US6252497B1 - Coupling alignment warning system - Google Patents
Coupling alignment warning system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6252497B1 US6252497B1 US08/951,250 US95125097A US6252497B1 US 6252497 B1 US6252497 B1 US 6252497B1 US 95125097 A US95125097 A US 95125097A US 6252497 B1 US6252497 B1 US 6252497B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- warning system
- light
- light source
- alignment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
- B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
- B62D53/00—Tractor-trailer combinations; Road trains
- B62D53/04—Tractor-trailer combinations; Road trains comprising a vehicle carrying an essential part of the other vehicle's load by having supporting means for the front or rear part of the other vehicle
- B62D53/08—Fifth wheel traction couplings
- B62D53/12—Fifth wheel traction couplings engaging automatically
Definitions
- the present invention relates to systems for aligning a towing unit with a towed unit, e.g., a trailer.
- the instant invention is adapted to assist the driver of the towing unit with aligning the fifth wheel hitch of a commercial truck and the king pin of a trailer to achieve positive coupling between the two, especially in zero or low visibility conditions.
- the driver To couple a vehicle, such as a commercial truck, to a trailer, the driver must continually estimate the position of the vehicle relative to the trailer while maneuvering the vehicle into alignment with the trailer. In practice, this may involve exiting the truck to determine the position of the truck relative to the trailer and then re-entering the truck to maneuver it into alignment. In addition, the driver utilizes his rearview side mirrors to approximate the lateral alignment between the truck and trailer, while vertical alignment is often judged only by “feel,” or guess. Such practice often leads to high or low coupling and, possibly, lateral misalignment between the truck and the trailer, which can result in damage to the truck, trailer and/or the interlocking apparatus.
- the interlocking apparatus is comprised of components on both the truck and the trailer which mate to achieve a mechanical connection.
- the truck is equipped with a locking assembly, known in the heavy trucking industry as a fifth wheel hitch, and an apparatus mounted to the trailer, known in the industry as a king pin.
- the king pin extends downwardly, perpendicular to the bolster plate to which it is attached, the bolster plate being mounted to the bottom surface of the trailer.
- the fifth wheel hitch includes a hitch plate having a throat with its open end facing rearwardly to receive the king pin, and a locking mechanism for locking the king pin in the throat of the hitch plate.
- the driver When backing up the towing unit, the driver often experiences difficulty in aligning the throat of the hitch plate with the king pin. For instance, the height of the king pin relative to the throat may be such that proper mating between the two will not be achieved, even though the two may be laterally aligned. In these instances, the front lower edge of the trailer may crash into the fifth wheel hitch plate (trailer and king pin too low) or the cab of the truck may crash into the body of the trailer (trailer and king pin too high). Alternatively, even though the king pin and fifth wheel hitch may appear coupled, if the king pin is not seated properly in the locking mechanism a “high couple” may result leading to an unsafe and potentially dangerous condition.
- the throat and the king pin may be laterally misaligned. In either case, positive coupling is not achieved, and the interlocking apparatus and/or the truck/trailer may be damaged or unsafe. Further, the problems attendant with this “guesswork” are exacerbated by the fact that the driver will often be faced with zero or low visibility conditions (night, severe weather, sleeper cab configurations, etc.)
- Known alignment systems use a variety of technologies to measure lateral offset and vertical alignment.
- these systems utilize infrared sensor technology with a modulated pulsed beam.
- these systems are limited in range (typically less than 20 feet) and require separate sets of infrared sensors on the towing and towed units, respectively, to indicate the lateral offset and vertical alignment.
- the infrared emitters and sensors are required on both the towing and towed units, the system must include a remote, powered transmitter on the towed unit.
- these systems are limited in their application, inconvenient and relatively expensive.
- the coupling alignment warning system (CAWS) of the instant invention is designed to provide the driver of a towing unit with visual and/or audible cues that indicate whether the towing unit is sufficiently aligned with the trailer to achieve positive coupling.
- the CAWS of the present invention is adapted to assist the driver in aligning and coupling the fifth wheel hitch of the towing unit, e.g., a commercial truck, with the king pin of the trailer.
- the CAWS is especially useful in assisting the driver with coupling the towing unit to the towed unit in zero or low visibility conditions.
- the CAWS combines laser technology with a reflective target to provide vertical and horizontal offset information.
- the CAWS includes a laser light source mounted on the towing unit and a retro-reflective target that is preferably installed on the front of the trailer. The light source and the target cooperate with a control circuit to determine whether the towing unit is aligned with the trailer so as to achieve positive coupling and, if not, to signal to the driver that the towed and/or towing unit need to be repositioned.
- the user initially aligns the laser light source with the retro-reflective target to accommodate a range of allowed misalignment between the towing and towed units that still achieves positive coupling.
- the laser beam emitted from the light source is directed toward the trailer in an attempt to “acquire” the retro-reflective target on the towed unit.
- target acquisition has been achieved and, therefore, laser light is reflected back toward the laser light source, the reflected light impinges upon an array of sensors which surround the laser light source.
- the sensors Upon detecting reflected light, the sensors generate a detection signal and transmit that detection signal to a control circuit that determines whether positive coupling will occur and, thereafter, transmits an indicator signal that may be displayed to the user.
- the system includes a spatial filter positioned adjacent the sensors to restrict the angles at which light may impinge upon the sensors. Also, to further minimize the chance of triggering on a false signal, photo-resistors having a peak sensitivity that is in tune with the wavelength of laser light are used. Both of these features make it less likely that off-axis light sources will trigger a positive coupling signal.
- the control circuit includes a processor that is programmed to establish a threshold level of light based on the amount of ambient light detected by the system and continuously updates that threshold level to distinguish the reflected laser beam from the detected ambient light thereby insuring that the integrity of the CAWS output is maintained in varying ambient light conditions. If the sensed reflected laser light reaches the updated threshold level, the system will signal to the user that the towing unit is aligned with the trailer. More specifically, as the driver of the towing unit maneuvers the towing unit into alignment with the trailer, the CAWS will generate the indicator signal and transmit the indicator signal to the driver, preferably, via a display. If target acquisition has not been achieved or is subsequently lost, the driver will know from the display output that further maneuvering of the towing and/or towed units will be necessary to achieve proper coupling between the two.
- the nature of the retro-reflective target is such that, when contacted by laser light, the target returns the laser light directly to its source regardless of impingement angle.
- the target is appropriately sized so that it will not return the laser light unless the fifth wheel hitch and the king pin are aligned for coupling.
- the size of the target preferably corresponds to the dimensions of the fifth wheel hitch which define the range of allowed misalignment between the towing and towed units. Therefore, the CAWS will indicate that positive coupling will occur even if the towed and towing units are not precisely aligned.
- FIG. 1 is an enlarged top view of the transmitter/receiver components of a coupling alignment warning system embodying the present invention
- FIG. 3 is a simplified side view of a towing unit and towed unit having a coupling alignment warning system embodying the present invention showing initial alignment of the primary system components;
- FIG. 4 is a simplified top view of a towing unit and towed unit having a coupling alignment warning system embodying the present invention showing initial alignment of the primary system components;
- FIG. 6 is a simplified top view of a towing unit and towed unit having a coupling alignment warning system showing the lateral tolerance of the system;
- FIG. 7 is a graph of the desired relationship of the detected ambient light level and the threshold level established by the control circuit
- FIG. 8 is a simplified side view of the instant invention showing vertical misalignment between the towing unit and the towed unit;
- FIG. 9 is a simplified top view of the instant invention showing lateral misalignment between the towing unit and the towed unit;
- FIG. 10 is a simplified top view similar to FIG. 8 showing vertical misalignment between the towing unit and the towed unit;
- FIG. 11 is a simplified top view similar to FIG. 9 showing lateral misalignment between the towing unit and the towed unit;
- FIG. 12 is a block diagram depicting the operation of the coupling alignment warning system.
- FIG. 1 shows the transmitter/receiver components of the coupling alignment warning system (CAWS) 10 for aligning a towing unit with a towed unit by detecting ambient and reflected laser light in the system.
- the transmitter includes a laser light source 12 (preferably, a laser diode) that is mounted in an adjustable support 14 that is, in turn, attached to the interior of a rugged enclosure 64 .
- rugged enclosure 64 is mounted to the towing unit during initial installation as described in more detail below (FIG. 3 ).
- the receiving components of the system which are also shown in FIG. 1, include a spatial filter 18 and a series of sensors 28 , 30 .
- Spatial filter 18 has a series of optical tunnels 22 , 26 that limit the amount of light that may reach both ambient sensors 28 and target sensors 30 , that are positioned adjacent thereto, by restricting the angles at which light may impinge upon sensors 28 , 30 .
- Optical tunnels 22 (aligned with ambient sensors 28 ) have flared receiving ends 24 so that more ambient light may impinge upon ambient sensors 28 than on target sensors 30 .
- Spatial filter 18 also has a tunnel 20 that is aligned with light source 12 so that a collimated light beam 15 emitted from light source 12 is permitted to pass entirely through spatial filter 18 .
- Sensors 28 , 30 are mounted in the path of optical tunnels 22 , 26 , respectively, with target sensors 30 being positioned closest to the axis of the collimated light beam 15 emitted by laser light source 12 .
- sensors 28 , 30 detect the amount of light in the system including ambient light and, as described in more detail below, laser light that is reflected back towards target sensors 30 to determine whether target acquisition has been achieved. If it has, the CAWS provides continuous feedback to the user indicating that proper coupling will occur as long as alignment is maintained.
- the system will not detect reflected laser light and, therefore, will not provide the user with continuous positive coupling feedback, thus indicating to the user that either further maneuvering is necessary to couple the towing unit to the trailer, or that the user should inspect the system for a height adjustment.
- laser light source 12 emits collimated light beam 15 that initially passes through a gun-barrel type tunnel 16 between an output end 13 of light source 12 and interior wall 29 of spatial filter 18 .
- Tunnel 16 insures that collimated laser light beam 15 passes entirely into tunnel 20 of spatial filter 18 without reaching surrounding sensors 30 , 28 . In other words, tunnel 16 minimizes the chance that the system will detect a false signal.
- target acquisition i.e., laser light impinges upon the target
- light beam 15 is at least partially reflected back toward spatial filter 18 .
- the laser light is reflected directly back toward laser light source 12 and, therefore, principally impinges upon target sensors 30 (they being closer to the path of the laser light beam).
- the signals are thereafter processed (described below) and, if a sufficient amount of reflected laser light is detected, the CAWS will indicate that the towed and towing units are aligned for proper coupling. As long as the towing unit remains aligned with the towed unit, the system will indicate that positive coupling will occur without further lateral or height adjustment maneuvering by the user.
- sensors 28 , 30 are made from CdSe photo-resistors that have a peak sensitivity in tune with the wavelength of light beam 15 emitted by laser light source 12 ( ⁇ 655 nm).
- spatial filter 18 is formed from an opaque, non-reflective medium that has a predetermined thickness; typically, the medium is black hard rubber or plastic that is approximately 0.75 inches thick. Therefore, spatial filter 18 minimizes the reflection of light impinging upon spatial filter 18 and minimizes the chance that other bright sources of light will generate false signals and, therefore, maximizes the chance that the system reliably identifies whether target acquisition has been achieved.
- FIG. 2 a block diagram illustrates the operation of the CAWS.
- a control circuit 38 calculates a threshold level of light based on the detected level of ambient light. Thereafter, the CAWS determines whether the level of light detected by target sensors 30 reaches that threshold level. If so, control circuit 38 indicates to the user that reflected laser light is being received and that target acquisition has been achieved.
- the CAWS when activated, power is supplied to the CAWS, preferably from the battery of the vehicle, through a power convertor 48 .
- laser light source 12 which is controlled by a microprocessor through a relay, described below
- ambient sensors 28 and target sensors 30 detect the amount of ambient light impinging upon sensors 28 and 30 .
- the system includes two ambient sensors 28 and two target sensors 30 , each pair being mounted equidistant from tunnel 20 of spatial filter 18 (FIG. 1 ).
- sensors 28 , 30 transmit analog output signals, preferably voltage signals, to separate analog-to-digital (A/D) convertors 40 , 42 .
- A/D convertors 40 , 42 The voltage level of the analog output signals varies in response to the sensed level of illumination.
- Each A/D convertor has two inputs for receiving signals from sensors 28 , 30 .
- A/D convertors 40 , 42 have twelve-bit resolution for converting the analog output signals to discrete values having a high degree of precision.
- the discrete values from the A/D converters are then transmitted to a microprocessor 46 (preferably including EPROM technology for program control and data storage) which, in turn, calculates a threshold level of reflected laser light that must be detected before the CAWS will signal that target acquisition has been achieved (described in more detail below).
- microprocessor 46 activates a relay 44 that allows power to be supplied to laser source 12 .
- Laser source 12 preferably, a laser diode, then emits collimated laser light beam ( 15 in FIG. 1) that is directed toward a target on the towed unit and that is reflected back toward laser source 12 when properly aligned.
- sensors 28 , 30 detect both ambient light and, upon target acquisition, reflected laser light. As described previously, more ambient light impinges upon ambient sensors 28 due to the corresponding flared ends 24 of optical tunnels 22 , as best shown in FIG. 1 . Further, more of the reflected laser light impinges upon target sensors 30 than ambient sensors 28 because the retro-reflective target returns light back to its source regardless of the angle of impingement (described below) and, thus, target sensors 30 , which are positioned closer to the axis of laser light beam 15 , receive more reflected laser light. Nevertheless, target sensors 30 do detect ambient light, so, as the ambient light levels increase, it becomes more difficult to distinguish the reflected laser light from the detected ambient light.
- the CAWS 10 of the instant invention solves this problem by continually updating the threshold level of light based upon the most current level of sensed ambient light.
- microprocessor 46 periodically sends a signal to relay 44 which, as a result, deactivates the power supplied to laser source 12 for a predetermined amount of time; preferably, about one half of a second.
- the system reads all four sensors 28 , 30 simultaneously which, necessarily, are only detecting ambient light.
- These signals are transmitted to A/D convertors 40 , 42 and, thereafter, the digitized signals generated by A/D converters 40 , 42 are transmitted to and processed by microprocessor 46 to establish a new threshold level.
- microprocessor 46 activates laser light source 12 , the CAWS reads sensors 28 , 30 and determines whether the digitized signals from target sensors 30 reach this threshold level via a set of instructions programmed into microprocessor 46 .
- Microprocessor 46 first processes the digitized target sensor signals and then determines whether the target sensor signal reaches the calculated threshold level and, if so, transmits an indicating signal to an indicator 50 which notifies the user that target acquisition is currently achieved.
- the indicator 50 could provide, for example, an LED display and/or an audio output of the indicator signal.
- the LED display would remain illuminated as long as the CAWS detects reflected laser light. If the towing and towed units become misaligned, the sensors will no longer detect reflected laser light and the processor will deactivate the LED to signal to the driver that the towing and towed units need to be repositioned for positive coupling to occur.
- FIG. 7 A graphical representation of the relationship between the detected ambient light level and the threshold level calculated by microprocessor 46 , is shown in FIG. 7 . Because photo-resistor sensors are used, the resistance of sensors 28 , 30 is measured and the resistance levels (ambient, target and threshold) are plotted as a function of the amount of light detected by the system. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the resistance levels of the sensors may be determined by passing a fixed current through the sensors and monitoring their voltage levels. Also, note that when progressively more light impinges upon the sensors, i.e., when the system is used in the daytime as opposed to night, the resistance of each sensor decreases.
- the “threshold” curve designates the resistance level that the target sensors must reach before the CAWS indicates to the user that target acquisition has been achieved.
- the ambient light consists mainly of artificial light such as light emitted by headlights
- the measured resistance of target sensors 30 (when target sensors are detecting reflected laser light) is significantly lower than the measured resistance of ambient sensors 28 since ambient sensors 28 receive very little light at all in such conditions.
- the measured resistance of ambient sensors 28 decreases dramatically, and approaches the measured resistance of target sensors 30 when target sensors 30 are receiving both reflected laser light and ambient light.
- the CAWS continually updates the threshold level to establish the greatest degree of distinguishability for varying ambient conditions.
- microprocessor 46 By continually updating the threshold resistance level based on the amount of ambient light in the system and by incorporating relatively high resolution A/D convertors, microprocessor 46 , which is programmed with instructions to calculate the threshold level based on the desired relationship shown in FIG. 7, determines whether the measured resistance of target sensors 30 reaches the calculated threshold level of resistance. If it does, microprocessor 46 transmits an indicating signal to indicator ( 50 in FIG. 2) thus notifying the user that target acquisition is currently achieved. Therefore, the CAWS is reliable regardless of the current amount of ambient light present during operation.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 a more detailed description of the initial set-up and operation of the CAWS 10 is shown.
- initial alignment of the system on level ground is shown with the position determining components mounted on a towing unit 60 and a towed unit 62 .
- the CAWS 10 includes a rugged enclosure 64 that contains the laser light source 12 , sensors 28 , 30 and the control circuit 38 (not shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 ), as well as a retro-reflective target 70 that together cooperate to send a signal to the driver that continuously indicates alignment of towing unit 60 relative to towed unit 62 as long as laser light impinges upon target 70 .
- FIGS. 3 and 4 also show a locking apparatus that is included on the towing and towed units 60 , 62 .
- towed unit 62 has what is commonly known in the commercial trucking industry as a king pin 74 that extends downwardly from a bottom surface 76 of towed unit 62 .
- towing unit 60 has what is known in the trucking industry as a fifth wheel hitch 78 .
- Fifth wheel hitch 78 includes a hitch plate 80 having a throat 82 (FIG. 4) for receiving king pin 74 and which pitches about a mounting bracket 83 approximately at its center.
- Fifth wheel hitch 78 is mounted to a frame 79 of towing unit 60 (FIG. 4) such that an open end 86 of throat 82 faces rearwardly to receive and lock king pin 74 of towed unit 62 when the two are brought into engagement.
- rugged enclosure 64 is mounted to a back wall 66 of towing unit 60 , above the grease and contaminant area, so that light beam 15 emitted by laser light source 12 is directed generally perpendicular to wall 66 of towing unit 60 . Further, rugged enclosure 64 is mounted at a height X defined by a top surface 84 of hitch plate 80 when hitch plate 80 is level and the axis of light beam 15 emitted from laser source 12 , laser source 12 being mounted in rugged enclosure 64 as best shown in FIG. 3 . Retro-reflective target 70 is mounted to a front vertical surface 68 of towed unit 62 at a height corresponding to the height X at which rugged enclosure 64 is installed.
- retro-reflective target 70 is attached to surface 68 at distance X defined by a bottom surface 76 of towed unit 62 (which is at the same height relative to the ground as top surface 84 of hitch plate 80 when coupled) and a bottom surface 72 of retro-reflective target 70 , such that laser light beam 15 contacts bottom surface 72 of retro-reflective target 70 when towed unit 62 and towing unit 60 are on level ground, as shown in FIG. 3 .
- Light beam 15 is initially aligned so it strikes lower edge 72 and center of target 70 to accommodate the tolerance of allowed vertical misalignment (described below). Further, turning to FIG. 4, rugged enclosure 64 is mounted such that laser beam 15 is emitted perpendicularly from, in the preferred embodiment, the center of width of back wall 66 of towing unit 60 , corresponding to the center axis of throat 82 of fifth wheel hitch 78 . Retro-reflective target 70 is placed at the center of width of surface 68 of towed unit 62 which corresponds to the position of king pin 74 , i.e., king pin 74 is likewise centered relative to the width of towed unit 62 .
- the enclosure 64 and target 70 could be offset to accommodate alternate mounting on some trailers.
- retro-reflective target 70 is, in the preferred embodiment, removably attached to towed unit 62 for ready installation and adaptability.
- target 70 may have a magnetic backing that makes attaching and aligning the CAWS at initial installation relatively effortless.
- towed unit 62 could first be coupled to towing unit 60 and, thereafter, the user could adjust the position of retro-reflective target 70 with respect to rugged enclosure 64 to achieve the alignment shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. The user would activate the CAWS and position enclosure 64 and target 70 so that the axis of light beam 15 is directed at the center of bottom surface 72 of target 70 when towing unit 60 and towed unit 62 are on level ground.
- retro-reflective target 70 The specific characteristics of retro-reflective target 70 are preferably exploited during the operation of the CAWS 10 .
- the nature of retro-reflective target 70 is such that, when laser light from laser source 12 impinges upon it, the target returns the laser light directly to source 12 regardless of impingement angle.
- Target 70 has an array of closely spaced miniature corner cube reflectors, each of which contains three walls that are mutually perpendicular for reflecting light back to its source. Also, to insure that all the light that impinges on the cube reflector returns to the laser light source 12 , the surface of each cube reflector is made of a highly reflective material.
- retro-reflective target 70 corrects for off-angle coupling approaches within a range of ⁇ 45°.
- Commercially available retro-reflective targets which offer acceptable performance include Model BRT-2 ⁇ 2 by Banner Engineering Corp. and Model UZZ112 from Nais Aromat Corp.
- the lateral misalignment tolerance is defined by the dimensions of fifth wheel hitch 78 and, more particularly, the dimensions of open end 86 of throat 82 of fifth wheel hitch 78 .
- the vertical misalignment tolerance is defined by the maximum height that the ramps (not shown) on the open end 86 of throat 82 can safely engage the lower front edge 87 of towed unit 62 and “lift” said towed unit to the proper height during the coupling action (FIG. 3 ). As best shown in FIGS.
- retro-reflective target 70 is rectangular having dimensions that are approximately four inches high by twelve inches wide corresponding to the dimensions of the opening of throat 82 of fifth-wheel hitch 78 and king pin 74 .
- the CAWS senses target acquisition and, as the driver backs up towing unit 60 , bottom surface 76 of towed unit 62 will contact the top surface 84 of hitch plate 80 and king pin 74 will enter throat 82 to couple fifth wheel hitch 78 and king pin 74 . If the height of towed unit 62 is lower than that shown in FIG.
- the CAWS 10 will continue to indicate proper alignment as long as the height of towed unit 62 is not more than four inches below the initial, and ideal, height that is shown in FIG. 5 . If towed unit 62 is more than four inches below the height shown in FIG. 5, surface 68 of towed unit 62 may crash into outwardly facing open end 86 of hitch plate 80 .
- the instant invention accounts for this potential fault condition by utilizing a retro-reflective target that is four inches high. If towed unit 62 and, necessarily, retro-reflective target 70 attached thereto is lower than four inches below what it is in initial alignment, laser light beam 15 will not impinge upon retro-reflective target 70 and no laser light will be reflected back toward rugged enclosure 64 . Thus, the CAWS 10 will not detect reflected laser light and will indicate to the user that target acquisition has not been achieved, i.e., that positive coupling will not occur without repositioning the towing and/or towed units.
- king pin 74 will be too high to engage throat 82 of fifth wheel hitch 78 and positive coupling cannot occur (FIG. 10 ). In this case, as shown in FIGS. 8 and 10, no laser light will contact retro-reflective target 70 and the system will appropriately indicate that target acquisition has not been achieved.
- the CAWS 10 will tolerate a twelve inch range of lateral misalignment. Because laser source 12 mounted in rugged enclosure 64 is initially aligned so that laser light beam 15 strikes the center of retro-reflective target 70 and because retro-reflective target 70 is twelve inches wide, the system will signal to the user that towing unit 60 will be unable to couple to towed unit 62 if the approach that the driver of towing unit 60 takes is more than six inches, in either lateral direction, off the center line of initial alignment (shown in FIG. 4 ). As depicted in FIGS.
- FIG. 12 shows that, in the preferred embodiment, when the system 100 is activated (step 101 ), the analog-to-digital convertors are initialized (step 102 ) while the laser light source is off (step 104 ). Then, the microprocessor clock signal is started (step 106 ) and the sensors, ambient and target, are read (step 108 ), digitized and electrically coupled to the processor for computation of the threshold level (step 110 ) based on the amount of ambient light in the system (described above). Next, the laser light source is activated (step 112 ) and the sensors are continuously read (step 114 ) as the driver attempts to couple the towing unit with the towed unit.
- the sensor signals are digitized by the analog-to-digital convertors, and then coupled to the processor which, computes a value, S_MIN (step 116 ), that is compared with the computed threshold level (step 118 ).
- S_MIN a value that is compared with the computed threshold level
- a positive coupling signal step 120
- the processor asks whether the clock signal is greater than two seconds (step 122 ), and, if so, computes a new threshold level based on the then current amount of ambient light in the system.
- the laser light source could be mounted on the towing unit so that it is capable of multi-dimension tracking of the position of the towed unit by, for example, mounting laser light source 12 on a gimbal system.
- the laser could maintain target acquisition even when the relative height between the towed and towing units varies, e.g., when backing up on a hill.
- the system could be adapted for scanning the retro-reflective target laterally and/or vertically, therefore tracking the position of the towing unit relative to the towed unit in two dimensions. The measured azimuth and elevation angles could be transmitted to the user via the display unit to further assist in maneuvering the towing unit for proper alignment with the towed unit.
- the detected light signals could be processed by a wave band filter tuned to pass only light having a wavelength corresponding to the emitted laser light. If the filter passes a signal, the system necessarily must be detecting reflected laser light and, therefore, will indicate to the user that target acquisition has been achieved.
- the system can indicate to the user whether reflected laser light has been sensed and, therefore, whether target acquisition has been achieved.
- the entire system may draw its operating power from the towing unit power supply, typically a 12-volt battery.
- the indicator is preferably mounted to the exterior mirror of the towing unit, it may also be mounted within the cab or any convenient place in which it may be monitored by the operator of the vehicle.
- the CAWS may be manually activated by the user or, alternatively, the system may be activated by certain vehicle operations. For instance, the system could be adapted to sense when the towing unit is in reverse and, in response, activate the CAWS. To deactivate the CAWS, the system could be used in conjunction with the fifth wheel hitch coupling control system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,802 which includes a lock sensor for detecting when a locking mechanism of a trailer hitch assembly is locked.
- the CAWS could be used in conjunction with the coupling control system of the above-referenced U.S. Pat. no. 5,861,802 to record additional feedback information as the driver attempts to achieve positive coupling.
- the proximity sensing capabilities of the U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,802 could be utilized to signal the microprocessor 46 to begin recording position data within a predetermined range, preferably near coupling. By analyzing the recorded data, users will be able to determine whether the driver maneuvered the towing unit in response to a CAWS signal that indicated that the towing unit was aligned with the towed unit.
- the present invention could be used to align the back of a trailer with a loading dock.
- the CAWS could be used in various other transportation alignment applications.
- the retro-reflective target could be mounted in a boat docking station, with the primary system components mounted on the boat, for assisting the driver with parking the boat.
- the system of the instant invention may be retrofit to any vehicle/trailer combination. And, because a minimum number of components is necessary, the overall cost of manufacture is relatively low.
Abstract
Description
Claims (47)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/951,250 US6252497B1 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1997-10-16 | Coupling alignment warning system |
CA002246042A CA2246042A1 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1998-09-29 | Coupling alignment warning system |
AU87893/98A AU8789398A (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1998-10-01 | Coupling alignment warning system |
EP98308184A EP0921056A3 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1998-10-08 | Coupling alignment warning system |
JP29157198A JP3470947B2 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1998-10-14 | Connection alignment warning system |
US09/836,796 US6592230B2 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 2001-04-17 | Truck rearview mirror assembly having a display for displaying trailer coupling status information |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/951,250 US6252497B1 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1997-10-16 | Coupling alignment warning system |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/493,534 Continuation-In-Part US6285278B1 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 2000-01-28 | Electronic system for monitoring a fifth wheel hitch |
US09/836,796 Continuation-In-Part US6592230B2 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 2001-04-17 | Truck rearview mirror assembly having a display for displaying trailer coupling status information |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6252497B1 true US6252497B1 (en) | 2001-06-26 |
Family
ID=25491484
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/951,250 Expired - Fee Related US6252497B1 (en) | 1997-10-16 | 1997-10-16 | Coupling alignment warning system |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6252497B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP0921056A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3470947B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU8789398A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2246042A1 (en) |
Cited By (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020075138A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2002-06-20 | Van Rees H. Barteld | Portable object detection system |
US6587041B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2003-07-01 | Wabash Technology Corporation | Semi-tractor fifth wheel sensor and rail car stanchion sensor for a trailer |
US6592230B2 (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 2003-07-15 | Holland Hitch Company | Truck rearview mirror assembly having a display for displaying trailer coupling status information |
US20030137126A1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-24 | Reuter Gerald Louis | Driver controlled side-to-side movable vehicle hitch for trailer backing |
US20040079557A1 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2004-04-29 | Saxon Nancy L. | Intelligent load distribution system |
US20040222902A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-11 | Wortsmith Joe W. | Vehicle positioning apparatus |
US20040252019A1 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2004-12-16 | Paull George Emil | Trailer eye |
US20060225293A1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-12 | Godwin W L | Trailer hitch alignment device |
US20070075522A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Hermon Christopher J | Recreational vehicle |
US20070137053A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Ball Randell D | Object alignment device and method |
US20070153701A1 (en) * | 2005-12-31 | 2007-07-05 | Kotzin Michael D | Search determination module for a secondary network and corresponding method |
US20070159310A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-07-12 | Ball Randell D | Object alignment device and method |
CN1332844C (en) * | 2001-09-04 | 2007-08-22 | 霍兰集团公司 | Electronic system for monitoring fifth wheel suspension |
US20070245831A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-10-25 | Francisco Betancor Bethencourt | Machine for Inspecting the Coupling System Used to Hitch a Semi-Trailer to a Towing Vehicle |
US7396035B1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2008-07-08 | Smith Rick L | Trailer hitch alignment device |
US20080180526A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2008-07-31 | Trevino James S | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
US20080191449A1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2008-08-14 | John Paul Standen | Trailer Vehicle Coupling Safety Aids |
US20090192658A1 (en) * | 2008-01-24 | 2009-07-30 | Wofford Jr Paul E | Vehicle Guidance System and Method |
US20100219988A1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2010-09-02 | Griffith Gregory M | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US20100243594A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-09-30 | Henry King | Gantry crane truck jostle prevention and/or hatch cover detection |
WO2011025411A1 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2011-03-03 | Volvo Lastvagnar Ab | Battery monitoring system for a vehicle and corresponding vehicle |
US20110216199A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2011-09-08 | Target Hitach LLC | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
CN103171386A (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2013-06-26 | 佛山市顺德区嘉腾电子有限公司 | AGV (Automatic Guided Vehicle) rear hook non-return traction device |
US8820768B2 (en) | 2012-05-29 | 2014-09-02 | Roger D. Grizzle | High lock warning system for fifth wheel hitches |
US20150343865A1 (en) * | 2013-06-02 | 2015-12-03 | Tumtable Safety Devices Australia Pty Ltd | Safety Enhanced Turntable or Fifth Wheel for Coupling a Semi-Trailer to a Prime Mover |
US10670479B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2020-06-02 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US10696109B2 (en) | 2017-03-22 | 2020-06-30 | Methode Electronics Malta Ltd. | Magnetolastic based sensor assembly |
US11014417B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-05-25 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11084342B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-08-10 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11135882B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-10-05 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11221262B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2022-01-11 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11491832B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2022-11-08 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11682313B2 (en) | 2021-03-17 | 2023-06-20 | Gregory M. Griffith | Sensor assembly for use in association with aircraft collision avoidance system and method of using the same |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6285278B1 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2001-09-04 | Holland Hitch Company | Electronic system for monitoring a fifth wheel hitch |
DE19901953B4 (en) * | 1999-01-20 | 2014-02-06 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Device and method for stabilizing a vehicle combination |
DE19950808A1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-04-26 | Zuern Gmbh & Co | Coupling device to connect a traction vehicle and a trailer has measuring unit to detect position deviations and relative distance between tractor and trailer and supply information to display for driver |
JP4739569B2 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2011-08-03 | パナソニック株式会社 | Driving assistance device |
DE102004021562A1 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2005-12-08 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method for parking and picking up a semi-trailer |
WO2009101655A1 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-20 | Mamorukun Co., Ltd. | Wrecker vehicle state warning device |
CN108917659B (en) * | 2018-07-06 | 2020-05-29 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | Method for realizing rapid centering and alignment of coupler by adopting laser demarcation device |
CN110425956A (en) * | 2019-06-27 | 2019-11-08 | 上海宝钢工业技术服务有限公司 | Slewing center support system and its application method based on cell phone application |
Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3734539A (en) | 1971-11-03 | 1973-05-22 | M Salmi | Apparatus for aligning the coupling on separate vehicles |
US3767292A (en) | 1972-10-16 | 1973-10-23 | P Rutkowski | Aligning device for tractor hitches |
US3924257A (en) | 1973-06-21 | 1975-12-02 | Fatzer Elmer B | Trailer hitch guide |
US4852901A (en) * | 1987-02-20 | 1989-08-01 | Beasley Donald R | Trailer hitch positioning apparatus |
US4988116A (en) | 1989-04-10 | 1991-01-29 | Evertsen Gary L | Trailer hitching aid |
US5108123A (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1992-04-28 | Robert Rubenzik | Vehicle docking device using sensor matrix |
US5191328A (en) | 1990-06-13 | 1993-03-02 | Donald L. Gambill | Trailer hitching aid and method using reception delay of different velocity signals |
US5224270A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1993-07-06 | Burrus Thomas L | Visual hitch alignment apparatus |
US5285205A (en) | 1990-07-16 | 1994-02-08 | White Bernard H | Laser guided vehicle positioning system and method |
US5455557A (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1995-10-03 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Auxiliary back-up and trailer coupling device for motor vehicles |
US5461471A (en) | 1993-05-08 | 1995-10-24 | Sommerfeld; Keith M. | Optical ranging |
US5513870A (en) | 1995-05-24 | 1996-05-07 | Hickman; Herbert D. | Guidance system for use in docking a movable vehicle with a stationary target |
US5530421A (en) | 1994-04-26 | 1996-06-25 | Navistar International Transportation Corp. | Circuit for automated control of on-board closed circuit television system having side and rear view cameras |
US5617072A (en) | 1994-12-07 | 1997-04-01 | Rockin' Chair Truckers Co. | Position signaling apparatus |
US5650784A (en) * | 1994-01-13 | 1997-07-22 | Mita Industrial Co., Ltd. | Digital AGC circuit for image processing |
US5729194A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1998-03-17 | Spears; Dan E. | Backup system to position vehicle relative to stationary trailer during backing procedure |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NZ314186A (en) | 1996-03-04 | 1998-02-26 | Holland Hitch Co | Electronic trailer hitch coupling control system |
US5951035A (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 1999-09-14 | Phillips, Jr.; Robert E. | Trailer hitch alignment system |
US6120052A (en) * | 1998-01-15 | 2000-09-19 | Capik; Dan | Optically guided trailer hitching system |
-
1997
- 1997-10-16 US US08/951,250 patent/US6252497B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-09-29 CA CA002246042A patent/CA2246042A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-10-01 AU AU87893/98A patent/AU8789398A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-10-08 EP EP98308184A patent/EP0921056A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-10-14 JP JP29157198A patent/JP3470947B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3734539A (en) | 1971-11-03 | 1973-05-22 | M Salmi | Apparatus for aligning the coupling on separate vehicles |
US3767292A (en) | 1972-10-16 | 1973-10-23 | P Rutkowski | Aligning device for tractor hitches |
US3924257A (en) | 1973-06-21 | 1975-12-02 | Fatzer Elmer B | Trailer hitch guide |
US4852901A (en) * | 1987-02-20 | 1989-08-01 | Beasley Donald R | Trailer hitch positioning apparatus |
US4988116A (en) | 1989-04-10 | 1991-01-29 | Evertsen Gary L | Trailer hitching aid |
US5191328A (en) | 1990-06-13 | 1993-03-02 | Donald L. Gambill | Trailer hitching aid and method using reception delay of different velocity signals |
US5285205A (en) | 1990-07-16 | 1994-02-08 | White Bernard H | Laser guided vehicle positioning system and method |
US5108123A (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1992-04-28 | Robert Rubenzik | Vehicle docking device using sensor matrix |
US5224270A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1993-07-06 | Burrus Thomas L | Visual hitch alignment apparatus |
US5455557A (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1995-10-03 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Auxiliary back-up and trailer coupling device for motor vehicles |
US5461471A (en) | 1993-05-08 | 1995-10-24 | Sommerfeld; Keith M. | Optical ranging |
US5650784A (en) * | 1994-01-13 | 1997-07-22 | Mita Industrial Co., Ltd. | Digital AGC circuit for image processing |
US5530421A (en) | 1994-04-26 | 1996-06-25 | Navistar International Transportation Corp. | Circuit for automated control of on-board closed circuit television system having side and rear view cameras |
US5617072A (en) | 1994-12-07 | 1997-04-01 | Rockin' Chair Truckers Co. | Position signaling apparatus |
US5513870A (en) | 1995-05-24 | 1996-05-07 | Hickman; Herbert D. | Guidance system for use in docking a movable vehicle with a stationary target |
US5729194A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1998-03-17 | Spears; Dan E. | Backup system to position vehicle relative to stationary trailer during backing procedure |
Cited By (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6592230B2 (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 2003-07-15 | Holland Hitch Company | Truck rearview mirror assembly having a display for displaying trailer coupling status information |
US6587041B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2003-07-01 | Wabash Technology Corporation | Semi-tractor fifth wheel sensor and rail car stanchion sensor for a trailer |
US20020075138A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2002-06-20 | Van Rees H. Barteld | Portable object detection system |
US7072763B2 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2006-07-04 | Arvinmeritor Technology, Llc | Intelligent load distribution system |
US20040079557A1 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2004-04-29 | Saxon Nancy L. | Intelligent load distribution system |
CN1332844C (en) * | 2001-09-04 | 2007-08-22 | 霍兰集团公司 | Electronic system for monitoring fifth wheel suspension |
US20030137126A1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-24 | Reuter Gerald Louis | Driver controlled side-to-side movable vehicle hitch for trailer backing |
US20040222902A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-11 | Wortsmith Joe W. | Vehicle positioning apparatus |
US6995662B2 (en) | 2003-05-06 | 2006-02-07 | Wortsmith Joe W | Vehicle positioning apparatus |
US20040252019A1 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2004-12-16 | Paull George Emil | Trailer eye |
US7396035B1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2008-07-08 | Smith Rick L | Trailer hitch alignment device |
US20070245831A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-10-25 | Francisco Betancor Bethencourt | Machine for Inspecting the Coupling System Used to Hitch a Semi-Trailer to a Towing Vehicle |
US7391303B2 (en) | 2004-12-16 | 2008-06-24 | Ball Randell D | Object alignment device and method |
US20070159310A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-07-12 | Ball Randell D | Object alignment device and method |
US20070137053A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Ball Randell D | Object alignment device and method |
US20080191449A1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2008-08-14 | John Paul Standen | Trailer Vehicle Coupling Safety Aids |
US7243431B2 (en) | 2005-04-11 | 2007-07-17 | Godwin W Lee | Trailer hitch alignment device |
US20060225293A1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-12 | Godwin W L | Trailer hitch alignment device |
US20090127821A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2009-05-21 | Hermon Christopher J | recreational vehicle |
US20070075522A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Hermon Christopher J | Recreational vehicle |
US7775543B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-08-17 | Thor Tech, Inc. | Recreational vehicle |
US7500690B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2009-03-10 | Thor Tech, Inc. | Recreational vehicle |
US20070153701A1 (en) * | 2005-12-31 | 2007-07-05 | Kotzin Michael D | Search determination module for a secondary network and corresponding method |
US8888121B2 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2014-11-18 | Target Hitch Llc | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
US20080180526A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2008-07-31 | Trevino James S | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
US20110216199A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2011-09-08 | Target Hitach LLC | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
US8888120B2 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2014-11-18 | Target Hitch Llc | Towing vehicle guidance for trailer hitch connection |
US20090192658A1 (en) * | 2008-01-24 | 2009-07-30 | Wofford Jr Paul E | Vehicle Guidance System and Method |
US20100219988A1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2010-09-02 | Griffith Gregory M | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US10013888B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2018-07-03 | Wingguard, Llc | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US8264377B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2012-09-11 | Griffith Gregory M | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US10431104B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2019-10-01 | Wingguard, Llc | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US8803710B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2014-08-12 | Gregory M. Griffith | Aircraft collision avoidance system |
US20100243594A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-09-30 | Henry King | Gantry crane truck jostle prevention and/or hatch cover detection |
US9114960B2 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2015-08-25 | HKI Systems and Services LLC | Crane safety device for preventing truck jostling and/or hatch cover detection |
WO2011025411A1 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2011-03-03 | Volvo Lastvagnar Ab | Battery monitoring system for a vehicle and corresponding vehicle |
US8820768B2 (en) | 2012-05-29 | 2014-09-02 | Roger D. Grizzle | High lock warning system for fifth wheel hitches |
CN103171386B (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2015-03-04 | 广东嘉腾机器人自动化有限公司 | AGV (Automatic Guided Vehicle) rear hook non-return traction device |
CN103171386A (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2013-06-26 | 佛山市顺德区嘉腾电子有限公司 | AGV (Automatic Guided Vehicle) rear hook non-return traction device |
US20150343865A1 (en) * | 2013-06-02 | 2015-12-03 | Tumtable Safety Devices Australia Pty Ltd | Safety Enhanced Turntable or Fifth Wheel for Coupling a Semi-Trailer to a Prime Mover |
US10696109B2 (en) | 2017-03-22 | 2020-06-30 | Methode Electronics Malta Ltd. | Magnetolastic based sensor assembly |
US10940726B2 (en) | 2017-03-22 | 2021-03-09 | Methode Electronics Malta Ltd. | Magnetoelastic based sensor assembly |
US10670479B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2020-06-02 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11014417B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-05-25 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11084342B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-08-10 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11135882B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-10-05 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11221262B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2022-01-11 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11491832B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2022-11-08 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Towing systems and methods using magnetic field sensing |
US11682313B2 (en) | 2021-03-17 | 2023-06-20 | Gregory M. Griffith | Sensor assembly for use in association with aircraft collision avoidance system and method of using the same |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0921056A2 (en) | 1999-06-09 |
JP3470947B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 |
JPH11217013A (en) | 1999-08-10 |
AU8789398A (en) | 1999-05-06 |
EP0921056A3 (en) | 2001-09-19 |
CA2246042A1 (en) | 1999-04-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6252497B1 (en) | Coupling alignment warning system | |
US6592230B2 (en) | Truck rearview mirror assembly having a display for displaying trailer coupling status information | |
US6222457B1 (en) | Electronic trailer hitching system | |
US6259357B1 (en) | Trailer hitch positioning apparatus | |
US5951035A (en) | Trailer hitch alignment system | |
US5574426A (en) | Obstacle detection system for vehicles moving in reverse | |
US4679158A (en) | Automatic mirror rotating system | |
US20080191449A1 (en) | Trailer Vehicle Coupling Safety Aids | |
US6886847B2 (en) | Trailer hitch alignment system and method | |
US6176505B1 (en) | Optically guided alignment system | |
US5701122A (en) | Electronic curb feeler | |
US6264337B1 (en) | Vehicle safety system | |
US6025797A (en) | Angular shift determining apparatus for determining angular shift of central axis of radar used in automotive obstacle detection system | |
US6268803B1 (en) | System and method of avoiding collisions | |
US5650764A (en) | Trailer alignment device with visual display | |
US5028920A (en) | Driver alerting device | |
US7501938B2 (en) | Vehicle range-based lane change assist system and method | |
US5680125A (en) | Sensing the steering angle while transporting aircraft on the ground | |
JP2004529038A (en) | Vehicle mirror | |
KR20070012887A (en) | Rear side view warning mirror module and control method | |
US5684647A (en) | Automatic mirror positioning system for truck-trailers and the like | |
US20040036586A1 (en) | Light tracking apparatus and method | |
US6302547B1 (en) | Automatically adjustable passenger mirror assembly for a trailered vehicle having a mirror position feedback and position correction device | |
KR100296269B1 (en) | The near positioning sensing device for vehicle | |
WO1996016836A1 (en) | Optical infrared safety system for vehicles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HOLLAND HITCH COMPANY, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DUPAY, STEVEN C.;SCHUTT, RANDY L.;REEL/FRAME:008784/0436 Effective date: 19971007 |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HOLLAND GROUP, INC., THE, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014782/0070 Effective date: 20031118 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HILCO CAPITAL LP, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:014220/0799 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: HILCO CAPITAL LP, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014220/0811 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: STANDARD FEDERAL BANK, N.A., AS U.S. AGENT, MICHIG Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:014227/0143 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: STANDARD FEDERAL BANK, N.A., AS U.S. AGENT, MICHIG Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014220/0744 Effective date: 20031222 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SW PELHAM FUND II, L.P., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014852/0254 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: SW PELHAM FUND II, L.P., ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:014852/0242 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: SW PELHAM FUND, L.P., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014852/0254 Effective date: 20031222 Owner name: SW PELHAM FUND, L.P., ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HOLLAND GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:014852/0242 Effective date: 20031222 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SILVER POINT FINANCE, LLC, CONNECTICUT Free format text: AMENDMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HILCO CAPITAL LP;REEL/FRAME:015592/0739 Effective date: 20040928 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SILVER POINT FINANCE, LLC, CONNECTICUT Free format text: AMENDMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HILCO CAPITAL LP;REEL/FRAME:015703/0645 Effective date: 20040928 |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20050626 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LASALLE BANK MIDWEST N.A., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:THE HOLLAND GROUP, INC.;HOLLAND USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019009/0214 Effective date: 20070313 |