US20090099933A1 - Total value bidding - Google Patents
Total value bidding Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090099933A1 US20090099933A1 US12/316,482 US31648208A US2009099933A1 US 20090099933 A1 US20090099933 A1 US 20090099933A1 US 31648208 A US31648208 A US 31648208A US 2009099933 A1 US2009099933 A1 US 2009099933A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- value
- bid
- processor
- period
- interest rate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012886 linear function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006188 syrup Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020357 syrup Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0207—Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons or rebates
- G06Q30/0226—Incentive systems for frequent usage, e.g. frequent flyer miles programs or point systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to conducting online electronic auctions, and in particular, to determining adjustment values in online bidding.
- Supplier-bidding auctions for products and services defined by a buyer have been developed. In a supplier-bidding auction, bid prices may start low and move upward or start high and move downward-in reverse-auction format, as suppliers interact to establish a closing price.
- the auction marketplace is often one-sided, i.e., one buyer and many potential suppliers. It is believed that, typically, the products being purchased are components or materials. “Components” may mean fabricated tangible pieces or parts that become part of assemblies of durable products. Example components include gears, bearings, appliance shelves, or door handles. “Materials” may mean bulk quantities of raw materials that are further transformed into product. Example materials include corn syrup or sheet steel.
- Industrial buyers may not purchase one component at a time. Rather, they may purchase whole families of similar components. These items may therefore be grouped into a single lot. Suppliers in industrial auctions may provide unit price quotes for all line items in a lot.
- price may not be the sole parameter upon which a decision is made.
- a buyer may compare various proposals not only on the basis of price but also on the basis of the non-price characteristics of non-standard goods, such as the location of the supplier, payment, delivery terms, the reputation of the supplier, etc.
- a plurality of parameters may be considered in combination with the supplier's price proposal.
- biddingders may not have access to information on the buyer-defined weighting functions. At most, bidders may be selectively informed (at their disadvantage) of aspects of other competing bids. The limited communication of information between bidders may limit the potential of true competition between the bidders. The absence of competition may lower the likelihood that the bidders approach their true walk-away bid. Further, the manual weighting process may be time consuming and subject to inconsistency from one application to the next.
- the invention provides a method for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions.
- This method includes obtaining an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot, having a predetermined value, receiving a first bid, having a payment time and a rebate, from a first bidder and a second bid, having a payment time and a rebate, from a second bidder on the lot, and transforming the first bid into a first value and the second bid into a second value using the interest rate, the period, and the price from the buyer, and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
- the invention provides another method for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions.
- This method includes obtaining an interest rate (i) and payment period (e) from a buyer for lots, receiving bids from bidders, generating an adder (b) and a factor (m) for each bid, transforming the adders (b), factors (m), and rebates (x) into values (y), and ranking the values (y).
- Each lot has a price (n), and each bid has a payment time (p) and the rebate (x).
- the invention also provides another method of evaluating values of different payment terms in online auctions.
- This method includes obtaining an interest rate (i) and payment period (e) from a buyer for a lot, soliciting bids from bidders, receiving the bids from the bidders, where the bids have a payment time (p) and a rebate (x), calculating a factor (m), generating adders (b) for each bid, determining the values (y), and ranking the values (y).
- the lot has a price (n), and
- the factor (m) is defined by:
- the invention also provides a system for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions.
- This system includes a database for receiving and storing an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots and bids on the lots from bidders, and software for generating an adder and a factor for each bid and transforming the adders, factors and rebates into values.
- Each bid has a payment time and the rebate, and the lots have a predetermined value.
- the invention further provides a machine readable medium evaluating values of different terms in online auctions.
- This machine readable medium includes a first machine readable code that receives and stores an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots, a second machine readable code that receives bids from bidders, a third readable code that generates an adder and a factor for each bid, and a fourth readable code that transforms the adders, factors and rebates into values.
- Each lot has a predetermined value and each bid has a payment time and a rebate.
- FIG. 1A is a flow diagram of a request for quotation in an auction
- FIG. 1B is a flow diagram of a bidding process in an auction
- FIG. 1C is a flow diagram of a contract award following an auction
- FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of communications links between the coordinator, the buyer, and the suppliers in an auction
- FIG. 3 is a block flow diagram of an embodiment of the method of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of auction software and computers hosting that software in an auction.
- the invention provides a method of evaluating values of different terms, including payment terms and delivery schedules, in online auctions.
- the invention is designed to create a market of competition in business transactions that traditionally could not take advantage of natural auction dynamics.
- the method is particularly applicable to online auctions where bidders submit bids to an auction coordinator electronically during the auction process.
- the method allows real-time evaluation of bids that include different payment terms and rebates. The buyer may choose the best bid for his particular situation.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the functional elements and entities involved in setting up and conducting a typical supplier-bidding auction.
- FIG. 1A illustrates the creation of an auctioning event
- FIG. 1B illustrates the bidding during an auction
- FIG. 1C illustrates results after completion of a successful auction.
- the product or service to be purchased is, preferably, defined by the sponsor, or originator, 10 of the auction, as shown in FIG. 1A .
- the buyer may set up all or some of its own bidding events and find its own suppliers.
- the sponsor 10 would run the events through a market operations center, which is a facility where auctions are monitored and participants receive assistance. If the sponsor 10 decides to use the auctioning system of the present invention to procure products or services, the sponsor 10 may provide information to an auction coordinator 20 . That information may include information about incumbent suppliers and historic prices paid for the products or services to be auctioned, for example.
- the sponsor 10 also works with the auction coordinator 20 to define the products and services to be purchased in the auction and lot the products and services appropriately so that desired products and services can be procured using optimal auction dynamics.
- a specification may then be prepared for each desired product or service, and a Request for Quotation (“RFQ”) may be generated for the auction.
- RFQ Request for Quotation
- the auction coordinator 20 may identify potential suppliers 30 , preferably with input from the sponsor 10 , and invite the potential suppliers 30 to participate in the upcoming auction.
- the suppliers 30 that are selected to participate in the auction may become bidders 30 and may be given access to the RFQ, typically through an RFQ in a tangible form, such as on paper or in an electronic format.
- Bidders 30 may submit actual unit prices for all line items within a lot, however, the competition in an auction is typically based on the aggregate value bid for all line items within a lot. The aggregate value bid for a lot may, therefore, depend on the level and mix of line item bids and the quantity of goods or services that are offered for each line item. Thus, bidders 30 submitting bids at the line item level may actually be competing on the lot level.
- the sponsor 10 may typically monitor the bidding as it occurs. Bidders 30 may also be given market feedback during the auction so that they may bid competitively.
- the auction coordinator 20 may analyze the auction results with the sponsor 10 .
- the sponsor 10 may conduct final qualification of the low bidding supplier or suppliers 30 .
- the sponsor 10 may furthermore retain the right not to award business to a low bidding supplier 30 based on final qualification or other business concerns.
- a supply contract may be drawn up for the winning bidder 30 and executed based on the results of the auction.
- the auction may be conducted electronically between bidders 30 at their respective remote sites and the auction coordinator 20 at its site.
- the sponsor 10 may perform auction coordinator tasks at its site.
- bidders 30 may be connected to the auction through the Internet via a network service provider 40 accessed, for example, through a dial-up telephone connections.
- sponsors 10 and bidders 30 may be coupled to the auction by communicating directly with the auction coordinator 20 through a public switched telephone network, a wireless network, or any other connection.
- the auction coordinator 20 obtains buyer information, including an interest rate (i) and period (e) for a lot with a predetermined value (n), or price or annual spending amount, in step 41 .
- the interest rate (i) is a cost of capital and is adjusted to the appropriate time period, and the period (e) may be a current payment period or a delivery period. At this time, the buyer may also identify goods or services to be purchased.
- the predetermined value (n) is fixed throughout the bidding and may be price or volume.
- the auction coordinator 20 then solicits bids on the lot of predetermined value (n) from bidders 30 in step 42 .
- each bid has a payment time (p) and a rebate (x).
- the payment time (p) is the number of days, or other units of time, such as months, years, etc., by which the buyer must pay the seller, or bidder 30 , after receiving shipment or an invoice for the goods or services.
- the units of payment time (p) should correlate with the units on which the interest rate (i) is based.
- Rebates (x), or discounts, may be offered from the seller to the buyer based on volume, price, quantity, relationship, or any other factor.
- a factor (m) is calculated from the interest rate (i) in step 44 , in accordance with equation (1):
- t time in which the rebate (x) will be paid.
- step 45 an adder (b), or annual value, is generated for each bid in accordance with
- the variable f is a payment value defined in time and the sum (z q +f) represents sequential period benefits, or extra time for payment, which may also be represented as extra time q or (total time units from 0 to q time periods+payment value).
- q is 1 to 12 months if payment is due after each month, or a monthly invoice is received
- r is 30 days in a month
- f is in days
- q is based on days
- the other variables in the equation should also be based on days, and the adder (b) will be based on days.
- step 46 the bids are transformed into values (y), using equation (4):
- m is fixed by the buyer and b is fixed by the seller.
- the values (y) may be calculated using any linear program that is well-known in the art.
- the values (y) that are calculated may be ranked in step 47 for display to the buyer.
- the buyer annually spends $25,000,000 on a lot, or will pay a price (n) of $25,000,000, has an annual cost of capital (c) of 7.5%, and currently pays for the monthly portion of the supplied lot in fourteen (14) days after invoice (e).
- These values (n), (c), and (e), and therefore interest rate (i), are fixed by the buyer.
- the annual spending (n) is converted into a monthly spending (a) by dividing the annual spending (n) by 12 months (g).
- the interest rate (i) is based on days for calculation purposes, so (i) is calculated by dividing the annual cost of capital (c) by 360 days in a year.
- a bid submitted by a seller gives 21 days to pay (p) with a 0.3940% rebate (x). Since the bid has 7 extra payment days above the 14 days, the value (f) to the buyer is 7.
- the value of the extended days, or adder (b) is calculated by adding the value per month (b q ) represented by Bill 1 through Bill 12, where q is 1 to 12 months, and dividing by (1+i) (r+e) .
- r+e 30 days+14 days because accounting principles typically consider a “month” to be 30 days and 14 extra payment days are offered by the bidder.
- the annual value (y) using equation (2) is calculated to be $34,862.35.
- the total package present value (y) to buyer, according to equation (4), is $125,110.73.
- the buyer annually spends $50,000,000 on a lot, has an annual cost of capital of 7.5% and currently pays within 14 days.
- a bid submitted by a seller gives 40 days to pay with a 0.2310% rebate (x).
- the extra days (f) are calculated to be 26 days.
- the annual value (b) is calculated according to equation (2) to be $257,954.47.
- the discounted value based on the rebate (x), which will be paid 60 days after the year end, is $105,824.24.
- Table 1 illustrates that even though a bidder may offer more days to pay, the calculated value (y) for that number of days may not be the most optimal value for the buyer.
- a computer software application may be used to manage the auction.
- the software application has two components: a client component 16 and a server component 23 .
- the client component 16 may operate on a computer at the site of each of the potential suppliers 30 .
- Suppliers 30 make bids during the auction using the client component 16 .
- the bids may be sent via the network service provider 40 to the site of the coordinator, where it is received by the server component 23 of the software application.
- the client component 16 may include software used to make a connection through telephone lines or the Internet to the server component 23 . Bids may be submitted over this connection and updates may be sent to the connected suppliers.
- Bids may only be submitted using the client component 16 of the application. This ensures that buyers do not circumvent the bidding process, and that only invited suppliers participate in the bidding. Bidders may see their bids and bids placed by other suppliers for each lot on the client component 16 . When a bidder submits a bid, that bid is sent to the server component 23 and evaluated to determine whether the bid is from an authorized bidder and whether the bid has exceeded a pre-determined maximum acceptable price. Bids placed by a supplier may be broadcast to all connected bidders, thereby enabling every participating bidder to quickly view the change in market conditions and begin planning their competitive responses.
- the embodiments of the invention may be implemented by a processor-based computer system.
- the system includes a database for receiving and storing an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a plurality of lots and a plurality of bids on the lots from a plurality of bidders.
- the bids have a payment time and a rebate, and the lots have a predetermined value.
- the system further includes software for generating an adder and a factor for each bid, transforming the adders, factors and rebates into values, and optionally, comparing and ranking the values.
- a computer system 20 operates to execute the functionality for server component 23 .
- Computer system 20 includes a processor 21 , a memory 22 A and a disk storage 22 B.
- Memory 22 A stores computer program instructions and data.
- Processor 21 executes the program instructions or software, and processes the data, stored in memory 22 A.
- Disk storage 22 B stores data to be transferred to and from memory 22 A. All these elements are interconnected by one or more buses, which allows data to be intercommunicated between the elements.
- Processor 21 may be any type of processor capable of providing the speed and functionality required by the embodiments of the invention.
- processor 21 could be a processor from a family of processors made by Intel Corporation or Motorola.
- memory 22 A and disk 22 B are machine readable mediums and could include any medium capable of storing instructions adapted to be executed by a processor.
- Some examples of such media include, but are not limited to, read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), programmable ROM, erasable programmable ROM, electronically erasable programmable ROM, dynamic RAM, magnetic disk (e.g., floppy disk and hard drive), optical disk (e.g., CD-ROM), optical fiber, electrical signals, lightwave signals, radio-frequency (RF) signals and any other device or signal that can store digital information.
- the instructions are stored on the medium in a compressed and/or encrypted format.
- system 20 may contain various combinations of machine readable storage devices, which are accessible by processor 21 and which are capable of storing a combination of computer program instructions and data.
- Memory 22 A is accessible by processor 21 over a bus and includes an operating system, a program partition and a data partition.
- the program partition stores and allows execution by processor 21 of program instructions that implement the functions of each respective system described herein.
- the data partition is accessible by processor 21 and stores data used during the execution of program instructions.
- the program partition contains program instructions that performs the buy versus leasing transformation functionality described above.
- Computer system 20 also includes input and output devices 29 , such as a monitor, printer, mouse, and keyboard, and a network interface 28 .
- Network interface 28 may be any suitable means for controlling communication signals between network devices using a desired set of communications protocols, services and operating procedures. Communication protocols are layered, which is also referred to as a protocol stack, as represented by operating system 24 , a CBE-communication layer 26 , and a Transport Control. Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) layer 27 .
- Network interface 28 also includes connectors for connecting interface 28 with a suitable communications medium. Those skilled in the art will understand that network interface 28 may receive communication signals over any suitable medium such as twisted-pair wire, co-axial cable, fiber optics, radio-frequencies, and so forth.
- FIG. 4 also shows a computer system 15 that operates to execute the functionality for client component 16 .
- Computer system 15 includes a processor 31 , a memory 32 A, disk storage 32 B, a communications interface 38 , input and output devices 39 , and a protocol stack having a CBE-communication layer 37 and a TCP/IP layer 35 . These elements operate in a manner similar to the corresponding elements for computer system 20 .
- the machine readable medium includes a first machine readable code that receives and stores an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots, where each lot has a predetermined value, and a second machine readable code that receives bids from bidders. The bids have a payment time and a rebate.
- the machine readable medium further includes a third readable code that generates an adder and a factor for each bid and a fourth readable code that transforms the adders, factors and rebates into values.
- a fifth readable code that compares and ranks the values may be included.
Abstract
Evaluating values of different terms in online auctions is disclosed. An interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot are obtained. The lot has a predetermined value. A first bid is received from a first bidder and a second bid is received from a second bidder on the lot. The first and second bids each have a payment time and a rebate. The first bid is transformed into a first value and the second bid is transformed into a second value using the interest rate, period, and predetermined value from the buyer and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
Description
- The invention relates generally to conducting online electronic auctions, and in particular, to determining adjustment values in online bidding.
- It is believed that procurement of goods and services has traditionally involved high transaction costs. The cost of finding and qualifying potential bidders has been particularly high. The advent of electronic commerce has introduced new methods of procurement that lower some of the transaction costs associated with procurement. Electronic procurement, and in particular business-to-business electronic procurement, matches buyers and suppliers and facilitates transactions that take place on networked processors.
- Supplier-bidding auctions for products and services defined by a buyer have been developed. In a supplier-bidding auction, bid prices may start low and move upward or start high and move downward-in reverse-auction format, as suppliers interact to establish a closing price. The auction marketplace is often one-sided, i.e., one buyer and many potential suppliers. It is believed that, typically, the products being purchased are components or materials. “Components” may mean fabricated tangible pieces or parts that become part of assemblies of durable products. Example components include gears, bearings, appliance shelves, or door handles. “Materials” may mean bulk quantities of raw materials that are further transformed into product. Example materials include corn syrup or sheet steel.
- Industrial buyers may not purchase one component at a time. Rather, they may purchase whole families of similar components. These items may therefore be grouped into a single lot. Suppliers in industrial auctions may provide unit price quotes for all line items in a lot.
- In many types of business transactions, price may not be the sole parameter upon which a decision is made. For example, in the negotiations for a supply contract, a buyer may compare various proposals not only on the basis of price but also on the basis of the non-price characteristics of non-standard goods, such as the location of the supplier, payment, delivery terms, the reputation of the supplier, etc. In a typical business-to-business situation, a plurality of parameters may be considered in combination with the supplier's price proposal.
- In these situations, purchasers may negotiate with each supplier independently because multi-parameter bids may not be readily compared. Actual comparisons by the purchaser may be based on a combination of subjective and objective weighting functions. Bidders may not have access to information on the buyer-defined weighting functions. At most, bidders may be selectively informed (at their disadvantage) of aspects of other competing bids. The limited communication of information between bidders may limit the potential of true competition between the bidders. The absence of competition may lower the likelihood that the bidders approach their true walk-away bid. Further, the manual weighting process may be time consuming and subject to inconsistency from one application to the next.
- The invention provides a method for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions. This method includes obtaining an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot, having a predetermined value, receiving a first bid, having a payment time and a rebate, from a first bidder and a second bid, having a payment time and a rebate, from a second bidder on the lot, and transforming the first bid into a first value and the second bid into a second value using the interest rate, the period, and the price from the buyer, and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
- The invention provides another method for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions. This method includes obtaining an interest rate (i) and payment period (e) from a buyer for lots, receiving bids from bidders, generating an adder (b) and a factor (m) for each bid, transforming the adders (b), factors (m), and rebates (x) into values (y), and ranking the values (y). Each lot has a price (n), and each bid has a payment time (p) and the rebate (x).
- The invention also provides another method of evaluating values of different payment terms in online auctions. This method includes obtaining an interest rate (i) and payment period (e) from a buyer for a lot, soliciting bids from bidders, receiving the bids from the bidders, where the bids have a payment time (p) and a rebate (x), calculating a factor (m), generating adders (b) for each bid, determining the values (y), and ranking the values (y). The lot has a price (n), and
- the factor (m) is defined by:
-
m=n/(1+i)t (1) - wherein t is a time in which the rebate will be paid. The adder (b) is defined by equations (2) and (3):
-
- wherein:
-
- q is 1 to g time periods, g is a number of time periods, r is total time units in a time period, f is (p-e), and Zq is total time units from 0 to q. The value (y) is defined by equation (4):
-
y=(m*x)+b. (4) - The invention also provides a system for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions. This system includes a database for receiving and storing an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots and bids on the lots from bidders, and software for generating an adder and a factor for each bid and transforming the adders, factors and rebates into values. Each bid has a payment time and the rebate, and the lots have a predetermined value.
- The invention further provides a machine readable medium evaluating values of different terms in online auctions. This machine readable medium includes a first machine readable code that receives and stores an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots, a second machine readable code that receives bids from bidders, a third readable code that generates an adder and a factor for each bid, and a fourth readable code that transforms the adders, factors and rebates into values. Each lot has a predetermined value and each bid has a payment time and a rebate.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.
- In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1A is a flow diagram of a request for quotation in an auction; -
FIG. 1B is a flow diagram of a bidding process in an auction; -
FIG. 1C is a flow diagram of a contract award following an auction; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of communications links between the coordinator, the buyer, and the suppliers in an auction; -
FIG. 3 is a block flow diagram of an embodiment of the method of the invention; -
FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of auction software and computers hosting that software in an auction. - Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood that the Figures and descriptions of the present invention included herein illustrate and describe elements that are of particular relevance to the present invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements found in typical auction systems and computer networks.
- The invention provides a method of evaluating values of different terms, including payment terms and delivery schedules, in online auctions. The invention is designed to create a market of competition in business transactions that traditionally could not take advantage of natural auction dynamics. The method is particularly applicable to online auctions where bidders submit bids to an auction coordinator electronically during the auction process. The method allows real-time evaluation of bids that include different payment terms and rebates. The buyer may choose the best bid for his particular situation.
- The following description of the features of the present invention is presented in the context of an upward-based online auction. However, as would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art, these inventive features could also be applied in the context of downward-based online auctions as well.
- The basic process for a purchaser sponsored supplier-bidding as conducted by the assignee of the present invention, is described below with reference to
FIG. 1 .FIG. 1 illustrates the functional elements and entities involved in setting up and conducting a typical supplier-bidding auction.FIG. 1A illustrates the creation of an auctioning event,FIG. 1B illustrates the bidding during an auction, andFIG. 1C illustrates results after completion of a successful auction. - In the supplier-bidding total value auction model, the product or service to be purchased is, preferably, defined by the sponsor, or originator, 10 of the auction, as shown in
FIG. 1A . Alternatively, the buyer may set up all or some of its own bidding events and find its own suppliers. In that case, thesponsor 10 would run the events through a market operations center, which is a facility where auctions are monitored and participants receive assistance. If thesponsor 10 decides to use the auctioning system of the present invention to procure products or services, thesponsor 10 may provide information to anauction coordinator 20. That information may include information about incumbent suppliers and historic prices paid for the products or services to be auctioned, for example. Preferably, thesponsor 10 also works with theauction coordinator 20 to define the products and services to be purchased in the auction and lot the products and services appropriately so that desired products and services can be procured using optimal auction dynamics. A specification may then be prepared for each desired product or service, and a Request for Quotation (“RFQ”) may be generated for the auction. - Next, the
auction coordinator 20 may identifypotential suppliers 30, preferably with input from thesponsor 10, and invite thepotential suppliers 30 to participate in the upcoming auction. Thesuppliers 30 that are selected to participate in the auction may becomebidders 30 and may be given access to the RFQ, typically through an RFQ in a tangible form, such as on paper or in an electronic format. - As shown in
FIG. 1B , during a typical auction, bids are made for lots.Bidders 30 may submit actual unit prices for all line items within a lot, however, the competition in an auction is typically based on the aggregate value bid for all line items within a lot. The aggregate value bid for a lot may, therefore, depend on the level and mix of line item bids and the quantity of goods or services that are offered for each line item. Thus,bidders 30 submitting bids at the line item level may actually be competing on the lot level. During the auction, thesponsor 10 may typically monitor the bidding as it occurs.Bidders 30 may also be given market feedback during the auction so that they may bid competitively. - After the auction, the
auction coordinator 20 may analyze the auction results with thesponsor 10. Thesponsor 10 may conduct final qualification of the low bidding supplier orsuppliers 30. Thesponsor 10 may furthermore retain the right not to award business to alow bidding supplier 30 based on final qualification or other business concerns. As shown inFIG. 1C , a supply contract may be drawn up for the winningbidder 30 and executed based on the results of the auction. - The auction may be conducted electronically between
bidders 30 at their respective remote sites and theauction coordinator 20 at its site. Alternatively, instead of theauction coordinator 20 managing the auction at its site, thesponsor 10 may perform auction coordinator tasks at its site. - Information may be conveyed between the
coordinator 20 and thebidders 30 via any communications medium. As shown inFIG. 2 ,bidders 30 may be connected to the auction through the Internet via anetwork service provider 40 accessed, for example, through a dial-up telephone connections. Alternatively, sponsors 10 andbidders 30 may be coupled to the auction by communicating directly with theauction coordinator 20 through a public switched telephone network, a wireless network, or any other connection. - In one embodiment, as shown in
FIG. 3 , theauction coordinator 20 obtains buyer information, including an interest rate (i) and period (e) for a lot with a predetermined value (n), or price or annual spending amount, instep 41. The interest rate (i) is a cost of capital and is adjusted to the appropriate time period, and the period (e) may be a current payment period or a delivery period. At this time, the buyer may also identify goods or services to be purchased. The predetermined value (n) is fixed throughout the bidding and may be price or volume. Theauction coordinator 20 then solicits bids on the lot of predetermined value (n) frombidders 30 instep 42. The bids are received by theauction coordinator 20 instep 43, where each bid has a payment time (p) and a rebate (x). Preferably, the payment time (p) is the number of days, or other units of time, such as months, years, etc., by which the buyer must pay the seller, orbidder 30, after receiving shipment or an invoice for the goods or services. The units of payment time (p) should correlate with the units on which the interest rate (i) is based. Rebates (x), or discounts, may be offered from the seller to the buyer based on volume, price, quantity, relationship, or any other factor. As the bidding by thebidders 30 proceeds, since the predetermined value (n) remains fixed,bidders 30 are competing on a combination of their allowed payment time (p) and their offered rebate (x). - A factor (m) is calculated from the interest rate (i) in
step 44, in accordance with equation (1): -
m=n/(1+i)t (1) - where t=time in which the rebate (x) will be paid. The value (n) may need to be converted to different time units, such as months, and the value (t) may be based on days, where t=360 days +days after the 360 days in which the rebate (x) will be paid. This calculation represents a calculation for a present value.
- In
step 45, an adder (b), or annual value, is generated for each bid in accordance with -
- wherein:
-
- q=1 to g time periods, g=number of time periods for which the buyer chooses to evaluate bids, r=total time units in a time period, f=(p-e), and zq=total time units from 0 to q time periods. The variable f is a payment value defined in time and the sum (zq+f) represents sequential period benefits, or extra time for payment, which may also be represented as extra timeq or (total time units from 0 to q time periods+payment value). For example, q is 1 to 12 months if payment is due after each month, or a monthly invoice is received, r is 30 days in a month, f is in days, and z is number of days at the end of the month q, or 0 days for the first month (q=1), 30 days for the second month (q=2), and so on. If q is based on days, the other variables in the equation should also be based on days, and the adder (b) will be based on days.
- In
step 46, the bids are transformed into values (y), using equation (4): -
y=(m*x)+b (4) - In this linear function equation, m is fixed by the buyer and b is fixed by the seller. The values (y) may be calculated using any linear program that is well-known in the art. The values (y) that are calculated may be ranked in
step 47 for display to the buyer. - In a first example of the embodiment, as shown below, the buyer annually spends $25,000,000 on a lot, or will pay a price (n) of $25,000,000, has an annual cost of capital (c) of 7.5%, and currently pays for the monthly portion of the supplied lot in fourteen (14) days after invoice (e). These values (n), (c), and (e), and therefore interest rate (i), are fixed by the buyer. For calculation purposes, the annual spending (n) is converted into a monthly spending (a) by dividing the annual spending (n) by 12 months (g). In this example, the interest rate (i) is based on days for calculation purposes, so (i) is calculated by dividing the annual cost of capital (c) by 360 days in a year. A bid submitted by a seller gives 21 days to pay (p) with a 0.3940% rebate (x). Since the bid has 7 extra payment days above the 14 days, the value (f) to the buyer is 7.
-
Description Variable Value Annual Spend n 25,000,000 Monthly Spend = (Annual Spend/12) a 2,083,333 (n/g) Annual Cost of Capital c 7.50% Daily Cost of Capital = (Annual i 0.000208333 Cost of Capital/360) Payment Days p 21 Value to Buyer = (Payment Days − f 7 14 (e)) Rebate x 0.3940% - To calculate the value (y), first, the value of the extended days, or adder (b), is calculated by adding the value per month (bq) represented by Bill 1 through Bill 12, where q is 1 to 12 months, and dividing by (1+i)(r+e). In this case, r+e=30 days+14 days because accounting principles typically consider a “month” to be 30 days and 14 extra payment days are offered by the bidder. The annual value (y) using equation (2) is calculated to be $34,862.35.
-
Bill 1 Bill 2 Bill 3 Bill 12 Value of the ExtendedDays per Month (bq) 3,033.77 3,014.87 2.996.09 → 2,832.22 Sum of Monthly Benefit 35,183.36 sum of Bill 1 to Bill 12 Annual Value Discounted Backto January 1 (b) 34,862.35 - The discounted value of the rebate is calculated, based on the rebate being paid in 60 days from the end of the year, where 360+60=420, and the annual spend (n) converted from units of years to months (a), to be $90,248.38.
-
- The total package present value (y) to buyer, according to equation (4), is $125,110.73.
- In a second example of the embodiment, as shown below, the buyer annually spends $50,000,000 on a lot, has an annual cost of capital of 7.5% and currently pays within 14 days. A bid submitted by a seller gives 40 days to pay with a 0.2310% rebate (x). The extra days (f) are calculated to be 26 days.
-
Description Variable Value Annual Spend n 50,000,000 Monthly Spend = (Annual Spend/12) a 4,166,667 (n/g) Annual Cost of Capital c 7.50% Daily Cost of Capital = (Annual i 0.000208333 Cost of Capital/360) Payment Days p 40 Value = (Payment Days (p) − f 26 14 (e)) Rebate x 0.2310% - The annual value (b) is calculated according to equation (2) to be $257,954.47.
-
Bill 1 Bill 2 Bill 3 Bill 12 Value of the Extended Daysper Month (bq) 22,447.54 22,307.69 22,168.72 → 20,956.27 Annual Value Discounted Back toJanuary 1 (b) 257,954.47 - The discounted value based on the rebate (x), which will be paid 60 days after the year end, is $105,824.24.
-
- Therefore, the value (y), according to equation (4), is $363,778 71.
- The above examples, having different allowable days to pay (p), are shown in Table 1. In the first example, the buyer would likely choose 35 days to pay because the value (y) is the greatest. In the second example, the buyer would likely choose 40 days to pay because the value (y) is the greatest. Table 1 illustrates that even though a bidder may offer more days to pay, the calculated value (y) for that number of days may not be the most optimal value for the buyer.
-
TABLE 1 Based on 7.5% cost of capital Client Bid Value of Rebate Held Available for different Annual Spend Days Hold Day Offerings Calculated Value to Volume (p) (m*x) Customer (y) $25,000,000.00 21 0.3940 125,110.73 24 0.3245 124,101.18 27 0.2950 132,235.25 30 0.2389 134,257.79 35 0.1989 149,841.88 40 0.0909 149,798.50 $50,000,000.00 21 0.3999 252,924.33 24 0.3500 259,884.25 27 0.3240 277,755.79 30 0.2970 295,131.97 35 0.2513 323,688.91 40 0.2310 363,778.71 - A computer software application may be used to manage the auction. Preferably, as shown in
FIG. 6 , the software application has two components: a client component 16 and aserver component 23. The client component 16 may operate on a computer at the site of each of thepotential suppliers 30.Suppliers 30 make bids during the auction using the client component 16. The bids may be sent via thenetwork service provider 40 to the site of the coordinator, where it is received by theserver component 23 of the software application. The client component 16 may include software used to make a connection through telephone lines or the Internet to theserver component 23. Bids may be submitted over this connection and updates may be sent to the connected suppliers. - Bids may only be submitted using the client component 16 of the application. This ensures that buyers do not circumvent the bidding process, and that only invited suppliers participate in the bidding. Bidders may see their bids and bids placed by other suppliers for each lot on the client component 16. When a bidder submits a bid, that bid is sent to the
server component 23 and evaluated to determine whether the bid is from an authorized bidder and whether the bid has exceeded a pre-determined maximum acceptable price. Bids placed by a supplier may be broadcast to all connected bidders, thereby enabling every participating bidder to quickly view the change in market conditions and begin planning their competitive responses. - The embodiments of the invention may be implemented by a processor-based computer system. The system includes a database for receiving and storing an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a plurality of lots and a plurality of bids on the lots from a plurality of bidders. The bids have a payment time and a rebate, and the lots have a predetermined value. The system further includes software for generating an adder and a factor for each bid, transforming the adders, factors and rebates into values, and optionally, comparing and ranking the values.
- With reference to
FIG. 4 , acomputer system 20 operates to execute the functionality forserver component 23.Computer system 20 includes aprocessor 21, a memory 22A and a disk storage 22B. Memory 22A stores computer program instructions and data.Processor 21 executes the program instructions or software, and processes the data, stored in memory 22A. Disk storage 22B stores data to be transferred to and from memory 22A. All these elements are interconnected by one or more buses, which allows data to be intercommunicated between the elements. -
Processor 21 may be any type of processor capable of providing the speed and functionality required by the embodiments of the invention. For example,processor 21 could be a processor from a family of processors made by Intel Corporation or Motorola. - For purposes of this application, memory 22A and disk 22B are machine readable mediums and could include any medium capable of storing instructions adapted to be executed by a processor. Some examples of such media include, but are not limited to, read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), programmable ROM, erasable programmable ROM, electronically erasable programmable ROM, dynamic RAM, magnetic disk (e.g., floppy disk and hard drive), optical disk (e.g., CD-ROM), optical fiber, electrical signals, lightwave signals, radio-frequency (RF) signals and any other device or signal that can store digital information. In one embodiment, the instructions are stored on the medium in a compressed and/or encrypted format. As used herein, the phrase “adapted to be executed by a processor” is meant to encompass instructions stored in a compressed and/or encrypted format, as well as instructions that have to be compiled or installed by an installer before being executed by the processor. Further,
system 20 may contain various combinations of machine readable storage devices, which are accessible byprocessor 21 and which are capable of storing a combination of computer program instructions and data. - Memory 22A is accessible by
processor 21 over a bus and includes an operating system, a program partition and a data partition. The program partition stores and allows execution byprocessor 21 of program instructions that implement the functions of each respective system described herein. The data partition is accessible byprocessor 21 and stores data used during the execution of program instructions. For some embodiments of the invention, the program partition contains program instructions that performs the buy versus leasing transformation functionality described above. -
Computer system 20 also includes input andoutput devices 29, such as a monitor, printer, mouse, and keyboard, and anetwork interface 28.Network interface 28 may be any suitable means for controlling communication signals between network devices using a desired set of communications protocols, services and operating procedures. Communication protocols are layered, which is also referred to as a protocol stack, as represented by operatingsystem 24, a CBE-communication layer 26, and a Transport Control. Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)layer 27.Network interface 28 also includes connectors for connectinginterface 28 with a suitable communications medium. Those skilled in the art will understand thatnetwork interface 28 may receive communication signals over any suitable medium such as twisted-pair wire, co-axial cable, fiber optics, radio-frequencies, and so forth. -
FIG. 4 also shows acomputer system 15 that operates to execute the functionality for client component 16.Computer system 15 includes aprocessor 31, amemory 32A,disk storage 32B, acommunications interface 38, input andoutput devices 39, and a protocol stack having a CBE-communication layer 37 and a TCP/IP layer 35. These elements operate in a manner similar to the corresponding elements forcomputer system 20. - Another embodiment of the invention includes a machine readable medium for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions. The machine readable medium includes a first machine readable code that receives and stores an interest rate and a period from a buyer for lots, where each lot has a predetermined value, and a second machine readable code that receives bids from bidders. The bids have a payment time and a rebate. The machine readable medium further includes a third readable code that generates an adder and a factor for each bid and a fourth readable code that transforms the adders, factors and rebates into values. In addition, a fifth readable code that compares and ranks the values may be included.
- While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. For example, the invention may be used in a downward auction. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (20)
1. A system for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions comprising:
a processor; and
a memory coupled with the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to:
obtain an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot, the lot having a predetermined value;
receive a first bid from a first bidder and a second bid from a second bidder on the lot, the first and second bids each having a payment time and a rebate; and
transform the first bid into a first value and the second bid into a second value using the interest rate, period, and predetermined value from the buyer and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to compare the first value and the second value.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to display a rank of the first value with respect to the second value.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the transforming comprises using linear programming to calculate the first and second values.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the transforming comprises:
determining a factor from the interest rate and the period; and
generating a first and second adder from the first and second payment times, respectively, the interest rate, the period, and the predetermined value.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein the generating comprises calculating the factor (m) according to equation (1):
m=predetermined value/(1+interest rate)time period (1)
wherein the time period comprises a time in which the rebate will be paid.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the calculating comprises providing the time period based on days, the time period being 360 days +days after the 360 days in which the rebate will be paid.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to solicit potential bidders.
9. The system of claim 8 wherein the soliciting comprises:
preparing a request for quotation;
providing the request for quotation to the potential bidders; and
requesting the potential bidders to respond to the request for quotation.
10. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to:
electronically couple the first and second bidders to an auction coordinator; and
submit the first and second bids to the auction coordinator online.
11. The system of claim 1 wherein the obtaining comprises identifying at least one of goods and services to be purchased.
12. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to:
receive at least one additional bid having an additional time period and an additional rebate; and
transform the additional rebate into an additional value.
13. A method for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions comprising:
obtaining an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot, the lot having a predetermined value;
receiving a first bid from a first bidder and a second bid from a second bidder on the lot, the first and second bids each having a payment time and a rebate; and
transforming the first bid into a first value and the second bid into a second value using the interest rate, period, and predetermined value from the buyer and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising comparing the first value and the second value.
15. The method of claim 14 further comprising displaying a rank of the first value with respect to the second value.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein the transforming comprises:
determining a factor from the interest rate and the period; and
generating a first and second adder from the first and second payment times, respectively, the interest rate, the period, and the predetermined value.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the generating comprises calculating the factor (m) according to equation (1):
m=predetermined value/(1+interest rate)time period (1)
wherein the time period comprises a time in which the rebate will be paid.
18. The method of claim 13 further comprising:
electronically coupling the first and second bidders to an auction coordinator; and
submitting the first and second bids to the auction coordinator online.
19. The method of claim 13 further comprising:
receiving at least one additional bid having an additional time period and an additional rebate; and
transforming the additional rebate into an additional value.
20. A computer program product for evaluating values of different terms in online auctions, the computer program product being embodied in a computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:
obtaining an interest rate and a period from a buyer for a lot, the lot having a predetermined value;
receiving a first bid from a first bidder and a second bid from a second bidder on the lot, the first and second bids each having a payment time and a rebate; and
transforming the first bid into a first value and the second bid into a second value using the interest rate, period, and predetermined value from the buyer and the payment times and rebates from the first and second bidders.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/316,482 US20090099933A1 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2008-12-12 | Total value bidding |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/131,326 US7483852B2 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-04-24 | Total value bidding |
US12/316,482 US20090099933A1 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2008-12-12 | Total value bidding |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/131,326 Continuation US7483852B2 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-04-24 | Total value bidding |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090099933A1 true US20090099933A1 (en) | 2009-04-16 |
Family
ID=29248570
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/131,326 Active 2025-11-11 US7483852B2 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-04-24 | Total value bidding |
US12/316,482 Abandoned US20090099933A1 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2008-12-12 | Total value bidding |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/131,326 Active 2025-11-11 US7483852B2 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-04-24 | Total value bidding |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7483852B2 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8392317B2 (en) | 2010-11-09 | 2013-03-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice |
US8612300B2 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2013-12-17 | Ariba, Inc. | Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers |
US8688537B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2014-04-01 | Ariba, Inc. | Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network |
US8732036B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2014-05-20 | Ariba, Inc. | Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates |
US9836773B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2017-12-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network |
US9990634B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2018-06-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6243691B1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2001-06-05 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US7181408B2 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2007-02-20 | Integrated Management Information, Inc. | Livestock pricing system |
US20050080715A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-14 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating and conducting on-line charitable fund raising activities |
US7584139B2 (en) * | 2003-11-18 | 2009-09-01 | The Debt Exchange, Inc. | Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network |
US7783555B2 (en) * | 2003-12-11 | 2010-08-24 | Ebay Inc. | Auction with interest rate bidding |
US20050228746A1 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2005-10-13 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for contribution based placement of donor advertisements |
US20050228742A1 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2005-10-13 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating and conducting on-line charitable fund raising activities with competitive events |
US20050228745A1 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2005-10-13 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for conducting on-line auction events in coordination with incentive promotion for bidders |
US20050228744A1 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2005-10-13 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for modifying the winning bid in an on-line auction to benefit a charitable organization |
US20050246265A1 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2005-11-03 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning value to an item donated to an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event |
US20070043629A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2007-02-22 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating a catalog for an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event from a virtual consignment database in accordance with an organization profile |
US20080065513A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-13 | Cmarket, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sponsoring a consignable item in an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20010032167A1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2001-10-18 | Tulloch Shane M. | Method of transformational bidding with rebates and discounts |
Family Cites Families (61)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3581072A (en) | 1968-03-28 | 1971-05-25 | Frederick Nymeyer | Auction market computation system |
US3863060A (en) | 1972-10-30 | 1975-01-28 | Hewlett Packard Co | General purpose calculator with capability for performing interdisciplinary business calculations |
JPS58189761A (en) | 1982-04-30 | 1983-11-05 | Casio Comput Co Ltd | Processor for totalization of table data |
US4674044A (en) | 1985-01-30 | 1987-06-16 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | Automated securities trading system |
JPH0743748B2 (en) | 1986-02-17 | 1995-05-15 | 株式会社オークネット | Information transmission processing method of auction information transmission processing system |
US4799156A (en) | 1986-10-01 | 1989-01-17 | Strategic Processing Corporation | Interactive market management system |
US4845625A (en) | 1987-04-29 | 1989-07-04 | Stannard Louis A | Flight bidding system or the like especially for airline personnel |
US4992940A (en) | 1989-03-13 | 1991-02-12 | H-Renee, Incorporated | System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications |
US5136501A (en) | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5243515A (en) | 1990-10-30 | 1993-09-07 | Lee Wayne M | Secure teleprocessing bidding system |
GB9027249D0 (en) | 1990-12-17 | 1991-02-06 | Reuters Ltd | Offer matching system |
US5297032A (en) | 1991-02-01 | 1994-03-22 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | Securities trading workstation |
GB9103907D0 (en) | 1991-02-25 | 1991-04-10 | Beaumont Maxin International L | Interactive transaction processing system |
US5193056A (en) | 1991-03-11 | 1993-03-09 | Signature Financial Group Inc. | Data processing system for hub and spoke financial services configuration |
US5375055A (en) | 1992-02-03 | 1994-12-20 | Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. | Credit management for electronic brokerage system |
US5794219A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1998-08-11 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling |
US5402336A (en) | 1993-01-15 | 1995-03-28 | Ss&D Corporation | System and method for allocating resources of a retailer among multiple wholesalers |
US5802502A (en) | 1993-05-24 | 1998-09-01 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | System for selective communication connection based on transaction pricing signals |
US5794207A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
US5394324A (en) | 1993-12-08 | 1995-02-28 | Xerox Corporation | Auction-based control system for energy resource management in a building |
US5799151A (en) | 1994-04-04 | 1998-08-25 | Hoffer; Steven M. | Interactive electronic trade network and user interface |
US5809483A (en) | 1994-05-13 | 1998-09-15 | Broka; S. William | Online transaction processing system for bond trading |
US5915209A (en) | 1994-11-21 | 1999-06-22 | Lawrence; David | Bond trading system |
US5684963A (en) | 1995-03-20 | 1997-11-04 | Discreet Logic, Inc. | System and method for distributing video from a plurality of video providers |
US5553145A (en) | 1995-03-21 | 1996-09-03 | Micali; Silvia | Simultaneous electronic transactions with visible trusted parties |
US5689652A (en) | 1995-04-27 | 1997-11-18 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile |
US5640569A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1997-06-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Diverse goods arbitration system and method for allocating resources in a distributed computer system |
US5664115A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-09-02 | Fraser; Richard | Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet |
US5826244A (en) | 1995-08-23 | 1998-10-20 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for providing a document service over a computer network using an automated brokered auction |
US5765138A (en) | 1995-08-23 | 1998-06-09 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors |
JPH09101994A (en) | 1995-10-06 | 1997-04-15 | Fujitsu General Ltd | Auction system |
US5832496A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1998-11-03 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for performing intelligent analysis of a computer database |
US5758327A (en) | 1995-11-01 | 1998-05-26 | Ben D. Gardner | Electronic requisition and authorization process |
US5606602A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1997-02-25 | Summit Telecom Systems, Inc. | Bidding for telecommunications traffic |
US5715402A (en) | 1995-11-09 | 1998-02-03 | Spot Metals Online | Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals |
US5905975A (en) | 1996-01-04 | 1999-05-18 | Ausubel; Lawrence M. | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions |
US6055518A (en) | 1996-02-01 | 2000-04-25 | At&T Corporation | Secure auction systems |
US5758328A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1998-05-26 | Giovannoli; Joseph | Computerized quotation system and method |
AU717594B2 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2000-03-30 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US5774873A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-06-30 | Adt Automotive, Inc. | Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system |
US5835896A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US6023685A (en) | 1996-05-23 | 2000-02-08 | Brett; Kenton F. | Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system |
US5799285A (en) | 1996-06-07 | 1998-08-25 | Klingman; Edwin E. | Secure system for electronic selling |
US5897621A (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1999-04-27 | Cybercash, Inc. | System and method for multi-currency transactions |
US5890138A (en) | 1996-08-26 | 1999-03-30 | Bid.Com International Inc. | Computer auction system |
US5862223A (en) | 1996-07-24 | 1999-01-19 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce |
JP3407561B2 (en) | 1996-09-04 | 2003-05-19 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Auction apparatus and method |
US5966699A (en) | 1996-10-11 | 1999-10-12 | Zandi; Richard | System and method for conducting loan auction over computer network |
US5905974A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1999-05-18 | Cantor Fitzgerald Securities | Automated auction protocol processor |
US5797127A (en) | 1996-12-31 | 1998-08-18 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method, apparatus, and program for pricing, selling, and exercising options to purchase airline tickets |
DK10797A (en) | 1997-01-30 | 1997-01-30 | Autocom Aps | Procedure for holding an auction, as well as uses of the method |
US5803500A (en) | 1997-03-27 | 1998-09-08 | Mossberg; Bjoern E. F. | Method and kit for conducting an auction |
US6119229A (en) | 1997-04-11 | 2000-09-12 | The Brodia Group | Virtual property system |
US6161099A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2000-12-12 | Muniauction, Inc. | Process and apparatus for conducting auctions over electronic networks |
US6058379A (en) | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6061663A (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2000-05-09 | The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. | Index rebalancing |
US6415269B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2002-07-02 | Bidcatcher, L.P. | Interactive remote auction bidding system |
US6275807B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2001-08-14 | Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | Computer system and methods for management, and control of annuities and distribution of annuity payments |
US6151589A (en) | 1998-09-10 | 2000-11-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods for performing large scale auctions and online negotiations |
US6230146B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2001-05-08 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots |
US6366891B1 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2002-04-02 | Vanberg & Dewulf | Data processing system for conducting a modified on-line auction |
-
2002
- 2002-04-24 US US10/131,326 patent/US7483852B2/en active Active
-
2008
- 2008-12-12 US US12/316,482 patent/US20090099933A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20010032167A1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2001-10-18 | Tulloch Shane M. | Method of transformational bidding with rebates and discounts |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8612300B2 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2013-12-17 | Ariba, Inc. | Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers |
US8732036B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2014-05-20 | Ariba, Inc. | Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates |
US8392317B2 (en) | 2010-11-09 | 2013-03-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice |
US8688537B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2014-04-01 | Ariba, Inc. | Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network |
US9836773B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2017-12-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network |
US9990634B2 (en) | 2011-05-22 | 2018-06-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20030204465A1 (en) | 2003-10-30 |
US7483852B2 (en) | 2009-01-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20090099933A1 (en) | Total value bidding | |
US7283979B2 (en) | Method of transformational bidding with rebates and discounts | |
US7062460B1 (en) | On-line auction method and system facilitating the sale of multiple product units at prices varying with volume | |
US6564192B1 (en) | Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions | |
US7870034B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for multiple variable bidding in an online auction | |
US7225152B2 (en) | Method, apparatus, and system for varying an award volume in an auction | |
US20140236801A1 (en) | Automated System for Adapting Market Data and Evaluating the Market Value of Items | |
US7536362B2 (en) | Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers | |
US8126799B2 (en) | Method of bidding to drive competition in an auction | |
US7499876B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction | |
US20080071672A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction | |
US20080208616A1 (en) | Method and system for supplier prioritization | |
US20010034663A1 (en) | Electronic contract broker and contract market maker infrastructure | |
CA2369111A1 (en) | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with net present value bidding | |
US20020111895A1 (en) | System and method for creating catalog neutral products | |
US20030115127A1 (en) | Method of market basket bidding for surplus merchandise | |
US7840476B1 (en) | Transformation bidding with tooling requirements | |
US7634439B1 (en) | Method and apparatus to perform buy versus leasing transformational bidding | |
US20020077959A1 (en) | Method and system for using line item bid limits in electonic auctions | |
US20030135444A1 (en) | Multiple award optimization |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |