|Publication number||WO1999031933 A1|
|Publication date||24 Jun 1999|
|Filing date||9 Dec 1998|
|Priority date||16 Dec 1997|
|Also published as||EP1060638A1, US6093144, US6422991, US6626822, US7322930, US7955250, US20040039245, US20080167516|
|Publication number||PCT/1998/26159, PCT/US/1998/026159, PCT/US/1998/26159, PCT/US/98/026159, PCT/US/98/26159, PCT/US1998/026159, PCT/US1998/26159, PCT/US1998026159, PCT/US199826159, PCT/US98/026159, PCT/US98/26159, PCT/US98026159, PCT/US9826159, WO 1999/031933 A1, WO 1999031933 A1, WO 1999031933A1, WO 9931933 A1, WO 9931933A1, WO-A1-1999031933, WO-A1-9931933, WO1999/031933A1, WO1999031933 A1, WO1999031933A1, WO9931933 A1, WO9931933A1|
|Inventors||Eric M. Jaeger, Geoffrey R. Ball, Duane E. Tumlinson|
|Applicant||Symphonix Devices, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (11), Classifications (6), Legal Events (8)|
|External Links: Patentscope, Espacenet|
IMPLANTABLE MICROPHONE HAVING IMPROVED SENSITIVITY AND FREQUENCY RESPONSE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention is related to hearing systems and, more particularly, to implantable microphone devices that may be utilized in hearing systems.
Conventional hearing aids are placed in the ear canal. However, these external devices have many inherent problems including the blockage of the normal avenue for hearing, discomfort because of the tight seal required to reduce the squeal from acoustic feedback and the all -too- common reluctance for hearing-impaired persons to wear a device that is visible.
Recent advances in miniaturization have resulted in the development of hearing aids that can be placed deeper in the ear canal such that they are almost unnoticeable .
However, smaller hearing aids inherently have problems, which include troublesome handling and more difficult care.
Implantable hearing devices offer the hope of eliminating problems associated with conventional hearing aids. One requirement for a fully implantable hearing device or system is an implantable microphone.
All microphones necessarily contain an interface between the internal components and the environment in which it will be situated. For non-piezoelectric designs, air- conduction microphones utilize a membrane, which can be made of various materials, stretched or formed to varying tensions. The tension in the membrane has a first order effect on the response of the microphone. A highly stretched membrane will tend to resonate at a high frequency, with a flat response at frequencies below the resonance. However, a higher tension in the membrane will also tend to lower the sensitivity of the microphone .
Prior art implantable microphones for use with hearing systems have comprised an electret microphone disposed within an air cavity, enclosed by a stretched stainless steel membrane. The air cavity is hermetically sealed, necessitated by implantation in the body. The membrane is stretched tight and laser welded; the resulting system frequency response therefore has a low sensitivity and a sharp high frequency resonance peak. An improved device response would have high sensitivity, comparable to an electret microphone alone in air, and would be generally flat across the audio frequency, especially in the range of speech (500-4,000 Hz). Additional requirements for an improved implanted microphone include low distortion and low noise characteristics.
Traditional, non-implantable type microphones have an air cavity behind the membrane that is not sealed, with reference to the nearest surface behind the membrane. Traditional microphones are concerned with optimal membrane displacement, and typically have several air cavities which are used to influence the shape of the microphone response . An implantable microphone design that incorporates a membrane, enclosing a sealed chamber containing an electret microphone, is necessarily concerned with an optimal pressure build-up in the sealed cavity. This pressure build-up in turn displaces the membrane of the electret microphone. However, a sealed air cavity presents new challenges to the design and optimization of implantable microphones. With the advent of fully implantable devices for stimulating hearing, there is a great need for implantable microphones that provide excellent audio performance. The present invention provides improved audio performance through improvement of microphone design.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides implantable microphone devices that may be utilized in hearing systems, particularly in systems having bone mounted and other implantable drivers. The device comprises a flexible membrane disposed over a sealed cavity. The membrane may be made substantially flexible by etching or forming the membrane until it is very thin. Also, the sealed cavity may be limited to a very small volume which decreases the sealed air cavity acoustic compliance. Both of these examples simultaneously increase overall sensitivity of the device and move the damped resonance peak to higher frequencies. In a preferred aspect an implantable microphone device is provided which comprises a housing and a membrane disposed over a surface of the housing to define a primary air cavity therebetween. A microphone assembly is secured within the housing. The microphone assembly has a secondary air cavity and an aperture which couples the secondary air cavity to the primary air cavity so that vibrations of the membrane are transmitted through the primary air cavity and aperture to the secondary air cavity. A microphone transducer is disposed in the secondary air cavity to detect said transmitted vibrations. Preferably, the microphone transducer comprises an electret membrane, a backplate, and electrical leads. Advantageously, a protective cover over the membrane is provided to protect the membrane from direct impact , where the protective cover is perforated to allow for free flow of vibration to the membrane.
In one configuration, the housing further includes a rear chamber. The rear chamber encases electric leads to the microphone, and provides external access to the leads through a hermetic feedthrough. In yet another configuration, the membrane may comprise at least one compliance ring. Preferably, a plurality of compliance rings may be used. The compliance ring may be either etched or formed into the membrane or otherwise secured to it by any suitable means . In a second aspect of the implantable microphone device, surface details are positioned on a surface of the housing. Preferably, the surface details may include pits, grooves, or at least one hole which connects the primary air cavity to a rear chamber of the housing. The surface details are provided to increase resonance peak damping.
In a third aspect, the implantable microphone comprises a housing comprising a rear chamber and includes a thin-walled tube section or other port opening for filling or evacuating specialty gases from said chamber. Filling the various cavities of the microphone with specialty gases decreases the acoustic compliance of those cavities. Accordingly, the housing further comprises a microphone assembly which may be vented, such that the gases can permeate each cavity of the implantable microphone. Alternatively, surfaces details on the housing, such as holes, may also connect the various cavities of the microphone device.
In a fourth aspect, the implantable microphone device, comprises a biocompatible material positioned proximate to the membrane. Preferably, the biocompatible material is biodegradable and degrades over time. Example materials include lactide and glycolide polymers. The position of the biocompatible material may vary from, for example, simple contact with only the front surface of the membrane to complete encapsulation of the entire microphone. This material provides protection from initial tissue growth on the microphone which may occur after implantation of the device. A volume occupying layer may be used to occupy a space between the membrane and an opposing surface of the biocompatible material. The volume occupying layer may naturally, over time, permanently fill up with body fluids or may comprise a permanent, biocompatible fluid-filled sack. In either form, these fluids will maintain an interface between the membrane and the surrounding tissue.
In a fifth aspect, the implantable microphone device comprises a microphone assembly with the secondary air cavity removed such that the electret membrane is directly exposed to the primary air cavity. The removal of the secondary air cavity creates a further reduction in overall air cavity volume which leads to a reduction in the acoustic compliance of the microphone.
In a sixth aspect, the implantable microphone device has a modified microphone assembly which eliminates the electret membrane. The assembly comprises an insulation layer secured on the inside surface of the implantable microphone membrane. An electret membrane-type material is, in turn, secured on the insulation layer. A backplate is disposed within the primary air cavity proximate to the insulation/membrane-type material combination. This aspect of the invention provides the advantage of a direct electret displacement, a lower overall component count, and an overall thinner microphone profile.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone in a hearing system; Figs. 2A-2C show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone of the present invention;
Fig. 3 shows a top view of a protective cover; Figs. 4A-4B show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with compliance rings; Figs. 4C-4D show a top view of an implantable microphone with compliance rings;
Figs. 5A-5B show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an air cavity and surface details; Fig. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with a vented electret microphone;
Fig. 7 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an exposed electret microphone;
Fig. 8A-8B shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an electret microphone with no electret membrane and a cross-sectional view of the membrane of this embodiment, respectively;
Fig. 9 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with a biocompatible material; and
Fig. 10 shows a cross- sectional view of an implantable microphone with synthetic skin.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In the description that follows, the present invention will be described in reference to hearing systems. The present invention, however, is not limited to any use or configuration. Therefore, the description the embodiments that follow is for purposes of illustration and not limitation. The same reference numerals will be utilized to indicate structures corresponding to similar structures.
Fig. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in a hearing system. An implantable microphone 100 is located under the skin and tissue behind the outer ear or concha. The implantable microphone picks up sounds through the skin and tissue. The sounds are then translated into electrical signals and carried by leads 102 to a signal processor 104 which may also be located under skin and tissue. The signal processor 104 receives the electrical signals from the implantable microphone 100 and processes the electrical signals appropriate for the hearing system and individual. An exemplary signal processor may include a battery and signal processing circuitry on an integrated circuit. For example, the signal processor may amplify certain frequencies in order to compensate for the hearing loss of the hearing-impaired person and/or to compensate for characteristics of the hearing system.
Electrical signals from the signal processor 104 travel via leads 106 to a direct-drive hearing device 108.
The leads may pass through a channel in the bone as shown or may run under the skin in the ear canal (not shown) . In a preferred embodiment, the direct-drive hearing device is a Floating Mass Transducer (FMT) described in U.S. Application No. 08/582,301, filed January 3, 1996 by Geoffrey R. Ball et al . , which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes .
The direct -drive hearing device vibrates in response to the electric signals and transfers the vibration to the malleus by direct attachment utilizing a clip 110. Although the direct -drive hearing device is shown attached to an ossicle, device 108 may be attached to any structure that allows vibrations to be generated in the inner ear. For example, the direct-drive hearing device may be attached to the tympanic membrane, ossicle, oval and round windows, skull, and within the inner ear. However, if the implantable microphone and direct -drive device are both anchored to bone of the skull, it may be advantageous isolate one of the devices to prevent feedback.
Figs. 2A-2C show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone of the present invention. Typically, implantable microphone 100 is located under the skin and within the underlying tissue. In a preferred embodiment, the implantable microphone is placed against bone of the skull and may be attached to the bone (e.g., surgical screws) . A shock absorbent material may be placed between the implantable microphone and the bone of the skull for vibration isolation. The shock absorbent material may include silicone or polyurethane .
The implantable microphone generally includes a housing 200, a microphone 208, and a membrane 202. The membrane flexes as it receives sounds transmitted through the skin and tissue. In a preferred embodiment, the membrane 202 and housing 200 both include titanium and are laser welded 209 together. In other embodiments, the housing 200 may include ceramic and the membrane 202 may include gold, platinum or stainless steel.
In order to optimize the response of the microphone, the membrane 202 must be sufficiently flexible. Increased membrane flexibility can be achieved, for example, by starting with a 0.0050" thick sheet of titanium (or other suitable material) and then chemically etching a circular portion of the sheet down to between 0.0005 " -0.0020 " . Etching can be performed on one or both sides of the membrane 203, 204. As a result, a circular band 210 of thicker (0.0050") titanium is left around the edges of the membrane. The thick band 210 provides stability to the membrane 202, and keeps the membrane in a flexible, unstressed or only slightly stressed state. The band 210 also provides for ease of attachment to the housing 200 at weld locations 209.
Preferably, the flexibility of the membrane 202 is defined in terms of the frequency response which it generates in open air, without an air cavity on either side. For example, the membrane will have a resonance frequency lower than 12,000 Hertz when measured by Laser Doppler Vibrometry. Resonance frequency measurements have been made with a Polytec Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer. In a preferred alternative, the flexibility of the membrane is defined as a function of its deflection when subjected to a force, centered on the membrane, supplied by a 3/32" diameter rod with a spherical tip. Force deflection measurements have been made with an Instron Tensile/Compression materials tester.
The membrane 202 disposed over the housing 200, defines a primary air cavity 206 therebetween. This cavity will typically be a hermetically sealed cavity necessitated by implantation into the body. Electro-acoustic simulation (lumped-parameter modeling) , finite element analysis, and physical prototyping has shown that once the membrane is sufficiently flexible, the one variable that has a first order effect on frequency response is the acoustic compliance of this air cavity. Optimizing device response is accomplished by decreasing the acoustic compliance of this air cavity. Acoustic compliance is determined by the following equation:
CA = V/pc2 = V/γP0
V = volume of the air cavity p = density of gas in the air cavity c = velocity of sound in the gas 7 = specific ratio of heats P0 = pressure of gas in air cavity
Preferably, the primary air cavity is defined as a volume that has an acoustic compliance of less than 4.3 x 10"14 m5/N measured parametrically .
From the equation above it can be seen that a decrease in compliance may be obtained through a decrease in air cavity volume. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the primary air cavity 206 has a very small volume. The depth of the primary air cavity, can range, for example, from 0.0005" to 0.0020". In a preferred embodiment, the primary air cavity may define a specific volume of no greater than 6 cubic millimeters (0.00036 in3). The depth of the primary air cavity 206 may be accomplished by machining a specified depth into a surface of the housing 212 or by etching the membrane lower surface 204 directly opposite the housing 200, or a combination of both procedures.
The decrease in acoustic compliance can also be achieved by increasing the bulk modulus of the gas in the primary air cavity, equal to pc2 . This may be accomplished by increasing the pressure in the chamber, or by using a gas with a high density and velocity of sound, relative to air.
Typical gases may include, for example, xenon, argon, helium, nitrogen, and the like.
In one embodiment, the microphone 208 is an electret microphone. It comprises a secondary air cavity 226, an electret membrane 222, a back plate 224, and an aperture or vent 220. An aperture 220 is connected to the primary air cavity 206 and allows vibrations of the membrane 202 to be transmitted as sound waves through the primary air cavity 206 and aperture 220 into the secondary air cavity 226. The sound waves passing through the secondary air cavity 226 generate vibrations on a surface of an electret membrane 222. The microphone, performs like a transducer, and subsequently transforms these vibrations into electrical signals. Since the response is driven by the characteristics of the primary air cavity 206, the characteristics of the electret microphone 208 can be adjusted to enhance overall microphone 100 response. In one embodiment, the aperture 220 acts as an acoustic resistance at the front end of the electret and is optimized such that the response peak of the response is damped, but overall sensitivity is minimally affected. This will create a flatter frequency response curve, and has been demonstrated with physical prototypes . In a preferred embodiment leads 228 carry the electrical signals from the microphone 208 to a direct-drive hearing device (Fig. 1) which vibrates in response to the electric signals and transfers the vibration to the malleus or other appropriate inner ear structure . The typical implantable microphone 100 will include a rear chamber 207. The rear chamber 207 is suited for encasing the leads 228 which pass from the electret microphone 208. A hermetically sealed feedthrough 230 is included in the housing 200 which allows the leads 228 to exit the rear chamber .
In another embodiment, the implantable microphone 100 includes a protective cover 240. The protective cover protects the implantable microphone (and membrane) from damage when a user's head is struck with an object as may sometimes happens in contact sports. The protective cover 240 includes inlet ports 242 which allow sounds to travel to the membrane uninhibited. The protective cover 240 may include a number of materials including plastic, stainless steel, titanium, and ceramic.
Fig. 3 shows a top view of a protective cover. As shown, protective cover 240 (and therefore the underlying membrane 202) is the majority of the top surface area of the implantable microphone. In this example, there are six inlet ports 242 through which sound may travel to the underlying membrane 202.
Figs. 4A-4B show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with compliance rings. In a preferred embodiment, the compliance rings are provided to ensure a smooth frequency response by creating a single node, pistonlike displacement of the membrane. The compliance rings may be fabricated using two different methods. Fig. 4A shows a cross-sectional view of the membrane 202 that has been depth etched to form rings 260 having a rectangular cross-section. The cross-sectional shape of the rings 260 is a function of the manufacturing process (i.e. depth of etching) . An alternative manufacturing process, shown in Fig. 4B, provides compliance rings 250 formed mechanically, for example, by stamping. These rings may provide additional flexibility to the membrane. Figs. 4C and 4D show a top view of the membrane 202 and further show how the rings 250, 260 may be positioned on the membrane . Figs. 5A-5B show a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with a primary cavity and surface details. In another embodiment of the implantable microphone, a surface of the housing 212 immediately opposite the lower surface of the membrane 204 will have fabricated surface details such as pits or grooves 213. The pits or grooves 213 are configured such that peak resonance damping may be optimized. In yet another embodiment of this concept, the primary air cavity 206 will have at least one hole 215 which connects the primary air cavity 206 to the rear chamber 207.
The result of the communication between the primary air cavity and the rear chamber is the formation of a resonance chamber for response shaping. The diameter of the hole or holes may, for example, be less than .020". Preferably, both cavities will remain hermetically sealed to the outside.
Fig. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an internally vented microphone 208. The internally vented microphone is another embodiment of the present invention having a membrane 202, a housing 200, a microphone 208 and a rear chamber 207. In this embodiment, the microphone 208 comprises a secondary air cavity 226, an electret membrane 222, a back plate 224, an aperture 220 and a vent 225. The aperture 220 connects the secondary air cavity 226 to the primary air cavity 206 so that vibrations of the membrane are transmitted through the primary air cavity 206 through the aperture 220 to the secondary air cavity 226. A vent 225 is provided to connect the secondary air cavity 226 to the rear chamber 207. The rear chamber 207 encases the microphone leads 228. The portion of the housing 200 which surrounds the rear chamber further comprises a feedthrough 230 and a gas-fill device 118. The gas-fill device aids in filling the microphone 100 with specialty gases, such as Xenon. Because of the aperture 220 and vent 225, the gas is allowed to permeate the entire microphone device. Conversely, gas can be evacuated from the entire microphone device as well. The device 118 will be a hollow thin-walled tube which can be easily sealed using a crimp- induced cold weld or other similar means for sealing the tube. In another embodiment, the first surface of the housing 212 may have surface details, such as holes (Fig. 5B) which will also allow a gas to permeate from the rear chamber 207 to the primary cavity 206. In all instances it is preferred that the cavities within the device remain hermetically sealed from the outside. Fig. 7 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an exposed electret microphone membrane. Another embodiment of the present invention provides an implantable microphone having a membrane 202, a housing 200, a microphone 208 and a rear chamber 207. The microphone 208, is an electret microphone, that has been modified such that the membrane 222 is directly exposed to the primary air cavity 206. This is accomplished by eliminating the top of the microphone protective cover 227, thus eliminating the aperture 220 and the secondary air cavity 226, as well. Exposing the electret membrane 222 directly to the primary air cavity 206 reduces the volume of the air cavity 206. Accordingly the acoustic compliance of the primary cavity is decreased and the performance may be improved. Fig. 8A shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with an electret microphone having no electret membrane. Another embodiment of the present invention, contains an electret microphone that has been modified such that the electret membrane 222 (See Fig. 7) is eliminated. The lower surface 204 of the membrane 202 has an insulation layer 221 secured directly on to the lower surface of the membrane 204. An electret membrane-type material 223 is placed directly onto the insulation layer 221. This material could be, for example, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) , Teflon® FEP, or single-side metallized mylar. Fig. 8B shows a cross section of the membrane 202 with the various layers attached. The backplate 224 is placed in close proximity to the PVDF layer 223 and is disposed within the air cavity. In this configuration, the membrane 202 will function as the membrane of the electret microphone. The primary air cavity volume 206 is considerably reduced which optimally decreases its acoustic compliance. Fig. 9 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with a biocompatible material. Since the implantable microphone is to be received into the human body it may be coated with a protective biocompatible material. The coating (not shown) may be parylene or similar substance and will completely encapsulate the microphone to aid in biocompatability . In a preferred embodiment, a biodegradable material 310 may be placed directly in front of the membrane 202. In this configuration, the initial tissue growth that typically occurs after surgical implantation (the healing process) would not be allowed to impinge on the microphone membrane 202. Human tissue that impinges or adheres to the membrane 202 may affect its frequency response. Preferably, the material will degrade over time and be absorbed into the body. After the healing process is concluded, the volume of space occupied by the biodegradable material 310 will fill with body fluids. Biodegradable materials suitable for this embodiment include lactide and glycolide polymers. The materials may be held in place by the protective cover or made to adhere to the membrane surface.
Fig. 10 shows a cross-sectional view of an implantable microphone with "synthetic skin". In another embodiment of the present invention, a synthetic skin 400 or similar material, is made to adhere 410 to the membrane 202. This patch 400 can be sewn to the edges of the skin of a patient, taking the place of the real skin removed by a surgeon. Placement could be anywhere on the side of the head, or it could be used in place of a tympanic membrane.
While the above is a complete description of preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications and equivalents may be used. It should be evident that the present invention is equally applicable by making appropriate modifications to the embodiments described above. For example, the above has shown that the implantable microphone and audio processor are separate; however, these two devices may be integrated into one device. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the metes and bounds of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3938615 *||11 Jul 1974||17 Feb 1976||Jacob Bodenger||Stethoscope consisting of a stethoscope chest piece and a sound mixer|
|US5859916 *||12 Jul 1996||12 Jan 1999||Symphonix Devices, Inc.||Two stage implantable microphone|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|WO2001045457A2 *||8 Dec 2000||21 Jun 2001||John Nicholas Marshall||Implantable hearing aid 1.1|
|WO2001045457A3 *||8 Dec 2000||27 Dec 2001||John Nicholas Marshall||Implantable hearing aid 1.1|
|WO2011001405A1 *||1 Jul 2010||6 Jan 2011||Nxp B.V.||Transducer with resonant cavity|
|WO2011066295A1 *||23 Nov 2010||3 Jun 2011||Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh||Implantable microphone for hearing systems|
|WO2012018400A1||3 Aug 2011||9 Feb 2012||Sonitus Medical, Inc.||Implantable piezoelectric polymer film microphone|
|CN104581592A *||23 Nov 2010||29 Apr 2015||Med-El电气医疗器械有限公司||Implantable microphone for hearing systems|
|EP2600796A1 *||3 Aug 2011||12 Jun 2013||Sonitus Medical, Inc.||Implantable piezoelectric polymer film microphone|
|EP2600796A4 *||3 Aug 2011||22 Jan 2014||Sonitus Medical Inc||Implantable piezoelectric polymer film microphone|
|US6978190||24 Aug 2001||20 Dec 2005||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Programming of cyclical machines|
|US8721518||23 Nov 2010||13 May 2014||Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh||Implantable microphone for hearing systems|
|US9794702||12 Dec 2013||17 Oct 2017||Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh||Implantable microphone for hearing systems|
|International Classification||H04R25/00, H04R19/01|
|Cooperative Classification||H04R19/016, H04R25/606, H04R2225/67|
|24 Jun 1999||AK||Designated states|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AU BR CA JP MX
|24 Jun 1999||AL||Designated countries for regional patents|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE
|25 Aug 1999||121||Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application|
|2 Sep 1999||DFPE||Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)|
|15 Jun 2000||ENP||Entry into the national phase in:|
Ref country code: JP
Ref document number: 2000 539679
Kind code of ref document: A
Format of ref document f/p: F
|17 Jul 2000||WWE||Wipo information: entry into national phase|
Ref document number: 1998963002
Country of ref document: EP
|20 Dec 2000||WWP||Wipo information: published in national office|
Ref document number: 1998963002
Country of ref document: EP
|1 Jul 2003||WWW||Wipo information: withdrawn in national office|
Ref document number: 1998963002
Country of ref document: EP