Abstract
Northern Viet Nam displays a remarkable diversity of wild bananas (Musa L.), including the species from which the majority of cultivated bananas derive. The taxonomy and exact distribution of these wild bananas are however not well known, limiting their conservation and use. In the present study, we describe the morphology, ecology, and phytogeography of the 6 Musa species that were collected between 2016 and 2019 in northern Viet Nam: Musa acuminata Colla, M. balbisiana Colla, M. itinerans Cheesman, M. haekkinenii N.S.Ly & Haev, M. lutea R.V.Valmayor, L.D.Danh and Hakkinen and M. paracoccinea A.Z.Liu and D.Z.Li:. Of these, M. itinerans was the species with the most widespread distribution range, occurring as large mats in various habitats between 136 and 1331 m, whereas M. acuminata was found between 136 and 989 m and M. balbisiana was between 108 and 981 m. Furthermore, M. lutea, M. paracoccinea and M. haekkinenii were distributed in open areas with low competition for light, between 80 and 800 m. These latter three species have the potential to become ornamental plants, being characterized by bright and colourful upright inflorescences. The data presented here will help in providing a valuable contribution to the conservation and use of the wild bananas in northern Viet Nam.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bananas are the most well-known members of the Musaceae Juss., a monocotyledonous family consisting of c. 91 species divided over three genera: Musa L. (Linnaeus 1753; Wong et al. 2002) which contain the cultivated bananas, Ensete Horan. (Vare and Häkkinen 2011; Horaninow 1862) which contain enset, an important crop in Ethiopia, and monotypic Musella (Franch.) H.W.Li. For a long time, the genus Musa was organized into four sections based on morphological characteristics and chromosome number: Eumusa and Rhodochlamys with chromosome number 2n = 2x = 22, Australimusa and Callimusa with 2n = 2x = 20 (Cheesman 1947; Franchet 1889; Šimoníková et al. 2022; Wu 1978). Sometimes a fifth section Ingentimusa was considered based on the presence of a chromosome number 2n = 2x = 14. Australimusa and Callimusa were morphologically defined by having bracts that are heavily imbricated and polished at the abaxial side. Australimusa species were delineated from Callimusa species by having subglobose or dorsoventrally compressed seeds with a small apical chamber. In contrast, Callimusa seeds are cylindrical or barrel-shaped and have large apical chambers (Wong et al. 2002). Eumusa and Rhodochlamys were characterized by having convolute or imbricate bracts that are rarely or never polished. Members of the Eumusa section are characterized by having dull-coloured bracts, often being more than three meters high, generating several flowers per bract, whereas members of the Rhodochlamys section are always less than three meters high with upright inflorescences, only a few flowers per bract and bright coloured bracts. Both the sections Eumusa and Callimusa are represented in Viet Nam. Later, (Wong et al. 2002) argued that sections Eumusa and Rhodochlamys should be merged into a single Section (2n = 2x = 22) and that the Australimusa section should be included in an enlarged Callimusa Section (2n = 2x = 20). In 2013, Häkkinen carried out a thorough revision of the Musa sections and decided to confirm this reorganisation (Häkkinen 2013). Moreover, Häkkinen (2013) estimated the number of species in the Musa genus at around 70 of which 33 species belonged to the Musa section and 37 species to the novel Callimusa section. However, this list has many synonyms and homonyms and needs to be further optimized from a taxonomic and systematic perspective.
Wild bananas provide an important source of important alleles for banana crop improvement. Wild M. acuminata Colla and M. balbisiana Colla germplasm have been used for breeding novel varieties that cope better with pests and diseases and for the improvement of important agronomic features including yield (Laliberte and De Langhe 2016). In addition, Musa basjoo Siebold and Zucc. Ex linuma, M. thomsonii (King) A.M. Cowan and Cowan, M. sikkimensis Kurz have been investigated for use in breeding cold-tolerant bananas, while M. balbisiana and M. nagensium Prain were examined for drought tolerance improvement (Horry and De Langhe 2016; Rosales et al. 2006). With the recent detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 (TR4) in Colombia and more extreme weather events associated with a changing climate, studying and conserving wild bananas could become even more important (García-Bastidas et al. 2019).
Viet Nam is geographically located in Indochina, one of the world's main centers of biodiversity (Myers et al. 2000), wild bananas included (Le Dinh Danh et al. 1998). A total of 9 Musa species have been identified in Viet Nam (Supplementary material S1). All these species have been verified and accepted by Häkkinen and Väre (2008), and in addition by (Lý Ngọc Sâm et al. 2018) for Musa splendida A.Chev.
Despite this large number of species, Musa remains an understudied genus. This is partly caused by too large difficulties in preparing valuable herbarium specimens that can be used for further taxonomic and systematic research (Gagnepain et al. 1907; Venu 2002). As a result, there are therefore many inconsistencies in the general taxonomy of Musa as well as correctly identifying wild banana accessions. In northern Viet Nam in particular there is insufficient data about the morphological characterization and distribution of wild bananas making it difficult to get a correct overview of the extent and diversity of this important group. In order to improve our knowledge of wild bananas in this important region, multiple field trips were undertaken between 2016 and 2019 to document wild Musa species of northern Viet Nam. In the current paper, we revise the wild Musa species from northern Viet Nam, improve their distribution data, and optimize the overall taxonomic description of those wild Musa species.
Materials and methods
Collections
Twelve collecting trips were carried out between 2016 and 2019 in 27 districts of nine provinces in the north of Viet Nam. We determined putative sites to locate wild Musa species based on earlier reports, and geographic and habitat data (Häkkinen and Väre 2008; Le Dinh Danh et al. 1998; Lý Ngọc Sâm et al. 2012; Lý Ngọc Sâm et al. 2018; Phạm Hoàng Hộ 1999; Valmayor 2001; Valmayor et al. 2004; Valmayor et al. 2005). In each district, local authorities were contacted for data at the district and commune level on geographic terrain and elevation, forest ecology and Musa population locations. Additionally, at the commune level, local people well acquainted with wild banana populations (e.g. rangers, farmers and foresters) assisted in identifying specific survey locations. For each located population, we recorded longitude, latitude, and elevation using a Garmin GPS (Garmin eTrex 10; Garmin Ltd. Kansas USA). As wild bananas were often found in densely covered forests or deep valleys and for which GPS signals are often weak or only moderately accurate, we fine-tuned collection localities using Google Earth or Google Maps.
Documentation of morphological characters
For each species and population collected, specimens were characterized by recording 34 morphological characters (descriptors) as defined by the Taxonomy Advisory Group (TAG) (revised 2019). These included-vegetative elements (size, shape, and colour of the pseudostem, leaf, petiole and rachis), inflorescences (shape, and colour of the male bud, male bud size, bract shape, tepals, and anthers), and fruit (number of hands per bunch, fruits per hand, fruit length, fruit shape, fruit apex and fruit pedicel). Measurements of pseudostem and inflorescense size were carried out on five plants per species. Additionally, we took at least fifteen pictures of each specimen from every population collected, showing the most important descriptors according to TAG (revised 2019). Colours were also determined using the TAG colour chart (revised 2019), out of direct sunlight and scored to the closest colour using freshly collected material. In order to identify the species name of each sample, we compared our observations with morphological keys from the literature (Daniells et al. (2001); Häkkinen and Väre (2008); OECD (2010).
Furthermore, the participatory research appraisal tools such as direct observation, interviews, and field visiting were applied in collecting traditional knowledge of wild bananas (Shuaib et al. 2021; Vu and Nguyen 2017). The traditional knowledge included local names, ecological distribution, and plant usages such as edible and/or medicinal usage, following the method of Fontefrancesco et al. (2022), Abidullah et al. (2021), Shuaib et al. (2021), Tongco (2007).
Sampling methodology
Mature fruits and seeds were collected from each examined population. Seed maturity was assessed by conducting a cut test (we regarded seeds as mature when having a powdery dry starch endosperm). Seeds were cleaned from the surrounding endocarp in the laboratory after the collecting trip with water and subsequently dried under a fan. Then, seed samples were dried to 15% equilibrium relative humidity (eRH) and tested daily with a hygrometer. Further seed drying was achieved at a slow rate using equal silica gel to seed mass. Finally, seed samples were sealed in aluminum bags and stored at − 20 °C for long-term storage (Guarino et al. 2011; Hay and Probert 2013; Liu et al. 2020). Samples were duplicated for storage at the Millennium Seed Bank (Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, UK) and Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam).
Additionally, within each population, fifteen to twenty leaf samples were collected from different individuals. Leaf samples were taken from a small part of the second leaf after the cigar leaf and were subsequently cleaned with a cloth and put in a teabag. After that, the tea bags containing leaves were placed in sealed plastic bags containing silica gel to desiccate samples quickly (Wilkie et al. 2013). Dry leaves were stored for long-term storage in sealed bags without silica gel. Leaf samples were transferred to Meise Botanic Garden (Belgium) for storage and DNA extraction.
Specimen preparation
A herbarium specimen was made representing each population. Specimens included leaf base and apex, inflorescence bracts, flowers, and fruits. During the collection trip, all material was stored in a solution of 70% ethanol by volume. Immediately after the field trip, the collected material was cleaned and dried in a plant press. All herbarium samples were placed between thick, water-absorbing paper and put in a drying-oven at 45 °C for four days (or more). Due to the large size of plant parts, we often collected only the base and apex of mature leaves. In case we were able to collect full leaves, they were folded to fit the herbarium sheets. Fruits, collected for herbarium specimens, were longitudinally sliced in half (Davis update 2011; Queensland herbarium 2016). Herbarium vouchers were divided between the herbarium of Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (KEW) (United Kingdom) and Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). Vouchers of 6 species were deposited in the HNU Herbarium of Vietnam National University of Science (Table 2).
Results
Distribution and topography of survey sites
Wild bananas were surveyed and collected between 2016 and 2019 in nine provinces situated in the northern climate type (Fig. 1). Field trips for Musa collections were made in the climatic subzones as defined by Van (2015) and summarised in Supplementary Table 2. These embrace ten of the 18 delineated northern Vietnamese habitat types defined by Lung et al. (2011) and summarised in Supplementation Table 3.
Seeds and leaf tissue were from a total of 80 populations of six different banana species, Musa balbisiana (14), M. acuminata (19), M. itinerans (26), M. paracoccinea (14), M. lutea (6), and M. haekkinenii (1) (Table 2).
Descriptions of species collected
The original description by the authors who established the species status is compared with those observed by the team. Additional descriptors are formulated as in the “Minimum List of Descriptors for Musa” (Taxonomy Advisory Group (TAG) 2019).
Musa balbisiana
Colla: Colla, Memorie della Reale Accademia Delle Scienze di Torino 25: 56-57, 1820b; Cheesman, Kew Bull. 3(1): 11-17, 1948; Jacob, Superintendent Government Press, 1952; Joe el al., 2014, Phytotaxa, 175(2), 113-116; Simmonds, Longmans, 1962; Simmonds, Longmans, 1966; Singh et al, Malay. Nat. J. 52 (3 & 4): 157-160, 1998; Wu, D.L. & Kress, W.J. Fl. China 24: 314-318, 2000; Nayar, N.M., Hortic Rev 36: 127-129, 2010; Kongkona Borah et al, Indian J. Tradit. Knowl, 15 (1): 116–120, 2016.
Type:
India orientalis, ex H. Rip. 1820 Anonymous (lecto designed by Häkkinen and Väre: TO, n.v.).
Description
Pseudostem is to 6 m in height and grows in clusters, large in size, green coloured below when leaf sheaths are removed (Fig. 2c). Blotch at petiole base is not pigmented, the petiole light green with wax, petiole canal of third leaf margins curved inward, petiole margin not winged; clasp, green and rim contrasts with the petiole (Fig. 2d, and e). Leaves are slightly yellowish-green on the upper surface; base cordate, asymmetrical (Fig. 2o). Cigar leaf green.
Peduncle hairless; bunch and male rachis hang vertically, could be 2.5 m long, bunch cone-shaped. Male rachis has male bracts above the male bud, the rest of the stalk can be bare. Male bud has a skinny shape, a medium length between 20 and 30 cm and a low shoulder. The bract of the male flowers has an obtuse shape, moderate imprecation, last lifted bract does not revolute; bracts of female flowers deciduous after female flower becomes fruit, bract has a red–purple external with adaxially yellow–green; internal red (Fig. 2h, i and j). Compound tepals turn from pink–purple to bright yellow in lobes of compound tepal (Fig. 2i, and k), anthers yellow.
Bunch has 8–10 hands (Fig. 2g), each hand 8–20 fruits (Fig. 2m). Fruit length 5–10 cm, obovoid and slightly curved. The fruit apex is pointed with persistent flower relicts. Fruit pedicel length more than 21 mm and no visible sign of fusion (Fig. 2m, and n). Seeds numerous, brown, oblate, creased shells (Fig. 2n).
Distribution:
Musa balbisiana populations, fourteen in total, were found in north-western regions. Figure 1 shows the locations where they were collected. The altitude range of the collection areas was 108–959 m.
Habitat:
Musa balbisiana often occurs on cleared hill slopes that are regenerating from earlier clearing activities. In this habitat, shrubs and grasses are growing and the species do not compete for light with other large and tall trees. Musa balbisiana often occurs as sizeable populations that dominate over large areas.
Musa balbisiana was initially considered to be found throughout the whole of Viet Nam (Le Dinh Danh et al. 1998). However, collection teams only discovered wild forms of M. balbisiana in the northwest of Viet Nam. Le Dinh Danh et al. (1998) also showed M. balbisiana has three forms: 1) wild, diploid, with many seeds (BBw) with the name Chuoi hot rung; 2) seeded but seeds less numerous and soft, with the name Chuoi hot; 3) edible, seedless, triploid and cultivated (BBBc) with the name Chuoi hot qua lep. Form two and three were also found in collection areas, but they were not focused on in this study that dealt with wild Vietnamese Musa species.
Of the fourteen Musa balbisiana populations found in northern Viet Nam, 11 occurred in the tropical monsoon climate range characterized by dry, cold winters, always below 700 m altitude. There, the annual average temperature is low in comparison with other climatic zones. This region is characterized by relatively high precipitation (rainfall, rainy season). The indicators for the dry season are ranging of dry and drought months. The other three populations of M. balbisiana were located above 700 m in elevations belonging to the Hoang Lien Son sub-climate region (Supplementary Table 2) (Van 2015).
Conservation status:
Musa balbisiana is conserved ex-situ at Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). IUCN conservation assessment of the species showed that it is the Least concern (Allen 2019).
Local names:
In Viet Nam, most ethnic groups have a specific vernacular name for Musa balbisiana. These include: cuổi peng (Tày language), chìu píu (Dao language), trơ cờ (Mông language), chi đoòng (Giáy language), and pề dón (Kháng language) (Table 2). The species is also known as Chuoi hot rung, meaning jungle banana with seeds, in the Kinh ethnic language.
Musa acuminata
Colla: Mem. Reale Accad. Sci. Torino 25:394. 1820a; Zoll. Kurz. J. Agr. Hort. Soc. India 5: 112-168, 1878; Koorder Exk. Fl. Java 314, 1911; ibid. Fl. Tjibodas, Visser, Batavia 52-53, 1913; Cheesman, Kew Bull. 3(1): 17-28, 1948; Simmonds, Bot. J. Linn. 55(359): 302-312, 1955; ibid; Evol. Banana, 1962; Backer & Bakhuizen, Jr. Fl. Java 3: 35-38, 1968; Itino et al, Biotropica, 23(2): 151-158, 1991; Vrydaghs et al, Ethnobot. Res. Appl., 7: 239–246, 2009; Hastuti et al, Biodiversitas 20(3): 824-832, 2019.
Type:
Rumphius (1747), Herbarium Amboinense 5: t. 61 Fig. 1, M. simiarum Pissang Jacki.
Description: The morphology of all the observed plants completely conform to the description of the type by Cheesman (Fig. 3).
Pseudostem about 3 m in height, cream coloured below when leaf sheaths are removed (Fig. 3c). Plants grow in clusters or clumps, often growing separately. Blotch at the petiole base is brown and moderate and black–purple, petioles are usually light green with wax on the back, the petiole canal of the third leaf margins spreads (Fig. 3e), petiole margin not winged and clasped, green and rim contrast with the petiole (Fig. 3d). The leaves are dark green without wax on the upper surface, lighter green colour and wax on the lower surface; base oblique (Fig. 3o). Cigar leaf green.
The peduncle is short-highly hairy (Fig. 3g); the bunch is often hung at about 45° angle, but the male rachis sometimes hangs horizontally; bunch cylindrical to truncate shape but very short (Fig. 3g), male rachis bare. Male bud has a skinny shape, a medium length between 20 and 30 cm, and a low shoulder (Fig. 3h, and i). The bract apex of the male flowers has an intermediate shape, moderate imprecation and last lifted bract revolute before falling; the bract of the female flower is purple and waxed externally, adaxially yellow-green, internally purple (Fig. 3h, i and j). Compound tepal turns from yellow to bright yellow in lobes (Fig. 3d, and e), anther brown-rusty brown.
Bunch has 10–15 hands, each hand has 10–30 fruits (Fig. 3g and m). Fruit length 5–10 cm, curved. Fruit apex has bottle-neck without reflects. Ripe fruits are yellow, often browned by insects or other lesions on the skin, with a strong aroma. Fruit pedicel short length, 5–10 mm, and no visible sign of fusion (Fig. 3m, n).
The species is subdivided in subspecies (Simmonds 1956b), and we identified all the examined acuminata specimens as belonging to his subspecies siamea. However, confusion may occur because of the male bud which strongly reminds that of the ssp. burmannica, and an explanation is necessary here.
Figure 3h, and i shows the bracts that are characteristic for the ‘Annam form’ described by Cheesman (sub-Indo-China), i.e. “male bud…indistinguishable in all respects from the bud of the Tavoy form (later on named by Simmonds (1956a, b, p468) subspecies burmannica (Simmonds 1956a), the latter having’bracts dark violet–purple’” (same page, subspecies Burma).
Simmonds, in his “Botanical results of the banana expedition, p 467” included the Annam form in his subsp. siamea, but together with the ‘Kedah form’ which in fact closely resembles subspecies malaccensis with its reddish purple bracts at their outside. This apparently led Simmonds to state that “This subspecies (siamea) is, in general aspect, nearest to the subsp. malaccensis”, with the result that he described the subspecies siamea male bud as having “bracts paler, more purple in tone”.
With the hope that the taxonomy of subspecies siamea will be definitely clarified in the future, we meanwhile adopt for our specimen the name “M. acuminata subsp. siamea, form Annam”.
Distribution:
A total of 18 populations of M. acuminata were found in northwestern and northeastern provinces. Figure 1 shows the locations where they were collected. The altitudinal range of the collected M. acuminata accessions was between 137 and 989 m.
Habitat:
Musa acuminata often grows on fertile, loose land, that is usually characterized by wet brown soil. This species was also found in gaps in the soil or alongside large rocks covered with a thin layer of soil.
In contrast to Le Dinh Danh et al. (1998), who only found M. acuminata in the south of Viet Nam, we also collected it in many northern provinces (Table 2).
We found Musa acuminata in fairly wide distribution range, covering all subclimate-regions of Supplementary Table 2 (Van 2015), and seven forestry ecological sub-regions as indicated in Supplementary Table 3 (Lung et al. 2011).
Conservation status:
Musa acuminata is conserved as ex-situ collection at Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). IUCN conservation assessment of the species showed that the species is the Least concern (Williams 2017).
Local names:
In Viet Nam, vernacular names for this species include cuổi cáy (Nùng language), thỉu chảy (Dao-long shirt language), cuổi peng (Tày language), giuốc năng (Dao, Tày, Nùng language from Cao Bang province), chìu piu gái (Dao from Lai Chau province), tfawp quav tfhws/ tróp qua trừ (written in Mông language/read in Kinh language), chi đoòng (Giáy language) and cọ vén or cuổi pá (Thái language) (Table 2). According to (Le Dinh Danh et al. 1998), it is also known as Chuoi tay rung.
Musa itinerans Cheesman:
Cheesman, Kew Bulletin (1):23-28, 1949; Simmonds, Kew Bulletin 11(3):463-489, 1956; Stover & Simmonds, Longman Sc & Tech, 1987; Novak, CAB International, 449-488, 1992; Liu, Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 43(1):77-81, 2002; Valmayor & Hakkines, Philipp. Agric. Sci. 88(2):236-244, 2005; Häkkinen, Novon 18: 50–60, 2008; Sulistyaningsih et al, Makara J. Sci., 1-6, 2014.
Type:
[Myanmar] Burma, Myitkyina, Tagwin, alt. 400 ft, evergreen forests, C. E. Parkinson 1761, designated by Liu et al. [2002: 79] “lectotype”).
Description:
Cheesman (1949) description fits with the observed populations for the basic descriptors (Fig. 4).
Pseudostem about 3–7 m high, and up to 12 m in some populations, growing separately, with long rhizomes far from the mother plant. Pseudostem diameter 20–25 cm or larger in some populations at the base; with cream, yellow, purple-brown, or red–purple colour under layers. Blotches of the petiole base are moderate, purple-brown to black-purple, the petiole green to yellow without wax, petiole canal of the third leaf margin erect (Fig. 4e), petiole margin not winged and clasped, purple to blue colour and rim contrast with the petiole (Fig. 4d). The leaves are dark green on the upper surface, lighter green colour and without wax on both the face; base subcordate, asymmetrical (Fig. 4o). Cigar leaf light red–purple.
The peduncle is slightly hairy, bunch and male rachis hang from a slight angle to about 45°, bunch cylindrical, male rachis bare. The male bud has a small to medium shape, medium to fat size, and low shoulder. Bract of male flowers has an obtuse, convolute imbrication, and last lifted bract revolute; bract has a red–purple colour external face (some populations have yellow-green with purple-brown streaks, yellow or red colour) and yellow colour internal face (Fig. 4h, i, j). Compound tepal has yellow with bright yellow lobe (Fig. 4k), anther bright yellow.
Bunch has 5–10 hands up to 15 hands (Fig. 4c), each hand with 10–20 fruits (Fig. 4m). Fruit length 7–12 cm, slightly curved, fruit apex pointed without relicts; pedicel fruit has 30–70 cm length and partial fusion (Fig. 4m, n).
Distribution:
A total of 24 populations of Musa itinerans populations were found in the northwestern and northeastern provinces (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Populations of the species were collected between 136 and 1331 m.
Habitat:
Musa itinerans is found in green forests and valleys that are characterized by a high degree of humidity, often near water sources. They grow most often in large populations when there are no large trees in the close vicinity.
Musa itinerans is found throughout the whole country (Le Dinh Danh et al. 1998). Likewise, we also collected the species in many parts of northern Viet Nam (Table 2). Populations were distributed in a wide topographical range in three of the five Vietnamese climate regions, and in nine of the 18 ecological subregions of northern Viet Nam.
Conservation status:
Musa itinerans is conserved as ex-situ collection at Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). A conservation assessment of the species by Mertens et al. (2021) showed that the species is Least Concern (LC).
Local names:
In Viet Nam, the vernacular names for this species are chuối tím or chuối quả tím (Kinh language), cuổi suộc (Nùng language), thiu ui tung (Dao-long shirt language), cuổi lộc (Tày language), cuổi pá or cuổi tang (Thái language), giuốc đông (Dao, Tày, Nùng language in Thach An district, Cao Bang province), tfawp laib/trớp lia) (written in Mông language/read in Kinh language) (Table 2).
Musa lutea R.V.Valmayor, L.D.Danh & Häkkinen: Valmayor et al, Philipp. Agric. Sci. 87:110-118, 2004; Lý et al, Phytotaxa, 75(1):33-42, 2012; Mertens et al, Divers. Distrib., 27(4), 729-746, 2021.
Type:
Viet Nam, Van Chan district, Yen Bai province, 18. IX.1994, Le Dinh Danh VN1-049 (holo-, PHH no. 003!).
Description
Because the description of the type is very short, we propose a more extensive version.
Pseudostem 2–3 m in height, light green to green coloured below when leaf sheaths are removed (Fig. 6c). Musa lutea grows in small clusters. Petiole green, no waxiness, with moderate black–purple blotching at the base. Petiole canal margins erect (Fig. 6e), slightly winged, not clasping, with purple to blue and rim contrast with the petiole. Leaf blade upper face medium green to green with base oblique, asymmetrical (Fig. 6o). Cigar leaf green.
Peduncle hairless. bunch and male rachis erect, cone shape with stretched internodes at the female part. Flowers persist on the male rachis only on one to few hands near the bunch. Male bud is of medium shape, short, and low shouldered. The male bud bracts have an intermediate shape, are slightly imbricate, and the last lifted bract does not revolt before falling. Bract colour orange-red to red externally, orange-red colour internally (Fig. 6i, j). Compound tepal bright yellow with green lobes (Fig. 6i); anther yellow.
Bunch has 3–8 hands, each hand with 3–6 fruits. Fruit is 6–10 cm long, straight. Fruits green and in horizontal position when young, rich yellow and virtually hanging down at maturity (Fig. 6g, i, m, n). Fruit apex truncate with persistent flower relicts. Fruit pedicel length more than 20 mm and no visible sign of fusion. Fruit has very few seeds and display a pronounced parthenocarpy.
Distribution:
A total of 6 M. lutea populations were found in the northwest in Yen Bai province and the northeast in Tuyen Quang and Cao Bang provinces (Fig. 1, Table 2). The elevation of populations was 85–483 m.
Habitat:
Musa lutea often grows in small populations or as a single individual on cleared land, with a regeneration vegetation of low shrubs where there is no competition for light (e.g. along roadsides in the mountains or along large streams with few large trees).
Collection areas of M. lutea are situated in the north-western region (dry cold winters) below 700 m. Here, the first half of the year is cold and dry, whereas the second half is cold and humid (Lung et al. 2011).
Conservation status:
Musa lutea is conserved as ex-situ collection at Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). A conservation assessment of the species by Mertens et al. (2021) showed that the species is Vulnerable.
Local names: Musa lutea is indigenous to Viet Nam with the local name Chuoi Rung Hoa Do meaning jungle banana with a red flower. Some other names were recorded as well (Table 2).
Musa paracoccinea A.Z.Liu & D.Z.Li: Liu et al, Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 43:77-81, 2002; Lý et al, Phytotaxa, 75(1):33-42, 2012; Mertens et al, Divers. Distrib., 27(4), 729-746, 2021.
Type:
China, Yunnan, Jinping Hsien, in valley or along stream, 5.X.1998, A. Z. Liu 98007 (holo-, KUN; iso-, PE).
Description:
The morphology of all the observed plants is completely conform to the description of the type by Liu et al. (2002) (Fig. 7).
Pseudostems are 4–6 m high, growing separately, 15–20 cm in diameter at the base, light green colour below when leaf sheaths are removed (Fig. 7c). Blotches at the petiole base are moderate, the petiole green without wax, petiole canal of third leaf margins erect (Fig. 7e); petiole margin not winged and clasped, green and rim contrast with the petiole. Leaves are dark green on the upper surface, base oblique (Fig. 7o). The cigar leaf is green.
Peduncle slightly hairy, bunch and male rachis erect, truncate; male rachis bare (Fig. 7f). Male bud has a fat shape, short length from 10 to 15 cm, low shoulder. The bract of the female flower has an obtuse shape, convolute imbrication, and the last lifted bract does not revolute; bracts are light pink-purple on both sides but internally lighter in colour (Fig. 7i, h and j). The compound tepal is bright yellow, lobe of compound tepal light green, anther has a cream colour (Fig. 7j).
Bunch has 5–10 hands, and each hand has 2–4 fruits. Fruits length 10–12 cm, slightly curved. Fruit apex point with persistent flower reflects (Fig. 7n). Fruit pedicel length 15–20 mm and no visible sign of fusion, seeds numerous and brown.
Additional descriptors:
the pseudostem has a light green colour below when the outermost not-yet-dry leaf sheath is removed (Fig. 7c); leaf blade base oblique (Fig. 7o); male bud has a fat shape, low shoulder, and is 10–15 cm long (Fig. 7h); mature fruits curving upwards towards the axis.
Distribution:
A total of 14 populations of Musa paracoccinea populations were found (Fig. 1, Table 2). The elevation of the collections of M. paracoccinea was 127–966 m.
Habitat:
Musa paracoccinea was found along streams and roads, or on cleared land, always outside the shadow.
Musa paracoccinea was firstly reported in Yunnan (China) (Liu et al. 2002). This Chinese province shares a border with Lao Cai and Ha Giang provinces in Viet Nam, where we found the six populations of M. paracoccinea.
Musa paracoccinea populations were found in the tropical monsoon climate region at an altitude above 600–700 m. In this area, the first half of the year is cold (< 18 °C, Subplementary Table 2) and dry whereas the second half is cold and humid. Additionally, M. paracoccinea was found in areas with dry, cold winters, and elevations over 700 m in the north-western Yen Bai, Lao Cai, Lai Chau, Dien Bien regions. The collected areas belonged to the north–north-western climate sub-region type (Supplementary Table 2) (Van 2015).
Conservation status:
Musa paracoccinea is conserved as ex-situ collection at Plant Resources Center (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). A conservation assessment of the species by (Mertens et al. 2021) showed that the species is Least Concern or Near-Threatened.
Local names:
In Viet Nam Musa paracoccinea is referred to as jungle banana having a red male bud. Local names in each ethnic group were recorded and added to Table 2.
Musa haekkinenii N.S.Lý & Haev.: Lý et al, Phytotaxa, 75(1):33-42, 2012.
Type:
Vietnam. Phu Tho Province: Phu Tho District, Phu Ho Commune, 21°27′1″ N, 105°15′16″ E, 54 m, 19 November 2008, T. Haevermans et al. 508 (Holotype P! (incl. spirit material), isotypes VNM!, H!).
Description:
The observed single specimen (Distribution and Habitat) corresponds completely with the type extensively described by (Sâm et al. 2012).
Pseudostem is about 1–1.5 m in height, slender, suckers freely, diameter at the base is very small size (3–7 cm), light green coloured below when leaf sheaths are removed. Blotches at the petiole base sparse, small, brown; petiole of the third leaf has margin erect (Fig. 8e), petiole margin not winged and clasp, brown, no wax, and rim contrasts with the petiole. The leaves are without wax and medium green to dark green on the upper surface, light green to medium green on the lower surface, base oblique (Fig. 8o). Cigar leaf medium green.
The peduncle is without hair; the bunch and male rachis erect, bunch has spaced stretches and cylindrical shape, on male rachis, bract does not fall. The male bud has a skinny shape, short length, and low shouldered (Fig. 8h). The bract of the male flower has an intermediate to obtuse shape, moderate imprecation, and the last lifted bract does not revolute, orange-red on both sides, persistent and obliquely upwards to axis (Fig. 8f, g). Compound tepal is orange and light green in lobes, anther cream (Fig. 8k).
Bunch about 3–6 hands, each hand with 2–4 fruits, fruit length from 3–4 cm, straight, fruit apex round with persistent flower relicts, pedicel length less than 10 mm and no visible sign fusion and without mature fruits and seeds.
To note that fertilized fruits were absent in all cases where the plants were observed, probably because growing only in gardens.
Distribution:
This species is known only from cultivated material. Our sample was collected in a national park in Ba Vi district (115 m above sea level) (Ha Noi area) in 2017 (Fig. 1, Table 2). The two previous samples were first found in Phu Tho and Son La provinces in 2008 and 2010 (Sâm et al. 2012).
Habitat:
The specimen was collected from Ba Vi National Park. Ba Vi district has a rainy season from April to October, with an average temperature of 23–28.6 °C. Precipitation is 1832.2 mm (equivalent to 90.87% of annual rainfall), average monthly rainfall is over 100 mm. The highest rainfall occurs in August (339.6 mm). Total days with rain days are 104 days; the dry season is from November to March, with an average temperature of 15.8–20 °C. The rainfall in these months is very low, from 15.0 to 64.4 mm (Ba Vi Web Portal 2020). The previous Musa haekkinenii samples were also collected by Lý Ngọc Sâm et al. (2012) in the tropical monsoon climate region showed in the Supplementary Table 2, at the same altitude as for our collection.
Conservation status:
M. haekkinennii is cultivated in Phu Tho and Son La provinces. Recently, the species was introduced in the ex-situ collection of the Plant Resources Center, (Ha Noi, Viet Nam). According to the IUCN, the species is among the Red List criteria and categories Lý Ngọc Sâm et al. (2012).
Local names:
M. haekkinenii is called chuối rừng hoa đỏ, in Kinh language-meaning jungle banana with a red male bud (Table 2).
Key to the Musa species applicable for northern Viet Nam.
N° | Morphological characters | |
---|---|---|
1 | Bunch and male rachis are erect | 2 |
Bunch and male rachis are not erect | 4 | |
2 | Pseudostem more than 3 m in height, fruit light green during all stages of maturity | Musa paracoccinea |
Pseudostem less than 3 m in height, fruit is yellow during all stages of maturity | 3 | |
3 | On male rachis, almost bare; bracts falling down | Musa lutea |
On male rachis, bracts dense, covering the stalk, persistent, not falling down | Musa haekkinenii | |
4 | Bract does not revolute before falling | Musa balbisiana |
Bract revolutes before falling | 5 | |
5 | Pseudostem about 3–7 m and up to 12 m in high, growing separately with long rhizomes far from mother plant; fruits length 7–12 cm, slightly curved, fruit apex pointed, fruit pedicel length 3–7 cm, partial fusion | Musa itinerans |
Pseudostem about 3 m, growing in cluster or clumps, sucker near mother plant; fruit length 5–10 cm, curved, fruit apex bottle-necked, fruit pedicel short length, 0.5–1 cm, no visible sign of fusion | Musa acuminata |
Discussion
In total 80 populations of following six Musa species were found and collected in northern Viet Nam: M. acuminata, M. balbisiana, and M. itinerans, of the section Eumusa and M. lutea, M. paracoccinea and M. haekkinenii of the section Callimusa. Since their populations occur in various forest ecological habitat types, those roughly reflect the degree of presence throughout both the north-eastern and north-western region (Table 2): M. itinerans (8), M. acuminata (6), M. balbisiana (5), M. paracoccinea (5), M. lutea (3), M. haekkinenii (1). Most of these species often display large populations and seem therefore to be adapted to a wide range of climate conditions, including different amounts of precipitation, and various temperature ranges. In general, Musa species occur on very steep to flat slopes, from low to high elevations. Populations were more often found near streams where there was abundant water. In contrast, M. lutea and M. paracoccinea had small populations with limited topographical distributions.
In our study, additional descriptors of Musa in the north of Viet Nam were provided in the Table 1 such as: The Musa balbisiana species had pseudostem green coloured below at the base when below when the outern not-yet-dry leaf sheath is removed (Fig. 2c); the last lifted bracts on the male bud do not revolute (Fig. 2f); fruit pedicel length more than 21 mm i.e. slightly longer than the 1–2 cm by Cheesman (Cheesman 1948a, b). The Musa acuninata species had pseudostem cream coloured below when leaf sheaths are removed (Fig. 3c); male bud has a skinny shape, a medium length between 20–30 cm, and a low shoulder (Fig. 3h and i); The Musa itinerans Cheesman displays a large variation per some descriptors in China (Häkkinen et al. 2008), and at least one variant in Viet Nam has been classified as subspecies annamica. Several local variants have been found by our team in northern Viet Nam as is shown on Fig. 5. A due classification of the variants can now be carried out, whereby the descriptions by Häkkinen et al. (2008) should be most helpful; the M. paracoccineea had the pseudostem has a light green colour below when the outermost not-yet-dry leaf sheath is removed (Fig. 7c); leaf blade base oblique (Fig. 7o); male bud has a fat shape, low shoulder, and is 10–15 cm long (Fig. 7h); mature fruits curving upwards to axis. We observed a range of intraspecific morphological variation in M. itinerans with a considerable diversity in male flower colour (male bud varied from completely purple-brown to white–green with brown stripes), fruit colour (varying from light green to dark purple Fig. 5) and fruit size. Since a similar variation was observed in China (Häkkinen et al. 2008), and because the species is present from northeastern India (in the west) to Taiwan (in the east), an international effort is needed in order to infer a correct intraspecific.
Quite surprising is the discovery of pronounced parthenocarpy in the Callimusa species M. lutea (Fig. 6n). Since the trend to parthenocarpy was also found in M. balbisiana (Table 2), the widespread opinion that parthenocarpy is restricted to M. acuminata (i.e. its edible diploids) can no longer be hold. Of crucial importance in (phylo) genetics is its presence in the widely different Callimusa section (n = 10), thus showing that at least the potential for parthenocarpy seems to exist already at the Musa genus level.
Interestingly, some disease symptoms were recorded in wild banana. Musa balbisiana, M. acuminata and M. itinerans species were found to be infected by Banana Bunchy Top Virus in the populations 1, 28 and 53, respectively. Population 53 was also infected by Fussarium wilt. The population 64, Musa lutea, was also infected by F. wilt (Race 1) (Le Thi et al. 2022).
References
Abidullah S, Rauf A, Zaman W, Ullah F, Ayaz A, Batool F, Saqib S (2021) Consumption of wild food plants among tribal communities of Pak-Afghan border, near Bajaur, Pakistan. Acta Ecol Sin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.08.002
Allen R (2019) Musa balbisiana. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2019: e.T111907032A111907034. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T111907032A111907034.en. Accessed 09 September 2021
Ba Vi Web Portal (2020) Overview about Ba Vi district. Electronic portal of Ba Vi district-Ha Noi, Viet Nam. https://bavi.hanoi.gov.vn/gioi-thieu-chung#:~:text=V%E1%BB%81%20kh%C3%AD%20h%E1%BA%ADu%2C%20Ba%20V%C3%AC,cao%20nh%E1%BA%A5t%20l%C3%A0%2028%2C60c. Accessed 22 June 2020
Backer CA, Bakhuizen van den Brink Jr RC (1968) Flora of java, vol 3. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen
Cheesman EE (1947) Classification of the bananas: II the genus Musa l. Kew Bull 2:106–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/4109207
Cheesman EE (1948a) Classification of the bananas: IIIa. critical notes on species: Musa balbisiana. Kew Bull 3:11–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/4118908
Cheesman EE (1948b) Classification of the bananas: IIIb. Critical notes on species: Musa acuminata. Kew Bull 3:17–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/4118909
Cheesman EE (1949) Classification of the bananas: critical notes on species: M. itinerans. Kew Bull 4:23–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/4119030
Colla L (1820a) Memorie sul genere Musa. Memorie Accad Sci Torino 25:394
Colla L (1820b) Memorie sul genere Musa. Memorie Accad Sci Torino 25:56–57
Linnaeus Cv (1753) MUSA. In: species plantarum, vol 2. Claffis XXIII. POLYCAMIA. MONOECIA. Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, p 1043
Danh LD, Nhi HH, Valmayor RV (1998) Banana collection, characterization and conservation in Vietnam. INFO-MUSA 7:10–13
Daniells J, Jenny C, Karamura D, Tompeke K (2001) Musalogue: a catalogue of Musa germplasm. Diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier, France
Davis AP (update 2011) Chapter 27: Collecting herbarium vouchers. In: Guarino L, Ramanatha Rao V, Goldberg E (eds). Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. bioversity international, Rome, Italy, pp 1–9
Fontefrancesco MF, Zocchi DM, Cevasco R, Dossche R, Abidullah S, Pieroni A (2022) Crumbotti and rose petals in a ghost mountain valley: foraging, landscape, and their transformations in the upper Borbera Valley. NW Italy J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 18:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00535-7
Franchet AR (1889) Un nouveau type de Musa lasiocarpa. J Bot (morot) 3:329–331
Gagnepain F, Humbert H, Lecomte H (1907) Flore générale de l’Indo-Chine. Masson, Paris, France
García-Bastidas FA et al (2019) First report of fusarium wilt tropical race 4 in cavendish bananas caused by Fusarium odoratissimum in Colombia. Plant Dis 104:994–994. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1922-PDN
Guarino L, Ramanatha Rao V, Goldberg E (2011) Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. 2011 update. Bioversity International, Italy
Häkkinen M, Väre H (2008) Typification and check-list of Musa L. names (Musaceae) with nomenclatural notes. Adansonia 30:63–112
Häkkinen M, Hong W, Ge X-J (2008) Musa itinerans (Musaceae) and its intraspecific taxa in China. Novon 18:50–60. https://doi.org/10.3417/2006162
Häkkinen M (2013) Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (Musaceae). Taxon 62:809–813. https://doi.org/10.12705/624.3
Hastuti H, Purnomo P, Sumardi I, Daryono BS (2019) Diversity wild banana species (Musa spp.) in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20:824–832. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d200328
Hay FR, Probert RJ (2013) Advances in seed conservation of wild plant species: a review of recent research. Conserv Physiol 1:cot030. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot030
Horaninow P (1862) Prodromus monographiae scitaminearum. Typis Academiae Caesareae Scientiarum, Petropoli
Horry J-P, De Langhe E (2016) Chapter 12: Genetic improvement. In: global strategy for the conservation and use of Musa genetic resources, vol Part D-Use. Bioversity International, France, pp 124–141
Itino T, Kato M, Hotta M (1991) Pollination ecology of the two wild bananas, Musa acuminata subsp. halabanensis and M. salaccensis: chiropterophily and ornithophily. Biotropica 23:151–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388300
Jacob KC (1952) Madras bananas: a monograph. Govt Press, India, Superintendent
Joe A, Sreejith PE, Sabu M (2014) A new variety of Musa balbisiana Colla (Musaceae) from South India. Phytotaxa 175:113–116. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.175.2.6
Kongkona B, Borthakur SK, Bhaben T (2016) Musa balbisiana Colla-taxonomy, traditional knowledge and economic potentialities of the plant in Assam, India. Indian J Tradit Knowl 15:116–120
Koorders SH (1911) Exkursionsflora Von Java, Umfassend Die Blütenpflanzen Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung Der Im Hochgebirge Wildwachsenden Arten, vol 1. G. Fischer, Netherlands
Koorders SH (1913) Exkursion flora von Tjibodas. Visser, Batavia
Kurz S (1878) The Banana: a pomological contribution. J Agr Hort Soc India 5:112–168
Laliberte B, De Langhe E (2016) Chapter 6: Musa collections around the world. In: Global strategy for the conservation and use of Musa genetic resources, vol C-Management. Bioversity International, France, pp 44–70
Le Thi L et al (2022) Diversity of Fusarium associated banana wilt in northern Viet Nam. MycoKeys 87:53–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.87.72941
Liu A-Z, Li D-Z, Li X-W (2002) Taxonomic notes on wild bananas (Musa) from China. Bot Bull Acad Sin 43:77–81
Liu U, Cossu TA, Davies RM, Forest F, Dickie JB, Breman E (2020) Conserving orthodox seeds of globally threatened plants ex situ in the millennium seed bank, royal botanic gardens, Kew, UK: the status of seed collections. Biodivers Conserv 29:2901–2949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02005-6
Lung NN, Sam DD, Quat NX et al (2011) Final report on forest ecological stratification in Vietnam. Research Center for Forest Ecology and Environment, Viet Nam
Mertens A, Swennen R, Rønsted N, Vandelook F, Panis B, Sachter-Smith G, Vu DT, Janssens SB (2021) Conservation status assessment of banana crop wild relatives using species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 27:729–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13233
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Nayar NM (2009) The bananas: botany, origin, dispersal. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews. Wiley Online Library, vol 36, pp 127-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470527238.ch2
Novak FJ (1992) Musa (bananas and plantains). Biotechnology of perennial fruit crops. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 449–488
OECD (2010) Section 2-bananas and plantains (Musa spp.). In: Safety assessment of transgenic organisms. OECD Consensus Documents, OECD Publishing, Paris. vol 4 https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096158-6-en
Phạm Hoàng Hộ (1999) Cây cỏ Việt Nam [An illustrated flora of Vietnam], vol 3. Youth Publishing House, Ha Noi, Vietnam
QGIS Development Team (2020) QGIS 3.14. QGIS Geogrpahic information system. Open source geospatial foundation project. http://qgis.osgeo.org/
Queensland herbarium (2016) Collecting and preserving plant specimens, a Manual. (2nd edn) Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane
Rosales F, Belalcázar Carvajal S, Pocasangre L (2006) Global conservation strategy for Musa (Banana and Plantain): a consultative document prepared in collaboration with partners in the Musa research-and-development community. INIBAP, Bioversity International, Italy
Sâm Lý Ngọc, Kiệt Lê Công, Dũng Triệu Tiến, Haevermans A, Porter PLI, Thomas H (2012) A distinctive new species of wild banana (Musa, Musaceae) from northern Vietnam. Phytotaxa 75:33–42. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.75.1.3
Sâm LN, Lowry Ii PP, Haevermans T (2018) Typification and an emended description of Musa splendida (Musaceae). Phytotaxa 351:281–288. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.351.4.4
Shuaib M et al (2021) Traditional knowledge about medicinal plant in the remote areas of Wari Tehsil, Dir Upper, Pakistan. Braz J Biol [online] 83:e246803. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.246803
Simmonds NW (1956a) Botanical results of the banana collecting expedition, 1954–5. Kew Bull 11:468. https://doi.org/10.2307/4109131
Simmonds NW (1956b) Botanical results of the banana collecting expedition, 1954–5. Kew Bull 11:463–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/4109131
Simmonds NW (1962) The evolution of the bananas. Longmans Green, London
Simmonds NW (1966) Bananas, 2nd edn. Longmans Green and Co Ltd., London
Simmonds NW, Shepherd K (1955) The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. Bot J Linn 55:302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1955.tb00015.x
Šimoníková D, Čížková J, Zoulová V, Christelová P, Hřibová E (2022) Advances in the molecular cytogenetics of bananas family Musaceae. Plants. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040482
Singh DB, Sreekumar PV, Sharma T, Bandyopadhyay AK (1998) Musa balbisiana var. andamanica (Musaceae)-a new banana variety from Andaman Islands. Malay Nat J 52:157–160
Stover RH, Simmonds NW (1987) Bananas (tropical agriculture series). Longman Scientific & Technical, UK
Sulistyaningsih LD, Megia R, Widjaja EA (2014) Two new records of wild bananas (Musa balbisiana and Musa itinerans) from Sulawesi. Makara J Sci 18:1–6. https://doi.org/10.7454/mss.v18i1.3043
Taxonomy Advisory Group (TAG) (2019) Minimum list of descriptors for Musa. Bioversity International, Montpellier, France
The World Bank (2020) World-Terrain Elevation Above Sea Level (ELE) GIS Data, Global Solar Atlas. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-terrain-elevation-above-sea-level-ele-gis-data-global-solar-atlas
Tongco MDC (2007) Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl 5:147–158
Valmayor RV (2001) Classification and characterization of Musa exotica, M. alinsanaya and M. acuminata ssp. errans. Infomusa 10:35–39
Valmayor RV, Danh LD, Häkkinen M (2004) Rediscovery of Musa splendida A. Chevalier and description of two new species (Musa viridis and Musa lutea). Philipp Agric Sci 87:110–118
Valmayor RV, Danh LD, Häkkinen M (2005) The wild and ornamental Musaceae of Vietnam with descriptions of two new traveling bananas. Philipp Agric Sci 88:236–244
Van NK (2015) Climatic zoning of the Bac Bo mountainous provinces and Western Thanh Nghe. VJES 37:204–212. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7187/37/3/7793
Vare H, Häkkinen M (2011) Typification and check-list of Ensete Horan. names (Musaceae) with nomenclatural notes. Adansonia 33:191–200. https://doi.org/10.5252/a2011n2a3
Venu P (2002) Some conceptual and practical issues in taxonomic research. Curr Sci 82:924–933
Vrydaghs L, Ball T, Volkaert H, van den Houwe I, Manwaring J, De Langhe E (2009) Differentiating the volcaniform phytoliths of bananas: Musa acuminata. Ethnobot Res Appl 7:239–246
Vu DT, Nguyen TA (2017) The neglected and underutilized species in the Northern mountainous provinces of Vietnam. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64:1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0517-1
Williams E (2017) Musa acuminata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017:e.T22486320A22486950. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T22486320A22486950.en. Accessed 9 Sept
Wilkie P, Poulsen AD, Harris D, Forrest LL (2013) The collection and storage of plant material for DNA extraction: the teabag method. Gardens’ Bull Singap 65:231–234
Wong C, Kiew R, Argent G, Set O, Lee SK, Gan YY (2002) Assessment of the validity of the sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP. Ann Bot 90:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf170
Wu CY (1978) Musella Lasiocarpa. Acta Phytotax Sin 16:56–57
Wu DL, Kress WJ (2000) Musaceae. In: Wu CY, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China, vol 24. Science Press, Beijing, China and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 314–318
Funding
This study was funded by a bilateral grant between the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) and the Vietnamese National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number G0D9318N / FWO.106-NN.2017.02. This work was also supported by the University of Queensland via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation project ‘BBTV mitigation: Community management in Nigeria, and screening wild banana progenitors for resistance’ [INV-010652]. The authors thank all donors who supported this work also through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund (http://www.cgiar.org/who-we-are/cgiar-fund/fund-donors-2/), in particular to the CGIAR Research Program Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB-CRP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TVD, DTV and SBJ designed the study. TVD, SK, LTL, DTV, AM, and SBJ collected the data. TVD, DTV, SBJ performed the clarification. TVD and DTV drafted the manuscript and DTV, TDV, SK, SBJ, EDL and TTN thoroughly revised it. All authors have contributed to the manuscript and approve this final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that non-conflict of interest related to the work for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vu, T.D., Vu, D.T., Janssens, S.B. et al. The description, distribution and habitat of wild banana species in northern Viet Nam. Genet Resour Crop Evol 70, 479–504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01442-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01442-2