
6. Stamens inserted in or just below corolla tube orifice; cotyledons plano-convex ........................................ 7
7. Flowers cup-shaped; style simple ..................................................................................................... Pichonia
7. Flowers narrowly campanulate or tubular; style with several stigmatic areas ................................ Sersalisia
8. Stamens inserted just below corolla tube orifice; foliaceous cotyledons .................................. Planchonella
8. Stamens inserted near middle of corolla tube; plano-convex cotyledons .................................... Van-royena
Amorphospermum F. Muell., Fragm. 7: 112 (1870). — Type: Amorphospermum antilogum F. Muell., Fragm. 7:
113 (1870). ≡ Lucuma amorphosperma F.M. Bailey, Queensl. Fl. 3: 955 (1900), nom. illegit. ≡ Sersalisia
antiloga (F. Muell.) Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 89: 508 (1928). ≡ Chrysophyllum antilogum (F. Muell.) Vink,
Blumea 9: 65 (1958). ≡ Niemeyera antiloga (F. Muell.) T.D. Penn., Gen. Sapotac.: 235 (1991). Lectotype
designated by Vink (1958): Australie, Queensland, Thozet s.n., 1870 (MEL n.v.), isolectotype (P!).
Diagnostic character combination. — Leaves pubescent below, not translucent; tertiary leaf venation
parallel, higher venation non-areolate; sepals glabrous inside; flowers axillary, cup-shaped; stamens inserted in
corolla tube orifice; staminodes absent; style simple; cotyledons plano-convex, white; radicle included in
cotyledons; endosperm absent.
A single species in forests of eastern Australia, from New South Wales to Papua New Guinea. There seems
to exist another, as yet undescribed species (L. Jessup, pers. comm.).
Magodendron Vink, Nova Guinea, n.s., 8: 124 (1957). — Type: Magodendron venefici (C.T. White & W.D.
Francis) Vink, Nova Guinea, n.s., 8: 125 (1957). ≡ Achradotypus venefici C.T. White & W.D. Francis,
Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 38: 254 (1927).
Diagnostic character combination. — Leaf venation areolate; sepals glabrous inside; flowers born on
trunk, cup-shaped; stamens inserted in corolla tube orifice; staminodes present, irregularly incised; style with
stigmatic areas; cotyledons plano-convex with a radicle extending below cotyledon commissure; endosperm
absent.
Two species confined to New Guinea (Vink, 1995).
Niemeyera F. Muell., Fragm. 7: 114 (1870), nom. cons. — Type: Niemeyera prunifera (F. Muell.) F. Muell., ≡
Chrysophyllum pruniferum F. Muell.
Diagnostic character combination. — Leaves glabrous or glabrescent below, usually translucent; tertiary
leaf venation oblique, non-areolate; sepals glabrous inside; flowers axillary, cup-shaped; stamens inserted in
corolla tube orifice; staminodes absent; style simple; cotyledons plano-convex, white; radicle included in
cotyledons; endosperm absent.
Three described species and one undescribed species (L. Jessup, pers.comm.), all confined to Australia. No
modern treatment is available, but will appear in Flora of Australia.
Pichonia Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 22 (1890). — Type: Pichonia balansana Pierre.
≡ Epiluma Baill., Hist. Pl. 11: 287 (1891). — Type: Epiluma pyriformis Baill.
= Rhamnoluma Baill., Hist. Pl. 11: 287 (1891). — Type: Rhamnoluma novocaledonica (Engl.) Baill. ≡ Lucuma
novocaledonica Engl.
= Wokoia Baehni, Arch. Sci. 17: 78 (1964). — Type: Wokoia rhopalocarpa (P. Royen) Baehni ≡ Pouteria
rhopalocarpa P. Royen
= Arnanthus Baehni, Arch. Sci. 17: 78 (1964). — Type: Arnanthus balansae Baehni ≡ Chrysophyllum balansae
Baill., nom. illeg.
Diagnostic character combination. — Tertiary leaf venation laxly reticulate, higher venation areolate;
sepals usually pubescent inside in upper part or sometimes glabrous; flowers usually axillary, cup-shaped;
stamens inserted in corolla tube orifice; staminodes present, generally entire; style simple; cotyledons planoconvex, radicle included in cotyledons; endosperm absent.
Twelve known species, of which seven are endemic to New Caledonia (Swenson & Munzinger, 2012) and
five to New Guinea, one reaching as far east as the Solomon Islands.
Pichonia hochreutineri (H.J. Lam) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella hochreutineri H.J. Lam, Boissiera 7:
92 (1943). ≡ Pouteria hochreutineri (H.J. Lam) H.J. Lam, Blumea 5: 337 (1943). Holotype: New Guinea,
Boridi, c. 1400 ft alt., 9.IX.1935, C. E. Carr 13023 (L!), isotypes (BM!, K!, SING!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pichonia rhopalocarpa (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria rhopalocarpa P. Royen, Nova Guinea, n.s.,
10: 134 (1959). ≡ Wokoia rhopalocarpa (P. Royen) Baehni, Arch. Sci 17 (1): 78 (1964). Holotype: West
New Guinea, Manokwari District, Oransbari, alt. 50 m, 11.X.1955, R. P. Mangold 51 (L!), isotype (MAN
n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 34 (1890), nom. cons. — Type: Planchonella obovata (R. Br.) Pierre ≡
Sersalisia obovata R. Br.
= Iteiluma Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 892 (1890), nom. rej. — Type: Iteiluma baillonii (Zahlbr.)
Baill. ≡ Lucuma baillonii Zahlbr. ≡ Poissonella Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 29 (1890).
= Peuceluma Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 895 (1890), nom. rej. — Type: Peuceluma pinifolia Baill.
= Beauvisagea Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 15 (1890). — Type: Beauvisagea pomifera Zippel ex Baill.
= Bureavella Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 16 (1890). — Type: Bureavella maclayana (F. Muell.) Pierre. ≡ Bassia
maclayana F. Muell.
= Fontbrunea Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 31 (1890). — Type: Fontbrunea malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Pierre ≡
Sideroxylon malaccense C.B. Clarke
= Krausella H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 566 (1932). — Type: Krausella polyneura (K. Krause) H.J. Lam ≡
Sideroxylon polyneurum K. Krause
= Albertisiella Pierre ex Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 4: 42 (1964). — Type: Albertisiella novoguineensis (Vink)
Aubrév. ≡ Chrysophyllum novoguineense Vink
= Blabeia Baehni, Arch. Sci. 17 (1): 77 (1964). — Type: Blabeia endlicheri (Montrouz.) Baehni ≡ Sapota
endlicheri Montrouz.
= Pyriluma Aubrév., Fl. Nouv.-Caléd. 1: 83 (1967). — Type: Pyriluma sphaerocarpa (Baill.) Aubrév. ≡
Sideroxylon sphaerocarpa Baill. in Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 891. 1890.
Diagnostic character combination. — Tertiary leaf venation usually reticulate or oblique, higher venation
non-areolate; sepals glabrous inside or rarely pubescent to varying degree; flowers usually axillary, urn-shaped
or rarely tubular; stamens inserted just below corolla tube orifice, rarely in middle of tube or near base;
staminodes present, usually entire; style with stigmatic areas; cotyledons foliaceous with a radicle extending
below cotyledon commissure; endosperm present.
Planchonella is the largest genus of Chrysophylloideae in the Old World with approximately 110 known
species. Several species in New Caledonia and the west Pacific Islands remain to be described (or resurrected).
Planchonella is distributed from Thailand and southern China in the north, through Malesia, Australia, New
Caledonia, and on to the Pacific Islands, reaching French Polynesia and Hawaii. The highest diversity is in New
Caledonia (c. 40 spp.), followed by New Guinea (c. 30 spp.), and Australia (12 spp.). No modern revision is
available, but see Aubréville (1967) for New Caledonia and Swenson & al. (2007b) for an amended generic
description.
Note. — Planchonella is conserved against Iteiluma and Peuceluma (Swenson & Morat, 2008; Brummitt,
2011a). However, Pierre (1890) described Planchonella, Beauvisagea, Bureavella, and Fontbrunea in the same
publication, i.e., four competing names with equal priority. Swenson & al. (2007a) found Bureavella to be
embedded in Planchonella and chose the latter over the former. Since no choice has been made between
Planchonella, Beauvisagea, and Fontbrunea, we choose, in accordance with Article 11.5 of the International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill & al., 2006), Planchonella over Beauvisagea and Fontbrunea, as the
latter two have never (or very rarely) been used, and therefore the choice requires fewer new combinations,
retaining nomenclatural stability.
Planchonella forbesii (S. Moore) H.J. Lam, Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 217 (1925). ≡ Sideroxylon
forbesii S. Moore, J. Bot. 61 (Suppl.): 30 [June] (1923). ≡ Pouteria forbesii (S. Moore) Baehni, Candollea
9: 408 (1942). ≡ Krausella forbesii (S. Moore) H.J. Lam, Boissiera 7: 92 (1943).
— Holotype: New
Guinea, Sogeri Region, Mt. Wori-Wori, alt. 5000 ft, 1885-6, H. O. Forbes 756 (MEL n.v.), isotypes (E!, FI
n.v, L!, K!).
= Sideroxylon patentinervium K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 58: 474 [November] (1923). ≡ Krausella
patentinervia (K. Krause) Erlee, Blumea 8: 448 (1957). — Lectotype designated by Herrmann-Erlee &
Lam (1957): Kaiser-Wilhelmsland [New Guinea], Kani Geberges, 1000 m alt., 31 October 1907, R.
Schlechter 16746 (P!).
Note. — We used an accession determined as Krausella patentinervia. A careful examination of the types
and additional material reveals that the leaf characters used by Herrman-Erlee and Lam (1957) to distinguish the
above species are overlapping and the two are better conceived as conspecific, but different from the generic
type K. polyneura. The name Sideroxylon forbesii was published a few months before S. patentinervium and has
priority. We mention this here in order to avoid an unnecessary combination. Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella garcinioides (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon garcinioides K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb.
Syst. 58: 477 (1923). ≡ Lucuma garcinioides (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 568 (1932). ≡
Pouteria garcinioides (K. Krause) Baehni, Candollea 9: 338 (1942). — Lectotype designated by Vink
(2002): Neu Guinea, Sepik-Gebiet, im alluvial wald am Sepik, beim Larger Malu, alt. 20-40 m, I.1913,
Ledermann 10728 (L!) (holotype in B, destroyed).
= Planchonella solida P. Royen, Blumea 8: 404, 433 (1957). — Holotype: New Guinea, Yalu, near Lae,
5.III.1950, D. Fryar 3344 (SING!), isotype (L!, LAE n.v.).
Note. — Herrmann-Erlee and van Royen (1957), in their revision of Pouteria, repeated the original Latin
description of Pouteria garcinioides since no material was available and the type in Berlin was destroyed during
World War II. Simultaneously, van Royen (1957) described Planchonella solida, but Wim Vink (Leiden) united
these two species in an unpublished record. We have used an accession of P. solida, but this species should be
united with Sideroxylon garcinioides, a name that has priority but needs to be combined with Planchonella.
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella lamii P. Royen, Blumea 8: 398, 432 (1957). — Holotype: Amboina, near Sirimau, 450 m alt.,
11.II.1930, NIFS bb 14283 (L!).
= Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii P. Royen, Blumea 9: 74 (1958). — Holotype: New Guinea, Alola, alt. 2000 m, C.
E. Carr 14159 (L!), isotype (BM n.v.).
Distribution: Maluku Islands, New Guinea.
Note. — We sequenced an accession determined as Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii, but an examination of the
available material of this species and Planchonella lamii shows that they are conspecific and should be united.
Planchonella maclayana (F. Muell.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Bassia maclayana F. Muell., Vict. Chem. &
Druggist 7 (April): 93 (1885). ≡ Illipe maclayana (F. Muell.) F. Muell., Descr. Notes Papuan Pl. 2 (6): 12 (1885).
≡ Bureavella maclayana (F. Muell.) Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 16 (1890). ≡ Lucuma maclayana (F. Muell.) H.J.
Lam, Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 22 (1925). ≡ Pouteria maclayana (F. Muell.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 307
(1942).
— Type: New Guinea, Miklouho-Maclay (MEL!, P!).
Distribution: Widespread in Malesia, Solomon Islands.
Planchonella macrantha (Merr.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon macranthum Merr., Publ. Bur. Sci. Gov.
Lab. 35: 56 (1905 publ. 1906). ≡ Lucuma macrantha (Merr.) H.J. Lam, Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7:
225 (1925). ≡ Pouteria macrantha (Merr.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 328 (1942). ≡ Bureavella macrantha
(Merr.) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 331 (1963).
— Holotype: Philippines, Luzon, Province Bataan,
Lamoa River, Mt. Mariveles, March 1905, T. E. Borden 21736 (= Forestry Bureau 2741) (PNH, destroyed),
isotypes (BO!, K!, SING!, US!).
Distribution: Philippines to Maluku.
Planchonella malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon malaccense C.B. Clarke in J.D.
Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 3: 537 (1882). ≡ Fontbrunea malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 31
(1890). ≡ Lucuma malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 19 (1912). ≡
Pouteria malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Baehni, Candollea 9: 302 (1942). ≡ Xantolis malaccensis (C.B. Clarke)
Baehni, Boissiera 11: 23 (1965).
— Holotype: Malaya, 1871, A. C. Maingay 994 (SING!), isotypes (K!,
L!, P!).
Widely distributed: Thailand, Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Sulawesi, Borneo and New Guinea.
Planchonella menait (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria menait Vink, Blumea 47: 131 (2002).
—
Holotype: Papua New Guinea, East Sepik Province, Hunstein Range (Mt. Samsai), at the site ”Camp 3” on
slopes above the main streamcourse, 450 m alt., 04°29S, 142°41’E, 19.VII.1990, W. Takeuchi 6276 (L!),
isotype (L!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella orkor (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria orkor Vink, Blumea 47: 134 (2002).
— Holotype:
New Guinea, Saidor Subdistrict, Naho-Rawa, Budemu, 4150 ft alt., 24.X.1964, C. D. Sayers NGF 21329
(L!), isotypes (BM!, LAE n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella paucinervia (Erlee) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria paucinervia Erlee, Blumea 8: 503 (1957).
— Holotype: Indonesia, Sumatra, Riouw District, Indragiri, Moeata Pedjanki, 11.IV.1939, P. Buwalda
6503 (L!), isotypes (A n.v., BO n.v., PNH!, SING!).
Distribution: Malay Peninsula, Sumatra.
Planchonella polyneura (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon polyneurum K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb.
Syst. 58: 475 (1923). ≡ Krausella polyneura (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 567 (1932). ≡
Pouteria multinervis T.D. Penn., Gen. Sapotac.: 202 (1991).
— Lectotype selected by Herrmann-Erlee &
Lam (1957): Deutsch-Neuguinea, Sepikgebiet, Ledermann 9054 (K!), isolectotype (SING!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella pullenii (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria pullenii Vink, Blumea 47: 98 (2002).
—
Holotype: New Guinea, Milne Bay District, Baniara Subdistrict, south of Opanabu village, 149°43’E,
10°01’S, 600-700 m alt., 16.VII.1969, A. Kanis 1243 (L!), isotypes (A n.v., BRI n.v., CANB n.v., CHR
n.v., K n.v., LAE n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Planchonella ridsdalei (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria ridsdalei Vink, Blumea 47: 136 (2002). —
Holotype: Philippines, Mindoro, Mt. Halcon area near Paitan, Dulangan Range, 13°12’N, 121°12 E,
8.V.1986, C. E. Ridsdale 1695 (L!), isotype (K!).
Distribution: Philippines.
Planchonella stellibacca (J F. Maxwell) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria stellibacca J.F. Maxwell, Nat. Hist.
Bull Siam Soc. 50: 90 (2002).
— Holotype: Thailand, Nakhon Nayok Province, Muang District, Khao Yai
National Park, 14°24.5’N, 101°23’E, Klong Sai area, 760 m alt., 8.III.2001, P. Charoenchai 1024 (CMU
n.v.), isotypes (A n.v., BHF n.v., CAS n.v., L!).
Distribution: Borneo, Thailand.
Planchonella villamilii (Merr.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon villamilii Merr., Philipp. J. Sci., C 10: 59
(1915). ≡ Pouteria villamilii (Merr.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 318 (1942). ≡ Bureavella villamilii (Merr.)
Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 331 (1963). — Holotype: Philippines, Luzon, Province of Laguna, VI.1913, A.
Villamil, Forest Bureau 19762 (PNH, not found), isotype (US!).
Distribution: Philippines.
Planchonella whitmorei (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria whitmorei Vink, Blumea 47: 142 (2002).
Holotype: Solomon Islands, south Vella Lavella Island, Oula River area, 14.VIII.1968, C. Kotali & al.
BSIP 11182 (L!).
Distribution: Solomon Islands.
Pleioluma (Baill.) Baehni, Boissiera 11: 150 (1965). ≡ Sersalisia section Pleioluma Baill., Hist. Pl. 11: 280
(Sept.-Oct. 1891). — Type: Pleioluma crebrifolia (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger ≡ Lucuma crebrifolia
Baill. = Beccariella Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 30 (1890), nom. illeg., non Beccariella Ces. in Atti. Reale
Accad. Sci. Fis. 8: 9 (1879). — Type: Beccariella sebertii (Pancher) Pierre ≡ Chrysophyllum sebertii
Pancher
Diagnostic character combination. — Leaf venation areolate; sepals pubescent inside; flowers usually
axillary, narrowly campanulate; stamens inserted in middle or at base of corolla tube; staminodes present,
usually entire; style with stigmatic areas; cotyledons foliaceous with a radicle extending below cotyledon
commissure; endosperm present.
About 30 species are here attributed to Pleioluma, but several species are to be described from New
Caledonia and New Guinea. The highest diversity is in New Guinea (14 spp.) and New Caledonia (13 spp.),
extending to Malesia and Southeast Asia. The only available treatment, then under Beccariella, is in the flora of
New Caledonia by Aubréville (1967).
Pleioluma azou (P. Royen) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella azou P. Royen, Blumea 8: 308,
428 (1957). ≡ Beccariella azou (P. Royen) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193 (1962). — Holotype: NouvelleCalédonie, Port Boisé, zone maritime, X.1903, Cribs 1424 (P!), isotype (L!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma balansana (Pierre ex Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon balansanum Pierre ex
Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 889 (1890). ≡ Planchonella balansana (Pierre ex Baill.) Pierre ex
Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 46 (1912). ≡ Pouteria balansana (Pierre ex Baill.) Baehni,
Candollea 9: 317 (1942). ≡ Beccariella balansana (Pierre ex Baill.) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193
(1962).
— Lectotype designated by van Royen (1957): Nouvelle Calédonie, 11.IV.1869, Balansa 1327a
(P!).
Distribution: New Caledonia. Beccariella brevipedicellata sensu Aubréville (1967), a later described taxon,
is possibly conspecific with P. balansana but is not put into synonymy here; instead we await future results.
Pleioluma baueri (Montrouz.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Sapota baueri Montrouz., Mem. Acad.
Roy. Sci. Lyon, Sect. Sci. 10: 229 (1860). ≡ Planchonella baueri (Montrouz.) Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon.
Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 53 (1912). ≡ Pouteria baueri (Montrouz.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 329 (1942).
Beccariella baueri (Montrouz.) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193 (1962). — Holotype: Nouvelle-Calédonie,
Ile Art, Montrouzier 133 (P), isotype (G).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma brownlessiana (F. Muell.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Achras brownlessiana F. Muell.,
Fragm. 7: 111 (1870). ≡ Sideroxylon brownlessianum (F. Muell.) F. Muell., Fragm. 8: 111 (1873). ≡
Sersalisia brownlessiana (F. Muell.) Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 89: 508 (1928). ≡ Pouteria brownlessiana (F.
Muell.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 318 (1942). ≡ Planchonella brownlessiana (F. Muell.) P. Royen, Blumea 8:
343 (1957). ≡ Beccariella brownlessiana (F. Muell.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Cladistics 23: 221
(2007).
— Type: Australia, Queensland, Rockingham Bay, Dallachy s.n. (MEL!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma crebrifolia (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Lucuma crebrifolia Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc.
Linn. Paris 2: 897 (1891). ≡ Sideroxylon crebrifolium (Baill.) Engl. in H.G.A. Engler & K.A.E. Prantl, Nat.
Pflanzenfam., Nachtr. 1: 277 (1897). ≡ Planchonella crebrifolia (Baill.) Pierre ex Dubard, Ann. Mus.
Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 53 (1912). ≡ Beccariella crebrifolia (Baill.) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193
(1962). ≡ Pouteria crebrifolia (Baill.) Baehni, Boissiera 11: 59 (1965). — Lectotype designated here:
Nouvelle Calédonie, Collines éruptives entre Canala et Couaoua, IV.1871, Balansa 3154 (P00282377!),
isolectotypes (P00282375!, P00282376!, P00282378!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Note. — Baillon (1891a) described Lucuma crebrifolia based on three collections, viz. Vieillard 191,
Vieillard 2906, and Balansa 3154, all deposited in the Paris Herbarium (P). Later that year, Baillon (1891b)
described section Pleioluma of the genus Sersalisia, referring to his earlier work, but did not assign any type
collection. Lucuma crebrifolia remained untypified until Aubréville (1967) stated, in his flora of New Caledonia,
"Holotype: Balansa 3154 (P)". However, there are four specimens of this collection in Paris, none bearing any
sign of being seen by Aubréville. Hence, and in accordance with Article 9.2 of the International Code of
Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill & al., 2006), one well-preserved and fertile specimen of Balansa 3154 is here
designated as lectotype.
Pleioluma densinervia (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon densinervium K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb.
Syst. 58: 476 (1923). ≡ Planchonella densinervia (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 562 (1932). ≡
Pouteria densinervia (K. Krause) Baehni, Candollea 9: 342 (1942).
— Lectotype selected by van Royen
(1957): Neuguinea, Sepikgebiet, 1912/13, Ledermann 12698 (L!), isolectotypes (BM!, K!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma dies-reginae (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella dies-reginae P. Royen, Blumea 8: 352,
431 (1957). ≡ Pouteria dies-reginae (P. Royen) Vink, Blumea 47: 103 (2002).
— Holotype: New Guinea,
4 km SW of Bernhard Camp, Idenburg River, III.1939, L. J. Brass & C. Versteegh 13150 (L!), isotype (A
n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma firma (Miq.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Chrysophyllum firmum Miq., Fl. Ned. Ind., Eerste Bijv.: 579
(1861). ≡ Sideroxylon firmum (Miq.) Pierre ex Burck, Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg 5: 17 (1885). ≡
Beccariella firma (Miq.) Pierre, Not. Bot.: 30 (1890). ≡ Planchonella firma (Miq.) Dubard, Ann. Mus.
Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 59 (1912). ≡ Pouteria firma (Miq.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 284 (1942). — Type:
Teysmann s.n. (BO n.v.).
Distribution: Widespread, from Thailand via Malesia to Solomon Islands.
Pleioluma foxworthyi (Elmer) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon foxworthyi Elmer, Leafl. Philipp. Bot. 5:
1836 (1913). ≡ Planchonella foxworthyi (Elmer) H.J. Lam, Proc. Pacific Sci. Congr. 6 (4): 678 (1940). —
Type: Philippine Islands, Island of Palawan, Puerto Princesa, Mt. Pulgar, III.1911, Elmer 12824 (E!, FI
n.v., G!, L!, NSW n.v., P!, PNH [destroyed], US!, Z!).
Distribution: Philippines.
Pleioluma gillisonii (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria gillisonii Vink, Blumea 47: 104 (2002).
—
Holotype: Papua New Guinea, Morobe Province, Morobe Subprovince, Waiu Bay, 7°30’S, 147°15’E, 300
m alt., 14.VIII.1968, Gillison & Kairo NGF 25627 (L!), isotypes (A n.v., BRI n.v., CANB n.v., CHR n.v.,
LAE n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma krausei (H.J. Lam) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon spathulatum K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 58:
474 (1923), nom. illeg., non Hillebr., Fl. Hawaiian Isl.: 277 (1888). ≡ Planchonella krausei H.J. Lam, Nova
Guinea 14: 561 (1932). ≡ Pouteria krausei (H.J. Lam) Baehni, Candollea 9: 322 (1942). — Lectotype
designated by van Royen (1957): Nieuw Guinea, Kaiser Wilhelmsland, Gomadjiji, c. 450 m alt.,
23.VIII.1909, R. Schlechter 19915 (L!), isolectotype (BR!, P!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma lamprophylla (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon lamprophyllum K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb.
Syst. 58: 481 (1923). ≡ Planchonella lamprophylla (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 564 (1932). ≡
Pouteria lamprophylla (K. Krause) Baehni, Candollea 9: 333 (1942).
— Lectotype designated by van
Royen (1957): Neu-Guinea, Sepik-Gebeit, 1912-1913, Ledermann 10318 (L!), isolectotype (K!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma lanatifolia (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella lanatifolia P. Royen, Blumea 8: 306,
428 (1957). ≡ Pouteria lanatifolia (P. Royen) Vink, Blumea 47: 107 (2002).
— Holotype: Dutch New
Guinea, Angi, Arfak Mts., 2200 m alt., 9.IV.1940, R. Kanehira & S. Hatusima 13891 (A!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma lasiantha (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon lasianthum Baill., Bull. Mens.
Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 887 (1890). ≡ Planchonella lasiantha (Baill.) Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér.
2, 10: 58 (1912). ≡ Pouteria lasiantha (Baill.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 324 (1942). ≡ Beccariella lasiantha
(Baill.) Aubrév., Fl. Nouv.-Caléd. 1: 114 (1967).
— Holotype: Nouvelle-Calédonie, Mont Mi, 25.III.1869,
Balansa 1322 (P!), isotype (L!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma laurifolia (A. Rich.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sersalisia laurifolia A. Rich. in J.S.C. Dumont
d’Urville, Voy. Astrolabe 2: 84 (1834). ≡ Achras laurifolia (A. Rich.) F. Muell ex Benth., Fl. Austral. 4:
282 (1868). ≡ Sideroxylon laurifolium (A. Rich.) Engl., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 12: 517 (1890), nom. illeg. ≡
Planchonella laurifolia (A. Rich.) Pierre, Not. Bot.: 36 (1890). ≡ Beccariella laurifolia (A. Rich.) Aubrév.,
Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193 (1962). ≡ Sideroxylon richardii F. Muell., Syst. Census Austral. Pl.: 92 (1882). ≡
Pouteria richardii (F. Muell.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 287 (1942). — Type: Voyage de l’Astrolabe 6 (E!, P!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma ledermannii (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon ledermannii K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb.
Syst. 58: 475 (1923). ≡ Planchonella ledermannii (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 561 (1932). ≡
Pouteria ledermannii (K. Krause) Baehni, Candollea 9: 341 (1942).
— Neotype: designated by van Royen
(1957) (original type, Lederman 12248 in B, destroyed): Neu-Guinea, Kaiser Wilhelmsland, Sepik Region,
Ledermann 6956 (K!), isotype (E!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma longipetiolata (Aubrév.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. — Beccariella longipetiolata Aubrév.,
Fl. Nouv.-Caléd. 1: 121 (1967). — Holotype: Nouvelle-Calédonia, Prony, XI.1914, I. Franc 1885 (P!),
isotype (P!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma lucens (P. Royen) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella lucens P. Royen, Blumea 8:
429 (1957). ≡ Pouteria royenii Baehni, Boissiera 11: 55 (1965). ≡ Beccariella lucens (P. Royen) Aubrév.,
Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193 (1962). Holotype: Nouvella-Calédonie, 19.X.1909, Mr. & Mrs. Le Rat 763 (P!),
isotype (L!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma macrocarpa (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella macrocarpa P. Royen, Blumea 8: 320,
429 (1957). ≡ Pouteria pearsoniorum Jessup, Austrobaileya 6: 163 (2001). ≡ Beccariella macrocarpa (P.
Royen) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Cladistics 23: 221 (2007). — Holotype: Australia, Queensland,
Cook District, Kaban, Pearson Brothers s.n. (BRI!), isotype (BRI!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma macropoda (H.J. Lam) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella macropoda H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14:
563 (1932). ≡ Pouteria macropoda (H.J. Lam) Baehni, Candollea 9: 410 (1942). Neotype designated by
van Royen (1957): New Guinea, Alola, 6000 ft alt., 5.XII.1935, C. E. Carr 13631 (L!), isotypes (BM!, K!,
SING!).
Distributed: Sulawesi to New Guinea.
Pleioluma moluccana (Burck) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon moluccanum Burck, Ann. Jard. Bot.
Buitenzorg 5: 19 (1885). ≡ Beccariella moluccana (Burck) Pierre, Not. Bot. Sapot.: 30 (1890). ≡
Planchonella moluccana (Burck) H.J. Lam, Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 200 (1925). ≡ Pouteria
moluccana (Burck) Baehni, Candollea 9: 327 (1942). — Lectotype: Archipel. Ind., Teysmann 7819 (BO),
isolectotype (L).
Distribution: Widespread, from Java to New Guinea.
Pleioluma monticola (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon monticolum K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb. Syst.
58: 481 (1923). ≡ Planchonella monticola (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 561 (1932). ≡ Pouteria
monticola (K. Krause) H .J. Lam, Blumea 5: 337 (1943). — Neotype designated by van Royen (1957):
New Guinea, Uniri River, 2200 m alt., 18.I.1936, C. E. Carr 15189 (L!), isotypes (BM!, SING!).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma novocaledonica (Dubard) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella novocaledonica
Dubard, Notul. Syst. (Paris) 2: 84 (1911). ≡ Sideroxylon novocaledonicum (Dubard) Baehni, Candollea 9:
428 (1942), nom. illeg. ≡ Beccariella novocaledonica (Dubard) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 2: 193 (1962). ≡
Pouteria egassia Baehni, Boissiera 11: 60 (1965).
— Holotype: Nouvelle-Calédonie, Petit 130 (P!),
isotypes (G!, L!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma papyracea (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella papyracea P. Royen, Blumea 8: 431
(1957). ≡ Beccariella papyracea (P. Royen) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 335 (1963). ≡ Pouteria papyracea
(P. Royen) Baehni, Boissiera 11: 59 (1965). — Holotype: Australia, Queensland, Cook District, c. 30 km
NE of Atherton, Krauss 102 (BRI n.v.).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma queenslandica (P. Royen) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Planchonella queenslandica P. Royen, Blumea 8:
341, 430 (1957). ≡ Beccariella queenslandica (P. Royen) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 335 (1963). ≡
Pouteria queenslandica (P. Royen) Jessup, Austrobaileya 6: 161 (2001). — Holotype: Australia,
Queensland, Eungella Mts, 31.III.1937, H. H. Haines 136Q (K!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma rigidifolia (K. Krause) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon rigidifolium K. Krause, Bot. Jahrb. Syst.
58: 474 (1923). ≡ Planchonella rigidifolia (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Nova Guinea 14: 560 (1932). ≡ Pouteria
rigidifolia (K. Krause) Baehni, Candollea 9: 319 (1942). — Lectotype designated here: New Guinea,
Torricelli Mts., 800 m alt., 22.IX.1909, R. Schlechter 20322 (P00648143), isolectotype (P00648141)
(holotype in B destroyed).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma rubicunda (Pierre ex Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Lucuma rubicunda Pierre ex
Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 883 (1890). ≡ Beccariella rubicunda (Pierre ex Baill.) Pierre, Not.
Bot. Sapot.: 30 (1890). ≡ Planchonella rubicunda (Pierre ex Baill.) Dubard in Guillaumin, Ann. Mus.
Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 9: 287 (1911). ≡ Pouteria rubicunda (Pierre ex Baill.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 31
(1942). — Holotype: Nouvelle Calédonie, forêt situées au sud de Canala, vers 900 m alt., 20.XI.1869,
Balansa 1825 (P00282282!), isotypes (P00282281!, P00282283!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma sebertii (Pancher) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Chrysophyllum sebertii Pancher in J. A. I.
Pancher & H. Sebert, Not. Bois Nouv. Caléd.: 194 (1874). ≡ Beccariella sebertii (Pancher) Pierre, Not.
Bot. 1: 30 (1890). ≡ Planchonella sebertii (Pancher) Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 58
(1912). ≡ Pouteria sebertii (Pancher) Baehni, Candollea 9: 297 (1942).
— Type: Nouvelle Calédonie,
Sébert & Fournier 49 (P!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma singuliflora (C.T. White & W.D. Francis) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon singuliflorum C.T.
White & W.D. Francis, Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 37: 161 (1926[1925]). ≡ Pouteria singuliflora (C.T.
White & W.D. Francis) Baehni, Candollea 9: 316 (1942). ≡ Planchonella singuliflora (C.T. White & W.D.
Francis) P. Royen, Blumea 8: 345 (1957). ≡ Beccariella singuliflora (C.T. White & W.D. Francis)
Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Cladistics 23: 221 (2007). — Syntypes: Australia, Bellenden Ker, near
summit of Central Peak, North Queensland, south of Cairns, I.1923, C. T. White s.n. (BRI!, K!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pleioluma vieillardii (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon vieillardii Baill., Bull. Mens.
Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 886 (1890). ≡ Planchonella vieillardii (Baill.) Dubard, Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér.
2, 10: 58 (1912). ≡ Pouteria vieillardii (Baill.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 414 (1942). ≡ Beccariella vieillardii
(Baill.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Cladistics 23: 221 (2007). — Holotype: Nouvelle Calédonie,
Gatope, 1861--67, Vieillard 2889 (P!), isotypes (K!, L!).
Distribution: New Caledonia.
Pleioluma wandae (Vink) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Pouteria wandae Vink, Blumea 47: 118 (2002). —
Holotype: Indonesia, Irian Jaya, sourroundings of Ayawasi, 01°14’S, 132°12E, c. 450 m alt., 16.I.1996, W.
Ave 4163 (L!), isotypes (BO n.v., CANB n.v., MAN n.v.).
Distribution: New Guinea.
Pleioluma xerocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Achras xerocarpa F. Muell. ex Benth., Fl.
Austral. 4: 281 (1868). ≡ Sideroxylon xerocarpum (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Benth. & Hook f. ex F. Muell.,
Syst. Census Austral. Pl. 1: 91 (1882). ≡ Planchonella xylocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) H.J. Lam, Bull.
Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 218 (1925). ≡ Sersalisia xerocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Domin, Biblioth.
Bot. 89: 508 (1928). ≡ Pouteria xerocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Baehni, Boissiera 11: 58 (1965). ≡
Beccariella xerocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 335 (1963). — Syntypes:
Australia, Rockingham Bay, Dallachy s.n. (BRI!, K!, L!, MEL!, P!).
Distribution: Australia.
Pycnandra Benth., in G. Bentham and J.D. Hooker, Gen. Pl. 2: 658 (1876). — Type: Pycnandra benthamii
Baill.
= Leptostylis Benth., in G. Bentham and J.D. Hooker, Gen. Pl. 2: 659 (1876). — Lectotype: Leptostylis
longiflora Benth., designated by Vink in Nova Guinea, n.s., 8: 87 (1957).
= Achradotypus Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 881 (1890). — Type: Achradotypus vieillardii Baill.
= Trouettia Pierre ex Baill., Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 945 [3 Jun.] (1891). — Type: Trouettia leptoclada
Pierre ex Baill.
= Chorioluma Baill., Hist. Pl. 11: 287 [Sep.-Oct.] (1891). — Type: Chorioluma coriacea (Baill.) Baill. ≡
Sideroxylon coriaceum Baill.
= Ochrothallus Pierre ex Baill., Hist. Pl. 11: 298 [Sep.-Oct.] (1891). — Type: Ochrothallus sessilifolius (Pancher
& Sebert) Pierre ex Baill. ≡ Chrysophyllum sessilifolium Pancher & Sebert
= Sebertia Pierre ex Engl., Nat. Pflanzenfam., Nachtr. 4 (1): 280 (1897). — Type: Sebertia acuminata (Baill.)
Engl. ≡ Sersalisia acuminata Baill.
= Tropalanthe S. Moore, J. Linn Soc., Bot. 45: 354 (1921). — Type: Tropalanthe comptonii S. Moore
= Corbassona Aubrév., Fl. Nouv.-Caléd. 1: 72 (1967). — Type: Corbassona deplanchei (Baill.) Aubrév. ≡
Chrysophyllum deplanchei Baill.
Diagnostic character combination. — Higher leaf venation non-areolate; sepals glabrous inside; flowers
usually born along branches, cup-shaped (rarely tubular); stamens usually inserted in corolla tube orifice (rarely
below); staminodes absent; style simple; cotyledons plano-convex, red or rarely pinkish, radicle included in
cotyledons; endosperm absent.
Some 55 recognized species with another ten waiting to be described, all restricted to New Caledonia.
Current classification accepts four subgenera (Swenson & Munzinger, 2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c), and
Pycnandra subgenus Leptostylis is under revision. Most species are restricted to either ultramafic or noneultramafic substrates, and a few to calcareous soils, which means many species are threatened to the point of
extinction due to habitat destruction from mining, logging and deliberately set fires.
Sersalisia R. Br., Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holl.: 529 (1810). — Type Sersalisia sericea (Aiton) R. Br. ≡ Sideroxylon
sericeum Aiton
Diagnostic character combination. — Higher leaf venation areolate; sepals pubescent or glabrous inside;
flowers axillary, narrowly campanulate or tubular; stamens inserted in or just below corolla tube orifice;
staminodes present, entire; style with stigmatic areas; cotyledons plano-convex, radicle included in cotyledons;
endosperm absent.
Four to six species, depending on the future status of some undescribed taxa and the relationships of the
Australian species Pouteria unmackiana (F.M. Bailey) Erlee, which is still not analysed but probably belongs to
this genus. One widely distributed species, S. luzoniensis.
Sersalisia luzoniensis (Merr.) Swenson, comb. nov. ≡ Sideroxylon luzoniense Merr., Philipp. J. Sci. 1 (Suppl.):
222 (1906). ≡ Lucuma luzoniensis (Merr.) H.J. Lam, Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 227 (1925). ≡
Pouteria luzoniensis (Merr.) Baehni, Candollea 9: 365 (1942). ≡ Fontbrunea luzoniensis (Merr.) Aubrév.,
Adansonia, n.s., 3: 333 (1963).
— Original type material in PNH is destroyed. Lectotype designated here:
Philippines, Luzon, Province of Rizal, I.1906, Foxworthy 127 (K!), isolectotype (US!).
Distribution: Widespread, from the Philippine Islands in the north, Borneo, Sulawesi, and New Guinea in
the south.
Van-royena Aubrév., Adansonia, n.s., 3: 329 (1963). — Type: Van-royena castanosperma (C.T. White) Aubrév.
≡ Chrysophyllum castanospermum C.T. White.
Diagnostic character combination. — Tertiary leaf venation parallel and reticulate, non-areolate; sepals
pubescent inside; flowers axillary, narrowly campanulate; stamens inserted near middle (or just above) of the
corolla tube; staminodes present, entire; style with stigmatic areas; cotyledons plano-convex, radicle included in
cotyledons; endosperm absent.
A single species restricted to northeast Australia, poorly monographed, but van Royen (1957) provided a
treatment with an acceptable illustration.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are very grateful to Steve Wagstaff, two anonymous reviewers, and Gail Stride for constructive
comments on this manuscript. Mats Thulin and Jens Klackenberg are thanked for fruitful discussions on
nomenclature. Wayne Takeuchi, George Weiblen, and Timothy Whitfield kindly provided fresh plant material
from New Guinea, especially Wayne, who has sent material to Stockholm for a long period of time. Nellie Sugii,
Doug Okamoto and Mary Merello are acknowledged for additional samples of Planchonella from Hawaii, and
Peter Wilkie and Nura Abdul Karim who sent material from Singapore. Kate Armstrong kindly made one
sequence available. Material from Vanuatu was collected during the Santo 2006 expedition, funded, among
others, by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation, the Total Foundation and the French Fonds Pacifique, and samples
from Futuna were collected as part of an inventory of exotic species conducted for the Wallis and Futuna
environmental service. Marika Tuiwawa and the SUVA team are thanked for their help in the field and for
getting the collecting permit in Fiji. Jacques Florence (Paris), Jean-Yves Meyer (Papeete), and Rava Taputuarai
(Papeete) helped with various issues in Tahiti. The herbaria G, K, L, MO, NOU, P, PAP, and PNH provided
access to their collections. Alison Moore, Rogier deKok, Felix Forest, and Laszlo Csiba (K) are all
acknowledged, who made an exception by extracting DNA from a loose fragment of a type specimen. Laurence
Jessup (Brisbane) and Gerard Thijsse (Leiden) helped with scanning images of type collections and various
issues. Jean-François Butaud (Tahiti), Glenn Leiper (Australia), Hugh Nicholson (Australia), and Jean-Louis
Ruiz (New Caledonia) are thanked for their contribution of field images. We are indebted to Bodil Cronholm at
the molecular laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, who successfully designed primers for this study
and was able to "fish-up" Krausella polyneura from a really messy aliquot! Funds to Ulf Swenson were provided
from the Swedish Research Council and Regnells Gåvomedel (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences).
LITERATURE CITED
Álvarez, I. & Wendel, J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogen.
Evol. 29: 417–434.
Anderberg, A.A. & Swenson, U. 2003. Evolutionary lineages in Sapotaceae (Ericales): a cladistic analysis
based on ndhF sequence data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 763–773.
Aubréville, A. 1962. Notes sur les Sapotacées de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Adansonia, sér. 2, 2: 172–199.
Aubréville, A. 1964. Les Sapotacées: taxonomie et phytogéographie. Adansonia Mém. 1: 1–157.
Aubréville, A. 1967. Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et dépendances. 1. Sapotacées. Muséum National
d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Baehni, C. 1964. Genres nouveaux de Sapotacées. Arch. Sci. Genève 17: 77–79.
Baehni, C. 1965. Mémoire sur les Sapotacées III. Inventaire des genres. Boissiera 11: 1–262.
Baillon, H. 1891a. Observations sur les Sapotacées de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (séance du 3 janvier). Bull. Mens.
Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 897–904.
Baillon, H. 1891b. Histoire des Plantes. Sapotacées, Vol. 11, pp. 255–304. Librairie Hachette, Paris.
Baldwin, B.G. & Markos, S. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S
rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10, 449–463.
Bartish, I.V., Swenson, U., Munzinger, J. & Anderberg, A.A. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships among New
Caledonian Sapotaceae (Ericales): molecular evidence for generic polyphyly and repeated dispersal. Am. J.
Bot. 92: 667–673.
Bartish, I.V., Antonelli, A., Richardson, J.E. & Swenson, U. 2011. Vicariance or long-distance dispersal:
historical biogeography of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae). J. Biogeogr. 38: 177–
190.
Brummitt, R.K. 2011a. Report of the Nomenclature Committee for vascular plants: 62. Taxon 60: 226–232.
Brummitt, R.K. 2011b. Report of the Nomenclature Committee for vascular plants: 63. Taxon 60: 1202–1210.
Butaud, J.-F., Gérard, J. & Guibal, D. 2011. Guide des arbres de Polynésie française: Bois et utilisations. Au
vent des îles, Pirae.
Denton, A.L., McConaughy, B.L. & Hall, B.D. 1998. Usefulness of RNA polymeras II coding sequences for
estimation of green plant phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1082–1085.
Drummond, A. & Rambaut, A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol.
Biol. 7: 214.
Dubard, M. 1912. Les Sapotacées du groupe des Sideroxylinées. Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille, sér. 2, 10: 1–90.
Eggens, F., Popp, M., Nepokroeff, M., Wagner, W.L. & Oxelman, B. 2007. The origin and number of
introductions of the Hawaiian endemic Silene species (Caryophyllaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 94: 210–218.
Engler, A. 1897. Sapotaceae. Pp. 271–280 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,
Nachträge. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A.G. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing
outperforms neighbour-joining. Cladistics 12: 99–124.
Fosberg, F.R. 1992. Pacific Island plants - taxonomic and distributional notes. Micronesica 25: 175–199.
Govaerts, R., Frodin, D.G. & Pennington, T.D. 2001. World Checklist and Bibliography of Sapotaceae. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Grandcolas, P., Murienne, J., Robillard, T., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Jourdan, H., Guilbert, E. &
Deharveng, L. 2008. New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 3309–3317.
Grant, M.L., Fosberg, F.R. & Smith, H.M. 1974. Partial flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to
Apocynaceae. Smith. Contr. Bot. 17: 1–85.
Harris, G.J. & Harris M.W. 1997. Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary. Springer Lake,
Payson.
Heads, M. 2006. Seed plants of Fiji: an ecological analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 89: 407–431.
Heads, M. 2008. Panbiogeography of New Caledonia, south-west Pacific: basal angiosperms on basement
terranes, ultramafic endemics inherited from volcanic island arcs and old taxa endemic to young islands. J.
Biogeogr. 35: 2153–2175.
Herrmann-Erlee, M.P.M. & Lam, H.J. 1957. Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian area in a wider
side. VIII. Krausella H. J. Lam. Blumea 8: 446–451.
Herrmann-Erlee, M.P.M. & van Royen, P. 1957. Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian area in a wider
sense. IX. Pouteria Aublet. Blumea 8: 452–509.
Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H. & Barnett, L.C. 1990. Index Herbariorum, edition 8, Part I. The Herbaria
of the World. New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, NY.
Katoh, K., Kuma, K-I., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple
sequence alignment. Nucl. Acids Res. 33: 511–518.
Keppel, G., Lowe, A.J. & Possingham, H.P. 2009. Changing perspectives on the biogeography of the tropical
South Pacific: influences of dispersal, vicariance and extinction. J. Biogeogr. 36: 1035–1054.
Lam, H. J. 1925. The Sapotaceae, Sarcospermaceae and Boerlagellaceae of the Dutch East Indies and
surrounding countries (Malay Peninsula and Philippine Islands). Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 7: 1–289.
Lam, H. J. 1932. Enumeration of the Sapotaceae, thus far known from New Guinea. Nova Guinea 14: 549–570,
pl. 94–129.
Lam, H.J. 1939. On the system of the Sapotaceae, with some remarks on taxonomical methods. Recueil Trav.
Bot. Neerl. 36: 509–525.
Lam, H.J. 1942. A tentative list of wild Pacific Sapotaceae, except those from New Caledonia. Blumea 5: 1–46.
Lowry II, P.P., Munzinger, J., Bouchet, P., Géraux, H., Bauer, A., Langrand, O. & Mittermeier, R.A.
2004. New Caledonia. Pp. 193–197 in: Mittermeier, R.A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks,
T., Mittermeier, C.G., Lamoreux, J.L., da Fonseca, G.A.B. (eds.), Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically
Richest and Most Threatened Terrestrial Ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City.
Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, v. 4.0.
Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2011. MESQUITE: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version
2.75. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org (last accessed April 2012)
McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, D., Hawksworth, D.L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D.H.,
Prado, J., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Wiersema, J.H. & Turland, N.J. (eds.). 2006. International Code of
Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code). Adopted by the seventeenth international botanical congress Vienna,
Austria, July 2005. Regnum Vegetabile 146: 1–568.
Méndez, M. & Munzinger, J. 2010. Planchonella, first record of gynomonoecy for the family Sapotaceae.
Plant Syst. Evol. 287: 65–73.
Meyer, J.-Y. & Florence, J. 1996. Tahiti's native flora endangered by the invasion of Miconia calvescens DC.
(Melastomataceae). J. Biogeogr. 23: 775–781.
Mueller, F. 1870. Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae, vol. 7. Auctoritate Guberni Coloniae Victoriae,
Melbourne.
Munzinger, J. & Swenson, U. 2009. Three new species of Planchonella Pierre (Sapotaceae) with a
dichotomous and an online key to the genus in New Caledonia. Adansonia, sér 3, 31: 175–189.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots
for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.
Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9: 413–426.
Oxelman, B. & Bremer, B. 2000. Discovery of paralogous nuclear gene sequences coding for the secondlargest subunit of RNA polymeras II (RPB2) and their phylogenetic utility in Gentianales of the asterids. Mol.
Biol. Evol. 17: 1131–1145.
Oxelman, B., Yoshikawa, N., McConaughy, B.L., Luo, J., Denton, A.L. & Hall, B.D. 2004. RPB2 gene
phylogeny in flowering plants, with particular emphasis on asterids. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 32: 462–479.
Pennington, T.D. 1990. Flora Neotropica Monograph 52: Sapotaceae. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
Pennington, T.D. 1991. The Genera of Sapotaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Pierre, L. 1890. Notes Botaniques. Sapotacées 1: 1–36.
Poczai, P. & Hyvönen, J. 2010. Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and
prospects. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37: 1897–1912.
Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253–1256.
Posada, D. & Buckley, T.R. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of
Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53: 793–808.
Pouteau, R., Meyer, J.-Y., Taputuarai, R. & Stoll, B. 2012. Support vector machines to map rare endangered
native plants in Pacific islands forests. Ecol. Inform. 9: 37–46.
Rambaut, A. 2009. FigTree v1.3.1. Computer program available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
(last accessed April 2012).
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. 2009. Tracer v1.5. Computer program available from
http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ (last accessed April 2012).
Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of
phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43: 304–311.
van Royen, P. 1957. Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian area in a wider sense. VII. Planchonella
Pierre. Blumea 8: 235–445.
van Royen, P. 1959. Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian area in a wider sense. Nova Guinea 10: 131–
142.
Rydin, C., Pedersen, K.R. & Friis, E.M. 2004. On the evolutionary history of Ephedra: Cretaceous fossils and
extant molecules. PNAS 101: 16571–16576.
Schwartz, G.E. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6: 461–464.
Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling,
E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA
sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142–166.
Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome
sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III.
Amer. J. Bot. 94: 275–288.
Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst.
Biol. 49: 369–381.
Smedmark, J.E.E. Anderberg, A.A. 2007. Boreotropical migration explains hybridization between
geographically distant lineages in the pantropical clade Sideroxyleae (Sapotaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1491–
1505.
Smedmark, J.E.E., Swenson, U. & Anderberg, A.A. 2006. Accounting for variation of substitution rates
through time in Bayesian phylogeny reconstruction of Sapotoideae (Sapotaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39:
706–721.
Smith, A.C. 1981. Flora Vitiensis Nova, Vol. 2. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Hawaii.
Swenson, U. & Anderberg, A.A. 2005. Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae
(Ericales). Cladistics 21: 101–130.
Swenson, U. & Morat, P. 2008. Proposal to conserve the name Planchonella nom. cons. against the additional
names Iteiluma and Peuceluma (Sapotaceae). Taxon 57: 1013–1014.
Swenson, U. & Munzinger, J. 2009. Revision of Pycnandra subgenus Pycnandra (Sapotaceae), a genus
endemic to New Caledonia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 22: 437–465.
Swenson, U. & Munzinger, J. 2010a. Revision of Pycnandra subgenus Sebertia (Sapotaceae) and a generic key
to the family in New Caledonia. Adansonia, sér. 3, 32: 239–249.
Swenson, U. & Munzinger, J. 2010b. Revision of Pycnandra subgenus Achradotypus (Sapotaceae), with five
new species from New Caledonia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 23: 185–216.
Swenson, U. & Munzinger, J. 2010c. Taxonomic revision of Pycnandra subgenus Trouettia (Sapotaceae), with
six new species from New Caledonia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 23: 333–370.
Swenson, U. & Munzinger, J. 2012. Revision of Pichonia (Sapotaceae) in New Caledonia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 25:
31–48.
Swenson, U. & Tehler, A. 2009. Proposal to conserve the name Beccariella Pierre (Sapotaceae, Magnoliphyta)
against Beccariella Ces. (Podoscyphaceae, Basidiomycota). Taxon 58: 654.
Swenson, U., Bartish, I.V. & Munzinger, J. 2007a. Phylogeny, diagnostic characters, and generic limitation of
Australasian Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae, Ericales): evidence from ITS sequence data and morphology.
Cladistics 23: 201–228.
Swenson, U., Munzinger, J. & Bartish, I.V. 2007b. Molecular phylogeny of Planchonella (Sapotaceae) and
eight new species from New Caledonia. Taxon 56: 329–354.
Swenson, U., Lowry II, P.P., Munzinger, J., Rydin, C. & Bartish, I.V. 2008a. Phylogeny and generic limits in
the Niemeyera complex of New Caledonian Sapotaceae: evidence of multiple origins of the anisomerous
flower. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49: 909–929.
Swenson, U., Richardson, J.E. & Bartish, I.V. 2008b. Multi-gene phylogeny of the pantropical subfamily
Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae): evidence of generic polyphyly and extensive morphological homoplasy.
Cladistics 24: 1006–1031.
Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), ver. 4.0b10.
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Taputuarai, R. & Tchung, V. 2003. Etude préliminaire de la régénération de l’arbre endémique Planchonella
tahitensis (Sapotacées) menacé par l’invasion de Miconia calvescens (Mélastomatacées) à Tahiti (Polynésie
française). Délégation à la Recherche, Polynésie française. Master thesis, available from http://jymeyer.overblog.com/article-23555170.html (last accessed May 2012)
Triono, T., Brown, A.H.D., West, J.G. & Crisp, M.D. 2007. A phylogeny of Pouteria (Sapotaceae) from
Malesia and Australasia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 20: 107–118.
Vink, W. 1958. Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian area in a wider sense. XIII. Chrysophyllum L.
Blumea 9: 21–74.
Vink, W. 1995. Revision of Magodendron (Sapotaceae) with observations on floral development and
morphology. Blumea 40: 91–107.
Vink, W. 2002. Some Malesian species of Pouteria (Sapotaceae). Blumea 47: 95–147.
Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R. & Sohmer, S.H. 1990. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i. Bishop
Museum Special Publication 83. Bishop Museum, Honolulu.
Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte
Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 717–724.
Figure legends
Fig. 1. Field images of members of subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) growing in Oceania. A,
Niemeyera chartacea; B, Niemeyera antiloga; C, Van-royena castanosperma; D, Pycnandra belepensis; E,
Pichonia deplanchei; F, Sersalisia sericea; G, Planchonella baillonii; H, Planchonella ericiflora; I,
Planchonella minutiflora; J, Planchonella tahitensis; K, Planchonella rufocostata; L, Beccariella spec. nov.
Photos: A, C, F by Hugh Nicholson (Australia); B by Glenn Leiper (Australia); D, I by Ulf Swenson (Sweden);
E by Jean-Louis Ruiz (New Caledonia); G, H, K, L by Jérôme Munzinger (France); J by Jean-François Butaud
(Tahiti).
Fig. 2. Maximum clade credibility tree obtained from the BEAST analysis of nuclear sequences of
Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) from Oceania and Southeast Asia. Currently accepted names are colour-coded
according to the legend. Posterior probabilities (PP; above) and parsimony jackknifing (JK; below) are found
along the branches. Nodes with support below PP 0.8 and JK 50 are collapsed, except for the estimated
relationship of Van-royena. Three subclades (D1–D3) within Planchonella, identified by Swenson & al. (2007b),
are marked with arrows. The outgroup Ecclinusa is pruned from the figure.
Fig. 3. Eight morphological characters of diagnostic value mapped on a condensed generic phylogeny of
Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) present in Oceania and Southeast Asia. Three seed characters are mapped in F.
Black lines represent an equivocal state. Embedded triangles or lines in different colours represent taxa with
homoplasious characters (see text).
Fig. 4. Summary of proposed classification and necessary combinations of Oceanian and Southeast Asian
Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) based on BEAST and jackknife analyses of nrDNA sequences. Accepted genera
are (A) Pleioluma, (B) Sersalisia, (C) Pichonia, (D) Niemeyera, (E) Pycnandra, (F) Planchonella, and the small
genera Amorphospermum, Magodendron and Van-royena. Type species of genera are indicated in bold.
Undescribed species and those not transferred here appear in citation marks.
Table 1. List of primers used
DNA region Primer
Sequence 5'–3'
Reference
ETS
18S-ETS
ACT TAC ACA TGC ATG GCT TAA TCT
Baldwin & Markos (1998)
ETS
Sap-1
CGT ACT TGA GCG TGT TGG TGT
Swenson & al. (2008a)
ITS
18SF
GAA CCT TAT CGT TTA GAG GAA GG
Rydin & al. (2004)
ITS
26RN
CCG CCA GAT TTT CAC GCT GGG C
Rydin & al. (2004)
RPB2
P6F
TGG GGA ATG ATG TGT CCT GC
Denton & al. (1998)
RPB2
P7R
CCC ATG GCT TGC TTC CCC AT
Denton & al. (1998)
RPB2
270F-Sap
CCT AGT GTT ACC TTT TAC CCT GAT TG
This study*
RPB2
570F-Sap
CAT GGC ATT CAA CTA CTG AAG AGT TG
This study*
RPB2
540R-Sap
CAA CTC TTC AGT AGT TGA ATG CCA TG
This study*
RPB2
435F-Sap
TAA TAT GTC AGC TTG TGG TGG AGA G
This study*
RPB2
435R-Sap
CTC TCC ACC ACA AGC TGA CAT ATT A
This study*
This study*
RPB2
800F-Sap
GCA TCT CTG TCC TCT TGA TTA CTT GAA TG
RPB2
800R-Sap
CAT TCA AGT AAT CAA GAG GAC AGA GAT GC This study*
RPB2
1020F-Sap
GCT ACT TTG AAG CAC TTG CTA GAA TCT
This study*
RPB2
1020R-Sap
AGA TTC TAG CAA GTG CTT CAA AGT AGC
This study*
*Primers designed by Bodil Cronholm, Swedish Museum of Natural History.
Table 2. Characteristics of nuclear sequences in each of the data partitions (excluding the outgroup)
Data
Number of characters
Aligned Constant Uninformative
Informative
Gaps
ETS
403
114
91
198 (49.1%)
22
ITS
914
418
176
320 (35.0%)
42
RPB2
1169
483
535
151 (12.9%)
13
Total
2486
1015
802
668 (26.9%)
77
Appendix 1. Voucher information in the following order: Taxon name with authority, country, collector(s),
collector number, (herbarium abbreviation), and GenBank accessions (ETS, ITS, RPB2). Informal or
unpublished names are given in quotation marks and sequences published here have the prefix HE or HF.
Beccariella "acutifolia" Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 5759 (NOU, P, S),
HE860126, HE860065, HE995703. Beccariella balansana (Pierre) Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger & al.
4196 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860127, HE860066, HE995704. Beccariella baueri (Montrouz.) Aubrév., New
Caledonia, Munzinger 340 (NOU, P, S), HE860128, AY552113, HE995705. Beccariella "belepensis" Swenson
& Munzinger, New Caledonia, Swenson & al. 917 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860129, HE860067, HE995706.
Beccariella brevipedicellata (P. Royen) Aubrév., New Caledonia, Dumontet, Poullain & Zongo 658 (NOU, P,
S), HE860130, HE860068, HE995707. Beccariella brownlessiana (F. Muell.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger,
Australia, Bartish & Ford 17 (BRI, S), HE860131, DQ154063, HE995708. Beccariella crebrifolia (Baill.)
Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger, Lowry & Létocart 2036 (NOU, P, S), HE860132, DQ154042, HE995597.
Beccariella lasiantha (Baill.) Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger 2308 (NOU, P, S), HE860133, DQ154044,
HE995598. Beccariella longipetiolata Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger & Létocart 2264 (NOU, P, S),
HE860135, DQ154045, HE995709. Beccariella longipetiolata Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger, Pillon &
Butin 2911 (NOU, P, S), HE860136, HE860070, HE995710. Beccariella lucens (P. Royen) Aubrév., New
Caledonia, Munzinger & Létocart 2310 (NOU, P, S), HE860137, HE860071, HE995711. Beccariella
macrocarpa (P. Royen) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Australia, Bartish & Ford 24 (S), HE860138,
DQ154073, HE995712. Beccariella "Munzinger2581", New Caledonia, Munzinger, Labat & Butin 2581
(NOU, P, S), HE860140, HE860073, HE995713. Beccariella novocaledonica (Dubard) Aubrév., New
Caledonia, Munzinger 2304 (MO, NOU, S), HE860141, HE860074, HE995714. Beccariella papyracea (P.
Royen) Aubrév., Australia, Bartish & Ford 20 (S), HE860142, DQ154046, HE995715. Beccariella
queenslandica (P. Royen) Aubrév., Australia, Bartish & Jessup 8 (S), HE860143, DQ154043, HE995659.
Beccariella rubicunda (Pierre ex Baill.) Pierre, New Caledonia, Swenson, McPherson & Mouly 596 (NOU, P,
S), HE860144, AY552160, HE995716. Beccariella sebertii (Pancher) Pierre, New Caledonia, Munzinger,
Pignal, Dagostini & Hopkins 1975 (S), HE860145, DQ154047, HE995717. Beccariella singuliflora (C.T. White
& W.D. Francis) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Australia, Ford & Metcalfe 4547 (QRS, S), HE860146,
DQ246699, HE995718. Beccariella "Takeuchi25691", New Guinea, Takeuchi 25691 (LAE, S), HE860147,
HE860075, HE995599. Beccariella vieillardii (Baill.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, New Caledonia,
Munzinger 2282 (S), HE860148, DQ154087, HE995719. Beccariella xerocarpa (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Aubrév.,
Australia, Bartish & Ford 28 (BRI, S), HE860149, DQ154048, HE995683. Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii P.
Royen, New Guinea, Takeuchi 18997 (LAE, S), HE860150, HE860076, HE995600. Chrysophyllum wagapense
Guillaumin, New Caledonia, Munzinger, D. & I. Létocart 5634 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860151, HE860077,
HE995601. Ecclinusa guianensis Eyma, South America, Brazil, Ducke Reserve 05-906 (K), HE860152,
DQ246677, HE995661. Ecclinusa ramiflora Mart., South America, Surinam, Irwing & al. 55081 (S),
HE860153, DQ246678, HE995602. Krausella patentinervia (K. Krause) Erlee, New Guinea, Armstrong 317 (E,
S), HE860154, HE860078, HE995686. Krausella polyneura (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, Papua New Guinea,
Ledermann 9054 (K), HF678108, HF912279, —. Leptostylis filipes Benth., New Caledonia, Webster & Hildreth
14665 (P), EU661382, AY552135, HE995603. Leptostylis goroensis Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger 2288
(NOU, P, S), EU661383, DQ154052, HE995604. Leptostylis grandifolia Vink, New Caledonia, Munzinger &
Oddi 2121 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661384, DQ154053, HE995605. Magodendron mennyae Vink, New Guinea,
Takeuchi, Ama & Siga 16570 (S), HE860155, AY552114, HE995685. Niemeyera antiloga (F. Muell.) T.D.
Penn., Australia, Bartish & Jessup 4 (S), HE860156, DQ154055, HE995662. Niemeyera chartacea (F.M.Bailey)
C.T. White, Australia, Bartish & Jessup 5 (S), HE860157, DQ154057, HE995606. Niemeyera "Ford2429",
Australia, Andrew Ford 2429 (S), EU661389, EF025089, HE995607. Niemeyera prunifera (F. Muell.) F.
Muell., Australia, Jessup 5238 (S), HE860158, DQ154058, HE995608. Niemeyera whitei (Aubrév.) L.W.
Jessup, Australia, Floyd s.n. (S), EU661388, AY552137, HE995609. Pichonia balansae (Baehni) Swenson &
Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger 975 (MO, NOU, P), HE860159, AY552102, HE995720. Pichonia
balansana Pierre, New Caledonia, Veillon 7990 (P), HE860160, AY552109, HE995610. Pichonia daenikeri
(Aubrév.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Jaffré & Rigault 3038 (NOU, P), HE860161,
AY552108, HE995690. Pichonia deplanchei (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Veillon 377
(NOU, P), HE860162, AY552103, HE995699. Pichonia dubia (Guillaumin) Swenson & Munzinger, New
Caledonia, Grande Terre, Munzinger & Swenson 3065 (NOU, S), HE860163, HE860079, HE995721. Pichonia
dubia (Guillaumin) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Ile Art, Swenson & al. 918 (NOU, P, S),
HE860164, HE860080, HE995722. Pichonia grandiflora Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Swenson &
Munzinger 930 (NOU, P, S), HE860165, HE860081, HE995611. Pichonia lecomtei (Guillaumin) T.D. Penn.,
New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 2170 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860166, DQ154061, HE995723. Pichonia
occidentalis (H.J. Lam) Aubrév., New Guinea, Takeuchi & Ama 22233 (LAE, S), HE860167, HE860082,
HE995750. Planchonella amieuana (Guillaumin) Aubrév., New Caledonia, Dumontet, Zongo & Maituku 510
(NOU, P, S), HE860168, EF025090, HE995612. Planchonella aneityensis (Guillaumin) H.J. Lam ex P.Royen,
Vanuatu, Munzinger, Lowry & Tuiwawa 3665 (NOU, P, S, SUVA), HE860169, HE860083, HE995724.
Planchonella anteridifera (C.T. White & W.D. Francis ex Lane-Poole) H.J. Lam, New Guinea, Takeuchi &
Ama 17902 (LAE, S), HE860170, EF025109, HE995750. Planchonella arnhemica (F. Muell. ex Benth.) P.
Royen, Australia, Harwood 1170 (S), HE860171, AY552107, HE995663. Planchonella asterocarpon (P.
Royen) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Australia, Bartish & Ford 25 (BRI, S), HE860172, DQ154078,
HE995664. Planchonella australis (R. Br.) Pierre, Australia, Floyd s.n. (S), HE860173, AY552148, HE995613.
Planchonella baillonii (Zahlbr.) Dubard, New Caledonia, Munzinger & Dagostini 2119 (MO, NOU, P, S),
HE860174, HE860084, HE995725. Planchonella cauliflora Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia, Munzinger
& al. 3495 (K, MO, NOU, NSW, P, S), HE860175, HE860085, HE995666. Planchonella chartacea (F. Muell.
ex Benth.) H.J. Lam, Australia, Bartish & Jessup 1 (BRI, S), HE860176, HE862231, HE995665. Planchonella
clemensii (Lecomte) P. Royen, China, Hainan, How 73783 (S), HE860177, HE860086, HE995692.
Planchonella costata (Endl.) Pierre, New Zealand (cultivated in USA), Peter W. Fritsch 1770 (CAS), —,
AF396230, —. Planchonella costata (Endl.) Pierre, New Zealand (cultivated in Edinburgh), Robertson 9 (E),
HE860178, —, HE995726. Planchonella cotinifolia (A.DC.) Dubard, Australia, Bartish & Jessup 11 (BRI, S),
HE860179, DQ154066, HE995701. Planchonella crassinervia Dubard, New Caledonia, Munzinger 2275
(NOU, P, S), HE860180, DQ154067, HE995667. Planchonella cyclopensis P. Royen, New Guinea, Polak 1365
(L), HE860181, HE860087, HE995693. Planchonella cyclopensis P. Royen, New Guinea, Takeuchi, Ama &
Gambia 25495 (LAE, S), HE860182, HE860088, HE995751. Planchonella dothioensis (Aubrév.) Swenson,
Bartish & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger 995 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860183, AY552138, HE995668.
Planchonella duclitan (Blanco) Bakh.f., New Guinea, Fuentes & Fernando 37140 (L), HE860184, HE860089,
—. Planchonella eerwah (F.M. Bailey) P. Royen, Australia, Floyd s.n. (S), EU661400, AY552147, HE995669.
Planchonella endlicheri (Montrouz.) Guillaumin, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Lowry & Létocart 2038 (NOU,
P, S), HE860185, DQ154068, HE995614. Planchonella ericiflora Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia,
Munzinger & al. 4197 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860186, HE860090, HE995660. Planchonella euphlebia (F.
Muell.) Francis, Australia, Bartish & Ford 18 (BRI, MO, S), HE860187, DQ154069, HE995727. Planchonella
firma (Miq.) Dubard, New Guinea, Takeuchi, Ama & Jisaka 21437 (LAE, S), HE860188, HE860091,
HE995615. Planchonella glauca Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Swenson, McPherson & Mouly 625
(S), HE860189, AY552104, HE995728. Planchonella grayana H.St.John, French Polynesia, Australs, Butaud
192 (PAP), HE860191, HE860092, HE995616. Planchonella grayana var. florencei Fosberg, French Polynesia,
Tahiti, Florence 3967 (BISH, PAP, S), —, HE860093, —. Planchonella grayana H. St.John, French Polynesia,
Tuamotus, Butaud & Lagouy 1173 (PAP), HE860193, HE860094, HE995617. Planchonella grayana H.
St.John, Wallis and Futuna, Alofi, Munzinger 5479 (NOU, P, S), HE860190, HE860095, HE995729.
Planchonella grayana H. St.John, Wallis and Futuna, Futuna, Munzinger, Meyer & Jourdan 5282 (P, S),
HE860192, HE860096, HE995730. Planchonella howeana (F. Muell.) Pierre, Lord Howe Island, Le Cussan
1210 (BRI), HE860194, EF025094, HE995681. Planchonella "Ile Yande", New Caledonia, Swenson &
Munzinger 715 (S), HE860195, EF025091, —. Planchonella kaalaensis Aubrév., New Caledonia, Swenson &
Munzinger 706 (S), HE860196, HE860097, HE995694. Planchonella koumaciensis Aubrév., New Caledonia,
Munzinger 2665 (NOU), HE860197, EF025095, HE995682. Planchonella kuebiniensis Aubrév., New
Caledonia, Munzinger & Létocart 2057 (S), HE860198, DQ154070, HE995670. Planchonella laetevirens
(Baill.) Pierre ex Dubard, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Pignal & Lowry 2001 (MO, NOU, P, S), HE860199,
DQ154071, HE995618. Planchonella lamprophylla (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, New Guinea, Takeuchi, Ama &
Gambia 25573 (LAE, S), HE860200, HE860098, HE995619. Planchonella lauracea (Baill.) Dubard, New
Caledonia, McPherson & Munzinger 18070 (MO, S), HE860201, AY552145, HE995731. Planchonella
ledermannii (K. Krause) H.J. Lam, New Guinea, Takeuchi, Towati, Jisaka & Ama 17700 (LAE, S), HE860202,
HE860099, HE995732. Planchonella linggensis (Burck) Pierre, Wallis and Futuna, Futuna, Munzinger 5330
(NOU, P, S), HE860203, HE860100, HE995733. Planchonella linggensis (Burck) Pierre, New Guinea,
Takeuchi, Jisaka, Towati & Ama 21108 (LAE, S), HE860204, HE860101, HE995695. Planchonella linggensis
(Burck) Pierre, Vanuatu, Wheatley 271 (K), —, DQ154062, —. Planchonella luteocostata Munzinger &
Swenson, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Jaffré & Roumagnac 2375 (NOU, S), EU661401, EF025099, HE995755.
Planchonella maingayi (C.B. Clarke) P. Royen, Singapore, Wilkie & Gwee 507 (E), HE860205, HE860102,
HE995620. Planchonella mandjeliana Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia, Munzinger & Pillon 2861
(NOU, P, S), HE860206, EF025100, HE995680. Planchonella membranacea H.J. Lam, Fiji, Smith 4609 (S),
HE860207, DQ154074, HE995621. Planchonella mindanaensis H.J. Lam, Philippines, Clemens 1015 (PNH),
HE860208, HE860103, HE995622. Planchonella minutiflora Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia, MacKee
16639 (NOU, P, S), HE860209, HE860104, HE995734. Planchonella moluccana (Burck) H.J. Lam, New
Guinea, Takeuchi, Ama & Gambia 25550 (S), HE860139, HE860072, HE995671. Planchonella "Munzinger
6150", New Caledonia, Munzinger 6150 (NOU) , HE860210, HE860105, HE995735. Planchonella
"Munzinger 6490", Fiji, Munzinger 6490 (NOU, SUVA) , HE860211, HE860106, HE995736. Planchonella
"Munzinger 6514", Fiji, Munzinger 6514 (NOU, SUVA) , HE860212, HE860107, HE995737. Planchonella
myrsinifolia (F. Muell.) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Australia, Floyd s.n. (S), HE860213, AY552143,
HE995702. Planchonella myrsinoides (Benth.) S.T. Blake ex Francis, Australia, McDonald 3365 (QRS, S),
HE860214, EF025092, HE995738. Planchonella obovata (R. Br.) Pierre, Taiwan, Chung & Anderberg 1166
(HAST, S), EU661402, DQ154076, HE995739. Planchonella "Pillon 150", New Caledonia, Pillon, Barrabé &
Rigault 150 (NOU, P, S), HE860215, HE860108, HE995696. Planchonella pohlmaniana (F. Muell.) Pierre ex
Dubard, Australia, Bartish & Ford 22 (BRI, S), HE860216, DQ154079, HE995672. Planchonella pronyensis
Guillaumin, New Caledonia, Munzinger 2051 (NOU), HE860217, DQ154080, HE995623. Planchonella
roseoloba Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia, Munzinger 2311 (NOU, P, S), HE860218, DQ154090,
HE995673. Planchonella rufocostata Munzinger & Swenson, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Labat & Butin 2583
(NOU, S), HE860219, DQ154089, HE995684. Planchonella saligna S. Moore, New Caledonia, Munzinger,
Létocart & Gâteblé 2218 (NOU, P, S), HE860220, DQ154083, HE995624. Planchonella sandwicensis (A.
Gray) Pierre, Hawaii, Ohao, Koolan 119d (GB), HE860221, DQ154084, HE995740. Planchonella sandwicensis
(A. Gray) Pierre, Hawaii, Kauai, Merello, Bess & Johnson 3227 (MO, S) , HE860222, HE860109, HE995741.
Planchonella sandwicensis (A. Gray) Pierre, Hawaii, Ohau, Doug Okamoto s.n. (S), HE860223, HE860110,
HE995742. Planchonella skottsbergii Guillaumin, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Gâteblé & Amice 2391 (NOU,
P, S), HE860224, DQ154085, HE995674. Planchonella smithii (P. Royen) A.C. Sm., Fiji, Munzinger 6495
(NOU, S, SUVA), HE860225, HE860111, HE995743. Planchonella solida P. Royen, New Guinea, Takeuchi,
Towati & Ama 17286 (LAE, S), HE860226, EF025104, HE995675. Planchonella sphaerocarpa (Baill.) Dubard,
New Caledonia, Tronchet, Munzinger & Oddi 389 (MO, P), EU661403, AY552139, HE995625. Planchonella
tahitensis (Nadeaud) Pierre ex Dubard, French Polynesia, Raiatea, Meyer & Taputuarai 3013 (NOU, PAP),
HE860227, EF025108, HE995626. Planchonella tahitensis (Nadeaud) Pierre ex Dubard, French Polynesia,
Tahiti, Meyer & Taputuarai 3051 (PAP), HE860228, EF025105, HE995744. Planchonella thiensis Aubrév.,
New Caledonia, Munzinger, Dagostini, Rigault & Kurpisz 2625 (S), HE860229, EF025106, HE995676.
Planchonella thyrsoidea C.T. White, New Guinea, Whitfeld PA-2E-0072 (LAE, MIN, S), HE860230,
HE860112, HE995745. Planchonella torricellensis (K. Schum.) H.J. Lam, Wallis and Futuna, Alofi, Munzinger
5473 (NOU, S), HE860231, HE860113, HE995746. Planchonella torricellensis (K. Schum.) H.J. Lam, Wallis
and Futuna, Futuna, Munzinger 5284 (NOU), HE860232, HE860114, HE995747. Planchonella umbonata (P.
Royen) A.C. Sm., Fiji, Smith 8298 (K), HE860233, DQ154086, HE995627. Planchonella vitiensis Gillespie,
Fiji, Smith 7700 (S), HE860234, DQ154088, HE995628. Planchonella xylocarpa (C.T. White) Swenson,
Bartish & Munzinger, Australia, Bartish & Ford 31 (BRI, S), HE860235, DQ154049, HE995629. Planchonella
xylocarpa (C.T. White) Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, Papua New Guinea, Takeuchi, Towati & Ama 17284
(LAE, S), HE860236, EF025107, HE995677. Pouteria "Armstrong316", New Guinea, Armstrong 316 (E), —,
HE860115, —. Pouteria gillisonii Vink, New Guinea, Takeuchi & Ama 19050B (LAE, S), HE860237,
HE860116, HE995748. Pouteria luzoniensis (Merr.) Baehni, New Guinea, Conn, Damas, Fazang, Paul & Kuria
5063 (L), HE860238, HE860117, HE995697. Pouteria maclayana (F. Muell.) Baehni, Papua New Guinea,
Regaldo & Katik 1102 (L), HE860239, HE860118, HE995698. Pouteria malaccensis (C.B. Clarke) Baehni,
Singapore, Swenson, Karim & Fadli 1017 (S, SING), HE860240, HE860119, HE995679. Pouteria pullenii
Vink, New Guinea, Takeuchi, Jisaka, Towati & Ama 21157 (LAE, S), —, HE860120, HE995630. Pouteria
richardii (F. Muell.) Baehni, Australia, Dixon & Leach 1032 (BRI, DNA, S), HE860134, HE860069,
HE995749. Pouteria stellibacca J.F. Maxwell, Thailand, Boonkongchart & Chongko 146 (L), HE860241,
HE860121, HE995700. Pouteria wandae Vink, New Guinea, Armstrong 305 (E, S) , HE860242, HE860122, —.
Pycnandra acuminata (Pierre ex Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger 1006 (MO, NOU,
P), EU661430, AY552124, HE995631. Pycnandra atrofusca Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia,
Munzinger & al. 2618 (NOU, P, S), EU661419, EU661443, HE995632. Pycnandra balansae (Baill.) Swenson
& Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 1451 (S), EU661387, AY552123, HE995754. Pycnandra
belepensis Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Ile Art, Swenson, Munzinger & Barrabé 913 (S), HE860243,
HE860123, HE995687. Pycnandra benthamii Baill., New Caledonia, Munzinger, Létocart & Gâteblé 2228
(NOU, P, S), EU661404, EU661436, HE995633. Pycnandra blaffartii Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia,
Swenson, McPherson & Mouly 597 (NOU, S), EU661423, AY552127, HE995634. Pycnandra blanchonii
(Aubrév.) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Labat, Leveque & Mandaoué 2576 (S),
EU661390, DQ154059, HE995635. Pycnandra bracteolata Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger,
Pillon & Butin 2885 (NOU, P, S), EU661421, EU661445, HE995636. Pycnandra caeruleilatex Swenson &
Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 2622 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661426, EU661448, HE995637.
Pycnandra canaliculata Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 2067 (MO, NOU, P, S),
EU661431, DQ154092, HE995638. Pycnandra carinocostata Vink, New Caledonia, McPherson & Munzinger
18091 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661405, AY552132, HE995639. Pycnandra comptonii (S. Moore) Vink, New
Caledonia, Lowry, McPherson & Le Borgne 5780A (MO, S), EU661407, AY552131, HE995640. Pycnandra
controversa (Guillaumin) Vink, New Caledonia, Lowry, McPherson & Le Borgne 5787 (MO, S), EU661408,
AY552126, HE995641. Pycnandra cylindricarpa Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Swenson, McPherson
& Mouly 615 (MO, NOU, S), EU661429, AY552110, HE995757. Pycnandra decandra (Montrouz.) Vink, New
Caledonia, Ile Art, Swenson, Munzinger & Barrabé 920 (S), HE860244, HE860124, HE995688. Pycnandra
deplanchei (Baill.) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger 978 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661380,
AY552120, HE995642. Pycnandra fastuosa (Baill.) Vink, New Caledonia, Munzinger & Swenson 2993 (NOU,
S), EU661394, EU661434, HE995643. Pycnandra francii (Guillaumin & Dubard) Swenson & Munzinger, New
Caledonia, Munzinger 965 (MO, NOU, P), EU661391, AY552117, HE995644. Pycnandra glabella Swenson &
Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 2615 (NOU, P, S), EU661418, EU661442, HE995645. Pycnandra
glaberrima Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 1394 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661399,
AY552133, HE995646. Pycnandra gordoniifolia (S.Moore) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Swenson
& Munzinger 726a (BRI, MO, NOU, P, S), EU661392, EU661433, HE995647. Pycnandra griseosepala Vink,
New Caledonia, Swenson, McPherson & Mouly 627 (MO, NOU, S), EU661414, AY552128, HE995648.
Pycnandra kaalaensis Aubrév., New Caledonia, Munzinger & Labat 2599 (NOU, S), EU661415, EU661440,
HE995756. Pycnandra linearifolia Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & Blaffart 2786 (NOU,
P, S), EU661427, EU661440, HE995753. Pycnandra neocaledonica (S.Moore) Vink, New Caledonia, Tronchet,
Munzinger & Oddi 426 (MO, NOU, P, S), EU661416, AY552129, HE995649. Pycnandra ouaiemensis
Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger, Lowry, Blaffart & Brown 3135 (NOU, S), EU661422,
EU661446, HE995689. Pycnandra paucinervia Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger & al. 1438
(NOU, P, S), EU661424, AY552159, HE995650. Pycnandra pubiflora Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia,
Munzinger & al. 2624 (NOU, P, S), EU661420, EU661444, HE995651. Pycnandra sarlinii (Aubrév.) Swenson
& Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger 1860 (NOU, P, S), EU661395, EU661435, HE995652. Pycnandra
schmidii (Aubrév.) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, McPherson & Munzinger 18106 (MO, NOU, P, S),
EU661396, AY552116, HE995653. Pycnandra sessiliflora Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, Munzinger
& McPherson 696 (BRI, MO, NOU, P, S), EU661398, AY552161, HE995691. Pycnandra sessilifolia (Pancher
& Sebert) Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia, McPherson & Munzinger 18176 (MO, P), EU661397,
AY552118, HE995654. Pycnandra vieillardii (Baill.) Vink, New Caledonia, Dumontet, Zongo & Maituku s.n.
(S), EU661417, EU661441, HE995655. Pycnandra viridiflora Swenson & Munzinger, New Caledonia,
Munzinger, McPherson & Tuiwawa 4195 (NOU, S), HE860245, HE860125, HE995656. Sersalisia sericea
(Aiton) R. Br., Australia, Harwood 1172 (S), HE860246, AY552112, HE995657. Sersalisia sessiliflora (C.T.
White) Aubrév., Australia, Bartish & Ford 33 (BRI, MO, P, S), HE860247, DQ154094, HE995678. Van-royena
castanosperma (C.T. White) Aubrév., Australia, Bartish & Ford 26 (S), HE860248, DQ154096, HE995658.
A
B
D
E
F
I
Figure 1.
C
G
J
H
K
L
1
97
1
99
1
100
1
100
.97
64
0.96
1
59
1
1
85
1
91
0.96
64
1
100
1
1
62
1
100
1
98
0.72
1
100
1
100
0.95
61
0.95
0.9
1
100
1
84
1
52
1
100
83
1
84
0.92
73
1
100
1
100
0.8
1
86
1
98
1
100
1
100
1
85
1
76
0.9
72
1
95
0.88
61
1
100
0.96
64
1
100
1
87
1
0.97
100
73
1
0.97
100
0.86
1
100
1
100
0.96
1
51
100
0.99
0.93
61
1
78
0.98
60
1
76
1
100
1
87
1
100
1
100
1
97
0.8
1
84
1
64
1
88
0.92
59
63
0.98
85
1
92
1
95
D2
1
67
1
100
1
100
0.97
52
1
76
1
66
1
100
1
100
1
90
Current classification
Beccariella
Chrysophyllum
Krausella
Leptostylis
Niemeyera
Magodendron
Pichonia
Planchonella
Pycnandra
Pouteria
Sersalisia
Van-royena
1
86
1
99
D1
1
1
74
1
0.99
100
64 0.86
64
1
99
1
100
0.85
1
63
1
100
0.82
1
88
1
95
D3
0.8
1
90
1
100
1
100
1
.92
1
73
1
100
1
100
1
68
1
100
1
99
0.95
0.8
0.8
58
1
97
1
0.81
1
100
1
100
.87
1
96
Figure 2.
1
1
100
1
100
1
100
0.96
67
1
100
1
99
1
1 100
100
Planchonella moluccana
Beccariella macrocarpa
Beccariella papyracea
Beccariella singuliflora
Beccariella xerocarpa
Beccariella brownlessiana
Beccariella queenslandica
Beccariella “acutifolia”
Beccariella longipetiolata M2264
Beccariella longipetiolata M2911
Beccariella baueri
Beccariella rubicunda
Beccariella Munzinger2581
Planchonella firma
Pouteria wandae
Pouteria gillisonii
Planchonella lamprophylla
Planchonella ledermannii
Pouteria richardii
Beccariella Takeuchi25691
Beccariella sebertii
Beccariella vieillardii
Beccariella novocaledonica
Beccariella lucens
Beccariella lasiantha
Beccariella crebrifolia
Beccariella “belepensis”
Beccariella brevipedicellata
Beccariella balansana
Van-royena castanosperma
Sersalisia sessiliflora
Sersalisia sericea
Pouteria luzoniensis
Pichonia occidentalis
Pichonia deplanchei
Pichonia lecomtei
Pichonia daenikeri
Pichonia balansana
Pichonia grandiflora
Pichonia balansae
Pichonia dubia S918
Pichonia dubia M3065
Magodendron mennyae
Niemeyera antiloga
Niemeyera whitei
Niemeyera Ford2429
Niemeyera prunifera
Niemeyera chartacea
Pycnandra canaliculata
Pycnandra acuminata
Chrysophyllum wagapense
Leptostylis filipes
Leptostylis grandifolia
Leptostylis goroensis
Pycnandra ouaiemensis
Pycnandra comptonii
Pycnandra blaffartii
Pycnandra controversa
Pycnandra vieillardii
Pycnandra griseosepala
Pycnandra neocaledonica
Pycnandra kaalaensis
Pycnandra decandra
Pycnandra belepensis
Pycnandra bracteolata
Pycnandra glabella
Pycnandra sessilifolia
Pycnandra francii
Pycnandra schmidii
Pycnandra pubiflora
Pycnandra caeruleilatex
Pycnandra sessiliflora
Pycnandra sarlinii
Pycnandra deplanchei
Pycnandra fastuosa
Pycnandra carinocostata
Pycnandra viridiflora
Pycnandra blanchonii
Pycnandra gordoniifolia
Pycnandra paucinervia
Pycnandra atrofusca
Pycnandra benthamii
Pycnandra glaberrima
Pycnandra balansae
Pycnandra cylindricarpa
Pycnandra linearifolia
Planchonella baillonii
Pouteria malaccensis
Pouteria maclayana
Planchonella linggensis Vanuatu
Planchonella chartacea Australia
Planchonella linggensis Futuna
Planchonella solida New Guinea
Planchonella linggensis New Guinea
Planchonella xylocarpa
Planchonella xylocarpa
Pouteria stellibacca
Planchonella maingayi
Planchonella sphaerocarpa
Planchonella arnhemica
Planchonella pohlmaniana
Planchonella asterocarpon
Planchonella membranacea
Planchonella dothioensis
Planchonella thiensis
Planchonella laetervirens
Planchonella mandjeliana
Planchonella cauliflora
Planchonella luteocostata
Planchonella amieuana
Planchonella endlicheri
Planchonella ericiflora
Planchonella Pillon150
Planchonella kaalaensis
Planchonella koumaciensis
Planchonella Munzinger6150
Planchonella minutiflora
Planchonella pronyensis
Planchonella rufocostata
Planchonella saligna
Planchonella crassinervia
Planchonella roseoloba
Planchonella skottsbergii
Planchonella kuebiniensis
Planchonella howeana
Planchonella myrsinifolia
Planchonella cotinifolia
Planchonella eerwah
Planchonella costata
Planchonella australis
Planchonella myrsinoides
Planchonella euphlebia
Planchonella Ile Yande
Planchonella lauracea
Planchonella glauca
Chrysophyllum bakhuizenii
Planchonella clemensii
Planchonella obovata
Planchonella mindanaensis
Planchonella Munzinger6514 Fiji
Planchonella vitiensis Fiji
Planchonella aneityensis Vanuatu
Planchonella tahitensis Raiatea
Planchonella grayana Tuamotu
Planchonella tahitensis Tahiti
Planchonella grayana Alofi
Planchonella grayana Futuna
Planchonella grayana Australs
P. grayana var. florencei Tahiti
Pouteria pullenii
Pouteria Armstrong316
Planchonella Munzinger6490
Planchonella smithii
Planchonella umbonata
Planchonella sandwicensis K119
Planchonella sandwicensis Okamoto
Planchonella sandwicensis M3227
Planchonella cyclopensis P1365
Planchonella anteridifera
Planchonella thyrsoidea
Planchonella cyclopensis T25495
Planchonella dulcitan
Planchonella torricellensis Futuna
Planchonella torricellensis Alofi
Krausella patentinervia
Krausella polyneura
B Sepals inner surface
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Pichonia
Pichonia
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Niemeyera
Niemeyera
Pycnandra
Pycnandra
Planchonella
Planchonella
not areolate
areolate
D Stamens inserted
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Pichonia
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Niemeyera
Niemeyera
Pycnandra
Pycnandra
Planchonella
Planchonella
cup-shaped
urn-shaped
narrowly campanulate
tubular
in tube orifice
just below tube orifice
in middle of the tube
near the base
Beccariella
Beccariella
F Seed characters
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Pichonia
Pichonia
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Magodendron
Niemeyera antiloga
Niemeyera
Niemeyera
Pycnandra
Pycnandra
with stigmatic areas
simple
Planchonella
Planchonella
Figure 3.
Van-royena
Sersalisia
Pichonia
E Style
pubescent
glabrous
Beccariella
Beccariella
C Flowers
Beccariella
Beccariella
A Higher leaf venation
cotyledons foliaceous,
radicle exserted and
endosperm present
cotyledons plano-convex,
radicle included and
endosperm absent
cotyledons plano-convex,
radicle exserted and
endosperm absent
Pleioluma moluccana
Pleioluma macrocarpa
Pleioluma papyracea
Pleioluma singuliflora
Pleioluma xerocarpa
Pleioluma brownlessiana
Pleioluma queenslandica
“Pleioluma acutifolia”
Pleioluma longipetiolata M2264
Pleioluma longipetiolata M2911
Pleioluma baueri
Pleioluma rubicunda
Pleioluma Munzinger2581
Pleioluma firma
Pleioluma wandae
Pleioluma gillisonii
Pleioluma lamprophylla
Pleioluma ledermannii
Pleioluma laurifolia
Pleioluma Takeuchi25691
Pleioluma sebertii
Pleioluma vieillardii
Pleioluma novocaledonica
Pleioluma lucens
Pleioluma lasiantha
Pleioluma crebrifolia
“Pleioluma belepensis”
Pleioluma balansana
Pleioluma balansana
Van-royena castanosperma
Sersalisia sessiliflora
Sersalisia sericea
Sersalisia luzoniensis
Pichonia occidentalis
Pichonia deplanchei
Pichonia lecomtei
Pichonia daenikeri
Pichonia balansana
Pichonia grandiflora
Pichonia balansae
Pichonia dubia S918
Pichonia dubia M3065
Magodendron mennyae
Amorphospermum antilogum
Niemeyera whitei
Niemeyera Ford2429
Niemeyera prunifera
Niemeyera chartacea
Pycnandra canaliculata
Pycnandra acuminata
“Pycnandra wagapensis”
“Pycnandra filipes”
“Pycnandra grandifolia”
“Pycnandra goroensis”
Pycnandra ouaiemensis
Pycnandra comptonii
Pycnandra blaffartii
Pycnandra controversa
Pycnandra vieillardii
Pycnandra griseosepala
Pycnandra neocaledonica
Pycnandra kaalaensis
Pycnandra decandra
Pycnandra belepensis
Pycnandra bracteolata
Pycnandra glabella
Pycnandra sessilifolia
Pycnandra francii
Pycnandra schmidii
Pycnandra pubiflora
Pycnandra caeruleilatex
Pycnandra sessiliflora
Pycnandra sarlinii
Pycnandra deplanchei
Pycnandra fastuosa
Pycnandra carinocostata
Pycnandra viridiflora
Pycnandra blanchonii
Pycnandra gordoniifolia
Pycnandra paucinervia
Pycnandra atrofusca
Pycnandra benthamii
Pycnandra glaberrima
Pycnandra balansae
Pycnandra cylindricarpa
Pycnandra linearifolia
A
B
C
D
E
F
Figure 4.
Planchonella
F
Planchonella baillonii
Planchonella malaccensis
Planchonella maclayana
Planchonella linggensis Vanuatu
Planchonella chartacea Australia
Planchonella linggensis Futuna
Planchonella garcinioides New Guinea
Planchonella linggensis New Guinea
Planchonella xylocarpa
Planchonella xylocarpa
Planchonella stellibacca
Planchonella maingayi
Planchonella sphaerocarpa
Planchonella arnhemica
Planchonella pohlmaniana
Planchonella asterocarpon
Planchonella membranacea
Planchonella dothioensis
Planchonella thiensis
Planchonella laetervirens
Planchonella mandjeliana
Planchonella cauliflora
Planchonella luteocostata
Planchonella amieuana
Planchonella endlicheri
Planchonella ericiflora
Planchonella Pillon150
Planchonella kaalaensis
Planchonella koumaciensis
Planchonella Munzinger6150
Planchonella minutiflora
Planchonella pronyensis
Planchonella rufocostata
Planchonella saligna
Planchonella crassinervia
Planchonella roseoloba
Planchonella skottsbergii
Planchonella kuebiniensis
Planchonella howeana
Planchonella myrsinifolia
Planchonella cotinifolia
Planchonella eerwah
Planchonella costata
Planchonella australis
Planchonella myrsinoides
Planchonella euphlebia
Planchonella Ile Yande
Planchonella lauracea
Planchonella glauca
Planchonella lamii
Planchonella clemensii
Planchonella obovata
Planchonella mindanaensis
Planchonella Munzinger6514 Fiji
Planchonella vitiensis Fiji
Planchonella aneityensis Vanuatu
Planchonella tahitensis Raiatea
Planchonella tahitensis Tuamotu
Planchonella tahitensis Tahiti
Planchonella tahitensis Alofi
Planchonella tahitensis Futuna
Planchonella tahitensis Australs
Planchonella tahitensis Tahiti
Planchonella pullenii
Planchonella Armstrong316
Planchonella Munzinger6490
Planchonella smithii
Planchonella umbonata
Planchonella sandwicensis K119
Planchonella sandwicensis Okamoto
Planchonella sandwicensis M3227
Planchonella cyclopensis P1365
Planchonella anteridifera
Planchonella thyrsoidea
Planchonella cyclopensis T25495
Planchonella dulcitan
Planchonella torricellensis Futuna
Planchonella torricellensis Alofi
Planchonella forbesii
Planchonella polyneura