Skip to main content

Phytomorph and Geomorph Identification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unraveling the Voynich Codex

Part of the book series: Fascinating Life Sciences ((FLS))

  • 918 Accesses

Abstract

The Voynich Codex is largely an herbal with an estimated 359 illustrations of plants (phytomorphs) in the Herbal and Pharmaceutical sections. In 1944, the distinguished botanical taxonomist Hugh O’Neill identified New World plants in the Voynich Codex, including the sunflower and capsicum pepper. In 2013, Arthur O. Tucker and Rexford H. Talbert identified 37 plants indigenous to colonial New Spain. Later, in 2016, Tucker and Jules Janick expanded this to 58 phytomorphs and 55 species. Identifications here include 60 phytomorphs and 57 species, all indigenous to colonial New Spain or circumboreal. No European plants have been identified. Many were medicinal plants. The geomorph boleite was identified. Although boleite was found in many locations, the only examples of crystals of this quality were primarily from Baja California. We conclude that the Voynich Codex must be a post-Columbian manuscript written in colonial New Spain in the sixteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 15 March 2019

    This book was inadvertently published without updating the following corrections and it has now been updated:

Literature Cited

  • Alcántara Rojas, B. 2008. Nepapan Xochitl: The power of flowers in the works of Sahagún. In Colors between two worlds: The Florentine codex of Bernardino de Sahagún, ed. L.A. Waldman, 106–132. Florence: Villa I Tatti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2012. Brassicaceae. In The Jepson manual. Vascular plants of California, ed. B.G. Baldwin, D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Bosatti, and D.H. Wilken, 2nd ed., 512–577. Berkeley: University California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. 1986. The Voynich manuscript—By Voynich? Cryptologia 10: 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, R.J., A.L. Bogle, and D.M. Cherniawsky. 2006. Petasites. In Flora of North America North of Mexico, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 635–637. Vol. 20. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, Part 7: Asteraceae, Part 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C.C. 2001. Moreae, Artocarpeae, and Dorstenia (Moraceae). Flora Neotropica 83: 1–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, B.K., M. Scascitelli, N.C. Kane, H.H. Luton, D.A. Rasmussen, R.A. Bye, D. Lentz, and L.H. Rieseberg. 2011. Sunflower domestication alleles support single domestication center in eastern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 14360–14365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiler, E.F., ed. 1976. Early floral engravings: All 110 plates from the 1612 “florilegium” by Emanuel Sweerts. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borschenius, F., L.S. Suárez Suárez, and L.M. Prince. 2012. Molecular phylogeny and redefined generic limits of Calathea (Marantaceae). Systematic Botany 37: 620–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bown, D. 1988. Aroids, plants of the arum family. Portland: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye, R.A., and E. Linares. 2013. Códice de la Cruz-Badiano: Medicine préhispánica. Primera parte. Arqueología Mexicana 50: 7–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye, R.A., E. Linares, and D.L. Lentz. 2009. México: Centro de origen de la domesticación del girasol. Tip Revista Especializada en Ciencias Quimico-Biológicas 12: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camelo Arredondo, R., J. Gurría Lacroix, and C. Reyes Valerio. 1964. Juan Gerson, Tlacuilo de Tecamachalco. In Departamento de Monomuntos Coloniales. México: Instituto Nacional de Anthropolgia e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaumeton, F.P. 1830. Flore médicale. Vol. 3. Paris: C.L.F. Panckoucke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., R.B. Channell, and U. Nur. 1964. Viola rafinesquii, the only Melanium violet native to North America. Rhodora 66: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, M., L. Guerrini, and A. de Avila. 2009. Flora: The Aztec herbal. London: Royal Collection Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. 2000. Medieval herbals: The illustrative traditions. London: The British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J.A., A. Culham, and S.L. Jury. 1998. Reclassification of Actaea to include Cimicifuga and Souliea (Ranunculaceae): Phylogeny inferred from morphology, nrDNA ITS, and cpDNA trnL-F sequence variation. Taxon 47: 593–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M.A., and F.C. Hawthorne. 2000. Boleite: Resolution of the formula KPb26Ag9Cu24Cl62(OH)48. The Canadian Mineralogist 8: 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copper Development Association. 1971. Uses of copper compounds. CDA technical note TN11. Hemel Hempstead: Copper Development Association http://www.copperinfo.co.uk/copper-compounds/downloads/tn11-uses-of-copper-compounds.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ávila Blomberg, A. 2012. Yerba del coyote, veneno del perro: La evidencia lexica para identificar plantas en el Códice de la Cruz Badiano. Acta Botánica Mexicana (100): 489–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Batres, L.D.P., C.A.B. Alfaro, and J. Ghaemghami. 2012. Mesoamerica aesthetics: Horticultural plants in hair and skin care. Chronica Horticulturae 50 (2): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Cruz, M., and J. Badianus. 1991. Libellus de medicinalibus indorum herbis. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Motolinia, T. 1951. Motolinia’s history of the Indians of new Spain. Trans. F.B. Steck. Washington, DC: Academy of American Franciscan History.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sahagún B. 1963. Florentine Codex. General history of the things of New Spain. Book 11—Earthly things. Trans. C.E. Dibble and A.J.O. Anderson. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, J.L. 1976. Índice y sinonimia de las plantas medicinales de MéxicoInstituto Mexicano para el Estudio de las Plantas, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R.L. 1953. The pre-Columbian cultivated plants of Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets 16: 115–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D.B., and W.E. Harmon. 1977. The Lupinus montanus complex of Mexico and Central America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 64: 340–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastaugh, N., V. Walsh, T. Chaplin, and R. Siddall. 2008. Pigment compendium: A dictionary and optical microscopy of historical pigments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmart, E.W. 1940. The Badianus manuscript. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán, J.A.F., and J.G.R. Elferink. 2010. Ethnobotany and Aztec sexuality. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, R.L., ed. 1986. Artists’ pigments. A handbook of their history and characteristics. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M.L. 1938. Noteworthy plants of southeastern Virginia. Rhodora 40: 434–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, V. 2014. The brilliant history of color in art. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E.S. 1962. ‘The most mysterious MS’ still an enigma. Washington Post 5 August: E1, E5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, W. 2000. An Aztec herbal. New York: Dover Publication (First publ. Maya Society. 1939. Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • González Stuart, A. 2004. Plants used in Mexican traditional medicine. http://www.herbalsafety.utep.edu/documents/Plants%20Used%20in%20Mexican%20Traditional%20Medicine-July%2004.pdf.

  • Granziera, P. 2001. Concept of the garden in pre-Hispanic Mexico. Garden History 29: 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Huaxtepec: The sacred garden of an Aztec emperor. Landscape Research 30: 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravier, M.G. 2011. Sahagún’s codex and book design in the indigenous context. In Colors between two worlds, ed. G. Wolf and J. Connors, 156–197. Milan: Florentine Codex of Bernardino de Sahagún. Officina Libraria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J.F. 2012. Plant evolution and the origin of crop species. Wallingford: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, A., K.A. Gardner, D. Falush, D.L. Lentz, R.A. Bye, and L.H. Rieseberg. 2004. Origin of extant domesticated sunflowers in eastern North America. Nature 430: 201–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C.B. 2008. How old is the sunflower in Mexico? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America 105: E48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, F. 1942. Historia de las Plantas de Nueva España. Ed. I. Ochoterena. Imprenta Universitaria. Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, F., F. Celsi, F. Colonna, B. Deversini, J. Faber, J. Greuter, V. Mascardi, N. A. Recchi, and J. Terentius. 1651. Rerum medicatum Novae Hispaniae Thesarus, seu, Plantarum animalium mioneralium Mexicanorum historia. Vitalis Mascardi, Romae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, W. 1908. The pulque of Mexico. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 33: 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janick, J., and K.E. Hummer. 2012. The 1500th anniversary 512–2012 of the Juliana Anicia codex: An illustrated Diorcoridean recension. Chronica Horticulturae 52 (3): 9–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G., and R. Churchill. 2006. The Voynich manuscript. Rochester: Inner Traditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killip, E.P. 1938. The American species of Passifloraceae. Fieldiana 19: 1–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, D.L., M.D. Pohl, J.L. Alvarado, S. Tarighat, and R. Bye. 2008a. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as a pre-Columbian domesticate in Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 105: 6232–6237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, D.L., M.D. Pohl, and R. Bye. 2008b. Reply to Rieseberg and Burke, Heiser, Brown, and Smith: Molecular, linguistic, and archaeological evidence for domesticated sunflower in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America 105: E59–E50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mali, P.Y., and S.S. Panchal. 2013. A review on phyto-pharmacological potentials of Euphorbia thymifolia L. Ancient Science Life 32: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallard, E., and E. Cumenge. 1891. Sur une nouvelle espèce minérale, la Boléite. Bulletin de la Societe Francaise de Mineralogie et de Cristallographie 14: 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, M.E., L. Constance. 1941. A synopsis of North American species of Eryngium. The American Midland Naturalist 24: 361–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. 1981. Studies in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) I. The Arborescens group. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meira, M., E.P. da Silva, J.M. David, and J.P. David. 2012. Review of the genus Ipomoea: Traditional uses, chemistry and biological activities. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 22: 682–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, F.C. 1951. Valeriana in North America and the West Indies (Valerianaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 38: 377–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickel, J.T., and A.R. Smith. 2004. The pteridophytes of Mexico. Garden: New York Bot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh, C.F. 1892. American medicinal plants. Philadelphia: J.C. Yorston & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, M.L., and L.H. Rieseberg. 2012. Sorting through the chaff, nDNA gene trees for phylogenetic inference and hybrid identification of annual sunflowers (Helianthus sect. Helianthus). Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 64: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, P.C. 2014. The casa del Deán: New World imagery in a sixteenth century Mexican mural cycle. Austin: University Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J.K. 2005. Silene. In Flora of North America, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 168–216. Vol. 5. Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottana, A., R. Crespi, and G. Liboro. 1978. In Guide to rocks and minerals, ed. M. Prinz, G. Harlow, and J. Peters. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, A., D. Niño, B. Reyes, C. Sixtos, E. Aguirre, and E. Estrada. 1990. On the hypocholesteremic effect of Eryngium heterophyllum. Fitoterapia 61: 183–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieland, LaShara, and Willa Finley. 2009. Lone Star Wildflowers, 164–165. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutttall, Z. 1925. The gardens of ancient Mexico. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 1923: 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H.T. 1940. The sedges of the Yucatan peninsula. Carnegie Institute Washington Publication 522: 247–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H. 1944. Botanical observations on the Voynich MS. Speculum 19: 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocaranza, F. 2011. Historia de la medicina en México. 2nd ed. Cauhtémoc: Cien de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, M.S., and P.E. Elvander. 2012. Saxifragaceae. In The Jepson manual. Vascular plants of California, ed. B.G. Baldwin, D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Bosatti, and D.H. Wilken, 2nd ed., 1234–1244. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereda-Miranda, R., D. Rosas-Ramírez, and J. Castañeda-Gómez. 2010. Resin glycosides from the morning glory family. Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe 92: 77–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J.F. 1988. The Florentine codex imagery and the colonial tlacuilo. In The work of Bernardino de Sahagun, pioneer ethnographer of sixteenth-century Aztec Mexico, ed. J. Klor de Alva, H.B. Nicholson, and E. Quiñones Keber, 273–293. Austin: Univeristy of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant List. 2013. Version 1.1. http://www.theplantlist.org/.

  • Prather, A. 1999. Systematics of Cobaea (Polemoniaceae). Systematic Botanical Monographs 57: 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, J., and I. Chau. 2012. Boleite. http://www.mindat.org/min-712.html.

  • Ramírez, J., and G.V. Alcocer. 1902. Sinonimia vulgar y científica de las plantas mexicanas. Mexico: Oficina Tipográfica de la Secretaría del Fomento.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reko, B.P. 1947. Nombres bótanicos del manuscrito Badiano. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 5: 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.H., M. Dow, and T. Troxler. 2010. Modeling Nymphoides architecture: A morphological analysis of Nymphoides aquatica (Menyanthaceae). American Journal of Botany 97: 1761–1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L., and J.M. Burke. 2008. Molecular evidence and the origin of the domesticated sunflower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: E46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Ibarra, J., and A. Molina-Cruz. 2002. The ethnobotany of chaya (Cnidoscolus aconitifolius ssp. aconitifolius Breckon): A nutritious Maya vegetable. Economic Botany 56: 350–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-López, M.A., P.M. Garcia-López, R. Rodríguez, and J.F. Zamora Natera. 2010. Mexican wild lupines as a source of quinolizidine alkaloids of economic potential. Polibotánica 29: 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, N.H. 1965. Violets (Viola) of central and eastern United States: An introductory survey. Sida 2: 1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, E., and E. Sherwood. 2008. The Voynich botanical plants. http://www.edithsherwood.com/voynich_botanical_plants/index.php. 26 July 2012.

  • Shinners, L.H. 1961. Viola rafinesquii: Nomenclature and native status. Rhodora 63: 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A., and R. S. Cowan. 1979. Taxonomic literature: A selective guide to botanical publications and collections, with dates, commentaries and types. Vol. 2, H-Le. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P.C. 1914. A revision of the genus Cobaea. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 17: 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1920–1926. Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 23: 1–1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P.C., and L.O. Williams. 1973. Labiatae, mint family. In Flora of Guatemala, eds. P.C. Standley and L.O. Williams, Part IX, no. 3. Fieldiana 24: 237–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiz, L., and S.L. Taiz. 2011. The biological section of the Voynich manuscript: A textbook of medieval plant physiology. Chronica Horticulturae 51 (2): 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A.O., and R.H. Talbert. 2013. A preliminary analysis of the botany, zoology, and mineralogy of the Voynich manuscript. HerbalGram 100: 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A.O., and J. Janick. 2016. Identification of phytomorphs in the Voynich codex. Horticultural Reviews 44: 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A.O., M.E. Poston, and H.H. Iltis. 1989. History of the LCU herbarium, 1895–1986. Taxon 38: 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, ARS. 2015. National Genetics Resources Program. Germplasm resources information network – GRIN [online database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxgenform.pl.

  • Velinska, E. 2013. The Voynich Manuscript: Plant id list. ellievelinska.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-voynich-manuscript-plant-id-list.html. 5 June 2017.

  • Zepeda, G.C., and L.O. White. 2008. Herbolaria y pintura mural: Plantas medicinales en los murals del Convento del Divino Salvador de Malinalco, Estado de México. Polibotanica 25: 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur O. Tucker .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tucker, A.O., Janick, J. (2018). Phytomorph and Geomorph Identification. In: Unraveling the Voynich Codex. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77294-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics