|Publication number||USRE44392 E1|
|Application number||US 12/985,997|
|Publication date||23 Jul 2013|
|Filing date||6 Jan 2011|
|Priority date||16 Mar 2001|
|Also published as||US7220262, US7473269|
|Publication number||12985997, 985997, US RE44392 E1, US RE44392E1, US-E1-RE44392, USRE44392 E1, USRE44392E1|
|Inventors||Richard A. Hynes|
|Original Assignee||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (40), Referenced by (16), Classifications (15), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present inventionThis application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,269 issued on Jan. 6, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference, as if fully set forth herein. U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,269 matured from application Ser. No. 11/132,792 which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/099,797, filed on Mar. 15, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,220,262, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/276,706, filed Mar. 16, 2001.
The present invention relates to medical devices, and, more particularly, to spinal fixation systems and related methods.
Spinal fixation systems may be used to correct and stabilize the position of vertebral segments within a patient's spine. Such correction may be necessary as a result of accidents, degenerative diseases, etc. Typical spine fixation systems in use today include pedicle screws attached to the posterior of a patient's vertebrae in a vertical column along either one or both sides of the spine. A rod is connected to the heads of each pedicle screw in a column to provide support for the spine. Examples of such prior art devices may be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,255 entitled “Spinal Column Retaining Apparatus” to Krag et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,005 entitled “Variable Angle Spinal Fixation System” to Brace et al.
Unfortunately, when the above prior art systems are inserted in a patient, the pedicle screws are typically positioned such that the head of each pedicle screw angles outward away from the center of the spine (i.e., in a lateral orientation). Because of this screw angle and the fact that the support rods are mounted at about the same height as the pedicle screw heads, there is a significant amount of trauma to the back muscles when this system is installed. This, in turn, leads to a significant amount of pain after the surgery as well as a long recovery time.
Another spinal fixation system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,628,740 entitled “Articulating Toggle Bolt Bone Screw” to Mullane. This spinal fixation system is designed for anterior attachment to a patient's spine and includes two columns of screws on either side of the spine with a single support rod as therebetween attached to the screws by clamps, as may be seen in
Another limitation of the above systems is that their support rods are typically formed as a unitary piece. Even though such support rods typically have some degree of flexibility, they may not be able to accommodate spines that require correction in multiple directions.
The invention involves apparatus and method for minimizing the height of profile of spinal implants employed for correcting and stabilizing the position of vertebral segments within a patient's spine. Fasteners are secured in two columns, one on each side of the center of the spine. Cross members are connected to the fasteners and support a spinal rod in space provided by removal of portions of spinous processes involved in the treatment of the patient. In some embodiments, the spinal rod is a one-piece item, and in other embodiments it is a multi-piece assembly with cross supports fixed to longitudinal portions at certain locations and cross supports swiveled to longitudinal portions at other locations. The spinal rod also has portions longitudinally slidable for selectively increasing or decreasing spacing between cross supports. Rotatable or swivel joints are provided according to other features of the invention to enable relative rotation between cross supports about axes of spinal rod portions connecting such cross supports.
Turning now to
One advantage of this configuration is that the support rod may protrude less than with typical prior art systems. This is due partly to the fact that the pedicle screws may be angled so the heads of the screws are angled in toward the center of the spine (i.e., a medialized orientation), causing less interference with the back muscles. Also, during the installation of spinal fixation systems, and as shown in
As mentioned above, poly-axial hinges may be used to attach the pedicle screws to the support rods. More particularly, a pin 27 and locking screw 29 may be used to attach the poly-axial hinge to the screw head, as seen in
Still other embodiments of the invention may be understood with reference to
The articulating spinal fixation systems illustrated in
A key feature of the articulating system according to the invention is that it provides controlled correction at each segment (
If there were no correction of deformity required, the articulating system could easily be allowed to lock by lock screw 51 (
Again, as shown in
It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the articulating system of the present invention allows surgeons greater control in soft bone for degenerative spines. It may further allow greater capture of the pedicle screws in cortical bone for osteopenic patients with less screw pull out. This may allow greater manipulation of deformity in the elderly spine. This may be particularly difficult with prior art systems because of the weakness of the bone which may cause the pedicle screws to cut through or pull out.
Medial orientation of the pedicle screws may also allow coverage over the muscle to be significantly enhanced. Thus, dissection over the posterolateral recess may not be necessary for lateral grafting with a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approach, especially with the advent of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Further, the present invention facilitates the concept of a posterior tension band with anterior column fusion and may also have significant application with regard to absorbable systems, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.
Traditional methods for placement of pedicle screw instrumentation in the lumbar and thoracic spine involve identifying bony landmarks and following a trajectory from posterior lateral to anterior medial, as will be understood by those of skill in the art. A method aspect of the present invention is directed to a method which starts more medially and follows a lateral trajectory for pedicle screw insertion (i.e., posterior medial to anterior lateral). The method of present invention provides several advantages over prior art methods. For example, narrower exposure may be required. That is, traditional methods call for dissection to the tips of the transverse process. This may result in a wide band of muscle that is stripped from the bone, de-innervated, and potentially experiences compromised blood supply. By only exposing to the facet joints, this limitation may be dramatically reduced.
Yet another advantage is that the implant mass may be moved to the midline. Medialized instrumentation places the bulk of the mass more toward the midline where massive structures (like the spinous process) are typically found anyway. This permits the muscles to reapproximate naturally back into position once the instrumentation is placed. Additionally, improved biomechanical control and correction of spinal deformity is facilitated.
Traditionally, lateral positioned pedicle screws have been utilized historically for the past 15 or 20 years. The positioning of the screw involves a starting point at the midportion of the transverse process at the lateral wall midportion of the superior facet. The trajectory really begins anywhere from 30 to 40 degrees lateral to a medial position and in the pedicle, transversing toward the midline of the vertebral body along the cephalad border. This progresses up to the lumbar spine to about a 20 degree position or so at the higher lumbar levels.
The method of medialized pedicle screw instrumentation according to the present invention may improve surgical outcome in the use of instrumentation for patients undergoing lumbar stabilization procedures, for example. It has been identified that the dorsal cortex of the transverse process is a critical area of maintenance of bony structure to facilitate holding of the pedicle screw laterally.
The medialized approach of the present invention involves entering the bony construct from the medial inferior portion on the facet, rather than a lateral position. That is, it involves a different trajectory than with prior art systems. Advantages of this method may include ease of insertion, harder and more abundant cortical bone for fixation of screws, smaller screw sizes, potentially less metal in the spine, more favorable trajectory from medial to lateral to reduce the potential for injury of the neural structures, better muscle coverage, easy metal removal and better muscle physiology.
According to the present invention, a laminectomy dissection may be required, i.e., not a typical lateral dissection for posterolateral screw placement, for example. This facilitates reduced stripping of the paravertebral muscles from the transverse processes and reduced denervation of paravertebral muscles. It has been noted in the past that a typical laminectomy incision is less painful and less debilitating than a typical exposure for a lumbar posterolateral fusion. This represents a marked advantage for patient outcome, recovery and postoperative healing.
An initial starting point is identified at the cephalad border of the pars interarticularis at the junction of the caudal aspect of the inferior facet. Along the pars interarticularis at the cephalad border approximately at the perpendicular midportion of transverse process, the pedicle may be identified. This may be visualized after laminectomy, especially from the medial position. The egressing nerve roots beneath the pedicle from cephalad to an inferolateral direction may easily be identified along with the pedicle cortical medial wall.
Two points of entry are possible, for example. Through standard laminectomy the inferomedial portion of the inferior facet may be removed to prevent any abutment against the screw. This does not necessarily involve any more removal of facet than is done with a typical laminectomy. Using a drill, a small starting point may be made in the cortical bone with the direction approximately neutral to 10 degrees medial and the drill may be directed approximately 10 degrees cephalad. The uppermost screw position may be directed more cephalad based on the preoperative CT scan after approximating the angle of the vertebral body endplate compared to the perpendicular.
Using the drill lightly, a small opening may be made in the cortical bone drilling in the appropriate trajectory. Next, appropriate, sharp bone taps may be used because of the greater content of cortical bone in this region. Forces are preferably directed away from the cauda equina in the trajectory. To avoid any facet impingement, by starting the entry, slight caudal pointing to the above starting point at the cephalad border of the pars interarticularis and then angling in the cephalad direction approximately 20 degrees may be performed. This may create a cephalad angulation of the screw and thereby alleviate abutment of the inferior articulating facet.
The lower levels to be included in the fusion need not be of concern, since these facet joints may be included in the fusion mass itself. By way of example, 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm screws can fit in this trajectory fairly well. With anterior column support, such as allograft or cage, smaller size screws may be used, such as 4.0 or 4.5 mm, for example. Of course, other screw sizes may also be used in accordance with the present invention. Generally, the smaller the screw size, the easier the insertion and the greater the range for placement of the screw.
Because of the above trajectory and because of the significant increased amount of cortical bone, the typical 40 to 45 mm length screws used for lateral position may not be required. For example, it has been found that 25 mm screws facilitate excellent hold in this position because of the increased cortical bone. Yet, screws longer than 25 to 30 millimeters are not preferred for secondary to possible lateral exit or penetration of the vertebral body margin. Bicortical purchase, of course, is an option of the surgeon and certainly can be accomplished with careful technique, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.
Once the pedicle screws are positioned bilaterally, it is noted that the articulating heads of the M-8 system, for example, may be more centralized and approximate the area of the spinous process rather than lateral to the facet obstructing the paravertebral muscles. This facilitates greater ease of instrumentation. The surgeon may not be required to pull the paravertebral muscles laterally trying to access a lateral starting point. In patients with very deep spine dissections, this may facilitate a much greater ease of the instrumentation because the instrumentation is placed centrally and the surgeon can work from one side of the table.
The rods may be placed in the usual fashion with a typical medialized approach or a central construct system. The central mass of metal is now in a natural physiologic position (spinous process mass) thereby being recognized as a normal physiologic position to the paravertebral muscles. Next, the rods may be placed from cephalad to caudad or transversely based on a new concept of the central construct system.
Cross rods or links may also be utilized in a more rigid fashion with an inverted “V” relationship of the screws to the spine. Once again, the mass of metal may remain centralized. The paravertebral muscle may easily reapproximate with a low profile system, such as that of the present invention. There is a normal physiological position over the facet with the ease of closure of the wound. Normal tension of the paravertebral muscles may be recreated, which is not possible with a lateral position screw system.
Furthermore, there may be less “dead space” for wound healing beneath the spinal fixation systems of the present invention compared to a lateral construct. Again, this facilitates less postoperative drainage, seroma and other possible complications of hematoma. The initial recovery is facilitated to a significant degree due to the method and systems of the present invention. The above method may be used in conjunction with the PLIF technique with anterior construct and/or a facet fusion from a medialized approach rather than a posterolateral fusion.
It is believed that there will be a learning curve to developing the appropriate surgical technique to facilitate the above methods, and it is recommended appropriate instruction be done with cadaveric work before instrumentation with patients. This method for medialized pedicle instrumentation according to the present invention differs from the classic lateral position screw technique in that:
If the surgeon elects to continue with posterolateral intertransverse process fusion, the medial approach allows for significant exposure of the posterior bony areas for fusion compared to the typical lateral constructs. The medialized approach potentially represents a marked advantage and improvement over the standard technique of lateral positioning for the care of patients with lumbar disorders and facilitates minimal access to the clinical surgical approach to the lumbar spine. The construct of
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that other modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims, in some of which the term “motion segment” is to be understood as a location in the spine where motion is achieved through a combination of two vertebral bodies with an intervertebral disc in-between.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4003376||25 Aug 1975||18 Jan 1977||Bio-Dynamics, Inc.||Apparatus for straightening the spinal column|
|US4369769||13 Jun 1980||25 Jan 1983||Edwards Charles C||Spinal fixation device and method|
|US4662365||1 Dec 1983||5 May 1987||Ortopedia Gmbh||Device for the external fixation of bone fragments|
|US4697582||24 Oct 1984||6 Oct 1987||Peze William||Appliance for correcting rachidial deformities|
|US5254118||4 Dec 1991||19 Oct 1993||Srdjian Mirkovic||Three dimensional spine fixation system|
|US5261912||15 Aug 1991||16 Nov 1993||Synthes (U.S.A.)||Implant for an osteosynthesis device, in particular for spinal column correction|
|US5387212 *||26 Jan 1993||7 Feb 1995||Yuan; Hansen A.||Vertebral locking and retrieving system with central locking rod|
|US5437669 *||12 Aug 1993||1 Aug 1995||Amei Technologies Inc.||Spinal fixation systems with bifurcated connectors|
|US5437671||7 Mar 1994||1 Aug 1995||Zimmer, Inc.||Perpendicular rod connector for spinal fixation device|
|US5466238 *||22 Dec 1994||14 Nov 1995||Lin; Chih-I||Vertebral locking and retrieving system having a fixation crossbar|
|US5470333 *||10 Jun 1993||28 Nov 1995||Danek Medical, Inc.||System for stabilizing the cervical and the lumbar region of the spine|
|US5474551||18 Nov 1994||12 Dec 1995||Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.||Universal coupler for spinal fixation|
|US5486174||23 Feb 1994||23 Jan 1996||Soprane S.A.||Fastener for the osteosynthesis of the spinal column|
|US5507747||12 Apr 1995||16 Apr 1996||Yuan; Hansen A.||Vertebral fixation device|
|US5514132||19 Jan 1993||7 May 1996||Jbs S.A.||Spinal osteosynthesis device|
|US5531745||14 Nov 1994||2 Jul 1996||Danek Medical, Inc.||System for stabilizing the spine and reducing spondylolisthesis|
|US5531747 *||30 May 1995||2 Jul 1996||Danek Medical Inc.||System for stabilizing the spine and reducing spondylolisthesis|
|US5591165||15 Oct 1993||7 Jan 1997||Sofamor, S.N.C.||Apparatus and method for spinal fixation and correction of spinal deformities|
|US5628740||30 Jun 1995||13 May 1997||Mullane; Thomas S.||Articulating toggle bolt bone screw|
|US5667506 *||14 Mar 1995||16 Sep 1997||Danek Medical, Inc.||Spinal rod transverse connector for supporting vertebral fixation elements|
|US5688275||9 Feb 1996||18 Nov 1997||Koros; Tibor||Spinal column rod fixation system|
|US5702392||25 Sep 1995||30 Dec 1997||Wu; Shing-Sheng||Coupling plate for spinal correction and a correction device of using the same|
|US5728097 *||9 Jul 1996||17 Mar 1998||Sdgi Holding, Inc.||Method for subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation|
|US5741255||5 Jun 1996||21 Apr 1998||Acromed Corporation||Spinal column retaining apparatus|
|US5876403||4 Sep 1997||2 Mar 1999||Robert Reid Inc.||Bone-fixing devices|
|US6053917||9 Mar 1999||25 Apr 2000||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Multi-axial bone screw assembly|
|US6063089||13 Apr 1998||16 May 2000||Spinal Concepts, Inc.||Side mounted polyaxial pedicle screw|
|US6113601||12 Jun 1998||5 Sep 2000||Bones Consulting, Llc||Polyaxial pedicle screw having a loosely coupled locking cap|
|US6139548||13 Apr 1998||31 Oct 2000||Spinal Concepts, Inc.||Sliding shaft variable length cross-link device for use with dual rod apparatus|
|US6146383||1 Feb 1999||14 Nov 2000||Sulzer Orthopadie Ag||Pivotal securing system at a bone screw|
|US6187005||9 Sep 1999||13 Feb 2001||Synthes (Usa)||Variable angle spinal fixation system|
|US6224597||13 Aug 1999||1 May 2001||Wesley L. Coker||Vertebral triplaner alignment method|
|US6231575||16 Aug 1999||15 May 2001||Martin H. Krag||Spinal column retainer|
|US6261288||8 Feb 2000||17 Jul 2001||Roger P. Jackson||Implant stabilization and locking system|
|US6296644 *||25 Feb 2000||2 Oct 2001||Jean Saurat||Spinal instrumentation system with articulated modules|
|US6454769 *||2 Jun 1998||24 Sep 2002||Spinal Concepts, Inc.||System and method for stabilizing the human spine with a bone plate|
|US6575899 *||20 Oct 2000||10 Jun 2003||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Methods and instruments for endoscopic interbody surgical techniques|
|EP0465158B1||28 Jun 1991||22 Jan 1997||Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mehdian||Apparatus for use in the treatment of spinal disorders|
|FR2624720A1||Title not available|
|WO2001054597A1||26 Jan 2001||2 Aug 2001||Scient'x||Intervertebral linking device with connecting bar for fixing a linking rod|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8828058||1 Sep 2010||9 Sep 2014||Kspine, Inc.||Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control|
|US8920472||18 Apr 2013||30 Dec 2014||Kspine, Inc.||Spinal correction and secondary stabilization|
|US9011491||9 Jan 2012||21 Apr 2015||K Spine, Inc.||Facet device and method|
|US9078685||5 Jul 2012||14 Jul 2015||Globus Medical, Inc.||Method and system for performing invasive medical procedures using a surgical robot|
|US9113959||10 Sep 2014||25 Aug 2015||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction and secondary stabilization|
|US9168071||15 Sep 2009||27 Oct 2015||K2M, Inc.||Growth modulation system|
|US9173681||20 Dec 2012||3 Nov 2015||K2M, Inc.||Alignment system with longitudinal support features|
|US9333009||1 Jun 2012||10 May 2016||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction system actuators|
|US9358044||20 Dec 2012||7 Jun 2016||K2M, Inc.||Semi-constrained anchoring system|
|US9408638||29 Jan 2016||9 Aug 2016||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction system actuators|
|US9439690 *||20 Jul 2015||13 Sep 2016||Globus Medical, Inc.||Lamina implant and method|
|US9451997||18 Mar 2015||27 Sep 2016||K2M, Inc.||Facet device and method|
|US9468468||21 Nov 2011||18 Oct 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse connector for spinal stabilization system|
|US9468469||17 Sep 2013||18 Oct 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods|
|US9468471||17 Sep 2013||18 Oct 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods|
|US9510865||8 Sep 2014||6 Dec 2016||K2M, Inc.||Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control|
|U.S. Classification||606/279, 606/250|
|International Classification||A61B17/70, A61B17/88|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B17/7041, A61B17/7025, A61B17/7013, A61B17/7014, A61B17/7038, A61B17/7034, A61B17/7005, A61B17/7043, A61B17/7011, A61B17/7071, A61B17/7023|
|9 Jun 2015||CC||Certificate of correction|
|6 Jul 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8