WO1997027557A1 - Process management system and method - Google Patents

Process management system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997027557A1
WO1997027557A1 PCT/US1997/001208 US9701208W WO9727557A1 WO 1997027557 A1 WO1997027557 A1 WO 1997027557A1 US 9701208 W US9701208 W US 9701208W WO 9727557 A1 WO9727557 A1 WO 9727557A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
work
graphically
graphical object
agent
work element
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1997/001208
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jean B. Lehmann
Matthew B. Reid
Jaye D. Hicks
Steven K. Berenbrock
Brad L. Rucker
Scott M. Boettcher
Original Assignee
Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Electronic Data Systems Corporation filed Critical Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Priority to EP97903113A priority Critical patent/EP0976073A1/en
Priority to AU17102/97A priority patent/AU706198B2/en
Priority to JP9527048A priority patent/JP2000504131A/en
Publication of WO1997027557A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997027557A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06311Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management

Definitions

  • This invention is related in general to the field of computer software programs. More particularly, the invention is related to a process management system and method therefor.
  • Process management refers to the "direction, control, and coordination of work performed to develop a product or perform a service” 1 . It involves the specification of who, what, and how requirements for completing tasks. Some companies manage their processes by documenting them in voluminous paper documents, which are difficult and cumbersome to revise, reprint, redistribute, and consult.
  • a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, and a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter-relationships therebetween.
  • a knowledge repository is further coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
  • a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow.
  • a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and said graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow.
  • a work element graphical object may be expanded to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process. Properties associated with the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects may also be displayed.
  • FIGURE 1 is a simplified block diagram of a process management system and method constructed according to the teachings of the present invention
  • FIGURE 2A to 21 are exemplary process notations of components and connecting links;
  • FIGURE 3 is a diagram showing a ma ⁇ or component, work element, and its minor components;
  • FIGURE 4 is a diagram showing a major component, work product, and its minor components
  • FIGURE 5 is a diagram showing a ma]or component, agent, and its minor components
  • FIGURE 6 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for process information
  • FIGURE 7 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work element information
  • FIGURE 8 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work product information
  • FIGURE 9 is an exemplary dialog prompting for process input/output information
  • FIGURE 10 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for responsibility information
  • FIGURE 11 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction process
  • FIGURE 12 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction subprocess
  • FIGURE 13 is an exemplary graphical screen showing an agent dialog window
  • FIGURE 14 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a work product dialog window
  • FIGURE 15 is a simplified diagram showing a computer network connecting computers for accessing the process management system of the present invention and data files stored m a common shared memory.
  • FIGURES 1-15 The preferred embodiment (s) of the present invention is (are) illustrated in FIGURES 1-15, like reference numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
  • Process management system 10 uses a number of major components 12, including work element, work product, agent, and several connectivities, to represent or express a process.
  • the process is presented to user(s) graphically through a graphical user interface (GUI) 14.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • a knowledge repository 16 is coupled to process management system 10 for storing knowledge acquired in formulating past processes, such as templates of existing processes.
  • process management system 10 is developed using object-oriented software development technology.
  • Process management system 10 may be written in the C++ programming language, and commercially available GUI class libraries Tools.h++ from Rogue Wave and/or StarView from Star Division may be used.
  • FIGURES 2A through 21 show the exemplary notations used to represent the various components of a process.
  • FIGURE 2A shows a work element represented by a rectangle, which is a task that is to be performed.
  • FIGURE 2B is a rectangle with a shadow, which represents a summary work element that has more process details and may be expanded to view those details. The process of expanding a component to view additional details is also called "drill down”.
  • a rectangle with dash lines is a conditional work element, representing a task that is to be performed if a condition is met.
  • FIGURE 2D is a work product, represented by a circle as shown or an ellipse. A work product is the result of performing a task or work element.
  • FIGURE 2E is an agent, represented by a hexagon, which is the person, machinery, automation, or software that is responsible for the task.
  • FIGURES 2F through 21 The major components: work element, work product, and agent of the process are connected by links shown in FIGURES 2F through 21.
  • a line in FIGURE 2F is a responsibility connection
  • a line with an arrow thereon in FIGURE 2G denotes input or output
  • a dashed line with an arrow in FIGURE 2H is a conditional input/output.
  • FIGURE 21 shows a connection used to represent iteration.
  • Each of the major components, work element, work product, and agent can be linked to many minor components or properties or traits, which further describe the methodology or process.
  • FIGURE 3 shows the exemplary minor components of a work element 20: standard 21, technique 22, training 23, reference 24, and policy 25.
  • Standard 21 may specify the standard by which the work element is measured, such as the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) established by Software Engineering Institute (SEI) .
  • Technique 22 may specify the techniques that can be used to perform the task described in the work element, such as brains orming, modeling, prototyping, simulation, technical review, etc.
  • Training 23 may set forth the training available to help perform the task in work element 20.
  • Reference 24 may include a bibliography of articles, books, and technical magazines that are associated with the performance of work element 20.
  • Policy 25 may specify the governmental or company policies related to the performance of work element 20.
  • FIGURE 4 shows the exemplary minor components related to a work product 30.
  • Standard 31 may describe the standard used to measure the quality of work product 31.
  • Technique 32 may describe the techniques that can be used- to produce work product 30, such as joint iterative rapid development, financial cost models, function-level risk assessment, or precedence diagraming.
  • Training 33 may describe the training class, seminar, or materials available or required to train for producing work product 30.
  • Tool 34 sets forth the tool(s) needed to produce or make work product 30.
  • Template 35 provides a shell or pattern that can be used as a guide for the development of work product 30 to speed up the process. Representative examples of work product 30 or completed templates may be provided as examples 36 of work product 30.
  • system 10 automatically launches the application.
  • Reference 37 is a bibliography that may provide additional information regarding making work product 30.
  • Policy 38 sets forth any policy or policies encompassing the act of producing work product 30.
  • Training 51 sets forth the training available for the agent.
  • the associated training may include project management development, leadership development, and customer relations.
  • the training may include programming logic, object oriented programming principles, and C++ programming language.
  • Reference 52 may list articles, books, and other information related to agent 50.
  • Policy 53 may list any policy that is related to agent 50.
  • standard 54 may describe the standards by which agent 50 is compared and measured.
  • FIGURES 6-10 are simplified exemplary dialog windows used to formulate a methodology or process.
  • an exemplary dialog window prompting for information on the process is shown.
  • the name of the process, its owner, audience, purpose, and further descriptions may be specified.
  • the owner of a process is the entity that owns the definition of the item. Accordingly, a process may be built from pieces of other processes. For example, a systems engineering process may reference start-up activities owned by a project management process. A special link may be used to tie processes together without making a new copy of the existing process.
  • Information used to summarize a process is shown in the following table, some of which may not be shown in FIGURE 6, in which A/N stands for alphanumeric:
  • Help button if clicked on, provides context- sensitive on-line help support to the user.
  • FIGURE 7 shows an exemplary dialog window for entering information on a work element, including name, short name, whether the work element is required or conditional, and additional textual information such as: purposes, conditions, guidelines, procedure, description, etc.
  • Dialog windows for entering attributes or associated minor components, such as references, training, and techniques are further reachable by clicking on respective push buttons.
  • the following table summarizes the exemplary information used to describe a work element.
  • the IF SUMMARY column indicates whether the attribute is specified, can be rolled up from lower detailed level attributes, or can be derived.
  • Procedure List of steps required for completing the work A/N N/A element describes the "how-to” or “step-by- step” instructions (SET) (for detail elements only)
  • N Specify attributes (NY) author that are process specific (one to three available)
  • FIGURE 8 is an exemplary window for requesting information on a work product.
  • the table below summarizes the information used to describe a work product.
  • Type The category of work product (e.g. decision, A/N Specify/ Roll condition, document, individual, etc.) Up
  • participant's role e.g. Y AM Specify project manager, data base administrator, etc.
  • Input/output is a link that connects work products and work elements.
  • a work product is an input to a work element, and a work product can also be an output of a work element.
  • the input/output information is shown in the tables below.
  • the link between an agent and a work element is the responsibility connectivity.
  • responsibility connectivity The information used to describe responsibility is listed in the table below and shown in an exemplary dialog screen in FIGURE 10 :
  • a N e.g. novice, intermediate, expert
  • Minor components associated with responsibility including training, tools, and techniques, may also be specified.
  • appropriate dialog windows pop up to receive information entered by the user/author in a similar manner, using some of the same graphical tools shown.
  • the information associated with each minor component is shown in the tables below.
  • Type Generalized type of tool e.g. spreadsheet, word processor, AM etc.
  • Type Generalized type of technique e.g. modeling, prioritization, AM etc.
  • Source Body, organization, or publisher A/N which provided or published the matenal
  • policy provides the law or Y AM regulations that govern, guide, or constrain operations (SEI)
  • FIGURES 6-10 are illustrative only, and that windows tools and manipulations such as push buttons, pull-down menus, tool bars, status lines, scroll bars, etc. as known in the art may be incorporated and/or substituted therein.
  • FIGURE 11 is an exemplary screen showing a bug correction process.
  • a hierarchies window is to the left of the process window, which displays a graphical representation of the process.
  • the hierarchies window currently shows the work element hierarchy, but may be changed to show agent or work product hierarchies of the process by clicking on the appropriate buttons immediately above the window.
  • Those entries with a square icon appearing to the left of the text indicates that these elements are expandable and the user may drill down to a lower level.
  • These expandable elements for example "fix the bug" and "close”, are shown in the graphical window with a shadow.
  • the process window contains the graphical depiction of a process or a portion of a process.
  • Process windows contain agents, work elements, work products, and any connections therebetween. Every image in a process window is a selectable object that has properties associated therewith. Summary work elements shown as a work element with a shadow represent the existence of additional details in the form of another process window that can be reached by drilling down or double clicking on the work element. In this manner, complex processes may be organized into multiple levels of abstraction to facilitate the presentation and understanding thereof.
  • a customized tool bar is further provided to permit the user to select operations such as open file, close file, save file, print, and to further select icons for the work element, work product, agent, and links therebetween to build or modify the displayed process.
  • the graphical display may be easily manipulated, for example, the size and location of the windows can be adjusted by clicking and dragging on the window or window boundaries, or the windows may be made to be cascaded, overlapped, or tiled.
  • a developer 60 is responsible for (link 61) changing the bug status 62 in a piece of software.
  • the work product of changing the bug status is a bug report 63 and a bug tracking database 64.
  • the next task, fix the bug 65 is also recorded and documented in a bug report 66.
  • the link between fix the bug 65 and test the fix 66 is iterative, because the first few attempts at fixing the bug may not succeed.
  • the software (PS Application) 61 is the work product of testing the fix, if successful. If the bug fix is successful, the task close 68 is performed.
  • the close sub-process shown in FIGURE 12 displays three tasks: check in files 71, update library files 72, and close out bug 73.
  • the associated agents and work products of these work elements are shown. It may be seen that all work elements within a process are unique regardless of whether the name and short names are the same. Unlike work elements, agents and work products in a process that have the same name and short names are the same entity. Therefore, all bug reports and all agents in the bug correction process are the same respective entities.
  • dialog windows displaying details of the developer agent and the bug report work product are shown overlaid on top of the process graphical representation. Any agent, work product, and work element defined in the process may be clicked on and details thereof may be displayed in like manner.
  • FIGURE 15 illustrates the distributed manner in which the instant system 10 may operate.
  • Process management system 10 may be run on a stand alone personal computer or work station, or on one or more computers 102-106 that are linked together by a computer network 110.
  • Information that can be shared by many users may be stored on a common database 108, which may also be linked by computer network 110.
  • members of an engineering team may independently access and consult a process the team is working on.
  • System 10 further provides an export capability which produces files in several formats compatible with different applications. For example, Common-Separated Values formatted files may be exported to spreadsheet and database applications to generate statistical information on a process. Microsoft Project Exchange formatted files can also be produced and exported to most project management tools for project management.
  • a process may be defined on process management system 10 easily and efficiently. Existing processes may also be easily revised and modified. System 10 displays the defined process in a graphical manner, which aides in the comprehension and management of the process. Knowledge accumulated from past experiences are also accessible by multiple users for reuse. For example, a company may distribute general processes that can then be customized to fit the special needs of individual organizations within the company. In this manner, existing processes may be reused and tailored to each new process without reinvestment of efforts. Through the use of system 10, company processes may be easily standardized with common terms and definitions. Furthermore, the number of levels of process details is unlimited in system 10, enabling complex processes to be represented in an uncluttered manner.
  • a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, that work element being expandable into an unlimited number of graphically representable sub-process levels, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter ⁇ relationships therebetween, and a knowledge repository coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
  • This project management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work element.
  • These properties associated with the work element may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the performance of the work element, a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element, and/or a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element .
  • the process management system according to the present invention may also comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work product.
  • These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product, a training trait for associating any training or educational class with making the work product, a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product, an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product, a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product.
  • Each of these traits, such as the tool trait, the example trait, and the template trait may further include a launchable application.
  • the process management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the agent . These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the agent, and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent.
  • the graphical user interface of the process management system may further display a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of the process.
  • the process management system may additionally comprise an exporter for exporting a defined process in a predetermined format and/or may further include context-sensitive help.
  • a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow, including graphically representing an iterative link corresponding to an iterative relationship.
  • Such method may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training or educational class with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object.
  • the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work product graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, defining a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, defining a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a start point of making the work product graphical object, defining an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object.
  • These traits may further include a step for defining a launchable application.
  • the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the agent graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent graphical object.
  • the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may include a step for providing a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of levels of the process.
  • a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and the graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow, expanding a work element graphical object to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process, and displaying properties associated with the work product, work element, and agent graphical objects.
  • the property displaying step of this method may further include the step of displaying a standard trait associating any industry or organizational standard with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object.
  • the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on the computer may further include a step for displaying a standard trait for associating an industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, displaying a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product graphical object, displaying an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object.
  • the properly displayed step may further include a step of launching an application.
  • the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include a step of displaying a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the agent graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organization policy with the agent graphical object.
  • the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further comprise the step of exporting a defined process in a predetermined format .

Abstract

A process management system (10) for operating on a computer (102, 104, 106) includes a graphical user interface (14) for graphically representing a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, and a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter-relationships therebetween. A knowledge repository (16) is further coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.

Description

PROCESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is related in general to the field of computer software programs. More particularly, the invention is related to a process management system and method therefor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When faced with a complex task, careful consideration and planning are often required to analyze the problem and define the efforts and resources needed to successfully complete the task. Process management refers to the "direction, control, and coordination of work performed to develop a product or perform a service"1. It involves the specification of who, what, and how requirements for completing tasks. Some companies manage their processes by documenting them in voluminous paper documents, which are difficult and cumbersome to revise, reprint, redistribute, and consult.
There are some existing software that attempt to provide an automated and computerized tool to perform process management, including Project Bridge Modeler by Applied Business Technology, Process Engineer by earmonth & Burchett Management Systems, Methodology Administration Platform by Structured Solutions, Hyper Analyst by Bachman, and firstCASE by AGS Management Systems. These existing process management software tools share some common weaknesses, including a non-graphical expression of the modeled process, a restriction on the number of hierarchical levels allowable in the process, a lack of support for iterative processes, and a lack of support for storing process information in a repository for multi-user access.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, there is a need for a process management system and method therefor that support textual and graphical expression of multiple levels of process detail, iterative processes and decision processing, and a repository of knowledge. In accordance with the present invention, a process management system and method are provided which eliminates or substantially reduces the disadvantages associated with prior systems.
In one aspect of the invention, a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, and a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter-relationships therebetween. A knowledge repository is further coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
In another aspect of the invention, a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and said graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow. A work element graphical object may be expanded to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process. Properties associated with the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects may also be displayed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference may be made to the accompanying drawings, m which: FIGURE 1 is a simplified block diagram of a process management system and method constructed according to the teachings of the present invention;
FIGURE 2A to 21 are exemplary process notations of components and connecting links; FIGURE 3 is a diagram showing a ma^or component, work element, and its minor components;
FIGURE 4 is a diagram showing a major component, work product, and its minor components;
FIGURE 5 is a diagram showing a ma]or component, agent, and its minor components;
FIGURE 6 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for process information;
FIGURE 7 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work element information; FIGURE 8 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work product information;
FIGURE 9 is an exemplary dialog prompting for process input/output information;
FIGURE 10 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for responsibility information;
FIGURE 11 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction process;
FIGURE 12 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction subprocess; FIGURE 13 is an exemplary graphical screen showing an agent dialog window;
FIGURE 14 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a work product dialog window; and
FIGURE 15 is a simplified diagram showing a computer network connecting computers for accessing the process management system of the present invention and data files stored m a common shared memory. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The preferred embodiment (s) of the present invention is (are) illustrated in FIGURES 1-15, like reference numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
Referring to FIGURE 1, a process management system constructed according to the teachings of the present invention is shown indicated generally at 10. Process management system 10 uses a number of major components 12, including work element, work product, agent, and several connectivities, to represent or express a process. The process is presented to user(s) graphically through a graphical user interface (GUI) 14. A knowledge repository 16 is coupled to process management system 10 for storing knowledge acquired in formulating past processes, such as templates of existing processes. In one embodiment of the present invention, process management system 10 is developed using object-oriented software development technology. Process management system 10 may be written in the C++ programming language, and commercially available GUI class libraries Tools.h++ from Rogue Wave and/or StarView from Star Division may be used.
FIGURES 2A through 21 show the exemplary notations used to represent the various components of a process. FIGURE 2A shows a work element represented by a rectangle, which is a task that is to be performed. FIGURE 2B is a rectangle with a shadow, which represents a summary work element that has more process details and may be expanded to view those details. The process of expanding a component to view additional details is also called "drill down". In FIGURE 2C, a rectangle with dash lines is a conditional work element, representing a task that is to be performed if a condition is met. FIGURE 2D is a work product, represented by a circle as shown or an ellipse. A work product is the result of performing a task or work element. FIGURE 2E is an agent, represented by a hexagon, which is the person, machinery, automation, or software that is responsible for the task.
The major components: work element, work product, and agent of the process are connected by links shown in FIGURES 2F through 21. A line in FIGURE 2F is a responsibility connection, a line with an arrow thereon in FIGURE 2G denotes input or output, and a dashed line with an arrow in FIGURE 2H is a conditional input/output. FIGURE 21 shows a connection used to represent iteration. Each of the major components, work element, work product, and agent, can be linked to many minor components or properties or traits, which further describe the methodology or process. FIGURE 3 shows the exemplary minor components of a work element 20: standard 21, technique 22, training 23, reference 24, and policy 25. Standard 21 may specify the standard by which the work element is measured, such as the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) established by Software Engineering Institute (SEI) . Technique 22 may specify the techniques that can be used to perform the task described in the work element, such as brains orming, modeling, prototyping, simulation, technical review, etc. Training 23 may set forth the training available to help perform the task in work element 20. Reference 24 may include a bibliography of articles, books, and technical magazines that are associated with the performance of work element 20. Policy 25 may specify the governmental or company policies related to the performance of work element 20.
FIGURE 4 shows the exemplary minor components related to a work product 30. Standard 31 may describe the standard used to measure the quality of work product 31. Technique 32 may describe the techniques that can be used- to produce work product 30, such as joint iterative rapid development, financial cost models, function-level risk assessment, or precedence diagraming. Training 33 may describe the training class, seminar, or materials available or required to train for producing work product 30. Tool 34 sets forth the tool(s) needed to produce or make work product 30. Template 35 provides a shell or pattern that can be used as a guide for the development of work product 30 to speed up the process. Representative examples of work product 30 or completed templates may be provided as examples 36 of work product 30. If a tool or template is associated with an application, such as WordPerfect, Word, and Lotus 1-2-3, for example, system 10 automatically launches the application. Reference 37 is a bibliography that may provide additional information regarding making work product 30. Policy 38 sets forth any policy or policies encompassing the act of producing work product 30.
Four exemplary minor components are shown related to agent 50. Training 51 sets forth the training available for the agent. For example, if an agent is a project manager, the associated training may include project management development, leadership development, and customer relations. For a software developer, the training may include programming logic, object oriented programming principles, and C++ programming language. Reference 52 may list articles, books, and other information related to agent 50. Policy 53 may list any policy that is related to agent 50. Finally, standard 54 may describe the standards by which agent 50 is compared and measured.
It is important to emphasize that although specific symbols and components have been set forth above, they serve as examples and do not limit the teachings of the present invention to those embodiments explicitly shown. FIGURES 6-10 are simplified exemplary dialog windows used to formulate a methodology or process. Referring to FIGURE 6, an exemplary dialog window prompting for information on the process is shown. The name of the process, its owner, audience, purpose, and further descriptions may be specified. The owner of a process is the entity that owns the definition of the item. Accordingly, a process may be built from pieces of other processes. For example, a systems engineering process may reference start-up activities owned by a project management process. A special link may be used to tie processes together without making a new copy of the existing process. Information used to summarize a process is shown in the following table, some of which may not be shown in FIGURE 6, in which A/N stands for alphanumeric:
PROCESS
ATTRIBUTE REQ TYPE
Name Long title of the process Y A/N
Short Name Short title ofthe process Y A N
Level Level in the Methodology Architecture (e.g Y A N Framework, Method, or Process)
Status Indication ofthe degree of completeness ofthe process Y A/N
Organization Name ofthe organization that owns the definition ofthe Y A/N process
Purpose List of objectives/reasons for usmg this process Y A/N
Description Overview/definition ofthe process A/N
Audience Description ofthe targeted audience for this process A/N
Context Bnef description of how this process fits interreia.es A/N with other related mateπal
Contact Where to go for additional information A/N
Benefits List of benefits of this process to company and to the A/N customer
Scope Brief description of the scope of the process A/N
Version/Release Indication ofthe applicable version and release A/N
Note that a Help button, if clicked on, provides context- sensitive on-line help support to the user.
FIGURE 7 shows an exemplary dialog window for entering information on a work element, including name, short name, whether the work element is required or conditional, and additional textual information such as: purposes, conditions, guidelines, procedure, description, etc. Dialog windows for entering attributes or associated minor components, such as references, training, and techniques are further reachable by clicking on respective push buttons. The following table summarizes the exemplary information used to describe a work element. The IF SUMMARY column indicates whether the attribute is specified, can be rolled up from lower detailed level attributes, or can be derived.
WORKELEMENT
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE IF SUMMARY
Name Long title ofthe work element Y A N Specify
Short Name Short title ofthe work element A/N Specify
Level (NY) Whether the work element is summary or detail Derived Derive (leaf)
Summary Type Whether the work element summarizes its A N Specify (?) children by function or flow (for summary elements only)
Alias List of customer local aliases for the work A N Specify element
Purpose List of objectives/reasons for the work element Y A N Specify Roll Up
Description Short overview/definition ofthe work clement A/N Specify
Guideline List of guidelines for performing the work A/N Specify element
Critical Success List of items that must be present for successful A/N Specify Roll Factor completion ofthe work element Up
Procedure List of steps required for completing the work A/N N/A element; describes the "how-to" or "step-by- step" instructions (SET) (for detail elements only)
Standards List of specific standards considerations (e.g. SEI A N Specify Consideration considerations to ensure CMM Level 2)
Required/ Whether the work element is required or Binary Roll Up Conditional conditional ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE IF SUMMARY
Condition List of conditions under which the work element A N N/A should be completed (for conditional elements only)
Entry Criteria Conditions that must be met before the work Dcnved Denve
(?) element can be started (inputs in the proper status, agents trained, task dependencies satisfied, etc.)
Exit Criteria (?) Conditions expected upon completion o the Derived Denve work element (outputs completed in the proper status, procedure completed, agents' responsibilities fulfilled, task dependencies sausfied, etc.)
User-defined Attributes that can be assigned by the process A N Specify attributes (NY) author that are process specific (one to three available)
FIGURE 8 is an exemplary window for requesting information on a work product. The table below summarizes the information used to describe a work product.
WORKPRODUCT
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE IF SUMMARY
Name Long title ofthe work product Y A N Specify
Short Name Short title of the work product A/N Specify
Level (NY) Whether the work product is summary or detail Derived Denve (leaf)
Type The category of work product (e.g. decision, A/N Specify/ Roll condition, document, individual, etc.) Up
Delrverable/Non- Whether work product can be delivered to the Binary Specify Roll deliverable customer Up
Internal/ Indication of whether this work product is Binary Specify/ Roll External internally produced or externally supplied Up ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE DF SUMMARY
Alias List of customer/ local aliases for the work A N Specify product
Purpose List of objectives/reasons for the work product Y A/N Specify/Roll and the data represented bv the work product Up
Description Short overview/definition o the work product A N Specify
Guideline List of format and content guidelines for the A/N Specify work product
Content List ofthe data contained in the work product A N N/A with a brief descπpuon of each
Standards List of specific standards considerations (e g. SEI AM Specify Consideration considerations to ensure C M Level 2)
User-defined Attributes that can be assigned by the process AJN Specify attributes (NY) author that are process specific (one to three available)
The information used to describe an agent is summarized in the table below.
AGENT
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE IT- SUMMARY
Name Long title ofthe agent; participant's role (e.g. Y AM Specify project manager, data base administrator, etc.)
Short Name Short title ofthe agent; acceptable abbreviaUon AM Specify
Level (NY) Whether the agent is summary or detail (leaf) Derived Denve
Alias List of customer/local aliases for the agent A/N Specify
Description Short overview/definition of the agent A N Specify
Competency List of knowledge, skills and behaviors expected A N Specify or beneficial for performing in this role
User-defined Attributes that can be assigned by the process AM Specify attributes (NY) author that are process specific (one to three available) Input/output is a link that connects work products and work elements. A work product is an input to a work element, and a work product can also be an output of a work element. The input/output information is shown in the tables below.
INPUT
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Status Degree of completeness Y A N
Required Whether the work product is required as an input under all Y Binarv Conditional conditions
Condition List of conditions under which the input should be expected A N (for conditional work products only)
OUTPUT
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Status Degree of completeness Y AM
Required Whether the work product is required as an output under all Y Binary Conditional conditions
Condition List of conditions under which the output should be A/N completed (for conditional work products only)
The link between an agent and a work element is the responsibility connectivity. The information used to describe responsibility is listed in the table below and shown in an exemplary dialog screen in FIGURE 10 :
RESPONSIBILITY
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Type The responstbility/authonty the agent has for the work A/N element
SldU Level The degree of skill in this responsibility the agent will require A N (e.g. novice, intermediate, expert) Minor components associated with responsibility, including training, tools, and techniques, may also be specified. When these minor components are selected, appropriate dialog windows pop up to receive information entered by the user/author in a similar manner, using some of the same graphical tools shown. The information associated with each minor component is shown in the tables below.
TOOL
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Title ofthe tool Y A/N
Type Generalized type of tool (e.g. spreadsheet, word processor, AM etc.)
Description Short overview/definition ofthe tool Y A/N
Execution Execution requirements for launching the tool Y Information
TECHNIQUE
ATTRIBUTE DESCWPΠON REQ TYPE
Name Title ofthe technique Y AM
Type Generalized type of technique (e.g. modeling, prioritization, AM etc.)
Description Short ove ew/definition/abstract ofthe technique Y AM
Execution Executable file/directory instructions for launching the Y Information associated tool
TEMPLATE
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Title ofthe template Y A N
Explanation Brief description to make the template clear and A/N understandable
Execution Executable file/directory and execution instructions for Y Information launching the associated tool EXAMPLE
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Name of the example Y A/N
Explanation Brief description to make the example clear and A N understandable
Execution Executable file directory and execuuon instructions for Y Information launching the associated tool
REFERENCE
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Short identifier ofthe reference item AM
Description Due to the vanous pieces and formats of bibliographic entries A N the following represents suggesuons for the content of an entry
PublicaUon Name ofthe book, periodical, or AM other publication
Volume or version Volume or date of periodical, or AM version o the book/ document
Source Body, organization, or publisher A/N which provided or published the matenal
Article Titte ofthe article or section A N referenced
Author Authors) ofthe book, article, or A/N other publication
Content Brief description or key words A/N for the content o the mateπal
Execution Executable filedirectory and execution instructions for Information launching the associated tool
TRAINING
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Title or name ofthe training course of mateπal Y A N
Purpose List of learning objectives for the training course or material AM
Description Summarv/synopsis ofthe content o the course or mateπal AM ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Provider Company or organization that provides the training course or Y A/N mateπal
Contact Directions for ordenng, enrollment, or requesung more AN information about the course or mateπal
Execution Executable file/directory and execution instructions for Information launching the associated tool
POLICY
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Short descπption ofthe policy, policy provides the law or Y AM regulations that govern, guide, or constrain operations (SEI)
Type Funcuonai grouping A/N
Statement Policy statement Y AM
Execution Executable file/directory and execution instructions for Y Information launching the associated tool
STANDARD
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION REQ TYPE
Name Short dcscπpϋon ofthe standard; standard provides the Y AM operational definitions or acceptance cπteπa for final or interim products or process (SEI)
Type Functional grouping AM
Statement Standard statement Y AM
Execution Executable file/directory and execution lnstrucuons for Y Information launching the associated tool
It must be noted that the exemplary screens shown in FIGURES 6-10 are illustrative only, and that windows tools and manipulations such as push buttons, pull-down menus, tool bars, status lines, scroll bars, etc. as known in the art may be incorporated and/or substituted therein.
FIGURE 11 is an exemplary screen showing a bug correction process. A hierarchies window is to the left of the process window, which displays a graphical representation of the process. The hierarchies window currently shows the work element hierarchy, but may be changed to show agent or work product hierarchies of the process by clicking on the appropriate buttons immediately above the window. Those entries with a square icon appearing to the left of the text indicates that these elements are expandable and the user may drill down to a lower level. These expandable elements, for example "fix the bug" and "close", are shown in the graphical window with a shadow.
The process window contains the graphical depiction of a process or a portion of a process. Process windows contain agents, work elements, work products, and any connections therebetween. Every image in a process window is a selectable object that has properties associated therewith. Summary work elements shown as a work element with a shadow represent the existence of additional details in the form of another process window that can be reached by drilling down or double clicking on the work element. In this manner, complex processes may be organized into multiple levels of abstraction to facilitate the presentation and understanding thereof.
A customized tool bar is further provided to permit the user to select operations such as open file, close file, save file, print, and to further select icons for the work element, work product, agent, and links therebetween to build or modify the displayed process. The graphical display may be easily manipulated, for example, the size and location of the windows can be adjusted by clicking and dragging on the window or window boundaries, or the windows may be made to be cascaded, overlapped, or tiled.
It may be instructional to walk through the bug correction process to show how a process is represented. A developer 60 is responsible for (link 61) changing the bug status 62 in a piece of software. The work product of changing the bug status is a bug report 63 and a bug tracking database 64. The next task, fix the bug 65, is also recorded and documented in a bug report 66. The link between fix the bug 65 and test the fix 66 is iterative, because the first few attempts at fixing the bug may not succeed. The software (PS Application) 61 is the work product of testing the fix, if successful. If the bug fix is successful, the task close 68 is performed. Because work element close 68 is shown with a shadow, more process details exist and the work element may be expanded to drill down to the next level of details, as shown in FIGURE 12. The close sub-process shown in FIGURE 12 displays three tasks: check in files 71, update library files 72, and close out bug 73. The associated agents and work products of these work elements are shown. It may be seen that all work elements within a process are unique regardless of whether the name and short names are the same. Unlike work elements, agents and work products in a process that have the same name and short names are the same entity. Therefore, all bug reports and all agents in the bug correction process are the same respective entities. Referring to FIGURES 13 and 14, dialog windows displaying details of the developer agent and the bug report work product are shown overlaid on top of the process graphical representation. Any agent, work product, and work element defined in the process may be clicked on and details thereof may be displayed in like manner.
FIGURE 15 illustrates the distributed manner in which the instant system 10 may operate. Process management system 10 may be run on a stand alone personal computer or work station, or on one or more computers 102-106 that are linked together by a computer network 110. Information that can be shared by many users may be stored on a common database 108, which may also be linked by computer network 110. Operating in this manner, members of an engineering team may independently access and consult a process the team is working on.
System 10 further provides an export capability which produces files in several formats compatible with different applications. For example, Common-Separated Values formatted files may be exported to spreadsheet and database applications to generate statistical information on a process. Microsoft Project Exchange formatted files can also be produced and exported to most project management tools for project management.
Constructed in this manner, a process may be defined on process management system 10 easily and efficiently. Existing processes may also be easily revised and modified. System 10 displays the defined process in a graphical manner, which aides in the comprehension and management of the process. Knowledge accumulated from past experiences are also accessible by multiple users for reuse. For example, a company may distribute general processes that can then be customized to fit the special needs of individual organizations within the company. In this manner, existing processes may be reused and tailored to each new process without reinvestment of efforts. Through the use of system 10, company processes may be easily standardized with common terms and definitions. Furthermore, the number of levels of process details is unlimited in system 10, enabling complex processes to be represented in an uncluttered manner. Accordingly, in one aspect of the invention, a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, that work element being expandable into an unlimited number of graphically representable sub-process levels, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter¬ relationships therebetween, and a knowledge repository coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process. This project management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work element. These properties associated with the work element may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the performance of the work element, a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element, and/or a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element . The process management system according to the present invention may also comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work product. These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product, a training trait for associating any training or educational class with making the work product, a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product, an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product, a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product. Each of these traits, such as the tool trait, the example trait, and the template trait may further include a launchable application. The process management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the agent . These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the agent, and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent. The graphical user interface of the process management system may further display a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of the process. Furthermore, the process management system may additionally comprise an exporter for exporting a defined process in a predetermined format and/or may further include context-sensitive help.
In another aspect of the invention, a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow, including graphically representing an iterative link corresponding to an iterative relationship. Such method may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training or educational class with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object. The method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work product graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, defining a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, defining a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a start point of making the work product graphical object, defining an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object. These traits, including the template trait, example trait, and tool trait, may further include a step for defining a launchable application. The method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the agent graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent graphical object. Moreover, the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may include a step for providing a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of levels of the process.
In a further aspect of the invention, a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and the graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow, expanding a work element graphical object to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process, and displaying properties associated with the work product, work element, and agent graphical objects. The property displaying step of this method may further include the step of displaying a standard trait associating any industry or organizational standard with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object. Moreover, the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on the computer may further include a step for displaying a standard trait for associating an industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, displaying a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product graphical object, displaying an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object. The properly displayed step may further include a step of launching an application. Further the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include a step of displaying a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the agent graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organization policy with the agent graphical object. The method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further comprise the step of exporting a defined process in a predetermined format . Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process management system for operating on a computer, comprising: a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user; a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, said work element being expandable into an unlimited number of graphically representable sub-process levels; a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task; an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task; a link for graphically connecting said work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter¬ relationships therebetween; and a knowledge repository coupled to said computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
2. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said link includes a responsibility link for connecting an agent with a work element.
3. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said link includes an input/output link for connecting a work element with a work product.
4. The process management system, as set forth in claim 3, wherein said input/output link includes a conditional input/output link.
5. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said link includes an iteration link indicative of an iterative relationship.
6. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a plurality of properties being associated with said work element.
7. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a plurality of properties being associated with said work product.
8. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a plurality of properties being associated with said agent.
9. The process management system, as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a process link for linking a defined process to another defined process or a portion thereof.
10. A method for defining and managing a process on a computer, comprising the steps of: graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object; defining properties associated with said work element graphical object; graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object; defining properties associated with said work product graphical object; graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object; defining properties associated with said agent graphical object; and graphically linking said work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow, including graphically representing an iterative link corresponding to an iterative relationship.
11. The method, as set forth in claim 10, further comprising the step of graphically representing said work element being expandable into an unlimited number of graphically representable sub-process levels.
12. The method, as set forth in claim 10, wherein the graphically linking step includes the step of graphically representing a responsibility link for connecting an agent graphical object with a work element graphical object.
13. The method, as set forth in claim 10, wherein the graphically linking step includes the step of graphically representing an input/output link for connecting a work element graphical object with a work product graphical object.
14. The method, as set forth in claim 13, wherein the graphically representing input/output link step includes the step of graphically representing a conditional input/output link.
15. The method, as set forth in claim 10, further comprising the step of providing a plurality of dialog windows for receiving property definitions of said work element, work product, and agent graphical objects.
16. The method, as set forth in claim 10, further comprising the step of exporting a defined process in a predetermined format.
17. The method, as set forth in claim 10, further comprising the step of defining a process link for linking a defined process to another defined process or a portion thereof.
18. The method, as set forth in claim 10, further comprising the step of providing context-sensitive help.
19. A method for defining and managing a process on a computer, comprising the steps of: graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and said graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow; expanding a work element graphical object to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process; and displaying properties associated with said work element, work product, and agent graphical objects.
PCT/US1997/001208 1996-01-25 1997-01-24 Process management system and method WO1997027557A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP97903113A EP0976073A1 (en) 1996-01-25 1997-01-24 Process management system and method
AU17102/97A AU706198B2 (en) 1996-01-25 1997-01-24 Process management system and method
JP9527048A JP2000504131A (en) 1996-01-25 1997-01-24 Process management system and method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/591,920 US5737727A (en) 1996-01-25 1996-01-25 Process management system and method
US08/591,920 1996-01-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997027557A1 true WO1997027557A1 (en) 1997-07-31

Family

ID=24368507

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/001208 WO1997027557A1 (en) 1996-01-25 1997-01-24 Process management system and method

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5737727A (en)
EP (1) EP0976073A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2000504131A (en)
AU (1) AU706198B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2243830A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1997027557A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2319367A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-05-20 Hitachi Ltd Workflow management system

Families Citing this family (98)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0770967A3 (en) * 1995-10-26 1998-12-30 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain
GB9623954D0 (en) * 1996-11-15 1997-01-08 Xerox Corp Systems and methods providing flexible representations of work
US6104802A (en) 1997-02-10 2000-08-15 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. In-band signaling for routing
US7031442B1 (en) 1997-02-10 2006-04-18 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Methods and apparatus for personal routing in computer-simulated telephony
US6480600B1 (en) 1997-02-10 2002-11-12 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Call and data correspondence in a call-in center employing virtual restructuring for computer telephony integrated functionality
US7085775B2 (en) * 1997-04-09 2006-08-01 Sidewinder Holdings Ltd. Database method and system for conducting integrated dispatching
CA2228574A1 (en) * 1997-06-05 1999-08-02 Attention Control Systems, Inc. An automatic planning and cueing system and method
US7546346B2 (en) * 1997-07-28 2009-06-09 Juniper Networks, Inc. Workflow systems and methods for project management and information management
JPH1172499A (en) * 1997-08-29 1999-03-16 Shimadzu Corp System controller for analyser
US6711611B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-03-23 Genesis Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for data-linking a mobile knowledge worker to home communication-center infrastructure
US6985943B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2006-01-10 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for extended management of state and interaction of a remote knowledge worker from a contact center
US6051029A (en) * 1997-10-31 2000-04-18 Entelos, Inc. Method of generating a display for a dynamic simulation model utilizing node and link representations
USRE46528E1 (en) 1997-11-14 2017-08-29 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Implementation of call-center outbound dialing capability at a telephony network level
US6078739A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-06-20 Entelos, Inc. Method of managing objects and parameter values associated with the objects within a simulation model
US6069629A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-05-30 Entelos, Inc. Method of providing access to object parameters within a simulation model
US6026402A (en) * 1998-01-07 2000-02-15 Hewlett-Packard Company Process restriction within file system hierarchies
US7907598B2 (en) 1998-02-17 2011-03-15 Genesys Telecommunication Laboratories, Inc. Method for implementing and executing communication center routing strategies represented in extensible markup language
US6332154B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2001-12-18 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing media-independent self-help modules within a multimedia communication-center customer interface
CA2336785A1 (en) 1998-07-02 2000-01-13 Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. Method and apparatus for problem solving, decision making, storing, analyzing, retrieving enterprisewide knowledge and conclusive data
US6873961B1 (en) * 1998-09-09 2005-03-29 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and apparatus for identifying and tracking project trends
USRE46153E1 (en) 1998-09-11 2016-09-20 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus enabling voice-based management of state and interaction of a remote knowledge worker in a contact center environment
US6249768B1 (en) * 1998-10-29 2001-06-19 International Business Machines Corporation Strategic capability networks
US8095581B2 (en) * 1999-02-05 2012-01-10 Gregory A Stobbs Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus
US6415979B1 (en) 1999-03-08 2002-07-09 Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying and recording values associated with plant equipment inspection used in managing fugitive emissions
WO2000063793A2 (en) * 1999-04-16 2000-10-26 Entelos, Inc. Method and apparatus for conducting linked simulation operations utilizing a computer-based system model
JP2001014389A (en) * 1999-06-25 2001-01-19 Hitachi Ltd Workflow server and client terminal
US6397202B1 (en) * 1999-07-01 2002-05-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy System and method for monitoring risk in a system development program
US7437304B2 (en) * 1999-11-22 2008-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for project preparing a procurement and accounts payable system
US6738746B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2004-05-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for ongoing supporting a procurement and accounts payable system
US6687677B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2004-02-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for deploying a procurement and accounts payable system
US6684191B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for assessing a procurement and accounts payable system
US6714915B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2004-03-30 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for project designing and developing a procurement and accounts payable system
AU1799301A (en) * 1999-11-23 2001-06-04 Andersen Consulting Llp Decision management in a merger and acquisition environment and method thereof
US6671693B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2003-12-30 Accenture Llp System for effectively collecting and disseminating data
US6671692B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2003-12-30 Accenture Llp System for facilitating the navigation of data
US8606588B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2013-12-10 Accenture Global Services Limited Merger and acquisition knowledgebase
US6571235B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2003-05-27 Accenture Llp System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database
US7929978B2 (en) 1999-12-01 2011-04-19 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing enhanced communication capability for mobile devices on a virtual private network
US7117260B2 (en) 2000-01-27 2006-10-03 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Content management application for an interactive environment
US7788631B2 (en) * 2000-02-24 2010-08-31 General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc. Process automation system
US6578004B1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2003-06-10 Prosight, Ltd. Method and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment
US7401131B2 (en) * 2000-05-22 2008-07-15 Verizon Business Global Llc Method and system for implementing improved containers in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US6922685B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2005-07-26 Mci, Inc. Method and system for managing partitioned data resources
US20020005866A1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-01-17 Space-Wise Technologies, Inc. Method and system for creation of a spatially referenced multimedia relational database that can be transmitted among users or published to internet
US7246074B1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2007-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for identifying skills and tools needed to support a process utilizing pre-defined templates
US6750882B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2004-06-15 Verizon Laboratories, Inc. Automated association of operations with objects in a graphical window
US7222329B2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2007-05-22 International Business Machines Corporation Business systems management: realizing end-to-end enterprise systems management solution
US6862585B2 (en) * 2000-12-19 2005-03-01 The Procter & Gamble Company System and method for managing product development
US20020082895A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-27 Budka Phyllis R. Method, apparatus and article for project management
US20030061081A1 (en) * 2000-12-26 2003-03-27 Appareon System, method and article of manufacture for collaborative supply chain modules of a supply chain system
US6681197B2 (en) 2001-01-05 2004-01-20 The Quaker Oats Company Automated data collection reporting and analysis system for industrial production
US20080250020A1 (en) * 2001-01-20 2008-10-09 Pointcross, Inc Ontological representation of knowledge
US20080255918A1 (en) * 2001-01-20 2008-10-16 Pointcross, Inc. Ontological representation of knowledge
US6801818B2 (en) 2001-03-14 2004-10-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Distributed product development
US7406430B2 (en) * 2001-03-30 2008-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for assessing information technology service delivery
US6643600B2 (en) 2001-04-26 2003-11-04 General Electric Company Method and system for assessing adjustment factors in testing or monitoring process
US20040015821A1 (en) * 2001-05-01 2004-01-22 Tonbu, Inc. System and method for interactive collaborative process management and project management
US20040204974A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2004-10-14 Prinable Robert J. Method of and system for gathering organisational information
GB2376094A (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-04 Ibm Flexible navigation of a workflow graph in a data processing system
US20020198926A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2002-12-26 Panter Gene L. Program management system and method
US7289966B2 (en) * 2001-08-14 2007-10-30 Norman Ken Ouchi Method and system for adapting the execution of a workflow route
US6978441B2 (en) * 2001-10-03 2005-12-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Rating apparatus and method for evaluating bugs
US20030083923A1 (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-01 Diego Guicciardi Collaboration-enabled enterprise
US7281221B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2007-10-09 Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. Work cell problem identification and notification system
US7386797B1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2008-06-10 Oracle Corporation Framework to model and execute business processes within a collaborative environment
US7370072B2 (en) * 2002-07-08 2008-05-06 Electronic Evidence Discovery, Inc. System and method for collecting electronic evidence data
US7475107B2 (en) * 2002-07-08 2009-01-06 Electronic Evidence Discovery, Inc. System and method for managing distributed computer processes
WO2004053624A2 (en) 2002-10-17 2004-06-24 The Knowledge It Corporation Virtual knowledge management system
US6732648B1 (en) * 2003-05-05 2004-05-11 Day International Inc. Printing blanket sleeve having sound dampening feature
US20040243461A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Riggle Mark Spencer Integration of causal models, business process models and dimensional reports for enhancing problem solving
US7426736B2 (en) * 2003-05-22 2008-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Business systems management solution for end-to-end event management using business system operational constraints
JP2005148933A (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-06-09 Nec Corp Project management system and method
US7904833B2 (en) * 2003-12-08 2011-03-08 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic commerce GUI for displaying trading partners
US20050209901A1 (en) * 2004-03-18 2005-09-22 Scott Miller System and method for engineering project tracking
US7729936B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2010-06-01 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. System and method for lot priority adjustment
US20050278687A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 Suresh Madhavan System and method for facilitating computer software features requested by end users
US20060036990A1 (en) * 2004-08-16 2006-02-16 Lockheed Martin Corporation Tool comprising systems engineering environment for meeting task requirements
US7590942B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2009-09-15 Novatech Llc System, method and computer program product for documenting and managing execution of procedures in a graphical interface environment
US20060229921A1 (en) * 2005-04-08 2006-10-12 Mr. Patrick Colbeck Business Control System
US20070016456A1 (en) * 2005-07-12 2007-01-18 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product for reporting status of contract performance or a process
US8620713B2 (en) * 2005-07-15 2013-12-31 Sap Ag Mechanism to control delegation and revocation of tasks in workflow system
US9008075B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2015-04-14 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System and methods for improving interaction routing performance
US8396736B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2013-03-12 Process Assets, Llc Systems and methods for providing documentation having succinct communication with scalability
US20090048896A1 (en) * 2007-08-14 2009-02-19 Vignesh Anandan Work management using integrated project and workflow methodology
EP2037359A1 (en) * 2007-09-14 2009-03-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method and a system for generating project-related requirements
US20090144194A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-04 Mark Dickelman Computer automated systems, devices and methods for data processing of accounting records
US20090182770A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-07-16 Pointcross, Inc. Personalization of contextually relevant computer content
US20090254546A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-08 Pointcross, Inc. Personalized screening of contextually relevant content
US20100121740A1 (en) * 2008-11-13 2010-05-13 Oracle International Corporation Data driven orchestration of business processes
US8589877B2 (en) 2009-10-07 2013-11-19 International Business Machines Corporation Modeling and linking documents for packaged software application configuration
US8234570B2 (en) * 2009-10-26 2012-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Harvesting assets for packaged software application configuration
US20110167070A1 (en) * 2010-01-06 2011-07-07 International Business Machines Corporation Reusing assets for packaged software application configuration
US8645854B2 (en) * 2010-01-19 2014-02-04 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Provisioning workflow management methods and systems
US8417798B2 (en) 2010-05-11 2013-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Deploying artifacts for packaged software application in cloud computing environment
US8612931B2 (en) 2010-07-14 2013-12-17 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive blueprinting for packaged applications
US8463816B2 (en) * 2011-06-27 2013-06-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method of administering a knowledge repository
US9542660B2 (en) 2012-11-02 2017-01-10 Mitchell International, Inc. Work process collaboration management
US10331437B2 (en) * 2017-07-05 2019-06-25 International Business Machines Corporation Providing customized and targeted performance improvement recommendations for software development teams

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5212771A (en) * 1990-04-27 1993-05-18 Bachman Information Systems, Inc. System for establishing concurrent high level and low level processes in a diagram window through process explosion and implosion subsystems
WO1994016395A1 (en) * 1993-01-15 1994-07-21 Action Technologies, Inc. System for creating workflow maps of business processes

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US538698A (en) * 1895-05-07 Car-coupling
US5572436A (en) * 1990-04-06 1996-11-05 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and system for creating and validating low level description of electronic design
US5557531A (en) * 1990-04-06 1996-09-17 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and system for creating and validating low level structural description of electronic design from higher level, behavior-oriented description, including estimating power dissipation of physical implementation
US5598344A (en) * 1990-04-06 1997-01-28 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and system for creating, validating, and scaling structural description of electronic device
US5301301A (en) * 1991-01-30 1994-04-05 National Instruments Corporation Polymorphic dataflow block diagram system and method for programming a computer
JPH06187384A (en) * 1991-02-26 1994-07-08 Texas Instr Inc <Ti> Designing method and designing-support system
US5572430A (en) * 1991-07-03 1996-11-05 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus for cooperated design
JPH05324295A (en) * 1991-09-12 1993-12-07 Fujitsu Ltd Design supporting device for software
FR2684779B1 (en) * 1991-12-06 1996-12-13 Bull Sa METHOD AND TOOL FOR CONCEPTUAL MODELING OF EXPERTISE ON A COMPUTER SYSTEM.
US5310349A (en) * 1992-04-30 1994-05-10 Jostens Learning Corporation Instructional management system
FR2692055B1 (en) * 1992-06-09 1996-10-25 Bull Sa DEVICE FOR DESIGNING INFORMATION CONTROL NETWORKS FOR MODELING ALL PROCESSES.
US5664126A (en) * 1992-07-24 1997-09-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Human interface system for communicating networked users
US5450540A (en) * 1992-12-16 1995-09-12 Apple Computer, Inc. Graphical interface for interacting constrained actors
JP3201156B2 (en) * 1993-08-30 2001-08-20 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Method and apparatus for assisting design
US5552995A (en) * 1993-11-24 1996-09-03 The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology Concurrent engineering design tool and method
US5657460A (en) * 1995-04-11 1997-08-12 Data View, Inc. System and method for storing and displaying data

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5212771A (en) * 1990-04-27 1993-05-18 Bachman Information Systems, Inc. System for establishing concurrent high level and low level processes in a diagram window through process explosion and implosion subsystems
WO1994016395A1 (en) * 1993-01-15 1994-07-21 Action Technologies, Inc. System for creating workflow maps of business processes

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2319367A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-05-20 Hitachi Ltd Workflow management system
GB2319367B (en) * 1996-09-27 1999-06-23 Hitachi Ltd Workflow management method and apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2243830A1 (en) 1997-07-31
AU1710297A (en) 1997-08-20
EP0976073A1 (en) 2000-02-02
US5737727A (en) 1998-04-07
JP2000504131A (en) 2000-04-04
AU706198B2 (en) 1999-06-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5737727A (en) Process management system and method
US5734837A (en) Method and apparatus for building business process applications in terms of its workflows
US20160239270A1 (en) Systems and methods for enhancing software products
CA2534666C (en) Methodology framework and delivery vehicle
US7613671B2 (en) Approach for re-using business rules
US5799193A (en) Scenario based iterative method for development of an object oriented system model
US7152053B2 (en) Approach for re-using business rules
WO1994016395A1 (en) System for creating workflow maps of business processes
Henninger An environment for reusing software processes
Gomaa et al. Domain modeling for software reuse and evolution
Wiratama et al. Analysis and Design of an Web-Based Ticketing Service Helpdesk at Food and Packaging Machinery Company
Gould Systems analysis and design
JPH06501576A (en) dynamic information management computer system
Stout Requirements traceability and the effect on the system development lifecycle (SDLC)
Noack Extending the software development process with a toolkit of UML-centred techniques
Donyaee Towards an integrated model for specifying and measuring quality in use
AU2014271283B2 (en) Methodology framework and delivery vehicle
AU2013200094B2 (en) Methodology framework and delivery vehicle
Butler et al. Designing more deeper: integrating task analysis, process simulation, & object definition
Baker Jr et al. Role of System Engineering Across The System Life Cycle
Armitage et al. Implementing a compliance manager
Bickley et al. Control system design philosophy for effective operations and maintenance
Hodges A visual development methodology for the Department of Defense
AU2016200774A1 (en) Methodology framework and delivery vehicle
Manley et al. The classification and evaluation of Computer-Aided Software Engineering tools

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2243830

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2243830

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1997903113

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1997903113

Country of ref document: EP

WWR Wipo information: refused in national office

Ref document number: 1997903113

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1997903113

Country of ref document: EP