WO2013028262A2 - Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue - Google Patents

Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013028262A2
WO2013028262A2 PCT/US2012/044664 US2012044664W WO2013028262A2 WO 2013028262 A2 WO2013028262 A2 WO 2013028262A2 US 2012044664 W US2012044664 W US 2012044664W WO 2013028262 A2 WO2013028262 A2 WO 2013028262A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tissue
electric field
cellular function
region
field
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/044664
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2013028262A3 (en
Inventor
Timothy Andrew Wagner
Original Assignee
Highland Instruments
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Highland Instruments filed Critical Highland Instruments
Priority to EP12826175.7A priority Critical patent/EP2747728B1/en
Priority to EP22191961.6A priority patent/EP4162915A1/en
Publication of WO2013028262A2 publication Critical patent/WO2013028262A2/en
Publication of WO2013028262A3 publication Critical patent/WO2013028262A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/36014External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
    • A61N1/36025External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes for treating a mental or cerebral condition
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/20Applying electric currents by contact electrodes continuous direct currents
    • A61N1/205Applying electric currents by contact electrodes continuous direct currents for promoting a biological process
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/325Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for iontophoresis, i.e. transfer of media in ionic state by an electromotoric force into the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/326Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for promoting growth of cells, e.g. bone cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/327Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for enhancing the absorption properties of tissue, e.g. by electroporation
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/36014External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
    • A61N1/36021External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes for treatment of pain
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N7/00Ultrasound therapy
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B2018/00994Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body combining two or more different kinds of non-mechanical energy or combining one or more non-mechanical energies with ultrasound
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F7/00Heating or cooling appliances for medical or therapeutic treatment of the human body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N7/00Ultrasound therapy
    • A61N2007/0004Applications of ultrasound therapy
    • A61N2007/0021Neural system treatment
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N7/00Ultrasound therapy
    • A61N2007/0004Applications of ultrasound therapy
    • A61N2007/0021Neural system treatment
    • A61N2007/0026Stimulation of nerve tissue

Definitions

  • the invention generally relates to systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in biological tissue.
  • Stimulation of tissue in humans and other animals is used in a number of clinical applications as well as in clinical and general biological research.
  • stimulation of neural tissue has been used in the treatment of various diseases including Parkinson's disease, depression, and intractable pain.
  • the stimulation may be applied invasively, e.g., by performing surgery to remove a portion of the skull and implanting electrodes in a specific location within brain tissue, or non-invasively, .e.g., transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
  • a synergistic stimulation effect in a region of tissue may be achieved by combining a first type of energy that is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function with a second type of energy that is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function.
  • Data herein show that the stimulatory effect is greater than the summed effect of the first and second amounts of energy provided to the region of tissue.
  • methods of the invention involve providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, in which the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, in which the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue.
  • the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue. In other embodiments, the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue.
  • the first and second types of energy may be provided simultaneously or sequentially.
  • the first energy source is an electric source that produces an electric field.
  • the electric filed may be pulsed, time varying, pulsed a plurality of time with each pulse being for a different length of time, or time invariant.
  • the second energy source is a source that produces a mechanical field, such as an ultrasound device.
  • the mechanical filed may be pulsed, time varying, or pulsed a plurality of time with each pulse being for a different length of time.
  • the electric field and/or the mechanical field is focused. The other permutations are also attainable, where the effect direction (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) is dependent on the electrical and/or ultrasound source transducer parameters and/or the electrical and/or ultrasound field parameters.
  • the first and second energy sources may be applied to any tissue.
  • the first and second energy sources may be applied to any tissue.
  • the first and second energy sources are applied to a structure or multiple structures within the brain or the nervous system such as the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, any component of the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, gastric nuclei, brainstem, thalamus, inferior colliculus, superior colliculus, periaqueductal gray, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, occipital lobe, Brodmann areas 1-48, primary sensory cortex, primary visual cortex, primary auditory cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, cochlea, cranial nerves, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, sub-cortical structures, and spinal cord.
  • the tissue is neural tissue, and the affect of the stimulation alters neural function past the duration of stimulation.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a system for stimulating cellular function within tissue that includes an ultrasound device configured to emit a mechanical field that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and an electric source configured to emit an electric field that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, the system being configured such that the ultrasound device and the electric source target the same region of tissue and the combined effect stimulates cellular function in a facilitatory manner within the region of tissue.
  • the ultrasound source could be provided in a facilitatory manner and the electrical source in an inhibitory manner such that the overall effect on cellular function is inhibitory.
  • the other permutations are also attainable, where the effect direction (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) is dependent on the electrical and/or ultrasound source transducer parameters and/or the electrical and/or ultrasound field parameters.
  • Figure 1 is a plan view of one embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure
  • Figure 3 is a top plan view of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing a chemical source for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure
  • Figure 4 is a top plan view of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing a radiation source for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
  • Figure 5 is a top plan view of another exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing an optical beam for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
  • Figures 6A-C show a set of graphs comparing mechanical stimulation alone, electrical stimulation alone, and the combination of mechanical and electrical stimulation.
  • Part A is a raw data example of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) shown from one animal, and one electrode contact (for readability).
  • Part B demonstrates the stimulation effect (averaged across all contacts and animals).
  • Part C demonstrates the depth effect of stimulation (the electrode implemented had 23 contacts (50mm length, and 50mm inter-contact distance), but in Figure 3-C only 3 contacts are shown for readability).
  • * indicates significance, which was determined first by an N-way Anova, as explained in the examples section, with a subsequent multiple comparison of means (with LSD correction).
  • the present disclosure may be used to stimulate biological tissue in- vivo comprising an electric source that is placed on and/or in the body to generate an electric field and a means for altering the permittivity of tissue relative to the electric field, whereby the alteration of the tissue permittivity relative to the electric field generates a displacement current in the tissue.
  • the exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods disclosed can be employed in the area of neural stimulation, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to alter neural activity via directly stimulating neurons, depolarizing neurons, hyperpolarizing neurons, modifying neural membrane potentials, altering the level of neural cell excitability, and/or altering the likelihood of a neural cell firing.
  • the method for stimulating biological tissue may also be employed in the area of muscular stimulation, including cardiac stimulation, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to alter muscular activity via direct stimulation, depolarizing muscle cells, hyperpolarizing muscle cells, modifying membrane potentials, altering the level of muscle cell excitability, and/or altering the likelihood of cell firing.
  • the present disclosure may be employed in the area of cellular metabolism, physical therapy, drug delivery, and gene therapy.
  • stimulation methods described herein can result in or influence tissue growth (such as promoting bone growth, directing neural growth or regeneration, and/or interfering with a tumor).
  • tissue stimulation method according to the present disclosure are fabricated from materials suitable for a variety medical applications, such as, for example, polymeries, gels, films, and/or metals, depending on the particular application and/or preference.
  • Semi-rigid and rigid polymeries are contemplated for fabrication, as well as resilient materials, such as molded medical grade polyurethane, as well as flexible or malleable materials.
  • the motors, gearing, electronics, power components, electrodes, and transducers of the method may be fabricated from those suitable for a variety of medical applications.
  • the method according to the present disclosure may also include circuit boards, circuitry, processor components, etc. for computerized control.
  • One skilled in the art will realize that other materials and fabrication methods suitable for assembly and manufacture, in accordance with the present disclosure, also would be appropriate.
  • Figure 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 10 to alter currents, e.g., amplify, focus, alter direction, and/or attenuate in the presence of an applied electric field or applied current source by the combined application of a mechanical field within a biological material to stimulate the biological cells and/or tissue in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • the apparatus 10 illustrated in Figure 1 according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of neural stimulation.
  • An initial source electric field 14 results in a current in the tissue.
  • the electric field 14 is created by an electric source, current or voltage source.
  • the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the electric field, for example by a mechanical field, thereby generating an additional displacement current.
  • Electrodes 12 are applied to the scalp and generate a low magnitude electric field 14 over a large brain region. While electrodes 12 are used and applied to the scalp in this exemplary embodiment, it is envisioned that the electrodes may be applied to a number of different areas on the body including areas around the scalp. It is also envisioned that one electrode may be placed proximal to the tissue being stimulated and the other distant, such as one electrode on the scalp and one on the thorax. It is further envisioned that electric source could be mono-polar with just a single electrode, or multi-polar with multiple electrodes. Similarly, the electric source may be applied to tissue via any medically acceptable medium.
  • inductive magnetic sources where the entire tissue region is placed within a large solenoid generating magnetic fields or near a coil generating magnetic fields, where the magnetic fields induce electric currents in the tissue.
  • a mechanical source such as an ultrasound source 16 is applied on the scalp and provides concentrated acoustic energy 18, i.e., mechanical field to a focused region of neural tissue, affecting a smaller number of neurons 22 than affected by the electric field 14, by the mechanical field 18 altering the tissue permittivity relative to the applied electric field 14, and thereby generating the altered current 20.
  • the mechanical source may be any acoustic source such as an ultrasound device.
  • such device may be a device composed of electromechanical transducers capable of converting an electrical signal to mechanical energy such as those containing piezoelectric materials, a device composed of electromechanical transducers capable of converting an electrical signal to mechanical energy such as those in an acoustic speaker that implement electromagnets, a device in which the mechanical source is coupled to a separate mechanical apparatus that drives the system, or any similar device capable of converting chemical, plasma, electrical, nuclear, or thermal energy to mechanical energy and generating a mechanical field.
  • the mechanical field could be generated via an ultrasound transducer that could be used for imaging tissue.
  • the mechanical field may be coupled to tissue via a bridging medium, such as a container of saline to assist in the focusing or through gels and/or pastes which alter the acoustic impedance between the mechanical source and the tissue.
  • the mechanical field may be time varying, pulsed, an impulse, or may be comprised of time varying pulse forms. It is envisioned that the mechanical source may be applied inside or outside of the tissue of interest. There are no limitations as to the frequencies that can be applied via the mechanical source, however, exemplary mechanical field frequencies range from the sub kHZ to 1000s of MHz.
  • the apparatus and method according to the present disclosure generates capacitive currents via permittivity alterations, which can be significant in magnitude, especially in the presence of low frequency applied electric fields.
  • Tissue permittivities in biological tissues are much higher than most other non biological materials, especially for low frequency applied electric fields where the penetration depths of electric fields are highest. This is because the permittivity is inversely related to the frequency of the applied electric field, such that the tissue permittivity magnitude is higher with lower frequencies. For example, for electric field frequencies below 100,000 Hz, brain tissue has permittivity magnitudes as high as or greater than 10 ⁇ 8 (100,000,000) times the permittivity of free space (8.854* 10 ⁇ -12 farad per meter), and as such, minimal local perturbations of the relative magnitude can lead to significant displacement current generation.
  • the method according to the present disclosure is an advantageous method for stimulating biological tissue due to lowered penetration depth limitations and thus lowered field strength requirements. Additionally, because displacement currents are generated in the area of the permittivity change, focusing can be accomplished via the ultrasound alone.
  • broad DC or a low frequency electric source field well below the cellular stimulation threshold is applied to a brain region but stimulation effects are locally focused in a smaller region by altering the tissue permittivity in the focused region of a mechanical field generated by a mechanical source such as an ultrasound source. This could be done
  • the electrodes and the ultrasound device both placed on the scalp surface such that the fields penetrate the tissue surrounding the brain region and intersect in the targeted brain location, or with one or both of the electrodes and/or the ultrasound device implanted below the scalp surface (in the brain or any of the surrounding tissue) such that the fields intersect in the targeted region.
  • the process described may be accomplished at any frequency of the applied electric field, the method in an exemplary embodiment is applied with lower frequency applied electric fields due to the fact the permittivity magnitudes of tissues, as high as or greater than
  • tissue are within the so called 'alpha dispersion band' where relative tissue permittivity magnitudes are maximally elevated (i.e., as high as or greater than 10 ⁇ 8 times the permittivity of free space).
  • Frequencies above approximately 100,000 to 1,000,000 Hz for the applied electric fields are still applicable for the method described in generating displacement currents for the stimulation of biologic cells and tissue, however, both the tissue permittivity and penetration depth are limited for biological tissues in this band compared to the previous band but displacement currents of sufficient magnitude can still be generated for some applications.
  • the magnitude of the applied electric field will likely need to be increased, or the method used to alter the permittivity relative to the applied electric field increased to bring about a greater permittivity change, relative to the tissue's permittivity magnitude for the applied electric field frequency.
  • the technique could still be applied in more superficial applications in a noninvasive manner or via an invasive method.
  • Higher frequency applied electric fields above 1,000,000 to 100,000,000 Hz, could be used in generating displacement currents for the stimulation of biologic cells and tissue.
  • augmentation, sensory alteration, anesthesia induction and maintenance brain mapping, epileptic mapping, neural atrophy reduction, neuroprosthetic interaction or control with nervous system, stroke and traumatic injury neurorehabilitation, bladder control, assisting breathing, cardiac pacing, muscle stimulation, and treatment of pain syndromes, such as those caused by migraine, neuropathies, and low-back pain; or internal visceral diseases, such as chronic pancreatitis or cancer.
  • the methods herein could be expanded to any form of arthritis, impingement disorders, overuse injuries, entrapment disorders, and/or any muscle, skeletal, or connective tissue disorder which leads to chronic pain, central sensitization of the pain signals, and/or an inflammatory response.
  • the excitability of individual neurons can be heightened to the point that the neurons can be stimulated by the combined fields, or be affected such as to cause or amplify the alteration of the neural excitability caused by the altered currents, either through an increase or decrease in the excitability of the neurons.
  • This alteration of neural excitability can last past the duration of stimulation and thus be used as a basis to provide lasting treatment.
  • the combined fields can be provided in multiple, but separate sessions to have a summed, or carry-over effect, on the excitability of the cells and tissue.
  • the combined fields can be provided prior to another form of stimulation, to prime the tissue making it more or less susceptible to alternate, follow-up forms of stimulation.
  • the combined fields can be provided after an alternate form of stimulation, where the alternate form of stimulation is used to prime the tissue to make it more or less susceptible to the form of stimulation disclosed herein.
  • the combined fields could be applied for a chronic period of time.
  • the tissues could have permittivity values as high as or greater than 10 ⁇ 8 times the permittivity of free space, differ by orders of magnitude, and/ or have anisotropic properties such that the tissue itself demonstrates a different permittivity magnitude depending on the relative direction of the applied electric field.
  • An example of altering permittivity of the bulk tissue occurs where the relative permittivity constant of the bulk tissue is directly altered by mechanical perturbation in the presence of an electric field.
  • the mechanical source i.e., ultrasound source may be placed at any location relative to the electrode locations, i.e., within or outside the same location as the electrodes, as long as components of the electric field and mechanical field are in the same region.
  • Tissue permittivities can be altered relative to the applied electric fields via a number of methods.
  • Mechanical techniques can be used to either alter the bulk tissue permittivity relative to an applied electric field or move tissue components of differing permittivities relative to an applied electric field.
  • frequency of the mechanical field There are no specific limitations to the frequency of the mechanical field that is applied as previously discussed, however, exemplary frequencies range from the sub kHZ to 1000s of MHz.
  • a second electromagnetic field could be applied to the tissue, at a different frequency than the initial frequency of the applied electromagnetic field, such that it alters the tissue permittivity at the frequency dependent point of the initially applied electric field.
  • An optical signal could also be focused on the tissues to alter the permittivity of the tissue relative to an applied electric field.
  • a chemical agent or thermal field could also be applied to the tissues to alter the permittivity of the tissue relative to an applied electric field.
  • Figure 3 shows a set up 50 for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 52 through the combined effects of an electric field 54 and a chemical agent 56.
  • a tissue or composite of tissues 58 is placed within an electric source 60 which generates an electric field 54 and combined with chemical source 62 which releases a chemical agent 56 that can be focused on the tissue 58.
  • the electric field 54 transects the sub region of tissue 64, and the chemical agent 56 reacts with the sub region of tissue 64 to alter the tissue's relative permittivity relative to the applied electric field 54. This generates a displacement current 52 in addition to the current that would be present due to the source electric field 54.
  • the chemical agent 56 may be any agent which can react with the tissue or cellular components of the tissue 64 to alter its permittivity relative to the electric field 54. This may be by a thermoreactive process to raise or lower the tissue 64 temperature or through a chemical reaction which alters the distribution of ions in the cellular and extra-cellular media, for instance, along ionic double layers at cell walls in the tissue 64. Similarly, the conformation of proteins and other charged components within the tissue 64 could be altered such that the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the low frequency electric field 54.
  • the agent could also be any agent that adapts the permanent dipole moments of any molecules or compounds in the tissue 64, temporarily or permanently relative to the low frequency electric field 54.
  • the chemical reaction driven by the chemical agent 56 must work rapidly enough such that the permittivity of the tissue is quickly altered in the presence of the electric field 54 in order to generate the displacement current 52.
  • the reaction may also be such as to fluctuate the permittivity, such that as the permittivity continues to change
  • FIG 4 illustrates a set up 70 for applying a method for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 72 through the combined effects of a low frequency electric field 74 and an electromagnetic radiation field 76.
  • a tissue or composite of tissues 78 is placed within a low frequency electric field 74 which is generated by an electric source 80 and combined with radiation source 82 which generates a radiation field 76 that can be focused on the tissue 78.
  • the electromagnetic radiation field 76 could, for example, interact with the tissue 84 by altering its temperature through ohmic processes, alter the distribution of ions in the cellular and extra-cellular media for instance along ionic double layers along cell walls through the electric forces acting on the ions, or alter the conformation of proteins and other charged components within the tissue through the electric forces such that the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the low frequency electric field 74.
  • the electromagnetic field 76 could interact with the tissue 84 by moving components of the tissue via electrorestrictive forces, as would be seen in anisotropic tissues, to alter the continuum permittivity of the tissue relative to the low frequency electric field 74.
  • a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents.
  • This embodiment may be useful for stimulation in the presence of an acute injury to the tissue
  • the thermal source could be used to additionally assist in the treatment of the tissue injury, for example with a traumatic brain injury or an infarct in any organ such as the heart.
  • the tissue could be cooled or heated at the same time stimulation is provided to reduce the impact of an injury.
  • the stimulation could be used after another form of stimulation was used to prime the tissue. Furthermore, the stimulation could be applied for a chronic period of time. This embodiment may be useful for altering or assisting cardiac pacing or function, assisted breathing, muscle stimulation for rehabilitation, muscle stimulation in the presence of nerve or spinal cord injury to prevent atrophy or assist in movement, or as substitution for physical exercise.
  • the method according to the present disclosure can be applied the area of physical therapy, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to stimulate blood flow, increase or alter neuromuscular response, limit inflammation, speed the break down of scar tissue, and speed rehabilitation by applying the focus of the current generation to the effected region in need of physical therapy.
  • the method according to the present disclosure may have a wide variety in the area of physical therapy including the treatment or rehabilitation of traumatic injuries, sports injuries, surgical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and assisted rehabilitation following neural or muscular injury. For instance, following an injury to a joint or muscle, there is often increased inflammation and scar tissue in the region and decreased neural and muscular response.
  • ultrasound is provided to the affected region to increase blood flow to the region and increase the metabolic re-absorption of the scar tissue while electrical stimulation is provided separately to the nerves and muscles; however, by providing them together, a person could receive the benefit of each individual effect, but additionally amplified stimulatory and metabolic effects through the altered currents.
  • the other methods for generating altered currents discussed within could also be used to assist in physical therapy via the displacement currents that are generated.
  • the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of cellular metabolism, where currents could be used to interact with electrically receptive cells or charged membranes to alter the tissue or cellular dynamics. It is envisioned that this
  • embodiment could provide treatment for various diseases where electrically receptive cells respond to the newly generated displacement currents and altered current distribution.
  • the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of gene therapy.
  • Amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to interact with electrically receptive cells or receptors within the cell to influence protein transcription processes and alter the genetic content of the cells.
  • the altered current densities in the tissue can interact with the tissue to stimulate this altered gene regulation.
  • the displacement currents generated by the method could further be used to assist in drug delivery and/or gene therapy through the altered current influence on the delivery of agents.
  • the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of tissue growth.
  • Combined energies could be used to interact with cells or receptors within the cell to influence cell growth (and/or tissue(s)) and/or alter cellular (and/or tissue(s)) processes and/or structures.
  • Stimulation can be used to increase and or slow cell and/or tissue growth and/or affect tumors, such as through ablation methods whereby energies can be used to ablate tissues or with methods whereby combined energies can create tumor treating fields.
  • electromechanical stimulation altered electromagnetic fields generated via electromechanical coupling can affect the tissues, while in certain embodiments the mechanical fields could also have a further therapeutic effect.
  • the methods and devices of this disclosure involve providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, in which the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, in which the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue.
  • the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue (and in certain embodiments, the stimulatory effect can have a greater facilitatory effect than that of the second type of energy alone).
  • the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue (and in certain embodiments, the stimulatory effect can have a greater inhibitory effect than that of the first type of energy alone).
  • providing one energy type with specific parameters inhibits certain electrical, thermal, mechanical, optical, and/or chemical functions of a cell (such as in size and/or timing), yet the application of a second energy type with specific parameters facilitates certain electrical, thermal, mechanical, optical, and/or chemical functions of a cell, but the combined application of the energies leads to an inhibitory effect(s) greater than the first energy applied alone or a facilitatory effect(s) greater than the second energy type applied alone.
  • the stimulation can be applied to affect multiple functions of the cell, whereby the combined energies could have multiple facilitatory and/or inhibitory effects on the cell (and/or the individual energies can have their own independent effects).
  • the direction of cellular effect can be controlled by any of the energy types applied, dependeing on the energy source parameters and the targeted tissue.
  • a transcranial DC electrical energy source applied in conjunction with a transcranial ultrasound energy source such as might be used for imaging or stimulation
  • the DC eletrical energy source characteristics could be used to determine the direction of typical cellular response during transcranial application (i.e., the polarity of the electrical field); for example one could apply a DC electrical field in conjunction with any typical ultrasound field transcranially to a neural target in the brain, where the DC electrical field and the ultrasound field could be provided in either a facilitatory or inhibitory manner, but the DC electric field is used determine the direction of stimulatory effect, such as could be done with a tDCS stimulation device in conjunction with an ultrasound imaging system, where the polarity of the tDCS fields are used for controlling the direction of combined effect. For instance if one provided a DC electrical field (such as what could be done transcranially from an anodal scalp
  • the combined effects would no longer be facilitatory, but inhibitory.
  • the general convention in transcranial brain stimulation methods is reported using the energy source positions on the scalp, one ultimately determines the direction of stimulation of the combined fields by accounting for the energy fields at the site of action (i.e., the stimulatory field(s) direction and timing at the site of the stimulated cell(s)) and thus while providing specific examples herein of transcranial applications (where we generally follow convention of reporting the effects relative from the scalp application site), the amplitude, source location, timing, and/or vector orientation of the energy fields (and direction of neural effect (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) can be modified by changing the location and/or characteristics of the stimulation energy source(s) (and their applied energies)).
  • the relative interactions between the two energy types can be used to determine and control the stimulatory effect direction.
  • one could also alter the ultrasound parameters instead of the electrical source characteristics to control the direction of neural effect such as one could provide a DC electric field, but alter the direction of neural response (i.e., inhibitor/facilitatory) through the pulse shape, pulse frequency, spectral components, and/or relative direction of the mechanical fields provided by the ultrasound source (relative to the DC field)).
  • a DC current source which was inhibitory to the neural targets (such as a cathodal application of a low intensity current to the cortex from a scalp electrode overlying the entire scalp (and thus cortex) with an indifferent electrode placed below the mouth of the individual being stimulated) but also provide a
  • the coupling of the fields can lead to an amplified electrical current in the tissue (at the frequency in which the ultrasonic field is turned on and off), which can ultimately have a facilitatory effect on the neural targets, such as for example those in the motor cortex (one can provide the electric field at an intensity where its effects alone are negligible in the targeted region, or at a level where the combined effects are greater than that of its individual effects).
  • a facilitatory effect on the neural targets such as for example those in the motor cortex
  • one could vary both of the electrical and mechanical fields e.g., the relative timing, phase, frequency (pulse or spectral power of individual pulses), shape, dynamics, direction, and/or amplitude of the applied energy fields
  • a control device and/or methodology whereby the field parameters are controlled and/or tuned to the desired effect (facilitatory or inhibitory (and magnitude of effect, timing of effect, duration of effect)) based on the combined field analysis relative to the neural response.
  • These parameters could be altered continuously, whereby combined effects (that when provided individually could have contrasting effects) provide stimulatory effects that are greater than either of the individual modality applied individually.
  • these methods could be implemented to effectively provide 'noise' to the cellular system that is targeted, or provide continuously alternating inhibitory and facilitatory signals to alter normal cellular function (either with combined stimulatory methods (i.e., multiple energy types) and/or with individual energy types).
  • Furthrermore the methods demonstrated herein could be extended to work with more than just two energy types, and the direction of effect (inhibitory or facilitatory) determined via the combined energy analysis working through the different permutations as described above.
  • the dynamics of the energy source(s) could be altered in a manner to controll direction (e.g., inhibitory, facilitroy) of the combined effect on cellular function.
  • the direction of the neural effect with more than two energy types can be determined by the methods outlined herein in conjunction with co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application serial number 13/216,282.
  • Example 1 Combination of inhibitory and facilitatory amounts of energy
  • VEP visual evoked potentials
  • a subsequent comparison of the means (with a least squares difference (LSD) correction, with p set as p ⁇ .05), demonstrated a significant difference between all of the techniques during their online periods.
  • LSD least squares difference

Abstract

The invention generally relates to systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in biological tissue. In certain embodiments, the invention provides a method for stimulating cellular function within tissue that involves providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, in which the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, in which the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue.

Description

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STIMULATING CELLULAR FUNCTION IN TISSUE
Related Application
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. nonpro visional application serial number 13/216,313, filed August 24, 2011, the content of which is
incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Government Support
This invention was made with Government support under Grant Number R43NS062530 awarded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Contract No. W31P4Q-09-C-0117 awarded by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in biological tissue.
Background
Stimulation of tissue in humans and other animals is used in a number of clinical applications as well as in clinical and general biological research. In particular, stimulation of neural tissue has been used in the treatment of various diseases including Parkinson's disease, depression, and intractable pain. The stimulation may be applied invasively, e.g., by performing surgery to remove a portion of the skull and implanting electrodes in a specific location within brain tissue, or non-invasively, .e.g., transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Summary
The invention recognizes that a synergistic stimulation effect in a region of tissue may be achieved by combining a first type of energy that is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function with a second type of energy that is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function. Data herein show that the stimulatory effect is greater than the summed effect of the first and second amounts of energy provided to the region of tissue. Accordingly, methods of the invention involve providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, in which the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, in which the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue. In certain
embodiments, the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue. In other embodiments, the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue. The first and second types of energy may be provided simultaneously or sequentially.
Any energy sources known in the art may be used with systems of the invention. In certain embodiments, the first energy source is an electric source that produces an electric field. The electric filed may be pulsed, time varying, pulsed a plurality of time with each pulse being for a different length of time, or time invariant. In certain embodiments, the second energy source is a source that produces a mechanical field, such as an ultrasound device. The mechanical filed may be pulsed, time varying, or pulsed a plurality of time with each pulse being for a different length of time. In certain embodiments, the electric field and/or the mechanical field is focused. The other permutations are also attainable, where the effect direction (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) is dependent on the electrical and/or ultrasound source transducer parameters and/or the electrical and/or ultrasound field parameters.
The first and second energy sources may be applied to any tissue. In certain
embodiments, the first and second energy sources are applied to a structure or multiple structures within the brain or the nervous system such as the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, any component of the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, gastric nuclei, brainstem, thalamus, inferior colliculus, superior colliculus, periaqueductal gray, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, occipital lobe, Brodmann areas 1-48, primary sensory cortex, primary visual cortex, primary auditory cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, cochlea, cranial nerves, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, sub-cortical structures, and spinal cord. In particular embodiments, the tissue is neural tissue, and the affect of the stimulation alters neural function past the duration of stimulation.
Another aspect of the invention provides a system for stimulating cellular function within tissue that includes an ultrasound device configured to emit a mechanical field that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and an electric source configured to emit an electric field that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, the system being configured such that the ultrasound device and the electric source target the same region of tissue and the combined effect stimulates cellular function in a facilitatory manner within the region of tissue. Similarly, the ultrasound source could be provided in a facilitatory manner and the electrical source in an inhibitory manner such that the overall effect on cellular function is inhibitory. The other permutations are also attainable, where the effect direction (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) is dependent on the electrical and/or ultrasound source transducer parameters and/or the electrical and/or ultrasound field parameters. Brief Description of the Drawings
The above-mentioned and other features and objects of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a plan view of one embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure;
Figure 2 is a top plan view of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure;
Figure 3 is a top plan view of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing a chemical source for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure;
Figure 4 is a top plan view of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing a radiation source for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure; and
Figure 5 is a top plan view of another exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for stimulating biological tissue implementing an optical beam for altering permittivity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
Figures 6A-C show a set of graphs comparing mechanical stimulation alone, electrical stimulation alone, and the combination of mechanical and electrical stimulation. Part A is a raw data example of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) shown from one animal, and one electrode contact (for readability). Part B demonstrates the stimulation effect (averaged across all contacts and animals). Part C demonstrates the depth effect of stimulation (the electrode implemented had 23 contacts (50mm length, and 50mm inter-contact distance), but in Figure 3-C only 3 contacts are shown for readability). Throughout the figure, * indicates significance, which was determined first by an N-way Anova, as explained in the examples section, with a subsequent multiple comparison of means (with LSD correction).
Detailed Description
It is envisioned that the present disclosure may be used to stimulate biological tissue in- vivo comprising an electric source that is placed on and/or in the body to generate an electric field and a means for altering the permittivity of tissue relative to the electric field, whereby the alteration of the tissue permittivity relative to the electric field generates a displacement current in the tissue. The exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods disclosed can be employed in the area of neural stimulation, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to alter neural activity via directly stimulating neurons, depolarizing neurons, hyperpolarizing neurons, modifying neural membrane potentials, altering the level of neural cell excitability, and/or altering the likelihood of a neural cell firing.
Likewise, the method for stimulating biological tissue may also be employed in the area of muscular stimulation, including cardiac stimulation, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to alter muscular activity via direct stimulation, depolarizing muscle cells, hyperpolarizing muscle cells, modifying membrane potentials, altering the level of muscle cell excitability, and/or altering the likelihood of cell firing. Similarly, it is envisioned that the present disclosure may be employed in the area of cellular metabolism, physical therapy, drug delivery, and gene therapy. Furthermore, stimulation methods described herein can result in or influence tissue growth (such as promoting bone growth, directing neural growth or regeneration, and/or interfering with a tumor).
Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein, however, it is to be understood that the described embodiments are merely exemplary of the disclosure, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed embodiment. The components of the tissue stimulation method according to the present disclosure are fabricated from materials suitable for a variety medical applications, such as, for example, polymeries, gels, films, and/or metals, depending on the particular application and/or preference. Semi-rigid and rigid polymeries are contemplated for fabrication, as well as resilient materials, such as molded medical grade polyurethane, as well as flexible or malleable materials. The motors, gearing, electronics, power components, electrodes, and transducers of the method may be fabricated from those suitable for a variety of medical applications. The method according to the present disclosure may also include circuit boards, circuitry, processor components, etc. for computerized control. One skilled in the art, however, will realize that other materials and fabrication methods suitable for assembly and manufacture, in accordance with the present disclosure, also would be appropriate.
The following discussion includes a description of the components and exemplary methods for generating currents in biological tissues in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure. Alternate embodiments are also disclosed. Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure illustrated in the accompanying figures wherein like reference numerals indicate the similar parts throughout the figures.
Turning now to Figure 1, which illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 10 to alter currents, e.g., amplify, focus, alter direction, and/or attenuate in the presence of an applied electric field or applied current source by the combined application of a mechanical field within a biological material to stimulate the biological cells and/or tissue in accordance with the present disclosure. For example, the apparatus 10 illustrated in Figure 1 according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of neural stimulation. An initial source electric field 14 results in a current in the tissue. The electric field 14 is created by an electric source, current or voltage source. As described in further detail below, the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the electric field, for example by a mechanical field, thereby generating an additional displacement current.
Electrodes 12 are applied to the scalp and generate a low magnitude electric field 14 over a large brain region. While electrodes 12 are used and applied to the scalp in this exemplary embodiment, it is envisioned that the electrodes may be applied to a number of different areas on the body including areas around the scalp. It is also envisioned that one electrode may be placed proximal to the tissue being stimulated and the other distant, such as one electrode on the scalp and one on the thorax. It is further envisioned that electric source could be mono-polar with just a single electrode, or multi-polar with multiple electrodes. Similarly, the electric source may be applied to tissue via any medically acceptable medium. It is also envisioned that means could be used where the electric source does not need to be in direct contact with the tissue, such as for example, inductive magnetic sources where the entire tissue region is placed within a large solenoid generating magnetic fields or near a coil generating magnetic fields, where the magnetic fields induce electric currents in the tissue.
The electric source may be direct current (DC) or alternating current (AC) and may be applied inside or outside the tissue of interest. Additionally, the source may be time varying. Similarly, the source may be pulsed and may be comprised of time varying pulse forms. The source may be an impulse. Also, the source according to the present disclosure may be intermittent.
A mechanical source such as an ultrasound source 16 is applied on the scalp and provides concentrated acoustic energy 18, i.e., mechanical field to a focused region of neural tissue, affecting a smaller number of neurons 22 than affected by the electric field 14, by the mechanical field 18 altering the tissue permittivity relative to the applied electric field 14, and thereby generating the altered current 20. The mechanical source may be any acoustic source such as an ultrasound device. Generally, such device may be a device composed of electromechanical transducers capable of converting an electrical signal to mechanical energy such as those containing piezoelectric materials, a device composed of electromechanical transducers capable of converting an electrical signal to mechanical energy such as those in an acoustic speaker that implement electromagnets, a device in which the mechanical source is coupled to a separate mechanical apparatus that drives the system, or any similar device capable of converting chemical, plasma, electrical, nuclear, or thermal energy to mechanical energy and generating a mechanical field.
Furthermore, the mechanical field could be generated via an ultrasound transducer that could be used for imaging tissue. The mechanical field may be coupled to tissue via a bridging medium, such as a container of saline to assist in the focusing or through gels and/or pastes which alter the acoustic impedance between the mechanical source and the tissue. The mechanical field may be time varying, pulsed, an impulse, or may be comprised of time varying pulse forms. It is envisioned that the mechanical source may be applied inside or outside of the tissue of interest. There are no limitations as to the frequencies that can be applied via the mechanical source, however, exemplary mechanical field frequencies range from the sub kHZ to 1000s of MHz. Additionally, multiple transducers providing multiple mechanical fields with similar or differing frequencies, and/or similar or different mechanical field waveforms may be used- such as in an array of sources like those used in focused ultrasound arrays. Similarly, multiple varied electric fields could also be applied. The combined fields, electric and mechanical, may be controlled intermittently to cause specific patterns of spiking activity or alterations in neural excitability. For example, the device may produce a periodic signal at a fixed frequency, or high frequency signals at a pulsed frequency to cause stimulation at pulse frequencies shown to be effective in treating numerous pathologies. Such stimulation waveforms may be those implemented in rapid or theta burst TMS treatments, deep brain stimulation treatments, epidural brain stimulation treatments, spinal cord stimulation treatments, or for peripheral electrical stimulation nerve treatments. The ultrasound source may be placed at any location relative to the electrode locations, i.e., within, on top of, below, or outside the same location as the electrodes as long as components of the electric field and mechanical field are in the same region. The locations of the sources should be relative to each other such that the fields intersect relative to the tissue and cells to be stimulated, or to direct the current alteration relative to the cellular components being stimulated.
The apparatus and method according to the present disclosure generates capacitive currents via permittivity alterations, which can be significant in magnitude, especially in the presence of low frequency applied electric fields. Tissue permittivities in biological tissues are much higher than most other non biological materials, especially for low frequency applied electric fields where the penetration depths of electric fields are highest. This is because the permittivity is inversely related to the frequency of the applied electric field, such that the tissue permittivity magnitude is higher with lower frequencies. For example, for electric field frequencies below 100,000 Hz, brain tissue has permittivity magnitudes as high as or greater than 10Λ8 (100,000,000) times the permittivity of free space (8.854* 10Λ -12 farad per meter), and as such, minimal local perturbations of the relative magnitude can lead to significant displacement current generation. As the frequency of the electric field increases, the relative permittivity decreases by orders of magnitude, dropping to magnitudes of approximately 10Λ3 times the permittivity of free space (8.854* 10Λ -12 farad per meter) for electric field frequencies of approximately 100,000Hz. Additionally, by not being constrained to higher electric field frequencies, the method according to the present disclosure is an advantageous method for stimulating biological tissue due to lowered penetration depth limitations and thus lowered field strength requirements. Additionally, because displacement currents are generated in the area of the permittivity change, focusing can be accomplished via the ultrasound alone. For example, to generate capacitive currents via a permittivity perturbation relative to an applied electric field as described above, broad DC or a low frequency electric source field well below the cellular stimulation threshold is applied to a brain region but stimulation effects are locally focused in a smaller region by altering the tissue permittivity in the focused region of a mechanical field generated by a mechanical source such as an ultrasound source. This could be done
noninvasively with the electrodes and the ultrasound device both placed on the scalp surface such that the fields penetrate the tissue surrounding the brain region and intersect in the targeted brain location, or with one or both of the electrodes and/or the ultrasound device implanted below the scalp surface (in the brain or any of the surrounding tissue) such that the fields intersect in the targeted region.
A displacement current is generated by the modification of the permittivity in the presence of the sub threshold electric field and provides a stimulatory signal. In addition to the main permittivity change that occurs in the tissues, which is responsible for stimulation (i.e., the generation of the altered currents for stimulation), a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents. In a further embodiment, the displacement current generation and altered ohmic current components may combine for stimulation. Generally, tissue conductivities vary slightly as a function of the applied electric field frequency over the DC to 100,000 Hz frequency range, but not to the same degree as the permittivities, and increase with the increasing frequency of the applied electric field.
Additionally in biological tissues, unlike other materials, the conductivity and permittivity do not show a simple one-to-one relationship as a function of the applied electric field frequency. The permittivity ranges are as discussed above.
Although the process described may be accomplished at any frequency of the applied electric field, the method in an exemplary embodiment is applied with lower frequency applied electric fields due to the fact the permittivity magnitudes of tissues, as high as or greater than
10Λ8 times the permittivity of free space, and the electric field penetration depths are highest for low frequency applied electric fields. Higher frequency applied electric fields may be less desirable as they will require greater radiation power to penetrate the tissue and/or a more pronounced mechanical source for permittivity alteration to achieve the same relative tissue permittivity change, i.e., at higher applied electric field frequencies the permittivity of the tissue is lower and as such would need a greater overall perturbation to have the same overall change in permittivity of a tissue as at a lower frequency. Applied electric field frequencies in the range of DC to approximately 100,000 Hz frequencies are advantageous due to the high tissue
permittivity in this frequency band and the high penetration depth for biological tissues at these frequencies. In this band, tissues are within the so called 'alpha dispersion band' where relative tissue permittivity magnitudes are maximally elevated (i.e., as high as or greater than 10Λ8 times the permittivity of free space). Frequencies above approximately 100,000 to 1,000,000 Hz for the applied electric fields are still applicable for the method described in generating displacement currents for the stimulation of biologic cells and tissue, however, both the tissue permittivity and penetration depth are limited for biological tissues in this band compared to the previous band but displacement currents of sufficient magnitude can still be generated for some applications. In this range, the magnitude of the applied electric field will likely need to be increased, or the method used to alter the permittivity relative to the applied electric field increased to bring about a greater permittivity change, relative to the tissue's permittivity magnitude for the applied electric field frequency. Additionally, due to potential safety concerns for some applications, it may be necessary to limit the time of application of the fields or to pulse the fields, as opposed to the continuous application that is possible in the prior band. For tissues or applications where the safety concerns preclude the technique in deeper tissues, the technique could still be applied in more superficial applications in a noninvasive manner or via an invasive method. Higher frequency applied electric fields, above 1,000,000 to 100,000,000 Hz, could be used in generating displacement currents for the stimulation of biologic cells and tissue. However, this would require a more sufficient permittivity alteration or electromagnetic radiation, and as such is less than ideal in terms of safety than the earlier bands. For frequencies of the applied electric field above 100,000,000 Hz, biologic cell and tissue stimulation may still be possible, but may be limited for specialized applications that require less significant displacement currents.
The focus of the electric and mechanical fields to generate an altered current according to the present disclosure may be directed to various structures within the brain or nervous system including but not limited to dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, any component of the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, gastric nuclei, brainstem, thalamus, inferior colliculus, superior colliculus, periaqueductal gray, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, occipital lobe,
Brodmann areas 1-48, primary sensory cortex, primary visual cortex, primary auditory cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, cochlea, cranial nerves, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, sub-cortical structures, spinal cord, nerve roots, sensory organs, and peripheral nerves.
The focused tissue may be selected such that a wide variety of pathologies may be treated. Such pathologies that may be treated include but are not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Alzheimer's Disease, Dystonia, Tics, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Drug Craving, Food Craving, Alcohol Craving, Nicotine Craving, Stuttering, Tinnitus, Spasticity, Parkinson's Disease, Parkinsonianism, Obsessions, Depression, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Acute Mania, Catonia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Autism, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Phantom Limb Pain, Epilepsy, Stroke, Auditory
Hallucinations, Movement Disorders, Neurodegenerative Disorders, Pain Disorders, Metabolic Disorders, Addictive Disorders, Psychiatric Disorders, Traumatic Nerve Injury, and Sensory Disorders. Furthermore, electric and mechanical fields to generate an altered current may be focused on specific brain or neural structures to enact procedures including sensory
augmentation, sensory alteration, anesthesia induction and maintenance, brain mapping, epileptic mapping, neural atrophy reduction, neuroprosthetic interaction or control with nervous system, stroke and traumatic injury neurorehabilitation, bladder control, assisting breathing, cardiac pacing, muscle stimulation, and treatment of pain syndromes, such as those caused by migraine, neuropathies, and low-back pain; or internal visceral diseases, such as chronic pancreatitis or cancer. The methods herein could be expanded to any form of arthritis, impingement disorders, overuse injuries, entrapment disorders, and/or any muscle, skeletal, or connective tissue disorder which leads to chronic pain, central sensitization of the pain signals, and/or an inflammatory response.
In the focused region of tissue to which the mechanical fields and electrical fields are delivered, the excitability of individual neurons can be heightened to the point that the neurons can be stimulated by the combined fields, or be affected such as to cause or amplify the alteration of the neural excitability caused by the altered currents, either through an increase or decrease in the excitability of the neurons. This alteration of neural excitability can last past the duration of stimulation and thus be used as a basis to provide lasting treatment. Additionally, the combined fields can be provided in multiple, but separate sessions to have a summed, or carry-over effect, on the excitability of the cells and tissue. The combined fields can be provided prior to another form of stimulation, to prime the tissue making it more or less susceptible to alternate, follow-up forms of stimulation. Furthermore, the combined fields can be provided after an alternate form of stimulation, where the alternate form of stimulation is used to prime the tissue to make it more or less susceptible to the form of stimulation disclosed herein. Furthermore, the combined fields could be applied for a chronic period of time.
Figure 2 illustrates a set up 30 to perform a method for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 32 for stimulation in biologic tissue 34 through the combined effects of an electric field 36 and a mechanical field 38. A tissue or composite of tissues 34 is placed adjacent to the anode and cathode of an electric source 40 which generates an electric field 36. The electric field 36 is combined with a mechanical, e.g., ultrasound field 38 which can be focused on the tissue 34 and generated via an ultrasound transducer 42. In a sub- region of tissue 44 where the mechanical field 38 is focused and intersects with the electric field 36, a displacement current 32 is generated. By vibrating and/or mechanically perturbing the sub- region of tissue 44, the permittivity of the tissue 44 can be altered relative to the applied electric field 36 to generate a displacement current 32 in addition to the current that would be present due to the source electric field 36 and altered due to conductivity changes in the tissue caused by the mechanical perturbation.
By providing the mechanical field 38 to the sub region of tissue 44, the permittivity can be altered within the electric field 36 by either new elements of the sub region of tissue 44 vibrating in and out of the electric field such that the continuum permittivity of the tissue is changed relative to the electric field 36, or that the bulk properties of the sub region of tissue 44 and the permittivity, or tissue capacitance, change due to the mechanical perturbation. An example of altering the permittivity within the electric field can occur when a cell membrane and extra-cellular fluid, both of different permittivities, are altered in position relative to the electric field by the mechanical field. This movement of tissues of different permittivity relative to the electric field will generate a new displacement current. The tissues could have permittivity values as high as or greater than 10Λ8 times the permittivity of free space, differ by orders of magnitude, and/ or have anisotropic properties such that the tissue itself demonstrates a different permittivity magnitude depending on the relative direction of the applied electric field. An example of altering permittivity of the bulk tissue occurs where the relative permittivity constant of the bulk tissue is directly altered by mechanical perturbation in the presence of an electric field. The mechanical source, i.e., ultrasound source may be placed at any location relative to the electrode locations, i.e., within or outside the same location as the electrodes, as long as components of the electric field and mechanical field are in the same region.
Tissue permittivities can be altered relative to the applied electric fields via a number of methods. Mechanical techniques can be used to either alter the bulk tissue permittivity relative to an applied electric field or move tissue components of differing permittivities relative to an applied electric field. There are no specific limitations to the frequency of the mechanical field that is applied as previously discussed, however, exemplary frequencies range from the sub kHZ to 1000s of MHz. A second electromagnetic field could be applied to the tissue, at a different frequency than the initial frequency of the applied electromagnetic field, such that it alters the tissue permittivity at the frequency dependent point of the initially applied electric field. An optical signal could also be focused on the tissues to alter the permittivity of the tissue relative to an applied electric field. A chemical agent or thermal field could also be applied to the tissues to alter the permittivity of the tissue relative to an applied electric field. These methods could also be used in combination to alter the tissue permittivity relative to an applied electric field via invasive or noninvasive methods.
For example, Figure 3 shows a set up 50 for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 52 through the combined effects of an electric field 54 and a chemical agent 56. A tissue or composite of tissues 58 is placed within an electric source 60 which generates an electric field 54 and combined with chemical source 62 which releases a chemical agent 56 that can be focused on the tissue 58. In the area that the chemical agent 56 is released in the tissue 64, the electric field 54 transects the sub region of tissue 64, and the chemical agent 56 reacts with the sub region of tissue 64 to alter the tissue's relative permittivity relative to the applied electric field 54. This generates a displacement current 52 in addition to the current that would be present due to the source electric field 54. The chemical agent 56 may be any agent which can react with the tissue or cellular components of the tissue 64 to alter its permittivity relative to the electric field 54. This may be by a thermoreactive process to raise or lower the tissue 64 temperature or through a chemical reaction which alters the distribution of ions in the cellular and extra-cellular media, for instance, along ionic double layers at cell walls in the tissue 64. Similarly, the conformation of proteins and other charged components within the tissue 64 could be altered such that the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the low frequency electric field 54. The agent could also be any agent that adapts the permanent dipole moments of any molecules or compounds in the tissue 64, temporarily or permanently relative to the low frequency electric field 54. The chemical reaction driven by the chemical agent 56 must work rapidly enough such that the permittivity of the tissue is quickly altered in the presence of the electric field 54 in order to generate the displacement current 52. The reaction may also be such as to fluctuate the permittivity, such that as the permittivity continues to change
displacement currents continue to be generated. In addition to the main permittivity change that occurs in the tissues, a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents. A biological agent may be used in place of, or in addition to, the chemical agent 56. This embodiment may have particular application for focused drug delivery where an additional chemical or biological agent is included to assist in therapy of the tissue, or where the altered current could drive an additional electrochemical reaction for therapy. For example, this could be used in areas such as focused gene therapy or focused chemotherapy.
Another example is shown in Figure 4, which illustrates a set up 70 for applying a method for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 72 through the combined effects of a low frequency electric field 74 and an electromagnetic radiation field 76. A tissue or composite of tissues 78 is placed within a low frequency electric field 74 which is generated by an electric source 80 and combined with radiation source 82 which generates a radiation field 76 that can be focused on the tissue 78. In the area that the radiation field 76 is focused in the tissue 78, the electric field 74 transects the sub component of tissue 84, where the radiation field 76 interacts with the sub component of tissue 84 to alter the tissue's relative permittivity relative to the applied electric field 74, and as such generates a displacement current 72 in addition to the current that would be present due to the source electric field 74 or the radiation source field 76 alone. The electromagnetic radiation field 76 could, for example, interact with the tissue 84 by altering its temperature through ohmic processes, alter the distribution of ions in the cellular and extra-cellular media for instance along ionic double layers along cell walls through the electric forces acting on the ions, or alter the conformation of proteins and other charged components within the tissue through the electric forces such that the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the low frequency electric field 74. Furthermore, the electromagnetic field 76, could interact with the tissue 84 by moving components of the tissue via electrorestrictive forces, as would be seen in anisotropic tissues, to alter the continuum permittivity of the tissue relative to the low frequency electric field 74. In addition to the main permittivity change that occurs in the tissues, a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents.
Figure 5 shows a set up 90 for applying a method for generating an altered current with a newly generated displacement current 92 through the combined effects of an electric field 94 and an optical beam 96. A tissue or composite of tissues 98 is placed within electric field 94 generated by an electric source 100 and combined with optical source 102 which generates optical beam 96 that can be focused on the tissue 98. In the area that the optical beam 96 is focused on the tissue, the electric field 94 transects the sub component of tissue 104, where the optical beam 96 reacts with the tissue to alter the tissue's relative permittivity relative to the applied electric field 94, and as such generates a displacement current 92 in addition to the current that would be present due to the source electric field 94. The optical beam 96 could, for example, interact with the tissue by altering its temperature through photo thermal effects and/or particle excitation, alter the distribution of ions in the cellular and extra-cellular media for instance along ionic double layers along cell walls by exciting the movement of ions optically, ionizing the tissue via laser tissue-interactions, or alter the conformation of proteins and other charged components within the tissue such that the permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to the low frequency electric field 94. In addition to the main permittivity change that occurs in the tissues, a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents.
In another embodiment, a thermal source to alter the permittivity of the tissue may be used. In such embodiments, a thermal source such as a heating probe, a cooling probe, or a hybrid probe may be placed external or internal to the tissue to be stimulated. A thermal source may alter the permittivity of the tissue through the direct permittivity dependence of tissue temperature, mechanical expansion of tissues in response to temperature changes, or by mechanical forces that arise due to altered particle and ionic agitation in response to the temperature alteration such that permittivity of the tissue is altered relative to an applied electric field. In addition to the main permittivity change that occurs in the tissues, a conductivity change could also occur in the tissue, which secondarily alters the ohmic component of the currents. This embodiment may be useful for stimulation in the presence of an acute injury to the tissue where the thermal source could be used to additionally assist in the treatment of the tissue injury, for example with a traumatic brain injury or an infarct in any organ such as the heart. The tissue could be cooled or heated at the same time stimulation is provided to reduce the impact of an injury.
In a further embodiment, the method according to the present disclosure is applied in the area of muscular stimulation, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to alter muscular activity via direct stimulation, depolarizing muscular cells, hyperpolarizing muscular cells, modifying membrane potentials, and/or increasing or decreasing the excitability of the muscle cells. This alteration of excitability or firing patterns can last past the duration of stimulation and thus be used as a basis to provide lasting treatment. Additionally, the stimulation can be provided in multiple, but separate sessions to have a summed, or carry-over effect, on the excitability of cells and tissue. Additionally, the stimulation could be provided to prime the tissue by adjusting the muscle cell excitability to make it more or less susceptible to alternate follow up forms of stimulation. The stimulation could be used after another form of stimulation was used to prime the tissue. Furthermore, the stimulation could be applied for a chronic period of time. This embodiment may be useful for altering or assisting cardiac pacing or function, assisted breathing, muscle stimulation for rehabilitation, muscle stimulation in the presence of nerve or spinal cord injury to prevent atrophy or assist in movement, or as substitution for physical exercise.
In yet another embodiment, the method according to the present disclosure can be applied the area of physical therapy, where amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to stimulate blood flow, increase or alter neuromuscular response, limit inflammation, speed the break down of scar tissue, and speed rehabilitation by applying the focus of the current generation to the effected region in need of physical therapy. It is envisioned that the method according to the present disclosure may have a wide variety in the area of physical therapy including the treatment or rehabilitation of traumatic injuries, sports injuries, surgical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and assisted rehabilitation following neural or muscular injury. For instance, following an injury to a joint or muscle, there is often increased inflammation and scar tissue in the region and decreased neural and muscular response.
Typically, ultrasound is provided to the affected region to increase blood flow to the region and increase the metabolic re-absorption of the scar tissue while electrical stimulation is provided separately to the nerves and muscles; however, by providing them together, a person could receive the benefit of each individual effect, but additionally amplified stimulatory and metabolic effects through the altered currents. The other methods for generating altered currents discussed within could also be used to assist in physical therapy via the displacement currents that are generated.
Furthermore, the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of cellular metabolism, where currents could be used to interact with electrically receptive cells or charged membranes to alter the tissue or cellular dynamics. It is envisioned that this
embodiment could provide treatment for various diseases where electrically receptive cells respond to the newly generated displacement currents and altered current distribution.
Furthermore, the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of gene therapy. Amplified, focused, direction altered, and/or attenuated currents could be used to interact with electrically receptive cells or receptors within the cell to influence protein transcription processes and alter the genetic content of the cells. The altered current densities in the tissue can interact with the tissue to stimulate this altered gene regulation. Additionally, the displacement currents generated by the method could further be used to assist in drug delivery and/or gene therapy through the altered current influence on the delivery of agents.
Furthermore, the method according to the present disclosure may be applied to the area of tissue growth. Combined energies could be used to interact with cells or receptors within the cell to influence cell growth (and/or tissue(s)) and/or alter cellular (and/or tissue(s)) processes and/or structures. Stimulation can be used to increase and or slow cell and/or tissue growth and/or affect tumors, such as through ablation methods whereby energies can be used to ablate tissues or with methods whereby combined energies can create tumor treating fields. For instance, with electromechanical stimulation, altered electromagnetic fields generated via electromechanical coupling can affect the tissues, while in certain embodiments the mechanical fields could also have a further therapeutic effect. The methods and devices of this disclosure involve providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, in which the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue, and providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, in which the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue, wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue. In certain embodiments, the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue (and in certain embodiments, the stimulatory effect can have a greater facilitatory effect than that of the second type of energy alone). In other embodiments, the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue (and in certain embodiments, the stimulatory effect can have a greater inhibitory effect than that of the first type of energy alone). For example, providing one energy type with specific parameters inhibits certain electrical, thermal, mechanical, optical, and/or chemical functions of a cell (such as in size and/or timing), yet the application of a second energy type with specific parameters facilitates certain electrical, thermal, mechanical, optical, and/or chemical functions of a cell, but the combined application of the energies leads to an inhibitory effect(s) greater than the first energy applied alone or a facilitatory effect(s) greater than the second energy type applied alone. The stimulation can be applied to affect multiple functions of the cell, whereby the combined energies could have multiple facilitatory and/or inhibitory effects on the cell (and/or the individual energies can have their own independent effects). Furthermore the methods described herein could be applied to extend (or decrease) the duration of stimulatory effect of one (or both) of the energy types on cellular function, whereby the combined effects of the two energies lead to an extended duration of effect of one (or both) of the stimulatory energies.
The direction of cellular effect (inhibitory or facilitatory) can be controlled by any of the energy types applied, dependeing on the energy source parameters and the targeted tissue. For example with a transcranial DC electrical energy source applied in conjunction with a transcranial ultrasound energy source (such as might be used for imaging or stimulation), the DC eletrical energy source characteristics could be used to determine the direction of typical cellular response during transcranial application (i.e., the polarity of the electrical field); for example one could apply a DC electrical field in conjunction with any typical ultrasound field transcranially to a neural target in the brain, where the DC electrical field and the ultrasound field could be provided in either a facilitatory or inhibitory manner, but the DC electric field is used determine the direction of stimulatory effect, such as could be done with a tDCS stimulation device in conjunction with an ultrasound imaging system, where the polarity of the tDCS fields are used for controlling the direction of combined effect. For instance if one provided a DC electrical field (such as what could be done transcranially from an anodal scalp electrode (with
approximately 2mA/25 cmA2 current density amplitude, as reported at the scalp source)) focused on the visual cortex while simultaneuosuly providing an ultrasound stimulation with inhibitory properties to the same area (such as could be done with an ultrasound source providing a typical transcranial imaging signal of approximately a 2.4 MHz center frequency (where the center frequency refers to the NEMA center frequency, calculated in accordance with NEMA UD2 (NEMA Acoustic Output Measurement Standard) defined as Fc=(fl + f2)/2 where fl and f2 are the frequencies at which the transmitted acoustic pressure spectrum is 71% (-3dB) of its maximum value), with a Max Ispta.3 of -0.2 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) Spatial- Peak Temporal- Average intensity (mW/cmA2)), the Max Isppa.3 of -33 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) Spatial-Peak Pulse- Average intensity (W/cm )), and a Max Imax.3 of -46 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) maximum half-cycle intensity value acquired at the depth where Pii.3 is maximized (W/cmA2))) the overall effect on the neural target would be facilitatory (although the techniques provided individually would elicit facilitatory (tDCS) and inhibitory (ultrasound) effects). However, by altering the relative position of the DC source (such as by placing it inside the brain) and both lowering its strength and reversing its polarity, such that it was a cathodal source (for further examples describing anodal vs cathodal effects see (Wagner, Valero-Cabre and Pascual-Leone, Noninvasive Human Brain Stimulation, Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2007) or its references (Bindman, Lippold and Redfearn, The Action of Brief Polarizing Currents on the Cerebral Cortex of the Rat (1) During Current Flow and (2) in the Production of Long-Lasting after-Effects, J Physiol, 172,(369-82, 1964), (Bindman LJ, Long- lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced by polarizing currents, Nature 196,(584—85, 1962), (Purpura and McMurtry, Intracellular Activities and Evoked Potential Changes During Polarization of Motor Cortex, J Neurophysiol, 28,(166-85, 1965), and (Terzuolo and Bullock, Measurment of Imposed Voltage Gradient Adequate to Modulate Neuronal Firing, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 42,(9), 687-694, 1956)), the relative electric field effect on the visual cortex would be the same as having used the anodal stimulation on the scalp surface (and thus the combined effect would be the same, but driven by the cathodal driven electric field (but where the relative field effects are the same)). However, by flipping the polarity of the electrical source field in either example the combined effects would no longer be facilitatory, but inhibitory. (Although the general convention in transcranial brain stimulation methods is reported using the energy source positions on the scalp, one ultimately determines the direction of stimulation of the combined fields by accounting for the energy fields at the site of action (i.e., the stimulatory field(s) direction and timing at the site of the stimulated cell(s)) and thus while providing specific examples herein of transcranial applications (where we generally follow convention of reporting the effects relative from the scalp application site), the amplitude, source location, timing, and/or vector orientation of the energy fields (and direction of neural effect (i.e., inhibitory or facilitatory) can be modified by changing the location and/or characteristics of the stimulation energy source(s) (and their applied energies)).
And while above we provide an example for combined electrical and mechanical stimulation where the DC electric field is used to control the direction of effect (i.e.,
inhibitor/facilitatory), the relative interactions between the two energy types can be used to determine and control the stimulatory effect direction. For instance, one could also alter the ultrasound parameters instead of the electrical source characteristics to control the direction of neural effect (such as one could provide a DC electric field, but alter the direction of neural response (i.e., inhibitor/facilitatory) through the pulse shape, pulse frequency, spectral components, and/or relative direction of the mechanical fields provided by the ultrasound source (relative to the DC field)). For example, one could provide an electrical field, such as through a DC current source which was inhibitory to the neural targets (such as a cathodal application of a low intensity current to the cortex from a scalp electrode overlying the entire scalp (and thus cortex) with an indifferent electrode placed below the mouth of the individual being stimulated) but also provide a pulsed transcranial ultrasonic field to a focused target in the presence of the broad field (for example with a 0.7 MHz field, pulsed on and off (for short pulse durations, for example for a period shorter than the refractory period of the targeted cells, or for instance at a 65 microsecond duration, or just for one quarter of a wave-cycle) at a frequency greater than 20 Hz) to the same brain area. The coupling of the fields can lead to an amplified electrical current in the tissue (at the frequency in which the ultrasonic field is turned on and off), which can ultimately have a facilitatory effect on the neural targets, such as for example those in the motor cortex (one can provide the electric field at an intensity where its effects alone are negligible in the targeted region, or at a level where the combined effects are greater than that of its individual effects). As another example, one could provide the same electrical field, but alter the mechanical field such that it is pulsed on and off at a 1 Hz frequency, this in turn would lead to an overall inhibitory effect on the neural targets.
Furthermore, one could vary both of the electrical and mechanical fields (e.g., the relative timing, phase, frequency (pulse or spectral power of individual pulses), shape, dynamics, direction, and/or amplitude of the applied energy fields), such as with a control device and/or methodology whereby the field parameters are controlled and/or tuned to the desired effect (facilitatory or inhibitory (and magnitude of effect, timing of effect, duration of effect)) based on the combined field analysis relative to the neural response. These parameters could be altered continuously, whereby combined effects (that when provided individually could have contrasting effects) provide stimulatory effects that are greater than either of the individual modality applied individually.
Ultimately, one could calculate, optimize, tune, or guide the combined energy field effects (such as those driven by an electric field source and a mechanical field source) with any computational method such as those explained co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application serial number 13/216,282 the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety (and/or integrated with imaging data and/or tissue property data and/or feedback information, such as those explained co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application serial number
13/162,047 the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety).
In another potential embodiment these methods could be implemented to effectively provide 'noise' to the cellular system that is targeted, or provide continuously alternating inhibitory and facilitatory signals to alter normal cellular function (either with combined stimulatory methods (i.e., multiple energy types) and/or with individual energy types).
All of the methods and processes discussed in this document could be implemented with any form of stimulation, including but not limited to electromagnetic, mechanical, optical, thermal, electrical, magnetic, and/or combined methods (and/or methods which alter tissue impedances relative to electrical sources to generate altered stimulation currents, for example with electromagnetic, chemical, mechanical, optical, thermal, electrical, magnetic, and/or combined sources). Typically, the two energy components would be simultaneuosly applied; but, using one energy type to prime the tissue for one or more energy types is also possible, either sequentually applying the energies or with a period of time in between the second energy application.
Furthrermore the methods demonstrated herein could be extended to work with more than just two energy types, and the direction of effect (inhibitory or facilitatory) determined via the combined energy analysis working through the different permutations as described above. As in the other methods with two energy types, the dynamics of the energy source(s) could be altered in a manner to controll direction (e.g., inhibitory, facilitroy) of the combined effect on cellular function. As in the other methods with two energy types, the direction of the neural effect with more than two energy types can be determined by the methods outlined herein in conjunction with co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application serial number 13/216,282.
Incorporation by Reference
References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Equivalents
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 : Combination of inhibitory and facilitatory amounts of energy
Electrophysiology protocols focused on comparing the combined local visual evoked potentials (VEP) recorded from a 23 contact electrode, implanted in area 17 (i.e., primary visual cortices, VI) of anaesthetized adult cats (n=6) during and immediately following transcranial stimulations applied to the VI. Application of a mechanical field (TUS (2.4 MHz/ 0.2 W/cm )), an electrical field (tDCS (2 mA DC/ 9 cm , anodal)), a combination of a mechanical field and an electrical field (ESSstim (2 mA DC/ 9 cm2, 2.4 MHz/ 0.2 W/cm2)), and a SHAM (inactive transducer) were evaluated (i.e., stimulations completed transcranially from an anodal scalp electrode (with a ~2mA/9 cmA2 current density amplitude, as reported at the scalp source) and a ultrasound scalp source (a 2.4 MHz center frequency (where the center frequency refers to the NEMA center frequency, calculated in accordance with NEMA UD2 (NEMA Acoustic Output Measurement Standard) defined as Fc=(f 1 + f2)/2 where f 1 and f2 are the frequencies at which the transmitted acoustic pressure spectrum is 71% (-3dB) of its maximum value), with a Max Ispta.3 of -0.2 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) Spatial-Peak Temporal-Average intensity (mW/cmA2)), the Max Isppa.3 of -33 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) Spatial-Peak Pulse- Average intensity (W/cm )), and a Max Imax.3 of -46 W/cmA2 (the derated (at 0.3 dB/cm.MHz) maximum half-cycle intensity value acquired at the depth where Pii.3 is maximized (W/cmA2))) . Dosing was applied for 5 min periods. Although anesthesia and low stimulation doses were used to minimize the offline/carryover effects of stimulation, each application of stimulation was followed by a variable washout period, where the real-time VEP response was monitored and allowed to return to the range of the pre- stimulation VEPs (15 min minimum, assessed in 5 min blocks).
A 3- way ANOVA (Dependent: Area Under VEP Curve (i.e., measure of cortical excitability); Independent: Stimulation Type, Time, and Cat) demonstrated a highly significant effect of stimulation type (F3> 14699=73.97, p~0), time (analyzed in 5 minute epochs (i.e., online, 0- 5, 5-10, and 10-15 mins)) (F3j l4699=90.68,p~0), and cat (Fs>14699= 40.31, p~0). A subsequent comparison of the means (with a least squares difference (LSD) correction, with p set as p<.05), demonstrated a significant difference between all of the techniques during their online periods. It was observed that application of the mechanical field alone had a suppressive effect on cellular function within the region of tissue, and that application of the electric field had a facilitatory effect on cellular function within the region of tissue. See Fig. 6A-C. It was observed that combining the mechanical field and the electrical field at the same dosing as they were applied individually facilitated cellular function within the tissue, and that the stimulation of cellular function was approximately 4 times greater than the stimulation of cellular function observed from the electrical field alone. See Fig. 6A-C.
A secondary analysis of the techniques as a function of stimulation type, time, and contact depth
Figure imgf000023_0001
p~0) accounting for cat to cat variability was undertaken where a multiple comparison of means, with an LSD correction(p<0.05), demonstrated the online effects of the combination of the mechanical field and the electrical field to be significant throughout every contact (from surface to deeper contacts) and the electrical field to only be significant at the cortical surface. The mechanical field alone had an insignificant effect at any individual contact site but was consistently suppressive (See Fig. 6A-C).
Finally, in a sub cat group (n=3 complete), randomized transcranial stimulations to the VI, the frontal eye field (A6), and the posterior middle suprasylvian sulcus (PMS) areas have been made with comparisons being made among a combination of a mechanical field and electrical field, an electrical field alone, a mechanical field alone, and a SHAM field (i.e., inactive transducers). In these animals, the results demonstrated VI and PMS stimulation effects similar to above (with the VI stimulations demonstrating a slightly larger effect than PMS, although not greatly different); and in the deepest target (A6), the combination of the mechanical field and the electrical field was the only technique to demonstrate any consistent effect in neural activity (approximately +5.8% change in the VEP magnitude).

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for stimulating cellular function within tissue, the method comprising:
providing a first type of energy to a region of tissue, wherein the first type is provided in an amount that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue; and
providing a second type of energy to the region of tissue, wherein the second type is provided in an amount that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue;
wherein the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the tissue.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stimulatory effect is greater than the summed effect of the first and second amounts of energy provided to the region of tissue.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue.
4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second types are provided simultaneously.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second types are provided sequentially.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first type of energy is a mechanical field.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the mechanical field is generated by an ultrasound device.
9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the mechanical field is pulsed.
10. The method according to claim 7, wherein the mechanical field is time varying.
11. The method according to claim 7, wherein the mechanical field is pulsed a plurality of time, and each pulse may be for a different length of time.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second type of energy is an electric field.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the electric field is pulsed.
14. The method according to claim 12, wherein the electric field is time varying.
15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the electric field is pulsed a plurality of time, and each pulse may be for a different length of time.
16. The method according to claim 12, wherein the electric field is time invariant.
17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second types of energy are applied to a structure or multiple structures within the brain or the nervous system selected from the group consisting of: dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, any component of the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, gastric nuclei, brainstem, thalamus, inferior colliculus, superior colliculus, periaqueductal gray, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, occipital lobe,
Brodmann areas 1-48, primary sensory cortex, primary visual cortex, primary auditory cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, cochlea, cranial nerves, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, sub-cortical structures, and spinal cord.
18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tissue is neural tissue.
19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the affect of the stimulation alters neural function past the duration of stimulation.
20. A system for stimulating cellular function within tissue, the system comprising: an ultrasound device configured to emit a mechanical field that inhibits cellular function within the region of tissue; and
an electric source configured to emit an electric field that facilitates cellular function within the region of tissue;
wherein the system is configured such that the ultrasound device and the electric source target the same region of tissue and the combined effect stimulates cellular function within the region of tissue.
21. The system according to claim 20, wherein the stimulatory effect is greater than the summed effect of the mechanical field and the electric field provided to the region of tissue.
22. The system according to claim 21, wherein the stimulatory effect is facilitatory to the cellular function within the tissue.
23. The system according to claim 21, wherein the stimulatory effect is inhibitory to the cellular function within the tissue.
24. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field and the electric field are provided simultaneously.
25. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field and the electric field are provided sequentially.
26. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field is pulsed.
27. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field is time varying.
28. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field is pulsed a plurality of time, and each pulse may be for a different length of time.
29. The system according to claim 20, wherein the electric field is pulsed.
30. The system according to claim 20, wherein the electric field is time varying.
31. The system according to claim 20, wherein the electric field is pulsed a plurality of time, and each pulse may be for a different length of time.
32. The system according to claim 20, wherein the electric field is time invariant.
33. The system according to claim 20, wherein the mechanical field and the electric field are applied to a structure or multiple structures within the brain or the nervous system selected from the group consisting of: dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, any component of the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, gastric nuclei, brainstem, thalamus, inferior coUiculus, superior coUiculus, periaqueductal gray, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, occipital lobe,
Brodmann areas 1-48, primary sensory cortex, primary visual cortex, primary auditory cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, cochlea, cranial nerves, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, sub-cortical structures, and spinal cord.
34. The system according to claim 20, wherein the tissue is neural tissue.
35. The system according to claim 34, wherein the affect of the stimulation alters neural function past the duration of stimulation.
PCT/US2012/044664 2011-08-24 2012-06-28 Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue WO2013028262A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12826175.7A EP2747728B1 (en) 2011-08-24 2012-06-28 Systems for stimulating cellular function in tissue
EP22191961.6A EP4162915A1 (en) 2011-08-24 2012-06-28 Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/216,313 2011-08-24
US13/216,313 US8594783B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2011-08-24 Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013028262A2 true WO2013028262A2 (en) 2013-02-28
WO2013028262A3 WO2013028262A3 (en) 2014-05-08

Family

ID=47744755

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/044664 WO2013028262A2 (en) 2011-08-24 2012-06-28 Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (6) US8594783B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2747728B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013028262A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4162915A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2023-04-12 Highland Instruments Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100076314A1 (en) * 2008-03-25 2010-03-25 Robert Muratore System and method for creating virtual force field
US20130317573A1 (en) * 2012-05-25 2013-11-28 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Combination electrical stimulation and low-level laser therapy
CA2979247A1 (en) * 2015-03-25 2016-09-29 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Methods and devices for identifying treatment sites
ES2571460B1 (en) * 2015-10-23 2017-01-05 Indiba, S.A. Cosmetic procedure for the reduction or prevention of the accumulation of adipose tissue
US10335607B2 (en) 2016-02-05 2019-07-02 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Implantable optical stimulation lead and methods of making and using
US10625072B2 (en) 2016-10-21 2020-04-21 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Electrical stimulation methods with optical observation and devices therefor
WO2018101986A1 (en) 2016-12-01 2018-06-07 Thimble Bioelectronics, Inc. d/b/a Enso Neuromodulation device and method for use
EP3645110B1 (en) 2017-06-26 2022-07-13 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Systems for visualizing and controlling optogenetic stimulation using optical stimulation systems
EP3737464A1 (en) 2018-01-11 2020-11-18 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Methods and systems for stimulation for glial modulation
WO2019183068A1 (en) 2018-03-23 2019-09-26 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation An optical stimulation system with on-demand monitoring and methods of making and using
US11565131B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2023-01-31 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Optical stimulation systems with calibration and methods of making and using
US11224743B2 (en) 2018-09-21 2022-01-18 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Systems and methods for making and using modular leads for electrical stimulation systems
US11426595B2 (en) 2018-11-16 2022-08-30 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Optical stimulation system with on-demand monitoring and methods of making and using
US11890467B2 (en) * 2019-08-30 2024-02-06 Novocure Gmbh Delivering tumor treating fields (TTFields) to the neck
WO2022051295A1 (en) 2020-09-04 2022-03-10 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation Stimulation systems with a lens arrangement for light coupling and methods of making and using

Family Cites Families (93)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2838672A (en) 1954-06-29 1958-06-10 Physical Medicine Products Co Electro-therapy generator
US2830578A (en) 1957-01-31 1958-04-15 Mark E Degroff Electro-sonic apparatus
US3735756A (en) 1971-06-23 1973-05-29 Medco Products Co Inc Duplex ultrasound generator and combined electrical muscle stimulator
US3822708A (en) 1972-12-07 1974-07-09 Clinical Technology Corp Electrical spinal cord stimulating device and method for management of pain
US4305402A (en) 1979-06-29 1981-12-15 Katims Jefferson J Method for transcutaneous electrical stimulation
US4503863A (en) 1979-06-29 1985-03-12 Katims Jefferson J Method and apparatus for transcutaneous electrical stimulation
US4611596A (en) 1980-10-14 1986-09-16 Purdue Research Foundation Sensory prostheses
ES510489A0 (en) 1982-03-16 1982-08-16 Rodriguez Delgado Jose Manu "ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR THE ACTIVATION, INHIBITION AND-OR MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONING OF CELLS, ORGANS AND ORGANISMS OF LIVING BEINGS".
US4535785A (en) 1982-09-23 1985-08-20 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Co. Method and apparatus for determining the viability and survival of sensori-neutral elements within the inner ear
US4723536A (en) 1984-08-27 1988-02-09 Rauscher Elizabeth A External magnetic field impulse pacemaker non-invasive method and apparatus for modulating brain through an external magnetic field to pace the heart and reduce pain
US4889526A (en) 1984-08-27 1989-12-26 Magtech Laboratories, Inc. Non-invasive method and apparatus for modulating brain signals through an external magnetic or electric field to reduce pain
US4672951A (en) 1985-12-30 1987-06-16 Bio-Electric, Inc. Method and apparatus for treatment of biological tissue
US4805636A (en) 1986-02-24 1989-02-21 The University Of Michigan System for controlling muscle response
US5014699A (en) 1986-05-23 1991-05-14 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Electromagnetic method and apparatus for healing living tissue
US4923437A (en) 1986-07-18 1990-05-08 Gordon Robert T Process for applying a localized magnetic or electric field
US4759377A (en) 1986-11-26 1988-07-26 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Apparatus and method for mechanical stimulation of nerves
DE3831809A1 (en) 1988-09-19 1990-03-22 Funke Hermann DEVICE DETERMINED AT LEAST PARTLY IN THE LIVING BODY
US5061234A (en) 1989-09-25 1991-10-29 Corteks, Inc. Magnetic neural stimulator for neurophysiology
US5569591A (en) 1990-08-03 1996-10-29 University College Of Wales Aberystwyth Analytical or monitoring apparatus and method
DE4104358A1 (en) 1991-02-13 1992-08-20 Implex Gmbh IMPLANTABLE HOER DEVICE FOR EXCITING THE INNER EAR
JPH0670987A (en) 1992-08-28 1994-03-15 Katsuro Tachibana Medicine dosing and body liquid taking-out unit and device therefor
US5300093A (en) 1992-09-14 1994-04-05 Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring, formatting and transmitting combined intracardiac impedance data and electrograms
GB9302335D0 (en) 1993-02-05 1993-03-24 Macdonald Alexander J R Electrotherapeutic apparatus
DE4315282C2 (en) 1993-05-07 1999-10-07 Siemens Ag Use of an acoustic pressure pulse source
US6081744A (en) 1993-05-28 2000-06-27 Loos; Hendricus G. Electric fringe field generator for manipulating nervous systems
US5575761A (en) 1994-07-27 1996-11-19 Hajianpour; Mohammed-Ali Massage device applying variable-frequency vibration in a variable pulse sequence
US5776171A (en) 1994-09-06 1998-07-07 Case Western Reserve University Functional neuromuscular stimulation system
US6342379B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2002-01-29 The Regents Of The University Of California Detection of transmembrane potentials by optical methods
WO1997000639A2 (en) 1995-06-19 1997-01-09 Holcomb Robert R Electromagnetic treatment device and methods of using
CN1168511C (en) 1996-01-08 2004-09-29 伊帕斯动力公司 Electrical muscle controller
US6463328B1 (en) 1996-02-02 2002-10-08 Michael Sasha John Adaptive brain stimulation method and system
US5925070A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-07-20 Medtronic, Inc. Techniques for adjusting the locus of excitation of electrically excitable tissue
US5713922A (en) 1996-04-25 1998-02-03 Medtronic, Inc. Techniques for adjusting the locus of excitation of neural tissue in the spinal cord or brain
US6094598A (en) 1996-04-25 2000-07-25 Medtronics, Inc. Method of treating movement disorders by brain stimulation and drug infusion
US6102875A (en) 1997-01-16 2000-08-15 Jones; Rick E. Apparatus for combined application of massage, accupressure and biomagnetic therapy
US6390995B1 (en) 1997-02-12 2002-05-21 Healthtronics Surgical Services, Inc. Method for using acoustic shock waves in the treatment of medical conditions
US5893883A (en) 1997-04-30 1999-04-13 Medtronic, Inc. Portable stimulation screening device for screening therapeutic effect of electrical stimulation on a patient user during normal activities of the patient user
US6128537A (en) 1997-05-01 2000-10-03 Medtronic, Inc Techniques for treating anxiety by brain stimulation and drug infusion
US5975085A (en) 1997-05-01 1999-11-02 Medtronic, Inc. Method of treating schizophrenia by brain stimulation and drug infusion
US6161048A (en) 1997-06-26 2000-12-12 Radionics, Inc. Method and system for neural tissue modification
AU3458197A (en) 1997-07-16 1999-02-10 Impulse Dynamics N.V. Smooth muscle controller
US6091992A (en) 1997-12-15 2000-07-18 Medtronic, Inc. Method and apparatus for electrical stimulation of the gastrointestinal tract
US6491039B1 (en) 1998-01-23 2002-12-10 Innercool Therapies, Inc. Medical procedure
US6231604B1 (en) 1998-02-26 2001-05-15 Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerate Ges.M.B.H Apparatus and method for combined acoustic mechanical and electrical auditory stimulation
US6836685B1 (en) 1998-04-07 2004-12-28 William R. Fitz Nerve stimulation method and apparatus for pain relief
US6169403B1 (en) 1998-04-29 2001-01-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and MR device for simulating electrical simulations in a subject by MR stimulation
US6941171B2 (en) 1998-07-06 2005-09-06 Advanced Bionics Corporation Implantable stimulator methods for treatment of incontinence and pain
US6035236A (en) 1998-07-13 2000-03-07 Bionergy Therapeutics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy
US6275737B1 (en) 1998-10-14 2001-08-14 Advanced Bionics Corporation Transcutaneous transmission pouch
US6964643B2 (en) 1998-11-18 2005-11-15 Nugyn, Inc. Devices and methods for treatment of incontinence
US6206831B1 (en) 1999-01-06 2001-03-27 Scimed Life Systems, Inc. Ultrasound-guided ablation catheter and methods of use
US6393325B1 (en) 1999-01-07 2002-05-21 Advanced Bionics Corporation Directional programming for implantable electrode arrays
CA2369475A1 (en) 1999-05-11 2000-11-16 Exogen, Inc. Method and apparatus for ultrasonic treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy
US6692490B1 (en) 1999-05-18 2004-02-17 Novasys Medical, Inc. Treatment of urinary incontinence and other disorders by application of energy and drugs
US7510536B2 (en) 1999-09-17 2009-03-31 University Of Washington Ultrasound guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment of nerves
US6654642B2 (en) 1999-09-29 2003-11-25 Medtronic, Inc. Patient interactive neurostimulation system and method
AU1332101A (en) 1999-10-13 2001-04-23 Arthrocare Corporation Systems and methods for treating spinal pain
US6567702B1 (en) 1999-10-15 2003-05-20 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Eliciting analgesia by transcranial electrical stimulation
US6375666B1 (en) 1999-12-09 2002-04-23 Hans Alois Mische Methods and devices for treatment of neurological disorders
US6546290B1 (en) 2000-04-12 2003-04-08 Roamitron Holding S.A. Method and apparatus for electromedical therapy
US6408211B1 (en) 2000-06-16 2002-06-18 Newcare Products, Llc Microcurrent therapy device
RU2160130C1 (en) 2000-07-10 2000-12-10 Закрытое акционерное общество "ЭКОИНВЕНТ" Method for normalization of biologic functions of living tissues and device for electromagnetic influence on living tissues
US6921413B2 (en) 2000-08-16 2005-07-26 Vanderbilt University Methods and devices for optical stimulation of neural tissues
US6871099B1 (en) 2000-08-18 2005-03-22 Advanced Bionics Corporation Fully implantable microstimulator for spinal cord stimulation as a therapy for chronic pain
US6591138B1 (en) 2000-08-31 2003-07-08 Neuropace, Inc. Low frequency neurostimulator for the treatment of neurological disorders
WO2002026140A1 (en) 2000-09-26 2002-04-04 Medtronic, Inc. Medical method and system for directing blood flow
US6536440B1 (en) 2000-10-17 2003-03-25 Sony Corporation Method and system for generating sensory data onto the human neural cortex
US6584357B1 (en) 2000-10-17 2003-06-24 Sony Corporation Method and system for forming an acoustic signal from neural timing difference data
JP3518502B2 (en) 2000-10-19 2004-04-12 株式会社日立製作所 Biomagnetic field measurement device
US20050043726A1 (en) * 2001-03-07 2005-02-24 Mchale Anthony Patrick Device II
US6615080B1 (en) 2001-03-29 2003-09-02 John Duncan Unsworth Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the foot muscles for prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
US6685729B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2004-02-03 George Gonzalez Process for testing and treating aberrant sensory afferents and motors efferents
US7013177B1 (en) 2001-07-05 2006-03-14 Advanced Bionics Corporation Treatment of pain by brain stimulation
US6535767B1 (en) 2001-08-21 2003-03-18 James W. Kronberg Apparatus and method for bioelectric stimulation, healing acceleration and pain relief
US6976998B2 (en) 2002-01-17 2005-12-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Minimally invasive retinal prosthesis
US6721603B2 (en) 2002-01-25 2004-04-13 Cyberonics, Inc. Nerve stimulation as a treatment for pain
US6937906B2 (en) 2002-01-29 2005-08-30 Medtronic, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting static magnetic fields
US8086296B2 (en) 2002-04-30 2011-12-27 Brainsonix Corporation Methods for modifying electrical currents in neuronal circuits
US7283861B2 (en) 2002-04-30 2007-10-16 Alexander Bystritsky Methods for modifying electrical currents in neuronal circuits
US7003352B1 (en) 2002-05-24 2006-02-21 Advanced Bionics Corporation Treatment of epilepsy by brain stimulation
US6934580B1 (en) 2002-07-20 2005-08-23 Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C. Stimulation methodologies and apparatus for control of brain states
US7002790B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2006-02-21 Medtronic, Inc. Capacitor in an implantable medical device
US6866678B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2005-03-15 Interbational Technology Center Phototherapeutic treatment methods and apparatus
US7738952B2 (en) * 2003-06-09 2010-06-15 Palo Alto Investors Treatment of conditions through modulation of the autonomic nervous system
US6970744B1 (en) 2003-08-13 2005-11-29 Pacesetter, Inc. Bioenergy generator
US7184830B2 (en) * 2003-08-18 2007-02-27 Ebr Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for treating arrhythmias using a combination of vibrational and electrical energy
US7104947B2 (en) 2003-11-17 2006-09-12 Neuronetics, Inc. Determining stimulation levels for transcranial magnetic stimulation
US7949401B2 (en) 2006-04-11 2011-05-24 Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. Electromagnetic signal delivery for tissue affected by neuronal dysfunction, degradation, damage, and/or necrosis, and associated systems and methods
EP2965782B1 (en) * 2006-06-19 2017-08-09 Highland Instruments, Inc. Apparatus for stimulation of biological tissue
US8644934B2 (en) 2006-09-13 2014-02-04 Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. Cardiac stimulation using leadless electrode assemblies
WO2010017392A2 (en) * 2008-08-07 2010-02-11 Highland Instruments, Inc. Interface apparatus for stimulation of biological tissue
US20110178442A1 (en) * 2010-01-18 2011-07-21 Mishelevich David J Patient feedback for control of ultrasound deep-brain neuromodulation
US8594783B2 (en) * 2011-08-24 2013-11-26 Highland Instruments, Inc. Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of EP2747728A4 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4162915A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2023-04-12 Highland Instruments Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20140058295A1 (en) 2014-02-27
US20140276249A1 (en) 2014-09-18
US8774914B2 (en) 2014-07-08
US20130053905A1 (en) 2013-02-28
EP2747728A2 (en) 2014-07-02
US20150246248A1 (en) 2015-09-03
EP2747728A4 (en) 2015-04-08
US9623264B2 (en) 2017-04-18
US9808622B2 (en) 2017-11-07
EP2747728B1 (en) 2022-10-12
WO2013028262A3 (en) 2014-05-08
US10143843B2 (en) 2018-12-04
US9050463B2 (en) 2015-06-09
US8594783B2 (en) 2013-11-26
EP4162915A1 (en) 2023-04-12
US20180140836A1 (en) 2018-05-24
US20170209697A1 (en) 2017-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10143843B2 (en) Systems and methods for stimulating cellular function in tissue
US20210128915A1 (en) Apparatus and method for stimulation of biological tissue
US8892200B2 (en) Systems and methods for stimulating tissue using focused energy
US20120109020A1 (en) Methods for modifying neural transmission patterns
US20150360026A1 (en) Systems and methods for synchronizing the stimulation of cellular function in tissue
US20140357934A1 (en) Systems and methods for changing tissue impedance in a region of a biologically generated field

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12826175

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012826175

Country of ref document: EP