Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background and aims

Psidium is the fourthth largest genus of Myrtaceae in the Neotropics. Psidium guajava is widely cultivated in the tropics for its edible fruit. It is commercially under threat due to the disease guava decline. Psidium cattleyanum is one of the 100 most invasive organisms in the world. Knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships within Psidium is poor. We aim to provide a review of the biology, morphology and ecology of Psidium, a phylogenetic tree, an infrageneric classification and a list of species.

Methods

Morphological and geographic data were obtained by studying Psidium in herbaria and in the field between 1988 and 2020. Forty-six herbaria were visited personally. A database of approx. 6000 specimens was constructed, and the literature was reviewed. Thirty species (about a third of the species in the genus) were sampled for molecular phylogenetic inference. Two chloroplast (psbA-trnH and ndhF) and two nuclear (external transcribed spacer and internal transcribed spacer) regions were targeted. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood (ML; RaxML) and Bayesian inference (BI; MrBayes).

Key results

Psidium is a monophyletic genus with four major clades recognized as sections. Section Psidium (ten species), to which P. guajava belongs, is sister to the rest of the genus; it is widespread across the Neotropics. Section Obversifolia (six species; restricted to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest), which includes P. cattleyanum, is sister to the innermost clade composed of sister sections Apertiflora (31 species; widespread but most diverse in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest) + Mitranthes (26 species; widespread in dry forests and probably diverse in the Caribbean). Characters associated with diversification within Psidium are discussed.

Conclusions

Research on pre-foliation, colleters, leaf anatomy, leaf physiology, staminal development, placentation and germination associated with the anatomy of the opercular plug is desirable. Studies are biased towards sections Psidium and Obversifolia, with other sections poorly known.

Free full text 


Logo of annbotAboutAuthor GuidelinesEditorial BoardAnnals of Botany
Ann Bot. 2022 Apr 1; 129(4): 367–388.
Published online 2022 Jan 16. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac005
PMCID: PMC8944734
PMID: 35034117

Diversity, phylogeny and evolution of the rapidly evolving genus Psidium L. (Myrtaceae, Myrteae)

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Background and Aims

Psidium is the fourthth largest genus of Myrtaceae in the Neotropics. Psidium guajava is widely cultivated in the tropics for its edible fruit. It is commercially under threat due to the disease guava decline. Psidium cattleyanum is one of the 100 most invasive organisms in the world. Knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships within Psidium is poor. We aim to provide a review of the biology, morphology and ecology of Psidium, a phylogenetic tree, an infrageneric classification and a list of species.

Methods

Morphological and geographic data were obtained by studying Psidium in herbaria and in the field between 1988 and 2020. Forty-six herbaria were visited personally. A database of approx. 6000 specimens was constructed, and the literature was reviewed. Thirty species (about a third of the species in the genus) were sampled for molecular phylogenetic inference. Two chloroplast (psbA–trnH and ndhF) and two nuclear (external transcribed spacer and internal transcribed spacer) regions were targeted. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood (ML; RaxML) and Bayesian inference (BI; MrBayes).

Key Results

Psidium is a monophyletic genus with four major clades recognized as sections. Section Psidium (ten species), to which P. guajava belongs, is sister to the rest of the genus; it is widespread across the Neotropics. Section Obversifolia (six species; restricted to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest), which includes P. cattleyanum, is sister to the innermost clade composed of sister sections Apertiflora (31 species; widespread but most diverse in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest) + Mitranthes (26 species; widespread in dry forests and probably diverse in the Caribbean). Characters associated with diversification within Psidium are discussed.

Conclusions

Research on pre-foliation, colleters, leaf anatomy, leaf physiology, staminal development, placentation and germination associated with the anatomy of the opercular plug is desirable. Studies are biased towards sections Psidium and Obversifolia, with other sections poorly known.

Keywords: Amphistomatic leaves, animal dispersal, apomixis, guava, Neotropical flora, idioblasts, invasive species, polyploidy, stone cells, tropical fruit

INTRODUCTION

Psidium L. (Myrtaceae) is a large, economically important genus including Psidium guajava L., the widely cultivated guava, and P. cattleyanum Sabine, one of the worst invasive alien organisms in the world (Global Invasive Species Database, 2013 – a list that includes plants, animals and micro-organisms). Psidium is the fourth most species-rich genus of Myrtaceae in the Neotropics (Govaerts et al., 2021) and new species are still being described. Since the beginning of the 21st century, 15 new species have been described, re-established or transferred to Psidium (Landrum and Sobral, 2006; Landrum and Funch, 2008; Soares-Silva and Proença, 2008; Proença et al., 2010, 2017, 2020; Landrum and Parra, 2014; Landrum and Proença, 2015; Tuler et al., 2016, 2017b, 2019b, 2020a, b). There are currently 113 accepted names in Psidium in The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org), although species described since 2014 are not listed; if they were included, The Plant List would show 122 accepted names. The World Checklist of Selected Plant Families (https://wcsp.science.kew.org/) that is continuously updated records 92 accepted species. It was suggested based on BAMM analysis that Psidium might be undergoing recent, rapid diversification in comparison with other large genera of Myrtaceae whose rates of diversification were slowing down (Vasconcelos et al., 2017b); this study compared a wide spectrum of Myrteae genera (only four genera were absent).

Species of the genus Psidium were amongst the earliest Neotropical plants to be known and introduced into Europe along with potatoes and tobacco (Menéndez de Luarca, 1999). The first report of the guava was published in 1555 by Spanish Captain and historian Gonzalo Fernandez Oviedo y Valdés who recorded it from Hispaniola and Central America (de los Rios, 1854). The guava was also accurately described and illustrated by Clusius (1601) in his Rariorum Plantarum Historiae based on leaves and immature fruits of ‘Guayava’ specimens he had obtained from Seville (Menéndez de Luarca, 1999). Other early records were by Georg Marcgrave between 1637 and 1642 (Marcgrave and Piso, 1648) and William Dampier from 1699 (Harris et al., 2017), who respectively recorded ‘araças’ and ‘arissahs’ (Psidium guineense Sw. and probably P. oligospermum Mart. ex DC.) from Pernambuco and Bahia in north-eastern Brazil.

Psidium guajava L. is the type species of the genus, and its present-day, widespread range has certainly been expanded by humans since pre-Colombian times (Newsom and Wing, 2004; Clement et al., 2010). The guava is believed to have been domesticated by approx. 4000 BP (uncalibrated radiocarbon date; Solis et al., 2001) although its exact centre of origin is uncertain (Landrum, 2017); Central America, Mexico, northern South America and north-eastern Brazil have been suggested (Nakasone and Paull, 1998; Pereira et al., 2003; Clement et al., 2010). Guavas were apparently introduced into the Philippines through the Acapulco–Manila galleon route during the 16th century (Merril, 1954), from whence they spread to China. This originated an early misconception that the guava was Asian; Linnaeus (1753) described it as native to India.

Psidium has been included (with a few species) in phylogenetic studies of the family Myrtaceae and tribe Myrteae (Lucas et al., 2007; Vasconcelos et al., 2017b) and in studies focusing on the placement of particular species (Tuler et al., 2019b) or regional floras (Flickinger et al., 2020), but no phylogenetic study focused on the genus has been published until now. The economic and ecological significance of Psidium as well as its recent taxonomic growth through the description of additional species in the 21st century makes understanding its phylogenetic relationships highly desirable. Berg (1857) recognized six sections in Psidium but these have been largely ignored except by some authors’ attempts to detect affinities between species. Recent publications have recognized sections in large Myrtaceous genera based on phylogeny, e.g. 11 sections within Eugenia (>1000 species; Mazine et al., 2018) and nine in Myrcia (774 species; Lucas et al., 2018). Identifying natural, infra-generic sections within Psidium is necessary for effective management of the economically important and invasive species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Geographic distribution, morphology and ecology

A morphological overview of the genus was obtained by study of specimens of this genus in the herbarium and in the field since 1988. The following herbaria were personally consulted by C.E.B.P. or A.C.T. between 1988 and 2020: ALCB, ASE, ASU, BHCB, BM, BOTU, CAP, CEN, CGE, CEPEC, CVRD, FHO, FLOR, HAS, HB, HRCB, HUEMG, IAN, ICN, IPA, JBSD, K, MBM, MBML, MG, MO, NX, NY, OXF, P, PEUFR, R, RB, SAMES, SP, SPF, TEPB, UB, UEC, UEFS, UFG, USZ, VIES and W; additional material was obtained on loan from BR, C, INPA and G. A database of approx. 6000 specimens was generated, and species were morphologically characterized from this material and from the literature (Berg, 1857; Proença et al., 2013; Landrum, 2017; Tuler et al., 2017a; Stadnik et al., 2018 and references therein). Geographic distribution was obtained from this database and from the TDWG areas in the World Checklist of Myrtaceae (Govaerts et al., 2008). Leaf venation patterns follow the terminology of Hickey (1973) as applied to Myrtaceae by Cardoso and Sajo (2006).

Phylogeny

Thirty species (45 specimens), about a third of the species in the genus, were sampled for molecular phylogenetic inference; samples were obtained from Brazil, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic (see Supplementary data Tables S1–S3). Sampling was non-random and concentrated on three groups: (1) economically important species valued for human fruit consumption; (2) invasive species that threaten the biodiversity of fragile ecosystems; and (3) taxonomically problematic species that form species complexes, i.e. the Psidium grandifolium complex (Landrum, 2005) and the Psidium salutare complex (Landrum, 2003).

Total DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (Doyle and Doyle, 1987) or the DNeasy kit (Qiagen) in the Laboratório de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade de Brasília or Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Garden Kew. Two chloroplast (psbA–trnH and ndhF) and two nuclear [external transcribed spacer (ETS) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 + 5.8S + ITS2] regions were targeted for each accession. Amplification was carried out on a Gene Amp 9700 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) thermal cycler under the following conditions: psbA–trnH (Hamilton, 1999), 4 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 48 °C, 2 min and 30 s at 72 °C; ndhF (Biffin et al., 2006), 4 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C; ETS (Wright et al., 2001; Lucas et al., 2007), 4 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 50 °C, 1 min at 72 °C; and ITS (ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2; Sun et al., 1994), 2 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 52 °C, 1 min at 72 °C; annealing temperatures were lowered to a minimum value of 48 °C and cycles increased from 30 up to 36 in order to optimize amplification; the standard stabilizing phase was 7 min at 72 °C. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Sequencing reactions were conducted using the Taq DyeDeoxy™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were produced on an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Complementary strands were sequenced, and consensus sequences obtained using Geneious™ version 10. Sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE plug-in implemented in Geneious™ 10 (Edgar, 2004) with default values, and visually inspected and corrected for alignment mismatches. The psbA–trnH inversion flanked by inverted repeats identified by Flickinger et al. (2020) in Eugenia was not found in the dataset; all sequences had the common configuration so no corrections were necessary.

Phylogenetic analyses were run in two separate datasets based on the number of molecular regions successfully sequenced for each specimen. First, we analysed a dataset comprising 30 species and 45 specimens in the ingroup and one specimen each of three species in the outgroup. This included specimens where two, three or four molecular regions could be sequenced; ten single-region species were not included. This inclusive analysis was performed so that more specimens could be included in the phylogenetic tree, even if this was at the cost of reducing the support of some relationships due to the gaps in the matrix. Next, we removed all accessions that were not complete for the four molecular regions in the matrix, leaving only those that could be sequenced for all markers (15 species and 20 accessions in the ingroup; two outgroups). This more restrictive analysis was important to evaluate the support of the main clades in a scenario where the molecular matrix is complete, albeit with fewer samples.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on maximum likelihood (ML) using RaxML (default parameters) and Bayesian inference (BI) using MrBayes on the CIPRES (Miller et al., 2011) gateway. ML and BI are phylogenetic inference methods that have become common in the field since the computational advances of the late 20th century allowed calculations based on large datasets. Briefly, ML utilizes sequence data to search for trees that maximize the likelihood of a particular evolutionary history given a molecular substitution model (Huelsenbeck and Crandall, 1997). BI expands the ML assumptions to incorporate prior probabilities and accounts for uncertainty in estimations by using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to search for a posterior distribution of trees with high probabilities. The way in which trees are summarized differs between each method. Whereas most ML software uses bootstrap (BS) values to indicate support (Felsenstein, 1981), BI usually synthesizes the posterior probability (PP) distributions on the trees by calculating a maximum clade credibility tree (Huelsenbeck et al., 2001). Consequently, metrics used to measure support of relationships are also different, varying from 0 to 100 in ML (with BS values > 70 generally considered high support; Hillis and Bull, 1993) and from 0 to 1 in BI (with values of PP > 0.95 generally considered high support; Huelsenbeck et al., 2001). Metrosideros stipularis Hook.f. was set as the outgroup in the inclusive analysis and Calycolpus goetheanus (Mart. ex DC.) O.Berg in the restricted analysis, based on their placement in the family (Vasconcelos et al., 2017b). For the BI analysis, substitution models were tested using JmodelTest (Posada, 2008) and the models that best fit the individual regions were implemented; these were GTR + G (ETS and ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 and psbA–trnH) and GTR + I + G (ndhF). Four MCMC runs of 10 million generations sampling every 1000 were performed and convergence was confirmed in Tracer [effective sample size (ESS) > 200, 0.25 burn-in].

Subgeneric classification

As recommended by the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code), our first criterion when selecting the type species was that it fit the characteristics described in the original diagnosis of the section (Berg, 1857); all lectotypes fulfilled this criterion. Our second criterion was that the selected species was both sampled in our phylogeny and included by Berg within its section either in Flora Brasiliensis (Berg, 1857) or, failing this, in the Revisio Myrtacearum Americae (Berg, 1854) where the same characters of the sections were used as keys to groups. Thus, our third criterion was to rule out the misclassified species, and judiciously select as lectotype a species that emerged within the clade that corresponded to the section with high support in the phylogeny.

The section that includes the type species (Psidium guajava) was called by Berg (1857) section Costata; this must be substituted for the autonym Psidium section Psidium, according to Article 22 of the International Code (Shenzhen Code) of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Turland et al., 2018).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Geographic distribution

Psidium is naturally Neotropical in distribution, occurring from 30°N (State of Sonora, Mexico) to 38°S (Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina), including the West Indies as well as two Archipelagos in the Pacific, the Galápagos and Revillagigedo Islands (Rotman, 1976; Landrum, 2017; this study). Inspection of our database per country suggests that three apparent centres of species diversity exist: (1) West Indies, particularly Cuba and Hispaniola; (2) Central and Southern Brazil and Paraguay; and (3) Northern South America (Peru, Venezuela and the Guianas). These three areas present a wide range of natural habitats, and the large number of species of Psidium present seems to have been due to their successful colonization. Cuba appears to have the highest co-occurrence of species (22 species; Govaerts et al. 2008; this study). A detailed biogeographic study of Psidium will be presented elsewhere.

We recognize 92 species as definitely belonging to Psidium L.; 25 names in Psidium were considered uncertain for various reasons (see Supplementary data Table S1). The geographic distribution of the genus is characterized by a few wide-ranging species, many regional species and a few narrow endemics. Only two species, Psidium sartorianum (O.Berg) Nied. and P. guineense Sw., can be considered naturally wide-ranging, occurring almost throughout the whole area of distribution of the genus. Psidium guajava and P. cattleyanum are also widely distributed, but this is at least partially due to the action of man, and the fact that they are very invasive species (Richardson and Rejmánek, 2013).

Vegetative ecology

The most common life form is that of a shrub or small tree, but Psidium species can occur as small, recurrent sub-shrubs with well-developed lignotubers (hemixyles that resprout after fire or a prolonged dry season), such as Psidium salutare Sprengel (Landrum, 2017), to large trees such as Psidium myrtoides O.Berg (Tuler et al., 2017a). In fire-prone fields and savannas, Psidium species are small to large shrubs or treelets. In maritime and semi-desertic scrubs or woodlands, such as Caatingas, Restingas and Pinares, they are small to large trees. In densely forested regions, such as the Amazon and in gallery forests, several species are adapted to a riparian habit. Field notes on specimens of Psidium collected in the Amazon (e.g. P. densicomum Mart. ex DC. and P. riparium Mart. Ex DC.) frequently allude to a riparian habitat. Poeppig, collecting P. densicomum Mart. ex DC. on the Amazon River, noted that it grew exclusively along rivers and formed large aquatic populations which resembled Rhizophora mangle L. mangroves, with many fasciculate, red, adventitious roots and decumbent branches (Berg, 1857). Studies of this species (under the synonym P. ovatifolium O.Berg) in a flooded forest on the Mapire River, Venezuela (Fernandez et al., 1999), showed that flooding probably does not cause water stress in that species and that submerged leaves maintained photosynthetic and leaf conductance rates similar to those observed in aerial leaves. Riparian species are not restricted to the Amazon, they also occur in Cuba (P. orbifolium Urban), Paraguay and south-western Brazil (P. striatulum Mart. ex DC.).

Psidium species are thus edaphically very variable, with species that grow on sandy soil, limestone soil, limestone soil with rocky outcrops, mesotrophic soil and water-logged soil (Fernandez et al., 1999; Proença et al., 2013; Landrum and Cornejo, 2016). Myrtaceae are strongly ectomycorrhizal, a rare form of symbiosis estimated to occur in 2 % of land plants (Brundrett and Tedersoo, 2018) and in up to 10 % of tracheophytes, although it can be dominant in certain environmental conditions (Wang and Qiu, 2006). In vitro inoculation of Psidium cattleyanum confirmed that it is ectomycorrhizal (Freire et al., 2018), while experiments with artificial inoculation of P. guajava plantlets have found that species to be highly mycotrophic, with a mycorrhizal dependency index (RDMI) of 103 % (Estrada-Luna et al., 2002); this index compares the dry weight of mycorrhizal plantlets with that of non-mycorrhizal plantlets.

Leaf venation and anatomy

Leaves in Psidium are highly variable in size, shape, morphology, venation and anatomy; if all these parameters are considered, perhaps more so than in any other genus of Tribe Myrteae. Colleters have been sometimes observed in the leaf axils (Landrum, 2017; Tuler et al., 2021). Leaves vary in size from 0.4 cm in diameter in P. nannophyllumLiogier (1973) to 19 cm long in P. oblongatum O.Berg (Tuler et al., 2017a). The midvein can be sunken, flush or prominulous on the upper surface (Landrum, 2017; Oliveira et al., 2017). Secondary veins vary from four to 22 (Landrum, 2017; this study). The secondary venation is predominantly brochidodromous but can be so throughout the leaf or only apically, with the basal veins acrodromous or camptodromous; tertiary venation is admedial reticulate and the ultimate marginal venation can be in complete or incomplete arches, or fimbriate (Cardoso and Sajo, 2006; Fank-de-Carvalho et al., 2007; Oliveira et al., 2017). Considering the high abundance and diversity of Psidium, relatively few anatomical studies of the leaves have been conducted in the genus (see Gomes et al., 2009 for a review; Al-Edany and Al-Saadi, 2012; Oliveira et al., 2017; Endringer, 2020). Amongst leaf anatomical characters common to the genus, we can highlight a uniseriate epidermis and cuticle; hypostomatic leaves (amphistomatic in P. ratterianum Proença and Soares-Silva, Proença et al., 2010); paracytic stomata; and tector trichomes that are abundant on the abaxial surface and rare on the adaxial surface (rarely absent on the adaxial surface). The mesophile is dorsiventral with 1–3 layers of palisade parenchyma on each side and a compact arrangement of spongy parenchyma. The hypodermis is formed by two continuous layers on the adaxial surface. The vascular bundle of the midvein is bicolateral and protected by lignified fibres. Sub-epidermal secretory cavities and prismatic crystals occur throughout the mesophyll (Soares-Silva and Proença, 2008; Gomes et al., 2009; Endringer, 2020).

Reproductive biology

Psidium is mainly bee pollinated and mammal dispersed (Nic Lughadha and Proença, 1996; Gressler et al., 2006). Pollination is by large (Apidae: Bombinae; Anthophoridae: Xylocopinae) or small (Apidae: Ceratini, Meliponinae; Colletidae; Oxaeidae) bees. Phenological strategy is steady state (Gentry, 1974), i.e. a few flowers open per day during a more or less prolonged flowering period (Proença and Gibbs, 1994). Several short, synchronized episodes of flowering per year were recorded for P. guineense Sw. (Suárez and Esquivel, 1987) while P. acidum (DC.) Landrum flowers throughout the year (Falcão et al., 1992). Flowers are white, aromatic, with many anthers and a single style with a punctiform, funnel-shaped or capitate stigma (Proença et al., 2010; Landrum, 2017). In P. cattleyanum, pollen is released as a mixture of monads and tetrads (Patel et al., 1984).

Psidium firmum O.Berg is completely self-compatible, but the PERS (pre-emergent reproductive success; Wiens, 1984) range (4.6–12.7) found does not suggest habitual selfing (Proença and Gibbs, 1994). This study of P. firmum looked at the reproductive biology of eight sympatric species of Neotropical Myrtaceae in six genera and found two unusual characters in P. firmum that were not present in any of the other species: (1) the length of the styles varied within a plant so that some flowers had the stigmas raised 1–2 mm above the anthers, while others had the stigma at the same level as the anthers; and (2) cross-pollen tubes had penetrated ovules 48 and 72 h after pollination while at 72 h self-pollen tubes had still not penetrated the ovules. This suggests two possibilities: fruit set from self-pollinations results from either preferential self-exclusion or facultative apomixis. Preferential self-exclusion has been suggested to occur in Clarkia unguiculata Lindl. (Onagraceae, Myrtales). Clarkia unguiculata is a totally self-compatible species in which the use of a genetic marker (flower colour) showed that 58–100 % of the progeny of mixed self and cross pollen was outcrossed (Bowman, 1987); the author suggested that this was because the cross-pollen tubes grew faster and were responsible for most of the fertilizations. Apomixis has been recently recorded in P. cattleyanum and found to be through diplospory, an unusual and previously unrecorded pathway in Myrtaceae (Souza-Pérez and Speroni, 2017), possibly conforming to the most common type of diplospory, the Antennaria type (Nogler, 1984). Apomixis had been previously reported in Myrtaceae but from non-Neotropical genera and following other pathways. In Syzygium (Tribe Syzygieae), apomixis occurs through adventitious embryony (Thurlby et al., 2012, and references therein) and in Callistemon (Tribe Melaleuceae) through apospory (Rye, 1979). Urquía et al. (2020) suggested that the levels of clonal diversity found in populations of P. galapagaeum Hook.f. are best explained by clonal or asexual reproduction rather than by random mating between related plants. Most species of Psidium are hermaphrodites, but Psidium ovale (Spreng.) Burret is andromonoeicious, with both male and hermaphrodite flowers in the same plant (Soares-Silva and Proença, 2006).

The range of dispersal agents in Psidium was the widest recorded in a review of Neotropical Myrtaceae that included 115 species (Gressler et al., 2006), with nine out of the possible ten classes of dispersers recorded: ants, bats, birds, fish, carnivorous mammals, lizards, marsupials, monkeys and ungulates; their study did not record rodents, but rodent dispersal has also been recorded (Nic Lughadha and Proença, 1996; Alvarenga and Talamoni, 2006). Mammal dispersal is probably dominant, with a few species with small, wine-coloured fruit that suggest bird dispersal, such as P. ovale, P. macahense O.Berg, P. ganevii Landrum & Funch, P. cauliflorum Landrum & Sobral and P. grazielae Tuler & M.C.Souza (Soares-Silva and Proença 2006; Tuler et al., 2017b; Stadnik et al., 2018). In P. guajava, P. cauliflorum and P. grazielae, the fruits are reddish internally. Half-eaten fruits are thus very conspicuous to birds, and one of us (C.E.B.P.) has observed parrots returning to the same half-eaten fruits of P. guajava to feed, while V.G.S. (see also Staggemeier et al., 2017) observed that P. cattleyanum is consumed by large birds such as jays, e.g. Cyanocorax caeruleus (Vieillot, 1818) that remove whole fruits but also by smaller tanagers, e.g. Rhamphocelos carbo (Pallas, 1764), and thrushes, e.g. Turdus rufiventris (Vieillot, 1818), that peck at the fruits, consuming bits of flesh and presumably a few seeds. Psidium cattleyanum showed a keystone functional role in sustaining the fauna in a tropical forest in Southern Brazil (Pizo, 2002; Staggemeier et al., 2017): its many small seeds scattered in the pulp of a medium to large fruit allowed dispersal by a wide range of vertebrate frugivores from small birds to medium sized mammals. Cauliflory has evolved albeit rarely; it is known in two species, P. cauliflorum and P. grazielae. Cauliflory has been suggested to be associated with bat dispersal (van der Pijl, 1982) and also with increased visibility of flowers to pollinators (Wallace, 1878; Warren et al., 1997).

Floral morphology and anatomy

Flowers vary markedly in calyx structure and mode of anthesis, from completely closed buds that open by tearing or by a calyptra, to partially closed lobes, to free, shallow lobes. This plasticity is also found in other genera of Myrtaceae (Vasconcelos et al., 2017a; Giaretta et al., 2019). Besides this, flowers vary in size (4–13 mm long), bud shape and number of stamens (from approx. 80 to 720), number of locules (2–6) and ovules per locule (from approx. 3 to 180). Anthers vary by an order of magnitude in size, from 0.3 to 3 mm, and usually have an apical gland and a few smaller glands scattered along the connective, although some species have no glands and species with long anthers may have many scattered glands (Landrum, 2017; Vasconcelos et al., 2019).

Floral vasculature was found to be of the ‘consistent eight bundle’ type in P. cattleyanum and P. guineense (Pimentel et al., 2014). The presence of sclereids in the pericarp of the fruits has been recorded in several genera of Myrteae (Galan et al., 2016; Pittarelli et al., 2021, and references therein). However, Psidium is apparently the only genus in Tribe Myrteae (based on three studies that together looked at 34 species in 13 genera; Proença, 1991; Pimentel et al., 2014; Pittarelli et al., 2021) to consistently have isodiametric sclereids (stone cells) in the ovarian walls of the flower. Stone cells are found in the ovary of P. cattleyanum, P. guineense, and P. firmum (Proença, 1991; Pimentel et al., 2014); they also occur in three closely related species of Campomanesia of the ‘guazumifolia’ complex, but were absent in nine other members of Campomanesia (Pittarelli et al., 2021). However, these studies did not include all Myrteae genera, or even all nine genera in the subtribe Pimentinae to which Psidium belongs (Lucas et al., 2019): Curitiba Salywon & Landrum, Legrandia Kausel, Mosiera Small and Pimenta Lindl. have not been investigated. Stone cells were hypothesized to offer protection to ovules and seeds (Pimentel et al., 2014), an idea that is compatible with the theory presented by one of us (Proença, 1991) that they act as a mechanical barrier against oviposition by fruit flies (Tephritidae), notorious predators of guavas and other Myrtaceous fruit crops (Malavasi and Morgante, 1980; Burk, 1983; Malavasi et al., 1983). Stone cells in the ovary occur in other fleshy fruited Myrtales, such as Australasian mega-diverse Syzygium (tribe Syzygieae, Myrtaceae; Schmid, 1972; Pimentel et al., 2014, and references therein) and Mouriri Aubl. (Melastomataceae; Morley, 1976).

Placentation and fruit morphology

Although tribe Myrteae is invariably fleshy fruited (Wilson et al., 2005), Psidium is the only genus to have not only fleshy fruit walls but also fleshy, developing placentas. In all other Myrteae genera, fruit fleshiness is exclusively due to the development of ovarian tissue, i.e. the thickness and fleshiness of the fruit wall. In the Myrtales, a fleshy placenta is also found in Melastoma L. and Miconia Ruiz & Pav. (Melastomataceae; Clausing et al., 2000).

The placentation of Psidium is of the (putatively plesiomorphic) carpellate type (Pimentel et al., 2014). It has been described as either axillary or parietal, and also as bilamellate, extrusive, intrusive, lamellate or peltate (Berg, 1857; Landrum and Sobral, 2006; Soares-Silva and Proença, 2008). This can be attributed to the fact that the margins of the carpels can be deeply intrusive into the locule or hardly so, and are sometimes incompletely coalescent, so that, in some cross-sections, placentation appears parietal and in others (at different levels) axillary. The placental lamellae can bear one, two or many series of ovules. The placental lamellae can be linear, bilobed, scutellate, peltate or U-shaped. To complicate matters furthermore, the lamellae can be straight, or curve either outwards or inwards to accommodate the ovules in the locule. If the placental lamellae curve outwards, a tangential cut of the locule will show the ovules, which will appear as one or two neat series or, if the series are more numerous or the lamellae are less developed, a cluster of ovules like a bunch of grapes, sometimes described as mound like (Landrum, 2017). If the placental lamellae curve inwards (sometimes called reflexed), a tangential cut will show the smooth lamellae – only the outer series of ovules will be perceptible; other series, if present, will be hidden from view.

Seed morphology

Psidium seeds can be as few as one per fruit (rarely, and never in most of the fruits in any one species; Tuler et al., 2021) or up to 325 (Landrum, 2017). They are 2–10 mm long and have bony seed coats from (5)8 to 30 cells thick at the narrowest point, in which the cells of the outer layer are pulpy and the inner thick-walled, elongated, somewhat ragged, and superimposed at one of the ends, giving the seed an opaque surface (Landrum and Sharp, 1989). This contrasts with other Myrteae genera with bony seed coats in which the cells are hexagonal and abutting; these genera have shiny seed coats, such as Amomyrtella, Calycolpus, Mosiera, Myrrhinium Schott, Ugni Turcz. (Landrum and Sharp, 1989) and Accara Landrum (Landrum, 1990). In species in which seeds develop imbedded in placental tissue, such as P. guajava and P. guineense, most are reniform and smooth (Landrum et al., 1995); if there are edges, these are rounded and not sharp. If placentas do not develop into fleshy tissue, seeds tend to be more angular probably due to contact during development.

The bony seed coat has a plug-like operculum that in contact with water allows seeds to imbibe water, which is followed by the radicle pushing out the opercular plug and germinating through the aperture. The operculum can be shiny and mammiliform or dull and somewhat sunken (Tuler et al., 2016; Landrum, 2017). Seeds of P. guineense are non-dormant and show a typical three phase imbibition pattern but were able to germinate after 1 year of storage (dos Santos et al., 2015).

Cytogenetics

Psidium has the highest levels of polyploidy of any Neotropical Myrtaceae genus (Costa, 2009). In fact, it is the only Neotropical genus in which the diploid 2n = 22 appears to be rare, although most species have not yet been sampled. A total of 100 counts of 15 species (approx. 15 % of the genus) have been made (Supplementary data Table S2). Three species had a single count that was the diploid number (Moussel, 1965; Tuler et al., 2019a; Silveira et al., 2021), six species had a single count that was a polyploid number, while all other species had more than one count. Total counts were 100, but these were heavily biased (77 %) towards three species: P. cattleyanum (36 counts; exclusively polyploid; Atchison, 1947; Smith-White, 1948; Hirano and Nakazone, 1969; Singhal et al., 1984; Medina, 2014; de Souza et al., 2015), P. guajava (30 counts; mixed ploidy but predominantly diploid; Kumar and Ranade, 1952; Sharma and Majumdar, 1957; D’Cruz and Rao, 1962; Roy and Jha, 1962; Raman et al., 1971; Majumder and Mukherjee, 1972; Srivastava, 1977; Singhal et al., 1980, 1984; Vijayakumar and Subramanian, 1985; Pedrosa et al., 1999; Marques et al., 2016) and P. guineense (11 counts; Hirano and Nakazone, 1969; Srivastava, 1970; Chakraborti et al., 2010; de Souza et al., 2015; Marques et al., 2016; Tuler et al., 2019a; mixed ploidy but predominantly tetraploid). Diploid counts appear to be associated with narrow geographic distributions in general (Dar et al., 2020) and also in Psidium and Eugenia (Silveira et al., 2016; Tuler et al., 2019a). If this hypothesis is true, it suggests that P. guajava might have been originally a rather narrowly distributed species whose range has been expanded by man, while crossing with P. guineense as suggested by Landrum et al. (1995) may have increased its invasive potential. A study of genetic diversity in P. galapagaeum, endemic to the Galapagos Islands, suggests it is an allopolyploid (Urquía et al., 2020).

Importance to humans

The main utility of the genus Psidium to man are the edible fruits of guava (P. guajava). Guava fruits can be very rich in antioxidants, flavonoids and vitamin C (230–1426 mg 100 g–1 fresh fruit depending upon the cultivar and environmental conditions; Vaughan and Geissler, 1997; Luximon-Ramma et al., 2003), and are consumed as fresh fruit, or industrialized in the form of juice drinks, jams, compotes, sweets, ice creams, fruit salads, biscuit fillings and tarts. The guava is a widely cultivated tropical fruit tree. During the 21st century, major producers for the world market have been Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Colombia, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Phillipines, Thailand and the USA (Vaughan and Geissler, 1997; Pariona, 2017).

Also occasionally cultivated are P. cattleyanum, P. guineense (Vaughan and Geissler, 1997) and P. friedrichsthalianum O.Berg (Rojas-Gómez et al. 2020). These species have smaller fruits than the guava but exhibit similar fruit qualities. Psidium cattleyanum has shiny, yellow, deep pink or wine-coloured fruits, and P. guineense has thin-skinned yellow-green fruits which are juicier than guavas, while the fruits of P. friedrichsthalianum are also yellow-green and very tart. These latter species are commercialized on a small scale in local markets in Brazil and Costa Rica. In Cuba, a liqueur is made from the wild fruits of P. salutare (Kunth) O.Berg (Liogier, 1953).

Commercial guava orchards have recently suffered severely from guava decline, a disease caused by co-infection of the roots by species of Meloidogyne enterolobii, a nematode, with Fusarium solani, a fungus (Pereira et al., 2009; Carneiro et al., 2011; Gomes et al., 2011). Investigations into possible sources of resistance to this disease in the P. guajava gene pool have found it to be either absent (Cardoso et al., 2017) or borderline in a few genotypes (Cavalcanti Júnior et al., 2020). Psidium cattleyanum Sabine is resistant to infection by Meloidogyne (de Almeida et al., 2009; Marques et al., 2012), but techniques such as its use as root stock and intraspecific crosses with P. guajava have failed (Cardoso et al., 2017), which the authors attributed to possible differences in ploidy levels between these two species. Psidium myrtoides and P. acidum are also resistant (Marques et al., 2012), and approx. 10 % of genotypes of P. guineense investigated were found to be resistant (Cavalcanti Júnior et al., 2020). Therefore, the phylogenetic affinities of P. guajava are of particular importance to direct research into guava decline.

Invasiveness

Psidium cattleyanum, P. guajava and P. guineense are aggressive, pioneer species that have become naturalized throughout the tropics and are considered globally widespread invaders (Richardson and Rejmánek, 2011). Fragile island ecosystems seem particularly susceptible. In Hawaii, Mauritius, the Phillipines, the Galapagos and the Seychelles, they have become major pests that are successfully outcompeting the native endemic flora. A colonization study in Hawaii has shown that P. cattleyanum was the most abundant understorey tree beneath old Eucalyptus plantations, even though they were surrounded by native rain forest (Harrington and Ewell, 1997); it is listed as one of the 100 worst invasive alien species in the Global Invasive Species Database (2013). In the Galápagos, P. guajava forms large populations (Jackson, 1995) and is considered one of the greatest threats to local biodiversity (Urquía et al., 2019).

However, in some situations, the presence of guavas may be advantageous in secondary vegetation. A study on relative abundance of five species of arboreal mammals (macaque, langur, two flying squirrels and one giant squirrel) in forest fragments in India suggested that the presence of guava trees (that produce fruits that support a wide spectrum of birds and mammals) was beneficial (Umapathy and Kumar, 2000). Another study, in Ecuador, showed that abandoned pastures with guava tree canopies were apparently in a state of active succession to revert to forest, while open pastures were in a state of arrested succession, dominated by a few aggressive herbaceous or shrubby species (Zahawi and Augspurger, 1999).

Phylogenetic structure

Psidium emerges as a monophyletic genus, although with poor support (PP = 0.73) when the sister genus Myrrhinium Schott is included in the analysis. This is congruent with the results of Vasconcelos et al. (2017b) in which five species of Psidium were included in an inclusive phylogeny of Tribe Myrteae. The Psidium ML phylogenetic tree for which sequences of all four regions were available (restricted analysis) was almost fully resolved (Fig. 1). This tree is herein referred to as the backbone tree and major clades are congruent with the more inclusive ML tree (Fig. 2) and with the BI tree (Fig. 3), both of which included 30 species (45 accessions) that corresponds to about a third of the accepted species in the genus. Ten other species (Supplementary data Table S3) are present only in the single region trees that are available as Supplementary data Fig. S1 (ETS), Fig. S2 (ITS), Fig. S3 (ndhF) and Fig. S4 (psbA–trnH).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mcac005_fig1.jpg

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Psidium L. with 16 species (20 accessions). Only species with all four regions (ETS, ITS, ndhF and trnH–psbA) are included (backbone tree). Numbers to the right of nodes are bootstrap values. Section names are to the right of clades. Vouchers are identified by the first letter of the first collector’s surname and number. For complete voucher data, see Supplementary data Tables S1 and S3.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mcac005_fig2.jpg

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Psidium L. with 31 species (45 accessions). Numbers to the right of nodes are bootstrap values. Section names are to the right of clades. Vouchers are identified by the first letter of the first collector’s surname and number. For complete voucher data, see Supplementary data Tables S1 and S3.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mcac005_fig3.jpg

Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree of Psidium L. with 31 species (45 accessions). Posterior probability (PP) values are to the right of nodes. PP values are presented with two digits (additional digits removed without approximation). For complete voucher data, see Supplementary data Tables S1 and S3.

We identified four major clades in Psidium (Fig. 4). We propose to treat these clades as formal taxonomic sections with the following structure: section Psidium [section Obversifolia (section Apertiflora + section Mitranthes)]. Section Psidium has two strongly supported subclades that we treat as sub-sections: sub-section Psidium and sub-section Albotomentosa. This structure and the monophyly of these clades are supported by previous phylogenetic analyses in Myrtaceae, all of which included a smaller number of species of Psidium. Previous studies using Sanger sequencing that support the clades were focused on: (1) Tribe Myrteae (five species of Psidium; seven molecular regions; Vasconcelos et al., 2017b); (2) the re-establishment of P. macahense O.Berg [17 species of Psidium (originally 18 but the identity of voucher Pietro s.n. RB595299 has been changed to P. aff. cattleyanum); three molecular regions; Tuler et al., 2019b]; and (3) the Greater Antilles flora [originally seven species of Psidium (eight since we accept Calyptrogenia biflora as a synonym of Psidium amplexicaule; Landrum, 2017); three molecular regions, Flickinger et al., 2020].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mcac005_fig4.jpg

Diagnostic characters of Psidium sections. Border colours indicate sections. Pink = section Apertiflora: (A) fissured bark [P. laruotteanum; Proença 3019 (UB)]; (B) venation forming a distinct marginal vein [P. laruotteanum; Kuhlmann 34 (UB)]; (C) auxotelic racemes [P. cupreum; Faria 10009 (UB)]; (D) open floral buds, stamens few and hemispherically distributed, anthers small [P. basanthum; Proença 3022 (UB)]. Yellow = section Obversifolia: (E) large red fruit with thick, torn calyx lobes (P. cattleyanum; photograph Forest & Kim Starr); (F) compressed branches and fleshy leaves [P. gaudichaudiaum; Tuler 637 (RB)]; (G) large yellow fruit (P. ubatubense; photograph Henry M. Alexandre). Green = section Psidium: (H) large fruit with well-developed fleshy placentas [P. guineense; Tuler 625 (RB)]; (I) dichasia, floral buds closed, many stamens at same level, anthers large (Psidium guajava; photograph Amelia C. Tuler); J. brochydodromous venation with arches (P. guajava; photograph Carolyn E.B. Proença); (K). quadrangular branches [Psidium ratterianum; Proença 3016 (UB)]. Purple = section Mitranthes: (L) camptodromous, inconspicuous venation and small fruit (Psidium myrsinites; photograph Stephen A. Harris); (M) seeds few per fruit (Psidium myrsinites; photograph Maurício Mercadante); (N) bark smooth and thinly peeling [P. sartorianum; Proença et al. 2993 (UB)].

In our study, the nuclear markers ITS and ETS both showed high levels of correct section identification, with good bootstrap values for sections and few misclassified species. The chloroplast intergenic spacer psbA–trnH showed a strongly conserved identity within section Apertiflora but poor internal structuring, while the other sections showed high variability; this region may be evolving too fast to be very informative for the whole of the genus. The chloroplast ndhF gene, that expresses NADH-plastoquinone oxidoreductase, as might be expected, showed low variability and low bootstrap values. One of its most informative regions was a 9 bp region (GTTTATTAA), commonly present in other genera of Myrteae such as Calycolpus, Myrceugenia, Mosiera and Myrtus, but frequently lost in Psidium. This 9 bp region was almost always present in the basal section Psidium (except for P. guajava and one accession of P. guineense), but was lost in all species except one each of sections Obversifolia, Mitranthes and Apertiflora.

Evolution, diversity and distribution

Psidium underwent an accelerated rate of diversification from approx. 25 million years ago (mya; under macrofossil calibration) or from approx. 17 mya (under fossil pollen calibration) up to the present (Vasconcelos et al., 2017b). Eugenia L. and Psidium were the only Myrteae genera to show an abrupt increase in diversification rate at the crown (explosive radiation). However, while in the older Eugenia, diversification rates have gradually decreased over the last 10–20 million years, in the younger Psidium they have remained high (Fig. 5). Analyses of diversification through time using molecular phylogenies have been recently criticized (Louca and Pennell, 2020), so these results must be interpreted with care, and a wider sample of Psidium is desirable.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mcac005_fig5.jpg

Distinguishing morpho-anatomic characters in Psidium and their occurrence in Tribe Myrteae. (A) Hemixyle habit with lignotuber [P. bergianum; Wood 26934 (USZ)]; (B) variability in leaf pre-foliation and architecture (P. guajava; photograph CEBP); (C) amphistomatic leaves with arrows showing stomata [P. ratterianum; Proença et al. 3016 (UB)]; (D) fruit size, colour and seediness [P. cauliflorum; Tuler 480 (RB)]; (E) stone cell belt (white) in the ovary [P. firmum; Proença 610 (HEPH)]; (F) fruits with fleshy placentas (P. guajava; photograph CEBP); (G) bony seeds with operculum (black) [P. rotundidiscum; Faria et al. 4160 (UB)]; (H) seeds with pulpy testa of irregular, superimposed cells [P. firmum; Proença 638 (HEPH)]. Red = restricted to Psidium; deep pink = restricted to one to three large genera in tribe Myrteae; pale pink = restricted to a few genera in Tribe Myrteae. Photographs by first collectors in vouchered material except (C) (microphotograph by Suzanne Fank de Carvalho). Phylogeny showing diversification in Myrteae reproduced from Vasconcelos et al. (2017b) in accordance with the STM Permissions Guidelines, 28 April 28 2021).

Eugenia and Psidium are the Neotropical genera of Myrtaceae with the highest rates of polyploidy (Costa et al., 2008). Polyploidy is apparently rare in Myrcia, the second largest genus of Neotropical Myrtaceae (two polyploid populations out of 22 counts of 14 species; Forni-Martins and Martins, 2000; Costa and Forni-Martins, 2007; Amorim et al., 2012; Silveira et al., 2021). Eugenia and Psidium are also the genera with the highest diversity of fruit size and colour. Eugenia does not vary greatly in fruit seediness (1–4 seeds are the norm), while Psidium does. Also, Eugenia has a thin or crustaceous seed coat while Psidium has a thick bony seed coat with an operculum. Opercula are not unique to Psidium; they are also found in other genera in Subtribe Ugniinae such as Mosiera, Myrteola and Ugni (Landrum and Sharp, 1989; Salywon and Landrum, 2014), and in Subtribe Pimentinae, such as Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus (Gomes) Landrum and Curitiba prismatica (Landrum and Sharp, 1989; Salywon and Landrum, 2007) and in Amomyrtella (unplaced; Lucas et al., 2019). Psidium is, however, the only genus to combine operculate seeds with both bird (Snow, 1981) and a wide range of other dispersal agents, including mammals (Pizo, 2002; Gressler et al., 2006).

The combination of a wide range of dispersal agents, a wide range of seediness, operculate seeds that can exhibit long-term mechanical dormancy, stone cells in the ovarian tissue, polyploidy and apomixis is tentatively proposed as the main drivers behind the rapid rates of diversification in Psidium, as well as the ability to adapt to many different habitats. Polyploidy can break self-incompatibility (Richards, 1997; Miller and Venable, 2000), facilitate plant invasions, increase flower, fruit and seed size, and propitiate niche shifts by increasing drought tolerance (ter Beest et al., 2012). Speciation in Psidium seems to have occurred mostly by such niche shifts through vegetative specialization and adaptation to different dispersal agents. This is reflected in the great variation in plant architecture and leaf pre-foliation, shape, textures, venation and anatomy, seed number and seed size found within the genus (Rotman, 1976; Landrum, 2005, 2017; Proença et al., 2010, 2013, and references therein). Apomixis facilitates range expansion by generating clonal populations (Hojsgaard and Hörandl, 2015) and has been recorded in two megadiverse Myrtalean genera: Syzygium (Myrtaceae), the most species rich genus in the family (Govaerts et al., 2008), and Miconia (Melastomataceae), the most species-rich woody genus with an exclusively Neotropical distribution (Goldenberg et al., 2013).

Infra-generic classification

Three of the four clades identified in the phylogeny were found to mirror three of the six sections proposed by Berg (1857) in Flora Brasiliensis (Table 1). The alignment of Berg’s sections with these three major clades in our phylogeny was mostly accurate: a relatively small percentage (9–16 % depending on the section) of his names were misclassified. The exception was the artificial sect. Rigidifolia in which the three species were not found to be closely related. Since Berg indicated no type species, judicious lectotypification that would reflect phylogenetic structure was undertaken. To ensure that the infra-generic structure is congruent with the phylogeny, we have recognized two of Berg’s sections, reduced two of them to sub-sections and synonymized two of them. The genus Mitranthes O.Berg, a synonym of Psidium, was raised to section level as the fourth section.

Table 1.

Sections of Psidium proposed by Berg (1857) with original diagnostic characters showing species chosen as lectotypes

SectionLeaf charactersBud charactersOvary loculesNames * not originally included (a current synonym was listed)
Apertiflora Membranous or rigid, entire, never tomentoseOpen, 4-5 crenate or dentate and later deeply split, calyx campanulate2-7 P. australe (anceps, suffruticosum) √ M
37 original names P. basanthum √ 
20 current species (11 sampled) P. cupreum
P. decussatum
2 names in other genera P. densicomum (ovatifolium)
P. firmum
31 names correctly classified (84 %)
P. grandifolium (rubescens, sericeum) √ M
* P. guineense (ypanemense) √ M
P. guyanense (umbrosum)
P. hians (nutans, refractum)
P. laruotteanum (aerugineum, glaucescens, pohlianum) √ 
P. myrsinites (gardnerianum, myrsinoides) √ M
P. myrtoides √ chosen LECTOTYPE
P. langsdorffii
P. oblongatum
P. rhombeum
P. rufum (macrospermum, widgrenianum)
P. riparium (maranhense, mengahiense, paraense, sieberianum)
P. striatulum (turbiniflorum)
Rigidifolia Sometimes obverse, rigid or barely rigid when mature, entire, venation obsolete, glabrousClosed2–4 * P. guyanense (donianum)
P. macahense √ chosenLECTOTYPE
3 original names
P. oligospermum √
3 current species (2 sampled)
Species not closely related
Obversifolia O coriaceous, entire, venation tenuous, glabrous or nearly so4–5 toothed at apex3–6 P. australe √ M
9 original names * P. cattleyanum (coriaceum, obovatum, variabile) √ chosen LECTOTYPE
6 current species (3 sampled)
P. itanareense
6 names probably correctly classified (91 %) * P. gaudichadianum (sellowianum)
P. oblongifolium
P. robustum √ M
Costata Cartaceous or coriaceous, entire, venation costate, glabrous or velutinous on the undersurface, or albo-tomentoseClosed3–5 P. guajava √ chosen LECTOTYPE
7 original names *P. guineense (araça, ooideum, polycarpon, sorocabense, sprucei)
2 current species (1 sampled)
P. inaequilaterum
6 names correctly classified (86 %)
Albotomentosa Coriaceous, usually obverse, venation costate, densely white tomentose on the undersurfaceWith apical gap (hiantibus) 2–5 *P. australe var. argenteum (cuneatum)
10 original names P. grandifolium (albidum, incanescens, cinereum, lacteum, riedelianum, microcarpum) √ chosen LECTOTYPE
4 current species (4 sampled)
9 names correctly classified (90 %) P. laruotteanum √  M
*P. guineense (multiflorum, radicans)
Crenatifolia annual, membranous, slightly crenulate, venation tenuousclosed at first2-4 P. acutangulum
7 original names *P. australe var. sufruticosum (alatum) chosen LECTOTYPE
4 current species (2 sampled)
P. striatulum (leptocladum, paranense, persicifolium)
P. maribense

Bold  =  currently accepted species; synonyms in parenthesis; √ = species sampled in the inclusive ML and BI phylogeny (Figs 2 and and3);3); M = misclassified by Berg according to the phylogeny. Some accepted species appear in more than one section (e.g. P. guineense) because Berg accepted current synonyms as good species and put them into different sections.

 Berg (1857) included Psidium campomanesioides O.Berg, a synonym of Calycolpus calophyllus (Kunth) O.Berg and Psidium elegans DC., now recognized as Accara elegans (DC.) Landrum in this section.

Taxonomic treatment

Psidium L. Species Plantarum 470. 1753. Type: P. guajava L.

Guajava P. Miller, Gard. Dict. Abr. ed. 4. 28 Jan 1754.

Cuiavus C. J. Trew, Pl. Sel. Pinx. Ehret 4: 12. 1754.

Guaiava Adanson, Fam. 2: 88, 563 (‘Guiava’). Jul–Aug 1763.

  1. Psidium L. sect. Psidium, Typus: P. guajava L.

  • Calyptropsidium O.Berg, Linnaea 27: 347, 349. Jan 1856 (‘1854’). Typus: C. friedrichsthalianum O.Berg.

  • Psidium sect. Costata O.Berg, Fl. Bras. 14(1): 396. Typus: P. guajava L. (Lectotype here designated), nom. illeg. to be substituted for Psidium sect. Psidium

  • Psidium sect. Crenatifolia O.Berg, Fl. Bras. 14(1): 407. Typus: Psidium alatum O.Berg (Lectotype here designated) = Psidium australe var. suffruticosum (O.Berg) Landrum, syn. nov.

Diagnosis.

Trees, shrubs or sub-shrubs. Bark smooth and thinly exfoliating in strips in trees. Young branches frequently quadrangular or alate, at least distally when young. Leaf venation not forming a clear marginal vein that runs parallel to the margin from the base (see sub-sections). Leaves coriaceous or chartaceous. Inflorescence axillary, solitary flowers or a three-flowered dichasium, rarely a raceme; average flower size 20–35 mm in diameter. Buds usually completely to partially closed with round, pentagonal or stellate apical pore or gap, rarely open. Calyx tearing or calyptrate at anthesis. Stamens rarely less than 150 and up to 720; anthers 0,5–1(–3) mm, usually with an apical gland and few to many smaller glands along the connective. Ovary locules (2)3–5(6); ovules (2)4–8-seriate per placental arm, the placental arms intrusive or extrusive. Fruits green, yellow-green or yellow when mature, never red or crimson, sometimes with a crimson flush when maturing, large for the genus, (1–)1,5–3(–6) cm in diameter, with well-developed fleshy placentas. Seeds (6)50–80(–325) per fruit, (2)3–5(–9) mm, geniculate, angular, reniform or lenticulate.

Phylogenetic support.

Section Psidium clade has maximum support (BS = 100) in the four region ML backbone tree with six accessions (five species). In the inclusive trees with 14 accessions (eight species), the clade also has maximum support (BS = 100; PP = 1) in the ML tree and in the BI tree. The single region ML trees have between seven and 14 accessions. ETS supports the clade (BS = 84) with the additional inclusion of two single region species P. striatulum Mart. ex DC. and P. kennedyanum Morong, but two accessions emerge in weak, external clades. ITS (BS = 99) supports the clade with one species misclassified within it (P. firmum). The psbA–trnH region provides support for this clade: most of the accessions are in two clades (BS = 100 and 90) although they are not sisters and one accession is external to both. The ndhF chloroplast region does not support this clade; accessions are scattered.

Comments.

Quadrangular young branches are common (not universal) in this section and are a good morphological marker; de Candolle (1828) was the first to observe this character and used it in his key in Prodromus. Pre-foliation is conduplicate; other vegetative morphological markers are the two venation types (see sub-sections for a detailed description) that are not of the typical Myrtaceae type, and the larger number of stamens, locules and ovules. The placental arms are well developed and frequently curve outwards, with ovules usually 4–8 seriate per placental arm. Psidium guajava and P. guineense, both members of this section, can be hybridized artificially and probably do so in the wild as postulated based on morphological studies of putative hybrid swarms in several South American localities (Landrum et al., 1995). Polyploidy is common in this section (in both sub-sections) and is discussed in more detail under the sub-sections.

  • a. Psidium sect. Psidium. subsect. Psidium – Type species: P. guajava L.

Diagnosis.

Shrubs or trees to at least 18 m. Leaves usually glabrescent, sometimes with a crenulate margin. Venation brochydodromous. Calyx lobes free to partially coalescent to completely coalescent (bud closed), tearing slightly to completely between the calyx lobes at anthesis, or calyptrate. Stamens approx. (100–)150–250(–720); anthers 0,7–1,5(–3) mm. Ovary locules (2–)4(–6); ovules approx. (30–)50–90(–180) per locule. Fruits (7–)15–50(–60 mm); seeds (45–)60–100(–325) per fruit, (2)3–5(9) mm, geniculate, angular or reniform.

Phylogenetic support.

Sub-section Psidium showed maximum support (BS = 100) in the four region ML backbone tree with three accessions (three species), in the inclusive ML tree (BS = 100) and in the Bayesian tree (PP = 1), both with four accessions (four species). Sub-section Psidium showed the highest support over the whole tree as well as high or maximum resolution between species. The single region ML trees had either three or four accessions. ETS supported (BS = 99) a clade with three of the four accessions of section Psidium; the fourth, P. guajava, emerged in sister sub-section Albotomentosa, sister to the remainder of that clade. ITS showed maximum support (BS = 100) for sub-section Psidium. The ndhF chloroplast region supported (BS = 70) the sub-section, with two accessions (P. guineense and P. australe, both of sub-section albotomentosa) emerging as misclassified by Berg (1857) within the clade. The psbA–trnH region supported the clade (BS = 100) with three accessions.

Comments.

Pre-foliation in section Psidium is conduplicate sensuCullen (1978), i.e. the leaf is folded inwards along the midrib, but in P. guajava the adaxial surfaces are appressed, sometimes until the leaf reaches more than half its fully expanded length (Fig. 5B). The separation can also be earlier, when leaves are about a third of their mature length. This specialized leaf pre-foliation is associated with young leaf protection due to increased fracture toughness, a thicker edge that acts as a deterrent to leaf larvae that eat inwards, and by exposing only the better protected abaxial surface during leaf expansion (Grubb and Jackson, 2007, and references therein). Interestingly, glandular trichomes (not present in other species of Psidium) were observed on the petioles and abaxial surface of P. guajava (Cardoso et al., 2009; Al-Edany and Al-Saadi, 2012). Glandular trichomes are very rare in tribe Myrteae, i.e. they were found in only one species of Myrceugenia in a study of 17 genera (44 species; four species of Psidium not including P. guajava) of Neotropical Myrtaceae (Cardoso et al., 2009). Although conduplicate pre=foliation is present in P. guineense and P. friedrichsthalianum (that also belong to this section) the adaxial leaf surfaces are apparently always free.

  • b. Psidium sect. Psidium subsect. Albotomentosa (O.Berg) Tuler & Proença, stat. nov. – Type species: P. grandifolium (Lectotype here designated).

Diagnosis.

Small trees, shrubs or sub-shrubs 0.3–6 m. Leaves frequently covered with whitish, tawny or rufous indumentum on the abaxial surface; venation acrodromous–brochydodromous (see comments below). Calyx lobes nearly free to partially coalescent to completely coalescent (bud closed), tearing slightly to completely between the calyx lobes at anthesis, never calyptrate. Stamens approx. 100–300(–560); anthers 0,5–1(–1,2) mm. Ovary locules (2)3(–5); ovules approx. 20–100(–120) per locule. Fruits 8–30 mm. Seeds approx. (6–)15–80(–234) per fruit.

Phylogenetic support.

Sub-section Albotomentosa has been informally recognized by botanists as a morphological group, e.g. the P. grandifolium complex sensuLandrum (2005). The sub-section was highly supported (BS = 98) in the four region ML backbone tree with three accessions (three species). In the inclusive trees the sub-section also had high support (BS = 86) both in the ML tree and in the Bayesian tree (PP = 0.99) with ten accessions (four species). The single region ML trees had between five and 11 accessions. ETS supports (BS = 99) the section with eight accessions plus an additional species, P. striatulum, but two accessions (P. australe var. suffruticosum and one of the accessions of P. grandifolium) emerged external to the clade. ITS supports (BS = 100) the clade with one species misclassified by Berg (1857) within it (P. firmum). The ndhF region does not support the clade; accessions are scattered. The psbA–trnH region supports the clade (BS = 90) with one accession misclassified by Berg (1857) (P. australe). Although sub-section Albotomentosa is highly supported, resolution between species was poor. This suggests this clade has only recently diversified, as was found for some other savanna genera (Simon et al., 2009; Inglis and Cavalcanti, 2018). Rapid, recent diversification was suggested by these authors to have been driven by habitat changes associated with the rise of inflammable C4 grasses during the last 5 million years.

Comments.

This small sub-section has successfully occupied non-forested areas such as savannas and other grass-dominated habitats (Landrum, 2005; Tuler et al., 2021); both plants and fruits are usually smaller than in its sister clade sub-section Psidium. The venation type of sub-section Albotomentosa is unusual in Neotropical Myrtaceae and restricted to this clade in Psidium and to Campomanesia (Cardoso and Sajo, 2006). This was classified as acrodromous–brochydodromous/last marginals forming arches/intramarginal vein absent/tertiary venation ramified admedial (Cardoso and Sajo, 2006). Psidium ratterianum is amphistomatic (Proença et al., 2010), a derived condition associated with high CO2 leaf conductance and fast growth of herbaceous plants in high-light and high-altitude conditions (Mott et al., 1982; Muir, 2015). Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (another amphistomatic Myrtaceae) can independently regulate closure of leaf stomata on the different leaf surfaces, with changes in temperature, humidity and irradiance inducing differential closure (Richardson et al., 2017) that allow plants to fine-tune their response to environmental conditions. Further investigation into leaf anatomy and leaf physiology in this section is desirable. Ploidy levels are poorly known in sub-section Albotomentosa if compared with sub-section Psidium. Four counts are available: 2n = 44 for P. australe and P. guineense, n approx. 33 for P. grandifolium and 2n = 22 for P. ratterianum (Costa and Forni-Martins, 2006; Silveira et al., 2021), suggesting that polyploidy is at least not uncommon.

  1. Psidium sect. Obversifolia O.Berg, Fl. Bras. – Type: P. cattleyanum Sabine (Lectotype here designated).

Diagnosis.

Trees or large shrubs. Bark smooth and thinly exfoliating in trees. Young branches compressed; leaf venation camptodromous at base, the distal veins with arched loops or sometimes forming a clear marginal vein, but not with the typical Myrtaceous marginal vein that runs along the whole margin starting at the base, frequently obovate, glabrous, crass when fresh and somewhat lustrous above. Inflorescence axillary, uniflorous or in short racemes. Buds open, partially closed to completely closed; stamens approx. 180–400, locules 3–5; placentation peltate, ovules 10–35 per locule. Fruits green, yellow or deep crimson when mature, 20–45 mm, with well-developed fleshy placentas. Seeds 30–60.

Comments.

Section Obversifolia is supported by three accessions (two species) in the four region ML (BS = 100) backbone tree. In the inclusive trees, it includes five accessions (two species) and is strongly supported in the ML tree (BS = 99) and in the Bayesian tree (PP = 1). The single region ML trees have between four and five accessions. ETS (BS = 49) and ITS (BS = 63) regions provided weak to good support for this section, with the first suggesting two possible new inclusions: Psidium sp. nov. from Bahia, Brazil and P. minutiflorum Urban & Ekman from Piauí, Brazil. Neither of the chloroplast regions (ndhF and psbA) supports this section.

The thick, rubbery leaves (empirically observed in the field by author A.C.T.) in P. cattleyanum of this clade are supported by leaf anatomy (Gomes et al., 2009) and by a study of comparative leaf anatomy and morphology (Boeger and Wisniewski, 2003) in lowland tropical forest in Paraná, Southern Brazil. Boeger and Wisniewski (2003) investigated leaf thickness of 16 species of trees (in ten Angiosperm families) at three different successional stages; P. cattleyanum (native to the area) was present in two of these stages and showed above-average leaf thickness in both. The thick leaves in P. cattleyanum were due to the well-developed adaxial epidermis and the thick palisade parenchyma, not to cuticules or spongy parenchyma that showed low or average values. Psidium cattleyanum has 2–3 layers of palisade parenchyma on each side (Arruda and Fontenelle, 1994; Endringer, 2020) an unusual character in Neotropical Myrtaceae (Gomes et al., 2009). However, other species of the section have not had their leaf anatomy studied.

The five accessions in the inclusive tree are one of P. araucanum and four of P. cattleyanum (two of P. cattleyanum var. cattleyanum, the red-fruited variety, and two of P. cattleyanum var. lucidum, the yellow-fruited variety). Our results provide some support that the two varieties be recognized at species level due to the position of P. araucanum (Fig. 1) as sister to P. cattleyanum var. cattleyanum (BS = 55 and PP = 0.95). Previous studies have found differences of putative taxonomic significance between the yellow-fruited and the red-fruited varieties (Table 2). The thickness of the collapsed phloem and organization of cristaliferous series in the bark are considered taxonomically significant characters that are not influenced by environmental conditions (Roth, 1981). Psidium cattleyanum shows disporic apomixis (Raseira and Raseira, 1996; Souza-Pérez and Speroni, 2017). Machado (2016) found that seeds from the same fruit showed different levels of ploidy.

Table 2.

Cytogenetic and morphological characteristics of Psidium cattleyanum Sabine

Charactervar. cattleyanumvar. lucidumReference
(red fruits)(yellow fruits)
Chromosome numbers44, 88, 77, 13233, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 98, 99, 110, 132 Éder-Silva et al. (2007); Raseira and Raseira (1996); Machado (2016)
Bark: phloematic tissueOrganized and uniformDisorganized and irregular Rocha et al. (2008)
Bark: collapsed phloem2129 µm thick1656 µm thick Rocha et al. (2008)
Bark: cristaliferous seriesSingle side of raySurrounding ray Rocha et al. (2008)
Bark: angle of sieve plates152159 Rocha et al. (2008)
Fruit: anthocyanins (cyanidin)Yes (deep red)No (yellow) Biegelmeyer et al. (2011)
Fruit: polyphenols501 mg 100 g–1292 mg 100 g–1 Biegelmeyer et al. (2011)
Fruit: vitamin C (ascorbic acid)242 µg g–1 f. wt200 µg g–1 f. wt Luximon-Ramma et al. (2003)
Flavonoids100 mg 100 g–135 mg 100 g–1 Biegelmeyer et al. (2011)

Psidium cattleyanum. is characterized by absolute polyploidy (no diploid counts, 2n = 22, have been recorded in a total of 36 counts; Supplementary data Table S2). Considering the two varieties of P. cattleyanum separately permits a novel interpretation of the cytogeographic study of 17 populations of P. cattleyanum done by Machado (2016). That author found nine different cytotypes, and both varieties had a similar range of cytotypes. The diploid 2n = 22 was not found in the study and n = 33 was found only in P. cattleyanum var. lucidum, the yellow-fruited variety (Machado, 2016). The yellow-fruited variety populations were almost all coastal (only one was not) with conserved levels of ploidy per population and cytogeographic segregation. The lower levels of ploidy (44, 66 and 77) were restricted to the colder, wetter, more southerly populations of São Paulo, Paraná and Santa Catarina, and the higher levels (98, 110 and 132) to the warmer, drier, more northerly populations of Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Bahia and Paraíba (Éder-Silva et al., 2007; Machado, 2016). The red-fruited variety, on the other hand, occurred in colder, wetter, inland habitats at higher altitudes in São Paulo and Paraná, with low and high ploidy levels coexisting in the same population. The red-fruited variety was sympatric with the yellow-fruited variety; no pure, red-fruited populations were found. Why is P. cattleyanum not as invasive in Brazil, where it is native (although identified as a pioneer species; Boeger and Wisniewski, 2003), as in other parts of the tropics? Although identified as a pioneer species, it is not as problematic in Brazil as elsewhere in the tropics. Machado (2016) showed that, in Brazil, red-fruited populations were (1) mixed with yellow-fruited populations and (2) showed no cyto-geographic segregation. It is possible that the chance introduction of a well-adapted plant with an even polyploid number into a favourable habitat with available niche and low levels of competition (common in island habitats; Denslow, 2003) could be the trigger to its hyperinvasiveness. Since P. cattleyanum is apomictic (Souza-Perez and Speroni, 2017), founder populations could be established from this single plant, whose descendants would later cross sexually and produce many fertile seeds.

  1. Psidium sect. Apertiflora O.Berg – Type species: P. myrtoides O.Berg (Lectotype here designated).

  • Psidium sect. Rigidifolia O.Berg – Type species: Psidium macahense O.Berg (Lectotype here designated), syn. nov.

  • Corynemyrtus (Kiaerskou) Mattos, Loefgrenia 10: 1. Mai 1963. Type: C. corynantha (Kiaerskou) Mattos (Myrtus corynantha Kiaerskou) Myrtus subgen. Corynemyrtus Kiaerskou, Enum. Myrt. Brasil. 39: 18. 1893.

Diagnosis.

Trees, shrubs, sub-shrubs or hemixyles. Bark smooth or rough, exfoliating in rings, flakes, scales or plaques in trees. Young branches terete or compressed; venation brochydodromous usually forming a clear, crenate to almost straight marginal vein that runs closely parallel to the margin. Inflorescence axillary or terminal (rarely cauliflorous), uniflorous, raceme or auxotelic raceme; dichasia rare. Buds usually open, tearing into five or rarely four lobes (flowers tetramerous: P. macahense O.Berg; Tuler et al., 2019b) or a mixture of tetramerous and pentamerous (Landrum, 2017); stamens (100–)125–200(–320); locules 2–3(–5); ovules 1–2(3) seriate per placental arm. Fruits green, yellow or crimson when mature, usually small for the genus (8–)10–25(–34) mm, with poorly developed placentas when mature; seeds (1–)4–20(–50).

Phylogenetic support.

Several of the species in this section have been recognized as the Psidium salutare complex (Landrum, 2003). Section Apertiflora has maximum support (BS = 100) in the four region ML backbone tree with nine accessions (six species). In the inclusive trees it has high support in the ML analysis (BS = 76) and moderate support in the Bayesian analysis (PP = 0.92), with 18 accessions (13 species). The single region ML trees have between ten and 19 accessions. ETS supports (BS = 95) the section, with one accession misclassified by Berg (1857) and two new inclusions: P. ovale (Sprengel) Burret and P. dictyophyllum Urban & Ekman. ITS supports the section (BS = 72), with one accession misclassified by Berg (1857). The psbA chloroplast region supports (BS = 75) the clade with no misclassifications and the additional inclusion of two accessions of P. robustum. The ndhF region provides average support (BS = 62) for this clade, with two accessions emerging external to the clade. Psidioum sessiliflorum (Landrum) Proença & Tuler emerged as sister to the rest of the clade on a long branch that also reduced its BS support from 89 to 76. Morphologically, P. sessiliflorum fits section Apertiflora well, and the three sequences are well aligned with other species of the section. Possibly the long branch is caused by a combination of the ETS sequence being exceptionally short, and a unique 17 bp insertion in the psbA region.

Comments.

This is the most species-rich section of the genus. It has diversified mostly in the Atlantic Forest and the South American savannahs and grasslands. In the Atlantic Forest, plants are large trees or shrubs in which the bark is frequently (not always) rough or scaly, only rarely smooth and guava-like as in other sections. In savannahs and grasslands, species have adapted to seasonal drought and fire by the scaly bark becoming thick and corky (in arboreal species; Fig. 4A) or by adopting an hemixyle habit (i.e. sub-shrubs that resprout from underground lignotubers; Fig. 5A), in a similar way as in Psidium subsect. Albotomentosa. The tendency for flowers to be produced in auxotelic racemes observed in trees (Fig. 4C) has resulted in hemixyles that resprout after fire or drought by producing flowers at the proximal nodes and vegetative growth at distal nodes (Fig. 5A). The strongest morphological marker for this clade is the open flower buds with clear calyx lobes and minimal tearing or none at anthesis. It shares with its sister section Mitranthes a reduction in the number of locules, ovules and seeds. In these two sections, 2–3 loculate ovaries with one- or two-seriate ovules are the norm, with few exceptions. Seeds produced per fruit are on average fewer, with the lowest values of seeds per fruit almost always below ten.

  1. Psidium sect. Mitranthes (O.Berg) Tuler & Proença, stat. nov. – Type species: P. brownianum DC.

  • Mitranthes O.Berg, Linnaea 27: 136 (in clave), 316. Jan 1856 (‘1854’). M. browniana (DC.) O.Berg (Psidium brownianum DC.) (Lectotype; see Pfeiffer, Nom. 2: 327. 9 Mai 1873).

  • Mitropsidium Burret, Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 15: 488 (1941). Typus: M. pittieri Burret

Diagnosis.

Trees or shrubs. Leaves not fleshy when fresh, usually cartaceous or coriaceous. Branches compressed; venation brochydodromous or camptodromous, rarely forming a clear marginal vein, sometimes inconspicuous. Inflorescence axillary or terminal, uniflorous or rarely in simple three-flowered dichasia or in short racemes. Floral buds very variable, open, partially closed or completely closed, if closed tearing at anthesis or with a calyptra. Stamens (80–)100–200(–270); anthers 0,3–0,5(–0,9) mm with a single apical gland or with 1–5(–17) smaller glands on the connective. Ovary locules 2–3(4); ovules (3–)5–30(–44) per locule, uniseriate or biseriate. Fruits smallish for the genus, green, yellow-green or black mature, with poorly developed placentas (Fig. 4). Seeds (1–)4–20(–23) per fruit, externally rounded and pressed against the fruit wall and internally faceted where developing seeds abut or rounded and immersed in a fleshy endocarp.

Phylogenetic support.

Section Mitranthes is highly supported (BS = 100) in the four region ML with two accessions (two species). In the inclusive trees with eight accessions (seven species) it is highly supported in the ML tree (BS = 76) and in the Bayesian tree (PP = 0.99). The single region ML trees have between three and seven accessions. ETS (BS = 95) supported the clade with four accessions, but three other accessions were misclassified. ITS (BS = 89) and the chloroplast region psbA (BS = 61) supported the clade with no misclassifications. The chloroplast region ndhF did not support the clade; accessions were scattered.

Comments.

This section has successfully colonized the Atlantic Forest, Dry Forests throughout South America and the South American Dry Diagonal (Caatinga and Cerrado). There are apparently no sub-shrubs or hemixyles; plants are trees or large shrubs. It has also dispersed into the Caribbean where there are apparently several closely related species (Flickinger et al., 2020). Pre-foliation is weakly (P. myrsinites) to strongly (P. schenckianum) revolute. Leaf venation camptodromous–brochydodromous/last marginals forming complete or incomplete arches/intramarginal vein absent/tertiary venation ramified admedial or more rarely brochidodromous (Cardoso and Sajo, 2006; Oliveira et al., 2017). We have not been able to find chromosome counts for any species of this section. Anatomically, P. oligospermum lacks tector trichomes on the adaxial epidermis, a condition also common in its sister clade, Psidium sect. Apertiflora. It shares with its sister section Apertiflora a reduction in the number of locules, ovules and seeds (see discussion under that section).

Conclusion

Information gaps identified in morphology are on pre-foliation, the occurrence of colleters, staminal development, placentation and floral anatomy in general throughout the genus; records are patchy. Studies are in general biased towards sections Psidium and Obversifolia where the economically important species are. Scattered evidence suggests that stone cells in the ovary, apomixis and polyploidy occur across the genus. Stone cells in the ovary have been recorded in three species from different clades. Chromosome counts or studies of reproductive biology within section Mitranthes are non-existent, and few in section Apertiflora.

A comprehensive phylogenetic study of Psidium would undoubtedly bring a better focus to the preliminary understanding of how the genus evolved and diversified that has come to light in the present study. Recognition of the major clades/sections should facilitate this task by allowing in-depth studies of the sections separately, particularly of sections Psidium and Obversifolia, which present problems that are challenges to humanity in the areas of food security and biodiversity conservation. The approximately ten species of Psidium that are restricted to the western South American highlands of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela are absent from our phylogeny and their sampling would be of particular biogeographical interest. Many American genera of Myrtaceae are restricted either to Western (Andean) or Eastern South America (Govaerts et al., 2008). The few genera that occur in both areas, such as Myrcianthes and Myrceugenia have been found to have a strong East/West dichotomy in recent phylogenetic studies (Murillo et al., 2012; Vasconcelos et al., 2017b). The same could be said for the Caribbean species, since our sample from this area was small (three species) and the Caribbean is quite diverse for Myrtaceae, with species putatively endemic to Jamaica, Hispaniola and Cuba (Flickinger et al., 2020).

Relationships between species within Psidium sect. Psidium subsect. Albotomentosa and the Psidium sect. Apertiflora clades that have occupied the South American savannas and grasslands are very unclear, as can be seen in the trees with different accessions of P. australe, P. bergianum and P. laruotteanum emerging on different (albeit close) branches, i.e. not as sister taxa. These have been considered complexes of closely related species (Landrum, 2005, 2021) so the lack of resolution is not surprising. If Psidium is a rapidly evolving genus, it is possible that these clades are recently evolved or evolving and that a genomic approach will be necessary to clarify their relationships. The two accessions of P. corynanthum that emerged separately could likewise be an artefact of poor resolution in section Apertiflora (these two accessions shared two regions, the ETS and ndhF) and are in separate, low bootstrap clades.

Many authors have alluded to the close morphological similarity between P. guajava and P. guineense (Landrum et al., 1995; Marques et al., 2016; Landrum, 2021). These two species share similar leaf venation, inflorescences, closed floral buds, flowers with many stamens, elongated anthers and fruits with many small seeds, and are frequently misidentified as each other in herbaria (Arévalo-Marín et al., 2021). It has been widely believed that P. guajava and P. guineense would emerge as closely related, as was found by Salywon (2003) based only on ITS1 + ITS2. Our study has shown this not to be the case. The closest relatives of P. guajava are P. acidum, P. friedrichsthalianum and P. kennedyanum, not P. guineense. Although members of the same section, P. guajava and P. guineense belong to separate sister clades. These two species have apparently undergone parallel morphological evolution; we believe this parallelism could be associated with their similar invasive qualities.

The list of species with their probable sections (Supplementary data Table S1) is tentative. Thirty-five species have not had any DNA sequences generated and have thus been assigned to sections based on morphology; nine species with unclear affinities have not been attributed to a section. Twenty-five names were considered of uncertain status. The high degree of homoplasy, convergence and parallelism that appears to occur within Psidium, particularly between sister sections Apertiflora and Mitranthes, makes this a hazardous exercise. We have been conservative in only attributing species to sections when there was either strong molecular evidence, some molecular evidence combined with morphology or overwhelming morphological evidence. We hope this study will guide and encourage future work in this fascinating genus.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Table S1: list of accepted species in Psidium with probable sections, voucher specimens and bootstrap support for the section in molecular phylogenies, and references. Table S2: species with available chromosome counts, with section, count, reference, and voucher and geographic information when available. Table S3: species included in the phylogeny with GenBank accession numbers, voucher information and geographic data. Figure. S1: maximum likelihood single region tree (ETS). Figure S2: maximum likelihood single region tree (ITS). Figure S3: maximum likelihood single region tree (ndhF). Figure S4: maximum likelihood single region tree (psbA–trnH).

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S1

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S2

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S3

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S4

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Material

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S1

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S2

mcac005_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S3

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

C.E.B.P. wrote the paper. Species circumscription and descriptions were jointly constructed by C.E.B.P. and A.C.T., and anatomical descriptions were led by the latter author. I.R.C. and E.R.F.-M. were major contributors to discussion on cytogenetics. Sampling in the field was done by J.E.Q.F., I.R.C., C.E.B.P. and V.G.S. Modus operandi in the lab, experimental design and analysis and interpretation of molecular results had significant input from T.N.C.V., E.J.L., P.W.I., L.R.M. and P.S.d-C. Most sequences were generated by I.R.C., with significant contributions from C.E.B.P., V.G.S. and T.N.C.V.. All authors contributed with comments and suggestions that improved the final draft of the manuscript. We thank the photographers that kindly contributed images (cited by name in the legends) to Figs 4 and and5,5, Maria Rosa Zanatta for assistance in improving the illustrations, and Stephen A. Harris for reviewing an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, CEP, Brazil. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.

Amélia Carlos Tuler, Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica, Av. José Ruschi 4, Santa Teresa, ES, CEP, Brazil.

Eve J Lucas, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.

Thais Nogales da Costa Vasconcelos, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. University of Arkansas, Oakland Ave, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

Jair Eustáquio Quintino de Faria, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, CEP, Brazil.

Vanessa Graziele Staggemeier, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, R. das Biociências, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, CEP, Brazil.

Plauto Simão de-Carvalho, Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Setor Sul, Palmeiras de Goiás,  , GO, CEP, Brazil.

Eliana Regina Forni-Martins, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato 255 SP, CEP, Brazil.

Peter Ward Inglis, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (EMBRAPA CENARGEN),  , SAIN Parque Rural, W5, Asa Norte, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Lorena Ramos da Mata, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (EMBRAPA CENARGEN),  , SAIN Parque Rural, W5, Asa Norte, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Itayguara Ribeiro da Costa, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Campus do Pici Bloco 906, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

FUNDING

This work was supported by: CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Brazil) field work and laboratory work by I.R.C., V.G.S. and C.E.B.P. [Project Estudos filogenéticos e macroecológicos voltados à conservação do gênero Psidium L. (Myrtaceae Juss. – 2011-2015, REFLORA Program)], PhD grants to C.E.B.P., I.R.C. and A.C.T., and Produtividade em Pesquisa-PQ2 Research grants to C.E.B.P. and E.R.F.-M.; KLARF (Kew Latin American Research Fellowship) doctoral grant to IRC; CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Ensino Superior – finance code 001) PhD grants to A.C.T., T.N.C.V. and V.G.S., and a post-doctoral grant to I.R.C. at the Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo – Brazil), MSc grant to I.R.C. and a Research grant to E.R.F.-M. and I.R.C.; FAPES/VALE/FAPERJ (Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo/Vale S.A./Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – Brazil) field work, herbarium and laboratory work to A.C.T. (Project Identificação e Caracterização de Espécies de Psidium da Mata Atlântica de Interesse Econômico); The Andrew T. Mellon Foundation, a post-doctoral grant to C.E.B.P. for herbarium-based work; The Emily Holmes Memorial Foundation, field work and laboratory work at the Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew to T.N.C.V.; and FAPDF (Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal – Brazil), laboratory work at the Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew to C.E.B.P.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Al-Edany  TY, Al-Saadi SAAM. 2012. Taxonomic significance of anatomical characters in some species of the family Myrtaceae. American Journal of Plant Sciences 3: 572–581. [Google Scholar]
  • de Almeida  EJ, dos Santos JM, Martins ABG. 2009. Resistência de goiabeiras e araçazeiros a Meloidogyne mayaguensis. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 44: 421–423. [Google Scholar]
  • Alvarenga  CA, Talamoni SA. 2006. Foraging behaviour of the Brazilian squirrel Sciurus aestuans (Rodentia, Sciuridae). Acta Theriologica 51: 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • Amorim  BS, Alves M, Guerra M, Souza LG. 2012. IAPT/IOPB chromosome data XIV. Taxon 61: 1336. [Google Scholar]
  • Arévalo-Marín  E, Casas A, Landrum L, et al.  2021. The taming of Psidium guajava: natural and cultural history of a Neotropical fruit. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 1–15. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Arruda  R, Fontenelle G. 1994. Leaf anatomy of Psidium cattleyanum Sabine (Myrtaceae). Revista Brasileira de Botânica 17: 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Atchison  E. 1947. Chromosome numbers in the Myrtaceae. American Journal of Botany 34: 159–164. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Berg  CO. 1854. Revisio Myrtacearum Americae. Linnaea 27: 1–472. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg  CO. 1857. Myrtaceae. Leipzig: Frid. Fleischer. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Beest  M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, et al.  2012. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109: 19–45. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Biegelmeyer  R, Andrade JML, Aboy AN, et al.  2011. Comparative analysis of the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of red (Psidium cattleianum) and yellow (Psidium cattleianum var. lucidum) strawberry guava fruit. Journal of Food Science 76: C991–C996. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Biffin  E, Craven LA, Crisp MD, Gadek PA. 2006. Molecular systematics of Syzygium and allied genera (Myrtaceae): evidence from the chloroplast genome. Taxon 55: 79–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Boeger  MRT, Wisniewski C. 2003. Comparação da morfologia foliar de espécies arbóreas de três estádios sucessionais distintos de floresta ombrófila densa (Floresta Atlântica) no Sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 26: 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowman  RN. 1987. Cryptic self-imcompatibility and the breeding system of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany 74: 471–476. [Google Scholar]
  • Brundrett  MC, Tedersoo L. 2018. Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity. New Phytologist 220: 1108–1115. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Burk  T. 1983. Behavioral ecology of mating in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). The Florida Entomologist 66: 330–344. [Google Scholar]
  • de Candolle  AP. 1828. Myrtaceae. In: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Parisiis. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso  CMV, Sajo MG. 2006. Nervação foliar em espécies brasileiras de Myrtaceae Adans. Acta Botanica Brasilica 20: 657–669. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso  CMV, Proença SL, Sajo MG. 2009. Foliar anatomy of the subfamily Myrtoideae (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57: 148–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso  JC, Costa BT, de Almeida EJ. 2017. Pollination and in vitro germination of seeds for interspecific hybridization of Psidium guajava and Psidium cattleianum. Euphytica 213: 146. [Google Scholar]
  • Carneiro  RMDG, Hidalgo-Díaz L, Martins I, Ayres de Souza Silva KF, Guimarães de Sousa M, Tigano MS. 2011. Effect of nematophagous fungi on reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii on guava (Psidium guajava) plants. Nematology 13: 721–728. [Google Scholar]
  • Cavalcanti Junior  EA, Filho RMM, Rossiter JGA, Montarroyos AVV, Musser RS, Martins LSS. 2020. Reaction of genotypes of the genus Psidium spp. to Meloidogyne enterolobii. Summa Phytopathologica 46: 333–339. [Google Scholar]
  • Chakraborti  S, Sinha S, Sinha RK. 2010. Chromosome number and karyotype analysis of wild guava Psidium guineense Sw. – a new report from Tripura, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 3: 925–927. [Google Scholar]
  • Clausing  G, Meyer K, Renner SS. 2000. Correlations among fruit traits and evolution of different fruits within Melastomataceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 303–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Clement  CR, Pereira AA, Cristo-Araújo M, D’Eeckenbrugge GC, Pereira AA, Picanço-Rodrigues D. 2010. Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2: 72–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Clusius  C. 1601. Rariorum plantarum historia. Antwerp: Plantin. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa  IR. 2009. Estudos evolutivos em Myrtaceae: aspectos citotaxonômicos e filogenéticos em Myrteae, enfatizando Psidium e gêneros relacionados. PhD Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa  IR, Forni-Martins ER. 2006. Chromosome studies in Brazilian species of Campomanesia Ruiz & Pávon and Psidium L. (Myrtaceae Juss.). Caryologia 59: 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa  IR, Forni-Martins ER. 2007. Chromosome studies in Gomidesia, Marlierea, Myrceugenia and Myrcia (Myrtaceae, subtribe Myrciinae). Kew Bulletin 62: 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa  IR, Dornelas MC, Forni-Martins ER. 2008. Nuclear genome size variation in fleshy-fruited Neotropical Myrtaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 276: 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Cullen  J. 1978. A preliminary survey of ptyxis (vernation) in the Angiosperms. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 37: 161–214. [Google Scholar]
  • D’Cruz  R, Rao GB. 1962. Cytogenetic studies in two guava aneuploids. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 41: 316–321. [Google Scholar]
  • Dar  MA, Wani GA, Reshi ZA, Al-Qarawi AA, Abd Allah EF, Shah MA. 2020. Stage-specific ploidy level variations in invasive species in comparison to rare endemics in Kashmir Himalaya. Flora 262: 151525. [Google Scholar]
  • Denslow  JS. 2003. Weeds in paradise: thoughts on the invasibility of tropical islands. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Doyle  JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Éder-Silva  E, Felix LP, Bruno RLA. 2007. Citogenética de algumas espécies frutíferas nativas do nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 29: 110–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Edgar  RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Endringer  LS. 2020. Análise da arquitetura, padrões de nervação e anatomia foliar de espécies de Psidium (Myrtaceae): uma abordagem taxonômica. Dissertation. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Estrada-Luna  A, Davies F Jr, Egilla J. 2002. Mycorrhizal fungi enhancement of growth and gas exchange of micropropagated guava plantlets (Psidium guajava L.) during ex-vitro acclimatization and plant establishment. Mycorrhiza 10: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Falcão  MdA, Ferreira SAdN, Clement CR, dos Santos TCT, Souza RdM. 1992. Crescimento e fenologia de araçá-pera (Psidium acutangulum DC.). Acta Amazonica 22: 285–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Fank-de-Carvalho  SM, Silva PIT, Araújo RF, Santos MRR, Báo SN. 2007. Arquitetura foliar de Psidium basanthum O.Berg. In: 39a. Reunião anual da Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência. Belém, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Felsenstein  J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: q maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368–376. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez  MD, Pieters A, Donoso C, et al.  1999. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis of trees in the flooded forest of the Mapire River. Tree Physiology 19: 79–85. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Flickinger  JA, Jestrow B, Oviedo Prieto R, et al.  2020. A phylogenetic survey of Myrtaceae in the Greater Antilles with nomenclatural changes for some endemic species. Taxon 69: 448–480. [Google Scholar]
  • Forni-Martins  ER, Martins FR. 2000. Chromosome studies on Brazilian cerrado plants. Genetics and Molecular Biology 23: 947–955. [Google Scholar]
  • Freire  CG, Giachini AJ, Gardin JPP, et al.  2018. First record of in vitro formation of ectomycorrhizae in Psidium cattleianum Sabine, a native Myrtaceae of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. PLoS One 13: 1–15. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Galan  ATOF, Martos L, Machado NC, Mourão KSM. 2016. A survey of ontogeny pericarp features as contribution to the infratribal characterization of Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 34: 596–604. [Google Scholar]
  • Gentry  AH. 1974. Coevolutionary patterns in Central American Bignoniaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 728. [Google Scholar]
  • Giaretta  A, Vasconcelos TNC, Mazine FF, et al.  2019. Calyx (con)fusion in a hyper-diverse genus: parallel evolution of unusual flower patterns in Eugenia (Myrtaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 139: 106553. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Global Invasive Species Database.  2013. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/100_worst.php. (4 February 2021).
  • Goldenberg  R, Almeda F, Caddah MK, et al.  2013. Nomenclator botanicus for the neotropical genus Miconia (Melastomataceae: Miconieae). Phytotaxa 106: 1–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Gomes  SM, Somavilla NS, Gomes-Bezerra KM, Miranda SC, Carvalho PS, Graciano-Ribeiro D. 2009. Anatomia foliar de espécies de Myrtaceae: contribuições à taxonomia e filogenia. Acta Botanica Brasilica 23: 224–238. [Google Scholar]
  • Gomes  VM, Souza RM, Mussi-Dias V, da Silveira SF, Dolinski C. 2011. Guava decline: a complex disease involving Meloidogyne mayaguensis and Fusarium solani. Journal of Phytopathology 159: 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Govaerts  R, Sobral MEG, Ashton P, et al.  2008. World checklist of Myrtaceae. Kew: Royal Botanic Garden, Kew. [Google Scholar]
  • Govaerts  R, Sobral MEG, Ashton P, et al.  2021. Myrtaceae. https://wcsp.science.kew.org/. (29 March 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • Gressler  E, Pizo MA, Morellato LPC. 2006. Polinização e dispersão de sementes em Myrtaceae do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29: 509–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Grubb  PJ, Jackson R V. 2007. The adaptive value of young leaves being tightly folded or rolled on monocotyledons in tropical lowland rain forest: an hypothesis in two parts. Plant Ecology 192: 317–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton  MB. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 513–525. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrington  RA, Ewel JJ. 1997. Invasibility of tree plantations by native and non-indigenous plant species in Hawaii. Forest Ecology and Management 99: 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Harris  SA, Marner SK, Proença CEB. 2017. William Dampier’s Brazilian botanical observations in 1699. Journal of the History of Collections 29: 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Hickey  LJ. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60: 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Hillis  DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Hirano  RT, Nakazone HY. 1969. Chromosome numbers of ten species and clones in the genus Psidium. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Sciences 94: 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Hojsgaard  D, Hörandl E. 2015. Apomixis as a facilitator of range expansion and diversification in plants. In: Pontarotti P, ed. Evolutionary biology: biodiversification from genotype to phenotype. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 305–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Huelsenbeck  JP, Crandall KA. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 437–466. [Google Scholar]
  • Huelsenbeck  JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310–2314. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Inglis  PW, Cavalcanti TB. 2018. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Diplusodon (Lythraceae), endemic to the campos rupestres and cerrados of South America. Taxon 67: 66–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson  MH. 1995. Galapagos, a natural history. Calgary: University of Calgary Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar  LSS, Ranade SG. 1952. Autotriploidy in guava (Psidium guajava, Linn.). Current Science 21: 75–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR. 1990. Accara: a new genus of Myrtaceae, Myrtinae from Brazil. Systematic Botany 15: 221–225. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR. 2003. A revision of the Psidium salutare complex (Myrtaceae). Sida 20: 1449–1469. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR. 2005. A revision of the Psidium grandifolium complex (Myrtaceae). Sida 21: 1335–1354. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR. 2017. The genus Psidium (Myrtaceae) in the State of Bahia, Brazil. Canotia 13: 1–101. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR. 2021. Psidium guajava L.: taxonomy, relatives and possible origin. In: Mitra S, ed. Guava: botany, production and uses. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Clark WD, Sharp WP, Brendecke J. 1995. Hybridization between Psidium guajava and P. guineense (Myrtaceae). Economic Botany 49: 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Cornejo X. 2016. A new species of Psidium from western Ecuador. Brittonia 68: 418–421. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Funch LS. 2008. Two new species of Psidium (Myrtaceae) from Bahia, Brazil. Novon 18: 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Parra-O C. 2014. A new species of Psidium (Myrtaceae) from Ecuador and Colombia. Brittonia 66: 311–315. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Proença CEB. 2015. A new species of Psidium (Myrtaceae) from the Brazilian Northeast. Brittonia 67: 324–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Sharp WP. 1989. Seed coat characters of some American Myrtinae (Myrtaceae): Psidium and related genera. Systematic Botany 14: 370–376. [Google Scholar]
  • Landrum  LR, Sobral MEG. 2006. Psidium cauliflorum (Myrtaceae), a new species from Bahia, Brazil. Sida 22: 927–929. [Google Scholar]
  • Linnaeus  C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: L. Salvii. [Google Scholar]
  • Liogier  AH. 1953. Flora de Cuba 3: 1–502. [Google Scholar]
  • Liogier  AH. 1973. Novitates Antillanae VI. Phytologia 25: 265–280. [Google Scholar]
  • Louca  S, Pennell MW. 2020. Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580: 502–505. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas  EJ, Amorim BS, Lima DF, et al.  2018. A new infra-generic classification of the species-rich Neotropical genus Myrcia s.l. Kew Bulletin 73: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas  EJ, Harris SA, Mazine-Capelo FF, et al.  2007. Suprageneric phylogenetics of Myrteae, the generically richest tribe in Myrtaceae (Myrtales). Taxon 56: 1105–1128. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas  EJ, Holst BK, Sobral MEG, et al.  2019. A new subtribal classification of tribe Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Systematic Botany 44: 560–569. [Google Scholar]
  • Luximon-Ramma  A, Bahorun T, Crozier A. 2003. Antioxidant actions and phenolic and vitamin C contents of common Mauritian exotic fruits. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 496–502. [Google Scholar]
  • Machado  RM. 2016. Distribuição geográfica e análise cariotípica dos citótipos de Psidium cattleianum Sabine (Myrtaceae). MSc Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Majumder  PK, Mukherjee SK. 1972. Aneuploidy in guava (Psidium guajava L.) I. Mechanism of variation in chromosome number. Cytologia 37: 541–548. [Google Scholar]
  • Malavasi  A, Morgante JS. 1980. Biology of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) 2: indexes of infestations in different hosts and localities. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 40: 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Malavasi  A, Morgante JS, Prokopy RJ. 1983. Distribution and activities of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies on host and nonhost trees. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 76: 286–292. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcgrave  G, Piso W. 1648. Historia naturalis brasiliae. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Marques  AM, Tuler AC, Carvalho CR, Carrijo TT, Ferreira MFS, Clarindo WR. 2016. Refinement of the karyological aspects of Psidium guineense (Swartz, 1788): a comparison with Psidium guajava (Linnaeus, 1753). Comparative Cytogenetics 10: 117–128. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Marques  MLS, Pimentel JP, Tavares OCH, Veiga CFM, Berbara RLL. 2012. Hospedabilidade de diferentes espécies de plantas a Meloidogyne enterolobii no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Nematropica 42: 304–313. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazine  FF, Faria JEQ, Giaretta A, Vasconcelos TNC, Forest F, Lucas EJ. 2018. Phylogeny and biogeography of the hyper-diverse genus Eugenia (Myrtaceae: Myrteae), with emphasis on E. sect. umbellatae, the most unmanageable clade. Taxon 67: 752–769. [Google Scholar]
  • Medina  SNV. 2014. Psidium cattleyanum Sabine y Acca sellowiana (Berg.) Burret (Myrtaceae): caracterización cromossómica y cariotípica em poblaciones silvestre ygenótipos selecionados em programas nacionales de mejoramiento. Thesis, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay. [Google Scholar]
  • Menéndez de Luarca  LRL. 1999. Las Plantas Americanas en la Obra de Charles de L’Écluse: primeras citas en las Cartas de Juan de Castañeda. Anales del Jardin Botanico de Madrid 57: 97–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Merril  ED. 1954. The botany of Cook’s voyages and its unexpected significance in relation to anthropology, biogeography, and history. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller  JS, Venable DL. 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289: 2335–2338. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller  MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2011. The CIPRES science gateway: a community resource for phylogenetic analyses. In: Proceedings of the TeraGrid 2011 Conference: Extreme Digital Discovery, TG’11, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Moussel  B. 1965. Contribution a l’étude cyto-taxonomique des Myrtacées. Mémoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, ser. B, Botanique 16: 91–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Morley  T. 1976. Memecyleae (Melastomataceae). Flora Neotropica 15: 1–295. [Google Scholar]
  • Mott  KA, Gibson AC, O’Leary JW. 1982. The adaptive significance of amphistomatic leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 5: 455–460. [Google Scholar]
  • Muir  CD. 2015. Making pore choices: repeated regime shifts in stomatal ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20151498. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Murillo-A  J, Ruiz-P E, Landrum LR, Stuessy TF, Barfuss MHJ. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships in Myrceugenia (Myrtaceae) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 764–776. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakasone  H, Paull R. 1998. Tropical fruit. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. [Google Scholar]
  • Newsom  LA, Wing ES. 2004. On land and sea: Native American uses of biological resources in the West Indies. Tucsaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Nic Lughadha  EM, Proença CEB. 1996. A survey of the reproductive biology of the Myrtoideae (Myrtaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83: 480–503. [Google Scholar]
  • Nogler  GA. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri BM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 475–518. [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira  EF, Bezerra DG, Santos ML, Rezende MH, Paula JAM. 2017. Leaf morphology and venation of Psidium species from the Brazilian savanna. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 27: 407–413. [Google Scholar]
  • Pariona  A. 2017. Top guava producing countries in the world.http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-guava-producing-countries-in-the-world.html. (4 March 2021).
  • Patel  VC, Skavarla JJ, Raven PH. 1984. Pollen characters in relation to the delimitation of Myrtales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 858–969. [Google Scholar]
  • Pedrosa  A, Gitaí J, e Silva AEB, Felix LP, Guerra M. 1999. Citogenética de angiospermas coletadas em Pernambuco – V. Acta Botanica Brasilica 13: 49–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira  FM, Carvalho CA, Nachtigal JC. 2003. Século XXI: nova cultivar de goiabeira de dupla finalidade. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 25: 498–500. [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira  FOM, Souza RM, Souza PM, Dolinski C, Santos GK. 2009. Estimativa do impacto econômico e social direto de Meloidogyne mayaguensis na cultura da goiaba no Brasil. Nematologia Brasileira 33: 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  • van der Pijl  L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Pimentel  RR, Barreira NP, Spala D, et al.  2014. Development and evolution of the gynoecium in Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 62: 335–346. [Google Scholar]
  • Pittarelli  BFdS, Mourão KSM, Thadeo M. 2021. Pericarp development in Campomanesia Ruiz & Pav. (Myrtaceae) species and systematic implications for the genus. Flora 282, 151885. [Google Scholar]
  • Pizo  MA. 2002. The seed dispersers and fruit syndromes of Myrtaceae in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M, eds. Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. New York: CABI Publishing, 129–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Posada  D. 2008. JModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB. 1991. The reproductive biology and taxonomy of the Myrtaceae in the Distrito Federal (Brazil). PhD Thesis, University of Saint Andrews, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB, Gibbs PE. 1994. Reproductive biology of eight sympatric Myrtaceae from Central Brazil. New Phytologist 126: 343–354. [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB, Soares-Silva LH, Silva PIT, Fank-de-Carvalho SM. 2010. Two new endemic species of Myrtaceae and an anatomical novelty from the Highlands of Brazil. Kew Bulletin 65: 463–468. [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB, Oliveira MIU, Landim MF. 2013. Myrtaceae. In: Flora de Sergipe 364–431. [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB, Faria JEQ, Mazine-Capelo FF. 2017. A new species and a new name in Myrtaceae (Myrteae) from Southeastern Brazil. Phytotaxa 308: 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Proença  CEB, Faria JEQ, Giaretta A, et al.  2020. Nomenclatural and taxonomic changes in tribe Myrteae (Myrtaceae) spurred by molecular phylogenies. Heringeriana 14: 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Raman  VS, Rangasamy SRS, Manimekalai G. 1971. Triploidy and Seedlessness in Guava (Psidium guajava L.). Cytologia 36: 392–399. [Google Scholar]
  • Raseira  MdCB, Raseira A. 1996. Contribuição ao estudo do araçazeiro. Pelotas: EMBRAPA/CPACT. [Google Scholar]
  • Richards  AJ. 1997. Plant breeding systems. London: Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson  DM, Rejmánek M. 2011. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Diversity and Distributions 17: 788–809. [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson  DM, Rejmánek M. 2013. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – 2013 update of the global database. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1093–1094. [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson  F, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. 2017. Amphistomatic leaf surfaces independently regulate gas exchange in response to variations in evaporative demand. Tree Physiology 37: 869–878. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • de los Rios  M. 1854. Vida y escritos de Gonzalo Fernando de Oviedo y Valdés. Madrid: Real Academia de la Historia. [Google Scholar]
  • Rocha  LD, Preussler KH, Pegorini F, Farias V, Maranho LT. 2008. Estudo anatômico comparativo da casca do caule do araçá-amarelo e araçá-vermelho, Psidium cattleianum Sabine, Myrtaceae. Acta Botanica Brasilica 22: 1114–1122. [Google Scholar]
  • Rojas-Gómez  M, García-Piñeres A, Bolaños-Villegas P, Arrieta-Espinoza G, Fuchs EJ. 2020. Genome size and chromosome number of Psidium friedrichsthalianum (O. Berg) Nied (‘cas’) in six populations of Costa Rica. Caryologia 73: 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Roth  I. 1981. Structural patterns of tropical barks. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger. [Google Scholar]
  • Rotman  AD. 1976. Revisión del género Psidium en la Argentina (Myrtaceae). Darwiniana 20: 418–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy  RP, Jha RP. 1962. Studies in Myrtaceae In: 49th Indian Science Congress 3: 336. [Google Scholar]
  • Rye  BL. 1979. Chromosome number variation in the Myrtaceae and its taxonomic implications. Australian Journal of Botany 27: 547–573. [Google Scholar]
  • Salywon  AM. 2003. A monograph of Mosiera (Myrtaceae). PhD thesis, Arizona State University (unpublished). [Google Scholar]
  • Salywon  AM, Landrum LR. 2007. Curitiba (Myrtaceae): a new genus from the Planalto of southern Brazil. Brittonia 59: 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  • Salywon  AM, Landrum LR. 2014. A new species of Mosiera (Myrtaceae) from the Sierra de Nipe, Cuba. Brittonia 66: 274–277. [Google Scholar]
  • dos Santos  MAC, de Queiróz MA, Bispo JdS, Dantas BF. 2015. Germinação de sementes de araçá (Psidium guineense Swartz.). Journal of Seed Science 37: 214–221. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmid  R. 1972. A resolution of the Eugenia–Syzygium controversy (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 59: 423–436. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma  AK, Majumdar A. 1957. Structure and behaviour of chromosomes in different varieties of Psidium guajava Linn. 1 In: 44th Indian Science Congress 3: 256. [Google Scholar]
  • Silveira  AD, Ribeiro ARO, Proença CEB. 2021. IAPT chromosome data 35/1. Taxon 76: E3–E7. [Google Scholar]
  • Simon  MF, Grether R, Queiroz LP, Skema C, Pennington RT, Hughes CE. 2009. Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 20359–20364. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Singhal  V, Gill B, Bir S. 1980. Chromosome number reports LXVII. Taxon 29: 355–357. [Google Scholar]
  • Singhal  V, Gill B, Bir S. 1984. Cytology of cultivated woody species (Polypetalae). Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress Association 71: 143–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Snow  DW. 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica 13: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith-White  S. 1948. Cyrtological studies in Myrtaceae II. Chromosome numbers in Leptospermoideae and Myrtoideae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 73: 16–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Soares-Silva  LH, Proença CEB. 2006. An old species revisited and a new combination proposed in Psidium (Myrtaceae). Kew Bulletin 61: 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Soares-Silva  LH, Proença CEB. 2008. A new species of Psidium L. (Myrtaceae) from southern Brazil. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 158: 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Solis  RS, Haas J, Creamer W. 2001. Dating Caral, a preceramic site in the Supe Valley on the central coast of Peru. Science 292: 723–726. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • de Souza  ADG, Resende LV, de Lima IP, Martins LSS, Techio VH. 2015. Chromosome number and nuclear DNA amount in Psidium spp. resistant and susceptible to Meloidogyne enterolobii and its relation with compatibility between rootstocks and commercial varieties of guava tree. Plant Systematics and Evolution 301: 231–237. [Google Scholar]
  • Souza-Pérez  M, Speroni G. 2017. New apomictic pathway in Myrtaceae inferred from Psidium cattleyanum female gametophyte ontogeny. Flora 234: 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Srivastava  HC. 1970. Chromosome studies in Psidium molle Bertel. Science & Culture 36: 177. [Google Scholar]
  • Srivastava  HC. 1977. Cytological studies in Psidium friedrichsthalianum Niedenzu. Cytologia 42: 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Stadnik  AMS, De Oliveira MIU, Roque N. 2018. Myrtaceae in Serra Geral of Licínio de Almeida, Bahia, Brazil. Rodriguesia 69: 515–552. [Google Scholar]
  • Staggemeier  VG, Cazetta E, Morellato LPC. 2017. Hyperdominance in fruit production in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest: the functional role of plants in sustaining frugivores. Biotropica 49: 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Suárez  E, Esquivel C. 1987. Fenología del Guisaro (Psidium guineense Swartz) en Barva de Heredia, Costa Rica. Brenesia 28: 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun  Y, Skinner DZ, Liang GH, Hulbert SH. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 26–32. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Thurlby  KAG, Wilson PG, Sherwin WB, Connelly C, Rossetto M. 2012. Reproductive bet-hedging in a rare yet widespread rainforest tree, Syzygium paniculatum (Myrtaceae). Austral Ecology 37: 936–944. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Peixoto AL, Proença CEB. 2016. A new endangered species of Psidium (Myrtaceae, Myrteae) from Bahia, Brazil. Phytotaxa 288: 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Carrijo TT, Ferreria MFS, Peixoto AL. 2017a. Flora of Espírito Santo: Psidium (Myrtaceae). Rodriguésia 68: 1791–1805. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Souza MC, Carrijo TT, Peixoto AL. 2017b. A new cauliflorous species of Psidium (Myrtaceae) from the Atlantic forest. Phytotaxa 297: 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Carrijo TT, Peixoto AL, et al.  2019.  a. Diversification and geographical distribution of Psidium (Myrtaceae) species with distinct ploidy levels. Trees – Structure and Function 33: 1101–1110. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Carrijo TT, Sheu Y, Ferreira MFDS, Peixoto AL. 2019b. Re-establishment of Psidium macahense (Myrtaceae, Myrteae), an endemic species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Phytotaxa 397: 34. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Costa CM, Carrijo TT, Peixoto AL. 2020a. Psidium pulcherrimum (Myrtaceae, Myrteae), a new species from Bahia, Brazil. Brittonia 72: 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Jardim L, Carrijo TT, Peixoto AL. 2020b. Novelties in Psidium (Myrtaceae): a new species from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, and re-establishment of Psidium turbinatum Mattos. Systematic Botany 45: 137–141. [Google Scholar]
  • Tuler  AC, Proença CEB, Costa IR. 2021. Psidium.floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/listaBrasil/. (15 March 2021).
  • Turland  NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, et al.  2018. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Umapathy  G, Kumar A. 2000. The occurrence of arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the Anamalai Hills, South India. Biological Conservation 92: 311–319. [Google Scholar]
  • Urquía  D, Gutierrez B, Pozo G, Pozo MJ, Espín A, De Lourdes Torres M. 2019. Psidium guajava in the Galapagos Islands: population genetics and history of an invasive species. PLoS One 14: 1–21. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Urquía  D, Pozo G, Gutierrez B, Rowntree JK, Torres M de L. 2020. Understanding the genetic diversity of the guayabillo (Psidium galapageium), an endemic plant of the Galapagos Islands. Global Ecology and Conservation 24: e01350. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasconcelos  TNC, Prenner G, Santos MF, Wingler A, Lucas EJ. 2017a. Links between parallel evolution and systematic complexity in angiosperms – a case study of floral development in Myrcia s.l. (Myrtaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 24: 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasconcelos  TNC, Proença CEB, Ahmad B, et al.  2017.  b. Myrteae phylogeny, calibration, biogeography and diversification patterns: Increased understanding in the most species rich tribe of Myrtaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 109: 113–137. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Vasconcelos  TNC, Prenner G, Lucas EJ. 2019. A systematic overview of the floral diversity in Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Systematic Botany 44: 570–591. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaughan  J, Geissler C. 1997. The new Oxford book of food plants. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Vijayakumar  N, Subramanian D. 1985. Cytotaxonomical studies in South Indian Myrtaceae. Cytologia (Tokyo) 50: 513–520. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace  AR. 1878. Tropical nature and other essays. London: Macmillan & Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang  B, Qiu Y-L. 2006. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16: 299–363. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Warren  JM, Emamdie DZ, Shanmugam KS. 1997. Reproductive allocation and pollinator distributions in cauliflorus trees in Trinidad. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 337–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiens  D. 1984. Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems, and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia 64: 47–53. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson  PG, O’Brien MM, Heslewood MM, Quinn CJ. 2005. Relationships within Myrtaceae sensu lato based on a matK phylogeny. Plant Systematics and Evolution 251: 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Wright  SD, Yong CG, Wichman SR, Dawson JW, Gardner RC. 2001. Stepping stones to Hawaii: a trans-equatorial dispersal pathway for Metrosideros (Myrtaceae) inferred from nrDNA (ITS + ETS). Journal of Biogeography 28: 769–774. [Google Scholar]
  • Zahawi  RA, Augspurger CK. 1999. Early plant succession in abandoned pastures in Ecuador. Biotropica 31: 540–552. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/121092912
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/121092912

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1093/aob/mcac005

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
4
0

Article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

    Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Ensino Superior