WO1994009383A1 - Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data - Google Patents

Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1994009383A1
WO1994009383A1 PCT/US1993/009429 US9309429W WO9409383A1 WO 1994009383 A1 WO1994009383 A1 WO 1994009383A1 US 9309429 W US9309429 W US 9309429W WO 9409383 A1 WO9409383 A1 WO 9409383A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
emission
radionuclide
transmission
signals
imaging system
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1993/009429
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bruce H. Hasegawa
Robert G. Gould
Thomas F. Lang
J. Keenan Brown
Joseph A. Heanue
Christopher E. Cann
Original Assignee
The Regents Of The University Of California
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Regents Of The University Of California filed Critical The Regents Of The University Of California
Priority to AU52977/93A priority Critical patent/AU5297793A/en
Publication of WO1994009383A1 publication Critical patent/WO1994009383A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16Measuring radiation intensity
    • G01T1/161Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
    • G01T1/1615Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting using both transmission and emission sources simultaneously
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03Computerised tomographs
    • A61B6/037Emission tomography
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/52Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/5211Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of medical diagnostic data
    • A61B6/5229Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of medical diagnostic data combining image data of a patient, e.g. combining a functional image with an anatomical image
    • A61B6/5235Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of medical diagnostic data combining image data of a patient, e.g. combining a functional image with an anatomical image combining images from the same or different ionising radiation imaging techniques, e.g. PET and CT
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16Measuring radiation intensity
    • G01T1/161Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
    • G01T1/1611Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting using both transmission and emission sources sequentially
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16Measuring radiation intensity
    • G01T1/161Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
    • G01T1/164Scintigraphy
    • G01T1/1641Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
    • G01T1/1642Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras using a scintillation crystal and position sensing photodetector arrays, e.g. ANGER cameras
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16Measuring radiation intensity
    • G01T1/161Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
    • G01T1/164Scintigraphy
    • G01T1/1641Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
    • G01T1/1647Processing of scintigraphic data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/16Measuring radiation intensity
    • G01T1/161Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
    • G01T1/164Scintigraphy
    • G01T1/1641Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
    • G01T1/1648Ancillary equipment for scintillation cameras, e.g. reference markers, devices for removing motion artifacts, calibration devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01TMEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
    • G01T1/00Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
    • G01T1/29Measurement performed on radiation beams, e.g. position or section of the beam; Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
    • G01T1/2914Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
    • G01T1/2985In depth localisation, e.g. using positron emitters; Tomographic imaging (longitudinal and transverse section imaging; apparatus for radiation diagnosis sequentially in different planes, steroscopic radiation diagnosis)
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05GX-RAY TECHNIQUE
    • H05G1/00X-ray apparatus involving X-ray tubes; Circuits therefor
    • H05G1/08Electrical details
    • H05G1/60Circuit arrangements for obtaining a series of X-ray photographs or for X-ray cinematography

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to x-ray transmission and radionuclide emission imaging systems.
  • the invention relates to a diagnostic imaging system where x-ray transmission data are used to derive material properties of the object imaged, which properties are then used directly to correct radionuclide emission data obtained from the same object using the same imaging system, herein referred to as X-SPECT.
  • Diagnostic imaging techniques can image both anatomical structure and physiological function of patients in whom the physician wishes to diagnose disease or follow treatment. In clinical settings, most of these diagnostic imaging techniques -- including conventional film radiography, MRI, and CT -- predominantly image structure rather than function. Unlike these anatomical imaging methodologies, in vivo measurement of tissue metabolism, perfusion, and biochemical processes is best performed with emission radionuclide-tracer techniques. In these techniques, a radionuclide or a compound labeled with a radionuclide is injected into a subject. The radiolabelled material concentrates in an organ or lesion of interest, and can show a concentration defect.
  • the pattern of concentration of the radiolabelled material is imaged by a rectilinear scanner, scintillation camera, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) system, or positron emission tomography (PET) system.
  • SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography
  • PET positron emission tomography
  • Applications of radionuclide imaging include quantitation of tissue metabolism and blood flow, evaluation of coronary artery disease, tumor and organ localization and volume determination, quantitation of receptor binding, measurement of brain perfusion, and liver imaging.
  • the radionuclide imaging procedure requires a means to define the path along which the emitted gamma-ray travels before striking the detector of the imaging system.
  • the path can be a vector path, a line, narrow fan, or a narrow cone as defined by the detector or collimator.
  • a collimator typically made of lead or other high-atomic number material
  • PET the unique characteristics of positron annihilation radiation are coupled with electronic circuitry to define the vector path.
  • the only information obtained when a gamma-ray strikes the detector is the fact that the photon originated somewhere within the object along the vector path projected back from the detector.
  • a two-dimensional image is formed with the intensity of each picture element, or pixel, proportional to the number of photons striking the detector at that position.
  • the vector paths are determined for multiple projection positions, or views, of the object, and cross-sectional or tomographic images are reconstructed of the object using standard algorithms.
  • the intensity assigned to each vector path is proportional to the number of photons striking the detector originating along the path, and the intensity of each pixel in the reconstructed image is related to these vector path intensities obtained at multiple views .
  • Radionuclide imaging it is desirable to obtain absolute values for radionuclide concentrations (or radionuclide uptake) at each point in the image.
  • Attenuation of the emitted photons within the object, before they reach the detector, is a function of the energy of the photons and the exact composition of the material through which the photons pass to reach the detector. Photons emitted deeper within the object have a higher probability of attenuation than those emitted near the surface.
  • the composition of the material in terms of effective atomic number Z and electron density) affects the attenuation, with more attenuation if the path passes through high-Z or high-density regions.
  • Radionuclide imaging has been seriously hindered by some important limitations.
  • the spatial resolution and photon statistical limitations of radionuclide imaging frustrate accurate anatomical localization and hinder quantitation of the radionuclide distribution.
  • Photon attenuation has been identified by the American Heart Association and leading nuclear cardiologists as a major deficiency in diagnosis of heart disease with SPECT, and is a major source of error in the measurement of tumor metabolism using radionuclide techniques. Quantitation is further complicated by the need for scatter compensation for imaging with both single-photon and positron-emitting radionuclides.
  • the prior art in this field includes several different approaches to localize and quantify the uptake of radionuclides in the human body.
  • One approach uses stereotactic techniques or computer processing methods to correlate functional information from SPECT or PET images with morphologic information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT.
  • MRI magnetic resonance imaging
  • This technique has the advantage that it can be applied retrospectively without acquiring new image data from the patient.
  • these approaches are computationally intensive, require that the patient be scanned separately on two systems, and have only been successful in the head where the skull limits motion of internal anatomical structures .
  • a second set of prior art describes instrumentation used to detect emission and transmission data using instruments with single or multiple detectors.
  • the map of attenuation coefficients required for the attenuation correction procedure can be obtained from a separate x-ray transmission CT scan of the patient, although a specific method of generating an attenuation map at the photon energy of the radionuclide source is not known.
  • Specific techniques to determine the attenuation map of the patient from single-energy transmission measurement using radionuclide or x-ray sources have been described which are limited to sources emitting monoenergetic (line) spectra rather than broad spectra such as those typically obtained from an x-ray source.
  • single-energy x-ray data and dual-energy x- ray data.
  • single-energy x-ray describes methods in which an image is generated by integrating the x-ray signal over a single range of photon energies.
  • dual-energy x-ray describes methods in which two images are generated by integrating the signal over two different photon energy ranges.
  • either "single-energy x-ray” or “dual-energy x-ray” includes methods in which the x-ray source emits an x-ray beam having either a narrow of broad spectrum of energies.
  • a key element has been the combination of the emission and transmission data in a reconstruction algorithm which corrects the radionuclide distribution for photon attenuation.
  • analytic algorithms such as filtered backprojection in which the radionuclide data is modified using an attenuation map to correct for attenuation errors.
  • these analytic algorithms are fast and require only a single step to reconstruct the radionuclide distribution.
  • they are inexact and utilize a uniform attenuation map in which the value of the attenuation coefficient is assumed to be constant across the patient.
  • Other reconstruction algorithms are iterative and use an exact attenuation map and the radionuclide projection data to estimate the radionuclide distribution across the patient.
  • Maximum likelihood estimation is one statistical method that can be used for image reconstruction.
  • a maximum likelihood estimator appropriate for radionuclide tomography based on an iterative expectation maximization algorithm (ML-EM) has been described.
  • the ML-EM algorithm is easy to implement, accounts for the Poisson nature of the photon counting process inherent with radionuclide imaging, and it produces better images than filtered backprojection.
  • ML-EM algorithms can incorporate physical phenomena associated with radionuclide tomography, such as photon attenuation and scatter, detection efficiency, and geometric aspects of the imaging process .
  • Iterative weighted least squares/conjugate gradient (WLS/CG) methods have also been proposed and used for radionuclide tomography.
  • WLS/CG reconstruction algorithms converge faster than ML-EM procedures, while still incorporating the statistical nature of radionuclide imaging, and permit compensation for photon attenuation and scatter, detection efficiency and geometric response. Iterative algorithms have been successfully used for both SPECT and PET imaging.
  • Iterative algorithms are iterative procedures and are started with an initial image estimate that either corresponds to a constant radionuclide density throughout the image plane to be reconstructed or corresponds to constant density throughout the highly sampled "reconstruction circle" and zero outside this region. This estimate is unlikely to be representative of the actual distribution of radionuclide in a patient, and a large fraction of the total iterations required to generate useful images may be necessary to reveal the real qualitative structure of the radionuclide distribution. Thus, these algorithms often require 30 to 50 iterations to yield visually acceptable images, and possibly several hundred iterations to generate quantitatively accurate reconstructions.
  • Filtered backprojection algorithms can operate concurrently with the emission data acquisition, and they are the method currently used for most clinical radionuclide imaging systems due to their efficiency and ability to produce useful images.
  • Unfortunately it is generally not possible to modify filtered backprojection algorithms to accurately account for details of the collimator geometry, or for the effects of scatter, especially in regions where there are large inhomogeneities in these properties, or details of the collimator geometry. Therefore, this approach can speed up iterative techniques slightly, although the improvement in convergence speed has not been dramatic. Thus, many investigators have pursued various methods of speeding the convergence of ML-EM algorithms or reducing the time required per iteration.
  • Methods include exploiting the symmetry of the imaging system, multigrid approaches, high frequency enhanced filtered iterative reconstruction, expectation maximization search (EMS) algorithms, rescaled gradient procedures, vector-extrapolated maximum likelihood algorithms, and hybrid maximum likelihood/weighted least squares (ML/WLS) algorithms.
  • EMS expectation maximization search
  • ML/WLS hybrid maximum likelihood/weighted least squares
  • the present invention is a system for acquiring correlated transmission and emission images with a dedicated imaging instrument, and includes the algorithms to process the emission and transmission data to calculate the radionuclide concentrations in the anatomical regions being imaged.
  • a radiation detector is provided to record radionuclide images like a standard radionuclide imaging system.
  • the system contains a transmission source and detector for acquisition of transmission images from which the anatomy of the body can be determined.
  • the transmission source may be either a radionuclide or an x- ray tube or other radiation generating device.
  • the transmission detector may be the same detector or a different detector from the radionuclide detector.
  • a method is provided to maintain the relative spatial locations between the emission and transmission data sets.
  • the concept of single imaging system includes those embodiments in which the emission and transmission detectors are mounted on separate but adjacent gantries which share a common patient table. This will allow the patient to be translated from one imaging system to the other without having the patient move relative to the patient-support of the common table.
  • Both the emission detector and the transmission detector are electronically connected to data acquisition electronics which receive the detector signals and generate signals representative of the radiation striking the detector.
  • the detector signals are digitized and stored in a computer as projection data showing the emission and transmission radiation signals recorded from the patient.
  • the computer uses a tomographic reconstruction algorithm to calculate an attenuation map which shows the distribution of attenuation coefficients at each point across the volume imaged in the patient . Because the emission and transmission data are registered spatially, the attenuation map can be used as input data which is used in the reconstruction of the radionuclide data.
  • the attenuation map is used to correct the radionuclide projection for absorption by overlying tissue and is necessary for quantitative accurate calculations of the radionuclide concentrations within the patient.
  • this is performed with an iterative reconstruction algorithm which also can correct for other physical perturbations such as photon-statistical noise, scattered radiation, and partial-volume effects.
  • the transmission image also can be used as a priori information in Bayesian reconstruction algorithms to improve anatomical definition in the radionuclide image.
  • color-mapped radionuclide emission data can be superimposed on high-resolution transmission image in _ order to correlate physiological information with structural information.
  • the system allows the operator to define a region-of-interest on a correlated transmission image which has better statistics and spatial resolution than the radionuclide image.
  • the inherent features of the emission-transmission system can improve the localization, accuracy, and precision of in vivo radionuclide measurements used to assess a patient's physiological status.
  • Potential applications of emission- transmission imaging include tumor and organ localization and volume determination, myocardial perfusion, quantitation of receptor binding, measurement of brain perfusion, and liver imaging.
  • FIGs. IA, IB, 1C, and ID are isometric views of hardware of a system in accordance with four embodiments of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating signal processing in the system of Fig. 1.
  • Figs. 3A-3C are schematics of detectors in the system of Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 4 is a schematic of a triple mode detector circuit for use in the system of Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 5 is a flow chart of a beam-hardening correction algorithm in accordance with the invention.
  • Fig. 6A illustrates a CT method of obtaining an attenuation map using a calibration phantom
  • Fig. 6B illustrates the correlation between CT " numbers and attenuation coefficients for known material properties.
  • Figs. 7A and 7B are flow diagrams illustrating two methods of concurrent iterative reconstruction in accordance with the invention.
  • Figs. IA and IB are isometric views of two embodiments of the emission-transmission imaging system in accordance with the invention showing a radiation source 10, a transmission detector 12, and a radionuclide emission detector 14 all mounted to a gantry 16.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates the detection and processing of signals. Both the emission detector and transmission detector are electronically connected to data acquisition electronics with the transmission data used to generate an attenuation map which is then used to correct the emission data. In accordance with a feature of the invention, the emission image can be reconstructed using concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms.
  • the system requires detectors for both the emission and transmission data.
  • a single detector array can be used for both emission and transmission imaging, as shown in Figs; IA and IB.
  • An alternative approach shown in Figs. 1C and ID uses separate detector arrays for emission and transmission' imaging. In Fig. IA a two-dimensional transmission detector is used, while in Fig. IB a one- dimensional transmission detector array is used.
  • One-dimensional detectors acquire images of a single plane in the patient during a single tomographic scan, while two-dimensional detector arrays acquire images from an entire volume.
  • the transmission detector can be designed to use a limited cone-beam or fan-beam geometry.
  • single-slice and spiral fan-beam geometries can be used while translating the object across the stationary x-ray fan-beam.
  • Radionuclide imaging systems use scintillators such as sodium iodide or bismuth germinate (BGO) which are coupled to photomultiplier tubes or photodiodes.
  • BGO bismuth germinate
  • other detector technologies can be used for emission-transmission imaging.
  • semiconductor detectors can be used, including HPGe, cadmium telluride, zinc cadmium telluride, and mercuric iodide.
  • Scintillation detectors also can be operated in a pulse-counting mode, but are impractical for x-ray transmission measurements due to their low count-rate capabilities.
  • multiwire proportional counters operate in a pulse-counting mode, but have inadequate count-rate capabilities and poor detection efficiencies for the x-ray energies used in the emission-transmission system.
  • pressurized xenon ionization detectors have been used for x-ray CT but are difficult to manufacture and to operate as area detectors.
  • Hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) plates are being investigated as two-dimensional radiation detectors which integrate the photodiode, capacitor, and FET switch on a single substrate.
  • Image intensifiers are compatible with cone-beam x-ray geometries, but suffer from pin-cushion distortion and veiling glare which complicate quantitative measurements. In addition, they are relatively large, heavy, and expensive, especially in formats large enough for body scanning with a cone-beam geometry.
  • Scatter radiation contributes a significant error to quantitative transmission measurements in CT, and these errors are aggravated in a system using an area detector. Therefore, it is desirable but not essential that the transmission detector is operated with a collimator to reject scatter.
  • scatter compensation algorithms can be applied to the transmission projection data before it is reconstructed using a tomographic algorithm. Radionuclide imaging devices typically are operated with energy discrimination which reduces the amount of scatter radiation in the recorded data.
  • scatter compensation algorithms have been developed to provide additional corrections for scattered radiation. In emission-transmission imaging, the radionuclide detector can receive large amounts of scattered radiation during acquisition of the x-ray transmission image.
  • the emission and transmission projection data can be acquired sequentially rather than simultaneously.
  • the scintillation camera can be protected from turning these high photon fluxes using a lead-lined cover.
  • the scintillation detector used for radionuclide imaging can be turned off during the transmission scan to protect the photomultiplier tubes from damage from the high photon fluxes.
  • Scintillation detectors used for radionuclide imaging commonly are operated with photomultiplier tubes (PMT's) , which can be damaged by high photon fluxes.
  • Compensating filters can be used to decrease dynamic range, and thereby improve both the scatter and signal-to-noise characteristics of the recorded transmission signal. Compensating filters also introduce spatially-dependent changes in x-ray beam-hardening, which can introduce errors into quantitative transmission measurements. As will be described herein below, accuracy errors contributed by beam-hardening artifacts are corrected using uniformity corrections as well as iterative correction techniques. Additional corrections are derived from the use of aggressive filtration of the x-ray beam to derive quasi-monoenergetic spectra. It also is possible to use dual-energy CT to derive attenuation maps of sufficient accuracy and precision for attenuation-correction of the radionuclide data.
  • Aggressive x-ray beam filtration also can be used to reduce errors in the x-ray transmission measurement which results from use of iodinated contrast media which have attenuation coefficients with a k-edge within the photon energy range used to acquire the transmission data.
  • This nonlinearity introduces errors into calculation of the attenuation map from the beam-hardening correction described in this disclosure and can require that we can filter the x-ray beam so that its spectrum falls above the iodine k-edge to avoid these nonlinearities .
  • the emission-transmission system can use either separate detectors or a single detector to record the emission and transmission data.
  • the ideal implementation of this instrument is to use a single detector so that the emission and transmission data can be spatially registered, and potentially can be recorded simultaneously.
  • the use of a single detector is complicated because differences in the acquisition requirements of the transmission and emission data are extreme.
  • the transmission data are acquired with a point or line source, typically at high data rates, and do not require energy discrimination. Therefore, transmission CT scanners use detectors operated in the "current" or "integrating" mode, where the electronic circuitry attached to the detector reads the current produced by absorption of one or more photons in a unit of time (Fig. 3A) .
  • radionuclide imaging typically is performed at low data rates and requires energy discrimination so that unscattered emission photons can be separated from those which are scattered within the body.
  • Emission imaging devices therefore use detectors operated in the "pulse” or “counting” mode in which signals are generated for single photons and where the signal amplitude is proportional to the photon energy (Fig. 3B) .
  • the circuitry when simultaneous emission-transmission imaging is performed, the circuitry must operate at high count rates (to accommodate the photon flux from the transmission source) but must operate in a "count” or “pulse” mode to allow discrimination of the emission and transmission photons, -as well as discrimination of scattered and unscattered photons from the emission source (Fig. 3C) .
  • the component values in Fig. 3 are chosen to illustrate these applications for a high-purity germanium detector element having a thickness of 6-mm and a surface area of 2-mm x 10-mm and with a charge collection time of 50 ns.
  • the feedback resistor and capacitor values are chosen to produce the largest usable signal from the amplifier which is compatible with the photon flux received and the charge-conversion characteristics of the detector.
  • the values of the feedback resistor and capacitor are selected to provide a time constant which is long in comparison to the charge-collection time of the detector.
  • Fig. 3A the feedback resistor and capacitor values are chosen to produce the largest usable signal from the amplifier which is compatible with the photon flux received and the charge-conversion characteristics of the detector.
  • the values of the feedback resistor and capacitor are selected to provide a time constant which is long in comparison to the charge-collection time of the detector.
  • the pulse-shaping time constants and number of integrators are chosen to maximize the signal-to-noise characteristics of the circuit which optimizes the energy resolution capabilities for photon- counting at low count rates.
  • the pulse-shaping time constants are chosen to be consistent with the charge collection time of the detector to maximize count rate with moderate energy resolution.
  • the input amplifier can function in either charge-sensitive pulse mode or in current mode. This flexibility is achieved by using a variable feedback resistor which can be made larger for charge sensitive operation or smaller for current mode operation.
  • the feedback capacitance is chosen such that it is suitable as an integrating capacitor for pulse-mode operation or as a compensating capacitor for current mode operation.
  • several pulse shaping stages are available in parallel; the desired stage can be switched in for a given application. Fast pulse shaping is available for high count rate applications (x- ray imaging) , and slow pulse shaping is available for low count rates (radionuclide imaging) . No pulse shaping is necessary in current mode.
  • the triple mode electronics allow the detector to be read out in current mode, fast pulse mode, and slow pulse mode.
  • the circuit can be assembled from discrete components, or can be fabricated as an application-specific integrated circuit in which the resistor is implemented by a MOSFET operated in the ohmic region.
  • x-ray CT can be used to obtain attenuation maps but has not described specific procedures to do so.
  • This procedure is complicated by x-ray beam hardening that introduces errors in the quantitation of attenuation coefficients obtained with this technique.
  • These errors can be compensated by conventional beam-hardening correction algorithms that use a CT scan of a uniformity phantom having an appropriate diameter to normalize the CT scans of other objects.
  • These uniformity correction coefficients are parameterized in a look-up table giving the normalization factor as a function of the diameter and distance from the rotational center of the object.
  • the imaging system in accordance with the invention uses techniques to correct beam-hardening errors contributed by soft-tissue, water, and bone within the scanned object.
  • FIG. 5 A flow chart of one technique for calculating the attenuation map for x-ray measurements is shown in Fig. 5.
  • the correction procedure uses calibration scan of a bidirectional step-wedge containing known thicknesses of aluminum and acrylic.
  • the transmission data are approximated as
  • each voxel could be equivalently expressed in terms of fractional weights of soft-tissue and bone.
  • the fractional weights are used as first estimates in the following iterative process to correct their values for beam-hardening.
  • the ri h estimate of the basis set coefficients (a flC (n) ,a ⁇ n) ) are projected to give the n ,h estimate of the equivalent ray-sums (A n) , A a[ ( ) ) of the two basis materials
  • This iterative beam-hardening algorithm converges toward a pair of images describing the equivalent density contributions of the aluminum and acrylic basis materials for each voxel of the original uncorrected image. These values can be used to estimate the monoenergetic attenuation map used for attenuation correction of the radionuclide image.
  • the attenuation map at the point (x, y) is calculated as
  • ⁇ x _x, y, E) a ac (x, y) ⁇ ac (E) + a al (x, y) ⁇ al (E) (6)
  • E is chosen to be the photon energy of the radionuclide (e.g., 140 keV for " m Tc, and where ⁇ ac (E)and ⁇ a ,(E)are the linear attenuation coefficients of acrylic and aluminum- at the energy E.
  • the resulting attenuation map then can be used as input data for the reconstruction of the radionuclide image. These data also can be analyzed directly for quantitative measurement of tissue components at each point in the image. Other techniques can be used to obtain an accurate attenuation map for this application.
  • One class of these techniques uses a calibration phantom which is scanned simultaneously rather than separately from the patient as illustrated in Fig 6A and 6B.
  • the phantom includes distinct regions which contain materials similar in the x- ray attenuation properties to those found in the human body.
  • the image is read into a computer where the derived CT number from the various regions of the calibration phantom are related to their known material properties.
  • the known material properties then can be correlated with the attenuation coefficients of these materials at the radionuclide energy, thereby giving an equation which transforms the measured CT numbers from the image to desired attenuation coefficients . In some, cases, this relationship will be sufficient to generate the desired attenuation map.
  • a new class of concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms is provided. These "concurrent" algorithms reconstruct the image during (rather than after) acquisition of the radionuclide data, thereby speeding up the overall image reconstruction process .
  • the major motivation for using concurrent reconstruction algorithms is to account for physical ' effects so that qualitatively improved and quantitatively accurate images can be obtained.
  • the concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms process partial sets of projection data during the acquisition phase to dramatically reduce the elapsed time required to obtain and reconstruct the radionuclide image.
  • JD * is the vector of measured counts for each detector in the imaging system
  • the transition matrix w gives the probability of a photon emitted from pixel b being detected in detector d.
  • the sum over d in Eq. 7 extends over all N rf detectors in the acquired radionuclide data, while the sum over b extends over all N b pixels in the reconstructed radionuclide image.
  • Physical aspects of the imaging process, including geometric response of the imaging system, and photon attenuation and scatter, are incorporated in the transition matrix, which includes information derived from the transmission image.
  • the objective function for WLS/CG reconstruction algorithms is somewhat different, although the general goal of minimizing an objective function is identical to that of the ML-EM algorithm given in Eq. 7.
  • the objective functions for the concurrent algorithms have the same form as Eq. 7, however, the sum over detectors, d, does not include all N d projections that are ultimately used to form the final image. This is a necessary requirement for these reconstruction methods to take place simultaneously with the acquisition of radionuclide projection data.
  • two approaches can be used to obtain the iterative image estimates, but differ in the manner used to generate subsets of projection data.
  • the first approach for processing projection subsets illustrated in Fig. 7A and referred to here as the method of "sequential subsets, " will be started with a uniform image estimate and some minimum number of projections, N Mln , available during the radionuclide scan.
  • N Mln some minimum number of projections
  • a WLS/CG or ML-EM type algorithm will then be used to generate the first iterative image estimate. After the first iteration is completed, any new projections available from the radionuclide imaging system will be incorporated in the projection subset, and the next iterative image estimate will be generated. This method of sequentially adding projections to the reconstruction subset is continued until all N d projections are included in the reconstruction procedure. Additional iterations are performed with the complete set of projections until appropriate stopping conditions are satisfied.
  • the second method for processing the radionuclide projection data again starts with a uniform image estimate and some minimum number of projections.
  • a fixed number of iterations, N iter of a WLS/CG or ML-EM type algorithm is used to generate a "subimage" from this subset of projections.
  • the next set of N Min projections available from the radionuclide imaging system will then be reconstructed in a similar manner. This procedure is repeated until subimages have been generated for all N d projections with each subimage reconstructed from N Min projections, and in general each projection appears in one and only one subset.
  • N iter should be chosen such that reconstruction of a subimage is completed just as the next subset of projections is available.
  • the subimages are then combined to form an initial image estimate for the post acquisition iterative reconstruction routine with the following procedure.
  • Each pixel in the combined image will be constructed from a weighted linear combination of pixels in the respective subsets.
  • the weights are determined from the transition matrix w appearing in Eq. 7.
  • pfb be the probability that photons emitted from pixel Jb are detected in subset i. For example, this probability can be calculated as
  • Pixel b in the iterative initial image estimate, ⁇ 0 then may be described by
  • concurrent image estimates will be of sufficient quality to be of limited clinical utility, generally additional processing is necessary. Therefore, the concurrent images will be used as initial image estimates with complete sets of projection data in conventional iterative reconstruction procedure.
  • the concurrent image estimates will not be restricted to use the same underlying reconstruction method as is used in the post-acquisition reconstruction phase.
  • the terms “concurrent iterative reconstruction” and “concurrent reconstruction” include those applications in which iterative reconstruction algorithms include a priori information in the reconstruction of either emission or transmission data.
  • the a priori information can include an attenuation map, information about scattered radiation, corrections for partial-volume effects derived from the transmission image.
  • the a priori information can include a description of spatial resolution loss due to the geometrical characteristics of the system or the collimator.

Abstract

Radionuclide emission imaging is improved by correcting emission-transmission data for attenuation along calculated path lengths and through calculated basis material. X-ray transmission data are used to develop an attenuation map through an object which is then used in reconstructing an image based on emission data. Radiation detection circuitry is provided which has different operating modes in detecting the X-ray and emission photons passing through the object. An iterative process is used to reconstruct the radionuclide distribution using the radionuclide projection data and the attenuation map based on physical characteristics of the object being imaged. Subsets of the complete radionuclide projection data are used to reconstruct image subsets of the radionuclide distribution. The image subsets can be generated concurrently with the acquisition of the radionuclide projection data or following acquisition of all data.

Description

EMISSION-TRANSMISSION IMAGING SYSTEM USING SINGLE ENERGY AND DUAL ENERGY TRANSMISSION AND RADIONUCLIDE EMISSION DATA
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT The Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. DK-39964 awarded by the National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to x-ray transmission and radionuclide emission imaging systems. In a primary application the invention relates to a diagnostic imaging system where x-ray transmission data are used to derive material properties of the object imaged, which properties are then used directly to correct radionuclide emission data obtained from the same object using the same imaging system, herein referred to as X-SPECT.
Diagnostic imaging techniques can image both anatomical structure and physiological function of patients in whom the physician wishes to diagnose disease or follow treatment. In clinical settings, most of these diagnostic imaging techniques -- including conventional film radiography, MRI, and CT -- predominantly image structure rather than function. Unlike these anatomical imaging methodologies, in vivo measurement of tissue metabolism, perfusion, and biochemical processes is best performed with emission radionuclide-tracer techniques. In these techniques, a radionuclide or a compound labeled with a radionuclide is injected into a subject. The radiolabelled material concentrates in an organ or lesion of interest, and can show a concentration defect. At a prescribed time following injection, the pattern of concentration of the radiolabelled material is imaged by a rectilinear scanner, scintillation camera, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) system, or positron emission tomography (PET) system. Applications of radionuclide imaging include quantitation of tissue metabolism and blood flow, evaluation of coronary artery disease, tumor and organ localization and volume determination, quantitation of receptor binding, measurement of brain perfusion, and liver imaging. The radionuclide imaging procedure requires a means to define the path along which the emitted gamma-ray travels before striking the detector of the imaging system. The path can be a vector path, a line, narrow fan, or a narrow cone as defined by the detector or collimator. In rectilinear scanners, scintillation cameras, and SPECT systems, a collimator (typically made of lead or other high-atomic number material) is interposed between the object and the detector to define the gamma-ray path. In PET, the unique characteristics of positron annihilation radiation are coupled with electronic circuitry to define the vector path. In all cases, the only information obtained when a gamma-ray strikes the detector is the fact that the photon originated somewhere within the object along the vector path projected back from the detector. For projection imaging systems, a two-dimensional image is formed with the intensity of each picture element, or pixel, proportional to the number of photons striking the detector at that position. In SPECT or PET, the vector paths are determined for multiple projection positions, or views, of the object, and cross-sectional or tomographic images are reconstructed of the object using standard algorithms. Again, the intensity assigned to each vector path is proportional to the number of photons striking the detector originating along the path, and the intensity of each pixel in the reconstructed image is related to these vector path intensities obtained at multiple views .
In radionuclide imaging, it is desirable to obtain absolute values for radionuclide concentrations (or radionuclide uptake) at each point in the image. Attenuation of the emitted photons within the object, before they reach the detector, is a function of the energy of the photons and the exact composition of the material through which the photons pass to reach the detector. Photons emitted deeper within the object have a higher probability of attenuation than those emitted near the surface. In addition, the composition of the material (in terms of effective atomic number Z and electron density) affects the attenuation, with more attenuation if the path passes through high-Z or high-density regions. Thus, in order to calculate absolute uptake or concentration of a radionuclide in a region of an object, it is required that the path length of each type of material or tissue (or effective-Z and electron density path lengths) be known for each vector. Attenuation corrections for emitted photons are made from this knowledge, allowing accurate concentration values to be obtained.
The full clinical potential of radionuclide imaging has been seriously hindered by some important limitations. The spatial resolution and photon statistical limitations of radionuclide imaging frustrate accurate anatomical localization and hinder quantitation of the radionuclide distribution. Photon attenuation has been identified by the American Heart Association and leading nuclear cardiologists as a major deficiency in diagnosis of heart disease with SPECT, and is a major source of error in the measurement of tumor metabolism using radionuclide techniques. Quantitation is further complicated by the need for scatter compensation for imaging with both single-photon and positron-emitting radionuclides.
A number of researchers have shown that many of these limitations can be overcome through use of emission- transmission imaging techniques which combine anatomical (structural) information from transmission images with physiological (functional) information from radionuclide emission images. By correlating the emission and transmission images, the observer can more easily identify and delineate the location of radionuclide uptake. In addition, the quantitative accuracy of measurement of radionuclide uptake can be improved through use of iterative reconstruction methods which can account for these errors and improve the radionuclide images. Currently existing medical imaging instrumentation has been designed for either emission or transmission imaging, but not both, and attempts to perform both compromise one or both of the data sets. In addition, as currently implemented, iterative reconstruction algorithms are too slow to converge and therefore impede the flow of information in a hospital setting. Virtually all clinical tomographic systems use analytic rather than iterative reconstruction algorithms which, unlike iterative reconstruction techniques, have the major advantage that the image reconstruction process can occur concurrently with the acquisition of the image data. The efficiency of analytic approaches is compromised by their inability to account for the quantitative errors of photon attenuation, scatter radiation, and spatial resolution losses mentioned above .
The prior art in this field includes several different approaches to localize and quantify the uptake of radionuclides in the human body. One approach uses stereotactic techniques or computer processing methods to correlate functional information from SPECT or PET images with morphologic information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT. This technique has the advantage that it can be applied retrospectively without acquiring new image data from the patient. However, these approaches are computationally intensive, require that the patient be scanned separately on two systems, and have only been successful in the head where the skull limits motion of internal anatomical structures . A second set of prior art describes instrumentation used to detect emission and transmission data using instruments with single or multiple detectors. Several investigators have acquired both the emission and transmission images, with a radionuclide point, line, or sheet used as the transmission source which is placed on the opposite side of the body from the scintillation camera. This approach has been applied more recently using SPECT. Studies have shown that this technique is capable of producing adequate attenuation maps for attenuation correction to improve quantitation of radionuclide uptake, and that some modest anatomical localization of the radionuclide distribution is also possible. An alternative approach uses specially-designed instruments for emission-transmission imaging. For example, Kaplan (International Patent Application No. PCT/US90/03722) describes an emission-transmission system in which the emission and transmission data are acquired with the same detector (single or multiple heads) .
An alternative emission-transmission imaging system
(disclosed in SU-1405-819-A) uses x-ray transmission data and two detectors for determining the direction of the photons to improve detection efficiency. However, an exact method of correcting emission data based on transmission data is not described by either Kaplan or in SU-1405-819-A.
Other prior art notes that the map of attenuation coefficients required for the attenuation correction procedure can be obtained from a separate x-ray transmission CT scan of the patient, although a specific method of generating an attenuation map at the photon energy of the radionuclide source is not known. Specific techniques to determine the attenuation map of the patient from single-energy transmission measurement using radionuclide or x-ray sources have been described which are limited to sources emitting monoenergetic (line) spectra rather than broad spectra such as those typically obtained from an x-ray source.
Specific algorithms for correcting beam-hardening artifacts use single-energy x-ray data and dual-energy x- ray data. As used herein, the term "single-energy x-ray" describes methods in which an image is generated by integrating the x-ray signal over a single range of photon energies. As used herein, the term "dual-energy x-ray" describes methods in which two images are generated by integrating the signal over two different photon energy ranges. Thus, either "single-energy x-ray" or "dual-energy x-ray" includes methods in which the x-ray source emits an x-ray beam having either a narrow of broad spectrum of energies. Algorithms for correcting -beam-hardening artifacts by using basis-material measurements derived from single-energy or dual-energy x-ray data have been presented but without describing how these measurements can be applied to correction of radionuclide data. Especially for single-energy measurements, the correction techniques associated therewith are principally directed at the removal of beam-hardening streaks and nonuniformities which disturb the qualitative evaluation of images produced with CT.
A key element has been the combination of the emission and transmission data in a reconstruction algorithm which corrects the radionuclide distribution for photon attenuation. Several authors have described analytic algorithms such as filtered backprojection in which the radionuclide data is modified using an attenuation map to correct for attenuation errors. Among their advantages, these analytic algorithms are fast and require only a single step to reconstruct the radionuclide distribution. However, they are inexact and utilize a uniform attenuation map in which the value of the attenuation coefficient is assumed to be constant across the patient. Other reconstruction algorithms are iterative and use an exact attenuation map and the radionuclide projection data to estimate the radionuclide distribution across the patient. Maximum likelihood estimation is one statistical method that can be used for image reconstruction. A maximum likelihood estimator appropriate for radionuclide tomography based on an iterative expectation maximization algorithm (ML-EM) has been described. The ML-EM algorithm is easy to implement, accounts for the Poisson nature of the photon counting process inherent with radionuclide imaging, and it produces better images than filtered backprojection. In addition, ML-EM algorithms can incorporate physical phenomena associated with radionuclide tomography, such as photon attenuation and scatter, detection efficiency, and geometric aspects of the imaging process . Iterative weighted least squares/conjugate gradient (WLS/CG) methods have also been proposed and used for radionuclide tomography. Overall, WLS/CG reconstruction algorithms converge faster than ML-EM procedures, while still incorporating the statistical nature of radionuclide imaging, and permit compensation for photon attenuation and scatter, detection efficiency and geometric response. Iterative algorithms have been successfully used for both SPECT and PET imaging.
The major disadvantage of iterative algorithms is their computational burden. Iterative algorithms are iterative procedures and are started with an initial image estimate that either corresponds to a constant radionuclide density throughout the image plane to be reconstructed or corresponds to constant density throughout the highly sampled "reconstruction circle" and zero outside this region. This estimate is unlikely to be representative of the actual distribution of radionuclide in a patient, and a large fraction of the total iterations required to generate useful images may be necessary to reveal the real qualitative structure of the radionuclide distribution. Thus, these algorithms often require 30 to 50 iterations to yield visually acceptable images, and possibly several hundred iterations to generate quantitatively accurate reconstructions.
It also is possible to use filtered backprojection to produce initial image estimates for iterative reconstruction algorithms. Filtered backprojection algorithms can operate concurrently with the emission data acquisition, and they are the method currently used for most clinical radionuclide imaging systems due to their efficiency and ability to produce useful images. Unfortunately it is generally not possible to modify filtered backprojection algorithms to accurately account for details of the collimator geometry, or for the effects of scatter, especially in regions where there are large inhomogeneities in these properties, or details of the collimator geometry. Therefore, this approach can speed up iterative techniques slightly, although the improvement in convergence speed has not been dramatic. Thus, many investigators have pursued various methods of speeding the convergence of ML-EM algorithms or reducing the time required per iteration. Methods include exploiting the symmetry of the imaging system, multigrid approaches, high frequency enhanced filtered iterative reconstruction, expectation maximization search (EMS) algorithms, rescaled gradient procedures, vector-extrapolated maximum likelihood algorithms, and hybrid maximum likelihood/weighted least squares (ML/WLS) algorithms. However, all iterative reconstruction methods require significantly more computer time than filtered backprojection algorithms to generate useful images. The iterative ML-EM and WLS/CG algorithms mentioned above assume complete sets of radionuclide projection data exists prior to commencement of the reconstruction procedure. The requirement to acquire complete sets of projection data is especially important in radionuclide system because clinical emission imaging systems typically require several minutes to acquire projection data, making iterative reconstruction techniques impractical .
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is a system for acquiring correlated transmission and emission images with a dedicated imaging instrument, and includes the algorithms to process the emission and transmission data to calculate the radionuclide concentrations in the anatomical regions being imaged. A radiation detector is provided to record radionuclide images like a standard radionuclide imaging system. In addition, the system contains a transmission source and detector for acquisition of transmission images from which the anatomy of the body can be determined. The transmission source may be either a radionuclide or an x- ray tube or other radiation generating device. The transmission detector may be the same detector or a different detector from the radionuclide detector. In addition, a method is provided to maintain the relative spatial locations between the emission and transmission data sets. This can be performed by placing a localizing apparatus on the patient which is scanned concurrently with the patient. Alternatively, because the emission and transmission detectors are supported on a common gantry or embodied in a single detector, it is possible to perform calibration scans on a phantom prior to acquisition of the patients from which the emission and transmission data can be registered. As defined herein, the concept of single imaging system includes those embodiments in which the emission and transmission detectors are mounted on separate but adjacent gantries which share a common patient table. This will allow the patient to be translated from one imaging system to the other without having the patient move relative to the patient-support of the common table.
Both the emission detector and the transmission detector are electronically connected to data acquisition electronics which receive the detector signals and generate signals representative of the radiation striking the detector. Typically, the detector signals are digitized and stored in a computer as projection data showing the emission and transmission radiation signals recorded from the patient. From the transmission data, the computer uses a tomographic reconstruction algorithm to calculate an attenuation map which shows the distribution of attenuation coefficients at each point across the volume imaged in the patient . Because the emission and transmission data are registered spatially, the attenuation map can be used as input data which is used in the reconstruction of the radionuclide data. In this process, the attenuation map is used to correct the radionuclide projection for absorption by overlying tissue and is necessary for quantitative accurate calculations of the radionuclide concentrations within the patient. Typically, this is performed with an iterative reconstruction algorithm which also can correct for other physical perturbations such as photon-statistical noise, scattered radiation, and partial-volume effects. The transmission image also can be used as a priori information in Bayesian reconstruction algorithms to improve anatomical definition in the radionuclide image. For visual evaluation, color-mapped radionuclide emission data can be superimposed on high-resolution transmission image in _ order to correlate physiological information with structural information. The system allows the operator to define a region-of-interest on a correlated transmission image which has better statistics and spatial resolution than the radionuclide image. Thus, the inherent features of the emission-transmission system can improve the localization, accuracy, and precision of in vivo radionuclide measurements used to assess a patient's physiological status. Potential applications of emission- transmission imaging include tumor and organ localization and volume determination, myocardial perfusion, quantitation of receptor binding, measurement of brain perfusion, and liver imaging.
The invention and objects and features thereof will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments and appended claims when taken with the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figs. IA, IB, 1C, and ID are isometric views of hardware of a system in accordance with four embodiments of the invention.
Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating signal processing in the system of Fig. 1.
Figs. 3A-3C are schematics of detectors in the system of Fig. 1.
Fig. 4 is a schematic of a triple mode detector circuit for use in the system of Fig. 1. Fig. 5 is a flow chart of a beam-hardening correction algorithm in accordance with the invention.
Fig. 6A illustrates a CT method of obtaining an attenuation map using a calibration phantom, and Fig. 6B illustrates the correlation between CT " numbers and attenuation coefficients for known material properties.
Figs. 7A and 7B are flow diagrams illustrating two methods of concurrent iterative reconstruction in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
Figs. IA and IB are isometric views of two embodiments of the emission-transmission imaging system in accordance with the invention showing a radiation source 10, a transmission detector 12, and a radionuclide emission detector 14 all mounted to a gantry 16.
Fig. 2 illustrates the detection and processing of signals. Both the emission detector and transmission detector are electronically connected to data acquisition electronics with the transmission data used to generate an attenuation map which is then used to correct the emission data. In accordance with a feature of the invention, the emission image can be reconstructed using concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms.
The system requires detectors for both the emission and transmission data. A single detector array can be used for both emission and transmission imaging, as shown in Figs; IA and IB. An alternative approach shown in Figs. 1C and ID uses separate detector arrays for emission and transmission' imaging. In Fig. IA a two-dimensional transmission detector is used, while in Fig. IB a one- dimensional transmission detector array is used.
One-dimensional detectors acquire images of a single plane in the patient during a single tomographic scan, while two-dimensional detector arrays acquire images from an entire volume. However, the transmission detector can be designed to use a limited cone-beam or fan-beam geometry. For example, single-slice and spiral fan-beam geometries can be used while translating the object across the stationary x-ray fan-beam. These approaches have the disadvantage that a longer period of time is required to obtain the x-ray data, but have the advantages that this detector configuration are less expensive and have better scatter-rejection characteristics.
Conventional CT scanners typically use scintillation detectors coupled to photodiodes, which are operated in a current mode. Radionuclide imaging systems use scintillators such as sodium iodide or bismuth germinate (BGO) which are coupled to photomultiplier tubes or photodiodes. However, other detector technologies can be used for emission-transmission imaging. In the pulse- counting regime, semiconductor detectors can be used, including HPGe, cadmium telluride, zinc cadmium telluride, and mercuric iodide. Scintillation detectors also can be operated in a pulse-counting mode, but are impractical for x-ray transmission measurements due to their low count-rate capabilities. Similarly, multiwire proportional counters operate in a pulse-counting mode, but have inadequate count-rate capabilities and poor detection efficiencies for the x-ray energies used in the emission-transmission system. Among current-integrating systems, pressurized xenon ionization detectors have been used for x-ray CT but are difficult to manufacture and to operate as area detectors. Hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) plates are being investigated as two-dimensional radiation detectors which integrate the photodiode, capacitor, and FET switch on a single substrate. Image intensifiers are compatible with cone-beam x-ray geometries, but suffer from pin-cushion distortion and veiling glare which complicate quantitative measurements. In addition, they are relatively large, heavy, and expensive, especially in formats large enough for body scanning with a cone-beam geometry.
Scatter radiation contributes a significant error to quantitative transmission measurements in CT, and these errors are aggravated in a system using an area detector. Therefore, it is desirable but not essential that the transmission detector is operated with a collimator to reject scatter. In addition, scatter compensation algorithms can be applied to the transmission projection data before it is reconstructed using a tomographic algorithm. Radionuclide imaging devices typically are operated with energy discrimination which reduces the amount of scatter radiation in the recorded data. In addition, several scatter compensation algorithms have been developed to provide additional corrections for scattered radiation. In emission-transmission imaging, the radionuclide detector can receive large amounts of scattered radiation during acquisition of the x-ray transmission image. To avoid this source of error from affecting the radionuclide data, the emission and transmission projection data can be acquired sequentially rather than simultaneously. During acquisition of the x- ray transmission data by the transmission detector, the scintillation camera can be protected from turning these high photon fluxes using a lead-lined cover. Alternatively, the scintillation detector used for radionuclide imaging can be turned off during the transmission scan to protect the photomultiplier tubes from damage from the high photon fluxes. Scintillation detectors used for radionuclide imaging commonly are operated with photomultiplier tubes (PMT's) , which can be damaged by high photon fluxes. Compensating filters can be used to decrease dynamic range, and thereby improve both the scatter and signal-to-noise characteristics of the recorded transmission signal. Compensating filters also introduce spatially-dependent changes in x-ray beam-hardening, which can introduce errors into quantitative transmission measurements. As will be described herein below, accuracy errors contributed by beam-hardening artifacts are corrected using uniformity corrections as well as iterative correction techniques. Additional corrections are derived from the use of aggressive filtration of the x-ray beam to derive quasi-monoenergetic spectra. It also is possible to use dual-energy CT to derive attenuation maps of sufficient accuracy and precision for attenuation-correction of the radionuclide data.
Aggressive x-ray beam filtration also can be used to reduce errors in the x-ray transmission measurement which results from use of iodinated contrast media which have attenuation coefficients with a k-edge within the photon energy range used to acquire the transmission data. This nonlinearity introduces errors into calculation of the attenuation map from the beam-hardening correction described in this disclosure and can require that we can filter the x-ray beam so that its spectrum falls above the iodine k-edge to avoid these nonlinearities .
As noted above, the emission-transmission system can use either separate detectors or a single detector to record the emission and transmission data. The ideal implementation of this instrument is to use a single detector so that the emission and transmission data can be spatially registered, and potentially can be recorded simultaneously. However, the use of a single detector is complicated because differences in the acquisition requirements of the transmission and emission data are extreme. The transmission data are acquired with a point or line source, typically at high data rates, and do not require energy discrimination. Therefore, transmission CT scanners use detectors operated in the "current" or "integrating" mode, where the electronic circuitry attached to the detector reads the current produced by absorption of one or more photons in a unit of time (Fig. 3A) . In comparison, radionuclide imaging typically is performed at low data rates and requires energy discrimination so that unscattered emission photons can be separated from those which are scattered within the body. Emission imaging devices therefore use detectors operated in the "pulse" or "counting" mode in which signals are generated for single photons and where the signal amplitude is proportional to the photon energy (Fig. 3B) . Finally, when simultaneous emission-transmission imaging is performed, the circuitry must operate at high count rates (to accommodate the photon flux from the transmission source) but must operate in a "count" or "pulse" mode to allow discrimination of the emission and transmission photons, -as well as discrimination of scattered and unscattered photons from the emission source (Fig. 3C) . For example, the component values in Fig. 3 are chosen to illustrate these applications for a high-purity germanium detector element having a thickness of 6-mm and a surface area of 2-mm x 10-mm and with a charge collection time of 50 ns. In Fig. 3A, the feedback resistor and capacitor values are chosen to produce the largest usable signal from the amplifier which is compatible with the photon flux received and the charge-conversion characteristics of the detector. In Fig. 3B and Fig. 3C, the values of the feedback resistor and capacitor are selected to provide a time constant which is long in comparison to the charge-collection time of the detector. However, in Fig. 3B, the pulse-shaping time constants and number of integrators are chosen to maximize the signal-to-noise characteristics of the circuit which optimizes the energy resolution capabilities for photon- counting at low count rates. In comparison, in Fig. 3C, the pulse-shaping time constants are chosen to be consistent with the charge collection time of the detector to maximize count rate with moderate energy resolution.
One possible implementation involves a novel "triple-mode"' electronic circuit for the detector readout shown in Fig. 4. The input amplifier can function in either charge-sensitive pulse mode or in current mode. This flexibility is achieved by using a variable feedback resistor which can be made larger for charge sensitive operation or smaller for current mode operation. In addition, the feedback capacitance is chosen such that it is suitable as an integrating capacitor for pulse-mode operation or as a compensating capacitor for current mode operation. Following the input amplifier, several pulse shaping stages are available in parallel; the desired stage can be switched in for a given application. Fast pulse shaping is available for high count rate applications (x- ray imaging) , and slow pulse shaping is available for low count rates (radionuclide imaging) . No pulse shaping is necessary in current mode. In brief, the triple mode electronics allow the detector to be read out in current mode, fast pulse mode, and slow pulse mode. The circuit can be assembled from discrete components, or can be fabricated as an application-specific integrated circuit in which the resistor is implemented by a MOSFET operated in the ohmic region.
As previously noted, the prior art has suggested that x-ray CT can be used to obtain attenuation maps but has not described specific procedures to do so. This procedure is complicated by x-ray beam hardening that introduces errors in the quantitation of attenuation coefficients obtained with this technique. These errors can be compensated by conventional beam-hardening correction algorithms that use a CT scan of a uniformity phantom having an appropriate diameter to normalize the CT scans of other objects. These uniformity correction coefficients are parameterized in a look-up table giving the normalization factor as a function of the diameter and distance from the rotational center of the object. This technique corrects "global" uniformity errors, but does not correct "local" beam-hardening errors between two heterogeneities (e.g., bones) in the reconstruction volume. Therefore, the imaging system in accordance with the invention uses techniques to correct beam-hardening errors contributed by soft-tissue, water, and bone within the scanned object.
A flow chart of one technique for calculating the attenuation map for x-ray measurements is shown in Fig. 5. The correction procedure uses calibration scan of a bidirectional step-wedge containing known thicknesses of aluminum and acrylic. The transmission data are approximated as
Ic = f (Aac, Aal) (1)
where the measured calibration intensities /.are represented as a function (e.g., polynomial) of the known material thicknesses (A^A in the calibration phantom.
We then acquire projection data p of the object (i.e., phantom or patient) , from which we reconstruct a tomogram using filtered backprojection or other standard technique. We assume voxels with more attenuation than acrylic contain a homogeneous mixture of acrylic and aluminum, while those with less attenuation than acrylic contain a homogeneous mixture of acrylic and air. Based on the reconstructed attenuation coefficients, we assign a fractional contribution of acrylic (a and aluminum {a to each voxel in the tomogram. (Because the attenuation properties of soft-tissue and bone can be approximated as linear combinations of acrylic and aluminum, each voxel could be equivalently expressed in terms of fractional weights of soft-tissue and bone.) The fractional weights are used as first estimates in the following iterative process to correct their values for beam-hardening.
In the iterative process, the rih estimate of the basis set coefficients (aflC (n),aα n)) are projected to give the n,h estimate of the equivalent ray-sums (A n) , Aa[ ( )) of the two basis materials
A <? = fa ] (x, y) ds and
Figure imgf000019_0001
= Ja <? (x, y) ds (2)
L L
for each set of projection data. These values are used to obtain the n,h estimate the projected transmission values pn from Eq. 1, so that
Pn = f iA^ . A^ ) (3) Assuming the difference between pn and the experimental projection data p is small, error estimates (Δ,ac (n,,Δ-,<n)) for the ray-sums (A n) .A "}) can be determined from a first-order Taylor's series expansion of Eq. 1
„ „ M~ ( Α (n) A (n) ., df i * (i_) df i (__) (4)
-,r-ac -'--al and a second arbitrary constraint, such as A (a) a al A Αa{l?
(5)
Λ a {nc) * A-a {cn)
Corrected estimates of the rih iterative ray-sums, (AβC (n) + ΔflC (n),A_; (n) + Δ.n)) are determined for each experimentally measured projection, and the set backprojected to give the (n+l)'h iterative estimate of the acrylic and aluminum densities for each voxel. This procedure is repeated until the acrylic and aluminum densities within each voxel are stable to within 0.5% (or other accuracy level) of the densities obtained on the previous iteration.
This iterative beam-hardening algorithm converges toward a pair of images describing the equivalent density contributions of the aluminum and acrylic basis materials for each voxel of the original uncorrected image. These values can be used to estimate the monoenergetic attenuation map used for attenuation correction of the radionuclide image. The attenuation map at the point (x, y) is calculated as
\x _x, y, E) = aac (x, y) μac (E) + aal (x, y) μal (E) (6)
where E is chosen to be the photon energy of the radionuclide (e.g., 140 keV for "mTc, and where μac(E)and μa,(E)are the linear attenuation coefficients of acrylic and aluminum- at the energy E. The resulting attenuation map then can be used as input data for the reconstruction of the radionuclide image. These data also can be analyzed directly for quantitative measurement of tissue components at each point in the image. Other techniques can be used to obtain an accurate attenuation map for this application. One class of these techniques uses a calibration phantom which is scanned simultaneously rather than separately from the patient as illustrated in Fig 6A and 6B. The phantom includes distinct regions which contain materials similar in the x- ray attenuation properties to those found in the human body. After the patient and phantom are scanned, the image is read into a computer where the derived CT number from the various regions of the calibration phantom are related to their known material properties. The known material properties then can be correlated with the attenuation coefficients of these materials at the radionuclide energy, thereby giving an equation which transforms the measured CT numbers from the image to desired attenuation coefficients . In some, cases, this relationship will be sufficient to generate the desired attenuation map. However, the existence of beam-hardening and other errors require that the calibration measurements be used to calculate material properties of the patient which are entered into an iterative correction algorithm such as that described above, which is used to generate an accurate attenuation map of the patient including corrections for beam-hardening errors .
In accordance with another feature of the invention, a new class of concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms is provided. These "concurrent" algorithms reconstruct the image during (rather than after) acquisition of the radionuclide data, thereby speeding up the overall image reconstruction process . As with iterative reconstruction methods, the major motivation for using concurrent reconstruction algorithms is to account for physical ' effects so that qualitatively improved and quantitatively accurate images can be obtained. However, the concurrent iterative reconstruction algorithms process partial sets of projection data during the acquisition phase to dramatically reduce the elapsed time required to obtain and reconstruct the radionuclide image.
Two general approaches have been developed, which use only subsets of projections and which can be described in terms of the ML-EM algorithm as follows. From a numerical analysis perspective, the image reconstruction problem reduces to finding the global minimum (or maximum) of an "objective function" or "cost function. " The objective function is constructed such that the image associated with the least (or greatest) cost is in some probabilistic sense "most" representative of the distribution of radionuclide within a patient. For ML-EM reconstruction algorithms, the goal of the reconstruction procedure can be stated as maximizing the following objective function:
ΆC λn (b) w(b, d) (7)
Figure imgf000022_0002
Figure imgf000022_0001
In the above equation, λ„ is the nth iterative estimate of the radionuclide distribution, JD* is the vector of measured counts for each detector in the imaging system, and the transition matrix w gives the probability of a photon emitted from pixel b being detected in detector d. The sum over d in Eq. 7 extends over all Nrf detectors in the acquired radionuclide data, while the sum over b extends over all Nb pixels in the reconstructed radionuclide image. Physical aspects of the imaging process, including geometric response of the imaging system, and photon attenuation and scatter, are incorporated in the transition matrix, which includes information derived from the transmission image. The objective function for WLS/CG reconstruction algorithms is somewhat different, although the general goal of minimizing an objective function is identical to that of the ML-EM algorithm given in Eq. 7.
The objective functions for the concurrent algorithms have the same form as Eq. 7, however, the sum over detectors, d, does not include all Nd projections that are ultimately used to form the final image. This is a necessary requirement for these reconstruction methods to take place simultaneously with the acquisition of radionuclide projection data. For example, two approaches can be used to obtain the iterative image estimates, but differ in the manner used to generate subsets of projection data. The first approach for processing projection subsets, illustrated in Fig. 7A and referred to here as the method of "sequential subsets, " will be started with a uniform image estimate and some minimum number of projections, NMln, available during the radionuclide scan. Thus, the sum over detectors in the appropriate objective function contains NMin terms. A WLS/CG or ML-EM type algorithm will then be used to generate the first iterative image estimate. After the first iteration is completed, any new projections available from the radionuclide imaging system will be incorporated in the projection subset, and the next iterative image estimate will be generated. This method of sequentially adding projections to the reconstruction subset is continued until all Nd projections are included in the reconstruction procedure. Additional iterations are performed with the complete set of projections until appropriate stopping conditions are satisfied.
The second method for processing the radionuclide projection data, illustrated in Fig. 7B and referred to here as the method of "independent subsets," again starts with a uniform image estimate and some minimum number of projections. A fixed number of iterations, Niter, of a WLS/CG or ML-EM type algorithm is used to generate a "subimage" from this subset of projections. The next set of NMin projections available from the radionuclide imaging system will then be reconstructed in a similar manner. This procedure is repeated until subimages have been generated for all Nd projections with each subimage reconstructed from NMin projections, and in general each projection appears in one and only one subset. In addition, it is reasonable that Niter should be chosen such that reconstruction of a subimage is completed just as the next subset of projections is available. The subimages are then combined to form an initial image estimate for the post acquisition iterative reconstruction routine with the following procedure. Each pixel in the combined image will be constructed from a weighted linear combination of pixels in the respective subsets. The weights are determined from the transition matrix w appearing in Eq. 7. First, let pfb) be the probability that photons emitted from pixel Jb are detected in subset i. For example, this probability can be calculated as
p± [b) = w{b_ dΛ (8)
where the sum over d, includes all projections in subset i. Pixel b in the iterative initial image estimate, λ0, then may be described by
Figure imgf000024_0001
^1
where i is indexed over all Ns subimages, λ,.
Although the concurrent image estimates will be of sufficient quality to be of limited clinical utility, generally additional processing is necessary. Therefore, the concurrent images will be used as initial image estimates with complete sets of projection data in conventional iterative reconstruction procedure. The concurrent image estimates will not be restricted to use the same underlying reconstruction method as is used in the post-acquisition reconstruction phase.
It has been assumed that angular views with the radionuclide imaging system are taken at consecutive angles, and projection subsets for the concurrent algorithms contain consecutive angular views . This is the logical sequence for acquiring data with a single detector array. However, the imaging system can have two or three radionuclide detector arrays, providing projections corresponding to vastly different angular views of the patient simultaneously. This reduces the total scan time, and will improve the convergence rate of concurrent algorithms when projection subsets are constructed from data with significantly varying angles. In the preceding discussion, we have described how these concurrent techniques can be applied to the tomographic reconstruction of radionuclide images. However, as used herein, the terms "concurrent iterative reconstruction" and "concurrent reconstruction" include those applications in which iterative reconstruction algorithms include a priori information in the reconstruction of either emission or transmission data. In the case of emission imaging, the a priori information can include an attenuation map, information about scattered radiation, corrections for partial-volume effects derived from the transmission image. In the case of emission or transmission imaging, the a priori information can include a description of spatial resolution loss due to the geometrical characteristics of the system or the collimator.
Thus, while the invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS;
1. An emission-transmission imaging system comprising a) A radiation source for emitting a photon spectrum, b) detector means for selectively detecting photons corresponding to said photon spectrum and photons corresponding to radionuclide emission, c) means for positioning said radiation source facing said detector means with an object positionable therebetween, said object having a radionuclide therein, d) data acquisition means connected with said detector means for receiving transmission signals from said detector means representative of said detected photon spectrum photons and radionuclide signals representative of detected radionuclide emission signals, e) computer means for receiving and processing said transmission signals and developing an attenuation map for photons, said computer means receiving and processing said radionuclide signals using said attenuation map for attenuation correction and producing image signals of distribution of a radionuclide in an object positioned between said radiation source and said detector means, and f) display means responsive to said image signals.
2. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said computer means processes said transmission signals by reconstructing an image of at least one slice through an object using computed tomography (CT) attenuation coefficients developed from said photon signals.
3. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 2 wherein said computer means processes said radionuclide signals using said attenuation map to correct for at least one of photon attenuation, scattered radiation, and partial volume effects.
4. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 3 wherein said radiation source transmits single energy photons.
5. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 4 wherein said computer means receives and processes transmission signals from said detector means representative of a detected photon spectrum passed through a phantom for providing calibration data used in developing said attenuation map.
6. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 5 wherein said computer means iteratively processes said transmission signals and said radionuclide signals to reconstruct image signals of radionuclide distribution.
7. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 6 wherein said computer means uses subsets of complete radionuclide signals to reconstruct image subsets of radionuclide distribution which are combined to produce said image signals.
8. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 7 wherein said computer means reconstructs said image subsets concurrently with the acquisition of said radionuclide signals.
9. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 8 wherein said data acquisition means includes pulse counting circuitry operable at low count rates and high energy resolution for said radionuclide emission detection, pulse counting circuitry operable at high count rates and moderate energy resolution for simultaneous radionuclide emission and transmission detection, and current mode circuitry operable at very high count rates without energy resolution for transmission detection.
10. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 9 wherein said data acquisition means includes means for switching said pulse counting circuitry.
11. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said data acquisition means includes pulse counting circuitry operable at low count rates and high energy resolution for said radionuclide emission detection, pulse counting circuitry operable at high count rates and moderate energy resolution for simultaneous radionuclide emission and transmission detection, and current mode circuitry operable at very high count rates without energy resolution for transmission detection.
12. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 11 wherein said data acquisition means includes means for switching said pulse counting circuitry.
13. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said radiation source is an x-ray source for emitting x-rays.
14. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 13 wherein said x-ray source transmits single energy x-rays.
15. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 13 wherein said computer means receives and processes x-ray signals from said detector means representative of detected x-ray spectrum photons passed through a phantom for providing calibration data used in developing said attenuation map.
16. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said computer means iteratively processes said transmission signals and said radionuclide signals to reconstruct image signals of radionuclide distribution.
17. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 16 wherein said computer means uses subsets of complete radionuclide signals to reconstruct image subsets of radionuclide distribution which are combined to produce said image signals.
18. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 17 wherein said computer means reconstructs said image subsets concurrently with the acquisition of said radionuclide signals.
19. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said detector means comprises a single detector for photons.
20. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said detector means includes a first detector for photons from said radiation source and a second detector for photons from said radionuclide.
21. The emission-transmission imaging system as defined by claim 1 wherein said radiation source comprises a radionuclide source.
22. A method of computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction comprising the steps of a) directing photons through an object to be imaged, b) detecting photons after passing through the object, c) generating electrical signals indicative of detected photons, d) modifying said electrical signals using parameters of the imaging system and attenuation effects of the object, and e) reconstructing a CT image using subsets of said electrical signals as modified to reconstruct image subsets.
23. The method as defined by claim 22 wherein step e) occurs concurrently with steps b) , c) , and d) .
24. The method as defined by claim 22 wherein step e) occurs after steps b) , c) , and d) are completed.
25. The method as defined by claim 22 wherein step a) includes use of a radionuclide source.
26. The method as defined by claim 22 wherein step a) includes use of an x-ray source.
27. The method as defined by claim 22 wherein step d) uses a priori knowledge of said parameters.
28. A method of forming an emission image from a radionuclide source in an object comprising a) transmitting photons through said object, b) detecting photons transmitted through said object and photons from the radionuclide source, c) generating transmission signals based on detected photons transmitted through said object and emission signals based on detected photons from the radionuclide source, d) processing said transmission signals to develop an attenuation map for photons e) processing said emission signals using said attenuation map for attenuation connection, and f) generating image signals using processed emission signals from step e) .
29. The method as defined by claim 28 wherein steps d) , e) , and f) are repeated iteratively.
30. The method as defined by claim 29 wherein step f) includes generating image subsets using subsets of said transmission signals and subsets of said emission signals .
PCT/US1993/009429 1992-10-09 1993-09-30 Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data WO1994009383A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU52977/93A AU5297793A (en) 1992-10-09 1993-09-30 Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/958,980 US5376795A (en) 1990-07-09 1992-10-09 Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data
US07/958,980 1992-10-09

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1994009383A1 true WO1994009383A1 (en) 1994-04-28

Family

ID=25501522

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1993/009429 WO1994009383A1 (en) 1992-10-09 1993-09-30 Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US5376795A (en)
AU (1) AU5297793A (en)
WO (1) WO1994009383A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2752948A1 (en) * 1996-09-05 1998-03-06 Smv Int SIMULTANEOUS ACQUISITION OF TRANSMITTED SHOTS AND EMITTED SHOTS FOR A GAMMA CAMERA
WO2007126572A2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-11-08 General Electric Company Image-based material decomposition
WO2012010959A3 (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-04-26 Szabolcs Osvath Single photon emission tomography system using a collimator-free gamma camera and method
WO2012147004A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-01 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Multi-energy imaging
US9700264B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2017-07-11 The Johns Hopkins University Joint estimation of tissue types and linear attenuation coefficients for computed tomography

Families Citing this family (103)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2696027B1 (en) * 1992-09-18 1994-10-28 Commissariat Energie Atomique Method for reconstructing three-dimensional images of a region of interest of an object, and appropriate installation.
US5611026A (en) * 1992-12-21 1997-03-11 General Electric Company Combining a priori data with partial scan data to project three dimensional imaging of arbitrary objects with computerized tomography
US5461232A (en) * 1993-01-08 1995-10-24 Mccandless; Brian K. Pulse transmission scintigraphic imaging
US6055450A (en) * 1994-12-23 2000-04-25 Digirad Corporation Bifurcated gamma camera system
DE69534284T2 (en) * 1994-12-23 2006-03-23 Digirad Corp., San Diego SEMICONDUCTOR GAMMA RADIATION CAMERA AND MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM
US5871013A (en) * 1995-05-31 1999-02-16 Elscint Ltd. Registration of nuclear medicine images
US7110587B1 (en) 1995-05-31 2006-09-19 Ge Medical Systems Israel Ltd. Registration of nuclear medicine images
US5638817A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-06-17 Picker International, Inc. Gamma camera split collimator collimation method and apparatus
US5576545A (en) * 1995-06-16 1996-11-19 Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. Line source for attenuation correction in nuclear medicine studies and apparatus and methods for using the source
FR2736178B1 (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-07-25 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR ACQUIRING IMAGES IN TRANSMISSION OF A RADIATION BODY
US5682036A (en) * 1995-12-29 1997-10-28 Adac Laboratories Method and apparatus for accurately calibrating an attenuation map for emission computed tomography
US5774521A (en) * 1996-07-08 1998-06-30 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Regularization technique for densitometric correction
FR2751109B1 (en) * 1996-07-09 1998-10-09 Ge Medical Syst Sa PROCEDURE FOR LOCATING AN ELEMENT OF INTEREST CONTAINED IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT, IN PARTICULAR DURING AN EXAMINATION OF STEREOTAXIS IN MAMMOGRAPHY
US6380540B1 (en) * 1997-01-29 2002-04-30 Ge Medical Systems Israel, Ltd. Radiation imaging using simultaneous emission and transmission
US7085405B1 (en) * 1997-04-17 2006-08-01 Ge Medical Systems Israel, Ltd. Direct tomographic reconstruction
US5936247A (en) * 1997-06-27 1999-08-10 General Electric Company Imaging attenuation correction mechanism
US5909476A (en) * 1997-09-22 1999-06-01 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Iterative process for reconstructing cone-beam tomographic images
US6740883B1 (en) * 1998-08-14 2004-05-25 Robert Z. Stodilka Application of scatter and attenuation correction to emission tomography images using inferred anatomy from atlas
US6101236A (en) * 1998-10-02 2000-08-08 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Iterative method and apparatus for x-ray computed tomographic fluoroscopy
CA2252993C (en) 1998-11-06 2011-04-19 Universite De Sherbrooke Detector assembly for multi-modality scanners
US6173201B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2001-01-09 V-Target Ltd. Stereotactic diagnosis and treatment with reference to a combined image
US6368331B1 (en) 1999-02-22 2002-04-09 Vtarget Ltd. Method and system for guiding a diagnostic or therapeutic instrument towards a target region inside the patient's body
US6878941B2 (en) * 2002-04-09 2005-04-12 Elgems Ltd. Gamma camera and CT system
US6841782B1 (en) 1999-06-06 2005-01-11 Elgems Ltd. Gamma camera and CT system
US6490476B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2002-12-03 Cti Pet Systems, Inc. Combined PET and X-ray CT tomograph and method for using same
US6459085B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2002-10-01 Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center Depth of interaction system in nuclear imaging
US6603991B1 (en) 1999-11-24 2003-08-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for dual mode medical imaging system
WO2001054579A1 (en) * 2000-01-10 2001-08-02 Super Dimension Ltd. Methods and systems for performing medical procedures with reference to projective images and with respect to pre-stored images
US20050105665A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2005-05-19 Lee Grodzins Detection of neutrons and sources of radioactive material
US20050117683A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2005-06-02 Andrey Mishin Multiple energy x-ray source for security applications
US20080211431A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2008-09-04 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Pulse-to-Pulse-Switchable Multiple-Energy Linear Accelerators Based on Fast RF Power Switching
US7538325B2 (en) * 2000-02-10 2009-05-26 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Single-pulse-switched multiple energy X-ray source applications
EP1269166A2 (en) * 2000-03-28 2003-01-02 American Science &amp; Engineering, Inc. Detection of fissile material
US8325871B2 (en) 2000-03-28 2012-12-04 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Radiation threat detection
WO2004042546A1 (en) 2002-11-04 2004-05-21 V-Target Technologies Ltd. Apparatus and methods for imaging and attenuation correction
US6628983B1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-09-30 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Nuclear imaging systems and methods with feature-enhanced transmission imaging
US6787777B1 (en) * 2000-11-09 2004-09-07 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Nuclear imaging system and method using segmented field of view
US6449331B1 (en) * 2001-01-09 2002-09-10 Cti, Inc. Combined PET and CT detector and method for using same
US6823205B1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2004-11-23 Boston University Radiology Associates Synthetic images for a magnetic resonance imaging scanner using linear combination of source images to generate contrast and spatial navigation
US6670614B1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-12-30 Leonard F. Plut Volume cone beam acquisition on a nuclear spect system using a digital flat panel
US20030128801A1 (en) * 2002-01-07 2003-07-10 Multi-Dimensional Imaging, Inc. Multi-modality apparatus for dynamic anatomical, physiological and molecular imaging
EP1347309A3 (en) * 2002-03-20 2012-04-18 Hitachi, Ltd. Radiological imaging apparatus and method
US7295691B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2007-11-13 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Computer aided diagnosis of an image set
US9958569B2 (en) 2002-07-23 2018-05-01 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Mobile imaging system and method for detection of contraband
US6661866B1 (en) 2002-08-28 2003-12-09 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Integrated CT-PET system
US20040044282A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-04 Mixon Lonnie Mark Medical imaging systems and methods
DE10256075A1 (en) * 2002-11-29 2004-06-17 Siemens Ag Combined emission and computer tomography unit uses smoothed extrapolation processing to produce reconstruction field outside measurement field
JP2006513410A (en) 2003-01-06 2006-04-20 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ Single photon tomography with constant radius
WO2004095066A1 (en) * 2003-04-22 2004-11-04 Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh Attenuation map generation from pet scans
US20040225214A1 (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-11 General Electric Company Method of high-throughput quantitative pet for small animal imaging using a large-bore pet scanner for the assessment of pet tracer performance
IL156569A (en) * 2003-06-22 2009-11-18 Ultraspect Ltd Method of enhancing planar single photon emission imaging
US7343030B2 (en) * 2003-08-05 2008-03-11 Imquant, Inc. Dynamic tumor treatment system
WO2007010534A2 (en) 2005-07-19 2007-01-25 Spectrum Dynamics Llc Imaging protocols
US7560699B2 (en) * 2004-02-25 2009-07-14 Digirad Corporation Small field-of-view detector head (“SPECT”) attenuation correction system
US7352840B1 (en) 2004-06-21 2008-04-01 Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. Micro CT scanners incorporating internal gain charge-coupled devices
US7260174B2 (en) * 2004-09-13 2007-08-21 General Electric Company Direct conversion energy discriminating CT detector with over-ranging correction
US7606347B2 (en) * 2004-09-13 2009-10-20 General Electric Company Photon counting x-ray detector with overrange logic control
US7376894B2 (en) * 2004-11-18 2008-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Vector path merging into gradient elements
EP1844352B1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2010-03-24 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Timing calibration using radioactive sources
US7332724B2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2008-02-19 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for acquiring radiation data
US8073109B2 (en) * 2005-10-05 2011-12-06 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and system for pet image reconstruction using a surogate image
US7869860B2 (en) * 2005-11-14 2011-01-11 University Of Washington Method for enhancing the accuracy of PET/CT images
US7348564B2 (en) * 2005-12-12 2008-03-25 General Electric Company Multi modality imaging methods and apparatus
US7372934B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2008-05-13 General Electric Company Method for performing image reconstruction using hybrid computed tomography detectors
US7486773B2 (en) * 2006-05-09 2009-02-03 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Megavoltage scatter radiation measurement using beam stop array
GB2450073B (en) * 2006-08-25 2009-11-04 Siemens Molecular Imaging Ltd Regional reconstruction of spatially distributed functions
WO2008047270A1 (en) * 2006-10-17 2008-04-24 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Visualization of 3d images in combination with 2d projection images
US7466793B2 (en) * 2006-10-26 2008-12-16 General Electric Company Distinct incident energy spectra detection
JP4575909B2 (en) * 2006-11-22 2010-11-04 ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー X-ray tomography equipment
US8676744B2 (en) * 2007-10-25 2014-03-18 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Physics-based, Bayesian sequential detection method and system for radioactive contraband
CN101848679B (en) * 2007-11-06 2014-08-06 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Nuclear medicine SPECT-CT machine with integrated asymmetric flat panel cone-beam CT and SPECT system
US7613274B2 (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-11-03 General Electric Company Method and system of energy integrating and photon counting using layered photon counting detector
US9575140B2 (en) 2008-04-03 2017-02-21 Covidien Lp Magnetic interference detection system and method
EP2297673B1 (en) 2008-06-03 2020-04-22 Covidien LP Feature-based registration method
US8218847B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2012-07-10 Superdimension, Ltd. Hybrid registration method
WO2010032167A2 (en) * 2008-09-17 2010-03-25 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Mr segmentation using transmission data in hybrid nuclear/mr imaging
CN102934143B (en) * 2008-09-19 2016-04-27 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 For producing the method for decay pattern in PET-MR
US8457430B2 (en) * 2009-08-02 2013-06-04 Mediatek Inc. Region-based method for iterative regularization image enhancement, and associated region-based apparatus and associated processing circuit
DE102010011911B4 (en) * 2010-03-18 2019-09-26 Siemens Healthcare Gmbh Tomosynthesis method with an iterative maximum a posteriori reconstruction
US10670740B2 (en) 2012-02-14 2020-06-02 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Spectral discrimination using wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled scintillation detectors
US9165360B1 (en) 2012-09-27 2015-10-20 Zepmed, Llc Methods, systems, and devices for automated analysis of medical scans
CN103720474B (en) * 2012-10-12 2017-03-01 西门子公司 Calculate inspection parameter
KR20140132829A (en) * 2013-05-07 2014-11-19 삼성전자주식회사 photon counting unit, radiographic imaging apparatus and method for controlling the photon counting unit
JP6162241B2 (en) * 2013-07-25 2017-07-12 株式会社日立製作所 X-ray CT system
US20150123003A1 (en) * 2013-11-06 2015-05-07 University Of Kentucky Research Foundation High resolution absorption imaging using annihilation radiation from an external positron source
US9801597B2 (en) 2014-09-24 2017-10-31 General Electric Company Multi-detector imaging system with x-ray detection
US9968310B2 (en) 2014-09-24 2018-05-15 General Electric Company Multi-detector imaging system with x-ray detection
MX2017012069A (en) 2015-03-20 2018-06-27 Rapiscan Systems Inc Hand-held portable backscatter inspection system.
US10446931B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2019-10-15 Covidien Lp Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same
US10751126B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2020-08-25 Covidien Lp System and method for generating a map for electromagnetic navigation
US10615500B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2020-04-07 Covidien Lp System and method for designing electromagnetic navigation antenna assemblies
US10418705B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2019-09-17 Covidien Lp Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same
US10722311B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2020-07-28 Covidien Lp System and method for identifying a location and/or an orientation of an electromagnetic sensor based on a map
US10792106B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2020-10-06 Covidien Lp System for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system
US10638952B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2020-05-05 Covidien Lp Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system
US10517505B2 (en) 2016-10-28 2019-12-31 Covidien Lp Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for optimizing an electromagnetic navigation system
US10699448B2 (en) 2017-06-29 2020-06-30 Covidien Lp System and method for identifying, marking and navigating to a target using real time two dimensional fluoroscopic data
EP3811117A4 (en) 2018-06-20 2022-03-16 American Science & Engineering, Inc. Wavelength-shifting sheet-coupled scintillation detectors
CN110797120A (en) * 2019-10-23 2020-02-14 苏州大学 Ischemic stroke bad outcome risk prediction device integrating epigenetic factors
CN111568450B (en) * 2020-05-20 2023-04-18 上海联影医疗科技股份有限公司 PET scanning data scattering correction method and device and computer equipment
US11175245B1 (en) 2020-06-15 2021-11-16 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Scatter X-ray imaging with adaptive scanning beam intensity
EP3985416A1 (en) * 2020-10-15 2022-04-20 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Combined imaging detector and imaging system
US11340361B1 (en) 2020-11-23 2022-05-24 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Wireless transmission detector panel for an X-ray scanner

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4633398A (en) * 1983-12-07 1986-12-30 General Electric Company Attenuation compensated emission reconstruction with simultaneous attenuation factor evaluation
US5210421A (en) * 1991-06-10 1993-05-11 Picker International, Inc. Simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3914607A (en) * 1973-12-12 1975-10-21 Industrial Nucleonics Corp Thickness measuring apparatus and method for tire ply and similar materials
US4029963A (en) * 1976-07-30 1977-06-14 The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Junior University X-ray spectral decomposition imaging system
JPS5892974A (en) * 1981-11-30 1983-06-02 Shimadzu Corp Radiation type computer-aided tomograph
US4578803A (en) * 1981-12-07 1986-03-25 Albert Macovski Energy-selective x-ray recording and readout system
SU1405819A1 (en) * 1987-01-20 1988-06-30 Ташкентский Филиал Всесоюзного Научного Центра Хирургии Амн Ссср Transmission/emission computing tomograph
AU5963890A (en) * 1989-06-30 1991-01-17 H. Charles Kaplan Transmission/emission registered image (teri) computed tomography scanners

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4633398A (en) * 1983-12-07 1986-12-30 General Electric Company Attenuation compensated emission reconstruction with simultaneous attenuation factor evaluation
US5210421A (en) * 1991-06-10 1993-05-11 Picker International, Inc. Simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2752948A1 (en) * 1996-09-05 1998-03-06 Smv Int SIMULTANEOUS ACQUISITION OF TRANSMITTED SHOTS AND EMITTED SHOTS FOR A GAMMA CAMERA
US6194724B1 (en) 1996-09-05 2001-02-27 Smv International Simultaneous acquisition of transmitted counts and emitted counts for a gamma camera
WO2007126572A2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-11-08 General Electric Company Image-based material decomposition
WO2007126572A3 (en) * 2006-03-31 2008-10-23 Gen Electric Image-based material decomposition
WO2012010959A3 (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-04-26 Szabolcs Osvath Single photon emission tomography system using a collimator-free gamma camera and method
WO2012147004A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-01 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Multi-energy imaging
US9324142B2 (en) 2011-04-28 2016-04-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Multi-energy imaging
EP2702563B1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2019-11-27 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Multi-energy imaging
US9700264B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2017-07-11 The Johns Hopkins University Joint estimation of tissue types and linear attenuation coefficients for computed tomography

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5376795A (en) 1994-12-27
AU5297793A (en) 1994-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5376795A (en) Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data
US5155365A (en) Emission-transmission imaging system using single energy and dual energy transmission and radionuclide emission data
US6631284B2 (en) Combined PET and X-ray CT tomograph
Kinahan et al. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner
US6399951B1 (en) Simultaneous CT and SPECT tomography using CZT detectors
US5338936A (en) Simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography
US7705316B2 (en) Dynamic SPECT camera
US7968851B2 (en) Dynamic spect camera
EP0526970B1 (en) Imaging methods and apparatus
RU2606561C2 (en) Truncation compensation for iterative reconstruction in computed tomography (ct) with conical beam in combined spect/ct systems
EP0887661B1 (en) Diagnostic imaging
US8472683B2 (en) Motion correction in tomographic images
US7734076B2 (en) Material decomposition image noise reduction
US5818050A (en) Collimator-free photon tomography
Weber et al. Evaluation of the TierPET system
JP2010501856A (en) Artifact correction for motion artifact images
US6429433B1 (en) Continuous rotation sampling scheme for transmission radiation corrected gamma cameras
Jaszczak SPECT: state-of-the-art scanners and reconstruction strategies
Freifelder et al. First results of a dedicated breast PET imager, BPET, using NaI (Tl) curve plate detectors
Hutton et al. SPECT and SPECT/CT
Madhav et al. Initial development of a dual-modality SPECT-CT system for dedicated mammotomography
EP0747728B1 (en) Improved gamma camera imaging system
Ay et al. Pet/Ct
Saha et al. Data Acquisition and Corrections
Hasegawa et al. Physics and history of SPECT/CT

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CZ DE DK ES FI GB HU JP KP KR KZ LK LU MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SK UA VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA