|Publication number||US6594665 B1|
|Application number||US 09/608,736|
|Publication date||15 Jul 2003|
|Filing date||30 Jun 2000|
|Priority date||18 Feb 2000|
|Publication number||09608736, 608736, US 6594665 B1, US 6594665B1, US-B1-6594665, US6594665 B1, US6594665B1|
|Inventors||Kurt E. Sowa, Christopher M. McAllen|
|Original Assignee||Intel Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (107), Classifications (9), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/183,557, filed Feb. 18, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Contained herein is material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction of the patent disclosure by any person as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all rights to the copyright whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to hashing and searching techniques. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for locating data utilizing a stored hash values derived from the data.
2. Description of the Related Art
FIG. 1 illustrates a general directory hierarchy that may exist in a prior art computer file system, such as a file system utilized under any of the Windows® platforms, and the progression through the directory hierarchy traversed in performing a search for a file or directory. A user may enter a file path character string such as indicated by file path 105 when using the find function provided with the operating system, or the user may click on a shortcut resident on the computer desktop which will invoke the operating system's search function to find the file according to a preset file path 105. FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating prior art search processing that may be followed.
After a file path search string 105 is received in block 205, the search processing begins in the Root Directory page 110. In block 210, the first entry in the Root Directory page, “Program_Files” 111 is read. The character string, “My_Documents,” from the file path 105 is compared to the first Root Directory page entry in block 220. Since the two character strings do not match, the processing proceeds, as shown in decision block 230, back to block 210 where the next character string 112 in the Root Directory page 110 is read and the comparison processing of block 220 is repeated for the second entry in the Root Directory page 110. Since “My_Documents” 112 in the Root Directory page 110 matches the Root Directory file path character string, the processing for this directory page is complete as indicated by block 240. The search processing proceeds to the My Documents Directory page 120 where FIG. 2 processing is repeated by comparing data elements 121, 122 & 123 with the search character string “Word_Files” until a match is found between the file path directory name, “Word_Files” and the third entry 123. Next, the same processing is repeated for both the Word Files Directory page 130 and the Reports Directory page 140 until the “Intel_Persistant_Storage.doc” file name 141 is located. Presumably, the filename contains a pointer to the actual file permitting it to be retrieved.
One draw back of searching using character strings is the time and processing capacity necessary to perform the multiple comparisons. For instance, using a 32 bit processor only 4 characters of a character string may be transferred over a processor bus every processor cycle. Accordingly, even if it assumed that the comparison between the character strings require no extra cycles for comparison processing, a total of 7 cycles would be required just to access the character string, “Intel_Persistent_Storage.doc” 141 from the Reports directory page 140. This problem is compounded as the numbers of comparisons performed to find a match are increased. For example, the file path search discussed above and illustrated in, FIG. 1 would require 41 cycles using a 32 bit processor just to access all necessary character strings. The problem is compounded in that character strings may be very long. For instance, file names of up to 512 characters are supported in the Windows® environment.
Hashing is a common and well known method of storing data that facilitates quick access of the data. Hashing generally involves the transformation of data, such as a character string that has meaning to a user, into a value or number that identifies the location of the corresponding data in a structure called a hash table. For example, a hash value of 116 might signify the 116th row in the related hash table. In order to find the data associated with hash value 116, it is not necessary to search through a list of hash values until the hash value 116 is located, rather the 116th row in the table need only be accessed to find the desired data element or a pointer thereto. In certain instances, two data elements may have the same hash value requiring a mechanism whereby a compare is performed to distinguish between the data elements to determine which data element is desired.
The method of using the hash value to look up data in a hash table requires the creation of a hash table with as many rows as there are possible hash values and the reservation of physical memory space related to the operation and management thereof. Therefore, this method of accessing data may not be practical in situations where the number of distinct data elements and the hash values associated therewith are extremely large or practically unbounded requiring the reservation of a significant amount of memory space.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
FIG. 1 is a bock diagram illustrating a prior art file directory hierarchy as may be present in a prior art file management architecture.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating prior art search processing.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of an exemplary computer system on which embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a file directory hierarchy as may be utilized according to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 5 is an exemplary software architecture under which embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
FIG. 6A is a flow diagram illustrating hash search processing according to one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6B is a flow diagram illustrating hash search processing according to another embodiment of the present invention.
A method and apparatus are described for providing an efficient manner to locate data in a memory device. According to various aspects of the present invention, the use of a stored hash allows faster comparisons and therefore more efficient location and retrieval of values from memory.
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The invention is described herein primarily in terms of a file directory system utilized to access file and directory stored in memory. The invention is, however, not limited to this particular embodiment alone. For instance, the claimed method and apparatus may be used in conjunction with a database where it is necessary to search fields to locate desired database records. It is contemplated that embodiments of the invention will have applicability in any computer-based product that requires data to be searched and located. In this vain, the detailed description provided herein is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed. To the contrary, embodiments of the claims have been contemplated that encompass the full breadth of the claim language. Accordingly, the present invention may be practiced without some of the specific detail provided herein.
The present invention includes various steps, which will be described below. The steps of the present invention may be performed by hardware components or may be embodied in machine-executable instructions, which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor or logic circuits programmed with the instructions to perform the steps. Alternatively, the steps may be performed by a combination of hardware and software.
The present invention may be provided as a computer program product, which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to the present invention. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. Moreover, the present invention may; also be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection). Accordingly, herein, a carrier wave shall be regarded as comprising a machine-readable medium.
In one preferred embodiment, the invention is incorporated into a flash memory management system utilized in conjunction with an apparatus running in a Windows CE® (or equivalent) environment.
An Exemplary Computer System
FIG. 3 is an example of a typical computer system upon which one embodiment of the present invention may be implemented.
Computer system 300 comprises a bus or other communication means 301 for communicating information, and a processing means such as processor 302 coupled with bus 301 for processing information. Computer system 300 further comprises a random access memory (RAM), flash memory, or other dynamic storage device 304 (referred to as main memory), coupled to bus 301 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 302. Main memory 304 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 302. Computer system 300 may also comprise a read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 306 coupled to bus 301 for storing static information and instructions for processor 302. A data storage device 307 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 300 for storing information and instructions. In certain architectures, such as a computer running Windows CE®, main memory 304 may consist of one or more flash memory devices with the one or more flash memory devices performing all the functions of the ROM 306, main memory 304, and the mass storage device 307
Computer system 300 can also be coupled via bus 301 to a display device 321, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), for displaying information to an end user. Typically, an alphanumeric input device 322, including alphanumeric and other keys, may be coupled to bus 301 for communicating information and/or command selections to processor 302. Another type of user input device that may be included in the computer system 300 is a cursor control 323, such as a mouse, a trackball, a pen in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 302 and for controlling cursor movement on display 321.
A communication device 325.is also coupled to bus 301. The communication device 325 may include a modem, a network interface card, or other well-known interface devices, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of physical attachment for purposes of providing a communication link to support a local or wide area network, for example. In this manner, the computer system 300 may be coupled to a number of clients and/or servers via a conventional network infrastructure, such as a company's Intranet and/or the Internet, for example.
It is appreciated that a lesser or more equipped computer system than the example described above may be desirable for certain implementations. Therefore, the configuration of computer system 300 will vary from implementation to implementation depending upon numerous factors, such as price constraints, performance requirements, technological improvements, and/or other circumstances.
It should be noted that, while the steps described herein may be performed under the control of a programmed processor, such as processor 302, in alternative embodiments, the steps may be fully or partially implemented by any programmable or hardcoded logic, such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), TTL logic, or Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), for example. Additionally, the method of the present invention may be performed by any combination of programmed general-purpose computer components and/or custom hardware components. Therefore, nothing disclosed herein should be construed as limiting the present invention to a particular embodiment wherein the recited steps are performed by a specific combination of hardware components.
An Exemplary Data Format
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a file directory hierarchy as may be utilized according to one embodiment of the invention. For ease of comparison, the hypothetical directory pages and entries therein are identical to those illustrated in prior art FIG. 1. The primary distinction between the manner in which data elements are stored in FIG. 1 and FIG. 4 is the addition of hash values stored on the same lines of the directory tables as the directory or file names from which they were derived. In other embodiments, the hash values may be associated with their respective data elements by way of pointers.
The hash values may be derived from their respective data elements using any number of functions that are well known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the function may be such that an essentially unique hash value is created for each applicable data element. In other embodiments, more than one data element may share the same hash value, thereby requiring a comparison to be performed between the search data element and the stored data element to validate any hash value match. It is to be appreciated that the hash function may be tuned for maximum performance by balancing the average number of hash value searches that will need to be performed to generate a hash value match with the number of data element comparisons that will need to be performed to validate the hash value match when more than one data element might have the same hash value. In the FIG. 4 example, an extremely simple hash function was applied to the directory and file names for purposes of illustration: the numerical representations of the first and fifth alphanumeric characters were added together. As can be ascertained upon reviewing FIG. 4, there are two directory names that share the same hash value, but they are located in separate directory pages.
In a preferred embodiment, the hash values are comprised of integers, which facilitate quick comparison, although the hash values comprising other formats are possible. Unlike character strings, which often must be accessed over multiple processor cycles, as discussed above, integer values will typically be accessed in a single processor cycle. Advantageously, the number of cycles required to compare a hash value derived from a search term character string and a stored hash value derived from a stored character string is often significantly less than a direct compare of two character strings as will become apparent infra in a discussion of the exemplary search processing utilized in conjunction with the described data formats.
An Exemplary Software Architecture
FIG. 5 is an exemplary software architecture under which embodiments of the invention may be practiced. It is noted that other software architectures may be utilized in implementing embodiments of the invention as would be obvious to one skilled in the art.
The file manager module 510 provides a mechanism for managing files, folders and directories with regard to their organization and storage in memory 520. The Create File/Directory Routine 530 is typically a component of the File Manager 510 that facilitates the creation and storage of new files and directories. In embodiments of the invention, the Create File/Directory Routine 530 would perform a hash function on the names of newly created files and directories to generate associated hash values. These hash values are stored in memory 520 in an associative relationship with the file and directory names from which they were derived. In some embodiments, a hash value may be stored in the same memory location as the file or directory name from which it was derived. In other embodiments, the hash value may be stored with a locator or pointer to the memory location of the associated file or directory name.
The search module 540 performs the function of locating files and directories in memory 520. It performs a hash function on the search term that is the same or similar to the hash function utilized by the Create File/Directory Routine 530 to create a search hash value. It then accesses the memory 520 directly or through the File Manager 510 to locate the file and/or directory names that match the provided search term using the search hash values as the basis for the comparisons. The file or directory names are typically associated with pointers or locators so that an associated file or directory can be accessed once the desired file or directory name is located.
Exemplary Search Processing
FIG. 6A and 6B describe exemplarily search processing of two embodiments of the invention in the context of a file/directory search. Both figures are described herein with reference to the directory structure illustrated in FIG. 4.
First, a search term is received such as the file path 405 of FIG. 4. In block 610, one or more hash values are generated for the search data. The file path may be parsed and a hash value generated for each directory level in the file path name as shown by element 406, which represents the respective hash values of file path 405. A file path name or a portion thereof may be entered into a search mechanism provided by an operating system, an extension thereof, or an independent application. Additionally, in a GUI environment such as Windows® a file path, such as file path 405, may be invoked when a user clicks upon a shortcut icon appearing in a file folder or on the desktop. As would be intuitive to someone skilled in the art, the search term need not be limited to exact file path names and could comprise any portion of the desired file or directory. For example, a user might search for all files and/or directories containing the term “Intel.”
In block 615, a first stored hash value is accessed from memory. In the FIG. 4 example, the stored hash value “34” associated with the directory “Program_Files” 411 would be accessed. The hash value “28” representing the “My_Documents” term in file path 405 is compared with the accessed hash value of “34” in block 620. Since the terms do not match as determined in block 625, the processing sequence loops back to block 615 where the next hash value is accessed. In the FIG. 4 example, the stored hash value “28” associated with the “My_Documents” element 412 is read. The stored hash value is compared to the hash value “28” of file path 405 and a match is found.
In an embodiment of the invention where the hash value is not necessarily a unique representation of each file or directory, it is necessary to access the file/directory name associated with the hash value “28” as shown in block 630, and compare the stored file/directory name with the relevant search term. In the FIG. 4 example, a character string compare is performed to verify that the “My_Documents” character string as it appears in the search file path 405 matches the stored directory name, “My_Documents” 412. In this example the character strings match, indicating that the appropriate directory has been located in the Root Directory page 410, and the search processing can proceed to the My Documents Directory page 420 to locate the directory/file name contained therein that matches the term, “Word_Files” from file path 405. Ultimately, the processing will proceed through the various directory pages of FIG. 4 until the file “Intel_Persistant_Storage.doc” 441 is located.
If the names fail to match in block 635 despite having the same hash value, as would be the case in a search for the directory name “Power_Point_Files” performed in the Root Directory page 410, the search processing would loop back to block 615 and access the next hash value in the Root Directory page 410.
The number of processor cycles required to complete the search indicated by file path 405 utilizing the search processing exemplified in FIG. 6A is significantly less than is required to perform the same search using the prior art file/directory structure of FIG. 1 and the prior art search processing of FIG. 2. For example, only 17 processor cycles would be required complete the search: 10 cycles to access all of the necessary hash values, and an additional 7cycles to access the file name, “Intel_Persistant_Storage.doc” 141 to perform the match validation.
In the described examples, the search hash value has been identical to the hash value of the stored file/directory name. This need not be the case in all embodiments of the invention. In certain instances a match condition in block 625 might be satisfied when the two compared hash values are not identical but meet certain match criteria. One can surmise that it would be likely that a search term comprising a partial file name would not always generate the same hash value as the complete file name, yet it may desirable to be able to search for files using partial file names.
FIG. 6B illustrates search processing similar to that illustrated in the FIG. 6A flow diagram save for the storage locations of the stored hash values and the data elements they were derived from. In FIG. 6A, the hash values are stored in the same location as their associated data elements. Only the hash portion is accessed by processing block 615 as is necessary to perform the hash value compare. Similarly, only the data element portion is accessed by processing block 630 when performing the data element compare. In FIG. 6B, the hash value and the data element from which it is derived are stored in separate memory locations. A locator or pointer is stored with each hash value that indicates the location in memory of its associated data element.
The invention as embodied by the claims has applicability in a number of areas beyond the file management context as would be obvious to someone with skill in the art. For instance, the hash values could be generated and stored in association with database fields, wherein searches of said fields could be accomplished using hash values to identify the database records containing the desired search information. Ultimately, claimed embodiments of the invention have applicability in any software product that requires the lookup of data.
The description provided herein has been discussed in terms of a sequential search methodology performed on directory pages. It is to be understood that other embodiments of the invention may utilize other search methodologies that are not necessarily sequential as would be obvious to one skilled in the art.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5542087 *||15 Oct 1993||30 Jul 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||Linear hashing for distributed records|
|US5893086 *||11 Jul 1997||6 Apr 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Parallel file system and method with extensible hashing|
|US6115802 *||3 Mar 1998||5 Sep 2000||Sun Mircrosystems, Inc.||Efficient hash table for use in multi-threaded environments|
|US6212521 *||27 Mar 1998||3 Apr 2001||Fujitsu Limited||Data management system, primary server, and secondary server for data registration and retrieval in distributed environment|
|US6212525 *||24 Feb 1999||3 Apr 2001||Apple Computer, Inc.||Hash-based system and method with primary and secondary hash functions for rapidly identifying the existence and location of an item in a file|
|US6243720 *||14 Jul 2000||5 Jun 2001||Nortel Networks Limited||Address translation method and system having a forwarding table data structure|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7120625 *||17 May 2002||10 Oct 2006||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for document information management|
|US7143113 *||21 Dec 2001||28 Nov 2006||Cybersoft, Inc.||Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for securing and maintaining computer systems and storage media|
|US7143146 *||20 Aug 2003||28 Nov 2006||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US7284041||9 Aug 2005||16 Oct 2007||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US7363352||19 Jul 2006||22 Apr 2008||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US7363378||1 Jul 2003||22 Apr 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Transport system for instant messaging|
|US7373514||23 Jul 2003||13 May 2008||Intel Corporation||High-performance hashing system|
|US7409526 *||28 Oct 2003||5 Aug 2008||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Partial key hashing memory|
|US7412449 *||23 May 2003||12 Aug 2008||Sap Aktiengesellschaft||File object storage and retrieval using hashing techniques|
|US7433700||12 Nov 2004||7 Oct 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Strategies for peer-to-peer instant messaging|
|US7469260||28 Aug 2003||23 Dec 2008||Hitachi, Ltd.||File storage service system, file management device, file management method, ID denotative NAS server and file reading method|
|US7529255||21 Apr 2005||5 May 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Peer-to-peer multicasting using multiple transport protocols|
|US7539727 *||1 Jul 2003||26 May 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Instant messaging object store|
|US7548959||4 Mar 2008||16 Jun 2009||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US7568191 *||30 Jan 2004||28 Jul 2009||Ati Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for superword register value numbering|
|US7568193||28 Jan 2004||28 Jul 2009||Ati Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for static single assignment form dead code elimination|
|US7613701 *||22 Dec 2004||3 Nov 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Matching of complex nested objects by multilevel hashing|
|US7647317||30 Mar 2007||12 Jan 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Search techniques for page-based document layouts|
|US7660819 *||31 Jul 2000||9 Feb 2010||Alion Science And Technology Corporation||System for similar document detection|
|US7661134 *||21 Dec 2001||9 Feb 2010||Cybersoft, Inc.||Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for securing computer networks|
|US7720930 *||30 Dec 2003||18 May 2010||Intel Corporation||Systems and methods using NIC-based prefetching for host TCP context lookup|
|US7747582||5 Apr 2007||29 Jun 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|US7774385||2 Jul 2007||10 Aug 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Techniques for providing a surrogate heuristic identification interface|
|US7792810 *||5 Apr 2007||7 Sep 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|US7801868||5 Apr 2007||21 Sep 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|US7814070||5 Apr 2007||12 Oct 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|US7814079 *||22 Feb 2007||12 Oct 2010||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for managing file|
|US7814129||10 Mar 2006||12 Oct 2010||Ross Neil Williams||Method and apparatus for storing data with reduced redundancy using data clusters|
|US7840540 *||20 Apr 2006||23 Nov 2010||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|US7895651||29 Jul 2005||22 Feb 2011||Bit 9, Inc.||Content tracking in a network security system|
|US7979665 *||23 Dec 2004||12 Jul 2011||Emc Corporation||Method and apparatus for processing access requests in a computer system|
|US7991206||2 Jul 2007||2 Aug 2011||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate heuristic identification|
|US8024307 *||27 Nov 2007||20 Sep 2011||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Information processing apparatus and information processing method|
|US8051252||10 Mar 2006||1 Nov 2011||Ross Neil Williams||Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of subblocks in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|US8060749 *||3 Feb 2010||15 Nov 2011||Panasonic Corporation||Authenticated program execution method|
|US8095803 *||9 Mar 2007||10 Jan 2012||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Protecting the privacy of files referenced by their hash|
|US8131724||21 Dec 2009||6 Mar 2012||Alion Science And Technology Corporation||System for similar document detection|
|US8156132||2 Jul 2007||10 Apr 2012||Pinehill Technology, Llc||Systems for comparing image fingerprints|
|US8171004 *||5 Apr 2007||1 May 2012||Pinehill Technology, Llc||Use of hash values for identification and location of content|
|US8171084||20 Jan 2004||1 May 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Custom emoticons|
|US8185507 *||5 Apr 2007||22 May 2012||Pinehill Technology, Llc||System and method for identifying substantially similar files|
|US8185635||21 Apr 2008||22 May 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Transport system for instant messaging|
|US8190573||4 Dec 2008||29 May 2012||Hitachi, Ltd.||File storage service system, file management device, file management method, ID denotative NAS server and file reading method|
|US8214607||7 Jul 2011||3 Jul 2012||Ross Neil Williams||Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of subblocks in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|US8272058||29 Jul 2005||18 Sep 2012||Bit 9, Inc.||Centralized timed analysis in a network security system|
|US8356021 *||10 Mar 2006||15 Jan 2013||Ross Neil Williams||Method and apparatus for indexing in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|US8381290 *||17 Jul 2009||19 Feb 2013||Exelis Inc.||Intrusion detection systems and methods|
|US8463000||2 Jul 2007||11 Jun 2013||Pinehill Technology, Llc||Content identification based on a search of a fingerprint database|
|US8549022||2 Jul 2007||1 Oct 2013||Datascout, Inc.||Fingerprint generation of multimedia content based on a trigger point with the multimedia content|
|US8560546||1 Feb 2012||15 Oct 2013||Alion Science And Technology Corporation||System for similar document detection|
|US8700573||21 May 2012||15 Apr 2014||Hitachi, Ltd.||File storage service system, file management device, file management method, ID denotative NAS server and file reading method|
|US8732245 *||7 Feb 2003||20 May 2014||Blackberry Limited||Method, system and computer software product for pre-selecting a folder for a message|
|US8775467 *||29 Apr 2009||8 Jul 2014||Blackberry Limited||System and method for linking an address|
|US8924439 *||1 Sep 2009||30 Dec 2014||Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.||System for and method of partial file hashing|
|US8924741||29 Dec 2012||30 Dec 2014||Intel Corporation||Instruction and logic to provide SIMD secure hashing round slice functionality|
|US8984636||29 Jul 2005||17 Mar 2015||Bit9, Inc.||Content extractor and analysis system|
|US9020964||2 Jul 2007||28 Apr 2015||Pinehill Technology, Llc||Generation of fingerprints for multimedia content based on vectors and histograms|
|US9027104||15 Mar 2013||5 May 2015||Intel Corporation||Instructions processors, methods, and systems to process secure hash algorithms|
|US9063947 *||24 Oct 2008||23 Jun 2015||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Detecting duplicative hierarchical sets of files|
|US9231615 *||24 Oct 2012||5 Jan 2016||Seagate Technology Llc||Method to shorten hash chains in Lempel-Ziv compression of data with repetitive symbols|
|US9251377||28 Dec 2012||2 Feb 2016||Intel Corporation||Instructions processors, methods, and systems to process secure hash algorithms|
|US9542561||1 Feb 2016||10 Jan 2017||Intel Corporation||Instructions processors, methods, and systems to process secure hash algorithms|
|US9613010||7 Jul 2014||4 Apr 2017||Blackberry Limited||System and method for linking an address|
|US20030093417 *||17 May 2002||15 May 2003||Hideko Kagimasa||Method and apparatus for document information management|
|US20030120953 *||21 Dec 2001||26 Jun 2003||Cybersoft, Inc||Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for securing computer networks|
|US20030140049 *||21 Dec 2001||24 Jul 2003||Cybersoft, Inc.||Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for securing and maintaining computer systems and storage media|
|US20040098544 *||15 Nov 2002||20 May 2004||Gaither Blaine D.||Method and apparatus for managing a memory system|
|US20040181605 *||20 Aug 2003||16 Sep 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US20040236761 *||23 May 2003||25 Nov 2004||Hans-Joachim Both||File system storage|
|US20050004993 *||1 Jul 2003||6 Jan 2005||Miller David Michael||Instant messaging object store|
|US20050005014 *||1 Jul 2003||6 Jan 2005||John Holmes||Transport system for instant messaging|
|US20050044134 *||23 Jul 2003||24 Feb 2005||Krueger Jon H.||High-performance hashing system|
|US20050166194 *||28 Jan 2004||28 Jul 2005||Ati Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for static single assignment form dead code elimination|
|US20050198400 *||30 Dec 2003||8 Sep 2005||Intel Corporation, A Delaware Corporation||Systems and methods using nic-based prefetching for host TCP context lookup|
|US20050198468 *||30 Jan 2004||8 Sep 2005||Ati Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for superword register value numbering|
|US20050267982 *||9 Aug 2005||1 Dec 2005||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US20060026236 *||7 Feb 2003||2 Feb 2006||Research In Motion Limited||Method, system and computer software product for pre-selecting a folder for a message|
|US20060072563 *||5 Oct 2004||6 Apr 2006||Regnier Greg J||Packet processing|
|US20060136390 *||22 Dec 2004||22 Jun 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for matching of complex nested objects by multilevel hashing|
|US20060173913 *||23 Jan 2006||3 Aug 2006||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image Processing Apparatus and Image Processing Method|
|US20060173960 *||12 Nov 2004||3 Aug 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Strategies for peer-to-peer instant messaging|
|US20060239275 *||21 Apr 2005||26 Oct 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Peer-to-peer multicasting using multiple transport protocols|
|US20060259611 *||19 Jul 2006||16 Nov 2006||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US20060271540 *||10 Mar 2006||30 Nov 2006||Williams Ross N||Method and apparatus for indexing in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|US20060282457 *||10 Mar 2006||14 Dec 2006||Williams Ross N||Method and apparatus for storing data with reduced redundancy using data clusters|
|US20070192548 *||10 Mar 2006||16 Aug 2007||Williams Ross N||Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of subblocks in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|US20070250521 *||20 Apr 2006||25 Oct 2007||Kaminski Charles F Jr||Surrogate hashing|
|US20070276793 *||22 Feb 2007||29 Nov 2007||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for managing file|
|US20080147662 *||27 Nov 2007||19 Jun 2008||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Information processing apparatus and information processing method|
|US20080209051 *||21 Apr 2008||28 Aug 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Transport System for Instant Messaging|
|US20090089298 *||4 Dec 2008||2 Apr 2009||Hitachi, Ltd.||File Storage Service System, File Management Device, File Management Method, ID Denotative NAS Server and File Reading Method|
|US20090150632 *||10 Dec 2008||11 Jun 2009||Computer Associates Think, Inc.||Directory and Methods of Use|
|US20090228496 *||8 May 2009||10 Sep 2009||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for accessing distributed file system|
|US20100114842 *||24 Oct 2008||6 May 2010||Forman George H||Detecting Duplicative Hierarchical Sets Of Files|
|US20100138665 *||3 Feb 2010||3 Jun 2010||Panasonic Corporation||Authenticated program execution method|
|US20100169329 *||21 Dec 2009||1 Jul 2010||Alion Science And Technology Corporation||System for similar document detection|
|US20100281057 *||29 Apr 2009||4 Nov 2010||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for linking an address|
|US20110016522 *||17 Jul 2009||20 Jan 2011||Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.||Intrusion detection systems and methods|
|US20110055179 *||1 Sep 2009||3 Mar 2011||Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc.||System for and method of partial file hashing|
|US20120203748 *||18 Apr 2012||9 Aug 2012||Pinehill Technology, Llc||Surrogate hashing|
|US20140114937 *||24 Oct 2012||24 Apr 2014||Lsi Corporation||Method to shorten hash chains in lempel-ziv compression of data with repetitive symbols|
|CN101853302B||17 Nov 2005||22 Aug 2012||微软公司||Extensible file system|
|WO2005010773A1 *||8 Jul 2004||3 Feb 2005||Intel Corporation||Method and system for high-performance hashing|
|WO2006094365A1 *||10 Mar 2006||14 Sep 2006||Rocksoft Limited||Method for storing data with reduced redundancy using data clusters|
|WO2006094366A1 *||10 Mar 2006||14 Sep 2006||Rocksoft Limited||Method for indexing in a reduced-redundancy storage system|
|WO2007124144A2 *||19 Apr 2007||1 Nov 2007||Datascout, Inc.||Surrogate hashing|
|WO2007124144A3 *||19 Apr 2007||28 Aug 2008||Datascout Inc||Surrogate hashing|
|U.S. Classification||1/1, 711/216, 707/E17.036, 707/999.01, 707/999.101|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S707/99942, G06F17/30949|
|12 Dec 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SOWA, KURT E.;MCALLEN, CHRISTOPHER M.;REEL/FRAME:011327/0397
Effective date: 20001113
|12 Jan 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|21 Feb 2011||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|14 Apr 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|14 Apr 2011||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|24 Dec 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12