Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6009442 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/941,099
Publication date28 Dec 1999
Filing date8 Oct 1997
Priority date8 Oct 1997
Fee statusPaid
Also published asWO1999018524A1, WO1999018524B1
Publication number08941099, 941099, US 6009442 A, US 6009442A, US-A-6009442, US6009442 A, US6009442A
InventorsYing-Jye James Chen, David R. Ferguson, An N. Hong, Dani Suleman, Gregory L. Whittemore
Original AssigneeCaere Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Computer-based document management system
US 6009442 A
Abstract
A computer-based electronic document and/or paper-based document management application program. The program provides an efficient way to automatically import, index, categorize, store, search, retrieve, manipulate and archive electronic documents. The program is also capable of managing documents regardless of document type or document format.
Images(18)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(24)
What is claimed is:
1. In a computer-based document management system, a method of identifying an electronic document in an electronic document collection, said method comprising the steps of:
extracting summary information from the electronic document based upon an electronic analysis of the electronic document:
storing the extracted summary information, regardless of document type or document format, in a document data structure associated with the electronic document;
displaying a representation of the electronic document; and
activating an electronic display containing the extracted summary information stored in the document data structure associated with the electronic document.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of activating the electronic display containing the extracted summary information comprises the step of:
positioning a cursor over the displayed representation of the electronic document.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of activating the electronic display containing the extracted summary information comprises the step of:
selecting an electronic button presented on the electronic display.
4. In a computer-based document management system, a method of browsing a collection of electronic documents stored in memory, said method comprising the steps of:
electronically analyzing each of a plurality of electronic documents;
based on the electronic analysis of each of the plurality of electronic documents storing browsable information for each of the plurality of electronic documents into a corresponding document data structure; and
electronically displaying the browsable information contained in the document data structure for at least one of the plurality of electronic documents.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of electronically displaying the browsable information for at least one of the plurality of electronic documents comprises the step of:
displaying a property sheet.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the property sheet includes an abstract.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the property sheet includes search criteria utilized for identifying the electronic document during an electronic document search.
8. The method of claim 4 further comprising the steps of:
displaying a representation of the electronic document; and
activating the browsable information display.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the displayed representation of the electronic document is an icon.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the displayed representation of the electronic document is a thumbnail.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of activating the browsable information display comprises the step of:
positioning a cursor over the representation of the electronic document.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of activating the browsable information display comprises the step of:
selecting an icon.
13. The method of claim 4, wherein the document data structure is a STG file.
14. A computer-readable storage medium having stored therein an electronic document management program which executes the steps of:
automatically and electronically analyzing each of a plurality of electronic documents in a collection of electronic documents;
extracting document summary information from each of the plurality of electronic documents based on the electronic analysis of each electronic document;
storing the extracted document summary information relating to each of the plurality of electronic documents in a corresponding document data structure regardless of document format or document type; and
displaying, on a computer screen, at least one property sheet, wherein each of the at least one property sheet corresponds with a different one of the plurality of electronic documents, and wherein each of the at least one property sheets contains the document summary information relating to the corresponding electronic document.
15. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 14, wherein said program further comprises the executable steps of:
displaying a representation of the electronic document that corresponds to the at least one property sheet that is to be displayed on the computer screen; and
activating the display of the at least one property sheet.
16. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 15, wherein the representation of the electronic document is an icon.
17. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 15, wherein the representation of the electronic document is a thumbnail.
18. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 15, wherein said executable step of activating the display of the at least one property sheet comprises the executable step of:
positioning a cursor over the representation of the electronic document that corresponds to the at least one property sheet that is to be displayed on the computer screen.
19. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 15, wherein said executable step of activating the property sheet comprises the executable step of:
selecting an electronic button on the display corresponding to the property sheet.
20. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 14, wherein the summary information includes an abstract.
21. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 14, wherein the summary information includes electronic search criteria.
22. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 14, wherein the summary information includes a document attribute, and wherein the document attribute is selected from a group consisting of a document title, a document author, a document length, or a date document was last modified.
23. The computer-readable storage medium in accordance with claim 14, wherein the executable step of storing document summary information comprises the executable step of:
storing the summary information in an STG file.
24. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of activating the electronic display containing the extracted summary information comprises the step of:
displaying a property sheet.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to computer-based document management systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a computer-based document management system that has the capability of importing, organizing, browsing, searching and viewing paper-based documents and electronic documents of any type or format.

In today's business environment, most businesses, from small businesses to large corporate entities, organize and maintain a tremendous amount of information, particularly information in the form of paper-based documents and electronic documents. The task of organizing and maintaining such a large number of documents, as well as document types, can, and typically is, a time consuming and costly matter.

In response, the computer industry, particularly the computer software industry, offers a number of computer application programs designed to help mitigate this problem. Some of these computer application programs work in conjunction with optical scanners to automatically import paper-based documents into the host computer. Other application programs are directed more specifically at providing electronic file management services for existing electronic documents. Some of the more advanced computer application programs attempt to integrate a number of different capabilities into a single application program. Among the capabilities that some of the more advanced programs provide are automated document importing, storage, manipulation, retrieval, indexing, archiving, exporting and document annotation. Included among these more advanced application programs are PageKeeper by Caere Inc., PaperPort by Visioneer, and PAGIS by Xerox.

Despite the many features already offered by various software products currently on the market, there is still a tremendous need to provide a more efficient product. This is especially true regarding the way in which existing application programs allow a user to browse through an electronic document collection in an attempt to identify one or more specific documents.

For example, a document collection may include dozens of related documents. However, the user may wish to identify and access but one of those documents. Given the capabilities of existing electronic document management programs, the user is often forced to open each document, one at a time, then read or browse through all or a portion of each document to determine whether a document is, in fact, the desired document. As this would also involve opening a corresponding host application program for each document, the task of identifying a particular document from amongst a large number of documents in a document collection can become extremely difficult and time consuming. Therefore, a computer-based electronic document management program that has the ability to efficiently and automatically analyze, store, browse, retrieve and display summary information for electronic documents, without requiring the user to either enter the summary information or open a document, would be extremely desirable.

SUMMARY

The present invention is directed at a method and a computer application program for managing electronic documents in a computer-based system. The present invention provides a number of improvements over prior products, particularly, the way in which the present invention automatically analyzes, stores, browses, retrieves and displays electronic document summary information.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to automatically analyze and store summary information for an electronic document.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a user with a way to quickly browse through a document collection and identify a specific electronic document without first having to open each document, along with a corresponding host application program.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a user with a way to quickly and efficiently browse through a collection of electronic documents and identify a specific electronic document by displaying summary information for the electronic document.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the foregoing and other objects are achieved by a method for identifying an electronic document in an electronic document collection. The method involves generating summary information for the electronic document based upon an electronic analysis of the document, then storing the summary information in a document data structure corresponding to the electronic document regardless of document type or document format. The method also involves displaying a representation of the electronic document, and activating a display containing the summary information stored in the document data structure corresponding to the electronic document.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the foregoing and other objects are achieved by a method for browsing a collection of electronic documents and/or a computer-readable storage medium having stored therein an electronic document management program. The method and/or program involve analyzing an electronic document, and storing browsing information or document summary information in a document data structure corresponding to the electronic document, based on the analysis of the electronic document. The method and/or program also involve displaying the browsing information or the document summary information stored in the document data structure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and advantages of the invention will be understood by reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1A is a diagram of a general purpose computer which could be used to implement the present invention;

FIG. 1B is a diagram illustrating some of the features and utilities employed by the present invention;

FIG. 2A is an exemplary representation of an STG file associated with a document;

FIG. 2B is an exemplary representation of an STG file associated with a clipped document;

FIG. 3 depicts the hierarchical organization of an exemplary document collection in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a screen display of the user interface associated with the change notification utility;

FIG. 5 is a screen display of a first scanner preferences user interface;

FIG. 6 is a screen display of a second scanner preferences user interface;

FIG. 7 is a screen display of a third scanner preferences user interface;

FIG. 8 is a screen display of a fourth scanner preferences user interface;

FIG. 9 is a screen display of the scanner control interface;

FIG. 10 is a screen display of a first Browser utility user interface;

FIG. 11 is a screen display of a second Browser utility user interface;

FIG. 12 is a screen display of the second Browser utility user interface with a customizable application toolbar;

FIG. 13 is a screen display of a third Browser utility user interface containing icons representing transitional documents;

FIG. 14 illustrates the user interface for conducting a basic document search;

FIG. 15 illustrates the user interface for conducting an advanced document search;

FIG. 16 is a screen display of the document viewing utility user interface;

FIGS. 17A-D illustrate a drag and drop operation in conjunction with the creation of a clipped document;

FIG. 18 is a screen display of the file helper user interface;

FIG. 19 is a screen display of a secondary file helper utility user interface;

FIG. 20 is a screen display of the directory monitor user interface;

FIG. 21 is a screen display of the task manager user interface; and

FIG. 22 is a screen display of the system task bar illustrating the task manager icon.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention involves a system and/or method for managing electronic documents in a general purpose computer, such as the general purpose computer 100 illustrated in FIG. 1A. The present invention further includes a system and/or method for importing electronic documents and electronic representations of paper-based documents from any number of different sources. For example, the present invention is capable of importing electronic representations of paper-based documents from a scanner 105, word processing documents from an internal memory such as a RAM (not shown) or an external memory 115 (e.g., a hard drive), e-mail from an internet connection 120, or a document containing graphical image data from a server 125 supporting a local-area network, to which the general purpose computer 100 is connected. Once a document has been imported, the present invention employs a system and/or method for automatically categorizing, indexing, browsing, viewing and otherwise manipulating the document, along with each of the other documents contained in what is herein referred to as the document collection. As one skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the present invention can be implemented in software, using standard programming methods and techniques which are well known in the art.

The present invention employs a number of core features 150 as well as a number of document management utilities as illustrated in FIG. 1B. The core features 150 refer to certain attributes or characteristics that the present invention employs and/or executes in the background to support the various document management utilities. For the purpose of simplicity, the following description of the present invention is divided into the various core features 150 and document management utilities. The order in which each invention feature and/or utility is presented herein below is not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Rather, the scope of the invention is given by the appended claims.

DATA STORAGE (STG) FILES

The first core feature 150 of the present invention is a unique data storage (STG) structure referred to herein as an STG file. The present invention maintains an STG file for each document in the document collection. A new STG file is created for each new document, and an existing STG file may be updated if the corresponding document is modified.

Each STG file contains a number of standardized data fields. This provides a way to maintain various attribute data and other information for a given document in a common, standardized format regardless of the document's type (e.g., text document versus image document) or the document's format (e.g., JPEG versus HTML). In a preferred embodiment, all STG files are stored in a common disk directory.

FIG. 2A represents an exemplary STG file 200 along with some of the data fields that may be contained therein. For example, STG file 200 may include a data field 205 which contains a file name, e.g., "001,STG", to identify the corresponding STG file 200. The STG file 200 may also include a data field 210 and a data field 215 which reflects the memory location of the corresponding document and a bit map defining a representative thumbnail respectively. The STG file 200 may also contain a data field 220 which reflects the raw text associated with the corresponding document. The raw text data is primarily used for indexing purposes. Indexing is described in greater detail below. In addition, the STG file 200 is likely to contain a number of other data fields (not shown) for such attributes as document author, publishing date, word count, annotations, and/or key words if the document belongs to a particular category. Categories and categorization of documents are also explained in detail below. If the document corresponding to the STG file is an image document, data fields may be included for such attributes as image type (e.g., color, black and white, or gray scale), image dimension, and/or image meta-text with text positioning information.

An STG file also exists for each clipped document stored by general purpose computer 100. A clipped document is a special type of compound document data structure. Typically, a clipped document incorporates a number of related or component documents in a particular document order similar to attaching a number of physical documents together with a paper clip. When a clipped document is created, an STG file is generated. Unlike STG files associated with individual documents, an STG file associated with a clipped document includes a data field having its own file name, e.g., "002.STG" and a number of additional data fields which contain the identity of the STG files corresponding to the component documents. FIG. 2B shows an exemplary STG file 250 that is associated with a clipped document. As illustrated, STG file 250 links the clipped document with four component documents, wherein the STG files that correspond with the four component documents are identified by their file names as follows: 100.STG, 101.STG, 211.STG and 084.STG. Clipped documents are described in greater detail below.

Aside from creating an STG file for each new document and each new clipped document, an existing STG file may be updated if the corresponding document or clipped document is edited or modified in some way. For example, if a user modifies an existing word processing document, upon saving the modified version of the document, the corresponding STG file is updated, if necessary, particularly the text data field 120.

ORGANIZATION OF THE DOCUMENT COLLECTION

In a preferred embodiment, the document collection is organized into a hierarchy of files, clipped documents, and electronic folders, wherein electronic folders may, in turn, contain additional files, clipped documents and nested folders. The data that defines how the hierarchy of files, clipped documents and electronic folders are organized with respect to each other is maintained in a compound data structure referred to herein as the document collection organization (DCO) file.

The DCO file is the second core feature described herein, and it contains, in essence, all of the information necessary to resurrect or reconstruct the document collection hierarchy, which takes on the appearance of an organizational "tree" 300, as illustrated in FIG. 3. For example, the DCO file contains the information necessary to establish that folder F1 contains two nested folders F2 and F3. In addition, this exemplary DCO file contains the information necessary to establish that there are a number of documents D1, D2, D3 and D4 directly associated with folder F1 ; that there are two documents D3 and D4 directly associated with folder F2 ; that there are two documents D5 and D6, as well as a nested folder F4 associated with folder F3 ; and that folder F4 contains a document D4 and a clipped document S.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, each user, in a multiple-user environment, has the ability to create a user profile for a local terminal or workstation. The user profile, in essence, defines a "local" version of the primary document collection and the document collection hierarchy, which are, in turn, defined by the various STG files and the DCO file respectively, as described above. The user profile may define the local document collection such that it includes all of, or a portion of, the documents in the primary document collection. The user profile may also define the local document collection such that it reflects a different document collection hierarchy than the one defined by the DCO file for the primary document collection.

This is accomplished, in part, by maintaining a local STG file for each document in the local document collection. In addition, a local version of the DCO file is maintained, which defines the hierarchy of the documents in the local document collection. Although a user can, of course, alter the content of an existing document in the primary document collection by manipulating the document locally, and hence, the content of the STG file associated with that document, the user profile cannot alter the document collection hierarchy defined by the DCO file for the primary document collection.

VIRTUAL DOCUMENT STORAGE

The present invention also employs a virtual document storage scheme. Virtual document storage is the third core feature described herein.

FIG. 3 illustrates the concept of this virtual document storage feature. It will be recognized that document D4 appears in several folders within the organizational hierarchy 300. First, it is associated with folder F1. Next, it is associated with folder F2. Finally, it is associated with folder F4. However, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, this does not mean that three copies of document D4 are stored in the DCO file. On the contrary, the content of document D4, as with each and every document in the document collection, is stored in its entirety in but one memory location, and the DCO file links folders F1, F2 and F4 to the one copy of document D4 by providing a pointer from each folder F1, F2 and F4 to the STG file 310 associated with the document D4.

The virtual document storage feature saves memory space, it simplifies the task of updating files, and it guarantees document integrity by maintaining but one version of a given document, as one skilled in the art will readily understand. For example, if a user modifies an existing document, such as document D4, the modifications are reflected in the affected data fields in the corresponding STG file 310. Consequently, these modifications are reflected whenever the user, at a later time, accesses the document D4 through folder F1, F2 or F4.

INDEXING AND RETRIEVING

In addition to the core features 150 described above, the present invention employs a number of document management utilities. The first of these utilities is the indexing and retrieving utility 157, the focus of which is an index and retrieval engine. The index and retrieval engine, among other things, maintains an indexing database comprising an index or list of each document in the document collection and a cross-reference between each document in the document collection and various key terms and/or document attributes that are stored for each document in the corresponding STG file. The indexing database, in turn, is primarily used to support the document search function, which is described in greater detail below. Briefly, however, the present invention employs a search engine which has the ability to compare the information in the indexing database with one or more user-supplied search terms or attributes. Documents whose indexing information match the user-supplied search terms or attributes are then identified and/or retrieved.

The index and retrieval engine also continuously updates the indexing database. For example, when a new document becomes part of the document collection, an STG file is created for that document, as explained above. In a preferred embodiment, the index and retrieval engine also creates a new entry in the indexing database for the new document, cross-referenced with key terms and other attributes extracted from the new document's STG file.

In addition, the index and retrieval engine continuously monitors the contents of existing STG files. If a document is modified, and if the modification is reflected in the corresponding STG file, the index and retrieval engine updates the indexing database accordingly.

Another related utility is the Universal Resource Locator (URL) indexing module. Essentially, a URL is a World Wide Web site that furnishes information regarding the location and, in some cases, the content of particular Web sites and/or Web documents. The URL indexing module provides the ability to index this information so that a user can more effectively access a Web site or retrieve a particular web document as if it were any other document stored in the document collection.

In the present invention, there are three exemplary embodiments for implementing the URL indexing module. The first exemplary embodiment involves auto-indexing "bookmarks". A bookmark is an entry in a list of commonly used web sites. In accordance with this embodiment, an STG file is created for each bookmark. The second exemplary embodiment involves physically copying a URL into memory, and indexing information relating to that URL. In this embodiment, an STG file is created for the URL. The third exemplary embodiment involves viewing a particular document located at or identified by a particular URL. Again, information relating to this document may be indexed as with any document in the document collection. Moreover, an STG file is created for the document, and the document can be imported through the Browser utility, which is described below.

CATEGORIES AND CATEGORIZATION OF DOCUMENTS

The present invention also employs a categorization utility 159 that provides different levels of automated assistance in organizing the document collection. A category is a logical grouping of documents that share some common attribute or attributes, sometimes referred to as category criteria. For example, a category may consist of a number of documents that share a common author, a number of documents that contain at least a predefined number of words, a number of documents that contain certain key words, or a number of documents that share a common concept. A more specific example might be a category called "company press releases" or a category called "all e-mails I've sent out". Categories can also be defined hierarchically. In other words, a category may have a subcategory. For example, "all e-mails I've sent out to my group" might be a subcategory of "all e-mails I've sent out".

The categorization utility 159 implements a category by associating a corresponding set of category criteria with a folder in the document collection hierarchy; however, it will be recognized that not every folder in the document collection hierarchy is associated with a category. For example, in FIG. 3, folder F2 is associated with a category as indicated by the symbol "*". However, folders F1, F3 and F4 are not associated with a category.

Folders that are associated with a category are, in general, referred to herein as "smart" folders. They are referred to as smart folders because the categorization utility 159 continuously searches through the STG file directory, or a portion thereof, for documents that match the category criteria associated with each smart folder. If a match is identified, the categorization utility 159 generates a link between the smart folder and the matching document, through the matching document's STG file, thus creating the appearance that smart folders automatically collect matching documents without user interaction.

As stated, the categorization utility 159 may only search a portion of the STG directory for documents that match the category criteria of a given smart folder. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the categorization utility 159 limits its search of the STG directory to only those STG files associated with documents that are linked to the smart folder's parent folder. For example, in FIG. 3, F2 is a smart folder. In accordance with this exemplary embodiment, the categorization utility 159 searches the STG files associated with F1, wherein F1 is the parent folder of F2. Accordingly, the categorization utility 159 only searches through the STG files associated with the documents D1, D2, D3 and D4. At present, only the documents D3 and D4 match the category criteria associated with the smart folder F2.

Generating a link between a document and a smart folder may occur after an STG file is created for a new document, or it may occur after an existing STG file has been updated due to the modification of its corresponding document, wherein the modification caused the document to meet the category criteria of the smart folder. Similarly, if a document is modified such that the modification causes the document to no longer meet the category criteria of a particular smart folder, the link between that document's STG file and the smart folder may be eliminated.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the categorization utility 159 categorizes documents under various smart folders using one of three possible categorization methods: auto categorization; semi-automatic categorization; or manual categorization.

With manual categorization, a document, through its corresponding STG file, is linked with a particular category, hence a particular folder, when a user physically "drags and drops" a display screen representation of the document onto a display screen representation of the folder. As the categorization utility 159 did not previously nor automatically categorize the document with this folder, the folder is either not a smart folder or it is an inactive smart folder, or the folder is an active smart folder, but the document does not otherwise match the corresponding category criteria. Active versus inactive smart folders are explained in more detail below.

Semi-automatic categorization involves categorizing a document into any one or more categories with minimal user interaction. Here, the user constructs category criteria in the form of a query. The query, in turn, comprises one or more key terms and/or document attributes which define the category. The user may also restrict the scope of the query, for example, to particular directories or document types. The category criteria are then associated with a folder, i.e., a smart folder, and the categorization utility 159 continuously searches through all or a portion of the STG files for documents that have attributes matching the category criteria. If a matching document is identified, a new link is established between the corresponding smart folder and the matching document through the document's STG file.

Automatic categorization involves categorizing a document into one or more categories without any user interaction. Here, each category is represented by a smart folder that initially contains a "seed" document. The "seed" document is then analyzed by the categorization utility 159, and the category criteria (i.e., the key words and/or attributes) are automatically extracted. Existing documents and new documents that match the automatically extracted category criteria are linked with the smart folder through their corresponding STG files.

The categorization utility 159 can utilize the indexing information to examine the relationship between the various documents within a particular category. This feature scores or ranks the relationships. For example, documents that share a large number of key terms are considered closely related; those that do not share a large number of key terms are considered less related. The categorization utility 159 can display the results in the form of an organization hierarchy "tree". Branching high in the organizational hierarchy denotes a close relationship, while branching low in the hierarchy denotes a more distant relationship.

In a preferred embodiment, a user can modify the category criteria associated with a smart folder. This is accomplished through a "modify category criteria" user interface. Changing category criteria may result in the categorization utility 159 purging documents from the corresponding category if the documents no longer match the category criteria. In addition, the categorization utility 159 initiates a search using the modified category criteria, to identify additional documents in the document collection that are now relevant given the new category criteria.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a user may designate a smart folder as active or non-active. For each active smart folder, the categorization utility 159 continuously searches the STG file directory, as described above, for documents that match the category criteria associated with each of the smart folders. For inactive smart folders, the categorization utility 159 does not continuously search the STG file directory for documents that match the category criteria of the various inactive smart folders; however, a user is able manually categorize a document with a non-active smart folder. Active smart folders are sometimes referred to as "hungry" folders.

Smart folders can also be reactive. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a user can program a smart folder with particular behavioral characteristics, such that a particular task or tasks are automatically performed on or with the documents linked with that smart folder. For example, the user may program a smart folder to automatically e-mail all documents stored therein to a particular e-mail address. In another example, the user may program a smart folder to periodically display folder updates, such as the addition or deletion of new documents.

With respect to semi-automatic and automatic categorization, there are two filter types associated with each smart folder. The first filter type generates an inclusion list. The inclusion list identifies those documents that were not automatically included in the category associated with the smart folder during the categorization process. The inclusion list may provide the user with an indication that the category criteria associated with that category are too restrictive. The second filter type generates an exclusion list. The exclusion list identifies those documents that were not automatically excluded from the category associated with the smart folder during the categorization process. The exclusion list may provide the user with an indication that the category criteria associated with that category are not restrictive enough (i.e., the category criteria is too aggressive). Both lists are manually manipulated by the user. Accordingly, the user can modify the two lists as needed.

As explained above, the data defining the links that are established between the various smart folders and the documents in the document collection are maintained in the DCO file. If a user modifies the contents of a document and that modification causes a change in the link or links between that document, through its corresponding STG file, and one or more smart folders, a change notification utility (not shown in FIG. 1B) updates the DCO file to reflect the changes accordingly. More specifically, the change notification utility modifies the DCO file to reflect the newly created links and/or the deletion of links. The change notification utility also updates the thumbnail representations if needed. And if the user deletes a document in its entirety, the change notification utility deletes all of the links associated with that document from the DCO file.

The user interface for the change notification utility is illustrated in FIG. 4. This user interface allows the user to select a few preferences with respect to the change notification utility. More particularly, the user can select how often the utility is to perform the updates, as well as the type of file changes that triggers an update notification.

IMPORTING DOCUMENTS

The present invention also employs a document importing utility 161. The document importing utility permits the present invention to import electronic documents or electronic representation of paper-based documents from various sources. For example, the document importing utility 161, as shown in FIG. 1A, can import documents from a scanner, from an external memory such as a hard drive, from a LAN, or from the internet.

The first feature associated with the document importing utility 161 is the scanner module. The scanner module controls a scanner connected to the host computer system. More specifically, the scanner module allows the user to set-up the scanner. It also controls the scanning process and the process of saving the electronic representation of the document being scanned.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there are a number of user interfaces associated with the scanner module. The first user interface is the scanner preferences interface, and there are four display options associated with the scanner preferences interface. The first display option allows the user to define various scanner options, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The second display option is for defining image file options, as illustrated in FIG. 6. The third display is for setting-up scan-to-category options, as illustrated in FIG. 7. This option permits the user to scan a document directly into a desired category. The fourth is for defining options with respect to multiple page documents, as illustrated in FIG. 8.

With particular regard to the multiple page option interface illustrated in FIG. 8, this set of user-defined options is for controlling the scanner's automatic document feeder (ADF). Of course, this particular scanner preference option is enabled only if the scanner has an ADF. If the user selects the "Check ADF continuously" box 805, the scanner is polled at a predefined interval to determine whether there is paper in the ADF waiting to be scanned. If there is paper in the ADF, it is scanned, and the document is saved according to the other above-identified scanner preference options. If there is more than one page being scanned, there are a number of additional options as illustrated in FIG. 8. If the user selects the "prompt for more pages at the end of the scan" box 810, the user will be prompted to append additional pages to the document at the end of the current scanning operation.

The second user interface associated with the scanner module is the scanner control interface. The scanner control interface is illustrated in FIG. 9. When the scan button 905 in the center of the scanner control interface is selected, the scanner module begins scanning a document in accordance with the scanner preference options described above. If the user selects the scanner control interface title bar 910, the scanner preferences interface described above is be displayed, thus allowing the user to accept or change the current scanner preference options.

As previously stated, an STG file is created for each new document in the document collection. In addition, the index and retrieval engine indexes each new document based on the attribute data in the corresponding STG file, and the categorization utility 159 links each new document with the appropriate smart folders. Each of these features holds true for new documents that have been scanned into the document collection as well as those which have entered the document collection via other mechanisms. This saves the user from having to physically interact with a particular document or documents after they have been scanned.

The second feature associated with the document importing utility 161 is the file import module. The file import module is responsible for extracting and saving attribute information in the STG file of a newly imported document. The attribute information extracted from each document by the file import module depends, to some extent, upon the file type. With regard to word processing type documents, the file import module extracts and saves the raw text information. The file import module also extracts a 96×96 pixel map for generating a thumbnail image of the first page of each document. Thumbnails contain actual document information, and are primarily used in conjunction with the Browser utility to help a user quickly identify specific files. FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary display from the Browser utility which contains a number of thumbnail representations 1005 for the category entitled "My Documents" as indicated in text box 1010. For image files, the file import module extracts a thumbnail map and any meta-text associated with the image file. Meta-text contains the content and position information for any alpha-numeric information appearing in the image. The file import module then converts the alpha-numeric information into plain text. The plain text can then be used by the index and retrieval engine as described above. Therefore, image files can be indexed and categorized just like word processing and other text files.

When a color image containing text is to be scanned, the user can specify that the color image is to be scanned using a two-pass scanning process. The first pass is a low resolution scan which converts the document into a desired image format, e.g., TIFF, JPEG etc. . . . The second pass is a higher resolution pass that is conducted on a non-color or non-gray scale version of the image. This second scanning pass is used to obtain the position of the meta-text described above.

The third feature associated with the document importing utility 161 is the failed import recovery feature. If, upon importing a document into the document collection, the file import module is unable to determine the document format, the user is prompted to define the format.

BROWSING DOCUMENTS

The present invention includes a document browsing utility 163. The Browser utility 163 permits the user to quickly and efficiently review the document collection or a portion thereof. Moreover, it allows the user to view the documents and the document categories as they are logically arranged in the organizational tree described above. In addition, the Browser utility 163 permits the user to manipulate documents and document categories; to copy, move and delete documents and document categories; to view and print documents; and to bundle multiple documents into a compound document entity referred to as a clipped document. Clipped documents are described in greater detail below.

There are two basic user interfaces associated with the Browser utility 163. The first is referred to as My Computer, as illustrated in FIG. 10. When viewing documents and document categories with the My Computer interface, there is one display panel 1015 for displaying a representation of each document, clipped document or folder. In FIG. 10, the document representations are displayed as thumbnails, although other representations are available such as small or large icons. The second user interface is referred to as the Explorer interface, as illustrated in FIG. 11. In contrast, Explorer has two display panels: a right display panel 1105 and a left display panel 1110. While the left panel 1110 displays the folders and/or document categories, including the one currently opened, the right panel 1105 displays a representation of each document, clipped document and/or folder associated with the currently opened folder or document category. Again, the representations appearing in the right panel 1105 can take the form of thumbnails, small icons, or large icons. In FIG. 11, the representations are in the form of small icons.

The Browser utility 163 allows the user to interact with the documents in the document collection in a number of different ways. Using a mouse or cursor, the user can open documents in a corresponding host application. The user can open a category and display the documents, clipped documents, folders and/or subcategories associated therewith. The user can open a context menu 1115 for a given document, as shown in FIG. 11, wherein the context menu 1115 provides the user with a number of additional options as illustrated.

These two user interfaces associated with the Browser utility 163, My Computer, as illustrated in FIG. 10, and Explorer, as illustrated in FIG. 11, each have a number of standard pull-down menus. The FILE pull-down menu, for example, allows the user to, among other options, open documents, clipped documents, or document categories; send documents or clipped documents as e-mail messages; create new categories; import new documents from the scanner; delete, rename and/or list the properties of documents, clipped documents and categories. The EDIT menu allows the user to copy, paste, select all or part of a document. This menu also allows the user to clip or unclip documents. The VIEW menu, among other options, allows the user to display a customizable application toolbar, to be described below, and to control the arrangement and display representation of each document. In addition, there is also a TOOLS, TEST and a HELP menu.

In order to import a document into the system's document collection from the Browser utility 163, a user can exercise one of several options. For example, a user can drag a document from the computer operating system desktop environment and drop it onto a Browser utility icon also appearing on the desktop. If one of the two above-identified Browser utility interfaces is active, the user can drag a document from the desktop environment and drop it into one of the aforementioned panels in a location that is unoccupied by another icon or thumbnail. As described above, the categorization utility 159 automatically categorizes these documents based on the document attributes extracted and then stored in their corresponding STG files. The user can also drag a document from the desktop environment into a particular category representation appearing in the Browser interface, thus, manually categorizing the document. Finally, the user can cut and paste all or part of a document, or the user can scan in a document.

The user can also initiate a scanning operation from the Browser utility 163. A representation of the scanned image can be displayed on the desktop or scanned directly into one or more categories based on the user specified scanner options described above. This too is handled by a task manager utility 165 which is described in greater detail below.

The user may also opt to display the customizable application toolbar, mentioned above, with either of the two Browser interfaces. An exemplary toolbar 1205 is illustrated in FIG. 12. The toolbar 1205 makes it easier for the user to directly interact with documents maintained in the document collection. For example, by employing the toolbar 1205, the user is able to drag and drop application program icons or buttons (i.e., buttons or icons which, if selected, launch an application program such as Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Word, Netscape, or Wordperfect), thus allowing the user to quickly open one or more application programs and to convert, view and/or edit documents on-the-fly. This on-the-fly document conversion is accomplished by employing conversion filters to convert the various file formats. As stated, the user is able to quickly execute other functions with the customizable application toolbar, such as send e-mail, transmit facsimiles, and initiate print jobs.

The Browser utility 163 is also capable of displaying a representation for one or more transitional documents. A transitional document is a document that is currently being processed by the importing utility 161. During the period in which a document is being processed by the importing utility 161, the Browser utility 163 displays an "in-transition" icon for that document, for example, the in-transition icons 1305 shown in FIG. 13. However, an in-transition icon is a temporary representation. When the importing utility 161 finishes processing the document, the Browser utility 163 automatically replaces the in-transition icon with the appropriate thumbnail representation, a small icon or a large icon, depending upon the current Browser utility display settings described above. In-transition icons provide the user with an easily recognizable representation for each of the one or more transitional documents.

SEARCHING DOCUMENTS

The present invention also includes a document searching utility 167. The searching utility 167, in turn, employs a search engine that globally searches the document collection (i.e., the STG files in the STG file directory) and retrieves documents that fit or match a number of user-defined conditions with respect to text, meta-text, and/or other file attributes (e.g., document author, date, size, format).

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there are two search types which the user can initiate: a basic search and an advanced search. The basic search allows the user to search the document collection using a search query that contains only words or phrases. The advanced search allows the user to build a query that contains words and/or phrases as well as other file attributes, and it allows the user to combine the various words, phrases and other file attributes with boolean operators.

Whether the user invokes a basic search or an advanced search, the searching procedure is essentially the same. The user enters a desired query, then selects a FIND NOW option in the corresponding user interface, which is described in greater detail below. The results are then displayed. The user then selects one or more of the identified documents, if desired.

As stated, there is a user interface for the basic search and a user interface for the advanced search. The user interface for the basic search is illustrated in FIG. 14. As shown in FIG. 14, the user interface is divided into an upper portion 1405, which is reserved for building search queries, and a lower portion 1410, where the results of a given search are displayed. The lower portion 1410 is referred to as the results listbox.

After the user builds a basic search query, the user selects the FIND NOW option 1415 on the user interface to initiate the search. The search engine then performs the search for that query. As the indexing engine finds a document that matches the search criteria defined by the search query, the indexing engines informs the search utility 167. The search utility 167, in turn, displays the name of the document in the results listbox 1410 of the basic search user interface. At any time during the search, the user can select the STOP option 1420 on the user interface, which forces the indexing engine to terminate the search.

With regard to the results listbox 1410, the user can view the identified documents as small icons, large icons, thumbnails, or as a detailed list of documents. In an exemplary embodiment, the search utility 167 creates one or more smart folders and displays them in the results listbox 1410. Each of the one or more smart folders has category criteria associated with a particular level of relevance (e.g., a number of search hits). Documents identified during the search are linked to one of these smart folders depending upon the actual relevancy of the document. For example, the search utility 167 may create two smart folders. The first smart folder's category criteria may be documents identified during the search operation having 10 or more search hits. In contrast, the second smart folder's category criteria may be documents identified during the search having less than 10 search hits. The search utility 167 then links the documents identified during the search to either the first or the second smart folder accordingly. The smart folders, along with the documents linked thereto are then displayed in the results listbox 1410. In another example, the search operation may create a number of smart folders which are displayed in the listbox 1410, wherein each smart folder may be linked to a group of documents that share a certain number of key search terms. Alternatively, each smart folder may be linked to a group of documents containing key search terms that exhibit a certain semantic similarity.

In accordance with another exemplary embodiment, the search operation may identify one or more existing categories whose category criteria, in whole or in part, overlaps the key search query criteria. The search results might then be organized such that the one or more existing categories are listed. The user could then view those documents associated with each category that meet the search query criteria.

The user can also select any number of retrieved documents, and then select the SIMILAR DOCS 1425 option on the basic search user interface. The search utility 167 then queries the indexing engine to identify all documents similar to those selected. For example, the indexing engine might identify all documents that are similarly categorized. The newly identified documents are then displayed in the results listbox 1410.

The advanced search user interface is accessed through the basic search user interface by selecting the ADVANCED option 1430. The advanced search user interface is illustrated in FIG. 15. As stated above, the primary difference between a basic search and an advanced search is that with an advanced search, the user can conduct more sophisticated searches with words, phrases, file attributes and/or a combination thereof using boolean operators. A file attribute refers to any number of file characteristics, for example, document size, publication date, author, or document source (i.e., files with a particular extension such as *.TIF, *.TXT, *.HTM).

Although the advanced search user interface, like the basic search user interface, includes an upper portion 1505 for building search queries, and a lower portion 1510 for displaying search results, the advanced search user interface also includes a number of additional options not available for basic searching. For example, the user can modify the scope of an advanced search by entering a specific category in the SCOPE EDIT BOX 1515. By selecting the BROWSE option 1520, a category tree is displayed, which allows the user to select, therefrom, a category for limiting the scope of the advanced search. Accordingly, the selected category is displayed in the SCOPE EDIT BOX 1515. The user can also limit the scope of an advanced search to the contents of each document, excluding document annotations; or the user can include the annotations; or the user can limit the search to only document annotations. This is accomplished by selecting the box 1525 entitled "Include Documents" and/or the box 1530 entitled "Include Annotations". Finally, the user can return to the basic search user interface by selecting the BASIC option 1535. If the user selects this option, all search conditions are lost except those containing exclusively words and/or phrases.

VIEWING DOCUMENTS

The next utility employed by the present invention is the document viewing utility 169. The document viewing utility 169 allows the user to view an entire document regardless of document type or document format, even if the corresponding host application cannot be launched.

The document viewing utility 169 user interface, as illustrated in FIG. 16, is accessed through the Browser utility 163. The document viewing user interface comprises two panes, a right pane 1605 and a left pane 1610, as illustrated in FIG. 16. The left pane 1610 displays an icon or thumbnail of the document that is being viewed in the right pane 1605. In a preferred embodiment, a thumbnail representation is used if the document is an image. If, instead of a document, a clipped document is being viewed, then the icons or thumbnails for each individual document associated with the clipped document is displayed in the left pane 1610.

The document viewing user interface, like the browser user interfaces, includes a customizable application toolbar 1615 as illustrated in FIG. 16. Again, the toolbar 1615 is customizable in that the user can drag and drop functional buttons into the toolbar 1615 as described above, particularly buttons that, when selected, launch an application program which the user may need to properly view the documents. In addition, the toolbar 1615 may contain a number of functional buttons. In FIG. 16, the toolbar 1615 includes, from left to right, buttons for opening, saving, printing, hand scrolling, annotating, zooming, and advancing forward or back one page of the document being viewed.

The document viewing utility 169 also highlights category criteria. In other words, it highlights the various key words, phrases, and/or attributes in the document being viewed, which make up the category criteria, assuming, of course, the document has been categorized.

CLIPPED DOCUMENTS

The present invention also utilizes a document clipping utility 171. This utility allows a user to combine several documents into a compound document entity herein referred to as a clipped document. More specifically, a clipped document is a form of compound document that contains zero or more documents of any type or format. For example, a clipped document may contain an image document, a Microsoft Word document, a Wordperfect document and a web page in HTML format.

Clipped documents are different from ordinary file folders. First, clipped documents maintain the order in which each component document appears. In other words, each of the component documents that are associated with a clipped document maintains a relative position within the clipped document with respect to the other component documents. Second, clipped documents provide the user with the ability to quickly and simply manipulate a set of related documents as a group. For example, a user can e-mail a clipped document to another user, and the other user actually receives the documents as a clipped document. If the host computer being operated by the other user is not executing the present invention, the other user receives each of the documents individually.

Although the user can manipulate the component documents as a group, there are other instances when the component documents associated with a clipped document are manipulated individually. For example, the search engine, in performing a basic or advanced search, identifies each component document within a clipped document, assuming they meet the search criteria, including the level of relevance of each individual component document.

As explained above, the present invention employs a virtual document storage feature. Accordingly, clipped documents do not physically contain a copy of each component document. Rather, each clipped document has a corresponding STG file, as described above, and as illustrated in FIG. 2B. The STG file associated with a clipped document contains a link to the STG file of each component document (see FIG. 2A). Once again, this virtual document storage feature saves valuable memory space and it helps maintain document integrity (i.e., a single, up-to-date version of each document).

Just as individual documents can belong to more than one category, clipped documents can belong to more than one category. A clipped document can also belong to no categories.

In a preferred embodiment, there are six ways in which a user can create a clipped document. First, from the Browser utility 163, a user can drag the representation of a source document D1 and drop it onto the representation of a destination document D2, as illustrated in FIGS. 17A-17D. The Browser utility 163 creates a new clipped document S in the category containing the destination document D2. A representation of the new clipped document S then appears to subsume the representation of the destination document D2. At the same time, the source document D1 remains in the source category or be removed from the source category depending upon whether the user executes a copy operation or move operation.

Second, from the Browser utility 163, a user can drag the representation of an existing clipped document and drop it onto a destination document. The Browser utility 163 causes the destination document to become concatenated with the clipped document, which in turn appears to subsume the representation of the destination document. A representation of a new clipped document, once again, appears in the category containing the destination document. Also, the existing clipped document remains in or is removed from the source category depending upon whether the user executes a copy operation or a move operation.

Third, from the Browser utility 163, a user can drag the representation of a source document and drop it onto the representation of an existing clipped document in a destination category. Here, the source document is appended to the existing clipped document in the destination category. Again, the source document remains in or is removed from the source category depending upon whether the user executes a copy operation or a move operation.

Fourth, from the Browser utility 163, a user can drag the representation of a clipped document from a source category and drop it onto a representation of a clipped document in a destination category. Accordingly, the component documents associated with the source clipped document are appended to the destination clipped document. The source clipped document remains in or is removed from the source category depending upon whether the user executes a copy operation or a move operation.

Fifth, from the Browser utility 163, a user can simply create a new clipped document. The user can then designate that the clipped document is to be associated with a particular category.

Sixth, from the document viewing utility 169, a user can drag the representation of a document in a source category or the representation of a clipped document in a source category and drop it onto the representation of the document being viewed. The document or documents associated with the clipped document are appended to the document being viewed, thus creating a new clipped document in the category containing the document being viewed. Once again, the source document or source clipped document remains in or is removed from the source category depending upon whether the user executes a copy operation or a move operation.

A user can also unclip a clipped document. Upon executing an unclipping operation, the representation of the clipped document is removed and the representations of the component documents are made visible in the corresponding Browser user interface. Additionally, the user can delete a clipped document, either locally or globally. From within a particular category, the user merely executes a delete clipped document command, wherein the Browser utility 163 deletes the clipped document, along with the component documents, from that category. From the "My Documents" category, a user can execute a delete clipped document command, wherein the Browser utility 163 deletes the clipped document from every category.

Other software applications, such as Microsoft Office, employ compound document entities; however, these entities differ from clipped documents. For example, Microsoft Office uses "binders". Unlike clipped documents, binders only allow a user to mix Microsoft Excel, Powerpoint and Word documents. But binders do not allow the user to bind non-Microsoft Office formatted documents. Another major difference between binders and clipped documents is that binders are monolithic documents. In other words, the component documents cannot be individually manipulated. In addition, a user of Microsoft Office cannot e-mail a binder to another person unless the other person is running Microsoft Office. Yet another difference between Microsoft Office binders and clipped documents is the fact that binders maintain a physical copy of each component document whereas the present invention employs a virtual document storage feature. As explained above, this is an inefficient usage of memory space, and it can lead to multiple versions of a single document, since a single document may be stored in more than one binder.

FILE HELPER

A next utility is the file helper or archiving utility 173. The file helper utility keeps the document collection tidy. More specifically, the file helper utility automatically archives files onto removable media, if, in general, those files have not been accessed or modified for a long period of time. The file helper utility also notifies the user if files have old dates; it notifies the indexing engine and the DCO file when files are taken off-line; it monitors the document collection for document duplicates; and it organizes a separate index of off-line documents.

The file helper utility has a user interface, as illustrated in FIG. 18. As one skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the user interface illustrated in FIG. 18 permits the user to select one or more various conditions that trigger the automatic archiving process. The file helper utility also prompts a user, if the user so desires, before the system archives a document in accordance with the user selected options. In addition, there are a number of secondary user interfaces associated with the file helper utility 173, for example, the user interface illustrated in FIG. 19. The secondary user interfaces are utilized for entering more specific archiving conditions, such as the exact size of a document or the age of a document that trigger this archiving utility 173.

The file helper utility continues to maintain a link to or an index of each archived document, by storing a thumbnail representation of each archived document and/or the STG file associated with each archived document. Therefore, if a user wishes to run a search involving archived documents, the search engine is capable of searching the content of the thumbnail representations and/or the STG file data fields of each archived document. If the search identifies one or more archived documents, the file helper utility prompts the user to make the appropriate removable storage medium available (e.g., prompt the user to insert a particular floppy disk) in the event the user wishes to access the archived document.

DIRECTORY MONITOR

There is also a directory monitor utility 175 that monitors specific user-identified directories, categories, and/or folders on a particular storage device for newly stored documents. When the directory monitor utility 175 identifies newly stored documents, the categorization utility 159 automatically categorizes these documents into the appropriate categories or smart folders, as described above. Again, there is a user interface associated with the directory monitor utility 175 as illustrate in FIG. 20. As shown, the user interface provides the user with a vehicle to select the particular directories to be monitored.

TASK MANAGER

The task manager utility 165 is yet another utility employed by the present invention. The task manager utility 165 is a multi-threaded single instance utility that is launched when the host computer is booted after loading the software associated with the present invention or upon a first request for one of its services after the utility has been turned off. Its main function, however, is to facilitate background or batch processing jobs such as importing documents into the document collection.

The task manager utility 165 has a corresponding user interface, as illustrated in FIG. 21. The user interface includes a queue for displaying a list 2105 of the various tasks currently being undertaken by the task manager utility 165.

When the task manager utility 165 is first initiated, for example, if the user executes a document import request, a small icon 2210 appears in the system task bar at the bottom of the display, as illustrated in FIG. 22. If the user selects the icon (with a mouse/cursor), the task manager utility 165 responds by opening the task manager utility 165 user interface.

The task manager utility 165 user interface also includes a number of "pull-down" menus, as illustrated in FIG. 21, including a QUEUE menu and a JOB menu. The QUEUE menu includes, among other options, the option of stopping the task manager utility 165 from scanning or indexing a document, purging the queue, and terminating the task manager utility 165. The JOB menu provides options that include purging a document from the queue, and changing the priority in which the task manager utility 165 executes the jobs in the queue.

ANNOTATIONS

The present invention has an annotations utility 177 which provides the user with the option of adding annotations to a document before a scanning operation is completed. This feature allows the user to automatically manipulate an image document, including the added annotations, immediately upon completion of the scan. The user is also permitted to add annotations of almost any type. For example, text annotations, free-form annotations (i.e., pictures and graphs), and waveform (i.e., audio) annotations. Drag and drop annotations are also available, if a user wishes to insert an annotation from one document into another document. The user can even print annotations apart from the remainder of the accompanying document.

PROPERTY SHEETS

The present invention also has a property sheet utility 179. The property sheet utility 179 allows a user to display a property sheet for each individual category, clipped document and/or document. Property sheets are yet additional user interfaces which convey specific summary information about a given category, document and/or clipped document. This summary information may include particular document attributes such as document size, date, author, or the number of key words or attributes contained in a document. Moreover, the summary information for a particular document is stored in the STG file corresponding to that document. Table I contains a list of potential attributes that might appear in a property sheet depending upon whether the property sheet pertains to a category, a clipped document or a document. Property sheets might also include a brief synopsis or abstract describing the contents of a given document. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, property sheets can be accessed either through the Browser utility 163 or the document viewing utility 169.

                                  TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________CATEGORY      CLIPPED DOCUMENT                    DOCUMENT__________________________________________________________________________•location         •size                    •image type (with values of color•size   •name                    8-bit gray scale, 4-bit gray•folder members         •created date                    scale, or binary)•name   •modified date                    •doc type (scanner/image/tiff,•creation date         •accessed date                    word processor document, etc.)•modified date (modifying         •author                    •width dimension (for scannedeither criteria changed or         •title                    documents)the documents it contains         •last saved by                    •height dimension (for scannedchanges)      •subject                    documents)•author            •size•criteria, threshold score,                    •physical storage-- idand exemplar document    •storage media (e.g., the type of•document members  media on which a document is•clipped document members                    stored)•inclusion list    •name•exclusion list    •modified date•automatically included                    •accessed datedocuments                •author•contains (number of                    •key wordsdocuments, clipped documents,                    •summaryetc.)                    •title•static/dynamic (an inactive                    •subjector hungry category       •categories (i.e., the categories•up-to-date (meaning is the                    to which a document belongs)category current with regards                    •clipped documents (i.e., theto the documents held in the                    clipped documents to which acollection)              document belongs)                    •query hits                    •relevance score (i.e., the                    relevance score the document has                    to the query)                    •revision number                    •text information (e.g., number                    of characters, etc.)__________________________________________________________________________

The invention has been described with reference to a preferred exemplary embodiment. However, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that it is possible to embody the invention in forms other than those of the preferred embodiment described above. This may be done without departing from the spirit of the invention. The preferred embodiment is merely illustrative and should not be considered restrictive in any way. The scope of the invention is given by the appended claims, rather than the preceding description, and all variations and equivalents which fall within the range of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5060135 *1 Nov 198822 Oct 1991Wang Laboratories, Inc.Apparatus for manipulating documents in a data processing system utilizing reduced images of sheets of information which are movable
US5369508 *29 Oct 199329 Nov 1994System X, L. P.Information processing methodology
US5459307 *30 Nov 199317 Oct 1995Xerox CorporationSystem for storage and retrieval of digitally encoded information on a medium
US5499108 *9 Dec 199212 Mar 1996Visioneer Communications, Inc.Document-driven scanning input device communicating with a computer
US5715381 *8 Aug 19943 Feb 1998Xerox CorporationMethod of creating and managing packages, including multiple documents, in a printing system
US5754939 *31 Oct 199519 May 1998Herz; Frederick S. M.System for generation of user profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US5778397 *28 Jun 19957 Jul 1998Xerox CorporationAutomatic method of generating feature probabilities for automatic extracting summarization
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"Intelligent Document Retrieval." IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1, 1991, pp. 403-405.
2"Technology Enables Users to Have Paperless Office and Easily File, Store, Retrieve, Annotate and Distribute More Than 100,000 Electronically Created or Paper-Based Documents of Unlimited Size and File Type", Computhink, Business Wire, Chicago, IL, Oct. 18, 1996.
3"Visioneer Announces PaperPort Software for Everyone", Visioneer, Inc., PRNewswire, Fremont, CA, Nov. 4, 1996.
4"Visioneer Awarded Patents on Innovative Paper Management Technology and Product Design", Visioneer, Inc. PRNewswire, Palo Alto, CA, Jul. 9, 1996.
5Gottesman, B. et al., "Ending the Paper Chase." PG Magazine, Oct. 24, 1995, pp. 129, 131, 134, 135, 140, 142, 144, 151, 152, 154-156, 160-162.
6 *Gottesman, B. et al., Ending the Paper Chase. PG Magazine, Oct. 24, 1995, pp. 129, 131, 134, 135, 140, 142, 144, 151, 152, 154 156, 160 162.
7 *Intelligent Document Retrieval. IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1, 1991, pp. 403 405.
8 *International Search Report issued on Feb. 15, 1999, in connection with Counterpart PCT Application No. PCT/US98/20488.
9Rose, D.E., "Content Awareness in a File System Interface: Implementing the `Pile` Metaphor for Organizing Information." Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Pittsburgh, Jun. 1993, pp. 260-269.
10 *Rose, D.E., Content Awareness in a File System Interface: Implementing the Pile Metaphor for Organizing Information. Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Pittsburgh, Jun. 1993, pp. 260 269.
11 *Technology Enables Users to Have Paperless Office and Easily File, Store, Retrieve, Annotate and Distribute More Than 100,000 Electronically Created or Paper Based Documents of Unlimited Size and File Type , Computhink, Business Wire, Chicago, IL, Oct. 18, 1996.
12 *Visioneer Announces PaperPort Software for Everyone , Visioneer, Inc., PRNewswire, Fremont, CA, Nov. 4, 1996.
13 *Visioneer Awarded Patents on Innovative Paper Management Technology and Product Design , Visioneer, Inc. PRNewswire, Palo Alto, CA, Jul. 9, 1996.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6108676 *27 Oct 199722 Aug 2000Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Document processing apparatus, document type determining method, and hierarchical regular expression determining method
US6144975 *5 May 19987 Nov 2000Fmr CorporationComputer system for intelligent document management
US6240429 *31 Aug 199829 May 2001Xerox CorporationUsing attached properties to provide document services
US624350120 May 19985 Jun 2001Canon Kabushiki KaishaAdaptive recognition of documents using layout attributes
US6253208 *31 Mar 199826 Jun 2001British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanyInformation access
US6272484 *27 May 19987 Aug 2001Scansoft, Inc.Electronic document manager
US6308179 *31 Aug 199823 Oct 2001Xerox CorporationUser level controlled mechanism inter-positioned in a read/write path of a property-based document management system
US6314425 *17 Aug 19996 Nov 2001Critical Path, Inc.Apparatus and methods for use of access tokens in an internet document management system
US6330573 *31 Aug 199811 Dec 2001Xerox CorporationMaintaining document identity across hierarchy and non-hierarchy file systems
US6351747 *12 Apr 199926 Feb 2002Multex.Com, Inc.Method and system for providing data to a user based on a user's query
US6397209 *29 Aug 199728 May 2002Telexis CorporationReal time structured summary search engine
US6466983 *30 Sep 199915 Oct 2002Steven Paul StrazzaSystems and methods for controlling access to data maintained in a repository
US656207631 Aug 199813 May 2003Xerox CorporationExtending application behavior through active properties attached to a document in a document management system
US65810579 May 200017 Jun 2003Justsystem CorporationMethod and apparatus for rapidly producing document summaries and document browsing aids
US658247429 Jun 200124 Jun 2003Xerox CorporationTagging related files in a document management system
US6584466 *7 Apr 199924 Jun 2003Critical Path, Inc.Internet document management system and methods
US6610104 *9 Jul 199926 Aug 2003Inventec Corp.Method for updating a document by means of appending
US6613100 *26 Nov 19972 Sep 2003Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for displaying miniaturized graphical representations of documents for alternative viewing selection
US6658456 *22 Sep 19982 Dec 2003Panasonic Communications Co., Ltd.Electric mail transferring apparatus and electric mail transferring method
US6691309 *25 Feb 200010 Feb 2004International Business Machines CorporationLong term archiving of digital information
US672522831 Oct 200020 Apr 2004David Morley ClarkSystem for managing and organizing stored electronic messages
US6784925 *24 Mar 199831 Aug 2004Canon Kabushiki KaishaSystem to manage digital camera images
US6826572 *13 Nov 200130 Nov 2004Overture Services, Inc.System and method allowing advertisers to manage search listings in a pay for placement search system using grouping
US6842876 *14 Apr 199811 Jan 2005Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Document cache replacement policy for automatically generating groups of documents based on similarity of content
US6918083 *24 May 200112 Jul 2005The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyTool for marking up electronic documents
US6950533 *31 Jul 200127 Sep 2005International Business Machines CorporationSorting images for improved data entry productivity
US7047248 *19 Nov 199716 May 2006International Business Machines CorporationData processing system and method for archiving and accessing electronic messages
US709290124 Jul 200115 Aug 2006Overture Services, Inc.System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US711102410 Oct 200219 Sep 2006Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaDocument management system for automating operations performed on documents in data storage areas
US711724724 Apr 20013 Oct 2006Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for storing information in an application service provider via e-mails
US7120625 *17 May 200210 Oct 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for document information management
US714269020 Feb 200128 Nov 2006Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US714978423 Apr 200112 Dec 2006Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for exchanging documents with an application service provider at a predetermined time
US717809713 Nov 200013 Feb 2007Srikrishna TalluriMethod and system for using a communications network to archive and retrieve bibliography information and reference material
US71944335 Apr 200220 Mar 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US721607015 Nov 20028 May 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.System and method for managing documents with multiple applications
US724615823 Apr 200117 Jul 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for selecting an application service provider
US72667689 Jan 20014 Sep 2007Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Systems and methods for manipulating electronic information using a three-dimensional iconic representation
US734050420 Jul 20064 Mar 2008Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for storing information in an application service provider
US736330022 May 200622 Apr 2008Overture Services, Inc.System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US740112510 Oct 200015 Jul 2008Ricoh CorporationSystem, computer program product and method for managing documents
US7421650 *1 May 20012 Sep 2008General Electric CompanyMethod and system for publishing electronic media to a document management system in various publishing formats independent of the media creation application
US7447712 *19 Aug 19984 Nov 2008Global 360, Inc.Structured workfolder
US745437130 May 200318 Nov 2008Sureprep, LlcSystem and method for managing login resources for the submission and performance of engagements
US747831610 Oct 200213 Jan 2009Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaDocument management system for transferring a plurality of documents
US7505984 *30 Sep 200317 Mar 2009Google Inc.Systems and methods for information extraction
US7509569 *19 Jul 200424 Mar 2009Ricoh Co., Ltd.Action stickers for nested collections
US751616228 Dec 20047 Apr 2009Konica Minolta Business Technoloiges, Inc.Method, apparatus, and program for document management
US753234019 Apr 200212 May 2009Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaDocument management system rule-based automation
US753315530 Mar 200512 May 2009Ricoh Company, Ltd.System and method for managing documents with multiple network applications
US753663816 Sep 200319 May 2009Ricoh Co., Ltd.Action stickers for identifying and processing stored documents
US7546528 *20 Dec 20049 Jun 2009Ricoh Co., Ltd.Stamp sheets
US7549129 *28 Jun 200216 Jun 2009Microsoft CorporationComputer system with enhanced user interface for images
US7552381 *31 Mar 200423 Jun 2009Ricoh Co., Ltd.Check boxes for identifying and processing stored documents
US7552395 *25 Apr 200523 Jun 2009Neale Richard SGraphical user interface for building boolean queries and viewing search results
US761022730 Jul 200427 Oct 2009Sureprep, LlcSystem and method for creating cross-reference links, tables and lead sheets for tax return documents
US7636712 *14 Nov 200622 Dec 2009Microsoft CorporationBatching document identifiers for result trimming
US763688624 Apr 200322 Dec 2009Sureprep LlcSystem and method for grouping and organizing pages of an electronic document into pre-defined categories
US764730026 Jan 200412 Jan 2010Google Inc.Methods and systems for output of search results
US76604633 Jun 20049 Feb 2010Microsoft CorporationForeground extraction using iterated graph cuts
US767301615 Jun 20072 Mar 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for selecting an application service provider
US7676505 *27 Jan 20069 Mar 2010International Business Machines CorporationSystem, method and computer program product for shared user tailoring of websites
US767675113 Jul 20049 Mar 2010Jpmorgan Chase Bank, NaSystem and method for processing applicant input information
US7679774 *4 Apr 200216 Mar 2010Oce Printing Systems GmbhMethod, system and computer program for the generation of an electronic document from scanned image data
US7685136 *12 Jan 200523 Mar 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system and program product for managing document summary information
US7698335 *27 Jun 200513 Apr 2010Microsoft CorporationCluster organization of electronically-stored items
US7698647 *30 Jan 200713 Apr 2010Fast-Cat, LlcPortable dataport device and method for retrieving, inter-relating, annotating and managing electronic documents at a point of need
US770267814 Mar 200520 Apr 2010Microsoft CorporationSearch capture
US7703002 *31 Mar 200320 Apr 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.Method and apparatus for composing multimedia documents
US77165695 Jan 200511 May 2010Girafa.Com Inc.Framework for providing visual context to WWW hyperlinks
US77206167 May 200318 May 2010Sureprep, LlcMulti-stage, multi-user engagement submission and tracking process
US7720758 *12 Sep 200118 May 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing bills issued from application service providers
US77347151 Mar 20018 Jun 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US77348906 Oct 20068 Jun 2010Okralabs LlcMethod and system for using a distributable virtual address space
US7739583 *31 Mar 200315 Jun 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.Multimedia document sharing method and apparatus
US7742184 *11 Sep 200222 Jun 2010Brother Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaData transmission/reception system that informs a user that image data has been transmitted
US77522774 Jan 20086 Jul 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for storing information in an application service provider
US7757162 *15 Oct 200313 Jul 2010Ricoh Co. Ltd.Document collection manipulation
US7765271 *3 Feb 200027 Jul 2010Hyland Software, Inc.System and method for scanning a document in client/server environment
US776964620 Jun 20073 Aug 2010Sureprep, LlcEfficient work flow system and method for processing taxpayer source documents
US777009924 Jul 20063 Aug 2010Corey YoungEnhanced human computer user interface system for searching and browsing documents
US7774306 *26 Oct 200710 Aug 2010Bnsf Railway CompanyElectronic file creation and management systems and methods
US778354022 Feb 200624 Aug 2010Yahoo! Inc.System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US779733729 Sep 200514 Sep 2010Scenera Technologies, LlcMethods, systems, and computer program products for automatically associating data with a resource as metadata based on a characteristic of the resource
US780915710 Oct 20065 Oct 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US7818307 *27 Jan 200519 Oct 2010United Services Automobile Association (Usaa)System and method of providing electronic access to one or more documents
US782166030 Mar 200526 Oct 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System and method for compensating for resource unavailability in an image processing system
US7822880 *10 Mar 200526 Oct 2010Konica Minolta Systems Laboratory, Inc.User interfaces for peripheral configuration
US78360126 Apr 200716 Nov 2010Google Inc.Systems and methods for information extraction
US7836038 *10 Dec 200316 Nov 2010Google Inc.Methods and systems for information extraction
US7840586 *30 Jun 200423 Nov 2010Nokia CorporationSearching and naming items based on metadata
US78534947 Jan 200514 Dec 2010Sureprep, LlcEfficient work flow system and method for preparing tax returns
US78602674 Aug 200628 Dec 2010Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US787745823 Feb 200625 Jan 2011Ricoh Company Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US7882115 *25 Mar 20051 Feb 2011Scott HirschMethod and apparatus for improved information representation
US7900160 *29 Dec 20031 Mar 2011International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for illustrating a menu of insights associated with visualizations
US791783831 Aug 200629 Mar 2011Cory YoungEnhanced human computer user interface system for searching and browsing documents
US7921355 *31 Aug 20065 Apr 2011Young CoreyEnhanced human computer user interface system for searching and browsing documents
US796960923 Dec 200928 Jun 2011Oce Printing Systems GmbhMethod, system and computer program for the generation of an electronic document from scanned image data
US7970853 *17 Oct 200128 Jun 2011Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.System for controlled printing of a signature using web-based imaging
US797524016 Jan 20045 Jul 2011Microsoft CorporationSystems and methods for controlling a visible results set
US799649018 Mar 20099 Aug 2011Ricoh Company, Ltd.System and method for changing a functionality of an image processing device based on a file corresponding to a network application
US800619729 Sep 200323 Aug 2011Google Inc.Method and apparatus for output of search results
US80105087 Jul 200730 Aug 2011Maya-Systems Inc.Information elements locating system and method
US8027950 *17 Jun 201027 Sep 2011Bnsf Railway CompanyElectronic file creation and management systems and methods
US8028231 *20 Mar 200727 Sep 2011Tractmanager, Inc.Document management system for searching scanned documents
US8036980 *24 Oct 200711 Oct 2011Thomson Reuters Global ResourcesMethod and system of generating audit procedures and forms
US8042062 *17 Apr 200918 Oct 2011Microsoft CorporationComputer system with enhanced user interface for images
US8050988 *21 Dec 20071 Nov 2011Thomson Reuters Global ResourcesMethod and system of generating audit procedures and forms
US805929116 Feb 200715 Nov 2011Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US806039417 Sep 200915 Nov 2011Idocuments, LlcWorker and document management system
US806940413 Sep 200729 Nov 2011Maya-Systems Inc.Method of managing expected documents and system providing same
US8086045 *12 Apr 200727 Dec 2011Ricoh Company, Ltd.Image processing device with classification key selection unit and image processing method
US81272179 Jan 200928 Feb 2012Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaDocument management system for transferring a plurality of documents
US813603020 Feb 200813 Mar 2012Maya-Systems Inc.Method and system for managing music files
US81511858 Jan 20083 Apr 2012Maya-Systems Inc.Multimedia interface
US81662972 Jul 200824 Apr 2012Veritrix, Inc.Systems and methods for controlling access to encrypted data stored on a mobile device
US818081416 Feb 201115 May 2012Docbert, LLCSystem and method for file management
US818564629 Oct 200922 May 2012Veritrix, Inc.User authentication for social networks
US820067124 Feb 201012 Jun 2012Fujitsu LimitedGenerating a dictionary and determining a co-occurrence context for an automated ontology
US8225227 *19 Jan 200717 Jul 2012Microsoft CorporationManaging display of user interfaces
US822981119 Dec 200624 Jul 2012Ricoh Company, Ltd.System, computer program product and method for managing documents
US823929719 Dec 20067 Aug 2012Ricoh Americas CorporationSystem, managing computer program product and method for managing documents
US827585211 Oct 200625 Sep 2012Ricoh Americas CorporationSystem, computer program product and method for managing documents
US830698224 Aug 20116 Nov 2012Maya-Systems Inc.Method for associating and manipulating documents with an object
US831630627 Mar 200720 Nov 2012Maya-Systems Inc.Method and system for sequentially navigating axes of elements
US832131127 Jul 200927 Nov 2012Sureprep, LlcMulti-stage, multi-user engagement submission and tracking process
US8341554 *18 Jan 200825 Dec 2012Adobe Systems IncorporatedLaunch and edit user interface improvements
US834737018 Aug 20111 Jan 2013Veritrix, Inc.Multi-channel multi-factor authentication
US8418080 *17 Oct 20119 Apr 2013Microsoft CorporationComputer system with enhanced user interface for images
US844304513 Jun 200314 May 2013Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Storage of selected e-mails including attachments in document management system
US84683589 Nov 201018 Jun 2013Veritrix, Inc.Methods for identifying the guarantor of an application
US847401416 Aug 201125 Jun 2013Veritrix, Inc.Methods for the secure use of one-time passwords
US850445218 Jan 20086 Aug 2013Thomson Reuters Global ResourcesMethod and system for auditing internal controls
US851656218 Aug 201120 Aug 2013Veritrix, Inc.Multi-channel multi-factor authentication
US852753323 Jul 20103 Sep 2013Yahoo! Inc.Keyword suggestion system for a computer network search engine
US8527882 *17 Mar 20083 Sep 2013Gregory J. SwartzSystem and method for iconic software environment management
US853697611 Jun 200817 Sep 2013Veritrix, Inc.Single-channel multi-factor authentication
US853933421 Aug 200717 Sep 2013Tractmanager, Inc.Document management system having automatic notifications
US8543936 *14 May 200924 Sep 2013Kendyl A. RománGraphical user interface for building Boolean queries and viewing search results
US85550666 Mar 20128 Oct 2013Veritrix, Inc.Systems and methods for controlling access to encrypted data stored on a mobile device
US856048524 Feb 201015 Oct 2013Fujitsu LimitedGenerating a domain corpus and a dictionary for an automated ontology
US860139222 May 20083 Dec 20139224-5489 Quebec Inc.Timeline for presenting information
US860715514 Sep 200910 Dec 20139224-5489 Quebec Inc.Method of managing groups of arrays of documents
US861284619 Jan 201117 Dec 2013Google Inc.Framework for providing visual context to www hyperlink
US86207866 Aug 201031 Dec 2013Us Bank National AssociationSystem and method for waterfall prioritized payment processing
US864582618 Aug 20114 Feb 2014Apple Inc.Graphical multidimensional file management system and method
US866087623 Sep 201125 Feb 2014Idocuments, LlcDocument management system
US8661006 *28 Mar 200625 Feb 2014Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc.Data file management system and method for browsers
US867727513 Jan 201118 Mar 2014International Business Machines CorporationIllustrating a menu of insights associated with visualizations
US8688656 *29 Jan 20091 Apr 2014Canon Kabushiki KaishaDocument management method, document management apparatus, and document management system
US87010395 Jul 200815 Apr 20149224-5489 Quebec Inc.Method and system for discriminating axes of user-selectable elements
US8736712 *14 Nov 201227 May 2014Canon Kabushiki KaishaSystem to manage digital camera images
US87390509 Mar 200927 May 20149224-5489 Quebec Inc.Documents discrimination system and method thereof
US876285711 Mar 201024 Jun 2014Fasttac, Inc.Portable dataport device and method for retrieving, inter-relating, annotating and managing electronic documents at a point of need
US877540823 Sep 20118 Jul 2014Sureprep, LlcDocument element indexing system
US87825079 Mar 201015 Jul 2014Google Inc.Framework for providing visual context to WWW hyperlinks
US878893721 Nov 200722 Jul 20149224-5489 Quebec Inc.Method and tool for classifying documents to allow a multi-dimensional graphical representation
US881066027 Apr 200919 Aug 2014Canon Kabushiki KaishaSystem to manage digital camera images
US20040205451 *13 Aug 200114 Oct 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for identifying and distinguishing words contained within an electronic message in order to convey significance
US20050283476 *30 Aug 200522 Dec 2005Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for filtering and organizing items based on common elements
US20080256457 *24 Jun 200816 Oct 2008Jack ChuSearch query user interface
US20090228481 *14 May 200910 Sep 2009Neale Richard SGraphical user interface for building boolean queries and viewing search results
US20100115467 *5 Nov 20096 May 2010Service Trace E.K.Method and device for determining a characteristic quantity of an it system
US20110276886 *25 Mar 201110 Nov 2011Eric HallSystem and method for managing facility content and equipment information
US20120036438 *17 Oct 20119 Feb 2012Microsoft CorporationComputer system with enhanced user interface for images
US20130070120 *14 Nov 201221 Mar 2013Andrew Hunter TomatSystem to manage ditigal camera images
US20130317994 *13 Nov 201228 Nov 2013Bao TranIntellectual property generation system
USRE450077 Jun 20118 Jul 2014Sureprep, LlcEfficient work flow system and method for processing taxpayer source documents
CN100444173C31 Mar 200417 Dec 2008株式会社理光Method and apparatus for composing document collection and computer manipulation method
CN100477709C1 Mar 20028 Apr 2009株式会社理光Scanning device and scanning method thereof
EP1502197A1 *21 Apr 20032 Feb 2005Lenin BabuDocument management system
EP2224361A1 *25 Feb 20101 Sep 2010Fujitsu LimitedGenerating a domain corpus and a dictionary for an automated ontology
WO2000065762A2 *24 Apr 20002 Nov 2000HijkA process for improving print quality of a document created utilizing internet-type network applications
WO2001027783A1 *13 Oct 200019 Apr 2001Sirenic IncSystem and methods for accessing internet information using internet appliances
WO2001086490A1 *7 May 200115 Nov 2001Justsystem CorpMethod and apparatus for rapidly producing document summaries and document browsing aids
WO2002023399A1 *17 Sep 200021 Mar 2002Papercomp IncCombined storage and retrieval of paper documents, scanned documents and electronic
WO2008108626A1 *3 Mar 200812 Sep 2008Manual System Sdn Bhd EA method of data storage and management
Classifications
U.S. Classification715/205, 707/E17.082, 707/E17.09, 707/E17.092
International ClassificationG06F17/30
Cooperative ClassificationG06F17/30696, G06F17/30713, G06F17/30707
European ClassificationG06F17/30T4V, G06F17/30T2V, G06F17/30T4C
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
1 Jun 2011FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
4 Jun 2007FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
14 Aug 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA, JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018171/0164
Effective date: 20060331
20 Dec 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME TO NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;ASSIGNOR:SCANSOFT, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016914/0975
Effective date: 20051017
30 Dec 2002FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
18 Dec 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: CAERE CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FLEET NATIONAL BANK;REEL/FRAME:013589/0076
Effective date: 20021108
Owner name: CAERE CORPORATION 100 COOPER COURTLOS GATOS, CALIF
20 Nov 2000ASAssignment
Owner name: SCANSOFT, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CAERE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011295/0285
Effective date: 20001010
Owner name: SCANSOFT, INC. 9 CENTENNIAL DRIVE PEABODY MASSACHU
27 Jun 2000ASAssignment
Owner name: CAERE CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:CAERE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:010919/0583
Effective date: 20000313
Owner name: CAERE CORPORATION 9 CENTENNIAL DRIVE PEABODY MASSA
31 Mar 2000ASAssignment
Owner name: FLEET NATIONAL BANK, AS AGENT, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: PATENT COLLATERAL SECURITY AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CAERE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:010832/0805
Effective date: 20000314
Owner name: FLEET NATIONAL BANK, AS AGENT 100 FEDERAL STREET B
8 Oct 1997ASAssignment
Owner name: CAERE CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHEN, YING-JYE JAMES;FERGUSON, DAVID R.;HONG, AN N.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:008845/0452;SIGNING DATES FROM 19970918 TO 19970919