Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Characteristics and morphological variation of the tribe Morindeae (for details see text).

A–B: Appunia debilis; C: Morinda citrifolia; D: Morinda pacifica; E: Coelospermum fragrans; F: Coelospermum balansanum; G: Gynochthodes kanalensis; and H: Gynochthodes retusa (A–C by T. D. McDowell; D by F. Tronquet; E–G by J. T. Johansson; and H by K. Kainulainen).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Morphological characteristics and other important information of the five recognized genera of the tribe Morindeae.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Bayesian majority rule consensus tree from the combined nrETS/nrITS/trnT-F data of 61 Morindeae taxa.

Values above nodes are the posterior probabilities. Capital letters A–G denote selected nodes whose state probabilities were estimated for the states of the four characters (1–4). Data shown across the tips are growth habit (character 1: 0 = lianescent, 1 = arborescent, 2 = herbaceous), inflorescence architecture (character 2: 0 = headed inflorescences (heads); 1 = non-headed inflorescences), flower size (character 3: 0 = large, 1 = small), and fruit type (character 4: 0 = simple fruits, 1 = fused or multiple fruits). SF and LF stand for small and large fruits, respectively.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Bayesian reconstruction of ancestral states in the four characters (1–4) at seven nodes (A–G) across a posterior sample of trees including Morindeae but no outgroup.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Bayesian reconstruction of ancestral states in the four characters (1–4) at seven nodes (A–G) across a posterior sample of trees including Morindeae as well as the outgroup taxa Damnacanthus indicus and Mitchella repens (Mitchelleae).

More »

Table 3 Expand