US20100024651A1 - Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact - Google Patents

Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100024651A1
US20100024651A1 US12/182,230 US18223008A US2010024651A1 US 20100024651 A1 US20100024651 A1 US 20100024651A1 US 18223008 A US18223008 A US 18223008A US 2010024651 A1 US2010024651 A1 US 2010024651A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
membrane
alkyl
oleophobic
gas
contactor system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/182,230
Inventor
Vishal Bansal
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to US12/182,230 priority Critical patent/US20100024651A1/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BANSAL, VISHAL
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS BE AMENDED TO READ: 1 RIVER ROAD, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 12345 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021313 FRAME 0656. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS BE AMENDED TO READ: 1 RIVER ROAD, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 12345. Assignors: BANSAL, VISHAL
Priority to GB0912658.2A priority patent/GB2462178B/en
Priority to DE102009026278A priority patent/DE102009026278A1/en
Publication of US20100024651A1 publication Critical patent/US20100024651A1/en
Priority to US13/295,740 priority patent/US8317906B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/24Dialysis ; Membrane extraction
    • B01D61/246Membrane extraction
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/228Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion characterised by specific membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/229Integrated processes (Diffusion and at least one other process, e.g. adsorption, absorption)
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/62Carbon oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/77Liquid phase processes
    • B01D53/78Liquid phase processes with gas-liquid contact
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D65/00Accessories or auxiliary operations, in general, for separation processes or apparatus using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D65/08Prevention of membrane fouling or of concentration polarisation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0081After-treatment of organic or inorganic membranes
    • B01D67/0088Physical treatment with compounds, e.g. swelling, coating or impregnation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/30Polyalkenyl halides
    • B01D71/32Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
    • B01D71/36Polytetrafluoroethene
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/80Organic bases or salts
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/50Carbon oxides
    • B01D2257/504Carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/38Hydrophobic membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/77Liquid phase processes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates generally to membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contacting in process industry and, more specifically, to membrane contactors utilizing an oleophobically-treated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane.
  • Exemplary gas-liquid contacting applications can include carbon dioxide separation, natural gas sweetening, degasification of oil, and the like.
  • the removal of carbon dioxide or other compounds from gases may be desirable or necessary for a number of reasons. If a gas is to be burned as fuel or emitted into the atmosphere as a waste flow, the removal of carbon dioxide from the gas is necessary in order to satisfy the carbon dioxide emission requirements which are set by air pollution control authorities.
  • natural gas for instance, removing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the gas can satisfy sales specifications or other process-dependent requirements.
  • a removal process using absorption includes removing CO 2 from flue gas by means of an aqueous amine solution.
  • the gas to be separated is led into an absorption column where it comes into contact with amine solution, which absorbs the CO 2 molecules.
  • the solvent can then be led to a desorption process where the liquid is heated, and the CO 2 molecules are removed from the amine solvent by means of a desorption column.
  • the solvent is cooled and passed back to the absorption column, while the concentrated CO 2 is removed.
  • the amount of contact time with the solvent can determine the degree of purification for the gas. Therefore, a certain liquid surface area per volume must exist for contact with the gas in order to purify the gas. Moreover, the amount of gas which has to be treated factors into the size of the apparatus. An absorption column, therefore, can require a large diameter and height in order to treat a desired amount of gas to the desired purification. Not only does this increase the cost of the system, but it can also impact the system's utility in applications where size and weight are a particularly expensive commodity, such as in offshore installations.
  • Gas absorption membranes are used as contacting devices between a gas and a liquid flow. These membrane contactors contain a porous membrane, which promotes contact between the liquid and the gas phase. The separation is caused by the presence of an absorption liquid (e.g., an amine solvent) on one side the membrane, which selectively removes certain components from the gas flow (e.g., CO 2 ) from the other side of the membrane.
  • an absorption liquid e.g., an amine solvent
  • membrane contactors can provide up to multiple orders of magnitude more surface area per volume than the conventional absorption contactors mentioned above, due to the porous nature of the membrane. Further, membrane contactors are free from problems like channeling and flooding that can occur in packed and tray columns.
  • Membrane contactors can suffer from some drawbacks. Often times the membrane material, and the porosity thereof, is useful only for a limited range of liquids. Moreover, the pores of the membrane can block over time, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the contactor. Some membranes tend to absorb certain liquids and/or contaminating agents. The materials can clog up the pores of the membrane and prevent the desired gas from diffusing therethrough, or the membrane can no longer effectively resist penetration by the liquid phase.
  • a membrane contactor system for removing a component from a gas comprises a housing defining a gas flow path; a microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gas to flow across the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the component to diffuse therethrough; and an oleophobic coating disposed on the microporous membrane to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores.
  • a gas turbine engine comprises an exhaust treatment system configured to remove carbon dioxide from a combustion exhaust stream, wherein the system comprises: a housing defining a gas flow path and comprising a first outlet for the carbon dioxide and a second outlet for the purified exhaust; an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the exhaust stream to flow across a side of the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the membrane, wherein the pores are configured to allow the carbon dioxide to diffuse therethrough; an oleophobic enhancement coating disposed on the surfaces of structure of nodes and fibrils and configured to provide oleophobicity to the membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores; and an amine based sorbent liquid disposed on a side of the membrane opposite the exhaust stream, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid is configured to absorb the carbon dioxide from the exhaust stream to form the purified
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of gas/liquid oleophobically-treated membrane contactor
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic illustration of a portion of the membrane illustrated in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged schematic sectional illustration of a portion of the membrane in FIG. 2 , illustrating a coating disposed on the surfaces in the membrane;
  • FIG. 4 is schematic illustration of an exemplary embodiment of a membrane contactor system for carbon dioxide removal.
  • FIG. 5 is an enlarged schematic illustration of an oleophobically-treated membrane used in the membrane contactor system of FIG. 4 .
  • the membrane contactor systems described herein include an oleophobically-treated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane.
  • PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
  • the oleophobic treatment on the expanded PTFE membrane can allow for the membrane contactor system to be effective in applications covering a wider range of liquids than current membrane contactors.
  • the oleophobic treatment moreover, can increase the operating life of the membrane in the contactor by reducing the amount of blockage of pores that can occur during use.
  • the membrane contactor described herein can be disposed in any gas-liquid contacting application, such as, without limitation, carbon dioxide separation/removal, natural gas sweetening, oil degasification, and the like.
  • the membrane contactor system can replace current absorption units in a carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) separation process.
  • Employing the membrane contactor system instead of current separation technologies (e.g., packed bed scrubbers) for carbon dioxide removal can reduce the installation and operation costs of the system; reduce the space requirements and weight of the system; and improve the environmental impact of the system by reducing the amount of liquid stream carry over by the gas phase.
  • current separation technologies e.g., packed bed scrubbers
  • the membrane contactor system comprises a porous membrane and is configured to promote contact between a liquid and a gas phase.
  • the membrane When the membrane is placed between the gas and the liquid (i.e., the solvent), the liquid will not be in direct contact with the gas, which is in motion.
  • This division between the gas and liquid phases makes it possible to employ a high gas rate in the system without the liquid being carried along by the gas.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a membrane 10 .
  • the size of the pores 12 in the membrane 10 can be selected according to the following reasoning: the pores 12 are so large that the “X” gas molecules (e.g.
  • the membrane of the system described herein is advantageously treated with an oleophobic enhancement material.
  • Oleophobicity of the membrane can be rated on a scale of 1 to 8 according to AATCC test 118-1992. This test evaluates the membrane's resistance to wetting. Eight standard oils, labeled #1 to #8, are used in the test. The #1 oil is mineral oil (surface tension: 31.5 dynes/cm @ 25 degrees Celsius (° C.)) and the #8 oil is heptane (surface tension: 14.8 dynes/cm @ 25° C.). Five drops of each rated oil are placed on the membrane. Failure occurs when wetting of the membrane by a selected oil occurs within 30 seconds. The oleophobic rating of the membrane corresponds to the last oil successfully tested.
  • the membrane 10 can have an increased oleophobicity.
  • the oleophobicity of the membrane 10 is at least 1, specifically at least 2, more specifically at least 4, even more specifically at least 6, and most specifically at least 8.
  • the membrane 10 is comprised of an expanded PTFE (ePTFE).
  • ePTFE expanded PTFE
  • the ePTFE is porous, specifically microporous, with a three-dimensional matrix or lattice-type structure of nodes 22 interconnected by numerous fibrils 24 . Surfaces of the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 define numerous interconnecting pores 26 that extend through the membrane 10 between opposite sides of the membrane.
  • Expansion of the PTFE material to form the microporous structure is well known to those having skill in the art, and essentially involves stretching the PTFE at a certain rate and temperature as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566.
  • Exemplary ePTFE materials are available commercially from, for example, Tetratec #1305 (Tetratec, Philadelphia, Pa.) or Poreflon® WP-100, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Osaka, Japan.
  • the ePTFE typically provides air permeability, while being hydrophobic. This property of the ePTFE material is useful in applications where restriction of water is desirable.
  • the ePTFE material can be coated with an oleophobic material in such a way that provides oleophobic properties to the ePTFE without compromising the hydrophobicity or the permeability of the material.
  • the oleophobic treatment can adhere a coating 28 to the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 that define the pores 26 in the membrane 10 .
  • the oleophobic coating 28 can also conform to the surfaces of at least most, specifically all, the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 that define the pore 26 in the membrane 10 .
  • the coating 28 improves the oleophobicity of the membrane 10 by resisting contamination from absorption of contaminating materials. This permits the treated ePTFE membrane to be useful with a wider range of liquids and gases, because the oleophobic coated pores prevent the contaminating materials from absorbing in the membrane.
  • contaminating materials/contaminants is generally used to mean any material that is not the desired molecule to be absorbed in the membrane for the particular application, or any material that can cause blockage of the pores in the membrane.
  • the size of the pores of the oleophobically-treated ePTFE can contribute to determining the effective range of molecules that can be prevented or restricted from flow through the membrane 10 .
  • Some factors considered in choosing pore size are viscosity and pressure on the liquid side of the membrane.
  • pore size can have an effect on the rate at which gas can migrate across the membrane.
  • Exemplary average pore size can range from about 0.05 micrometers ( ⁇ m) to about 1.5 ⁇ m, specifically from about 0.2 ⁇ m to about 1.0 ⁇ m, and more specifically from about 0.5 ⁇ m to about 0.8 ⁇ m. However, larger or smaller average pore sizes may be used.
  • the average pore size of the particular membrane 10 will depend upon the intended application for the membrane contactor system, and the range of fluids involved therewith.
  • porosity of the membrane is another factor in the flow of the fluid through the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane 10 .
  • porosity of the membrane i.e., the percentage of open space in the volume of the membrane, as determined by comparison of the density of the ePTFE with respect to the density of nonporous, non-expanded PTFE.
  • Exemplary porosity of the membrane 10 can be in the range from about 20% or to about 95%. Again, depending upon the application of the membrane contactor system, the porosity of the membrane can range from about 70% to about 95%, specifically from about 80% to about 95%, and more specifically from about 85% to about 95%, for most gas-liquid contacting applications.
  • the dimensions (e.g., length, width, or diameter) of the membrane 10 can vary and will again depend on the use of the membrane contactor system.
  • a membrane contactor system used as an absorption unit for removal of CO 2 from a turbine exhaust gas can have dimensions based on, among other things, the size of the port through which the exhaust gas flows, the flow rate through the port, the average amount of CO 2 in the exhaust, the amount of CO 2 to be absorbed during the lifetime of the system, and the like.
  • the membrane contact system can comprise a single layer of oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane, or multiple layers.
  • the membrane can be configured as a hollow tube or tubes. In such a configuration, liquid can be disposed on the outside of the tube(s) and the gas can be disposed inside. Conversely, the hollow tube membrane can be as effective when the liquid is disposed within the tube(s) and the gas is disposed outside.
  • the thickness of the membrane 10 can depend, for example, on the amount of absorption desired, the average pore size of the membrane 10 , the expected or desired lifetime of the membrane contactor system, the average pore size of other possible membrane layers in the system, and the durability of the membrane 10 .
  • the thicker the membrane 10 the more restricted the flow of fluid and/or molecules through the membrane 10 .
  • the thickness of a membrane in a CO 2 separation/removal process may be determined by a balance of a desired rate of mass transport of fluid (e.g., exhaust gas) across the membrane and a desired amount of filtration of CO 2 .
  • thicknesses of the membrane in the membrane contactor system can be in a range of about 0.5 ⁇ m to about 500 ⁇ m.
  • the thickness of the membrane can range from about 4 ⁇ m to about 200 ⁇ m, specifically from about 10 ⁇ m to about 150 ⁇ m, and more specifically from about 25 ⁇ m to about 100 ⁇ m.
  • larger and smaller thicknesses can be used.
  • the membrane can be disposed on a substrate layer.
  • the substrate layer can impart strength and durability to the membrane.
  • the substrate layer can be a textile material.
  • a textile material can be a fabric, netting, and the like.
  • the membrane can be laminated to the substrate layer. The lamination of membrane to the substrate layer or layers can be by thermal means, adhesive means or the like. In this specific embodiment, the overall thickness of the system can be bigger due to the addition of the substrate.
  • the membrane 10 is treated using an oleophobic coating material, in one embodiment to increase the oleophobicity of the membrane.
  • exemplary oleophobic coating materials include fluorinated polymers, which as used herein includes homopolymers and copolymers having fluorohydrocarbon and/or perfluorohydrocarbon moieties.
  • the fluoro- or perfluorohydrocarbon moieties can be incorporated into the polymer backbone, pendant from the polymer backbone, or a combination thereof.
  • polystyrene resin a variety of different types can be used, including, for example, polyolefins, polyacrylates, polymethacrylates, polyesters, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polycarbonates, polyethers, polyamides, polyacrylamides, polysulfonamides, polysiloxanes, and polyurethanes.
  • the fluorinated polymers can be derived from polymerization of a variety of monomers or oligomers known to produce the desired backbone ands that include fluorinated or perfluorinated C 1-32 hydrocarbon moieties, in particular fluoro(C 1-32 )alkyl and/or perfluoro(C 1-32 )alkyl moieties.
  • perfluoro(C 1-16 )alkyl moieties are present, in particular, —CF 3 , —CF 2 CF 3 , and —CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 .
  • perfluoro(C 1-4 )alkylene moieties are present, in particular, —CF 2 —, —CF 2 CF 2 —, and —CF 2 CF 2 CF 2 —.
  • Exemplary monomer or oligomer units can include, for example, fluoro(C 1-16 )alkyl acrylates, fluoro(C 1-16 )alkyl methacrylates, perfluoro(C 1-16 )alkyl acrylates, perfluoro(C 1-16 )alkyl methacrylates, fluorinated and perfluorinated C 1-12 olefins such as tetrafluoroethylene, fluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl maleic acid esters, perfluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl maleic acid esters, fluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl (C 6-12 )aryl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl allyl urethan
  • the fluorinated monomers or oligomers can optionally be copolymerized with additional non-fluorinated monomers or oligomers including, for example, unsaturated hydrocarbons (e.g., olefins), (C 1-12 )alkyl acrylates, and (C 1-12 )alkyl methacrylates.
  • unsaturated hydrocarbons e.g., olefins
  • C 1-12 )alkyl acrylates e.g., olefins
  • C 1-12 )alkyl methacrylates e.g., olefins
  • oleophobic polymers include, without limitation, apolar perfluoroalkylpolyethers having —CF 3 , —CF 2 CF 3 , and ⁇ CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 moieties (PFPE), mixtures of apolar (PFPE) with polar monofunctional PFPE, polar water-insoluble PFPE with phosphate, silane, or amide end groups, mixtures of apolar PFPE with fluorinated or perfluorinated (C 1-12 )alkyl methacrylate polymers or fluorinated or perfluorinated (C 1-12 )alkyl acrylate polymers, and copolymers comprising perfluoro(C 1-3 )alkylether units and fluorinated or perfluorinated (C 1-12 )alkyl methacrylate units or fluorinated or perfluorinated (C 1-12 )alkyl acrylate units.
  • the above-mentioned polymers can be crosslinked
  • emulsions can include, without limitation, those based on copolymers of siloxanes and perfluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl-substituted acrylates or methacrylates, emulsions based on fluorinated or perfluorinated co- or terpolymers, one type of unit containing at least hexafluoropropene or perfluoroalkyl vinyl ether, emulsions based on perfluoro(C 1-12 )alkyl-substituted polyacrylates and methacrylates, and the like.
  • a specific oleophobic fluorinated polymer is a perfluoroalkyl acrylic copolymer and/or perfluoroalkyl methacrylic copolymer water-based dispersion of Zonyl® 8195, 7040, 8412, and/or 8300, available from Dupont of Wilmington, Del.
  • the microporous ePTFE membrane is rendered oleophobic by treating it with an oleophobic coating composition.
  • the process of treating the membrane can comprise any suitable method for oleophobically coating an article, and are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • Exemplary techniques can include applying the oleophobic coating composition in a liquid form, e.g., a melt, or solution, or latex dispersion of the material.
  • Exemplary methods for applying the liquid oleophobic enhancement material can include, without limitation, dipping, painting, spraying, roller-coating, brushing, and the like, over the surface of the membrane.
  • the application can be carried out until internal surfaces of the microporous membrane structure are coated with the oleophobic coating composition, but not until the pores are filled as that could lessen the gas-liquid absorption property of the membrane.
  • the presence of the oleophobic coating composition has little effect on the porosity; that is, the walls defining the voids in the microporous membrane have only a very thin coating of the oleophobic material (as illustrated in FIG. 3 ).
  • Application of the oleophobic coating composition can be achieved by varying the concentration, solids content of the solution or dispersion, and/or by varying the application temperature, or pressure.
  • an organic solvent can help to facilitate the distribution of the oleophobic fluorinated polymer throughout the microporous membrane.
  • the microporous membrane is not initially oleophobic and may be oleophilic.
  • use of an organic solvent can sometimes reduce difficulties in wetting and/or saturating the membrane structure with the oleophobic coating composition.
  • organic solvents can be used.
  • the term “organic solvent” is intended to generally refer to non-aqueous solvents and combinations of non-aqueous solvents, and, in particular, to solvents comprising organic compounds.
  • the oleophobic material is “dissolved in an organic solvent” if at least about 50 wt.
  • organic solvents can include, without limitation, alkanes, ketones, esters, ethers, alcohols, and the like, as well as combinations of these solvents.
  • exemplary organic solvents can include heptane, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, dioctyl adipate, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, isopropanol, diethyl ether, mineral spirits, petroleum distillate, and combinations thereof
  • the choice of organic solvent or solvents for use with the oleophobic material can be affected by a variety of factors including, without limitation, solubility of the oleophobic fluoropolymer, boiling point of the solvent, molecular weight of the solvent, polarity of the solvent or solvent combination, and the like.
  • the oleophobic coating composition can wet and saturate the membrane 10 .
  • the solvent can then be removed, for example, by air drying or heating.
  • the oleophobic is disposed on the membrane 10 and can impart oleophobicity to the membrane contactor system. It is possible in some embodiments to achieve covalent coupling between the oleophobic coating and the membrane.
  • the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane can be “cured” by heating. This “curing” process can possibly increase the oleophobicity by allowing rearrangement of the fluoropolymer into a specific oleophobic orientation.
  • the application of heat can permit the oleophobic fluoropolymer to flow around the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 to form the coating 28 .
  • the curing temperature can vary among the oleophobic fluoropolymers. Exemplary ranges can include from about 40° C. to about 140° C., specifically about 50° C. to about 130° C., and more specifically about 70° C. and about 125° C.
  • the fluorinated polymer is in the form of a stabilized water-miscible dispersion of the polymer solids.
  • the oleophobic fluoropolymer solids can also contain relatively small amounts of acetone and ethylene glycol or other water-miscible solvents and surfactants that were used in the polymerization reaction when the fluorinated polymer solids were made.
  • the dispersion of oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids is stabilized with a stabilizing agent, such as, but not limited to, deionized and/or demineralized water.
  • the stabilizing agent reduces the propensity of the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids from settling out and agglomerating to a size which cannot enter a pore in the membrane to be coated.
  • the coating composition may include other amounts of stabilizing agent, in some embodiments the coating composition forming coating layer includes an amount of stabilizing agent in the range of about 5 wt % to 50 wt %. For example, in some embodiments the coating composition includes an amount of stabilizing agent in the range of about 15 wt % to about 25 wt %.
  • the stabilized dispersion of oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids can be diluted in one or more suitable solvents to form the coating composition that will form coating layer.
  • suitable solvents can include, but are not limited to, water, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, acetone, methanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, N,N-dimethylformamide, methyl ethyl ketone and water soluble e-and p-series glycol ethers.
  • the solvents can have other surface tensions, in some embodiments, the coating composition includes a solvent having a surface tension of less than about 31 dynes per centimeter.
  • the coating composition is then consolidated, for example by heating the coated membrane such that the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids flow and coalesce, and such that the stabilizing agents and solvents are removed.
  • the thermal mobility of the oleophobic fluoropolymer solids allows the solids to be mobile and flow around, engage, and adhere to surfaces of the membrane, and therefore coalesce to form the coating layer.
  • the coating compositions can include an amount of oleophobic fluoropolymer solids in the range of about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % based on a total weight of the coating composition.
  • the coating composition includes oleophobic fluoropolymer solids in the range of about 0.5 wt % to about 1.5 wt %.
  • the coating composition that forms coating layer includes an amount of solvent, other than water, in the range of about 40 wt % to about 80 wt %.
  • the coating composition includes an amount of solvent, other than water, in the range of about 50 wt % to about 75 wt %.
  • the coating composition has a surface tension and a relative contact angle that enable the coating composition to wet pores in the membrane such that pores are coated with the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids in the coating composition.
  • the membrane is wet with a solution containing a solvent before the coating composition is applied to membrane such that the coating composition will pass through membrane pores and “wet-out” surfaces of membrane.
  • the thickness of coating layer formed and the amount and type of fluorinated polymer solids in the coating layer can depend on several factors, including the affinity of the solids to adhere and conform to the surfaces of the membrane that define membrane pores, the final solids content within the coating composition, the coating process, and the intended use and desired durability during use.
  • the coating composition completely encapsulate the entire surface of the membrane network, or be continuous to increase oleophobicity of the membrane. However, in one embodiment, at least 50%, specifically at least 75%, and more specifically at least 90% of the membrane surfaces are coated.
  • the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane can be advantageously employed as a membrane contactor in gas/liquid contacting applications.
  • the membrane contactor system can be particularly useful as a as the absorption unit of a CO 2 removal system for a gas turbine. While the discussion below focuses on the use of the membrane contactor in a downstream application for gas turbines, it is to be understood that the membrane contactor described herein can be employed in any system employing liquid-gas contacting technology.
  • the membrane contactor system can be particularly effective in processes where weight, size, cost, energy consumption, and environmental aspects are key concerns.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a membrane contactor system 100 that functions as a CO 2 absorption unit in a gas turbine engine system.
  • the membrane contactor system 100 is configured to remove CO 2 or other compounds from combustion gases (e.g., natural gas). With recent trends in environmental regulation, it is becoming increasingly important to cheaply and effectively remove CO 2 emissions in hydrocarbon combustion processes. Exhaust gas is created after natural gas, or some other combustive fuel, are ignited in a gas turbine for energy. After being expanded through the turbine, the exhaust gas stream 102 is fed into the absorption unit 100 . The exhaust gas stream 102 can be cooled first in order to help reduce the volume of the gas, and therefore, to reduce the size and weight of the membrane contactor system 100 .
  • combustion gases e.g., natural gas
  • the membrane contactor system is configured to remove the CO 2 from the exhaust gas stream 102 .
  • the purified gas 104 i.e., the CO 2 -free exhaust
  • exits the top of the membrane contactor system 100 and can be vented to atmosphere or further treated or recycled for energy recovery.
  • the CO 2 -rich stream 106 can exit a lower portion of the membrane contactor system 100 and continue on for further treatment, such as desorption, compression, sequestration, and the like.
  • the membrane contactor system 100 is shown cutaway to reveal the individual membrane contactors 110 disposed in the system housing 108 .
  • the membrane contactor system 100 can contain a single membrane contactor or multiple membrane contactors, and will depend on the volume of the exhaust gas, the concentration of CO 2 in the gas, and the like.
  • the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes in the CO 2 removal system can have a variety of shapes including, without limitation, sheets, hollow fibers, and the like.
  • the membranes contactors 110 comprise sheets of membranes 112 .
  • the carbon dioxide removal system of the present disclosure can comprise the venting membrane contactor system 100 with an amine based absorption liquid.
  • This system can utilize an amine-based sorbent and a membrane contactor at the appropriate partial pressure to absorb the CO 2 from the exhaust stream.
  • the amine based sorbent is configured to absorb CO 2 from the gaseous stream while the membrane contactor system, comprised of a plurality of membranes, is configured to support the amine based sorbent and separate the amine based sorbent, the gaseous stream, and the CO 2 .
  • the amine based sorbent is a liquid sorbent which is capable of absorbing CO 2 .
  • Exemplary characteristics of the amine based sorbent can include low volatility, nontoxicity, low viscosity, the ability to absorb CO 2 from low partial pressures (e.g., less than about 1 kilopascal (kPa)), and the like.
  • Exemplary amine based sorbents can include amines, such as 2-amino-2-methyl-1, 3-propanediol, 2-hydroxyethyl piperazine, methyldiethanolamine, monoethanolamine, tetraethylenepentamine, triethanolamine, polyethylene imine, and other like amine based sorbents.
  • the amine base sorbent can be a monoethanolamine (MEA).
  • a solvent can be added to the amine based sorbent.
  • Exemplary solvents can possess the same low volatility, low viscosity, and nontoxic properties of the amine based sorbent.
  • Exemplary solvents can include, without limitation, alcohols, cyclic ketone, esters, ethers, and mixtures thereof, including dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol, glycerol, methoxy triethylene, glycol diacetate, polyethylene glycol, propylene carbonate, 1,2-propylene glycol, and the like.
  • the solvent used with a particular amine base sorbent for a given application can readily be determined by one of skill in the art.
  • Exemplary factors for the selection of the solvent and the amine based sorbent can include chemical compatibility, solubility of the amine based sorbent in the solvent, absorption/desorption kinetics, nontoxicity, low viscosity, low volatility, and the like.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane 150 in one of the membrane contactors. The separation is caused by the presence of the amine based sorbent liquid 158 on one side of the membrane 150 , which selectively removes CO 2 156 from the exhaust gas flow 157 on the other side of the membrane 150 .
  • the membrane 150 is intended to provide a contacting area which prevents mixing of the exhaust gas 157 and the amine based sorbent 158 .
  • the membrane 150 is advantageously permeable to the CO 2 156 , which is required to be removed.
  • the selectivity in the separation process is derived from the amine based sorbent 158 . A highly selective separation can be achieved through an appropriate choice of the amine based sorbent 158 .
  • the removal of the exhaust gas CO 2 component is achieved by use of porous, oleophobic ePTFE membrane 150 in combination with a suitable amine based sorbent liquid 158 .
  • a suitable amine based sorbent liquid 158 As a result of the membrane oleophobicity and small pore size, the exhaust gas 157 and amine based sorbent liquid 158 can be kept separate, and exhaust contaminant are prevented from blocking the pores by the oleophobic coating of the membrane.
  • the amine based sorbent solution contacts the CO 2 in the gaseous exhaust stream within the membrane contactor.
  • the membrane contactor system 100 promotes CO 2 removal via partial pressure gradients by utilizing the plurality of oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes that contain or support the amine based sorbent.
  • the contactor system allows direct liquid-gas contact, while preventing sorbent leakage, or blockage of the pores by contaminants in the gaseous exhaust stream.
  • the membrane pore size is chosen dependent upon the operational characteristics of the amine based sorbent and the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane utilized. In an exemplary CO 2 removal system application, the membrane pore size can be less than about 0.1 ⁇ m, specifically less than about 0.05 ⁇ m.
  • gas absorption membrane contactor systems comprising oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes have several advantages over conventional contacting devices such as packed columns.
  • the compactness of the equipment through the use of hollow fiber or sheet shaped membranes is typically smaller than packed column filter media, because the membranes have a much greater surface area per volume (cm 2 /cm 3 ).
  • the height of the absorption unit in the CO 2 removal system of a gas turbine will likewise be significantly reduced compared to current columns for the same reason. In some cases, the reduction can be as great as about 4 ⁇ 5 of the packed column height.
  • the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes do not have the same entrainment, flooding, channeling or foaming issues typically found in current packed bed columns.
  • the oleophobic coating on the membranes provide a membrane contactor system that can be employed in a wider variety of liquid compositions, because of the non-wetting nature of the pores.
  • the coating also helps to increase the use life of the membrane contactors, because the oleophobic characteristics reduce the blockage of pores. All of these benefits lead to size, weight, cost, and environmental savings over current gas-liquid separation systems. The benefits of which can be particularly useful in off-shore applications, where space and weight are at a premium.
  • Ranges disclosed herein are inclusive and combinable (e.g., ranges of “up to about 25 wt %, or, more specifically, about 5 wt % to about 20 wt %”, is inclusive of the endpoints and all intermediate values of the ranges of “about 5 wt % to about 25 wt %,” etc.). “Combination” is inclusive of blends, mixtures, alloys, reaction products, and the like.
  • the terms “first,” “second,” and the like, herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another, and the terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
  • the modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by context, (e.g., includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity).
  • the suffix “(s)” as used herein is intended to include both the singular and the plural of the term that it modifies, thereby including one or more of that term (e.g., the colorant(s) includes one or more colorants).

Abstract

A membrane contactor system for removing a component from a gas, comprising a housing defining a gas flow path; a microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gas to flow across the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the component to diffuse therethrough; and an oleophobic coating disposed on the microporous membrane to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This disclosure relates generally to membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contacting in process industry and, more specifically, to membrane contactors utilizing an oleophobically-treated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane.
  • Systems for capturing and/or separating liquids and gases are desirable in a variety of applications. Exemplary gas-liquid contacting applications can include carbon dioxide separation, natural gas sweetening, degasification of oil, and the like. For example, the removal of carbon dioxide or other compounds from gases may be desirable or necessary for a number of reasons. If a gas is to be burned as fuel or emitted into the atmosphere as a waste flow, the removal of carbon dioxide from the gas is necessary in order to satisfy the carbon dioxide emission requirements which are set by air pollution control authorities. In natural gas, for instance, removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the gas can satisfy sales specifications or other process-dependent requirements.
  • Several systems exist for removing components, such as CO2, from gases. Packed bed scrubbers, distillation columns, strippers, and the like, are all apparatuses used in such gas-liquid contacting applications for separation/removal of components. An example of a removal process using absorption includes removing CO2 from flue gas by means of an aqueous amine solution. The gas to be separated is led into an absorption column where it comes into contact with amine solution, which absorbs the CO2 molecules. The solvent can then be led to a desorption process where the liquid is heated, and the CO2 molecules are removed from the amine solvent by means of a desorption column. The solvent is cooled and passed back to the absorption column, while the concentrated CO2 is removed.
  • In an absorption column, the amount of contact time with the solvent can determine the degree of purification for the gas. Therefore, a certain liquid surface area per volume must exist for contact with the gas in order to purify the gas. Moreover, the amount of gas which has to be treated factors into the size of the apparatus. An absorption column, therefore, can require a large diameter and height in order to treat a desired amount of gas to the desired purification. Not only does this increase the cost of the system, but it can also impact the system's utility in applications where size and weight are a particularly expensive commodity, such as in offshore installations.
  • Gas absorption membranes are used as contacting devices between a gas and a liquid flow. These membrane contactors contain a porous membrane, which promotes contact between the liquid and the gas phase. The separation is caused by the presence of an absorption liquid (e.g., an amine solvent) on one side the membrane, which selectively removes certain components from the gas flow (e.g., CO2) from the other side of the membrane. This technology is currently being used as a substitute for the apparatuses mentioned above in gas-liquid contacting applications.
  • The replacement of the conventional absorption columns with membrane contactors can lead to significant reductions both with regard to cost and weight for a separation system absorption unit. Membrane contactors can provide up to multiple orders of magnitude more surface area per volume than the conventional absorption contactors mentioned above, due to the porous nature of the membrane. Further, membrane contactors are free from problems like channeling and flooding that can occur in packed and tray columns.
  • Membrane contactors, however, can suffer from some drawbacks. Often times the membrane material, and the porosity thereof, is useful only for a limited range of liquids. Moreover, the pores of the membrane can block over time, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the contactor. Some membranes tend to absorb certain liquids and/or contaminating agents. The materials can clog up the pores of the membrane and prevent the desired gas from diffusing therethrough, or the membrane can no longer effectively resist penetration by the liquid phase.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Disclosed herein are membrane contactor systems, particularly those used for carbon dioxide separation, and methods for removing carbon dioxide from a flue gas stream in a gas turbine system. According to an embodiment, a membrane contactor system for removing a component from a gas comprises a housing defining a gas flow path; a microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gas to flow across the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the component to diffuse therethrough; and an oleophobic coating disposed on the microporous membrane to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores.
  • In another embodiment, a membrane contactor system for use in separating carbon dioxide from a gaseous stream in a continuous flow process comprises a housing defining a gas flow path and comprising a first outlet for the carbon dioxide and a second outlet for the purified gas; an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gaseous stream to flow across a side of the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane, wherein the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the carbon dioxide to diffuse therethrough; an oleophobic enhancement coating disposed on the surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores; and an amine based sorbent liquid disposed on a side of the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane opposite the gas, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid is configured to absorb the carbon dioxide from the gaseous stream.
  • In still another embodiment, a gas turbine engine comprises an exhaust treatment system configured to remove carbon dioxide from a combustion exhaust stream, wherein the system comprises: a housing defining a gas flow path and comprising a first outlet for the carbon dioxide and a second outlet for the purified exhaust; an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the exhaust stream to flow across a side of the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the membrane, wherein the pores are configured to allow the carbon dioxide to diffuse therethrough; an oleophobic enhancement coating disposed on the surfaces of structure of nodes and fibrils and configured to provide oleophobicity to the membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores; and an amine based sorbent liquid disposed on a side of the membrane opposite the exhaust stream, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid is configured to absorb the carbon dioxide from the exhaust stream to form the purified exhaust.
  • The above-described and other features are exemplified by the following Figures and detailed description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Referring now to the Figures, which are exemplary embodiments, and wherein the like elements are numbered alike:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of gas/liquid oleophobically-treated membrane contactor;
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic illustration of a portion of the membrane illustrated in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged schematic sectional illustration of a portion of the membrane in FIG. 2, illustrating a coating disposed on the surfaces in the membrane;
  • FIG. 4 is schematic illustration of an exemplary embodiment of a membrane contactor system for carbon dioxide removal; and
  • FIG. 5 is an enlarged schematic illustration of an oleophobically-treated membrane used in the membrane contactor system of FIG. 4.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The membrane contactor systems described herein include an oleophobically-treated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. The oleophobic treatment on the expanded PTFE membrane can allow for the membrane contactor system to be effective in applications covering a wider range of liquids than current membrane contactors. The oleophobic treatment, moreover, can increase the operating life of the membrane in the contactor by reducing the amount of blockage of pores that can occur during use. The membrane contactor described herein can be disposed in any gas-liquid contacting application, such as, without limitation, carbon dioxide separation/removal, natural gas sweetening, oil degasification, and the like. In an exemplary embodiment, the membrane contactor system can replace current absorption units in a carbon dioxide (CO2) separation process. Employing the membrane contactor system instead of current separation technologies (e.g., packed bed scrubbers) for carbon dioxide removal can reduce the installation and operation costs of the system; reduce the space requirements and weight of the system; and improve the environmental impact of the system by reducing the amount of liquid stream carry over by the gas phase.
  • As mentioned, the membrane contactor system comprises a porous membrane and is configured to promote contact between a liquid and a gas phase. When the membrane is placed between the gas and the liquid (i.e., the solvent), the liquid will not be in direct contact with the gas, which is in motion. This division between the gas and liquid phases makes it possible to employ a high gas rate in the system without the liquid being carried along by the gas. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a membrane 10. The size of the pores 12 in the membrane 10 can be selected according to the following reasoning: the pores 12 are so large that the “X” gas molecules (e.g. CO2) move (diffuse) rapidly through the pores 12 and into the solvent, and the pores 12 are so small that solvent does not penetrate into the pores 12 and through the membrane 10. The membrane of the system described herein is advantageously treated with an oleophobic enhancement material.
  • “Oleophobicity” of the membrane can be rated on a scale of 1 to 8 according to AATCC test 118-1992. This test evaluates the membrane's resistance to wetting. Eight standard oils, labeled #1 to #8, are used in the test. The #1 oil is mineral oil (surface tension: 31.5 dynes/cm @ 25 degrees Celsius (° C.)) and the #8 oil is heptane (surface tension: 14.8 dynes/cm @ 25° C.). Five drops of each rated oil are placed on the membrane. Failure occurs when wetting of the membrane by a selected oil occurs within 30 seconds. The oleophobic rating of the membrane corresponds to the last oil successfully tested. The higher the oleophobic rating, the better the oleophobicity. After treatment, the membrane 10 can have an increased oleophobicity. In an exemplary embodiment, the oleophobicity of the membrane 10 is at least 1, specifically at least 2, more specifically at least 4, even more specifically at least 6, and most specifically at least 8.
  • The membrane 10 is comprised of an expanded PTFE (ePTFE). As illustrated in FIG. 2, the ePTFE is porous, specifically microporous, with a three-dimensional matrix or lattice-type structure of nodes 22 interconnected by numerous fibrils 24. Surfaces of the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 define numerous interconnecting pores 26 that extend through the membrane 10 between opposite sides of the membrane. Expansion of the PTFE material to form the microporous structure is well known to those having skill in the art, and essentially involves stretching the PTFE at a certain rate and temperature as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566. Exemplary ePTFE materials are available commercially from, for example, Tetratec #1305 (Tetratec, Philadelphia, Pa.) or Poreflon® WP-100, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Osaka, Japan.
  • ePTFE typically provides air permeability, while being hydrophobic. This property of the ePTFE material is useful in applications where restriction of water is desirable. The ePTFE material can be coated with an oleophobic material in such a way that provides oleophobic properties to the ePTFE without compromising the hydrophobicity or the permeability of the material. Turning now to FIG. 3, the oleophobic treatment can adhere a coating 28 to the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 that define the pores 26 in the membrane 10. The oleophobic coating 28 can also conform to the surfaces of at least most, specifically all, the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 that define the pore 26 in the membrane 10. Again, the coating 28 improves the oleophobicity of the membrane 10 by resisting contamination from absorption of contaminating materials. This permits the treated ePTFE membrane to be useful with a wider range of liquids and gases, because the oleophobic coated pores prevent the contaminating materials from absorbing in the membrane. As used herein, “contaminating materials/contaminants” is generally used to mean any material that is not the desired molecule to be absorbed in the membrane for the particular application, or any material that can cause blockage of the pores in the membrane.
  • The size of the pores of the oleophobically-treated ePTFE can contribute to determining the effective range of molecules that can be prevented or restricted from flow through the membrane 10. Some factors considered in choosing pore size are viscosity and pressure on the liquid side of the membrane. In addition, pore size can have an effect on the rate at which gas can migrate across the membrane. Exemplary average pore size can range from about 0.05 micrometers (μm) to about 1.5 μm, specifically from about 0.2 μm to about 1.0 μm, and more specifically from about 0.5 μm to about 0.8 μm. However, larger or smaller average pore sizes may be used. The average pore size of the particular membrane 10 will depend upon the intended application for the membrane contactor system, and the range of fluids involved therewith.
  • Another factor in the flow of the fluid through the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane 10 is the porosity of the membrane, (i.e., the percentage of open space in the volume of the membrane, as determined by comparison of the density of the ePTFE with respect to the density of nonporous, non-expanded PTFE). Exemplary porosity of the membrane 10 can be in the range from about 20% or to about 95%. Again, depending upon the application of the membrane contactor system, the porosity of the membrane can range from about 70% to about 95%, specifically from about 80% to about 95%, and more specifically from about 85% to about 95%, for most gas-liquid contacting applications.
  • The dimensions (e.g., length, width, or diameter) of the membrane 10 can vary and will again depend on the use of the membrane contactor system. For example, a membrane contactor system used as an absorption unit for removal of CO2 from a turbine exhaust gas can have dimensions based on, among other things, the size of the port through which the exhaust gas flows, the flow rate through the port, the average amount of CO2 in the exhaust, the amount of CO2 to be absorbed during the lifetime of the system, and the like. Depending upon the size of the intended application, the membrane contact system can comprise a single layer of oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane, or multiple layers. In one embodiment, the membrane can be configured as a hollow tube or tubes. In such a configuration, liquid can be disposed on the outside of the tube(s) and the gas can be disposed inside. Conversely, the hollow tube membrane can be as effective when the liquid is disposed within the tube(s) and the gas is disposed outside.
  • The thickness of the membrane 10 can depend, for example, on the amount of absorption desired, the average pore size of the membrane 10, the expected or desired lifetime of the membrane contactor system, the average pore size of other possible membrane layers in the system, and the durability of the membrane 10. Generally, the thicker the membrane 10, the more restricted the flow of fluid and/or molecules through the membrane 10. Thus, for example, the thickness of a membrane in a CO2 separation/removal process may be determined by a balance of a desired rate of mass transport of fluid (e.g., exhaust gas) across the membrane and a desired amount of filtration of CO2. In some embodiments, useful, for example as absorption units, thicknesses of the membrane in the membrane contactor system can be in a range of about 0.5 μm to about 500 μm. In exemplary embodiments, the thickness of the membrane can range from about 4 μm to about 200 μm, specifically from about 10 μm to about 150 μm, and more specifically from about 25 μm to about 100 μm. However, larger and smaller thicknesses can be used.
  • In another embodiment, the membrane can be disposed on a substrate layer. The substrate layer can impart strength and durability to the membrane. In an exemplary embodiment, the substrate layer can be a textile material. A textile material can be a fabric, netting, and the like. In one embodiment, the membrane can be laminated to the substrate layer. The lamination of membrane to the substrate layer or layers can be by thermal means, adhesive means or the like. In this specific embodiment, the overall thickness of the system can be bigger due to the addition of the substrate.
  • The membrane 10 is treated using an oleophobic coating material, in one embodiment to increase the oleophobicity of the membrane. Exemplary oleophobic coating materials include fluorinated polymers, which as used herein includes homopolymers and copolymers having fluorohydrocarbon and/or perfluorohydrocarbon moieties. The fluoro- or perfluorohydrocarbon moieties can be incorporated into the polymer backbone, pendant from the polymer backbone, or a combination thereof. Accordingly, a variety of different types of polymers can be used, including, for example, polyolefins, polyacrylates, polymethacrylates, polyesters, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polycarbonates, polyethers, polyamides, polyacrylamides, polysulfonamides, polysiloxanes, and polyurethanes.
  • The fluorinated polymers can be derived from polymerization of a variety of monomers or oligomers known to produce the desired backbone ands that include fluorinated or perfluorinated C1-32 hydrocarbon moieties, in particular fluoro(C1-32)alkyl and/or perfluoro(C1-32)alkyl moieties. In one embodiment, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl moieties are present, in particular, —CF3, —CF2CF3, and —CF2CF2CF3. In another embodiment, perfluoro(C1-4)alkylene moieties are present, in particular, —CF2—, —CF2CF2—, and —CF2CF2CF2—. Exemplary monomer or oligomer units can include, for example, fluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, fluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, fluorinated and perfluorinated C1-12 olefins such as tetrafluoroethylene, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, perfluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl (C6-12)aryl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl allyl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, and the like. The fluorinated monomers or oligomers can optionally be copolymerized with additional non-fluorinated monomers or oligomers including, for example, unsaturated hydrocarbons (e.g., olefins), (C1-12)alkyl acrylates, and (C1-12)alkyl methacrylates.
  • Specific exemplary classes of these oleophobic polymers include, without limitation, apolar perfluoroalkylpolyethers having —CF3, —CF2CF3, and −CF2CF2CF3moieties (PFPE), mixtures of apolar (PFPE) with polar monofunctional PFPE, polar water-insoluble PFPE with phosphate, silane, or amide end groups, mixtures of apolar PFPE with fluorinated or perfluorinated (C1-12)alkyl methacrylate polymers or fluorinated or perfluorinated (C1-12)alkyl acrylate polymers, and copolymers comprising perfluoro(C1-3)alkylether units and fluorinated or perfluorinated (C1-12)alkyl methacrylate units or fluorinated or perfluorinated (C1-12)alkyl acrylate units. The above-mentioned polymers can be crosslinked by, for example, UV radiation in aqueous form solution or emulsion. Mixtures of the fluorinated polymers can be used as well.
  • One specific form that the oleophobic polymers are commercially available is emulsions. Exemplary emulsions can include, without limitation, those based on copolymers of siloxanes and perfluoro(C1-12)alkyl-substituted acrylates or methacrylates, emulsions based on fluorinated or perfluorinated co- or terpolymers, one type of unit containing at least hexafluoropropene or perfluoroalkyl vinyl ether, emulsions based on perfluoro(C1-12)alkyl-substituted polyacrylates and methacrylates, and the like. These polymers and their preparation are well known to those with skill in the art. A specific oleophobic fluorinated polymer is a perfluoroalkyl acrylic copolymer and/or perfluoroalkyl methacrylic copolymer water-based dispersion of Zonyl® 8195, 7040, 8412, and/or 8300, available from Dupont of Wilmington, Del.
  • The microporous ePTFE membrane is rendered oleophobic by treating it with an oleophobic coating composition. The process of treating the membrane can comprise any suitable method for oleophobically coating an article, and are well known to those skilled in the art. Exemplary techniques can include applying the oleophobic coating composition in a liquid form, e.g., a melt, or solution, or latex dispersion of the material. Exemplary methods for applying the liquid oleophobic enhancement material can include, without limitation, dipping, painting, spraying, roller-coating, brushing, and the like, over the surface of the membrane. Regardless of the technique, the application can be carried out until internal surfaces of the microporous membrane structure are coated with the oleophobic coating composition, but not until the pores are filled as that could lessen the gas-liquid absorption property of the membrane. Thus, the presence of the oleophobic coating composition has little effect on the porosity; that is, the walls defining the voids in the microporous membrane have only a very thin coating of the oleophobic material (as illustrated in FIG. 3). Application of the oleophobic coating composition can be achieved by varying the concentration, solids content of the solution or dispersion, and/or by varying the application temperature, or pressure.
  • The use of an organic solvent can help to facilitate the distribution of the oleophobic fluorinated polymer throughout the microporous membrane. Typically, the microporous membrane is not initially oleophobic and may be oleophilic. Thus, use of an organic solvent can sometimes reduce difficulties in wetting and/or saturating the membrane structure with the oleophobic coating composition. A variety of organic solvents can be used. The term “organic solvent” is intended to generally refer to non-aqueous solvents and combinations of non-aqueous solvents, and, in particular, to solvents comprising organic compounds. As used herein, the oleophobic material is “dissolved in an organic solvent” if at least about 50 wt. % of the material is dissolved in the organic solvent. Exemplary organic solvents can include, without limitation, alkanes, ketones, esters, ethers, alcohols, and the like, as well as combinations of these solvents. For example, exemplary organic solvents can include heptane, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, dioctyl adipate, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, isopropanol, diethyl ether, mineral spirits, petroleum distillate, and combinations thereof The choice of organic solvent or solvents for use with the oleophobic material can be affected by a variety of factors including, without limitation, solubility of the oleophobic fluoropolymer, boiling point of the solvent, molecular weight of the solvent, polarity of the solvent or solvent combination, and the like.
  • During application to the membrane, the oleophobic coating composition can wet and saturate the membrane 10. The solvent can then be removed, for example, by air drying or heating. The oleophobic is disposed on the membrane 10 and can impart oleophobicity to the membrane contactor system. It is possible in some embodiments to achieve covalent coupling between the oleophobic coating and the membrane. In an optional embodiment, the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane can be “cured” by heating. This “curing” process can possibly increase the oleophobicity by allowing rearrangement of the fluoropolymer into a specific oleophobic orientation. The application of heat can permit the oleophobic fluoropolymer to flow around the nodes 22 and fibrils 24 to form the coating 28. The curing temperature can vary among the oleophobic fluoropolymers. Exemplary ranges can include from about 40° C. to about 140° C., specifically about 50° C. to about 130° C., and more specifically about 70° C. and about 125° C.
  • In one embodiment, the fluorinated polymer is in the form of a stabilized water-miscible dispersion of the polymer solids. In this embodiment, the oleophobic fluoropolymer solids can also contain relatively small amounts of acetone and ethylene glycol or other water-miscible solvents and surfactants that were used in the polymerization reaction when the fluorinated polymer solids were made. Optionally, the dispersion of oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids is stabilized with a stabilizing agent, such as, but not limited to, deionized and/or demineralized water. The stabilizing agent reduces the propensity of the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids from settling out and agglomerating to a size which cannot enter a pore in the membrane to be coated. Although the coating composition may include other amounts of stabilizing agent, in some embodiments the coating composition forming coating layer includes an amount of stabilizing agent in the range of about 5 wt % to 50 wt %. For example, in some embodiments the coating composition includes an amount of stabilizing agent in the range of about 15 wt % to about 25 wt %.
  • The stabilized dispersion of oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids can be diluted in one or more suitable solvents to form the coating composition that will form coating layer. Although other solvents may be used, suitable solvents can include, but are not limited to, water, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, acetone, methanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, N,N-dimethylformamide, methyl ethyl ketone and water soluble e-and p-series glycol ethers. Moreover, although the solvents can have other surface tensions, in some embodiments, the coating composition includes a solvent having a surface tension of less than about 31 dynes per centimeter. After coating, as described above, the coating composition is then consolidated, for example by heating the coated membrane such that the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids flow and coalesce, and such that the stabilizing agents and solvents are removed. During the application of heat, the thermal mobility of the oleophobic fluoropolymer solids allows the solids to be mobile and flow around, engage, and adhere to surfaces of the membrane, and therefore coalesce to form the coating layer.
  • Irrespective of the solvent or carrier used, the coating compositions can include an amount of oleophobic fluoropolymer solids in the range of about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % based on a total weight of the coating composition. For example, in some embodiments, the coating composition includes oleophobic fluoropolymer solids in the range of about 0.5 wt % to about 1.5 wt %. When the coating composition includes other amounts of solvent, other than water, the coating composition that forms coating layer includes an amount of solvent, other than water, in the range of about 40 wt % to about 80 wt %. For example, in some embodiments the coating composition includes an amount of solvent, other than water, in the range of about 50 wt % to about 75 wt %.
  • The coating composition has a surface tension and a relative contact angle that enable the coating composition to wet pores in the membrane such that pores are coated with the oleophobic fluorinated polymer solids in the coating composition. However, in some embodiments where an organic solvent is used as described above, the membrane is wet with a solution containing a solvent before the coating composition is applied to membrane such that the coating composition will pass through membrane pores and “wet-out” surfaces of membrane.
  • The thickness of coating layer formed and the amount and type of fluorinated polymer solids in the coating layer can depend on several factors, including the affinity of the solids to adhere and conform to the surfaces of the membrane that define membrane pores, the final solids content within the coating composition, the coating process, and the intended use and desired durability during use.
  • It is not necessary that the coating composition completely encapsulate the entire surface of the membrane network, or be continuous to increase oleophobicity of the membrane. However, in one embodiment, at least 50%, specifically at least 75%, and more specifically at least 90% of the membrane surfaces are coated.
  • The oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane can be advantageously employed as a membrane contactor in gas/liquid contacting applications. The membrane contactor system can be particularly useful as a as the absorption unit of a CO2 removal system for a gas turbine. While the discussion below focuses on the use of the membrane contactor in a downstream application for gas turbines, it is to be understood that the membrane contactor described herein can be employed in any system employing liquid-gas contacting technology. The membrane contactor system can be particularly effective in processes where weight, size, cost, energy consumption, and environmental aspects are key concerns.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a membrane contactor system 100 that functions as a CO2 absorption unit in a gas turbine engine system. The membrane contactor system 100 is configured to remove CO2 or other compounds from combustion gases (e.g., natural gas). With recent trends in environmental regulation, it is becoming increasingly important to cheaply and effectively remove CO2 emissions in hydrocarbon combustion processes. Exhaust gas is created after natural gas, or some other combustive fuel, are ignited in a gas turbine for energy. After being expanded through the turbine, the exhaust gas stream 102 is fed into the absorption unit 100. The exhaust gas stream 102 can be cooled first in order to help reduce the volume of the gas, and therefore, to reduce the size and weight of the membrane contactor system 100. Again, the membrane contactor system is configured to remove the CO2 from the exhaust gas stream 102. The purified gas 104 (i.e., the CO2-free exhaust) exits the top of the membrane contactor system 100, and can be vented to atmosphere or further treated or recycled for energy recovery. The CO2-rich stream 106 can exit a lower portion of the membrane contactor system 100 and continue on for further treatment, such as desorption, compression, sequestration, and the like.
  • The membrane contactor system 100 is shown cutaway to reveal the individual membrane contactors 110 disposed in the system housing 108. The membrane contactor system 100 can contain a single membrane contactor or multiple membrane contactors, and will depend on the volume of the exhaust gas, the concentration of CO2 in the gas, and the like. The oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes in the CO2 removal system can have a variety of shapes including, without limitation, sheets, hollow fibers, and the like. As shown in FIG. 4, the membranes contactors 110 comprise sheets of membranes 112.
  • The carbon dioxide removal system of the present disclosure can comprise the venting membrane contactor system 100 with an amine based absorption liquid. This system can utilize an amine-based sorbent and a membrane contactor at the appropriate partial pressure to absorb the CO2 from the exhaust stream. The amine based sorbent is configured to absorb CO2 from the gaseous stream while the membrane contactor system, comprised of a plurality of membranes, is configured to support the amine based sorbent and separate the amine based sorbent, the gaseous stream, and the CO2.
  • The amine based sorbent is a liquid sorbent which is capable of absorbing CO2. Exemplary characteristics of the amine based sorbent can include low volatility, nontoxicity, low viscosity, the ability to absorb CO2 from low partial pressures (e.g., less than about 1 kilopascal (kPa)), and the like. Exemplary amine based sorbents can include amines, such as 2-amino-2-methyl-1, 3-propanediol, 2-hydroxyethyl piperazine, methyldiethanolamine, monoethanolamine, tetraethylenepentamine, triethanolamine, polyethylene imine, and other like amine based sorbents. In an exemplary embodiment, the amine base sorbent can be a monoethanolamine (MEA).
  • In order to further enhance the amine based sorbent's CO2 sorption rates, reduce its viscosity, and facilitate transport of the absorbed carbon dioxide, a solvent can be added to the amine based sorbent. Exemplary solvents can possess the same low volatility, low viscosity, and nontoxic properties of the amine based sorbent. Exemplary solvents can include, without limitation, alcohols, cyclic ketone, esters, ethers, and mixtures thereof, including dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol, glycerol, methoxy triethylene, glycol diacetate, polyethylene glycol, propylene carbonate, 1,2-propylene glycol, and the like. The solvent used with a particular amine base sorbent for a given application can readily be determined by one of skill in the art. Exemplary factors for the selection of the solvent and the amine based sorbent can include chemical compatibility, solubility of the amine based sorbent in the solvent, absorption/desorption kinetics, nontoxicity, low viscosity, low volatility, and the like.
  • The chemical reaction for amine absorption is:

  • 2(R—NH2)+H2O+CO2—(R—NH3)2CO3, where R═C2H4OH
  • The reaction is reversible and the equilibrium can be altered by altering the temperature. The CO2 is absorbed by an absorption medium in a temperature range of about 20° C. to about 70° C. The oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes are employed as contact devices between a gas and a liquid flow in the membrane contactor system 100. FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane 150 in one of the membrane contactors. The separation is caused by the presence of the amine based sorbent liquid 158 on one side of the membrane 150, which selectively removes CO 2 156 from the exhaust gas flow 157 on the other side of the membrane 150. The membrane 150 is intended to provide a contacting area which prevents mixing of the exhaust gas 157 and the amine based sorbent 158. The membrane 150, however, is advantageously permeable to the CO 2 156, which is required to be removed. The selectivity in the separation process is derived from the amine based sorbent 158. A highly selective separation can be achieved through an appropriate choice of the amine based sorbent 158.
  • The removal of the exhaust gas CO2 component is achieved by use of porous, oleophobic ePTFE membrane 150 in combination with a suitable amine based sorbent liquid 158. As a result of the membrane oleophobicity and small pore size, the exhaust gas 157 and amine based sorbent liquid 158 can be kept separate, and exhaust contaminant are prevented from blocking the pores by the oleophobic coating of the membrane. The amine based sorbent solution contacts the CO2 in the gaseous exhaust stream within the membrane contactor. The membrane contactor system 100 promotes CO2 removal via partial pressure gradients by utilizing the plurality of oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes that contain or support the amine based sorbent. As a result of the porosity and oleophobic characteristics of the membranes, the contactor system allows direct liquid-gas contact, while preventing sorbent leakage, or blockage of the pores by contaminants in the gaseous exhaust stream. The membrane pore size is chosen dependent upon the operational characteristics of the amine based sorbent and the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membrane utilized. In an exemplary CO2 removal system application, the membrane pore size can be less than about 0.1 μm, specifically less than about 0.05 μm.
  • The use of gas absorption membrane contactor systems comprising oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes have several advantages over conventional contacting devices such as packed columns. The compactness of the equipment through the use of hollow fiber or sheet shaped membranes is typically smaller than packed column filter media, because the membranes have a much greater surface area per volume (cm2/cm3). The height of the absorption unit in the CO2 removal system of a gas turbine will likewise be significantly reduced compared to current columns for the same reason. In some cases, the reduction can be as great as about ⅘ of the packed column height. Moreover, the oleophobically-treated ePTFE membranes do not have the same entrainment, flooding, channeling or foaming issues typically found in current packed bed columns. Still further, the oleophobic coating on the membranes provide a membrane contactor system that can be employed in a wider variety of liquid compositions, because of the non-wetting nature of the pores. The coating also helps to increase the use life of the membrane contactors, because the oleophobic characteristics reduce the blockage of pores. All of these benefits lead to size, weight, cost, and environmental savings over current gas-liquid separation systems. The benefits of which can be particularly useful in off-shore applications, where space and weight are at a premium.
  • The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Ranges disclosed herein are inclusive and combinable (e.g., ranges of “up to about 25 wt %, or, more specifically, about 5 wt % to about 20 wt %”, is inclusive of the endpoints and all intermediate values of the ranges of “about 5 wt % to about 25 wt %,” etc.). “Combination” is inclusive of blends, mixtures, alloys, reaction products, and the like. Furthermore, the terms “first,” “second,” and the like, herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another, and the terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by context, (e.g., includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). The suffix “(s)” as used herein is intended to include both the singular and the plural of the term that it modifies, thereby including one or more of that term (e.g., the colorant(s) includes one or more colorants). Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment”, “another embodiment”, “an embodiment”, and so forth, means that a particular element (e.g., feature, structure, and/or characteristic) described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment described herein, and may or may not be present in other embodiments. In addition, it is to be understood that the described elements may be combined in any suitable manner in the various embodiments.
  • Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the embodiments of the invention belong. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and the present disclosure, and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
  • While the disclosure has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this disclosure, but that the disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. A membrane contactor system for removing a component from a gas, comprising:
a housing defining a gas flow path;
a microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gas to flow across the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the component to diffuse therethrough; and
an oleophobic coating disposed on the microporous membrane to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores.
2. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the microporous membrane is expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
3. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 2.
4. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 4.
5. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 6.
6. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 8.
7. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, further comprising a support layer upon which the microporous membrane is disposed.
8. The membrane contactor system of claim 7, wherein the support layer comprises a textile material.
9. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the microporous membrane is configured to be a hollow tube.
10. The membrane contactor system of claim 1, wherein the oleophobic coating comprises a polymer comprising fluorinated C1-32 hydrocarbon moieties.
11. The membrane contactor system of claim 10, wherein the fluorinated polymer comprises units derived from polymerization of fluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, fluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, fluorinated and perfluorinated C1-12 olefins, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, perfluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl (C6-12)aryl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl allyl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
12. A membrane contactor system for use in separating carbon dioxide from a gaseous stream in a continuous flow process, the system comprising:
a housing defining a gas flow path and comprising a first outlet for the carbon dioxide and a second outlet for the purified gas;
an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the gaseous stream to flow across a side of the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane, wherein the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane, wherein the plurality of interconnecting pores are configured to allow the carbon dioxide to diffuse therethrough;
an oleophobic enhancement coating disposed on the surfaces of the structure of nodes and fibrils to form a coated membrane and configured to provide oleophobicity to the coated membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores; and
an amine based sorbent liquid disposed on a side of the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane opposite the gas, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid is configured to absorb the carbon dioxide from the gaseous stream.
13. The membrane contactor system of claim 11, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 4.
14. The membrane contactor system of claim 11, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 6.
15. The membrane contactor system of claim 11, wherein the coated membrane has an oleophobic rating of at least 8.
16. The membrane contactor system of claim 11, wherein the oleophobic coating comprises a polymer comprising fluorinated C1-32 hydrocarbon moieties.
17. The membrane contactor system of claim 16, wherein the fluorinated polymer is comprises units derived from polymerization of fluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, fluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl acrylates, perfluoro(C1-16)alkyl methacrylates, fluorinated and perfluorinated C1-12 olefins, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, perfluoro(C1-12)alkyl maleic acid esters, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl (C6-12)aryl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl allyl urethane oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, fluoro(C1-12)alkyl urethane acrylate oligomers, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
18. The membrane contactor system of claim 11, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid comprises 2-amino-2-methyl-1, 3-propanediol, 2-hydroxyethyl piperazine, methyldiethanolamine, monoethanolamine, tetraethylenepentamine, triethanolamine, polyethylene imine, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
19. The membrane contactor system of claim 18, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid further comprises a solvent, wherein the solvent comprises alcohol, cyclic ketone, ester, ether, glycerol, methoxy triethylene, glycol diacetate, polyethylene glycol, propylene carbonate, 1,2-propylene glycol, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
20. A gas turbine engine comprising:
an exhaust treatment system configured to remove carbon dioxide from a combustion exhaust stream, wherein the system comprises:
a housing defining a gas flow path and comprising a first outlet for the carbon dioxide and a second outlet for the purified exhaust;
an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene microporous membrane positioned in the housing to allow the exhaust stream to flow across a side of the membrane, wherein the membrane comprises a structure of nodes connected by fibrils in which surfaces of the structure nodes and fibrils define a plurality of interconnecting pores extending through the membrane, wherein the pores are configured to allow the carbon dioxide to diffuse therethrough;
an oleophobic enhancement coating disposed on the surfaces of structure of nodes and fibrils and configured to provide oleophobicity to the membrane without blocking the plurality of interconnecting pores; and
an amine based sorbent liquid disposed on a side of the membrane opposite the exhaust stream, wherein the amine based sorbent liquid is configured to absorb the carbon dioxide from the exhaust stream to form the purified exhaust.
US12/182,230 2008-07-30 2008-07-30 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact Abandoned US20100024651A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/182,230 US20100024651A1 (en) 2008-07-30 2008-07-30 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact
GB0912658.2A GB2462178B (en) 2008-07-30 2009-07-22 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact
DE102009026278A DE102009026278A1 (en) 2008-07-30 2009-07-29 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact
US13/295,740 US8317906B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2011-11-14 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/182,230 US20100024651A1 (en) 2008-07-30 2008-07-30 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/295,740 Division US8317906B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2011-11-14 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100024651A1 true US20100024651A1 (en) 2010-02-04

Family

ID=41058289

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/182,230 Abandoned US20100024651A1 (en) 2008-07-30 2008-07-30 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact
US13/295,740 Expired - Fee Related US8317906B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2011-11-14 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/295,740 Expired - Fee Related US8317906B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2011-11-14 Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US20100024651A1 (en)
DE (1) DE102009026278A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2462178B (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110011262A1 (en) * 2009-07-15 2011-01-20 General Electric Company System and method for reduction of moisture content in flue gas
US20110120304A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2011-05-26 Klaus-Viktor Peinemann Polymer membrane
US20110138074A1 (en) * 2007-02-14 2011-06-09 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Content distribution management device, terminal, program, and content distribution system
US20130068689A1 (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-21 Bha Group, Inc. Membrane distillation modules using oleophobically and antimicrobially treated microporous membranes
US20140309471A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2014-10-16 Shaojun Zhou Sweetening of natural gas
US20150122122A1 (en) * 2012-05-08 2015-05-07 Petroliam Nasional Berhard (Petronas) Method and system for removing carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons
US20150251134A1 (en) * 2014-03-10 2015-09-10 Uop Llc Methods and apparatuses for removing impurities from a gaseous stream
US20150265977A1 (en) * 2014-03-21 2015-09-24 General Electric Company Fouling resistant membranes for water treatment
US9180401B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2015-11-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Liquid, slurry and flowable powder adsorption/absorption method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9297285B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2016-03-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Direct densification method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9371755B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2016-06-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Membrane separation method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9581062B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2017-02-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Reversible solid adsorption method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US20180361303A1 (en) * 2017-06-19 2018-12-20 Kumho Environment Co., Ltd Scrubber system with diffraction plate adapted for swirl bubble generation for effective removal of pollutants
CN109464889A (en) * 2017-12-28 2019-03-15 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 A kind of technique and its system for ocean platform gas cleaning
US10486113B2 (en) 2014-12-08 2019-11-26 Technische Universität Berlin Fluid distribution device for a gas-liquid contactor, gas-liquid contactor and method for adding a gas to a liquid
CN112302838A (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-02 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 EGR exhaust gas recirculation system and automobile
CN113491935A (en) * 2020-04-08 2021-10-12 中石化南京化工研究院有限公司 Absorption liquid for deep decarburization in mixed gas
US20220203292A1 (en) * 2019-04-03 2022-06-30 Klaus Lackner System and method for carbon dioxide capture through membrane conduits
US20220274066A1 (en) * 2019-08-30 2022-09-01 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Elements and Modules
WO2023272451A1 (en) * 2021-06-28 2023-01-05 Entegris, Inc. Oleophobic fluoropolymers and filter materials prepared therefrom
WO2023044508A1 (en) * 2021-09-20 2023-03-23 California Institute Of Technology Systems and methods for gas-liquid contactors for rapid carbon capture
US11739506B2 (en) 2021-02-05 2023-08-29 General Electric Company Water recovery system including integrated contactor with thermally-enhanced recovery
US11931696B2 (en) * 2019-08-30 2024-03-19 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas separation elements and modules

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8702844B2 (en) * 2011-04-18 2014-04-22 Phillips 66 Company Particle doped hollow-fiber contactor
US8741029B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-06-03 United Technologies Corporation Fuel deoxygenation using surface-modified porous membranes
WO2013136310A1 (en) * 2012-03-16 2013-09-19 Aker Process Systems As Hydrocarbon gas treatment
US8821731B1 (en) * 2012-06-22 2014-09-02 Subramanian Iyer Systems and methods for regenerating liquid solvents used in the removal of organic contaminants from gaseous mixtures
US10384167B2 (en) 2013-11-21 2019-08-20 Oasys Water LLC Systems and methods for improving performance of osmotically driven membrane systems
WO2015167404A1 (en) * 2014-04-28 2015-11-05 Ptt Public Company Limited A natural gas purification system and a process of using thereof
US11123685B2 (en) 2017-02-27 2021-09-21 Honeywell International Inc. Hollow fiber membrane contactor scrubber/stripper for cabin carbon dioxide and humidity control
US10688435B2 (en) 2017-02-27 2020-06-23 Honeywell International Inc. Dual stripper with water sweep gas
DE102018206942A1 (en) 2018-05-04 2019-11-07 Mahle International Gmbh Tank venting device
US11058990B1 (en) 2018-06-26 2021-07-13 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Apparatus and method for carbon dioxide removal
US11920248B2 (en) 2018-12-18 2024-03-05 Prometheus Fuels, Inc Methods and systems for fuel production
US11458437B2 (en) 2019-09-05 2022-10-04 Molecule Works Inc. Universal planar membrane device for mass transfer
US20220267914A1 (en) * 2021-02-19 2022-08-25 Prometheus Fuels, Inc Integrated direct air capture of co2 for aqueous electrochemical reduction of co2

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3953566A (en) * 1970-05-21 1976-04-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Process for producing porous products
US4493716A (en) * 1982-10-12 1985-01-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Apparatus for the separation of hydrogen sulfide from a gas mixture
US5281254A (en) * 1992-05-22 1994-01-25 United Technologies Corporation Continuous carbon dioxide and water removal system
US5480455A (en) * 1993-08-25 1996-01-02 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lining material for use with prosthetics and similar devices and method for making and using same
US5832712A (en) * 1994-02-15 1998-11-10 Kvaerner Asa Method for removing carbon dioxide from exhaust gases
US6074738A (en) * 1996-06-25 2000-06-13 Von Fragstein; Rainer Flexible water and oil resistant composites
US6196708B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2001-03-06 Donaldson Company, Inc. Oleophobic laminated articles, assemblies of use, and methods
US6228145B1 (en) * 1996-07-31 2001-05-08 Kvaerner Asa Method for removing carbon dioxide from gases
US6228477B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2001-05-08 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US20030192428A1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-10-16 Mykrolis Corporation Hollow fiber membrane contactor
US6854603B2 (en) * 1999-02-12 2005-02-15 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US20070077407A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 General Electric Company Composite article having oleophobic properties and method of manufacture

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4737166A (en) * 1986-12-30 1988-04-12 Bend Research, Inc. Acid gas scrubbing by composite solvent-swollen membranes
US5059374A (en) * 1989-02-09 1991-10-22 The Dow Chemical Company Method for sealing a hollow fiber membrane module in a case
NL9401233A (en) * 1994-03-25 1995-11-01 Tno Membrane gas absorption method.
JP3606614B2 (en) * 1994-10-13 2005-01-05 ジャパンゴアテックス株式会社 Humidification sheet and humidification unit
US5753009A (en) * 1996-05-14 1998-05-19 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for selectively removing a component from a multicomponent gas/vapor mixture
US20020014154A1 (en) * 1996-09-27 2002-02-07 Richard Witzko Separation of gaseous components from a gas stream with a liquid absorbent
US20050230856A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2005-10-20 Parekh Bipin S Hollow fiber membrane contact apparatus and process
US6896717B2 (en) * 2002-07-05 2005-05-24 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Gas separation using coated membranes
FR2888247B1 (en) * 2005-07-11 2009-11-20 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR REMOVING CARBON OXYSULFIDE FROM A LIQUID HYDROCARBON LOAD
US7811359B2 (en) * 2007-01-18 2010-10-12 General Electric Company Composite membrane for separation of carbon dioxide
US7993523B2 (en) * 2007-03-06 2011-08-09 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Liquid filtration media
US8398743B2 (en) * 2007-05-08 2013-03-19 General Electric Company Methods and systems for reducing carbon dioxide in combustion flue gases
US7825046B2 (en) * 2008-02-29 2010-11-02 General Electric Company Oleophobic laminated article
US8057579B2 (en) * 2008-11-10 2011-11-15 General Electric Company Method, apparatus, and system for acid gas removal

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3953566A (en) * 1970-05-21 1976-04-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Process for producing porous products
US4493716A (en) * 1982-10-12 1985-01-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Apparatus for the separation of hydrogen sulfide from a gas mixture
US5281254A (en) * 1992-05-22 1994-01-25 United Technologies Corporation Continuous carbon dioxide and water removal system
US5480455A (en) * 1993-08-25 1996-01-02 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lining material for use with prosthetics and similar devices and method for making and using same
US5832712A (en) * 1994-02-15 1998-11-10 Kvaerner Asa Method for removing carbon dioxide from exhaust gases
US6074738A (en) * 1996-06-25 2000-06-13 Von Fragstein; Rainer Flexible water and oil resistant composites
US6228145B1 (en) * 1996-07-31 2001-05-08 Kvaerner Asa Method for removing carbon dioxide from gases
US6196708B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2001-03-06 Donaldson Company, Inc. Oleophobic laminated articles, assemblies of use, and methods
US20030192428A1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-10-16 Mykrolis Corporation Hollow fiber membrane contactor
US6228477B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2001-05-08 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US6854603B2 (en) * 1999-02-12 2005-02-15 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US20070077407A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 General Electric Company Composite article having oleophobic properties and method of manufacture

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110138074A1 (en) * 2007-02-14 2011-06-09 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Content distribution management device, terminal, program, and content distribution system
US8396939B2 (en) 2007-02-14 2013-03-12 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Content distribution management device, terminal, program, and content distribution system
US20110120304A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2011-05-26 Klaus-Viktor Peinemann Polymer membrane
US8317900B2 (en) * 2008-06-25 2012-11-27 Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Zentrum fur Material-und Kustenforschung GmbH Polymer membrane
US8349056B2 (en) * 2009-07-15 2013-01-08 General Electric Company System and method for reduction of moisture content in flue gas
US20110011262A1 (en) * 2009-07-15 2011-01-20 General Electric Company System and method for reduction of moisture content in flue gas
US9180401B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2015-11-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Liquid, slurry and flowable powder adsorption/absorption method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9581062B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2017-02-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Reversible solid adsorption method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9371755B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2016-06-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Membrane separation method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US9297285B2 (en) 2011-01-20 2016-03-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Direct densification method and system utilizing waste heat for on-board recovery and storage of CO2 from motor vehicle internal combustion engine exhaust gases
US20130068689A1 (en) * 2011-09-15 2013-03-21 Bha Group, Inc. Membrane distillation modules using oleophobically and antimicrobially treated microporous membranes
US8801933B2 (en) * 2011-09-15 2014-08-12 Bha Altair, Llc Membrane distillation modules using oleophobically and antimicrobially treated microporous membranes
EP2846899A4 (en) * 2012-05-08 2016-02-17 Petroliam Nasional Berhad Petronas Method and system for removing carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons
US20150122122A1 (en) * 2012-05-08 2015-05-07 Petroliam Nasional Berhard (Petronas) Method and system for removing carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons
US9993768B2 (en) * 2012-05-08 2018-06-12 Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) Method and system for removing carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons
US20140309471A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2014-10-16 Shaojun Zhou Sweetening of natural gas
US9227889B2 (en) * 2013-04-15 2016-01-05 Gas Technology Institute Sweetening of natural gas
US20150251134A1 (en) * 2014-03-10 2015-09-10 Uop Llc Methods and apparatuses for removing impurities from a gaseous stream
US20150265977A1 (en) * 2014-03-21 2015-09-24 General Electric Company Fouling resistant membranes for water treatment
CN106458649A (en) * 2014-03-21 2017-02-22 通用电气公司 Fouling resistant membranes for water treatment
US10486113B2 (en) 2014-12-08 2019-11-26 Technische Universität Berlin Fluid distribution device for a gas-liquid contactor, gas-liquid contactor and method for adding a gas to a liquid
US20180361303A1 (en) * 2017-06-19 2018-12-20 Kumho Environment Co., Ltd Scrubber system with diffraction plate adapted for swirl bubble generation for effective removal of pollutants
CN109464889A (en) * 2017-12-28 2019-03-15 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 A kind of technique and its system for ocean platform gas cleaning
US20220203292A1 (en) * 2019-04-03 2022-06-30 Klaus Lackner System and method for carbon dioxide capture through membrane conduits
CN112302838A (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-02 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 EGR exhaust gas recirculation system and automobile
US20220274066A1 (en) * 2019-08-30 2022-09-01 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Elements and Modules
US11931696B2 (en) * 2019-08-30 2024-03-19 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas separation elements and modules
CN113491935A (en) * 2020-04-08 2021-10-12 中石化南京化工研究院有限公司 Absorption liquid for deep decarburization in mixed gas
US11739506B2 (en) 2021-02-05 2023-08-29 General Electric Company Water recovery system including integrated contactor with thermally-enhanced recovery
WO2023272451A1 (en) * 2021-06-28 2023-01-05 Entegris, Inc. Oleophobic fluoropolymers and filter materials prepared therefrom
WO2023044508A1 (en) * 2021-09-20 2023-03-23 California Institute Of Technology Systems and methods for gas-liquid contactors for rapid carbon capture

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8317906B2 (en) 2012-11-27
US20120058016A1 (en) 2012-03-08
GB2462178A (en) 2010-02-03
DE102009026278A1 (en) 2010-04-01
GB0912658D0 (en) 2009-08-26
GB2462178B (en) 2012-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8317906B2 (en) Membrane contactor systems for gas-liquid contact
Dalane et al. Potential applications of membrane separation for subsea natural gas processing: A review
Lin et al. Absorption of carbon dioxide by mixed piperazine–alkanolamine absorbent in a plasma-modified polypropylene hollow fiber contactor
US10618008B2 (en) Polymeric ionomer separation membranes and methods of use
US6165253A (en) Apparatus for removal of volatile organic compounds from gaseous mixtures
JP6838819B2 (en) Composite membranes with improved performance and / or durability and usage
Lin et al. Absorption of carbon dioxide by the absorbent composed of piperazine and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol in PVDF membrane contactor
JP6816269B2 (en) A method of extracting the components of a gas mixture by parting on a nanoporous membrane
Ansaloni et al. CO2 capture using highly viscous amine blends in non-porous membrane contactors
US5753009A (en) Method and apparatus for selectively removing a component from a multicomponent gas/vapor mixture
AU2014238156B2 (en) Method and apparatus for desorption using microporous membrane operated in wetted mode
JP2001504385A (en) How to remove carbon dioxide from gas
EP3356016A1 (en) Membrane contactor comprising a composite membrane of a porous layer and a non-porous selective polymer layer for co2 separation from a mixed gasesous feed stream
US10737220B2 (en) PVP- and/or PVL-containing composite membranes and methods of use
EP1778388A1 (en) Membrane gaz seperation
Lee et al. Decompression stripping of carbon dioxide from rich monoethanolamine through porous hydrophobic modified ceramic hollow fiber membrane contactor
Lin et al. Determination of mass transfer resistance during absorption of carbon dioxide by mixed absorbents in PVDF and PP membrane contactor
US20200368690A1 (en) Polymeric ionomer separation membranes and methods of use
JP2008200589A (en) Method and apparatus for separation of gas
US20200164319A1 (en) Composite membranes with improved performance and/or durability and methods of use
Yu et al. Membrane technologies for CO2 capture
WO2017053647A1 (en) Method of removing volatile compounds for emulsions
Talaghat et al. Mathematical modeling of carbon dioxide removal from the CO2/CH4 gas mixture using amines and blend of amines in polypropylene: A comparison between hollow fiber membrane contactor and other membranes
Tamidi et al. Membrane Compatibility and its Characterization to Determine the Potential Applicability for H2S Separation
Pavel et al. The Basic Technologies of Mass Transfer and Their Progress in the Field of Upgrading Biogas

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,CONNECTICUT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BANSAL, VISHAL;REEL/FRAME:021313/0656

Effective date: 20080728

AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,NEW YORK

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS BE AMENDED TO READ: 1 RIVER ROAD, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 12345 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021313 FRAME 0656. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS BE AMENDED TO READ: 1 RIVER ROAD, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 12345;ASSIGNOR:BANSAL, VISHAL;REEL/FRAME:021366/0587

Effective date: 20080728

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION