Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3801099 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication date2 Apr 1974
Filing date23 Jun 1971
Priority date23 Jun 1971
Publication numberUS 3801099 A, US 3801099A, US-A-3801099, US3801099 A, US3801099A
InventorsJ Lair
Original AssigneeJ Lair
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Tennis racquet
US 3801099 A
Abstract
An improved tennis racquet constructed of magnesium, beryllium or other metal with a low ratio of weight to stiffness and strength wherein the elliptical head of the racquet is disposed so that the long axis of the ellipse is transverse to the axis of the racquet handle, thereby to increase the rotational moment of inertia about the longitudinal axis of the racquet.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 1 Lair [ TENNIS RACQUET [76] Inventor: John C. Lair, 187 N. Mountain Trail, Sierra Madre, Calif. 91024 22 Filed: June 23,1971

21 Appl. No.: 155,902

[52] U.S. Cl. 273/73 C,'273/73 D [51] Int. Cl. A631) 49/02, A63b 49/04 [58] Field of Search...273/67 R, 678, 73 R, 73 A-L,

- 273/76; 34/5 ST, 5 SP [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,305,235 2/1967 Williams 273/79 X 3,582,073 6/1971 Melnick et al.. 273/73 H 1,486,330 3/1924 Glenn 27-3/73 H 1,539,019 5/1925 Nikonow 173/73 R 1,548,134 8/1925 Gallaudet 273/73 H 3,083,968 4/1963 Takahashi.... 273/73 R 3,545,756 12/1970 Nash 273/73 D 3,330,560 7/1967 Higdon 273/73 R 1 Apr. 2, 1974 2,164,631 7/1939 Abell 273/73 H FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 17,636 l/1929 Australia 273/73 J 1,643 l/1894 Great Britain. 273/73 D 800,262 4/1936 France 273/73 H 1,442,020 3/1968 France 273/73 H 446,348 4/1936 Great Britain 273/73 C 755,257 8/1956 Great Britain 273/73 C Primary Examiner-Richard C. Pinkham Assistant Examiner- Richard J. Apley [5 7 ABSTRACT An improved tennis racquet constructed of magnesium, beryllium or other metal with a low ratio of weight to stiffness and strength wherein the elliptical head of the racquet is disposed so that the long axis of the ellipse is transverse to the axis of the racquet handle, thereby to increase the rotational moment of inertia about the longitudinal axis of the racquet.

1 Claim, 5 Drawing Figures PATENIED APR 2 I974 PRIOR ART 1 TENNIS RACQUET 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to the design and construction of racquets, and particularly of racquets intended for use in playing the internationally popular game of tenms.

2. Description of the Prior Art The game, once fully named lawn tennis but not known simply as tennis," has been played for almost one hundred years. Within the past decade or so tennis has seen a great increase in its popularity, particularly in areas of the world which are not subjected to long cold winter periods. However, even in colder areas, indoor facilities have been constructed to permit play at any time. The game involves the stroking of a feltcovered ball by players moving on opposite sides of a net bisecting a marked court with each player employing a racquet, which, by custom and convention but not by regulation, is approximately 27 inches long with an elliptical head integrally secured on the end of a handle. The racquet head is strung with nylon or cat-gut in a crossed pattern, thereby providing a grid of approximately one-half inch square openings to minimize the air resistance to the rapid movement of the racquet head in a direction substantially normal to the plane of racquet strings, and hopefully properly opposing the trajectory of the ball.

For most of the years during which the game of tennis has been played, the racquets were almost exclusively made of wood. initially, and for many years the racquet heads were in the shape of an inverted isosocles trian-' gle rounded at the base angles with the apex integrated with the handle. Later the head assumed more the shape of an ellipse, the long axis of which coincided with the axis of the handle. Construction of these early racquets was accomplished by steam or otherwise bending a wooden member into such triangular or elliptical shapes with the extremities extending beyond the apex of the triangle or the ellipse and laid one upon the other to be secured together to constitute a handle.

Beginning in about the 1920s elliptical racquet heads were formed separately as laminated wood ellipses and one end of the ellipse was glued, cemented or otherwise joined to the bifurcated end of the handle. This type of construction, in various improved versions, is still employed for the standard still popular wooden racquet. Sometime in the 1920s and 1930s certain racquets were fabricated with metal elliptical heads and strung with wire instead of gut, but-these never acquired any real popularity and generally disappeared entirely from the tennis scene by the early 1950s.

Although the laminated wood racquet continues to be popular, within the last few years a number of new types of metal racquets strung with gut or nylon have been made and sold and these are now in widespread use. These metal racquets have generally assumed the same shape as that of their wooden forebears, viz., an elliptical head with the long axis of the ellipse being coaxial with the axis of the handle. Such metal racquets now offered ar fabricated either from formed tubular members, stampings or from extrusions with the head frame being integral with the handle. The currently offered metal racquets are generally designed to duplicate within 5 percent both the weight and its distribution of their wooden predecessors (and still competitors). Because the head frame of a metal racquet may be thinner and thus appear to offer less air resistance than a wood frame needed to provide sufficient rigidity to resist buckling upon impact with a ball or warping under the tension imposed upon the frame by the tight stringing, some players believe that a metal head frame may be moved more rapidly through the air than a wooden frame. However, complaints are often heard that metal frame racquets lack the solid feel of wooden racquets to which many tennis players have been accustomed through years of play.

In addition, since the efforts of manufacturers of metal racquets have been directed toward duplicating the shape, weight and its distribution and the stringing of the long accepted wooden racquets, no consideration appears to have been given to the possibility of utilizing certain advantages which metal frame construction can offer to produce a novel racquet design with features not possibly attainable with wood construction. in this connection, it should be pointed out that the Rules of the American Lawn Tennis Association make no provision for any particular size, shape or construction of a racquet. Anything may be employed as a racquet, but the conventional form in use today is based upon the years of experience of the millions of tennis players and the historical development of racquets as essentially wooden constructed devices.

As previously mentioned, tennis racquets of both metal and wood, have traditionally been approximately 27 inches in length with an elliptical head providing a strung area of approximately square inches. The long dimension of the ellipse is approximately 1 1 inches, the short dimension, 9 inches. The handle, thus, extends some 15 inches from one end of the ellipse.

Racquets traditionally weigh from about 12-% oz. for children to as much as 16 oz. for some men. The average racquet weight, however, ranges between 13- 7% 02. and 14 02., normally distributed so that the center of gravity lies at between 12-% and l3- /2 inches from the gripped end of the handle. This weight distribution has not been arbitrarily selected but rather has resulted from the weight of the average type of wood of the volume which has been found necessary to provide sufficient strength in the usual racquet configuration to enable the average player to impact the ball with the greatest amount of force he normally can develop in his stroking of the ball with the racquet. When racquet manufacturers began substituting metal for wood in the racquet framing, they generally sought to simulate the weight and its distribution of the conventional wood racquet.

It has been found by many of the better players of tennis that the best area of the strung head at which to impact the ball is not on the geometric center (or centroid) of the strung elliptical area, but may be as much as an inch toward the handle from that centroid. This ideal impacting area is sometimes referred to as the sweet spot. ln engineering terminology it may be called the center of percussion (c.o.p.), and is defined as the square of the radius of gyration about the instantaneous center of rotation, divided by the coordinate of the center-of-gravity. I have determined that such conventional off-centroid location of the sweet spot, or c.o.p., may be attributed to the fact that the center-of-gravity of the racquet is conventionally located where it is, i.e., at about 13 inches from the end of the handle instead of further away from that end toward the centroid of the strung ellipse. Because of its location, a relatively large portion of the strung area of the ellipse is not really effective in hitting, and the players reach for ideal stroking is decreased by the distance between the cop and centroid of the ellipse.

in addition, since racquets have been designed originally for wooden construction, they have been constructed to permit bending in the direction of impact with theball, but to minimize twisting of the strung head. This is because although a wooden racquet head can withstand bending, it cannot toleratelarge twisting moments without fracturing, owing to the intrinsic grain structure of wood in which weakness is always sought out and exploited by a twisting moment. Thus, there has resulted in the genesis of racquet design based upon wood construction the conventional elliptical head oriented with its long axis coaxial with the handle.

Moreover, the wooden racquet cannot stand too great a bending moment at the throat (i.e., the portion of the racquet where the handle is joined to the head),

since in order to give the appearance of reducing air resistance to the movement of the racquet, racquet manufacturers narrow the throat to the minimum width required to withstand maximum anticipated impacts of the ball upon the head. To enable the. width of the throat to be so minimized, the center-of-gravity of the wooden racquet cannot be disposed much farther toward the centroid of the racquet ellipse than where it is conventionally located (i.e., about 13 inches from the gripped end of the handle). To effect any material shift of the center-of-gravity in such direction ain a wood racquet would produce excessive bending, and possibly undesired twisting, moments at the throat and shoulders, thereby resulting in their fracture when the head is impacted with an overhead smash or hard forehand shot. I

Thus, racquets based upon the limitations in design imposed by the use of wood in their construction, have heretofore assumed a fairly standard shape and weight distribution even though, as pointed out above, more recently, racquets have been constructed of metal. in so constructing. metal racquets, racquet designers and manufacturers have apparently ignored certain structural capabilities of the metals particularly of those exotic metals such as magnesium and beryllium, or the high modulus carbon fiber composites developed particularly for aerospace use, as well as certain principles of physics and rigid body mechanics which have peculiar application to the stroking of a tennis ball.

Among such principles of physics is the fact that a players energy is most efficiently transferred to the ball as he hits it if the c.g. of his racquet is as far from his hand and as near the ball as structural mechanics permit.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has resulted from considerable study of the dynamics of the game of tennis and certain principles of rigid body mechanics. Careful consideration of these principles has led to the present redesign of a novel and improved tennis racquet. No longer limited in designing a racquet by the physical properties and characteristics of wood, l have evolved certain novel features which, if incorporated in the construction of a tennis racquet, will be found to result in a racquet of quite a radically different appearance and rigid body mechanical effect. My approach to the problems of racquet design and construction, which approach has resulted in the present invention hereinafter to be described, is as follows:

Should a racquet frame of present-day metal frame configuration be constructed of a metal having a very low ratio of weight to stiffness (and strength), such as magnesium or beryllium, it will be considerably lighter in its over-all weight, than that of present-day metal or wood racquet frames, and yet it may possess all the stiffness and strength which may be requiredvfor impacting the ball. One may then address himself to the optimum location of the c.g. of the racquet and effect such location by design and/or weight supplements so as to bring the c.g. nearer the ideal impacting spot on the strung frame and further from the players hand. Such design and/or addition of such weight supplements may still keep the over-all weight of the racquet at or below that of present-day wood and metal racquets. The weight supplements may be in the form of lead or silver or other metals having a high specific gravity. I have found that such weight supplements should be added at the ends of a transverse diameter of the elliptical hitting face of the racquet. In addition to more properly locating the c. g. of the racquet for ball stroking in conformity with the principles of physics hereinabove referred to, the addition of dead weight supplements at the ends of such transverse diameter will be found to contribute strongly to the racquets moment of inertia about its longitudinal axis, thereby minimizing for the player the unfavorable consequences of his minor mis hits about this axis.

it is a feature of the present invention to provide means on the frame to receive such supplementary dead weights and to secure them along the sides or even end of the frame. They may be added by' the player himself after he has purchased the strung frame or by the vendor of the racquet at the time it is purchased. Conceivably, a retailing professional may even engage in some type of try-out" session with the purchaser to arrive at the optimum disposition of the weight supplements to the racquet head in order to give the purchaser the best feel for ball stroking.

By'this lightweight metal racquet construction and the addition of such supplementary dead weights, there may be attained one object of the invention, namely, to shift the center of gravity of the racquet-toward the head and away from the conventional location about 13 inches from the handle end. This center of gravity shift will be found to result in moving the c.o.p., or sweet spot, of the racquet from its off-center location in the string area nearer to the centroid of the strung ellipse, thereby increasing the strung area for the most effective response to ball impact.

However, this and other objectives may also be accomplished by perhaps the most iconoclastic feature of the present invention wherein the disposition of the elliptical head may be such that the long axis of the strung ellipse is transverse to the axis of the handle. This can readily be accomplished with metal framing and has a number of unexpected and interesting results. Particularly noticeable among end results are the following:

First, it inherently facilitates shifting the center of gravity away from the handle.

Secondly, stability in roll about the longitudinal axis is naturally increased to improve particularly volleys and overheads, i.e., shots which, being hit in the air, are especially vulnerable to small mis-hits about the long axis.

Third, since most playerserrors occur through mishitting in the cross dimension of the head, the greater string area in that cross dimension tends naturally to attenuate the effects of such mis-hitting.

Lastly, a chopped, undercut or topped" ball, accomplished during ground stroking or serving, will receive a longer dwell on the strings since each of those strokes is made by a movement which subjects the ball to string action in the cross dimension.

A racquet frame of such head disposition is preferably also made of lightweight metal such as magnesium or beryllium or the so-called high modulus carbon fiber composites, and may be constructed to receive deadweight supplements.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1 is a plan view of a metal racquet of conventional shaping;

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a metal racquet constituted in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a section taken on the line 3-3 of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a section similar to FIG. 3, but showing the addition of a weight supplement on the cross-axis.

FIG. 5 is a partial view similar to FIG. 2, but showing the addition of further outwardly disposed weight supplements.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 illustrates a metal racquet of generally conventional shape and dimensions. It comprises'an integral frame which may be constructed by bending a metal member 12 back upon itself in an elliptical loop configuration to form a handle 13 and head 20. The loop 14 may be completed by inserting and securing as by welding an arcuate segment 15 inside the member 12. The long axis 22 of the elliptical head coincides with the axis 24 of the handle 13 and the short head axis 23 is perpendicular to handle axis 24.

To be compared with the conventional metal racquet illustrated in FIG. 1 is the racquet constructed in accordance with the present invention which is shown in FIG. 2. This racquet differs substantially from the conventional tennis racquet configuration in that the elliptica] head 29a is turned 90 deg regs s o that the long axis 22a of the ellipse is disposed perpendicularly to the handle axis 240 and the short head axis 23a is coaxial with the handle. It should be pointed out, however, that in order for the racquet of this novel configuration to be accepted by tennis players who have learned and long played the game with the racquets of the conventional configuration, the centroid 26a of the ellipse of the racquet of FIG. 2, should be located the same distance from the end 28a of the handle 13a as is the centroid 26 of the elliptical head of the conventional racquet of FIG. 1, i.e., about ZI-A inches from the end 28 of its handle 13. In order to effect such location of the centroid of the ellipse in a racquet where the elliptical head is disposed with its long axis 22a transverse to the axis 24a of the handle 130, the overall length of the racquet is necessarily shortened from the standard 27 inches to about 26 inches.

Although a racquet in the configuration of FIG; 2 may be constructed in any of the modes by which metal racquets now on the market are constructed, I would prefer to construct it in the form shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. Thus, the handle 13a is formed about-a pair of members 30, 32, secured together at their handle-forming extremities 34, 36 and at several other points by struts 38. These members 30,32, are curved arcuately away from each other and then back to embrace a separately formed elliptical head 20a. Members 30, 32 are provided with channels 40 (FIG. 3) along their embracing arcuate segments 42, 46 respectively. The head frame 20a is made of a thickness and configuration to fit into said channels 40. The arcuate segments 42, 46, may be welded or otherwise secured to the inserted frame 20a. The latter preferably includes an inwardly extending rib 48 with a plurality of orifices 50 to receive the gut or nylong stringing 52. I

One important advantage of constructing a racquet in the manner illustrated in FIG. 2 is believed to be that because more of the head frame mass is disposed further away from the handle, the center of gravity is inherently disposed further away from the handle and toward the centroid of the ellipse, thereby enabling the cop. to be located more nearly at such centroid. Other advantages are:

a. Since the overall length of the racquet is slightly decreased, the bending moment generated by a smash toward the racquet tip will be somewhat less than that sustained by the conventional racquet;

b. It has been found that most hitting errors of players occur as lateral deviations in the head from the axis passing through the handle. Where the short axis of the ellipse is transverse to such handle axis, such deviations more naturally involve the ball striking the frame or just inside the frame than they would where the long axis is transverse to the handle axis. However, where the long axis of the ellipse is transverse to the handle axis, there is a greater string area in' the head where such lateral deviations are wont to occur. The effects of lateral mis-hits may, therefore, be substantially de-' creased. In other words the stringing in the radially greater lunes of the ellipse, which stringing is less utilized for mis-hits when the ellipse is oriented with its longer axis coaxial with the handle, is better utilized when the racquet head is turned so that those lunes are disposed on an axis transverse to the axis of the handle;

0. The disposition of the head ellipse with its long axis transverse to the axis of the handle provides an increased inertial stability against roll. The moment of inertia of the racquet about the longitudinal axis is believed to be typically increased by more than 200 percent without the addition of supplementary weights at I mentary mechanics that the torque required to produce body about that axis. Hence any increase in the moment of inertia of a tennis racquet about its longitudinal axis increases the inertial stability of the racquet against rotation about that axis. That is to say, a given applied torque, such as results when a ball strikes the strings at a point laterally offset from the longitudinal axis, causes a smaller rotational disturbance of the racquet.

The moment of inertia of a body with respect to a specified axis may be defined as the sum or integral, taken overall mass elements of the body, of the product of each mass element by the square of its distance from the axis. Since the distance term is squared, the handle'of a tennis racquet, being concentrated close to the longitudinal axis, contributes relatively little to its moment of inertia about that axis, and the value of that moment of inertia is determined predominantly by the distribution of mass in the head. A comparison of FIGS. 1 and 2 shows that the mass of the head is distributed on the average appreciably farther from axis 241: in FIG. 2 than from axis 24 in FIG. 1. Taking account of the squaring of the distance, that redistribution of mass yields a significant increase in stability against roll.

F IG'. 4 illustrates a possible manner of attaching supplementary weights 54 to each side of the elliptical frame 20a in the vicinity of the cross axis 22a in order to provide such further increase in inertial stability against roll. The weight 54 may comprise a relatively thin arcuately-shaped strip of lead with an inner contour 56 mating with the outer contour 58 of the arcuate segment 42 of the member 30. Such lead strip 54 may be held by a pair of straps 60, the ends of which are held by a fastener 62 which passes through a hole provided in the inwardly projecting rib 48 of the frame 20a.

The present invention also contemplates that supplementary weights 64 could be applied to the racquet frame through strut-like extensions 66 shown in FIG. 5, to provide lateral mass disposition even further out wardly along the cross axis 22a from the centroid 26a of the ellipse. It should be appreciated, however, that although FIG. shows such strut-like extensions 66 supporting supplementary weights 64 on the sides of a frame of the configuration of FIG. 2, they could be similarly applied to a conventional racquet of the type shown in FIG. 1, and a noticeable improvement in the form of an increase of inertial stability against roll of the FIG. 1 racquet would be obtained. The quantum of such improvement would, of course, be a function of the square of the distance of the two oppositely disposed masses from the centroid of the ellipse. Obviously, with such a functional relationship, a much greater roll stability effect is inherently obtained with a racquet head of the configuration shown in FIG. 2, since the sides of the racquet head to which the supple mentary weights are attached, are disposed at a substantially greater distance from the ellipse centroid than are the sides of the FIG. 1 racquet from its centroid along the cross axis 22.

It will further be appreciated that many factors will affect the particular design of the racquet which is considered optimum for each player, but the present invention offers new parameters and design factors which have not heretofore been considered or appear to have been taken into account by manufacturers in design even for metal racquets.

I claim:

1. A tennis racquet comprising a rigid frame structure forming a handle and a head frame in the shape of an elliptically closed loop having a continuous concave curvature presented towards the interior thereof, said head frame having a long axis and a short axis,

the interior of said loop providing an elliptical string area which is substantially symmetrical with respect to both said axes,

said head frame being provided with means for stringing the encompassed elliptical area with resilient stringing, and

the long axis of said head frame being perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the handle and the short axis of said head frame being coaxial with the longitudinal axis of the handle,

whereby greater inertial stability against roll about the handle axis is provided than is the case with a conventional racquet wherein the long axis of the elliptical head frame is coaxial with the longitudinal axis of the handle.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1486330 *15 Jun 192211 Mar 1924American Magnesium CorpTennis racket or the like
US1539019 *7 Feb 192426 May 1925Nikonow John PTennis racket
US1548134 *31 Jan 19234 Aug 1925Gallaudet Edson FTennis racket and the like
US2164631 *16 Jan 19374 Jul 1939Rollin AbellRacket
US3083968 *17 Dec 19582 Apr 1963Takahashi YoshiakiGame racket construction
US3305235 *28 Jul 196521 Feb 1967Williams Jr Albert JLongitudinally adjustable golf club including head with high moment of inertia abouttwo axes
US3330560 *26 Apr 196511 Jul 1967Higdon Mark ATennis racket with weight attachment
US3545756 *7 Jun 19688 Dec 1970Nash Eugene WTennis racket with string supports of variable resiliency
US3582073 *20 Jun 19681 Jun 1971Midland Merchandise CorpCast metal racquet with offcenter string guides
AU17636A * Title not available
FR800262A * Title not available
FR1442020A * Title not available
GB446348A * Title not available
GB755257A * Title not available
GB189401643A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3874667 *26 Dec 19731 Apr 1975Nl Industries IncDie-cast light-metal racket and stringing means therefor
US3907292 *27 Sep 197323 Sep 1975James P MorelandDynamically variable tennis racket
US3913911 *9 Jan 197421 Oct 1975Peterson Kenneth AlanTennis racket with head frame weighting means
US3999756 *10 Sep 197528 Dec 1976Prince Manufacturing, Inc.Tennis racket
US4153249 *3 Jun 19778 May 1979Motion Analysis, Inc.Bioengineered game racket
US4165071 *5 Jan 197621 Aug 1979Frolow Jack LTennis racket
US4174110 *10 Feb 197813 Nov 1979Zenzo YamamotoInertia balanced golf club
US4183526 *10 Jan 197815 Jan 1980Brown Donald KTennis training device
US4192505 *7 Nov 197711 Mar 1980Pepsico, Inc.Game racket
US4196901 *7 Mar 19778 Apr 1980Durbin Enoch JTennis racquet
US4200285 *7 Dec 197729 Apr 1980Petitti Angelo JrRacquet weight system
US4291574 *26 Mar 197929 Sep 1981Frolow Jack LTennis racket
US4346891 *6 Aug 197931 Aug 1982David EpsteinRackets
US4353551 *15 Aug 198012 Oct 1982Battelle Development CorporationTennis racket with frame mounted oscillatable weights
US4367874 *4 Jan 197911 Jan 1983Starwin Industries, Inc.Tennis racquet and method of making same
US4478416 *2 Sep 198223 Oct 1984Carlo GibelloTennis racquet with offset, oval-shaped head
US4693474 *24 Jun 198515 Sep 1987Dunlop Limited A British CompanyGames racket
US5083777 *23 Oct 199028 Jan 1992Held Russell KConditioning aid for racquet sports
US5110126 *26 Jun 19915 May 1992Head Sportgeraete Gesellschaft M.B.H. & Co. Ohg.Tennis racket
US5143370 *6 Jan 19921 Sep 1992Rammer, Inc.Ball racket
US5211691 *27 Nov 199018 May 1993Donnay International S.A.Tennis rackets
US5312115 *6 Apr 199317 May 1994Jan Feng Sports Products Corp.Racket
US5368295 *2 Jun 199329 Nov 1994Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennis racket
US5470062 *9 Dec 199428 Nov 1995Yamaha CorporationTennis racket
US5755633 *21 Dec 199626 May 1998Marquez; Humberto AlTennis stroke training and exercise device
US5893810 *9 Aug 199613 Apr 1999Head Sport AktiengesellschaftTennis rackets
US6106417 *22 Jun 199822 Aug 2000Head Sport AktiengesellschaftLightweight tennis racket having high frequency
US657249828 Mar 20013 Jun 2003Larry J. NeversBall launching racket
US8808121 *15 May 201319 Aug 2014Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Racquet configured with fewer cross strings than main strings
US20140031150 *15 May 201330 Jan 2014Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Racquet configured with fewer cross strings than main strings
US20140206482 *15 May 201324 Jul 2014Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Racquet configured with fewer cross strings than main strings
USRE31419 *28 Jan 198118 Oct 1983 Tennis racket
DE3520335A1 *7 Jun 198517 Apr 1986Dunlop AgArrangement for altering and/or adjusting the desired playing performance of a racquet for tennis or similar games
EP0074094A2 *2 Sep 198216 Mar 1983Kneissl International GmbHBalancing device for a tennis racket
EP0166561A2 *17 Jun 19852 Jan 1986Dunlop LimitedGames racket
WO1980002510A1 *17 May 197927 Nov 1980J FrolowTennis racket
WO1981000214A1 *23 Jul 19805 Feb 1981Battelle Development CorpTennis racket
Classifications
U.S. Classification473/537, 473/519, 473/541, 473/545
International ClassificationA63B49/04, A63B49/02, A63B49/12, A63B49/00
Cooperative ClassificationA63B49/00, A63B49/12, A63B49/04, A63B2208/12
European ClassificationA63B49/04, A63B49/00, A63B49/12