Technocracy News – Bias and Credibility

Technocracy.news - Conspiracy - Conservative - Right Bias - Fake News - Not CredibleTechnocracy.news - Pseudoscience - Conservative - Right Bias - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Technocracy News a far-right tin foil hat Conspiracy site that promotes quackery-level pseudoscience. We also rate them Very Low in factual reporting due to the routine publication of false information, as evidenced by numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY-LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2015 by author Patrick Wood, Technocracy News is a conspiracy and pseudoscience website that reports on technology, and its supposed dangers that lead to government control. According to the about page, Patrick Wood describes himself as “An economist by education, a financial analyst and writer by profession and an American Constitutionalist by choice; Wood maintains a Biblical world view and has deep historical insights into the modern attacks on sovereignty, property rights, and personal freedom. Such attacks are epitomized by the implementation of U.N. policies such as Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, and in education, the widespread adoption of Common Core State Standards.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Technocracy.News is owned by Patrick Wood. Books sales and donations generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Technocracy News frequently publishes conspiracy theories and promotes pseudoscience. Many articles are written by Patrick Wood, with others republished from right-leaning sources such as the questionable Breitbart and conspiracy website Zerohedge. They also republish from credible sources such as The Hill; however, they add biased commentary such as this: “Rice is a globalist of the first order and tightly connected with members of the Trilateral Commission.  As a former Ambassador to the UN and then-National Security Advisor to Obama, it is not surprising that she would be on Biden’s shortlist. ⁃ TN Editor.”



Story selection often favors the right with great concern over Globalism and the New World Order such as this IMF Reveals That Cryptocurrency Is The New World Order Endgame. This story comes from the conspiracy website Alt-Market. They also frequently promote conspiracy theories about 5G and Agenda 21. Further, they routinely publish misinformation regarding the CoronaVirus, such as this CDC Sent Useless Test Kits To States, Tainted With Coronavirus. Coronavirus test kits are not tained. This is a false claim. Finally, they routinely promote anti-vaccination propaganda and support the claim that Human Influenced Climate Change is a hoax Dr. Tim Ball: Why People Continue To Believe Global Warming Hoax. In general, this is a website that frequently publishes misleading or false information from a far-right perspective.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Technocracy News a far-right tin foil hat Conspiracy site that promotes quackery-level pseudoscience. We also rate them Very Low in factual reporting due to the routine publication of false information, as evidenced by numerous failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 2/15/2021) Updated (10/29/2022)

Source: https://www.technocracy.news/

This poll is for entertainment purposes and does not change our overall rating.

Last Updated on June 30, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: