FILE - In this Dec. 10, 2013 file photo, British billionaire Richard Branson visits a Zumba Step dance class at Virgin installations in Madrid, Spain. On Friday, Oct. 12, 2018 Branson announced he has frozen business links with Saudi Arabia amid reports that journalist Jamal Khashoggi may have been murdered at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. (AP Photo/Abraham Caro Marin, file)
Richard Branson’s Virgin Care threatened the NHS with legal action (Picture: AP)

In November 2017 the NHS paid an undisclosed settlement to Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Care after the threat of legal action.

Branson’s Virgin Care started High Court proceedings against NHS England in 2016 after the private healthcare group lost its bid to provide children’s services in Surrey.

In November 2016, Virgin Care sued six Surrey clinical commissioning groups, NHS England and Surrey County Council after the three-year £82 million healthcare deal was awarded to a group of in-house NHS providers and a social enterprise.

The Labour Party said it was ‘scandalous’ that the NHS was forced to face legal action from Virgin Care and called for the Department of Health to disclose further details on the settlement.

Jonathan Ashworth, Shadow Health Secretary, said: ‘It is scandalous that NHS money is being wasted on fighting off legal bids from private companies.

virgin care
(Picture: Virgin)

‘Ministers need to make clear how much public money has been used in this case – at the least it seems to be hundreds of thousands of pounds.

‘That is money that could be being used for NHS patients who are waiting longer than ever for routine services.’

Branson’s Virgin Care Services claimed there were ‘serious flaws in the procurement process’, which prompted ‘concerns’.

In a statement, Virgin Care and lead commissioner Guildford and Waverley CCG said: ‘The parties are pleased to confirm that an agreed resolution on the litigation concerning the Surrey children’s procurement has been reached to a satisfactory conclusion for all parties with detailed terms confidential to the parties.’

A paper, published by Surrey Downs, stated that its liability for the case was £328,000 – though it was later removed, with a CCG spokesperson adding, ‘the level of detail should not have been included in the report’.

A Virgin Care spokesperson told The Independent: ‘We took the action because we were concerned that there may have been serious flaws in the procurement process.

‘Never before had we been so concerned with the whole process that we have needed to make a challenge of this nature.

‘Our stated preference throughout was not to be paid damages but that the process be re-run properly in the interests of local families and the frontline staff.

‘Contrary to reports, no money has been pocketed by Virgin Group or Sir Richard Branson and we continue to invest funds in the frontline NHS services we deliver.’

MORE : Massive fire breaks out at Chester Zoo sparking mass evacuation

MORE : Conman ‘pretended to be a make-up artist to paint Indonesian woman white’