US20090174554A1 - Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons - Google Patents

Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090174554A1
US20090174554A1 US11/920,042 US92004205A US2009174554A1 US 20090174554 A1 US20090174554 A1 US 20090174554A1 US 92004205 A US92004205 A US 92004205A US 2009174554 A1 US2009174554 A1 US 2009174554A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
luggage item
target object
image
canceled
target
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/920,042
Inventor
Eric Bergeron
Alain Bergeron
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Institut National dOptique
Vanderlande APC Inc
Original Assignee
Institut National dOptique
Optosecurity Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Institut National dOptique, Optosecurity Inc filed Critical Institut National dOptique
Assigned to OPTOSECURITY INC. reassignment OPTOSECURITY INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE
Assigned to INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE reassignment INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BERGERON, ALAIN
Assigned to OPTOSECURITY INC. reassignment OPTOSECURITY INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BERGERON, ERIC
Assigned to OPTOSECURITY INC. reassignment OPTOSECURITY INC. CHANGE OF ADDRESS Assignors: OPTOSECURITY INC.
Publication of US20090174554A1 publication Critical patent/US20090174554A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G01V5/22
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/02Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G01N23/04Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/70Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/88Image or video recognition using optical means, e.g. reference filters, holographic masks, frequency domain filters or spatial domain filters
    • G06V10/89Image or video recognition using optical means, e.g. reference filters, holographic masks, frequency domain filters or spatial domain filters using frequency domain filters, e.g. Fourier masks implemented on spatial light modulators
    • G06V10/893Image or video recognition using optical means, e.g. reference filters, holographic masks, frequency domain filters or spatial domain filters using frequency domain filters, e.g. Fourier masks implemented on spatial light modulators characterised by the kind of filter
    • G06V10/898Image or video recognition using optical means, e.g. reference filters, holographic masks, frequency domain filters or spatial domain filters using frequency domain filters, e.g. Fourier masks implemented on spatial light modulators characterised by the kind of filter combination of filters, e.g. phase-only filters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V2201/00Indexing scheme relating to image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V2201/05Recognition of patterns representing particular kinds of hidden objects, e.g. weapons, explosives, drugs

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to security systems and, more particularly, to methods and systems for screening luggage or cargo containers to identify certain objects located therein and for screening persons to identify certain objects located thereon.
  • security-screening systems make use of devices generating penetrating radiation, such as x-ray devices, to scan individual pieces of luggage to generate an image conveying the contents of the luggage.
  • the image is displayed on a screen and is examined by a human operator whose task it is to identify on the basis of the image potentially threatening objects located in the luggage.
  • a deficiency with current systems is that they are entirely reliant on the human operator to identify potentially threatening objects.
  • the performance of the human operator greatly varies according to such factors as poor training and fatigue.
  • the identification of threatening objects is highly susceptible to human error.
  • failure to identify a threatening object, such as a weapon for example may have serious consequences, such as property damage, injuries and human deaths.
  • the invention provides a system for screening a luggage item.
  • the system comprises an image generation device, an apparatus for processing image information and an output unit.
  • the image generation device is suitable for generating an image signal associated with a luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item.
  • the apparatus for processing image information is in communication with the image generation device and comprises an input for receiving the image signal associated with the luggage item and a processing unit.
  • the processing unit processes the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the processing unit generates a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the output module conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • the expression “luggage item” is used to broadly describe luggage, suitcase, handbags, backpacks, briefcases, boxes, parcels or any other similar type of item suitable for containing objects therein.
  • the image generation device uses penetrating radiation or emitted radiation to generate the image associated with the luggage item.
  • Examples include, but are not limited to, x-ray, gamma ray, computed tomography (CT scan), thermal imaging and millimeter wave.
  • CT scan computed tomography
  • the image signal generated may also be of any suitable format such as for example, VGA, SVGA, XGA, JPEG, GIF, TIFF and bitmap amongst others.
  • the output module includes a display adapted for generating an output display image conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal in visual format.
  • the output module is adapted for generating image data conveying the location of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
  • the output module is adapted for generating image data conveying the location of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected in combination with the image associated with the luggage item.
  • the output module is adapted for conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal in audio format.
  • the detection signal conveys position information related to at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
  • the processing unit is responsive to detection of the presence of at least one target object to generate log information elements conveying a presence of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected and for storing the log information data elements on a computer readable storage medium.
  • the log information may include a time stamp data element indicating timing information associated to the detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the processing unit is operative for applying a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the plurality of target images to detect the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the correlation operation may be effected optically, by using an optical correlator, or digitally using a programmed digital computer or dedicated hardware.
  • the comparisons between the image signal associated with the luggage item and at least some images in the plurality of target images is effected any suitable image processing algorithm.
  • the apparatus further comprises a second input for receiving the plurality of target images associated with target objects.
  • the plurality of target objects includes at least one weapon.
  • the invention provides a method for screening a luggage item.
  • the method includes receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item.
  • the method also includes processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • a detection signal is generated, which detection signal is then released.
  • the invention provides and apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item in accordance with the above described method.
  • the invention provides a computer readable storage medium including a program element suitable for execution by a computing apparatus for screening a luggage item, the computing apparatus comprising a memory unit and a processor operatively connected to the memory unit.
  • the program element when executing on the processor is operative for screening a luggage item in accordance with the above-described method.
  • the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item.
  • the apparatus comprises means for receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, means for processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the apparatus also comprises means for generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • the apparatus also comprises means for releasing the detection signal.
  • the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a cargo container.
  • the apparatus comprises an input for receiving an image signal associated with the cargo container, a processing unit in communication with the input and an output.
  • the image signal conveys information related to the contents of the cargo container.
  • the processing unit is operative for processing the image signal associated with the cargo container in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the cargo container.
  • the processing unit In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the cargo container, the processing unit generates a detection signal, which is then released at the output.
  • cargo container is used to broadly describe an enclosures for storing cargo such as would be used, for example, in a ship, train, truck or an other suitable of container.
  • the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a person.
  • the apparatus comprises an input for receiving an image signal associated with the person, a processing unit in communication with the input and an output.
  • the processing unit is operative for processing the image signal associated with the person in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object on the person.
  • the processing unit generates a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the person. The detection signal is then released at the output.
  • the invention provides an apparatus for detecting the presence of one or more prohibited objects in a container.
  • the apparatus comprises an input for receive data conveying graphic information on contents of the container and an optical correlator for processing the graphic information to detect depiction of the one or more prohibited objects.
  • FIG. 1 is a high-level block diagram of a system for screening a luggage item in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an output module suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for processing images suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b depict specific examples of visual outputs conveying the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item in accordance with specific examples of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram depicting a process for detecting a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item in accordance with specific examples of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 6 shows three images associated to a target object suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 , each image depicting the target object in a different orientation, in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 7 shows a mosaic image including a plurality of sub-images associated with a target object suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 , each sub-image depicting the target object in a different orientation and scale, in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram a luggage screening process using an optical correlator in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a block diagram depicting the functioning of an optical correlator in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 10 and 11 depict Fourier transforms of the spatial domain image for various numbers
  • FIG. 12 shows two images associated to a person suitable for use in a system for screening a person in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention
  • FIG. 13 is a block diagram of an apparatus suitable for implementing at least a portion of the modules depicted in connection with the apparatus for processing images shown in FIG. 3 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 Shown in FIG. 1 is a system 100 for screening a luggage item in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention.
  • the system 100 includes an image generation device 102 , an apparatus 106 in communication with the image generation device 102 and an output module 108 .
  • the image generation device 102 generates an image signal associated with a luggage item 104 .
  • the image signal conveys information related to the contents of the luggage item 104 .
  • the apparatus 106 receives the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and processes that image signal in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the plurality of target images are stored in a database of target images 110 .
  • the apparatus 106 In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104 , the apparatus 106 generates a detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104 . Examples of the manner in which the detection signal can be derived are described later on in the specification.
  • the output module 108 conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • the system 100 provides assistance to the human security personnel using the system to detect certain target objects and decreases the susceptibility of the screening process to human error.
  • the image generation device 102 uses penetrating radiation or emitted radiation to generate the image associated with the luggage item 104 .
  • penetrating radiation or emitted radiation include, without being limited to, x-ray, gamma ray, computed tomography (CT scans), thermal imaging and millimeter wave devices.
  • CT scans computed tomography
  • millimeter wave devices Such devices are known in the art and as such will not be described further here.
  • the image generation device 102 is a conventional x-ray machine adapted for generating a x-ray image of the luggage item 104 .
  • the image signal generated by the image generation device 102 and associated with the luggage item 104 may be convey a two-dimensional (2-D) image or a three-dimensional (3-D) image and may be in any suitable format Possible formats include, without being limited to, VGA, SVGA, XGA, JPEG, GIF, TIFF and bitmap amongst others.
  • the image signal is a format that can be displayed on a display screen.
  • the database of target images 110 includes a plurality of entries associated to respective target objects that the system 100 is designed to detect.
  • target image for each entry associated to a target object at least one image (hereinafter referred to as a “target image”) is provided in the database of target images 110 .
  • the format of the target images will depend upon the image processing algorithm implemented by the apparatus 106 . More specifically, the format of the target images is such that a comparison operation can be performed by the processing unit between the target images and data derived from the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 .
  • a set of images is provided in the database of target images 110 .
  • images depicting the target object in various orientations may be provided.
  • FIG. 6 of the drawings depicts an example of arbitrary 3D orientations of a target object.
  • each entry in the database of target images 110 is also associated to a respective target object identifier data element.
  • the database of target images 110 includes at least one entry associated to a weapon.
  • the specific design and content of the database of target images 110 may vary from one implementation to the next without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
  • the design of the database is not critical to the present invention and as such will not be described further here.
  • the database of target images 110 has been shown in FIG. 1 to be a component separate from the apparatus 106 , it will be appreciated that in certain embodiment the database of target images 110 may be part of apparatus 106 and that such implementations do not detract from the spirit of the invention. In addition, it will also be appreciated that in certain implementations, the database of target images 110 is shared between multiple apparatuses 106 .
  • the output module 108 conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • the output module 108 includes an output device 202 and an output controller unit 200 .
  • the output controller unit 200 receives the detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104 from apparatus 106 (shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • the detection signal conveys position information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the detection signal also conveys a target object identifier data element.
  • the target object identifier data element is associated to an entry in the database of target images 110 .
  • the output controller unit 200 is adapted to cause a display unit to convey information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output controller unit 200 generates image data conveying the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output controller unit 200 also extracts characteristics of the target object from the database of target images 110 on the basis of the target object identifier data element and generates image data conveying the characteristics of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output controller unit 200 generates image data conveying the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 in combination with the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and generated by the image generation device 102 (shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • the output controller unit 200 is adapted to cause an audio unit to convey information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output controller unit 200 generates audio data conveying the presence of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 and optionally the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 and the characteristics of the target object.
  • the output controller unit 200 then releases a signal for causing the output device 202 to convey information to a user of the system
  • the output device 202 may be any device suitable for conveying information to a user of the system 100 regarding the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the information may be conveyed in visual format, audio format or as a combination of visual and audio formats.
  • the output device 202 includes a display screen adapted for displaying in visual format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output device 202 includes a printer adapted for displaying in printed format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b show in simplified format example of information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 presented in visual format. More specifically, in FIG.
  • the image associated with the luggage item 104 is displayed along with a visual indicator (e.g., arrow 404 ) identifying the location of a target object (e.g., gun 402 ) detected by the apparatus 106 .
  • a visual indicator e.g., arrow 404
  • a text message is provided describing the target object detected by apparatus 106 .
  • the output may include additional information without detracting from the spirit of the invention and that the example illustrated in FIGS. 4 a and 4 b have been provided for the purpose of illustration only.
  • the output device 202 includes an audio output unit adapted for releasing an audio signal conveying information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the output device 202 includes a set of visual elements, such as lights or other suitable visual elements, adapted for conveying in visual format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the apparatus 106 includes a first input 310 , a second input 314 , an output 312 and a processing unit, generally comprising a pre-processing module 300 , an image comparison module 302 and a detection signal generator module 306 .
  • the first input 310 is for receiving an image signal associated with a luggage item from the image generation device 102 (shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • the second input 314 is for receiving target images from the database of target images 110 . It will be appreciated that in embodiments where the database of target images 110 is part of apparatus 106 , the second input 314 may be omitted.
  • the output 312 is for releasing a detection signal conveying the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 for transmittal to output module 108 .
  • the processing unit of the apparatus 106 receives the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 from the first input 310 and processes that image signal in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects received at input 314 to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104 . In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104 , the processing unit of the apparatus 106 generates and releases at output 312 a detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104 .
  • the pre-processing module 300 receives an image signal associated with the luggage item 104 is received via the first input 310 .
  • the pre-processing module 300 processes the image signal in order to enhance the image, remove extraneous information therefrom and remove noise artefacts in order to obtain more accurate comparison results.
  • the complexity of the requisite level of pre-processing and the related tradeoffs between speed and accuracy depend on the application. Examples of pre-processing may include, without being limited to, brightness and contrast manipulation, histogram modification, noise removal and filtering amongst others.
  • the pre-processing module 300 may actually be external to the apparatus 106 , e.g., it may be integrated as part of the image generation device 102 or as an external component. It will also be appreciated that the pre-processing module 300 (and hence step 501 ) may be omitted in certain embodiments of the present invention without detracting from the spirit of the invention. As part of step 501 , the pre-processing module 300 releases a modified image signal for processing by the image comparison module 302 .
  • the image comparison module 302 verifies whether there remain any unprocessed target images in the database of target images 110 . In the affirmative, the image comparison module 302 proceeds to step 503 where the next target image is accessed and the image comparison module 302 then proceeds to step 504 . If at step 502 all target images in the database of target images 110 have been processed, the image comparison module 302 proceeds to step 508 and the process in completed.
  • the image comparison module 302 compares the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 against the target image accessed at step 503 to determine whether a match exists.
  • the comparison may be effected using any image processing algorithm suitable for comparing two images. Examples of algorithms that can be used to perform image processing and comparison include without being limited to:
  • the image comparison module 302 includes an edge detector to perform part of the comparison at step 504 .
  • the comparison performed at step 504 includes effecting a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the target images.
  • the correlation operation is performed by an optical correlator.
  • an optical correlator suitable for use in comparing two images will be described later on in the specification.
  • the correlation operation is performed by a digital correlator.
  • the image comparison module 302 then proceeds to step 506 where the result of the comparison effected at step 504 is processed to determine whether a match exists between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image. In the absence of a match, the image comparison module 302 returns to step 502 . In response to detection of a match, the image comparison module 302 triggers the detection signal generation module 306 to execute step 510 . Then, the image comparison module 302 returns to step 502 to continue processing with respect to the next target image.
  • the detection signal generation module 306 generates a detection signal conveying the presence of the target object in the luggage item 104 , and the detection signal is released at output 312 .
  • the detection signal may simply convey the fact that a target object has been detected as present in the luggage item 104 , without necessarily specifying the identity of the target object.
  • the detection signal may convey the actual identity of the detected target object detected as being present in the luggage item 104 .
  • the detection signal may include information related to the positioning of the target object within the luggage item 104 and optionally a target object identifier data element associated to the target object determined to be a potential match.
  • step 504 which involves a comparison between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target images from the database of target images 110 , is performed using a correlation operation.
  • the correlation operation multiplies together the Fourier transform of the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 with the Fourier transform of a target image.
  • the result of correlation operation provides a measure of the degree of similarity between two images.
  • the image comparison module 302 includes an optical correlator unit for computing the correlation between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and a target image from the database of target images 110 .
  • the optical correlator include a joint transform correlator (JTC) and a focal plane correlator (SPC).
  • the optical correlator multiplies together the Fourier transform of the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 with that of a target image and records the result with a camera. An energy peak measured with that camera indicates a match between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image.
  • the optical correlator performs the correlation operation physically through light-based computation, rather than by using software running on a silicon-based computer, which allows computations to be performed at a higher speed than is possible with a software implementation and thus provides for improved real-time performance.
  • the correlation computation may also be implemented using a digital correlator.
  • the correlation operation is computationally intensive and, in certain implementations requiring real-time performance, the use of a digital correlator may not provide suitable performance. In such implementations, an optical correlator will be preferred.
  • the database of target images 110 includes a plurality of target images associated to objects which the system 100 is designed to detect.
  • the database of target images 110 includes data indicative of the Fourier transform of the target image. This data will herein be referred to as a template or filter. The template will be retrieved later when performing a verification or identification operation. Image processing and enhancement can be performed to obtain better matching performance depending on the environment and application.
  • the Fourier transform of the target image is digitally pre-computed such as to improve the speed of the correlation operation when the system is in use.
  • the generation of the reference template or filter is performed in a few steps.
  • the resulting image is then processed through a Fourier transform function.
  • the result of this transform is a complex image.
  • a phase only filter (POF) for example will only contain phase information (between zero and 2 pi) which is mapped to a 0 to 255 range values. These 256 values correspond in fact to the 256 levels of gray of an image.
  • phase only filter for example will only contain phase information (between zero and 2 pi) which is mapped to a 0 to 255 range values. These 256 values correspond in fact to the 256 levels of gray of an image.
  • a MACE Minimum Average Correlation Energy
  • the MACE file includes combining several different 2D projections of a given object and encoding them in a single MACE filter instead of having one 2D projection per filter.
  • MACE filters One of the benefits of using MACE filters is that the resulting database of target images 110 would take less space since it would include fewer items. Also, since the number of correlations needed to identify a single target object would be reduced, the total processing time would also be reduced.
  • a composite image By dividing the target image into several sub-images, a composite image can be formed, herein referred to as a mosaic.
  • a mosaic When a mosaic is displayed at the input of the correlator, the correlation is computed simultaneously on all the sub-images without incurring any substantial time penalty.
  • a mosaic may contain several different target objects or several different orientations of the same target object or a combination of both.
  • FIG. 7 of the drawings depicts a mosaic including a target object in various orientations and scales. The parallel processing capabilities a mosaic effectively increase the throughput of the correlator.
  • FIG. 8 depicts a high level representation of a luggage screening process using an optical correlator.
  • an image 800 associated with a luggage item is provided as input to the correlator and undergoes an optical Fourier transformation 804 .
  • the result of the transformation is multiplied 802 by the (previously computed) Fourier transform of a target image 804 .
  • the result of the multiplication of the two Fourier transforms is then processed through another optical Fourier transform 822 and the resulting signal is captured by a camera at what is referred to as the correlation plane, which yields the correlation output.
  • the correlation output is released for transmission to the detection signal generator 306 where it is analyzed.
  • a peak in the correlation output indicates a match between the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image.
  • the Fourier transform of the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 is performed as follows: The image is displayed internally on a small Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). A light beam projects the image through a lens that performs the equivalent of a Fourier transform on the image. The Fourier transform of the image is then projected on a second LCD screen on which is displayed the template or filter associated to the target image. The two multiplied Fourier transforms are then processed through a second Fourier lens which forces the light beam to converge to a CCD at the correlation plane. The CCD output is then sent to a frame grabber in the computer.
  • LCD Liquid Crystal Display
  • FIG. 9 The inner workings of the aforementioned non-limiting example optical correlator are illustrated in FIG. 9 .
  • a laser source 900 that generates a light beam used to project images across the correlator.
  • the light beam is directed first through a small set of lenses 902 used to expand its diameter in order to illuminate the whole surface of the first LCD screen 904 to the left.
  • the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 is displayed on the first LCD screen 904 either through a direct camera interface or provided as a VGA image by the computer.
  • the first LCD screen 904 is illuminated by the light beam and the image is propagated through the correlator.
  • the image 800 captured by the camera is that of a gun on a conveyor belt.
  • the light beam modulated by the first image on the first LCD screen 904 is then propagated through the second set of lenses 906 , referred to as a Fourier lens since it performs the equivalent of the Fourier transform mathematical operation.
  • the inherent properties of light are used to physically perform the appropriate calculations. Specifically, the propagation of light in vacuum is a function which corresponds to the kernel of the Fourier transform operation, thus the propagation of light along the axis of a Fourier lens represents a sufficiently strong approximation of this natural phenomenon to assert that the light beam undergoes a Fourier transform. Otherwise stated, a lens has the inherent property of performing a Fourier transform on images observed at its front focal plane, provided that this image is displayed at its back focal plane.
  • the Fourier transform which can normally be rather computation-intensive when calculated by a digital computer, is performed in the optical correlator simply by the propagation of the light.
  • the mathematics behind this optical realization is equivalent to the exact Fourier transform function and can be modeled with standard fast Fourier algorithms.
  • Fourier transforms the reader is invited to consider B.V.K. Vijaya Kumar, Marios Savvides, Krithika Venkataramani, and Chunyan Xie, “Spatial frequency domain image processing for biometric recognition”, Biometrics ICIP Conference 2002. The contents of this document are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the signal is projected on the second LCD screen 908 on which is displayed the target template, i.e., Fourier transform of the target image 804 .
  • the target template i.e., Fourier transform of the target image 804 .
  • the Fourier transform of the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 goes through the second LCD screen 908 on which the target template is displayed, the light beam crosses a second Fourier lens 910 which, again, optically computes the equivalent of a Fourier transform multiplication.
  • This operation corresponds to a correlation in the spatial domain.
  • the target image displayed on the second LCD screen 908 in fact induces a phase variation on the incoming light beam. Each pixel can potentially induce a phase change whose magnitude is equivalent to its grey level.
  • the Fourier transform displayed on the first LCD screen 904 is multiplied with the Fourier transform of the target image 804 , which is equivalent to performing a correlation.
  • the second Fourier lens 910 finally concentrates the light beam on a small area camera or CCD 912 where the result of the correlation is measured, so to speak.
  • the CCD 912 in fact measures energy peaks at on the correlation plane. The position of a correlation peak corresponds in fact to the location of the target object center in the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 .
  • the CCD 912 communicates the signal from the optical correlator to the detection signal generator module 306 .
  • the detection signal generator module 306 is a computing unit including a frame grabber and software.
  • the software is adapted to processing the signal received from the correlator to detects energy peaks as gray level video signals varying between 0 and 255.
  • a strong intensity peak on the correlation plane indicates a match between the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image 804 .
  • the location of the energy peak also indicates the location of the center of the target image in the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 .
  • the Fourier transform as applied to images is now described in general terms.
  • the Fourier transform is a mathematical tool used to convert the information present within an object's image into its frequency representation.
  • an image can be seen as a superposition of various spatial frequencies and the Fourier transform is a mathematical operation used to compute the intensity of each of these frequencies within the original image.
  • the spatial frequencies represent the rate of variation of intensity in space. Consequently, a smooth or uniform pattern mainly contains low frequencies. Sharply contoured patterns, by contrast, exhibit a higher frequency content.
  • the Fourier transform is a global operator: changing a single frequency of the Fourier transform affects the whole object in the spatial domain.
  • a correlation operation can be mathematically described by:
  • ⁇ and ⁇ represent the pixel coordinates in the correlation plane
  • C( ⁇ , ⁇ ) stands for the correlation
  • x and y identify the pixel coordinates of the input image
  • f(x, y) is the original input image
  • h*( ⁇ , ⁇ ) is the complex conjugate of the correlation filter.
  • the correlation between an input image and a target template is equivalent, in mathematical terms, to the multiplication of their respective Fourier transform, provided that the complex conjugate of the filter is used. Consequently, the correlation can be defined in the spatial domain as the search for a given pattern (template), or in the frequency domain, as filtering operation with a specially designed matched filter.
  • the use of optics for computing a correlation operation allows the computation to be performed in a shorter time than by using a digital implementation of the correlation. It turns out that an optical lens properly positioned (i.e. input and output images are located on the lens's focal planes) automatically computes the Fourier transform of the input image.
  • the Fourier transform of the target image is computed beforehand and submitted to the correlator as a mask.
  • the target template (or filter in short) is generated by computing the Fourier transform of the reference template. This type of filter is called a matched filter.
  • FIG. 10 depicts the Fourier transform of the spatial domain image of a ‘2’. It can be seen that most of the energy (bright areas) is contained in the central portion of the Fourier transform image which correspond to low spatial frequencies (the images are centred on the origin of the Fourier plane). The energy is somewhat more dispersed in the medium frequencies and is concentrated in orientations representative of the shape of the input image. Finally, little energy is contained in the upper frequencies.
  • the right-hand-side image shows the phase content of the Fourier transform. The phase is coded from black (0°) to white (360°).
  • Matched filters are specifically adapted to respond to one image in particular: they are optimized to respond to an object with respect to its energy content.
  • the contour of an object corresponds to its high frequency contents. This can be easily understood as the contours represent areas where the intensity varies rapidly (hence a high frequency as per the section about Fourier Transforms and Spatial Frequencies).
  • the matched filter can be divided by its module (the image is normalized), over the whole Fourier transform image.
  • the resulting filter is called a Phase-Only Filter (POF) and is defined by:
  • the discrimination provided by the POF filter has some disadvantages. It turns out that, although the optical correlator is somewhat insensitive to the size of the objects to be recognized, the images are expected to be properly sized, otherwise the features might not be registered properly. To understand this requirement, imagine a filter defined out of a given instance of a ‘2’. If that filter is applied to a second instance of a ‘2’ whose contour is slightly different, the correlation peak will be significantly reduced as a result of the great sensitivity of the filter to the original shape. A new type of filter, termed a composite filter, is introduced to overcome these limitations.
  • filters can be designed by:
  • composite filters are composed of the response of individual POF filters to the same symbol. Mathematically, this can be expressed by:
  • h comp ( x,y ) ⁇ a h a ( x,y )+ ⁇ b h b ( x,y )+ K+ ⁇ x h x ( x,y ) (5)
  • the filter generated in this fashion is likely to be more robust to minor signature variations as the irrelevant high frequency features will be averaged out.
  • the net effect is an equalization of the response of the filter to the different instances of a given symbol.
  • Composite filters can also be used to reduce the response of the filter to the other classes of symbols.
  • the coefficient b for example, is set to a negative value, then the filter response to a symbol of class b will be significantly reduced.
  • the correlation peak will be high if h a (x,y) is at the input image, and low if h b (X,y) is present at the input.
  • the filter is composed of too many coefficients, the response will degrade as a result of too much averaging. This means that the multiple characters used to generate the filter will each modify the response of the global filter. If too many are used, the filter will provide an average response. Therefore, the target images used to design the composite filter should be carefully selected. To overcome this problem and to ensure a good uniformity of the filter to the different occurrences of the same in-class character while preserving the discrimination capabilities, the following technique was used.
  • a filter is created out of the image of a symbol (say a ‘2’).
  • the filter is generated in the usual way and its response is tested on many instances of ‘2’s. Ideally, the response would be uniform but it is not because of the small discrepancies between the images.
  • Equation 5 The image of the ‘2’ that presents the weakest response to the filter is linearly combined (equation 5), using the original image. Note that the multiplying coefficients are smaller than unity so that the filter resulting from the composite image is not modified too drastically within one iteration of the process.
  • the same procedure is repeated, and again the image with the weakest response is added to the image used to form the filter. This process is repeated until all the images respond to the filter to within a given margin, at which point the desired filter has been generated.
  • the threshold was set at 85%.
  • Adding ‘multiple versions’ of a ‘2’ while creating the filter may induce the filter to respond to other symbols as well (e.g. crosstalk will appear) and this behaviour will intensify with the number of symbols used to compute the filter. To prevent this, a negative background can be added to the symbols used for the filter generation.
  • FIG. 11 The effect of the addition of this background is depicted in FIG. 11 , where as usual the original image is on the left, the modified image is in the middle and the phase contents of the Fourier transform corresponding to the middle image are shown at right.
  • the effect of this procedure can be seen by the appearance of a shadow around the edges of the symbols (middle vs left images).
  • h b max ⁇ 2 a a+ ⁇ 2 b b+K+ ⁇ 2 n n (6)
  • h n max ⁇ n a a+ ⁇ n b b+K+ ⁇ n n n
  • H n max ⁇ ( h n max ) ⁇ ⁇ ( h n max ) ⁇ ( 7 )
  • H n(max) stands for the POF filter computed with the object h n(max)
  • ⁇ i k are the weighing factors of the linear combination and a . . . n, the original symbol images.
  • equation (7) simply states that the normalized response of a filter to a symbol of its class should be unity while its response to a foreign symbol should be zero.
  • the filters would ideally need to take into account the response of all the pixels of the correlation plane (peak plus sidelobes) to all the symbols. While this can be achieved, the filter generation would, in this case, become a complex and time-consuming operation.
  • the correlator's video and graphics input are compatible with standard computer graphics (VGA) and NTSC video signals.
  • VGA computer graphics
  • NTSC NTSC video signals.
  • the maximum image area processed by the correlator is equal to 640 ⁇ 480 pixels, and is independent of the size of the image, as opposed to digital systems that require more processing time and power as images get larger.
  • Another example is the sharing of a single optical correlator by multiple image generation devices.
  • a system for screening cargo containers includes components similar to those described in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 .
  • the image generation device 102 is configured to scan a large object (i.e. the cargo container) and possibly to scan the large object along various axes to generate multiple images associated to the cargo container.
  • the image or images associated with the cargo container convey information related to the contents of the cargo container. Any suitable method for generating images associated to containers may be used. Such scanning methods for large objects are known in the art and as such will not be described further here.
  • Each image is then processed in accordance with the method described in the present specification to detect the presence of target objects in the cargo container.
  • a system for screening people includes components similar to those described in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 .
  • the image generation device 102 is configured to scan a person and possibly to scan the person along various axes to generate multiple images associated to the person.
  • the image or images associated with the person conveys information related to the objects carried by the person.
  • FIG. 12 depicts two images associated with a person suitable for use in connection with a specific implementation of the system. Each image is then processed in accordance with the method described in the present specification to detect the presence of target objects on the person.
  • Certain portions of the image processing apparatus 106 can be implemented on a general purpose digital computer 1300 , of the type depicted in FIG. 13 , including a processing unit 1302 and a memory 1304 connected by a communication bus.
  • the memory includes data 1308 and program instructions 1306 .
  • the processing unit 1302 is adapted to process the data 1308 and the program instructions 1306 in order to implement the functional blocks described in the specification and depicted in the drawings.
  • the digital computer 1300 may also comprise an I/O interface 1310 for receiving or sending data elements to external devices.
  • the above-described image processing apparatus 106 can be implemented on a dedicated hardware platform where electrical/optical components implement the functional blocks described in the specification and depicted in the drawings. Specific implementations may be realized using ICs, ASICs, DSPs, FPGA, optical correlator, digital correlator or other suitable hardware platform.

Abstract

A system for screening luggage items, which includes an image generation device suitable for generating an image signal associated with a luggage item where the image signal conveys information related to the contents of the luggage item. The system also includes an apparatus having an input for receiving the image signal and a processing unit. The processing unit processes the image signal in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. The processing unit generates a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. An output module conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system. In alternative embodiments, the system may also be used to screen cargo containers and persons.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates generally to security systems and, more particularly, to methods and systems for screening luggage or cargo containers to identify certain objects located therein and for screening persons to identify certain objects located thereon.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Security in airports, train stations, ports, office buildings and other public or private venues is becoming increasingly important in particular in light of recent violent events.
  • Typically, security-screening systems make use of devices generating penetrating radiation, such as x-ray devices, to scan individual pieces of luggage to generate an image conveying the contents of the luggage. The image is displayed on a screen and is examined by a human operator whose task it is to identify on the basis of the image potentially threatening objects located in the luggage.
  • A deficiency with current systems is that they are entirely reliant on the human operator to identify potentially threatening objects. However, the performance of the human operator greatly varies according to such factors as poor training and fatigue. As such, the identification of threatening objects is highly susceptible to human error. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that failure to identify a threatening object, such as a weapon for example, may have serious consequences, such as property damage, injuries and human deaths.
  • Another deficiency with current systems is that the labour costs associated with such systems are significant since human operators must view the images.
  • Consequently, there is a need in the industry for providing a method and system for use in screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons to identify certain objects that alleviate at least in part the deficiencies of the prior art.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with a broad aspect, the invention provides a system for screening a luggage item. The system comprises an image generation device, an apparatus for processing image information and an output unit. The image generation device is suitable for generating an image signal associated with a luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item. The apparatus for processing image information is in communication with the image generation device and comprises an input for receiving the image signal associated with the luggage item and a processing unit. The processing unit processes the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. The processing unit generates a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. The output module conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • For the purpose of this specification, the expression “luggage item” is used to broadly describe luggage, suitcase, handbags, backpacks, briefcases, boxes, parcels or any other similar type of item suitable for containing objects therein.
  • In a specific example of implementation, the image generation device uses penetrating radiation or emitted radiation to generate the image associated with the luggage item. Examples include, but are not limited to, x-ray, gamma ray, computed tomography (CT scan), thermal imaging and millimeter wave. The image signal generated may also be of any suitable format such as for example, VGA, SVGA, XGA, JPEG, GIF, TIFF and bitmap amongst others.
  • In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the output module includes a display adapted for generating an output display image conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal in visual format. Optionally, the output module is adapted for generating image data conveying the location of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected. Optionally still, the output module is adapted for generating image data conveying the location of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected in combination with the image associated with the luggage item. In an alternative example of implementation, the output module is adapted for conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal in audio format.
  • In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the detection signal conveys position information related to at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
  • In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the processing unit is responsive to detection of the presence of at least one target object to generate log information elements conveying a presence of at least one of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected and for storing the log information data elements on a computer readable storage medium. The log information may include a time stamp data element indicating timing information associated to the detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
  • In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the processing unit is operative for applying a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the plurality of target images to detect the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item. The correlation operation may be effected optically, by using an optical correlator, or digitally using a programmed digital computer or dedicated hardware. In an alternative example of implementation, the comparisons between the image signal associated with the luggage item and at least some images in the plurality of target images is effected any suitable image processing algorithm.
  • In a specific example of implementation, the apparatus further comprises a second input for receiving the plurality of target images associated with target objects. In a specific implementation, the plurality of target objects includes at least one weapon.
  • In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides a method for screening a luggage item. The method includes receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item. The method also includes processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item, a detection signal is generated, which detection signal is then released.
  • In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides and apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item in accordance with the above described method.
  • In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides a computer readable storage medium including a program element suitable for execution by a computing apparatus for screening a luggage item, the computing apparatus comprising a memory unit and a processor operatively connected to the memory unit. The program element when executing on the processor is operative for screening a luggage item in accordance with the above-described method.
  • In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item. The apparatus comprises means for receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, means for processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. The apparatus also comprises means for generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item. The apparatus also comprises means for releasing the detection signal.
  • In accordance with yet another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a cargo container. The apparatus comprises an input for receiving an image signal associated with the cargo container, a processing unit in communication with the input and an output. The image signal conveys information related to the contents of the cargo container. The processing unit is operative for processing the image signal associated with the cargo container in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the cargo container. In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the cargo container, the processing unit generates a detection signal, which is then released at the output.
  • For the purpose of this specification, the expression “cargo container” is used to broadly describe an enclosures for storing cargo such as would be used, for example, in a ship, train, truck or an other suitable of container.
  • In accordance with yet another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus suitable for screening a person. The apparatus comprises an input for receiving an image signal associated with the person, a processing unit in communication with the input and an output. The processing unit is operative for processing the image signal associated with the person in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object on the person. The processing unit generates a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the person. The detection signal is then released at the output.
  • In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus for detecting the presence of one or more prohibited objects in a container. The apparatus comprises an input for receive data conveying graphic information on contents of the container and an optical correlator for processing the graphic information to detect depiction of the one or more prohibited objects.
  • Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying Figures.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is provided herein below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a high-level block diagram of a system for screening a luggage item in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an output module suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for processing images suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIGS. 4 a and 4 b depict specific examples of visual outputs conveying the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item in accordance with specific examples of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram depicting a process for detecting a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item in accordance with specific examples of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 6 shows three images associated to a target object suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1, each image depicting the target object in a different orientation, in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 7 shows a mosaic image including a plurality of sub-images associated with a target object suitable for use in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1, each sub-image depicting the target object in a different orientation and scale, in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram a luggage screening process using an optical correlator in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 9 is a block diagram depicting the functioning of an optical correlator in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIGS. 10 and 11 depict Fourier transforms of the spatial domain image for various numbers;
  • FIG. 12 shows two images associated to a person suitable for use in a system for screening a person in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 13 is a block diagram of an apparatus suitable for implementing at least a portion of the modules depicted in connection with the apparatus for processing images shown in FIG. 3 in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention.
  • In the drawings, the embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of examples. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for the purpose of illustration and are an aid for understanding. They are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Shown in FIG. 1 is a system 100 for screening a luggage item in accordance with a specific example of implementation of the present invention. The system 100 includes an image generation device 102, an apparatus 106 in communication with the image generation device 102 and an output module 108.
  • The image generation device 102 generates an image signal associated with a luggage item 104. The image signal conveys information related to the contents of the luggage item 104. The apparatus 106 receives the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and processes that image signal in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104. In a specific implementation, the plurality of target images are stored in a database of target images 110. In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104, the apparatus 106 generates a detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104. Examples of the manner in which the detection signal can be derived are described later on in the specification. The output module 108 conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • Advantageously, the system 100 provides assistance to the human security personnel using the system to detect certain target objects and decreases the susceptibility of the screening process to human error.
  • Image Generation Device 102
  • In a specific example of implementation, the image generation device 102 uses penetrating radiation or emitted radiation to generate the image associated with the luggage item 104. Specific examples of such devices include, without being limited to, x-ray, gamma ray, computed tomography (CT scans), thermal imaging and millimeter wave devices. Such devices are known in the art and as such will not be described further here. In a non-limiting example of implementation, the image generation device 102 is a conventional x-ray machine adapted for generating a x-ray image of the luggage item 104.
  • The image signal generated by the image generation device 102 and associated with the luggage item 104 may be convey a two-dimensional (2-D) image or a three-dimensional (3-D) image and may be in any suitable format Possible formats include, without being limited to, VGA, SVGA, XGA, JPEG, GIF, TIFF and bitmap amongst others. Preferably, the image signal is a format that can be displayed on a display screen.
  • Database of Target Images 110
  • In a specific example of implementation, the database of target images 110 includes a plurality of entries associated to respective target objects that the system 100 is designed to detect.
  • In a non-limiting implementation, for each entry associated to a target object at least one image (hereinafter referred to as a “target image”) is provided in the database of target images 110. The format of the target images will depend upon the image processing algorithm implemented by the apparatus 106. More specifically, the format of the target images is such that a comparison operation can be performed by the processing unit between the target images and data derived from the image signal associated with the luggage item 104.
  • Optionally, for each entry associated to a target object, a set of images is provided in the database of target images 110. For example, images depicting the target object in various orientations may be provided. FIG. 6 of the drawings depicts an example of arbitrary 3D orientations of a target object.
  • Optionally still, for each entry associated to a target object, characteristics of the target object are provided. Such characteristics may include, without being limited to, the name of the target object, its associated threat level, the recommended handling procedure when such a target object is detected and any other suitable information. Optionally still, each entry in the database of target images 110 is also associated to a respective target object identifier data element. In a non-limiting example of implementation, the database of target images 110 includes at least one entry associated to a weapon.
  • The specific design and content of the database of target images 110 may vary from one implementation to the next without detracting from the spirit of the invention. The design of the database is not critical to the present invention and as such will not be described further here.
  • Although the database of target images 110 has been shown in FIG. 1 to be a component separate from the apparatus 106, it will be appreciated that in certain embodiment the database of target images 110 may be part of apparatus 106 and that such implementations do not detract from the spirit of the invention. In addition, it will also be appreciated that in certain implementations, the database of target images 110 is shared between multiple apparatuses 106.
  • Output Module 108
  • In a specific example of implementation, the output module 108 conveys information derived at least in part on the basis of the detection signal to a user of the system.
  • A specific example of implementation of the output module 108 is shown in FIG. 2 of the drawings. As depicted, the output module includes an output device 202 and an output controller unit 200.
  • The output controller unit 200 receives the detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104 from apparatus 106 (shown in FIG. 1). In a specific implementation, the detection signal conveys position information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104. Optionally, the detection signal also conveys a target object identifier data element. The target object identifier data element is associated to an entry in the database of target images 110.
  • In a first specific example of implementation, the output controller unit 200 is adapted to cause a display unit to convey information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104. In a non-limiting example of implementation, the output controller unit 200 generates image data conveying the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104. Optionally, the output controller unit 200 also extracts characteristics of the target object from the database of target images 110 on the basis of the target object identifier data element and generates image data conveying the characteristics of the certain target object in the luggage item 104. In yet another non-limiting example of implementation, the output controller unit 200 generates image data conveying the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 in combination with the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and generated by the image generation device 102 (shown in FIG. 1).
  • In a second specific example of implementation, the output controller unit 200 is adapted to cause an audio unit to convey information related to the certain target object in the luggage item 104. In a specific non-limiting example of implementation, the output controller unit 200 generates audio data conveying the presence of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 and optionally the location of the certain target object in the luggage item 104 and the characteristics of the target object.
  • The output controller unit 200 then releases a signal for causing the output device 202 to convey information to a user of the system
  • More specifically, the output device 202 may be any device suitable for conveying information to a user of the system 100 regarding the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104. The information may be conveyed in visual format, audio format or as a combination of visual and audio formats.
  • In a first specific example of implementation, the output device 202 includes a display screen adapted for displaying in visual format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104. In a second specific example of implementation, the output device 202 includes a printer adapted for displaying in printed format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104. FIGS. 4 a and 4 b show in simplified format example of information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 presented in visual format. More specifically, in FIG. 4 a, the image associated with the luggage item 104 is displayed along with a visual indicator (e.g., arrow 404) identifying the location of a target object (e.g., gun 402) detected by the apparatus 106. Alternatively, in FIG. 4 b, a text message is provided describing the target object detected by apparatus 106. It will be appreciated that the output may include additional information without detracting from the spirit of the invention and that the example illustrated in FIGS. 4 a and 4 b have been provided for the purpose of illustration only.
  • In a third specific example of implementation, the output device 202 includes an audio output unit adapted for releasing an audio signal conveying information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104.
  • In a fourth specific example of implementation, the output device 202 includes a set of visual elements, such as lights or other suitable visual elements, adapted for conveying in visual format information related to the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104.
  • The person skilled in the art will readily appreciate, in light of the present specification, that other suitable types of output devices may be used here without detracting from the spirit of the invention.
  • Apparatus 106
  • The apparatus 106 will now be described in greater detail with reference to FIG. 3. As depicted, the apparatus 106 includes a first input 310, a second input 314, an output 312 and a processing unit, generally comprising a pre-processing module 300, an image comparison module 302 and a detection signal generator module 306.
  • The first input 310 is for receiving an image signal associated with a luggage item from the image generation device 102 (shown in FIG. 1).
  • The second input 314 is for receiving target images from the database of target images 110. It will be appreciated that in embodiments where the database of target images 110 is part of apparatus 106, the second input 314 may be omitted.
  • The output 312 is for releasing a detection signal conveying the presence of a target object in the luggage item 104 for transmittal to output module 108.
  • The processing unit of the apparatus 106 receives the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 from the first input 310 and processes that image signal in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects received at input 314 to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104. In response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item 104, the processing unit of the apparatus 106 generates and releases at output 312 a detection signal conveying the presence of the at least one target object in the luggage item 104.
  • The process implemented by the various functional elements of the processing unit of the apparatus 106 is depicted in FIG. 5 of the drawings. At step 500, the pre-processing module 300 receives an image signal associated with the luggage item 104 is received via the first input 310. At step 501, the pre-processing module 300 processes the image signal in order to enhance the image, remove extraneous information therefrom and remove noise artefacts in order to obtain more accurate comparison results. The complexity of the requisite level of pre-processing and the related tradeoffs between speed and accuracy depend on the application. Examples of pre-processing may include, without being limited to, brightness and contrast manipulation, histogram modification, noise removal and filtering amongst others. It will be appreciated that all or part of the functionality of the pre-processing module 300 may actually be external to the apparatus 106, e.g., it may be integrated as part of the image generation device 102 or as an external component. It will also be appreciated that the pre-processing module 300 (and hence step 501) may be omitted in certain embodiments of the present invention without detracting from the spirit of the invention. As part of step 501, the pre-processing module 300 releases a modified image signal for processing by the image comparison module 302.
  • At step 502, the image comparison module 302 verifies whether there remain any unprocessed target images in the database of target images 110. In the affirmative, the image comparison module 302 proceeds to step 503 where the next target image is accessed and the image comparison module 302 then proceeds to step 504. If at step 502 all target images in the database of target images 110 have been processed, the image comparison module 302 proceeds to step 508 and the process in completed.
  • At step 504, the image comparison module 302 compares the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 against the target image accessed at step 503 to determine whether a match exists. The comparison may be effected using any image processing algorithm suitable for comparing two images. Examples of algorithms that can be used to perform image processing and comparison include without being limited to:
  • A—Image Enhancement
      • Brightness and contrast manipulation
      • Histogram modification
      • Noise removal
      • Filtering
    B—Image Segmentation
      • Thresholding
        • Binary or multilevel
        • Hysteresis based
        • Statistics/histogram analysis
      • Clustering
      • Region growing
      • Splitting and merging
      • Texture analysis
      • Watershed
      • Blob labeling
    C—General Detection
      • Template matching
      • Matched filtering
      • Image registration
      • Image correlation
      • Hough transform
    D—Edge Detection
      • Gradient
      • Laplacian
    E—Morphological Image Processing
      • Binary
      • Grayscale
    F—Frequency Analysis
      • Fourier Transform
      • Wavelets
    G—Shape Analysis and Representations
      • Geometric attributes (e.g. perimeter, area, euler number, compactness)
      • Spatial moments (invariance)
      • Fourier descriptors
      • B-splines
      • Chain codes
      • Polygons
      • Quad tree decomposition
    H—Feature Representation and Classification
      • Bayesian classifier
      • Principal component analysis
      • Binary tree
      • Graphs
      • Neural networks
      • Genetic algorithms
      • Markov random fields
  • The above algorithms are well known in the field of image processing and as such will not be described further here.
  • In a specific example of implementation, the image comparison module 302 includes an edge detector to perform part of the comparison at step 504. In another specific example of implementation, the comparison performed at step 504 includes effecting a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the target images. In a specific example of implementation, the correlation operation is performed by an optical correlator. A specific example of implementation of an optical correlator suitable for use in comparing two images will be described later on in the specification. In an alternative example of implementation, the correlation operation is performed by a digital correlator.
  • The image comparison module 302 then proceeds to step 506 where the result of the comparison effected at step 504 is processed to determine whether a match exists between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image. In the absence of a match, the image comparison module 302 returns to step 502. In response to detection of a match, the image comparison module 302 triggers the detection signal generation module 306 to execute step 510. Then, the image comparison module 302 returns to step 502 to continue processing with respect to the next target image.
  • At step 510, the detection signal generation module 306 generates a detection signal conveying the presence of the target object in the luggage item 104, and the detection signal is released at output 312. The detection signal may simply convey the fact that a target object has been detected as present in the luggage item 104, without necessarily specifying the identity of the target object. Alternatively, the detection signal may convey the actual identity of the detected target object detected as being present in the luggage item 104. As previously indicated, the detection signal may include information related to the positioning of the target object within the luggage item 104 and optionally a target object identifier data element associated to the target object determined to be a potential match.
  • Specific Example of Image Comparison Module 302 Including an Optical Correlator
  • As mentioned above, in a specific implementation of the image comparison module 302, step 504, which involves a comparison between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target images from the database of target images 110, is performed using a correlation operation. The correlation operation multiplies together the Fourier transform of the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 with the Fourier transform of a target image. The result of correlation operation provides a measure of the degree of similarity between two images.
  • In a specific implementation, the image comparison module 302 includes an optical correlator unit for computing the correlation between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and a target image from the database of target images 110. Specific examples of implementation of the optical correlator include a joint transform correlator (JTC) and a focal plane correlator (SPC).
  • The optical correlator multiplies together the Fourier transform of the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 with that of a target image and records the result with a camera. An energy peak measured with that camera indicates a match between the image signal associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image.
  • Advantageously, the optical correlator performs the correlation operation physically through light-based computation, rather than by using software running on a silicon-based computer, which allows computations to be performed at a higher speed than is possible with a software implementation and thus provides for improved real-time performance.
  • It will be appreciated that the correlation computation may also be implemented using a digital correlator. The correlation operation is computationally intensive and, in certain implementations requiring real-time performance, the use of a digital correlator may not provide suitable performance. In such implementations, an optical correlator will be preferred.
  • As described above, the database of target images 110 includes a plurality of target images associated to objects which the system 100 is designed to detect. In a specific example of implementation using a correlation operation, the database of target images 110 includes data indicative of the Fourier transform of the target image. This data will herein be referred to as a template or filter. The template will be retrieved later when performing a verification or identification operation. Image processing and enhancement can be performed to obtain better matching performance depending on the environment and application. In non-limiting examples of implementation the Fourier transform of the target image is digitally pre-computed such as to improve the speed of the correlation operation when the system is in use.
  • In a non-limiting example of implementation, the generation of the reference template or filter is performed in a few steps. First, the background is removed from the target image. In other words the target image is extracted from the background and the background is replaced by a black background. The resulting image is then processed through a Fourier transform function. The result of this transform is a complex image. A phase only filter (POF) for example will only contain phase information (between zero and 2 pi) which is mapped to a 0 to 255 range values. These 256 values correspond in fact to the 256 levels of gray of an image. The person skilled in the art, in light of the present specification, will readily appreciate that various types of templates or filters can be generated. Many methods for generating Fourier filters are known in the art and a few such methods will be described later on in the specification.
  • As a variant, in order to reduce the amount of data needed to represent the whole range of 3D orientations that a single target object can take, a MACE (Minimum Average Correlation Energy) filter is used to generate the template or filter. Typically, the MACE file includes combining several different 2D projections of a given object and encoding them in a single MACE filter instead of having one 2D projection per filter. One of the benefits of using MACE filters is that the resulting database of target images 110 would take less space since it would include fewer items. Also, since the number of correlations needed to identify a single target object would be reduced, the total processing time would also be reduced.
  • Another way of reducing the processing time is to take advantage of the linearity property of the Fourier transform. By dividing the target image into several sub-images, a composite image can be formed, herein referred to as a mosaic. When a mosaic is displayed at the input of the correlator, the correlation is computed simultaneously on all the sub-images without incurring any substantial time penalty. A mosaic may contain several different target objects or several different orientations of the same target object or a combination of both. FIG. 7 of the drawings depicts a mosaic including a target object in various orientations and scales. The parallel processing capabilities a mosaic effectively increase the throughput of the correlator.
  • FIG. 8 depicts a high level representation of a luggage screening process using an optical correlator. As shown, an image 800 associated with a luggage item is provided as input to the correlator and undergoes an optical Fourier transformation 804. The result of the transformation is multiplied 802 by the (previously computed) Fourier transform of a target image 804. The result of the multiplication of the two Fourier transforms is then processed through another optical Fourier transform 822 and the resulting signal is captured by a camera at what is referred to as the correlation plane, which yields the correlation output. The correlation output is released for transmission to the detection signal generator 306 where it is analyzed. A peak in the correlation output indicates a match between the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image.
  • In a non-limiting example of implementation of an optical correlator, the Fourier transform of the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 is performed as follows: The image is displayed internally on a small Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). A light beam projects the image through a lens that performs the equivalent of a Fourier transform on the image. The Fourier transform of the image is then projected on a second LCD screen on which is displayed the template or filter associated to the target image. The two multiplied Fourier transforms are then processed through a second Fourier lens which forces the light beam to converge to a CCD at the correlation plane. The CCD output is then sent to a frame grabber in the computer.
  • The inner workings of the aforementioned non-limiting example optical correlator are illustrated in FIG. 9. On the left hand side appears a laser source 900 that generates a light beam used to project images across the correlator. The light beam is directed first through a small set of lenses 902 used to expand its diameter in order to illuminate the whole surface of the first LCD screen 904 to the left. The image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 is displayed on the first LCD screen 904 either through a direct camera interface or provided as a VGA image by the computer. The first LCD screen 904 is illuminated by the light beam and the image is propagated through the correlator. In the illustrated example, the image 800 captured by the camera is that of a gun on a conveyor belt.
  • The light beam modulated by the first image on the first LCD screen 904 is then propagated through the second set of lenses 906, referred to as a Fourier lens since it performs the equivalent of the Fourier transform mathematical operation. The inherent properties of light are used to physically perform the appropriate calculations. Specifically, the propagation of light in vacuum is a function which corresponds to the kernel of the Fourier transform operation, thus the propagation of light along the axis of a Fourier lens represents a sufficiently strong approximation of this natural phenomenon to assert that the light beam undergoes a Fourier transform. Otherwise stated, a lens has the inherent property of performing a Fourier transform on images observed at its front focal plane, provided that this image is displayed at its back focal plane. The Fourier transform, which can normally be rather computation-intensive when calculated by a digital computer, is performed in the optical correlator simply by the propagation of the light. The mathematics behind this optical realization is equivalent to the exact Fourier transform function and can be modeled with standard fast Fourier algorithms. For more information regarding Fourier transforms, the reader is invited to consider B.V.K. Vijaya Kumar, Marios Savvides, Krithika Venkataramani, and Chunyan Xie, “Spatial frequency domain image processing for biometric recognition”, Biometrics ICIP Conference 2002. The contents of this document are incorporated herein by reference.
  • After going through the Fourier lens 906, the signal is projected on the second LCD screen 908 on which is displayed the target template, i.e., Fourier transform of the target image 804. When the Fourier transform of the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 goes through the second LCD screen 908 on which the target template is displayed, the light beam crosses a second Fourier lens 910 which, again, optically computes the equivalent of a Fourier transform multiplication. This operation corresponds to a correlation in the spatial domain. The target image displayed on the second LCD screen 908 in fact induces a phase variation on the incoming light beam. Each pixel can potentially induce a phase change whose magnitude is equivalent to its grey level. As such the Fourier transform displayed on the first LCD screen 904 is multiplied with the Fourier transform of the target image 804, which is equivalent to performing a correlation.
  • The second Fourier lens 910 finally concentrates the light beam on a small area camera or CCD 912 where the result of the correlation is measured, so to speak. The CCD 912 in fact measures energy peaks at on the correlation plane. The position of a correlation peak corresponds in fact to the location of the target object center in the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104.
  • Referring back to FIG. 8, the CCD 912 communicates the signal from the optical correlator to the detection signal generator module 306. In this specific implementation, the detection signal generator module 306 is a computing unit including a frame grabber and software. The software is adapted to processing the signal received from the correlator to detects energy peaks as gray level video signals varying between 0 and 255. A strong intensity peak on the correlation plane indicates a match between the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104 and the target image 804. The location of the energy peak also indicates the location of the center of the target image in the image 800 associated with the luggage item 104.
  • Fourier Transform and Spatial Frequencies
  • The Fourier transform as applied to images is now described in general terms. The Fourier transform is a mathematical tool used to convert the information present within an object's image into its frequency representation. In short, an image can be seen as a superposition of various spatial frequencies and the Fourier transform is a mathematical operation used to compute the intensity of each of these frequencies within the original image. The spatial frequencies represent the rate of variation of intensity in space. Consequently, a smooth or uniform pattern mainly contains low frequencies. Sharply contoured patterns, by contrast, exhibit a higher frequency content.
  • The Fourier transform of an image f(x,y) is given by:

  • F(u,v)=∫∫f(x,y)e −f2π(ux+vy) dxdy  (1)
  • where u, v are the coordinates in the frequency domain. Thus, the Fourier transform is a global operator: changing a single frequency of the Fourier transform affects the whole object in the spatial domain.
  • A correlation operation can be mathematically described by:
  • C ( ɛ , ξ ) = - - f ( x , y ) h * ( x - ɛ , y - ξ ) x y ( 2 )
  • where ε and ξ represent the pixel coordinates in the correlation plane, C(ε,ξ) stands for the correlation, x and y identify the pixel coordinates of the input image, f(x, y) is the original input image and h*(ε,ξ) is the complex conjugate of the correlation filter.
  • In the frequency domain the same expression takes a slightly different form:

  • C(ε,ξ)=ℑ−1(F(u,v)H*(u,v))  (3)
  • where ℑ is the Fourier transform operator, u and v are the pixel coordinates in the Fourier plane, F(u,v) is the Fourier transform of the image acquired with the camera f(x,y) and H*(u,v) is the Fourier transform of the filter of the reference template. Thus, the correlation between an input image and a target template is equivalent, in mathematical terms, to the multiplication of their respective Fourier transform, provided that the complex conjugate of the filter is used. Consequently, the correlation can be defined in the spatial domain as the search for a given pattern (template), or in the frequency domain, as filtering operation with a specially designed matched filter.
  • Advantageously, the use of optics for computing a correlation operation allows the computation to be performed in a shorter time than by using a digital implementation of the correlation. It turns out that an optical lens properly positioned (i.e. input and output images are located on the lens's focal planes) automatically computes the Fourier transform of the input image. In order to speed up the computation of the correlation, the Fourier transform of the target image is computed beforehand and submitted to the correlator as a mask. The target template (or filter in short) is generated by computing the Fourier transform of the reference template. This type of filter is called a matched filter.
  • FIG. 10 depicts the Fourier transform of the spatial domain image of a ‘2’. It can be seen that most of the energy (bright areas) is contained in the central portion of the Fourier transform image which correspond to low spatial frequencies (the images are centred on the origin of the Fourier plane). The energy is somewhat more dispersed in the medium frequencies and is concentrated in orientations representative of the shape of the input image. Finally, little energy is contained in the upper frequencies. The right-hand-side image shows the phase content of the Fourier transform. The phase is coded from black (0°) to white (360°).
  • Generation of Filters from Target Images
  • Matched filters, as their name implies, are specifically adapted to respond to one image in particular: they are optimized to respond to an object with respect to its energy content. Generally, the contour of an object corresponds to its high frequency contents. This can be easily understood as the contours represent areas where the intensity varies rapidly (hence a high frequency as per the section about Fourier Transforms and Spatial Frequencies).
  • In order to emphasize the contour of an object, the matched filter can be divided by its module (the image is normalized), over the whole Fourier transform image. The resulting filter is called a Phase-Only Filter (POF) and is defined by:
  • P O F ( u , v ) = H * ( u , v ) H * ( u , v ) ( 4 )
  • Because these filters are defined in the frequency domain, normalizing over the whole spectrum of frequency implies that each of the frequency components is considered with the same weight. In the spatial domain (e.g. usual real-world domain), this means that the emphasis is given to the contours (or edges) of the object. As such, the POF filter provides a higher degree of discrimination, sharper correlation peaks and higher energy efficiency.
  • The discrimination provided by the POF filter, however, has some disadvantages. It turns out that, although the optical correlator is somewhat insensitive to the size of the objects to be recognized, the images are expected to be properly sized, otherwise the features might not be registered properly. To understand this requirement, imagine a filter defined out of a given instance of a ‘2’. If that filter is applied to a second instance of a ‘2’ whose contour is slightly different, the correlation peak will be significantly reduced as a result of the great sensitivity of the filter to the original shape. A new type of filter, termed a composite filter, is introduced to overcome these limitations.
  • In accordance with specific implementations, filters can be designed by:
      • Appropriately choosing one specific instance (because it represents characteristics which are, on average, common to all symbols of a given class) of a symbol and calculating from that image the filter against which all instances of that class of symbols will be compared; or
      • Averaging many instances of a given to create a generic or ‘template’ image from which the filter is calculated. The computed filter is then called a composite filter since it incorporates the properties of many images (note that it is irrelevant whether the images are averaged before or after the Fourier transform operator is applied, provided that in the latter case, the additions are performed taking the Fourier domain phase into account).
  • The latter form procedure forms the basis for the generation of composite filters. Thus composite filters are composed of the response of individual POF filters to the same symbol. Mathematically, this can be expressed by:

  • h comp(x,y)=αa h a(x,y)+αb h b(x,y)+K+α x h x(x,y)  (5)
  • The filter generated in this fashion is likely to be more robust to minor signature variations as the irrelevant high frequency features will be averaged out. In short, the net effect is an equalization of the response of the filter to the different instances of a given symbol.
  • Composite filters can also be used to reduce the response of the filter to the other classes of symbols. In equation (5) above, if the coefficient b, for example, is set to a negative value, then the filter response to a symbol of class b will be significantly reduced. In other words, the correlation peak will be high if ha(x,y) is at the input image, and low if hb(X,y) is present at the input.
  • However, certain considerations are problems associated with these techniques. For one, if different images are to be grouped, averaged or somehow weighted into a single composite image, a few rules are to be followed. Failure to do this may result in an overall loss of accuracy. Consequently, the images should be appropriately chosen: if the images are too similar, no net gain in accuracy will be observed. On the other hand, if the images are too dissimilar, important features might become blurred. In the latter case, more than one filter might become necessary to fully describe one symbol. From the above it becomes evident that trade-offs are to be made, and the design and number of filters fully describing all the instances of a symbol should be gauged. The following paragraphs will address these issues.
  • To complete the design of the filters, there remains to select the right coefficients a, b, etc. as well as their numbers. On this aspect, it should be noted that if the filter is composed of too many coefficients, the response will degrade as a result of too much averaging. This means that the multiple characters used to generate the filter will each modify the response of the global filter. If too many are used, the filter will provide an average response. Therefore, the target images used to design the composite filter should be carefully selected. To overcome this problem and to ensure a good uniformity of the filter to the different occurrences of the same in-class character while preserving the discrimination capabilities, the following technique was used.
  • First a filter is created out of the image of a symbol (say a ‘2’). The filter is generated in the usual way and its response is tested on many instances of ‘2’s. Ideally, the response would be uniform but it is not because of the small discrepancies between the images.
  • The image of the ‘2’ that presents the weakest response to the filter is linearly combined (equation 5), using the original image. Note that the multiplying coefficients are smaller than unity so that the filter resulting from the composite image is not modified too drastically within one iteration of the process.
  • The same procedure is repeated, and again the image with the weakest response is added to the image used to form the filter. This process is repeated until all the images respond to the filter to within a given margin, at which point the desired filter has been generated. In a test case, the threshold was set at 85%.
  • One could argue that the same effect could be achieved without resorting to iteration. In the next section, we will describe a method, that, in theory, can be used to achieve that operation without resorting to iteration.
  • Adding ‘multiple versions’ of a ‘2’ while creating the filter may induce the filter to respond to other symbols as well (e.g. crosstalk will appear) and this behaviour will intensify with the number of symbols used to compute the filter. To prevent this, a negative background can be added to the symbols used for the filter generation.
  • To understand the mechanics of this process, assume that there are n classes of symbols to be recognized. Let it be further assumed that one is trying to optimize the filter for the ‘2’s. The process starts with the aggregation into one single symbol of all the symbols used in the development of the remaining n−1 classes (that is all symbols, the ‘2’s excepted). This image is then subtracted from all the instances of the ‘2’s using the linear combination process shown in equation 5, thereby reducing the probabilities that the filter for the ‘2’s will exhibit a response to another class of symbol.
  • The effect of the addition of this background is depicted in FIG. 11, where as usual the original image is on the left, the modified image is in the middle and the phase contents of the Fourier transform corresponding to the middle image are shown at right. The effect of this procedure can be seen by the appearance of a shadow around the edges of the symbols (middle vs left images).
  • With this strategy, if another character other than a ‘2’ is fed to the filter, one of its constituting areas will coincide with the negatively biased region of the image used to generate the filter. This will tend to minimize the filter crosstalk response. For example if an ‘8’ is fed to the filter of the ‘2’s, its upper left and lower right vertical segments will coincide with the negatively biased part of the filter and reduce the total correlation value.
  • Orthogonalization
  • As mentioned above, there is still another way to compute the filters. Mathematically speaking, it is possible to generate a filter from the linear combination of many instances of a symbol, each of the coefficients of the linear combination being adjusted in such a way that the filter response is maximum for the target symbol while being negligible for symbols belonging to other classes (when such a condition is met the equations—or filters in this case—are said to be orthogonalized). While the goal is the same as with the iteration process just described, the method is different as it relies on simultaneously solving a set of linear equations.
  • To carry out this computation, the following set of equations is to be solved:

  • h a max 1 a a+α 1 b b+K+α 1 n n

  • h b max 2 a a+α 2 b b+K+α 2 n n  (6)

  • M

  • h n max n a a+α n b b+K+α n n n
  • with:
  • H n max = ( h n max ) ( h n max ) ( 7 )
  • as before and where Hn(max) stands for the POF filter computed with the object hn(max), □i k are the weighing factors of the linear combination and a . . . n, the original symbol images.
  • In order to be orthogonalized, the set of equation 6 should obey the following constraint:
  • [ h a ( max ) h b ( max ) M h n ( max ) ] [ a b K n ] = [ 1 0 K 0 0 1 K 0 K K K K 0 0 K 1 ] ( 8 )
  • where
    Figure US20090174554A1-20090709-P00001
    stands for the correlation operator. Note that equation (7) simply states that the normalized response of a filter to a symbol of its class should be unity while its response to a foreign symbol should be zero.
  • The max subscript in equations (6) through (8) is used to indicate that the calculations were performed with the coordinates origin (reference point) of each and every Fourier plane image Hn, centred on its pixel of maximum correlation.
  • The tests performed with orthogonalized filters did not show the level of performance expected. To understand this, let us recall that an ideal filter would present a unitary response in the presence of its corresponding symbol and a null response to the other symbols. However, the presence of sidelobes (wings of decreasing intensity that surround the peak) render that statement true at the location of the correlation peak and at that location only. Thus, nothing can be said about the response of the filter in the vicinity of the correlation peak (e.g. the pixels surrounding the very peak itself).
  • Consequently, in order to obtain a truly orthogonalized set of filters, the filters would ideally need to take into account the response of all the pixels of the correlation plane (peak plus sidelobes) to all the symbols. While this can be achieved, the filter generation would, in this case, become a complex and time-consuming operation.
  • Since the iterative approach provides similar result in a more efficient way, the orthogonalization approach was not followed any further.
  • In a specific example of implementation, the correlator's video and graphics input are compatible with standard computer graphics (VGA) and NTSC video signals. The maximum image area processed by the correlator is equal to 640×480 pixels, and is independent of the size of the image, as opposed to digital systems that require more processing time and power as images get larger.
  • Another example is the sharing of a single optical correlator by multiple image generation devices.
  • Second Embodiment Cargo Container Screening
  • Although the above-described screening system was described in connection with screening of luggage items, the concepts described above can readily be applied to the screening of other enclosures.
  • For example, in an alternative embodiment, a system for screening cargo containers is provided. The system includes components similar to those described in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1. In a specific example of implementation, the image generation device 102 is configured to scan a large object (i.e. the cargo container) and possibly to scan the large object along various axes to generate multiple images associated to the cargo container. The image or images associated with the cargo container convey information related to the contents of the cargo container. Any suitable method for generating images associated to containers may be used. Such scanning methods for large objects are known in the art and as such will not be described further here. Each image is then processed in accordance with the method described in the present specification to detect the presence of target objects in the cargo container.
  • Third Embodiment Screening of Persons
  • Moreover, the concepts described above can readily be applied to the screening of people.
  • For example, in an alternative embodiment, a system for screening people is provided. The system includes components similar to those described in connection with the system depicted in FIG. 1. In a specific example of implementation, the image generation device 102 is configured to scan a person and possibly to scan the person along various axes to generate multiple images associated to the person. The image or images associated with the person conveys information related to the objects carried by the person. FIG. 12 depicts two images associated with a person suitable for use in connection with a specific implementation of the system. Each image is then processed in accordance with the method described in the present specification to detect the presence of target objects on the person.
  • Specific Physical Implementation
  • Certain portions of the image processing apparatus 106 can be implemented on a general purpose digital computer 1300, of the type depicted in FIG. 13, including a processing unit 1302 and a memory 1304 connected by a communication bus. The memory includes data 1308 and program instructions 1306. The processing unit 1302 is adapted to process the data 1308 and the program instructions 1306 in order to implement the functional blocks described in the specification and depicted in the drawings. The digital computer 1300 may also comprise an I/O interface 1310 for receiving or sending data elements to external devices.
  • Alternatively, the above-described image processing apparatus 106 can be implemented on a dedicated hardware platform where electrical/optical components implement the functional blocks described in the specification and depicted in the drawings. Specific implementations may be realized using ICs, ASICs, DSPs, FPGA, optical correlator, digital correlator or other suitable hardware platform.
  • Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, variations and refinements are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims (52)

1. An apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item, said apparatus comprising:
a) an input for receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal derived on the basis of penetrating radiation and conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item;
b) a processing unit in communication with said input, said processing unit being operative for:
i. processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
ii. generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
c) an output for releasing the detection signal.
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the detection signal enables identification of at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
7. (canceled)
8. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the detection signal conveys position information related to at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
9. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the detection signal conveys information describing at least one characteristic of at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
10. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein said detection signal is operative for causing a display unit to convey information related to at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
11. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein said processing unit is responsive to detection of the presence of at least one target object to:
a) generate log information elements conveying a presence of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected;
b) store said log information data elements on a computer readable storage medium.
12. An apparatus as defined in claim 11, wherein said log information elements include a time stamp data element.
13. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein said processing unit being operative for processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item comprises said processing unit being operative to effect a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the plurality of target images.
14. (canceled)
15. An apparatus as defined by claim 13, wherein said processing unit comprises a digital correlator for effecting the correlation operation.
16. (canceled)
17. (canceled)
18. (canceled)
19. (canceled)
20. (canceled)
21. (canceled)
22. A method for screening a luggage item, said method comprising:
a) receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal derived on the basis of penetrating radiation and conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item;
b) processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
c) generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item.
23. (canceled)
24. (canceled)
25. (canceled)
26. (canceled)
27. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein the detection signal enables identification of at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
28. (canceled)
29. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein the detection signal conveys position information related to at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
30. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein the detection signal conveys information describing at least one characteristic of at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
31. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein said detection signal is operative for causing a display unit to convey information related to at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
32. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein, in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object, said method comprises:
a) generating log information elements conveying a presence of the at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected;
b) storing said log information data elements on a computer readable storage medium.
33. A method as defined in claim 32, wherein said log information elements include a time stamp data element.
34. A method as defined in claim 22, wherein processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item comprises effecting a correlation operation between data derived from the image signal and the plurality of target images.
35. (canceled)
36. A method as defined by claim 34, wherein said correlation operation is effected at least in part by a digital correlator.
37. (canceled)
38. (canceled)
39. (canceled)
40. (canceled)
41. (canceled)
42. (canceled)
43. A system for screening luggage items, said system comprising:
a) an image generation device suitable for generating an image signal associated with a luggage item using penetrating radiation, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item;
b) an apparatus in communication with said image generation device, said apparatus comprising:
i. an input for receiving the image signal associated with the luggage item;
ii. a processing unit in communication with said input, said processing unit being operative for:
(a) processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
(b) generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
c) an output module for conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of said detection signal to a user of the system.
44-63. (canceled)
64. A system as defined in claim 43, wherein said output module is adapted for generating image data conveying the location of at least one target object whose presence in the luggage item was detected.
65. A system as defined in claim 43, wherein said output module includes a display adapted for generating an output display image conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of said detection signal in visual format.
66. A system as defined in claim 43, wherein said output module includes a display adapted for generating an output display image conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of said detection signal in visual format in combination with the image associated with the luggage item.
67. A system as defined in claim 43, wherein said output module is adapted for conveying information derived at least in part on the basis of said detection signal in audio format.
68. A computer readable medium including a program element suitable for execution by a computing apparatus for screening a luggage item, said computing apparatus comprising a memory unit and a processor operatively connected to said memory unit, said program element when executing on said processor being operative for:
a) receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item;
b) processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
c) generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
d) releasing the detection signal.
69-86. (canceled)
87. An apparatus suitable for screening a luggage item, said apparatus comprising:
a) means for receiving an image signal associated with the luggage item, the image signal conveying information related to the contents of the luggage item;
b) means for processing the image signal associated with the luggage item in combination with a plurality of target images associated with target objects to detect a presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
c) means for generating a detection signal in response to detection of the presence of at least one target object in the luggage item;
d) means for releasing the detection signal.
88-96. (canceled)
US11/920,042 2005-05-11 2005-05-11 Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons Abandoned US20090174554A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CA2005/000716 WO2006119603A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2005-05-11 Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090174554A1 true US20090174554A1 (en) 2009-07-09

Family

ID=37396125

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/920,042 Abandoned US20090174554A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2005-05-11 Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons
US11/268,749 Expired - Fee Related US7734102B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2005-11-08 Method and system for screening cargo containers
US11/407,217 Abandoned US20070058037A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2006-04-20 User interface for use in screening luggage, containers, parcels or people and apparatus for implementing same

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/268,749 Expired - Fee Related US7734102B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2005-11-08 Method and system for screening cargo containers
US11/407,217 Abandoned US20070058037A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2006-04-20 User interface for use in screening luggage, containers, parcels or people and apparatus for implementing same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (3) US20090174554A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1886257A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2608119A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006119603A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080257949A1 (en) * 2007-04-20 2008-10-23 Steven Leslie Hills Method and system for using a recording device in an inspection system
CN103917862A (en) * 2011-09-07 2014-07-09 拉皮斯坎系统股份有限公司 X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
CN104751163A (en) * 2013-12-27 2015-07-01 同方威视技术股份有限公司 Fluoroscopy examination system and method for carrying out automatic classification recognition on goods
EP3067823A4 (en) * 2013-11-07 2017-06-14 Nuctech Company Limited Detection method and device
US20170230620A1 (en) * 2016-02-04 2017-08-10 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Container use state determining device
WO2017139481A1 (en) * 2016-02-11 2017-08-17 American Rebel, Inc. Firearm detecting luggage
US10013750B2 (en) * 2012-12-27 2018-07-03 Tsinghua University Object detection methods, display methods and apparatuses
US10302807B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2019-05-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
US10585207B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2020-03-10 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Scanning systems
WO2021228281A1 (en) * 2020-05-11 2021-11-18 同方威视技术股份有限公司 Target object positioning method and apparatus, device, medium, and program product

Families Citing this family (92)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7963695B2 (en) 2002-07-23 2011-06-21 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Rotatable boom cargo scanning system
US8171567B1 (en) 2002-09-04 2012-05-01 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Authentication method and system
EP2081130B1 (en) 2004-03-12 2013-07-24 Ingenia Holdings Limited Methods and apparatuses for creating authenticatable printed articles and subsequently verifying them
EP2128790A3 (en) 2004-03-12 2011-01-26 Ingenia Technology Limited Authenticity verification with linearised data
GB2444139B (en) * 2004-08-13 2008-11-12 Ingenia Technology Ltd Authenticity verification methods products and apparatuses
GB2417592B (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-07-26 Ingenia Technology Ltd Authenticity verification of articles
US20070041613A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2007-02-22 Luc Perron Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same
US7991242B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2011-08-02 Optosecurity Inc. Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
EP1886257A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2008-02-13 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons
KR101223204B1 (en) 2005-07-27 2013-01-17 인제니아 홀딩스 리미티드 Verification of authenticity
WO2007072044A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Ingenia Holdings (Uk) Limited Optical authentication
CA2584683A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2007-10-20 Optosecurity Inc. Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons
US7899232B2 (en) 2006-05-11 2011-03-01 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for providing threat image projection (TIP) in a luggage screening system, and luggage screening system implementing same
US20080089477A1 (en) * 2006-05-25 2008-04-17 Eyal Eshed System and method for security of shipped containers
US20090175411A1 (en) * 2006-07-20 2009-07-09 Dan Gudmundson Methods and systems for use in security screening, with parallel processing capability
US8494210B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2013-07-23 Optosecurity Inc. User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
WO2008019473A1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2008-02-21 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for use in security screening providing incremental display of threat detection information and security system incorporating same
US20080152082A1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2008-06-26 Michel Bouchard Method and apparatus for use in security screening providing incremental display of threat detection information and security system incorporating same
CA2666838C (en) 2006-09-18 2010-12-07 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing characteristics of liquids
JP2008089868A (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-17 Fujifilm Corp Method and device for acquiring drawing point data and method and device for drawing
WO2008040119A1 (en) 2006-10-02 2008-04-10 Optosecurity Inc. Tray for assessing the threat status of an article at a security check point
EP2140253B1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2019-09-18 Vanderlande APC Inc. User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
US8081811B2 (en) * 2007-04-12 2011-12-20 Fujifilm Corporation Method, apparatus, and program for judging image recognition results, and computer readable medium having the program stored therein
US20080298544A1 (en) * 2007-05-29 2008-12-04 Peter Dugan Genetic tuning of coefficients in a threat detection system
US20080298546A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 General Electric Company Cargo container inspection method
US7692541B1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2010-04-06 Gianni Arcaini Method and apparatus for detecting container breach via visual cues
JP5503535B2 (en) * 2007-06-21 2014-05-28 ラピスカン システムズ、インコーポレイテッド System and method for improving controlled physical examination
WO2009043145A1 (en) 2007-10-01 2009-04-09 Optosecurity Inc. Method and devices for assessing the threat status of an article at a security check point
EP2208056A1 (en) * 2007-10-10 2010-07-21 Optosecurity Inc. Method, apparatus and system for use in connection with the inspection of liquid merchandise
US8108055B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2012-01-31 Larry Wong Method, system and apparatus for controlling an electrical device
WO2009114928A1 (en) * 2008-03-17 2009-09-24 Optosecurity, Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing characteristics of liquids
EP2331944B1 (en) 2008-09-05 2014-03-12 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for performing x-ray inspection of a liquid product at a security checkpoint
CA2737075A1 (en) * 2008-09-15 2010-03-18 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing properties of liquids by using x-rays
GB2466311B (en) 2008-12-19 2010-11-03 Ingenia Holdings Self-calibration of a matching algorithm for determining authenticity
GB2466465B (en) 2008-12-19 2011-02-16 Ingenia Holdings Authentication
US8401309B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2013-03-19 International Business Machines Corporation Security screening image analysis simplification through object pattern identification
EP2396646B1 (en) 2009-02-10 2016-02-10 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for performing x-ray inspection of a product at a security checkpoint using simulation
US8508592B2 (en) 2009-02-25 2013-08-13 The University Of Memphis Research Foundation Spatially-selective reflector structures, reflector disks, and systems and methods for use thereof
EP2443441B8 (en) 2009-06-15 2017-11-22 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing the threat status of luggage
US8879791B2 (en) 2009-07-31 2014-11-04 Optosecurity Inc. Method, apparatus and system for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product
GB2476226B (en) 2009-11-10 2012-03-28 Ingenia Holdings Ltd Optimisation
US8462206B1 (en) * 2010-02-25 2013-06-11 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Image acquisition system
US8917927B2 (en) * 2010-08-17 2014-12-23 Telesecurity Sciences, Inc. Portable backscatter advanced imaging technology scanner with automated target recognition
US8586955B2 (en) * 2010-09-22 2013-11-19 Ko Khee Tay Apparatus and method for attenuating high energy radiation based on detected vehicle type
US20150181136A1 (en) * 2011-03-29 2015-06-25 Thermal Matrix USA, Inc. Method and system for detecting concealed objects using handheld thermal imager
US10949677B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2021-03-16 Thermal Matrix USA, Inc. Method and system for detecting concealed objects using handheld thermal imager
US8780345B2 (en) 2011-04-22 2014-07-15 The University Of Memphis Research Foundation Spatially-selective disks, submillimeter imaging devices, methods of submillimeter imaging, profiling scanners, spectrometry devices, and methods of spectrometry
DE102011112652A1 (en) * 2011-05-16 2012-11-22 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Image analysis for ordnance disposal and security controls
EP2538394B1 (en) * 2011-06-24 2021-11-24 Tomra Systems ASA Method and apparatus for detecting fraud attempts in reverse vending machines
KR101305300B1 (en) * 2012-10-11 2013-09-06 사단법인 대덕원자력포럼 Millimeter wave search system and unified search method for freight and passenger using the system
DE102012111201B4 (en) * 2012-11-21 2014-07-17 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Sensor system and sensor device for it
US9256798B2 (en) * 2013-01-31 2016-02-09 Aurasma Limited Document alteration based on native text analysis and OCR
EP2793164A1 (en) * 2013-04-19 2014-10-22 Stichting Maastricht Radiation Oncology "Maastro Clinic" Method and system for determining a phenotype of a neoplasm in a human or animal body
EP2796902B1 (en) * 2013-04-23 2017-06-14 Spinner GmbH Millimeter Wave Scanning Imaging System
CN105637350A (en) 2013-07-23 2016-06-01 拉皮斯坎系统股份有限公司 Methods for improving processing speed for object inspection
DE102013222098A1 (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-04-30 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Cargo scanning system
US9558547B2 (en) * 2014-01-09 2017-01-31 The Boeing Company System and method for determining whether an apparatus or an assembly process is acceptable
US11280898B2 (en) 2014-03-07 2022-03-22 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Radar-based baggage and parcel inspection systems
JP6594331B2 (en) 2014-03-07 2019-10-23 ラピスカン システムズ、インコーポレイテッド Ultra-wideband detector
GB2525228B (en) * 2014-04-16 2020-05-06 Smiths Heimann Sas Identification or determination of a load based on texture
US10228487B2 (en) 2014-06-30 2019-03-12 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Rapidly relocatable modular cargo container scanner
US20160027303A1 (en) * 2014-07-22 2016-01-28 Advanced Technology & Research Corp. Active detection system for low ground clearance vehicles
CN104112190B (en) * 2014-07-23 2018-07-31 清华大学 Customs is in way supervisory systems and method
US10134254B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2018-11-20 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Intelligent security management system
CN105808555B (en) * 2014-12-30 2019-07-26 清华大学 Check the method and system of cargo
CN105809655B (en) * 2014-12-30 2021-06-29 清华大学 Vehicle inspection method and system
US10366364B2 (en) * 2015-04-16 2019-07-30 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Enhanced multi-layer cargo screening system, computer program product, and method of using the same
US10345479B2 (en) 2015-09-16 2019-07-09 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Portable X-ray scanner
US9989669B2 (en) * 2015-10-23 2018-06-05 The United States of America, as Represented by the Secretary of Homeland Security Intermodal container scanning
KR101778503B1 (en) 2016-03-25 2017-09-14 한국해양과학기술원 Method for providing information of cargo inspection, apparatus performing the same and storage media storing the same
EP3321845A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-16 Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast- natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO Ship identification system and method
US10600609B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2020-03-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. High-power X-ray sources and methods of operation
FR3064069B1 (en) * 2017-03-20 2019-06-07 Safran NON-DESTRUCTIVE CONTROL OF AERONAUTICAL PARTS BY A RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM
CN108734183A (en) * 2017-04-14 2018-11-02 清华大学 Inspection method and inspection equipment
CN108876230A (en) * 2017-05-12 2018-11-23 菜鸟智能物流控股有限公司 Boxing method, boxing scheme generation method, boxing system and server
US10572963B1 (en) 2017-07-14 2020-02-25 Synapse Technology Corporation Detection of items
US10210631B1 (en) 2017-08-18 2019-02-19 Synapse Technology Corporation Generating synthetic image data
US11144523B2 (en) * 2017-11-17 2021-10-12 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods and data structures for efficient cross-referencing of physical-asset spatial identifiers
JP7062434B2 (en) * 2017-12-21 2022-05-06 アンリツ株式会社 Goods inspection equipment
KR101969022B1 (en) * 2017-12-29 2019-04-15 (주)제이엘케이인스펙션 Image analysis apparatus and method
US10452959B1 (en) 2018-07-20 2019-10-22 Synapse Tehnology Corporation Multi-perspective detection of objects
JP2020035086A (en) * 2018-08-28 2020-03-05 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Information processing system, information processing apparatus and program
CN110020586B (en) * 2018-12-29 2021-01-29 北京品恩科技股份有限公司 Personnel security check management system based on big data
US11847606B2 (en) 2019-04-30 2023-12-19 Blackberry Limited System and method for cargo transportation unit tracking and monitoring device verification
US11010605B2 (en) 2019-07-30 2021-05-18 Rapiscan Laboratories, Inc. Multi-model detection of objects
WO2021130931A1 (en) * 2019-12-25 2021-07-01 Nec Corporation Object detection apparatus, system, and method, data conversion unit, and non-transitory computer readable medium
JP7239507B2 (en) * 2020-01-30 2023-03-14 株式会社日立製作所 ALERT OUTPUT TIMING CONTROL DEVICE, ALERT OUTPUT TIMING CONTROL METHOD, ALERT OUTPUT TIMING CONTROL PROGRAM
US11212902B2 (en) 2020-02-25 2021-12-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Multiplexed drive systems and methods for a multi-emitter X-ray source
US11193898B1 (en) 2020-06-01 2021-12-07 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Systems and methods for controlling image contrast in an X-ray system
CN113830510B (en) * 2020-06-23 2023-05-23 同方威视技术股份有限公司 Conveying device and inspection system
US11538319B2 (en) * 2020-09-22 2022-12-27 Kyndryl, Inc. Identifying a distributed threat in a security zone
KR20230150831A (en) 2021-02-23 2023-10-31 라피스캔 시스템스, 인코포레이티드 Systems and methods for removing crosstalk signals in one or more scanning systems with multiple X-ray sources

Citations (68)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4379348A (en) * 1980-09-23 1983-04-05 North American Philips Corporation X-Ray security screening system having magnification
US5642394A (en) * 1996-04-03 1997-06-24 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Sidescatter X-ray detection system
US5647018A (en) * 1991-10-28 1997-07-08 Imperial College Of Science, Technology And Medicine Method and apparatus for generating images
US5699400A (en) * 1996-05-08 1997-12-16 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Operator console for article inspection systems
US5838759A (en) * 1996-07-03 1998-11-17 Advanced Research And Applications Corporation Single beam photoneutron probe and X-ray imaging system for contraband detection and identification
US5838758A (en) * 1990-08-10 1998-11-17 Vivid Technologies Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects
US5893095A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-04-06 Virage, Inc. Similarity engine for content-based retrieval of images
US5911139A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-06-08 Virage, Inc. Visual image database search engine which allows for different schema
US6058159A (en) * 1996-01-11 2000-05-02 Control Screening, L.L.C. Compact scanner apparatus and method
US6097483A (en) * 1998-02-27 2000-08-01 Nikon Corporation Image detection apparatus
US6195444B1 (en) * 1999-01-12 2001-02-27 Analogic Corporation Apparatus and method for detecting concealed objects in computed tomography data
US6218943B1 (en) * 1998-03-27 2001-04-17 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Contraband detection and article reclaim system
US6373979B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2002-04-16 Lg Electronics, Inc. System and method for determining a level of similarity among more than one image and a segmented data structure for enabling such determination
US6463181B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-10-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for optimizing visual display of enhanced digital images
US20020186862A1 (en) * 2001-04-03 2002-12-12 Mcclelland Keith M. Remote baggage screening system, software and method
US20030081859A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-01 Nec Corporation Determination of similarity using weighting value depending on the type of characteristic
US6559769B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-05-06 Eric Anthony Early warning real-time security system
US20030128812A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-07-10 Michael Appleby Devices, methods, and systems involving cast collimators
US20030215143A1 (en) * 2002-05-20 2003-11-20 Zakrzewski Radoslaw Romuald Viewing a compartment
US6661867B2 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-12-09 Control Screening, Llc Tomographic scanning X-ray inspection system using transmitted and compton scattered radiation
US20040037462A1 (en) * 1998-08-24 2004-02-26 Lewis Meirion F. Pattern recognition and other inventions
US6738450B1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2004-05-18 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for cost-effective classification of an object under inspection
US20040101097A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-05-27 Kyoichiro Wakayama Apparatus and method for detecting threats
US20040120009A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 White Timothy J. Method for generating an image of a detected subject
US6763148B1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2004-07-13 Visual Key, Inc. Image recognition methods
US6785410B2 (en) * 1999-08-09 2004-08-31 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Image reporting method and system
US6813395B1 (en) * 1999-07-14 2004-11-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image searching method and image processing method
US20050025377A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-02-03 Avinash Gopal B. Method and apparatus for signal-to-noise ratio dependent image processing
US20050024199A1 (en) * 2003-06-11 2005-02-03 Huey John H. Combined systems user interface for centralized monitoring of a screening checkpoint for passengers and baggage
US6856272B2 (en) * 2002-08-28 2005-02-15 Personnel Protection Technoloties Llc Methods and apparatus for detecting threats in different areas
US6873261B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2005-03-29 Eric Anthony Early warning near-real-time security system
US20050111618A1 (en) * 2002-12-23 2005-05-26 Sommer Edward J.Jr. Method and apparatus for improving baggage screening examination
US20050113961A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-05-26 Sabol John M. Image temporal change detection and display method and apparatus
US6918541B2 (en) * 1999-06-07 2005-07-19 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Object identification and attribute information acquisition and linking computer system
US20050189412A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Evolution Robotics, Inc. Method of merchandising for checkout lanes
US6938488B2 (en) * 2002-08-21 2005-09-06 Battelle Memorial Institute Acoustic inspection device
US6950492B2 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-09-27 Besson Guy M Dynamic multi-spectral X-ray projection imaging
US20050226375A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2005-10-13 Eberhard Jeffrey W Enhanced X-ray imaging system and method
US20050240858A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 Creo Inc. Systems and methods for comparing documents containing graphic elements
US20050249416A1 (en) * 2004-05-07 2005-11-10 General Electric Company Contraband detection system and method using variance data
US7012256B1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2006-03-14 National Recovery Technologies, Inc. Computer assisted bag screening system
US7043474B2 (en) * 2002-04-15 2006-05-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for measuring image similarity based on semantic meaning
US7046761B2 (en) * 2003-01-23 2006-05-16 Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. System and method for CT scanning of baggage
US7050616B2 (en) * 2002-04-01 2006-05-23 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Data transmission scheme and system for image reconstruction
US20060115109A1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2006-06-01 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Ensuring airline safety while safeguarding personal passenger information
US20060133659A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Hammond Christopher R Method and system for viewing image data
US7068751B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2006-06-27 General Electric Company System and method of determining a center of mass of an imaging subject for x-ray flux management control
US20060173268A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-03 General Electric Company Methods and systems for controlling acquisition of images
US7092485B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2006-08-15 Control Screening, Llc X-ray inspection system for detecting explosives and other contraband
US20060269135A1 (en) * 2005-03-15 2006-11-30 Ramsay Thomas E System and method for identifying objects of interest in image data
US20070003122A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 General Electric Company Method for quantifying an object in a larger structure using a reconstructed image
US7193515B1 (en) * 2002-04-24 2007-03-20 Roberts Jon L System and method for centralized security screening
US7212661B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2007-05-01 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies. Inc. Image data navigation method and apparatus
US7233682B2 (en) * 2004-08-02 2007-06-19 Levine Michael C Security screening system and method
US20070147585A1 (en) * 2003-04-23 2007-06-28 L-3 Communications Security X-ray imaging technique
US20070168467A1 (en) * 2006-01-15 2007-07-19 Telesecurity Sciences Inc. Method and system for providing remote access to baggage scanned images
US20070200566A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Clark Keith A High performance security inspection system with physically isolated detection sensors
US20070206719A1 (en) * 2006-03-02 2007-09-06 General Electric Company Systems and methods for improving a resolution of an image
US20070210921A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2007-09-13 Volpi John P Interrogator and interrogation system employing the same
US20070269005A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2007-11-22 Alex Chalmers X-Ray Backscatter Detection Imaging Modules
US20080236275A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2008-10-02 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Remote Monitoring of Fluid Storage Tanks
US20080260097A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2008-10-23 Eg&G Middle East Container Inspection System
US7529341B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2009-05-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Automatic material discrimination by using computer tomography
US7720194B2 (en) * 2007-02-16 2010-05-18 L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems Inc. High throughput baggage inspection system
US7734066B2 (en) * 2003-11-19 2010-06-08 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Security system with distributed computing
US7769132B1 (en) * 2007-03-13 2010-08-03 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Material analysis based on imaging effective atomic numbers
US7792248B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2010-09-07 Morpho Detection, Inc. Methods of examining an item of luggage by means of an x-ray diffraction method
US7899232B2 (en) * 2006-05-11 2011-03-01 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for providing threat image projection (TIP) in a luggage screening system, and luggage screening system implementing same

Family Cites Families (538)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4338626A (en) 1963-03-11 1982-07-06 Lemelson Jerome H Scanning apparatus and method
US5283641A (en) * 1954-12-24 1994-02-01 Lemelson Jerome H Apparatus and methods for automated analysis
DE3019435A1 (en) 1980-05-21 1981-11-26 SIEMENS AG AAAAA, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München METHOD FOR PROCESSING ULTRASONIC ECHOSIGNALS FROM OBJECTS REFLECTING BOTH DIRECTLY AS WELL AS NON-DIRECTIVE, IN PARTICULAR FOR ULTRASONIC IMAGE PROCESSING IN THE FIELD OF FABRIC OR TISSUE EXAMINATION
JPS6058504B2 (en) 1980-11-17 1985-12-20 株式会社東芝 reconstruction device
US4383327A (en) 1980-12-01 1983-05-10 University Of Utah Radiographic systems employing multi-linear arrays of electronic radiation detectors
US4509075A (en) 1981-06-15 1985-04-02 Oxbridge, Inc. Automatic optical inspection apparatus
US4480899A (en) 1981-10-08 1984-11-06 Xerox Corporation Two dimensional electro-optic modulator and applications therefor
US5297222A (en) 1982-05-04 1994-03-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Image processing apparatus
US4470303A (en) 1982-09-20 1984-09-11 General Electric Company Quantitative volume backscatter imaging
US4573198A (en) * 1982-12-27 1986-02-25 Litton Systems, Inc. Optical image processing/pattern recognition system
EP0113677A3 (en) 1983-01-08 1989-02-01 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Signal processing method in autoradiography
EP0113676A3 (en) 1983-01-08 1989-02-08 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Signal processing method in autoradiography
US4725733A (en) * 1983-07-18 1988-02-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Apparatus and method for remotely detecting the presence of chemical warfare nerve agents in an air-released thermal cloud
US4637056A (en) * 1983-10-13 1987-01-13 Battelle Development Corporation Optical correlator using electronic image preprocessing
US4612666A (en) 1984-07-05 1986-09-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Automatic pattern recognition apparatus
US4653109A (en) * 1984-07-30 1987-03-24 Lemelson Jerome H Image analysis system and method
JPS6145737A (en) 1984-08-08 1986-03-05 株式会社東芝 X-ray examination apparatus
GB8424084D0 (en) 1984-09-24 1984-10-31 Sira Ltd Inspection apparatus
DE3541356A1 (en) 1984-11-22 1986-05-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba, Kawasaki, Kanagawa IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
US4651297A (en) 1984-11-28 1987-03-17 General Dynamics, Pomona Division Two-dimensional image correlator
CN1003542B (en) 1985-03-04 1989-03-08 海曼股份公司 X-ray scanner
CN1008135B (en) * 1985-03-04 1990-05-23 海曼股份公司 Arrangement for perspective container
CN85107860A (en) 1985-04-03 1986-10-01 海曼股份公司 The X-ray scanner
EP0198481B1 (en) * 1985-04-17 1996-03-13 Hitachi, Ltd. Image processing apparatus
US4651957A (en) * 1985-06-20 1987-03-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Large capacity tow/release apparatus
DE3530938A1 (en) 1985-08-29 1987-03-12 Heimann Gmbh LUGGAGE TEST SYSTEM
DE3530955A1 (en) 1985-08-29 1987-03-05 Heimann Gmbh LUGGAGE TEST SYSTEM
US4724543A (en) * 1985-09-10 1988-02-09 Beckman Research Institute, City Of Hope Method and apparatus for automatic digital image analysis
DE3544182A1 (en) 1985-12-13 1987-06-19 Heimann Gmbh CONTACT IMAGE SENSOR LINE
EP0247491B1 (en) 1986-05-28 1990-08-16 Heimann GmbH X-ray scanning system
US4901084A (en) 1988-04-19 1990-02-13 Millitech Corporation Object detection and location system
US4916722A (en) 1986-06-26 1990-04-10 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray image processing apparatus
EP0253060B1 (en) 1986-07-14 1990-05-30 Heimann GmbH X-ray scanning system
DE8703674U1 (en) 1987-03-11 1988-07-14 Heimann Gmbh, 6200 Wiesbaden, De
US5063602A (en) 1987-04-14 1991-11-05 Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd. Image correlation calculation apparatus
US4795253A (en) * 1987-04-24 1989-01-03 Mobay Corporation Remote sensing gas analyzer
GB8713819D0 (en) 1987-06-12 1987-12-16 Smiths Industries Plc Information processing systems
US4955060A (en) 1987-07-02 1990-09-04 Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd. Image recognition apparatus
US4849912A (en) 1987-08-03 1989-07-18 Vexcel Corporation Stereo mensuration method
US4838644A (en) 1987-09-15 1989-06-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Position, rotation, and intensity invariant recognizing method
DE8717508U1 (en) 1987-10-19 1989-01-05 Heimann Gmbh, 6200 Wiesbaden, De
US4832447A (en) 1987-12-04 1989-05-23 Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State University Joint transform image correlation using a nonlinear spatial light modulator at the fourier plane
US4887899A (en) 1987-12-07 1989-12-19 Hung Yau Y Apparatus and method for electronic analysis of test objects
JP2633607B2 (en) 1988-03-08 1997-07-23 株式会社東芝 X-ray CT scanner
US4869574A (en) 1988-05-13 1989-09-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Hybrid optical correlator
US5109276A (en) 1988-05-27 1992-04-28 The University Of Connecticut Multi-dimensional multi-spectral imaging system
IL87570A (en) 1988-08-26 1991-12-12 Israel Atomic Energy Comm Method and apparatus for the detection and imaging of heavy metals
JPH0830830B2 (en) 1988-09-07 1996-03-27 セイコー電子工業株式会社 Optical correlation processor
US5020111A (en) 1988-10-14 1991-05-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Spatial symmetry cueing image processing method and apparatus
GB8826550D0 (en) 1988-11-14 1989-05-17 Smiths Industries Plc Image processing apparatus and methods
US5353799A (en) 1991-01-22 1994-10-11 Non Invasive Technology, Inc. Examination of subjects using photon migration with high directionality techniques
DE69030606T2 (en) 1989-02-23 1998-01-02 Teijin Ltd METHOD FOR MEASURING A BONE SHAPE, DEVICE THEREFOR AND SYSTEM FOR BONE EVALUATION
US5132998A (en) 1989-03-03 1992-07-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Radiographic image processing method and photographic imaging apparatus therefor
US5079698A (en) * 1989-05-03 1992-01-07 Advanced Light Imaging Technologies Ltd. Transillumination method apparatus for the diagnosis of breast tumors and other breast lesions by normalization of an electronic image of the breast
JP2527807B2 (en) 1989-05-09 1996-08-28 住友大阪セメント株式会社 Optical associative identification device
CA2019121A1 (en) 1989-06-16 1990-12-16 Tadao Iwaki Optical pattern recognition apparatus
US5850465A (en) 1989-06-26 1998-12-15 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Abnormnal pattern detecting or judging apparatus, circular pattern judging apparatus, and image finding apparatus
US5132842A (en) 1989-07-21 1992-07-21 Rockwell International Corporation Optical image transformation system
DE58902570D1 (en) * 1989-08-09 1992-12-03 Heimann Gmbh DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING OBJECTS WITH FAN-SHAPED RADIATION.
EP0412190B1 (en) 1989-08-09 1993-10-27 Heimann Systems GmbH & Co. KG Device for transmitting fan-shaped radiation through objects
US5132811A (en) 1989-08-10 1992-07-21 Seiko Instruments Inc. Holographic operating optical apparatus
US5179581A (en) * 1989-09-13 1993-01-12 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Automatic threat detection based on illumination by penetrating radiant energy
US5022062A (en) 1989-09-13 1991-06-04 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Automatic threat detection based on illumination by penetrating radiant energy using histogram processing
US5198669A (en) * 1989-09-20 1993-03-30 Fujitsu Limited Digital X-ray image processing apparatus
US5257322A (en) 1989-09-20 1993-10-26 Agency Of Industrial Science And Technology Method and apparatus for pattern recognition and display with optical correlator
US5056130A (en) 1989-10-06 1991-10-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration Computerized tomography calibrator
JPH0670798B2 (en) 1989-11-20 1994-09-07 住友セメント株式会社 Optical pattern recognition method
US5107351A (en) 1990-02-16 1992-04-21 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Image enhanced optical correlator system
US5323472A (en) 1990-03-27 1994-06-21 The Boeing Company Optical image analyzer using optical correlation and opto-electronic feedback
JP2551497B2 (en) 1990-06-08 1996-11-06 シャープ株式会社 Image processing device
US5181234B1 (en) * 1990-08-06 2000-01-04 Rapiscan Security Products Inc X-ray backscatter detection system
US5138167A (en) 1991-01-23 1992-08-11 University Of Alabama - Birmingham Split energy radiation detection
EP0510540B1 (en) * 1991-04-23 1999-08-25 Seiko Instruments Inc. An optical pattern recognition system and driving method of ferroelectric liquid crystal spatial light modulator
US5257085A (en) 1991-04-24 1993-10-26 Kaman Aerospace Corporation Spectrally dispersive imaging lidar system
US5528702A (en) 1991-05-31 1996-06-18 Seiko Instruments Inc. Optical pattern recognition apparatus with coordinate conversion function
US5365560A (en) 1991-07-29 1994-11-15 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for acquiring a uniform distribution of radon data sufficiently dense to constitute a complete set for exact image reconstruction of an object irradiated by a cone beam source
JP3146534B2 (en) 1991-08-02 2001-03-19 株式会社日立製作所 Nuclear magnetic resonance equipment
US5680525A (en) 1991-08-08 1997-10-21 Hitachi, Ltd. Three-dimensional graphic system with an editor for generating a textrue mapping image
US5367552A (en) 1991-10-03 1994-11-22 In Vision Technologies, Inc. Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage
DE4235941A1 (en) * 1991-10-25 1993-07-22 American Science & Eng Inc Monitoring system for objects on conveyor - comprises source of penetrating illumination diverted to gap in conveyor, radiation detector and display
JP2849964B2 (en) 1991-12-26 1999-01-27 富士写真フイルム株式会社 Image processing method and apparatus
GB9200828D0 (en) 1992-01-15 1992-03-11 Image Research Ltd Improvements in and relating to material identification using x-rays
EP0664038B1 (en) 1992-02-18 2000-10-11 Neopath, Inc. Method for identifying objects using data processing techniques
FR2689271B1 (en) * 1992-03-27 1994-06-17 Univ Joseph Fourier THREE-DIMENSIONAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTOR.
US5375156A (en) 1992-03-31 1994-12-20 Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for 3-D computer tomography
CA2095366C (en) * 1992-05-21 1999-09-14 Timothy C. Collins Hybridized semiconductor pixel detector arrays for use in digital radiography
US5371542A (en) 1992-06-23 1994-12-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Dual waveband signal processing system
JP2940317B2 (en) 1992-06-24 1999-08-25 三菱電機株式会社 Image processing device
US5268967A (en) 1992-06-29 1993-12-07 Eastman Kodak Company Method for automatic foreground and background detection in digital radiographic images
US5329310A (en) 1992-06-30 1994-07-12 The Walt Disney Company Method and apparatus for controlling distortion of a projected image
EP0579848B1 (en) * 1992-07-20 1995-10-04 Heimann Systems GmbH Testing system for objects
US5757981A (en) 1992-08-20 1998-05-26 Toyo Ink Mfg. Co., Ltd. Image inspection device
US5327286A (en) 1992-08-31 1994-07-05 Texas Instruments Incorporated Real time optical correlation system
US5345081A (en) 1992-09-10 1994-09-06 Penetect, Inc. Pit detector and method
US6005916A (en) 1992-10-14 1999-12-21 Techniscan, Inc. Apparatus and method for imaging with wavefields using inverse scattering techniques
US5953452A (en) 1992-11-05 1999-09-14 The Johns Hopkins University Optical-digital method and processor for pattern recognition
US5376796A (en) 1992-11-25 1994-12-27 Adac Laboratories, Inc. Proximity detector for body contouring system of a medical camera
US5430787A (en) 1992-12-03 1995-07-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Compton scattering tomography
US5311359A (en) 1992-12-24 1994-05-10 Litton Systems, Inc. Reflective optical correlator with a folded asymmetrical optical axis
US5600303A (en) * 1993-01-15 1997-02-04 Technology International Incorporated Detection of concealed explosives and contraband
US7241569B2 (en) 1993-01-18 2007-07-10 Olympus Corporation Method and a device for the evaluation of biopolymer fitness
DE4306187A1 (en) 1993-02-27 1994-09-01 Industrieanlagen Betriebsges Method and arrangement of devices for protecting buildings and people against violent offenders
US5777742A (en) 1993-03-11 1998-07-07 Environmental Research Institute Of Michigan System and method for holographic imaging with discernible image of an object
US5754621A (en) 1993-03-15 1998-05-19 Hitachi, Ltd. X-ray inspection method and apparatus, prepreg inspecting method, and method for fabricating multi-layer printed circuit board
DE4311174C2 (en) * 1993-04-05 1996-02-15 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co X-ray inspection system for containers and trucks
CH693968A5 (en) 1993-04-21 2004-05-14 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung Method and apparatus for the Topographiepruefung of surfaces.
US5794788A (en) 1993-04-30 1998-08-18 Massen; Robert Method and device for sorting materials
FR2705786B1 (en) 1993-05-28 1995-08-25 Schlumberger Ind Sa Method and device for recognizing certain materials in the composition of an object.
US5420788A (en) 1993-08-09 1995-05-30 General Electric Company Method for processing data in 2D and 3D computed X-ray tomography
JP3326902B2 (en) 1993-09-10 2002-09-24 株式会社日立製作所 Pattern detection method, pattern detection apparatus, and projection exposure apparatus using the same
US5485312A (en) * 1993-09-14 1996-01-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Optical pattern recognition system and method for verifying the authenticity of a person, product or thing
US5604634A (en) * 1993-09-20 1997-02-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force All optical nonlinear joint fourier transform correlator
CA2132138C (en) 1993-09-29 2004-01-06 Shih-Ping Wang Computer-aided diagnosis system and method
US5619596A (en) 1993-10-06 1997-04-08 Seiko Instruments Inc. Method and apparatus for optical pattern recognition
US5532122A (en) * 1993-10-12 1996-07-02 Biotraces, Inc. Quantitation of gamma and x-ray emitting isotopes
US6049381A (en) 1993-10-29 2000-04-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Real time suspended particle monitor
WO1995012132A1 (en) 1993-10-29 1995-05-04 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Object imaging using diffuse light
US5910765A (en) 1993-11-02 1999-06-08 Advanced Optical Controls, Inc. Sensor module
US5481622A (en) * 1994-03-01 1996-01-02 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Eye tracking apparatus and method employing grayscale threshold values
DE4410603C1 (en) 1994-03-26 1995-06-14 Jenoptik Technologie Gmbh Detecting faults during inspection of masks, LCDs, circuit boards and semiconductor wafers
US5428657A (en) 1994-03-22 1995-06-27 Georgia Tech Research Corporation X-ray monitoring system
US5580471A (en) 1994-03-30 1996-12-03 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for material treatment and inspection using fiber-coupled laser diode
US5418380A (en) 1994-04-12 1995-05-23 Martin Marietta Corporation Optical correlator using ferroelectric liquid crystal spatial light modulators and Fourier transform lenses
US5493444A (en) * 1994-04-28 1996-02-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Photorefractive two-beam coupling nonlinear joint transform correlator
JP3159869B2 (en) 1994-05-09 2001-04-23 松下電器産業株式会社 Thermal object detection device and measurement method
US5546189A (en) 1994-05-19 1996-08-13 View Engineering, Inc. Triangulation-based 3D imaging and processing method and system
US6800452B1 (en) 1994-08-08 2004-10-05 Science Applications International Corporation Automated methods for simultaneously performing a plurality of signal-based assays
US6060677A (en) 1994-08-19 2000-05-09 Tiedemanns-Jon H. Andresen Ans Determination of characteristics of material
JP3449791B2 (en) 1994-08-23 2003-09-22 理化学研究所 Imaging method and imaging apparatus
US5815264A (en) 1994-09-21 1998-09-29 Laser Sensor Technology, Inc System for acquiring an image of a multi-phase fluid by measuring backscattered light
US5519225A (en) 1994-10-03 1996-05-21 General Electric Company System and method for using a dual modality detector for inspecting objects
US5841907A (en) 1994-11-14 1998-11-24 The University Of Connecticut Spatial integrating optical correlator for verifying the authenticity of a person, product or thing
US5481584A (en) * 1994-11-23 1996-01-02 Tang; Jihong Device for material separation using nondestructive inspection imaging
US6487307B1 (en) 1994-11-30 2002-11-26 Isoa, Inc. System and method of optically inspecting structures on an object
US5506880A (en) 1994-12-16 1996-04-09 Morton International, Inc. X-ray inspection system and method
DE69534284T2 (en) 1994-12-23 2006-03-23 Digirad Corp., San Diego SEMICONDUCTOR GAMMA RADIATION CAMERA AND MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM
EP0726060B1 (en) 1995-01-23 2003-09-03 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Apparatus for computer aided diagnosis
US6070583A (en) 1995-02-21 2000-06-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Optical imaging of tissue using inelastically scattered light
DE19509007C2 (en) 1995-03-13 2001-07-05 Siemens Ag C-arm X-ray diagnostic device for creating slice images
DE19510168C2 (en) 1995-03-21 2001-09-13 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Method and device for determining crystalline and polycrystalline materials in an examination area
US5756875A (en) 1995-04-14 1998-05-26 The University Of Rochester Thin film phantoms and phantom systems
US5703921A (en) 1995-05-30 1997-12-30 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray computed tomography apparatus
CN1101056C (en) 1995-06-22 2003-02-05 3Dv系统有限公司 Improved optical ranging camera
JP3140664B2 (en) 1995-06-30 2001-03-05 松下電器産業株式会社 Foreign matter inspection method and apparatus
US5706816A (en) * 1995-07-17 1998-01-13 Aloka Co., Ltd. Image processing apparatus and image processing method for use in the image processing apparatus
DE19532965C2 (en) 1995-09-07 1998-07-16 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co X-ray inspection system for large-volume goods
US5600700A (en) * 1995-09-25 1997-02-04 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Detecting explosives or other contraband by employing transmitted and scattered X-rays
US5642393A (en) 1995-09-26 1997-06-24 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Detecting contraband by employing interactive multiprobe tomography
JP3604467B2 (en) 1995-09-27 2004-12-22 株式会社東芝 Myocardial twist correction method
US6507025B1 (en) * 1995-10-23 2003-01-14 Science Applications International Corporation Density detection using real time discrete photon counting for fast moving targets
US7045787B1 (en) 1995-10-23 2006-05-16 Science Applications International Corporation Density detection using real time discrete photon counting for fast moving targets
US6636635B2 (en) 1995-11-01 2003-10-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Object extraction method, and image sensing apparatus using the method
US6018562A (en) * 1995-11-13 2000-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of concealed objects using multiple energy computed tomography
JPH09146228A (en) 1995-11-20 1997-06-06 Konica Corp Radiograph forming method
JP3441578B2 (en) 1995-11-22 2003-09-02 株式会社モリタ製作所 Dental panoramic radiography device
JPH09149902A (en) 1995-12-01 1997-06-10 Hitachi Medical Corp Tomography and tomograph
US5796868A (en) 1995-12-28 1998-08-18 Cognex Corporation Object edge point filtering system for machine vision
US5809171A (en) 1996-01-05 1998-09-15 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Image processing method and apparatus for correlating a test image with a template
US5981949A (en) 1996-01-18 1999-11-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Locating defects in solid material
US5778046A (en) 1996-01-19 1998-07-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Automatic X-ray Beam Equalizer
AUPN800796A0 (en) 1996-02-09 1996-03-07 Unisearch Limited Visual inspection system for leather hide
US5764683B1 (en) 1996-02-12 2000-11-21 American Science & Eng Inc Mobile x-ray inspection system for large objects
WO1997033517A1 (en) 1996-03-13 1997-09-18 Analogic Corporation Computed tomography ring suppression filter
WO1997033518A1 (en) 1996-03-13 1997-09-18 Analogic Corporation Computed tomography self-calibrating ring suppression filter
US6044170A (en) 1996-03-21 2000-03-28 Real-Time Geometry Corporation System and method for rapid shape digitizing and adaptive mesh generation
US5739539A (en) 1996-03-28 1998-04-14 Adac Laboratories Use of body boundary information to perform iterative reconstruction in medical imaging system
US5732529A (en) 1996-03-29 1998-03-31 Ethicon, Inc. Apparatus for feeding foil stock in a process for making sealed sterile packages
US6586193B2 (en) 1996-04-25 2003-07-01 Genicon Sciences Corporation Analyte assay using particulate labels
JP3562902B2 (en) 1996-04-26 2004-09-08 株式会社日立メディコ RF probe for magnetic resonance imaging equipment
DE19619925C2 (en) 1996-05-17 1999-09-09 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh X-ray diagnostic device for tomosynthesis
JPH09311109A (en) 1996-05-22 1997-12-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Defect inspection method and device utilizing light
US5815198A (en) 1996-05-31 1998-09-29 Vachtsevanos; George J. Method and apparatus for analyzing an image to detect and identify defects
WO1997045755A1 (en) 1996-05-31 1997-12-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Coded aperture imaging
US5799100A (en) 1996-06-03 1998-08-25 University Of South Florida Computer-assisted method and apparatus for analysis of x-ray images using wavelet transforms
US6043870A (en) 1996-07-01 2000-03-28 Cybernet Systems Corporation Compact fiber optic electronic laser speckle pattern interferometer
US5638420A (en) 1996-07-03 1997-06-10 Advanced Research And Applications Corporation Straddle inspection system
WO1998003889A1 (en) 1996-07-22 1998-01-29 American Science And Engineering, Inc. System for rapid x-ray inspection of enclosures
US5943388A (en) 1996-07-30 1999-08-24 Nova R & D, Inc. Radiation detector and non-destructive inspection
US5960104A (en) 1996-08-16 1999-09-28 Virginia Polytechnic & State University Defect detection system for lumber
EP0825457A3 (en) 1996-08-19 2002-02-13 Analogic Corporation Multiple angle pre-screening tomographic systems and methods
US5974111A (en) * 1996-09-24 1999-10-26 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Identifying explosives or other contraband by employing transmitted or scattered X-rays
AU4254497A (en) 1996-10-16 1998-05-11 Illinois Institute Of Technology Method for detecting an image of an object
US5668846A (en) 1996-10-18 1997-09-16 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for scanning an object and displaying an image in a computed tomography system
US5862258A (en) * 1996-11-04 1999-01-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method for distinguishing between objects using mace filters
WO1998020366A1 (en) 1996-11-08 1998-05-14 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Coded aperture x-ray imaging system
JPH10164437A (en) 1996-11-26 1998-06-19 Canon Inc X-ray image-pickup device and drive method for x-ray image-pickup element
KR100188712B1 (en) 1996-11-28 1999-06-01 이종구 Cross-sectional image apparatus and method for obtaining cross-sectional image using the same
IL119850A (en) 1996-12-17 2000-11-21 Prolaser Ltd Optical method and apparatus for detecting low frequency defects
US5748697A (en) 1996-12-20 1998-05-05 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Method and apparatus for eliminating boundary errors in cone beam imaging
US6502984B2 (en) * 1997-01-17 2003-01-07 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Radiographic apparatus
US6057761A (en) 1997-01-21 2000-05-02 Spatial Dynamics, Ltd. Security system and method
US6480285B1 (en) 1997-01-28 2002-11-12 Zetetic Institute Multiple layer confocal interference microscopy using wavenumber domain reflectometry and background amplitude reduction and compensation
US5802134A (en) 1997-04-09 1998-09-01 Analogic Corporation Nutating slice CT image reconstruction apparatus and method
AUPO625497A0 (en) 1997-04-16 1997-05-15 Macquarie Research Limited Analysis of molecules
US5864598A (en) * 1997-04-21 1999-01-26 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for scanning an object in a computed tomography system
WO1998049618A1 (en) 1997-04-30 1998-11-05 The Foxboro Company Methods and systems for synchronizing processes executing on a digital data processing system
WO1998050940A2 (en) 1997-05-05 1998-11-12 University Of Florida High resolution resonance ionization imaging detector and method
US5909285A (en) 1997-05-05 1999-06-01 Beaty; Elwin M. Three dimensional inspection system
US5779641A (en) 1997-05-07 1998-07-14 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for three-dimensional ultrasound imaging by projecting filtered pixel data
US5877849A (en) 1997-05-12 1999-03-02 Advanced Optical Technologies, Llc Object detection system
US5926568A (en) 1997-06-30 1999-07-20 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Image object matching using core analysis and deformable shape loci
US6292260B1 (en) 1997-07-03 2001-09-18 Isoa, Inc. System and method of optically inspecting surface structures on an object
FR2766044B1 (en) * 1997-07-11 1999-10-08 Ge Medical Syst Sa PROCESS FOR PROCESSING A SEQUENCE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMAGES OF AN OBJECT
US6335742B1 (en) * 1997-07-24 2002-01-01 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Apparatus for file management and manipulation using graphical displays and textual descriptions
JPH1156828A (en) 1997-08-27 1999-03-02 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Abnormal shadow candidate detecting method and its device
EP1012586A2 (en) 1997-09-09 2000-06-28 American Science & Engineering, Inc. A tomographic inspection system
US5862198A (en) * 1997-09-30 1999-01-19 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Pre-calculated hitlist for reducing run-time processing of an exact cone beam reconstruction algorithm
US5901196A (en) 1997-09-30 1999-05-04 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Reduction of hitlist size in spiral cone beam CT by use of local radon origins
US5901198A (en) 1997-10-10 1999-05-04 Analogic Corporation Computed tomography scanning target detection using target surface normals
US6256404B1 (en) 1997-10-10 2001-07-03 Analogic Corporation Computed tomography scanning apparatus and method using adaptive reconstruction window
US6149300A (en) 1997-10-17 2000-11-21 Welch Allyn, Inc. Intraoral imaging system
GB9726386D0 (en) 1997-12-12 1998-02-11 Univ Cambridge Tech Optical correlator
US6442288B1 (en) 1997-12-17 2002-08-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for reconstructing a three-dimensional image of an object scanned in the context of a tomosynthesis, and apparatus for tomosynthesis
JP4497570B2 (en) 1998-01-22 2010-07-07 株式会社東芝 Diagnostic imaging equipment
DE19802668B4 (en) * 1998-01-24 2013-10-17 Smiths Heimann Gmbh X-ray generator
US6035014A (en) 1998-02-11 2000-03-07 Analogic Corporation Multiple-stage apparatus and method for detecting objects in computed tomography data
US6452677B1 (en) * 1998-02-13 2002-09-17 Micron Technology Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting defects in the manufacture of an electronic device
US20030165213A1 (en) 1998-02-18 2003-09-04 Maglich Bogdan C. Method and apparatus for neutron microscopy with stoichiometric imaging
US6289235B1 (en) 1998-03-05 2001-09-11 Wake Forest University Method and system for creating three-dimensional images using tomosynthetic computed tomography
US6388788B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2002-05-14 Praelux, Inc. Method and apparatus for screening chemical compounds
DE19812055C2 (en) 1998-03-19 2002-08-08 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Image processing for material detection using X-rays
US6009142A (en) 1998-03-31 1999-12-28 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Practical cone beam image reconstruction using local regions-of-interest
US5881123A (en) 1998-03-31 1999-03-09 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Simplified cone beam image reconstruction using 3D backprojection
US6011620A (en) * 1998-04-06 2000-01-04 Northrop Grumman Corporation Method and apparatus for the automatic inspection of optically transmissive planar objects
US6094472A (en) 1998-04-14 2000-07-25 Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. X-ray backscatter imaging system including moving body tracking assembly
US6526120B1 (en) * 1998-05-06 2003-02-25 Joseph N. Gray X-ray flow rate measurement system for materials, including agricultural materials and food products
US6153873A (en) 1998-05-20 2000-11-28 E. I. Dupont De Numours And Company Optical probe having an imaging apparatus
US6088423A (en) 1998-06-05 2000-07-11 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Multiview x-ray based system for detecting contraband such as in baggage
DE19826062B4 (en) * 1998-06-12 2006-12-14 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Method and device for detecting X-rays
US6621888B2 (en) 1998-06-18 2003-09-16 American Science And Engineering, Inc. X-ray inspection by coherent-scattering from variably disposed scatterers identified as suspect objects
JP4078716B2 (en) 1998-06-29 2008-04-23 ソニー株式会社 Image processing apparatus and method, and providing medium
US6018561A (en) * 1998-07-27 2000-01-25 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Mask boundary correction in a cone beam imaging system using simplified filtered backprojection image reconstruction
US6080994A (en) 1998-07-30 2000-06-27 Litton Systems, Inc. High output reflective optical correlator having a folded optical axis using ferro-electric liquid crystal spatial light modulators
US6163403A (en) 1998-07-30 2000-12-19 Litton Systems, Inc. High output reflective optical correlator having a folded optical axis using grayscale spatial light modulators
US6899540B1 (en) 1998-07-30 2005-05-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Transportation Threat image projection system
JP3299193B2 (en) 1998-08-21 2002-07-08 日本電気株式会社 Bump inspection method / apparatus, information storage medium
JP2000069243A (en) 1998-08-24 2000-03-03 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Image processing method and image processor
US6714623B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2004-03-30 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image collecting system
JP2000083951A (en) * 1998-09-11 2000-03-28 Canon Inc X-ray radiographic device and grid device
US6850597B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2005-02-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha X-ray image photographing apparatus and grid device
JP3619027B2 (en) 1998-09-30 2005-02-09 キヤノン株式会社 X-ray imaging apparatus, X-ray imaging system, X-ray image processing method, and computer-readable recording medium
US6078638A (en) 1998-09-30 2000-06-20 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Pixel grouping for filtering cone beam detector data during 3D image reconstruction
DE19848765C2 (en) 1998-10-22 2000-12-21 Brainlab Med Computersyst Gmbh Position verification in camera images
DE19849764B4 (en) 1998-10-28 2004-10-21 Siemens Ag Imaging diagnostic facility
US6278760B1 (en) 1998-11-13 2001-08-21 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Radiation image forming method and apparatus
US6887710B2 (en) 1998-11-13 2005-05-03 Mesosystems Technology, Inc. Robust system for screening mail for biological agents
US6236708B1 (en) 1998-11-25 2001-05-22 Picker International, Inc. 2D and 3D tomographic X-ray imaging using flat panel detectors
US6222902B1 (en) 1998-11-25 2001-04-24 Picker International, Inc. Real-time tomographic system with flat panel detectors
DE19855250A1 (en) 1998-11-30 2000-06-08 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Process for optimizing an X-ray image
US6421420B1 (en) 1998-12-01 2002-07-16 American Science & Engineering, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating sequential beams of penetrating radiation
JP2002532837A (en) 1998-12-08 2002-10-02 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ X-ray inspection apparatus including brightness control depending on the absorption rate of the object
US6754374B1 (en) 1998-12-16 2004-06-22 Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for processing images with regions representing target objects
US6229872B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2001-05-08 United Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for use in inspection of objects
US6373970B1 (en) 1998-12-29 2002-04-16 General Electric Company Image registration using fourier phase matching
JP2002533150A (en) 1998-12-30 2002-10-08 ゼネラル・エレクトリック・カンパニイ Image thickness selection method for multi-slice imaging system
JP2000197627A (en) 1999-01-05 2000-07-18 Hitachi Medical Corp X-ray ct device
US6249341B1 (en) 1999-01-25 2001-06-19 Amnis Corporation Imaging and analyzing parameters of small moving objects such as cells
TW418342B (en) 1999-02-02 2001-01-11 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Sectional image photography system and method thereof
JP3866431B2 (en) 1999-02-17 2007-01-10 株式会社東芝 X-ray CT system
US6370222B1 (en) 1999-02-17 2002-04-09 Ccvs, Llc Container contents verification
US6272204B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2001-08-07 Cr Technology, Inc. Integrated X-ray and visual inspection systems
US7068825B2 (en) 1999-03-08 2006-06-27 Orametrix, Inc. Scanning system and calibration method for capturing precise three-dimensional information of objects
DE19910615C1 (en) 1999-03-10 2000-06-21 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Ergonomic operating station for x-ray equipment includes seat, monitor and control panel with individual adjustments allowing user of any size to customize settings for ideal posture, sitting or standing
FR2790851B1 (en) 1999-03-12 2001-06-08 Ge Medical Syst Sa METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE DETECTION OF ELEMENTS OF INTEREST IN A DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE
US6185272B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2001-02-06 Analogic Corporation Architecture for CT scanning system
US6448545B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2002-09-10 Syncrotronics Corp. Precision endoscopic imaging system
US6650779B2 (en) 1999-03-26 2003-11-18 Georgia Tech Research Corp. Method and apparatus for analyzing an image to detect and identify patterns
US6288974B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2001-09-11 The United States Of Americas As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy System and method for enhancing detection of objects through an obscuring medium
DE19916664A1 (en) 1999-04-14 2000-10-19 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co X-ray image processing method, involves checking coincidence of matching sides of image markings and ratio of common areas to achieve greater clarity by forming final summation marking
US6815687B1 (en) * 1999-04-16 2004-11-09 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method and system for high-speed, 3D imaging of optically-invisible radiation
US6256370B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2001-07-03 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for performing tomosynthesis
JP4159701B2 (en) 1999-04-20 2008-10-01 富士フイルム株式会社 Evaluation method and apparatus for digital radiographic image
US6292530B1 (en) 1999-04-29 2001-09-18 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for reconstructing image data acquired by a tomosynthesis x-ray imaging system
US6403960B1 (en) 1999-04-29 2002-06-11 Koninklijijke Philips Electronics N.V. Correction for spatial variations of deadtime of a monolithic scintillator based detector in a medical imaging system
US6373916B1 (en) 1999-05-10 2002-04-16 Shimadzu Corporation X-ray CT apparatus
US6731819B1 (en) 1999-05-21 2004-05-04 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Optical information processing apparatus capable of various types of filtering and image processing
US6919959B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-07-19 Masten Opto-Diagnostics Co. Digital spectral identifier-controller and related methods
US6236704B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2001-05-22 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Method and apparatus using a virtual detector for three-dimensional reconstruction from x-ray images
US6233303B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2001-05-15 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing X-ray dosage in a spiral scan cone beam CT imaging system
US6744909B1 (en) 1999-08-19 2004-06-01 Physical Optics Corporation Authentication system and method
DE19943183A1 (en) 1999-09-09 2001-03-15 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Method for color matching an image, in particular an X-ray image
DE19959081A1 (en) 1999-09-09 2001-03-22 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Process for image management of X-ray images
US6473489B2 (en) 1999-09-30 2002-10-29 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc Apparatus for superimposition of X-ray and video images
US6784982B1 (en) * 1999-11-04 2004-08-31 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Direct mapping of DNA chips to detector arrays
DE19954662B4 (en) * 1999-11-13 2004-06-03 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Apparatus and method for detecting unauthorized luggage items
US6542578B2 (en) 1999-11-13 2003-04-01 Heimann Systems Gmbh Apparatus for determining the crystalline and polycrystalline materials of an item
DE19954663B4 (en) 1999-11-13 2006-06-08 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Method and device for determining a material of a detected object
US6751349B2 (en) 1999-11-30 2004-06-15 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image processing system
US6525331B1 (en) * 1999-12-01 2003-02-25 Nanyang Technological University Ball grid array (BGA) package on-line non-contact inspection method and system
US7050646B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2006-05-23 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Image processing system and method for image segmentation using intensity contrast and depth contrast values
FR2803069B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2002-12-13 Ge Medical Syst Sa METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPENSATING THE THICKNESS OF AN ORGAN
US7108970B2 (en) 2000-01-07 2006-09-19 Transform Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Rapid identification of conditions, compounds, or compositions that inhibit, prevent, induce, modify, or reverse transitions of physical state
US6418189B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2002-07-09 Analogic Corporation Explosive material detection apparatus and method using dual energy information of a scan
US6570177B1 (en) 2000-01-31 2003-05-27 Dcs Corporation System, apparatus, and method for detecting defects in particles
JP2001212144A (en) 2000-01-31 2001-08-07 Toshiba Corp Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and ultrasonic imaging method
US6744848B2 (en) 2000-02-11 2004-06-01 Brandeis University Method and system for low-dose three-dimensional imaging of a scene
JP2003522583A (en) 2000-02-15 2003-07-29 フィリップス メディカル システムズ テクノロジーズ リミテッド Clinical screening CT system
JP3643745B2 (en) 2000-02-21 2005-04-27 株式会社モリタ製作所 X-ray imaging detector and X-ray imaging apparatus
GB2372930B (en) 2000-03-03 2003-03-19 Teraview Ltd Apparatus and method for investigating a sample
WO2001069186A1 (en) 2000-03-10 2001-09-20 Cyrano Sciences, Inc. Measuring and analyzing multi-dimensional sensory information for identification purposes
WO2001069329A2 (en) 2000-03-10 2001-09-20 Cyrano Sciences, Inc. Control for an industrial process using one or more multidimensional variables
DE10011318A1 (en) 2000-03-13 2001-09-20 Visicontrol Ges Fuer Elektroni Image processing apparatus for inspection and/or measurement of objects, includes infrared light source
US6628982B1 (en) 2000-03-30 2003-09-30 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Internal marker device for identification of biological substances
US6510202B2 (en) * 2000-03-31 2003-01-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Imaging apparatus, imaging method, and storage medium
JP3707347B2 (en) 2000-04-07 2005-10-19 株式会社島津製作所 Image processing method for X-ray CT apparatus, X-ray CT apparatus, and recording medium for X-ray CT imaging
WO2001078005A2 (en) 2000-04-11 2001-10-18 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. System and method for three-dimensional image rendering and analysis
AU2001253566A1 (en) 2000-04-17 2001-10-30 Matthias Aurich Diffraction enhanced x-ray imaging of articular cartilage
JP2001299744A (en) * 2000-04-18 2001-10-30 Hitachi Medical Corp Medical radiotomographic instrument
ATE418115T1 (en) 2000-04-20 2009-01-15 Greenvision Systems Ltd METHOD FOR GENERATING MORPHOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION/DENSITY IMAGE AND HISTOGRAMS IN PARTICLES OF A CHEMICALLY PURE PARTICLE SUBSTANCE
US6980681B1 (en) 2000-04-24 2005-12-27 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Methods and apparatus for helical reconstruction for multislice CT scan
JP2001299733A (en) 2000-04-27 2001-10-30 Konica Corp Pci radiation beam image processing apparatus, pci radiation beam image detecting and processing apparatus, pci radiation beam image outputting apparatus and pci radiation beam image diagnosis supporting apparatus
US6353673B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2002-03-05 Physical Optics Corporation Real-time opto-electronic image processor
US7359541B2 (en) 2000-04-28 2008-04-15 Konica Corporation Radiation image processing apparatus
US6408046B2 (en) 2000-04-29 2002-06-18 General Electric Company Method for dynamic range management of digital radiographic images
CA2307439C (en) 2000-05-02 2008-07-08 Institut National D'optique Method and apparatus for evaluating a scale factor and a rotation angle in image processing
US6549683B1 (en) 2000-05-02 2003-04-15 Institut National D'optique Method and apparatus for evaluating a scale factor and a rotation angle in image processing
US6866634B2 (en) 2000-05-09 2005-03-15 Hitachi Medical Corporation Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus
US6982643B2 (en) * 2002-10-08 2006-01-03 Freight Glove Technologies, Llc Cargo security method and apparatus
US6583420B1 (en) 2000-06-07 2003-06-24 Robert S. Nelson Device and system for improved imaging in nuclear medicine and mammography
JP2001346790A (en) 2000-06-12 2001-12-18 Hitachi Medical Corp X-ray detector, and x-ray ct device using the same
JP3517388B2 (en) 2000-06-14 2004-04-12 新光電気工業株式会社 Bump inspection method and bump inspection device
ITSV20000027A1 (en) * 2000-06-22 2001-12-22 Esaote Spa METHOD AND MACHINE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF ECHOGRAPHIC IMAGES IN PARTICULAR OF THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL TYPE AS WELL AS THE ACQUISITION PROBE
US6507278B1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2003-01-14 Adt Security Services, Inc. Ingress/egress control system for airport concourses and other access controlled areas
JP2002042169A (en) 2000-07-06 2002-02-08 Infiniteface.Com Inc Three-dimensional image providing system, its method, morphing image providing system, and its method
US6839403B1 (en) * 2000-07-24 2005-01-04 Rapiscan Security Products (Usa), Inc. Generation and distribution of annotation overlays of digital X-ray images for security systems
JP5016746B2 (en) * 2000-07-28 2012-09-05 キヤノン株式会社 Imaging apparatus and driving method thereof
WO2002019594A2 (en) 2000-08-02 2002-03-07 Arizona Board Of Regents, Acting On Behalf Of Arizona State University Scanning fluorescence lifetime microscope: directed evolution
JP2002139451A (en) * 2000-08-04 2002-05-17 Nikon Corp Surface inspection apparatus
US6381297B1 (en) 2000-08-15 2002-04-30 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc High pitch reconstruction of multislice CT scans
CA2418111C (en) * 2000-08-22 2011-04-19 Randell L. Mills 4 dimensional magnetic resonance imaging
SE517701C2 (en) * 2000-08-31 2002-07-02 October Biometrics Ab Device, method and system for measuring distrubution of selected properties in a material
US6837422B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2005-01-04 Heimann Systems Gmbh Service unit for an X-ray examining device
DE10044357A1 (en) 2000-09-07 2002-03-21 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Detector arrangement for the detection of X-rays
US6965684B2 (en) * 2000-09-15 2005-11-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing methods and apparatus for detecting human eyes, human face, and other objects in an image
DE10046091C1 (en) 2000-09-18 2002-01-17 Siemens Ag Computer tomography device has optical imaging device providing visual images of area of patient examined via X-ray beam
US6552809B1 (en) 2000-09-18 2003-04-22 Institut National D'optique Position encoding optical device and method
CA2319958C (en) 2000-09-18 2007-03-13 Institut National D'optique Image processing apparatus and method with locking feature
JP2002095655A (en) 2000-09-26 2002-04-02 Shimadzu Corp Ct apparatus
US6720874B2 (en) 2000-09-29 2004-04-13 Ids Systems, Inc. Portal intrusion detection apparatus and method
US6678350B2 (en) 2000-09-29 2004-01-13 Analogic Corporation Method of and system for improving the signal to noise characteristics of images from a digital X-ray detector receiving bi-chromatic X-ray energy
US7595878B2 (en) * 2000-10-13 2009-09-29 Chemimage Corporation Spectroscopic methods for component particle analysis
US6324245B1 (en) 2000-10-17 2001-11-27 Siemens Corporation Research, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying and correcting image inaccuracies caused by simplified processing of masked cone beam projection data
US6628983B1 (en) 2000-10-25 2003-09-30 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Nuclear imaging systems and methods with feature-enhanced transmission imaging
US6630996B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2003-10-07 Real Time Metrology, Inc. Optical method and apparatus for inspecting large area planar objects
KR100406113B1 (en) 2000-11-27 2003-11-15 학교법인 동국학원 searching apparatus using X-band and millimeter-wave signal
US6671541B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2003-12-30 Neomed Technologies, Inc. Cardiovascular imaging and functional analysis system
DE10062214B4 (en) 2000-12-13 2013-01-24 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Devices for transilluminating objects
NL1016916C2 (en) 2000-12-15 2002-07-02 Univ Delft Tech Method and device for analyzing and separating material flows.
WO2002049080A2 (en) 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Kla Tencor Corporation Method and apparatus for inspecting a substrate
US6473488B2 (en) 2000-12-20 2002-10-29 Cedara Software Corp. Three dimensional image reconstruction from single plane X-ray fluorograms
US6463118B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2002-10-08 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Computed tomography (CT) weighting for high quality image recontruction
US6418184B1 (en) 2000-12-29 2002-07-09 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Helical rowwise view weighting of computed tomographic images
US20020094119A1 (en) 2001-01-18 2002-07-18 Velayudhan Sahadevan High resolution digitized image analysis of chest x-rays for diagnosis of difficult to visualize evolving very ealrly stage lung cancer, pnumoconiosis and pulmonary diseases
US20020127586A1 (en) 2001-01-31 2002-09-12 Novozymes A/S Method of analyzing granular composition by fluorescene analysis
EP1363529A4 (en) 2001-02-02 2005-03-09 Dana Farber Cancer Inst Inc Rare event detection system
US6587575B1 (en) 2001-02-09 2003-07-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Method and system for contaminant detection during food processing
US6477221B1 (en) 2001-02-16 2002-11-05 University Of Rochester System and method for fast parallel cone-beam reconstruction using one or more microprocessors
DE10108295B4 (en) 2001-02-21 2004-01-29 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Tooth identification on digital x-rays and assignment of information to digital x-rays
US6366638B1 (en) 2001-03-16 2002-04-02 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Methods and apparatus for CT scout image processing
US6876322B2 (en) 2003-06-26 2005-04-05 Battelle Memorial Institute Concealed object detection
US6770407B2 (en) * 2001-03-26 2004-08-03 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Methods for monitoring photoresists
US6522775B2 (en) 2001-03-28 2003-02-18 Alan C. Nelson Apparatus and method for imaging small objects in a flow stream using optical tomography
ATE336760T1 (en) 2001-03-29 2006-09-15 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv METHOD FOR REDUCING ARTIFACTS IN OBJECT IMAGES
IL158190A0 (en) 2001-04-03 2004-03-28 L 3 Comm Security & Detection X-ray inspection system
DE10122279A1 (en) 2001-05-08 2002-12-12 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co X-ray system
US6778681B2 (en) 2001-05-09 2004-08-17 Invision Technologies, Inc. Analysis and presentation of internal features of logs
US20020172409A1 (en) 2001-05-18 2002-11-21 Motoaki Saito Displaying three-dimensional medical images
US6580778B2 (en) 2001-05-23 2003-06-17 Heimann Systems Gmbh Inspection device
US6597760B2 (en) 2001-05-23 2003-07-22 Heimann Systems Gmbh Inspection device
US7133543B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2006-11-07 Applied Imaging Corporation Automated scanning method for pathology samples
US6721387B1 (en) 2001-06-13 2004-04-13 Analogic Corporation Method of and system for reducing metal artifacts in images generated by x-ray scanning devices
US6408042B1 (en) 2001-06-15 2002-06-18 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Methods and apparatus for cone beam artifact suppression in scanning imaging systems
JP2003072186A (en) 2001-06-19 2003-03-12 Canon Inc Imaging apparatus, imaging method, program and recording medium
EP1402248A1 (en) 2001-06-20 2004-03-31 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. X-ray device for medical examination and method of improving the image quality thereof
US6944267B2 (en) 2001-06-22 2005-09-13 Hitachi Medical Corporation X-ray image diagnostic device, and x-ray image data correcting method
DE10131407A1 (en) 2001-06-28 2003-01-09 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co inspection system
US6529574B1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-03-04 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Methods and apparatus for FOV-dependent aliasing artifact reduction
US20030023592A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-01-30 Rapiscan Security Products (Usa), Inc. Method and system for certifying operators of x-ray inspection systems
US6611575B1 (en) 2001-07-27 2003-08-26 General Electric Company Method and system for high resolution 3D visualization of mammography images
DE10139672A1 (en) 2001-08-11 2003-03-06 Heimann Systems Gmbh & Co Method and installation for inspecting an object, in particular a piece of luggage
US6674531B2 (en) * 2001-08-17 2004-01-06 Maehner Bernward Method and apparatus for testing objects
EP1427337B1 (en) 2001-09-05 2009-12-02 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Dose control in ct-images
JP4363980B2 (en) 2001-09-06 2009-11-11 ジェノミック プロファイリング システムズ インコーポレイティッド Rapid detection of replicating cells
CA2459558A1 (en) 2001-09-17 2003-03-27 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food Method for identifying and quantifying characteristics of seeds and other small objects
US20060274916A1 (en) 2001-10-01 2006-12-07 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems Remote data access
US6610977B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-08-26 Lockheed Martin Corporation Security system for NBC-safe building
DE10149254B4 (en) 2001-10-05 2006-04-20 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Method and device for detecting a specific material in an object by means of electromagnetic radiation
US6621887B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2003-09-16 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for processing a fluoroscopic image
US6792070B2 (en) 2001-10-16 2004-09-14 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Radiation image recording method and apparatus
US6574297B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2003-06-03 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. System and method for image reconstruction in a cone beam imaging system
US6904122B2 (en) 2001-10-31 2005-06-07 Inventqjaya Sdn. Bhd. 3D stereoscopic X-ray system
US6946655B2 (en) 2001-11-07 2005-09-20 Applied Materials, Inc. Spot grid array electron imaging system
US6618465B2 (en) 2001-11-12 2003-09-09 General Electric Company X-ray shielding system and shielded digital radiographic inspection system and method
JP2005509483A (en) 2001-11-17 2005-04-14 カウンシル・フォー・ザ・セントラル・ラボラトリー・オブ・ザ・リサーチ・カウンシルズ Imaging method and apparatus
US7058210B2 (en) 2001-11-20 2006-06-06 General Electric Company Method and system for lung disease detection
US20040041082A1 (en) 2001-11-27 2004-03-04 Harmon Gary R. Molecular sensing array
US20030210139A1 (en) 2001-12-03 2003-11-13 Stephen Brooks Method and system for improved security
JP2003175027A (en) 2001-12-10 2003-06-24 Hitachi Medical Corp X-ray ct system
WO2003050567A1 (en) * 2001-12-11 2003-06-19 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. X-ray examination apparatus and method
DE10163351C1 (en) 2001-12-14 2003-06-26 Heimann Biometric Systems Gmbh Method and arrangement for the low-distortion recording of intensity patterns created on a contact surface by disturbed total reflection
US6542580B1 (en) 2002-01-15 2003-04-01 Rapiscan Security Products (Usa), Inc. Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting vehicles and containers
US20030138147A1 (en) 2002-01-17 2003-07-24 Yandi Ongkojoyo Object recognition system for screening device
ATE492794T1 (en) 2002-01-19 2011-01-15 Pvt Probenverteiltechnik Gmbh METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYZING BODY FLUID
US6603536B1 (en) 2002-01-24 2003-08-05 Textron Systems Corporation Hybrid optical correlator/digital processor for target detection and discrimination
US9092841B2 (en) 2004-06-09 2015-07-28 Cognex Technology And Investment Llc Method and apparatus for visual detection and inspection of objects
US7738995B2 (en) 2002-02-12 2010-06-15 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for use in electronic processing of foreign origin and export shipments and/or passengers and baggage at security check points
GB0203530D0 (en) 2002-02-14 2002-04-03 Lettington Alan H Scanning apparatus
US6618466B1 (en) 2002-02-21 2003-09-09 University Of Rochester Apparatus and method for x-ray scatter reduction and correction for fan beam CT and cone beam volume CT
US6654443B1 (en) 2002-02-25 2003-11-25 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co., Llc Thermal sensing detector cell for a computed tomography system and method of manufacturing same
US6459755B1 (en) 2002-02-26 2002-10-01 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co. Llc Method and apparatus for administering low dose CT scans
JP3823150B2 (en) * 2002-03-06 2006-09-20 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Inclined 3D X-ray CT
US6803997B2 (en) 2002-03-08 2004-10-12 Anzus, Inc. Gridlocking and correlation methods and arrangements
US6665373B1 (en) 2002-03-12 2003-12-16 Rapiscan Security Products (Usa), Inc. X-ray imaging system with active detector
CN100398066C (en) * 2002-03-13 2008-07-02 分离成像有限责任公司 Systems and methods for quasi-simultaneous multi-planar X-ray imaging
EP1347309A3 (en) 2002-03-20 2012-04-18 Hitachi, Ltd. Radiological imaging apparatus and method
JP4149189B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2008-09-10 株式会社日立メディコ X-ray CT system
US7218766B2 (en) 2002-04-15 2007-05-15 General Electric Company Computer aided detection (CAD) for 3D digital mammography
US7811825B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2010-10-12 University Of Washington System and method for processing specimens and images for optical tomography
JP3785576B2 (en) 2002-04-24 2006-06-14 株式会社モリタ製作所 Subject blur correction means and medical X-ray imaging apparatus using the same
AU2003230169A1 (en) * 2002-05-07 2003-11-11 Amit Stekel Automatic certification, identification and tracking of remote objects in relative motion
US6927888B2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2005-08-09 Juan Manuel Bueno Garcia Method and apparatus for imaging using polarimetry and matrix based image reconstruction
US6570951B1 (en) 2002-05-14 2003-05-27 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Image space compensation scheme for reducing artifacts
US7174033B2 (en) 2002-05-22 2007-02-06 A4Vision Methods and systems for detecting and recognizing an object based on 3D image data
US6868138B2 (en) 2002-05-29 2005-03-15 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method, processor and computed tomography (CT) machine for generating images utilizing high and low sensitivity data collected from a flat panel detector having an extended dynamic range
US7272252B2 (en) 2002-06-12 2007-09-18 Clarient, Inc. Automated system for combining bright field and fluorescent microscopy
IL150251A (en) 2002-06-16 2007-06-03 Securelogic Ltd Screening system for objects in transit
AU2003281427A1 (en) 2002-07-03 2004-01-23 Security Point Media Advertising trays for security screening
JP3698130B2 (en) * 2002-07-22 2005-09-21 株式会社日立製作所 CT apparatus, CT imaging method, and CT imaging service method
US7486768B2 (en) * 2002-07-23 2009-02-03 Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. Self-contained mobile inspection system and method
US6843599B2 (en) * 2002-07-23 2005-01-18 Rapiscan, Inc. Self-contained, portable inspection system and method
US20040016271A1 (en) * 2002-07-23 2004-01-29 Kirti Shah Portable inspection containers
US7103137B2 (en) * 2002-07-24 2006-09-05 Varian Medical Systems Technology, Inc. Radiation scanning of objects for contraband
US7050615B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2006-05-23 Ge Medical Systems Glogal Technology Company, Llc Temporal image comparison method
EP1430446B1 (en) 2002-07-26 2006-08-30 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Image processing method for appearance inspection
USH2110H1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2004-10-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Automated security scanning process
US20040022425A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-05 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company Llc Temporal image comparison method
US7580185B2 (en) 2002-08-28 2009-08-25 Carl Zeiss Surgical Gmbh Microscopy system, microscopy method and a method of treating an aneurysm
US20050153356A1 (en) 2002-09-09 2005-07-14 Olympus Corporation Image processing method for biochemical test
US20040051030A1 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-03-18 Artur Olszak Method and apparatus for acquiring images from a multiple axis imaging system
US7359042B2 (en) 2002-09-23 2008-04-15 S.T.I. Security Technology Integration Ltd Inspection system for limited access spaces
US6946671B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2005-09-20 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, Llc System and method for identifying, reporting, and evaluating presence of substance
US6961404B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2005-11-01 Eastman Kodak Company Method and system for reconstructing an image from projection data acquired by a cone beam computed tomography system
DE10245676B4 (en) 2002-09-30 2008-01-17 Siemens Ag Phase-contrast x-ray machine with line focus for creating a phase-contrast image of an object and method for producing the phase-contrast image
US6970531B2 (en) 2002-10-07 2005-11-29 General Electric Company Continuous scan RAD tomosynthesis system and method
US6940943B2 (en) 2002-10-07 2005-09-06 General Electric Company Continuous scan tomosynthesis system and method
US6906330B2 (en) 2002-10-22 2005-06-14 Elgems Ltd. Gamma camera
US7633518B2 (en) 2002-10-25 2009-12-15 Quantum Magnetics, Inc. Object detection portal with video display overlay
US7289841B2 (en) 2002-10-25 2007-10-30 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for volumetric cardiac computed tomography imaging
US6904117B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2005-06-07 Toshiba Corporation Tilted gantry helical cone-beam Feldkamp reconstruction for multislice CT
US6737102B1 (en) 2002-10-31 2004-05-18 Nordson Corporation Apparatus and methods for applying viscous material in a pattern onto one or more moving strands
US7233817B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2007-06-19 Brian Yen Apparatus and method for pattern delivery of radiation and biological characteristic analysis
JP2004166923A (en) 2002-11-19 2004-06-17 Canon Inc X-ray computed tomography imaging apparatus
JP2004177377A (en) 2002-11-29 2004-06-24 Hitachi Ltd Inspecting method and inspecting apparatus
US20050025280A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2005-02-03 Robert Schulte Volumetric 3D x-ray imaging system for baggage inspection including the detection of explosives
KR20050113596A (en) 2002-12-10 2005-12-02 커먼웰쓰 사이언티픽 앤드 인더스트리얼 리서치 오가니제이션 Radiographic equipment
GB2396406A (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-06-23 Qinetiq Ltd Image analysis
WO2004064639A1 (en) 2003-01-20 2004-08-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Medical imaging device having means for rendering the detector orientation and the display orientation essentially equal
US6735279B1 (en) 2003-01-21 2004-05-11 University Of Florida Snapshot backscatter radiography system and protocol
JP3760918B2 (en) 2003-01-21 2006-03-29 株式会社日立製作所 Security system
JP2006516440A (en) 2003-01-31 2006-07-06 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ 3D object reconstruction method
GB2398379A (en) 2003-02-11 2004-08-18 Qinetiq Ltd Automated digital image analysis
CN1327249C (en) 2003-02-13 2007-07-18 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Method and device for examining an object
US6936828B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2005-08-30 Honeywell International Inc. Particle detection system and method
US7103301B2 (en) 2003-02-18 2006-09-05 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Image forming apparatus using a contact or a proximity type of charging system including a protection substance on a moveable body to be charged
US7065175B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2006-06-20 Varian Medical Systems Technologies, Inc. X-ray diffraction-based scanning system
US7991454B2 (en) 2003-03-04 2011-08-02 Academia Sinica Imaging of biological structures
EP1599828A1 (en) 2003-03-06 2005-11-30 Animetrics, Inc. Viewpoint-invariant image matching and generation of three-dimensional models from two-dimensional imagery
US7164750B2 (en) * 2003-03-26 2007-01-16 Smiths Detection, Inc. Non-destructive inspection of material in container
US6895072B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2005-05-17 Heimann Systems Corp. Apparatus and method for non-destructive inspection of material in containers
US20050190882A1 (en) 2003-04-04 2005-09-01 Mcguire Edward L. Multi-spectral x-ray image processing
JP2004321310A (en) 2003-04-22 2004-11-18 Canon Inc Radiation imaging apparatus
US20050058242A1 (en) 2003-09-15 2005-03-17 Peschmann Kristian R. Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects
US6920198B2 (en) 2003-05-02 2005-07-19 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Methods and apparatus for processing a fluoroscopic image
US20040225222A1 (en) 2003-05-08 2004-11-11 Haishan Zeng Real-time contemporaneous multimodal imaging and spectroscopy uses thereof
US20040228766A1 (en) 2003-05-14 2004-11-18 Witty Thomas R. Point of care diagnostic platform
JP4245976B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2009-04-02 オリンパス株式会社 Ultrasonic image processing device
US7317390B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2008-01-08 Quantum Magnetics, Inc. Screening checkpoint for passengers and baggage
US7119553B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2006-10-10 Konsulteurope Limited Limited Joint Stock Company Security scanners with capacitance and magnetic sensor arrays
US20040253660A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Giles Scientific, Inc. Automated microbiological testing apparatus and method
US6947521B2 (en) 2003-06-17 2005-09-20 Illinois Institute Of Technology Imaging method based on attenuation, refraction and ultra-small-angle-scattering of x-rays
US20060142662A1 (en) 2003-06-19 2006-06-29 Van Beek Michael C Analysis apparatus and method comprising auto-focusing means
US6928141B2 (en) 2003-06-20 2005-08-09 Rapiscan, Inc. Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting commercial vehicles and cargo containers
US6888924B2 (en) 2003-06-25 2005-05-03 General Electric Company Method, apparatus, and medium for calibration of tomosynthesis system geometry using fiducial markers with non-determined position
CN100445767C (en) 2003-07-08 2008-12-24 通用电气家园保护有限公司 Security checkpoint
US7295689B2 (en) * 2003-07-09 2007-11-13 General Electric Company System and method for real-time processing and display of digital medical images
US7236625B2 (en) * 2003-07-28 2007-06-26 The Boeing Company Systems and method for identifying foreign objects and debris (FOD) and defects during fabrication of a composite structure
US7596286B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2009-09-29 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus, image processing system, imaging apparatus and image processing method
US7889835B2 (en) * 2003-08-07 2011-02-15 Morpho Detection, Inc. System and method for detecting an object by dynamically adjusting computational load
US7366282B2 (en) 2003-09-15 2008-04-29 Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. Methods and systems for rapid detection of concealed objects using fluorescence
US20050117700A1 (en) 2003-08-08 2005-06-02 Peschmann Kristian R. Methods and systems for the rapid detection of concealed objects
US7385549B2 (en) * 2003-08-12 2008-06-10 Trex Enterprises Corp Millimeter wave portal imaging system
US7099432B2 (en) 2003-08-27 2006-08-29 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. X-ray inspection apparatus and X-ray inspection method
WO2005086616A2 (en) 2003-09-10 2005-09-22 Sommer Jr Edward J Method and apparatus for improving baggage screening examination
US20050058350A1 (en) 2003-09-15 2005-03-17 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for object identification
US7145148B2 (en) 2003-09-25 2006-12-05 Alfano Robert R Systems and methods for non-destructively detecting material abnormalities beneath a coated surface
US7889113B2 (en) 2003-10-10 2011-02-15 L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems Inc. Mmw contraband screening system
US7672431B2 (en) 2003-10-10 2010-03-02 Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft X-ray arrangement and x-ray contrast process for imaging an object under examination that contains at least one radiopaque element as well as use of the x-ray arrangement
US6990171B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2006-01-24 General Electric Company System and method of determining a user-defined region-of-interest of an imaging subject for x-ray flux management control
US20050094856A1 (en) 2003-11-03 2005-05-05 Warren Scott R. Systems and methods for detecting target focus and tilt errors during genetic analysis
US20050128069A1 (en) 2003-11-12 2005-06-16 Sondre Skatter System and method for detecting contraband
US7555144B2 (en) 2003-12-03 2009-06-30 Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique (Cnrs) Optical scanning device for liquid biological samples, process of operation and computer program for a computer connected to said device
US20050133708A1 (en) 2003-12-18 2005-06-23 General Electric Company Method and system for three dimensional tomosynthesis imaging
US7027553B2 (en) 2003-12-29 2006-04-11 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Systems and methods for generating images by using monochromatic x-rays
US7177389B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2007-02-13 Adelphi Technology X-ray tomography and laminography
US7105828B2 (en) 2004-02-10 2006-09-12 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Hybrid x-ray detector
JP2005269605A (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-09-29 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Digital picture book system, and picture book retrieving method and program therefor
US7183906B2 (en) 2004-03-19 2007-02-27 Lockheed Martin Corporation Threat scanning machine management system
US20050207655A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Nasreen Chopra Inspection system and method for providing feedback
DE102004015806A1 (en) 2004-03-29 2005-10-27 Smiths Heimann Biometrics Gmbh Method and device for recording areas of interest of moving objects
DE102004016586A1 (en) 2004-03-31 2005-11-03 Siemens Ag Image reconstruction device for an X-ray device and method for local 3D reconstruction of an object region
JP2005283527A (en) 2004-03-31 2005-10-13 Hitachi High-Technologies Corp Apparatus for detecting foreign substance
US20060098866A1 (en) 2004-04-26 2006-05-11 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. User interface for inspection system with isoluminant regions
US20050251398A1 (en) 2004-05-04 2005-11-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Threat scanning with pooled operators
US7212113B2 (en) 2004-05-04 2007-05-01 Lockheed Martin Corporation Passenger and item tracking with system alerts
US20050251397A1 (en) 2004-05-04 2005-11-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Passenger and item tracking with predictive analysis
US7313270B2 (en) 2004-05-19 2007-12-25 Applied Vision Company, Llc Vision system and method for process monitoring
US7492937B2 (en) * 2004-05-26 2009-02-17 Ramsay Thomas E System and method for identifying objects of interest in image data
US20050276443A1 (en) 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 Slamani Mohamed A Method and apparatus for recognizing an object within an image
US7285779B2 (en) 2004-06-21 2007-10-23 Applied Materials Israel, Ltd. Methods of scanning an object that includes multiple regions of interest using an array of scanning beams
US7604595B2 (en) 2004-06-22 2009-10-20 General Electric Company Method and system for performing real time navigation of ultrasound volumetric data
US7203267B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2007-04-10 General Electric Company System and method for boundary estimation using CT metrology
US20060036167A1 (en) * 2004-07-03 2006-02-16 Shina Systems Ltd. Vascular image processing
US7367880B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2008-05-06 Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc Method and apparatus for monitoring characteristics of a flow path having solid components flowing therethrough
JP2006025832A (en) * 2004-07-12 2006-02-02 Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic Inc System and method for taking radiation image
US20080063140A1 (en) 2004-07-20 2008-03-13 William Awad System and Method for Detecting the Presence of a Threat in a Package
US7224772B2 (en) * 2004-07-20 2007-05-29 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Radiography by selective detection of scatter field velocity components
JP2006051198A (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-23 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Medical image processing system
US7570786B2 (en) 2004-08-30 2009-08-04 Antoun Ateya Automatic digital object counting and verification system and associated method
DE102004042491B4 (en) 2004-08-31 2009-07-09 Siemens Ag A method for generating tomographic slice images of an examination subject with at least two angularly offset beams and computed tomography device for performing this method
US20060064246A1 (en) 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Medberry Scott L Automated Processing of chemical arrays and systems therefore
US20060065844A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Zelakiewicz Scott S Systems and methods for dynamic optimization of image
US7330530B2 (en) 2004-10-04 2008-02-12 Illinois Institute Of Technology Diffraction enhanced imaging method using a line x-ray source
WO2006044652A1 (en) 2004-10-16 2006-04-27 Identix Incorporated Diffractive imaging system for the reading and analysis of skin topology
US7583821B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2009-09-01 Avago Technologies Ecbu Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Apparatus for classifying a material by analyzing the material's surface, and related systems and method
US7308142B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2007-12-11 Applied Vision Company, Llc System and methods for rogue can detection
EP1886257A1 (en) 2005-05-11 2008-02-13 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons
US20060262902A1 (en) 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Security X-ray screening system
US20060282886A1 (en) 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Service oriented security device management network

Patent Citations (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4379348A (en) * 1980-09-23 1983-04-05 North American Philips Corporation X-Ray security screening system having magnification
US5838758A (en) * 1990-08-10 1998-11-17 Vivid Technologies Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects
US5647018A (en) * 1991-10-28 1997-07-08 Imperial College Of Science, Technology And Medicine Method and apparatus for generating images
US6058159A (en) * 1996-01-11 2000-05-02 Control Screening, L.L.C. Compact scanner apparatus and method
US5893095A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-04-06 Virage, Inc. Similarity engine for content-based retrieval of images
US5911139A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-06-08 Virage, Inc. Visual image database search engine which allows for different schema
US5642394A (en) * 1996-04-03 1997-06-24 American Science And Engineering, Inc. Sidescatter X-ray detection system
US5699400A (en) * 1996-05-08 1997-12-16 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Operator console for article inspection systems
US5838759A (en) * 1996-07-03 1998-11-17 Advanced Research And Applications Corporation Single beam photoneutron probe and X-ray imaging system for contraband detection and identification
US6097483A (en) * 1998-02-27 2000-08-01 Nikon Corporation Image detection apparatus
US6218943B1 (en) * 1998-03-27 2001-04-17 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Contraband detection and article reclaim system
US20040037462A1 (en) * 1998-08-24 2004-02-26 Lewis Meirion F. Pattern recognition and other inventions
US6195444B1 (en) * 1999-01-12 2001-02-27 Analogic Corporation Apparatus and method for detecting concealed objects in computed tomography data
US6373979B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2002-04-16 Lg Electronics, Inc. System and method for determining a level of similarity among more than one image and a segmented data structure for enabling such determination
US6918541B2 (en) * 1999-06-07 2005-07-19 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Object identification and attribute information acquisition and linking computer system
US6813395B1 (en) * 1999-07-14 2004-11-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image searching method and image processing method
US6785410B2 (en) * 1999-08-09 2004-08-31 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Image reporting method and system
US6763148B1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2004-07-13 Visual Key, Inc. Image recognition methods
US6463181B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-10-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for optimizing visual display of enhanced digital images
US7139406B2 (en) * 2001-04-03 2006-11-21 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems Remote baggage screening system, software and method
US20020186862A1 (en) * 2001-04-03 2002-12-12 Mcclelland Keith M. Remote baggage screening system, software and method
US20060115109A1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2006-06-01 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Ensuring airline safety while safeguarding personal passenger information
US6559769B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-05-06 Eric Anthony Early warning real-time security system
US6661867B2 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-12-09 Control Screening, Llc Tomographic scanning X-ray inspection system using transmitted and compton scattered radiation
US20030081859A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-01 Nec Corporation Determination of similarity using weighting value depending on the type of characteristic
US6873261B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2005-03-29 Eric Anthony Early warning near-real-time security system
US20030128812A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-07-10 Michael Appleby Devices, methods, and systems involving cast collimators
US7244941B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2007-07-17 National Recovery Technologies, Inc. Computer assisted bag screening system
US7012256B1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2006-03-14 National Recovery Technologies, Inc. Computer assisted bag screening system
US7050616B2 (en) * 2002-04-01 2006-05-23 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Data transmission scheme and system for image reconstruction
US7043474B2 (en) * 2002-04-15 2006-05-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for measuring image similarity based on semantic meaning
US7193515B1 (en) * 2002-04-24 2007-03-20 Roberts Jon L System and method for centralized security screening
US20030215143A1 (en) * 2002-05-20 2003-11-20 Zakrzewski Radoslaw Romuald Viewing a compartment
US20080236275A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2008-10-02 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Remote Monitoring of Fluid Storage Tanks
US6938488B2 (en) * 2002-08-21 2005-09-06 Battelle Memorial Institute Acoustic inspection device
US6856272B2 (en) * 2002-08-28 2005-02-15 Personnel Protection Technoloties Llc Methods and apparatus for detecting threats in different areas
US20070269005A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2007-11-22 Alex Chalmers X-Ray Backscatter Detection Imaging Modules
US20040101097A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-05-27 Kyoichiro Wakayama Apparatus and method for detecting threats
US6738450B1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2004-05-18 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for cost-effective classification of an object under inspection
US20040120009A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 White Timothy J. Method for generating an image of a detected subject
US20050111618A1 (en) * 2002-12-23 2005-05-26 Sommer Edward J.Jr. Method and apparatus for improving baggage screening examination
US7046761B2 (en) * 2003-01-23 2006-05-16 Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. System and method for CT scanning of baggage
US7212661B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2007-05-01 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies. Inc. Image data navigation method and apparatus
US7529341B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2009-05-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Automatic material discrimination by using computer tomography
US20070210921A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2007-09-13 Volpi John P Interrogator and interrogation system employing the same
US20070147585A1 (en) * 2003-04-23 2007-06-28 L-3 Communications Security X-ray imaging technique
US7092485B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2006-08-15 Control Screening, Llc X-ray inspection system for detecting explosives and other contraband
US20050024199A1 (en) * 2003-06-11 2005-02-03 Huey John H. Combined systems user interface for centralized monitoring of a screening checkpoint for passengers and baggage
US6950492B2 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-09-27 Besson Guy M Dynamic multi-spectral X-ray projection imaging
US20050025377A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-02-03 Avinash Gopal B. Method and apparatus for signal-to-noise ratio dependent image processing
US7068751B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2006-06-27 General Electric Company System and method of determining a center of mass of an imaging subject for x-ray flux management control
US7734066B2 (en) * 2003-11-19 2010-06-08 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Security system with distributed computing
US20050113961A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-05-26 Sabol John M. Image temporal change detection and display method and apparatus
US20050189412A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Evolution Robotics, Inc. Method of merchandising for checkout lanes
US7142633B2 (en) * 2004-03-31 2006-11-28 General Electric Company Enhanced X-ray imaging system and method
US20050226375A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2005-10-13 Eberhard Jeffrey W Enhanced X-ray imaging system and method
US20050240858A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 Creo Inc. Systems and methods for comparing documents containing graphic elements
US20050249416A1 (en) * 2004-05-07 2005-11-10 General Electric Company Contraband detection system and method using variance data
US7792248B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2010-09-07 Morpho Detection, Inc. Methods of examining an item of luggage by means of an x-ray diffraction method
US7233682B2 (en) * 2004-08-02 2007-06-19 Levine Michael C Security screening system and method
US20080260097A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2008-10-23 Eg&G Middle East Container Inspection System
US20060133659A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Hammond Christopher R Method and system for viewing image data
US20060173268A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-03 General Electric Company Methods and systems for controlling acquisition of images
US20060269135A1 (en) * 2005-03-15 2006-11-30 Ramsay Thomas E System and method for identifying objects of interest in image data
US20070003122A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 General Electric Company Method for quantifying an object in a larger structure using a reconstructed image
US20070168467A1 (en) * 2006-01-15 2007-07-19 Telesecurity Sciences Inc. Method and system for providing remote access to baggage scanned images
US20070200566A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Clark Keith A High performance security inspection system with physically isolated detection sensors
US20070206719A1 (en) * 2006-03-02 2007-09-06 General Electric Company Systems and methods for improving a resolution of an image
US7899232B2 (en) * 2006-05-11 2011-03-01 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for providing threat image projection (TIP) in a luggage screening system, and luggage screening system implementing same
US7720194B2 (en) * 2007-02-16 2010-05-18 L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems Inc. High throughput baggage inspection system
US7769132B1 (en) * 2007-03-13 2010-08-03 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Material analysis based on imaging effective atomic numbers

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7926705B2 (en) * 2007-04-20 2011-04-19 Morpho Detection, Inc. Method and system for using a recording device in an inspection system
US20080257949A1 (en) * 2007-04-20 2008-10-23 Steven Leslie Hills Method and system for using a recording device in an inspection system
US11768313B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2023-09-26 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Multi-scanner networked systems for performing material discrimination processes on scanned objects
US11275194B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2022-03-15 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Scanning systems
US10585207B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2020-03-10 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Scanning systems
US10422919B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2019-09-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
CN103917862A (en) * 2011-09-07 2014-07-09 拉皮斯坎系统股份有限公司 X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
US9632206B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2017-04-25 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
US11099294B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2021-08-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems
US10830920B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2020-11-10 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis X-ray inspection methods and systems
US10509142B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2019-12-17 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems
US10013750B2 (en) * 2012-12-27 2018-07-03 Tsinghua University Object detection methods, display methods and apparatuses
US10013615B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2018-07-03 Nuctech Company Limited Inspection methods and devices
EP3067823A4 (en) * 2013-11-07 2017-06-14 Nuctech Company Limited Detection method and device
US10122973B2 (en) 2013-12-27 2018-11-06 Nuctech Company Limited Fluoroscopic inspection method, device and storage medium for automatic classification and recognition of cargoes
CN104751163A (en) * 2013-12-27 2015-07-01 同方威视技术股份有限公司 Fluoroscopy examination system and method for carrying out automatic classification recognition on goods
US20170230620A1 (en) * 2016-02-04 2017-08-10 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Container use state determining device
US9984552B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-05-29 American Rebel, Inc. Firearm detecting luggage
WO2017139481A1 (en) * 2016-02-11 2017-08-17 American Rebel, Inc. Firearm detecting luggage
US10302807B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2019-05-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
US10768338B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2020-09-08 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
US11287391B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2022-03-29 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
WO2021228281A1 (en) * 2020-05-11 2021-11-18 同方威视技术股份有限公司 Target object positioning method and apparatus, device, medium, and program product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2608119A1 (en) 2006-11-16
US7734102B2 (en) 2010-06-08
US20060257005A1 (en) 2006-11-16
US20070058037A1 (en) 2007-03-15
EP1886257A1 (en) 2008-02-13
WO2006119603A1 (en) 2006-11-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090174554A1 (en) Method and system for screening luggage items, cargo containers or persons
US7991242B2 (en) Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
US20070041613A1 (en) Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same
US20080062262A1 (en) Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons
US8494210B2 (en) User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
WO2007131328A1 (en) Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
CN105809655B (en) Vehicle inspection method and system
US20080152082A1 (en) Method and apparatus for use in security screening providing incremental display of threat detection information and security system incorporating same
US7496218B2 (en) System and method for identifying objects of interest in image data
US20090175411A1 (en) Methods and systems for use in security screening, with parallel processing capability
US20090175526A1 (en) Method of creating a divergence transform for identifying a feature of interest in hyperspectral data
EP2140253B1 (en) User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
US20110052032A1 (en) System and method for identifying signatures for features of interest using predetermined color spaces
Shihavuddin et al. Automated classification and thematic mapping of bacterial mats in the north sea
WO2006119605A1 (en) Method and system for screening cargo containers
WO2008019473A1 (en) Method and apparatus for use in security screening providing incremental display of threat detection information and security system incorporating same
Costianes et al. Gray-level co-occurrence matrices as features in edge enhanced images
AU2006246250A2 (en) User interface for use in screening luggage, containers, parcels or people and apparatus for implementing same
Ye et al. Morphological and wavelet transforms for object detection and image processing
WO2006119629A1 (en) Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same
CA2546296C (en) Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
CA2608121A1 (en) User interface for use in screening luggage, containers, parcels or people and apparatus for implementing same
CA2525997A1 (en) Method and system for screening containers
Kumar et al. A novel edge-map creation approach for highly accurate pupil localization in unconstrained infrared iris images
CA2608124A1 (en) Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: OPTOSECURITY INC., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE;REEL/FRAME:021972/0319

Effective date: 20050729

Owner name: INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BERGERON, ALAIN;REEL/FRAME:021975/0165

Effective date: 20050729

Owner name: OPTOSECURITY INC., CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:OPTOSECURITY INC.;REEL/FRAME:022096/0256

Effective date: 20081209

Owner name: OPTOSECURITY INC., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BERGERON, ERIC;REEL/FRAME:021975/0173

Effective date: 20050728

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION