Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberWO2008124760 A2
Publication typeApplication
Application numberPCT/US2008/059740
Publication date16 Oct 2008
Filing date9 Apr 2008
Priority date10 Apr 2007
Also published asCN101711414A, CN101711414B, EP2135252A2, WO2008124760A3
Publication numberPCT/2008/59740, PCT/US/2008/059740, PCT/US/2008/59740, PCT/US/8/059740, PCT/US/8/59740, PCT/US2008/059740, PCT/US2008/59740, PCT/US2008059740, PCT/US200859740, PCT/US8/059740, PCT/US8/59740, PCT/US8059740, PCT/US859740, WO 2008/124760 A2, WO 2008124760 A2, WO 2008124760A2, WO-A2-2008124760, WO2008/124760A2, WO2008124760 A2, WO2008124760A2
InventorsRaul-Adrian Cernea
ApplicantSandisk Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: Patentscope, Espacenet
Non-volatile memory and method for predictive programming
WO 2008124760 A2
Abstract
In a nonvolatile memory having an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels, there is provided a predictive programming mode in which a predetermined function predicts what programming voltage level needs to be applied in order to program a given memory cell to a given target threshold voltage level. In this way, no verify operation needs to be performed, thereby greatly improving the performance of the programming operation. In a preferred embodiment, the predetermined function is linear and is calibrated for each memory cell under programming by one or more checkpoints. The checkpoint is an actual programming voltage that programs the memory cell in question to a verified designated threshold voltage level.
Claims  (OCR text may contain errors)
IT IS CLAIMED:
1. In a nonvolatile memory having an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels, a method of programming a memory cell to a target threshold voltage level, comprising: providing a predetermined function for a memory cell under programming, the function yielding programming voltage value as a function of threshold voltage level a memory cell is targeted to be programmed thereto; programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level with a programming voltage having increasing amplitude; and stopping programming of the memory cell after the programming voltage has substantially reached a value as determined by the predetermined function evaluated at the target threshold voltage level.
2. The method as in claim 1, wherein the programming voltage having increasing amplitude is a series of voltage pulses.
3. The method as in claim 1, wherein the predetermined function is substantially a linear function.
4. The method as in claim 1, wherein said providing a predetermined function includes: designating a checkpoint of the function as a designated checkpoint threshold voltage level programmable by a corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value; determining the corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value by alternately programming and verifying until the checkpoint threshold voltage level is program-verified; and calibrating the predetermined function to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.
5. The method as in claim 4, wherein the target threshold voltage level is less than a predetermined voltage from the checkpoint threshold voltage level.
6. The method as in claim 4, wherein one or more checkpoint threshold voltage level is designated among the range of threshold voltage levels.
7. The method as in claim 4, wherein the predetermined function is linear and is defined by an estimated slope and a checkpoint.
8. The method as in claim 4, wherein the predetermined function is substantially linear and is defined by at least two checkpoints.
9. The method as in claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells that individually store more than one bit of data.
10. The method as in claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells that individually store data as an amount of charge programmed into a charge storing element.
11. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the charge storing element is a floating gate of a field effect transistor.
12. The method as in claim 1, wherein the charge storing element is a dielectric layer in a field effect transistor.
13. The method as in claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells with a NAND structure.
14. The method as in claim 1, wherein the non- volatile memory is a flash EEPROM.
15. The method as in claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memory is embodied in a memory card.
16. The method as in claim 1, wherein the nonvolatile memory is embedded in a computing device.
17. A method as in any one of claims 1-16, wherein the memory cell is one of a group of memory cells being programming together.
18. A nonvolatile memory, comprising: an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels; read/write circuits for reading and programming a page of memory cells in parallel; a state machine for controlling the operation of said non-volatile memory including said read/write circuits, said state machine: providing a predetermined function for a memory cell under programming, the function yielding programming voltage value as a function of threshold voltage level a memory cell is targeted to be programmed thereto; controlling programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level with a programming voltage having increasing amplitude; and stopping programming of the memory cell after the programming voltage has substantially reached a value as determined by the predetermined function evaluated at the target threshold voltage level.
19. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the programming voltage having increasing amplitude is a series of voltage pulses.
20. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the predetermined function is substantially a linear function.
21. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein said state machine providing a predetermined function further includes: designating a checkpoint of the function as a designated checkpoint threshold voltage level programmable by a corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value; determining the corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value by alternately programming and verifying until the checkpoint threshold voltage level is program-verified; and calibrating the predetermined function to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.
22. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 21, wherein the target threshold voltage level is less than a predetermined voltage from the checkpoint threshold voltage level.
23. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 21, wherein one or more checkpoint threshold voltage level is designated among the range of threshold voltage levels.
24. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 21, wherein the predetermined function is linear and is defined by an estimated slope and a checkpoint.
25. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 21, wherein the predetermined function is substantially linear and is defined by at least two checkpoints.
26. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells that individually store more than one bit of data.
27. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells that individually store data as an amount of charge programmed into a charge storing element.
28. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the charge storing element is a floating gate of a field effect transistor.
29. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the charge storing element is a dielectric layer in a field effect transistor.
30. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the nonvolatile memory has memory cells with a NAND structure.
31. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the non- volatile memory is a flash EEPROM.
32. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the nonvolatile memory is embodied in a memory card.
33. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 18, wherein the nonvolatile memory is embedded in a computing device.
34. A nonvolatile memory, comprising: an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels; means for providing a predetermined function for a memory cell under programming, the function yielding programming voltage value as a function of threshold voltage level a memory cell is targeted to be programmed thereto; means for controlling programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level with a programming voltage having increasing amplitude; and means for stopping programming of the memory cell after the programming voltage has substantially reached a value as determined by the predetermined function evaluated at the target threshold voltage level.
35. The nonvolatile memory as in claim 34, further comprising: means for designating a checkpoint of the function as a designated checkpoint threshold voltage level programmable by a corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value; means for determining the corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value by alternately programming and verifying until the checkpoint threshold voltage level is program-verified; and means for calibrating the predetermined function to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.
36. A nonvolatile memory as in any one of claims 18-36, wherein the memory cell is one of a group of memory cells being programming together.
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

NON- VOLATILE MEMORY AND METHOD FOR PREDICTIVE

PROGRAMMING

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] This invention relates generally to non- volatile semiconductor memory such as electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) and flash EEPROM, and specifically to memory and programming operations in which the number of program- verify operations is minimized.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Solid-state memory capable of nonvolatile storage of charge, particularly in the form of EEPROM and flash EEPROM packaged as a small form factor card, has recently become the storage of choice in a variety of mobile and handheld devices, notably information appliances and consumer electronics products. Unlike RAM (random access memory) that is also solid-state memory, flash memory is non- volatile and retains its stored data even after power is turned off. In spite of the higher cost, flash memory is increasingly being used in mass storage applications. Conventional mass storage, based on rotating magnetic medium such as hard drives and floppy disks, is unsuitable for the mobile and handheld environment. This is because disk drives tend to be bulky, are prone to mechanical failure and have high latency and high power requirements. These undesirable attributes make disk-based storage impractical in most mobile and portable applications. On the other hand, flash memory, both embedded and in the form of a removable card, are ideally suited in the mobile and handheld environment because of its small size, low power consumption, high speed and high reliability features.

[0003] EEPROM and electrically programmable read-only memory (EPROM) are non-volatile memory that can be erased and have new data written or "programmed" into their memory cells. Both utilize a floating (unconnected) conductive gate, in a field effect transistor structure, positioned over a channel region in a semiconductor substrate, between source and drain regions. A control gate is then provided over the floating gate. The threshold voltage characteristic of the transistor is controlled by the amount of charge that is retained on the floating gate. That is, for a given level of charge on the floating gate, there is a corresponding voltage (threshold) that must be applied to the control gate before the transistor is turned "on" to permit conduction between its source and drain regions.

[0004] The floating gate can hold a range of charges and therefore can be programmed to any threshold voltage level within a threshold voltage window. The size of the threshold voltage window is delimited by the minimum and maximum threshold levels of the device, which in turn correspond to the range of the charges that can be programmed onto the floating gate. The threshold window generally depends on the memory device's characteristics, operating conditions and history. Each distinct, resolvable threshold voltage level range within the window may, in principle, be used to designate a definite memory state of the cell. When the threshold voltage is partitioned into two distinct regions, each memory cell will be able to store one bit of data. Similarly, when the threshold voltage window is partitioned into more than two distinct regions, each memory cell will be able to store more than one bit of data.

[0005] In the usual two-state EEPROM cell, at least one current breakpoint level is established so as to partition the conduction window into two regions. When a cell is read by applying predetermined, fixed voltages, its source/drain current is resolved into a memory state by comparing with the breakpoint level (or reference current IREF). If the current read is higher than that of the breakpoint level, the cell is determined to be in one logical state (e.g., a "zero" state). On the other hand, if the current is less than that of the breakpoint level, the cell is determined to be in the other logical state (e.g., a "one" state). Thus, such a two-state cell stores one bit of digital information. A reference current source, which may be externally programmable, is often provided as part of a memory system to generate the breakpoint level current.

[0006] In order to increase memory capacity, flash EEPROM devices are being fabricated with higher and higher density as the state of the semiconductor technology advances. Another method for increasing storage capacity is to have each memory cell store more than two states. [0007] For a multi-state or multi-level EEPROM memory cell, the conduction window is partitioned into more than two regions by more than one breakpoint such that each cell is capable of storing more than one bit of data. The information that a given EEPROM array can store is thus increased with the number of states that each cell can store. EEPROM or flash EEPROM with multi-state or multi-level memory cells have been described in U.S. Patent No. 5,172,338.

[0008] The transistor serving as a memory cell is typically programmed to a

"programmed" state by one of two mechanisms. In "hot electron injection," a high voltage applied to the drain accelerates electrons across the substrate channel region. At the same time a high voltage applied to the control gate pulls the hot electrons through a thin gate dielectric onto the floating gate. In "tunneling injection," a high voltage is applied to the control gate relative to the substrate. In this way, electrons are pulled from the substrate to the intervening floating gate.

[0009] The memory device may be erased by a number of mechanisms. For

EPROM, the memory is bulk erasable by removing the charge from the floating gate by ultraviolet radiation. For EEPROM, a memory cell is electrically erasable, by applying a high voltage to the substrate relative to the control gate so as to induce electrons in the floating gate to tunnel through a thin oxide to the substrate channel region (i.e., Fowler-Nordheim tunneling.) Typically, the EEPROM is erasable byte by byte. For flash EEPROM, the memory is electrically erasable either all at once or one or more blocks at a time, where a block may consist of 512 bytes or more of memory.

[0010] The memory devices typically comprise one or more memory chips that may be mounted on a card. Each memory chip comprises an array of memory cells supported by peripheral circuits such as decoders and erase, write and read circuits. The more sophisticated memory devices operate with an external memory controller that performs intelligent and higher level memory operations and interfacing.

[0011] There are many commercially successful non-volatile solid-state memory devices being used today. These memory devices may be flash EEPROM or may employ other types of nonvolatile memory cells. Examples of flash memory and systems and methods of manufacturing them are given in United States patents nos. 5,070,032, 5,095,344, 5,315,541, 5,343,063, and 5,661,053, 5,313,421 and 6,222,762. In particular, flash memory devices with NAND string structures are described in United States patent nos. 5,570,315, 5,903,495, 6,046,935. Also nonvolatile memory devices are also manufactured from memory cells with a dielectric layer for storing charge. Instead of the conductive floating gate elements described earlier, a dielectric layer is used. Such memory devices utilizing dielectric storage element have been described by Eitan et al., "NROM: A Novel Localized Trapping, 2-Bit Nonvolatile Memory Cell," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, no. 11, November 2000, pp. 543-545. An ONO dielectric layer extends across the channel between source and drain diffusions. The charge for one data bit is localized in the dielectric layer adjacent to the drain, and the charge for the other data bit is localized in the dielectric layer adjacent to the source. For example, United States patents nos. 5,768,192 and 6,011,725 disclose a nonvolatile memory cell having a trapping dielectric sandwiched between two silicon dioxide layers. Multi-state data storage is implemented by separately reading the binary states of the spatially separated charge storage regions within the dielectric.

[0012] In order to improve read and program performance, multiple charge storage elements or memory transistors in an array are read or programmed in parallel. Thus, a "page" of memory elements are read or programmed together. In existing memory architectures, a row typically contains several interleaved pages or it may constitute one page. All memory elements of a page will be read or programmed together.

[0013] The conventional programming technique of using a series of alternating program/verify cycles is to deal with the uncertainty in the programming process in which the cell's threshold voltage grows fast initially in response to a relatively large change in VPGM- However, the growth slows down and eventually stops as charges programmed into the floating gate act as a shield to diminish the effective electric field for further tunneling of the electrons into the floating gate. The process appears highly non-linear and hence a trial-and-error approach is employed. [0014] The disadvantage of the program/verify programming technique is that the verify cycle takes up time and impacts performance. The problem is exacerbated by the implementation of memory cells capable of storing multiple bits. Essentially verify needs to be performed for each of the possible multiple states of a memory cell. For a memory with 16 possible memory states, this means each verify step would incur at least 16 sensing operations. In some other schemes it could even be a few times more. Thus, with increasing number of distinguishable state levels in multilevel memory cells ("MLC"), the verify cycle of the program/verify scheme becomes increasingly time-consuming.

[0015] United States Patent application serial number 11/531,227, entitled,

"Method for Non-volatile Memory with Linear Estimation of Initial Programming Voltage"" filed by Loc Tu et al on September 12, 2006 discloses a method of estimating initial programming voltages by linear estimation. In order to achieve good programming performance for a non-volatile memory, the initial programming voltage VPGMO and the step size must be optimally chosen at the factory. This is accomplished by testing each page of memory cells. The word line coupled to a selected page is successively programmed by a series of voltage pulses of a staircase waveform with verifications in between the pulses until the page is verified to a designated pattern. The programming voltage at the time the page is programmed verified will be used to estimate by linearly scaling back to the initial value of a starting programming voltage for the page. The estimation is further refined by using the estimate from a first pass in a second pass. Thus, conventional alternating programming and verifications are used to establish a final programming voltage for successfully programming a page. Then the final programming voltage is linearly scaled back to arrived at an estimated initial programming voltage for the page. This type of scaling is on a gross scale at a page level and does not address the disadvantage of conventional programming and verifying the memory in the field on a cell by cell basis.

[0016] Therefore there is a general need for high capacity and high performance non-volatile memory. In particular, there is a need to have a high capacity nonvolatile memory with improved programming performance where the aforementioned disadvantage is minimized.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

[0017] According to one general aspect of the invention, in a nonvolatile memory having an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels, there is provided a predetermined function that predicts what programming voltage level needs to be applied in order to program a given memory cell to a given target threshold voltage level. In this way, no verify operation needs be performed, thereby greatly improving in the performance of the programming operation.

[0018] In one embodiment, the predetermined function is approximated by a linear function, which proportionally yields a programming voltage level for a given targeted threshold voltage level. The linear function has a slope given by a predetermined average value applicable to the population of cells of the memory array. The linear function is uniquely determined for the given memory cell by predetermining a checkpoint on the linear function for the given memory cell. The checkpoint is based on an actual programming voltage that programs the memory cell to a designated threshold voltage level. The checkpoint preferably corresponds to one of lowest program states of the memory cell. The memory cell is initially programmed to the checkpoint and verified by, for example, the conventional program/verify programming technique. In this way, the checkpoint values of the actual programming voltage necessary to program the memory cell to the designated memory state is determined. The predetermined function is thus calibrated to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.

[0019] In another embodiment, multiple checkpoints may be designated among the range of possible threshold voltage levels supported by the memory cells. Each checkpoint will be used to calibrate a local predetermined function in the vicinity of each checkpoint. The local predetermined function is used to predict a programming voltage level for programming to a targeted threshold voltage level in the vicinity of an associated checkpoint.

[0020] The predictive programming technique is advantageous in that programming to a target state does not require verify operations. A verify operation is only needed for determining a checkpoint which in general is much less in number than the number of possible memory states.

[0021] There will be variations that will cause the predictive programming to yield erroneous results, but these will be statistically predictable errors which can be handled by an appropriate error correction code ("ECC").

[0022] Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be understood from the following description of its preferred embodiments, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] FIG. 1 illustrates schematically the functional blocks of a non-volatile memory chip in which the present invention may be implemented.

[0024] FIG. 2 illustrates schematically a non-volatile memory cell.

[0025] FIG. 3 illustrates the relation between the source-drain current ID and the control gate voltage VCG for four different charges Q1-Q4 that the floating gate may be selectively storing at any one time.

[0026] FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an NOR array of memory cells.

[0027] FIG. 5A illustrates schematically a string of memory cells organized into an NAND string.

[0028] FIG. 5B illustrates an example of an NAND array 200 of memory cells, constituted from NAND strings 50 such as that shown in FIG. 5A.

[0029] FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional technique for programming a memory cell to a target memory state. [0030] FIG. 7 illustrates samples of programming various memory cells in a given memory device and the observed relation between applied programming voltage and threshold voltage level.

[0031] FIG. 8 illustrates schematically the distribution of the slopes shown in

FIG. 7 for a sample of memory cells in a given memory device.

[0032] FIG. 9 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the predetermined function used to provide the programming voltage needed to program the memory cell to a targeted threshold voltage level.

[0033] FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating predictive programming according to a general embodiment of the invention.

[0034] FIG. 11 illustrates the programming voltages in time with the calibration of the predetermined function shown in FIG. 9 followed by the application of it in predictive programming mode.

[0035] FIG. 12 illustrates schematically the distribution of various memory states of a page of memory cells during the programming process shown in FIG. 11.

[0036] FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating STEP 300 shown in FIG. 10 to include calibrating the predetermined function for a memory cell using a checkpoint.

[0037] FIG. 14 illustrates a first example of an embodiment of predictive programming using more than one checkpoint.

[0038] FIG. 15 illustrates the manner the checkpoints illustrated in FIG. 14 is used to calibrate various associated predetermined functions local to the checkpoints.

[0039] FIG. 16 illustrates a second example of an embodiment of predictive programming using more than one checkpoint. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Memory System

[0040] FIG. 1 to FIG. 5 illustrate example memory systems in which the various aspects of the present invention may be implemented.

[0041] FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional programming technique.

[0042] FIG. 7 to FIG. 16 illustrate the various aspects and embodiments of the present invention.

[0043] FIG. 1 illustrates schematically the functional blocks of a non-volatile memory chip in which the present invention may be implemented. The memory chip 100 includes a two-dimensional array of memory cells 200, control circuitry 210, and peripheral circuits such as decoders, read/write circuits and multiplexers.

[0044] The memory array 200 is addressable by word lines via row decoders

230 (split into 230A, 230B) and by bit lines via column decoders 260 (split into 260A, 260B) (see also FIGs. 4 and 5.) The read/write circuits 270 (split into 270A, 270B) allow a page of memory cells to be read or programmed in parallel. A data I/O bus

231 is coupled to the read/write circuits 270.

[0045] In a preferred embodiment, a page is constituted from a contiguous row of memory cells sharing the same word line. In another embodiment, where a row of memory cells are partitioned into multiple pages, block multiplexers 250 (split into 250A and 250B) are provided to multiplex the read/write circuits 270 to the individual pages. For example, two pages, respectively formed by odd and even columns of memory cells are multiplexed to the read/write circuits.

[0046] FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred arrangement in which access to the memory array 200 by the various peripheral circuits is implemented in a symmetric fashion, on opposite sides of the array so that the densities of access lines and circuitry on each side are reduced in half. Thus, the row decoder is split into row decoders 230A and 230B and the column decoder into column decoders 260A and 260B. In the embodiment where a row of memory cells are partitioned into multiple pages, the page multiplexer 250 is split into page multiplexers 250A and 250B. Similarly, the read/write circuits 270 are split into read/write circuits 270A connecting to bit lines from the bottom and read/write circuits 270B connecting to bit lines from the top of the array 200. In this way, the density of the read/write modules, and therefore that of the sense modules 380, is essentially reduced by one half.

[0047] The control circuitry 110 is an on-chip controller that cooperates with the read/write circuits 270 to perform memory operations on the memory array 200. The control circuitry 110 typically includes a state machine 112 and other circuits such as an on-chip address decoder and a power control module (not shown explicitly). The state machine 112 provides chip level control of memory operations. The control circuitry is in communication with a host via an external memory controller.

[0048] The memory array 200 is typically organized as a two-dimensional array of memory cells arranged in rows and columns and addressable by word lines and bit lines. The array can be formed according to an NOR type or an NAND type architecture.

[0049] FIG. 2 illustrates schematically a non-volatile memory cell. The memory cell 10 can be implemented by a field-effect transistor having a charge storage unit 20, such as a floating gate or a dielectric layer. The memory cell 10 also includes a source 14, a drain 16, and a control gate 30.

[0050] There are many commercially successful non-volatile solid-state memory devices being used today. These memory devices may employ different types of memory cells, each type having one or more charge storage element.

[0051] Typical non- volatile memory cells include EEPROM and flash

EEPROM. Examples of EEPROM cells and methods of manufacturing them are given in United States patent no. 5,595,924. Examples of flash EEPROM cells, their uses in memory systems and methods of manufacturing them are given in United States patents nos. 5,070,032, 5,095,344, 5,315,541, 5,343,063, 5,661,053, 5,313,421 and 6,222,762. In particular, examples of memory devices with NAND cell structures are described in United States patent nos. 5,570,315, 5,903,495, 6,046,935. Also, examples of memory devices utilizing dielectric storage element have been described by Eitan et al., "NROM: A Novel Localized Trapping, 2-Bit Nonvolatile Memory Cell," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, no. 11, November 2000, pp. 543-545, and in United States patents nos. 5,768,192 and 6,011,725.

[0052] In practice, the memory state of a cell is usually read by sensing the conduction current across the source and drain electrodes of the cell when a reference voltage is applied to the control gate. Thus, for each given charge on the floating gate of a cell, a corresponding conduction current with respect to a fixed reference control gate voltage may be detected. Similarly, the range of charge programmable onto the floating gate defines a corresponding threshold voltage window or a corresponding conduction current window.

[0053] Alternatively, instead of detecting the conduction current among a partitioned current window, it is possible to set the threshold voltage for a given memory state under test at the control gate and detect if the conduction current is lower or higher than a threshold current. In one implementation the detection of the conduction current relative to a threshold current is accomplished by examining the rate the conduction current is discharging through the capacitance of the bit line.

[0054] FIG. 3 illustrates the relation between the source-drain current ID and the control gate voltage VCG for four different charges Q1-Q4 that the floating gate may be selectively storing at any one time. The four solid ID versus VCG curves represent four possible charge levels that can be programmed on a floating gate of a memory cell, respectively corresponding to four possible memory states. As an example, the threshold voltage window of a population of cells may range from 0.5V to 3.5V. Seven possible memory states "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", respectively representing one erased and six programmed states may be demarcated by partitioning the threshold window into five regions in interval of 0.5V each. For example, if a reference current, IREF of 2 μA is used as shown, then the cell programmed with Ql may be considered to be in a memory state "1" since its curve intersects with IREF in the region of the threshold window demarcated by VCG = 0.5 V and 1.0V. Similarly, Q4 is in a memory state "5". [0055] As can be seen from the description above, the more states a memory cell is made to store, the more finely divided is its threshold window. For example, a memory device may have memory cells having a threshold window that ranges from -1.5V to 5V. This provides a maximum width of 6.5V. If the memory cell is to store 16 states, each state may occupy from 20OmV to 30OmV in the threshold window. This will require higher precision in programming and reading operations in order to be able to achieve the required resolution.

[0056] FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an NOR array of memory cells. In the memory array 200, each row of memory cells are connected by their sources 14 and drains 16 in a daisy-chain manner. This design is sometimes referred to as a virtual ground design. The cells 10 in a row have their control gates 30 connected to a word line, such as word line 42. The cells in a column have their sources and drains respectively connected to selected bit lines, such as bit lines 34 and 36.

[0057] FIG. 5A illustrates schematically a string of memory cells organized into an NAND string. An NAND string 50 comprises of a series of memory transistors Ml, M2, ... Mn (e.g., n= 4, 8, 16 or higher) daisy-chained by their sources and drains. A pair of select transistors Sl, S2 controls the memory transistors chain's connection to the external via the NAND string's source terminal 54 and drain terminal 56 respectively. In a memory array, when the source select transistor Sl is turned on, the source terminal is coupled to a source line (see FIG. 5B). Similarly, when the drain select transistor S2 is turned on, the drain terminal of the NAND string is coupled to a bit line of the memory array. Each memory transistor 10 in the chain acts as a memory cell. It has a charge storage element 20 to store a given amount of charge so as to represent an intended memory state. A control gate 30 of each memory transistor allows control over read and write operations. As will be seen in FIG. 5B, the control gates 30 of corresponding memory transistors of a row of NAND string are all connected to the same word line. Similarly, a control gate 32 of each of the select transistors S 1 , S2 provides control access to the NAND string via its source terminal 54 and drain terminal 56 respectively. Likewise, the control gates 32 of corresponding select transistors of a row of NAND string are all connected to the same select line. [0058] When an addressed memory transistor 10 within an NAND string is read or is verified during programming, its control gate 30 is supplied with an appropriate voltage. At the same time, the rest of the non-addressed memory transistors in the NAND string 50 are fully turned on by application of sufficient voltage on their control gates. In this way, a conductive path is effective created from the source of the individual memory transistor to the source terminal 54 of the NAND string and likewise for the drain of the individual memory transistor to the drain terminal 56 of the cell. Memory devices with such NAND string structures are described in United States patent nos. 5,570,315, 5,903,495, 6,046,935.

[0059] FIG. 5B illustrates an example of an NAND array 200 of memory cells, constituted from NAND strings 50 such as that shown in FIG. 5A. Along each column of NAND strings, a bit line such as bit line 36 is coupled to the drain terminal 56 of each NAND string. Along each bank of NAND strings, a source line such as source line 34 is couple to the source terminals 54 of each NAND string. Also the control gates along a row of memory cells in a bank of NAND strings are connected to a word line such as word line 42. The control gates along a row of select transistors in a bank of NAND strings are connected to a select line such as select line 44. An entire row of memory cells in a bank of NAND strings can be addressed by appropriate voltages on the word lines and select lines of the bank of NAND strings. When a memory transistor within a NAND string is being read, the remaining memory transistors in the string are turned on hard via their associated word lines so that the current flowing through the string is essentially dependent upon the level of charge stored in the cell being read.

[0060] FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional technique for programming a memory cell to a target memory state. A programming voltage VPGM is applied to the control gate of the memory cell via a coupled word line. The VPGM is a series of programming voltage pulses in the form of a staircase waveform starting from an initial voltage level, VPGMO- The cell under programming is subject to this series of programming voltage pulses, with an attempt each time to add incremental charges to the floating gate. In between programming pulses, the cell is read back or verified to determine its source-drain current relative to a breakpoint level. The read back process may involve one or more sensing operation. Programming stops for the cell when it has been verified to reach the target state. The programming pulse train used may have increasing period or amplitude in order to counteract the accumulating electrons programmed into the charge storage unit of the memory cell. Programming circuits generally apply a series of programming pulses to a selected word line. In this way, a page of memory cells whose control gates are coupled to the word line can be programmed together. Whenever a memory cell of the page has been programmed to its target state, it is program-inhibited while the other cells continue to be subject to programming until all cells of the page have been program- verified.

[0061] The conventional programming technique of using a series of alternating program/verify cycles is to deal with the uncertainty in the programming process in which the cell's threshold voltage grows fast initially in response to a relatively large change in VPGM- However, the growth slows down and eventually stops as charges programmed into the floating gate act as a shield to diminish the effective electric field for further tunneling of the electrons into the floating gate. The process appears highly non-linear and hence a trial-and-error approach is employed.

[0062] The disadvantage of the program/verify programming technique is that the verify cycle takes up time and impacts performance. The problem is exacerbated by the implementation of memory cells capable of storing multiple bits. Essentially verify needs to be performed for each of the possible multiple states of a memory cell. For a memory with 16 possible memory states, this means each verify step would incur at least 16 sensing operations. In some other schemes it could even be a few times more. Thus, with increasing state levels in multi-level memory cells ("MLC"), the verify cycle of the program/verify scheme becomes increasingly time-consuming.

[0063] Thus, there is a need for a memory device with improved programming performance where the aforementioned disadvantage is minimized.

PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES

[0064] According to one general aspect of the invention, in a nonvolatile memory having an array of memory cells, wherein the memory cells are individually programmable to one of a range of threshold voltage levels, there is provided a predetermined function that predicts what programming voltage level needs to be applied in order to program a given memory cell to a given target threshold voltage level. In this way, no verify operation needs be performed, thereby greatly improving in the performance of the programming operation.

[0065] In one embodiment, the predetermined function is approximated by a linear function, which proportionally yields a programming voltage level for a given targeted threshold voltage level. The linear function has a slope given by a predetermined average value applicable to the population of cells of the memory array. The linear function is uniquely determined for the given memory cell by predetermining a checkpoint on the linear function for the given memory cell. The checkpoint is based on an actual programming voltage that programs the memory cell to a designated threshold voltage level. The checkpoint preferably corresponds to one of lowest program states of the memory cell. The memory cell is initially programmed to the checkpoint and verified by, for example, the conventional program/verify programming technique. In this way, the checkpoint values of the actual programming voltage necessary to program the memory cell to the designated memory state is determined. The predetermined function is thus calibrated to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.

[0066] In another embodiment, multiple checkpoints may be designated among the range of possible threshold voltage levels supported by the memory cells. Each checkpoint will be used to calibrate a local predetermined function in the vicinity of each checkpoint. The local predetermined function is used to predict a programming voltage level for programming to a targeted threshold voltage level in the vicinity of an associated checkpoint.

[0067] The predictive programming technique is advantageous in that programming to a target state does not require verify operations. A verify operation is only needed for determining a checkpoint which in general is much less in number than the number of possible memory states. [0068] There will be variations that will cause the predictive programming to yield erroneous results, but these will be statistically predictable errors which can be handled by an appropriate error correction code ("ECC").

[0069] FIG. 7 illustrates samples of programming various memory cells in a given memory device and the observed relation between applied programming voltage and threshold voltage level. It can be seen that the programming behavior of individual memory cell is surprisingly linear even across substantial range of the threshold window. Individual cells within an array more or less behave the same way where the change in programmed threshold voltage is substantially proportional to the change in programming voltage level. Due to how deeply erased the individual cells were and other factors, the individual cells may differ by the number of programming pulses to arrive at a designated checkpoint, but the predetermined function for each of the individual cells has a substantially similar slope. FIG. 7 shows an example each of a slow programming cell, a fast programming cell, as well as some examples of medium rate programming cells (solid lines). It can be seen the variation in slopes between the different examples are slight.

[0070] FIG. 8 illustrates schematically the distribution of the slopes shown in

FIG. 7 for a sample of memory cells in a given memory device. The distribution essentially exhibits a normal distribution with a mean slope around 0.9 and a standard deviation approximately of 0.1. The actual programming employed two different programming voltage step sizes. It has been observed that both step sizes yield similar distributions and mean slopes.

[0071] FIG. 9 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the predetermined function used to provide the programming voltage needed to program the memory cell to a targeted threshold voltage level. The predetermined function is approximated by a linear function where the targeted threshold level VT is given as a function of the programming voltage VPGM by the relation:

Vx (VPGM) = <Slope> VPGM + Vx(O) Equation ( 1 )

(where <Slope> = ΔVT/ΔVPGM ) Conversely,

VPGM (Vx) = l/<Slope> [Vx - Vx(O)] ; Equation (2)

[0072] In the preferred embodiment, the mean <Slope> can be predetermined by testing at the factory samples from similar production batches. For example, the testing may yield <Slope> to be 0.9. The Vx(O) is cell-dependent and is predetermined by a checkpoint from each memory cell prior to a predictive programming of each cell. Once the <slope> and Vx(O) are known, the predetermined function for the memory cell is defined and Equation (2) can be used to obtain the programming voltage level needed to program to a targeted threshold voltage level.

[0073] FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating predictive programming according to a general embodiment of the invention.

STEP 300: Providing a predetermined function for a memory cell under programming, the function yielding programming voltage value as a function of threshold voltage level a memory cell is targeted to be programmed thereto.

STEP 310: Programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level with a programming voltage having increasing amplitude. The programming voltage is applied to the control gate of the memory cell via a coupled word line.

STEP 320: Stopping programming of the memory cell after the programming voltage has substantially reached a value as determined by the predetermined function evaluated at the target threshold voltage level. Typically, a page of memory cells coupled to the same word line is being programmed at the same time. When the memory cell in question has received the value as determined by the predetermined function evaluated at the target threshold voltage level, it is inhibited from further programming despite possible additional programming pulses on the word line for other memory cells of the page.

[0074] In general the predetermined function need not be approximated by a linear function. If the predetermined function is to accurately cover a wide range of threshold voltage levels, it can be determined by testing the production batch at the factory and modeled by some suitable function.

[0075] Generally, the memory cell being programmed is one of a page of similar memory cells simultaneously under programming. There will be a predetermined function provided for each memory cell of the page. Since all memory cells of the page share the same word line, once a memory cell of the page has been programmed by the predictive programming voltage, it is inhibited from further programming.

[0076] The predictive programming mode illustrated in FIG. 10 is preferably implemented in the state machine 112 (see FIG. 1) in the control circuitry 110 that controls memory operations of the memory array 200.

[0077] FIG. 11 illustrates the programming voltages in time with the calibration of the predetermined function shown in FIG. 9 followed by the application of it in predictive programming mode.

[0078] In an initial phase, a checkpoint(O) for the memory cell is designated to be at a threshold voltage level (checkpoint threshold voltage level) slightly higher than that considered to be associated with the erased state. A series of increasing programming voltage pulses is applied to program the memory cell toward the checkpoint threshold voltage level. The programming mode can be the conventional one of alternately programming and verifying until the checkpoint threshold voltage level is program-verified. Once the set of coordinates [VPGM, Vτ]checkPomt(θ) for Checkpoint(O) is known, the predetermined function (see FIG. 9) in the form of Equation (2) can be solved for Vχ(0) and be completely specified.

[0079] After the predetermined function in the form of Equation (2) is specified, the memory cell can subsequently be programmed in the predictive mode using the predetermined function to provide an estimated programming voltage level for a targeted threshold voltage level or for a targeted memory state. In a preferred embodiment, the programming voltage step size is adjusted such that each addition pulse will program the memory cell to the next memory state. For example of a memory cell with 16 possible memory states, the pulse size may be 30OmV. In this way, one additional pulse will program the memory to State(l), another additional pulse will program the memory to State(2), etc. Thus, programming to a given memory state can be reduced to counting the number of states from State(O) and supplying the same number of pulses. For example, a flag may be set once in State(O) and thereafter the memory cell can be programmed by a number of pulses same as the number of states the target state is away from State(O).

[0080] Other programming pulse sizes are possible. For example, for the memory cell with 16 possible memory states, the pulse size may be 15OmV. In that case, it will take two pulses to program from one memory state to the next adjacent memory state. This will provide finer resolution in the programming, which is useful in some implementations where a margin from the targeted threshold is employed.

[0081] FIG. 12 illustrates schematically the distribution of various memory states of a page of memory cells during the programming process shown in FIG. 11. The page of memory cells starts off with all the memory cells in an erased state which may in any one of low-lying threshold voltage levels. During the initial programming phase, a series of program/verify cycles (e.g., a total of x program pulses plus n*x verifying steps) will program the memory cell from the erase state to State(O). In general, the x for each memory cell is independent of each other. Once, the memory cell is in State(O), predictive programming mode commences and each additional pulse will program the memory cell to the next memory state.

[0082] FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating STEP 300 shown in FIG. 10 to include calibrating the predetermined function for a memory cell using a checkpoint.

STEP 302: Designating a checkpoint of the function as a designated checkpoint threshold voltage level programmable by a corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value.

STEP 304: Determining the corresponding checkpoint programming voltage value by alternately programming and verifying until the checkpoint threshold voltage level is program-verified. STEP 306: Calibrating the predetermined function to yield the checkpoint programming voltage value when evaluated at the checkpoint threshold voltage level before being used to determine a programming voltage value for programming the memory cell to the target threshold voltage level.

[0083] FIG. 14 illustrates a first example of an embodiment of predictive programming using more than one checkpoint. In the first example, every memory state to be programmed by the predictive mode is preceded by a memory state programmed under the checkpoint mode. The checkpoint mode is described in FIG. 13 in STEP 302 and STEP 304. If the memory cell can be progressively programmed into State(O), State(l), State(2), ..., then the even states State(O), State(2), State(4), ... can be designated as checkpoints. These states are reached from a preceding state by the program/verify programming mode (see FIG. 6). From each checkpoint, a predetermined function can be calibrated and used to predictively program the next memory states, e.g., the odd State(l), State(3), State(5), ...

[0084] The embodiment illustrated in FIG. 14 allows programming in predictive mode to be at its most accurate since the predetermined function is recalibrated every other memory state and the cell programming behavior exhibits good linearity at such a short interval. As only every other memory state is programmed in the checkpoint mode, at least half of the verifying operations in convention programming (see FIG. 6) are avoided.

[0085] FIG. 15 illustrates the manner the checkpoints illustrated in FIG. 14 is used to calibrate various associated predetermined functions local to the checkpoints. It will be seen that all the local predetermined functions are linear and have the same predetermined mean slope. The checkpoint(O) is used to set the boundary condition for the local predetermined function 400. Similarly, the checkpoint(2) is used to set the boundary condition for the local predetermined function 420 and the checkpoint(4) is used to set the boundary condition for the local predetermined function 440, etc.

[0086] Once a local predetermined function is set, it can be used to yield the programming voltage level for the next memory state. Thus the local predetermined function 400 is used to yield a programming voltage level for programming the cell to State(l), the local predetermined function 420 is used to yield a programming voltage level for programming the cell to State(3) and the local predetermined function 440 is used to yield a programming voltage level for programming the cell to State(5), etc.

[0087] FIG. 16 illustrates a second example of an embodiment of predictive programming using more than one checkpoint. In contrast to the first example shown in FIG. 14 and FIG. 15, the second example has a checkpoint designated in every four memory states. Thus a checkpoint(O) is designated at State(O), at State(4), at State(8), etc. The local predetermined function set by checkpoint(O) will be used to predict programming voltages respectively for the next three memory states, namely, State(l), State(2) and State(3). Similarly, the local predetermined function set by checkpoint(4) will be used to predict programming voltages respectively for the next three memory states, namely, State(5), State(6) and State(7), etc. The predicted programmed voltages resulted from this second example will not be as accurate as that of the first example, but may be sufficient in many applications. It has the advantage of further reducing the number of program- verify operations.

[0088] Other variations of designated checkpoints among the range of threshold values in the threshold window of a memory cell are possible. Choices can be made depending on the balance between performance and accuracy.

[0089] For example, in some programming algorithms, the page of memory cells are all programmed close to their respective target states in a first pass. Then a second programming pass will complete the programming to the respective target states. The two-pass approach is used to alleviate program disturb between floating gates of neighboring memory cells. Since the first pass programming does not demand as high precision as the second pass, the first pass can be performed using the predictive programming mode to save time. In some implementations, the second programming pass is also contemplated to employ the predictive programming mode, preferably with more checkpoints in place.

[0090] The predictive programming mode does not preclude a very slight possibility (estimated to be less than 0.1%) of overshooting a targeted threshold voltage level. In the case a targeted memory state is overshot, the error can be corrected by an implemented error correction code.

[0091] When two checkpoints are available, it is possible to independently set the slope of the predetermined function. Once the predetermined function is so specified, it can be used to yield programming voltage levels for subsequent memory states.

[0092] All patents, patent applications, articles, books, specifications, other publications, documents and things referenced herein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference in their entirety for all purposes. To the extent of any inconsistency or conflict in the definition or use of a term between any of the incorporated publications, documents or things and the text of the present document, the definition or use of the term in the present document shall prevail.

[0093] Although the various aspects of the present invention have been described with respect to certain embodiments, it is understood that the invention is entitled to protection within the full scope of the appended claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
EP0913832A1 *3 Nov 19976 May 1999SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS S.r.l.Method for multilevel programming of a nonvolatile memory, and a multilevel nonvolatile memory
US5289401 *19 Jun 199122 Feb 1994Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaAnalog storage device for artificial neural network system
US6366496 *2 Aug 20002 Apr 2002Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.Method for programming multi-level non-volatile memories by controlling the gate voltage
US7042766 *22 Jul 20049 May 2006Spansion, LlcMethod of programming a flash memory device using multilevel charge storage
US20030002374 *23 May 20022 Jan 2003Tedrow Kerry D.Charging a capacitance of a memory cell and charger
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *See also references of EP2135252A2
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US769732610 May 200713 Apr 2010Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reducing programming error in memory devices
US77061823 Dec 200727 Apr 2010Anobit Technologies Ltd.Adaptive programming of analog memory cells using statistical characteristics
US775124024 Jan 20086 Jul 2010Anobit Technologies Ltd.Memory device with negative thresholds
US77734135 Oct 200810 Aug 2010Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reliable data storage in analog memory cells in the presence of temperature variations
US782182630 Oct 200726 Oct 2010Anobit Technologies, Ltd.Memory cell readout using successive approximation
US786457323 Feb 20094 Jan 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Programming analog memory cells for reduced variance after retention
US788110712 Apr 20101 Feb 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Memory device with negative thresholds
US790010217 Dec 20071 Mar 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.High-speed programming of memory devices
US792458719 Feb 200912 Apr 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Programming of analog memory cells using a single programming pulse per state transition
US79246136 Jul 200912 Apr 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Data storage in analog memory cells with protection against programming interruption
US792464827 Nov 200712 Apr 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Memory power and performance management
US792593611 Jul 200812 Apr 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Memory device with non-uniform programming levels
US797519230 Oct 20075 Jul 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reading memory cells using multiple thresholds
US79953884 Aug 20099 Aug 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Data storage using modified voltages
US800013513 Sep 200916 Aug 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Estimation of memory cell read thresholds by sampling inside programming level distribution intervals
US800014115 Oct 200816 Aug 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Compensation for voltage drifts in analog memory cells
US800132010 Mar 200816 Aug 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Command interface for memory devices
US805008610 May 20071 Nov 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Distortion estimation and cancellation in memory devices
US805945717 Mar 200915 Nov 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Memory device with multiple-accuracy read commands
US806080627 Aug 200715 Nov 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Estimation of non-linear distortion in memory devices
US806836023 Jul 200829 Nov 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reading analog memory cells using built-in multi-threshold commands
US808558625 Dec 200827 Dec 2011Anobit Technologies Ltd.Wear level estimation in analog memory cells
US814598424 May 201127 Mar 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reading memory cells using multiple thresholds
US81511633 Dec 20073 Apr 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Automatic defect management in memory devices
US815116626 Feb 20083 Apr 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reduction of back pattern dependency effects in memory devices
US81563983 Feb 200910 Apr 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Parameter estimation based on error correction code parity check equations
US815640310 May 200710 Apr 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Combined distortion estimation and error correction coding for memory devices
US81698251 Sep 20091 May 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Reliable data storage in analog memory cells subjected to long retention periods
US817485730 Dec 20098 May 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Efficient readout schemes for analog memory cell devices using multiple read threshold sets
US817490511 Mar 20108 May 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Programming orders for reducing distortion in arrays of multi-level analog memory cells
US820830415 Nov 200926 Jun 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Storage at M bits/cell density in N bits/cell analog memory cell devices, M>N
US820958811 Dec 200826 Jun 2012Anobit Technologies Ltd.Efficient interference cancellation in analog memory cell arrays
US822518126 Nov 200817 Jul 2012Apple Inc.Efficient re-read operations from memory devices
US822870128 Feb 201024 Jul 2012Apple Inc.Selective activation of programming schemes in analog memory cell arrays
US82303004 Mar 200924 Jul 2012Apple Inc.Efficient readout from analog memory cells using data compression
US823454512 May 200831 Jul 2012Apple Inc.Data storage with incremental redundancy
US823815711 Apr 20107 Aug 2012Apple Inc.Selective re-programming of analog memory cells
US823973415 Oct 20097 Aug 2012Apple Inc.Efficient data storage in storage device arrays
US823973510 May 20077 Aug 2012Apple Inc.Memory Device with adaptive capacity
US824883130 Dec 200921 Aug 2012Apple Inc.Rejuvenation of analog memory cells
US82594976 Aug 20084 Sep 2012Apple Inc.Programming schemes for multi-level analog memory cells
US825950622 Mar 20104 Sep 2012Apple Inc.Database of memory read thresholds
US826115928 Oct 20094 Sep 2012Apple, Inc.Data scrambling schemes for memory devices
US82702464 Nov 200818 Sep 2012Apple Inc.Optimized selection of memory chips in multi-chips memory devices
US836914111 Mar 20085 Feb 2013Apple Inc.Adaptive estimation of memory cell read thresholds
US839713130 Dec 200912 Mar 2013Apple Inc.Efficient readout schemes for analog memory cell devices
US840085822 Aug 201119 Mar 2013Apple Inc.Memory device with reduced sense time readout
US842949316 Apr 200823 Apr 2013Apple Inc.Memory device with internal signap processing unit
US845690511 Dec 20084 Jun 2013Apple Inc.Efficient data storage in multi-plane memory devices
US847908024 Jun 20102 Jul 2013Apple Inc.Adaptive over-provisioning in memory systems
US848297828 Jun 20119 Jul 2013Apple Inc.Estimation of memory cell read thresholds by sampling inside programming level distribution intervals
US849378128 Jul 201123 Jul 2013Apple Inc.Interference mitigation using individual word line erasure operations
US849546527 Sep 201023 Jul 2013Apple Inc.Error correction coding over multiple memory pages
US84981514 Aug 200930 Jul 2013Apple Inc.Data storage in analog memory cells using modified pass voltages
US852781912 Oct 20083 Sep 2013Apple Inc.Data storage in analog memory cell arrays having erase failures
US857080422 Sep 201129 Oct 2013Apple Inc.Distortion estimation and cancellation in memory devices
US857231110 Jan 201129 Oct 2013Apple Inc.Redundant data storage in multi-die memory systems
US85724236 Feb 201129 Oct 2013Apple Inc.Reducing peak current in memory systems
US85955916 Jul 201126 Nov 2013Apple Inc.Interference-aware assignment of programming levels in analog memory cells
US859961122 Sep 20113 Dec 2013Apple Inc.Distortion estimation and cancellation in memory devices
US864579428 Jul 20114 Feb 2014Apple Inc.Data storage in analog memory cells using a non-integer number of bits per cell
US86770549 Dec 201018 Mar 2014Apple Inc.Memory management schemes for non-volatile memory devices
US867720310 Jan 201118 Mar 2014Apple Inc.Redundant data storage schemes for multi-die memory systems
US869481412 Sep 20108 Apr 2014Apple Inc.Reuse of host hibernation storage space by memory controller
US869485317 Apr 20118 Apr 2014Apple Inc.Read commands for reading interfering memory cells
US86948542 Aug 20118 Apr 2014Apple Inc.Read threshold setting based on soft readout statistics
US871333028 Oct 200929 Apr 2014Apple Inc.Data scrambling in memory devices
US876745928 Jul 20111 Jul 2014Apple Inc.Data storage in analog memory cells across word lines using a non-integer number of bits per cell
US883235422 Mar 20109 Sep 2014Apple Inc.Use of host system resources by memory controller
US885647529 Jun 20117 Oct 2014Apple Inc.Efficient selection of memory blocks for compaction
US892466117 Jan 201030 Dec 2014Apple Inc.Memory system including a controller and processors associated with memory devices
US89496841 Sep 20093 Feb 2015Apple Inc.Segmented data storage
US902118114 Sep 201128 Apr 2015Apple Inc.Memory management for unifying memory cell conditions by using maximum time intervals
US90479625 Mar 20132 Jun 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaSemiconductor memory device and control method of the same
US910458023 Mar 201111 Aug 2015Apple Inc.Cache memory for hybrid disk drives
USRE4634626 Mar 201421 Mar 2017Apple Inc.Reading memory cells using multiple thresholds
Classifications
International ClassificationG11C11/56, G11C16/10
Cooperative ClassificationG11C16/10, G11C16/0483, G11C16/3454, G11C2211/5621, G11C11/5628
European ClassificationG11C16/10, G11C11/56D2, G11C16/34V4, G11C16/04N
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
3 Dec 2008121Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
Ref document number: 08745369
Country of ref document: EP
Kind code of ref document: A2
2 Oct 2009ENPEntry into the national phase in:
Ref document number: 2010503176
Country of ref document: JP
Kind code of ref document: A
12 Oct 2009ENPEntry into the national phase in:
Ref document number: 20097021264
Country of ref document: KR
Kind code of ref document: A
13 Oct 2009NENPNon-entry into the national phase in:
Ref country code: DE