WO2001063453A1 - Selecting recipients of a direct mailing advertisement - Google Patents
Selecting recipients of a direct mailing advertisement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001063453A1 WO2001063453A1 PCT/US2001/005546 US0105546W WO0163453A1 WO 2001063453 A1 WO2001063453 A1 WO 2001063453A1 US 0105546 W US0105546 W US 0105546W WO 0163453 A1 WO0163453 A1 WO 0163453A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- pipeline
- boundary
- recipients
- direct mail
- addresses
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to the mailing of direct mail pieces to specifically identified individuals and/or businesses.
- the present invention relates to the automated selection of recipients of a direct mail advertisement or communication based upon their geographic proximity to a selected straight or curved path.
- a written communication or notice be sent to a certain class or group of addressees.
- a pipeline operator or railroad company may be required to transmit a written notification to all individuals and business who reside within a specified distance from their pipeline or railroad track, for example, to give written notice of pipeline or track maintenance and/or cautionary or emergency procedures to be followed in the event of a pipeline or rail accident.
- USPS United States Postal Service
- a railroad may which to advertise a special fare targeted to individuals residing close to the train's tracks.
- the pipeline or railroad operator had to spend unnecessary money to provide the required or desired written notice in a manner that ensured that all required or intended recipients are actually sent the notice.
- a pipeline operator might be compelled to periodically notify all homes and business within 1/2 mile of their pipeline of emergency procedures to be followed in the event of a pipeline leak.
- a railroad may be required to give notice when a special cargo passes along their tracks.
- a pipeline operator may have assembled a database of addresses within a given range of their pipeline, such address databases quickly become outdated and inaccurate given the ever changing address parameters and the continued development of new housing including whole new subdivisions, especially in outlying areas where pipelines may have intentionally been built to be far from populated areas.
- adjacent municipalities and states may each establish different criteria identifying who is required to be sent what type of notice thereby complicating any direct mail campaign.
- An address database is typically sorted and maintained in zip code order, sometimes alphabetized by zip code, and often stored on a computer.
- a business or operator may choose to select addresses within a given zip code by either printing labels or generating a computer file containing the addresses within that particular zip code for direct printing on envelopes, etc.
- a great deal of effort is required - - an effort which is typically unsuccessful given the manner in which the address data is typically maintained by the business.
- an operator may be forced to send mailings to every address within the zip codes through which its pipeline passes.
- Using a "Zip Plus 4" postal format the operator may be able to somewhat narrow the focus of the mailing, but is still often sending direct mail pieces to more addressees than is truly desired or necessary. In some situations, the operator may find that a mailing is required only to addresses proximate a certain limited section along of an otherwise extensive pipeline or railroad path.
- the present invention has utility to others, such as highway departments who may need to notify homeowners living within mere blocks of a highway of a weed killing operation using sprayed insecticide.
- a still further object of the present invention is to provide the user with the ability to select recipients of the direct mail piece by geographic proximity to the user's pipeline, railroad, highway or the like.
- a further object of the present invention is to provide for the selection of intended recipients of the direct mail piece in a manner which obviates over- selection of addresses and thereby minimizes costs.
- Fig. 1 of the drawings illustrates one example of a pipeline running through a populated region and the boundary 1/4 mile one each side of the pipeline.
- Fig. 2 of the drawings illustrates a boundary 1/2 mile on each side of a straight section of railroad
- Fig. 3 of the drawings illustrates a boundary 1/2 mile on each side of a curved pipeline.
- Fig. 4 of the drawings is a flow chart illustrating the various steps of the present invention.
- the present invention Rather than having to over-select recipients for a direct mail communication, the present invention provides the user with the ability to effectively and efficiently implement and execute a highly focused direct mail campaign.
- a direct mail communication being sent by a pipeline operator is illustrated with the understanding that the present invention is suitable for use by virtually any business or industry.
- Fig. 1 of the drawings illustrates a pipeline running through a populated region and a boundary extending 1/4 mile one each side of the pipeline.
- Pipeline 20 is shown on a map passing through a populated region comprising numerous individual streets. Region 11 in the illustrated example is defined by Zip Code boundary 10.
- Northern boundary 21 and southern boundary 22 each define a perimeter one-quarter of a mile in each direction perpendicular to the path of pipeline 20, essentially one quarter mile to the north and one quarter mile to the south of pipeline 20.
- the present invention provides for the selection of recipients of a direct mail advertisement or communication based upon geographic proximity to a straight line or curve.
- pipeline 20 is the starting point from which addressees are identified.
- the selection of the entire region defined by Zip Code 10 results in many more addressees receiving the pipeline operator's mailing than truly required.
- Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 of the drawings illustrate a 1/4 mile boundary on each side of a straight section of pipeline and a 1/4 mile boundary on a curved section of pipeline, respectively.
- the straight line of Fig. 2 is defined by end points 30 and 31 while the curved line of Fig. 3 is defined by points 40 through 46.
- pipeline 20 of Fig. 1 is defined by points 12 each shown by the letter "X".
- the present system is intended for implementation on a personal computer that includes software for generating a user interface for accepting from the user commands and instructions as well as software for executing the computational aspects of the present invention.
- the specific software code is code which one of ordinary skill in the art, having the present disclosure before them, would be capable of creating, without undue experimentation.
- Existing address database software and graphical mapping software can be used to execute the present invention.
- the present system operates by automatically generating a two dimensional polygon defined by a straight or curved line, corresponding to the pipeline in the present example, and a distance therefrom specified by the user.
- the present system permits the selection of a entire long running pipeline, or like structure, or a mere section thereof, depending upon the end points selected.
- the coordinates which define the pipeline, or like structure are preferably specified by latitude and longitude coordinates (Lat/Lon). These Lat/Lon coordinates may be manually entered into the system or may be entered using a map and a digitizer tablet and pen where the user merely touches the pen to a map overlying the tablet to select and input into the system the coordinates defining the path of the pipeline. The user thus defines the coordinates which in turn define the pipeline structure, step 50 of Fig. 4.
- the user next specifies a geographic distance from the line which is used to define a two dimensional boundary within which the user intends to send its mailing. For example, the user may specify a distance of one half mile, step 51 of Fig. 4.
- the system software automatically computes the vertices which define a two dimensional boundary one quarter mile from the pipeline, step 52 of Fig. 4.
- the number of vertices generated will depend upon the shape of the pipeline, where a straight line will generate fewer vertices than a curved line.
- the boundary 23 is substantially straight at point 24 and curved at point 25 so as to accurately define the specified region and comply with the specified one quarter mile variable.
- the boundary 23 is curved at point 24 following the curve of pipeline 20 and more sharply curved at point 25 so as to accurately define the specified region and comply with the specified one quarter mile variable
- the boundary as thus defined constitutes a specification which is applied by the system software to an address database which may be maintained within or external to the system.
- the boundary thus constitutes a "filter” which is applied to the database to identify the intended addressees within the established boundary.
- the database of addresses includes the name, house number, street, city, state and zip code for each address together with a Lat/Lon coordinate - sometimes known as a geopoint.
- the system will search the address database for matches to identify addresses from the database which are located within the generated boundary, step 53 of Fig. 4. Convex Hull or other techniques may be used to select the desired conforming addresses. The system thus generates a list of addresses which lie within the boundary region, step 54 of Fig.4.
- the database entry for each user includes an additional database field containing a code identifying a particular or special characteristic of the address, such as whether the address corresponds to a school, hospital or other unique facility.
- the user may also include this field when specifying not only a distance parameter but also a special variable used to narrow the identification of addressees, step 51a of Fig. 4.
- a pipeline operator or like entity may accurately and efficiently select only those addressees which are required to receive a mailing. Addresses are not selected which do not comply with the criteria set by the user.
- the user may adapt the system to select addresses for different ranges or sections of pipeline in manner which permits compliance with laws or regulations which are inconsistent with one another, such as may be exist when adjacent municipalities through which a pipeline runs establish different criteria as to who should receive notices.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2001239812A AU2001239812A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2001-02-21 | Selecting recipients of a direct mailing advertisement |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US18384900P | 2000-02-22 | 2000-02-22 | |
US60/183,849 | 2000-02-22 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001063453A1 true WO2001063453A1 (en) | 2001-08-30 |
WO2001063453A8 WO2001063453A8 (en) | 2001-11-22 |
WO2001063453A9 WO2001063453A9 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
Family
ID=22674552
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2001/005546 WO2001063453A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2001-02-21 | Selecting recipients of a direct mailing advertisement |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2001239812A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001063453A1 (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6005928A (en) * | 1997-04-15 | 1999-12-21 | Mci Communication Corporation | Method and system for automatic distribution addressing |
US6012087A (en) * | 1997-01-14 | 2000-01-04 | Netmind Technologies, Inc. | Unique-change detection of dynamic web pages using history tables of signatures |
US6023723A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-02-08 | Accepted Marketing, Inc. | Method and system for filtering unwanted junk e-mail utilizing a plurality of filtering mechanisms |
-
2001
- 2001-02-21 WO PCT/US2001/005546 patent/WO2001063453A1/en active Application Filing
- 2001-02-21 AU AU2001239812A patent/AU2001239812A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6012087A (en) * | 1997-01-14 | 2000-01-04 | Netmind Technologies, Inc. | Unique-change detection of dynamic web pages using history tables of signatures |
US6005928A (en) * | 1997-04-15 | 1999-12-21 | Mci Communication Corporation | Method and system for automatic distribution addressing |
US6023723A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-02-08 | Accepted Marketing, Inc. | Method and system for filtering unwanted junk e-mail utilizing a plurality of filtering mechanisms |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2001239812A1 (en) | 2001-09-03 |
WO2001063453A8 (en) | 2001-11-22 |
WO2001063453A9 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20230161827A1 (en) | Methods and systems for creating and using a location identification grid | |
US9654920B2 (en) | Methods and systems for creating and using a location identification grid | |
Waters | Transportation gis: Gis-t | |
US8131652B2 (en) | Residential delivery indicator | |
WO2002041186A9 (en) | Address matching | |
Kumar et al. | Mapping Indian districts across census years, 1971-2001 | |
Glickman et al. | GIS-Based Environmental Equity Analysis A Case Study of TRI Facilities in the Pittsburgh Area | |
Coetzee et al. | What is an address in South Africa? | |
Cowen et al. | Integrated planning information systems | |
WO2001063453A1 (en) | Selecting recipients of a direct mailing advertisement | |
DE502004011044D1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING GRAPHIC INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON POSTAGE SHIPMENTS | |
CN101315419A (en) | Discrete tracing positional code | |
Rhoads et al. | Integrating herbarium data into a geographic information system: requirements for spatial analysis | |
CN104572954A (en) | System and method for verifying map interest point information by mail delivery | |
Abe et al. | Geocoding practices in cancer registries | |
Brusegard et al. | Real data and real problems: Dealing with large spatial databases | |
Ogunkan et al. | Geographies of fuel dispensing: locational analysis and conformity of petrol filling stations (PFS) to planning standards in Ota, Nigeria | |
Dolney | From Mylar to map documents: GIS AML inventory for abandoned coal mine investigations | |
Yildirm et al. | Address-Based Geospatial Applications: A Case Study of Trabzon, Turkey | |
Authority | Address Data Content Standard Public Review Draft | |
Glickman | CASE STUDY: Evaluating Environmental Equity in Allegheny County | |
Farnsworth et al. | The DIME geocoding system | |
Ansén et al. | Statistics for Regional and Local Planning | |
Meyer | Geographic base files and the world of Polk | |
Kelly | Redefining Local Documents Collections |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
CFP | Corrected version of a pamphlet front page | ||
CR1 | Correction of entry in section i | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: C2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: C2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
COP | Corrected version of pamphlet |
Free format text: PAGES 1/3-3/3, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/3-3/3; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |