Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3420572 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication date7 Jan 1969
Filing date20 Jan 1964
Priority date20 Jan 1964
Publication numberUS 3420572 A, US 3420572A, US-A-3420572, US3420572 A, US3420572A
InventorsBisland Theodore
Original AssigneeBisland Theodore
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Automatic headrest and neck protector
US 3420572 A
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Jan. 7, 1969 T. BISLAND 5 9 AUTOMATIC HEADREST AND NECK PROTECTOR Filed Jan. 20, 1964 Sheet oi 3 F/GJ INVENTOR THEODORE 'alsmw BYMMJMW ATTORNEYS 7, 1969- T. BISLAND 3,420,572

AUTOMATIC HEADREST AND NECK PROTECTOR Filed Jan. 20, 1964 Sheet 2 of 5 19 ii. 1/ I0 g R -I o, *7 I D2 9 I; RADIO RANGING DEVICE I I! l RANGE 6 I ZIE'DETERMIN- I l ATION l 6 I RELATIVE l I VELOCITY DETERMIN- ZZ ATION TO SOLENOID IN SEAT 25 VF -23 R 24 19 SPEED- VI SAFE/UNSAFE COLLISION COLLISION OMETER DETERMINATION IMMINENT UNAVOIDABLE DEVICE WARNING SAFETY 55 DEVICE ACTIVATED WARNING DEVICE INVENTOR THEWORE BISLA ND ATTORNEY 8 RC lN FEET Jan. 7, 1969 V T. BISLAND 3,420,572

AUTOMATIC HEADHEST AND NECK PROTECTOR Filed Jan. 20, 1964 Sheet 3 of 5 PLOT FOR VALUES o v 4 sown i WHERE a =\o.25 FT/SEC28'T=O9SEQ O 0 2o 30 4O 5O INVENTOR v, IN MPH THEODORE BISLAND F/6.5

ATTORNEYS United States Patent 5 Claims While a largely successful compaign has been waged in this country by public spirited, safety-conscious public and private organizations and individuals to arouse motor vehicle riders of the desirability of using seat belts, very little has been done to minimize a common injury which a seat belt cannot prevent.

This injury is caused by rear-end collisions which results when a following vehicle cannot avoid hitting a vehicle in front of it. Too often this is the result of poor judgment on the part of one or both drivers involved; rarely is it caused by mechanical failure.

The injury often resulting is known as whiplash, because the sudden impact on the vehicle hit causes the unsuspecting occupants head to be suddenly snapped backwardly; after which, it will be brought forwardly again by muscular reflex action.

The so-called whiplash syndrome results from the rapid to-and-fro movement of the unsupported head when the trunk is carried forward by the seat of the car. This rapid extension and flexion of the cervical spine can cause varying symptoms, depending upon the amount of damage done locally and the damage done at other parts of the body by virtue of damaged innervation or damaged blood supply.

The immediate damage may vary from a slight sensation of a strained back of neck muscle up to and including actual decapitation of the individual.

The delayed effects from whiplash injuries generally fall into the following categories:

Bone damage: This can be in the form of a traumatic arthritis of the cervical spine. Many times there are X-ray changes over a period of months which graphically demonstrate these changes. Ofttimes, these changes lead to involvement of the various openings where the spinal nerves make their exit from the spinal canal, and this leads, in turn, to:

' Nerve damage: This can be seen in the paralysis of the brachial plexus that occurs following the whiplash injury. The brachial plexus supplies the motor nerves for the movements of the arm (upper and lower). The nerve damage is ofttimes intracranial (inside the skull). This type may be the result of actual damage to the nerve tissue by the'initial trauma, or may be the indirect result of:

Blood vessel damage: By so-called reflex vaso-spasm, the blood supply to the brain can be altered and markedly diminished. The'two main arteries which supply blood to the brain are the common carotid, which gives off the internalcar'otidartery (which enters the skull from the anterior part of the neck under the angle of the jaw) and the vertebral artery which goes up the vertebrae and enters the brain from the area of the spine. The vertebral artery has been shown to be completely thrombosed (clotted off) inpatients who had a relatively mild appearing initial whiplash injury which eventually ended in their death.

The decreased blood flow which can result in varying degrees of cerebral hypoxia can give rise to many neurological symptoms. These include the following:

Diplopia (double vision), decreased accommodation (decreased focusing ability), decreased amplitude of binocular vision, headache, rapid fatigueability in previously boundless energy individuals, decreased tolerance to stress situations, increased irritability, other mental and neurological symptoms up to and including well documented cases of rapid onset of mental illness in previously completely happy, well adjusted individuals. In at least one case, a patient progressed to the vegetable stage in a few months from what was apparently a moderately mild whiplash.

Therefore, it is one of the objects of this invention to prevent, or at least minimize the possibility of whiplash injuries to the occupant of a vehicle which has been struck from the rear, and to offer additional protection to the head and neck when an impending head-on collision appears to be imminent. In this event, the device can be actuated by a convenient switch on the dash or steering wheel, as Well as by the electronic circuit.

For this purpose, a plate is provided for the seat of a vehicle, which plate may be concealed normally within the back thereof. Means is also provided whereby the plate may be raised behind the head and neck of the occupant to prevent any sudden backward movement of the head, which would be the normal result of an unexpected impact from the rear.

Electronic circuit means is associated with the plateraising apparatus for continuously sensing the movement of any vehicle immediately to the rear. This circuit means also includes computing circuits for calculating the imminence of a rear-end collision and, when such a condition exists, for initiating action.

Other objects and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the attached specification in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional elevation of one form of device for preventing injury to occupants of a vehicle constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention;

FIG. 2 is a cross-section taken on the line 22 of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary perspective view of a portion of the mechanism shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating two vehicles traveling in the same direction, one behind the other, on a highway, and indicating the various factors involved in determining the imminence of a rear-end collision;

'FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating relative rates of speed of the two vehicles shown in FIG. 4 and the distance between vehicles for safe and unsafe operating conditions at various rates of speed of the leading vehicle;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the electrical mechanisms associated in the operation of the device shown in FIG. 1; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the components comprising the safe-unsafe determination device shown in FIG. 6.

In FIG. 1, the outline of a vehicle seat having a generally upright back portion is indicated by the dotted lines. The top portion 71 customarily terminates at approximately the level of the shoulders of the occupant thereof.

In the preferred embodiment of this invention, a substantially rigid supporting plate 72 of generally semicylindrical configuration is normally concealed within the seat back. This plate is generally rectangular in vertical elevation having parallel side margins 73 which are slidably received in a pair of vertically disposed channel members 74 suitably mounted within the seat back.

As viewed in the side elevation (in FIG. 1) these channels are positioned so that when the plate is vertically raised, it will be moved almost vertically upwardly into close proximity with the back of the head of the occupant. However, upward movement of the plate is limited by a stop member 75 which engages with a rearwardly turned lower portion 76 of the plate.

The height of the plate and the position of the stop are such that while the plate may be completely concealed within the seat when not needed, it may be projected upwardly as shown in dotted lines in FIG. 1, a distance at least as high as the top of the head of the occupant of the seat. Furthermore, the plate should extend substantially across the entire width of the seat back so as to serve as protection regardless of the occupants position.

Upward movement of the plate is effected by means of a spring means 77, one end of which is attached to the rearwardly extending lower edge 76 of the plate, while the other end is attached to a suitable support 78 concealed within the framework of the seat adjacent the top thereof.

When not in use, the plate is held in its downwardly retracted position by means of a latch 79 supported on a pivot 80 and having a pivotal connection 81 with the armature 82 of an electrical solenoid 83, all of these elements being concealed within the seat. The solenoid actuating coil is provided with the usual connections 84 and 85, one of which may be grounded to the vehicle frame and the other connected with a mechanism, to be described later, capable of furnishing a voltage to actuate the solenoid to release the latch 79, permitting the spring means to abruptly project the protecting plate 72 upwardly behind the occupant.

In order to cushion the impact between the protecting plate and the head of the occupant in the event of collision, the forward face of the plate is preferably covered with some form of cushioning means, indicated generally by the numeral 86-.

While this cushioning may comprise a fairly thick layer of yieldably elastic material, such as foam rubber, in the form shown, the cushioning means comprises a layer of a high elasticity material 87 with an outer layer 88 of a material which may be described as having low elastic qualities.

Materials such as foam rubber can be considered as high elasticity materials, because when deformed, they immediately and continuously tend to return to their normal shape. Thus, when an object strikes such a material, it usually rebounds quickly.

Materials such as goosedown, feathers, or granular Dacron, can be used and their characteristic is that while they are extremely yieldable to impact and therefore thus quickly adjust to the shape of the object received, they do not tend to return quickly to their original position, and therefore have a tendency to distribute the forces over a much larger area than do the high elasticity materials.

Of course, if the low elastic cushioning material comprises a loose packing of discreet particles, it would be held in place by a flexible sheet covering material 89.

In addition, while it is considered desirable for all occupants of a vehicle to use seat belts, the possibility exists that the head of the person seated behind the seat shown in FIG. 1 might strike the back of plate 72 and therefore the rear surface should be provided with padding, as indicated at 90.

FIG. 4 indicates diagrammatically the factors involved in determining the imminence of a rear-end collision between a leading vehicle and one following behind.

The leading vehicle, indicated generally by the numeral 10, is moving with a velocity V while the following vehicle, indicated generally by the numeral 11, is proceeding at a speed V the distance between the cars being represented as R.

If, at this point, car 10 begins decelerating at its maximum rate, indicated by a, it will come to a full stop within a distance indicated at D The driver of the following car 11 will, upon observing the SlOWing down of the car in front of him, also immediately begin decelerating at its maximum rate of a, but the actions of the driver will be delayed by a time factor -r. While the actual reaction time in various individual varies between individuals, for the purpose of this illustration, an average time will be used. This average value of 1, based on national studies, will be taken at 0.9 second. It will also be necessary to assume that all vehicles are capable of deceleration at the same rate and therefore, for this purpose, national studies indicate that an average value for the maximum deceleration rate a, is 10.26 ft./sec.'-.

Returning to FIG. 4, the distance which will be covered by car 11 before it comes to a standstill is indicated as D In order that both cars may come to a stop without colliding, the distance between cars (R) at any given moment while they are moving, must be such that D is equal to or less than D +R. Therefore, R must always 'be such that it is equal to or greater than D D and an equation may be derived which makes this determination possible.

In this equation, the following additional terms will be used:

By definition, a collision is imminent only when V is negative.

It should be obvious that the safe distance between cars depends upon the speed at which they are traveling and, that this distance increases rapidly as the speed of the vehicles increases, and to illustrate this, the equation developed above has been graphically plotted in FIG. 5 in which the values for V are plotted as abscissa in miles per hour; while the distance R, in feet, is plotted as ordinates.

The various curves indicated by the numerals 12 through 17 inclusive have been obtained by substituting values V for the rate of speed of the leading car 10 from zero (when it is at a standstill) to 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 miles per hour, respectively. Each of these curves represents the dividing lines between safe and unsafe conditions at the respective rates of speed of the leading car.

Any combination of values for V and R which intersect to the left of the respective curves indicates that no collision will result; whereas, if the values for V and R are such that they intersect to the right of the respective curves, a collision is imminent. Thus, if the leading car is traveling at miles per hour and V and R are respectively 40 and 400, a collision is imminent, whereas if R is 400 feet and V is only 30 miles per hour, no danger exists.

Therefore, in order to actuate the protective means forming a part of the present invention, a detection and actuating means must be provided which will continually sense and calculate instantaneous values of R and V as well as the speed of'the vehicle with which the detection system is associated.

, On such form of detection and actuating system using conventional electronic circuits is disclosed in FIGS. 6 and 7. Since many types of circuits are known capable of providing signals proportionate to the values detected, no specific circuits-are shown and it will be understood that the only criterion is .that the various inputs and outputs throughout the system should be compatible.

In FIG. 6, the circuits included within the rectangular dotted lines comprise a conventional radio-sensing device for connection with an antenna 19 which is to be mounted on a vehicle 10 so as to be operative in a rearward direction. Many types of systems are known which include radio ranging sub-circuits 20, range-determining circuits 21 and relative velocity determining circuits 22, thereby providing output signals 23 and 24, the signal 23 being proportional to the difference in speed between the two vehicles, or V while the signal 24 is proportional to the distance between the vehicles or R. These two signals are continuously fed to a safe/unsafe determination circuit, indicated generally by the numeral 25. The circuit 25 is shown in block diagram form in FIG. 7 and comprises an arrangement of well known electronic devices arranged to continuously compute the equation represented graphically in FIG. 5, and previously referred to.

The sub-components of the system include conventional electronic analogue multiplier circuits 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30, respectively, each of which receives two signals and is capable ,of furnishing an output signal which represents a value equivalent to the product of the values represented by the two input signals. Other components include adder and subtractor circuits 31, 32 and 33, which also receive two input signals and provide a single output signal. However, in the case of the adder and subtractor circuits, the single output signal represents either the sum or the difference between the values provided by the two input signals depending upon the mode of operation of each circuit.

Further, circuits represented by the numerals 34, 35 and 36 are conventionalsignal sources, each of which is capable of supplying a signal representing constant values in the basic equation, while numeral 37 indicates a conventional electronic. comparator circuit which receives two input signals and produces an output signal only when one input signal value is equal to or greater than the other input signal value.

Since the multiplier 26 is arranged to receive a signal corresponding to the value V at both of its inputs 38 and 39, it continually supplies an output signal 40 representing the value of V The multiplier 27, however,

receives at its input 41, a signal equivalent to V and :at its input 42, a signal from speedometer 56 equivalent to V therefore, it"1,develops a signal at its output 43, which represents a yalue V V This signal is then fed to input 44 of the multiplier circuit 28, while the signal source 34 feeds a signal equivalent to the numeral 2 to input 45, with the result that this multiplier supplies at its output 46, a continuous value equivalent to 2V V which, in turn, is fed to the input 47 of the adder and subtractor circuit 31 is receiving the signal from the output 40 of the multiplier 26, the signal equivalent to V and the circuit 31 being arranged to subtract the signal from input 47 from that of input 48, the resultant signal produced at output 49 is V 2V V This output signal is then fed to input 50 of the multiplier 30, while the other input 51 receives the signal from the source 36 equivalent to the value of the reciprocal of 20: to provide a signal at the output 52 representing a value of V -2V V which, in turn, is fed to the input 53 of the adder and subtractor 33. The other input 54 of the adder and subtractor 33 receives another signal which will now be described. v

This latter signal is also derived from the output 55 of the speedometer 56. This output is not only fed to the multiplier 27, but also to the input 57 of the adder and subtractor 32. The other input 58 of this adder and subtractor circuit also receives a signal equivalent to the output signal 23 from the radar circuit 18, and is arranged to produce an output at 59 equivalent to Vr-Vz, which, in turn, is fed to input 60 of the multiplier 29.

The other input 61 of multiplier 29 receives the constant value from the signal source 35 equivalent to the value of 1-, whereby it furnishes a signal at output 52 equivalent to (V V )1-; this signal being supplied at the input '54 of adder and subtractor circuit 33; this latter circuit being arranged to furnish a signal at its output 63 equivalent to the sum of the two inputs, or

which value is the continuously computed value for the distance between the two vehicles 10 and 11 representing the boundary between safe and unsafe conditions at any instant, which value will be indicated as R In other words, if this computed value R is less than the actual distance R at that moment, conditions are determined as being safe, while if the computed value for R is greater than that of the actual distance, a collision is imminent.

This signal R is fed to one input 64 of an electronic comparator circuit 37. The other input 66, receives the signal 24 representing the actual distance R between the two vehicles, as measured by the radar. The comparator circuit is arranged in accordance with well known principles and is provided with two outputs 65 and 67. The output 65 may be grounded to the frame of the vehicle in accordance with conventional use of single wire electric circuits, and the circuit is designed to produce a voltage at its output 67, only when the two inputs receive simultaneous signals indicating that R is equal to or greater than R, or in other words, an indication that collision is imminent and transmits this signal as a voltage in line 68.

This voltage can be fed directly to the connection of the solenoid coil (see FIG. 1), or, as shown in FIG. 6, the comparator may be arranged so that the voltage in line 68 will be supplied when the value for R is slightly less than the value for R in order to actuate a visual or aduible signal device 69 to give the vehicle operator an indication that while an unsafe condition does not exist, such a condition is imminent.

Having disclosed one form of equipment for carrying out the purposes of this invention, it will be obvious that changes and improvements may be made by those skilled in the art which would be within the scope of the annexed claims.

I claim:

1. In an automatic head and neck protector for vehicle seats having a substantially vertical back portion, the combination including, a rigid plate having a curvature in the horizontally transverse direction corresponding generally to the curvature of the back of a human body, means for mounting said plate on a vehicle seat for vertical sliding movement, the top of said plate being normally positioned below the level of the occupants neck, actuating means for raising said plate vertically behind the head and neck of the occupant, and electronic means for initiating operation of said actuator, said electronic means including means for sensing the movement of a vehicle toward the rear of a vehicle carrying the protector and for instantaneously and continuously calculating the imminence of a collision.

2. The invention as defined in claim 1, wherein said electronic means also includes means for sensing the speed of the vehicle carrying said protector.

3. The invention as defined in claim 1, wherein said electronic means also includes means for sensing the distance between said two vehicles.

4. The invention as defined in claim 3, wherein said electronic means also includes means for sensing the relative rate of change of said distance.

5. The invention as defined in claim 4, wherein said electronic means includes means for sensing the speed of the vehicle carrying said protector.

- References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 365,248 6/1887 Fackrell 297-4l0 1,977,159 10/1934 Tursi 2971 12 2,796,919 6/1959 Ginsberg 297-283 2,804,160 8/ 1957 Rashid.

2,851,120 9/ 1958 Fogiel.

2,943,866 7/1960 Witter 2-97-2l6 2,985,229 5/ 1961 Shamblin 297--4l0 3,088,539 5/1963 Mathues et al.

FRANCIS K. ZUGEL, Primary Examiner.

US. Cl. X.R.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US365248 *3 Feb 188721 Jun 1887 Head-rest for car-seats
US1977159 *2 May 193316 Oct 1934Anthony CiampiAdjustable headrest
US2796919 *11 Jan 195425 Jun 1957William GinsbergAdjustable back and head rest for furiniture
US2804160 *27 Jan 195427 Aug 1957Rashid GeorgeAutomatic vehicle control system
US2851120 *5 Jul 19559 Sep 1958Max FogielMotor vehicle safety system
US2943866 *7 Jan 19585 Jul 1960Mathias WitterProtective device
US2985229 *13 Apr 195923 May 1961Shamblin Ernest HSafety head cushion for automobiles
US3088539 *18 Nov 19607 May 1963Gen Motors CorpVehicle instrument and dashboard assemblies
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3546593 *3 May 19678 Dec 1970Gen ElectricReceiver for frequency modulated radio-frequency signals
US3660846 *23 Oct 19692 May 1972Anderson Lawrence FAutomatic collision warning system
US3684309 *18 Jan 197115 Aug 1972Toyota Motor Co LtdInflatable safety device for vehicle passengers
US3687213 *10 Sep 197029 Aug 1972Toyota Motor Co LtdSafety method and apparatus for vehicle passengers
US3703702 *7 May 197121 Nov 1972Toyota Motor Co LtdAir bag safety device for vehicle passengers
US3718332 *27 Aug 197127 Feb 1973Gen Motors CorpOccupant restraint system
US3735398 *20 May 197122 May 1973Sperry Rand CorpBase band short range pre-collision sensor for actuation of vehicle safety apparatus
US3741580 *27 Aug 197126 Jun 1973Gen Motors CorpOccupant restraint system
US3741584 *8 Apr 197126 Jun 1973Toyota Motor Co LtdDevice for inflating a safety bag for vehicle passengers
US3762495 *15 Apr 19712 Oct 1973Nissan MotorMethod and device for triggering motor vehicle safety mechanisms
US3789950 *8 Mar 19725 Feb 1974Sperry Rand CorpVehicle protective apparatus
US3802737 *7 Jul 19729 Apr 1974Heizer KSafety seat, particularly for automotive vehicles
US3905515 *20 Nov 197216 Sep 1975Aerojet General CoTwo-stage, pressure augmented inflator assembly
US4073359 *6 Dec 197614 Feb 1978Nissan Motor Company, LimitedBraking system for avoiding a collision of a vehicle with an obstacle thereof
US4079802 *29 Dec 197621 Mar 1978Aisin Seiki Company, LimitedMethods and devices for controlling distance between vehicles
US4095666 *30 Mar 197720 Jun 1978Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaApparatus for preventing collision of vehicles
US4097864 *12 Apr 197727 Jun 1978Nissan Motor Company, LimitedRadar-operated vehicle safety apparatus
US4146891 *13 Jul 197727 Mar 1979Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaVehicle collision preventing apparatus
US4217582 *23 Aug 197812 Aug 1980Nissan Motor Company, LimitedRadar system for detecting approaching vehicles from behind
US4715468 *23 Dec 198629 Dec 1987Daimler-Benz AktiengesellschaftDevice for controlling a roll bar serving as a safety device for the occupants of a motor vehicle
US4722550 *13 Aug 19862 Feb 1988Mazda Motor CorporationSeat assembly for motor vehicle
US4840398 *26 Sep 198820 Jun 1989Daimler-Benz AktiengesellschaftDrive arrangement for a roll bar of motor vehicles
US4881754 *29 Aug 198821 Nov 1989Mercedes-Benz AgSafety device for the occupant of the central rear seat position in a motor vehicle
US4938527 *7 Mar 19893 Jul 1990Keiper Recaro Gmbh & Co.Plastic body for vehicle seats
US5205585 *4 Jul 199027 Apr 1993Alfred Teves GmbhOccupant safety device for automotive vehicles
US5458396 *13 Jan 199017 Oct 1995Audi AgRoll bar for convertible motor vehicles
US5484189 *24 Jun 199416 Jan 1996Patterson; JamesRetractable pop-up head rest usable with a vehicle passenger seat
US5707108 *4 Dec 199613 Jan 1998Pi; Ching-TienCushioning device
US5848661 *22 Oct 199615 Dec 1998Lear CorporationVehicle seat assembly including at least one occupant sensing system and method of making same
US5882071 *1 Aug 199716 Mar 1999Trw Occupant Restraint Systems GmbhVehicle seat with headrest adjustable on the backrest
US5927804 *11 Feb 199827 Jul 1999Trw Inc.Vehicle occupant protection apparatus
US6017086 *14 Apr 199925 Jan 2000Grammer AgVehicle seat with head support
US6024378 *29 Sep 199815 Feb 2000Lear CorporationVehicle seat assembly including at least one occupant sensing system and method of making same
US6030036 *23 Jan 199729 Feb 2000Trw Occupant Restraint Systems GmbhVehicle seat with gas bag located in the back rest
US6033017 *9 Apr 19987 Mar 2000Trw Inc.Vehicle occupant protection apparatus
US6082817 *27 Feb 19984 Jul 2000Inova Gmbh Technische EntwicklungenMotor vehicle seat
US621354812 Aug 199910 Apr 2001Trw Inc.Head restraint apparatus
US6247752 *30 Sep 199819 Jun 2001Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc.Crash-responsive blocking device for a vehicle seat frame
US638551714 Feb 20007 May 2002Mazda Motor CorporationPassenger protecting apparatus for use in a vehicle
US640223816 Jun 199811 Jun 2002Trw Occupant Restraint Systems Gmbh & Co. KgCar seat with a head rest
US6550858 *21 Sep 200022 Apr 2003Lear CorporationExtricable seat assembly
US676706427 Feb 200227 Jul 2004Lear CorporationTranslatable head restraint for automotive seat backrest
US744182121 Nov 200528 Oct 2008Lear CorporationSystem and method for actuation of a head restraint
US7585023 *24 Feb 20068 Sep 2009Ford Global Technologies, LlcSupport structure for roof reinforcement
US7588115 *26 Oct 200715 Sep 2009Automotive Technologies International, Inc.System and method for moving a headrest for whiplash prevention
US7604080 *1 May 200620 Oct 2009Automotive Technologies International, Inc.Rear impact occupant protection apparatus and method
US7616101 *26 Feb 200310 Nov 2009Robert Bosch GmbhDevice for monitoring the surroundings of a vehicle
US769501526 Oct 200713 Apr 2010Automotive Technologies International, Inc.Rear impact occupant protection apparatus and method
US774412518 Dec 200829 Jun 2010Ford Global Technologies, LlcOccupant safety device for roof reinforcement
US8149157 *27 Feb 20093 Apr 2012Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaIn-vehicle radar device and cover for in-vehicle radar device
US8336909 *30 Nov 201025 Dec 2012Hyundai Motor CompanyRear airbag system having advanced safety performance
US8368587 *22 Feb 20125 Feb 2013Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaIn-vehicle radar device and cover for in-vehicle radar device
US20120001461 *3 Jul 20105 Jan 2012Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.Stowable active material actuated rear seat headrest
US20120049493 *30 Nov 20101 Mar 2012Hyundai Motor CompanyRear airbag system having advanced safety performance
USRE40527 *26 Jul 20067 Oct 2008Lear CorporationTranslatable head restraint for automotive seat backrest
DE2246079A1 *20 Sep 197228 Mar 1974Volvo AbStossdaempfende, den kopf schuetzende vorrichtung fuer fahrzeuge
DE3440181A1 *2 Nov 19847 May 1986Bayerische Motoren Werke AgBackrest of a seat, in particular a motor vehicle seat, having a receptacle for a head support which can be fitted later
DE3900495A1 *10 Jan 198926 Jul 1990Bayerische Motoren Werke AgHead restraint for a motor-vehicle seat
DE19622146C2 *1 Jun 199630 Aug 2001Opel Adam AgKraftfahrzeugsitz
EP0678418A1 *27 Dec 199425 Oct 1995FIAT AUTO S.p.A.A headrest for motor vehicle seats, in particular for car seats
EP1029736A1 *10 Feb 200023 Aug 2000Mazda Motor CorporationA passenger protecting apparatus for use in a vehicle
WO1998057818A1 *16 Jun 199823 Dec 1998Trw Repa GmbhCar seat with a head rest
Classifications
U.S. Classification180/271, 297/216.13, 297/216.12, 297/410, 180/169, 342/72, 280/735, 280/753
International ClassificationB60N2/00, B60N2/48
Cooperative ClassificationB60N2/4885, B60N2/4829, B60N2/002
European ClassificationB60N2/00C, B60N2/48W, B60N2/48C2C