Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Change in C:N, C:P, N:P ratios for leaf (left) and root (right) tissue over time for three grassland species in the sand culture study.

Error bars are SEM.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Mean C:N, C:P, N:P ratios for foliage of different ages (young = emerging; medium = fully expanded at midpoint of plant; old = fully expanded at base of plant) (left) and roots in different size categories (small = Φ ≤2 mm; medium = 2 mm <Φ<5 mm; large = Φ≥5 mm) (right).

Error bars are SEM.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Multivariate ANOVA results for the effects of species, plant sampling date, leaf age and root size on C:N, C:P, N:P ratios in the sand culture study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Partitioning of total variation (%) of C:N, C:P, N:P into species, effects of sampling (sampling date, leaf age, root size) and residual components in the sand culture experiment.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 3.

C:N, C:P, N:P ratios of 13 Inner Mongolia grassland dominate and common species with four sampling dates during two-year field N and P addition experiment.

KP Kochia Prostrate, LC Leymus chinensis, SG Stipa grandis, AC Agropyron cristatum, CS Cleistogenes squarrosa, AS Achnatherum sibiricum, KC Koeleria cristata, PS Poa sphondylodes, CK Carex korshinskyi, AR Allium ramosum, AT Allium tenuissimum, AA Axyris amarantoides, CG Chenopodium glaucum. Error bars are SEM.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariate ANOVA results for the effects of species, sampling year (Y) and sampling month (M) on leaf C:N, C:P, N:P ratios in the field study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Partitioning of total variation (%) of C:N, C:P, N:P into species, sampling year (Y), sampling month (M) and residual components in the field experiment.

More »

Table 4 Expand