US20120185549A1 - Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback - Google Patents

Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120185549A1
US20120185549A1 US13/429,338 US201213429338A US2012185549A1 US 20120185549 A1 US20120185549 A1 US 20120185549A1 US 201213429338 A US201213429338 A US 201213429338A US 2012185549 A1 US2012185549 A1 US 2012185549A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
unwanted message
potentially unwanted
unwanted
message
forwarding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/429,338
Inventor
Matthew Thomas Hart
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
McAfee LLC
Original Assignee
McAfee LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by McAfee LLC filed Critical McAfee LLC
Priority to US13/429,338 priority Critical patent/US20120185549A1/en
Publication of US20120185549A1 publication Critical patent/US20120185549A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M1/00—Substation equipment, e.g. for use by subscribers
    • H04M1/247—Telephone sets including user guidance or feature selection means facilitating their use
    • H04M1/2478—Telephone terminals specially adapted for non-voice services, e.g. email, internet access
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00—User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
    • H04L51/21—Monitoring or handling of messages
    • H04L51/212—Monitoring or handling of messages using filtering or selective blocking
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/107—Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
    • H04M3/53—Centralised arrangements for recording incoming messages, i.e. mailbox systems
    • H04M3/5322—Centralised arrangements for recording incoming messages, i.e. mailbox systems for recording text messages

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of data processing systems. More particularly, this invention relates to the field of e-mail filtering within such data processing systems.
  • the present invention provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to process received e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • filter downloading logic operable to download filter data from a remote source, said filter data specifying a plurality of tests that may be used to identify unwanted e-mail messages;
  • e-mail filtering logic operable to receive an e-mail message and to apply said plurality of tests to identify unwanted e-mail messages
  • unwanted message reporting logic operable to allow reporting to a filter data generator a new unwanted e-mail message received and not identified by said plurality of tests such that said filter data may be updated to identify said new unwanted e-mail message.
  • the invention recognises that unwanted e-mail messages are not generally restricted to a single user and that filtering rules developed in response to receipt of an unwanted e-mail message by one user may well be of use to another user who has yet to receive any of that unwanted e-mail.
  • the invention also recognises that the value of allowing users to report the receipt of new unwanted e-mail messages not already trapped by the filters is that the positive identification of that mail as wanted by a user is very strongly indicative of the mail genuinely being a Spam mail that will be unwanted by all users. This contrasts with computer virus reporting or bug reporting by users where the updating of a central resource by a provider needs much more careful consideration before being performed as users may often be incorrect in their assessment of the nature of the problem.
  • the tests applied by the filtering mechanisms of preferred embodiments use scoring algorithms to identify received e-mail messages as unwanted e-mail messages.
  • the scoring algorithms are generally more flexible and have a chance of identifying new unwanted e-mail messages at their first occurrence due to content matching known criteria for unwanted e-mail messages, such as the presence of predetermined words in a high proportion or characteristics of the addressee list.
  • a particularly preferred feature of the invention is that should the tests identify an e-mail message as potentially unwanted then it is forwarded to its addressee together with a prompt that allows the addressee to provide feedback as to whether or not in their opinion the e-mail is an unwanted e-mail message.
  • This preferred feature builds upon the realisation that the determination of whether or not an e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message is primarily in the mind of the recipient and accordingly allowing the recipient to make this decision enables the load of maintaining the rules set to be distributed and a faster and more reliable response achieved.
  • a particularly preferred way of facilitating such feedback is to encapsulate the suspect e-mail message within a mark up language document that provides voting buttons to allow the addressee to give their feedback to the system.
  • the filtering mechanisms are in place upstream of the primary mail server.
  • the invention also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to process received e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • e-mail filtering logic operable to receive an e-mail message and to apply at least one test to identify a received e-mail message as a potentially unwanted e-mail message
  • message forwarding logic operable to forward said potentially unwanted e-mail message to its addressee together with a prompt for said addressee to provide feedback as to whether or not said received e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message.
  • the user feedback mechanism applied to suspect e-mail messages is potentially advantageous in its own right independently of the central downloadable source of filter data.
  • the invention also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to provide downloadable filter data for identifying unwanted e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • filter data updating logic operable in response to receipt of one or more of said user reports to modify said downloadable filter data to add a test to identify a new unwanted e-mail message.
  • the source of the downloadable filter data itself represents a complementary aspect of the present invention.
  • the downloadable data source and the client system using that downloadable data may be physically separated by considerable distance and may be provided in different countries. Both the client and the data source are separate aspects of the same inventive concept.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an arrangement of a filter data provider and filter data users
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of a client user of the filter data
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the encapsulation of a suspect e-mail message within a markup language document with voting buttons
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing by a user of the message of FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the response of a system to votes received from recipients of the message of FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing applied by the downloadable filtered data provider on receipt of user reports of problem e-mails.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a computer that may be used to implement the above described techniques.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a plurality of e-mail users in the form of client computers connected via respective mail servers and gateways through the internet.
  • a central provider 1 of the downloadable filter data uses an attached rule database 2 to generate filter data files that may be downloaded by individual connected gateway computers 4 , 6 , 8 .
  • These gateway computers apply the downloaded filter data specified tests to received e-mail messages prior to passing these along to their associated mail servers.
  • the individual gateways 4 , 6 , 8 may also apply locally defined filtering rules specific to that particular organisation or user.
  • the rules specified in the rule database 2 may be of an algorithmic form rather than a less flexible direct regular expression form.
  • a predetermined list of words identified as common within unwanted e-mail messages may be established. Words such as “buy”, “free”, “credit” and others have a relatively higher likelihood of occurrence within unwanted e-mail messages than in wanted e-mail messages.
  • By being responsive both to the occurrence of such predetermined rules and the size of the e-mail message itself an indication of the likelihood of an e-mail message being an unwanted e-mail message can be algorithmically determined. Individual words may be given a greater or lesser waiting in the degree to which they indicate that an e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message.
  • the rules may also be responsive to the addressee of a received e-mail message. If a particular e-mail message is detected as being addressed to users who do not exist as well as some that do exist, then this may be indicative of an unwanted e-mail message generated using lexicon based techniques. Depending upon the preponderance of invalid e-mail addresses compared to valid e-mail addresses, such a rule could be used to classify an e-mail message as either definitely unwanted, suspect or wanted.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram schematically illustrating the rule based processing that may be applied by the various gateway computers 4 , 6 , 8 .
  • an e-mail message is received.
  • the e-mail message is compared with the downloaded and locally generated rule sets held by that gateway computer 4 , 6 , 8 and scored as to its likelihood of being an unwanted e-mail message.
  • the message is forwarded to the addressee at step 22 .
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a markup language document 24 containing the encapsulated suspect e-mail message 26 .
  • the voting buttons 28 provided at the foot of the message 24 sent to the user allows the user to provide feedback to a central source effectively voting upon the nature of the encapsulated e-mail message 26 .
  • a threshold of a predetermined number of votes positively identifying an e-mail as an unwanted e-mail may be set before triggering a report to the central filter data provider or the generation of a new local rule.
  • the feedback mechanism illustrated is shown in the form of classic HTML buttons, but it will be appreciated that different user interface mechanisms may be provided in conjunction with the encapsulated message to allow a user to provide their feedback as to the nature of the encapsulated E-mail message 26 .
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing performed by the recipient of a message such as illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • the user receives the message.
  • the user votes on the nature of the message by clicking on one of the buttons 28 .
  • this vote is returned to the gateway computer 4 , 6 , 8 associated with that user.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating how the gateway computer 4 , 6 , 8 may respond to votes upon suspect e-mail messages.
  • the system waits for votes to be received.
  • step 38 determines whether or not this newly received vote has the result of making the total number of votes received in relation to that particular encapsulated message 26 exceed a predetermined threshold level, such as three votes positively identifying the encapsulated message 26 as unwanted. If the threshold has not yet been exceeded, then step 40 serves to increment the current count and processing terminates. Processing to accommodate conflicting votes may also be provided.
  • step 42 issues a notification to an administrator of the gateway computer 4 , 6 , 8 .
  • the notification to the administrator generated at step 42 can give an indication of the unwanted e-mail message and allow the administrator to either confirm or not confirm the appropriateness of now treating that e-mail message as unwanted and generating an associated new rule.
  • the administrator makes this confirmation at step 44 .
  • step 46 stops further counting of votes relating to that message. If the administrator indicates that the message should not be treated as unwanted, then step 46 stops further counting of votes relating to that message. If the e-mail message is confirmed as unwanted, then step 48 automatically generates a new local rule to filter out that e-mail message and step 50 provides a notification of the nature of that e-mail message to the central downloadable filter data source such that other users may benefit from the experience of the current user.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating how the central source of downloadable filter data may respond to notifications from separate gateway computers 4 , 6 , 8 of newly detected unwanted e-mail messages.
  • the system waits for new notifications.
  • the system checks as to whether or not a newly received notification means that a threshold level of notifications relating to a particular e-mail message has now been received. If the threshold level has not yet been exceeded, then step 56 increments the current count and processing terminates.
  • a central authority confirming new globally applicable rules is notified at step 58 .
  • new rules set up within the downloadable filtered data will impact potentially all the users of the system, there is a high level of justification for at least having some level of manual checking of new global rules. It may be that the new rules are automatically added to the set and checked retrospectively in order to provide the optimum speed of response. It could be that the confirmation would not be required if severally highly trusted users reported an e-mail message as unwanted compared with perhaps individual users.
  • step 60 If confirmation is being sought, then this is received at step 60 . If the new rule is not confirmed, then step 62 terminates further counting in relation to that e-mail message. If the new rule is confirmed, then step 64 automatically adds it to the downloadable rule set 2 .
  • FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a computer 200 of a type that may be used to execute the computer programs described above.
  • the computer 200 includes a central processing unit 202 , a random access memory 204 , a read-only memory 206 , a hard disk drive 208 , a display driver 210 and display 212 , a user input/output circuit 214 , a keyboard 216 , a mouse 218 and a network interface circuit 220 , all coupled via a common bus 222 .
  • the central processing unit 202 executes computer programs using the random access memory 204 as its working memory.
  • the computer programs may be stored within the read-only memory 206 , the hard disk drive 208 or retrieved via the network interface circuit 220 from a remote source.
  • the computer 200 displays the results of its processing activity to the user via the display driver 210 and the display 212 .
  • the computer 200 receives control inputs from the user via the user input/output circuit 214 , the keyboard 216 and the mouse 218
  • the computer program product described above may take the form of a computer program stored within the computer system 200 on the hard disk drive 208 , within the random access memory 204 , within the read-only memory 206 , or downloaded via the network interface circuit 220 .
  • the computer program product may also take the form of a recording medium such as a compact disk or floppy disk drive that may be used for distribution purposes.
  • the various components of the computer 200 serve to provide the appropriate circuits and logic for carrying out the above described functions and acts.
  • the computer 200 illustrated in FIG. 7 is merely one example of a type of computer that may execute the computer program product, method and provide the apparatus described above.

Abstract

A filter mechanism for unwanted e-mail messages uses a downloadable central source (1, 2) of filter rule data. User reports of received unwanted e-mail messages are relayed back to the central source of the filter data and used to automatically update that filter data. An algorithmic approach to identifying characteristics of unwanted e-mail messages may be applied based upon the preponderance of predetermined words within an e-mail message or characteristics of the addressee list. If an e-mail message is identified as suspect, but not definitely unwanted, then it may be encapsulated within a HTML document and sent to its addressee together with buttons (28) allowing the recipient to provide feedback in the form of votes as to whether or not that e-mail message is unwanted. This recipient feedback may be used to establish a new local rule.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to the field of data processing systems. More particularly, this invention relates to the field of e-mail filtering within such data processing systems.
  • With the rise in the use of e-mail as a communication mechanism, this has been accompanied by a rise in the occurrence of unsolicited and unwanted e-mail messages. These so-called “Spam” messages cause a number of problems, such as consuming physical network and processing resources as well as wasting the time of the recipients in dealing with these messages in their inbox.
  • 2. Description of the Prior Art
  • It is known to provide e-mail filtering mechanisms that apply predefined rules to received e-mail messages in order that Spam messages may be identified and automatically deleted. These existing system often work on content filtering with rules based on regular expressions applied to all inbound messages. A significant amount of unwanted e-mail is generally still able to pass through such systems because the filtering rules are not normally maintained to a high degree and tend to lack flexibility to deal with an ever changing problem.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Viewed from one aspect the present invention provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to process received e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • (i) filter downloading logic operable to download filter data from a remote source, said filter data specifying a plurality of tests that may be used to identify unwanted e-mail messages;
  • (ii) e-mail filtering logic operable to receive an e-mail message and to apply said plurality of tests to identify unwanted e-mail messages; and
  • (iii) unwanted message reporting logic operable to allow reporting to a filter data generator a new unwanted e-mail message received and not identified by said plurality of tests such that said filter data may be updated to identify said new unwanted e-mail message.
  • The invention recognises that unwanted e-mail messages are not generally restricted to a single user and that filtering rules developed in response to receipt of an unwanted e-mail message by one user may well be of use to another user who has yet to receive any of that unwanted e-mail. The invention also recognises that the value of allowing users to report the receipt of new unwanted e-mail messages not already trapped by the filters is that the positive identification of that mail as wanted by a user is very strongly indicative of the mail genuinely being a Spam mail that will be unwanted by all users. This contrasts with computer virus reporting or bug reporting by users where the updating of a central resource by a provider needs much more careful consideration before being performed as users may often be incorrect in their assessment of the nature of the problem. Compared to this, whether or not an e-mail is an unwanted e-mail is a decision that is primarily made in the mind of the recipient and so a report of such an e-mail message to a provider of filtered data is substantially definitive in establishing that the filter data should be modified to prevent receipt of that unwanted e-mail message. This lends the mechanisms well suited to being substantially automated thereby giving a possibility of faster filter generation and anti-Spam protection.
  • The tests applied by the filtering mechanisms of preferred embodiments use scoring algorithms to identify received e-mail messages as unwanted e-mail messages. The scoring algorithms are generally more flexible and have a chance of identifying new unwanted e-mail messages at their first occurrence due to content matching known criteria for unwanted e-mail messages, such as the presence of predetermined words in a high proportion or characteristics of the addressee list.
  • A particularly preferred feature of the invention is that should the tests identify an e-mail message as potentially unwanted then it is forwarded to its addressee together with a prompt that allows the addressee to provide feedback as to whether or not in their opinion the e-mail is an unwanted e-mail message. This preferred feature builds upon the realisation that the determination of whether or not an e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message is primarily in the mind of the recipient and accordingly allowing the recipient to make this decision enables the load of maintaining the rules set to be distributed and a faster and more reliable response achieved.
  • A particularly preferred way of facilitating such feedback is to encapsulate the suspect e-mail message within a mark up language document that provides voting buttons to allow the addressee to give their feedback to the system.
  • Whilst the system could be arranged such that new rules could only be created centrally within the downloading source, preferred embodiments provide the ability for local rules t be created. This allows a faster response for an organisation receiving problems through unwanted e-mail messages and also allows a organisation to treat as unwanted e-mail messages that may not qualify as such in the view of the provider of the downloadable filter data.
  • In order to advantageously offload the burden of unwanted e-mail messages from the bulk of the mail systems of an organisation it is preferred that the filtering mechanisms are in place upstream of the primary mail server.
  • Viewed from another aspect the invention also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to process received e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • (i) e-mail filtering logic operable to receive an e-mail message and to apply at least one test to identify a received e-mail message as a potentially unwanted e-mail message; and
  • (ii) message forwarding logic operable to forward said potentially unwanted e-mail message to its addressee together with a prompt for said addressee to provide feedback as to whether or not said received e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message.
  • The user feedback mechanism applied to suspect e-mail messages is potentially advantageous in its own right independently of the central downloadable source of filter data.
  • Viewed from a further aspect the invention also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program operable to control a computer to provide downloadable filter data for identifying unwanted e-mail messages, said computer program comprising:
  • (i) user report receiving logic operable to receive a user report of an unwanted e-mail message received by said user of said downloadable filter data; and
  • (ii) filter data updating logic operable in response to receipt of one or more of said user reports to modify said downloadable filter data to add a test to identify a new unwanted e-mail message.
  • It will be appreciated that the source of the downloadable filter data itself represents a complementary aspect of the present invention. The downloadable data source and the client system using that downloadable data may be physically separated by considerable distance and may be provided in different countries. Both the client and the data source are separate aspects of the same inventive concept.
  • Further aspects of the invention provide a method of processing received e-mail messages and an apparatus for processing received e-mail messages.
  • The above, and other objects, features and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an arrangement of a filter data provider and filter data users;
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of a client user of the filter data;
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the encapsulation of a suspect e-mail message within a markup language document with voting buttons;
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing by a user of the message of FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the response of a system to votes received from recipients of the message of FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing applied by the downloadable filtered data provider on receipt of user reports of problem e-mails; and
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a computer that may be used to implement the above described techniques.
    •  DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a plurality of e-mail users in the form of client computers connected via respective mail servers and gateways through the internet. A central provider 1 of the downloadable filter data uses an attached rule database 2 to generate filter data files that may be downloaded by individual connected gateway computers 4, 6, 8. These gateway computers apply the downloaded filter data specified tests to received e-mail messages prior to passing these along to their associated mail servers. The individual gateways 4, 6, 8 may also apply locally defined filtering rules specific to that particular organisation or user.
  • The rules specified in the rule database 2 may be of an algorithmic form rather than a less flexible direct regular expression form. A predetermined list of words identified as common within unwanted e-mail messages may be established. Words such as “buy”, “free”, “credit” and others have a relatively higher likelihood of occurrence within unwanted e-mail messages than in wanted e-mail messages. By being responsive both to the occurrence of such predetermined rules and the size of the e-mail message itself an indication of the likelihood of an e-mail message being an unwanted e-mail message can be algorithmically determined. Individual words may be given a greater or lesser waiting in the degree to which they indicate that an e-mail message is an unwanted e-mail message. When an e-mail message has been processed by this “fuzzy logic” type testing mechanism, then an indication will be given as to whether or not the e-mail message is definitely unwanted, potentially unwanted or wanted. Wanted e-mail messages can be passed through to the addressee, definitely unwanted e-mail messages can be deleted and potentially unwanted e-mail messages can be subject to further processing as described below.
  • The rules may also be responsive to the addressee of a received e-mail message. If a particular e-mail message is detected as being addressed to users who do not exist as well as some that do exist, then this may be indicative of an unwanted e-mail message generated using lexicon based techniques. Depending upon the preponderance of invalid e-mail addresses compared to valid e-mail addresses, such a rule could be used to classify an e-mail message as either definitely unwanted, suspect or wanted.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram schematically illustrating the rule based processing that may be applied by the various gateway computers 4, 6, 8. At step 10, an e-mail message is received. At step 12 the e-mail message is compared with the downloaded and locally generated rule sets held by that gateway computer 4, 6, 8 and scored as to its likelihood of being an unwanted e-mail message.
  • At step 14, a determination is made from the score as to whether or not the e-mail message is definitely unwanted. If the e-mail message falls within this category, then it is deleted at step 16. If the e-mail message is not definitely unwanted, then it passes to step 18 where a test is made as to whether or not its score indicates that it is a potentially unwanted suspect e-mail message. If the e-mail message is a potentially unwanted E-mail message, then it is passed to step 20 where it is encapsulated within an HTML mail message with voting buttons added to the bottom of the mail message to enable a recipient to provide feedback to a central source as to whether or not that encapsulated mail message is in fact an unwanted mail message. Button is a term that indicates a mechanism within the message allowing automated feedback rather than a specific appearance or coding form.
  • If the e-mail message is definitely wanted or after encapsulation at step 20, then the message is forwarded to the addressee at step 22.
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a markup language document 24 containing the encapsulated suspect e-mail message 26. The voting buttons 28 provided at the foot of the message 24 sent to the user allows the user to provide feedback to a central source effectively voting upon the nature of the encapsulated e-mail message 26. Within an individual gateway computer 4, 6, 8, a threshold of a predetermined number of votes positively identifying an e-mail as an unwanted e-mail may be set before triggering a report to the central filter data provider or the generation of a new local rule. The feedback mechanism illustrated is shown in the form of classic HTML buttons, but it will be appreciated that different user interface mechanisms may be provided in conjunction with the encapsulated message to allow a user to provide their feedback as to the nature of the encapsulated E-mail message 26.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing performed by the recipient of a message such as illustrated in FIG. 3. At step 30 the user receives the message. At step 32 the user votes on the nature of the message by clicking on one of the buttons 28. At step 34 this vote is returned to the gateway computer 4, 6, 8 associated with that user.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating how the gateway computer 4, 6, 8 may respond to votes upon suspect e-mail messages. At step 36 the system waits for votes to be received. When a vote is received, step 38 determines whether or not this newly received vote has the result of making the total number of votes received in relation to that particular encapsulated message 26 exceed a predetermined threshold level, such as three votes positively identifying the encapsulated message 26 as unwanted. If the threshold has not yet been exceeded, then step 40 serves to increment the current count and processing terminates. Processing to accommodate conflicting votes may also be provided.
  • If the threshold has now been exceeded, then step 42 issues a notification to an administrator of the gateway computer 4, 6, 8. The notification to the administrator generated at step 42 can give an indication of the unwanted e-mail message and allow the administrator to either confirm or not confirm the appropriateness of now treating that e-mail message as unwanted and generating an associated new rule. The administrator makes this confirmation at step 44.
  • If the administrator indicates that the message should not be treated as unwanted, then step 46 stops further counting of votes relating to that message. If the e-mail message is confirmed as unwanted, then step 48 automatically generates a new local rule to filter out that e-mail message and step 50 provides a notification of the nature of that e-mail message to the central downloadable filter data source such that other users may benefit from the experience of the current user.
  • It will be appreciated that the confirmation steps by the administrator could be removed and the process once the votes had exceeded the predetermined threshold level could be completely automated. This accords well with the realisation that the determination of whether or not an e-mail message is a Spam e-mail message is one properly decided by the recipients and intervention by an administrator may not be necessary or appropriate.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating how the central source of downloadable filter data may respond to notifications from separate gateway computers 4, 6, 8 of newly detected unwanted e-mail messages. At step 52, the system waits for new notifications. At step 54, the system checks as to whether or not a newly received notification means that a threshold level of notifications relating to a particular e-mail message has now been received. If the threshold level has not yet been exceeded, then step 56 increments the current count and processing terminates.
  • If the threshold has been exceeded, then a central authority confirming new globally applicable rules is notified at step 58. Given that new rules set up within the downloadable filtered data will impact potentially all the users of the system, there is a high level of justification for at least having some level of manual checking of new global rules. It may be that the new rules are automatically added to the set and checked retrospectively in order to provide the optimum speed of response. It could be that the confirmation would not be required if severally highly trusted users reported an e-mail message as unwanted compared with perhaps individual users.
  • If confirmation is being sought, then this is received at step 60. If the new rule is not confirmed, then step 62 terminates further counting in relation to that e-mail message. If the new rule is confirmed, then step 64 automatically adds it to the downloadable rule set 2.
  • FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a computer 200 of a type that may be used to execute the computer programs described above. The computer 200 includes a central processing unit 202, a random access memory 204, a read-only memory 206, a hard disk drive 208, a display driver 210 and display 212, a user input/output circuit 214, a keyboard 216, a mouse 218 and a network interface circuit 220, all coupled via a common bus 222. In operation, the central processing unit 202 executes computer programs using the random access memory 204 as its working memory. The computer programs may be stored within the read-only memory 206, the hard disk drive 208 or retrieved via the network interface circuit 220 from a remote source. The computer 200 displays the results of its processing activity to the user via the display driver 210 and the display 212. The computer 200 receives control inputs from the user via the user input/output circuit 214, the keyboard 216 and the mouse 218.
  • The computer program product described above may take the form of a computer program stored within the computer system 200 on the hard disk drive 208, within the random access memory 204, within the read-only memory 206, or downloaded via the network interface circuit 220. The computer program product may also take the form of a recording medium such as a compact disk or floppy disk drive that may be used for distribution purposes. When operating under control of the above described computer program product, the various components of the computer 200 serve to provide the appropriate circuits and logic for carrying out the above described functions and acts. It will be appreciated that the computer 200 illustrated in FIG. 7 is merely one example of a type of computer that may execute the computer program product, method and provide the apparatus described above.
  • Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various changes and modifications can be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (21)

1.-36. (canceled)
37. Logic encoded in one or more non-transitory media that includes code for execution and when executed by one or more processors is operable to perform operations for processing received messages for a plurality of addressees, the operations comprising:
identifying a potentially unwanted message in the received messages based on filter data;
forwarding the potentially unwanted message to at least one of the addressees;
receiving votes as feedback from at least one of the addressees; and
adding a rule associated with the unwanted message if a threshold number of the votes identifies the potentially unwanted message as an unwanted message.
38. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm.
39. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm responsive to identification of predetermined words within the received messages and a size of the received messages.
40. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein the scoring algorithm is responsive to validity of the addressees.
41. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises forwarding the potentially unwanted message with a prompt to provide the feedback.
42. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises encapsulating the potentially unwanted message within a markup language providing voting buttons for providing the feedback.
43. The encoded logic of claim 37, wherein the operations further comprises forwarding the rule to an administrator for confirmation.
44. A method of processing received messages for a plurality of addressees, the method comprising:
identifying a potentially unwanted message in the received messages based on filter data;
forwarding the potentially unwanted message to at least one of the addressees;
receiving votes as feedback from at least one of the addressees; and
adding a rule associated with the unwanted message if a threshold number of the votes identifies the potentially unwanted message as an unwanted message.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm.
46. The method of claim 44, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm responsive to identification of predetermined words within the received messages and a size of the received messages.
47. The method of claim 44, wherein the scoring algorithm is responsive to validity of the addressees.
48. The method of claim 44, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises forwarding the potentially unwanted message with a prompt to provide the feedback.
49. The method of claim 44, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises encapsulating the potentially unwanted message within a markup language providing voting buttons for providing the feedback.
50. The method of claim 44, further comprising forwarding the rule to an administrator for confirmation.
51. An apparatus for processing received messages for a plurality of addressees, comprising one or more processors operable to execute instructions such that the apparatus is configured for:
identifying a potentially unwanted message in the received messages based on filter data;
forwarding the potentially unwanted message to at least one of the addressees;
receiving votes as feedback from at least one of the addressees; and
adding a rule associated with the unwanted message if a threshold number of the votes identifies the potentially unwanted message as an unwanted message.
52. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm.
53. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the potentially unwanted message is identified with a scoring algorithm responsive to identification of predetermined words within the received messages and a size of the received messages.
54. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the scoring algorithm is responsive to validity of the addressees.
55. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises forwarding the potentially unwanted message with a prompt to provide the feedback.
56. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein forwarding the potentially unwanted message comprises encapsulating the potentially unwanted message within a markup language providing voting buttons for providing the feedback.
US13/429,338 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback Abandoned US20120185549A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/429,338 US20120185549A1 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/785,240 US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2001-02-20 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US13/429,338 US20120185549A1 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/785,240 Continuation US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2001-02-20 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120185549A1 true US20120185549A1 (en) 2012-07-19

Family

ID=25134858

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/785,240 Active 2030-12-26 US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2001-02-20 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US13/429,338 Abandoned US20120185549A1 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted E-Mail Filtering System Including Voting Feedback
US13/429,354 Abandoned US20120185551A1 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US13/429,345 Expired - Fee Related US8838714B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/785,240 Active 2030-12-26 US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2001-02-20 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/429,354 Abandoned US20120185551A1 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US13/429,345 Expired - Fee Related US8838714B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-03-24 Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US8219620B2 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130086635A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 General Electric Company System and method for communication in a network
US8601160B1 (en) 2006-02-09 2013-12-03 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for gathering information relating to electronic content utilizing a DNS server
US8838714B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2014-09-16 Mcafee, Inc. Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US8984644B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-03-17 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9100431B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-04 Securityprofiling, Llc Computer program product and apparatus for multi-path remediation
US9117069B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Real-time vulnerability monitoring
US9118710B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc System, method, and computer program product for reporting an occurrence in different manners
US9118708B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Multi-path remediation
US9118711B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9118709B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9350752B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2016-05-24 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US11695869B2 (en) 2015-04-20 2023-07-04 Youmail, Inc. System and method for identifying and handling unwanted callers using a call answering system
US11895074B2 (en) 2022-05-31 2024-02-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Systems and methods for determining scores for messages based on actions of message recipients and a network graph

Families Citing this family (176)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU3969093A (en) * 1992-04-30 1993-11-29 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for organizing information in a computer system
US6832245B1 (en) 1999-12-01 2004-12-14 At&T Corp. System and method for analyzing communications of user messages to rank users and contacts based on message content
US9246975B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2016-01-26 Facebook, Inc. State change alerts mechanism
DE60132433T2 (en) 2000-03-17 2008-12-24 America Online, Inc. IMMEDIATE MESSAGE TRANSMISSION WITH ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE COMMUNICATION
US7624172B1 (en) 2000-03-17 2009-11-24 Aol Llc State change alerts mechanism
US20130073648A1 (en) 2000-05-04 2013-03-21 Facebook, Inc. Presenting a recipient of an e-mail with an option to instant message a sender or another recipient based on the sender's or the other recipient's address and online status
US9100221B2 (en) 2000-05-04 2015-08-04 Facebook, Inc. Systems for messaging senders and recipients of an electronic message
US8122363B1 (en) 2000-05-04 2012-02-21 Aol Inc. Presence status indicator
US8132110B1 (en) 2000-05-04 2012-03-06 Aol Inc. Intelligently enabled menu choices based on online presence state in address book
US20130067340A1 (en) 2000-05-04 2013-03-14 Facebook, Inc. Intelligently enabled menu choices based on online presence state in address book
US6912564B1 (en) 2000-05-04 2005-06-28 America Online, Inc. System for instant messaging the sender and recipients of an e-mail message
US7979802B1 (en) 2000-05-04 2011-07-12 Aol Inc. Providing supplemental contact information corresponding to a referenced individual
US7032023B1 (en) * 2000-05-16 2006-04-18 America Online, Inc. Throttling electronic communications from one or more senders
US20040073617A1 (en) 2000-06-19 2004-04-15 Milliken Walter Clark Hash-based systems and methods for detecting and preventing transmission of unwanted e-mail
US8290768B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2012-10-16 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for determining a set of attributes based on content of communications
US6408277B1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2002-06-18 Banter Limited System and method for automatic task prioritization
US9699129B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2017-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for increasing email productivity
US8001190B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2011-08-16 Aol Inc. Email integrated instant messaging
WO2002009437A2 (en) 2000-07-25 2002-01-31 America Online, Inc. Video messaging
US7711790B1 (en) 2000-08-24 2010-05-04 Foundry Networks, Inc. Securing an accessible computer system
US6802012B1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2004-10-05 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Scanning computer files for unwanted properties
US7644057B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2010-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for electronic communication management
DE10115428A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2002-10-17 Siemens Ag Procedure for detecting an unsolicited email
US8799183B2 (en) * 2001-04-09 2014-08-05 United States Postal Service System and method for predelivery notifcation using mail image
US7325249B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2008-01-29 Aol Llc Identifying unwanted electronic messages
US7380126B2 (en) * 2001-06-01 2008-05-27 Logan James D Methods and apparatus for controlling the transmission and receipt of email messages
US7076527B2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2006-07-11 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for filtering email
US7502829B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2009-03-10 Cybersoft, Inc. Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for intercepting, examining and controlling code, data and files and their transfer
US7016939B1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2006-03-21 Mcafee, Inc. Intelligent SPAM detection system using statistical analysis
US7647376B1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2010-01-12 Mcafee, Inc. SPAM report generation system and method
US7117533B1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2006-10-03 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for providing dynamic screening of transient messages in a distributed computing environment
US7765484B2 (en) 2001-09-28 2010-07-27 Aol Inc. Passive personalization of lists
US7774711B2 (en) 2001-09-28 2010-08-10 Aol Inc. Automatic categorization of entries in a contact list
US7512652B1 (en) 2001-09-28 2009-03-31 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Passive personalization of buddy lists
US7403953B2 (en) * 2001-10-03 2008-07-22 Amazingmail.Com Methods and apparatus for a dynamic messaging engine
US6988129B2 (en) * 2001-11-26 2006-01-17 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method for providing address change notification in an electronic message forwarding system
EP1476819B1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2009-04-01 Postini, Inc. E-mail management services
US20030208524A1 (en) * 2002-05-02 2003-11-06 Morman Daniel N. System for routing data in a communication network
US7139801B2 (en) * 2002-06-14 2006-11-21 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring events associated with transmitted electronic mail messages
US8396926B1 (en) 2002-07-16 2013-03-12 Sonicwall, Inc. Message challenge response
US7908330B2 (en) 2003-03-11 2011-03-15 Sonicwall, Inc. Message auditing
US8924484B2 (en) 2002-07-16 2014-12-30 Sonicwall, Inc. Active e-mail filter with challenge-response
US7539726B1 (en) 2002-07-16 2009-05-26 Sonicwall, Inc. Message testing
US7899867B1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2011-03-01 FaceTime Communications, Inc, SpIM blocking and user approval techniques for real-time messaging networks
US7334020B2 (en) * 2002-09-20 2008-02-19 Goodcontacts Research Ltd. Automatic highlighting of new electronic message address
US6804687B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-10-12 Scott E. Sampson File system management with user-definable functional attributes stored in a token action log
US8051172B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2011-11-01 Sampson Scott E Methods for managing the exchange of communication tokens
US7010565B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2006-03-07 Sampson Scott E Communication management using a token action log
US7200636B2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2007-04-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for applying personalized rules to e-mail messages at an e-mail server
US7899862B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-03-01 Aol Inc. Dynamic identification of other users to an online user
US7640306B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-12-29 Aol Llc Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US8965964B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-24 Facebook, Inc. Managing forwarded electronic messages
US7590696B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-09-15 Aol Llc Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US8005919B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-08-23 Aol Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US8701014B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-04-15 Facebook, Inc. Account linking
US8122137B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2012-02-21 Aol Inc. Dynamic location of a subordinate user
US7428580B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2008-09-23 Aol Llc Electronic message forwarding
WO2004046867A2 (en) 2002-11-18 2004-06-03 America Online, Inc. People lists
US7636755B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2009-12-22 Aol Llc Multiple avatar personalities
US8037150B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2011-10-11 Aol Inc. System and methods for providing multiple personas in a communications environment
US7945674B2 (en) 2003-04-02 2011-05-17 Aol Inc. Degrees of separation for handling communications
US7263614B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2007-08-28 Aol Llc Implicit access for communications pathway
US9742615B1 (en) 2002-12-31 2017-08-22 Aol Inc. Popularity index
US8538895B2 (en) * 2004-03-15 2013-09-17 Aol Inc. Sharing social network information
US7949759B2 (en) 2003-04-02 2011-05-24 AOL, Inc. Degrees of separation for handling communications
US7171450B2 (en) * 2003-01-09 2007-01-30 Microsoft Corporation Framework to enable integration of anti-spam technologies
US7533148B2 (en) * 2003-01-09 2009-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Framework to enable integration of anti-spam technologies
US7725544B2 (en) * 2003-01-24 2010-05-25 Aol Inc. Group based spam classification
US7089241B1 (en) * 2003-01-24 2006-08-08 America Online, Inc. Classifier tuning based on data similarities
US20040176072A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-09 Gellens Randall C. Simplified handling of, blocking of, and credit for undesired messaging
US7299261B1 (en) * 2003-02-20 2007-11-20 Mailfrontier, Inc. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Sonicwall, Inc. Message classification using a summary
US7917620B2 (en) * 2003-02-20 2011-03-29 Nokia Corporation Communication system
US8266215B2 (en) * 2003-02-20 2012-09-11 Sonicwall, Inc. Using distinguishing properties to classify messages
US7406502B1 (en) * 2003-02-20 2008-07-29 Sonicwall, Inc. Method and system for classifying a message based on canonical equivalent of acceptable items included in the message
US7913176B1 (en) 2003-03-03 2011-03-22 Aol Inc. Applying access controls to communications with avatars
US7219148B2 (en) * 2003-03-03 2007-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Feedback loop for spam prevention
US7908554B1 (en) 2003-03-03 2011-03-15 Aol Inc. Modifying avatar behavior based on user action or mood
US7484176B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2009-01-27 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Reactive avatars
US20040177120A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2004-09-09 Kirsch Steven T. Method for filtering e-mail messages
US20050091320A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-28 Kirsch Steven T. Method and system for categorizing and processing e-mails
US20050091319A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-28 Kirsch Steven T. Database for receiving, storing and compiling information about email messages
US7366761B2 (en) * 2003-10-09 2008-04-29 Abaca Technology Corporation Method for creating a whitelist for processing e-mails
US7206814B2 (en) * 2003-10-09 2007-04-17 Propel Software Corporation Method and system for categorizing and processing e-mails
US20050080857A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-14 Kirsch Steven T. Method and system for categorizing and processing e-mails
US7603417B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2009-10-13 Aol Llc Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user
US7546348B2 (en) * 2003-05-05 2009-06-09 Sonicwall, Inc. Message handling with selective user participation
US20050187913A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2005-08-25 Yoram Nelken Web-based customer service interface
US8495002B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2013-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Software tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US7590695B2 (en) 2003-05-09 2009-09-15 Aol Llc Managing electronic messages
US20050108340A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2005-05-19 Matt Gleeson Method and apparatus for filtering email spam based on similarity measures
US7657599B2 (en) * 2003-05-29 2010-02-02 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically updating electronic mail access lists
US8145710B2 (en) * 2003-06-18 2012-03-27 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module
US7739602B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2010-06-15 Aol Inc. System and method for community centric resource sharing based on a publishing subscription model
US7562119B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2009-07-14 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically updating electronic mail access lists
US8214437B1 (en) * 2003-07-21 2012-07-03 Aol Inc. Online adaptive filtering of messages
US7653693B2 (en) 2003-09-05 2010-01-26 Aol Llc Method and system for capturing instant messages
US8112483B1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2012-02-07 Emigh Aaron T Enhanced challenge-response
ATE370466T1 (en) * 2003-09-15 2007-09-15 Philippe Baumard METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT OF DIGITAL NEWS
US7610342B1 (en) * 2003-10-21 2009-10-27 Microsoft Corporation System and method for analyzing and managing spam e-mail
US7395314B2 (en) 2003-10-28 2008-07-01 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for governing the performance of high volume electronic mail delivery
WO2005043846A1 (en) * 2003-11-03 2005-05-12 Adva Technologies Ltd Apparatus and method for filtering unwanted e-mail
US7620690B1 (en) 2003-11-20 2009-11-17 Lashback, LLC Privacy control system for electronic communication
US7660857B2 (en) * 2003-11-21 2010-02-09 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically updating electronic mail access lists
US7730137B1 (en) 2003-12-22 2010-06-01 Aol Inc. Restricting the volume of outbound electronic messages originated by a single entity
US7548956B1 (en) 2003-12-30 2009-06-16 Aol Llc Spam control based on sender account characteristics
US20050198145A1 (en) * 2004-01-12 2005-09-08 Xerox Corporation Pay e-mail methods and systems
US7693943B2 (en) * 2004-01-23 2010-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Classification of electronic mail into multiple directories based upon their spam-like properties
CA2457478A1 (en) * 2004-02-12 2005-08-12 Opersys Inc. System and method for warranting electronic mail using a hybrid public key encryption scheme
US7653695B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2010-01-26 Ironport Systems, Inc. Collecting, aggregating, and managing information relating to electronic messages
US10257164B2 (en) 2004-02-27 2019-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Classifying e-mail connections for policy enforcement
US8635273B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2014-01-21 Aol Inc. Announcing new users of an electronic communications system to existing users
US8595146B1 (en) 2004-03-15 2013-11-26 Aol Inc. Social networking permissions
US7756930B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2010-07-13 Ironport Systems, Inc. Techniques for determining the reputation of a message sender
US7849142B2 (en) * 2004-05-29 2010-12-07 Ironport Systems, Inc. Managing connections, messages, and directory harvest attacks at a server
US7873695B2 (en) * 2004-05-29 2011-01-18 Ironport Systems, Inc. Managing connections and messages at a server by associating different actions for both different senders and different recipients
US7693945B1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2010-04-06 Google Inc. System for reclassification of electronic messages in a spam filtering system
US8832316B2 (en) * 2004-09-28 2014-09-09 Presto Services Inc. Method and system for message delivery using a secure device and simple output without the use of a personal computer
US7454778B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2008-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Enforcing rights management through edge email servers
US9002949B2 (en) 2004-12-01 2015-04-07 Google Inc. Automatically enabling the forwarding of instant messages
US8060566B2 (en) 2004-12-01 2011-11-15 Aol Inc. Automatically enabling the forwarding of instant messages
US7730143B1 (en) 2004-12-01 2010-06-01 Aol Inc. Prohibiting mobile forwarding
US9652809B1 (en) 2004-12-21 2017-05-16 Aol Inc. Using user profile information to determine an avatar and/or avatar characteristics
US7921369B2 (en) * 2004-12-30 2011-04-05 Aol Inc. Mood-based organization and display of instant messenger buddy lists
US7577709B1 (en) 2005-02-17 2009-08-18 Aol Llc Reliability measure for a classifier
WO2006122055A2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2006-11-16 Ironport Systems, Inc. Method of determining network addresses of senders of electronic mail messages
US7765265B1 (en) 2005-05-11 2010-07-27 Aol Inc. Identifying users sharing common characteristics
US7606580B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2009-10-20 Aol Llc Personalized location information for mobile devices
JP4559295B2 (en) * 2005-05-17 2010-10-06 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Data communication system and data communication method
US8131805B2 (en) * 2006-03-01 2012-03-06 Research In Motion Limited Multilevel anti-spam system and method with load balancing
US7685271B1 (en) * 2006-03-30 2010-03-23 Symantec Corporation Distributed platform for testing filtering rules
US20080028029A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-01-31 Hart Matt E Method and apparatus for determining whether an email message is spam
US8726195B2 (en) 2006-09-05 2014-05-13 Aol Inc. Enabling an IM user to navigate a virtual world
US8078625B1 (en) 2006-09-11 2011-12-13 Aol Inc. URL-based content categorization
US8510388B2 (en) * 2006-11-13 2013-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Tracking messages in a mentoring environment
US8224905B2 (en) * 2006-12-06 2012-07-17 Microsoft Corporation Spam filtration utilizing sender activity data
US8948046B2 (en) 2007-04-27 2015-02-03 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Routing method and system for a wireless network
US20090006532A1 (en) * 2007-06-28 2009-01-01 Yahoo! Inc. Dynamic phishing protection in instant messaging
US8285737B1 (en) 2008-04-10 2012-10-09 Google Inc. Selecting content for publication
US8218502B1 (en) 2008-05-14 2012-07-10 Aerohive Networks Predictive and nomadic roaming of wireless clients across different network subnets
US8548503B2 (en) 2008-08-28 2013-10-01 Aol Inc. Methods and system for providing location-based communication services
US9674892B1 (en) 2008-11-04 2017-06-06 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Exclusive preshared key authentication
US9424407B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2016-08-23 International Business Machines Corporation Weak password support in a multi-user environment
US8483194B1 (en) 2009-01-21 2013-07-09 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Airtime-based scheduling
US10558949B2 (en) * 2009-05-20 2020-02-11 International Business Machines Corporation User-configured alternate email rendering
US9900251B1 (en) 2009-07-10 2018-02-20 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Bandwidth sentinel
US11115857B2 (en) 2009-07-10 2021-09-07 Extreme Networks, Inc. Bandwidth sentinel
SG177015A1 (en) * 2010-06-07 2012-01-30 Boxsentry Pte Ltd In situ correction of false-positive errors in messaging security systems (lagotto)
US8671187B1 (en) 2010-07-27 2014-03-11 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Client-independent network supervision application
US9002277B2 (en) 2010-09-07 2015-04-07 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Distributed channel selection for wireless networks
US9450781B2 (en) * 2010-12-09 2016-09-20 Alcatel Lucent Spam reporting and management in a communication network
US9384471B2 (en) 2011-02-22 2016-07-05 Alcatel Lucent Spam reporting and management in a communication network
US8650649B1 (en) * 2011-08-22 2014-02-11 Symantec Corporation Systems and methods for determining whether to evaluate the trustworthiness of digitally signed files based on signer reputation
US20130086486A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Michael James Ahiakpor Mutable Message Attributes
TWI456948B (en) * 2011-10-05 2014-10-11 Univ Southern Taiwan Tech Method for mailing
US10091065B1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2018-10-02 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Zero configuration networking on a subnetted network
EP2862301B1 (en) 2012-06-14 2020-12-02 Extreme Networks, Inc. Multicast to unicast conversion technique
US9143498B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2015-09-22 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Internetwork authentication
US20150295874A1 (en) * 2012-12-17 2015-10-15 Nokia Technologies Oy Message preloading system
US10389650B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-08-20 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Building and maintaining a network
US9769056B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-09-19 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Gateway using multicast to unicast conversion
US9762679B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-09-12 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Providing stateless network services
US9413772B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-08-09 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Managing rogue devices through a network backhaul
US20140316844A1 (en) * 2013-04-22 2014-10-23 Nipendo Ltd. Messaging engine
US9544256B2 (en) * 2013-06-28 2017-01-10 Td Ameritrade Ip Company, Inc. Crowdsourcing e-mail filtering
US9992619B2 (en) 2014-08-12 2018-06-05 Aerohive Networks, Inc. Network device based proximity beacon locating
US9942182B2 (en) * 2014-11-17 2018-04-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for cloud based IP mobile messaging spam detection and defense
US11735028B2 (en) * 2018-06-12 2023-08-22 Intergraph Corporation Artificial intelligence applications for computer-aided dispatch systems
US10656884B2 (en) * 2018-07-26 2020-05-19 Xerox Corporation System and method for automatically locking in response to a print fault a print job and notification thereof
US11050793B2 (en) 2018-12-19 2021-06-29 Abnormal Security Corporation Retrospective learning of communication patterns by machine learning models for discovering abnormal behavior
US11824870B2 (en) 2018-12-19 2023-11-21 Abnormal Security Corporation Threat detection platforms for detecting, characterizing, and remediating email-based threats in real time
WO2021178423A1 (en) 2020-03-02 2021-09-10 Abnormal Security Corporation Multichannel threat detection for protecting against account compromise
US11252189B2 (en) 2020-03-02 2022-02-15 Abnormal Security Corporation Abuse mailbox for facilitating discovery, investigation, and analysis of email-based threats
WO2021217049A1 (en) 2020-04-23 2021-10-28 Abnormal Security Corporation Detection and prevention of external fraud
US11528242B2 (en) * 2020-10-23 2022-12-13 Abnormal Security Corporation Discovering graymail through real-time analysis of incoming email
US11687648B2 (en) 2020-12-10 2023-06-27 Abnormal Security Corporation Deriving and surfacing insights regarding security threats
US11831661B2 (en) 2021-06-03 2023-11-28 Abnormal Security Corporation Multi-tiered approach to payload detection for incoming communications

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6370526B1 (en) * 1999-05-18 2002-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Self-adaptive method and system for providing a user-preferred ranking order of object sets
US6370139B2 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-04-09 Tranz-Send Broadcasting Network, Inc. System and method for providing information dispersal in a networked computing environment
US6480885B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2002-11-12 Michael Olivier Dynamically matching users for group communications based on a threshold degree of matching of sender and recipient predetermined acceptance criteria
US6598026B1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2003-07-22 Nextag.Com, Inc. Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions
US6654787B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-11-25 Brightmail, Incorporated Method and apparatus for filtering e-mail
US6807566B1 (en) * 2000-08-16 2004-10-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method, article of manufacture and apparatus for processing an electronic message on an electronic message board
US7082430B1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2006-07-25 Accenture Llp Collaboration planning in a collaborative work tool architecture

Family Cites Families (132)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5121345A (en) * 1988-11-03 1992-06-09 Lentz Stephen A System and method for protecting integrity of computer data and software
US5283856A (en) * 1991-10-04 1994-02-01 Beyond, Inc. Event-driven rule-based messaging system
US5509120A (en) * 1993-11-30 1996-04-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for detecting computer viruses during power on self test
US5724567A (en) * 1994-04-25 1998-03-03 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
US5870549A (en) * 1995-04-28 1999-02-09 Bobo, Ii; Charles R. Systems and methods for storing, delivering, and managing messages
US5619648A (en) * 1994-11-30 1997-04-08 Lucent Technologies Inc. Message filtering techniques
US5805911A (en) * 1995-02-01 1998-09-08 Microsoft Corporation Word prediction system
US5623600A (en) * 1995-09-26 1997-04-22 Trend Micro, Incorporated Virus detection and removal apparatus for computer networks
US6101531A (en) * 1995-12-19 2000-08-08 Motorola, Inc. System for communicating user-selected criteria filter prepared at wireless client to communication server for filtering data transferred from host to said wireless client
US5765028A (en) * 1996-05-07 1998-06-09 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for providing neural intelligence to a mail query agent in an online analytical processing system
US6396513B1 (en) * 1996-05-14 2002-05-28 At&T Corp. Electronic message sorting and notification system
US6453327B1 (en) 1996-06-10 2002-09-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying and discarding junk electronic mail
US5832208A (en) * 1996-09-05 1998-11-03 Cheyenne Software International Sales Corp. Anti-virus agent for use with databases and mail servers
US6144934A (en) 1996-09-18 2000-11-07 Secure Computing Corporation Binary filter using pattern recognition
US5845285A (en) 1997-01-07 1998-12-01 Klein; Laurence C. Computer system and method of data analysis
US5898836A (en) * 1997-01-14 1999-04-27 Netmind Services, Inc. Change-detection tool indicating degree and location of change of internet documents by comparison of cyclic-redundancy-check(CRC) signatures
CA2282502A1 (en) 1997-02-25 1998-08-27 Intervoice Limited Partnership E-mail server for message filtering and routing
US6092101A (en) * 1997-06-16 2000-07-18 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for filtering mail messages for a plurality of client computers connected to a mail service system
US6047277A (en) * 1997-06-19 2000-04-04 Parry; Michael H. Self-organizing neural network for plain text categorization
US6073142A (en) 1997-06-23 2000-06-06 Park City Group Automated post office based rule analysis of e-mail messages and other data objects for controlled distribution in network environments
JPH1115756A (en) * 1997-06-24 1999-01-22 Omron Corp Electronic mail discrimination method, device, therefor and storage medium
US6615241B1 (en) * 1997-07-18 2003-09-02 Net Exchange, Llc Correspondent-centric management email system uses message-correspondent relationship data table for automatically linking a single stored message with its correspondents
US6199102B1 (en) 1997-08-26 2001-03-06 Christopher Alan Cobb Method and system for filtering electronic messages
US6266664B1 (en) * 1997-10-01 2001-07-24 Rulespace, Inc. Method for scanning, analyzing and rating digital information content
US6393465B2 (en) * 1997-11-25 2002-05-21 Nixmail Corporation Junk electronic mail detector and eliminator
WO1999032985A1 (en) * 1997-12-22 1999-07-01 Accepted Marketing, Inc. E-mail filter and method thereof
US6023723A (en) * 1997-12-22 2000-02-08 Accepted Marketing, Inc. Method and system for filtering unwanted junk e-mail utilizing a plurality of filtering mechanisms
US6052709A (en) * 1997-12-23 2000-04-18 Bright Light Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for controlling delivery of unsolicited electronic mail
US5999932A (en) * 1998-01-13 1999-12-07 Bright Light Technologies, Inc. System and method for filtering unsolicited electronic mail messages using data matching and heuristic processing
US5987610A (en) 1998-02-12 1999-11-16 Ameritech Corporation Computer virus screening methods and systems
US6161130A (en) * 1998-06-23 2000-12-12 Microsoft Corporation Technique which utilizes a probabilistic classifier to detect "junk" e-mail by automatically updating a training and re-training the classifier based on the updated training set
US6108703A (en) * 1998-07-14 2000-08-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Global hosting system
US6167434A (en) 1998-07-15 2000-12-26 Pang; Stephen Y. Computer code for removing junk e-mail messages
US6356935B1 (en) * 1998-08-14 2002-03-12 Xircom Wireless, Inc. Apparatus and method for an authenticated electronic userid
GB9825102D0 (en) * 1998-11-16 1999-01-13 Insignia Solutions Plc Computer system
US6189002B1 (en) * 1998-12-14 2001-02-13 Dolphin Search Process and system for retrieval of documents using context-relevant semantic profiles
US6643686B1 (en) * 1998-12-18 2003-11-04 At&T Corp. System and method for counteracting message filtering
US6615242B1 (en) 1998-12-28 2003-09-02 At&T Corp. Automatic uniform resource locator-based message filter
US6266692B1 (en) * 1999-01-04 2001-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method for blocking all unwanted e-mail (SPAM) using a header-based password
US6330590B1 (en) 1999-01-05 2001-12-11 William D. Cotten Preventing delivery of unwanted bulk e-mail
US6609205B1 (en) * 1999-03-18 2003-08-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Network intrusion detection signature analysis using decision graphs
US6393423B1 (en) * 1999-04-08 2002-05-21 James Francis Goedken Apparatus and methods for electronic information exchange
US7213061B1 (en) * 1999-04-29 2007-05-01 Amx Llc Internet control system and method
US6393464B1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2002-05-21 Unbound Communications, Inc. Method for controlling the delivery of electronic mail messages
US7164413B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2007-01-16 Digimarc Corporation Enhanced input peripheral
US7006993B1 (en) 1999-05-28 2006-02-28 The Coca-Cola Company Method and apparatus for surrogate control of network-based electronic transactions
US6718367B1 (en) * 1999-06-01 2004-04-06 General Interactive, Inc. Filter for modeling system and method for handling and routing of text-based asynchronous communications
US6546390B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2003-04-08 Abuzz Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for evaluating relevancy of messages to users
CN1293478C (en) 1999-06-30 2007-01-03 倾向探测公司 Method and apparatus for monitoring traffic in a network
WO2001016695A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2001-03-08 Katsikas Peter L System for eliminating unauthorized electronic mail
GB9920905D0 (en) * 1999-09-03 1999-11-10 Sgs Thomson Microelectronics A relocation format for linking
US6687740B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2004-02-03 Neostar, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for preventing the proliferation of unwanted electronic messages
US7281268B2 (en) * 1999-11-14 2007-10-09 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for detection of unwanted processes
US6321267B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2001-11-20 Escom Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering junk email
US6460050B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-10-01 Mark Raymond Pace Distributed content identification system
US7007080B2 (en) * 1999-12-23 2006-02-28 Solution Inc Limited System for reconfiguring and registering a new IP address for a computer to access a different network without user intervention
US7072942B1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2006-07-04 Microsoft Corporation Email filtering methods and systems
AU2001240005B2 (en) * 2000-03-03 2005-11-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for participating in group communication services in an existing communication system
US6691156B1 (en) * 2000-03-10 2004-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method for restricting delivery of unsolicited E-mail
EP1137236A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2001-09-26 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Processing network address identifiers
US20020001307A1 (en) * 2000-05-20 2002-01-03 Equipe Communications Corporation VPI/VCI availability index
US7225244B2 (en) * 2000-05-20 2007-05-29 Ciena Corporation Common command interface
US7213062B1 (en) * 2000-06-01 2007-05-01 General Instrument Corporation Self-publishing network directory
US6609081B1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2003-08-19 Astec International Limited Automated expansion analyzer for telecommunications power systems
US6901519B1 (en) 2000-06-22 2005-05-31 Infobahn, Inc. E-mail virus protection system and method
US8204082B2 (en) * 2000-06-23 2012-06-19 Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. Transparent provisioning of services over a network
US7725602B2 (en) * 2000-07-19 2010-05-25 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Domain name resolution using a distributed DNS network
US7574499B1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2009-08-11 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Global traffic management system using IP anycast routing and dynamic load-balancing
US7716367B1 (en) * 2000-07-20 2010-05-11 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Network performance monitoring in a content delivery service
US6772196B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2004-08-03 Propel Software Corp. Electronic mail filtering system and methods
US6779021B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2004-08-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for predicting and managing undesirable electronic mail
AU2001288463A1 (en) 2000-08-30 2002-03-13 Citibank, N.A. Method and system for internet hosting and security
US20020035566A1 (en) 2000-09-20 2002-03-21 Choicepoint, Inc. Method and system for the wireless delivery of images
US6650890B1 (en) 2000-09-29 2003-11-18 Postini, Inc. Value-added electronic messaging services and transparent implementation thereof using intermediate server
US6802012B1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2004-10-05 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Scanning computer files for unwanted properties
US6757830B1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2004-06-29 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Detecting unwanted properties in received email messages
US6748422B2 (en) * 2000-10-19 2004-06-08 Ebay Inc. System and method to control sending of unsolicited communications relating to a plurality of listings in a network-based commerce facility
US6963904B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2005-11-08 Gateway Inc. Method for correlating an electronic mail message with related messages
US8219620B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2012-07-10 Mcafee, Inc. Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US7647411B1 (en) * 2001-02-26 2010-01-12 Symantec Corporation System and method for controlling distribution of network communications
WO2002069108A2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2002-09-06 Eprivacy Group, Inc. System and method for controlling distribution of network communications
US7590684B2 (en) * 2001-07-06 2009-09-15 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. System providing methodology for access control with cooperative enforcement
US7149189B2 (en) 2001-07-17 2006-12-12 Mcafee, Inc. Network data retrieval and filter systems and methods
US7047297B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2006-05-16 Mcafee, Inc. Hierarchically organizing network data collected from full time recording machines and efficiently filtering the same
US7162698B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2007-01-09 Mcafee, Inc. Sliding window packet management systems
US7016939B1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2006-03-21 Mcafee, Inc. Intelligent SPAM detection system using statistical analysis
US6769016B2 (en) * 2001-07-26 2004-07-27 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Intelligent SPAM detection system using an updateable neural analysis engine
US7647376B1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2010-01-12 Mcafee, Inc. SPAM report generation system and method
US8880709B2 (en) 2001-09-12 2014-11-04 Ericsson Television Inc. Method and system for scheduled streaming of best effort data
US7545754B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2009-06-09 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Geographically adjacent access router discovery and caching for mobile nodes
GB2384659B (en) * 2002-01-25 2004-01-14 F Secure Oyj Anti-virus protection at a network gateway
EP1476819B1 (en) 2002-02-19 2009-04-01 Postini, Inc. E-mail management services
US7096498B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2006-08-22 Cipher Trust, Inc. Systems and methods for message threat management
US6941467B2 (en) 2002-03-08 2005-09-06 Ciphertrust, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive message interrogation through multiple queues
US7865554B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2011-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Internet e-mail bridge
CA2380762A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2003-10-04 Intrinsyc Software, Inc. Internet-enabled device provisioning, upgrade and recovery mechanism
US6772292B2 (en) * 2002-06-04 2004-08-03 Isaak Garber Two area stack
JP4619788B2 (en) * 2002-10-11 2011-01-26 パナソニック株式会社 Method for protecting identification information in WLAN interconnection
US7386889B2 (en) * 2002-11-18 2008-06-10 Trusted Network Technologies, Inc. System and method for intrusion prevention in a communications network
US7970832B2 (en) * 2002-11-20 2011-06-28 Return Path, Inc. Electronic message delivery with estimation approaches and complaint, bond, and statistics panels
US20040117450A1 (en) 2002-12-13 2004-06-17 Campbell David T. Gateway email concentrator
US6732157B1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-05-04 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Comprehensive anti-spam system, method, and computer program product for filtering unwanted e-mail messages
US8380791B1 (en) 2002-12-13 2013-02-19 Mcafee, Inc. Anti-spam system, method, and computer program product
US7299261B1 (en) 2003-02-20 2007-11-20 Mailfrontier, Inc. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Sonicwall, Inc. Message classification using a summary
US8266215B2 (en) * 2003-02-20 2012-09-11 Sonicwall, Inc. Using distinguishing properties to classify messages
US20040177120A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2004-09-09 Kirsch Steven T. Method for filtering e-mail messages
US7926104B1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2011-04-12 Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. Methods and systems for network attack detection and prevention through redirection
US20050015626A1 (en) * 2003-07-15 2005-01-20 Chasin C. Scott System and method for identifying and filtering junk e-mail messages or spam based on URL content
US20050097177A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Mcumber William E. Business process for improving electronic mail
US7797443B1 (en) * 2003-12-03 2010-09-14 Microsoft Corporation System and method for detecting spam e-mail
CN101288060B (en) * 2004-05-25 2012-11-07 波斯蒂尼公司 Electronic message source reputation information system
AU2005247504B2 (en) * 2004-05-25 2008-12-18 Reflexion Networks, Inc. A system and method for controlling access to an electronic message recipient
US7756930B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2010-07-13 Ironport Systems, Inc. Techniques for determining the reputation of a message sender
US7917588B2 (en) * 2004-05-29 2011-03-29 Ironport Systems, Inc. Managing delivery of electronic messages using bounce profiles
US7873695B2 (en) * 2004-05-29 2011-01-18 Ironport Systems, Inc. Managing connections and messages at a server by associating different actions for both different senders and different recipients
US7664819B2 (en) * 2004-06-29 2010-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Incremental anti-spam lookup and update service
US7565423B1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2009-07-21 Google Inc. System and method of accessing a document efficiently through multi-tier web caching
US8037527B2 (en) 2004-11-08 2011-10-11 Bt Web Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for look-ahead security scanning
US8196199B2 (en) * 2004-10-19 2012-06-05 Airdefense, Inc. Personal wireless monitoring agent
US8032594B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2011-10-04 Digital Envoy, Inc. Email anti-phishing inspector
US7580982B2 (en) * 2004-12-14 2009-08-25 The Go Daddy Group, Inc. Email filtering system and method
US20060149823A1 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-07-06 The Go Daddy Group, Inc Electronic mail system and method
US7984163B2 (en) * 2005-01-13 2011-07-19 Flash Networks, Inc. Method and system for optimizing DNS queries
US8011003B2 (en) * 2005-02-14 2011-08-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for handling messages containing pre-selected data
WO2006122055A2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2006-11-16 Ironport Systems, Inc. Method of determining network addresses of senders of electronic mail messages
US7984493B2 (en) * 2005-07-22 2011-07-19 Alcatel-Lucent DNS based enforcement for confinement and detection of network malicious activities
US7895651B2 (en) * 2005-07-29 2011-02-22 Bit 9, Inc. Content tracking in a network security system
US8769663B2 (en) * 2005-08-24 2014-07-01 Fortinet, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting undesirable network traffic content
US7891001B1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2011-02-15 Perimeter Internetworking Corporation Methods and apparatus providing security within a network
US7774843B1 (en) * 2005-11-16 2010-08-10 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for preventing the execution of unwanted code
US7849143B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2010-12-07 Research In Motion Limited System and method of dynamic management of spam
US8601160B1 (en) 2006-02-09 2013-12-03 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for gathering information relating to electronic content utilizing a DNS server

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6370139B2 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-04-09 Tranz-Send Broadcasting Network, Inc. System and method for providing information dispersal in a networked computing environment
US6480885B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2002-11-12 Michael Olivier Dynamically matching users for group communications based on a threshold degree of matching of sender and recipient predetermined acceptance criteria
US6654787B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-11-25 Brightmail, Incorporated Method and apparatus for filtering e-mail
US6598026B1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2003-07-22 Nextag.Com, Inc. Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions
US6370526B1 (en) * 1999-05-18 2002-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Self-adaptive method and system for providing a user-preferred ranking order of object sets
US7082430B1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2006-07-25 Accenture Llp Collaboration planning in a collaborative work tool architecture
US6807566B1 (en) * 2000-08-16 2004-10-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method, article of manufacture and apparatus for processing an electronic message on an electronic message board

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8838714B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2014-09-16 Mcafee, Inc. Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US9118711B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US8984644B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-03-17 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9225686B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-12-29 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9118709B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US9117069B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Real-time vulnerability monitoring
US9118710B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc System, method, and computer program product for reporting an occurrence in different manners
US9118708B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-25 Securityprofiling, Llc Multi-path remediation
US10154055B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2018-12-11 Securityprofiling, Llc Real-time vulnerability monitoring
US10104110B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2018-10-16 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US10050988B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2018-08-14 Securityprofiling, Llc Computer program product and apparatus for multi-path remediation
US9100431B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2015-08-04 Securityprofiling, Llc Computer program product and apparatus for multi-path remediation
US9350752B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2016-05-24 Securityprofiling, Llc Anti-vulnerability system, method, and computer program product
US10021124B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2018-07-10 Securityprofiling, Llc Computer program product and apparatus for multi-path remediation
US8601160B1 (en) 2006-02-09 2013-12-03 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for gathering information relating to electronic content utilizing a DNS server
US9246860B2 (en) 2006-02-09 2016-01-26 Mcafee, Inc. System, method and computer program product for gathering information relating to electronic content utilizing a DNS server
US20130086635A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 General Electric Company System and method for communication in a network
US11695869B2 (en) 2015-04-20 2023-07-04 Youmail, Inc. System and method for identifying and handling unwanted callers using a call answering system
US11895074B2 (en) 2022-05-31 2024-02-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Systems and methods for determining scores for messages based on actions of message recipients and a network graph

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20020116463A1 (en) 2002-08-22
US8219620B2 (en) 2012-07-10
US20120185551A1 (en) 2012-07-19
US8838714B2 (en) 2014-09-16
US20120185550A1 (en) 2012-07-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8219620B2 (en) Unwanted e-mail filtering system including voting feedback
US11601450B1 (en) Suspicious message report processing and threat response
US7664812B2 (en) Phonetic filtering of undesired email messages
US7930351B2 (en) Identifying undesired email messages having attachments
US7853989B2 (en) System for eliminating unauthorized electronic mail
US6453327B1 (en) Method and apparatus for identifying and discarding junk electronic mail
US7406506B1 (en) Identification and filtration of digital communications
US9141940B2 (en) Checking electronic messages for compliance with user intent
US20180027086A1 (en) Methods, Systems, and Products for Spam Messages
US20160301705A1 (en) Suspicious message processing and incident response
WO2016164844A1 (en) Message report processing and threat prioritization
US8321512B2 (en) Method and software product for identifying unsolicited emails
EP1232431A1 (en) System for eliminating unauthorized electronic mail
GB2347053A (en) Proxy server filters unwanted email
US6810408B1 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling cascading e-mail distribution
EP3699796B1 (en) Message report processing and threat prioritization
US8560614B2 (en) Scanner-driven email message decomposition
JP2004523012A (en) A system to filter out unauthorized email
Ferreira et al. The development of the open machine-learning-based anti-spam (Open-MaLBAS)
US20230319076A1 (en) Method and system for processing data packages
WO2001004787A2 (en) Method and system for classifying users of an electronic network
CA2389472A1 (en) Method for filtering email spam

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION