US20070150136A1 - Periodic rate sensor self test - Google Patents
Periodic rate sensor self test Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070150136A1 US20070150136A1 US11/345,350 US34535006A US2007150136A1 US 20070150136 A1 US20070150136 A1 US 20070150136A1 US 34535006 A US34535006 A US 34535006A US 2007150136 A1 US2007150136 A1 US 2007150136A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- test
- sensor
- signal
- motion sensor
- output
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
- B60T8/32—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration
- B60T8/88—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration with failure responsive means, i.e. means for detecting and indicating faulty operation of the speed responsive control means
- B60T8/885—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration with failure responsive means, i.e. means for detecting and indicating faulty operation of the speed responsive control means using electrical circuitry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F7/00—Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M17/00—Testing of vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/22—Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T2270/00—Further aspects of brake control systems not otherwise provided for
- B60T2270/40—Failsafe aspects of brake control systems
- B60T2270/406—Test-mode; Self-diagnosis
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T2270/00—Further aspects of brake control systems not otherwise provided for
- B60T2270/40—Failsafe aspects of brake control systems
- B60T2270/413—Plausibility monitoring, cross check, redundancy
Definitions
- This invention relates in general to motion sensors and in particular to a method for periodically testing the operation of such sensors.
- Vehicle electronically controlled brake systems are becoming increasing sophisticated to include the capability to correct vehicle directional movement upon detection of an undesired vehicle motion, such as, for example, loss of directional control on a low mu surface or potential vehicle roll over.
- detection typically involves motion sensors, to include accelerometers and/or angular rate sensors and also usually includes input from other vehicle operating parameter sensors, such as, for example, wheel speed sensors and a steering angle sensor.
- Vehicle brake control systems typically include an Electronic Control Unit (ECU) that receives the various sensor output signals.
- a microprocessor within the ECU that is controlled by a stored algorithm monitors the received sensor signals. The microprocessor is operative, upon detection of a potential vehicle directional stability problem, to selectively apply the vehicle brakes and/or vary engine torque to correct the problem.
- the motion sensors utilized by the brake control system are also becoming increasingly miniaturized and sophisticated to include signal conditioning circuits. Multiple motion sensors with associated signal conditioning circuits for the sensor outputs may be included on a single sensor chip.
- the signal conditioning circuits also may include a self testing capacity for monitoring the sensor output signal to detect a malfunctioning sensor. Typically, the self test is carried out during initial vehicle start-up and will generate an error code if the signal conditioning circuit determines that the senor output signal exceeds a predetermined threshold Additionally, upon detecting a malfunctioning sensor, the self test capability may disable the sensor output so an erroneous signal is not sent to the ECU.
- This invention relates to a method for periodically testing the operation of motion sensors.
- the present invention contemplates a method for verifying proper operation of a motion sensor that includes injecting a test signal into the motion sensor and then, after a predetermined delay, measuring the output of the sensor. The measured sensor output is then compared to an acceptable range of output values and, upon determining that the output is either above or below the acceptable range of output values, a fault is declared and an error signal generated. Additionally, the present invention contemplates that the test signal is a periodic signal and that the error signal is generated only after a predetermined number of consecutive faults have been detected. Furthermore, the invention also contemplates that the output of the sensor is blocked for a period of time following the injection of each test single. In the preferred embodiment, the test signal comprises a series of pulses of one millisecond duration. The pulses may all be positive, all negative, alternately positive and negative or selected or random combinations of positive and negative pulses.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portion of a control circuit for an electronic vehicular brake control system that includes motion sensors and that is in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a graph of typical voltage waveforms produced by the accelerometer shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a graph of a periodic test voltage that is injected into the accelerometer shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a graph of the accelerometer voltage waveform produced by the accelerometer shown in FIG. 1 after the test voltage shown in FIG. 3 has been injected.
- FIG. 5 is an enlarged graph that illustrates the response of the acceleration sensor to the test voltage shown in FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 5A is a graph of waveform shown in FIG. 4 after digital filtering.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a method of testing the accelerometer shown in the circuit shown in FIG. 1 that is in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow chart for a subroutine included in the method illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 8 is a graph of typical voltage waveforms produced by the yaw sensor shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 9 is graph of a periodic test voltage that is injected into the yaw sensor shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 10 is a graph of the yaw sensor voltage waveform produced by the yaw sensor shown in FIG. 1 after the test voltage shown in FIG. 9 has been injected.
- FIG. 11 is an enlarged graph that illustrates the response of the yaw sensor to the test voltage shown in FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 11A is a graph of waveform shown in FIG. 10 after digital filtering.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart of a method of testing the yaw sensor shown in the circuit shown in FIG. 1 that is in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 13 is a flow chart for an alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 14 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 15 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 16 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 1 a portion of a control circuit 10 for an electronic vehicular brake control system (not shown) in accordance with the invention.
- the control circuit 10 includes a microprocessor 12 having an acceleration sensor test signal output port 13 that is connected to a test signal input port of an acceleration sensor 14 .
- the acceleration sensor 14 has output port connected through a first analog hardware anti-aliasing filter 15 to the input of a first analog to digital converter 16 .
- the first analog to digital converter 16 is included in the microprocessor 12 .
- the output of the first analog to digital converter 16 is connected to both an acceleration sensor test signal input port 17 of a signal processing and diagnostic portion 12 A of the microprocessor 12 and the input of a first digital filter 18 .
- the first digital filter 18 is included in the microprocessor 12 .
- the first digital filter 18 has an output connected to an accelerometer input port 19 of the microprocessor portion 12 A.
- the microprocessor 12 also has a pair of angular rate sensor test signal output ports 20 and 22 connected to an angular rate sensor 24 .
- the angular rate sensor 24 has an output port connected through a second analog hardware anti-aliasing filter 26 to the input of a second analog to digital converter 28 .
- the second analog to digital converter 28 is included in the microprocessor 12 .
- the output of the second analog to digital converter 28 is connected to both an angular rate sensor teat signal input port 29 of the microprocessor portion 12 A and the input of a second digital filter 30 .
- the second digital filter 30 is included in the microprocessor 12 .
- the second digital filter 30 has an output connected to an angular rate sensor input port 31 of the microprocessor portion 12 A.
- the analog anti-aliasing filters 15 and 26 are operative to remove frequency components from the sensor signals that are beyond the range of the corresponding analog to digital converters 16 and 28 , respectively.
- the acceleration sensor test signal output port 13 of the microprocessor 12 is operative, as will be described below, to apply a periodic test signal to the acceleration sensor 14 .
- the pair of angular rate sensor test signal output ports 20 and 22 of the microprocessor 12 are operative, as also will be described below, to apply periodic test signals to the angular rate sensor 24 .
- the microprocessor 12 also has an output port 32 connected to a brake system Electronic Control Unit (ECU) 34 .
- the microprocessor 12 is operative to supply acceleration and angular rate signals to the ECU 34 .
- the microprocessor 12 also has additional output ports that are connected to additional vehicle dynamic controllers, such as, for example a Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system.
- VSC Vehicle Stability Control
- the group of additionally vehicle dynamic controllers is labeled with the numerical identifier 36 . While individual connecting wires are shown between the controller 12 and the control systems in FIG. 1 , the invention also may be practiced with a CAN bus connecting output of the controller 12 to the systems (not shown).
- acceleration sensor 14 and one yaw rate sensor 24 are shown in FIG. 1 , it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with more sensors than are shown in the figure. Additionally, the invention also may be practiced with only one of the sensors shown.
- sensor test signals are shown as being generated within the microprocessor 12 and being applied directly to the sensor test signal ports, it will be appreciated that the a test signal generator (not shown) may be provided external to the microprocessor 12 with the controller programmed to provide the test signal generator with trigger signals. The test signal generator would then generate the test signals that would be applied to the accelerometer and angular rate sensor test signal ports.
- the dashed smooth curve labeled 40 represents the analog output signal generated within the acceleration sensor 148 and amplified by a signal conditioning circuit within the accelerometer sensor.
- the conditioned sensor signal 40 is passed through the first analog anti-aliasing filter 15 and the filtered signal is applied to the input of the first analog to digital converter 16 .
- the analog to digital converter 16 periodically samples the filtered analog signal at a rate N 1 to generate the solid stepped voltage curve labeled 42 in FIG. 2 .
- the conditioned sensor signal 40 is sampled every millisecond, which is then equal to N 1 ; however, faster or slower sampling rates also may be utilized.
- the first digital filter 18 operates on the digitized sensor signal 42 and generates a filter output signal 43 at a rate of N 2 , which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N 1 .
- the rate N 2 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N 1 .
- the present invention contemplates periodically injecting a test signal consisting of a voltage pulse into the acceleration sensor test port at a testing rate N 3 , which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of the digital filter rate N 2 .
- a testing rate N 3 which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of the digital filter rate N 2 .
- each test pulse has a relatively short duration, such as, for example one millisecond; however, the invention also may be practiced using a test pulse having other durations.
- the test signal is illustrated in FIG. 3 where the voltage pulses are labeled 44 .
- the resulting analog to digital converter output signal 46 as modified by the test pulse, but before filtering by the first digital filter 18 , is shown in FIG. 4 .
- This signal having a sampling rate of N 1 , is applied directly to the acceleration test signal input port 17 of the microprocessor portion 12 A.
- a typical voltage response 48 of the circuit to the test pulse 44 is illustrated in FIG. 5 , where ST is the magnitude of the test pulse 44 .
- the invention contemplates measuring the magnitude of the sensor output signal after a predetermined time period passes following the application of the test pulse 44 . In the preferred embodiment, a one millisecond delay is utilized; however, the invention also may be practiced with other time delays.
- the resulting response voltage is labeled ⁇ ST and is less than ST. For clarity, only the test pulse 44 and the response voltage ⁇ ST are shown in FIG. 5 . While the preferred embodiment measures the response voltage one millisecond after the test pulse is applied, it will be appreciated that the measurement may be taken after any selected time period has passed.
- the response voltage ⁇ ST is compared by the microprocessor 12 to minimum and maximum thresholds values that are stored in a Non-Volatile Random Access Memory (NVRAM) and the sensor is deemed to operating satisfactorily only if the response voltage ⁇ ST falls within the range defined by the thresholds.
- NVRAM Non-Volatile Random Access Memory
- ⁇ ST has been shown as an excursion from the zero voltage axis; however, the invention contemplates that ⁇ ST would actually be measured relative to the digitized sensor signal 46 shown in FIG. 4 . Accordingly, the voltage response threshold values also would be adjusted relative to the sensor signal.
- the digitized signal 46 including the periodic test pulses 44 is fed to the first digital filter 18 .
- the digital filter sampling rate N 2 is selected to be sufficiently large that the digital filter output signal 47 is very similar to, or exactly the same as, the signal 43 shown in FIG. 2 that does not include test pulses 44 .
- sampling rates N 1 , N 2 and N 3 are selected with consideration of the response times of the controlled vehicle systems.
- the selected sampling rates are sufficiently faster than the system response times such that the loss of the sampled acceleration sensor signals following insertion of the sensor test pulses does not adversely affect the system responses.
- test voltage pulse ST is applied at every N 3 milliseconds in FIG.
- the microprocessor 12 After detecting a response signal ⁇ ST that is outside the acceptable range of values, the microprocessor 12 declares a fault and begins counting the consecutive number of resultant voltage faults. Only upon counting a predetermined number of consecutive faults, or fault threshold, will the microprocessor set an error flag. Thus, a potential false error signal is avoided being triggered by one or a few consecutive faults. If, during the counting of the response voltage errors, the response signal ⁇ ST returns to being within the acceptable range, the error count is reset to zero.
- the error flag remains set for a relatively long period without further detection of response voltage errors before being reset.
- the time required without detection of an error for resetting the error flag, or flag reset delay is 100N 1 , although other greater or shorter time periods also could be utilized. Additionally, the error flag reset delay will begin again whenever the response signal fault count exceeds the fault count threshold.
- the control circuit would then take corrective action which may include providing a warning message to the vehicle operator and disabling the control system.
- the method is implemented by an algorithm that is stored in a memory unit accessible by the microprocessor 12 .
- the algorithm is illustrated by the flow chart shown in FIG. 6 and is entered through block 50 .
- the first three functional blocks initialize the program.
- the error flag is reset while the an error flag count EC and a fault count FC are set to zero in functional blocks 54 and 56 , respectively.
- the algorithm continues to block 58 which is an error flag count/clear subroutine that is shown in FIG. 7 and will described below.
- the error flag count/clear subroutine is operative to track the time that the flag has been set without a reoccurrence of a response voltage error; and, upon reaching the predetermined time period without an additional error, to reset the error flag.
- the algorithm then proceeds to functional block 60 where the operation is delayed for a time period DELAY 1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N 3 .
- DELAY 1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N 3 .
- sensor output signals are being supplied to the controller 12 by the first digital filter 18 at a rate of N 2 .
- the algorithm advances to functional block 62 where a test voltage pulse ST is inserted into the acceleration sensor test signal input port.
- the response voltage, ⁇ ST is measured in functional block 66 and the result applied to the test signal input port 17 of the microprocessor portion 12 A.
- the first digital filter 18 continues to supply acceleration sensor signals to the input port 19 of the microprocessor portion 12 A at a rate of N 2 .
- the algorithm reaches decision block 72 where the response voltage ⁇ ST is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship: Is T MAx ⁇ ST ⁇ T MIN ?, where,
- T MAX is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range
- T MIN is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- decision block 72 if the response voltage ⁇ ST is within the allowable voltage range, the algorithm transfers to functional block 73 where the fault count FC is again zeroed. The algorithm then returns to functional block 58 and continues as described above. If, in decision block 72 , the response voltage ⁇ ST is outside of the allowable voltage range, a fault is declared and the algorithm transfers to decision block 74 where the algorithm counts the number of consecutive iterations FC that the response voltage ⁇ ST is outside of the allowable voltage range. It is to be noted that, if, subsequent to beginning to increase the fault count FC, the response voltage ⁇ ST returns to be within the allowable voltage range, decision block 72 will cause the fault count FC to be reset to zero, beginning the counting over. The algorithm then continues to decision block 76 .
- decision block 76 the total number of consecutive fault iterations FC that the response voltage ⁇ ST is out of the allowed voltage range is compared to the maximum allowable number of fault iterations, or threshold, FC MAX . If the maximum number of consecutive fault iterations FC MAX has not been reached, the algorithm transfers to functional block 58 where the error flag count/clear subroutine is entered and the algorithm continues as described above. If, in decision block 76 , the maximum number of consecutive iterations has been reached, the algorithm transfers to functional block 78 where the error flag is set. The algorithm then continues to functional block 80 where the reset error flag count, EC, is set to zero. Thus, the error flag reset counter is reset every time that the maximum number of consecutive fault iterations FC MAX is exceeded.
- FC MAX the maximum allowable number of fault iterations
- decision block 82 it is determined whether or not the algorithm should continue. A specific test regarding the vehicle is applied at this point, such as for example, checking to determine if the vehicle ignition is still on. If the continuation is needed, the algorithm transfers back to functional block 58 and the algorithm continues as described above. If the continuation is not needed, the algorithm transfers to exit block 84 and terminates.
- FIG. 7 a flow chart for the subroutine is shown in FIG. 7 .
- the subroutine is entered though block 90 and proceeds to decision block 92 , where it is determined whether or not the error flag has been previously set. If the error flag has not been set, as would. occur upon the first time through the algorithm shown in FIG. 6 , the subroutine immediately exits through block 94 to functional block 60 for the time delay as shown in FIG. 6 . If it is determined in decision block 92 that the error flag has been set, the subroutine transfers to functional block 96 where the error count EC is indexed by one. The subroutine then continues to decision block 96 .
- decision block 96 the subroutine determines whether or not the maximum error count EC MAX has been reached. If the maximum error count has not been reached, the subroutine exits through block 94 to functional block 60 as shown in FIG. 6 . However, if the maximum error count has been reached, the subroutine transfers to decision block 98 where the error flag is reset and then continues to decision block 100 where the error flag count EC is set to zero. The subroutine then exits through block 94 to functional block 60 as shown in FIG. 6 . Thus, the subroutine is operative to reset the error flag upon the time period without the response voltage ⁇ ST being outside of its allowable range reaching the predetermined value EC MAX . As described above, the time period for resetting the error flag is 100N 1 , seconds in the preferred embodiment.
- the present invention contemplates that the above described self-test also may be applied to an angular rate sensor with periodic test pulses being injected into the sensor and the sensor response measured and compared to an allowable range of values.
- the sampling rates of the components shown in FIG. 1 are selected such that the second digital filter 30 “steps over” the output of the second analog to digital converter 28 during the test. Either positive or negative test pluses may be applied to the angular rate sensor 24 .
- the present invention also contemplates an alternate embodiment of the self-test for angular rate sensors.
- alternating positive and negative test pulses are applied to the angular rate sensor.
- the resulting sensor output is compared to an allowable range of values with a first range corresponding to positive test pulses and a second range corresponding to negative test pulses.
- Each time that the response voltage is outside of its allowable range constitutes a sensor fault.
- the number of consecutive sensor faults that result from positive test pulses is counted.
- the number of consecutive sensor faults that result form negative test pulses is counted.
- Each of the fault counts is then compared to a corresponding fault count threshold.
- the sum of the fault counters is compared to a sum count threshold. Upon either one of the fault count thresholds or the sum count threshold being exceeded, an error flag is set.
- the invention also contemplates that the yaw sensor response signal thresholds are temperature compensated.
- the dashed smooth curve labeled 100 represents the analog output signal generated by the angular rate sensor 24 and amplified by a signal conditioning circuit within the angular rate sensor.
- the conditioned sensor signal 100 is passed through the second analog anti-aliasing filter 26 and the filtered signal is applied to the input of the second analog to digital converter 28 .
- the analog to digital converter 17 periodically samples the filtered analog signal at a rate N 1 to generate the solid stepped voltage curve labeled 101 in FIG. 9 .
- the conditioned sensor signal 100 is sampled every millisecond, which is then equal to N 1 ; however, faster or slower sampling rates also may be utilized.
- the second digital filter 30 operates on the digitized angular rate sensor signal 101 and generates a filter output signal at a rate of N 2 , which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N 1 .
- the rate N 2 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N 1 .
- the alternate embodiment of the invention contemplates periodically injecting a test signal consisting of alternating positive and negative voltage pulses into the angular rate sensor test port at a testing rate N 3 which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N 2 .
- a testing rate N 3 which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N 2 .
- the invention also may be practiced with the rate N 3 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N 2 .
- two input test ports are shown for the angular rate sensor 24 in FIG. 12 , it will be appreciated that both test signals may injected into a single test port.
- a test pulse is injected at N 3 time intervals with positive test pulses being injected at 2N 3 time intervals.
- negative test pulses are injected at 2N 3 time intervals.
- each of the test pulses has a relatively short duration, such as, for example, one millisecond; however, the invention also may be practiced using test pulses having other durations.
- the test signal is illustrated in FIG. 9 where the positive and negative voltage pulses are labeled 104 and 106 , respectively.
- the resulting analog to digital converter output signal 108 as modified by the test pulse, but before filtering by the second digital filter 30 , is shown in FIG. 10 .
- This signal having a sampling rate of N 1 , is applied directly to the angular rate sensor test signal input port 29 of the controller 12 .
- a typical voltage response 108 of the circuit to a positive test pulse 104 is illustrated in FIG. 11 , where ST 1 is the magnitude of the positive test pulse.
- a typical voltage response 110 of the circuit to a negative test pulse 106 also is illustrated in FIG. 11 , where ST 2 is the magnitude of the negative test pulse.
- the invention contemplates measuring the magnitude of the sensor output signal after a predetermined time period passes following the application of the test pulse 44 .
- the resulting response voltages are labeled ⁇ STI and ⁇ ST 2 and are less than ST 1 and ST 2 , respectively.
- FIG. 11 only the test voltage pulses ST 1 and ST 2 and their response voltages ⁇ ST 1 and ⁇ ST 2 are shown.
- ⁇ ST 1 and ⁇ ST 2 have been shown as excursions from the zero voltage axis; however, the invention contemplates that ⁇ ST 1 and ⁇ ST 2 would actually be measured relative to the digitized sensor signal 108 shown in FIG. 10 . Accordingly, the voltage response threshold values also would be adjusted relative to the sensor signal.
- the digitized signal 108 including the periodic test pulses 104 and 106 is fed to the second digital filter 30 .
- the second digital filter sampling rate N 2 is selected to be large enough relative to the analog to digital converter rate N 1 .
- the transient effects of the test pulses 104 and 106 are ended by time that the second digital filter 30 samples the signal 108 .
- the second digital filter 30 also effectively “steps over” the signals generated by the testing of the angular rate sensor and produces the output signal 109 shown in FIG. 11 A that is supplied to the angular rate sensor input port 31 of the microprocessor portion 12 A and then subsequently to the individual vehicle systems.
- the digital filter sampling rate N 2 is selected to be sufficiently large that the digital filter output signal 109 is very similar to, or exactly the same as, the signal 102 shown in FIG. 8 that does not include test pulses 104 and 106 .
- the selected sampling rates N 1 , N 2 and N 3 are sufficiently faster than the controlled vehicle system response times that the loss of the sampled angular rate sensor signals following insertion of the sensor test pulses does not adversely affect the system responses.
- the alternate embodiment of the invention effectively discards a predetermined number of analog to digital converter output data samples during the sensor test.
- four data points following the initial application of the test pulse are discarded; however, the application also may be practiced with the discarding of more or less than four data points.
- a positive test pulse ST 1 is injected at N 3 milliseconds in FIG. 11 and the data points that are taken at (N 3 +N 1 ), (N 3 +2N 1 ), (N 3 +3N 1 ) and (N 3 +4N 1 ) milliseconds are discarded.
- a negative test pulse ST 2 is injected at 2N 3 milliseconds in FIG.
- the alternate embodiment of the method for angular rate sensors is implemented by an algorithm that is stored in a memory unit accessible by the controller 12 .
- the algorithm is illustrated by the flow chart shown in FIGS. 12A and 12B , which is similar to the flow chart shown in FIG. 6 , and is entered through block 120 .
- the first three functional blocks shown in FIG. 12A initialize the program.
- the error flag is reset while the an error flag count EC and fault counts FC 1 and FC 2 are set to zero in functional blocks 124 and 126 , respectively.
- the algorithm continues to block 128 which represents the same error flag count/clear subroutine that is shown in FIG. 7 .
- the error flag count/clear subroutine is operative to track the time that the flag has been set without a reoccurrence of a response voltage error; and, upon reaching the predetermined time period without an additional error, to reset the error flag.
- the algorithm then proceeds to functional block 130 where the operation is delayed for a first time period DELAY 1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N 3 .
- DELAY 1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N 3 .
- sensor output signals are being supplied to the microprocessor portion 12 A by the second digital filter 30 at a rate of N 2 .
- the algorithm advances to functional block 132 where a positive test voltage pulse ST 1 is inserted into the angular rate sensor test signal input port.
- the response voltage, ⁇ ST 1 is measured in functional block 134 and the result is applied to the test signal input port 29 of the microprocessor portion 12 A.
- the second digital filter 30 continues to supply angular rate sensor signals to the input port 31 of the microprocessor portion 12 A at a rate of N 2 .
- the algorithm reaches decision block 138 where the response voltage ⁇ ST 1 to the positive test signal pulse ST 1 is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship: Is T MAX ⁇ ST 1 ⁇ T MIN ?, where,
- T MAX is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range
- T MIN is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- the algorithm transfers to functional block 140 where the first fault count FC 1 is indexed. The algorithm then continues to functional block 142 where the delay DELAY 1 preceding the injection of the next test pulse is implemented. However, if it is determined in decision block 138 that the response voltage ⁇ ST 1 is within the allowable voltage response range, the algorithm transfers to functional block 144 where the first fault count FC 1 is zeroed. The algorithm then continues to functional block 142 where the operation is delayed for a second time period DELAY 1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N 3 .
- the algorithm then continues to functional block 145 where the negative test pulse voltage ST 2 is injected into the angular rate sensor test signal input port. Then, again following a time delay, the response voltage, ⁇ ST 2 is measured in functional block 146 and the result applied to the test signal input port 29 of the microprocessor portion 12 A. As before, the second digital filter 30 continues to supply angular rate sensor signals to the input port 31 of the microprocessor portion 12 A at a rate of N 2 .
- the algorithm reaches decision block 150 where the response voltage ⁇ ST 2 to the negative test signal pulse ST 2 is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship: Is ⁇ T MAX ⁇ ST 1 ⁇ T MIN ?, where,
- ⁇ T MAX is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range
- ⁇ T MIN is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- the algorithm transfers to functional block 152 where the second fault count FC 2 is indexed.
- the algorithm then continues to functional block 154 , which is shown in FIG. 12B where a total fault count FCT is computed as the sum of the first and second fault counts, FC 1 and FC 2 , respectively.
- the algorithm transfers to functional block 156 where the second fault count FC 2 is zeroed. The algorithm then continues to functional block 154 .
- the algorithm advances to a series of three decision blocks labeled 156 , 158 and 160 where the fault counts and total fault counts are compared to predetermined fault count thresholds.
- decision block 156 the first fault count FC 1 is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FC 1 MAX . If FC 1 is less than or equal to FC 1 MAX , the algorithm transfers to decision block 158 where second fault count FC 2 is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FC 2 MAX . If FC 2 is less than or equal to FC 2 MAX , the algorithm transfers to decision block 160 where the total fault count FCT is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FCT MAX . If FCT is less than or equal to FCT MAX , the algorithm transfers to decision block 162 where the algorithm where it is determined whether or not the algorithm should continue.
- a fault is declared and the algorithm transfers to functional block 164 where the total fault count FCT is set to zero. The algorithm continues to functional block 166 where the error flag is set and then to functional block 168 where the error flag count EC is set to zero. After setting EC to zero, the algorithm advances to decision block 162 .
- a failure is declared when any of the fault counts, FC 1 , FC 2 , or FCT exceeds a maximum of eight counts; however, other values may be utilized for the maximum fault counts. Additionally, the fault count thresholds also may have different values from one another. Because the test signals alternate between positive and negative pulses, in the preferred embodiment, the algorithm will take twice as long to declare a fault for FC 1 or FCT 2 than to declare a fault for FCT.
- decision block 162 a specific test regarding the vehicle is used to determine whether the algorithm should continue, such as for example, checking to determine if the vehicle ignition is still on. If the continuation is needed, the algorithm transfers back to functional block 128 in FIG. 12A where the error flag count/clear subroutine is entered and the algorithm continues as described above. If the continuation is not needed, the algorithm transfers to exit block 170 and terminates.
- NVRAM Non-Volatile Random Access Memory
- the above threshold bound calculations would be carried out before comparing the test response voltage ⁇ ST x to the thresholds in decision blocks 138 and 150 in FIG. 12A .
- the calculation for the ⁇ ST 1 bounds may be completed during the measurement of the first response voltage in functional block 134 (not shown).
- the calculation for the ⁇ ST 2 bounds may be completed during the measurement of the second response voltage in functional block 146 (not shown).
- FIGS. 13 through 16 Four additional embodiments of the invention are illustrated in FIGS. 13 through 16 . These additional embodiments provide the capability to ignore response voltages caused by external actions, such as, for example, power supply spikes and external noise, without resetting the fault counters. Such extraneous signals are identified by monitoring the rise time and/or frequency of the signal.
- the alternate embodiment of the algorithm shown in FIG. 13 is a modification of the basic flow chart shown in FIG. 6 and blocks shown in FIG. 13 that are the same as blocks shown in FIG. 6 have the same numerical identifiers.
- the change shown in FIG. 13 involves measuring the rate of rise of the response voltage in functional block 66 and the inclusion of decision block 180 where the rate of rise of the response voltage is compared to a rate of rise threshold.
- the rate of rise decision block 180 is only reached upon the determination in decision block 72 that the response is not within the bounds. If, in decision block 180 , the response voltage rate of rise is less than or equal to a rate of rise threshold SR MAX , the fault counter FC is indexed in functional block 74 .
- the algorithm transfers directly to decision block 76 , skipping the indexing of the fault counter FC 74 .
- the use of the algorithm shown in FIG. 13 allows an extraneous signal having too fast of a rise time to be ignored without resetting the fault counter.
- the alternate embodiment of the algorithm shown in FIG. 14 involves measuring the frequency of the response voltage in functional block 66 and the inclusion of decision block 182 where the frequency of the response voltage is compared to a signal frequency threshold.
- the response voltage frequency decision block 182 is only reached upon the determination in decision block 72 that the response is not within the bounds. If, in decision block 182 , the response voltage frequency is less than or equal to a frequency threshold SF MAX , the fault counter FC is indexed in functional block 74 . If, in decision block 182 , the rate of rise is greater than the frequency threshold SF MAX , the algorithm transfers directly to decision block 76 , skipping the indexing of the fault counter FC 74 .
- the use of the algorithm shown in FIG. 14 allows an extraneous signal having too fast of a frequency to be ignored without resetting the fault counter.
- FIGS. 15 and 16 include consideration of both the rate of rise and the frequency of the response voltage with both of the parameters being measured in functional block 66 .
- both decision blocks 180 and 182 are shown in FIGS. 15 and 16 .
- the algorithm transfers directly to decision block 76 , skipping the indexing of the fault counter FC 74 .
- the algorithm transfers directly to decision block 76 , skipping the indexing of the fault counter FC 74 .
- accelerometers and yaw rate sensors While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described for accelerometers and yaw rate sensors, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced for other sensors such as, for example, pressure sensors, rotational sensors, optical based sensors, Hall effect based sensors and Linear Variable Displacement Transducers.
Abstract
A periodic test signal is injected into a motion sensor and the sensor output is compared to a threshold to determine whether the sensor is functioning properly.
Description
- Not Applicable
- This invention relates in general to motion sensors and in particular to a method for periodically testing the operation of such sensors.
- Vehicle electronically controlled brake systems are becoming increasing sophisticated to include the capability to correct vehicle directional movement upon detection of an undesired vehicle motion, such as, for example, loss of directional control on a low mu surface or potential vehicle roll over. Such detection typically involves motion sensors, to include accelerometers and/or angular rate sensors and also usually includes input from other vehicle operating parameter sensors, such as, for example, wheel speed sensors and a steering angle sensor. Vehicle brake control systems typically include an Electronic Control Unit (ECU) that receives the various sensor output signals. A microprocessor within the ECU that is controlled by a stored algorithm monitors the received sensor signals. The microprocessor is operative, upon detection of a potential vehicle directional stability problem, to selectively apply the vehicle brakes and/or vary engine torque to correct the problem.
- The motion sensors utilized by the brake control system are also becoming increasingly miniaturized and sophisticated to include signal conditioning circuits. Multiple motion sensors with associated signal conditioning circuits for the sensor outputs may be included on a single sensor chip. The signal conditioning circuits also may include a self testing capacity for monitoring the sensor output signal to detect a malfunctioning sensor. Typically, the self test is carried out during initial vehicle start-up and will generate an error code if the signal conditioning circuit determines that the senor output signal exceeds a predetermined threshold Additionally, upon detecting a malfunctioning sensor, the self test capability may disable the sensor output so an erroneous signal is not sent to the ECU.
- However, because vehicles are operated for increasingly lengthy periods of time, the operational time of motion sensors between self tests also has increased. As a result, if motion sensors begin to malfunction the problem may not be detected in a timely fashion. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a periodic self test method for the motion sensors that would occur while the vehicle is in operation.
- This invention relates to a method for periodically testing the operation of motion sensors.
- The present invention contemplates a method for verifying proper operation of a motion sensor that includes injecting a test signal into the motion sensor and then, after a predetermined delay, measuring the output of the sensor. The measured sensor output is then compared to an acceptable range of output values and, upon determining that the output is either above or below the acceptable range of output values, a fault is declared and an error signal generated. Additionally, the present invention contemplates that the test signal is a periodic signal and that the error signal is generated only after a predetermined number of consecutive faults have been detected. Furthermore, the invention also contemplates that the output of the sensor is blocked for a period of time following the injection of each test single. In the preferred embodiment, the test signal comprises a series of pulses of one millisecond duration. The pulses may all be positive, all negative, alternately positive and negative or selected or random combinations of positive and negative pulses.
- Various objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portion of a control circuit for an electronic vehicular brake control system that includes motion sensors and that is in accordance with the invention. -
FIG. 2 is a graph of typical voltage waveforms produced by the accelerometer shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a graph of a periodic test voltage that is injected into the accelerometer shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 4 is a graph of the accelerometer voltage waveform produced by the accelerometer shown inFIG. 1 after the test voltage shown inFIG. 3 has been injected. -
FIG. 5 is an enlarged graph that illustrates the response of the acceleration sensor to the test voltage shown inFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 5A is a graph of waveform shown inFIG. 4 after digital filtering. -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a method of testing the accelerometer shown in the circuit shown inFIG. 1 that is in accordance with the invention. -
FIG. 7 is a flow chart for a subroutine included in the method illustrated inFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 8 is a graph of typical voltage waveforms produced by the yaw sensor shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 9 is graph of a periodic test voltage that is injected into the yaw sensor shown inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 10 is a graph of the yaw sensor voltage waveform produced by the yaw sensor shown inFIG. 1 after the test voltage shown inFIG. 9 has been injected. -
FIG. 11 is an enlarged graph that illustrates the response of the yaw sensor to the test voltage shown inFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 11A is a graph of waveform shown inFIG. 10 after digital filtering. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart of a method of testing the yaw sensor shown in the circuit shown inFIG. 1 that is in accordance with the invention. -
FIG. 13 is a flow chart for an alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated inFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 14 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated inFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 15 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated inFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 16 is a flow chart for another alternate embodiment of the method of testing illustrated inFIG. 6 . - Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated in
FIG. 1 a portion of acontrol circuit 10 for an electronic vehicular brake control system (not shown) in accordance with the invention. Thecontrol circuit 10 includes amicroprocessor 12 having an acceleration sensor testsignal output port 13 that is connected to a test signal input port of anacceleration sensor 14. Theacceleration sensor 14 has output port connected through a first analog hardwareanti-aliasing filter 15 to the input of a first analog todigital converter 16. As shown inFIG. 1 , the first analog todigital converter 16 is included in themicroprocessor 12. The output of the first analog todigital converter 16 is connected to both an acceleration sensor testsignal input port 17 of a signal processing anddiagnostic portion 12A of themicroprocessor 12 and the input of a first digital filter 18. As shown inFIG. 1 , the first digital filter 18 is included in themicroprocessor 12. The first digital filter 18 has an output connected to anaccelerometer input port 19 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. Similarly, as also shown inFIG. 1 , themicroprocessor 12 also has a pair of angular rate sensor testsignal output ports 20 and 22 connected to anangular rate sensor 24. Theangular rate sensor 24 has an output port connected through a second analog hardware anti-aliasing filter 26 to the input of a second analog todigital converter 28. As shown inFIG. 1 , the second analog todigital converter 28 is included in themicroprocessor 12. The output of the second analog todigital converter 28 is connected to both an angular rate sensor teatsignal input port 29 of themicroprocessor portion 12A and the input of a seconddigital filter 30. As shown inFIG. 1 , the seconddigital filter 30 is included in themicroprocessor 12. The seconddigital filter 30 has an output connected to an angular ratesensor input port 31 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. - The analog
anti-aliasing filters 15 and 26 are operative to remove frequency components from the sensor signals that are beyond the range of the corresponding analog todigital converters signal output port 13 of themicroprocessor 12 is operative, as will be described below, to apply a periodic test signal to theacceleration sensor 14. Similarly, the pair of angular rate sensor testsignal output ports 20 and 22 of themicroprocessor 12 are operative, as also will be described below, to apply periodic test signals to theangular rate sensor 24. Themicroprocessor 12 also has anoutput port 32 connected to a brake system Electronic Control Unit (ECU) 34. Themicroprocessor 12 is operative to supply acceleration and angular rate signals to the ECU 34. Themicroprocessor 12 also has additional output ports that are connected to additional vehicle dynamic controllers, such as, for example a Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system. The group of additionally vehicle dynamic controllers is labeled with thenumerical identifier 36. While individual connecting wires are shown between thecontroller 12 and the control systems inFIG. 1 , the invention also may be practiced with a CAN bus connecting output of thecontroller 12 to the systems (not shown). - While one
acceleration sensor 14 and oneyaw rate sensor 24 are shown inFIG. 1 , it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with more sensors than are shown in the figure. Additionally, the invention also may be practiced with only one of the sensors shown. Furthermore, while the sensor test signals are shown as being generated within themicroprocessor 12 and being applied directly to the sensor test signal ports, it will be appreciated that the a test signal generator (not shown) may be provided external to themicroprocessor 12 with the controller programmed to provide the test signal generator with trigger signals. The test signal generator would then generate the test signals that would be applied to the accelerometer and angular rate sensor test signal ports. - The operation of the invention relative to the
acceleration sensor 14 will now be described in light of the graphs of voltage vs. time shown inFIGS. 2 through 5 . InFIG. 2 , the dashed smooth curve labeled 40 represents the analog output signal generated within the acceleration sensor 148 and amplified by a signal conditioning circuit within the accelerometer sensor. The conditionedsensor signal 40 is passed through the firstanalog anti-aliasing filter 15 and the filtered signal is applied to the input of the first analog todigital converter 16. The analog todigital converter 16 periodically samples the filtered analog signal at a rate N1 to generate the solid stepped voltage curve labeled 42 inFIG. 2 . In the preferred embodiment, the conditionedsensor signal 40 is sampled every millisecond, which is then equal to N1; however, faster or slower sampling rates also may be utilized. The first digital filter 18 operates on the digitizedsensor signal 42 and generates afilter output signal 43 at a rate of N2, which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N1. However, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with the rate N2 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N1. - The present invention contemplates periodically injecting a test signal consisting of a voltage pulse into the acceleration sensor test port at a testing rate N3, which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of the digital filter rate N2. However, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with the rate N3 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N2. In the preferred embodiment, each test pulse has a relatively short duration, such as, for example one millisecond; however, the invention also may be practiced using a test pulse having other durations. The test signal is illustrated in
FIG. 3 where the voltage pulses are labeled 44. The resulting analog to digitalconverter output signal 46, as modified by the test pulse, but before filtering by the first digital filter 18, is shown inFIG. 4 . This signal, having a sampling rate of N1, is applied directly to the acceleration testsignal input port 17 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. - A
typical voltage response 48 of the circuit to thetest pulse 44 is illustrated inFIG. 5 , where ST is the magnitude of thetest pulse 44. The invention contemplates measuring the magnitude of the sensor output signal after a predetermined time period passes following the application of thetest pulse 44. In the preferred embodiment, a one millisecond delay is utilized; however, the invention also may be practiced with other time delays. The resulting response voltage is labeled ΔST and is less than ST. For clarity, only thetest pulse 44 and the response voltage ΔST are shown inFIG. 5 . While the preferred embodiment measures the response voltage one millisecond after the test pulse is applied, it will be appreciated that the measurement may be taken after any selected time period has passed. As will be explained in more detail below, the response voltage ΔST is compared by themicroprocessor 12 to minimum and maximum thresholds values that are stored in a Non-Volatile Random Access Memory (NVRAM) and the sensor is deemed to operating satisfactorily only if the response voltage ΔST falls within the range defined by the thresholds. For clarity inFIG. 5 , ΔST has been shown as an excursion from the zero voltage axis; however, the invention contemplates that ΔST would actually be measured relative to the digitizedsensor signal 46 shown inFIG. 4 . Accordingly, the voltage response threshold values also would be adjusted relative to the sensor signal. - As described above, the
digitized signal 46, including theperiodic test pulses 44 is fed to the first digital filter 18. By selecting the digital filter sampling rate N2 to be large enough relative to the analog to digital converter rate N1, the transient effect of thetest pulse 44 is ended by time that the digital filter 18 samples thesignal 46. Thus, the digital filter 18 effectively “steps over” the signals generated by the testing of the acceleration sensor and produces theoutput signal 47 shown inFIG. 5A that is supplied to the accelerationsensor input port 19 of thecontroller 12 and then subsequently to the individual vehicle systems. In the preferred embodiment, the digital filter sampling rate N2 is selected to be sufficiently large that the digitalfilter output signal 47 is very similar to, or exactly the same as, thesignal 43 shown inFIG. 2 that does not includetest pulses 44. Additionally, the sampling rates N1, N2 and N3 are selected with consideration of the response times of the controlled vehicle systems. Thus, the selected sampling rates are sufficiently faster than the system response times such that the loss of the sampled acceleration sensor signals following insertion of the sensor test pulses does not adversely affect the system responses. - While the preferred embodiment has been illustrated in
FIG. 3 with a test signal consisting a plurality of positive test pulses, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with a test signal consisting of a plurality of negative test pulses (not shown). As illustrated inFIGS. 4 and 5 A, the invention effectively discards a number of analog to digital converter output data samples during the sensor test. In the preferred embodiment, four data points following the initial application of the test pulse are discarded; however, the application also may be practiced with the discarding of more or less than four data points. Thus, in the preferred embodiment, the test voltage pulse ST is applied at every N3 milliseconds inFIG. 4 and the data points that are taken at (N3+N1), (N3+2N1), (N3+3N1,) and (N3+4N1) milliseconds are discarded. In place of the discarded data points, the last filter output signal, which would be at (N3−N1) milliseconds inFIG. 5 , is used as input to themicroprocessor portion 12A. - As will also be described in greater detail below, after detecting a response signal ΔST that is outside the acceptable range of values, the
microprocessor 12 declares a fault and begins counting the consecutive number of resultant voltage faults. Only upon counting a predetermined number of consecutive faults, or fault threshold, will the microprocessor set an error flag. Thus, a potential false error signal is avoided being triggered by one or a few consecutive faults. If, during the counting of the response voltage errors, the response signal ΔST returns to being within the acceptable range, the error count is reset to zero. - Once set, the error flag remains set for a relatively long period without further detection of response voltage errors before being reset. In the preferred embodiment, the time required without detection of an error for resetting the error flag, or flag reset delay, is 100N1, although other greater or shorter time periods also could be utilized. Additionally, the error flag reset delay will begin again whenever the response signal fault count exceeds the fault count threshold. Upon setting the error flag, the control circuit would then take corrective action which may include providing a warning message to the vehicle operator and disabling the control system.
- The method is implemented by an algorithm that is stored in a memory unit accessible by the
microprocessor 12. The algorithm is illustrated by the flow chart shown inFIG. 6 and is entered throughblock 50. The first three functional blocks initialize the program. Thus, infunctional block 52, the error flag is reset while the an error flag count EC and a fault count FC are set to zero infunctional blocks FIG. 7 and will described below. After the error flag has been set, the error flag count/clear subroutine is operative to track the time that the flag has been set without a reoccurrence of a response voltage error; and, upon reaching the predetermined time period without an additional error, to reset the error flag. - The algorithm then proceeds to
functional block 60 where the operation is delayed for a time period DELAY1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N3. As described above, during this period, sensor output signals are being supplied to thecontroller 12 by the first digital filter 18 at a rate of N2. Upon reaching the end of the first time delay, the algorithm advances tofunctional block 62 where a test voltage pulse ST is inserted into the acceleration sensor test signal input port. Then, after a time delay that, in the preferred embodiment, corresponds to the digital converter sampling rate of N1, the response voltage, ΔST is measured infunctional block 66 and the result applied to the testsignal input port 17 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. As described above, the first digital filter 18 continues to supply acceleration sensor signals to theinput port 19 of themicroprocessor portion 12A at a rate of N2. - Following sampling of the acceleration sensor response to the test signal in
functional block 66, the algorithm reachesdecision block 72 where the response voltage ΔST is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship:
Is T MAx ≧ΔST≧T MIN?, where, - TMAX is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range and
- TMIN is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- In
decision block 72, if the response voltage ΔST is within the allowable voltage range, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 73 where the fault count FC is again zeroed. The algorithm then returns tofunctional block 58 and continues as described above. If, indecision block 72, the response voltage ΔST is outside of the allowable voltage range, a fault is declared and the algorithm transfers todecision block 74 where the algorithm counts the number of consecutive iterations FC that the response voltage ΔST is outside of the allowable voltage range. It is to be noted that, if, subsequent to beginning to increase the fault count FC, the response voltage ΔST returns to be within the allowable voltage range,decision block 72 will cause the fault count FC to be reset to zero, beginning the counting over. The algorithm then continues todecision block 76. - In
decision block 76, the total number of consecutive fault iterations FC that the response voltage ΔST is out of the allowed voltage range is compared to the maximum allowable number of fault iterations, or threshold, FCMAX. If the maximum number of consecutive fault iterations FCMAX has not been reached, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 58 where the error flag count/clear subroutine is entered and the algorithm continues as described above. If, indecision block 76, the maximum number of consecutive iterations has been reached, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 78 where the error flag is set. The algorithm then continues tofunctional block 80 where the reset error flag count, EC, is set to zero. Thus, the error flag reset counter is reset every time that the maximum number of consecutive fault iterations FCMAX is exceeded. The algorithm then continues todecision block 82 where it is determined whether or not the algorithm should continue. A specific test regarding the vehicle is applied at this point, such as for example, checking to determine if the vehicle ignition is still on. If the continuation is needed, the algorithm transfers back tofunctional block 58 and the algorithm continues as described above. If the continuation is not needed, the algorithm transfers to exitblock 84 and terminates. - Returning now to the error flag count/clear subroutine shown in the
block 58, a flow chart for the subroutine is shown inFIG. 7 . The subroutine is entered thoughblock 90 and proceeds to decision block 92, where it is determined whether or not the error flag has been previously set. If the error flag has not been set, as would. occur upon the first time through the algorithm shown inFIG. 6 , the subroutine immediately exits throughblock 94 tofunctional block 60 for the time delay as shown inFIG. 6 . If it is determined in decision block 92 that the error flag has been set, the subroutine transfers tofunctional block 96 where the error count EC is indexed by one. The subroutine then continues todecision block 96. - In
decision block 96, the subroutine determines whether or not the maximum error count ECMAX has been reached. If the maximum error count has not been reached, the subroutine exits throughblock 94 tofunctional block 60 as shown inFIG. 6 . However, if the maximum error count has been reached, the subroutine transfers todecision block 98 where the error flag is reset and then continues to decision block 100 where the error flag count EC is set to zero. The subroutine then exits throughblock 94 tofunctional block 60 as shown inFIG. 6 . Thus, the subroutine is operative to reset the error flag upon the time period without the response voltage ΔST being outside of its allowable range reaching the predetermined value ECMAX. As described above, the time period for resetting the error flag is 100N1, seconds in the preferred embodiment. - Regarding angular rate, sensors, the present invention contemplates that the above described self-test also may be applied to an angular rate sensor with periodic test pulses being injected into the sensor and the sensor response measured and compared to an allowable range of values. As with the acceleration sensor test described above, the sampling rates of the components shown in
FIG. 1 are selected such that the seconddigital filter 30 “steps over” the output of the second analog todigital converter 28 during the test. Either positive or negative test pluses may be applied to theangular rate sensor 24. - The present invention also contemplates an alternate embodiment of the self-test for angular rate sensors. In the alternate embodiment, alternating positive and negative test pulses are applied to the angular rate sensor. The resulting sensor output is compared to an allowable range of values with a first range corresponding to positive test pulses and a second range corresponding to negative test pulses. Each time that the response voltage is outside of its allowable range constitutes a sensor fault. The number of consecutive sensor faults that result from positive test pulses is counted. Similarly, the number of consecutive sensor faults that result form negative test pulses is counted. Each of the fault counts is then compared to a corresponding fault count threshold. Additionally, the sum of the fault counters is compared to a sum count threshold. Upon either one of the fault count thresholds or the sum count threshold being exceeded, an error flag is set. Furthermore, as will be described below, the invention also contemplates that the yaw sensor response signal thresholds are temperature compensated.
- The operation of the alternate embodiment of the invention relative to the an
angular rate sensor 24 shown inFIG. 1 will now be described in light of the graphs of voltage vs. time shown inFIGS. 8 through 11 . InFIG. 8 , the dashed smooth curve labeled 100 represents the analog output signal generated by theangular rate sensor 24 and amplified by a signal conditioning circuit within the angular rate sensor. The conditionedsensor signal 100 is passed through the second analog anti-aliasing filter 26 and the filtered signal is applied to the input of the second analog todigital converter 28. The analog todigital converter 17 periodically samples the filtered analog signal at a rate N1 to generate the solid stepped voltage curve labeled 101 inFIG. 9 . In the preferred embodiment, the conditionedsensor signal 100 is sampled every millisecond, which is then equal to N1; however, faster or slower sampling rates also may be utilized. The seconddigital filter 30 operates on the digitized angularrate sensor signal 101 and generates a filter output signal at a rate of N2, which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N1. However, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with the rate N2 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N1. The digital filter output signal shown by the solid stepped voltage curve labeled 102 inFIG. 8 . - The alternate embodiment of the invention contemplates periodically injecting a test signal consisting of alternating positive and negative voltage pulses into the angular rate sensor test port at a testing rate N3 which, in the preferred embodiment, is selected as an integer multiple of N2. However, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with the rate N3 being a non-integer multiple of the rate N2. While two input test ports are shown for the
angular rate sensor 24 inFIG. 12 , it will be appreciated that both test signals may injected into a single test port. Thus, for the preferred embodiment, a test pulse is injected at N3 time intervals with positive test pulses being injected at 2N3 time intervals. Similarly, negative test pulses are injected at 2N3 time intervals. Also, in the preferred embodiment, each of the test pulses has a relatively short duration, such as, for example, one millisecond; however, the invention also may be practiced using test pulses having other durations. The test signal is illustrated inFIG. 9 where the positive and negative voltage pulses are labeled 104 and 106, respectively. The resulting analog to digitalconverter output signal 108, as modified by the test pulse, but before filtering by the seconddigital filter 30, is shown inFIG. 10 . This signal, having a sampling rate of N1, is applied directly to the angular rate sensor testsignal input port 29 of thecontroller 12. - A
typical voltage response 108 of the circuit to apositive test pulse 104 is illustrated inFIG. 11 , where ST1 is the magnitude of the positive test pulse. Similarly, a typical voltage response 110 of the circuit to anegative test pulse 106 also is illustrated inFIG. 11 , where ST2 is the magnitude of the negative test pulse. As described above for the acceleration sensor self-test, the invention contemplates measuring the magnitude of the sensor output signal after a predetermined time period passes following the application of thetest pulse 44. The resulting response voltages are labeled ΔSTI and ΔST2 and are less than ST1 and ST2, respectively. For clarity inFIG. 11 , only the test voltage pulses ST1 and ST2 and their response voltages ΔST1 and ΔST2 are shown. While the preferred embodiment measures each response voltage one millisecond after the associated test pulse has been applied, it will be appreciated that the measurement may be taken after any selected time period has passed. For clarity inFIG. 11 , ΔST1 and ΔST2 have been shown as excursions from the zero voltage axis; however, the invention contemplates that ΔST1 and ΔST2 would actually be measured relative to the digitizedsensor signal 108 shown inFIG. 10 . Accordingly, the voltage response threshold values also would be adjusted relative to the sensor signal. - As described above, the
digitized signal 108, including theperiodic test pulses digital filter 30. By selecting the second digital filter sampling rate N2 to be large enough relative to the analog to digital converter rate N1. the transient effects of thetest pulses digital filter 30 samples thesignal 108. Thus, the seconddigital filter 30 also effectively “steps over” the signals generated by the testing of the angular rate sensor and produces theoutput signal 109 shown inFIG. 11 A that is supplied to the angular ratesensor input port 31 of themicroprocessor portion 12A and then subsequently to the individual vehicle systems. In the preferred embodiment, the digital filter sampling rate N2 is selected to be sufficiently large that the digitalfilter output signal 109 is very similar to, or exactly the same as, thesignal 102 shown inFIG. 8 that does not includetest pulses - As illustrated in
FIGS. 10 and 11 A, the alternate embodiment of the invention effectively discards a predetermined number of analog to digital converter output data samples during the sensor test. In the preferred embodiment, four data points following the initial application of the test pulse are discarded; however, the application also may be practiced with the discarding of more or less than four data points. Thus, in the preferred embodiment, a positive test pulse ST1 is injected at N3 milliseconds inFIG. 11 and the data points that are taken at (N3+N1), (N3+2N1), (N3+3N1) and (N3+4N1) milliseconds are discarded. Similarly, a negative test pulse ST2 is injected at 2N3 milliseconds inFIG. 11 and the data points that are taken at (2N3+N1), (2N3+2N1), (2N3+3N1) and (2N3+4N1) milliseconds are discarded. In place of the discarded data points, the last filter output signals, which would be at (N3−N1) and at (2N3−N1) milliseconds inFIG. 11 , are used as input to themicroprocessor 12. - The alternate embodiment of the method for angular rate sensors is implemented by an algorithm that is stored in a memory unit accessible by the
controller 12. The algorithm is illustrated by the flow chart shown inFIGS. 12A and 12B , which is similar to the flow chart shown inFIG. 6 , and is entered throughblock 120. As in the algorithm described above, the first three functional blocks shown inFIG. 12A initialize the program. Thus, infunctional block 122, the error flag is reset while the an error flag count EC and fault counts FC1 and FC2 are set to zero infunctional blocks 124 and 126, respectively. The algorithm continues to block 128 which represents the same error flag count/clear subroutine that is shown inFIG. 7 . As described above, after the error flag has been set, the error flag count/clear subroutine is operative to track the time that the flag has been set without a reoccurrence of a response voltage error; and, upon reaching the predetermined time period without an additional error, to reset the error flag. - The algorithm then proceeds to
functional block 130 where the operation is delayed for a first time period DELAY1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N3. As described above, during this period, sensor output signals are being supplied to themicroprocessor portion 12A by the seconddigital filter 30 at a rate of N2. Upon reaching the end of the first time delay, the algorithm advances tofunctional block 132 where a positive test voltage pulse ST1 is inserted into the angular rate sensor test signal input port. Then, after a time delay that. in the preferred embodiment, corresponds to the digital converter sampling rate of N1, the response voltage, ΔST1 is measured in functional block 134 and the result is applied to the testsignal input port 29 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. As described above, the seconddigital filter 30 continues to supply angular rate sensor signals to theinput port 31 of themicroprocessor portion 12A at a rate of N2. - Following measurement of the sensor response voltage, the algorithm reaches
decision block 138 where the response voltage ΔST1 to the positive test signal pulse ST1 is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship:
Is T MAX ≧ΔST 1≧T MIN?, where, - TMAX is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range and
- TMIN is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- If, in
decision block 138 it is determined that the response voltage ΔST1 is outside of the allowable voltage response range, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 140 where the first fault count FC1 is indexed. The algorithm then continues tofunctional block 142 where the delay DELAY1 preceding the injection of the next test pulse is implemented. However, if it is determined indecision block 138 that the response voltage ΔST1 is within the allowable voltage response range, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 144 where the first fault count FC1 is zeroed. The algorithm then continues tofunctional block 142 where the operation is delayed for a second time period DELAY1 corresponding to the test voltage rate N3. - After completion of the delay in
functional block 142, the algorithm then continues tofunctional block 145 where the negative test pulse voltage ST2 is injected into the angular rate sensor test signal input port. Then, again following a time delay, the response voltage, ΔST2 is measured infunctional block 146 and the result applied to the testsignal input port 29 of themicroprocessor portion 12A. As before, the seconddigital filter 30 continues to supply angular rate sensor signals to theinput port 31 of themicroprocessor portion 12A at a rate of N2. - Following measurement of the sensor response voltage, the algorithm reaches
decision block 150 where the response voltage ΔST2 to the negative test signal pulse ST2 is compared to allowed maximum and minimum values in accordance with the following relationship:
Is −T MAX ≧ΔST 1≧−T MIN?, where, - −TMAX is the lower limit for the allowable output voltage range and
- −TMIN is the upper limit for the allowable output voltage range.
- If, in
decision block 150, it is determined that the response voltage ΔST2 is outside of the allowable voltage response range, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 152 where the second fault count FC2 is indexed. The algorithm then continues to functional block 154, which is shown inFIG. 12B where a total fault count FCT is computed as the sum of the first and second fault counts, FC1 and FC2, respectively. However, if it is detennined indecision block 150, that the response voltage ΔST2 is within the allowable voltage response range, the algorithm transfers tofunctional block 156 where the second fault count FC2 is zeroed. The algorithm then continues to functional block 154. - After the total fault count FCT is determined in functional block 154, the algorithm advances to a series of three decision blocks labeled 156, 158 and 160 where the fault counts and total fault counts are compared to predetermined fault count thresholds. Thus, in
decision block 156, the first fault count FC1 is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FC1 MAX. If FC1 is less than or equal to FC1 MAX, the algorithm transfers to decision block 158 where second fault count FC2 is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FC2 MAX. If FC2 is less than or equal to FC2 MAX, the algorithm transfers to decision block 160 where the total fault count FCT is compared to a maximum allowable fault count threshold FCTMAX. If FCT is less than or equal to FCTMAX, the algorithm transfers to decision block 162 where the algorithm where it is determined whether or not the algorithm should continue. - However, if in any of the decision blocks 156, 158 or 160, the count exceeds the corresponding allowable maximum count threshold, a fault is declared and the algorithm transfers to functional block 164 where the total fault count FCT is set to zero. The algorithm continues to
functional block 166 where the error flag is set and then to functional block 168 where the error flag count EC is set to zero. After setting EC to zero, the algorithm advances todecision block 162. In the preferred embodiment, a failure is declared when any of the fault counts, FC1, FC2, or FCT exceeds a maximum of eight counts; however, other values may be utilized for the maximum fault counts. Additionally, the fault count thresholds also may have different values from one another. Because the test signals alternate between positive and negative pulses, in the preferred embodiment, the algorithm will take twice as long to declare a fault for FC1 or FCT2 than to declare a fault for FCT. - Similar to the
decision block 82 inFIG. 6 , indecision block 162, a specific test regarding the vehicle is used to determine whether the algorithm should continue, such as for example, checking to determine if the vehicle ignition is still on. If the continuation is needed, the algorithm transfers back tofunctional block 128 inFIG. 12A where the error flag count/clear subroutine is entered and the algorithm continues as described above. If the continuation is not needed, the algorithm transfers to exitblock 170 and terminates. - The present invention also contemplates that the angular rate sensor test fault thresholds are temperature and noise compensated. Thus, a nominal value for each of the self test response voltages ΔSTx as a function of temperature T is given by the following formula:
ΔST x nominal deg/s(T)=ΔST x nominal volt(T)/K(T); where, ΔSTx nominal volt(T)=ΔST x+a— ΔST x* [0.0084*(25−T)]+b_ΔSTx* [0.0084*(25−T)]2 and
K(T)=Sens+a_Sens *[0.0084*(25−T)]+b_Sens *[0.0084*(25−T) ]2, with x=1 or 2 and ΔST1, a— ΔST1, b— ΔST1, ΔST2, a— ΔST2, b— ΔST2, - Sens, a_Sens and b_Sens being values that are stored in a Non-Volatile Random Access Memory (NVRAM).
- The self test error fault thresholds then be based upon gain and offset sensitivity for ΔSTx nominal deg/s (T) in accordance with the following formulas:
Upper bound=HW_FILTER_COEFFICIENT_HIGH *ΔST x nominal deg/s (T) +threshold value calculated above, and Lower bound=HW_FILTER_COEFFICIENT_LOW *ΔST x nominal deg/s (T) −threshold value calculated above. - The above threshold bound calculations would be carried out before comparing the test response voltage ΔSTx to the thresholds in decision blocks 138 and 150 in
FIG. 12A . Thus, the calculation for the ΔST1 bounds may be completed during the measurement of the first response voltage in functional block 134 (not shown). Similarly, the calculation for the ΔST2 bounds may be completed during the measurement of the second response voltage in functional block 146 (not shown). - Four additional embodiments of the invention are illustrated in
FIGS. 13 through 16 . These additional embodiments provide the capability to ignore response voltages caused by external actions, such as, for example, power supply spikes and external noise, without resetting the fault counters. Such extraneous signals are identified by monitoring the rise time and/or frequency of the signal. - The alternate embodiment of the algorithm shown in
FIG. 13 is a modification of the basic flow chart shown inFIG. 6 and blocks shown inFIG. 13 that are the same as blocks shown inFIG. 6 have the same numerical identifiers. The change shown inFIG. 13 involves measuring the rate of rise of the response voltage infunctional block 66 and the inclusion ofdecision block 180 where the rate of rise of the response voltage is compared to a rate of rise threshold. The rate ofrise decision block 180 is only reached upon the determination indecision block 72 that the response is not within the bounds. If, indecision block 180, the response voltage rate of rise is less than or equal to a rate of rise threshold SRMAX, the fault counter FC is indexed infunctional block 74. If, indecision block 180, the rate of rise is greater than the rate of rise threshold SRMAX, the algorithm transfers directly todecision block 76, skipping the indexing of thefault counter FC 74. The use of the algorithm shown inFIG. 13 allows an extraneous signal having too fast of a rise time to be ignored without resetting the fault counter. - The alternate embodiment of the algorithm shown in
FIG. 14 involves measuring the frequency of the response voltage infunctional block 66 and the inclusion ofdecision block 182 where the frequency of the response voltage is compared to a signal frequency threshold. The response voltagefrequency decision block 182 is only reached upon the determination indecision block 72 that the response is not within the bounds. If, indecision block 182, the response voltage frequency is less than or equal to a frequency threshold SFMAX, the fault counter FC is indexed infunctional block 74. If, indecision block 182, the rate of rise is greater than the frequency threshold SFMAX, the algorithm transfers directly todecision block 76, skipping the indexing of thefault counter FC 74. The use of the algorithm shown inFIG. 14 allows an extraneous signal having too fast of a frequency to be ignored without resetting the fault counter. - The alternate embodiments illustrated in
FIGS. 15 and 16 include consideration of both the rate of rise and the frequency of the response voltage with both of the parameters being measured infunctional block 66. Thus, both decision blocks 180 and 182 are shown inFIGS. 15 and 16 . InFIG. 15 , if either the rate of rise threshold SFMAX+or the frequency threshold SFMAX is exceeded, the algorithm transfers directly todecision block 76, skipping the indexing of thefault counter FC 74. InFIG. 16 , only if both the rate of rise threshold SFMAX+and the frequency threshold SFMAX are exceeded, the algorithm transfers directly todecision block 76, skipping the indexing of thefault counter FC 74. - While the alternate embodiments discussed above and illustrated in
FIGS. 13 through 15 have described with regard to modification of the algorithm shown inFIG. 6 , it will be appreciated that the invention also contemplates modifying the algorithm shown inFIG. 12 in a similar manner (not shown). - While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been described and illustrated above, it will be appreciated that the flow charts shown are intended to be exemplary of the methods, and that specific details and the sequence of the steps shown may vary. Also, while the preferred embodiment for testing the angular rate sensor was illustrated and described as utilizing alternating positive and negative test pulses, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced with selected combinations of positive and negative pulses, such as, for example, two positive pulses followed by one negative pulse. Furthermore, the invention contemplates utilizing random sequences of positive and negative pluses for test signals. The invention also contemplates applying sequenced or randomly selected positive and negative test signals to the test port of accelerometers. Additionally, while the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described for accelerometers and yaw rate sensors, it will be appreciated that the invention also may be practiced for other sensors such as, for example, pressure sensors, rotational sensors, optical based sensors, Hall effect based sensors and Linear Variable Displacement Transducers.
- In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.
Claims (19)
1. A method for verifying proper operation of a motion sensor comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a motion sensor;
(b) injecting a test pulse into the motion sensor;
(c) measuring the output of the motion sensor after a predetermined delay period;
(d) comparing the motion sensor output to an acceptable output range; and
(e) declaring a fault upon determining that the sensor output measured in step (a) is outside of the acceptable output range.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the test signal is periodically applied to the motion sensor.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein an error signal is generated subsequent to step (e) after a predetermined number of faults caused by consecutive test signals have been detected.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the motion sensor provided in step (a) is an accelerometer.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein the periodic test signal is alternately positive and negative.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein an error signal is generated subsequent to step (e) after a predetermined number of faults caused by consecutive positive test signals have been detected.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the motion sensor provided in step (a) is an angular rate sensor.
8. The method of claim 4 wherein an error signal is generated subsequent to step (e) after a predetermined number of faults caused by consecutive negative test signals have been detected.
10. The method of claim 4 wherein an error signal is generated subsequent to step (e) after a predetermined number of total faults caused by consecutive positive and negative test signals have been detected.
11. The method of claim 2 wherein the upper and lower limits of the acceptable output range utilized in step (d) are based upon at least one variable parameter.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the upper and lower limits of acceptable output range utilized in step (d) are based upon at least the ambient temperature.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the upper and lower limits of acceptable output range utilized in step (d) are based upon at least the variation of parts parameters.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein the upper and lower limits of acceptable output range utilized in step (d) are based upon at least vehicle dynamics.
15. The method of claim 3 wherein the output of the motion sensor is sampled at a rate of N1 and, during step (b), the test signal is injected into the motion sensor at a rate of N3, with N3 being greater than N1.
16. The method of clam 15 wherein the injected test signal from step (b) is passed through a digital filter prior and further wherein the digital filter generates an output signal at a rate of N2 with N1<N2<N3.
17. The method of claim 16 further including, subsequent to finding that the motion sensor output is within an acceptable output range in step (d), supplying the output of the digital filter to at least one vehicle control system.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the at least one vehicle control system includes an electronically controlled vehicle brake system.
19. The method of claim 3 wherein the periodic test signal includes sequenced positive and negative signals.
20. The method of claim 3 wherein the periodic test signal includes random positive and negative signals.
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/345,350 US20070150136A1 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-02-01 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
JP2008543451A JP4987010B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic change rate sensor self test |
PCT/US2006/045821 WO2007064782A1 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
DE112006003237T DE112006003237T5 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Sensor self-test at periodic rate |
US12/085,605 US8050816B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
KR1020087015781A KR20080071621A (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US74109805P | 2005-11-30 | 2005-11-30 | |
US11/345,350 US20070150136A1 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-02-01 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/085,605 Continuation US8050816B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070150136A1 true US20070150136A1 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
Family
ID=38092577
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/345,350 Abandoned US20070150136A1 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-02-01 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
US12/085,605 Active 2027-12-01 US8050816B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/085,605 Active 2027-12-01 US8050816B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2006-11-30 | Periodic rate sensor self test |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20070150136A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4987010B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20080071621A (en) |
DE (1) | DE112006003237T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007064782A1 (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070229014A1 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2007-10-04 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method for operating a control system of an industrial process |
WO2010042661A3 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2010-06-17 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for waking up a device due to motion |
US20110234813A1 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2011-09-29 | Dieter Baecher | Sensor module and method for monitoring the function thereof |
US8285344B2 (en) | 2008-05-21 | 2012-10-09 | DP Technlogies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adjusting audio for a user environment |
US20120259502A1 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Gaurav Nigam | System and method for use in evaluating an operation of a combustion machine |
US8555282B1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2013-10-08 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing |
US8620353B1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-12-31 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Automatic sharing and publication of multimedia from a mobile device |
US8678925B1 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2014-03-25 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus to provide a dice application |
US8712723B1 (en) | 2006-12-22 | 2014-04-29 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device |
US8876738B1 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2014-11-04 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device |
US8902154B1 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2014-12-02 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for utilizing motion user interface |
US8949070B1 (en) | 2007-02-08 | 2015-02-03 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device with activity identification |
US20150070042A1 (en) * | 2013-09-09 | 2015-03-12 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Systems and methods for internal and external error detection in sensor output interfaces |
US8996332B2 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2015-03-31 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Program setting adjustments based on activity identification |
US20160001676A1 (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2016-01-07 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Electrically powered vehicle and method of controlling electrically powered vehicle |
US9390229B1 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2016-07-12 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a health phone |
US9529437B2 (en) | 2009-05-26 | 2016-12-27 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a motion state aware device |
CN107202907A (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-26 | Trw汽车股份有限公司 | The method for detecting the sensor fault of safety device of vehicle |
CN107957545A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-04-24 | 苏州睿艾迪汽车科技有限公司 | FCT probe test instruments |
CN107976622A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-05-01 | 苏州睿艾迪汽车科技有限公司 | FCT testers |
CN110632525A (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2019-12-31 | 李尔公司 | Quasi-real time sensor measurement verification |
US20200264596A1 (en) * | 2017-04-19 | 2020-08-20 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Testing a crash sensor device during vehicle operation |
US11275127B2 (en) * | 2019-12-16 | 2022-03-15 | Allegro Microsystems, Llc | Data converter false saturation detector |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090201375A1 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Fail safe test for motion sensors |
US7996162B1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2011-08-09 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Detection of shorted output pins |
DE112009001956B4 (en) | 2008-08-08 | 2023-05-04 | ZF Active Safety US Inc. (n.d.Ges.d.Staates Delaware) | Reliable self-test for motion sensor modules |
US20100122565A1 (en) * | 2008-11-15 | 2010-05-20 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Continuous selftest for inertial sensors at 0 hz |
US20130125651A1 (en) * | 2011-11-17 | 2013-05-23 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Fail safe test for a bandwidth check on inertial sensing components |
JP5660236B1 (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2015-01-28 | オムロン株式会社 | Abnormality detection method for electromagnetic relay, abnormality detection circuit for electromagnetic relay, and abnormality detection system |
WO2016191243A1 (en) * | 2015-05-28 | 2016-12-01 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Systems and methods for assessing condition of a sensor |
US9983032B1 (en) * | 2017-06-01 | 2018-05-29 | Nxp Usa, Inc. | Sensor device and method for continuous fault monitoring of sensor device |
JP6968282B2 (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2021-11-17 | スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー | Causal analysis of powertrain management |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6298709B1 (en) * | 1997-09-11 | 2001-10-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Sensor device |
US6792792B2 (en) * | 2001-06-04 | 2004-09-21 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Diagnostic test for a resonant micro electro mechanical system |
US6843537B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2005-01-18 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | High reliability pressure sensor |
US20050167960A1 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2005-08-04 | Denso Corporation | Vehicular occupant protection system |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0579838B1 (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1998-09-09 | Ikegami Tsushinki Co., Ltd. | Solid-state imaging device and solid-state imaging element used therefor |
US5621167A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1997-04-15 | General Motors Corporation | Exhaust gas recirculation system diagnostic |
US6651205B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2003-11-18 | Advantest Corp. | Test pattern conversion apparatus and conversion method |
US6934665B2 (en) * | 2003-10-22 | 2005-08-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Electronic sensor with signal conditioning |
JP4306475B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2009-08-05 | 株式会社デンソー | Vehicle occupant protection system |
US7243278B2 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-07-10 | Credence Systems Corporation | Integrated circuit tester with software-scaleable channels |
-
2006
- 2006-02-01 US US11/345,350 patent/US20070150136A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-11-30 KR KR1020087015781A patent/KR20080071621A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2006-11-30 WO PCT/US2006/045821 patent/WO2007064782A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-11-30 US US12/085,605 patent/US8050816B2/en active Active
- 2006-11-30 DE DE112006003237T patent/DE112006003237T5/en active Pending
- 2006-11-30 JP JP2008543451A patent/JP4987010B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6298709B1 (en) * | 1997-09-11 | 2001-10-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Sensor device |
US6843537B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2005-01-18 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | High reliability pressure sensor |
US6792792B2 (en) * | 2001-06-04 | 2004-09-21 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Diagnostic test for a resonant micro electro mechanical system |
US20050167960A1 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2005-08-04 | Denso Corporation | Vehicular occupant protection system |
Cited By (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070229014A1 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2007-10-04 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method for operating a control system of an industrial process |
US9390229B1 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2016-07-12 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a health phone |
US9495015B1 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2016-11-15 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for utilizing motion user interface to determine command availability |
US8902154B1 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2014-12-02 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for utilizing motion user interface |
US8712723B1 (en) | 2006-12-22 | 2014-04-29 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device |
US8620353B1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-12-31 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Automatic sharing and publication of multimedia from a mobile device |
US10744390B1 (en) | 2007-02-08 | 2020-08-18 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device with activity identification |
US8949070B1 (en) | 2007-02-08 | 2015-02-03 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device with activity identification |
US8876738B1 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2014-11-04 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Human activity monitoring device |
US9183044B2 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2015-11-10 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing |
US8555282B1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2013-10-08 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing |
US10754683B1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2020-08-25 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing |
US9940161B1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2018-04-10 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing |
US8285344B2 (en) | 2008-05-21 | 2012-10-09 | DP Technlogies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adjusting audio for a user environment |
US8678925B1 (en) | 2008-06-11 | 2014-03-25 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus to provide a dice application |
US11249104B2 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2022-02-15 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Program setting adjustments based on activity identification |
US8996332B2 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2015-03-31 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Program setting adjustments based on activity identification |
US9797920B2 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2017-10-24 | DPTechnologies, Inc. | Program setting adjustments based on activity identification |
US8872646B2 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2014-10-28 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for waking up a device due to motion |
WO2010042661A3 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2010-06-17 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for waking up a device due to motion |
US9529437B2 (en) | 2009-05-26 | 2016-12-27 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a motion state aware device |
US20110234813A1 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2011-09-29 | Dieter Baecher | Sensor module and method for monitoring the function thereof |
US8878529B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2014-11-04 | Micronas Gmbh | Sensor module and method for monitoring the function thereof |
US8457835B2 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2013-06-04 | General Electric Company | System and method for use in evaluating an operation of a combustion machine |
US20120259502A1 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Gaurav Nigam | System and method for use in evaluating an operation of a combustion machine |
US20160001676A1 (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2016-01-07 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Electrically powered vehicle and method of controlling electrically powered vehicle |
US9956892B2 (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2018-05-01 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Electrically powered vehicle and method of controlling electrically powered vehicle |
US9846191B2 (en) * | 2013-09-09 | 2017-12-19 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Systems and methods for internal and external error detection in sensor output interfaces |
US20150070042A1 (en) * | 2013-09-09 | 2015-03-12 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Systems and methods for internal and external error detection in sensor output interfaces |
CN107202907A (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-26 | Trw汽车股份有限公司 | The method for detecting the sensor fault of safety device of vehicle |
CN107202907B (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2021-12-14 | Trw汽车股份有限公司 | Method for detecting sensor failure of vehicle safety device |
US20200264596A1 (en) * | 2017-04-19 | 2020-08-20 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Testing a crash sensor device during vehicle operation |
US11698631B2 (en) * | 2017-04-19 | 2023-07-11 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Testing a crash sensor device during vehicle operation |
CN107957545A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-04-24 | 苏州睿艾迪汽车科技有限公司 | FCT probe test instruments |
CN107976622A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-05-01 | 苏州睿艾迪汽车科技有限公司 | FCT testers |
CN110632525A (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2019-12-31 | 李尔公司 | Quasi-real time sensor measurement verification |
US11275127B2 (en) * | 2019-12-16 | 2022-03-15 | Allegro Microsystems, Llc | Data converter false saturation detector |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR20080071621A (en) | 2008-08-04 |
WO2007064782A1 (en) | 2007-06-07 |
JP2009519438A (en) | 2009-05-14 |
US8050816B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 |
US20090277244A1 (en) | 2009-11-12 |
DE112006003237T5 (en) | 2008-10-09 |
JP4987010B2 (en) | 2012-07-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20070150136A1 (en) | Periodic rate sensor self test | |
KR100403228B1 (en) | Error recognition method in rotation speed sensor | |
US5404304A (en) | Vehicle control system for determining verified wheel speed signals | |
US6636791B2 (en) | Collision record apparatus, collision state estimation method, and record medium | |
US5459732A (en) | Method and apparatus for anti-lock brake single channel wheel speed processing with diagnosis | |
US6502025B1 (en) | Relative steering angle sensor diagnostic for momentary signal dropout | |
US10692362B2 (en) | Systems and methods for comparing signal channels having different common mode transient immunity | |
US20050131602A1 (en) | Apparatus for correcting and diagnosing angular rate sensors installed in an automotive vehicle | |
US5487595A (en) | Dual hysteresis method of generating square waves from automotive wheel speed signals | |
US6087826A (en) | Device for detecting electromagnetic stray effects in systems with at least two inductive sensors providing periodic output signal | |
JP4071834B2 (en) | Anti-lock control method | |
US8650930B2 (en) | Fail safe self test for motion sensor modules | |
US7248991B2 (en) | Method and device for detecting a rotational speed, especially the rotational speed of the wheel of a vehicle | |
US6504360B1 (en) | Method and device for checking the installation air gap of an active sensor | |
US7359818B2 (en) | Sensor apparatus, control system having the same and offset correction method | |
US20130125651A1 (en) | Fail safe test for a bandwidth check on inertial sensing components | |
US20140172124A1 (en) | Method and Device for Monitoring Signal Levels | |
US7520573B2 (en) | Shadow zone fault detection | |
KR101198750B1 (en) | Vehicle control apparatus | |
US6485114B2 (en) | Sensor error detection in a dual sensor system | |
US20190066405A1 (en) | Method and system for detecting a road impact event and for diagnosing abnormalities in chassis components | |
US5727855A (en) | Anti-locking control system | |
JP4345207B2 (en) | Mechanical quantity detection sensor | |
JPS62241756A (en) | Speed diagnostic processing system for antiskid device | |
JPH1144701A (en) | Wheel speed measuring device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |