US20060088225A1 - Comparison - Google Patents

Comparison Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060088225A1
US20060088225A1 US11/084,356 US8435605A US2006088225A1 US 20060088225 A1 US20060088225 A1 US 20060088225A1 US 8435605 A US8435605 A US 8435605A US 2006088225 A1 US2006088225 A1 US 2006088225A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
representation
representations
function
individual
distortion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/084,356
Inventor
Cedric Neumann
Roberto Puch-Solis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SECRETARY FOR HOME DEPARTMENT
Forensic Science Service Ltd
Original Assignee
UK Secretary of State for the Home Department
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB0423648A external-priority patent/GB0423648D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0502849A external-priority patent/GB0502849D0/en
Application filed by UK Secretary of State for the Home Department filed Critical UK Secretary of State for the Home Department
Assigned to SECRETARY FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, THE reassignment SECRETARY FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEUMANN, CEDRIC, PUCH-SOLIS, ROBERTO
Priority to AU2005298425A priority Critical patent/AU2005298425A1/en
Priority to PCT/GB2005/004164 priority patent/WO2006046052A1/en
Priority to EP05803541A priority patent/EP1805692A1/en
Priority to CA002584611A priority patent/CA2584611A1/en
Publication of US20060088225A1 publication Critical patent/US20060088225A1/en
Assigned to FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICE LTD. reassignment FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICE LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, THE
Priority to US12/980,780 priority patent/US20110268324A1/en
Priority to US13/482,283 priority patent/US8977014B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/28Determining representative reference patterns, e.g. by averaging or distorting; Generating dictionaries
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V40/00Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
    • G06V40/10Human or animal bodies, e.g. vehicle occupants or pedestrians; Body parts, e.g. hands
    • G06V40/12Fingerprints or palmprints

Definitions

  • This invention concerns improvements in and relating to comparisons, particularly, but not exclusively to comparisons of biometric markers and the accounting for distortion involved therein.
  • the applicant has developed a likelihood ratio based approach for such a comparison and this takes into account the variation in representations of the same finger taken under different conditions.
  • the present invention has amongst its aims to provide additional data for such a process, without undue burden in its generation.
  • the first and/or second aspects of the invention may include any of the features, options or possibilities set out elsewhere in this application, including from amongst the following.
  • the distortion may arise from one or more factors.
  • the factors may be or include the particular finger and/or the particular hand from which the representation arises.
  • the factor may be or include the gender and/or profession and/or height and/or size and/or weight and/or age of the person from whom the representation arises.
  • the factor may be the type and/or material and/or shape of the substrate on which the representation arose.
  • the marker preferably a biometric marker, may be a fingerprint, but may be a palm print, ear print, footprint, footwear print or the like.
  • the plurality of representations may be obtained from the individual under controlled conditions.
  • the conditions may be controlled in terms of the finger used and/or substrate used and/or pressure used and/or extent of distortion used.
  • one or more repeats of each representation are obtained.
  • Preferably at least 2 repeats and more preferably at least 5 repeats are obtained for each of the different distortions.
  • Preferably at least 5 representations with different distortions are obtained from each individual.
  • Preferably a plurality of representations are obtained from a plurality of individuals.
  • at least 20 individuals are used, more preferably at least 40.
  • the function may be or include a non-linear function.
  • the function may be a non-linear transformation.
  • the function may be or include one or more matrices.
  • the function may be defined, at least in part, by a comparison of a pair of the representations having different distortions. The comparison may consider the position of one or more minutiae in each of the representations and/or consider the position of one or more points on one or more ridges.
  • the function may be defined, at least in part, by a thin plate spline approach.
  • the method is applied to a plurality of different individuals to provide a plurality of functions.
  • One or more of the functions may be used to generate the simulated distorted representations.
  • One or more of the functions may be combined, for instance to give a composite function.
  • One or more of the functions may be combined to give a general description of distortion.
  • the composite function may be a composite matrix.
  • the plurality of functions and/or composite function and/or composite matrix may be used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations from a further representation.
  • the further representation to which the function is applied is preferably an undistorted representation.
  • the representation to which the function is applied may be from a different individual to the individual or individuals that the distorted representations are obtained from.
  • Preferably a plurality of simulated distorted representations are obtained from each representation, potentially nine or more, preferably 10 or more, ideally 25 or more.
  • the function may be used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations for a plurality of individuals, ideally with the same function being used in for each individual.
  • the simulated distorted representations are supplied to a data set, ideally a data base.
  • the data set and/or data base is used in a comparison method, particularly a comparison method in which a representation being compared is considered against within finger variability and/or between finger variability.
  • the data set and/or data base may be used to form a probability distribution, for instance a probability distribution related to the distance between different representations of the same marker and/or a probability distribution related to the distance between different representations of different markers.
  • the method may be repeated for one or more different types and/or direction of distortion.
  • the one or more different types of distortion may include: distortion of and/or towards one end, for instance a top, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance a bottom, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance one side, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance another side, of a representation.
  • One or more functions may be provided.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the finger which was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the finger is the thumb, first finger, index finger, third finger or fourth finger.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the hand which was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the hand is the right hand or left hand.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the gender of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the gender is male or female.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the size of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance in respect of one or more hyped ranges for the person.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the age of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance with respect to one or more age ranges.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the weight of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance with respect to one or more weight ranges.
  • One or more functions related to or specific to the profession of the person who was the source of the representation may be used.
  • the comparison of fingerprints, or other biometric markers, obtained from one source with those obtained from another source is useful for a variety of purposes, including in forensic science.
  • the comparison may seek to suggest that a representation of a finger mark from a crime scene is linked to a suspect.
  • the applicant has conducted research and developed an approach which seeks to evaluate the strength of the link between a crime scene representation of a fingerprint and a representation of a fingerprint taken from a suspect and to present this evidence using a likelihood approach.
  • a significant issue in this approach and in other approaches to the consideration of representations of fingerprints is the issue of distortion.
  • the alternative approach of the present invention simulates a large number of specific distorted representations from an undistorted representation.
  • the undistorted representation is easy to collect or could even be obtained from one of a number of existing data sets of such representations.
  • the actual generation of the specific distorted representations is performed by a computer and so is quick to perform on a large scale.
  • the simulation is repeated on a large number of undistorted representations.
  • the data set representative of the variation in representations of the same fingerprint with distortion can be increased substantially in size with only a reasonable input effort. This means that the approach and statistical models which use this data set are more robust as a result, as more extensive testing and validation is possible.
  • An additional benefit comes from the approach enabling the creation of very large data sets of distorted representations without the need for physical sampling. A powerful research resource results.
  • the approach involves an initial investment in further physical representations of distortion.
  • a significant number of individuals, for instance 40, are used to provide a significant number of distorted representations of their fingerprints, for instance 50 each.
  • their representations and the distortion of them are then described using a non-linear mathematical transformation.
  • Such an approach is more accurate than some prior approaches as the nature of the distortion itself is non-linear.
  • the approach establishes a matrix which describes the distortion.
  • a pair of representations these are presented in a black and white format, preferably skeletonised and subjected to appropriate cleaning and healing of the representation.
  • the minutiae locations are then determined and information on them collected for each representation using a suitable information format.
  • the location in the representation and orientation of the associated ridge and grayscale intensity of pixels in the vicinity may be captured in this way.
  • the degree of correspondence between minutiae in the two representations can then be obtained and quantified using one or more techniques, such as an elastic stringer matcher. Ridge curves can be extended from these points and the degree of correspondence between points on the curves established too.
  • the Thin Plate Spline approach describes the dependence of point positions on a thin metal plate with the physical bending energy applied to the thin metal plate.
  • the Thin Plate Spline approach is a parametric generalisation from rigid to mild non-rigid deformations.
  • the parameters of the Thin Plate Spline approach can be obtained from a matrix equation and various approaches to the solution of the equation can be taken.
  • An average deformation model can be obtained from the technique.
  • the present approach uses the description of specific distortion provided by the matrix and takes it in an alternative direction. Firstly, it differs in terms of the end use as that is to take undistorted representations, which are not involved in any authentication process, and deliberately convert them to distorted representations. These representations are then used together with other such distorted representations to form a data-set, and ideally to contribute to or validate the data set or probability distribution used in the technique of GB0422784.9 filed 14 Oct. 2004 and/or GB0502900.4 filed 11 Feb. 2005. This is a use and interest not involved in the Ross et al., process.
  • the approach differs because the matrix arrived at for specific distortion of an individual is considered together with the matrices arrived at from corresponding distortions of a number of other individuals so as to provide a composite matrix descriptive of distortion in a more general sense.
  • the model of deformation is not specific to an individual, therefore, but instead is applicable between individuals.
  • the modelling of distortion according to the invention can address distortion as a whole, but more preferably a number of different models to cover different directions of distortion are generated. For instance, a model for distortion of the top of the representation can be determined and/or a model for distortion to one side and/or another and/or the bottom can be determined.
  • the models can be used individually and/or together.
  • the composite matrix which results provides a detailed and appropriate expression of how specific distortion alters representations in general. As such, it is then possible to take an undistorted representation from an individual, who has not provided distorted representations which have been physically collected and considered, and simulate a series of distorted representations for that representation. Repeat uses of the distortion matrix gives repeat distorted representations. All these are useful in terms of contributions to the data set on between representation variability for the same finger and/or person. The approach can equally well be applied to a set of ten representations collected with one representation for each finger of the person.

Abstract

A method of simulating the effect of distortion on a representation of a marker, such as a fingerprint is provided. The method is useful for generating data for use in various processes concerned with fingerprints and particularly avoids the need to manually generate and collect such data. The method includes obtaining a plurality of representations from an individual, the representations being subject to different distortions relative to one another. A function, such as a thin plate spline function, is then used to describe the effects of the different distortions on the plurality of representations obtained. This generic model of the effects of distortion can then be used to generate distortions for a further representation from an individual, preferably another individual. The simulated distorted representations can be used in a variety of ways.

Description

  • This invention concerns improvements in and relating to comparisons, particularly, but not exclusively to comparisons of biometric markers and the accounting for distortion involved therein.
  • Various approaches for comparing a biometric marker, such as a fingerprint, from one source with one from another source exist. Some such systems have attempted to account on a case by case basis for the effects of distortion.
  • The applicant has developed a likelihood ratio based approach for such a comparison and this takes into account the variation in representations of the same finger taken under different conditions.
  • The present invention has amongst its aims to provide additional data for such a process, without undue burden in its generation.
  • According to a first aspect of the invention we provide a method of simulating the effect of distortion on a representation of a marker, the method including
  • obtaining a plurality of representations from an individual, the representations being subject to different distortions relative to one another;
  • describing the effect of the different distortions on the plurality of representations using a function;
  • taking a further representation from an individual and preferably another individual, applying the function to that representation to generate one or more simulated distorted representations.
  • According to a second aspect of the invention we provide a method of forming a data set including distorted representations of a marker, the method including
  • obtaining a plurality of representations from an individual, the representations being subject to different distortions relative to one another;
  • describing the effect of the different distortions on the plurality of representations using a function;
  • taking a further representation from an individual, preferably another individual, applying the function to that representation to generate one or more simulated distorted representations;
  • adding the one or more simulated distorted representations to a data set.
  • The first and/or second aspects of the invention may include any of the features, options or possibilities set out elsewhere in this application, including from amongst the following.
  • The distortion may arise from one or more factors. The factors may be or include the particular finger and/or the particular hand from which the representation arises. The factor may be or include the gender and/or profession and/or height and/or size and/or weight and/or age of the person from whom the representation arises. The factor may be the type and/or material and/or shape of the substrate on which the representation arose.
  • The marker, preferably a biometric marker, may be a fingerprint, but may be a palm print, ear print, footprint, footwear print or the like.
  • The plurality of representations may be obtained from the individual under controlled conditions. The conditions may be controlled in terms of the finger used and/or substrate used and/or pressure used and/or extent of distortion used. Preferably one or more repeats of each representation are obtained. Preferably at least 2 repeats and more preferably at least 5 repeats are obtained for each of the different distortions. Preferably at least 5 representations with different distortions are obtained from each individual. Preferably a plurality of representations are obtained from a plurality of individuals. Preferably at least 20 individuals are used, more preferably at least 40.
  • The function may be or include a non-linear function. The function may be a non-linear transformation. The function may be or include one or more matrices. The function may be defined, at least in part, by a comparison of a pair of the representations having different distortions. The comparison may consider the position of one or more minutiae in each of the representations and/or consider the position of one or more points on one or more ridges. The function may be defined, at least in part, by a thin plate spline approach.
  • Preferably the method is applied to a plurality of different individuals to provide a plurality of functions. One or more of the functions may be used to generate the simulated distorted representations. One or more of the functions may be combined, for instance to give a composite function. One or more of the functions may be combined to give a general description of distortion. The composite function may be a composite matrix. The plurality of functions and/or composite function and/or composite matrix may be used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations from a further representation.
  • The further representation to which the function is applied is preferably an undistorted representation. The representation to which the function is applied may be from a different individual to the individual or individuals that the distorted representations are obtained from. Preferably a plurality of simulated distorted representations are obtained from each representation, potentially nine or more, preferably 10 or more, ideally 25 or more. The function may be used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations for a plurality of individuals, ideally with the same function being used in for each individual.
  • Preferably the simulated distorted representations are supplied to a data set, ideally a data base. Preferably the data set and/or data base is used in a comparison method, particularly a comparison method in which a representation being compared is considered against within finger variability and/or between finger variability. The data set and/or data base may be used to form a probability distribution, for instance a probability distribution related to the distance between different representations of the same marker and/or a probability distribution related to the distance between different representations of different markers.
  • The method may be repeated for one or more different types and/or direction of distortion. The one or more different types of distortion may include: distortion of and/or towards one end, for instance a top, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance a bottom, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance one side, of a representation; and/or distortion of and/or towards another end, for instance another side, of a representation.
  • One or more functions may be provided. One or more functions related to or specific to the finger which was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the finger is the thumb, first finger, index finger, third finger or fourth finger. One or more functions related to or specific to the hand which was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the hand is the right hand or left hand. One or more functions related to or specific to the gender of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance where the gender is male or female. One or more functions related to or specific to the size of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance in respect of one or more hyped ranges for the person. One or more functions related to or specific to the age of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance with respect to one or more age ranges. One or more functions related to or specific to the weight of the person who was the source of the representation may be used, for instance with respect to one or more weight ranges. One or more functions related to or specific to the profession of the person who was the source of the representation may be used.
  • Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only.
  • The comparison of fingerprints, or other biometric markers, obtained from one source with those obtained from another source is useful for a variety of purposes, including in forensic science. In the forensic science context, the comparison may seek to suggest that a representation of a finger mark from a crime scene is linked to a suspect.
  • The applicant has conducted research and developed an approach which seeks to evaluate the strength of the link between a crime scene representation of a fingerprint and a representation of a fingerprint taken from a suspect and to present this evidence using a likelihood approach. A significant issue in this approach and in other approaches to the consideration of representations of fingerprints is the issue of distortion.
  • Whilst a suspect's print taken in a controlled manner, using preferred materials, is fairly consistent in terms of the representation it gives between occasions, this is not the case in crime scene cases. Representations of fingerprints left during day to day activities, including those which are then associated with a crime, arise under a wide variety of conditions. The pressure applied, movement during application, the substrate involved and a variety of other factors can all alter the form of the representation which arises when compared with others left or with representations taken under controlled conditions.
  • In the approach taken by the applicant, detailed in applicant's UK patent application number GB0422784.9 filed 14 Oct. 2004 and/or UK patent application number GB 0502900.4 filed 11 Feb. 2005, the representations of interest are considered in the context of two data sets. A data set representative of the variation in representations of fingerprints across the population (say based on 2000 fingerprints) and a data set representative of the variation in representations of the same fingerprint with specific distortion are used. The existing data set representative of the variation in the representations of the same fingerprint with distortion has been compiled by taking a fingerprint from a small number of individuals (say 4) and obtaining a number of representations for them under a number of specific different conditions (say 9) with a number of repeats for each (say 5). In order to ensure that the different individuals are considered under the same variations in conditions, an extremely time consuming and rigorous procedure is followed. In practical terms this limits the number of different individuals and number of different conditions for each which can be considered.
  • Instead of physically sampling a large number of individuals, under various conditions and with repeats thereof, the alternative approach of the present invention simulates a large number of specific distorted representations from an undistorted representation. The undistorted representation is easy to collect or could even be obtained from one of a number of existing data sets of such representations. The actual generation of the specific distorted representations is performed by a computer and so is quick to perform on a large scale. The simulation is repeated on a large number of undistorted representations.
  • Using such an approach, the data set representative of the variation in representations of the same fingerprint with distortion can be increased substantially in size with only a reasonable input effort. This means that the approach and statistical models which use this data set are more robust as a result, as more extensive testing and validation is possible. An additional benefit comes from the approach enabling the creation of very large data sets of distorted representations without the need for physical sampling. A powerful research resource results.
  • To be able to distort undistorted representations in an appropriate way, it is necessary to derive an appropriate description of the distortion process. To do this, the approach involves an initial investment in further physical representations of distortion. A significant number of individuals, for instance 40, are used to provide a significant number of distorted representations of their fingerprints, for instance 50 each. For each individual, their representations and the distortion of them are then described using a non-linear mathematical transformation. Such an approach is more accurate than some prior approaches as the nature of the distortion itself is non-linear. In the preferred form the approach establishes a matrix which describes the distortion. An example of such a matrix description of distortion is to be found in Ross et al., Proceedings of the International Conference on Biometric Authentication (ICBA) Hong Kong, July 2004 “Estimating Fingerprint Deformation” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Starting with a pair of representations, these are presented in a black and white format, preferably skeletonised and subjected to appropriate cleaning and healing of the representation. The minutiae locations are then determined and information on them collected for each representation using a suitable information format. The location in the representation and orientation of the associated ridge and grayscale intensity of pixels in the vicinity may be captured in this way. The degree of correspondence between minutiae in the two representations can then be obtained and quantified using one or more techniques, such as an elastic stringer matcher. Ridge curves can be extended from these points and the degree of correspondence between points on the curves established too.
  • The global effect of different distortions between the different representations on these points is then considered. The Thin Plate Spline approach describes the dependence of point positions on a thin metal plate with the physical bending energy applied to the thin metal plate. The Thin Plate Spline approach is a parametric generalisation from rigid to mild non-rigid deformations. The parameters of the Thin Plate Spline approach can be obtained from a matrix equation and various approaches to the solution of the equation can be taken. An average deformation model can be obtained from the technique.
  • In the Ross et al., paper, a number of representations of a marker of a particular individual are taken. These are taken under generally similar but uncontrolled conditions and so reflect the common extent of variation for that marker of that individual. The results are used to form the average deformation model for that individual. The average deformation model can be considered as modelling the behaviour of the individual. The average deformation model is used to distort the representation or “baseline impression” of a particular individual before that is compared with the other, template representation of a particular individual. As a result, the comparison process is improved. No use of the distorted representation is made outside of the one representation versus another representation comparison for a particular individual. If another individual is to be considered, then representations must be collected for him, an average deformation model for that individual must be generated and that individual's own average deformation model is used in any comparison. Each model is individual specific, therefore, and the model for one individual may be very different to the model for another.
  • In contrast, the present approach uses the description of specific distortion provided by the matrix and takes it in an alternative direction. Firstly, it differs in terms of the end use as that is to take undistorted representations, which are not involved in any authentication process, and deliberately convert them to distorted representations. These representations are then used together with other such distorted representations to form a data-set, and ideally to contribute to or validate the data set or probability distribution used in the technique of GB0422784.9 filed 14 Oct. 2004 and/or GB0502900.4 filed 11 Feb. 2005. This is a use and interest not involved in the Ross et al., process. Secondly, the approach differs because the matrix arrived at for specific distortion of an individual is considered together with the matrices arrived at from corresponding distortions of a number of other individuals so as to provide a composite matrix descriptive of distortion in a more general sense. The model of deformation is not specific to an individual, therefore, but instead is applicable between individuals. The modelling of distortion according to the invention can address distortion as a whole, but more preferably a number of different models to cover different directions of distortion are generated. For instance, a model for distortion of the top of the representation can be determined and/or a model for distortion to one side and/or another and/or the bottom can be determined. The models can be used individually and/or together.
  • The composite matrix which results provides a detailed and appropriate expression of how specific distortion alters representations in general. As such, it is then possible to take an undistorted representation from an individual, who has not provided distorted representations which have been physically collected and considered, and simulate a series of distorted representations for that representation. Repeat uses of the distortion matrix gives repeat distorted representations. All these are useful in terms of contributions to the data set on between representation variability for the same finger and/or person. The approach can equally well be applied to a set of ten representations collected with one representation for each finger of the person.
  • Whilst a number of non-linear mathematical transformations are possible, and a number of matrix based approaches are possible, the preferred matrix form is achieved using a Thin Plate Spline approach referenced above. Many variations on that particular way of describing the distortion are possible, however.
  • Whilst the approach is described above in the context of one, preferably composite, matrix, it is possible to develop a range of such matrices which are expressions of distortion under various conditions. Thus a matrix for each gender and/or hand possible for the person from whom the representation arises is possible. A series of matrices, with individual matrices for different ages of the person from whom the representation arises, is possible. A series of matrices, with individual matrices for different weights of the person from whom the representation arises, is possible. A series of matrices, with individual matrices for different professions of the person from whom the representation arises, is possible.
  • By way of validation, it is possible to take one or more representations under controlled conditions and apply the distortion matrix to them. The resulting distorted representations can then be compared with real representations obtained under a variety of conditions and hence subject to distortion of their own.

Claims (27)

1. A method of simulating the effect of distortion on a representation of a marker, the method including
obtaining a plurality of representations from an individual, the representations being subject to different distortions relative to one another;
describing the effect of the different distortions on the plurality of representations using a function;
taking a further representation from an individual and preferably another individual, applying the function to that representation to generate one or more simulated distorted representations.
2. A method according to claim 1 in which the function is or includes a non-linear function.
3. A method according to claim 2 in which the function is a non-linear transformation.
4. A method according to claim 1 in which the function is or includes one or more matrices.
5. A method according to claim 1 in which the function is defined, at least in part, by a comparison of a pair of the representations having different distortions.
6. A method according to claim 5 in which the comparison considers the position of one or more minutiae in each of the representations and/or considers the position of one or more points on one or more ridges.
7. A method according to claim 1 in which the function is defined, at least in part, by a thin plate spline approach.
8. A method according to claim 1 in which the plurality of representations are obtained from the individual under controlled conditions.
9. A method according to claim 8 in which the conditions are controlled in terms of the finger used and/or substrate used and/or pressure used and/or extent of distortion used.
10. A method according to claim 1 in which one or more repeats of each representation are obtained.
11. A method according to claim 1 in which a plurality of representations are obtained from a plurality of individuals.
12. A method according to claim 1 in which the method is applied to a plurality of different individuals to provide a plurality of functions.
13. A method according to claim 12 in which the two or more of the functions are combined to give a composite function.
14. A method according to claim 12 in which two or more of the functions are combined to give a general description of distortion.
15. A method according to claim 12 in which the plurality of functions and/or composite function are used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations from a further representation.
16. A method according to claim 1 in which the function is applied to a further representation to generate one or more simulated distorted representations from a further representation.
17. A method according to claim 16 in which the further representation to which the function is applied being an undistorted representation.
18. A method according to claim 16 in which the representation to which the function is applied is from a different individual to the individual or individuals that the distorted representations are obtained from.
19. A method according to claim 16 in which a plurality of simulated distorted representations are obtained from each representation.
20. A method according to claim 16 in which the function is used to generate one or more simulated distorted representations for a plurality of individuals, with the same function being used in for each individual.
21. A method according to claim 16 in which the simulated distorted representations are supplied to a data set.
22. A method according to claim 21 in which the data set is used in a comparison method in which a representation being compared is considered against within finger variability and/or between finger variability.
23. A method according to claim 21 in which the data set is used to form a probability distribution.
24. A method according to claim 23 in which a probability distribution relates to the distance between different representations of the same marker and/or in which a probability distribution relates to the distance between different representations of different markers.
25. A method according to claim 1 in which the method is repeated for one or more different types and/or directions of distortion.
26. A method according to claim 1 in which the distortion arises from one or more of the following factors: the particular finger from which the representation arises, the particular hand from which the representation arises, the gender of the person from whom the representation arises, the profession of the person from whom the representation arises, the height of the person from whom the representation arises, the size of the person from whom the representation arises, the weight of the person from whom the representation arises, the age of the person from whom the representation arises, the type of the substrate on which the representation arose, the material of the substrate on which the representation arose, the shape of the substrate on which the representation arose.
27. A method of forming a data set including distorted representations of a marker, the method including
obtaining a plurality of representations from an individual, the representations being subject to different distortions relative to one another;
describing the effect of the different distortions on the plurality of representations using a function;
taking a further representation from an individual, preferably another individual, applying the function to that representation to generate one or more simulated distorted representations;
adding the one or more simulated distorted representations to a data set.
US11/084,356 2004-10-26 2005-03-18 Comparison Abandoned US20060088225A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002584611A CA2584611A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2005-10-26 Analysing and generating distorted fingerprint images
EP05803541A EP1805692A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2005-10-26 Analysing and generating distorted fingerprint images
AU2005298425A AU2005298425A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2005-10-26 Analysing and generating distorted fingerprint images
PCT/GB2005/004164 WO2006046052A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2005-10-26 Analysing and generating distorted fingerprint images
US12/980,780 US20110268324A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2010-12-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion
US13/482,283 US8977014B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2012-05-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0423648.5 2004-10-26
GB0423648A GB0423648D0 (en) 2004-10-26 2004-10-26 Improvements in and relating to comparison
GB0502849.3 2005-02-11
GB0502849A GB0502849D0 (en) 2005-02-11 2005-02-11 Improvements in and relating to comparison

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/980,780 Continuation US20110268324A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2010-12-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060088225A1 true US20060088225A1 (en) 2006-04-27

Family

ID=36206232

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/084,356 Abandoned US20060088225A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2005-03-18 Comparison
US12/980,780 Abandoned US20110268324A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2010-12-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion
US13/482,283 Expired - Fee Related US8977014B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2012-05-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/980,780 Abandoned US20110268324A1 (en) 2004-10-26 2010-12-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion
US13/482,283 Expired - Fee Related US8977014B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2012-05-29 Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US20060088225A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016022403A1 (en) * 2014-08-08 2016-02-11 3M Innovative Properties Company Automated examination and processing of biometric data

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5469512A (en) * 1992-09-08 1995-11-21 Sony Corporation Pattern recognition device
US6487662B1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2002-11-26 Jurij Jakovlevich Kharon Biometric system for biometric input, comparison, authentication and access control and method therefor
US20030063782A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2003-04-03 Tinku Acharya Method and apparatus to reduce false minutiae in a binary fingerprint image
US6594392B2 (en) * 1999-05-17 2003-07-15 Intel Corporation Pattern recognition based on piecewise linear probability density function
US6701016B1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Method of learning deformation models to facilitate pattern matching
US20040202355A1 (en) * 2003-04-14 2004-10-14 Hillhouse Robert D. Method and apparatus for searching biometric image data
US20040218789A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-11-04 Polcha Andrew J. Fingerprint reader using surface acoustic wave device
US6836554B1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2004-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for distorting a biometric for transactions with enhanced security and privacy
US20050047676A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2005-03-03 Microsoft Corporation System and process for generating high dynamic range video
US20050100243A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2005-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Automatic sketch generation
US7027624B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-04-11 Nec Corporation Pattern collation device and pattern collating method thereof, and pattern collation program
USRE39342E1 (en) * 1996-08-30 2006-10-17 For3D, Inc. Method for producing a synthesized stereoscopic image
US7124066B2 (en) * 2000-08-30 2006-10-17 Microsoft Corporation Facial image processing methods and systems
US7310446B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2007-12-18 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Recognition device and method
US7394918B2 (en) * 1998-12-25 2008-07-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image recognition method and apparatus
US7397933B2 (en) * 2005-05-27 2008-07-08 Microsoft Corporation Collusion resistant desynchronization for digital video fingerprinting
US7512255B2 (en) * 2003-08-22 2009-03-31 Board Of Regents, University Of Houston Multi-modal face recognition
US7680312B2 (en) * 2005-07-13 2010-03-16 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Method for knowledge based image segmentation using shape models

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IL106443A0 (en) 1993-07-21 1993-11-15 Personix Ltd Apparatus and method for topological processing of fingerprints
US6041133A (en) 1996-12-13 2000-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for fingerprint matching using transformation parameter clustering based on local feature correspondences
DE10126369A1 (en) 2001-05-30 2002-12-05 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Procedure for checking a fingerprint
WO2003085591A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2003-10-16 Nanyang Technological University, Centre For Signal Processing Method for synthesizing a minutiae template and increasing reliability of fingerprint matching using a fingerprint sensor with small sensor area
FR2848699B1 (en) 2002-12-13 2005-04-01 Oberthur Card Syst Sa BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION BY RECOGNITION OF DIGITAL FOOTPRINT

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5469512A (en) * 1992-09-08 1995-11-21 Sony Corporation Pattern recognition device
USRE39342E1 (en) * 1996-08-30 2006-10-17 For3D, Inc. Method for producing a synthesized stereoscopic image
US7394918B2 (en) * 1998-12-25 2008-07-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image recognition method and apparatus
US6487662B1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2002-11-26 Jurij Jakovlevich Kharon Biometric system for biometric input, comparison, authentication and access control and method therefor
US6594392B2 (en) * 1999-05-17 2003-07-15 Intel Corporation Pattern recognition based on piecewise linear probability density function
US6836554B1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2004-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for distorting a biometric for transactions with enhanced security and privacy
US7124066B2 (en) * 2000-08-30 2006-10-17 Microsoft Corporation Facial image processing methods and systems
US6701016B1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Method of learning deformation models to facilitate pattern matching
US7027624B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-04-11 Nec Corporation Pattern collation device and pattern collating method thereof, and pattern collation program
US20030063782A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2003-04-03 Tinku Acharya Method and apparatus to reduce false minutiae in a binary fingerprint image
US20050100243A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2005-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Automatic sketch generation
US7310446B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2007-12-18 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Recognition device and method
US20040218789A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-11-04 Polcha Andrew J. Fingerprint reader using surface acoustic wave device
US20040202355A1 (en) * 2003-04-14 2004-10-14 Hillhouse Robert D. Method and apparatus for searching biometric image data
US20050047676A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2005-03-03 Microsoft Corporation System and process for generating high dynamic range video
US7512255B2 (en) * 2003-08-22 2009-03-31 Board Of Regents, University Of Houston Multi-modal face recognition
US7397933B2 (en) * 2005-05-27 2008-07-08 Microsoft Corporation Collusion resistant desynchronization for digital video fingerprinting
US7680312B2 (en) * 2005-07-13 2010-03-16 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Method for knowledge based image segmentation using shape models

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8977014B2 (en) 2015-03-10
US20130034275A1 (en) 2013-02-07
US20110268324A1 (en) 2011-11-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tolosana et al. Benchmarking desktop and mobile handwriting across COTS devices: The e-BioSign biometric database
Wayman et al. Biometric systems: Technology, design and performance evaluation
Cappelli et al. Modelling plastic distortion in fingerprint images
Ross et al. Fingerprint warping using ridge curve correspondences
Ross et al. A deformable model for fingerprint matching
Galbally et al. Synthetic on-line signature generation. Part II: Experimental validation
Fong et al. A biometric authentication model using hand gesture images
Ramos et al. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method
Diaz et al. Anthropomorphic features for on-line signatures
Abraham et al. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations
US8977014B2 (en) Methods for stimulating the effect of distortion on representations of markers and methods for analyzing representations of markers using simulations of distortion
Ross et al. Estimating fingerprint deformation
KR20040035389A (en) Apparatus for verifying an online signature using of transform technique and method teherefor
Flynn Biometrics databases
Venkatasubramanian et al. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end‐to‐end system
US8983153B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for comparison
WO2006046052A1 (en) Analysing and generating distorted fingerprint images
Kocharyan et al. A multimodal biometric system based on fingerprint and signature recognition
Gafurov et al. Guc100 multisensor fingerprint database for in-house (semipublic) performance test
Delgado-Gómez et al. Individual identification using personality traits
Askarin et al. Planting attack on latent fingerprints
Macleod Affordable counterfeit fingerprints: Investigating the potential forensic applications of 3D printing
Kirst et al. A first approach to the detection and equalization of distorted latent fingerprints and microtraces on non-planar surfaces with confocal laser microscopy
Su Hand image recognition by the techniques of hand shape scaling and image weight scaling
Ball Prevalence of Pores in Latent Fingerprints

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SECRETARY FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, THE, UNITED KIN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NEUMANN, CEDRIC;PUCH-SOLIS, ROBERTO;REEL/FRAME:016675/0979

Effective date: 20050428

AS Assignment

Owner name: FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICE LTD., UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, THE;REEL/FRAME:017921/0073

Effective date: 20051206

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION