Skip to main content
Log in

Protection mechanisms against excess light in the resurrection plants Craterostigma wilmsii and Xerophyta viscosa

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanisms of avoidance and protection against light damage were studied in the resurrection plants Craterostigma wilmsii and Xerophyta viscosa.

In C. wilmsii, a combination of both physical and chemical changes appeared to afford protection against free radical damage. During dehydration leaves curled inwards, and the abaxial surface became exposed to light. The tissue became purple/brown in colour, this coinciding with a three-fold increase in anthocyanin content and a 30% decline in chlorophyll content. Thus light-chlorophyll interactions are progressively reduced as chlorophyll became masked by anthocyanins in abaxial layers and shaded in the adaxial layers. Ascorbate peroxidase (AP) activity increased during this process but declined when the leaf was desiccated (5% RWC). During rehydration leaves uncurled and the potential for normal light-chlorophyll interaction was possible before full hydration had occurred. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione reductase (GR) activities increased markedly during this stage, possibly affording free radical protection until full hydration and metabolic recovery had occurred.

In contrast, the leaves of X. viscosa did not curl, but light-chlorophyll interactions were minimised by the loss of chlorophyll and dismantling of thylakoid membranes. During dehydration, free radical protection was afforded by a four-fold increase in anthocyanin content and increased activities of AP, GR and SOD. These declined during rehydration. It is suggested that potential free radical damage may be avoided by the persistence of anthocyanins during the period of thylakoid membrane re-assembly and full chlorophyll restitution which only occurred once the leaves were fully rehydrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bewley JD and Oliver MJ (1992) Desiccation tolerance in vegetative plant tissues and seeds: Protein synthesis in relation to desiccation and a potential role for protection and repair mechanisms. In: GN Somero, CB Osmond and CL Bolis (eds) Water and Life: Comparative analysis of water relationships at the organismic cellular and molecular levels, pp 141-160. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elstner EF and Heupel A (1976) Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxyl ammonium chloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal Biochem 70: 616-620

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hallam ND and Luff SE (1980) Fine structural changes in the mesophyll tissue of the leaves of Xerophyta villosa during desiccation. Bot Gaz 141(2): 173-179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hopkins WG (1992) Introduction to plant physiology, pp 125- 140. New York, John Wiley &; Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingram J and Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 377-403

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larson A (1988) The antioxidants of higher plants. Phytochem 27(4): 969-978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148: 350-383

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malan C, Greyling MM and Gressel J (1990) Correlation between CuZn superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase, and environmental and xenobiotic stress tolerance in maize inbreds. Plant Science 69: 157-166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mancinelli AL, Yang C-PH, Lindquist P, Anderson OR and Rabino I (1975) Photocontrol of anthocyanin synthesis. III The action of streptomycin on the synthesis of chlorophyll and anthocyanin. Plant Physiol 55: 251-257

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCord JM and Fridovich I (1969) Superoxide dismutase, and enzymatic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein) J Biol Chem 244: 6049-6055

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muslin EH and Homann PH (1992) Light as a hazard for the desiccation-resistant “resurrection” fern Polypodium polypoides L. Plant Cell &; Environ 15: 81-89

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seel WE, Hendry GA and Lee JA (1992) Effects of desiccation on some activated oxygen processing enzymes and antioxidants in mosses. J Exp Bot 43(253): 1031-1037

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sgherri CLM, Loggini B, Puliga S and Navari-Izzo F (1994) Antioxidant system in Sporobolus stapfianus: changes in response to desiccation and rehydration. Phytochem 35(3): 561-565

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sgherri CLM, Loggini B, Bochicchio A and Navari-Izzo F (1994) Antioxidant system in Boea hygroscopica: changes in response to desiccation and rehydration. Phytochem 35(3): 377-381

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sherwin HW and Farrant JM (1996) Differences in rehydration of three desiccation-tolerant angiosperm species. Ann Bot 78: 703-710

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smirnoff N (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol 125: 27-58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swain T (1965) Nature and properties of flavonoids. In: T.W. Goodwin (ed) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments. London and New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tuba Z, Lichtenthaler HK, Csintalan Z, Nagy Z and Szente K (1994) Reconstitution of chlorophylls and photosynthetic CO2 assimilation upon rehydration of the desiccated poikilochlorophyllous plant Xerophyta scabrida (Pax) Th. Dur. et Schinz. Planta 192: 414-420

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vertucci CW and Farrant JM (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. In: J Kigel and G Galili (eds) Seed development and germination, pp 237-271. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang SY, Jiao HJ and Faust M (1991) Changes in ascorbate, glutathione, and related enzyme activities during thidiazuroninduced bud break of apple. Physiol Plant 82: 231-236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherwin, H.W., Farrant, J.M. Protection mechanisms against excess light in the resurrection plants Craterostigma wilmsii and Xerophyta viscosa. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 203–210 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801610891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801610891

Navigation