|Publication number||US4296326 A|
|Application number||US 06/127,789|
|Publication date||20 Oct 1981|
|Filing date||5 Mar 1980|
|Priority date||6 Mar 1979|
|Also published as||DE3008023A1|
|Publication number||06127789, 127789, US 4296326 A, US 4296326A, US-A-4296326, US4296326 A, US4296326A|
|Inventors||John M. Haslop, Reginald G. Knapman, Michael A. West|
|Original Assignee||Thomas De La Rue & Company Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (90), Classifications (16), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to the recognition of sheets, for example of paper, which lack predetermined characteristics associated with the presence of a watermark, and is of particular significance in sorting counterfeits from watermarked security documents.
There is a need for methods of and means for sorting counterfeit documents, which do not include a watermark or which have a simulated watermark possessing certain characteristics of a genuine watermark, from documents (including security documents such as banknotes, bonds and cheques) which incorporate genuine watermarks.
Watermarks, as correctly defined, are marks introduced into paper during its manufacture by one of two main methods; a shaped mould may be used in a cylindermould machine or a profile dandy roll may be used in a Fourdrinier machine and in both instances variations in fibre distribution are introduced in accordance with the design of the watermark. These variations in fibre distribution give rise to corresponding variations in light transmission when the document is viewed by an observer through rear illumination and these variations may also be detected by photoelectric systems. Watermarks which result from variations in fibre distribution introduced during manufacture are hereinafter collectively called "mould watermarks". Paper containing mould watermarks, particularly those made by the cylinder mould-process, is commonly used for the printing of security documents. It is known, however, to simulate such watermarks by printing upon the paper with one or more white inks, other opacifying materials and transparentizing materials; these marks (hereinafter called "simulated watermarks") may be used by printers in the manufacture of their standard products (although they are not usually used in the production of security documents) or may possibly be used by counterfeiters of security documents who do not have access to the watermarked paper used in the production of genuine security documents. In this specification such simulated watermarks, suitably distinguished where necessary from mould watermarks, are, together with mould watermarks, referred to as watermarks.
A feature of a sheet having a mould watermark is its variable light transmittance. However, this is also a feature of simulated watermarks and when counterfeiting has occured, some sheets of a batch to be sorted may have mould watermarks while others may have simulated watermarks and the appearance of the genuine and simulated watermarks may be confusingly similar. Consequently, tests related to the light transmission characteristics of watermarks on sheets are not in themselves sufficient to identify and reject the simulated watermarks. In this specification it is assumed that the area occupied by the watermark is either unprinted or overprinted only with tint or other subdued printing.
According to the present invention, a method of rejecting sheets which do not have a mould watermark comprises measuring for each sheet, in an area in which a watermark is expected to be present, the absorption of ultra-violet radiation by the sheet and also the transmittance of visible light by the sheet, and rejecting sheets for which the said absorption measurement does not show a substantially constant value and also sheets for which the said transmittance measurement shows a substantially constant transmittance of visible light over the said area.
In the preferred method embodying the invention, the reflectance of the ultra-violet radiation in the selected area is measured, preferably on each side of the sheet. In an alternative method, the transmittance of the sheet to ultra-violet radiation is measured, in which case the measurement need be carried out in one direction only. In yet a third method, the fluorescence of the sheet in the presence of ultra-violet radiation is measured, again preferably from both sides of the sheet.
Thus the invention relies in part on the fact that the opacifying and transparentizing inks used for simulated watermarks have stronger ultra-violet characteristics than paper when applied to the paper in quantity sufficient to produce a simulated watermark. The invention combines utilising the light transmittance variation produced by watermarks with using a feature which is not apparent in normal lighting, e.g. the variation in reflectance of a sheet with a simulated watermark in ultra-violet radiation. The reflectance of the base material of the sheet to ultra-violet radiation is compared with the reflectance of what has been added to the sheet (in a simulated watermark).
One of the principal uses of the present invention is in the field of detecting counterfeited security documents. We have observed that whereas genuine banknotes paper appears dull when exposed to ultra-violet radiation, counterfeit banknotes are usually printed on commercially available papers which almost invariably appear bright when exposed to ultra-violet radiation; this feature is deliberately incorporated in commercially papers by the addition during manufacture of so-called optical brightening agents. These brightening agents are not use in banknote paper manufacture.
According to a subsidiary feature of the invention, therefore, each sheet is further subjected to a measurement of the visible fluorescence of its base material in ultra-violet radiation and sheets for which the said visible fluorescence is greater than a predetermined value are rejected.
This test is preferably the first test to be carried out, so that only UV-dull sheets are affected by the second test, which is preferably the UV-reflectance test. This second test distinguishes sheets having simulated watermarks from those which do not have simulated watermarks. The remaining sheets, which are UV-dull sheets having genuine watermarks and UV-dull sheets which have no watermark at all, are sorted by the transmission test, which rejects the sheets having no watermark.
Thus, the invention provides a detection system which takes into account not only the light transmission characteristics of the watermark but also the manner of manufacture of the document, i.e. whether the watermark was incorporated during manufacture of the base material or was subsequently added; this is achieved by ascertaining the relationship between the ultra-violet absorption characteristics in different parts of the document (i.e. parts which are watermarked and parts which are not).
The invention can be carried into effect with a dynamic detection system in which there is relative movement between the document and a series of detection devices. Thus, the invention may be incorporated in a high-speed inspection and sorting system in which documents are transported along a flow line past detector heads and, in accordance with the output signals from the detectors, the documents are sorted.
It is advantageous to render the detectors operative for the tests only for the areas of a document where a watermark is expected to be present. This can be accomplished by delaying processing signals from the detectors for a period initiated by the arrival of the leading edge of the document at a given point along a flow line.
To allow for soiling or wear, on the assumption that such soiling or wear occurs uniformly over the whole of the sheet, a portion of the document remote from the expected position of the watermark may be inspected by the detectors, the resulting measurements providing reference signals for comparison with those obtained from the same detectors in the presence of the watermarked area.
In order that the invention may be better understood, any example of a method of and means for sorting sheets will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic plan view of the apparatus;
FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram for a part of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a waveform diagram obtained by measuring reflectance of ultra-violet radiation from a UV-bright paper having a printed watermark;
FIG. 4 is a similar waveform diagram for a UV-dull paper having a printed watermark; and
FIGS. 5 and 6 are waveform diagrams obtained by measuring the fluorescence of UV-bright and UV-dull paper, respectively, having printed watermarks in the presence of ultra-violet radiation.
FIG. 7 is a view similar to that of FIG. 1 but showing a second lamp and photomultiplier housing scanning the other face of the sheet;
FIG. 8 is a view similar to that of FIG. 1, showing the measurement of the transmittance of UV radiation by the sheet; and
FIG. 9 illustrates the measurement of visible light transmission along parallel paths on the sheet.
In FIG. 1, banknotes are removed sequentially from a supply stack by a feeding means (not shown) of known construction and are delivered in spatially timed relationship along a flow-line 1 and thence around the part peripheries of serially arranged transporter drums 2 and 3. The said drums may be of any suitable type but conveniently they include radially disposed vacuum ports in communication with a source of vacuum via stationary commutator devices so arranged that vacuum is applied to the ports during predetermined angles of rotation of the drums. Thus, in operation, a banknote is transferred from the drum 2 to the drum 3 at the common tangent 4 of the drums.
It will thus be appreciated that by providing a viewing device, or devices adjacent the drum 2, one side of a banknote N may be examined and that the reverse side thereof may be subsequently examined by a second viewing device or devices (not shown) disposed adjacent drum 3. A downstream banknote N1 is shown disposed on drum 3.
It should be noted that whilst the drums 2 and 3 are referred to as single drums, they in fact each comprise a pair of axially spaced drums between which certain parts of the viewing devices may be mounted to the framework of the apparatus without impeding the flowline.
The first viewing component of the device comprises a banknote presence detector 5 having a light source 6 and an optical system 7 disposed between the pair of drums 2, in association with a photo-detector P1 disposed outwardly thereof. The detector serves to provide a trigger pulse to initiate a counter (referred to below) upon the detection of the leading edge of a banknote.
Downstream of the device 5 there is provided a second viewing component 8 comprising a housing 9 containing two measuring devices for viewing a banknote together with a source of illumination therefor. The latter comprises a 4-watt low pressure mercury lamp 10 having an external coating of a UV-emitting phosphor (320-380nm) a UV filter 11 and a tapered solid quartz light pipe 12. The light pipe is proportioned to illuminate an area 1.5 ×15 mm. of a banknote in longitudinal and transverse directions with respect to the flow-line. The said measuring devices comprise photomultipliers PM1, and PM2 together with associated filters 13, 14 and arrays of light guides 15, 16 respectively. The viewing ends of the light guides are arranged in ribbon formation and are mounted immediately adjacent the opposite sides of the light pipe 12, as shown, so as to view the said illuminated area. The photomultiplier PM1 serves to evaluate fluorescence and is provided with a filter 13 having a 420-440 nm transmission characteristics and the light guide 15 is of glass. The photomultiplier PM2 serves to evaluate UV reflectance and is provided with a filter 14 having a 350 nm transmission characteristic and the light guide 16 is of quartz to transmit UV with minimal loss.
Downstream of the housing 9 there is provided a third viewing component 17 which serves to measure white light transmitted through a banknote. This device comprises a housing 18 containing a photomultiplier PM3 and an associated light guide 19 which receives illumination from a light source 20 and an optical system 21 disposed between the pair of drums 2.
The drums are synchronously driven at a constant peripheral velocity in unison with the velocity of banknotes fed along the flow-line 1 and accordingly the linear position of a banknote under test may be readily ascertained by the utilisation of length-indicative clock pulses.
A circuit suitable for the UV reflectance test is shown in FIG. 2. The photomultiplier PM2 detects the ultra-violet radiation reflected by a document N on the transporter, the filter 11 having removed visible radiation from the output of the lamp 10 and the filter 14 having removed the effects of UV-induced fluorescence. The photomultiplier signal is passed through an input amplifier 115 to a sample-and-hold circuit 116 where a reference level is taken and stored. This reference level corresponds to a measurement on unprinted or evenly tinted paper and is preferably taken before the watermarked area of the document is brought to the detector position by the transporter. The timing of the sampling is controlled as follows.
The signal from the photodetector P1 (FIG. 1), indicating the detection of the leading edge of a sheet, is applied to a first delay circuit 117, which delays the signal for a period equal to that required for the leading edge of the document to move from the position of the photodetector to the position of the detector head 8. The signal then passes to a second delay 118 which controls the point along the document at which a sample value is taken for reference purposes. At the end of this second delay, the signal switches a bistable circuit 119, the output of which initiates the sampling operation by the circuit 16.
The potentiometer 120 permits a proportion of the sampled signal to be applied to a comparator 121. In the comparator, it is compared with the current output of the input amplifier 115 and the difference signal passes to an AND gate 22. The initiation of the opening of the AND gate is controlled by a third delay circuit 23, which provides a delay representing the period between the leading edge of the document reaching the detector head 8 and the watermark to be detected reaching this point. A monostable circuit 24 operates in response to the signals from the third delay circuit 23 and opens the AND gate 22 for a period corresponding to the width of the watermark.
In this way, the output of the AND gate 22 is made to exist only when the watermark area is passing the detector head and then indicates the difference between the signal derived from the watermark area and the reference signal derived from another area of the document. If there is a reduction in UV reflectance over the watermarked position, greater than the preset proportion, the output of the AND gate will go high and the following bistable 25 will be set. This applies a signal to an output AND gate 26 which receives a strobe pulse along line 27, controlled from the transporter. The AND gate 26 provides a reject pulse to a sheet diverter 29.
A further delay circuit 28 responsive to the strobe pulse, resets the components of the circuit after each document has passed the detector head.
As previously explained, the photomultiplier PM3 provides a signal representing the transmittance of the document. This photomultiplier is connected into a circuit similar to that of FIG. 2 and also provides a reject pulse, in this case if the output of the photomultiplier PM3 is substantially constant during the passage of the area in which the watermark should be present.
The photomultiplier PM1 is connected to a circuit which is simpler than that of FIG. 2 in that there are no delays for "gating" the signal from the area in which the watermark should be present. This third circuit is concerned with the fluorescence of the base paper material when subjected to ultra-violet radiation and in this case the magnitude of the reference signal is preselected by the operator. Again, a reject signal is generated if the document exhibits a high level of fluorescence.
The delays may be achieved by the use of a clock pulse generator, operating at a frequency determined by the speed of the transporter, and counters. It will be appreciated that the first delay circuits for the photomultipliers PM2 and PM3 will provide different delays because of the spacing between the detectors 8 and 17. Sampling, controlled by the second delay circuits, may be effected on an unprinted margin of the document, for example.
The reject signals are gated together so that a diverter is actuated or a warning signal is produced when any of the three circuits provides a reject signal.
Because in practice the position of a watermark in a document may very slightly from sample to sample, two or more transversely spaced viewing devices may be provided to ensure that at least one of the devices will traverse the intended line of scan.
Generally speaking, filters having transmission characteristics of more than 400 nm are suitable for the evaluation of the fluorescence of commonly available paper. The filter associated with the photomultiplier PM2 should have a transmission characteristic below about 370 nm.
As explained above, as an alternative to or in addition to the measurement of ultra-violet reflectance in the area in which the watermark is expected, the signal from the photomultiplier PM1 may also be applied to a circuit similar to FIG. 2 for comparing the fluorescence of the area which is expected to contain the watermark with the fluorescence of a sample area of the banknote to determine whether a document should be rejected.
In FIG. 7, the housing 9 and its contents are duplicated on the other side of the sheet under consideration. The purpose of this is to permit two measurements of ultraviolet reflectance to be made, one from each side of the sheet, and two measurements of the fluorescence of the sheet induced by ultraviolet radiation, one from each side of the sheet. The elements 10A, 11A. 12A, 13A, 14A, 15A and 16A perform the same function as the elements 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16.
In FIG. 8, the position of the photomultiplier PM2 and its associated filter 14 differs from its position in FIG. 1 in that it is located to measure the transmittance of ultraviolet radiation by the sheet, and thereby the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by the sheet.
In FIG. 9, two photomultipliers PM3A and PM3B are shown in detectors 17A and 17B positioned over the sheet N; the elements 19, 20 and 21 are similarly duplicated, under the detectors 17A and 17B to permit the measurement of the transmittance of visible light by the two detectors scanning the sheet along parallel lines.
In one test, simulated watermarks were prepared by printing the watermark design in some cases with opacifying ink only, in others with transparentizing ink only, and in still others with both of these inks. The simulated watermarks were printed on both commercially available UV-bright paper and on UV-dull banknote paper. These documents were randomly mixed with unprinted documents of both UV-bright and UV-dull papers together with documents containing mould watermarks. The controls were adjusted to reject documents in which the UV-reflectance of the watermark area was greater or less than that of the base paper. The notes printed with the simulated watermarks were reliably rejected from the remaining documents with and without mould watermarks.
In tests on the transmission characteristics, on an arbitrary scale the unwatermarked paper was found to have a maximum variation of plus or minus 10% transmittance (using a scanning densitometer with a quartz light source and a closely coupled light guide of 1 mm diameter), whereas a typical watermark was found to show variations ranging from -50% to +20% transmittance.
In a further test, samples of commercially available UV-bright paper and samples of a typically UV-dull banknote paper (without a watermark) were separated reliably by the output of the photomultiplier PM1.
FIGS. 3 and 4 are waveform diagrams illustrating the ultra-violet reflectance obtained from two documents carrying simulated watermarks, that on FIG. 3 being on UV-bright paper and that on FIG. 4 being on UV-dull paper. The traces were obtained using a 20 kHz AC lamp. As will be seen from the portions of the traces which relate to the watermarks and those portions which relate to the unwatermarked parts of the paper, the reflectance test clearly identifies the simulated watermarks.
FIGS. 5 and 6 are waveform diagrams similar to those of FIGS. 3 and 4, but obtained by measuring the fluorescence derived from the sheets with the simulated watermarks in the presence of ultra-violet radiation. Again, the positions of the simulated watermarks are clearly identified in the traces.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3774046 *||25 Jun 1972||20 Nov 1973||Hirsch W||Counterfeit currency detector|
|US3842281 *||5 Feb 1973||15 Oct 1974||Goodrich R||Counterfeit document detector|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4650320 *||27 Apr 1984||17 Mar 1987||De La Rue Systems Limited||Detecting luminescent security features|
|US5410412 *||6 Jan 1994||25 Apr 1995||Labintellegence, Inc.||Gel electrophoresis system|
|US5456498 *||20 Dec 1993||10 Oct 1995||Bancimage, Inc.||Negotiable instrument fraud detector and processor|
|US5537486 *||13 Nov 1990||16 Jul 1996||Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield||High-speed document verification system|
|US5668377 *||27 Mar 1996||16 Sep 1997||Erickson; Win||Point of sale counterfeit detection apparatus|
|US5854673 *||7 Dec 1995||29 Dec 1998||Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain & Northern Ireland Of Defence||Method of authenticating watermarked paper|
|US5915518 *||4 Jan 1995||29 Jun 1999||Mars, Incorporated||Detection of counterfeit objects, for instance counterfeit banknotes|
|US5918960 *||2 Jul 1996||6 Jul 1999||Mars Incorporated||Detection of counterfeit objects, for instance counterfeit banknotes|
|US5933232 *||13 May 1997||3 Aug 1999||Tecan Austria Gmbh||Fluorimeter|
|US6089610 *||27 Oct 1997||18 Jul 2000||Greene; Jonathan D.||Security document|
|US6094500 *||13 Feb 1998||25 Jul 2000||Ncr Corporation||Apparatus for authenticating sheets|
|US6104036 *||12 Feb 1998||15 Aug 2000||Global Payment Technologies||Apparatus and method for detecting a security feature in a currency note|
|US6282650||25 Jan 1999||28 Aug 2001||Intel Corporation||Secure public digital watermark|
|US6297018||28 Jan 2000||2 Oct 2001||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for detecting nucleic acid polymorphisms|
|US6317207||22 Jan 2001||13 Nov 2001||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Frequency-domain light detection device|
|US6326605||18 Aug 2000||4 Dec 2001||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Broad range light detection system|
|US6466316||19 Jan 2001||15 Oct 2002||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for spectroscopic measurements|
|US6469311||31 Jul 2000||22 Oct 2002||Molecular Devices Corporation||Detection device for light transmitted from a sensed volume|
|US6471247 *||24 Sep 1997||29 Oct 2002||Securency Pty Ltd||Banknotes incorporating security devices|
|US6471248||12 Oct 2001||29 Oct 2002||Securency Pty Ltd.||Banknotes incorporating security devices|
|US6483582||19 Jan 2001||19 Nov 2002||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for time-resolved spectroscopic measurements|
|US6498335||3 Dec 2001||24 Dec 2002||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Broad range light detection system|
|US6499366||31 Aug 1998||31 Dec 2002||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Sample feeder|
|US6574350||3 Feb 2000||3 Jun 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarking employing both frail and robust watermarks|
|US6576476||29 Apr 1999||10 Jun 2003||Ljl Biosystems, Inc.||Chemiluminescence detection method and device|
|US6577746||28 Dec 1999||10 Jun 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Watermark-based object linking and embedding|
|US6590996||19 Apr 2000||8 Jul 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Color adaptive watermarking|
|US6608919||29 Feb 2000||19 Aug 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Method and apparatus for encoding paper with information|
|US6625297||10 Feb 2000||23 Sep 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Self-orienting watermarks|
|US6636615 *||3 Nov 1999||21 Oct 2003||Digimarc Corporation||Methods and systems using multiple watermarks|
|US6681028||19 May 1999||20 Jan 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Paper-based control of computer systems|
|US6694042||8 Apr 2002||17 Feb 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Methods for determining contents of media|
|US6721440||2 Jul 2001||13 Apr 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Low visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color|
|US6728390||7 Dec 2001||27 Apr 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Methods and systems using multiple watermarks|
|US6744906||7 Dec 2001||1 Jun 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Methods and systems using multiple watermarks|
|US6766045 *||11 Mar 2002||20 Jul 2004||Digital Verification Ltd.||Currency verification|
|US6771357 *||20 Mar 2000||3 Aug 2004||Sel, Inc.||False note detecting device and an electric bulb for use in detecting a false note|
|US6804376||28 Mar 2002||12 Oct 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Equipment employing watermark-based authentication function|
|US6804377||2 Apr 2002||12 Oct 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Detecting information hidden out-of-phase in color channels|
|US6823075||2 Feb 2001||23 Nov 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Authentication watermarks for printed objects and related applications|
|US6825921||10 Nov 2000||30 Nov 2004||Molecular Devices Corporation||Multi-mode light detection system|
|US6829368||24 Jan 2001||7 Dec 2004||Digimarc Corporation||Establishing and interacting with on-line media collections using identifiers in media signals|
|US6850626||28 Mar 2002||1 Feb 2005||Digimarc Corporation||Methods employing multiple watermarks|
|US6917691||29 May 2003||12 Jul 2005||Digimarc Corporation||Substituting information based on watermark-enable linking|
|US6917724||8 Apr 2002||12 Jul 2005||Digimarc Corporation||Methods for opening file on computer via optical sensing|
|US6965682||15 Feb 2000||15 Nov 2005||Digimarc Corp||Data transmission by watermark proxy|
|US6982431||13 Aug 2002||3 Jan 2006||Molecular Devices Corporation||Sample analysis systems|
|US6992761||22 May 2003||31 Jan 2006||Molecular Devices Corporation||Broad range light detection system|
|US6993153||23 Sep 2003||31 Jan 2006||Digimarc Corporation||Self-orienting watermarks|
|US7027614||12 Apr 2004||11 Apr 2006||Digimarc Corporation||Hiding information to reduce or offset perceptible artifacts|
|US7050201||14 Aug 2003||23 May 2006||Digimarc Corporation||Method and apparatus for encoding paper with information|
|US7054463||28 Mar 2002||30 May 2006||Digimarc Corporation||Data encoding using frail watermarks|
|US7321678||11 Nov 2002||22 Jan 2008||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Banknote identifying machine and banknote identifying method|
|US7362879||24 Apr 2007||22 Apr 2008||Digimarc Corporation||Substituting objects based on steganographic encoding|
|US7423738 *||17 Sep 2002||9 Sep 2008||Officina Riparazioni Macchine Grafiche-O.R.M.A.G.-S.P.A.||Inspecting system for security documents|
|US7536046||8 May 2003||19 May 2009||Cummins-Allison Corp.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US7539325||1 Jun 2004||26 May 2009||Digimarc Corporation||Documents and methods involving multiple watermarks|
|US7672499||6 Jun 2002||2 Mar 2010||Cummins-Allison Corp.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US7720689||6 Jul 2001||18 May 2010||Nec Corporation||Authenticity checker for driver's license, automated-teller machine provided with the checker and program recording medium|
|US7773770||22 Apr 2008||10 Aug 2010||Digimarc Corporation||Substituting or replacing components in media objects based on steganographic encoding|
|US7991184||10 Jan 2007||2 Aug 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Apparatus to process images and video|
|US8300274||23 Sep 2008||30 Oct 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Process for marking substrates with information using a texture pattern and related substrates|
|US8328194||13 Jul 2004||11 Dec 2012||Kba-Notasys Sa||Machine for processing sheets with a number of modules|
|US8783685||22 Oct 2012||22 Jul 2014||Kba-Giori S.A.||Machine for processing sheets with a plurality of modules|
|US9630443 *||2 Mar 2004||25 Apr 2017||Digimarc Corporation||Printer driver separately applying watermark and information|
|US20020046171 *||6 Jul 2001||18 Apr 2002||Nec Corporation||Authenticity checker for driver's license, automated-teller machine provided with the checker and program recording medium|
|US20030108233 *||6 Jun 2002||12 Jun 2003||Raterman Donald E.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US20030198373 *||8 May 2003||23 Oct 2003||Raterman Donald E.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US20030213841 *||14 May 2002||20 Nov 2003||Josephson Stanley M.||Method for verifying and authenticating initially named payee of negotiable instruments|
|US20040151359 *||11 Nov 2002||5 Aug 2004||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Banknote identifying machine and banknote identifying method|
|US20050111047 *||2 Mar 2004||26 May 2005||Rhoads Geoffrey B.||Printer driver separately applying watermark and information|
|US20050117791 *||6 Jun 2002||2 Jun 2005||Cummins-Allison Corp.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US20050117792 *||8 May 2003||2 Jun 2005||Cummins-Allison Corp.||Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting|
|US20060098840 *||17 Sep 2002||11 May 2006||Giovanni De Toni||Inspecting system for security supports|
|US20060208412 *||13 Jul 2004||21 Sep 2006||Reinhard Gerald J||Machine for processing sheets with a number of modules|
|US20110089677 *||7 Apr 2009||21 Apr 2011||Arjowiggins Security||Security sheet including a ribbon presenting a zone of reduced opacity|
|CN1836260B||13 Jul 2004||11 Aug 2010||卡巴-乔利有限公司||Machine for processing sheets with a number of modules|
|CN100437625C||10 Mar 2003||26 Nov 2008||数字验证有限公司||Currency verification|
|EP0679279B1 *||4 Jan 1994||19 May 1999||Mars Incorporated||Detection of counterfeit objects|
|EP0738408B1 *||4 Jan 1995||11 Sep 2002||Mars Incorporated||Detection of counterfeits objects, for instance counterfeits banknotes|
|EP1176563A3 *||10 Jul 2001||7 Jan 2004||Nec Corporation||Automated teller machine with driver's license authenticity checker|
|EP1644901B1 *||13 Jul 2004||31 Aug 2011||KBA-NotaSys SA||Machine for processing sheets with a number of modules|
|EP2453418A1 *||28 Sep 2011||16 May 2012||Beb Industrie-Elektronik AG||Method and device for assessing the authenticity of bank notes with security windows|
|WO1996018084A1 *||7 Dec 1995||13 Jun 1996||Hydronix Limited||Measuring method and apparatus|
|WO1996018978A1 *||7 Dec 1995||20 Jun 1996||The Secretary Of State For Defence||Method of authenticating watermarked paper|
|WO2000004373A1 *||12 Jul 1999||27 Jan 2000||Neles Paper Automation Oy||Method and apparatus for optically measuring properties of a moving web|
|WO2001026909A1 *||14 Jul 2000||19 Apr 2001||Virtual I.D. Financial Services, Inc.||Security document|
|WO2001059718A1||7 Feb 2001||16 Aug 2001||De La Rue International Limited||Document authenticating apparatus and method|
|WO2003050772A1 *||11 Nov 2002||19 Jun 2003||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Banknote identifying machine and banknote identifying method|
|WO2003077187A1 *||10 Mar 2003||18 Sep 2003||Digital Verification Ltd.||Currency verification|
|U.S. Classification||283/70, 250/372, 356/72, 356/71, 283/113, 250/461.1, 283/89|
|International Classification||G07D7/00, G01N21/892, G07D7/12, G07D7/20, G01N21/89|
|Cooperative Classification||G07D7/20, G07D7/002|
|European Classification||G07D7/20, G07D7/00B4|
|16 Oct 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DE LA RUE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:THOMAS DE LA RUE LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009507/0867
Effective date: 19980126