WO1997027557A1 - Process management system and method - Google Patents
Process management system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1997027557A1 WO1997027557A1 PCT/US1997/001208 US9701208W WO9727557A1 WO 1997027557 A1 WO1997027557 A1 WO 1997027557A1 US 9701208 W US9701208 W US 9701208W WO 9727557 A1 WO9727557 A1 WO 9727557A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- work
- graphically
- graphical object
- agent
- work element
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06311—Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
Definitions
- This invention is related in general to the field of computer software programs. More particularly, the invention is related to a process management system and method therefor.
- Process management refers to the "direction, control, and coordination of work performed to develop a product or perform a service” 1 . It involves the specification of who, what, and how requirements for completing tasks. Some companies manage their processes by documenting them in voluminous paper documents, which are difficult and cumbersome to revise, reprint, redistribute, and consult.
- a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, and a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter-relationships therebetween.
- a knowledge repository is further coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
- a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow.
- a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes the steps of graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and said graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow.
- a work element graphical object may be expanded to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process. Properties associated with the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects may also be displayed.
- FIGURE 1 is a simplified block diagram of a process management system and method constructed according to the teachings of the present invention
- FIGURE 2A to 21 are exemplary process notations of components and connecting links;
- FIGURE 3 is a diagram showing a ma ⁇ or component, work element, and its minor components;
- FIGURE 4 is a diagram showing a major component, work product, and its minor components
- FIGURE 5 is a diagram showing a ma]or component, agent, and its minor components
- FIGURE 6 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for process information
- FIGURE 7 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work element information
- FIGURE 8 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for work product information
- FIGURE 9 is an exemplary dialog prompting for process input/output information
- FIGURE 10 is an exemplary dialog window prompting for responsibility information
- FIGURE 11 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction process
- FIGURE 12 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a bug correction subprocess
- FIGURE 13 is an exemplary graphical screen showing an agent dialog window
- FIGURE 14 is an exemplary graphical screen showing a work product dialog window
- FIGURE 15 is a simplified diagram showing a computer network connecting computers for accessing the process management system of the present invention and data files stored m a common shared memory.
- FIGURES 1-15 The preferred embodiment (s) of the present invention is (are) illustrated in FIGURES 1-15, like reference numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
- Process management system 10 uses a number of major components 12, including work element, work product, agent, and several connectivities, to represent or express a process.
- the process is presented to user(s) graphically through a graphical user interface (GUI) 14.
- GUI graphical user interface
- a knowledge repository 16 is coupled to process management system 10 for storing knowledge acquired in formulating past processes, such as templates of existing processes.
- process management system 10 is developed using object-oriented software development technology.
- Process management system 10 may be written in the C++ programming language, and commercially available GUI class libraries Tools.h++ from Rogue Wave and/or StarView from Star Division may be used.
- FIGURES 2A through 21 show the exemplary notations used to represent the various components of a process.
- FIGURE 2A shows a work element represented by a rectangle, which is a task that is to be performed.
- FIGURE 2B is a rectangle with a shadow, which represents a summary work element that has more process details and may be expanded to view those details. The process of expanding a component to view additional details is also called "drill down”.
- a rectangle with dash lines is a conditional work element, representing a task that is to be performed if a condition is met.
- FIGURE 2D is a work product, represented by a circle as shown or an ellipse. A work product is the result of performing a task or work element.
- FIGURE 2E is an agent, represented by a hexagon, which is the person, machinery, automation, or software that is responsible for the task.
- FIGURES 2F through 21 The major components: work element, work product, and agent of the process are connected by links shown in FIGURES 2F through 21.
- a line in FIGURE 2F is a responsibility connection
- a line with an arrow thereon in FIGURE 2G denotes input or output
- a dashed line with an arrow in FIGURE 2H is a conditional input/output.
- FIGURE 21 shows a connection used to represent iteration.
- Each of the major components, work element, work product, and agent can be linked to many minor components or properties or traits, which further describe the methodology or process.
- FIGURE 3 shows the exemplary minor components of a work element 20: standard 21, technique 22, training 23, reference 24, and policy 25.
- Standard 21 may specify the standard by which the work element is measured, such as the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) established by Software Engineering Institute (SEI) .
- Technique 22 may specify the techniques that can be used to perform the task described in the work element, such as brains orming, modeling, prototyping, simulation, technical review, etc.
- Training 23 may set forth the training available to help perform the task in work element 20.
- Reference 24 may include a bibliography of articles, books, and technical magazines that are associated with the performance of work element 20.
- Policy 25 may specify the governmental or company policies related to the performance of work element 20.
- FIGURE 4 shows the exemplary minor components related to a work product 30.
- Standard 31 may describe the standard used to measure the quality of work product 31.
- Technique 32 may describe the techniques that can be used- to produce work product 30, such as joint iterative rapid development, financial cost models, function-level risk assessment, or precedence diagraming.
- Training 33 may describe the training class, seminar, or materials available or required to train for producing work product 30.
- Tool 34 sets forth the tool(s) needed to produce or make work product 30.
- Template 35 provides a shell or pattern that can be used as a guide for the development of work product 30 to speed up the process. Representative examples of work product 30 or completed templates may be provided as examples 36 of work product 30.
- system 10 automatically launches the application.
- Reference 37 is a bibliography that may provide additional information regarding making work product 30.
- Policy 38 sets forth any policy or policies encompassing the act of producing work product 30.
- Training 51 sets forth the training available for the agent.
- the associated training may include project management development, leadership development, and customer relations.
- the training may include programming logic, object oriented programming principles, and C++ programming language.
- Reference 52 may list articles, books, and other information related to agent 50.
- Policy 53 may list any policy that is related to agent 50.
- standard 54 may describe the standards by which agent 50 is compared and measured.
- FIGURES 6-10 are simplified exemplary dialog windows used to formulate a methodology or process.
- an exemplary dialog window prompting for information on the process is shown.
- the name of the process, its owner, audience, purpose, and further descriptions may be specified.
- the owner of a process is the entity that owns the definition of the item. Accordingly, a process may be built from pieces of other processes. For example, a systems engineering process may reference start-up activities owned by a project management process. A special link may be used to tie processes together without making a new copy of the existing process.
- Information used to summarize a process is shown in the following table, some of which may not be shown in FIGURE 6, in which A/N stands for alphanumeric:
- Help button if clicked on, provides context- sensitive on-line help support to the user.
- FIGURE 7 shows an exemplary dialog window for entering information on a work element, including name, short name, whether the work element is required or conditional, and additional textual information such as: purposes, conditions, guidelines, procedure, description, etc.
- Dialog windows for entering attributes or associated minor components, such as references, training, and techniques are further reachable by clicking on respective push buttons.
- the following table summarizes the exemplary information used to describe a work element.
- the IF SUMMARY column indicates whether the attribute is specified, can be rolled up from lower detailed level attributes, or can be derived.
- Procedure List of steps required for completing the work A/N N/A element describes the "how-to” or “step-by- step” instructions (SET) (for detail elements only)
- N Specify attributes (NY) author that are process specific (one to three available)
- FIGURE 8 is an exemplary window for requesting information on a work product.
- the table below summarizes the information used to describe a work product.
- Type The category of work product (e.g. decision, A/N Specify/ Roll condition, document, individual, etc.) Up
- participant's role e.g. Y AM Specify project manager, data base administrator, etc.
- Input/output is a link that connects work products and work elements.
- a work product is an input to a work element, and a work product can also be an output of a work element.
- the input/output information is shown in the tables below.
- the link between an agent and a work element is the responsibility connectivity.
- responsibility connectivity The information used to describe responsibility is listed in the table below and shown in an exemplary dialog screen in FIGURE 10 :
- a N e.g. novice, intermediate, expert
- Minor components associated with responsibility including training, tools, and techniques, may also be specified.
- appropriate dialog windows pop up to receive information entered by the user/author in a similar manner, using some of the same graphical tools shown.
- the information associated with each minor component is shown in the tables below.
- Type Generalized type of tool e.g. spreadsheet, word processor, AM etc.
- Type Generalized type of technique e.g. modeling, prioritization, AM etc.
- Source Body, organization, or publisher A/N which provided or published the matenal
- policy provides the law or Y AM regulations that govern, guide, or constrain operations (SEI)
- FIGURES 6-10 are illustrative only, and that windows tools and manipulations such as push buttons, pull-down menus, tool bars, status lines, scroll bars, etc. as known in the art may be incorporated and/or substituted therein.
- FIGURE 11 is an exemplary screen showing a bug correction process.
- a hierarchies window is to the left of the process window, which displays a graphical representation of the process.
- the hierarchies window currently shows the work element hierarchy, but may be changed to show agent or work product hierarchies of the process by clicking on the appropriate buttons immediately above the window.
- Those entries with a square icon appearing to the left of the text indicates that these elements are expandable and the user may drill down to a lower level.
- These expandable elements for example "fix the bug" and "close”, are shown in the graphical window with a shadow.
- the process window contains the graphical depiction of a process or a portion of a process.
- Process windows contain agents, work elements, work products, and any connections therebetween. Every image in a process window is a selectable object that has properties associated therewith. Summary work elements shown as a work element with a shadow represent the existence of additional details in the form of another process window that can be reached by drilling down or double clicking on the work element. In this manner, complex processes may be organized into multiple levels of abstraction to facilitate the presentation and understanding thereof.
- a customized tool bar is further provided to permit the user to select operations such as open file, close file, save file, print, and to further select icons for the work element, work product, agent, and links therebetween to build or modify the displayed process.
- the graphical display may be easily manipulated, for example, the size and location of the windows can be adjusted by clicking and dragging on the window or window boundaries, or the windows may be made to be cascaded, overlapped, or tiled.
- a developer 60 is responsible for (link 61) changing the bug status 62 in a piece of software.
- the work product of changing the bug status is a bug report 63 and a bug tracking database 64.
- the next task, fix the bug 65 is also recorded and documented in a bug report 66.
- the link between fix the bug 65 and test the fix 66 is iterative, because the first few attempts at fixing the bug may not succeed.
- the software (PS Application) 61 is the work product of testing the fix, if successful. If the bug fix is successful, the task close 68 is performed.
- the close sub-process shown in FIGURE 12 displays three tasks: check in files 71, update library files 72, and close out bug 73.
- the associated agents and work products of these work elements are shown. It may be seen that all work elements within a process are unique regardless of whether the name and short names are the same. Unlike work elements, agents and work products in a process that have the same name and short names are the same entity. Therefore, all bug reports and all agents in the bug correction process are the same respective entities.
- dialog windows displaying details of the developer agent and the bug report work product are shown overlaid on top of the process graphical representation. Any agent, work product, and work element defined in the process may be clicked on and details thereof may be displayed in like manner.
- FIGURE 15 illustrates the distributed manner in which the instant system 10 may operate.
- Process management system 10 may be run on a stand alone personal computer or work station, or on one or more computers 102-106 that are linked together by a computer network 110.
- Information that can be shared by many users may be stored on a common database 108, which may also be linked by computer network 110.
- members of an engineering team may independently access and consult a process the team is working on.
- System 10 further provides an export capability which produces files in several formats compatible with different applications. For example, Common-Separated Values formatted files may be exported to spreadsheet and database applications to generate statistical information on a process. Microsoft Project Exchange formatted files can also be produced and exported to most project management tools for project management.
- a process may be defined on process management system 10 easily and efficiently. Existing processes may also be easily revised and modified. System 10 displays the defined process in a graphical manner, which aides in the comprehension and management of the process. Knowledge accumulated from past experiences are also accessible by multiple users for reuse. For example, a company may distribute general processes that can then be customized to fit the special needs of individual organizations within the company. In this manner, existing processes may be reused and tailored to each new process without reinvestment of efforts. Through the use of system 10, company processes may be easily standardized with common terms and definitions. Furthermore, the number of levels of process details is unlimited in system 10, enabling complex processes to be represented in an uncluttered manner.
- a process management system for operating on a computer includes a graphical user interface for graphically presenting a process or a portion thereof to a user, a work element for graphically representing a task to be performed in the process, that work element being expandable into an unlimited number of graphically representable sub-process levels, a work product for graphically representing a resultant product of performing a task, an agent for graphically representing an actor responsible for performing a task, a link for graphically connecting the work element, work product, and agent indicative of inter ⁇ relationships therebetween, and a knowledge repository coupled to the computer for storing valuable information regarding the process.
- This project management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work element.
- These properties associated with the work element may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the performance of the work element, a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element, and/or a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element .
- the process management system according to the present invention may also comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the work product.
- These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product, a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product, a training trait for associating any training or educational class with making the work product, a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product, an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product, a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product.
- Each of these traits, such as the tool trait, the example trait, and the template trait may further include a launchable application.
- the process management system may further comprise a plurality of properties being associated with the agent . These properties may include a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent, a training trait for associating any training and educational class with the agent, and/or a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent.
- the graphical user interface of the process management system may further display a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of the process.
- the process management system may additionally comprise an exporter for exporting a defined process in a predetermined format and/or may further include context-sensitive help.
- a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically representing a task with a work element graphical object, defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, graphically representing a product resulting from performing a task with a work product graphical object, defining properties associated with the work product graphical object, graphically representing an actor with an agent graphical object, defining properties associated with the agent graphical object, and graphically linking the work element, work product, and agent graphical objects to indicate a process flow, including graphically representing an iterative link corresponding to an iterative relationship.
- Such method may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work element graphical object, defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training or educational class with the performance of the work element graphical object, defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object.
- the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the work product graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, defining a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, defining a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product, defining a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a start point of making the work product graphical object, defining an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, defining a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object.
- These traits may further include a step for defining a launchable application.
- the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include within the step of defining properties associated with the agent graphical object defining a standard trait for associating any industry or organization standard with the agent graphical object, defining a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or defining a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the agent graphical object.
- the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may include a step for providing a plurality of windows containing graphical representations of levels of the process.
- a method for defining and managing a process on a computer includes graphically displaying a defined process where tasks are graphically represented by a work element graphical object, products resulting from performing a task are graphically represented by a work product graphical object, actors are graphically represented with an agent graphical object, and the graphical objects are linked to indicate a process flow, expanding a work element graphical object to drill down to a graphical representation of a sub-process, and displaying properties associated with the work product, work element, and agent graphical objects.
- the property displaying step of this method may further include the step of displaying a standard trait associating any industry or organizational standard with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to performing the work element graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with a performance of the work element graphical object, displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, and organizational policy with the performance of the work element graphical object, and/or displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the performance of the work element graphical object.
- the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on the computer may further include a step for displaying a standard trait for associating an industry or organizational standard with the work product graphical object, displaying a technique trait for associating any technique applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and educational class with making the work product graphical object, displaying a tool trait for associating any tool applicable to making the work product graphical object, displaying a template trait for associating a shell product that may be used as a starting point of making the work product graphical object, displaying an example trait for associating exemplary completed work products with the work product graphical object, displaying a reference trait for associating any reference material with the work product graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organizational policy with the work product graphical object.
- the properly displayed step may further include a step of launching an application.
- the property displaying step of the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further include a step of displaying a standard trait for associating any industry or organizational standard with the agent graphical object, displaying a training trait for associating any training and education class with the agent graphical object, and/or displaying a policy trait for associating any governmental, industrial, or organization policy with the agent graphical object.
- the method for defining and managing a process on a computer may further comprise the step of exporting a defined process in a predetermined format .
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP97903113A EP0976073A1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1997-01-24 | Process management system and method |
AU17102/97A AU706198B2 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1997-01-24 | Process management system and method |
JP9527048A JP2000504131A (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1997-01-24 | Process management system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/591,920 US5737727A (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Process management system and method |
US08/591,920 | 1996-01-25 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1997027557A1 true WO1997027557A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
Family
ID=24368507
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1997/001208 WO1997027557A1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1997-01-24 | Process management system and method |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5737727A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0976073A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000504131A (en) |
AU (1) | AU706198B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2243830A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997027557A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2319367A (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-05-20 | Hitachi Ltd | Workflow management system |
Families Citing this family (98)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0770967A3 (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1998-12-30 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain |
GB9623954D0 (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1997-01-08 | Xerox Corp | Systems and methods providing flexible representations of work |
US6104802A (en) | 1997-02-10 | 2000-08-15 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | In-band signaling for routing |
US7031442B1 (en) | 1997-02-10 | 2006-04-18 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for personal routing in computer-simulated telephony |
US6480600B1 (en) | 1997-02-10 | 2002-11-12 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Call and data correspondence in a call-in center employing virtual restructuring for computer telephony integrated functionality |
US7085775B2 (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 2006-08-01 | Sidewinder Holdings Ltd. | Database method and system for conducting integrated dispatching |
CA2228574A1 (en) * | 1997-06-05 | 1999-08-02 | Attention Control Systems, Inc. | An automatic planning and cueing system and method |
US7546346B2 (en) * | 1997-07-28 | 2009-06-09 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Workflow systems and methods for project management and information management |
JPH1172499A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 1999-03-16 | Shimadzu Corp | System controller for analyser |
US6711611B2 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2004-03-23 | Genesis Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus for data-linking a mobile knowledge worker to home communication-center infrastructure |
US6985943B2 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2006-01-10 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus for extended management of state and interaction of a remote knowledge worker from a contact center |
US6051029A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2000-04-18 | Entelos, Inc. | Method of generating a display for a dynamic simulation model utilizing node and link representations |
USRE46528E1 (en) | 1997-11-14 | 2017-08-29 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Implementation of call-center outbound dialing capability at a telephony network level |
US6078739A (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2000-06-20 | Entelos, Inc. | Method of managing objects and parameter values associated with the objects within a simulation model |
US6069629A (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2000-05-30 | Entelos, Inc. | Method of providing access to object parameters within a simulation model |
US6026402A (en) * | 1998-01-07 | 2000-02-15 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Process restriction within file system hierarchies |
US7907598B2 (en) | 1998-02-17 | 2011-03-15 | Genesys Telecommunication Laboratories, Inc. | Method for implementing and executing communication center routing strategies represented in extensible markup language |
US6332154B2 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2001-12-18 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing media-independent self-help modules within a multimedia communication-center customer interface |
CA2336785A1 (en) | 1998-07-02 | 2000-01-13 | Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. | Method and apparatus for problem solving, decision making, storing, analyzing, retrieving enterprisewide knowledge and conclusive data |
US6873961B1 (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2005-03-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for identifying and tracking project trends |
USRE46153E1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2016-09-20 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus enabling voice-based management of state and interaction of a remote knowledge worker in a contact center environment |
US6249768B1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2001-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Strategic capability networks |
US8095581B2 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2012-01-10 | Gregory A Stobbs | Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus |
US6415979B1 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2002-07-09 | Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. | Method and apparatus for identifying and recording values associated with plant equipment inspection used in managing fugitive emissions |
WO2000063793A2 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-10-26 | Entelos, Inc. | Method and apparatus for conducting linked simulation operations utilizing a computer-based system model |
JP2001014389A (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2001-01-19 | Hitachi Ltd | Workflow server and client terminal |
US6397202B1 (en) * | 1999-07-01 | 2002-05-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | System and method for monitoring risk in a system development program |
US7437304B2 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2008-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for project preparing a procurement and accounts payable system |
US6738746B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2004-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for ongoing supporting a procurement and accounts payable system |
US6687677B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2004-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for deploying a procurement and accounts payable system |
US6684191B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for assessing a procurement and accounts payable system |
US6714915B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2004-03-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for project designing and developing a procurement and accounts payable system |
AU1799301A (en) * | 1999-11-23 | 2001-06-04 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Decision management in a merger and acquisition environment and method thereof |
US6671693B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-12-30 | Accenture Llp | System for effectively collecting and disseminating data |
US6671692B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-12-30 | Accenture Llp | System for facilitating the navigation of data |
US8606588B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2013-12-10 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Merger and acquisition knowledgebase |
US6571235B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-05-27 | Accenture Llp | System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database |
US7929978B2 (en) | 1999-12-01 | 2011-04-19 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced communication capability for mobile devices on a virtual private network |
US7117260B2 (en) | 2000-01-27 | 2006-10-03 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Content management application for an interactive environment |
US7788631B2 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2010-08-31 | General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc. | Process automation system |
US6578004B1 (en) * | 2000-04-27 | 2003-06-10 | Prosight, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment |
US7401131B2 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2008-07-15 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Method and system for implementing improved containers in a global ecosystem of interrelated services |
US6922685B2 (en) | 2000-05-22 | 2005-07-26 | Mci, Inc. | Method and system for managing partitioned data resources |
US20020005866A1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2002-01-17 | Space-Wise Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for creation of a spatially referenced multimedia relational database that can be transmitted among users or published to internet |
US7246074B1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2007-07-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for identifying skills and tools needed to support a process utilizing pre-defined templates |
US6750882B1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2004-06-15 | Verizon Laboratories, Inc. | Automated association of operations with objects in a graphical window |
US7222329B2 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2007-05-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Business systems management: realizing end-to-end enterprise systems management solution |
US6862585B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2005-03-01 | The Procter & Gamble Company | System and method for managing product development |
US20020082895A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Budka Phyllis R. | Method, apparatus and article for project management |
US20030061081A1 (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2003-03-27 | Appareon | System, method and article of manufacture for collaborative supply chain modules of a supply chain system |
US6681197B2 (en) | 2001-01-05 | 2004-01-20 | The Quaker Oats Company | Automated data collection reporting and analysis system for industrial production |
US20080250020A1 (en) * | 2001-01-20 | 2008-10-09 | Pointcross, Inc | Ontological representation of knowledge |
US20080255918A1 (en) * | 2001-01-20 | 2008-10-16 | Pointcross, Inc. | Ontological representation of knowledge |
US6801818B2 (en) | 2001-03-14 | 2004-10-05 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Distributed product development |
US7406430B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2008-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for assessing information technology service delivery |
US6643600B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2003-11-04 | General Electric Company | Method and system for assessing adjustment factors in testing or monitoring process |
US20040015821A1 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2004-01-22 | Tonbu, Inc. | System and method for interactive collaborative process management and project management |
US20040204974A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2004-10-14 | Prinable Robert J. | Method of and system for gathering organisational information |
GB2376094A (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-04 | Ibm | Flexible navigation of a workflow graph in a data processing system |
US20020198926A1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2002-12-26 | Panter Gene L. | Program management system and method |
US7289966B2 (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2007-10-30 | Norman Ken Ouchi | Method and system for adapting the execution of a workflow route |
US6978441B2 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2005-12-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Rating apparatus and method for evaluating bugs |
US20030083923A1 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2003-05-01 | Diego Guicciardi | Collaboration-enabled enterprise |
US7281221B2 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2007-10-09 | Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. | Work cell problem identification and notification system |
US7386797B1 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2008-06-10 | Oracle Corporation | Framework to model and execute business processes within a collaborative environment |
US7370072B2 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2008-05-06 | Electronic Evidence Discovery, Inc. | System and method for collecting electronic evidence data |
US7475107B2 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2009-01-06 | Electronic Evidence Discovery, Inc. | System and method for managing distributed computer processes |
WO2004053624A2 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2004-06-24 | The Knowledge It Corporation | Virtual knowledge management system |
US6732648B1 (en) * | 2003-05-05 | 2004-05-11 | Day International Inc. | Printing blanket sleeve having sound dampening feature |
US20040243461A1 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2004-12-02 | Riggle Mark Spencer | Integration of causal models, business process models and dimensional reports for enhancing problem solving |
US7426736B2 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2008-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Business systems management solution for end-to-end event management using business system operational constraints |
JP2005148933A (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2005-06-09 | Nec Corp | Project management system and method |
US7904833B2 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2011-03-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic commerce GUI for displaying trading partners |
US20050209901A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Scott Miller | System and method for engineering project tracking |
US7729936B2 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2010-06-01 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | System and method for lot priority adjustment |
US20050278687A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-15 | Suresh Madhavan | System and method for facilitating computer software features requested by end users |
US20060036990A1 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2006-02-16 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Tool comprising systems engineering environment for meeting task requirements |
US7590942B2 (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2009-09-15 | Novatech Llc | System, method and computer program product for documenting and managing execution of procedures in a graphical interface environment |
US20060229921A1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2006-10-12 | Mr. Patrick Colbeck | Business Control System |
US20070016456A1 (en) * | 2005-07-12 | 2007-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and program product for reporting status of contract performance or a process |
US8620713B2 (en) * | 2005-07-15 | 2013-12-31 | Sap Ag | Mechanism to control delegation and revocation of tasks in workflow system |
US9008075B2 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2015-04-14 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | System and methods for improving interaction routing performance |
US8396736B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2013-03-12 | Process Assets, Llc | Systems and methods for providing documentation having succinct communication with scalability |
US20090048896A1 (en) * | 2007-08-14 | 2009-02-19 | Vignesh Anandan | Work management using integrated project and workflow methodology |
EP2037359A1 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2009-03-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | A method and a system for generating project-related requirements |
US20090144194A1 (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2009-06-04 | Mark Dickelman | Computer automated systems, devices and methods for data processing of accounting records |
US20090182770A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | Pointcross, Inc. | Personalization of contextually relevant computer content |
US20090254546A1 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-08 | Pointcross, Inc. | Personalized screening of contextually relevant content |
US20100121740A1 (en) * | 2008-11-13 | 2010-05-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Data driven orchestration of business processes |
US8589877B2 (en) | 2009-10-07 | 2013-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modeling and linking documents for packaged software application configuration |
US8234570B2 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2012-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Harvesting assets for packaged software application configuration |
US20110167070A1 (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reusing assets for packaged software application configuration |
US8645854B2 (en) * | 2010-01-19 | 2014-02-04 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Provisioning workflow management methods and systems |
US8417798B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Deploying artifacts for packaged software application in cloud computing environment |
US8612931B2 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2013-12-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interactive blueprinting for packaged applications |
US8463816B2 (en) * | 2011-06-27 | 2013-06-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method of administering a knowledge repository |
US9542660B2 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2017-01-10 | Mitchell International, Inc. | Work process collaboration management |
US10331437B2 (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2019-06-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing customized and targeted performance improvement recommendations for software development teams |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5212771A (en) * | 1990-04-27 | 1993-05-18 | Bachman Information Systems, Inc. | System for establishing concurrent high level and low level processes in a diagram window through process explosion and implosion subsystems |
WO1994016395A1 (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1994-07-21 | Action Technologies, Inc. | System for creating workflow maps of business processes |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US538698A (en) * | 1895-05-07 | Car-coupling | ||
US5572436A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1996-11-05 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and system for creating and validating low level description of electronic design |
US5557531A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1996-09-17 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and system for creating and validating low level structural description of electronic design from higher level, behavior-oriented description, including estimating power dissipation of physical implementation |
US5598344A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1997-01-28 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and system for creating, validating, and scaling structural description of electronic device |
US5301301A (en) * | 1991-01-30 | 1994-04-05 | National Instruments Corporation | Polymorphic dataflow block diagram system and method for programming a computer |
JPH06187384A (en) * | 1991-02-26 | 1994-07-08 | Texas Instr Inc <Ti> | Designing method and designing-support system |
US5572430A (en) * | 1991-07-03 | 1996-11-05 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for cooperated design |
JPH05324295A (en) * | 1991-09-12 | 1993-12-07 | Fujitsu Ltd | Design supporting device for software |
FR2684779B1 (en) * | 1991-12-06 | 1996-12-13 | Bull Sa | METHOD AND TOOL FOR CONCEPTUAL MODELING OF EXPERTISE ON A COMPUTER SYSTEM. |
US5310349A (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1994-05-10 | Jostens Learning Corporation | Instructional management system |
FR2692055B1 (en) * | 1992-06-09 | 1996-10-25 | Bull Sa | DEVICE FOR DESIGNING INFORMATION CONTROL NETWORKS FOR MODELING ALL PROCESSES. |
US5664126A (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1997-09-02 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Human interface system for communicating networked users |
US5450540A (en) * | 1992-12-16 | 1995-09-12 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Graphical interface for interacting constrained actors |
JP3201156B2 (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 2001-08-20 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Method and apparatus for assisting design |
US5552995A (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 1996-09-03 | The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology | Concurrent engineering design tool and method |
US5657460A (en) * | 1995-04-11 | 1997-08-12 | Data View, Inc. | System and method for storing and displaying data |
-
1996
- 1996-01-25 US US08/591,920 patent/US5737727A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-01-24 WO PCT/US1997/001208 patent/WO1997027557A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-24 AU AU17102/97A patent/AU706198B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-01-24 EP EP97903113A patent/EP0976073A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-01-24 CA CA002243830A patent/CA2243830A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-01-24 JP JP9527048A patent/JP2000504131A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5212771A (en) * | 1990-04-27 | 1993-05-18 | Bachman Information Systems, Inc. | System for establishing concurrent high level and low level processes in a diagram window through process explosion and implosion subsystems |
WO1994016395A1 (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1994-07-21 | Action Technologies, Inc. | System for creating workflow maps of business processes |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2319367A (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-05-20 | Hitachi Ltd | Workflow management system |
GB2319367B (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1999-06-23 | Hitachi Ltd | Workflow management method and apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2243830A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
AU1710297A (en) | 1997-08-20 |
EP0976073A1 (en) | 2000-02-02 |
US5737727A (en) | 1998-04-07 |
JP2000504131A (en) | 2000-04-04 |
AU706198B2 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5737727A (en) | Process management system and method | |
US5734837A (en) | Method and apparatus for building business process applications in terms of its workflows | |
US20160239270A1 (en) | Systems and methods for enhancing software products | |
CA2534666C (en) | Methodology framework and delivery vehicle | |
US7613671B2 (en) | Approach for re-using business rules | |
US5799193A (en) | Scenario based iterative method for development of an object oriented system model | |
US7152053B2 (en) | Approach for re-using business rules | |
WO1994016395A1 (en) | System for creating workflow maps of business processes | |
Henninger | An environment for reusing software processes | |
Gomaa et al. | Domain modeling for software reuse and evolution | |
Wiratama et al. | Analysis and Design of an Web-Based Ticketing Service Helpdesk at Food and Packaging Machinery Company | |
Gould | Systems analysis and design | |
JPH06501576A (en) | dynamic information management computer system | |
Stout | Requirements traceability and the effect on the system development lifecycle (SDLC) | |
Noack | Extending the software development process with a toolkit of UML-centred techniques | |
Donyaee | Towards an integrated model for specifying and measuring quality in use | |
AU2014271283B2 (en) | Methodology framework and delivery vehicle | |
AU2013200094B2 (en) | Methodology framework and delivery vehicle | |
Butler et al. | Designing more deeper: integrating task analysis, process simulation, & object definition | |
Baker Jr et al. | Role of System Engineering Across The System Life Cycle | |
Armitage et al. | Implementing a compliance manager | |
Bickley et al. | Control system design philosophy for effective operations and maintenance | |
Hodges | A visual development methodology for the Department of Defense | |
AU2016200774A1 (en) | Methodology framework and delivery vehicle | |
Manley et al. | The classification and evaluation of Computer-Aided Software Engineering tools |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AU CA JP |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2243830 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2243830 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1997903113 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1997903113 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWR | Wipo information: refused in national office |
Ref document number: 1997903113 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1997903113 Country of ref document: EP |