US3354022A - Water-repellant surface - Google Patents
Water-repellant surface Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3354022A US3354022A US356155A US35615564A US3354022A US 3354022 A US3354022 A US 3354022A US 356155 A US356155 A US 356155A US 35615564 A US35615564 A US 35615564A US 3354022 A US3354022 A US 3354022A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- water
- microns
- projections
- contact angle
- angle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 108
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000008247 solid mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 51
- 239000001993 wax Substances 0.000 description 36
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 22
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 18
- 239000012510 hollow fiber Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000004049 embossing Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 16
- 230000002940 repellent Effects 0.000 description 15
- 239000005871 repellent Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 14
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 14
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 14
- -1 polysiloxanes Polymers 0.000 description 14
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 8
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 8
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910000634 wood's metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-Hexane Chemical compound CCCCCC VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 4
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003518 caustics Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001338 liquidmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- DSEKYWAQQVUQTP-XEWMWGOFSA-N (2r,4r,4as,6as,6as,6br,8ar,12ar,14as,14bs)-2-hydroxy-4,4a,6a,6b,8a,11,11,14a-octamethyl-2,4,5,6,6a,7,8,9,10,12,12a,13,14,14b-tetradecahydro-1h-picen-3-one Chemical compound C([C@H]1[C@]2(C)CC[C@@]34C)C(C)(C)CC[C@]1(C)CC[C@]2(C)[C@H]4CC[C@@]1(C)[C@H]3C[C@@H](O)C(=O)[C@@H]1C DSEKYWAQQVUQTP-XEWMWGOFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AJDIZQLSFPQPEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(Cl)C(F)(Cl)Cl AJDIZQLSFPQPEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004338 Dichlorodifluoromethane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013871 bee wax Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012166 beeswax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004204 candelilla wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013868 candelilla wax Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940073532 candelilla wax Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000004203 carnauba wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013869 carnauba wax Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000084 colloidal system Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- PXBRQCKWGAHEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichlorodifluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(Cl)Cl PXBRQCKWGAHEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019404 dichlorodifluoromethane Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012183 esparto wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluoromethane Chemical compound FC NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007429 general method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052736 halogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002367 halogens Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- IUJAMGNYPWYUPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N hentriacontane Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC IUJAMGNYPWYUPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCDGVLDPFQMKDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N hexafluoropropylene Chemical group FC(F)=C(F)C(F)(F)F HCDGVLDPFQMKDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930002839 ionone Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002499 ionone derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004200 microcrystalline wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019808 microcrystalline wax Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012170 montan wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010705 motor oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052755 nonmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012186 ozocerite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012187 peat wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012169 petroleum derived wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019381 petroleum wax Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000006089 photosensitive glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007770 physical coating process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001846 repelling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrafluoroethene Chemical group FC(F)=C(F)F BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B17/00—Methods preventing fouling
- B08B17/02—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust
- B08B17/06—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust by giving articles subject to fouling a special shape or arrangement
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B17/00—Methods preventing fouling
- B08B17/02—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B17/00—Methods preventing fouling
- B08B17/02—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust
- B08B17/06—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust by giving articles subject to fouling a special shape or arrangement
- B08B17/065—Preventing deposition of fouling or of dust by giving articles subject to fouling a special shape or arrangement the surface having a microscopic surface pattern to achieve the same effect as a lotus flower
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
- B29C59/00—Surface shaping of articles, e.g. embossing; Apparatus therefor
- B29C59/02—Surface shaping of articles, e.g. embossing; Apparatus therefor by mechanical means, e.g. pressing
- B29C59/022—Surface shaping of articles, e.g. embossing; Apparatus therefor by mechanical means, e.g. pressing characterised by the disposition or the configuration, e.g. dimensions, of the embossments or the shaping tools therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C12/00—Powdered glass; Bead compositions
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C17/00—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating
- C03C17/006—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with materials of composite character
- C03C17/007—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with materials of composite character containing a dispersed phase, e.g. particles, fibres or flakes, in a continuous phase
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K3/00—Materials not provided for elsewhere
- C09K3/18—Materials not provided for elsewhere for application to surfaces to minimize adherence of ice, mist or water thereto; Thawing or antifreeze materials for application to surfaces
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29K—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES B29B, B29C OR B29D, RELATING TO MOULDING MATERIALS OR TO MATERIALS FOR MOULDS, REINFORCEMENTS, FILLERS OR PREFORMED PARTS, e.g. INSERTS
- B29K2023/00—Use of polyalkenes or derivatives thereof as moulding material
- B29K2023/04—Polymers of ethylene
- B29K2023/06—PE, i.e. polyethylene
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29K—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES B29B, B29C OR B29D, RELATING TO MOULDING MATERIALS OR TO MATERIALS FOR MOULDS, REINFORCEMENTS, FILLERS OR PREFORMED PARTS, e.g. INSERTS
- B29K2827/00—Use of polyvinylhalogenides or derivatives thereof as mould material
- B29K2827/12—Use of polyvinylhalogenides or derivatives thereof as mould material containing fluorine
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29K—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES B29B, B29C OR B29D, RELATING TO MOULDING MATERIALS OR TO MATERIALS FOR MOULDS, REINFORCEMENTS, FILLERS OR PREFORMED PARTS, e.g. INSERTS
- B29K2995/00—Properties of moulding materials, reinforcements, fillers, preformed parts or moulds
- B29K2995/0037—Other properties
- B29K2995/0093—Other properties hydrophobic
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C2217/00—Coatings on glass
- C03C2217/40—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer
- C03C2217/43—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase
- C03C2217/44—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase characterized by the composition of the continuous phase
- C03C2217/445—Organic continuous phases
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C2217/00—Coatings on glass
- C03C2217/40—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer
- C03C2217/43—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase
- C03C2217/46—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase characterized by the dispersed phase
- C03C2217/47—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase characterized by the dispersed phase consisting of a specific material
- C03C2217/475—Inorganic materials
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C2217/00—Coatings on glass
- C03C2217/40—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer
- C03C2217/43—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase
- C03C2217/46—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase characterized by the dispersed phase
- C03C2217/48—Coatings comprising at least one inhomogeneous layer consisting of a dispersed phase in a continuous phase characterized by the dispersed phase having a specific function
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C2217/00—Coatings on glass
- C03C2217/70—Properties of coatings
- C03C2217/76—Hydrophobic and oleophobic coatings
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/24—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
- Y10T428/24479—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including variation in thickness
- Y10T428/2457—Parallel ribs and/or grooves
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/24—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
- Y10T428/24479—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including variation in thickness
- Y10T428/24595—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including variation in thickness and varying density
- Y10T428/24603—Fiber containing component
Definitions
- Water repellency which is defined in terms of the angle a (relative to the horizontal) to which a surface must be tilted in order for a water drop to roll off, depends on the differences in the cosines of the advancing and receding contact angles. This relationship is given by:
- the existing literature also gives the impression that formation of a composite surface, i.e., a surface composed of high portions and low portions which when contacted with water will create air-liquid and solid-liquid interfaces between the water drop and the repellent surface, will give improved repellency regardless of the air content of the composite surface.
- the air content of a composite surface is determined by taking an imaginary plane parallel to the surface passing through the tops of the high portions of the surface and measuring at this plane the percentage of the total surface area which is air.
- FIGURE l illustrates graphically the effect of the air content of a surface on the advancing contact angle 9a and the receding contact angle 0!- for a representative solid surface of this invention having a constant chemical composition and an intrinsic advancing water contact angle (0a) of 110 and an intrinsic receding water contact angle (0r) of 92.
- the intrinsic contact angle (for 0 and 0,) is defined as the contact angle exhibited by a given solid surface when smooth.
- a smooth surface is meant a surface having high portions not greater thanabout 0.5 micron in height.
- Whether a composite surface will be more or less repellent than the corresponding smooth surface depends on the air content of the composite surface. Actually, there is a reduction in repellency for composite surfaces having low percentages of air in the surface when compared to their smooth solid counterparts. This is due to the fact that the advancing contact angle 0 increases more rapidly than does the receding angle 0r when the air content of the surface is increased within certain limits, i.e., from about 0 to about 60% as shown in FIGURE 1. This increase in air content results in an increase in the difference between the contact angles. Referring to Equation 1, this increase in difference causes a concomitant increase in the tilt angle u.
- FIGURE 2 further illustrates graphically the relationship between tilt angle a and air content of the fsurface. As shown in the graph, initial increases in air content decrease water repellency until at a certain air content the l tilt angle equals the tilt angle for the smooth surface.
- the critical air content is about 60% or morerfor most solid surfaces. Surfaces having low tilt angles when contacted with water droplets exhibit characteristics similar to mercury droplets on glass.
- FIGURE 1 is a graph summarizing the effect of increasing aircontent on 0a and 0r for a given solid surface.
- FIGURE 2 is a graph summarizing the variations in tilt angle a with increasing air content for a given solid surface.
- FIGURE 3 is a plan view in partial section of one embodiment of the present invention wherein b is the distance between the centers of adjacent high portions,
- ' c is the distance between the outer extremities of adjacent high portions and d is the diameter of a high portion.
- FIGURE 4 is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment represented in FIGURE 3 taken along line 2 2 wherein h is the height of a given high portion.
- FIGURE 5 is a plan view in partial section of another specific embodiment of the present invention wherein b, c and d have the same meaning as in FIGURE 3.
- FIGURE 6 is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment represented in FIGURE taken along line 4--4 wherein h has the same meaning as in FIGURE 4.
- FIGURE 7 is a photomicrographic plan view of a representative non-uniform composite surface of this invention wherein the dark areas indicate low portions and the light areas indicate high portions. The angle of illumination of the original photograph was to the plane of the' surface.
- FIGURE 8 is a diagrammatic side elevation view of apparatus for preparing surfaces having the configurations dis-closed in this application.
- Another object is to provide a method for the production of solid water repellent surfaces.
- a further object is to provide intermediate means utilizable in processes for the production of these surfaces.
- thermodynamic properties of a water drop on a composite surface This can be theoretically explained by considering the thermodynamic properties of a water drop on a composite surface. Qualitatively, these considerations show that when a drop moves over a composite surface the advancing portion of its periphery rnoves rapidly over the solid areas and comes to rest at solid-air boundaries or edges. At these points the contact angle 0 increases to very high values, approaching 180 This behavior reinforces the tendency of the drop, due to its surface tension, to minimize its surface area. The receding portion of the drop periphery tends to remain on solid regions and the contact angle 0r at thesey points approaches the receding contact angle for water on the smooth solid. The extent to which this takes place depends on how much high solid area is present in the composite surface.
- the present invention is directed to a solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water contact angle 0a of greater than 90 and a receding water contact angle 0r of at least 75, Said SOlid surface comprising high portions and low portions, said low portions being at least 60% of the total surface area of the solid surface (i.e., an air content of at least 60% air).and said high portions having an average distance between adjacent high portions of not greater than 1000 microns, the average height of the high portions above the low portions. being at least .5 times the averagedistance between adjacent high portions, said high portions having con gurations which produce a lower tilt angle on said solid surface than exhibited on the corresponding smooth surface.
- One embodiment of the present invention involves a solid surface comprising an @ordered arrangement of projections (high portions) consisting of non-contiguous vertically oriented columns of solid rising from the low surface, the maximum distance between the columns being given by where Cm is distance in centimeters, 0a is the intrinsic advancing water contact angle and f is air content expressed as a fraction (i.e., the fraction of the total surface area that consists of low portions), the height of the columns being at least .5 times the distance between adjacent columns, said surface having an air content of at least air (low portions) and the advancing intrinsic water contact angle being greater than 90 and the receding intrinsic water contact angle being at least
- a third embodiment involves solids having rough surfaces comprising non-uniform arrangements of high and low portions which on an average fall within the necessary height, distance and air content requirements generic to this invention.
- Preferred embodiments of the present invention involve solid surfaces having intrinsic advancing water contact angles of greater than and intrinsic receding Water Contact angles of greater than 85 with air contents of 75% air or above and heights of high portions above low portions about equal to the average distances between adjacent high portions.
- the preferred distance between adjacent high portions is about 250 microns or below.
- the preferred distance between adjacent walls is 600 microns or below.
- the water repellent surfaces of this invention may be made from any solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water contact angle 0a of greater than 90 and ⁇ a receding Water contact angle (if of at least 75. It is necessary that the surfaces have high intrinsic advancing contact angles to prevent liquid penetration in the composite surface due to the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid drops. Receding contact angles of at least 75 are necessary to avoid having to increase the air content of the surface to impractically high values to overcome the attractive forces between the drops and the high solid portions.
- Solids found to have the necessary intrinsic contact angles are for example: alkyl polysiloxanes; polyfluoroalkyl polysiloxanes; waxes having a softening temperature greater than 40 C. which are essentially halogen free and water insoluble; and polymers comprising polymerizable or copolymerizable ethylenic compounds which will form polymers having the following surface constitutions:
- n is from 3 to 13.
- the waxes which are operable in this invention are:v Natural waxes such as beeswax, candelilla wax, carnauba Wax, esparto wax; petroleum waxes such as paratiin waxes, micro-crystalline waxes; fossil or earth waxes such as montan wax, ozocerite, peat wax and synthetic waxes such as Fischer-Tropsch waxes and hydrogenated waxes.
- While most solid surfaces exhibiting the required intrinsic contact angle show improved repellency over thesmooth unmodified surface when the air content is above about 60% and the other conditions mentioned above are met certain surfaces (e.g., polyethylene) do not show improved repellency until the air content of the surface is about 75% to 80% air.
- 0r is the receding contact angle. if Hr is less than the water will show no tendency to come out of the capillary. For most solids with non-zero Contact angles, @a and 0, are not equal (0r being less than 0a). In this situation the angles 0a and 0r are not to be confused with the angles actually observed forl water drops on the embossed surface.
- the present angles 9a and 0r refer to the water angles on the solid regions of the embossed surface. In some instances surfaces can be prepared where 6:0r but this requires special procedures to obtain smooth surfaces and elaborate purication methods to obtain homogeneous surfaces; It is probably impossible to obtain homogeneous polymer surfaces; even adsorbed monolayers are, to some extent, heterogeneous.
- prepared surfaces having average distances between adjacent high portions falling within the generic requirements of this invention provide improved water repellency.
- Preferred non-uniform surfaces having distances of from about 20 microns to about 400 microns have been found to impart superior water repellency to surfaces provided the largest average spacing between adjacent high portions is below about 300 microns.
- the high portions of the composite surfaces of this invention must have certain configurations in order to provide the proper air content while at the same time avoiding penetration of the liquid into the low portions of the surface. Optimum results are achieved when the sides of the walls or projections are perpendicular to the plane of the surface, however, it is not necessary that the sides of the projections or walls be absolutely vertical or perpendicular to the surface. It is sufficient if somewhere on all sides of a given high portion there is a point at which a line drawn tangent to the side will make an angle between the tangent and the horizontal, measured through the high portion, of about 80 or more.
- the present invention is also directed to a process for the preparation of water repellent solid surfaces which comprises contacting a solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water conta-ct angle of greater than 90 and an instrinsic receding contact angle of at least 75 with means for softening said solid surface, contacting the solid surface with a die capable of producing a positive configuration comprising high portions and low portions on the solid surface wherein the height of the high portions and the distance between adjacent high portions will conform to the requirements previously stated and removing said die from contact with the solid surface.
- the softening step may be dispensed with provided the die form or mold is of sufficient mechanical strength to withstand pressures necessary to impart the desired configurations to the surface materials of this invention without damage to the die or loss of detail in the resulting surface configuration.
- Die forms or molds utilizable in the practice of this invention include commercially available screens or mesh plates, photosen-sitive polymers which after exposure to actinic light are treated to produce the negative of the desired surface configuration, metallic dies produced by contacting the metal with photosensitive polymers having the positive configuration desired to be reproduced on the solid surface and masses of hollow fibers rigidly held together by suitable means.
- These holiow fiber die forms or molds are aligned together in parallel manner in bundles and cut or sliced approximately perpendicular to their length to create a die surface of their cross-section.
- the outer diameter of these hollow fibers must be on an average in the range of from about l to about 450 microns and the inner diameter must be on an average less than about .6 times the outer diameter.
- the length of hollow fibers used in the die must be at least .5 times the difference between the inner and outer diameters of the hollow fibers.
- the hollow fibers may be obtained as described in U.S. Patent 2,999,296 and French Patent 990,726.
- the outer diameter of the fibers used measure within the range of 10 to 450 microns and are 1.2 to 3.0 times the inner diameter.
- the fibers are compacted together and cut or sliced approximately perpendicular to their length exposing the cross-section.
- the truncated ends are then used as a mold or die.
- the surface to be treated is softened slightly, by heating or other suitable means (e.g., solvents) to facilitate impression of the surface by the mold.
- the surface hardens as it cools, whereby high portions (projections) resembling vertical columns corresponding to the hollow cores of the fibers are permanently developed on the surface.
- the hollow fibers may be assembled into bundles of various shapes and sizes or may be attached to a roller having the truncated ends of the fibers as the roller surface. A large quantity of the object having the surface to be treated may be conveyed in such a manner under the roller so that the pattern is stamped on the surface.
- This plastic grid is now used as a die and impressed onto another surface capable in itself of being used as an embossing die, eig., Woods metal.
- This die bearing a reverse pattern of the grid, is impressed on the surface to be made water repellent in the same manner as described above for the hollow fiber surface.
- the lines of the original paper pattern thus become the walls of the depressions.
- the embossing dies may also be made of any metal or non-metal which can be chemically or mechanically modified to give the desired surface pattern with the desired spacings and dimensions, providing the material is of sufficient strength to permit its use as a die.
- a photosensitive glass available commercially, such as described in Glass Engineering Handbook, E. B.
- Shund McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd ed., 1958, p. 363, may be used in the preparation of such a surface.
- a surface having an array of depressions may be produced directly.
- glass in itself does not possess the requisite advancing and receding water contact angles. It must therefore be treated with a material having the necessary intrinsic advancing and receding water contact angles to achieve the desired water repellency by a physical coating process. Or, for example, monoor multilayers of a substance having the required Contact angles may be chemisorbed on the glass to form a strongly adherent coating. The coating acquires the configuration of the glass substrate thereby forming a highly water repellent surface.
- the air content of the surface was determined by photomicrographs (plan view) of the surface.
- the photomicrographs are taken with the plane formed by the tops of the high portions of the surface in focus.
- the fraction of the total area of the photomicrographs that is air is taken as the air content of the surface.
- the magnification is chosen such that each photomicrograph includes enough of the area of the surface to give a reliable and reproducible value for surface porosity (air content).
- the method used to determine tilt angles (a) in these examples is essentially that described in I. Colloid. Sci., vol. 17, p. 309 (1962), by C. G. L. Furmidge.
- the surface to be studied was placed on a hinged brass plate.
- a drop of water of the required volume was placed on the experimental surface using a hypodermic syringe.
- the hinged plate was immediately ⁇ rotated until' the 'drop started to roll off the surface.
- the angle to which the plate was rotated was then measured .to the nearest degree lwith a protractor. With only slight differences the tilt anglennecessary to cause the drop to commence rolling is equal to the angle necessary to keep the drop rollmg.
- An embossing die is made in the following manner: A bundle of hollow fibers of a copolymer of tetraiiuoroethylene and hexauoropropylene is compressed, using a hose clamp, to give a close-packed arrangement of the fibers.
- the hollow fibers have an inside diameter of 250 microns and an outside diameter of 430 microns.
- the clamped Ibundle is then cut with a microtome knife so that the surface thereby formed is iiush with one end of the hose clamp. This surface (1.5 cm. in diameter), which consists of the truncated ends of the hollow fibers, is used as an embossing die.
- the die described above is pressed (by hand) against the warm surface of a piece (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 1 cm.) of paraffin wax.
- the surface of the Wax is previously heated to 35 to 40 C. (to a depth of about 1 mm.) in order to soften it and thereby facilitate fiow into the holes of the die.
- the embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections oriented at right angles to the original wax surface. There is negligible penetration of wax into the spaces between the fibers of the die because these spaces are sufficiently small, the applied pressure during embossing is low enough and the flow properties of the wax at 35 to 40 C. are poor enough to prevent penetration.
- the cylindrical projections are about 250 microns in diameter and 150 to 200 microns high.
- the distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 430 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 70% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 113 on the original surface to 144 on the embossed surface and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 129.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll olf the surface has decreased-from to 9.
- a lower tilt angle for one surface than for another means that if both surfaces are vertical the surface with the lower tilt angle will permit roll-off of smaller water drops. This is equivalent to saying that liquid 'retention will be lower on the surface with the lower tilt angle.
- the hollow fiber dies can be many times larger in area then the one described above and the embossing process can be carried out using conventional presses.
- the fibers can be mounted in closepacked array on any rigid backing such as a metal or hard plastic plate, the dimensions of the plate being determined by the size of the surface to be embossed or by the size of the embossing press. A plate of several square feet in area is possible.
- the close packing can be achieved and maintained by exerting lateral pressure at the periphery of the plate or by sealing the fiber ends to the plate using a suitable adhesive.
- the fibers can be mounted on a roller of several feet in length and of sufficient diameter so that close packing of the fibers is possible at the outer surface of the die.
- the parafiin wax in this example need not be a solid piece of the wax alone. It can just as well be a thin coating of wax (as thin as 0.1 mm.) on another surface, such as a sheet of glass or metal.
- EXAMPLE 2 An embossing die is made in the manner described in Example 1 using hollow fibers of polyethylene. These fibers have an inside diameter of 80 to 95 microns and an outside diameter of 220 microns. This die (1.5 cm. in diameter) is used to emboss the parafiin wax surface of Example 1 using the method described in Example 1.
- the resulting -cylindrical projections of the embossed surface are 80 to 95 microns in diameter and 200 to 300V microns high.
- the distance between centers of adjacent projections is 240 to 300 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 87% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a drop of Water has increased from 113 to 156 and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 148.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 15 to 4.
- EXAMPLE 3 The hollow ber die of Example 1 is pressed (by hand) against the surface of a piece of polypropylene film (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 0.05 cm.) having a melting point of about 165 C. and a melt index of about 0.5.
- the film is previously heated to 150 to 155 C. to soften it and thereby facilitate flow into the holes of the die.
- the die is also heated (to to 120 C.).
- the embos-sed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 250 microns in diameter and 500 to 6.00 microns high. There is negligible penetration of polypropylene between the fibers of the die.
- the average distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 450 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 75% air.
- the ad ⁇ vancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from on the original fiat surface to 139 on the embossed surface and the receding Contact angle has increased from 85 to 115.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.10 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 21 to 16.
- the larger dies described in Example 1, particularly the roller type, can be used to emboss large sheets of polypropylene to produce the surface described in this ex. ample.
- Example 4 The hollow fiber die of Example 1 is pressed (by hand) against the surface of a piece of polyethylene film (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 0.1 cm.) having a melting point of about 110 C. and a melt index of 1.8.
- the film is previously heated to 102 to 105 C. to soften it and thereby facilitate ow into the holes of the die.
- the die is also heated (to 95 to 100 C.).
- the embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 250 microns in diameter and 450 to 500 microns high. There is negligible penetration of polyethylene between the fibers of the die.
- the average distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 450 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is about 75% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 98 on the original at surface to 140 on the embossed surface and the receding contact angle has increased from 76 to 105
- the tilt angle necessary for an 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 30 to 22.
- a relief image of the configuration desired is prepared according to the method described in U.S. Patent 2,760,863, whereby the surface of a photosensitive polymer (1 mm. thick coating of the polymer on a 2.5 mm. thick sheet of aluminum) is irradiated with actinic light which has first passed through a photographic transparency on which there is an ordered array of opaque squares separated by ne spacings that transmit the actinic light.
- the exposed regions of the photosensitive polymer undergo a chemical reaction which makes them more resistant than the unexposed regions to attack by caustic solution.
- the resulting polymer surface consists of a network of interconnecting walls (intersecting at right angles) enclosing square-shaped depressions.
- the walls are 27 microns thick and 130 microns high.
- the distance between walls (centerto-center) is 195 microns.
- the network is approximately 1 cm. square in area.
- the negative form of the desired surface configuration can be produced on the photosensitive polymer.
- a caustic Washing procedure is necessary to -completely flush out the narrow (27 microns) channels which result if the negative form is made. Therefore, the procedure utilizing the Woods metal impression is preferred in order to obtain the negative form for use in embossing other surfaces.
- the embossed wax surface is a replica of the original photopolymer surface. However, some loss in surface detail has resulted from the above procedure of making an impression of an impression.
- the center-to-center dis tance between walls is 190 ⁇ microns; the walls are 37 microns thick and 130 microns high.
- the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the walls, is 65% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 113 on the original flat surface to 137 on the embossed surface and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 116. No decrease in tilt angle was obtained here since this example represents the lower limit to the air content of a parafin wax surface.
- EXAMPLE 6 An embossing die is produced in the manner described in Example 5 and a at parafn wax surface is embossed in the manner described in Example 1.
- the embossed wax surface consists of interconnecting walls 15 microns thick and 130 microns high. The distance between walls (centerto-center) is 195 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the walls, is about air.
- the advancing contact angle for water has increased from 113 on the original flat surface to 155 on the embossed surface and the receding contact angle has increased from 100 to 145. rl ⁇ he tilt angle necessary for a 0.015 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 15 to 4.
- embossing dies described in this example and in Example 5 can be many times larger and can be used in plate or roller form.
- the Woods metal die described here would be applicable only to surfaces of materials which have the desirable flow characteristics at temperatures below 65 C. For other materials, dies of higher melting metals or alloys must be used.
- the negative photopolymer surfaces can be fabricated and used directly as embossing dies.
- EXAMPLE 7 A fluorocarbon wax dispersion in 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2 triiiuoroethane, obtained by reacting methanol and tetraiiuoroethylene in the manner described in U.S. Patent 3,067,262 (the Wax having a crystalline melting point of 278 C., an approximate molecular weight of 2000) and containing about 20% solids, is diluted with a solution of 50 parts of trichloroiiuoromethane and 50 parts of dichlorodifluoromethane to give a solids concentration of about 1%. This mixture is sprayed onto a 1" x 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick.
- the wax particles at the top of the coating are 5 to 80 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 20 to 160 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 88 to 90% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 159 and the receding angle is 156; the corresponding angles for a smooth, flat surface of the wax are 111 and 95 re spectively.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water ⁇ drop to roll off the surface is 18 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax.
- EXAMPLE 8 A mixture containing 90 parts of a 12.5% solution of paraiiin wax in n-hexane and 10 parts of glass beads of a diameter in the range 3 to 12 microns, is heated to 40 to 50 C. and sprayed onto a 1" x 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick.
- the n-hexane rapidly evaporates from the surface leaving agglomerates of wax-coated glass beads.
- the agglomerates at the top of the coating are 15 to 250 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 50 to 350 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 88% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 158 and the receding angle is 156; the corresponding angles on a smooth, flat paran wax surface are 113 and 101 respectively.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface is 15 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax-glass bead mixture.
- EXAMPLE 9 A 400 line per inch nickel mesh plate, commercially available from the Buckbee Mears Co., St. Paul, Minn. (6" x 6) with a square array of holes (28 to 29 microns square with a center-to-center distance of 60 microns and a depth of 25 microns) is used as a die to emboss a lm (3 cm. x 6 om. x 15 cm.) of a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexaiiuoropropylene. The plate iS 13 pressed against the film in a Carver laboratory press at 12,000 to 14,000 p.s.i. and 100 C. for 15 minutes.
- the plate ⁇ is then peeled from the film; there is negligible adhesion between plate and film.
- the embossed surface consists. of a regular 'l arrayof square-shaped projections oriented at right angles to the original film surface.
- .'l ⁇ hese projections are 28 to 29 microns on a side and 22 to 25 microns high.
- the centertocenter distance of adjacent projections is 60 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by thetops of the' projections is 75 to 78% air.
- the advancing vangle for a water drop has increased from 114V on the original surface to 157H on the embossed surface and the receding angle has 4increased from 97 to 134.
- Thetilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml.
- EXAMPLE 1l A fiuorocarbon wax having a melting range of 95 to 135 C. and the general formula where n varies from 3 to 9 but is predominately 7 and 8, is dissolved in 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-triuoroethane to the extent of about 5%. About 100 parts of the above solution and parts of glass beads having diameters in the range of 3 to 12 microns are mixed together, heated to about 40 C. and sprayed onto a 1 by 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick. The 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane rapidly evaporates from the surface leaving agglomerates of waxcoated glass beads.
- the agglomerates at the top of the coating are to 300 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 80 to 300 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 82% air.
- the advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 157 and the receding angle is 154; the corresponding angles on a smooth, flat surface of the wax are 128 and 114 respectively.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface is 13 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax-glass ⁇ bead mixture. In the above example, all parts are by weight.
- EXAMPLE 12 A continuous film of polyethylene (3 ft. wide, 150 microns thick) having a melting point of 110 C. and a melt index of 1.8 is passed beneath a suitable heater which heats the top half of the film to 102 to 104 C. The lm is then passed between two rollers. The surface of one roller is covered with the close-packed ends of hollow fibers of a copolymer of tetrauoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene. The hollow fibers have an inside diameter of 50 microns and an outside diameter of 123 microns. The surface of the embossing roller is heated to 95 to 100 C. just before it comes into Contact with the film as shown in FIGURE 8.
- the embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 50 microns in diameter and 200 microns high.
- the average distance between centers of adjacent projections is 123 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane-formed by the tops of the projections, is air.
- the film thickness, excluding the projections,v isnow microns.
- the advancing Contact angle for a water drop has increased from 98 on the original fiat surface to on the embossed surface and the receding -anglehas increased from 76 to 120.
- the tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll olf the surface has decreased from 30 to 18".
- the embossed surfaces prepared as described in the preceding examples exhibit a lower tilt angle and thereby a vastly improved water repellency.
- the configuration of projections or depressions causes the advancing and receding contact angles to increase so that the drop width a'nd the difference in the cosines of the receding and advancing contact angles are decreased.
- the high water repellency is thus due to the intrinsic structure of the surface.
- novel water repellent surfaces of the invention are useful in the production of numerous articles which shed water easily, such as ranwear, shower curtains, tenting material and plastic and ceramic tiles. These surfaces may also constitute condenser surfaces of solar stills land serve as surfaces where ice formation is to be minimized.
- Composite surfaces of this invention have shown improved repellency to liquids with viscosities in the range of from 5,000 to 10,000 centipoises and surface tensions greater than 40 Idynes/cm. and viscous, aqueous sugar solutions with viscosities of 3000 centipoises and surface tensions close to that of water. Aqueous solutions of inorganic salts will also be repelled more readily since their surface tensions range from 72 to 85 dynes/cm.
- composition vof claim 1 wherein the average distance between adjacent projections is not greater than 600 microns and the avenage height of the projections is equal to the average distance between adjacent projections, wherein said
- composition of claim 1 wherein said composition is polyethylene @and wherein the ail content is at least 75 air.
- composition Iof claim 1 wherein said projection-s are 11o-contiguous, vertically oriented celums, and wherein the miaximum distance between columns is given by the equation ⁇ 1339 ⁇ COS wherein Cm is the distance in centimeters, 6EL is the intrinsic advancing water contact angle and A is the ai-r content expressed las 'a fraction.
- composition of claim l-wh'ere'in said projections are ordered interconnected vertical walls and wherein the maximum distance between
- adjacent Walls is given by the equation 'Cm 0.587 cos 6a where Cm is the distance in centimeters and 0a is ⁇ the intrinsic advancing Water content langle.
- composition of claim 1 wherein ⁇ said projections are nonuniformlly arranged, and wherein the average distance between adjacent projections is not greater than 300 microns. .f
- composition of claim 1 in the form of a film having said projections Ion one side thereof.
- composition of claim 1 in the form of a sheet having said projections on one ⁇ side therof.
Description
Nov. 21, 1967 R. H. DETTREI ET AL 3,354,022
'y wATER-REPELLANT SURFACE Filed March 31, 1964 v 5 Sheetsfsheet s MEMS/NG ROLLER COL@ /7//P United States Patent 3,354,022 WATER-REPELLANT SURFACE Robert Harold Dettre, Wilmington, Harold Leonard Jackson, Hociressin, and Rulon Edward Johnson, Jr., Wilmington, Del., assignors to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del., a corporation of Delaware Filed Mar. 31, 1964, Ser. No. 356,155 8 Claims. (Cl. 161--123) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE This invention relates to water repellent, solid surfaces and to a process for their preparation. More particularly, this invention relates to solid surfaces having configurations which endow the surfaces with improved water repellent properties and a method for imparting these configurations to solid surfaces.
Prior to this invention, major efforts in combatting the problem of producing water repellent materials centered around the application of coatings to substrates. A variety of water impervious coatings have been used, but they have the inherent disadvantages characteristic 4of coatings in general, namely, gradual absorption of water by the coating and contact angle hysteresis both of which reduce repellency. These and other problems have prevented the art from producing a durable, highly water repellent surface.
Literature concerning the theoretical requirements for good water repellency has created certain misleading postulates. For example, it is generally believed that water repellency is greatest when the contact angle 0 is as large as possible. Contact angle 6 is defined as the angle (measured through the liquid) which a liquid makes with a solid'. While it is true that increases in the advancing contact angle (the largest experimentally measured contact angle, 0a) and receding contact angle (the smallest experimentally measured contact angle, 0r) can improve repellency, in certain instances increases in both these angles result in decreased depellency. Water repellency, which is defined in terms of the angle a (relative to the horizontal) to which a surface must be tilted in order for a water drop to roll off, depends on the differences in the cosines of the advancing and receding contact angles. This relationship is given by:
` (1) Sin a=KW (cos r-cos 0,) where K'=a constant for a given volume of water W=width of drop Therefore, as mentioned above, repellency can be reduced if the increases in 0r and 0a are such that the difference in their cosines increases.
. The existing literature also gives the impression that formation of a composite surface, i.e., a surface composed of high portions and low portions which when contacted with water will create air-liquid and solid-liquid interfaces between the water drop and the repellent surface, will give improved repellency regardless of the air content of the composite surface. The air content of a composite surface is determined by taking an imaginary plane parallel to the surface passing through the tops of the high portions of the surface and measuring at this plane the percentage of the total surface area which is air.
This hypothesis found in the prior art is partially based on the premise that an increase in contact angle alone is sufficient to improve repellency. However, composite surfaces can be obtained which are less repellent than their smooth counterparts. FIGURE l illustrates graphically the effect of the air content of a surface on the advancing contact angle 9a and the receding contact angle 0!- for a representative solid surface of this invention having a constant chemical composition and an intrinsic advancing water contact angle (0a) of 110 and an intrinsic receding water contact angle (0r) of 92. The intrinsic contact angle (for 0 and 0,) is defined as the contact angle exhibited by a given solid surface when smooth. By a smooth surface is meant a surface having high portions not greater thanabout 0.5 micron in height. Whether a composite surface will be more or less repellent than the corresponding smooth surface depends on the air content of the composite surface. Actually, there is a reduction in repellency for composite surfaces having low percentages of air in the surface when compared to their smooth solid counterparts. This is due to the fact that the advancing contact angle 0 increases more rapidly than does the receding angle 0r when the air content of the surface is increased within certain limits, i.e., from about 0 to about 60% as shown in FIGURE 1. This increase in air content results in an increase in the difference between the contact angles. Referring to Equation 1, this increase in difference causes a concomitant increase in the tilt angle u.
FIGURE 2 further illustrates graphically the relationship between tilt angle a and air content of the fsurface. As shown in the graph, initial increases in air content decrease water repellency until at a certain air content the l tilt angle equals the tilt angle for the smooth surface.
Beyond this critical air content tilt angles decrease drastically. The critical air content is about 60% or morerfor most solid surfaces. Surfaces having low tilt angles when contacted with water droplets exhibit characteristics similar to mercury droplets on glass.
The manufactures, process and theory of this invention will be better appreciated by .reference to the drawing wherein several embodiments of the invention are illusi trated.
FIGURE 1, discussed above, is a graph summarizing the effect of increasing aircontent on 0a and 0r for a given solid surface. Y y
FIGURE 2, discussed above, is a graph summarizing the variations in tilt angle a with increasing air content for a given solid surface.
FIGURE 3 is a plan view in partial section of one embodiment of the present invention wherein b is the distance between the centers of adjacent high portions,
' c is the distance between the outer extremities of adjacent high portions and d is the diameter of a high portion.
FIGURE 4 is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment represented in FIGURE 3 taken along line 2 2 wherein h is the height of a given high portion.
FIGURE 5 is a plan view in partial section of another specific embodiment of the present invention wherein b, c and d have the same meaning as in FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 6 is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment represented in FIGURE taken along line 4--4 wherein h has the same meaning as in FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 7 is a photomicrographic plan view of a representative non-uniform composite surface of this invention wherein the dark areas indicate low portions and the light areas indicate high portions. The angle of illumination of the original photograph was to the plane of the' surface.
FIGURE 8 is a diagrammatic side elevation view of apparatus for preparing surfaces having the configurations dis-closed in this application.
It is an object of this invention to provide a permanent,
solid, water repellent surface. Another object is to provide a method for the production of solid water repellent surfaces. A further object is to provide intermediate means utilizable in processes for the production of these surfaces. These and other objects will become readily apparent from the following description and claims.
These objects are accomplished in accordance with lthe present invention whereby a surface is produced having configurations which impart a greater degree of water repellency to the surface than the corresponding unmodified solid surface.
The tendency for a solid surface to repel water is dependent upon contact angle hysteresis, Le., the difference between advancing (0a) and receding (0,.) contact angles of a water droplet on the solid surface. Where the difference in the above angles is great, there is a tendency for the water droplet to remain on the solid surface, i.e., the surface does not repel water. However, when hysteresis is reduced by lessening the difference between 0a and c1I water droplets are repelled from the solid surface and roll off the surface. When solid surfaces consisting of compositionsv having a high intrinsic contact angle are suiciently modified to produce a composite surface having an air content greater than the critical air content, low contact angle hysteresis is observed and high repellency is obtained.
This can be theoretically explained by considering the thermodynamic properties of a water drop on a composite surface. Qualitatively, these considerations show that when a drop moves over a composite surface the advancing portion of its periphery rnoves rapidly over the solid areas and comes to rest at solid-air boundaries or edges. At these points the contact angle 0 increases to very high values, approaching 180 This behavior reinforces the tendency of the drop, due to its surface tension, to minimize its surface area. The receding portion of the drop periphery tends to remain on solid regions and the contact angle 0r at thesey points approaches the receding contact angle for water on the smooth solid. The extent to which this takes place depends on how much high solid area is present in the composite surface. Opposing the tendency to remain on solid regions is the previously mentioned tendency to minimize surface area. Therefore, as the air content of the composite surface increases and less solid is present to restrain the periphery, the surface tension of the water predominates and the receding contact angle' increases to high values, approach ing those of the advancing portions of the drop.
Specifically, the present invention is directed to a solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water contact angle 0a of greater than 90 and a receding water contact angle 0r of at least 75, Said SOlid surface comprising high portions and low portions, said low portions being at least 60% of the total surface area of the solid surface (i.e., an air content of at least 60% air).and said high portions having an average distance between adjacent high portions of not greater than 1000 microns, the average height of the high portions above the low portions. being at least .5 times the averagedistance between adjacent high portions, said high portions having con gurations which produce a lower tilt angle on said solid surface than exhibited on the corresponding smooth surface.
One embodiment of the present invention involves a solid surface comprising an @ordered arrangement of projections (high portions) consisting of non-contiguous vertically oriented columns of solid rising from the low surface, the maximum distance between the columns being given by where Cm is distance in centimeters, 0a is the intrinsic advancing water contact angle and f is air content expressed as a fraction (i.e., the fraction of the total surface area that consists of low portions), the height of the columns being at least .5 times the distance between adjacent columns, said surface having an air content of at least air (low portions) and the advancing intrinsic water contact angle being greater than 90 and the receding intrinsic water contact angle being at least Another embodiment of the present invention involves a solid surface comprising high portions having therein an ordered arrangement of depressions (low portions), said high portions consisting of interconnected vertical walls of solid which enclose chambers of air, the maximum distance between the walls being given by Cm=0.587 cos 0a where C,m is the distance in centimeters, Qa is the intrinsic advancing water contact angle and the depth of the depressions being at least .5 times the distance between the walls, said surface having an air content of at least 60% air (depressions), the solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water contact angle of greater than and an intrinsic receding water contact angle of at least 75.
A third embodiment involves solids having rough surfaces comprising non-uniform arrangements of high and low portions which on an average fall within the necessary height, distance and air content requirements generic to this invention.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention involve solid surfaces having intrinsic advancing water contact angles of greater than and intrinsic receding Water Contact angles of greater than 85 with air contents of 75% air or above and heights of high portions above low portions about equal to the average distances between adjacent high portions.
In systems comprising ordered arrangements of high portions (projections) the preferred distance between adjacent high portions is about 250 microns or below. On surfaces having an ordered arrangement of depressions surrounded by interconnected vertical walls the preferred distance between adjacent walls is 600 microns or below.
The water repellent surfaces of this invention may be made from any solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water contact angle 0a of greater than 90 and `a receding Water contact angle (if of at least 75. It is necessary that the surfaces have high intrinsic advancing contact angles to prevent liquid penetration in the composite surface due to the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid drops. Receding contact angles of at least 75 are necessary to avoid having to increase the air content of the surface to impractically high values to overcome the attractive forces between the drops and the high solid portions.
Solids found to have the necessary intrinsic contact angles are for example: alkyl polysiloxanes; polyfluoroalkyl polysiloxanes; waxes having a softening temperature greater than 40 C. which are essentially halogen free and water insoluble; and polymers comprising polymerizable or copolymerizable ethylenic compounds which will form polymers having the following surface constitutions:
as described by Shafrin and Zisman, l. Phys. Chem. 64, 519, 521 (1960).
Speciiic examples of operable ethylenic compounds which fall within the definition of the invention are as follows:
where n is from 3 to 13.
Examples of polymers which arev not satisfactory are the homo-polymers of: CF2=CC12, CHZZCHOI,
CHFCClz, CHFCHCN The waxes which are operable in this invention are:v Natural waxes such as beeswax, candelilla wax, carnauba Wax, esparto wax; petroleum waxes such as paratiin waxes, micro-crystalline waxes; fossil or earth waxes such as montan wax, ozocerite, peat wax and synthetic waxes such as Fischer-Tropsch waxes and hydrogenated waxes.
While most solid surfaces exhibiting the required intrinsic contact angle show improved repellency over thesmooth unmodified surface when the air content is above about 60% and the other conditions mentioned above are met certain surfaces (e.g., polyethylene) do not show improved repellency until the air content of the surface is about 75% to 80% air.
The expressions listed above for the distance between adjacent high portionsare derived from a consideration of the water penetration pressure on the surfaces as follows: When a cylindrical capillary is made of a material which when smooth has an advancing water contact angle, 0a, greater than 90, a pressure, P, is required in order 6. to force the water into the capillary. The magnitude of the pressure is given by 2 P=47 cos 6a where Fy is the surface tension of water and c is the diameter of the capillary. Using the value for the surface tension of water at 25 C. and expressing P in centimeters of water, Equation 2 becomes cos 6a cos 0, c
where 0r is the receding contact angle. if Hr is less than the water will show no tendency to come out of the capillary. For most solids with non-zero Contact angles, @a and 0, are not equal (0r being less than 0a). In this situation the angles 0a and 0r are not to be confused with the angles actually observed forl water drops on the embossed surface. The present angles 9a and 0r refer to the water angles on the solid regions of the embossed surface. In some instances surfaces can be prepared where 6:0r but this requires special procedures to obtain smooth surfaces and elaborate purication methods to obtain homogeneous surfaces; It is probably impossible to obtain homogeneous polymer surfaces; even adsorbed monolayers are, to some extent, heterogeneous. Many materials possess surfaces when smooth which have 0g greater than 90 and 0r less than 90. It is therefore necessary to emboss the surfaces of these materials in order to have high repellency. For a given surface (with a 9a 90) the penetration pressure is determined by the distance, c,- in Equation 3. The maximum distance that could be tolerated would be one which prevents water drops from penetrating under their own hydrostatic pressure. The maximum 'height that a water drop can attain in the presence of gravity is about 0.5 cm. The maximum distance, Cm (in cm.), is then given by i (5) Cm=0.587 cos 0,L
edv cos 0a where d is the diameter of the cylinders and b is the center-to-center distance between cylinders. Expressed in terms of f (the fraction 'of the total surface area that is air) and the distance, c, between the outer walls of the cylinders (c=b-d) and using the value for the surface tension of water at 25 C., Equation 6 becomes P= [\/2.721 1-f) -rraau-fo'g) @OS 0 Where P is expressed in centimeters of water. ImposingV the condition that a water drop should not penetrate into the surface under its own hydrostatic pressure gives for the maximum distance between cylinder walls,
In a system of random dispersed high portions (rough surfaces) it is difficult to give exact mathematical definitions of distance ranges. However, prepared surfaces having average distances between adjacent high portions falling within the generic requirements of this invention provide improved water repellency. Preferred non-uniform surfaces having distances of from about 20 microns to about 400 microns have been found to impart superior water repellency to surfaces provided the largest average spacing between adjacent high portions is below about 300 microns.
The high portions of the composite surfaces of this invention must have certain configurations in order to provide the proper air content while at the same time avoiding penetration of the liquid into the low portions of the surface. Optimum results are achieved when the sides of the walls or projections are perpendicular to the plane of the surface, however, it is not necessary that the sides of the projections or walls be absolutely vertical or perpendicular to the surface. It is sufficient if somewhere on all sides of a given high portion there is a point at which a line drawn tangent to the side will make an angle between the tangent and the horizontal, measured through the high portion, of about 80 or more.
Methods of preparing water repellent surfaces The present invention is also directed to a process for the preparation of water repellent solid surfaces which comprises contacting a solid surface having an intrinsic advancing water conta-ct angle of greater than 90 and an instrinsic receding contact angle of at least 75 with means for softening said solid surface, contacting the solid surface with a die capable of producing a positive configuration comprising high portions and low portions on the solid surface wherein the height of the high portions and the distance between adjacent high portions will conform to the requirements previously stated and removing said die from contact with the solid surface.
Alternatively, the softening step may be dispensed with provided the die form or mold is of sufficient mechanical strength to withstand pressures necessary to impart the desired configurations to the surface materials of this invention without damage to the die or loss of detail in the resulting surface configuration.
Die forms or molds utilizable in the practice of this invention include commercially available screens or mesh plates, photosen-sitive polymers which after exposure to actinic light are treated to produce the negative of the desired surface configuration, metallic dies produced by contacting the metal with photosensitive polymers having the positive configuration desired to be reproduced on the solid surface and masses of hollow fibers rigidly held together by suitable means. These holiow fiber die forms or molds are aligned together in parallel manner in bundles and cut or sliced approximately perpendicular to their length to create a die surface of their cross-section. The outer diameter of these hollow fibers must be on an average in the range of from about l to about 450 microns and the inner diameter must be on an average less than about .6 times the outer diameter. The length of hollow fibers used in the die must be at least .5 times the difference between the inner and outer diameters of the hollow fibers.
I. Surfaces consisting of projections A novel and convenient method for preparing a surface consisting of vertical projections has now been provided by utilizing a mass of hollow fibers as a die form or mold. The hollow fibers may be obtained as described in U.S. Patent 2,999,296 and French Patent 990,726. The outer diameter of the fibers used measure within the range of 10 to 450 microns and are 1.2 to 3.0 times the inner diameter. The fibers are compacted together and cut or sliced approximately perpendicular to their length exposing the cross-section. The truncated ends are then used as a mold or die. The surface to be treated is softened slightly, by heating or other suitable means (e.g., solvents) to facilitate impression of the surface by the mold. The surface hardens as it cools, whereby high portions (projections) resembling vertical columns corresponding to the hollow cores of the fibers are permanently developed on the surface. The hollow fibers may be assembled into bundles of various shapes and sizes or may be attached to a roller having the truncated ends of the fibers as the roller surface. A large quantity of the object having the surface to be treated may be conveyed in such a manner under the roller so that the pattern is stamped on the surface.
II. Surfaces consisting of depressions One method of producing a pattern of depressions on a surface is now provided by first preparing a -grid conforming to the required surface dimensions by drawing the pattern on a sheet of paper which transmits actinic light. The pattern so drawn is a model of the pattern desired on a large scale. By reducing photographically, the pattern is obtained in the small scale desired. A halftone screen, such as is used in photography, may also be used in place of the paper pattern. A relief image of the pattern is made on photosensitive plastic by placing the paper pattern on halftone screen over the plastic and exposing to actinic light, as described in U.S. Patent 2,760,- 863. There is formed on the plastic a relief image of the pattern. This plastic grid is now used as a die and impressed onto another surface capable in itself of being used as an embossing die, eig., Woods metal. This die, bearing a reverse pattern of the grid, is impressed on the surface to be made water repellent in the same manner as described above for the hollow fiber surface. The lines of the original paper pattern thus become the walls of the depressions. The embossing dies may also be made of any metal or non-metal which can be chemically or mechanically modified to give the desired surface pattern with the desired spacings and dimensions, providing the material is of sufficient strength to permit its use as a die. Alternatively, a photosensitive glass available commercially, such as described in Glass Engineering Handbook, E. B. Shund, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd ed., 1958, p. 363, may be used in the preparation of such a surface. By following the lmethod described in the above reference for preparing patterned glass, a surface having an array of depressions may be produced directly.
However, glass in itself does not possess the requisite advancing and receding water contact angles. It must therefore be treated with a material having the necessary intrinsic advancing and receding water contact angles to achieve the desired water repellency by a physical coating process. Or, for example, monoor multilayers of a substance having the required Contact angles may be chemisorbed on the glass to form a strongly adherent coating. The coating acquires the configuration of the glass substrate thereby forming a highly water repellent surface.
The following examples are given to illustrate various specific embodiments of this invention and do not limit the invention in any way.
Contact angles were measured directly on profiles of sessile drops using the general method described in Surface Chemistry by I. J. Bikerman, Academic Press, Inc., New York (1958), 2nd ed., p. 343. In these examples contact angles were measured on profiles of sessile drops using a microscope fitted with a goniometer eyepiece; magnification was about 20X. Error in angle measurements by this method is estimated to be about if. Drop addition and size changes were made using a hypodermic syringe. Advancing angles were measured after the drop size was increased and the periphery advanced over the surface; receding angles Were measured after the drop size was reduced and the periphery receded. Unless otherwise stated, readings were taken with 30 seconds of drop formation and/or size change, and drop volumes were between 0.03 and 0.10 ml. Receding angles were measured on drops that had been in contact with the surface for some time (several minutes) before being receded and on fresh drops which were placed on the surface and immediately (several seconds) reduced in size. There was little difference between these two methods as long as the drop size was kept below 0.1 ml. Each contact angle value is the average of at least 8 measurements. All measurements were made at 25 il C. and 50% relative humidity.
In these examples the air content of the surface was determined by photomicrographs (plan view) of the surface. The photomicrographs are taken with the plane formed by the tops of the high portions of the surface in focus. The fraction of the total area of the photomicrographs that is air is taken as the air content of the surface. The magnification is chosen such that each photomicrograph includes enough of the area of the surface to give a reliable and reproducible value for surface porosity (air content).
The method used to determine tilt angles (a) in these examples is essentially that described in I. Colloid. Sci., vol. 17, p. 309 (1962), by C. G. L. Furmidge. The surface to be studied was placed on a hinged brass plate. A drop of water of the required volume was placed on the experimental surface using a hypodermic syringe. The hinged plate was immediately `rotated until' the 'drop started to roll off the surface. The angle to which the plate was rotated was then measured .to the nearest degree lwith a protractor. With only slight differences the tilt anglennecessary to cause the drop to commence rolling is equal to the angle necessary to keep the drop rollmg.
EXAMPLE 1 An embossing die is made in the following manner: A bundle of hollow fibers of a copolymer of tetraiiuoroethylene and hexauoropropylene is compressed, using a hose clamp, to give a close-packed arrangement of the fibers. The hollow fibers have an inside diameter of 250 microns and an outside diameter of 430 microns. The clamped Ibundle is then cut with a microtome knife so that the surface thereby formed is iiush with one end of the hose clamp. This surface (1.5 cm. in diameter), which consists of the truncated ends of the hollow fibers, is used as an embossing die.
The die described above is pressed (by hand) against the warm surface of a piece (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 1 cm.) of paraffin wax. The surface of the Wax is previously heated to 35 to 40 C. (to a depth of about 1 mm.) in order to soften it and thereby facilitate fiow into the holes of the die. There is negligible adhesion of the paralin wax to the hollow fiber die. The embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections oriented at right angles to the original wax surface. There is negligible penetration of wax into the spaces between the fibers of the die because these spaces are sufficiently small, the applied pressure during embossing is low enough and the flow properties of the wax at 35 to 40 C. are poor enough to prevent penetration.
The cylindrical projections are about 250 microns in diameter and 150 to 200 microns high. The distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 430 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 70% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 113 on the original surface to 144 on the embossed surface and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 129. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll olf the surface has decreased-from to 9.
A lower tilt angle for one surface than for another means that if both surfaces are vertical the surface with the lower tilt angle will permit roll-off of smaller water drops. This is equivalent to saying that liquid 'retention will be lower on the surface with the lower tilt angle.
In actual practice the hollow fiber dies can be many times larger in area then the one described above and the embossing process can be carried out using conventional presses. For example, the fibers can be mounted in closepacked array on any rigid backing such as a metal or hard plastic plate, the dimensions of the plate being determined by the size of the surface to be embossed or by the size of the embossing press. A plate of several square feet in area is possible. The close packing can be achieved and maintained by exerting lateral pressure at the periphery of the plate or by sealing the fiber ends to the plate using a suitable adhesive. l
Alternatively, for applications where continuous embossing of large areas is desirable, the fibers can be mounted on a roller of several feet in length and of sufficient diameter so that close packing of the fibers is possible at the outer surface of the die.
The parafiin wax in this example need not be a solid piece of the wax alone. It can just as well be a thin coating of wax (as thin as 0.1 mm.) on another surface, such as a sheet of glass or metal. I'
EXAMPLE 2 An embossing die is made in the manner described in Example 1 using hollow fibers of polyethylene. These fibers have an inside diameter of 80 to 95 microns and an outside diameter of 220 microns. This die (1.5 cm. in diameter) is used to emboss the parafiin wax surface of Example 1 using the method described in Example 1.
The resulting -cylindrical projections of the embossed surface are 80 to 95 microns in diameter and 200 to 300V microns high. The distance between centers of adjacent projections is 240 to 300 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 87% air. The advancing contact angle for a drop of Water has increased from 113 to 156 and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 148. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 15 to 4.
As with the hollow fiber dies of Example 1, it is also possible to fabricate dies which are much larger than the one used in this example.
EXAMPLE 3 The hollow ber die of Example 1 is pressed (by hand) against the surface of a piece of polypropylene film (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 0.05 cm.) having a melting point of about 165 C. and a melt index of about 0.5. The film is previously heated to 150 to 155 C. to soften it and thereby facilitate flow into the holes of the die. The die is also heated (to to 120 C.). The embos-sed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 250 microns in diameter and 500 to 6.00 microns high. There is negligible penetration of polypropylene between the fibers of the die. The average distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 450 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is approximately 75% air. The ad` vancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from on the original fiat surface to 139 on the embossed surface and the receding Contact angle has increased from 85 to 115. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.10 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 21 to 16.
The larger dies described in Example 1, particularly the roller type, can be used to emboss large sheets of polypropylene to produce the surface described in this ex. ample.
1 1 EXAMPLE 4 The hollow fiber die of Example 1 is pressed (by hand) against the surface of a piece of polyethylene film (2 cm. x 2 cm. x 0.1 cm.) having a melting point of about 110 C. and a melt index of 1.8. The film is previously heated to 102 to 105 C. to soften it and thereby facilitate ow into the holes of the die. The die is also heated (to 95 to 100 C.). The embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 250 microns in diameter and 450 to 500 microns high. There is negligible penetration of polyethylene between the fibers of the die. The average distance between centers of adjacent projections is about 450 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the projections, is about 75% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 98 on the original at surface to 140 on the embossed surface and the receding contact angle has increased from 76 to 105 The tilt angle necessary for an 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 30 to 22.
EXAMPLE 5 A relief image of the configuration desired is prepared according to the method described in U.S. Patent 2,760,863, whereby the surface of a photosensitive polymer (1 mm. thick coating of the polymer on a 2.5 mm. thick sheet of aluminum) is irradiated with actinic light which has first passed through a photographic transparency on which there is an ordered array of opaque squares separated by ne spacings that transmit the actinic light. The exposed regions of the photosensitive polymer undergo a chemical reaction which makes them more resistant than the unexposed regions to attack by caustic solution. After a thorough washing with caustic solution the resulting polymer surface consists of a network of interconnecting walls (intersecting at right angles) enclosing square-shaped depressions. The walls are 27 microns thick and 130 microns high. The distance between walls (centerto-center) is 195 microns. The network is approximately 1 cm. square in area.
An impression of this network is obtained by covering the surface with molten (80 to 100 C.) Woods metal (a 0.5 cm. thick layer of the liquid metal covers the surface), applying a vacuum (0.1 mm. of mercury) to remove air from between the Woods metal and the polymer surface, and then restoring atmospheric pressure in order to force the liquid metal into the depressions of the polymer surface. rIhe solidified metal impression is used to emboss the paraiin wax surface of Example 1. The same embossing procedure is used as in Example 1.
Alternatively the negative form of the desired surface configuration can be produced on the photosensitive polymer. However, a caustic Washing procedure is necessary to -completely flush out the narrow (27 microns) channels which result if the negative form is made. Therefore, the procedure utilizing the Woods metal impression is preferred in order to obtain the negative form for use in embossing other surfaces.
The embossed wax surface is a replica of the original photopolymer surface. However, some loss in surface detail has resulted from the above procedure of making an impression of an impression. The center-to-center dis tance between walls is 190` microns; the walls are 37 microns thick and 130 microns high. The area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the walls, is 65% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop has increased from 113 on the original flat surface to 137 on the embossed surface and the receding angle has increased from 100 to 116. No decrease in tilt angle was obtained here since this example represents the lower limit to the air content of a parafin wax surface.
EXAMPLE 6 An embossing die is produced in the manner described in Example 5 and a at parafn wax surface is embossed in the manner described in Example 1. The embossed wax surface consists of interconnecting walls 15 microns thick and 130 microns high. The distance between walls (centerto-center) is 195 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by the tops of the walls, is about air. The advancing contact angle for water has increased from 113 on the original flat surface to 155 on the embossed surface and the receding contact angle has increased from 100 to 145. rl`he tilt angle necessary for a 0.015 ml. water drop to roll off the surface has decreased from 15 to 4.
In actual practice the embossing dies described in this example and in Example 5 can be many times larger and can be used in plate or roller form. The Woods metal die described here would be applicable only to surfaces of materials which have the desirable flow characteristics at temperatures below 65 C. For other materials, dies of higher melting metals or alloys must be used.
If suficient care is taken in washing technique, the negative photopolymer surfaces can be fabricated and used directly as embossing dies.
EXAMPLE 7 A fluorocarbon wax dispersion in 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2 triiiuoroethane, obtained by reacting methanol and tetraiiuoroethylene in the manner described in U.S. Patent 3,067,262 (the Wax having a crystalline melting point of 278 C., an approximate molecular weight of 2000) and containing about 20% solids, is diluted with a solution of 50 parts of trichloroiiuoromethane and 50 parts of dichlorodifluoromethane to give a solids concentration of about 1%. This mixture is sprayed onto a 1" x 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick. All components of the above mixture except the wax are volatile. The wax particles at the top of the coating are 5 to 80 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 20 to 160 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 88 to 90% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 159 and the receding angle is 156; the corresponding angles for a smooth, flat surface of the wax are 111 and 95 re spectively. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water `drop to roll off the surface is 18 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax.
EXAMPLE 8 A mixture containing 90 parts of a 12.5% solution of paraiiin wax in n-hexane and 10 parts of glass beads of a diameter in the range 3 to 12 microns, is heated to 40 to 50 C. and sprayed onto a 1" x 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick. The n-hexane rapidly evaporates from the surface leaving agglomerates of wax-coated glass beads. The agglomerates at the top of the coating are 15 to 250 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 50 to 350 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 88% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 158 and the receding angle is 156; the corresponding angles on a smooth, flat paran wax surface are 113 and 101 respectively. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface is 15 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax-glass bead mixture.
In Examples 7 and 8 above, all parts are by weight.
EXAMPLE 9 A 400 line per inch nickel mesh plate, commercially available from the Buckbee Mears Co., St. Paul, Minn. (6" x 6) with a square array of holes (28 to 29 microns square with a center-to-center distance of 60 microns and a depth of 25 microns) is used as a die to emboss a lm (3 cm. x 6 om. x 15 cm.) of a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and hexaiiuoropropylene. The plate iS 13 pressed against the film in a Carver laboratory press at 12,000 to 14,000 p.s.i. and 100 C. for 15 minutes. The plate` is then peeled from the film; there is negligible adhesion between plate and film. The embossed surface consists. of a regular 'l arrayof square-shaped projections oriented at right angles to the original film surface..'l`hese projections are 28 to 29 microns on a side and 22 to 25 microns high. The centertocenter distance of adjacent projections is 60 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane formed by thetops of the' projections is 75 to 78% air. The advancing vangle for a water drop has increased from 114V on the original surface to 157H on the embossed surface and the receding angle has 4increased from 97 to 134. Thetilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. drop to roll off the surface has decreased from'23 on the smooth surface to 12 on the embossed surface. v EXAMPLE 10 The nickel mesh plate of Example 9 above is pressed against the surface of -a film of polypropylene (3 cm. x 6 cm. x 0.05 cm.) at 16,000 p.s.i.,and 140 C. for 20 minutes. The plate is peeled from"the film; there is negligible adhesion between plate and film. The embossed surface is asdescribed in Example 9 above. The advancing angle for a-water drop has increased from 107 on the original surface to 158 on the embossed surface and the receding angle has increased from, 83 to 110. The tilt angle necessary-forv a 0.05 mlfdrop to roll off the surface has decreased from 34 to 22.
EXAMPLE 1l A fiuorocarbon wax having a melting range of 95 to 135 C. and the general formula where n varies from 3 to 9 but is predominately 7 and 8, is dissolved in 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-triuoroethane to the extent of about 5%. About 100 parts of the above solution and parts of glass beads having diameters in the range of 3 to 12 microns are mixed together, heated to about 40 C. and sprayed onto a 1 by 3 glass microscope slide to give a coating which is 0.1 to 0.2 mm. thick. The 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane rapidly evaporates from the surface leaving agglomerates of waxcoated glass beads. The agglomerates at the top of the coating are to 300 microns in diameter, the spacing between them is 80 to 300 microns and the area of the surface in the plane formed by the top of the coating, is approximately 82% air. The advancing contact angle for a water drop on this surface is 157 and the receding angle is 154; the corresponding angles on a smooth, flat surface of the wax are 128 and 114 respectively. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll off the surface is 13 for the smooth wax and about 1 for the sprayed wax-glass `bead mixture. In the above example, all parts are by weight.
EXAMPLE 12 A continuous film of polyethylene (3 ft. wide, 150 microns thick) having a melting point of 110 C. and a melt index of 1.8 is passed beneath a suitable heater which heats the top half of the film to 102 to 104 C. The lm is then passed between two rollers. The surface of one roller is covered with the close-packed ends of hollow fibers of a copolymer of tetrauoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene. The hollow fibers have an inside diameter of 50 microns and an outside diameter of 123 microns. The surface of the embossing roller is heated to 95 to 100 C. just before it comes into Contact with the film as shown in FIGURE 8. This facilitates 4fiow of the polyethylene into the holes of the die. Before the film is separated from the embossing roller, a stream of cold air is directed -at the film in order to cool it to about C. Adhesion of the polyethylene to the copolymer is negligible and the film readily separates from the surface of the embossing roller.
The embossed surface consists of an array of cylindrical projections 50 microns in diameter and 200 microns high. The average distance between centers of adjacent projections is 123 microns and the area of the surface, measured at the plane-formed by the tops of the projections, is air. The film thickness, excluding the projections,v isnow microns. The advancing Contact angle for a water drop has increased from 98 on the original fiat surface to on the embossed surface and the receding -anglehas increased from 76 to 120. The tilt angle necessary for a 0.05 ml. water drop to roll olf the surface has decreased from 30 to 18".
Several of these 3-feet sheets, sealed together, can be used in shower curtains to make them more resistant to accumulation of undesirable film since much of this accumulation on ordinary curtains results from wetting of the surface and subsequent evaporation of the water thereon. l y
The embossed surfaces prepared as described in the preceding examples exhibit a lower tilt angle and thereby a vastly improved water repellency. The configuration of projections or depressions causes the advancing and receding contact angles to increase so that the drop width a'nd the difference in the cosines of the receding and advancing contact angles are decreased. The high water repellency is thus due to the intrinsic structure of the surface.
The novel water repellent surfaces of the invention are useful in the production of numerous articles which shed water easily, such as ranwear, shower curtains, tenting material and plastic and ceramic tiles. These surfaces may also constitute condenser surfaces of solar stills land serve as surfaces where ice formation is to be minimized.
While the composite surfaces of this invention have ben shown to have utility in repelling water, they also sh'ow improved repcllency to other liquids both water and oil based which exhibit intrinsic advancing contact angles of greater than 90 and intrinsic receding contact angles of at least 75. For example, liquids with surface tensions considerably lower than that lof water ('yf=72.8 dynes/cm. at 20 C.) will show increased repellency on the spray-coated surface of Example 11. That composite surface has shown improved repellency over the corre sponfding smooth, flat surface to motor oils with surface tensions las low as 32 dynes/cm. Examples of other liquids to which the surface of Example 11 will show improved repellency include:
'y (dynes/cm. at 20 C.)
Composite surfaces of this invention have shown improved repellency to liquids with viscosities in the range of from 5,000 to 10,000 centipoises and surface tensions greater than 40 Idynes/cm. and viscous, aqueous sugar solutions with viscosities of 3000 centipoises and surface tensions close to that of water. Aqueous solutions of inorganic salts will also be repelled more readily since their surface tensions range from 72 to 85 dynes/cm.
As many apparently wi'dely different embodiments of this invention may be made Without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, yit is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the specific embodiments thereof.
What is claimed is:
1. A solid composition having projections extending from the surface thereof, said projections having an average rdistance of not greater than 1000 microns between adjacent projections and having an average height of -at least .5 times the avenage distance, said projections spaced such that the air content of the surface of the composition is at least 60% air, said projections shaped such thiat a line drawn tangent to the sides thereof makes an angle between the tangent land the plane of said surface of =at least 80 when measured through the projection, said surface 'of said projection having an intrinsic advancing Water contact angle of greater than 90 and an intrinsic receding water contact :angle of aft least 75, said surface having a lower tilt angle for water than the corresponding smooth surface.
2. The composition vof claim 1 wherein the average distance between adjacent projections is not greater than 600 microns and the avenage height of the projections is equal to the average distance between adjacent projections, wherein said |air content is at least 75% air, and wherein the intrinsic advancing Water Contact angle is greater than 100 and the intrinsic receding water Contact angle is at least 85.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said composition is polyethylene @and wherein the ail content is at least 75 air.
4. The composition Iof claim 1 wherein said projection-s are 11o-contiguous, vertically oriented celums, and wherein the miaximum distance between columns is given by the equation {1339} COS wherein Cm is the distance in centimeters, 6EL is the intrinsic advancing water contact angle and A is the ai-r content expressed las 'a fraction.
5. The composition of claim l-wh'ere'in said projections are ordered interconnected vertical walls and wherein the maximum distance between |adjacent Walls is given by the equation 'Cm=0.587 cos 6a where Cm is the distance in centimeters and 0a is `the intrinsic advancing Water content langle.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein `said projections are nonuniformlly arranged, and wherein the average distance between adjacent projections is not greater than 300 microns. .f
7. The composition of claim 1 in the form of a film having said projections Ion one side thereof. v
8. The composition of claim 1 in the form of a sheet having said projections on one `side therof.
References Cited Bird Y 161- 116 MORRIS sUssMAN, Primary Examiner.
Claims (1)
1. A SOLID COMPOSITION HAVING PROJECTIONS EXTENDING FROM THE SURFACE THEREOF, SAID PROJECTIONS HAVING AN AVERAGE DISTANCE OF NOT GREATER THAN 100 MICRONS BETWEEN ADJACENT PROJECTIONS AND HAVING AN AVERAGE HEIGHT OF AT LEAST .5 TIMES THE AVERAGE DISTANCE, SAID PROJECTIONS SPACED SUCH THAT THE AIR CONTENT OF THE SURFACE OF THE COMPOSITION IS AT LEAST 60% AIR, SAID PROJECTIONS SHAPED SUCH THAT A LINE DRAWN TANGENT TO THE SIDES THEREOF MAKES AN ANGLE BETWEEN THE TANGENT AND THE PLANE OF SAID SURFACE OF AT LEAST 80* WHEN MEASURED THROUGH THE PROJECTION, SAID SURFACE OF SAID PROJECTION HAVING AN INTRINSIC ADVANCING WATER CONTACT ANGLE OF GREATER THAN 90* AND AN INTRINSIC RECEDING WATER CONTACT ANGLE OF AT LEAST 75*, SAID SURFACE HAVING A LOWER TILT ANGLE FOR WATER THAN THE CORRESPONDING SMOOTH SURFACE.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US356155A US3354022A (en) | 1964-03-31 | 1964-03-31 | Water-repellant surface |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US356155A US3354022A (en) | 1964-03-31 | 1964-03-31 | Water-repellant surface |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3354022A true US3354022A (en) | 1967-11-21 |
Family
ID=23400369
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US356155A Expired - Lifetime US3354022A (en) | 1964-03-31 | 1964-03-31 | Water-repellant surface |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3354022A (en) |
Cited By (159)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3502765A (en) * | 1967-08-24 | 1970-03-24 | Eastman Kodak Co | Method of controlling edge flatness of mechanically embossed oriented polymer sheeting |
US3969565A (en) * | 1975-03-26 | 1976-07-13 | Norman Forrest | Card clothing method for treating thermoplastic sheet material |
US4219376A (en) * | 1979-03-05 | 1980-08-26 | L. E. Carpenter & Company, Inc. | Flexible acoustical wall covering, method of making same, and wall panel employing same |
US4324749A (en) * | 1977-06-14 | 1982-04-13 | Akzona Incorporated | Three-dimensional exchange element for liquid guidance in liquid-gas contact systems |
WO1996004123A1 (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 1996-02-15 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Self-cleaning surfaces of objects and process for producing same |
US5599489A (en) * | 1993-01-18 | 1997-02-04 | Onoda Cement Co., Ltd. | Preparing molded articles of fluorine-containing polymer with increased water-repellency |
DE19860137A1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2000-06-29 | Bayer Ag | Process for the production of an ultraphobic surface based on structured aluminum |
DE19913601C1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2000-08-10 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Apparatus for transporting or discharging hydrophilic liquids has hydrophobic peaks or recesses on the side facing the liquid |
DE19923175A1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2000-11-23 | Borsi Kg F | Covering plastic support panel, e.g. to display commercial information and confer self-cleaning properties, adds textured surface of hydrophobic material and parting layer, in design also offering scratch resistance and anti-reflection |
WO2001056639A1 (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-09 | Pari GmbH Spezialisten für effektive Inhalation | Inhalation nebulizer |
WO2001074672A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Container with structured fluid repellent and fluid wettable partial regions of the inner surfaces |
WO2001074739A1 (en) | 2000-04-01 | 2001-10-11 | Dmc?2¿ Degussa Metals Catalyts Cerdec Ag | Glass ceramic and metal substrates with a self-cleaning surface, method for the production and use thereof |
WO2001079142A1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-10-25 | Nanogate Technologies Gmbh | Ceramic material surface with hydrophobic or ultraphobic properties and method for the production thereof |
DE10028772A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-01-24 | Univ Dresden Tech | Ultrahydrophobic surfaces, processes for their production and use |
US20020022426A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-02-21 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Applications for elastic laminate web |
WO2002049762A2 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2002-06-27 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Microchannels for efficient fluid transport |
US20020084553A1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-07-04 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Techn. Und Innov. Mbh | Process for molding hydrophobic polymers to produce surfaces with stable water- and oil-repellent properties |
US20020150723A1 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2002-10-17 | Creavis Gesellschaft F. Techn. U. Innovation Mbh | Surfaces which are self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures, and a process for their production |
US20020148601A1 (en) * | 2000-12-30 | 2002-10-17 | Martin Roos | Apparatus for accelerating condensation with the aid of structured surfaces |
WO2002101761A2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2002-12-19 | Ccs Technology, Inc. | Cable and method for producing a cable |
US20030013795A1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-01-16 | Creavis Gesellschaft F. Techn. U. Innovation Mbh | Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures and a process for their production |
US20030028165A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2003-02-06 | Curro John J | Laminate web comprising an apertured layer and method for manufacture thereof |
WO2003013827A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-20 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Structured surfaces that show a lotus effect |
WO2003013731A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-20 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Pipette tips with partly structured surfaces having improved pipetting properties |
WO2003032042A2 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft | Light coupling element |
US20030096083A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2003-05-22 | Robert Morgan | Surface, method for the production therof and an object provided with said surface |
EP1318228A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-11 | Creavis Gesellschaft für Technologie und Innovation mbH | Method for manufacturing items with antiallergic surfaces |
US20030108716A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-06-12 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Light-scattering materials which have self-cleaning surfaces |
US20030134086A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-07-17 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fur Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Diffuse-reflection surfaces and process for their production |
US20030147932A1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-08-07 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Self-cleaning lotus effect surfaces having antimicrobial properties |
DE10202513A1 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-08-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | An image producing sensor with a structured adhesion decreasing surface useful in the surface examination of automobile parts making use of the lotus effect |
WO2003073045A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-09-04 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Indirect measurement of surface contact angle of liquids |
US20030167667A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-09-11 | Gottlieb Binder Gmbh & Co. | Self-cleaning display device |
US20030187170A1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2003-10-02 | Axel Burmeister | Production of nano- and microstructured polymer films |
WO2003090943A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2003-11-06 | Chemco International Limited | Non-scratch flooring top coat |
US20040014865A1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2004-01-22 | Harald Keller | Composition for producing surfaces which are difficult to wet |
US6683126B2 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2004-01-27 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Compositions for producing difficult-to-wet surface |
US20040037961A1 (en) * | 2002-08-26 | 2004-02-26 | Cedric Dieleman | Production of surfaces to which liquids do not adhere |
US6712932B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2004-03-30 | Papierfabrik Schoeller & Hoesch Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method of producing self-cleaning and non-adhesive paper or paper-like material |
US20040067339A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-04-08 | Christophe Gandon | Transparent textured substrate and methods for obtaining same |
US20040127393A1 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2004-07-01 | Valpey Richard S. | Process and composition for producing self-cleaning surfaces from aqueous systems |
US6764745B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2004-07-20 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Structural member superior in water repellency and method for manufacturing the same |
US6773786B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-08-10 | Asten Privatgesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter Haftung | Paper machine cover |
US20040154106A1 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2004-08-12 | Markus Oles | Flat textile structures with self-cleaning and water-repellent surfaces |
US20040185736A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2004-09-23 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Electrical cable |
US20040191480A1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2004-09-30 | Yasushi Karasawa | Structural member superior in water repellency and method for manufacturing the same |
US6800354B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2004-10-05 | Ferro Gmbh | Substrates with a self-cleaning surface, a process for their production and their use |
US20040213904A1 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2004-10-28 | Goldschmidt Ag | Process for producing detachable dirt-and water-repellent surface coatings |
US6811856B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2004-11-02 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Properties of structure-formers for self-cleaning surfaces, and the production of the same |
EP1476257A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2004-11-17 | Gottlieb Binder GmbH & Co. KG | Surface |
US20040237590A1 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2004-12-02 | Ferro Corporation | Method of micro and nano texturing glass |
US6830800B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2004-12-14 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Elastic laminate web |
US6841197B2 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2005-01-11 | Degussa Ag | n-Propylethoxysiloxanes, their preparation and use |
US6858284B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2005-02-22 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures, and process for their production |
US6863960B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-03-08 | The Procter & Gamble Company | User-activatible substance delivery system |
US6878433B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-04-12 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Applications for laminate web |
US6884494B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-04-26 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Laminate web |
US20050136217A1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2005-06-23 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Method for the preparation of self-cleaning removable surfaces |
US20050145285A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2005-07-07 | Entegris, Inc | Fluid handling component with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1582329A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2005-10-05 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Microprotrusion structure and process for producing the same |
US20050276962A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-15 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Ultralyophobe interfaces |
EP1613541A2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-01-11 | Entegris, Inc. | Carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1622819A2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-02-08 | Entegris, Inc. | Tray carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
US20060051561A1 (en) * | 2002-03-23 | 2006-03-09 | University Of Durham | Method and apparatus for the formation of hydrophobic surfaces |
US20060081394A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Insulator coating and method for forming same |
US20060110541A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Russell Jodi L | Treatments and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US20060110542A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Thomas Dietz | Processing compositions and method of forming the same |
US20060144870A1 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2006-07-06 | Ian Anderson | Keg with an inner bag |
US20060147675A1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2006-07-06 | Degussa Ag | Self-cleaning surfaces comprising elevations formed by hydrophobic particles and having improved mechanical strength |
US20060174418A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2006-08-10 | Harald Keller | Method for hydrophobing textile materials |
US20060222815A1 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2006-10-05 | Degussa Ag | Use of particles hydrophobized by fluorosilanes for the production of self-cleaning surfaces having lipophobic, oleophobic, lactophobic and hydrophobic properties |
US20060246277A1 (en) * | 2005-04-27 | 2006-11-02 | Ferro Corporation | Structured self-cleaning surfaces and method of forming same |
US20060292369A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2006-12-28 | Rutledge Gregory C | Superhydrophobic fibers and methods of preparation and use thereof |
US20070031639A1 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-08 | General Electric Company | Articles having low wettability and methods for making |
US20070028588A1 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-08 | General Electric Company | Heat transfer apparatus and systems including the apparatus |
US20070059490A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-15 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Protective film |
WO2007053242A2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-05-10 | Wayne State University | Transparent hydrophobic article having self-cleaning and liquid repellant features and method of fabricating same |
WO2007075287A1 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2007-07-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Rough channel microfluidic devices |
US20070197111A1 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2007-08-23 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for finishing absorbent materials |
US20070227428A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2007-10-04 | Brennan Anthony B | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US20080014432A1 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2008-01-17 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the Production of Structured Surfaces |
WO2008025355A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Widex A/S | Filter for a hearing aid and a hearing aid |
WO2008080397A1 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2008-07-10 | Widex A/S | Component for a hearing aid and a method of making a component for a hearing aid |
US20080190574A1 (en) * | 2005-07-04 | 2008-08-14 | Astenjohnson, Inc. | Sheet-Like Products Exhibiting Oleophobic and Hydrophobic Properties |
US7423003B2 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2008-09-09 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Fold-resistant cleaning sheet |
US20080221009A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2008-09-11 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US20080221263A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-09-11 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Coating compositions for producing transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces |
US20080245012A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Lafarge | Superhydrophobic gypsum boards and process for making same |
US20080250978A1 (en) * | 2007-04-13 | 2008-10-16 | Baumgart Richard J | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating composition |
US20080254212A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2008-10-16 | Basf Se | Method for Coating Surfaces and Suitable Particles Therefor |
US20080257153A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Harp Gary P | Patterned Porous Venting Materials |
US20080257155A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Bacino John E | Porous Composite Article |
US20090011222A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2009-01-08 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Superhydrophobic surface and method for forming same |
US20090018249A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2009-01-15 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US20090029043A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2009-01-29 | Haitao Rong | Multifunctional star-shaped prepolymers, their preparation and use |
US20090029177A1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2009-01-29 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Highly water repellent fluoropolymer coating |
US20090064894A1 (en) * | 2007-09-05 | 2009-03-12 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Water based hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
WO2009074715A1 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-18 | Beneq Oy | Method for manufacturing an extremely hydrophobic surface |
US20090176920A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2009-07-09 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Particles with structured surface |
US20090181237A1 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-16 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Hydrophobic coating systems, suspensions for forming hydrophobic coatings, and methods for fabricating hydrophobic coatings |
US20090231714A1 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2009-09-17 | Yang Zhao | Transparent anti-reflective article and method of fabricating same |
US20090304983A1 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2009-12-10 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Non-Wettable Surfaces |
US20100009188A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | John Haozhong Xin | Nano-structured surface and an in situ method for forming the same |
US20100033818A1 (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2010-02-11 | Uni-Pixel Displays,Inc. | Microstructures to reduce the appearance of fingerprints on surfaces |
US20100040790A1 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2010-02-18 | Basf Se | Aqueous formulations and use thereof |
DE102008041920A1 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2010-03-11 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | New catalysts for the crosslinking of functional silanes or functional siloxanes, especially with substrates |
US20100120970A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2010-05-13 | University Of Leeds | Reversible micelles and applications for their use |
US20100119755A1 (en) * | 2008-11-11 | 2010-05-13 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of patterning a surface and articles comprising the same |
US20100129608A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2010-05-27 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Modification of Surface Wetting Properties of a Substrate |
US20100144225A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2010-06-10 | Basf Se | Method for treating surfaces |
US20100226943A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2010-09-09 | University Of Florida | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US20100304172A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt |
US20100304179A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic materials comprising cobalt |
US20100304182A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt |
US20110027475A1 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2011-02-03 | Beneq Oy | Method and device for structuring a surface |
US20110094417A1 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2011-04-28 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
WO2011147757A1 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2011-12-01 | Integran Technologies | Articles with super-hydrophobic and/or self-cleaning surfaces and method of making same |
WO2011147756A1 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2011-12-01 | Integran Technologies | Metallic articles with hydrophobic surfaces |
US8075669B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2011-12-13 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Composite material |
EP1750018A3 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2011-12-14 | General Electric Company | Surfaces and articles resistant to impacting liquids |
EP2404739A1 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2012-01-11 | 3M Innovative Properties Co. | Durable hyrophobic structured surface |
CN102424354A (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2012-04-25 | 东南大学 | Rough surface for fractal structure |
US8258206B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2012-09-04 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property, Llc | Hydrophobic coating compositions for drag reduction |
US8286561B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2012-10-16 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US20120315415A1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2012-12-13 | Dean Lavallee | Shipping structure and methods of making and using same |
WO2013004704A1 (en) | 2011-07-04 | 2013-01-10 | Syngenta Limited | Formulation |
US8354160B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2013-01-15 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Articles having durable hydrophobic surfaces |
EP2592056A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-05-15 | Schott AG | Coated glass or glass ceramic substrate with haptic characteristics |
WO2014041501A1 (en) * | 2012-09-13 | 2014-03-20 | Ariel - University Research And Development Company, Ltd. | Featured surface and method of making featured surface |
WO2014097309A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-26 | Asian Paints Ltd. | Stimuli responsive self cleaning coating |
WO2014108892A1 (en) * | 2013-01-12 | 2014-07-17 | Elad Mor | Super-hydrophobic surfaces in liquid-comprising systems |
US8808848B2 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2014-08-19 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Porous article |
US20140283699A1 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2014-09-25 | Hewlett-Packard Indigo B.V. | Embossing Die Creation |
US8974590B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2015-03-10 | The Armor All/Stp Products Company | Treatments and kits for creating renewable surface protective coatings |
US20150108032A1 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2015-04-23 | Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd | Packing container having excellent slipping property for the content |
WO2015082178A1 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2015-06-11 | BSH Hausgeräte GmbH | Household appliance |
US9067821B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2015-06-30 | Ross Technology Corporation | Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation |
US9074778B2 (en) | 2009-11-04 | 2015-07-07 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Cooking appliance surfaces having spill containment pattern |
US9139744B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2015-09-22 | Ross Technology Corporation | Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance |
US9249521B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2016-02-02 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Flow-through consumable anodes |
EP2859053A4 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2016-03-02 | Univ Houston | Self-cleaning coatings and methods for making same |
US9285584B2 (en) | 2010-10-06 | 2016-03-15 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Anti-reflective articles with nanosilica-based coatings and barrier layer |
US9388325B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2016-07-12 | Ross Technology Corporation | Elastomeric coatings having hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties |
WO2016203411A1 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2016-12-22 | Stora Enso Oyj | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on a sealing surface |
US9546299B2 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2017-01-17 | Ross Technology Corporation | Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems |
US20170043911A1 (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2017-02-16 | Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. | Plastic formed body for pouring out liquid |
US9896557B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2018-02-20 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Silicone-based material |
US9914849B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2018-03-13 | Ross Technology Corporation | Plunger and methods of producing hydrophobic surfaces |
US9937655B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2018-04-10 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of manufacturing catheter for antimicrobial control |
US10036556B2 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2018-07-31 | Schott Ag | Coated glass or glass ceramic substrate with haptic properties |
US10066109B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2018-09-04 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Articles including nanosilica-based primers for polymer coatings and methods |
DE102017008415A1 (en) | 2017-08-19 | 2019-02-21 | Hescoat GmbH | Non-stick coating |
US10317129B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2019-06-11 | Schott Ag | Refrigerator shelf with overflow protection system including hydrophobic layer |
WO2019122439A1 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2019-06-27 | O Ceallaigh Micheal | Viscous-drag-reducing cladding |
CN111883692A (en) * | 2019-09-24 | 2020-11-03 | 广东聚华印刷显示技术有限公司 | Ink drop capturing film, light-emitting device, and method for repairing bridging defect of light-emitting device and method for manufacturing light-emitting device |
EP3744175A1 (en) | 2019-05-31 | 2020-12-02 | Rolex S.A. | Composition for impregnating a substrate, in particular a watchstrap |
US11014029B2 (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2021-05-25 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Filter media ribbons with nanofibers formed thereon |
US11147900B1 (en) | 2021-04-29 | 2021-10-19 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Biomimetic nanofiber tissue scaffolds |
US11786036B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2023-10-17 | Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1409768A (en) * | 1917-07-11 | 1922-03-14 | Barrett Co | Floor covering |
US2582294A (en) * | 1947-10-31 | 1952-01-15 | Dow Chemical Co | Continuous method for cooling and shaping thermoplastics |
US2667436A (en) * | 1950-09-21 | 1954-01-26 | Carborundum Co | Pressure sensitive adhesive coated sheet material |
US2865046A (en) * | 1956-07-18 | 1958-12-23 | Collins & Aikman Corp | Apparatus and method for producing patterned foam rubber coated fabrics |
-
1964
- 1964-03-31 US US356155A patent/US3354022A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1409768A (en) * | 1917-07-11 | 1922-03-14 | Barrett Co | Floor covering |
US2582294A (en) * | 1947-10-31 | 1952-01-15 | Dow Chemical Co | Continuous method for cooling and shaping thermoplastics |
US2667436A (en) * | 1950-09-21 | 1954-01-26 | Carborundum Co | Pressure sensitive adhesive coated sheet material |
US2865046A (en) * | 1956-07-18 | 1958-12-23 | Collins & Aikman Corp | Apparatus and method for producing patterned foam rubber coated fabrics |
Cited By (308)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3502765A (en) * | 1967-08-24 | 1970-03-24 | Eastman Kodak Co | Method of controlling edge flatness of mechanically embossed oriented polymer sheeting |
US3969565A (en) * | 1975-03-26 | 1976-07-13 | Norman Forrest | Card clothing method for treating thermoplastic sheet material |
US4324749A (en) * | 1977-06-14 | 1982-04-13 | Akzona Incorporated | Three-dimensional exchange element for liquid guidance in liquid-gas contact systems |
US4219376A (en) * | 1979-03-05 | 1980-08-26 | L. E. Carpenter & Company, Inc. | Flexible acoustical wall covering, method of making same, and wall panel employing same |
US5599489A (en) * | 1993-01-18 | 1997-02-04 | Onoda Cement Co., Ltd. | Preparing molded articles of fluorine-containing polymer with increased water-repellency |
WO1996004123A1 (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 1996-02-15 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Self-cleaning surfaces of objects and process for producing same |
US6660363B1 (en) | 1994-07-29 | 2003-12-09 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Self-cleaning surfaces of objects and process for producing same |
DE19860137C2 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2002-07-18 | Sunyx Surface Nanotechnologies | Process for the production of an ultraphobic surface based on structured aluminum and its use |
DE19860137A1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2000-06-29 | Bayer Ag | Process for the production of an ultraphobic surface based on structured aluminum |
US6764745B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2004-07-20 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Structural member superior in water repellency and method for manufacturing the same |
US20050136217A1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2005-06-23 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Method for the preparation of self-cleaning removable surfaces |
DE19913601C1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2000-08-10 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Apparatus for transporting or discharging hydrophilic liquids has hydrophobic peaks or recesses on the side facing the liquid |
WO2000058415A1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2000-10-05 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Method and device for the loss-free transport of liquids |
DE19923175A1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2000-11-23 | Borsi Kg F | Covering plastic support panel, e.g. to display commercial information and confer self-cleaning properties, adds textured surface of hydrophobic material and parting layer, in design also offering scratch resistance and anti-reflection |
US6773786B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-08-10 | Asten Privatgesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter Haftung | Paper machine cover |
US7220332B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2007-05-22 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Electrical cable |
US20040185736A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2004-09-23 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Electrical cable |
US20020022426A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-02-21 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Applications for elastic laminate web |
US7037569B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2006-05-02 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Laminate web comprising an apertured layer and method for manufacturing thereof |
US6863960B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-03-08 | The Procter & Gamble Company | User-activatible substance delivery system |
US6884494B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-04-26 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Laminate web |
US6830800B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2004-12-14 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Elastic laminate web |
US6878433B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2005-04-12 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Applications for laminate web |
US20030028165A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2003-02-06 | Curro John J | Laminate web comprising an apertured layer and method for manufacture thereof |
US8596264B2 (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2013-12-03 | Pari GmbH Spezialisten für effektive Inhalation | Inhalation nebulizer |
WO2001056639A1 (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-09 | Pari GmbH Spezialisten für effektive Inhalation | Inhalation nebulizer |
US20030089366A1 (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2003-05-15 | Erik Sommer | Inhalation nebulizer |
US20030096083A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2003-05-22 | Robert Morgan | Surface, method for the production therof and an object provided with said surface |
WO2001074672A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Container with structured fluid repellent and fluid wettable partial regions of the inner surfaces |
US20050170098A1 (en) * | 2000-04-01 | 2005-08-04 | Ferro Gmbh | Glass, ceramic and metal substrates with a self-cleaning surface, method of making them and their use |
US6872441B2 (en) * | 2000-04-01 | 2005-03-29 | Ferro Gmbh | Glass ceramic and metal substrates with a self-cleaning surface, method for the production and use thereof |
WO2001074739A1 (en) | 2000-04-01 | 2001-10-11 | Dmc?2¿ Degussa Metals Catalyts Cerdec Ag | Glass ceramic and metal substrates with a self-cleaning surface, method for the production and use thereof |
US20030152780A1 (en) * | 2000-04-01 | 2003-08-14 | Martin Baumann | Glass ceramic and metal substrates with a self-cleaning surface, method for the production and use thereof |
WO2001079142A1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-10-25 | Nanogate Technologies Gmbh | Ceramic material surface with hydrophobic or ultraphobic properties and method for the production thereof |
US6683126B2 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2004-01-27 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Compositions for producing difficult-to-wet surface |
DE10028772B4 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2005-03-17 | Technische Universität Dresden | Aluminum material with ultrahydrophobic surface, process for its preparation and use |
DE10028772A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-01-24 | Univ Dresden Tech | Ultrahydrophobic surfaces, processes for their production and use |
US7851045B2 (en) | 2000-07-06 | 2010-12-14 | Saint-Gobain Glass France | Transparent textured substrate and methods for obtaining same |
US20090014416A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2009-01-15 | Saint-Gobain Glass France | Transparent textured substrate and methods for obtaining same |
US20040067339A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-04-08 | Christophe Gandon | Transparent textured substrate and methods for obtaining same |
US7959815B2 (en) | 2000-07-06 | 2011-06-14 | Saint-Gobain Glass France | Transparent textured substrate and methods for obtaining same |
US7423003B2 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2008-09-09 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Fold-resistant cleaning sheet |
US20040191480A1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2004-09-30 | Yasushi Karasawa | Structural member superior in water repellency and method for manufacturing the same |
US20040014865A1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2004-01-22 | Harald Keller | Composition for producing surfaces which are difficult to wet |
US6841197B2 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2005-01-11 | Degussa Ag | n-Propylethoxysiloxanes, their preparation and use |
EP1247636A2 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-10-09 | Creavis Gesellschaft für Technologie und Innovation mbH | Process for shapping hydrophobic polymers for the production of surfaces with durable water and oil repellent properties |
US20020084553A1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-07-04 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Techn. Und Innov. Mbh | Process for molding hydrophobic polymers to produce surfaces with stable water- and oil-repellent properties |
EP1247636A3 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-12-11 | Creavis Gesellschaft für Technologie und Innovation mbH | Process for shapping hydrophobic polymers for the production of surfaces with durable water and oil repellent properties |
US20050036918A1 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2005-02-17 | Lange Frederick F. | Microchannels for efficient fluid transport |
WO2002049762A3 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2003-06-26 | Univ California | Microchannels for efficient fluid transport |
WO2002049762A2 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2002-06-27 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Microchannels for efficient fluid transport |
US6800354B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2004-10-05 | Ferro Gmbh | Substrates with a self-cleaning surface, a process for their production and their use |
US20020148601A1 (en) * | 2000-12-30 | 2002-10-17 | Martin Roos | Apparatus for accelerating condensation with the aid of structured surfaces |
US6712932B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2004-03-30 | Papierfabrik Schoeller & Hoesch Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method of producing self-cleaning and non-adhesive paper or paper-like material |
US6811856B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2004-11-02 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Properties of structure-formers for self-cleaning surfaces, and the production of the same |
US20040154106A1 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2004-08-12 | Markus Oles | Flat textile structures with self-cleaning and water-repellent surfaces |
US6858284B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2005-02-22 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures, and process for their production |
US20020150723A1 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2002-10-17 | Creavis Gesellschaft F. Techn. U. Innovation Mbh | Surfaces which are self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures, and a process for their production |
US8629070B2 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2014-01-14 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Flat textile structures with self-cleaning and water-repellent surface |
WO2002101761A3 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2003-10-02 | Ccs Technology Inc | Cable and method for producing a cable |
WO2002101761A2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2002-12-19 | Ccs Technology, Inc. | Cable and method for producing a cable |
US20030013795A1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-01-16 | Creavis Gesellschaft F. Techn. U. Innovation Mbh | Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures and a process for their production |
US7211313B2 (en) | 2001-07-16 | 2007-05-01 | Degussa Ag | Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures and a process for their production |
WO2003013731A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-20 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Pipette tips with partly structured surfaces having improved pipetting properties |
WO2003013827A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-20 | Creavis Gesellschaft Für Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Structured surfaces that show a lotus effect |
US20030147932A1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-08-07 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Self-cleaning lotus effect surfaces having antimicrobial properties |
US6922287B2 (en) | 2001-10-12 | 2005-07-26 | Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft | Light coupling element |
WO2003032042A2 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft | Light coupling element |
WO2003032042A3 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-07-24 | Unaxis Balzers Ag | Light coupling element |
US20030187170A1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2003-10-02 | Axel Burmeister | Production of nano- and microstructured polymer films |
US20030124301A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-07-03 | Markus Oles | Process for producing articles with anti-allergic surfaces |
US6977094B2 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2005-12-20 | Degussa Ag | Process for producing articles with anti-allergic surfaces |
US20060035062A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2006-02-16 | Degussa Ag | Process for producing articles with anti-allergic surfaces |
EP1318228A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-11 | Creavis Gesellschaft für Technologie und Innovation mbH | Method for manufacturing items with antiallergic surfaces |
US20060127644A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2006-06-15 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fur Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Diffuse-reflection surfaces and process for their production |
US20030108716A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-06-12 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Light-scattering materials which have self-cleaning surfaces |
US20060127643A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2006-06-15 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Light-scattering materials which have self-cleaning sufraces |
US20030134086A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-07-17 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fur Tech. Und Innovation Mbh | Diffuse-reflection surfaces and process for their production |
DE10202513A1 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-08-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | An image producing sensor with a structured adhesion decreasing surface useful in the surface examination of automobile parts making use of the lotus effect |
DE10202513B4 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2006-03-30 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Self-cleaning surfaces for imaging sensors |
WO2003073045A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-09-04 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Indirect measurement of surface contact angle of liquids |
US6946170B2 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2005-09-20 | Gottlieb Binder Gmbh & Company | Self-cleaning display device |
EP1476257A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2004-11-17 | Gottlieb Binder GmbH & Co. KG | Surface |
US20030167667A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-09-11 | Gottlieb Binder Gmbh & Co. | Self-cleaning display device |
US20060051561A1 (en) * | 2002-03-23 | 2006-03-09 | University Of Durham | Method and apparatus for the formation of hydrophobic surfaces |
US10029278B2 (en) | 2002-03-23 | 2018-07-24 | Surface Innovations Limited | Method and apparatus for the formation of hydrophobic surfaces |
US20100330347A1 (en) * | 2002-03-23 | 2010-12-30 | Surface Innovations Limited | Method and apparatus for the formation of hydrophobic surfaces |
US9056332B2 (en) | 2002-03-23 | 2015-06-16 | P2I Limited | Method and apparatus for the formation of hydrophobic surfaces |
GB2404195A (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2005-01-26 | Chemco Internat Ltd | Non-scratch flooring top coat |
WO2003090943A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2003-11-06 | Chemco International Limited | Non-scratch flooring top coat |
US20040037961A1 (en) * | 2002-08-26 | 2004-02-26 | Cedric Dieleman | Production of surfaces to which liquids do not adhere |
US7196043B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2007-03-27 | S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. | Process and composition for producing self-cleaning surfaces from aqueous systems |
US20040127393A1 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2004-07-01 | Valpey Richard S. | Process and composition for producing self-cleaning surfaces from aqueous systems |
EP1582329A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2005-10-05 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Microprotrusion structure and process for producing the same |
US7799378B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2010-09-21 | Japan Science And Technology Agency | Process for producing micropillar structure |
US20060097361A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2006-05-11 | Masaru Tanaka | Microprotrusion structure, and process for producing the same |
EP1582329A4 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2006-12-20 | Japan Science & Tech Agency | Microprotrusion structure and process for producing the same |
US7604147B2 (en) | 2002-11-29 | 2009-10-20 | Anheuser-Busch Inbev S.A. | Keg with an inner bag |
US20060144870A1 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2006-07-06 | Ian Anderson | Keg with an inner bag |
US20100305256A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2010-12-02 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for hydrophobing textile materials |
US7790238B2 (en) | 2003-02-18 | 2010-09-07 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for hydrophobing textile materials |
US20060174418A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2006-08-10 | Harald Keller | Method for hydrophobing textile materials |
US7955518B2 (en) | 2003-02-18 | 2011-06-07 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for hydrophobing textile materials |
EP1613866A4 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-06-14 | Entegris Inc | Fluid handling component with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1613866A2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-01-11 | Entegris, Inc. | Fluid handling component with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1613541A2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-01-11 | Entegris, Inc. | Carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1622819A2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-02-08 | Entegris, Inc. | Tray carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1622819A4 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-06-14 | Entegris Inc | Tray carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
US20050145285A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2005-07-07 | Entegris, Inc | Fluid handling component with ultraphobic surfaces |
EP1613541A4 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-06-14 | Entegris Inc | Carrier with ultraphobic surfaces |
US7083828B2 (en) | 2003-04-24 | 2006-08-01 | Goldschmidt Gmbh | Process for producing detachable dirt- and water-repellent surface coatings |
US20060235143A1 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2006-10-19 | Felix Muller | Process for producing detachable dirt- and water-repellent surface coatings |
US7531598B2 (en) | 2003-04-24 | 2009-05-12 | Goldschmidt Gmbh | Process for producing detachable dirt- and water-repellent surface coatings |
US20040213904A1 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2004-10-28 | Goldschmidt Ag | Process for producing detachable dirt-and water-repellent surface coatings |
US20060222815A1 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2006-10-05 | Degussa Ag | Use of particles hydrophobized by fluorosilanes for the production of self-cleaning surfaces having lipophobic, oleophobic, lactophobic and hydrophobic properties |
US20040237590A1 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2004-12-02 | Ferro Corporation | Method of micro and nano texturing glass |
US6997018B2 (en) | 2003-06-02 | 2006-02-14 | Ferro Corporation | Method of micro and nano texturing glass |
US20060110542A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Thomas Dietz | Processing compositions and method of forming the same |
US7901731B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2011-03-08 | The Clorox Company | Treatment and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US8043654B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2011-10-25 | The Clorox Company | Treatments and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US8110037B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2012-02-07 | The Clorox Company | Treatments and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US8034173B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2011-10-11 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Processing compositions and method of forming the same |
US7828889B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2010-11-09 | The Clorox Company | Treatments and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US20060110541A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-05-25 | Russell Jodi L | Treatments and kits for creating transparent renewable surface protective coatings |
US20110054096A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2011-03-03 | Jodi Lynn Russell | Treatments and Kits For Creating Transparent Renewable Surface Protective Coatings |
US8974590B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2015-03-10 | The Armor All/Stp Products Company | Treatments and kits for creating renewable surface protective coatings |
US20100226943A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2010-09-09 | University Of Florida | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US20100126404A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2010-05-27 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Surface Topographies for Non-Toxic Bioadhesion Control |
US9016221B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2015-04-28 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US7650848B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2010-01-26 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US8997672B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2015-04-07 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US20070227428A1 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2007-10-04 | Brennan Anthony B | Surface topographies for non-toxic bioadhesion control |
US7727583B2 (en) | 2004-05-19 | 2010-06-01 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the production of structured surfaces |
US20070197111A1 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2007-08-23 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for finishing absorbent materials |
US20080014432A1 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2008-01-17 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the Production of Structured Surfaces |
US7851056B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2010-12-14 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Ultralyophobe interfaces |
WO2005123581A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-29 | University Of Florida Research | Ultralyophobe interfaces |
US20050276962A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-15 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Ultralyophobe interfaces |
US20060081394A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Insulator coating and method for forming same |
US7722951B2 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2010-05-25 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Insulator coating and method for forming same |
US20060147675A1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2006-07-06 | Degussa Ag | Self-cleaning surfaces comprising elevations formed by hydrophobic particles and having improved mechanical strength |
US8420163B2 (en) | 2004-12-27 | 2013-04-16 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Process for forming a surface comprising elevations of hydrophobic particles |
US7846529B2 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2010-12-07 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Self-cleaning surfaces comprising elevations formed by hydrophobic particles and having improved mechanical strength |
US20110045247A1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2011-02-24 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Self-cleaning surfaces comprising elevations formed by hydrophobic particles and having improved mechanical strength |
US20060292369A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2006-12-28 | Rutledge Gregory C | Superhydrophobic fibers and methods of preparation and use thereof |
US8574713B2 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2013-11-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Superhydrophobic fibers and methods of preparation and use thereof |
US7524531B2 (en) | 2005-04-27 | 2009-04-28 | Ferro Corporation | Structured self-cleaning surfaces and method of forming same |
US20060246277A1 (en) * | 2005-04-27 | 2006-11-02 | Ferro Corporation | Structured self-cleaning surfaces and method of forming same |
US8007638B2 (en) * | 2005-07-04 | 2011-08-30 | Astenjohnson, Inc. | Sheet-like products exhibiting oleophobic and hydrophobic properties |
US20080190574A1 (en) * | 2005-07-04 | 2008-08-14 | Astenjohnson, Inc. | Sheet-Like Products Exhibiting Oleophobic and Hydrophobic Properties |
US20070028588A1 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-08 | General Electric Company | Heat transfer apparatus and systems including the apparatus |
WO2008036074A2 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2008-03-27 | General Electric Company | Articles having low wettability and methods for making |
US20070031639A1 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-08 | General Electric Company | Articles having low wettability and methods for making |
WO2008036074A3 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2008-08-07 | Gen Electric | Articles having low wettability and methods for making |
EP1750018A3 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2011-12-14 | General Electric Company | Surfaces and articles resistant to impacting liquids |
US20070059490A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-15 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Protective film |
US7906172B2 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2011-03-15 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for coating surfaces and suitable particles therefor |
US20080254212A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2008-10-16 | Basf Se | Method for Coating Surfaces and Suitable Particles Therefor |
WO2007053242A3 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-11-15 | Univ Wayne State | Transparent hydrophobic article having self-cleaning and liquid repellant features and method of fabricating same |
WO2007053242A2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-05-10 | Wayne State University | Transparent hydrophobic article having self-cleaning and liquid repellant features and method of fabricating same |
US20090231714A1 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2009-09-17 | Yang Zhao | Transparent anti-reflective article and method of fabricating same |
US9217086B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2015-12-22 | Wayne State University | Method of fabricating transparent anti-reflective article |
US20080199659A1 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2008-08-21 | Wayne State University | Transparent hydrophobic article having self-cleaning and liquid repellant features and method of fabricating same |
WO2007075287A1 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2007-07-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Rough channel microfluidic devices |
US20090029177A1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2009-01-29 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Highly water repellent fluoropolymer coating |
US8632856B2 (en) | 2005-12-21 | 2014-01-21 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Highly water repellent fluoropolymer coating |
US20110177252A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2011-07-21 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Coating compositions for producing transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces |
US20080221009A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2008-09-11 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US8258206B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2012-09-04 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property, Llc | Hydrophobic coating compositions for drag reduction |
US8338351B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2012-12-25 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property, Llc | Coating compositions for producing transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces |
US20090018249A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2009-01-15 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US20090029043A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2009-01-29 | Haitao Rong | Multifunctional star-shaped prepolymers, their preparation and use |
US20090304983A1 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2009-12-10 | Wilhelm Barthlott | Non-Wettable Surfaces |
US20090011222A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2009-01-08 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Superhydrophobic surface and method for forming same |
US8409710B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2013-04-02 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Particles with structured surface |
US7972696B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2011-07-05 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Particles with structured surface |
US20090176920A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2009-07-09 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Particles with structured surface |
US8354160B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2013-01-15 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Articles having durable hydrophobic surfaces |
US8295522B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2012-10-23 | Widex A/S | Filter for a hearing aid and a hearing aid |
WO2008025355A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Widex A/S | Filter for a hearing aid and a hearing aid |
US20080221263A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-09-11 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Coating compositions for producing transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces |
US20090154747A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2009-06-18 | Widex A/S | Filter for a hearing aid and a hearing aid |
US9427908B2 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2016-08-30 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Modification of surface wetting properties of a substrate |
US20100129608A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2010-05-27 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Modification of Surface Wetting Properties of a Substrate |
US20100040790A1 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2010-02-18 | Basf Se | Aqueous formulations and use thereof |
US20100120970A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2010-05-13 | University Of Leeds | Reversible micelles and applications for their use |
JP2010515312A (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2010-05-06 | ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ | Hearing aid component and method of making a hearing aid component |
AU2007341776B2 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2011-01-27 | Widex A/S | Component for a hearing aid and a method of making a component for a hearing aid |
US8763238B2 (en) | 2007-01-03 | 2014-07-01 | Widex A/S | Method of manufacturing a component for a hearing aid |
WO2008080397A1 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2008-07-10 | Widex A/S | Component for a hearing aid and a method of making a component for a hearing aid |
US20090262966A1 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2009-10-22 | Widex A/S | Component for a hearing aid and a method of making a component for a hearing aid |
US20080245012A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Lafarge | Superhydrophobic gypsum boards and process for making same |
US20080250978A1 (en) * | 2007-04-13 | 2008-10-16 | Baumgart Richard J | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating composition |
US7927405B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2011-04-19 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc | Porous composite article |
AU2008244578B2 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2011-12-08 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Patterned porous venting materials |
US8075669B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2011-12-13 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Composite material |
US20080257155A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Bacino John E | Porous Composite Article |
US8858681B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2014-10-14 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Patterned porous venting materials |
US20080257153A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Harp Gary P | Patterned Porous Venting Materials |
US20100144225A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2010-06-10 | Basf Se | Method for treating surfaces |
US20090064894A1 (en) * | 2007-09-05 | 2009-03-12 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Water based hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US20100266761A1 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2010-10-21 | Beneq Oy | Method for manufacturing an extremely hydrophobic surface |
WO2009074715A1 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-18 | Beneq Oy | Method for manufacturing an extremely hydrophobic surface |
US8557335B2 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2013-10-15 | Beneq Oy | Method for manufacturing an extremely hydrophobic surface |
US20110027475A1 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2011-02-03 | Beneq Oy | Method and device for structuring a surface |
US8124189B2 (en) | 2008-01-16 | 2012-02-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Hydrophobic coating systems, suspensions for forming hydrophobic coatings, and methods for fabricating hydrophobic coatings |
US20090181237A1 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-16 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Hydrophobic coating systems, suspensions for forming hydrophobic coatings, and methods for fabricating hydrophobic coatings |
US9179773B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2015-11-10 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US11786036B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2023-10-17 | Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US11191358B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2021-12-07 | Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US8286561B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2012-10-16 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US10827837B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2020-11-10 | Ssw Holding Company, Llc | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US10130176B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2018-11-20 | Ssw Holding Company, Llc | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US9532649B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2017-01-03 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US8596205B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-12-03 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US9207012B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2015-12-08 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly |
US20100009188A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | John Haozhong Xin | Nano-structured surface and an in situ method for forming the same |
WO2010017503A1 (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2010-02-11 | Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc. | Microstructures to reduce the apperance of fingerprints on surfaces |
US20100033818A1 (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2010-02-11 | Uni-Pixel Displays,Inc. | Microstructures to reduce the appearance of fingerprints on surfaces |
DE102008041920A1 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2010-03-11 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | New catalysts for the crosslinking of functional silanes or functional siloxanes, especially with substrates |
WO2010028877A1 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2010-03-18 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | New catalysts for the cross-linking of functional silanes or functional siloxanes, particularly with substrates |
US9243175B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2016-01-26 | Ross Technology Corporation | Spill resistant surfaces having hydrophobic and oleophobic borders |
US9926478B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2018-03-27 | Ross Technology Corporation | Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation |
US9279073B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2016-03-08 | Ross Technology Corporation | Methods of making highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings |
US9096786B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2015-08-04 | Ross Technology Corporation | Spill resistant surfaces having hydrophobic and oleophobic borders |
US9067821B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2015-06-30 | Ross Technology Corporation | Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation |
US11383426B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2022-07-12 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of patterning a surface and articles comprising the same |
US10150245B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2018-12-11 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of patterning a surface and articles comprising the same |
US20100119755A1 (en) * | 2008-11-11 | 2010-05-13 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of patterning a surface and articles comprising the same |
US8691397B2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2014-04-08 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Biocidal metallic layers comprising cobalt |
US20100304179A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic materials comprising cobalt |
US8367217B2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2013-02-05 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt on iron-alloy substrates with enhanced fatigue performance |
US20100304182A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt |
US8663819B2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2014-03-04 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic coatings comprising cobalt with enhanced fatigue properties |
US8545994B2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2013-10-01 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic materials comprising cobalt |
EP2522377A1 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2012-11-14 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Antibacterial electrodeposited metallic materials comprising cobalt |
US8309233B2 (en) | 2009-06-02 | 2012-11-13 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt on ferrous-alloy substrates |
WO2010139054A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-09 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic materials comprising cobalt |
US20100304172A1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-12-02 | Integran Technologies, Inc. | Electrodeposited metallic-materials comprising cobalt |
US8147607B2 (en) | 2009-10-26 | 2012-04-03 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US20110094417A1 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2011-04-28 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Hydrophobic self-cleaning coating compositions |
US9074778B2 (en) | 2009-11-04 | 2015-07-07 | Ssw Holding Company, Inc. | Cooking appliance surfaces having spill containment pattern |
US9914849B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2018-03-13 | Ross Technology Corporation | Plunger and methods of producing hydrophobic surfaces |
US10066109B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2018-09-04 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Articles including nanosilica-based primers for polymer coatings and methods |
US9896557B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2018-02-20 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Silicone-based material |
US9303322B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2016-04-05 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Metallic articles with hydrophobic surfaces |
US8784713B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2014-07-22 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Method of making articles with super-hydrophobic and/or self-cleaning surfaces |
WO2011147756A1 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2011-12-01 | Integran Technologies | Metallic articles with hydrophobic surfaces |
WO2011147757A1 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2011-12-01 | Integran Technologies | Articles with super-hydrophobic and/or self-cleaning surfaces and method of making same |
US8486319B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2013-07-16 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Articles with super-hydrophobic and/or self-cleaning surfaces and method of making same |
US9339996B2 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2016-05-17 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Durable hydrophobic structured surface |
EP2404739A1 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2012-01-11 | 3M Innovative Properties Co. | Durable hyrophobic structured surface |
WO2012006207A1 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2012-01-12 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Durable hyrophobic structured surface |
US8808848B2 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2014-08-19 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Porous article |
US9285584B2 (en) | 2010-10-06 | 2016-03-15 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Anti-reflective articles with nanosilica-based coatings and barrier layer |
US9546299B2 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2017-01-17 | Ross Technology Corporation | Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems |
US10240049B2 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2019-03-26 | Ross Technology Corporation | Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems |
US9314973B2 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2016-04-19 | Dean Lavallee | Shipping structure and methods of making and using same |
US20120315415A1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2012-12-13 | Dean Lavallee | Shipping structure and methods of making and using same |
US10294004B2 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2019-05-21 | Dean Lavallee | Shipping structure and methods of making and using same |
US10625465B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2020-04-21 | Sharklet Technologies, Inc. | Catheter for antimicrobial control and method of manufacturing thereof |
US9937655B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2018-04-10 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of manufacturing catheter for antimicrobial control |
US11491700B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2022-11-08 | Sharklet Technologies, Inc. | Method of manufacturing catheter for antimicrobial control |
WO2013004704A1 (en) | 2011-07-04 | 2013-01-10 | Syngenta Limited | Formulation |
CN102424354A (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2012-04-25 | 东南大学 | Rough surface for fractal structure |
CN102424354B (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2014-08-06 | 东南大学 | Rough surface for fractal structure |
US9701576B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2017-07-11 | Schott Ag | Coated glass or glass ceramic substrate with haptic properties |
EP2592056A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-05-15 | Schott AG | Coated glass or glass ceramic substrate with haptic characteristics |
US9636941B2 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2017-05-02 | Hewlett-Packard Indigo B.V. | Embossing die creation |
US10046593B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2018-08-14 | Hp Indigo B.V. | Embossing die creation |
US20140283699A1 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2014-09-25 | Hewlett-Packard Indigo B.V. | Embossing Die Creation |
US10317129B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2019-06-11 | Schott Ag | Refrigerator shelf with overflow protection system including hydrophobic layer |
US9970120B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2018-05-15 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Porous, flow-through consumable anodes for use in selective electroplating |
US9249521B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2016-02-02 | Integran Technologies Inc. | Flow-through consumable anodes |
US9139744B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2015-09-22 | Ross Technology Corporation | Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance |
US9528022B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2016-12-27 | Ross Technology Corporation | Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance |
EP2859053A4 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2016-03-02 | Univ Houston | Self-cleaning coatings and methods for making same |
US10266702B2 (en) | 2012-06-08 | 2019-04-23 | University Of Houston System | Self-cleaning coatings and methods for making same |
US9388325B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2016-07-12 | Ross Technology Corporation | Elastomeric coatings having hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties |
US20150108032A1 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2015-04-23 | Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd | Packing container having excellent slipping property for the content |
US10689178B2 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2020-06-23 | Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd. | Packing container having excellent slipping property for the content |
WO2014041501A1 (en) * | 2012-09-13 | 2014-03-20 | Ariel - University Research And Development Company, Ltd. | Featured surface and method of making featured surface |
WO2014097309A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-26 | Asian Paints Ltd. | Stimuli responsive self cleaning coating |
US10036556B2 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2018-07-31 | Schott Ag | Coated glass or glass ceramic substrate with haptic properties |
WO2014108892A1 (en) * | 2013-01-12 | 2014-07-17 | Elad Mor | Super-hydrophobic surfaces in liquid-comprising systems |
WO2015082178A1 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2015-06-11 | BSH Hausgeräte GmbH | Household appliance |
US10562674B2 (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2020-02-18 | Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. | Plastic formed body for pouring out liquid |
US20170043911A1 (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2017-02-16 | Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. | Plastic formed body for pouring out liquid |
RU2704917C2 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2019-10-31 | Стора Энсо Ойй | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on sealing surface |
US11072458B2 (en) | 2015-06-18 | 2021-07-27 | Stora Enso Oyj | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on a sealing surface |
AU2016280244B2 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2020-06-11 | Stora Enso Oyj | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on a sealing surface |
JP2018517628A (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2018-07-05 | ストラ エンソ オーワイジェイ | Container with a lipophilic / oleophobic pattern on the sealing surface |
WO2016203411A1 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2016-12-22 | Stora Enso Oyj | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on a sealing surface |
US20180370678A1 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2018-12-27 | Stora Enso Oyj | Container with oleophilic/oleophobic pattern on a sealing surface |
CN107735337A (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2018-02-23 | 斯道拉恩索公司 | There is the container of oleophylic/oleophobic pattern on the sealing surface |
WO2019038592A1 (en) | 2017-08-19 | 2019-02-28 | Hescoat GmbH | Non-stick coating |
DE102017008415A1 (en) | 2017-08-19 | 2019-02-21 | Hescoat GmbH | Non-stick coating |
US11845517B2 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2023-12-19 | Micheal O'CEALLAIGH | Viscous-drag-reducing cladding |
WO2019122439A1 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2019-06-27 | O Ceallaigh Micheal | Viscous-drag-reducing cladding |
US11014029B2 (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2021-05-25 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Filter media ribbons with nanofibers formed thereon |
US11666841B2 (en) | 2019-05-24 | 2023-06-06 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Filter media ribbons with nanofibers formed thereon |
EP3744175A1 (en) | 2019-05-31 | 2020-12-02 | Rolex S.A. | Composition for impregnating a substrate, in particular a watchstrap |
EP4140304A1 (en) | 2019-05-31 | 2023-03-01 | Rolex S.A. | Composition for impregnating a substrate, in particular a watchstrap |
CN111883692A (en) * | 2019-09-24 | 2020-11-03 | 广东聚华印刷显示技术有限公司 | Ink drop capturing film, light-emitting device, and method for repairing bridging defect of light-emitting device and method for manufacturing light-emitting device |
CN111883692B (en) * | 2019-09-24 | 2023-02-03 | 广东聚华印刷显示技术有限公司 | Ink drop capturing film, light-emitting device, and method for repairing bridging defect of light-emitting device and method for manufacturing light-emitting device |
US11147900B1 (en) | 2021-04-29 | 2021-10-19 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Biomimetic nanofiber tissue scaffolds |
US11491258B1 (en) | 2021-04-29 | 2022-11-08 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Biomimetic nanofiber tissue scaffolds |
US11491259B1 (en) | 2021-04-29 | 2022-11-08 | Ultra Small Fibers, LLC | Biomimetic nanofiber tissue scaffolds |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3354022A (en) | Water-repellant surface | |
US3620895A (en) | Corrugated micropermeable membrane | |
US4279855A (en) | Method for the casting of ultrathin polymer membranes | |
US4374891A (en) | Ultrathin polymer membranes | |
US5523346A (en) | Seeded microemulsion polymerization for the production of small polymer particles | |
US2957791A (en) | Opaque porous pressure-clarifiable films of addition polymers | |
US8178011B2 (en) | Self-assembled nano-lithographic imprint masks | |
US3770567A (en) | Laminates of support material and fluorinated polymer containing pendant side chains containing sulfonyl groups | |
Basu et al. | A study of oil displacement on model surfaces | |
JP2937569B2 (en) | Fine unevenness formation method on substrate surface | |
Yin et al. | CO2‐Induced Tunable and Reversible Surface Wettability of Honeycomb Structured Porous Films for Cell Adhesion | |
US3625734A (en) | Ultra-thin liquid membrane construction | |
JP2003522058A (en) | Improved room temperature image transfer media | |
US3600490A (en) | Process of forming a ripple-free structure from a polymerizable material that shrinks upon polymerization | |
US20180229189A1 (en) | Composition for interfacial polymerization of polyamide and method for manufacturing reverse osmosis membrane using same | |
KR960703660A (en) | Composite membranes and their preparation from polymer articles on a porous substrate | |
JPS60137612A (en) | Casting device for ultra-thin polymer film | |
US5290595A (en) | Method of forming a coated sheet which wicks away oil | |
JPS5833086B2 (en) | Casting method for ultra-thin polymer membranes | |
JP2018109492A (en) | Heat exchange sheet | |
US2726956A (en) | Photographically sensitive diazo paper | |
EP0555398B1 (en) | Method of forming a coated sheet which wicks away oil and product thereof | |
KR890000011A (en) | Square Baking Pan for Automatic Baking Machine | |
JPH0683812B2 (en) | Method for applying a multilayer assembly of polymerizable surfactant on the surface of a solid substrate | |
Sykes et al. | Critical radius of holes in liquid coating |