Introduction

Astraea Klotzsch is a genus in Euphorbiaceae represented by 13 species that are found in the Neotropics and Tropical West Africa, with its greatest diversity in eastern Brazil (Silva et al. 2020). Weedy species, such as A. lobata (L.) Klotzsch and A. trilobata (Forssk.) O.L.M.Silva & Cordeiro, are found in the Old World (Silva et al. 2019). Species of Astraea may be recognized by their mostly deeply lobed or partite leaves, spiciform thyrses, staminate flowers with petals bearing moniliform trichomes at the base and stamens incurved in bud, pistillate flowers with slender, cylindrical multifid styles and mostly tetrangular seeds in cross section (Silva et al. 2020).

The genus Astraea is currently placed in tribe Crotoneae, subfamily Crotonoideae (Wurdack et al. 2005; Berry et al. 2005; Webster 2014), the most species rich lineage of Euphorbiaceae in the Neotropics (Ulloa-Ulloa et al. 2017). In spite of being traditionally included as a section of the giant Croton L. (Baillon 1858; Webster 1993), molecular data place Astraea as sister to Acidocroton Griseb. (Berry et al. 2005; Silva et al. 2020), found in Antilles, Central America, and northern South America. Berry et al. (2005) showed that the Astraea-Acidocroton clade emerged sister to the hyperdiverse Brasiliocroton-Croton clade, but a recent phylogeny recovered Croton sister to the Astraea-Acidocroton clade (Silva et al. 2020). The close relationship between Astraea and Acidocroton is surprising since the latter has distinctive xerophytic features in Crotoneae, such as stipules transformed in spines, leaves mostly arranged in short shoots (brachiblasts) and glomeruliform inflorescences (Webster 2014).

Pollen data have long been used in the classification of Euphorbiaceae (Punt 1962; Webster 1975, 1994, 2014). Crotoneae pollen has been studied extensively, but most works focused only on Croton (Erdtman 1952; Punt 1962; Nowicke 1994; Lobreau-Callen and Cervera 1997; Souza et al. 2016, 2019). For Astraea, only two works include descriptions of pollen grains (Oliveira and Santos 2000, Carreira and Barth 2003), whereas for Acidocroton no pollen data exist.

Taxonomic changes were proposed recently for Astraea including the re-delimitation of A. lobata (Silva et al. 2019), recognition of distinct species based on former varieties of Croton lobatus (Silva and Cordeiro 2017, Silva et al. 2019) and revision of the delimitation of some species, such as A. paulina and A. cincta (Silva et al. 2017, 2019). The genus is monophyletic and consists of three main clades (Silva et al. 2020). As palynological data are scarce for the genus, we aimed to characterize the pollen grains of Astraea, including a few representatives of Acidocroton, as a contribution to their taxonomy, to identify synapomorphies for both clades, and finally to infer the evolution of pollen traits within Astraea using the most recent phylogeny.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling

Samples of 40 specimens from 12 of the 13 species of Astraea, plus five specimens from three of the 12 species of Acidocroton (Table 1) were gathered from collections deposited in ALCB, CEN, COL, G, HUEFS, RB, SP, SPF, MBM, MO, UB, US and VIC.

Table 1 Examined material of the species of Acidocroton and Astraea used in this study (Euphorbiaceae)

Light (LM) and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM)

For LM, pollen grains were submitted to acetolysis following Erdtman (1960). From five of the mounted slides, one was stained with safranin. Slides were identified and deposited in the pollen library at Plant Micromorphology Laboratory of the Universidade Federal de Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.

For SEM, acetolyzed pollen grains were washed and dehydrated in ascending hydroethanolic series (50, 70, 90 and 100%), for 10 min at each step. A drop of absolute ethanol containing pollen grains was directly applied to a stub and, after complete drying, the sample was metalized with high-vacuum gold evaporation. Samples were then qualitatively analyzed, and images were obtained using a Quanta 250 microscope (FEI Company) at the Electronic Microscopy Center in the Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC) and a JEOL 6390LV microscope at the Plataforma de Microscopia Eletrônica in Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz (FIOCRUZ).

Pollen grains characterization

Pollen grains were described regarding size, shape, polarity, apertures, ornamentations and exine sculpture, adopting the nomenclature of Punt et al. (2007) and Hesse et al. (2009). The size classes follow Erdtman (1952). The measures were taken randomly in 25 pollen grains for each specimen, distributed in, at least, five slides. Exine thickness and diameter of pila, rosettes and the central space within rosettes were measured in 10 pollen grains from each specimen as illustrated by Souza et al. (2016).

Quantitative data were treated statistically, with arithmetic mean, sample and mean standard deviation, coefficient of variability, 95% confidence interval and variation range for measures taken from 25 pollen grains for each specimen. For exine thickness and diameter of pila, rosettes and the central space within rosettes we only calculated the arithmetic mean.

Ancestral states reconstruction

We employed the phylogeny of Astraea resulted from Bayesian inference based on ITS sequences from all Crotoneae genera from Silva et al. (2020), deposited in TreeBase (study ID 25606). As our study focuses on Astraea, we used Acidocroton as outgroup, and the remaining genera of Crotoneae were pruned from the tree using the drop.tip function from the ape package (Paradis and Schliep 2019) in R (R Core Team 2020). Six palynological characters (Table 2) were selected and their states coded and treated as unordered. Reconstructions of ancestral states were then performed using maximum likelihood, with one-parameter Markov k-state (Mk1) model, as implemented in Mesquite v. 3.2 (Maddison and Maddison 2009).

Table 2 Pollen characters reconstructed for Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae) in this study and coding of their respective states

Results

Pollen grains characterization

Astraea

Pollen grains of Astraea are monads, apolar, spherical, inaperturate, with Croton pattern exine, and sexine thicker than the nexine (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4). The predominant size is medium (Tables 3 and 4, Figs. 5 and 6), but large pollen grains are also observed exclusively in A. cincta (Müll.Arg.) Caruzo and Cordeiro. In Astraea, the rosette has 5-7(-8) pila with subcircular to subtriangular heads, which lumen has sexine elements. In A. cincta (Fig. 1c) and A. surinamensis (Miq.) O.L.M.Silva & Cordeiro (Fig. 4l), the lumen of the rosettes is reduced.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pollen grains of species of Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). Astraea cincta: a optical section; b detail of the surface; c surface (SEM); A. lobata: d optical section; e detail of the surface; f surface (SEM); A. macroura: g optical section; h detail of the surface; i surface (SEM); A. surinamensis: j optical section; k detail of the surface; l surface (SEM). Scale bars 5 μm (b, e, h, k), 10 μm (a, cd, fg, ij, l)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pollen grains of species of Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). Astraea comosa: a optical section; b detail of the surface; c surface (SEM); A. digitata: d optical section; e detail of the surface; f surface (SEM); A. jatropha: g optical section; h detail of the surface; i surface (SEM); A. paulina: j optical section; k detail of the surface; l surface (SEM). Scale bars 5 μm (b, e, h, k) 10 μm (a, cd, fg, ij, l)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pollen grains of species of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). Acidocroton gentryi: a optical section; b detail of the surface; c surface (SEM); Astraea cincta: d detail of exine structure (SEM), arrow showing clavae; Astraea comosa: e detail of the surface (SEM); Astraea gracilis: f detail of exine structure (SEM); Astraea lobata: g detail of the surface (SEM); Astraea praetervisa: h detail of the surface (SEM); Astraea surinamensis: i detail of the surface (SEM). c, clava; p, pilum; arrows indicate sexine elements in the lumen of the rosettes. Scale bars 5 μm (bi), 10 μm (a)

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM details of the surface of pollen grains of species of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). aAcidocroton gentryi; bAstraea cincta; cAstraea comosa; dAstraea digitata; eAstraea klotzschii; fAstraea lobata; gAstraea macroura; hAstraea jatropha; iAstraea paulina; jAstraea praetervisa; kAstraea subcomosa; lAstraea surinamensis. Scale bars 2 μm (c, ef, hl), 5 μm (a, b, d, g)

Table 3 Pollen characters in species of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae) included in this study
Table 4 Pollen characters in species of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae) included in this study
Fig. 5
figure 5

Boxplot graph of the distribution of the variable diameter of pollen grains of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). The horizontal bar inside the rectangle is the median, the rectangle shows 50% of interquartile, the ends show the amplitude variation, and the black circles correspond to the outlier

Fig. 6
figure 6

Graphic representation of 95% confidence interval for the mean diameter of the pollen grains of the Acidocroton and Astraea species (Euphorbiaceae). Circles represent the means, and vertical lines represent the range of variation. *Individual standard deviations were used to calculate the intervals

Pilum surface varies from psilate in Astraea comosa (Müll.Arg.) B.W. van Ee (Fig. 4c), A. klotzschii Didr. (Figure 4e), A. paulina Didr. (Fig. 4i) and A. subcomosa (Müll.Arg.) Caruzo (Fig. 4k), to plicate in the remaining species of Astraea (Fig. 4a–b, d, f–h, j, l). In the later, plicae show different levels of folding density (number) and deepness of the pilum grooves (Fig. 4). Only in A. cincta and A. digitata (Müll.Arg.) O.L.M.Silva & Cordeiro, we observed more than 10 plicae per pilum. As for deepness, only in A. cincta and A. praetervisa (Müll.Arg.) P.E.Berry, shallow folding is observed. Overall, pila with shallow plicae show more foldings than those with deep plicae: a minimum of eight foldings in deep plicae and a maximum of 13 in shallow plicae.

The sexine elements of the rosette lumen are clavae or pila (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4). Almost all species have only one of them (Fig. 3d; Table 3), while in A. lobata and A. comosa, have both (Fig. 3g). The distribution of clavae and pila vary from dense in A. gracilis (Müll.Arg.) O.L.M.Silva & Cordeiro, A. macroura (Mart. ex Colla) P.L.R.Moraes, De Smedt & Guglielmone (Fig. 4g), A. jatropha (Müll.Arg.) B.W.van Ee (Fig. 4h), A. praetervisa (Fig. 4j) and A. subcomosa (Fig. 4k) to slightly sparse in the remaining species.

In the lumen of rosettes, clavae and pila are sparse surrounding the base of the pilum in most species (Fig. 4c, g, k) or aggregated in the central region of the lumen in A. gracilis, A. jatropha and A. praetervisa (Fig. 4h, j). Finally, the sexine is thicker than the nexine in all species we analyzed (Table 3), with the thinnest in A. digitata (2.7 μm) and the thickest in A. cincta (4.0 μm).

Acidocroton

Pollen grains of Acidocroton are monads, apolar, spherical, inaperturate, with Croton pattern exine and sexine thicker than the nexine (Figs. 3a–c, 4a). Species of Acidocroton have medium pollen grains with diameter varying from 33.8 μm in A. gentryi Fern.Alonso & R.Jaram to 44.1 μm in A. oligostemon Urb. (Table 4, Fig. 5). The rosette is composed by 5-7 triangular pila, or subtriangular in A. gentryi and A. oligostemon. In A. gentryi, pilum surface is plicate, pila with deep plicae. The rosettes have a well delimited lumen with clavate sparsely distributed surrounding the base of the pilum in A. gentry to aggregate in the central region of the lumen in the other species.

Ancestral states reconstruction

Our ancestral state reconstruction (Fig. 7) indicates that the putative ancestor of Astraea most likely had medium pollen grains bearing subcircular pila and spaced sexine elements in the lumen of the rosettes surrounding the base of the pilum and with sexine of 3–4 μm. For the pilum surface, our reconstruction could not recover a most likely state between plicate and psilate.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Inferred ancestral state reconstruction of Acidocroton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae) for pollen size, pilum head shape, pilum surface, distribution and disposition of sexine elements in the lumen of the rosettes and sexine thickness using maximum likelihood over the ITS tree from Silva et al. (2020). Color codes for character states are shown on the upper left; gray represents unknown or inconclusive state reconstruction. Character state shifts in putative ancestors are indicated with a red arrow

Regarding pollen grains size, we recovered transitions to slightly larger pollen grains (from less than 40 μm to up to 46 μm) only in species of clade C (A. comosa, A. jatropha, A. klotzschii, A. paulina and A. subcomosa) and to more than 50 μm in A. cincta. Most putative ancestors in Astraea were inferred as having subcircular pilum head, with a shift to subtriangular ones in the putative ancestor of clade C2, which could represent a synapomorphy for this group, although A. digitata has also subcircular pilum head. In this scenario, the subtriangular pilum head, observed also in A. macroura, has an independent origin of this feature in C1, and circular pilum head, observed only in A. comosa and A. subcomosa, is restricted to C1. Nevertheless, the psilate pilum surface evolved separately in C1 (A. subcomosa and A. comosa) and C2 (A. paulina and A. klotzschii).

While most putative ancestors in Astraea were inferred as having sparse sexine elements in the lumen of the rosette, for clade C1 we inferred a putative ancestor with dense sexine elements in the lumen of the rosette. This shift could be interpreted as a synapomorphy for C1, with a reversion to sparse sexine elements in A. comosa. Regarding the disposition of such sexine elements, independent shifts from spaced, surrounding the base of the pilum, to aggregate in the central region of the rosette, were inferred in both C1 (A. jatropha and A. praetervisa) and C2 (A. gracilis). Finally, for sexine thickness, we inferred independent reductions (to up to 2.9 μm) in A. lobata and both C1 (A. praetervisa) and C2 (A. digitata and A. gracilis), with the sexine with more than 4.0 μm, as well as the pollen larger than 50 μm, representing autapomorphies of A. cincta.

Discussion

The work of Carreira and Barth (2003) described the pollen grains of Astraea paulina (as Croton lobatus in their work) as slightly large (48–53 μm), while Oliveira and Santos (2000) described the pollen of A. surinamensis (as C. lobatus in their work) similar to what we observed. Our analyzes showed that the majority of Astraea pollen grains are in the 40–50 μm range. The smallest diameter was observed in Acidocroton gentryi (33.8 μm), and Astraea cincta has the largest pollen grains (51.9 μm). Although we could not identify any synapomorphy for the clade Astraea + Acidocroton, our work confirmed that spheroidal and inaperturate pollen grains with Croton pattern ornamentation are shared among all representatives of Crotoneae following the circumscription of Wurdack et al. (2005). The presence of sexine elements in the lumen of the rosettes, as well as having the sexine thicker than the nexine, are features widely present in Croton, Brasiliocroton and Sagotia (Erdtman 1952; Thanikaimoni et al. 1984; Nowicke 1994; Lima et al. 2007; Souza et al. 2016, 2019) and now extended to Acidocroton and Astraea because of our study.

The morphology of the pilum surface of the rosette is a character of taxonomic value as demonstrated by Thanikaimoni et al. (1984), Nowicke (1994), Carreira et al. (1996), Lobreau-Callen and Cervera (1997), Souza et al. (2016), Ren-Yong et al. (2018) and Souza et al. (2019). Carreira et al. (1996), who studied the pollen morphology of several lianescent species of Croton, verified the presence of pilum with a striate and psilate surface. Ren-Yong et al. (2018) showed that the Trigonostemon (Euphorbiaceae) species differ from other genera (Dimorphocalyx, Ostodes and Tritaxis) by the absence of striate ornamentation on the subunits (pila). Souza et al. (2019) showed that the species of the genus Brasiliocroton have pila with variation in the surface of ornamentation, Brasiliocroton mamoninha P.E.Berry & Cordeiro has pila > 5-plicate and pointed apex, whereas B. muricatus Riina & Cordeiro had pila < 5-Plicate and rounded apex, thus contributing to the taxonomic circumscription of these taxa. For Thanikaimoni et al. (1984), the ornamentation of sculptural elements (pilum) is a diversification of the Croton pattern and may also be associated with pollination. In Astraea, however, we observed only psilate and plicate pila.

Most pollen characters analyzed are conserved in Astraea, with shifts concentrated within clades and evolving independently, a pattern also documented for monocots and basal angiosperms (Lu et al. 2015, Zhang et al. 2017). Silva et al. (2020) inferred recent divergences (from 10 Ma onward) within clades A, B, C1 and C2 of Astraea, most likely influenced by the colonization of humid areas, as, for example, in clade C1 we find species restricted to dry (A. comosa and A. subcomosa in campo rupestres) and humid areas (A. macroura and A. praetervisa in seashore vegetation). Therefore, shifts in pollen features may also be linked to the colonization of new habitats along the evolutionary history of Astraea.

Psilate pila are inferred as derived states (Fig. 7) in two distinct lineages: Astraea comosa and A. subcomosa in C1 and A. klotzschii and A. paulina in C2. These species with psilate pila are the only ones found in campos rupestres (Silva et al. 2020): A. comosa is restricted to the Meridional Espinhaço Range, while A. subcomosa is restricted to the Septentrional Espinhaço Range and Chapada Diamantina, A. paulina is found along the Espinhaço Range, but also in gallery forests in the Cerrado domain, and A. klotzschii is mainly found in seashore vegetation in eastern Brazil, but with a few collections from Chapada Diamantina.

Astraea cincta is unique in the genus due to its xylopodiferous underground system, cartilaginous leaf margin and rounded seeds (Silva et al. 2019). Pollen data provided additional unique features for this species: the largest pollen grains and the thickest exine (Fig. 7; Table 3). Such features seem to be related to preventing water loss during pollen dispersal as Nepi et al. (2001) have suggested for many groups of angiosperms. In fact, A. cincta is found in seasonally dry open vegetation in central Brazil and eastern Bolivia (Silva et al. 2019). Other factors such as transport conditions and level of polyploidy may reflect directly in pollen size (Muller 1979). However, there are no data available in the literature for cytotaxonomy and pollination system involving Astraea species, except the chromosome number of A. lobata (Miller and Webster 1966).

Medium pollen grains are observed in the remaining species of Astraea. However, most species restricted to the Atlantic rain Forest domain (namely, A. gracilis, A. digitata, A. macroura and A. praetervisa) have slightly smaller pollen grains (35.8–40.6 μm vs 43–48 μm in the remaining species with medium pollen grains), indicating that smaller pollen grains in Astraea may be associated with humid areas in both C1 and C2. In C2, A. gracilis and A. digitata have congruent patterns also in pilum surface and exine thickness, when compared to their sister species (A. paulina and A. klotzschii). The occurrence of Astraea paulina in the Cerrado domain suggests an association of plicate pilum surface and thinner exine with more humid habitats. Although A. klotzschii is also in the Atlantic Forest, it occurs in a different habitat (mostly restricted to seashore vegetation) from A. gracilis and A. digitata (borders of humid forests).

Finally, in support of the segregation of Astraea digitata, A. gracilis, A. jatropha and A. surinamensis from A. lobata, our data show that only A. lobata has both pilum and clava as sexine elements inside the lumen of its rosettes, while the remaining species have strictly clavate sexine elements. Also, A. jatropha and A. digitata have a high number of pilum head folding (10 and 13, respectively, vs. eight in A. lobata), while A. digitata and A. gracilis have smaller pollen grains (38.2 and 40.6 μm, respectively, vs. 45.4 μm in A. lobata) with slightly thinner sexine (2.7 and 2.8 μm, respectively, vs. 3.2 μm in A. lobata). Pollen grains of A. surinamensis, however, are very similar to those of A. lobata.

Conclusions

With an almost complete sampling of Astraea, we found little variation in pollen morphology, confirming its stenopalynous nature. Our pollen data support the placement of Astraea in Crotoneae based on shared features such as apolar, spheroidal, inaperturate pollen grains with Croton pattern exine. Shifts to less conserved pollen features in the most recent diverging clade of Astraea may be associated with the colonization of new habitats. Distinct pollen features among species within that clade also suggest this pattern. Although we did not identify any synapomorphy, neither for Astraea nor for the Astraea + Acidocroton clade, our results expand the palynological data for Crotoneae and will contribute to future taxonomic and phylogenetic studies in this group.