Publication number | US20090138242 A1 |

Publication type | Application |

Application number | US 11/945,589 |

Publication date | 28 May 2009 |

Filing date | 27 Nov 2007 |

Priority date | 27 Nov 2007 |

Also published as | CA2677785A1, CA2677785C, EP2212508A2, EP2212508B1, US9353577, US20140048337, WO2009070372A2, WO2009070372A3 |

Publication number | 11945589, 945589, US 2009/0138242 A1, US 2009/138242 A1, US 20090138242 A1, US 20090138242A1, US 2009138242 A1, US 2009138242A1, US-A1-20090138242, US-A1-2009138242, US2009/0138242A1, US2009/138242A1, US20090138242 A1, US20090138242A1, US2009138242 A1, US2009138242A1 |

Inventors | Jahir A. Pabon |

Original Assignee | Schlumberger Technology Corporation |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (4), Classifications (12), Legal Events (1) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 20090138242 A1

Abstract

According to the invention, a method for designing a rotary drill bit for drilling a cavity in a medium is disclosed. The method may include determining a characteristic of a drillstring with which the rotary drill bit is coupled. The method may also include determining an initial number of groups of cutters for the rotary drill bit, where each group of cutters includes a plurality of cutters substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face. The method may moreover include determining a characteristic of the medium relative to a characteristic of the cutters. The method may additionally include determining a characteristic of a rotational motion source used to rotate the rotary drill bit. The method may further include determining the angles of pitch between each of the groups of cutters to minimize an amount of sticking or slipping of the bit in the medium during a drilling operation.

Claims(21)

a bit body, wherein the bit body comprises:

a distal end having a drilling face; and

a proximal end, having a rotational power source coupling mechanism; and

a plurality of cutters coupled with the drilling face of the bit body, wherein the plurality of cutters comprises a plurality of groups of cutters, wherein each group of cutters is substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face; and wherein the azimuthal distribution of said groups of cutters is non-symmetric around the axis of the drilling face.

the radius along which the second group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially a first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the third group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) minus a second angle (θ), (A−θ), in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the fourth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) plus the second angle (θ), (A+θ),in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the fifth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters is substantially aligned; and

the radius along which the sixth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) minus two times the second angle (θ), (A−2×θ), in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters is substantially aligned, wherein the second angle θ is substantially greater than zero degree.

the radius along which the second group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially a first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the third group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) minus a second angle (θ), (A−θ), in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the fourth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A)in pitch from the radius along which the third group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the fifth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) plus the second angle (θ), (A+θ) in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters is substantially aligned; and

the radius along which the sixth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the seventh group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) minus two times the second angle (θ), (A−2×θ), in pitch from the radius along which the sixth group of cutters is substantially aligned;

the radius along which the eighth group of cutters is substantially aligned is substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the seventh group of cutters is substantially aligned, wherein the second angle θ is substantially greater than zero degree.

the characteristics of a bottom hole assembly (“BHA”) coupled with the bit body;

the characteristics of a lengthwise element coupling the BHA with a rotational motion source;

the characteristics of the interaction between the rotary drill bit and the medium; and

the characteristics of the rotational motion source.

a mass;

a rotational inertia;

an axial drag coefficient; and

a rotational drag coefficient.

a mass;

a rotational inertia;

an extensional spring constant;

a rotational spring constant;

an axial drag coefficient;

a rotational drag coefficient; and

a length.

a reaction force at the bit; and

a reaction torque at the bit.

a longitudinal force;

a drive torque;

a stall torque; and

a maximum rotation speed.

determining a characteristic of a drillstring with which the rotary drill bit is coupled;

determining an initial number of groups of cutters for the rotary drill bit, wherein each group of cutters comprises a plurality of cutters substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face;

determining a characteristic of the medium relative to a characteristic of the cutters;

determining a characteristic of a rotational motion source used to rotate the rotary drill bit; and

determining the angle of pitch between each of the groups of cutters to minimize an amount of sticking or slipping of the rotary drill bit in the medium during a drilling operation.

the characteristic of the drillstring;

the initial number of groups of cutters;

the characteristic of the medium relative to the characteristic of the cutters; and

the characteristic of the rotational motion source.

the characteristic of the drillstring;

the revised number of groups of cutters;

the characteristic of the medium relative to the characteristic of the cutters; and

the characteristic of the rotational motion source.

the characteristic of the drillstring;

the revised number of groups of cutters;

the characteristic of the medium relative to the characteristic of the cutters; and

the characteristic of the rotational motion source.

Description

- [0001]This invention relates generally to drilling. More specifically, the invention relates to cutter placement on a drill bit to minimize stick-slip occurrences.
- [0002]Drill bits, particularly Polycrystalline Diamond Composite (PDC) drill bits commonly used for drilling earthen formations, typically exhibit blades of cutters that are nearly uniformly distributed around the bit axis of rotation. The cutters on the face of such drill bits will therefore evenly share the cutting load of the medium into which they are applied. In theory, by equally distributing the cutting load onto all cutters, the life of the drill bit should be maximized, with all bits wearing evenly until the end of their useful life.
- [0003]However, such a symmetric drill bit may experience sticking and slipping of the drill bit in the medium when the drill bit either “bites” too much or to little of the medium to cause further boring into the medium. When the drill bit bites too much of the medium, each of the symmetrically cutters is engaging too much medium without enough torque to cause the medium to either be sheared or otherwise removed from the cavity. When the drill bit bites too little of the medium, the path of least resistance for the drill bits may be to skip over the medium rather than remove material from the cavity. Rippling caused by each symmetric cutter on the face of the bore hole may also result in each cutter arriving at the same time at the location of a ripple left by the previous cutter on the drill bit. This may happen repeatedly as the drill bit rotates against the face of the bore hole, causing both stick and slip conditions. Both stick and slip occurrences will cause torsional vibrations in the drillstring connecting the drill bit to drill's rotational power source.
- [0004]Furthermore, because the drill bit is being urged into the medium during drilling, axial vibrations may occur from the drill bit being forced into a medium it is not actually cutting (sticking) or retreating from the medium, albeit slightly, when it is slipping. These torsional and axial vibrations can reduce the life of the drill bit and associated drilling equipment such as the rotational power source.
- [0005]In one embodiment, a rotary drill bit for drilling a cavity in a medium is provided. The rotary drill bit may include a bit body and a plurality of cutters coupled with a drilling face of the bit body. The bit body may include a distal end having the drilling face, and a proximal end having a rotational power source coupling mechanism. The plurality of cutters is coupled with the drilling face of the bit body and includes a plurality of groups of cutters. Each group of cutters is substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face. The azimuthal distribution of said groups of cutters is non-symmetric around the axis of the drilling face.
- [0006]Advantageously, the plurality of cutter may include at least six groups of cutters and the radius along which the second group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially a first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the third group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) minus a second angle (θ), (A−θ), in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fourth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) plus the second angle (θ), (A+θ), in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fifth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the sixth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) minus two times the second angle (θ), (A−2×θ), degrees in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The second angle θ may be substantially greater than zero degrees.
- [0007]Advantageously, the plurality of cutter may include at least eight groups of cutters and the radius along which the second group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially a first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the third group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) minus a second angle (θ), (A−θ), in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fourth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the third group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fifth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) plus the second angle (θ), (A+θ), in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the sixth group of cutters may be substantially aligned in may be substantially the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the seventh group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) minus two times the second angle (θ), (A−2×θ), degrees in pitch from the radius along which the sixth group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the eighth group of cutters may be substantially aligned may be the first angle (A) in pitch from the radius along which the seventh group of cutters may be substantially aligned. The second angle θ may be substantially greater than zero degree.
- [0008]In another embodiment, a method for designing a rotary drill bit for drilling a cavity in a medium is provided. The method may include determining a characteristic of a drillstring with which the rotary drill bit is coupled. The method may also include determining an initial number of groups of cutters for the rotary drill bit, where each group of cutters includes a plurality of cutters substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face. The method may moreover include determining a characteristic of the medium relative to a characteristic of the cutters. The method may additionally include determining a characteristic of a rotational motion source used to rotate the rotary drill bit. The method may further include determining the angles of pitch between each of the groups of cutters to minimize an amount of sticking or slipping of the rotary drill bit in the medium during a drilling operation.
- [0009]The present invention is described in conjunction with the appended figures:
- [0010]
FIG. 1A is a side view of the cutters of a symmetrical circular drill bit, shown linearly with respect to the curvature of the drill bit for explanatory purposes only, as the drill bit cuts through a medium; - [0011]
FIG. 1B is a side view the same drill bit shown inFIG. 2A , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after a ripple has been caused in the drilling process; - [0012]
FIG. 1C is a side view the same drill bit shown inFIG. 2B , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after the ripple is first being encountered by the cutters during rotation; - [0013]
FIG. 1D is a side view the same drill bit shown inFIG. 2C , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after another ripple is created; - [0014]
FIG. 2A is a representation of a drill face with six groups of cutters non-symmetrically aligned; - [0015]
FIG. 2B is a representation of a drill face with eight groups of cutters non-symmetrically aligned; - [0016]
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of a typical drilling system for the purposes of simulation; - [0017]
FIG. 4 is a typical representation of angular velocity versus torque for a rotational motion source; - [0018]
FIG. 5 is a typical representation of force versus depth of cut for the interaction between a rotary drill bit and a drilling medium; - [0019]
FIG. 6 is a typical representation of torque versus depth of cut for the interaction between a rotary drill bit and a drilling medium; - [0020]
FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the differential form of a mathematical depth of cut expression; - [0021]
FIG. 8 is a typical representation of rate of progress and rotations per minute versus weight on bit for “hard” rock; - [0022]
FIG. 9 is set of graphs showing time transient results of a simulation of a symmetrical six cutter drill bit; - [0023]
FIG. 10 is a representation of the roots of the system simulated inFIG. 9 ; - [0024]
FIG. 11 is a representation of the roots of the system simulated inFIG. 9 when delay terms are introduced into the simulation; - [0025]
FIG. 12 is a closer view of the bit RPM versus time graph shown inFIG. 9 ; - [0026]
FIG. 13 is a representation of the roots of the system simulated inFIG. 9 except having a symmetrical eight cutter drill bit; - [0027]
FIG. 14 is set of graphs showing time transient results of a simulation of the symmetrical six cutter drill bit ofFIG. 13 ; - [0028]
FIG. 15A is a representation of the roots of the system with difficult drilling conditions using a symmetrical six cutter drill bit; - [0029]
FIG. 15B is a representation of the roots of the system with difficult drilling conditions ofFIG. 15A using a symmetrical thirty-four cutter drill bit; - [0030]
FIG. 16A is a representation of the roots of the system with difficult drilling conditions ofFIG. 15A using a symmetrical six cutter drill bit having the structure of the bit shown inFIG. 1 and where θ=0; - [0031]
FIG. 16B is a representation of the roots of the system with difficult drilling conditions ofFIG. 15A using a symmetrical six cutter drill bit having the structure of the bit shown inFIG. 1 and where θ=10; - [0032]
FIG. 16C is a representation of the roots of the system with difficult drilling conditions ofFIG. 15A using a symmetrical six cutter drill bit having the structure of the bit shown inFIG. 1 and where θ=20; and - [0033]
FIG. 17 is a set of graphs showing time transient results of a simulation of the asymmetrical six cutter drill bit ofFIG. 16C . - [0034]In the appended figures, similar components and/or features may have the same numerical reference label. Further, various components of the same type may be distinguished by following the reference label by a letter that distinguishes among the similar components and/or features. If only the first numerical reference label is used in the specification, the description is applicable to any one of the similar components and/or features having the same first numerical reference label irrespective of the letter suffix.
- [0035]The ensuing description provides exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the disclosure. Rather, the ensuing description of the exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing one or more exemplary embodiments. It being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
- [0036]Specific details are given in the following description to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. For example, systems, processes, and other elements in the invention may be shown as components in block diagram form in order not to obscure the embodiments in unnecessary detail. In other instances, well-known processes, structures, and techniques may be shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring the embodiments.
- [0037]Also, it is noted that individual embodiments may be described as a process which is depicted as a flowchart, a flow diagram, a data flow diagram, a structure diagram, or a block diagram. Although a flowchart may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be re-arranged. A process may be terminated when its operations are completed, but could have additional steps not discussed or included in a figure. Furthermore, not all operations in any particularly described process may occur in all embodiments. A process may correspond to a method, a function, a procedure, a subroutine, a subprogram, etc. When a process corresponds to a function, its termination corresponds to a return of the function to the calling function or the main function.
- [0038]Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may be implemented, at least in part, either manually or automatically. Manual or automatic implementations may be executed, or at least assisted, through the use of machines, hardware, software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description languages, or any combination thereof. When implemented in software, firmware, middleware or microcode, the program code or code segments to perform the necessary tasks may be stored in a machine readable medium. A processor(s) may perform the necessary tasks.
- [0039]In one embodiment of the invention, a rotary drill bit for drilling a cavity in a medium is provided. The medium may be any material, and in some embodiments may be an earthen formation. The rotary drill bit may include a bit body and a plurality of cutters coupled with a drilling face of the bit body. The bit body may include a distal end having the drilling face, and a proximal end having a rotational power source coupling mechanism. The plurality of cutters may be coupled with the drilling face of the bit body, and may include a plurality of groups of cutters. Each group of cutters may be substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face. The different groups of cutters may be non-symmetrically aligned on the drilling face. For the purposes of this disclosure, the phrases “groups of cutters,” “cutting blades,” and/or “blades of cutters” may be used interchangeably, and may refer to groups of cutters substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face.
- [0040]By non-symmetrically aligning the different group of cutters around the axis of the drilling face, more over he overall torque of the system may be applied by fewer number of cutters when some slippage occurs. As the rotary drill bit is urged downward, this will cause more powerful reengagement of a lesser number of cutters to occur prior to a complete revolution of the rotary drill bit. Thus, rather than all of the cutters implementing the same amount of torque that caused a slippage, fewer cutters will engage due to the non-symmetrical nature of the drill face, but will engage at higher levels of torque, causing drilling to continue.
- [0041]
FIGS. 1A-1D show an example of a drill bit**125**with symmetrically aligned cutters**140**cutting through a medium. InFIGS. 2A-2D , cutters**140**on a circular drill bit**125**are shown linearly with respect to the curvature of drill bit**125**for explanatory purposes only. InFIG. 1A , directional arrow**130**shows the direction of spin of the cutters**140**. Directional arrow**150**shows the direction of axial penetration into the medium**160**. Dashed lines**170**show the anticipated path of cutters**140**through medium**160**if the rate of drill bit rotation and rate of penetration remain constant. - [0042]
FIG. 1B is a side view of drill bit**125**shown inFIG. 1A , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after a ripple**175**has been caused in the drilling process. Ripple may have been cause by drill bit**125**pressing too hard into the medium, and temporarily slowing down rotationally, thereby causing each cutter**140**to leave a ripple**175**in its path. - [0043]
FIG. 1C is a side view of drill bit**125**shown inFIG. 1B , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after ripple**175**is first being encountered by the evenly spaced cutters**140**during rotation. As is shown, all of cutters**140**have encountered the ripple**175**at the same time. This results in a transient decrease in the amount of medium to be cut, speeding up drill bit**125**temporarily. - [0044]
FIG. 1D is a side view of drill bit**125**shown inFIG. 1C , except incrementally later in the drilling process, after another ripple**180**is created. The transient speed of drill bit**125**as it encountered the previous ripple**175**has caused a new ripple**180**to be created. This process of ripple creation may thus repeat as each set of ripples is again each encountered by an evenly spaced cutter**140**. The size of successive ripples may, under some circumstances grow and cause a stick slip condition. - [0045]Through embodiments of the invention, by un-evenly spacing the cutters on a drill bit face, each cutter may arrive at different times at the location of a ripple left by the previous cutter on the drill bit. The tendency of an unsymmetrical drill bit to speed up or slow down may be reduced since only one cutter at a time may encounter a ripple, rather than all cutters on a symmetric bit encountering all ripples at the same time, over and over again as the drill bit rotates through the medium.
- [0046]Merely by way of example, in
FIG. 2A , a representation of a drill face**100**with groups of cutters**110**non-symmetrically aligned is shown. In the embodiment ofFIG. 1 six groups of cutters are represented, referenced respectively**110**A to**110**F. The first group of cutters**110**A may lie on a particular radius. The radius along which the second group of cutters**110**B may be substantially aligned may be substantially a first angle A in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters may be substantially aligned**110**A. In the example ofFIG. 1 , the first angle A may be 60 degrees. The radius along which the third group of cutters**110**C may be substantially aligned may be substantially the first angle (A) minus a second angle θ, (A−θ), or (60−θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters**110**B may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fourth group of cutters**110**D may be substantially aligned may be substantially angle of (A+θ) or (60+θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters**110**C may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fifth group of cutters**110**E may be substantially aligned may be substantially first angle A in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters**110**D may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the sixth group of cutters**110**F may be substantially aligned may be substantially angle of (A−2θ) or (60−2θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters**110**E may be substantially aligned. - [0047]In another example, as shown in
FIG. 2B , a representation of another drill face**201**with non-symmetrically aligned cutters**210**is shown. In the embodiment ofFIG. 2 eight groups of cutters are represented, referenced respectively**210**A to**210**H. The first group of cutters**210**A may like on a particular radius. In the example ofFIG. 2 , the first angle A may be 45 degrees. The radius along which the second group of cutters**210**B may be substantially aligned may be substantially 45 degrees in pitch from the radius along which the first group of cutters may be substantially aligned**210**A. The radius along which the third group of cutters**210**C may be substantially aligned may be substantially (45−θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the second group of cutters**210**B may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fourth group of cutters**210**D may be substantially aligned may be substantially the angle A, 45 degrees, in pitch from the radius along which the third group of cutters**210**C may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the fifth group of cutters**210**E may be substantially aligned may be substantially (45+θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the fourth group of cutters**210**D may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the sixth group of cutters**210**F may be substantially aligned in may be substantially 45 degrees in pitch from the radius along which the fifth group of cutters**210**E may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the seventh group of cutters**210**G may be substantially aligned may be substantially (45−2θ) degrees in pitch from the radius along which the sixth group of cutters**210**E may be substantially aligned. The radius along which the eighth group of cutters**210**H may be substantially aligned may be the angle A or 45 degrees in pitch from the radius along which the seventh group of cutters**210**G may be substantially aligned. - [0048]In some embodiments, θ may be substantially greater than zero. Merely by way of example, in the example shown in
FIG. 2A , the second angle θ may be five degrees, ten degrees, fifteen degrees, or twenty degrees. In the example shown inFIGS. 2B , the second angle θ may, merely by way of example, be five degrees, ten degrees, or fifteen degrees. - [0049]In some embodiments, the second angle θ may be determined in an iterative manner based at least in part on any one or more of the following: the characteristics of a bottom hole assembly (“BHA”) coupled with the bit body, the characteristics of a lengthwise element coupling the BHA with a rotational motion source, the characteristics of the interaction between the rotary drill bit and the medium, and the characteristics of the rotational motion source.
FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of such a drilling system**300**. System**300**may include a rotational motion source**310**, a lengthwise element**320**coupling motion source**310**to a bottom hole assembly (“BHA”)**330**, and a drill bit head**340**coupled therewith. InFIG. 3 , a cavity in medium**350**is being excavated by system**300**. In this embodiment, lengthwise element**320**is shown as multiple segments of drill pipe, though in other embodiments, drill tube or other connective elements could also be used. - [0050]In some embodiments, the second angle θ may be selected and/or determined to maximize a rate of progress (“ROP”) of the rotary drill bit in the medium. In these or other embodiments, the second angle θ may also be selected to minimize a sticking and/or a slipping of the rotary drill bit in the medium during a drilling operation.
- [0051]Mathematical constructs are discussed below which are capable of determining whether a given configuration of exemplary system
**300**is stable, and therefore subject to a lessened number of stick-slip occurrences during drilling operations. These constructs may be employed in methods of the invention for designing a rotary bit for drilling cavities in mediums. These methods may determine pertinent drilling system characteristics and then apply of the principles discussed below to both select the number of cutters on the designed rotary drill, and the pitch angles between the cutters. - [0052]In some embodiments, characteristics of rotational motion source
**310**may include: - [0000]
${F}_{T}=\mathrm{Top}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{force}$ ${T}_{T}=\mathrm{Top}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{drive}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{torque}={T}_{\mathrm{st}}-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89e\omega $ ${T}_{\mathrm{st}}=\mathrm{Stall}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{torque}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{of}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{top}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{drive}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{motor}$ ${\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}=\mathrm{no}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{load}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{rotational}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{speed}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{of}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{top}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{drive}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.8em}{0.8ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{motor}$ - [0000]A typical representation of torque versus angular velocity is shown in
FIG. 4 . In some embodiments, additional control hardware and software may be included at the surface, and may be aimed at reducing the stick/slip tendencies of the drilling tool, for instance by regulating the applied torque. In these or other embodiments, that control may act only after the stick/slip condition downhole is severe enough to reach the surface. Such an additional control may work either independent or in tandem with the systems and methods discussed herein. - [0053]In some embodiments, characteristics of lengthwise element
**320**may include: - [0000]

*m*_{p}=pipe mass=ρ_{p}*L*_{p}(*D*_{po}^{2}*−D*_{pi}^{2})π/4 - [0000]

*I*_{p}=pipe rotational inertia=ρ_{p}*L*_{p}(*D*_{po}^{4}*−D*_{pi}^{4})π/32 - [0000]

*K*_{z }=pipe extensional spring constant=*E*_{p}(*D*_{po}^{2}*−D*_{pi}^{2})π/(4*L*_{p}) - [0000]

*K*_{θ}=pipe rotational spring constant=*G*_{p}(*D*_{po}^{4}*−D*_{pi}^{4})π/(32*L*_{p}) - [0000]

b_{vp}=pipe axial drag coefficient - [0000]

b_{ωp}=pipe rotational drag coefficient - [0000]

*n*=Number of pipe sections(total pipe length=*nL*_{p}) - [0054]In some embodiments, characteristics of BHA
**330**may include: - [0000]

*m*_{B}=BHA mass=ρ_{B}*L*_{B}(*D*_{Bo}^{2}*−D*_{Bi}^{2})π/4 - [0000]

*I*_{B}=BHA rotational inertia=ρ_{B}*L*_{B}(*D*_{Bo}^{4}*−D*_{Bi}^{4})π/32 - [0000]

b_{vB}=BHA axial drag coefficient - [0000]

b_{ωB}=BHA rotational drag coefficient - [0055]In some embodiments, characteristics of the interaction between the rotary drill bit
**340**and the medium**350**may include: - [0000]

*F*_{B}=Reaction force at the bit=*F*_{0}*+K*_{F}DoC - [0000]

*T*_{B}=Reaction torque at the bit=*T*_{0}*+K*_{T}DoC - [0000]Depth of Cut (“DoC”) may be the axial distance traveled by the bit per revolution, and may typically be specified in millimeters per revolution (mm/rev). A typical representation of force versus DoC is shown in
FIG. 5 . A typical representation of torque versus DoC is shown inFIG. 6 . - [0056]The linear position of lengthwise element
**320**may be described as z_{1}. The linear velocity of lengthwise element**320**may be described as v_{1}. The angular position of lengthwise element**320**may be described as θ_{1}. The angular velocity of lengthwise element**320**may be described as ω_{1}. Note that these descriptions assume one continuous lengthwise element**320**. Multiple lengthwise elements in series may be described by multiple state variables, each having a progressively higher subscript. - [0057]The equations of motion for system
**300**may be, - [0000]
$\phantom{\rule{4.4em}{4.4ex}}\ue89e\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}\ue89e{\ddot{\theta}}_{1}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{\theta}}_{1}+{K}_{\theta}\ue8a0\left({\theta}_{1}-{\theta}_{2}\right)={T}_{T}={T}_{\mathrm{st}}-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{\theta}}_{1}$ $\phantom{\rule{4.4em}{4.4ex}}\ue89e{I}_{p}\ue89e{\ddot{\theta}}_{2}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{\theta}}_{2}+{K}_{\theta}\ue8a0\left(2\ue89e{\theta}_{2}-{\theta}_{1}-{\theta}_{3}\right)=0$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\cdots \ue89e\text{}\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}+{I}_{B}\right)\ue89e{\ddot{\theta}}_{b}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eR}\right)\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{\theta}}_{b}+{K}_{\theta}\ue8a0\left({\theta}_{b}-{\theta}_{n}\right)={T}_{B}=-\left({T}_{0}+{K}_{T}\ue89e\mathrm{DoC}\right)$ $\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}+{m}_{B}\right)\ue89e{\ddot{z}}_{b}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}+{b}_{\mathrm{vB}}\right)\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}+{K}_{z}\ue8a0\left({z}_{b}-{z}_{n}\right)={F}_{B}=-\left({F}_{0}+{K}_{F}\ue89e\mathrm{DoC}\right)$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\cdots $ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e{m}_{p}\ue89e{\ddot{z}}_{2}+{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{2}+{K}_{z}\ue8a0\left(2\ue89e{z}_{2}-{z}_{3}-{z}_{1}\right)=0$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}\ue89e{\ddot{z}}_{1}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89e{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{1}+{K}_{z}\ue8a0\left({z}_{1}-{z}_{2}\right)={F}_{T}$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{DoC}={n}_{b}\ue8a0\left({z}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{z}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)\right)$ - [0000]τ may be a time delay which represents the time it takes to turn the rotary drill bit by an angle (2π)/n
_{b}, where n_{b }may be equal to the number of cutting blades on the rotary drill bit. - [0058]These equations do not explicitly include the effects of gravity. Gravity may generate an offset (the buoyant weight of the tool) between the force applied at the top (Hook Load) and the actual force pushing the bit against the rock (Weight On Bit, or WOB). However, apart from having the offset in top force, the development presented here may apply equally when gravity is considered.
- [0059]Additionally, these equations primarily consider just axial movement and rotation around the axis of movement. While this has been done to simplify the analytical development, the stick/slip minimization technique proposed herein may still apply to more complex drilling conditions, for example, directional drilling.
- [0060]In a stationary condition, at equilibrium,
- [0061]{umlaut over (θ)}
_{1 . . . n}={umlaut over (θ)}_{b}={umlaut over (z)}_{1 . . . n}={umlaut over (z)}_{b}=0 - [0062]{dot over (θ)}
_{1 . . . n}={dot over (θ)}_{b}=ω_{0 } - [0063]ż
_{1 . . . n}=ż_{b}=v_{0 } - [0000]

DoC=2π*v*_{0}/ω_{0 } - [0064]
$\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\left({T}_{\mathrm{st}}-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89e{\omega}_{0}\right)={b}_{\omega}\ue89e{\omega}_{0}+\left({T}_{0}+{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{T}\ue89e{v}_{0}/{\omega}_{0}\right)$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e{F}_{T}={b}_{v}\ue89e{v}_{0}+\left({F}_{0}+{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{F}\ue89e{v}_{0}/{\omega}_{0}\right)$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{and},\text{}\ue89e\left(\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}+{b}_{\omega}\right)\ue89e{\omega}_{0}^{2}+\left[\frac{{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{F}\ue8a0\left(\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}+{b}_{\omega}\right)}{{b}_{v}}-\left({T}_{\mathrm{st}}-{T}_{0}\right)\right]\ue89e{\omega}_{0}+\frac{{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{T}\ue8a0\left({F}_{T}-{F}_{0}\right)-{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{F}\ue8a0\left({T}_{\mathrm{st}}-{T}_{0}\right)}{{b}_{v}}=0$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e{v}_{0}=\frac{{F}_{T}-{F}_{0}}{{b}_{v}+{\stackrel{\u22d2}{K}}_{F}/{\omega}_{0}}$ - [0000]These last two equations may give the steady state values for the bit angular rotation speed, ω
_{0}, and axial drilling speed or Rate Of Penetration (ROP), v_{0}.

In these equations, - [0000]

*b*_{107 }*=nb*_{ωp}*+b*_{ωb}, - [0000]

*b*_{v}*=nb*_{vp}*+b*_{vb } - [0000]

K_{T}=2πK_{T}, - [0000]

K_{F}=2πK_{F } - [0065]As an example scenario, the following characteristics of system
**300**will be considered in an example application: a top drive**310**with a T_{st}=10 KNm and a ω_{free}=300 rpm; a lengthwise element**320**with a 3.5″ outer diameter, 2.5″ inner diameter, which is 10000 ft long in one sectional piece, b_{v}=0.5 N/m/(m/s), b_{w}=0.05 Nm/m/(rad/s); a BHA with a 4.75″ outer diameter, 2.5″ inner diameter, which is 200 ft long, b_{v}=1 N/m/(m/s), b_{w}=0.1 Nm/m/(rad/s); a rotary drill bit with a 6″ diameter and six cutting blades; and characteristics of the interaction between the rotary drill bit and the medium of F_{0}=800 N, K_{F}=7400 N/(mm/rev), and T_{0}=20 N, K_{T}=640 N/(mm/rev). - [0066]Given the scenario above,
FIG. 8 plots the steady state values of axial drilling speed (ROP given in ft/hr) and angular rotation speed (in RPM), as a function of the applied top force. Clearly a maximal drilling speed may be achieved with an applied force of about 60 KN. However, computer simulations may reveal that the dynamic behavior of drilling under such condition is unstable. In fact, the system may still be unstable even under a lower force of 40 KN, as observed in the RPM and ROP at the bit and at the surface presented inFIG. 9 . - [0067]A study of the dynamic stability of the system may be required in order to understand the observed behavior. Therefore, the Laplace Transform approach may be employed as follows.
- [0068]Using the differential form of the DoC expression to account for variability of time delay (τ),
- [0000]
$\mathrm{DoC}\ue8a0\left(t\right)={z}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{z}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)$ $\frac{\uf74c\mathrm{DoC}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{\uf74ct}={\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)\ue89e\left(1-\frac{\uf74c\tau}{\uf74ct}\right)$ $\mathrm{with}$ ${\int}_{t-\tau}^{t}\ue89e{\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(\xi \right)\ue89e\uf74c\xi =2\ue89e\pi /n$ - [0000]it may be determined that,
- [0000]
${\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\uf74ct={\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)\ue89e\left(\uf74ct-\uf74c\tau \right)\ue89e\text{}\Rightarrow \frac{\uf74c\tau}{\uf74ct}=1-\frac{{\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{{\omega}_{b\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)}$ - [0000]A graphical representation of this equation is shown in
FIG. 7 . Thus, - [0000]
$\frac{\uf74c\mathrm{DoC}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{\uf74ct}={\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)\ue89e\frac{{\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{{\omega}_{b\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}}\ue8a0\left(t-\tau \right)}$ - [0069]Linearized around the equilibrium state, and using the Laplace Transformation representation,
- [0000]
$\frac{\uf74c\mathrm{DoC}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{\uf74ct}={\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{\stackrel{.}{z}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-{\tau}_{0}\right)-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e\left({\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t\right)-{\omega}_{b}\ue8a0\left(t-{\tau}_{0}\right)\right)$ $\mathrm{with}$ ${\tau}_{0}=2\ue89e\pi /{n}_{b}\ue89e{\omega}_{0}$ $\mathrm{sDoC}={\mathrm{sz}}_{b}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89es\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\mathrm{DoC}=\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\left({z}_{b}-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\right)$ - [0070]Inserting the above value for DoC back into the equations of motion for system
**300**, and using the Laplace Transform representation, - [0000]
$\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89es+{K}_{\theta}\right)\ue89e{\theta}_{1}-{K}_{\theta}\ue89e{\theta}_{2}-{T}_{T}={T}_{\mathrm{st}}-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89es\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e{\theta}_{1}\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}-{K}_{\theta}\ue89e{\theta}_{1}+\left({I}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89es+2\ue89e{K}_{\theta}\right)\ue89e{\theta}_{2}-{K}_{\theta}\ue89e{\theta}_{3}=0$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\cdots \ue89e\text{}-{K}_{\theta}\ue89e{\theta}_{n}+\left(\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}+{I}_{B}\right)\ue89e{s}^{2}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eB}\right)\ue89es+{K}_{\theta}\right)\ue89e{\theta}_{b}={T}_{B}=-\left({T}_{0}+{K}_{T}\ue89e{n}_{b}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\left({z}_{b}-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\right)\right)$ $\left(\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}+{m}_{B}\right)\ue89e{s}^{2}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}+{b}_{\mathrm{vB}}\right)\ue89es+{K}_{z}\right)\ue89e{z}_{b}-{K}_{z}\ue89e{z}_{n}={F}_{B}=-\left({F}_{0}+{K}_{F}\ue89e{n}_{b}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\left({z}_{b}-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\right)\right)$ $\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}\ue89e\cdots \ue89e\text{}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}-{K}_{z}\ue89e{z}_{3}+\left({m}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89es+2\ue89e{K}_{z}\right)\ue89e{z}_{2}-{K}_{z}\ue89e{z}_{1}=0\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{1.1em}{1.1ex}}-{K}_{z}\ue89e{z}_{2}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89es+{K}_{z}\right)\ue89e{z}_{1}={F}_{T}$ - [0071]In matrix notation, this becomes,
- [0000]
$\begin{array}{c}\left[A\ue8a0\left(s\right)\right]\ue8a0\left[\begin{array}{c}{\theta}_{1}\\ {\theta}_{2}\\ \vdots \\ {\theta}_{n}\\ {\theta}_{b}\\ {z}_{b}\\ {z}_{n}\\ \vdots \\ {z}_{2}\\ {z}_{1}\end{array}\right]=\ue89e\left[\begin{array}{c}{T}_{T}\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ {T}_{B}\\ {F}_{B}\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ {F}_{T}\end{array}\right]\\ =\ue89e\left[\begin{array}{c}{T}_{\mathrm{st}}-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89es\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e{\theta}_{1}\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ -{\left({T}_{0}+{K}_{T}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\left({z}_{b}-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\right)\right)}_{0}\\ -\left({F}_{0}+{K}_{F}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\left({z}_{b}-\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}\ue89e{\theta}_{b}\right)\right)\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ {F}_{T}\end{array}\right]\\ =\ue89e\left[B\ue8a0\left(s\right)\right]\ue8a0\left[\begin{array}{c}{\theta}_{1}\\ {\theta}_{2}\\ \vdots \\ {\theta}_{n}\\ {\theta}_{b}\\ {z}_{b}\\ {z}_{n}\\ \vdots \\ {z}_{2}\\ {z}_{1}\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{c}{T}_{\mathrm{st}}\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ -{T}_{0}\\ -{F}_{0}\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\\ {F}_{T}\end{array}\right]\end{array}$ $\mathrm{Thus},\text{}\ue89eA\ue8a0\left(1,1\right)=\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89es+{K}_{\theta}$ $A\ue8a0\left(i,i+1\right)=A\ue8a0\left(i+1,i\right)=-{K}_{\theta},i=1,n$ $A\ue8a0\left(i,i\right)={I}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}\ue89es+2\ue89e{K}_{\theta},i=2,n$ $A\ue8a0\left(n+1,n+1\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{I}_{p}+{I}_{B}\right)\ue89e{s}^{2}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ep}+{b}_{\omega \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eB}\right)\ue89es+{K}_{\theta}$ $A\ue8a0\left(n+2,n+2\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}+{m}_{B}\right)\ue89e{s}^{2}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}+{b}_{\mathrm{vB}}\right)\ue89es+{K}_{z}$ $A\ue8a0\left(i,i+1\right)=A\ue8a0\left(i+1,i\right)=-{K}_{z},i=n+2,2\ue89en+1$ $A\ue8a0\left(i,i\right)={m}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89es+2\ue89e{K}_{z},i=n+3,2\ue89en+1$ $A\ue8a0\left(2\ue89en+2,2\ue89en+2\right)=\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{m}_{p}\ue89e{s}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\ue89e{b}_{\mathrm{vp}}\ue89es+{K}_{z}$ $B\ue8a0\left(1,1\right)=-\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{st}}}{{\omega}_{\mathrm{free}}}\ue89es$ $B\ue8a0\left(n+1,n+1\right)={K}_{T}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}$ $B\ue8a0\left(n+1,n+2\right)=-{K}_{T}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)$ $B\ue8a0\left(n+2,n+1\right)={K}_{F}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)\ue89e\frac{{v}_{0}}{{\omega}_{0}}$ $B\ue8a0\left(n+2,n+2\right)=-{K}_{F}\ue8a0\left(1-{\uf74d}^{-{\tau}_{0}\ue89es}\right)$ - [0072]Therefore, the stability of system
**300**may be determined by the roots of, - [0000]

det[*A*(*s*)−*B*(*s*)]=0 - [0073]In our example scenario, assuming a top force of F
_{T }of 40 KN, the above equations render the time transient simulation results shown inFIG. 9 for a bit with six symmetrically place cutting blades.FIG. 10 shows the location of the roots of the above system, when the time delay term in the expression giving the DoC is ignored. The system is shown as stable because all roots have a negative real part. However, when delay terms are introduced in the DoC expression,FIG. 11 shows that additional roots are added to the system, a pair of them in particular having a positive real part, indicating system instability. Observing the bit RPM fromFIG. 9 , it is shown inFIG. 12 how the frequency of the bit RPM similarly matches the frequency of the additional roots inFIG. 11 . - [0074]To remove this instability from the system, the number of cutting blades may be increased. Increasing the number of cutting blades from six to eight yields the results shown in
FIG. 13 . As can be seen inFIG. 13 , all roots now have a negative real part, and the system has been stabilized. The results of a time transient simulation of the new drill bit is shown inFIG. 14 . - [0075]However, increasing the number of cutting blades of a symmetrical bit drilling face is not always practical. Looking at a simulation using six cutting blades on a more difficult drilling medium (
FIG. 15A ), it may be determined as above that the bit may require**34**cutting blades for the drilling operation to become stabilized (FIG. 15B ). - [0076]Thus the symmetric distribution of cutting blades on the bit may be altered to be asymmetric, and thereby obtain stability with fewer numbers of cutting blades than symmetrical bits. Using the drill bit configuration shown in
FIG. 1 with six cutting blades,FIGS. 16A-16C show the results of the above equations in altering θ. InFIG. 16A , where θ=0 degrees, there remains one pair of roots with a positive real part (only the positive side of the complex plane is presented in the figure as the negative side is the mirror image of that positive side) and therefore the drill bit is unstable. InFIG. 16B , where θ=10 degrees, there still remains one root pair with a positive real part and therefore the drill bit is unstable. However, at θ=20 degrees, all roots have a negative real part and are therefore stable.FIG. 17 shows a time transient simulation of such a drill bit, demonstrating that stick-slip instability has been at least greatly reduced. - [0077]In another embodiment of the invention, a method for designing a rotary drill bit for drilling a cavity in a medium is provided. The method may include determining a characteristic of a drillstring with which the rotary drill bit is coupled. The method may also include determining an initial number of cutting blades for the rotary drill bit, where each cutting blade includes a plurality of cutters substantially aligned along a different radius of the drilling face. The method may moreover include determining a characteristic of the medium relative to a characteristic of the cutters. The method may additionally include determining a characteristic of a rotational motion source used to rotate the rotary drill bit. The method may further include determining the angles of pitch between each of the cutting blades to minimize an amount of sticking or slipping of the rotary drill bit in the medium during a drilling operation. In some embodiments, the calculations and simulations described above may be utilized to make any one or more of the above determinations.
- [0078]The invention has now been described in detail for the purposes of clarity and understanding. However, it will be appreciated that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Merely by way of example, though cavities at a normal angle at the surface of a medium have been primarily discussed, the principles herein may be applied to deviated drilling operations as well.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US3491844 * | 20 Mar 1967 | 27 Jan 1970 | Hughes Tool Co | Drag type core drill for pavement or rock having disparate inclusions |

US4858706 * | 17 Jun 1988 | 22 Aug 1989 | Lebourgh Maurice P | Diamond drill bit with hemispherically shaped diamond inserts |

US4981184 * | 21 Nov 1988 | 1 Jan 1991 | Smith International, Inc. | Diamond drag bit for soft formations |

US5131478 * | 10 Jul 1990 | 21 Jul 1992 | Brett J Ford | Low friction subterranean drill bit and related methods |

US5314033 * | 18 Feb 1992 | 24 May 1994 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drill bit having combined positive and negative or neutral rake cutters |

US5595252 * | 28 Jul 1994 | 21 Jan 1997 | Flowdril Corporation | Fixed-cutter drill bit assembly and method |

US5816346 * | 6 Jun 1996 | 6 Oct 1998 | Camco International, Inc. | Rotary drill bits and methods of designing such drill bits |

US5937958 * | 19 Feb 1997 | 17 Aug 1999 | Smith International, Inc. | Drill bits with predictable walk tendencies |

US6298930 * | 26 Aug 1999 | 9 Oct 2001 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drill bits with controlled cutter loading and depth of cut |

US6308790 * | 22 Dec 1999 | 30 Oct 2001 | Smith International, Inc. | Drag bits with predictable inclination tendencies and behavior |

US6460631 * | 15 Dec 2000 | 8 Oct 2002 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drill bits with reduced exposure of cutters |

US6997271 * | 19 May 2004 | 14 Feb 2006 | Strataloc Technology Products, Llc | Drilling string torsional energy control assembly and method |

US7036612 * | 18 Jun 2003 | 2 May 2006 | Sandia Corporation | Controllable magneto-rheological fluid-based dampers for drilling |

US7703557 * | 11 Jun 2007 | 27 Apr 2010 | Smith International, Inc. | Fixed cutter bit with backup cutter elements on primary blades |

US20060162968 * | 24 Jan 2005 | 27 Jul 2006 | Smith International, Inc. | PDC drill bit using optimized side rake distribution that minimized vibration and deviation |

US20060180356 * | 11 Jan 2006 | 17 Aug 2006 | Smith International, Inc. | PDC drill bit using optimized side rake angle |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US9353577 | 25 Oct 2013 | 31 May 2016 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Minimizing stick-slip while drilling |

US9366131 | 17 Dec 2010 | 14 Jun 2016 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Analyzing toolface velocity to detect detrimental vibration during drilling |

US9567844 | 10 Oct 2013 | 14 Feb 2017 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Analysis of drillstring dynamics using angular and linear motion data from multiple accelerometer pairs |

US20110147083 * | 17 Dec 2010 | 23 Jun 2011 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Analyzing Toolface Velocity to Detect Detrimental Vibration During Drilling |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 703/1, 175/398, 703/7 |

International Classification | G06G7/48, G06F17/50, E21B10/42 |

Cooperative Classification | E21B10/54, G06F17/50, E21B10/43 |

European Classification | E21B10/43, G06F17/50, E21B10/54 |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

25 Feb 2008 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PABON, JAHIR A.;REEL/FRAME:020553/0911 Effective date: 20071203 |

Rotate