The Chair of Cafcass, Baroness Claire Tyler, has very kindly answered the questions we put to her about child welfare, social work and the social care sector.
Cafcass’s history has been a long and troubled one, which nearly saw its dismantling in 2010. Since then, having taken on board the need to look at their service delivery, Cafcass have made an effort to do so and have implemented several interesting directives to this effect. These include a stakeholder system which invites parents to offer their input and a Young People’s Board made up of children who have been through the family justice system, designed to collect feedback about their services and amplify the voice of the child.
We felt now would be a good time to check in with the organisation and see how they’re getting on. To that end we invited Baroness Tyler to chat with us about her work as Chair for Cafcass, and the other organisations she works with. We also asked some no-nonsense questions about forced adoption and what she feels is the best way forward for the child welfare sector.
Despite the often emotive reaction the Cafcass acronym invites, we would ask you please to read Baroness Tyler’s answers and comment civilly. For an organisation that has in the past shunned direct communication with an often critical public, this interview represents a wonderful step forward, and the obvious care Baroness Tyler has taken to answer our queries is evident from the length of her answers and her attention to detail. It is a generous and open response.
We would like to thank the Baroness for taking the time and trouble to respond and a big thank you to Colette for being so patient with us.
You can read our interview with Baroness Tyler below:
- Baroness Tyler, thank you for allowing us to interview you. As a Lady who wears many hats, including Chair of Cafcass and President of The National Children’s Bureau, your days must be very busy, and no doubt diverse. What is a typical day like for you?
My days are certainly very varied and no two are the same. CAFCASS Board meetings usually take place towards the end of the week and these are also the days that I make out of London visits to avoid clashing with the main voting business in the Lords. Earlier in the year I visited the new Family Court in Liverpool where CAFCASS are located within the court building and the arrangement seems to be working very well. I also meet with CAFCASS practitioners from across the county about 6 times a year in London so I can hear from our front line staff about what’s going well and what their concerns are. I generally spend my mornings in the Lords and doing things such as attending a parliamentary meeting on social work training, meeting with Ministers and senior officials involved in the family justice system, meeting with charities and other groups who are working on issues I have a particular interest in or speaking at and attending external events about family justice and related areas of policy. I’ve finished serving on a Lords Select Committee on Affordable Childcare and I speak in debates in the Lords on issues including children and families, mental health, social care and social mobility/disadvantage.
In the last Parliament I was chair/vice chair of four different All Party Parliamentary Groups (APPGs) – one on social mobility, one on wellbeing and two on aspects of family relationships and parenting. I chaired a Parliamentary Inquiry on Social Mobility and Parenting which was jointly sponsored by the APPGs on Social Mobility and on Parenting and Families. Outside of Parliament, I chair a charity working with adults with multiple and complex needs called “Making Every Adult Matter”; I’m on the development board of “Think Ahead” which is designing and developing a new programme to recruit and train graduates to become mental health social workers; I am President of the National Children’s Bureau and Vice President of Relate. The latter two are both Honorary roles but I like to do practical things for them such as hosting or chairing events if I can. Because of the wide range of roles I have I often get asked to speak at events which can range from a few words at a reception to giving a full speech or lectures. So all in all I’m pretty busy and it’s interesting how these strands so often intersect and I can make helpful linkages between different policy areas.
- What do you foresee for children’s health and welfare in the next decade?
When it comes to looking after the interests of children’s health and welfare, we know that timely safeguarding and protecting children from the immediate risk of abuse and neglect at home are of the essence. However, there is also growing recognition of the need to look after their long-term mental health. We know from research that the experiences of children in care mean that they are more likely than their peers to experience mental health problems. Likewise, those children involved in private law proceedings can also be exposed to high levels of parental conflict, particularly where proceedings are protracted, and this causes confusion and disruption to their lives. I think we will see an increased focus on the emotional support services currently available to young people and children and how these can be improved. A CAMHS taskforce (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service) set out by the Department of Health looked into how children and young people can be better supported, by exploring the way children’s mental health services are organised, commissioned and provided so that young people can more easily access the essential help and support they need.
Just before the Election, the taskforce made a number of recommendations, including simplifying structures within CAMHS and improving access to children, delivering a clear joined up approach with other services so that care pathways are easier for children and young people to navigate. It is crucial that children are aware of these services and are able to access them.
- Poverty is an increasing concern for children in the UK: what impact do you see it having in 2015 on our children?
Much of the work we carried out in the All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Mobility and Parenting looked at the wider issues affecting disadvantaged children, who are often living in poverty, and how this affects their life chances. Although it can be a contested area, a lot of the research suggests that there is a distinct relationship between income inequality and social mobility. Children from poorer families are less likely to go to university and have access to higher skilled and higher status jobs.
We are seeing that families in poverty, generally, have more difficulties supporting their children with their development in their early years; and yet, these years are essential for the emotional, social and cognitive development of children which underpins success at school. Children who do not have books at home progress more slowly at school, and those who have a parent read to them each evening have a much better chance of achieving academic success. Child poverty, social mobility and parental income are interrelated, and you cannot improve one without working on the others. I recently chaired a Parliamentary Inquiry into Social Mobility and Parenting and our recommendations included developing and implementing a national parenting support campaign, based on locally-designed trails and based on national-local partnerships.
- Cafcass’ groundbreaking Voice of the Child project has attracted the support of (former) Justice Minister Simon Hughes and was our “Project to Watch” for 2015. How do you envisage it developing in the next 12 months and what hopes do you have for the project as a whole?
Practitioners I have spoken to have drawn my attention to the different ways in which children can feel involved in court proceedings. Some will want to communicate their views and wishes to the judge overseeing their case, whether that means meeting with the judge, or if more appropriate, writing a letter or making a drawing to express their views. Younger children may feel more comfortable just seeing the court setting, or speaking to a solicitor. Cafcass has been monitoring the ways children communicate with the court at present, which I understand has been of great assistance to those in MoJ charged with developing the VOTC commitment to date. I’ve heard great things about a court app – watch this space!
I’m also looking forward to hearing more on the progress of the Family Justice Young People’s Board’s (FJYPB) National Charter at what will be their third Voice of the Child Conference on 20th July. I cannot speak highly enough of the insight – and, quite often, the healthy challenge – that the FJYPB makes to the Cafcass Board; a member attends each Board meeting which means we have a live reminder of what Cafcass is here for and keeps us focussed.
- A 2014 report suggests that children may not want to have their cases reported in the national media, fearing journalists may wish to sensationalise their experiences rather than seek out the truth, and many feel it would be embarrassing for them, even if reporting was anonymised as there might be a risk of recognition. At the same time, the judiciary is pushing for more transparency within the family courts by way of reporting cases publicly. Do you think there is a workable middle ground and do you have any concerns about the transparency process?
I spoke about transparency at the Family Justice Council Debate. I believe that the transparency of decisions made about children in the family court is important for evidence-informed reasons so that the process can be used to ensure better practice and outcomes for children. However, it is clearly unacceptable if the impact of increased exposure is detrimental to a child. There will be some difference in what transparency means to a two year old and what it means to a 16 year old, and this must be taken into consideration. Transparency is also of real importance for later life. It is vital that the identity of children is safeguarded both at the time of the proceedings and in later years and that the files each organisation holds on a child have a well written, well analysed and well organised record that is maintained for a period of time so that when adults want to look back, they can find out the reasons for the decisions courts made about them which have such a major impact on their lives.
- Sometimes cases result in children being placed in care or adopted when families are deemed no longer able to care for them. The adoption process is heart-breaking for the families involved, and must affect practitioners working in the sector too. Do you feel that adoption without the birth family’s consent is a regrettable but necessary practice or do you think there might be other ways of working with separating families and children?
The number one focus has to be on protecting the welfare of every child, and making sure that they have a stable upbringing. For those children who cannot return home, adoption is one option for providing a permanent, safe environment to grow up in. It is about determining what is right for each child. The role of the Guardian is to ensure that the local authority’s plan for the child is not only the best available, but also that it is likely to be viable and to provide the child with a stable home. This is especially important in cases where returning home is appropriate, and the child is returning to an environment which was previously abusive or neglectful.
- A recent survey suggests that social workers have become too stressed to work effectively – are Cafcass officers also feeling the strain of now limited resources and if so what can be done about this?
Cafcass’ practitioners are all completely focused on making vulnerable children’s lives better and I know that their value base keeps them going despite the challenges they face. I also know Cafcass has worked hard to have a strong operational culture of risk sharing between practitioners and managers, meaning that practitioners are supported. Importantly, when I meet with front-line staff they tell me that they feel their input and expertise are recognised, which in turn helps them in what is a difficult professional role. The efforts and innovation of Cafcass’ Human Resources team in assisting practitioners were awarded last year with a number of awards, including ‘Best HR team in the Public Sector’ at the Personnel Today Awards 2014. There are some practical measures which have made a big impact, including introducing a health and wellbeing plan that includes a telephone counselling service which is available to practitioners 24 hours, seven days a week. A good talent management strategy is in play, and most important for many staff these days, practitioners have flexible working, which means they are able to do their work in the office, when they’re at court or at home. It’s an area that needs continual focus, but I was pleased to hear that a recent survey measuring staff resilience levels found that Cafcass’ staff had strong resilience levels. I hope that others in the sector can learn from what Cafcass has put in place.
- Child welfare is obviously one of your passions – do you have a defining mantra or sentiment when it comes to children?
It’s short and simple: I believe that every child, irrespective of their background, deserves the very best start in life.
- And finally- who or what do you think will be your “ones to watch” this year in terms of child welfare policy or people?
With the introduction of the Child Arrangements Programme (CAP) in April last year, we are now seeing more focus on directing separating parents away from the family courts, where this is possible and safe. Signposting parents towards mediation, which is generally less stressful, should help to make the process of separation shorter and less distressing for parents and children. Currently, we are seeing organisations within the family justice sector working towards supporting this policy change. We are likely to see the development of more out of court programmes to support separating parents, and wider collaboration between agencies and organisations within the family justice sector. For example, Cafcass has extended the Supporting Separating Parents in Dispute (SSPID) programme in five areas of the country: York and North Yorkshire, Kent, Bristol, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire, and Norfolk. It offers services to help parents who are in dispute with their ex-partner about arrangements for their children following divorce or separation, helping them to access information, guidance and support about the most appropriate dispute resolution pathways available to them. The Cafcass Parenting Plan is a very helpful resource – it is a tool that works to focus parents on what will work for them to give their child the very best after separation.
We’re going to see a continued focus on mediation. After fairly recent changes, like parents attending a compulsory Mediation Information Assessment Meeting (MIAM) before court proceedings, introduced as part of CAP, many more families will be involved in the mediation process. It will be interesting to see how the service develops, particularly in terms of the voice of the child – I know that the FJYPB is hoping to see more child-inclusive mediation.
Maggie Tuttle said:
how the hell can they have more mediation when
NO ONE LISTENS TO THE CHILDREN
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maggie Tuttle said:
and it was a cafcass officer of thirty years who told me that no kid in care knows what they want and they ALL tell lies so much for their training and the kids remain the silent witnesses and become the victims of abuse then told they are out of time and where is your evidence, sorry Natasha I have no time for any of these people “IN A CHILD’S BEST INTEREST” to them the best interest is the interest of the money they all make.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Natasha said:
Fair enough Maggie, but that was 30 years ago. We can’t expect organisations to improve if we don’t give them a chance.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Natasha what was thirty years ago.
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Perhaps you meant the SW was 30?
LikeLike
Angry Grandparent II said:
Looks good on paper but in practice it is a different world entirely.
With my eldest’s second son, the guardian to the court made a very detailed and lengthy report, it waxed lyrical about risk and dangers but even the Judge asked this one vital question, how did you base your report on a parent and child without ever seeing the child or the parent or both together?
My concern as is with others is the conflict of interest that exists between CAFCASS and the BAAF, Anthony Douglas works for both and gets every year a massive bonus from the BAAF based on quantity of adoptions, the more adoptions that go through, the more Mr Douglas gets paid and this has called into question the whole arrangement regardless of any suspected wrongdoing or not, it does not take a genius to work out that the main man for guardians could abuse their position to their own financial advantage.
Certainly one abuse has been observed and that is as head of CAFCASS Douglas did pressure the last government over fast tracking adoptions which technically Douglas should have abstained from such a position in my opinion.
And this is what we see time and again, gatekeepers at every turn to ensure the status quo is followed, despite many years of reported abuses of process by the state or council, that there is no room in their policy or thinking that the state or council could be actually wrong and closed adoptions in every nation its been utilised has led to mental illness, sociological deviance and high incidence of drug and alcohol abuses which are all strangely absent in open adoptions.
But until we take the money making out of it, the vast profiteering then no reform will ever happen, the people at the top are cashing in far too much to let something like children rights to matter a damn and until then, the state machine will gobble up countless innocent children to line the pockets of the venal.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Natasha said:
Yes, that conflict is a concern, and I agree Anthony/ Cafcass should not be involved with the BAAF. To my mind, it’s all about training and getting the philosophy and practice of evidence gathering right. For me at least, that is my main concern with organisations like Cafcass. Training is key.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[Name Withheld] said:
I recently was refused a permission application to apply for a residency order by the infamous Judge Dodds at Liverpool Family Court. The so called Guardian from CAFCASS objected on the grounds that the very process of the application would destabalise the placement? – Justice denied!
When she came to see me, she asked had I moved house since we last met, I replied we have never met before, to which she replied, Oh I do so many of these I get confused sometimes!
I recorded the meeting and have listened to it four times over, and basically she spent almost 40 minutes “Grilling” me about what I had been wrongly alleged to have told my Grandson at the last contact meeting.
She did not ask to see the rest of house, particularly his proposed Bedroom. She asked absolutely no questions regarding my proposals for his future healthcare, dentistry, physical welfare, and most specifically his education.
He is currently in care and in a school rated by OFSTED as INADEQUATE for a number of consecutive inspections, whereas the school I proposed for him is rated as OUTSTANDING with 100% of parents stating that they would recommend the school to other potential parents.
My honest opinion is that she cannot possibly appear to be independent by any normal right thinking neutral person.
When asked if she had spoken to my GS to discern his wishes and feelings, (He is 12 years old and above average intelligence) she replied it is obvious that he wants to return to his family, but that doesn’t mean that is what I will recommend.
In all honesty, I cannot possibly be expected to believe that she was acting in the best interest of the child, and her only purpose was to act as another highly paid layer of Bureaucracy to rubber stamp the decisions of Social Services who continue to supply the raw materials (children) needed to maintain the Multi billion pound fostering/adoption industry.
It is my honest and heartfelt opinion that the only reason that Social Services et al can respond with such hostility to my application, especially in the light of the current situation regarding budget cuts, is that the financial incentives are a greater consideration than the welfare of the child.
I am currently attempting to “follow the money” and find out just who is benefitting financially from this, and where such conflicts of interests like Anthony Douglas exist. Some remarkable and painstaking work has already been done on this point regarding Thurrock Social Services, and hopefully soon it will be possible to have this done in the Merseyside area as well.
The system as it stands is unjust and I sincerely hope that Baroness Tyler will read and digest the information in some of the responses to this post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Natasha said:
Thank you for your comment. It is my hope also.
LikeLike
Roger Crawford said:
The Baroness is obviously focused, intelligent, and sensitive to the needs of children – and parents (also important and I think not stressed enough – most of our children will become parents one day). I only wish her awareness were shared by the majority of CAFCASS officers on the ground, and I cannot believe, yet, that they are. This lady makes a good argument, and I hope her influence will permeate down the ranks. Thank you for sharing this with us. I agree that the money-making side should be taken right out of the equation when considering adoptions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Natasha said:
Pleasure Roger.
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Dana said:
Hi Natasha, It was only 3 years ago that a Carcass officer told me over the phone the reason my grandchild was to be adopted was because he was under 5 years old! If anyone would like to hear the recording I am happy to oblige.
She, also a long standing caffcass officer, mitigated her answer by saying” These things are hard on the grandparents!”. Really?!!
I wonder if it had anything to do with the fact he was a gorgeous blue eyed blond with a fabulous personality. Apparently 7 adoption offers were being considered whilst care proceedings were still going on!
It didn’t seem to matter that he was being separated from his older sibling causing distress to both children. Apparently his needs took prescendence over hers.
What of their mental health? The expert psychistrist didn’t seem to be aware of the research that showed kids in care were better off kept together and the judge ignored that little snippet of information because it wasn’t what the caffcass officer had agreed with the social workers!
With cafcass officer, the social workers and the expert (paid by local authority) all saying that adoption the right thing to do the Judge missed the critical point – it wasn’t the right thing to do but no doubt he wasn’t going to go against them all, after all he was up for retirement soon and he wouldn’t want to lose his pension!
Mental heath funding has always been the poor relation in politics and hasn’t changed for decades despite research saying early trauma harms the children way into adulthood. This is not new research only more research has been carried out confirming this fact. So is a little neglect worse than being dragged away from your family to go and live with strangers (despite adoption breakdowns leaving the child more traumatised). Why not work with families instead? I think it’s time that the child protection system changed and the ability to add a little perspective on what really is worse for the child needs to be worked on.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dana said:
By the way it isn’t just me who thinks this.
http://www.theconversation.com/child-protection-how-to-keep-vulnerable-children-with-their-families-32898
Research from US shows alternative system SafeCare for families with under 5s works!
Alternative methods to keep children safe must be tried because care doesn’t work! Not in other countries or in the UK! Kids currently in care need to be sent home and help and support should be available for families!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dana said:
Worth reading the articles found at the bottom of that article.
LikeLike
Forced Adoption said:
What a nasty piece of work this Baroness is revealed to be ! Meaningless cliché after cliché with no regard to the feelings of parents who have had their children snatched by social services !
Why should parents whose babies have been snatched at birth be gagged and imprisoned if they dare to protest publicly Under their own names?
She says in effect that the babies might not like it ! Is she really serious?
Why should children be gagged and stopped at contact from discussing their case or reporting abuse by fosterers or care workers?
Does she mean that social workers might be upset? What a shame………..
Does she mean forced adoption is ok even when a baby is removed at birth from a non criminal mother?
Weasel words in her reply to that one! Just best interests of the child and alas those are determined by the very people who make their living snatching children from non, criminal parents and by judges also salaried by the marauding state who naturally rubberstamp the majority of child snatchings!
There are few more dangerous bodies than a fanatical bunch of “do gooders” but it is the parents and kids who suffer .
LikeLiked by 2 people
tummum said:
Reblogged this on tummum's Blog.
LikeLike
ladyportia27 said:
Just a few years ago while working as an advocate, I had the honour of reading both social worker and Guardian reports on children. It was an eye opener for me. In one report, children from another family hundreds of miles away were mentioned- as if they belonged to the family I was dealing with.Clearly the Guardian was mixed up and confused.I called CAFCASS head office once to ask re one Guardian’s 5 reports. This is where it got interesting. The head office person claimed they had no Guardian of that name in that city and he never worked on the case. I asked why then have I got 5 reports on my desk all signed by said Guardian. Down went the phone. I called again to make it clear that I knew where that Guardian had been moved to.Reports were written too without having met the children or parents.
In another recent case the Guardian was caught telling untruths to the court. He then pretended to be dead- talk about weird- but its all on file with said court. Suddenly the Guardian is alive and well with a residential home for girls in care.
Another Guardian said domestic violence has no affect on children and had the children placed with serious abuser. The children ran away and hid but were dragged back and placed with abuser. They were 12 and 13 and made it clear they were not listened to. They both went from straight A students to E failures.
Now how was all that in the “Best interests of the child”?
LikeLiked by 2 people
davidmortimermiltonkeynes said:
The problem with UK child protection policies is they are not evidence based. There is no specific legislation or regulations which require local authorities to collect & hold information on child abuse perpetrators or for them to use that information to formulate evidence based child protection policies.
http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/
LikeLiked by 2 people
davidmortimermiltonkeynes said:
CafCass has no guidelines or training on how much contact is required http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/cafcasshasnoguidelinesortrainingonhowmuchcontactisrequired7thmarch2013.htm
LikeLike
Dana said:
If the Baroness is so concerned about the children’s mental health then can she please explain to me why children are prevented from seeing their families whilst in care? It is well researched that contact with families is beneficial to the child’s mental health so why do social workers think twice a year is ok, as that is what goes in their care plans and why is that acceptable to the family courts?
LikeLike
davidmortimermiltonkeynes said:
There is no research used to train judges in relation to deciding contact time http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/thereisnoresearchusedtotrainjudgesinrelationtodecidingcontacttime27thfebruary2013.htm
LikeLike
[Name Withheld] said:
I wrote a complaint to CAFCASS that they refused to answer. The complaint showed with evidence how CAFCASS had agreed in covering up the rape of my daughter and in covering up a host of other criminal child abuse acts – all heavily evidenced with unambiguous proof. When pushing them harder for a reply, they simply deemed me vexatious and refused any more communication.
So, they are criminal and child abusing and the dear old Baroness is either out of touch, or a paid PR front of no substance.
[This post has been edited to comply with reporting regulations].
LikeLike
Dana said:
Very often we, as service users, can review and critique services like GPs and Dentists, why isn’t there the same system for social workers and cafcass officers?
You cannot make complaints, they are disregarded, so how are these people held accountable? Oh yes, they’re not! Their status & power is higher than MPs as even MPs are held accountable and you can vote MPs out of office if they don’t perform well! It’s remarkable that MPs make the laws but cannot intervene when the laws are ignored by social workers and carcass officers who have their own agendas.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Dana, I have said and will say again that until families answer back and go to the top to complaine its all a nothing so many social workers tell parents this or that and they think they are gods, I have questioned so many families re contact asking when did you last have contact with your kids, answers were 2 years ago or what ever, i ask why no contact answer the social worker stopped the contact, i ask why did you not go back to court their was answer because the S/W said we are not allowed, so you see people let the S/W get away with it and as one social worker said to me, “we can overule the courts” I said really lets see. people must complain to the top not the dustmen which is what the S/W are.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
In one case I know of, the cafcass women had been taken through hell by a campagning grandmother and was so up set she told the judge this grandmother refers to the social services as the SS and Nazism well this must have been the first time a cafcass officer told the truth haha because that is what they are. dont they just hate it when they come up against some one who answers them back she also told the court and wrote in all of the reports written that the grandmother must take her campagning hat off and concentrate on the grandchild, then she told the grandmother you must change the grandmother answerd do you mean i should sit in my rocking chair and rock my self to the grave again i am told the cafcass got so upset, but as i tell all families do not be afraid to answer them back . Many cafcass officers just as many social workers have their own companies registerd its all a money game as for the judges well they are in my mind the most corrupt as they know truths but cannot be botherd to serve justice.
LikeLike
Dana said:
Natasha, it would have been good to get the numbers to fully appreciate what is or isn’t being done by Cafcass. A lot of what the Baroness has written is pure rhetoric! Sound bites that sound good but gives no real data.
I would have liked to know:
How many families go through family court?
How many of those were in private law?
What were the outcomes? Percentage of satisfied users?
How many were in public law?
How many times did Cafcass get to know the people they were writing reports about?
How many times did Cafcass agree with social worker recommendations?
How many times did Cafcass disagree with social worker recommendations?
How many times did the parents lose their children?
How many Care orders were made?
How many Supervision Orders?
What other Orders were made and how many?
What follow up is done on the child after going into care to make sure that the child continues to have contact with their parents and extended family?
What follow up is done if the child is to be adopted? To ensure the child is safe?
Why are so few open adoptions made, even though research states the child is better off knowing their birth family?
What does the Baroness think of the care system now after the exposés of so many abuses perpetrated by those tasked to protect the children entrusted into their care?
Why are so many children separated, when to do so is harmful to them?
What does the Baroness think of Adoption as this can a) break down and b) be a way of trafficking?
What is the reasoning behind separating siblings, to adoption and to foster care? How is that justified when its known the children are harmed?
When do the siblings meet up for contact after adoption? Who monitors this?
Do Cafcass employers get bonuses for targets set?
What targets are set?
How many employed by Cafcass have financial interests in foster/adoption agencies or other such companies?
How many ex Cafcass employers have financial interests in foster/adoption agencies or other such companies?
How many complaints have been made about Cafcass?
How many were upheld?
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Dana, a lot of that info you can get from the MOJ stats I post up (or just go to their site and take a look). I agree with you though about service user feedback, that’s very, very imporrtant. But I still think at the heart of all of this is training. It needs to be ramped up significantly, and all Cafcass officers and social workers need to be carefully selected. historically, these jobs have been given to people with minimum educational standards and often no discernible feel for children. That needs to change. But that will require the whole sector to shift its mindset about child welfare. This is a sector which needs highly vocational, intelligent people in it.
LikeLike
Dana said:
Well Natasha, here is an example of a social worker.
http://www.communitycare. co.uk/2014/10/10/social-worker-apprentice-hopeful-claims-best-world/
If he’s the best in the world what of the others?
Interesting news on Community care which shows the diversity of…… getting it wrong!
Kinship care treated like the Cinderella of permanent options.
£150m plus £19.3m to push adoption instead!
Foster carers claim councils are threatening to break up placements due to financial purposes. The push for in house placements or special guardian orders or adoptive placements!
“Sit on my lap and see what comes up!” Social workers 6 month suspension for inappropriate touching of colleagues!
Katie Hopkins to be investigated by social work!
Ofsted has found three quarters of children’s services not good enough! A call for more funding by local authorities! LAs are also in denial, they want a review!
Cafcass latest figures show 53% of local authorities have reported increases in care applications 2014/2015. This has now reached an all time high.
Anthony Douglas Cafcass Chief Executive said “That how local authorities are better understanding the families they are working with is more important than an increase or decrease in figures.”
I think the Baroness needs to have another look!
LikeLike
Dana said:
Sorry no space after communitycare on hyperlink!
LikeLike
Pingback: Child Abuse Inquiry Responds To Our Interview Request | Researching Reform
Alan L Brunwin said:
Its the lie and liars i just cannot bow down to. From local authorites to childrens charities of so many, without children how would this lot make there easy money from stolen children.
LikeLike