US20100063964A1 - Portable Browsing Interface for Information Retrieval - Google Patents

Portable Browsing Interface for Information Retrieval Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100063964A1
US20100063964A1 US12/611,252 US61125209A US2010063964A1 US 20100063964 A1 US20100063964 A1 US 20100063964A1 US 61125209 A US61125209 A US 61125209A US 2010063964 A1 US2010063964 A1 US 2010063964A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
information
user
terms
level
hierarchy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/611,252
Other versions
US7769741B2 (en
Inventor
Richard Daniel Borovoy
Michael Graves
Michael Robert Hanson
Nagabhushan Rao Machiraju
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Apple Inc
Original Assignee
Apple Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Apple Inc filed Critical Apple Inc
Priority to US12/611,252 priority Critical patent/US7769741B2/en
Publication of US20100063964A1 publication Critical patent/US20100063964A1/en
Priority to US12/845,476 priority patent/US7984065B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7769741B2 publication Critical patent/US7769741B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/954Navigation, e.g. using categorised browsing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/951Indexing; Web crawling techniques
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99935Query augmenting and refining, e.g. inexact access
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99936Pattern matching access
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • Y10S707/99945Object-oriented database structure processing

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to information retrieval systems, and more particularly to an integrated searching/browsing retrieval system that combines the functionality of a full-text search engine with the flexibility of a browser.
  • Hierarchical browser which permits the user to view groups of documents and identify the documents within the context in which they are stored. If a document of interest is located, related documents can be easily found as well, because the user is provided with the ability to look in areas surrounding the document of interest to see other documents that are stored with it.
  • Hierarchical browsers are essentially one dimensional, in that a single tree-like structure is provided for navigating among documents.
  • This mechanism may be acceptable for single-user systems, in which the user authored the hierarchy.
  • multi-user systems such as news databases, help lines, work group databases, and the like, not all users may find the single hierarchy to be cognitively intuitive, and therefore may have difficulty navigating through the hierarchy to find documents of interest.
  • the other type of retrieval mechanism namely a full-text search engine, permits users to enter queries, and respond to those queries by returning document titles.
  • These titles may be accompanied by relevance rankings or other indicators of the degree to which each document corresponds to the query.
  • the document titles are typically presented to the user in the form of a list that may be sorted by relevance rankings, and do not provide any information regarding the context of the documents in the full database of information. Furthermore, they do not give the user the ability to browse through the spaces that are occupied by the listed documents, to locate related documents which were not selected as a result of the query.
  • Such systems tend to work best for users who are looking for specific information, and they require a certain level of skill in constructing appropriate queries, since the results are highly dependent upon the terms which the user employs as an expression of interest.
  • the present invention provides an integrated searching/browsing mechanism that enables users to construct information hierarchies that represent a cognitive framework for the organization of information, and to apply those hierarchies to any database of information.
  • the user is provided with the ability to navigate any available document database in a manner that is intuitive to that user.
  • a user can combine two or more hierarchies to locate documents which match the criteria of both hierarchies, to further refine the collection of documents that are presented to the user.
  • a significant feature of this approach is that the hierarchies can be constructed and applied independently of any particular document collection.
  • the information retrieval system of the invention is comprised of three main components.
  • Dimension files represent information hierarchies constructed by users.
  • a search and indexing system indexes information and returns lists of documents in accordance with the hierarchical structure defined in the dimension files.
  • a user interface enables the user to specify the information to be retrieved, and provides the user with the ability to browse through various hierarchical levels of information.
  • a system comprised of these components can be applied to a variety of different sources of information.
  • the system of the present invention enables users to view any collection of documents via a cognitive framework, as represented by browser hierarchies, which is useful, meaningful and comfortable to the users. It also permits the users to switch from one browser hierarchy to another, or to combine hierarchies in a single browsing experience. As a result, the user is able to browse over independent document collections, rather than being required to perform targeted searches that may limit the information presented to the user.
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an embodiment of an information retrieval system in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is an example of a hierarchical structure of folders that is used to create a dimension file
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of a window containing a number of dimension files
  • FIGS. 4-7 illustrate examples of the user interface and search results provided to a user during information retrieval sessions
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the basic operation of the information retrieval system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary hierarchy which illustrates the relevance feedback feature of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 An embodiment of an information retrieval system which is based upon the principles of the present invention is illustrated in the block diagram of FIG. 1 .
  • the three main components of the system comprise a client application 10 , one or more dimension files 12 , and a search and indexing system 14 .
  • These components interact with one or more information sources 16 , such as news databases, on-line product catalogs, help files, etc., to present documents of interest to the user.
  • information sources 16 such as news databases, on-line product catalogs, help files, etc.
  • the term “document” connotes any searchable quantum of data that is presented to the user as a unit of information.
  • a document could be a conventional text file, a graphics image, an FTP file, etc.
  • the client application 10 executes on the user's computer (not shown).
  • this application is stored together with the dimension files on a suitable computer-readable medium associated with that computer, e.g. a magnetic disk.
  • the search and indexing system 14 could also be running on the user's computer, or on a different computer to which the user's computer is connected, such as a network server.
  • the information sources 16 might also be stored on the user's computer, but more typically would be associated with one or more servers to which the user's computer is connected.
  • the dimension files 12 represent browsing hierarchies that define the relationship between various search criteria, in a manner that is comprehensible to the user.
  • the hierarchies represented by the dimension files can be created by the users themselves, as described in detail hereinafter, or they can be preexisting hierarchies having a structure about which the user is knowledgeable.
  • the client application 10 provides the interface via which the user selects one or more browser hierarchies from the dimension files 12 , as well as the information sources 16 that are to be examined for documents of interest.
  • the search and indexing system 14 constructs an index of each of the information sources 16 , in a known manner.
  • the search and indexing system can be any suitable conventional type of search engine that is capable of accepting compound boolean requests.
  • Each dimension file 12 corresponds to a browser having a structure that represents various levels of information in a hierarchical relationship that is determined by the user's personal preferences regarding the organization and content of information.
  • the user can construct a browser hierarchy by creating a series of empty, nested folders within the graphical user interface of a computer's operating system.
  • a user interface is the Finder component of the Macintosh Operating System, distributed by Apple Computer, Inc.
  • the user can create a series of folders that are nested within one another in a manner that corresponds to a desired hierarchy.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example of folders that represent a browser hierarchy entitled “Market”.
  • the first level under the main browser category heading contains three items, namely “Business”, “Education” and “Home”.
  • the Home category contains a further sublevel comprising the “Family” and “Home Office” categories.
  • the user first creates an empty folder labeled “Market”. Within this folder, the user then creates three folders respectively labeled “Business”, “Education” and “Home”. The “Home” folder contains two further folders labeled “Family” and “Home Office”.
  • the highest level folder in this case the “Market” folder, is imported into the information retrieval system, to create a corresponding dimension file.
  • the importation of the folder hierarchy into the system might be carried out by means of a suitable command on the user interface, for example.
  • the information retrieval system examines the hierarchical structure of the folders, and creates a dimension file which defines this structure.
  • the dimension files contain terms which characterize content to be gathered within the hierarchies.
  • the dimension file contains a list of terms that correspond to the names given to the folders (“business”, “education,” etc.), in a manner that identifies their hierarchical relationship to one another. These are the terms that are used by the search engine to construct queries for the information retrieval process, as described below.
  • the “Market” dimension file represents one approach that the user employs to categorize information. In a similar manner, other dimension files are created by the user to represent other approaches to information content that are intuitive to that user.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example of various dimension files that may have been established by a given user to search for information of interest.
  • the dimension files are created independently of any particular source of information. This feature enables them to be portable, so that their inherent structure can be applied to information from a variety of different sources. As a result, the user can carry the client application 10 and the dimension files 12 to any suitable information source, e.g., a library, and use them to search documents in a manner that is comfortable to that user. Furthermore, because of their portability, the dimension file can be shared by several users, and distributed to all the members of a group or enterprise.
  • the terms at the various levels of the hierarchy are used to construct queries upon which the search system 14 operates to retrieve relevant documents from selected information sources. More particularly, the terms that the user employs in constructing the browser hierarchy, e.g., the names of the folders, form components of the query. The actual terms which are used in the query are dependent upon a level within the hierarchy that is selected by the user. If the user selects the lowest level in the hierarchy, only the term associated with that level is employed in the query. Conversely, if the user selects the highest level in the hierarchy, each of the terms in that selected level and all levels below it are employed in the search query.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of the user interface that is initially provided to the user when the client application 10 is opened.
  • the upper left portion of this interface contains a pop-up menu 20 via which the user can select the information sources that are to be searched.
  • the user has selected an information source entitled “NewsCore Mirror”.
  • this particular example illustrates a single information source, the user can select any number of information sources to be searched during a given session.
  • the hierarchical browsers to be used in the searching of those information sources are selected.
  • the available browsers which correspond to the dimension files, are listed in a window pane 22 on the right side of the interface. It can be seen that these browsers correspond to the dimension files illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • a “date” browser is added to the user-specified list. This browser provides a list of dates in both relative form (e.g. 1 week ago, 1 month ago, etc.) and in absolute form.
  • the window pane 22 includes a suitable arrow button, or other equivalent form of control element, which permits the user to view the various levels of each browser hierarchy.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an example in which the user has activated the button for the “Market” hierarchy, thereby causing the next level of components in that browser to be displayed in the window pane 22 .
  • the activation of this button also causes the “Market” browser to be selected for use in the search. This selection is indicated on the left side of the interface, under the information source.
  • the user has further selected the subcategory for the home market, and then further specified the family market.
  • the documents within the chosen information source(s) which correspond to the browser selections are displayed in a search results window pane 24 .
  • These documents are selected by means of a query which is presented to the search and indexing system 14 .
  • the particular browser level chosen by the user i.e. “Family”
  • the query that is presented to the search and indexing system 14 comprises the term at this level.
  • the search and indexing system conducts a search of the information source for all documents that contain, or otherwise relate to, the term “Family”.
  • These documents are then displayed in the search results window pane 24 .
  • any other information that may be useful to the user can be displayed in the search results pane, such as size, date, etc. From this list, the user can select any individual document and review it in a separate window, in a known manner.
  • the user can expand the search by selecting a higher level within the browser hierarchy. For example, if the user moves up one level to select the “Home” category, the search and indexing system 14 then institutes a search for all documents which contain, or relate to, the word “Home”, as well as the terms which appear in all lower levels of the hierarchy that depend from the “Home” level. In this particular case, the search and indexing system 14 would locate documents that relate to the terms “Home”, “Family” and “Home Office”.
  • the present invention provides an information retrieval system which enables the user to institute a targeted search, by selecting a particular level within the browser, but also provides the flexibility to locate related documents according to the hierarchical structure of the browser, simply by moving to different levels.
  • the browser interface provides the user with a convenient mechanism to expand or contract the search query, while remaining within the context originally established by the browser hierarchy.
  • search results did not identify the particular types of documents the user was looking for, or if the user simply desires to take a different approach to searching the documents, it is possible to switch to a different browser from among those which are available. In this manner, the same source of information can be viewed from a variety of different perspectives.
  • the user can combine multiple browsers which organize the information in different manners.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example in which the user has selected a second browser entitled “Products”.
  • the documents appearing in the window pane 24 are limited to those which meet the criteria set forth by the selected level of both browsers.
  • the search and indexing system 14 performs a boolean “AND” operation on the query terms provided by the respective browsers.
  • the user has selected the “All” category within the Products browser. This selection indicates that every subcategory within the “Desktop Systems” category is to be included within the browsing criteria.
  • the browsing hierarchies that are employed in the context of the present invention are true hierarchies, in the sense that the selection of any given level within a hierarchy causes all points beneath that selected level to be contained within the search specification.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example in which the user has chosen to include all African countries in the search specification, rather than specifying one or more particular countries.
  • the information retrieval system Once the information retrieval system is activated, it first awaits selection of one or more information sources by the user, at step 30 . After the user has selected the information source(s), the system looks for a selection of an available browser hierarchy, at step 32 . Once a hierarchy, and more specifically a particular level within the hierarchy has been selected, the system examines the hierarchy at step 34 and constructs a query of the terms contained at the selected level of the hierarchy and all lower levels which depend from it. These various terms are connected by means of boolean “OR” operators. At step 36 , a determination is made whether multiple browsers have been selected.
  • each browser is examined to construct a query, as in step 34 , and the queries from all of the browsers are then combined by means of boolean “AND” operators at step 38 .
  • the search engine 14 is called at step 40 , and the query is provided to it. If needed, the search engine is also informed of the information source(s) to be searched with that query. After the search is completed, the search engine returns the results to the client application 10 , and they are displayed hi the window pane 24 , at step 42 .
  • the information retrieval system can analyze a selected document to identify branches of the browsing hierarchy with which that document is most closely associated.
  • This feature of the invention is explained with reference to the exemplary hierarchy illustrated in FIG. 9 .
  • the user has selected a browser hierarchy, or a level within a hierarchy, that relates to handheld computing products.
  • the first sublevel contains two entries, namely “Palmtop Computers” and “Pocket Devices”. Each of these two subcategories contains further subsidiary levels, as shown.
  • the user can select one of the documents in the displayed results.
  • the contents of that given document are examined, to determine how many times each of the terms in the relevant hierarchy appear within the document.
  • a reverse indexing approach is employed, in which the words in the document are compared against the terms in the browser hierarchy, to determine which of those terms appears most frequently.
  • the number of times each term appears in a selected document is indicated in parentheses.
  • the term “Model 2000” appeared three times, and the terms “Model 3000” and “PDA” each appeared once.
  • the values for each of its dependent levels are summed. In the illustrated example, therefore, the category “Palmtop Computers” is given a value of 4, and the category “Pocket Device” has a value of 1.
  • the values that are associated with the levels in the hierarchy identify the concepts in the hierarchy that are most frequently mentioned in the selected document. These values can be displayed on the interface, to provide feedback to the user on the type of relevance associated with the document. From this information, the user can modify the selection within the browser hierarchy. For instance, in the example of FIG. 9 , the user might change the selection from the more general “Handheld Products” category to the more specific “Palmtop Computers” category. As a result of this change, the user is provided with the capability to more easily browse other documents that are nearby, or more closely related to, the selected document.
  • the client application could automatically reposition the browsing hierarchy to the location that most closely corresponds to the selected document's location, as indicated by the computed values.
  • the present invention provides an information retrieval system that allows users to employ any knowledge that they may have about the information they are looking for to construct a cognitive framework within which to locate that information.
  • This framework in the form of browser hierarchies, is independent of the actual information to be searched, and therefore can be readily distributed to various users and applied to different sources of information as desired.
  • the user has the continual ability to switch among alternative browsers, combine multiple browsers, and create additional contextual hierarchies, to fit any particular situation. By using these hierarchies to locate potentially relevant documents, the user is able to browse in spaces around those documents that are organized in accordance with the cognitive framework established by the user.

Abstract

An integrated searching/browsing mechanism employs user-constructed information hierarchies that represent a cognitive framework for the organization of information. The hierarchies are independent of the information itself. This feature permits them to be shared among multiple users, and applied to any of a variety of different sources of information. The hierarchical organization that is provided by the framework gives the user the ability to browse around any available document database in a manner that is intuitive to the user. Two or more hierarchies can be combined to locate documents which match the criteria of both hierarchies, and thereby refine search results to an appropriate level. A relevance feedback mechanism further enhances the browsing experience, by concentrating the search results in areas that are most relevant to documents selected as being of particular interest.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/406,439, filed Apr. 4, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,613,684, issued Nov. 3, 2009, which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/150,086, filed May 20, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,574,620, issued Jun. 3, 2003, which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 09/176,116, filed Oct. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,418,429, issued Jul. 9, 2002.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to information retrieval systems, and more particularly to an integrated searching/browsing retrieval system that combines the functionality of a full-text search engine with the flexibility of a browser.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • As greater amounts of information continue to be stored on, and accessed by, computerized information services, mechanisms which enable a user to locate and review information of interest become a critical component of an information retrieval system. Typically, one of two different types of mechanisms is employed by users to access documents that are relevant to their needs or interests. One such mechanism is the hierarchical browser, which permits the user to view groups of documents and identify the documents within the context in which they are stored. If a document of interest is located, related documents can be easily found as well, because the user is provided with the ability to look in areas surrounding the document of interest to see other documents that are stored with it. Hierarchical browsers are essentially one dimensional, in that a single tree-like structure is provided for navigating among documents. This mechanism may be acceptable for single-user systems, in which the user authored the hierarchy. However, in multi-user systems, such as news databases, help lines, work group databases, and the like, not all users may find the single hierarchy to be cognitively intuitive, and therefore may have difficulty navigating through the hierarchy to find documents of interest.
  • The other type of retrieval mechanism, namely a full-text search engine, permits users to enter queries, and respond to those queries by returning document titles. These titles may be accompanied by relevance rankings or other indicators of the degree to which each document corresponds to the query. The document titles are typically presented to the user in the form of a list that may be sorted by relevance rankings, and do not provide any information regarding the context of the documents in the full database of information. Furthermore, they do not give the user the ability to browse through the spaces that are occupied by the listed documents, to locate related documents which were not selected as a result of the query. Such systems tend to work best for users who are looking for specific information, and they require a certain level of skill in constructing appropriate queries, since the results are highly dependent upon the terms which the user employs as an expression of interest.
  • It is an objective of the present invention to provide a document retrieval mechanism that offers the functionality of a full-text search engine, to enable a user to readily identify documents meeting that user's criteria, while at the same time offering the flexibility of a browser, to permit the user to locate related documents that may not match a specific query but which may nevertheless be of interest to the user.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with the foregoing objective, the present invention provides an integrated searching/browsing mechanism that enables users to construct information hierarchies that represent a cognitive framework for the organization of information, and to apply those hierarchies to any database of information. With this approach, the user is provided with the ability to navigate any available document database in a manner that is intuitive to that user. Furthermore, a user can combine two or more hierarchies to locate documents which match the criteria of both hierarchies, to further refine the collection of documents that are presented to the user. A significant feature of this approach is that the hierarchies can be constructed and applied independently of any particular document collection.
  • The information retrieval system of the invention is comprised of three main components. Dimension files represent information hierarchies constructed by users. A search and indexing system indexes information and returns lists of documents in accordance with the hierarchical structure defined in the dimension files. A user interface enables the user to specify the information to be retrieved, and provides the user with the ability to browse through various hierarchical levels of information. A system comprised of these components can be applied to a variety of different sources of information.
  • The system of the present invention enables users to view any collection of documents via a cognitive framework, as represented by browser hierarchies, which is useful, meaningful and comfortable to the users. It also permits the users to switch from one browser hierarchy to another, or to combine hierarchies in a single browsing experience. As a result, the user is able to browse over independent document collections, rather than being required to perform targeted searches that may limit the information presented to the user.
  • Further features of the invention, as well as the advantages achieved thereby, are described in detail hereinafter with reference to an embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an embodiment of an information retrieval system in accordance with the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is an example of a hierarchical structure of folders that is used to create a dimension file;
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of a window containing a number of dimension files; FIGS. 4-7 illustrate examples of the user interface and search results provided to a user during information retrieval sessions;
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the basic operation of the information retrieval system of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary hierarchy which illustrates the relevance feedback feature of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The following description of the invention is made with reference to specific embodiments, to facilitate an understanding of the features and principles of the invention. For instance, examples of search hierarchies are given with respect to categories of products in which a user might be interested. It will be appreciated, however, that these specific examples are merely illustrative of one application of the invention, and that the features of the invention have a broad range of applicability to a variety of different types of information, and different categorizations of that information.
  • An embodiment of an information retrieval system which is based upon the principles of the present invention is illustrated in the block diagram of FIG. 1. The three main components of the system comprise a client application 10, one or more dimension files 12, and a search and indexing system 14. These components interact with one or more information sources 16, such as news databases, on-line product catalogs, help files, etc., to present documents of interest to the user. In the context of the present invention, the term “document” connotes any searchable quantum of data that is presented to the user as a unit of information. Thus, for example, a document could be a conventional text file, a graphics image, an FTP file, etc.
  • The client application 10 executes on the user's computer (not shown). Preferably, this application is stored together with the dimension files on a suitable computer-readable medium associated with that computer, e.g. a magnetic disk. The search and indexing system 14 could also be running on the user's computer, or on a different computer to which the user's computer is connected, such as a network server. The information sources 16 might also be stored on the user's computer, but more typically would be associated with one or more servers to which the user's computer is connected.
  • The dimension files 12 represent browsing hierarchies that define the relationship between various search criteria, in a manner that is comprehensible to the user. The hierarchies represented by the dimension files can be created by the users themselves, as described in detail hereinafter, or they can be preexisting hierarchies having a structure about which the user is knowledgeable.
  • The client application 10 provides the interface via which the user selects one or more browser hierarchies from the dimension files 12, as well as the information sources 16 that are to be examined for documents of interest. The search and indexing system 14 constructs an index of each of the information sources 16, in a known manner. The search and indexing system can be any suitable conventional type of search engine that is capable of accepting compound boolean requests. Once a user has selected one or more information sources to be searched and the appropriate browser hierarchies to be employed in searching the information, the search and indexing system 14 returns a list of the documents which meet the browsing criteria. These returned documents are then displayed to the user via the interface provided by the client 10.
  • Each dimension file 12 corresponds to a browser having a structure that represents various levels of information in a hierarchical relationship that is determined by the user's personal preferences regarding the organization and content of information. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the user can construct a browser hierarchy by creating a series of empty, nested folders within the graphical user interface of a computer's operating system. One example of such a user interface is the Finder component of the Macintosh Operating System, distributed by Apple Computer, Inc. By means of such an interface, the user can create a series of folders that are nested within one another in a manner that corresponds to a desired hierarchy. For instance, FIG. 2 illustrates an example of folders that represent a browser hierarchy entitled “Market”. The first level under the main browser category heading contains three items, namely “Business”, “Education” and “Home”. The Home category contains a further sublevel comprising the “Family” and “Home Office” categories.
  • To construct this browser hierarchy, the user first creates an empty folder labeled “Market”. Within this folder, the user then creates three folders respectively labeled “Business”, “Education” and “Home”. The “Home” folder contains two further folders labeled “Family” and “Home Office”. Once the folder hierarchy has been completed, the highest level folder, in this case the “Market” folder, is imported into the information retrieval system, to create a corresponding dimension file. The importation of the folder hierarchy into the system might be carried out by means of a suitable command on the user interface, for example. In response to the selection of such a command, the information retrieval system examines the hierarchical structure of the folders, and creates a dimension file which defines this structure.
  • The dimension files contain terms which characterize content to be gathered within the hierarchies. For the particular example depicted in FIG. 2, the dimension file contains a list of terms that correspond to the names given to the folders (“business”, “education,” etc.), in a manner that identifies their hierarchical relationship to one another. These are the terms that are used by the search engine to construct queries for the information retrieval process, as described below.
  • The “Market” dimension file represents one approach that the user employs to categorize information. In a similar manner, other dimension files are created by the user to represent other approaches to information content that are intuitive to that user. FIG. 3 illustrates an example of various dimension files that may have been established by a given user to search for information of interest.
  • One of the significant advantages of the dimension files is that they are created independently of any particular source of information. This feature enables them to be portable, so that their inherent structure can be applied to information from a variety of different sources. As a result, the user can carry the client application 10 and the dimension files 12 to any suitable information source, e.g., a library, and use them to search documents in a manner that is comfortable to that user. Furthermore, because of their portability, the dimension file can be shared by several users, and distributed to all the members of a group or enterprise.
  • In the operation of the system, the terms at the various levels of the hierarchy are used to construct queries upon which the search system 14 operates to retrieve relevant documents from selected information sources. More particularly, the terms that the user employs in constructing the browser hierarchy, e.g., the names of the folders, form components of the query. The actual terms which are used in the query are dependent upon a level within the hierarchy that is selected by the user. If the user selects the lowest level in the hierarchy, only the term associated with that level is employed in the query. Conversely, if the user selects the highest level in the hierarchy, each of the terms in that selected level and all levels below it are employed in the search query. For instance, all of the terms can be joined with boolean “OR” operators, to retrieve all documents that contain any of the teems in the selected level and all dependent levels of the browser hierarchy. This operation is explained in greater detail hereinafter with reference to specific examples that are illustrated in FIGS. 4-7.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of the user interface that is initially provided to the user when the client application 10 is opened. The upper left portion of this interface contains a pop-up menu 20 via which the user can select the information sources that are to be searched. In this particular example, the user has selected an information source entitled “NewsCore Mirror”. Although this particular example illustrates a single information source, the user can select any number of information sources to be searched during a given session.
  • Once the user has selected the appropriate information sources, the hierarchical browsers to be used in the searching of those information sources are selected. The available browsers, which correspond to the dimension files, are listed in a window pane 22 on the right side of the interface. It can be seen that these browsers correspond to the dimension files illustrated in FIG. 3. In addition to the dimension files that were created by users, a “date” browser is added to the user-specified list. This browser provides a list of dates in both relative form (e.g. 1 week ago, 1 month ago, etc.) and in absolute form.
  • The window pane 22 includes a suitable arrow button, or other equivalent form of control element, which permits the user to view the various levels of each browser hierarchy. FIG. 5 illustrates an example in which the user has activated the button for the “Market” hierarchy, thereby causing the next level of components in that browser to be displayed in the window pane 22. The activation of this button also causes the “Market” browser to be selected for use in the search. This selection is indicated on the left side of the interface, under the information source. In the particular example of FIG. 5, within the “Market” browser, the user has further selected the subcategory for the home market, and then further specified the family market.
  • Once these selections have been made by the user, the documents within the chosen information source(s) which correspond to the browser selections are displayed in a search results window pane 24. These documents are selected by means of a query which is presented to the search and indexing system 14. Referring to the hierarchy illustrated in FIG. 2, the particular browser level chosen by the user, i.e. “Family”, is at the lowest level of its corresponding branch of the hierarchy. In this case, the query that is presented to the search and indexing system 14 comprises the term at this level. In other words, the search and indexing system conducts a search of the information source for all documents that contain, or otherwise relate to, the term “Family”. These documents are then displayed in the search results window pane 24. In addition to the titles of the documents, any other information that may be useful to the user can be displayed in the search results pane, such as size, date, etc. From this list, the user can select any individual document and review it in a separate window, in a known manner.
  • The user can expand the search by selecting a higher level within the browser hierarchy. For example, if the user moves up one level to select the “Home” category, the search and indexing system 14 then institutes a search for all documents which contain, or relate to, the word “Home”, as well as the terms which appear in all lower levels of the hierarchy that depend from the “Home” level. In this particular case, the search and indexing system 14 would locate documents that relate to the terms “Home”, “Family” and “Home Office”. By means of this approach, it can be seen that the present invention provides an information retrieval system which enables the user to institute a targeted search, by selecting a particular level within the browser, but also provides the flexibility to locate related documents according to the hierarchical structure of the browser, simply by moving to different levels. The browser interface provides the user with a convenient mechanism to expand or contract the search query, while remaining within the context originally established by the browser hierarchy.
  • If the search results did not identify the particular types of documents the user was looking for, or if the user simply desires to take a different approach to searching the documents, it is possible to switch to a different browser from among those which are available. In this manner, the same source of information can be viewed from a variety of different perspectives.
  • To further refine the search results, the user can combine multiple browsers which organize the information in different manners. For instance, FIG. 6 illustrates an example in which the user has selected a second browser entitled “Products”. In this case, the documents appearing in the window pane 24 are limited to those which meet the criteria set forth by the selected level of both browsers. In other words, the search and indexing system 14 performs a boolean “AND” operation on the query terms provided by the respective browsers. By selecting multiple browsers in this manner, complex and specific search criteria can be generated without requiring the user to know how to construct boolean searches or to be familiar with the vocabulary of the particular document collection that is being searched.
  • In the example of FIG. 6, the user has selected the “All” category within the Products browser. This selection indicates that every subcategory within the “Desktop Systems” category is to be included within the browsing criteria. Thus, the browsing hierarchies that are employed in the context of the present invention are true hierarchies, in the sense that the selection of any given level within a hierarchy causes all points beneath that selected level to be contained within the search specification. For instance, FIG. 7 illustrates an example in which the user has chosen to include all African countries in the search specification, rather than specifying one or more particular countries.
  • To summarize the general operation of the information retrieval system of the present invention, a brief functional overview is provided in the flow chart of FIG. 8. Once the information retrieval system is activated, it first awaits selection of one or more information sources by the user, at step 30. After the user has selected the information source(s), the system looks for a selection of an available browser hierarchy, at step 32. Once a hierarchy, and more specifically a particular level within the hierarchy has been selected, the system examines the hierarchy at step 34 and constructs a query of the terms contained at the selected level of the hierarchy and all lower levels which depend from it. These various terms are connected by means of boolean “OR” operators. At step 36, a determination is made whether multiple browsers have been selected. If so, each browser is examined to construct a query, as in step 34, and the queries from all of the browsers are then combined by means of boolean “AND” operators at step 38. Once the construction of the query in this manner has been completed, the search engine 14 is called at step 40, and the query is provided to it. If needed, the search engine is also informed of the information source(s) to be searched with that query. After the search is completed, the search engine returns the results to the client application 10, and they are displayed hi the window pane 24, at step 42.
  • To further enhance the user's experience of browsing a document collection, as opposed to executing a targeted search, the information retrieval system can analyze a selected document to identify branches of the browsing hierarchy with which that document is most closely associated. This feature of the invention is explained with reference to the exemplary hierarchy illustrated in FIG. 9. In this particular example, the user has selected a browser hierarchy, or a level within a hierarchy, that relates to handheld computing products. The first sublevel contains two entries, namely “Palmtop Computers” and “Pocket Devices”. Each of these two subcategories contains further subsidiary levels, as shown.
  • Once a search is conducted in accordance with the selected level of the browser hierarchy and the search results are displayed, the user can select one of the documents in the displayed results. The contents of that given document are examined, to determine how many times each of the terms in the relevant hierarchy appear within the document. In effect, a reverse indexing approach is employed, in which the words in the document are compared against the terms in the browser hierarchy, to determine which of those terms appears most frequently. In the example of FIG. 9, the number of times each term appears in a selected document is indicated in parentheses. Thus, the term “Model 2000” appeared three times, and the terms “Model 3000” and “PDA” each appeared once. For each level of the hierarchy above the lowest level, the values for each of its dependent levels are summed. In the illustrated example, therefore, the category “Palmtop Computers” is given a value of 4, and the category “Pocket Device” has a value of 1.
  • The values that are associated with the levels in the hierarchy identify the concepts in the hierarchy that are most frequently mentioned in the selected document. These values can be displayed on the interface, to provide feedback to the user on the type of relevance associated with the document. From this information, the user can modify the selection within the browser hierarchy. For instance, in the example of FIG. 9, the user might change the selection from the more general “Handheld Products” category to the more specific “Palmtop Computers” category. As a result of this change, the user is provided with the capability to more easily browse other documents that are nearby, or more closely related to, the selected document.
  • As an alternative, rather than display the results that are obtained through this analysis, the client application could automatically reposition the browsing hierarchy to the location that most closely corresponds to the selected document's location, as indicated by the computed values.
  • From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides an information retrieval system that allows users to employ any knowledge that they may have about the information they are looking for to construct a cognitive framework within which to locate that information. This framework, in the form of browser hierarchies, is independent of the actual information to be searched, and therefore can be readily distributed to various users and applied to different sources of information as desired. Furthermore, the user has the continual ability to switch among alternative browsers, combine multiple browsers, and create additional contextual hierarchies, to fit any particular situation. By using these hierarchies to locate potentially relevant documents, the user is able to browse in spaces around those documents that are organized in accordance with the cognitive framework established by the user.
  • It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention can be embodied in various specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalence thereof are intended to be embraced.

Claims (23)

1. An information retrieval system, comprising:
a plurality of files stored in memory, each defining a different hierarchical relationships of terms describing an organizational framework for information;
a user interface which permits a user to select a level within each of at least two of the different hierarchical relationships;
a search query generator responsive to the selection of the level within each of the at least two different hierarchical relationships to construct individual search queries of terms that are based upon the selected levels, and combine the individual search queries of terms to form a search query that is provided to a search engine, wherein the search engine searches a source of information to locate documents which correspond to the search query; and
a display which displays information about the located documents to the user.
2. The information retrieval system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the individual search queries contains the term at the selected level of the hierarchical relationship and terms from lower levels of the hierarchical relationship which depend from the selected level.
3. The information retrieval system of claim 2, wherein the terms are combined by boolean “OR” operators to form the at least one of the individual search queries.
4. The information retrieval system of claim 1, wherein the user interface permits the user to select one or more sources of information to be searched.
5. The information retrieval system of claim 1, wherein the individual search queries are combined by boolean “AND” operators to form the search query.
6. The information retrieval system of claim 1, wherein the display displays values which identify the relevance of a document to levels in the selected hierarchies, in accordance with information provided by the search engine that is based upon analysis of the document among the located documents to determine which of the terms in a hierarchy said document most closely relates to.
7. The information retrieval system of claim 6, wherein the user interface automatically selects a level within the hierarchy in accordance with the analysis of a selected document.
8. A method for locating documents within a source of information, comprising the steps of:
defining, in a computer, a plurality of different hierarchical relationships of terms describing an organizational framework for information;
selecting, in a user interface, a level within each of at least two of the different hierarchical relationships;
constructing, in a search query generator responsive to the selection of the level within each of the at least two different hierarchical relationships, individual search queries of terms that are based upon the selected levels, and combining the individual search queries of terms to form a search query that is provided to a search engine;
searching, by the search engine, a source of information to locate documents which correspond to the search query; and
displaying, on a display, information about the located documents to the user.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the individual search queries contains the term at the selected level of the hierarchical relationship and terms from lower levels of the hierarchical relationship which depend from the selected level.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the terms are combined by boolean “OR” operators to form the at least one of the individual search queries.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the user interface permits the user to select one or more sources of information to be searched.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the individual search queries are combined by boolean “AND” operators to form the search query.
13. The method of claim 8, further including the step of analyzing a selected document among the located documents to determine which of the terms in a hierarchy said selected document most closely relates to.
14. The method of claim 13, further including the step of displaying values which identify the relevance of the selected document to levels in the selected hierarchy.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the user interface automatically selects a level within the hierarchy in accordance with the analysis of a selected document.
16. A computer-readable recording medium storing a program which causes a computer to execute the steps of:
defining, in a computer, a plurality of different hierarchical relationships of terms describing an organizational framework for information;
selecting, in a user interface, a level within each of at least two of the different hierarchical relationships;
constructing, in a search query generator responsive to the selection of the level within each of the at least two different hierarchical relationships, individual search queries of terms that are based upon the selected levels, and combining the individual search queries of terms to form a search query that is provided to a search engine;
searching, by the search engine, a source of information to locate documents which correspond to the search query; and
displaying, on a display, information about the located documents to the user.
17. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 16, wherein at least one of the individual search queries contains the term at the selected level of the hierarchical relationship and terms from lower levels of the hierarchical relationship which depend from the selected level.
18. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 17, wherein the terms are combined by boolean “OR” operators to form the at least one of the individual search queries.
19. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 16, wherein the user interface permits the user to select one or more sources of information to be searched.
20. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 16, wherein the individual
search queries are combined by boolean “AND” operators to form the search query.
21. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 16, further including the step of analyzing a selected document among the located documents to determine which of the terms in a hierarchy said selected document most closely relates to.
22. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 21, further including the step of displaying values which identify the relevance of the selected document to levels in the selected hierarchy.
23. The computer-readable recording medium of claim 22, wherein the user interface automatically selects a level within the hierarchy in accordance with the analysis of a selected document.
US12/611,252 1998-10-21 2009-11-03 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval Expired - Fee Related US7769741B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/611,252 US7769741B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2009-11-03 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US12/845,476 US7984065B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2010-07-28 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/176,116 US6418429B1 (en) 1998-10-21 1998-10-21 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/150,086 US6574620B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2002-05-20 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/406,439 US7613684B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2003-04-04 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US12/611,252 US7769741B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2009-11-03 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/406,439 Continuation US7613684B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2003-04-04 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/845,476 Continuation US7984065B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2010-07-28 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100063964A1 true US20100063964A1 (en) 2010-03-11
US7769741B2 US7769741B2 (en) 2010-08-03

Family

ID=22643046

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/176,116 Expired - Lifetime US6418429B1 (en) 1998-10-21 1998-10-21 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/150,086 Expired - Lifetime US6574620B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2002-05-20 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/406,439 Expired - Fee Related US7613684B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2003-04-04 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US12/611,252 Expired - Fee Related US7769741B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2009-11-03 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US12/845,476 Expired - Fee Related US7984065B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2010-07-28 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/176,116 Expired - Lifetime US6418429B1 (en) 1998-10-21 1998-10-21 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/150,086 Expired - Lifetime US6574620B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2002-05-20 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US10/406,439 Expired - Fee Related US7613684B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2003-04-04 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/845,476 Expired - Fee Related US7984065B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2010-07-28 Portable browsing interface for information retrieval

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (5) US6418429B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090228481A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2009-09-10 Neale Richard S Graphical user interface for building boolean queries and viewing search results

Families Citing this family (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6859213B1 (en) * 1998-03-23 2005-02-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting attachments
US6418429B1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2002-07-09 Apple Computer, Inc. Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US6175830B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2001-01-16 Evresearch, Ltd. Information management, retrieval and display system and associated method
US7287214B1 (en) * 1999-12-10 2007-10-23 Books24X7.Com, Inc. System and method for providing a searchable library of electronic documents to a user
US6708172B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-03-16 Urbanpixel, Inc. Community-based shared multiple browser environment
US20020032750A1 (en) * 2000-05-16 2002-03-14 Kanefsky Steven T. Methods and systems for searching and managing information on wireless data devices
US7035864B1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2006-04-25 Endeca Technologies, Inc. Hierarchical data-driven navigation system and method for information retrieval
US7325201B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2008-01-29 Endeca Technologies, Inc. System and method for manipulating content in a hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system
US7062483B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2006-06-13 Endeca Technologies, Inc. Hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system and method for information retrieval
US7617184B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2009-11-10 Endeca Technologies, Inc. Scalable hierarchical data-driven navigation system and method for information retrieval
US20010044796A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2001-11-22 Hiroyasu Fujiwara Totalization system and recording medium
US7219302B1 (en) 2000-07-19 2007-05-15 Everez Systems Limited System and method for organizing, managing, and manipulating desktop objects with an activity-oriented user interface
US6757673B2 (en) 2000-10-09 2004-06-29 Town Compass Llc Displaying hierarchial relationship of data accessed via subject index
US6727922B2 (en) * 2001-02-21 2004-04-27 International Business Machines Corporation GUI for representing entity matches utilizing graphical transitions performed directly on the matching object
US7080328B1 (en) * 2001-03-28 2006-07-18 Ebay, Inc. Graphical user interface for filtering a population of items
US6757678B2 (en) * 2001-04-12 2004-06-29 International Business Machines Corporation Generalized method and system of merging and pruning of data trees
US7831548B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2010-11-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods that use search queries to identify related lists
US20040205046A1 (en) * 2001-11-29 2004-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation Indexing and retrieval of textual collections on PDAS
US6910037B2 (en) * 2002-03-07 2005-06-21 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for providing search results in response to an information search request
US20040098249A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2004-05-20 Yaliang Wang Method and system to utilize web resources for language vocabulary learning
US20040117366A1 (en) * 2002-12-12 2004-06-17 Ferrari Adam J. Method and system for interpreting multiple-term queries
US20050038781A1 (en) * 2002-12-12 2005-02-17 Endeca Technologies, Inc. Method and system for interpreting multiple-term queries
AU2002953500A0 (en) * 2002-12-20 2003-01-09 Redbank Manor Pty Ltd A system and method of requesting, viewing and acting on search results in a time-saving manner
CA2546514C (en) * 2003-11-17 2013-04-30 Bloomberg Lp Legal research system
US7769752B1 (en) 2004-04-30 2010-08-03 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and system for updating display of a hierarchy of categories for a document repository
US20050262054A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2005-11-24 Nokia Corporation Item type specific structured search
US7765225B2 (en) 2004-08-03 2010-07-27 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Search system
US20060047673A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Molander Mark E System and methods for controlling navigation area content via inline and dynamic search control
US7493321B2 (en) * 2005-02-23 2009-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and computer program product for creating navigation views based on historical user behavior
US8019752B2 (en) 2005-11-10 2011-09-13 Endeca Technologies, Inc. System and method for information retrieval from object collections with complex interrelationships
US7664760B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2010-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Inferred relationships from user tagged content
US8676802B2 (en) 2006-11-30 2014-03-18 Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc Method and system for information retrieval with clustering
US7809703B2 (en) * 2006-12-22 2010-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Usage of development context in search operations
US7856434B2 (en) 2007-11-12 2010-12-21 Endeca Technologies, Inc. System and method for filtering rules for manipulating search results in a hierarchical search and navigation system
US8887100B1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2014-11-11 Intuit Inc. Multi-dimensional hierarchical browsing
US8407042B2 (en) * 2008-12-09 2013-03-26 Xerox Corporation Cross language tool for question answering
US9183560B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2015-11-10 Daniel H. Abelow Reality alternate
US10346479B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2019-07-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Facilitating interaction with system level search user interface
US8515984B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2013-08-20 Microsoft Corporation Extensible search term suggestion engine
US10073927B2 (en) * 2010-11-16 2018-09-11 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Registration for system level search user interface
CN107133280A (en) * 2017-04-14 2017-09-05 合信息技术(北京)有限公司 The response method and device of feedback
US11150783B1 (en) 2019-07-29 2021-10-19 Jason Kim GUI based methods and systems for working with large numbers of interactive items

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5642518A (en) * 1993-06-18 1997-06-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Keyword assigning method and system therefor
US6070164A (en) * 1998-05-09 2000-05-30 Information Systems Corporation Database method and apparatus using hierarchical bit vector index structure
US6094649A (en) * 1997-12-22 2000-07-25 Partnet, Inc. Keyword searches of structured databases
US6212512B1 (en) * 1999-01-06 2001-04-03 Hewlett-Packard Company Integration of a database into file management software for protecting, tracking and retrieving data
US6236987B1 (en) * 1998-04-03 2001-05-22 Damon Horowitz Dynamic content organization in information retrieval systems
US6414429B2 (en) * 1998-05-14 2002-07-02 Micron Technology, Inc. Faceplates having scrubbed cathodoluminescent layers for field emission displays
US6418429B1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2002-07-09 Apple Computer, Inc. Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US6480857B1 (en) * 2001-06-07 2002-11-12 David Chandler Method of organizing hierarchical data in a relational database
US20030074369A1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2003-04-17 Hinrich Schuetze System and method for identifying similarities among objects in a collection
US6567812B1 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-05-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management of query result complexity using weighted criteria for hierarchical data structuring
US20060053142A1 (en) * 2002-11-13 2006-03-09 Danny Sebbane Method and system for using query information to enhance catergorization and navigation within the whole knowledge base
US20070203892A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2007-08-30 Business Objects, S.A. Apparatus and method for using vertical hierarchies in conjuction with hybrid slowly changing dimension tables
US20080263009A1 (en) * 2007-04-19 2008-10-23 Buettner Raymond R System and method for sharing of search query information across organizational boundaries
US20090006427A1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2009-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Managing entity organizational chart

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS61193266A (en) 1985-02-21 1986-08-27 Hitachi Ltd Information retrieving system
US4807154A (en) 1987-01-29 1989-02-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method for developing automatic replies in an interactive electronic calendaring system
US4819191A (en) 1987-01-29 1989-04-04 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic calendaring method to establish calendar floating triggers for calendared events and processes
JPH02297188A (en) 1989-03-14 1990-12-07 Sharp Corp Document preparation supporting device
JPH03129472A (en) 1989-07-31 1991-06-03 Ricoh Co Ltd Processing method for document retrieving device
US5276616A (en) 1989-10-16 1994-01-04 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for automatically generating index
US5197000A (en) 1990-07-09 1993-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method of scheduling meetings
JP2895184B2 (en) 1990-08-22 1999-05-24 株式会社日立製作所 Document processing system and document processing method
US5321833A (en) * 1990-08-29 1994-06-14 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Adaptive ranking system for information retrieval
US5317683A (en) 1990-09-10 1994-05-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for automated meeting agenda generation in a data processing system
US5239466A (en) 1990-10-04 1993-08-24 Motorola, Inc. System for selectively routing and merging independent annotations to a document at remote locations
KR950014338B1 (en) 1991-01-29 1995-11-24 삼성전자주식회사 Memo management apparatus method
JP2943447B2 (en) 1991-01-30 1999-08-30 三菱電機株式会社 Text information extraction device, text similarity matching device, text search system, text information extraction method, text similarity matching method, and question analysis device
US5428778A (en) 1992-02-13 1995-06-27 Office Express Pty. Ltd. Selective dissemination of information
US5428784A (en) 1993-03-05 1995-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for linking electronic mail and an electronic calendar to provide a dynamic response to an electronic mail message
EP0615201B1 (en) 1993-03-12 2001-01-10 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Document detection system using detection result presentation for facilitating user's comprehension
US5523945A (en) 1993-09-17 1996-06-04 Nec Corporation Related information presentation method in document processing system
US5664063A (en) 1994-12-01 1997-09-02 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic user notification of certain meeting attributes of a posted calendar event
US5963940A (en) * 1995-08-16 1999-10-05 Syracuse University Natural language information retrieval system and method
US6026388A (en) * 1995-08-16 2000-02-15 Textwise, Llc User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method
US6006221A (en) * 1995-08-16 1999-12-21 Syracuse University Multilingual document retrieval system and method using semantic vector matching
US5572643A (en) 1995-10-19 1996-11-05 Judson; David H. Web browser with dynamic display of information objects during linking
US5778362A (en) * 1996-06-21 1998-07-07 Kdl Technologies Limted Method and system for revealing information structures in collections of data items
US6028602A (en) * 1997-05-30 2000-02-22 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Method for managing contents of a hierarchical data model
US6466901B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2002-10-15 Apple Computer, Inc. Multi-language document search and retrieval system
US7096214B1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2006-08-22 Google Inc. System and method for supporting editorial opinion in the ranking of search results
US6912525B1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2005-06-28 Verizon Laboratories, Inc. Techniques for web site integration

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5642518A (en) * 1993-06-18 1997-06-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Keyword assigning method and system therefor
US6094649A (en) * 1997-12-22 2000-07-25 Partnet, Inc. Keyword searches of structured databases
US6236987B1 (en) * 1998-04-03 2001-05-22 Damon Horowitz Dynamic content organization in information retrieval systems
US6070164A (en) * 1998-05-09 2000-05-30 Information Systems Corporation Database method and apparatus using hierarchical bit vector index structure
US6414429B2 (en) * 1998-05-14 2002-07-02 Micron Technology, Inc. Faceplates having scrubbed cathodoluminescent layers for field emission displays
US6418429B1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2002-07-09 Apple Computer, Inc. Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US6212512B1 (en) * 1999-01-06 2001-04-03 Hewlett-Packard Company Integration of a database into file management software for protecting, tracking and retrieving data
US20030074369A1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2003-04-17 Hinrich Schuetze System and method for identifying similarities among objects in a collection
US6567812B1 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-05-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management of query result complexity using weighted criteria for hierarchical data structuring
US6480857B1 (en) * 2001-06-07 2002-11-12 David Chandler Method of organizing hierarchical data in a relational database
US20060053142A1 (en) * 2002-11-13 2006-03-09 Danny Sebbane Method and system for using query information to enhance catergorization and navigation within the whole knowledge base
US20070203892A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2007-08-30 Business Objects, S.A. Apparatus and method for using vertical hierarchies in conjuction with hybrid slowly changing dimension tables
US20080263009A1 (en) * 2007-04-19 2008-10-23 Buettner Raymond R System and method for sharing of search query information across organizational boundaries
US20090006427A1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2009-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Managing entity organizational chart

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090228481A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2009-09-10 Neale Richard S Graphical user interface for building boolean queries and viewing search results
US8543936B2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2013-09-24 Kendyl A. Román Graphical user interface for building Boolean queries and viewing search results

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7613684B2 (en) 2009-11-03
US7769741B2 (en) 2010-08-03
US7984065B2 (en) 2011-07-19
US6574620B2 (en) 2003-06-03
US20030191755A1 (en) 2003-10-09
US20020143757A1 (en) 2002-10-03
US6418429B1 (en) 2002-07-09
US20110040739A1 (en) 2011-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7769741B2 (en) Portable browsing interface for information retrieval
US6334131B2 (en) Method for cataloging, filtering, and relevance ranking frame-based hierarchical information structures
US7089237B2 (en) Interface and system for providing persistent contextual relevance for commerce activities in a networked environment
Godin et al. Experimental comparison of navigation in a Galois lattice with conventional information retrieval methods
US6944613B2 (en) Method and system for creating a database and searching the database for allowing multiple customized views
US6434556B1 (en) Visualization of Internet search information
Lieberman et al. Exploring the web with reconnaissance agents
US6067552A (en) User interface system and method for browsing a hypertext database
US6185553B1 (en) System and method for implementing cooperative text searching
US6631496B1 (en) System for personalizing, organizing and managing web information
Greene et al. Previews and overviews in digital libraries: Designing surrogates to support visual information seeking
Yee et al. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing
US7881981B2 (en) Methods and computer readable media for determining a macro-context based on a micro-context of a user search
English et al. Flexible search and navigation using faceted metadata
JP5097328B2 (en) Hierarchical data driven navigation system and method for information retrieval
Head et al. World wide web navigation aid
WO2003027901A1 (en) Scalable hierarchical data-driven navigation system and method for information retrieval
US7664745B2 (en) Information retrieval system and method for retrieving information
Cruz et al. A user interface for distributed multimedia database querying with mediator supported refinement
Costabile et al. An adaptive visual environment for digital libraries
EP1101174A1 (en) Resource and project management system
Cruz et al. Integrating layout into multimedia data retrieval
Fluit et al. Visualization facility
Bizzozero et al. Dynamic WAIS Book: an electronic book to publish and consult information distributed across a wide-area network
Rosengren Applying conceptual models to multimedia information retrieval

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552)

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20220803