US20060169342A1 - Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit - Google Patents
Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060169342A1 US20060169342A1 US10/644,986 US64498603A US2006169342A1 US 20060169342 A1 US20060169342 A1 US 20060169342A1 US 64498603 A US64498603 A US 64498603A US 2006169342 A1 US2006169342 A1 US 2006169342A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- conduit
- pipe
- styrofoam
- utility
- cradle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16L—PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16L1/00—Laying or reclaiming pipes; Repairing or joining pipes on or under water
- F16L1/024—Laying or reclaiming pipes on land, e.g. above the ground
- F16L1/06—Accessories therefor, e.g. anchors
- F16L1/11—Accessories therefor, e.g. anchors for the detection or protection of pipes in the ground
Definitions
- the invention is related to the soil mechanics, foundation engineering, utility pipe/conduit system designs and construction thereof. Specifically the invention allows the facilitation of utility pipe/conduit installation under conditions where the character and bearing conditions of the soil and/or foundation materials are not conducive for standard types of installations; or where the use of the invention allows for substantial savings in installation costs where the character and bearing conditions of the soil/foundation materials in lieu of standard more expensive types of construction methods.
- the invention replaces the use of typical reinforced concrete cradles supported by piles or caissons or open cut installations requiring cofferdams, sheeting and dewatering. The invention when properly designed could even “float” a utility line on open waters with proper anchorage/mooring.
- the invention can also be used simply as a foundation cushion for the utility pipe/conduit system to protect the asset from potential damage in installations where the site foundation material is craggy, rocky, boulder or cobble strewn, or simply anywhere uneven protrusions occur in the foundation material that may inflict damaging point loads on the utility pipe/conduit system.
- Table 005 indicates a summary of improvements over standard installation methods that the invention provides.
- a sample computation of Styrofoam weight credit analysis is attached in order to demonstrate the mathematical and physical theories governing the phenomena of the invention.
- a 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe is illustrated in a trench cross section bedded, for the sake of simplicity, on a rectangular Styrofoam section 24-inches thick.
- the water table is at ground surface for the submerged computation with accompanied stress distribution diagram, and at the base of the Styrofoam bedding in the “dry” state. In both cases there are no appreciable stress increases on the underlying organic silt—therefore, no net settlement due to the additional load resulting form the utility/pipe conduit installation.
- the computations are attached as page 8 of this document.
- the invention allows for the facilitation of pipe/utility installation under conditions where the character and bearing capacity of the soil and foundation materials are not conducive for standard types of installation.
- the Styrofoam cradle upon which the utility pipe/conduit is bedded provides a weight credit displacement over the in situ soil/foundation material allowing additional loading capacity.
- the object of the invention is to provided a cost savings advantage over standard methods for the construction of utility pipe/conduit systems in unstable foundation materials.
- the 8.5′′ ⁇ 11′′ ink drawing on white paper entitled “Preformed Styrofoam Utility Pipe/Conduit Weight Credit Support Unit” dated 5 th Nov. 2002 indicates a plan view of a typical unit with a Section I-I cut showing a circular pipe supported by the low density Styrofoam unit.
- the invention a cradle composed of preformed Styrofoam, provides a weight credit benefit in utility pipe/conduit installations in unstable soil conditions by displacing the in situ material with the lightweight Styrofoam when the units are utilized.
- the Styrofoam cradle device can be mass produced by qualified Styrofoam products manufacturers by molding, extrusion, or other means or processes in standard lengths and cross sections.
- the units shall be sized to fit most common utility pipe/conduit systems in current use; or the units could even be custom manufactured for specific applications in order to meet the desired dimensions of an engineering design.
- a suitable Styrofoam material that can be considered for this application is an ASTM C 578, Type IV foam with a compressive strength of 25 pounds per square inch and a density of approximately 1.5 pounds per cubic foot.
- Dow Chemical Corporation is one of the leading manufacturers of Styrofoam. There are other types of Styrofoam that could be considered for this application.
Abstract
The device and method for construction of linear utility pipe/conduit in adverse soil conditions where instability, low bearing capacity or high water table challenges are overcome by the use of linear Styrofoam “weight-credit” cradles. It provides a marked improvement over standard methods of utility pipe/conduit installation in unstable foundation materials. The cradles can also be simply used as a cushion to protect the utility installation against point loads that could be inflicted as a result of unfavorable foundation conditions. The device is manufactured from Styrofoam material suitable for subterrainian and subaqueous installations. Cross-sectional dimensions can be adjusted according to the specific application depending on the physical properties of the pipe/conduit and the soil parameters where the system is to be installed. In essence the cradle is manufactured as a pre-formed unit extending usually to the spring-line of the pipe/conduit to facilitate acceptance of the pipe/conduit and to provide a stable platform and support for the full length of the pipe/conduit section. The cradles are generally installed in the trenches first, then the pipe/conduit section is placed into the cradle and joined to the adjacent pipe/conduit section. The width and thickness of the cradle is a function functionally determined as part an engineering design of the pipe/conduit system.
Description
- Not Applicable
- Not Applicable
- Not Applicable
- The invention is related to the soil mechanics, foundation engineering, utility pipe/conduit system designs and construction thereof. Specifically the invention allows the facilitation of utility pipe/conduit installation under conditions where the character and bearing conditions of the soil and/or foundation materials are not conducive for standard types of installations; or where the use of the invention allows for substantial savings in installation costs where the character and bearing conditions of the soil/foundation materials in lieu of standard more expensive types of construction methods. The invention replaces the use of typical reinforced concrete cradles supported by piles or caissons or open cut installations requiring cofferdams, sheeting and dewatering. The invention when properly designed could even “float” a utility line on open waters with proper anchorage/mooring.
- The invention can also be used simply as a foundation cushion for the utility pipe/conduit system to protect the asset from potential damage in installations where the site foundation material is craggy, rocky, boulder or cobble strewn, or simply anywhere uneven protrusions occur in the foundation material that may inflict damaging point loads on the utility pipe/conduit system.
- Table 005 indicates a summary of improvements over standard installation methods that the invention provides.
- A sample computation of Styrofoam weight credit analysis is attached in order to demonstrate the mathematical and physical theories governing the phenomena of the invention. A 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe is illustrated in a trench cross section bedded, for the sake of simplicity, on a rectangular Styrofoam section 24-inches thick. The water table is at ground surface for the submerged computation with accompanied stress distribution diagram, and at the base of the Styrofoam bedding in the “dry” state. In both cases there are no appreciable stress increases on the underlying organic silt—therefore, no net settlement due to the additional load resulting form the utility/pipe conduit installation. The computations are attached as page 8 of this document.
TABLE 005 New Method and Application Old Method Benefits/Improvements Installation of utility pipe/conduit Preconsolodation by Construct utility pipe/conduit in unstable soils, eg, peat, organic surcharging the sensitive system using the Styrofoam clays or silts, etc. stratum with placement of cradles using open cut temporary overburden loads. methods. OR Benefit: cost and time savings Construct reinforced concrete due to comparative ease of cradles supported on pile or construction. caisson foundation. Utilize the lighter density Eliminate additional net load on Excavate overburden to point Styrofoam cradle to obtain the sensitive soil stratum due to of zero net loading. weight credit required. weight of utility pipe/conduit Benefit: cost and time savings loading. due to comparative ease of construction. High water table or open water Strap to piles or caissons Low density of Styrofoam utility pipe/conduit installation. firmly anchored into suitable cradle allows for “floatation” foundation material. of utility pipe/conduit system in high water table situations or on open waters. Benefit: Need for expensive foundation eliminated, resulting in cost and time savings. Rough bedding conditions where Excavate additional depth, Use of cradle provides point loading can damage utility backfill with acceptable cushion for underside of pipe/conduit system. bedding material such as utility pipe/conduit system. sand, gravel, crushed stone, Benefit: Savings in cost and etc. time by eliminating the need for extra depth excavation and soil bedding. - The invention allows for the facilitation of pipe/utility installation under conditions where the character and bearing capacity of the soil and foundation materials are not conducive for standard types of installation. The Styrofoam cradle upon which the utility pipe/conduit is bedded provides a weight credit displacement over the in situ soil/foundation material allowing additional loading capacity. The object of the invention is to provided a cost savings advantage over standard methods for the construction of utility pipe/conduit systems in unstable foundation materials.
- The 8.5″×11″ ink drawing on white paper entitled “Preformed Styrofoam Utility Pipe/Conduit Weight Credit Support Unit” dated 5th Nov. 2002 indicates a plan view of a typical unit with a Section I-I cut showing a circular pipe supported by the low density Styrofoam unit.
- The invention, a cradle composed of preformed Styrofoam, provides a weight credit benefit in utility pipe/conduit installations in unstable soil conditions by displacing the in situ material with the lightweight Styrofoam when the units are utilized.
- The Styrofoam cradle device can be mass produced by qualified Styrofoam products manufacturers by molding, extrusion, or other means or processes in standard lengths and cross sections. The units shall be sized to fit most common utility pipe/conduit systems in current use; or the units could even be custom manufactured for specific applications in order to meet the desired dimensions of an engineering design. A suitable Styrofoam material that can be considered for this application is an ASTM C 578, Type IV foam with a compressive strength of 25 pounds per square inch and a density of approximately 1.5 pounds per cubic foot. Dow Chemical Corporation is one of the leading manufacturers of Styrofoam. There are other types of Styrofoam that could be considered for this application.
Claims (3)
1. The Styrofoam utility pipe/conduit cradle device provides for continuous and uniform support for linear pipe/conduit installations where the in situ soil conditions are such that the net additional gravity load form the pipe/conduit could cause settlement, differential or otherwise, resulting in vertical discontinuity of the utility pipe/conduit system which can cause breakage, open joints, or other deformation.
2. The extreme light density of the Styrofoam cradle when installed below the ground surface provides for a “weight-credit” simply by volumetric substitution of the displaced more dense native soil with the light weight Styrofoam; thus with a proper engineering design, diminishing in all or to some degree, the additional gravity load and surcharge imposed on the subsurface soil material by the overlying utility pipe/conduit system. The end result is significant reduction or even total elimination of potential settlement/subsidence of the utility pipe/conduit system installation.
3. The natural buoyancy of the light-weight Styrofoam material allows for additional support of utility pipe/conduit systems in high water table soil conditions or even in open waters much like a raft; thus eliminating the need for complex and expensive pilings, caissons or other conventional foundations/method-of-support. The utility piping/conduit systems with proper engineering design can be fully and uniformly supported in the Styrofoam cradle in the high water table conditions of marshes, swamps, wetlands, etc., anywhere the submerged soil conditions are of unfavorable bearing capacity.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/644,986 US20060169342A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2003-08-21 | Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/644,986 US20060169342A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2003-08-21 | Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060169342A1 true US20060169342A1 (en) | 2006-08-03 |
Family
ID=36755240
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/644,986 Abandoned US20060169342A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2003-08-21 | Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060169342A1 (en) |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6557780B1 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2003-05-06 | Manford L. Mora | Irrigation pipe protector |
-
2003
- 2003-08-21 US US10/644,986 patent/US20060169342A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6557780B1 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2003-05-06 | Manford L. Mora | Irrigation pipe protector |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wang et al. | Characteristics of wall deflections and ground surface settlements in Shanghai | |
Wong | Methods of resisting hydrostatic uplift in substructures | |
JP2005082976A (en) | Semi-underground flat bottom cylindrical liquid storage tank and construction method of the same | |
Svanø et al. | Skirted spud-cans—extending operational depth and improving performance | |
US20060169342A1 (en) | Preformed styrofoam utility pipe/conduit weight credit support unit | |
Bittner et al. | Design and construction of the Sutong Bridge foundations | |
Bono et al. | Performance of an internally braced slurry-diaphragm wall for excavation support | |
Burland et al. | A case history of a foundation problem on soft chalk | |
Al-Homoud et al. | Marine stone columns to prevent earthquake induced soil liquefaction | |
Sorota et al. | Cellular cofferdam for Trident drydock: Design | |
Hawkswood et al. | Foundations to precast marine structures | |
Theys et al. | Practical experience with screw piles used for the high-speed railway in Belgium | |
Abelev et al. | Construction Specifics of Oil Tanks with a Capacity of 20,000 m3 on Large Strata of Collapsible Loess Soils | |
CN220868255U (en) | Foundation pit supporting structure | |
Yildiz | Wave Mechanics and Hydrodynamic Wave Forces in Drinking Water under the Lake Pipeline in Burdur Lake–Turkey | |
Dayıoglu et al. | Soil improvement using reinforced granular fills on earthquake zones: Three case studies | |
Shulyatev et al. | Design and construction features on weak clay soils with high seismic hazard. The case of Olympic facilities in Sochi | |
GHEBREHIWET | LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE, SLOPE STABILITY AND PILE SHEETING (Sheet piled constructions) | |
Teme et al. | Geotechnical investigations for design of foundations for erosion and flood control structures at Unwana Beach, Afikpo, Ebonyi state, South-Eastern Nigeria | |
McIntyre et al. | Deep Excavation in Clayey Soils for a Sanitary Sewer Pump Station in Maple Ridge, British Columbia | |
Lunzhu et al. | Design of fuel tank foundations on soft clay deposit | |
Garbis | Excavations Stabilized Using Rock Revetments | |
Alzamora Jr et al. | Case studies of new york city projects with varying site constraints | |
Yuwen et al. | A Case study—Soil nailing wall in soft soil | |
Hamidi et al. | Application of Ground Improvement for Oil and Gas Tanks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |