US20040193436A1 - Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding - Google Patents
Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040193436A1 US20040193436A1 US10/659,465 US65946503A US2004193436A1 US 20040193436 A1 US20040193436 A1 US 20040193436A1 US 65946503 A US65946503 A US 65946503A US 2004193436 A1 US2004193436 A1 US 2004193436A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- customer
- return
- data
- returns
- merchant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/01—Customer relationship services
- G06Q30/015—Providing customer assistance, e.g. assisting a customer within a business location or via helpdesk
- G06Q30/016—After-sales
Definitions
- This invention relates to merchandise return methods and systems, and more particularly to a method of managing returns of goods purchased from retailers and other merchants.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a merchandise return process using postage due return labels in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a return label in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example of bar code fields for the bar code of FIG. 2.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a method of generating a return label in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label by the customer.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the use of the return label at the return center for issuing customer credit.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a process of dynamic routing, using data on the return label.
- This invention described herein is a merchandising method and system that permits a merchant to provide pre-authorized returns, for which the customer need not pay shipping charges.
- the merchant provides a special return label to the customer, which has machine readable data that enables shipping charges to be assessed at a point of delivery. Data on the return label may further ensure that the package is delivered to an initial point of return close to the customer, thereby providing “reverse zone skipping”.
- the return label may further have data that permits the merchant to dynamically route returned packages and that permits both the merchant and the customer to be quickly notified of the status of the return.
- the method is used by, or on behalf of, a “merchant”, which is typically a retail merchant.
- a “merchant” which is typically a retail merchant.
- the concepts discussed herein may be applied to any merchant, including service providers who sell goods incidentally to the providing of services.
- the “return” may be for purposes of receiving credit for an item recently purchased, but may also be subsequent to events such as warranty claims, recalls, or for repairs.
- the method described herein may be used in connection with a “reverse logistics return service”.
- This type of service is becoming increasingly popular, and permits merchants to “outsource” their returns process.
- these service providers are referred to as “returns providers”. They typically provide returns services for a number of different merchants, with part of their services being disposing of packages in accordance with the particular disposition rules of each merchant.
- the returns label will further have data useful for identifying each merchant and may contain other data particular to that merchant.
- the methods described herein are also useful for returns systems that handle only returns for a single merchant, such as for a merchant having an in-house returns provider.
- One example of a returns service that could incorporate use of the return label described herein is the SmartLabelTM service offered by Newgistics, Inc.
- This service makes use of a bar-coded shipping label, typically attached to an invoice received by the customer when the product is delivered to the customer.
- USPS U.S. Postal System
- the label directs the package to a returns center maintained by the service provider.
- the returns provider assesses shipping charges, pays the carrier, and passes the shipping costs on to the merchant, who may then deduct those costs from the customer's credit for the returned item.
- the various services that the returns provider provides to the merchant include the return label, aggregation of packages to each merchant, transportation and processing services, payment of shipping charges, reporting, and notifications to the merchant and/or the customer.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a returns process that uses postage due return labels in accordance with the invention.
- returns are processed through a returns provider that handles returns for multiple merchants.
- the method described herein may be easily adapted for a returns provider that handles only returns for a single merchant.
- the merchant is considered to “maintain” at least one returns center, whether by directly maintaining the returns center(s) or by associating with a third party that does so.
- Step 110 a merchant has delivered an item to a customer.
- Step 111 the customer has decided to return the item, herein referred to as “the return item”.
- a returns label 20 has already been, or is to be, provided to the customer.
- the return label 20 is delivered as an enclosure with the customer's original order, such as by being part of the customer invoice or a separate insert.
- return label 20 could be downloaded from a data network and printed by the customer, or otherwise delivered to the customer by means other than being included with the merchandise delivery.
- the return label 20 could be separately mailed or send as by facsimile.
- the customer might access a website provided by the merchant, link to a returns page, and download the data for printing the return label.
- Return label 20 is “pre-authorized” in the sense that the customer need not seek authorization from the merchant.
- the customer is apprised by the merchant that returns are pre-authorized, such as by information on the invoice or other shipping documents. The notification may be explicit on the return label or elsewhere or may be implicit.
- the customer is further apprised that the customer need not pay shipping charges, such as by a “no postage necessary” printing on the return label 20 .
- the customer affixes the returns label 20 to the packaging for the return item, and hands over the return item to a carrier, without paying any shipping charges to the carrier.
- the customer need not affix any indicia of postage or other shipping costs to the packaging.
- the customer may simply deposit the package into the US postal system, by putting it into a mailbox (if postal compliant), dropping it off at a postal drop, or taking it to a post office.
- the return is local to the customer in the sense that the customer may select whatever drop-off point is most convenient.
- return label 20 is preprinted to indicate at least the destination for the item and the package origin (the point where the customer places the package with a carrier).
- the destination and origin are identified by addresses, including postal codes.
- postal codes include the ZIP (zone improvement plan) codes of the USPS and similar codes used in other countries.
- the returns label further indicates that delivery charges are to be paid by a recipient. It further identifies the transaction leading to the return. Typically, this is a purchase transaction and the identification is by invoice number or other indicia of the package or its contents. In other embodiments, the transaction could be a warranty claim or repair request.
- the carrier delivers the return item to the returns provider.
- the initial point of return for the package is a specialized returns center, which may receive returns for more than one merchant.
- the returns center may be regional for a large area such as the United States. In other words, a large geographic area may have a number of returns centers.
- the return label 20 may ensure “reverse zone skipping”. At the time the data for each returns label 20 is composed, the destination address on the label 20 is determined.
- the destination address is typically that of a carrier station (such as a postal center) nearest the customer. This may mean that return packages are carried from the customer drop-off location to a destination associated with the carrier for pickup by the returns provider.
- the carrier is the USPS
- the package could be delivered to one of 21 regional bulk mail centers (BMCs).
- BMCs regional bulk mail centers
- the package is delivered to the BMC closest to the location of the returns provider.
- the returns provider may then pick up accumulated packages addressed to it. Equivalently, the carrier then may deliver the package directly to the returns center. In either case, the destination address is considered to be “to” a returns center closest to the customer.
- Step 114 the returns provider receives the package from the carrier.
- the returns provider scans the return label on the package and weighs the package. Any special shipping flags or indicia are entered at this time. In this manner, the returns provider receives multiple packages, which may be items originating from multiple merchants, throughout a daily course of business.
- the returns provider calculates the shipping charges due to the carrier and electronically manifests the carrier. Typically, this is done on a daily basis. In the example of this description, the returns provider pays the carrier, and is compensated by the merchant for carrier costs and other services.
- the returns provider then sorts the packages by merchant, again using data printed on return label 20 , and collects the packages associated with each merchant.
- the final destination code is encoded on the return label, and may also be printed in human readable form. For large volume merchants, the destination code may be associated with a package chute and/or a docking door.
- the returns provider may also provide “value added” services for the benefit of the merchant, such as notification of the return to merchant or notification to the customer of receipt of the package.
- the returns provider may use the scanned return label information to notify the customer and/or the merchant that the package has been received.
- Step 116 after aggregating the packages for each merchant, the returns provider further ships them in accordance with whatever policies are specified for that merchant. For example, the returns provider may palletize shipments back to the merchant.
- the return label data is used to create a bill of lading, with data such as pallet counts, package counts, and shipment weight.
- Step 118 the package is handled according to the disposition policy of the merchant, such as by being returned to stock, sent to a re-seller, liquidator, or otherwise disposed.
- a processing center 119 is used to collect data scanned from return labels, and to process the returns.
- the processing center 119 includes computer processing equipment, including computers, data storage, and networking equipment, appropriate for communication of data to and from returns centers, merchants, and customer, as appropriate.
- the computing equipment is programmed to fulfill the various data processing services described herein.
- the processing center 119 may also provide a web page or other network-accessible data source, accessible by customers for obtaining information about returns and data for printing return labels. As explained below, the processing center 119 is further used to match data on the return label to merchant rules, which may specify routing of the package or other rules for handling the return.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a return label 20 , suitable for use with the merchandise return method of FIG. 1.
- the carrier is the USPS.
- Return label 20 incorporates data appropriate for the merchandise return service offered by the USPS, as well as data used for additional services provided by the returns provider.
- return label 20 would be modified to comply with the requirements of those carriers.
- the customer's address 21 is printed on the upper left corner of label 20 . This address matches the original delivery address.
- the visual flag 22 is a human readable code, that can be used for various purposes.
- flag 22 is a destination code that indicates a final package destination. Examples of final destinations are a merchant's warehouse, a liquidator, or a warranty, recall or repair center. This destination code matches a destination code embedded in barcode 25 .
- flag 22 could correlate to any sort of delivery “rule”.
- visual flag 22 could indicate a quality of service, such as whether the package is to expedited or held for some reason.
- flag 22 could indicate the contents of the package, such as whether it is “high value” for special handling.
- Flag 22 permits the package to be manually sorted at the returns center for subsequent routing. In general, these examples are merchant-specific, in the sense that they represent data specific to the merchant and returns processing rules.
- the merchandise return rectangle 23 is specific to the carrier and pertains to the relationship between the carrier and the returns provider. In the example of this description, it states the USPS permit information of the returns provider.
- the delivery address 24 is, as explained above, the address of a delivery location that is geographically nearest the customer. This determination of this address is dependent on the customer's postal code, as specified during the transaction leading to the return (such as the purchase transaction). As stated above, the delivery address could be a carrier center, such as a USPS bulk mail center, where it is held for pickup by the returns provider.
- Barcode 25 is a dynamically generated machine-readable code that is based on unique information about the specific transaction involving the item(s) being returned.
- An example of barcode data is described below, but in general, the barcode data provides data for information servers 119 so that various “value added” returns processing tasks may be performed, such as manifesting of shipping charges, notifications to the customer and/or merchant, and final disposition of the returned item.
- the barcode data permits the returns center to correlate the returned item back to the transaction with the customer.
- One type of correlation is an invoice number, as indicated by the example below.
- Barcode 25 may comprise various alphanumeric or numeric only formats. Various other types of machine readable coding could be used as an alternative to bar-coding, such as other types of optical scan data or radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging.
- the coding may be printed or may be some other format, such as the electronic circuitry used in an RFID tag.
- the “postage due” insignia 26 indicates to the customer and the carrier that shipping charges are to be paid by the recipient.
- Barcode 25 is a “third party barcode” in the sense that need not be specified by the carrier, which in this case, is the USPS.
- return label 20 may have one or more additional barcodes, for example a barcode containing data for the carrier's use, such as for carrier tracking or return confirmation.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a data string that is an example of the contents of the barcode 25 of FIG. 2.
- the example of FIG. 3 has 24 positions, each with an alphanumeric character.
- the information in barcode 25 is “integrated” in the sense that it is contained in a single barcode or other machine readable string of data.
- the barcode 25 contains multiple data points, and contains data that is “transaction specific”, in the sense that it identifies the transaction between the customer and the merchant or other party to whom the package is being delivered.
- the “transaction specific” data is dynamically generated in the sense that it is generated after the original order is made, and is specific to that transaction.
- the barcode data points are used to process the package for purposes other than moving it from one place to another.
- carrier specific data elsewhere on the label 20 functions merely for shipping purposes.
- Field 1 identifies the returns provider.
- Field 2 identifies the package destination.
- Field 3 represents the shipping origin of the package (customer's postal code), which permits assessment of shipping charges from where the customer drops off the package (the return package origin) to the returns center (or a nearby BMC) where it is pulled from the carrier.
- Field 4 identifies the merchant from whom the item was purchased. Or, as explained above, some party other than the merchant may be involved in the transaction leading to the return, such as a warranty or repair service.
- Field 5 a selector field, may be used for various purposes, such as to identify the label type, or to identify a shipping category, such as Priority Mail or customer-paid.
- Field 6 identifies the transaction involving the returned item in some manner. As explained above, often the merchant uses this field to correlate the return label to the original order, such as by filling the field with the invoice number. This field could also be used for data such as a customer number, product SKU, or other data.
- one or more of the above-described fields could be omitted and another field used to link to the same information at the returns center.
- Field 3 the customer's postal code
- Field 6 used at the returns center to dynamically link to stored data that provides the customer's postal code.
- barcode 25 would equivalently be considered to contain “data representing at least the origin of the package and identification of the transaction”.
- barcode data in the example of FIG. 3 is minimal and additional data could be easily included. Additional data points that may be included in the barcode 25 include data points falling into categories “transaction specific”, “merchant specific”, “customer specific”, “product specific”, “trading partner”, or “disposition” data.
- Transaction specific data identifies the transaction, such as by invoice number in the case of a purchase transaction.
- the “merchant specific” data identifies the merchant or some characteristic of the merchant.
- the “customer specific” identifies the customer or some characteristic of the customer.
- Product specific” data identifies the package contents, such as by SKU number.
- Trading partner” data describes a trading partner of the returns center, such as a liquidator or other service provider.
- disposition data describes a disposition rule or final destination of the returned item.
- the merchant directly provides the return label (or data for generating the return label) to the customer.
- the returns provider provides the label specifications to the merchant, as well as a delivery address data file. This data file is used to correlate each customer's postal code to the returns provider location that is closest to the customer.
- the data file is made available to the merchant via data network access, such as by the internet.
- the data on the returns label 20 is pre-printed.
- the customer might fill in at least some of this data.
- label 20 could have a predetermined format, and the customer would be directed to fill in certain information such as the customer's address, the package invoice number, or a shipping destination.
- label 20 is entirely pre-printed or all or partly filled by the customer, it is deemed to have a predetermined format, and prior to being shipped by the customer, to contain certain customer data as discussed in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3.
- the various data elements described above in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3 can be used to implement the various returns services described herein, and some of these concepts may be implemented independently of others.
- the returns center can perform reverse manifesting.
- the returns center can dynamically route the package or notify the merchant or the customer about the status of the return.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a process of generating a return label, such as return label 20 .
- the return label 20 is to be provided to the customer in the original shipment.
- the merchant enters the order information to an automated order processing system.
- the merchant determines whether the order is an exception item.
- the merchant receives BMC (bulk mail center) data, which as explained above, is used to determine the BMC closest to the customer. In other embodiments, where the carrier is not the USPS, the address of some other carrier station close to the customer is used.
- BMC bulk mail center
- the return label and invoice are printed.
- the order is fulfilled and shipped to the customer, with the return label being enclosed with the order.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label 20 by the customer.
- Steps 501 - 510 illustrates various alternative ways for the customer to obtain the label 20 .
- the customer receives the label 20 with the invoice in the original shipment, as described above in connection with FIG. 4.
- the customer may merely detach the label (Step 509 ).
- Step 502 the customer receives the label 20 by contacting customer service of the merchant, such as by phone call or email (Step 504 ).
- the label is then generated (Step 506 ) and emailed to the customer (Step 508 ).
- Steps 503 and 505 the customer receives the label by accessing a website and requesting an image.
- the label is generated and displayed (Steps 506 and 507 ) and the customer prints the label (Step 510 ).
- Step 520 the customer prepares the return by filling out a return form and applying the return label to the package.
- Steps 521 and 522 the customer packages the return and drops it with the carrier specified by the merchant.
- Steps 530 - 536 illustrate how data from the return label can be used to facilitate tracking requests.
- the package has been received at the returns center and scanned as described above in connection with FIG. 1.
- the data is stored and accessible by a tracking process, which may be part of processing system 119 .
- Step 531 the customer makes a tracking request through customer service of the merchant.
- Step 533 the request is processed, and the results communicated to the customer.
- Step 532 the customer makes a tracking request via the merchant's website.
- Steps 533 and 534 the request is processed and the results are displayed.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the use of return label 20 for issuing credit to the customer.
- FIG. 6 is an expansion of one aspect of the returns center processing in Step 114 of FIG. 1.
- Step 61 the package with the return label affixed is received at the returns center. It is assumed that return label 20 has at least some means to correlate the package to the original order, such as an invoice number.
- Step 62 the label is scanned and linked to the original order.
- Step 63 the reason for the return is captured, such as by reading the return form. The reason for the return may be used to determine whether the customer is to bear shipping costs for the return, and hence the amount of credit to the customer. The return reason may be communicated to the merchant, in addition to other return information, using processing system 119 .
- Step 64 the credit due the customer is calculated. Step 64 may involve accessing stored business rules of the merchant.
- Step 65 data for implementing credit to the customer is delivered to the appropriate processing center.
- FIG. 7 illustrates how the data on returns label 20 can be used to implement “dynamic routing”.
- the package is received at a returns center.
- data on barcode 25 is linked to the merchant's specifications for routing the package to its final destination.
- the package is routed in accordance with whatever specifications are current at that time.
- the original shipment data may indicate that a package contains a seasonal item. At the end of the season, these packages may then be routed to an outlet destination rather than a re-stock destination.
- the original shipment information might merely identify the merchant. The returns center can then match the packages of that merchant to the current rules for that merchant, such as by routing all packages to a particular destination.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/446,142 filed Feb. 10, 2002 and entitled “Retail Package Returns Service System Using Postage Due Labels”.
- This invention relates to merchandise return methods and systems, and more particularly to a method of managing returns of goods purchased from retailers and other merchants.
- The growing use of electronic commerce as a customer marketplace has led to a greater need for appropriate customer return methods. In the absence of conveniently located retail stores, the customer needs an acceptable method of returning goods. Various “reverse logistics” systems have been developed to meet this need. These systems are a subset of the growing industry of “supply chain management” systems, and are designed to help merchants manage customer returns.
- For returns, as opposed to forward deliveries, the typical returns process requires the customer to take the package to the carrier and pay shipping costs. As an alternative to customer-paid shipping, some merchants have turned to a merchandise return service available from the United States Postal Service (USPS), which permits the customer use an addressed and prepaid merchandise return label. The customer may deposit the package at any post office or in a mailbox, and postage is paid by the merchant. The merchant decides the ultimate return shipping cost to the customer, such as by deducting that cost from the customer's credit.
- Existing merchandise return service methods, such as that offered by the USPS, although convenient for the customer, can be costly and time consuming for the merchant.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a merchandise return process using postage due return labels in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a return label in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example of bar code fields for the bar code of FIG. 2.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a method of generating a return label in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label by the customer.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the use of the return label at the return center for issuing customer credit.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a process of dynamic routing, using data on the return label.
- This invention described herein is a merchandising method and system that permits a merchant to provide pre-authorized returns, for which the customer need not pay shipping charges. The merchant provides a special return label to the customer, which has machine readable data that enables shipping charges to be assessed at a point of delivery. Data on the return label may further ensure that the package is delivered to an initial point of return close to the customer, thereby providing “reverse zone skipping”. The return label may further have data that permits the merchant to dynamically route returned packages and that permits both the merchant and the customer to be quickly notified of the status of the return.
- The method is used by, or on behalf of, a “merchant”, which is typically a retail merchant. However, the concepts discussed herein may be applied to any merchant, including service providers who sell goods incidentally to the providing of services. The “return” may be for purposes of receiving credit for an item recently purchased, but may also be subsequent to events such as warranty claims, recalls, or for repairs.
- The method described herein may be used in connection with a “reverse logistics return service”. This type of service is becoming increasingly popular, and permits merchants to “outsource” their returns process. For purposes of this description, these service providers are referred to as “returns providers”. They typically provide returns services for a number of different merchants, with part of their services being disposing of packages in accordance with the particular disposition rules of each merchant.
- If the merchant uses such a returns provider, the returns label will further have data useful for identifying each merchant and may contain other data particular to that merchant. However, the methods described herein are also useful for returns systems that handle only returns for a single merchant, such as for a merchant having an in-house returns provider.
- One example of a returns service that could incorporate use of the return label described herein is the SmartLabel™ service offered by Newgistics, Inc. This service makes use of a bar-coded shipping label, typically attached to an invoice received by the customer when the product is delivered to the customer. To return the product, the customer simply affixes the label to the return package, and drops the package anywhere into the U.S. Postal System (USPS), such as by dropping it into a mailbox. The label directs the package to a returns center maintained by the service provider. The returns provider assesses shipping charges, pays the carrier, and passes the shipping costs on to the merchant, who may then deduct those costs from the customer's credit for the returned item. The various services that the returns provider provides to the merchant include the return label, aggregation of packages to each merchant, transportation and processing services, payment of shipping charges, reporting, and notifications to the merchant and/or the customer.
- For purposes of example herein, it is assumed that the carrier that ships the returned items is the United States Postal Service. However, the same concepts could be applied to a returns process that uses other carriers or multiple carriers, so long as each carrier has the equivalent of postage due capability, that is, the ability to collect shipping charges after the package is delivered, that is, from the returns provider (the package recipient) rather than from the customer.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a returns process that uses postage due return labels in accordance with the invention. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, returns are processed through a returns provider that handles returns for multiple merchants. However, as stated above, the method described herein may be easily adapted for a returns provider that handles only returns for a single merchant. In either case, the merchant is considered to “maintain” at least one returns center, whether by directly maintaining the returns center(s) or by associating with a third party that does so.
- In
Step 110, a merchant has delivered an item to a customer. InStep 111, the customer has decided to return the item, herein referred to as “the return item”. - A
returns label 20 has already been, or is to be, provided to the customer. In the example of FIG. 1, thereturn label 20 is delivered as an enclosure with the customer's original order, such as by being part of the customer invoice or a separate insert. - In other embodiments,
return label 20 could be downloaded from a data network and printed by the customer, or otherwise delivered to the customer by means other than being included with the merchandise delivery. For example, thereturn label 20 could be separately mailed or send as by facsimile. As another example, the customer might access a website provided by the merchant, link to a returns page, and download the data for printing the return label. -
Return label 20 is “pre-authorized” in the sense that the customer need not seek authorization from the merchant. The customer is apprised by the merchant that returns are pre-authorized, such as by information on the invoice or other shipping documents. The notification may be explicit on the return label or elsewhere or may be implicit. The customer is further apprised that the customer need not pay shipping charges, such as by a “no postage necessary” printing on thereturn label 20. - An example of a
suitable return label 20 is described below in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3. - The customer affixes the
returns label 20 to the packaging for the return item, and hands over the return item to a carrier, without paying any shipping charges to the carrier. The customer need not affix any indicia of postage or other shipping costs to the packaging. In the example of this description, the customer may simply deposit the package into the US postal system, by putting it into a mailbox (if postal compliant), dropping it off at a postal drop, or taking it to a post office. The return is local to the customer in the sense that the customer may select whatever drop-off point is most convenient. - As further explained below in connection with FIG. 2,
return label 20 is preprinted to indicate at least the destination for the item and the package origin (the point where the customer places the package with a carrier). Typically, the destination and origin are identified by addresses, including postal codes. For purposes of this description, “postal codes” include the ZIP (zone improvement plan) codes of the USPS and similar codes used in other countries. - The returns label further indicates that delivery charges are to be paid by a recipient. It further identifies the transaction leading to the return. Typically, this is a purchase transaction and the identification is by invoice number or other indicia of the package or its contents. In other embodiments, the transaction could be a warranty claim or repair request.
- In
Step 112, the carrier delivers the return item to the returns provider. As stated above, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, the initial point of return for the package is a specialized returns center, which may receive returns for more than one merchant. The returns center may be regional for a large area such as the United States. In other words, a large geographic area may have a number of returns centers. - For a returns provider having regional returns centers, the
return label 20 may ensure “reverse zone skipping”. At the time the data for each returns label 20 is composed, the destination address on thelabel 20 is determined. - The destination address is typically that of a carrier station (such as a postal center) nearest the customer. This may mean that return packages are carried from the customer drop-off location to a destination associated with the carrier for pickup by the returns provider. For example, where the carrier is the USPS, the package could be delivered to one of21 regional bulk mail centers (BMCs). The package is delivered to the BMC closest to the location of the returns provider. The returns provider may then pick up accumulated packages addressed to it. Equivalently, the carrier then may deliver the package directly to the returns center. In either case, the destination address is considered to be “to” a returns center closest to the customer.
- In
Step 114, the returns provider receives the package from the carrier. The returns provider scans the return label on the package and weighs the package. Any special shipping flags or indicia are entered at this time. In this manner, the returns provider receives multiple packages, which may be items originating from multiple merchants, throughout a daily course of business. - In a process known as “manifesting”, the returns provider calculates the shipping charges due to the carrier and electronically manifests the carrier. Typically, this is done on a daily basis. In the example of this description, the returns provider pays the carrier, and is compensated by the merchant for carrier costs and other services.
- The returns provider then sorts the packages by merchant, again using data printed on
return label 20, and collects the packages associated with each merchant. The final destination code is encoded on the return label, and may also be printed in human readable form. For large volume merchants, the destination code may be associated with a package chute and/or a docking door. - The returns provider may also provide “value added” services for the benefit of the merchant, such as notification of the return to merchant or notification to the customer of receipt of the package. For example, the returns provider may use the scanned return label information to notify the customer and/or the merchant that the package has been received.
- In
Step 116, after aggregating the packages for each merchant, the returns provider further ships them in accordance with whatever policies are specified for that merchant. For example, the returns provider may palletize shipments back to the merchant. The return label data is used to create a bill of lading, with data such as pallet counts, package counts, and shipment weight. - In
Step 118, the package is handled according to the disposition policy of the merchant, such as by being returned to stock, sent to a re-seller, liquidator, or otherwise disposed. - A
processing center 119 is used to collect data scanned from return labels, and to process the returns. Theprocessing center 119 includes computer processing equipment, including computers, data storage, and networking equipment, appropriate for communication of data to and from returns centers, merchants, and customer, as appropriate. The computing equipment is programmed to fulfill the various data processing services described herein. Theprocessing center 119 may also provide a web page or other network-accessible data source, accessible by customers for obtaining information about returns and data for printing return labels. As explained below, theprocessing center 119 is further used to match data on the return label to merchant rules, which may specify routing of the package or other rules for handling the return. - FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a
return label 20, suitable for use with the merchandise return method of FIG. 1. In the example of FIG. 2, the carrier is the USPS.Return label 20 incorporates data appropriate for the merchandise return service offered by the USPS, as well as data used for additional services provided by the returns provider. As stated above, other or additional carriers having the equivalent of postage due capabilities could be used, in which case,return label 20 would be modified to comply with the requirements of those carriers. - The customer's
address 21 is printed on the upper left corner oflabel 20. This address matches the original delivery address. - The
visual flag 22 is a human readable code, that can be used for various purposes. In the example of this description,flag 22 is a destination code that indicates a final package destination. Examples of final destinations are a merchant's warehouse, a liquidator, or a warranty, recall or repair center. This destination code matches a destination code embedded inbarcode 25. In other embodiments,flag 22 could correlate to any sort of delivery “rule”. As another example,visual flag 22 could indicate a quality of service, such as whether the package is to expedited or held for some reason. Orflag 22, could indicate the contents of the package, such as whether it is “high value” for special handling.Flag 22 permits the package to be manually sorted at the returns center for subsequent routing. In general, these examples are merchant-specific, in the sense that they represent data specific to the merchant and returns processing rules. - The
merchandise return rectangle 23 is specific to the carrier and pertains to the relationship between the carrier and the returns provider. In the example of this description, it states the USPS permit information of the returns provider. - The
delivery address 24 is, as explained above, the address of a delivery location that is geographically nearest the customer. This determination of this address is dependent on the customer's postal code, as specified during the transaction leading to the return (such as the purchase transaction). As stated above, the delivery address could be a carrier center, such as a USPS bulk mail center, where it is held for pickup by the returns provider. -
Barcode 25 is a dynamically generated machine-readable code that is based on unique information about the specific transaction involving the item(s) being returned. An example of barcode data is described below, but in general, the barcode data provides data forinformation servers 119 so that various “value added” returns processing tasks may be performed, such as manifesting of shipping charges, notifications to the customer and/or merchant, and final disposition of the returned item. - The barcode data permits the returns center to correlate the returned item back to the transaction with the customer. One type of correlation is an invoice number, as indicated by the example below.
-
Barcode 25 may comprise various alphanumeric or numeric only formats. Various other types of machine readable coding could be used as an alternative to bar-coding, such as other types of optical scan data or radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging. The coding may be printed or may be some other format, such as the electronic circuitry used in an RFID tag. - The “postage due”
insignia 26, including the horizontal bars 26 a, indicates to the customer and the carrier that shipping charges are to be paid by the recipient. -
Barcode 25 is a “third party barcode” in the sense that need not be specified by the carrier, which in this case, is the USPS. Although not shown in FIG. 2,return label 20 may have one or more additional barcodes, for example a barcode containing data for the carrier's use, such as for carrier tracking or return confirmation. - FIG. 3 illustrates a data string that is an example of the contents of the
barcode 25 of FIG. 2. The example of FIG. 3 has 24 positions, each with an alphanumeric character. The information inbarcode 25 is “integrated” in the sense that it is contained in a single barcode or other machine readable string of data. - The
barcode 25 contains multiple data points, and contains data that is “transaction specific”, in the sense that it identifies the transaction between the customer and the merchant or other party to whom the package is being delivered. The “transaction specific” data is dynamically generated in the sense that it is generated after the original order is made, and is specific to that transaction. - In general, the barcode data points are used to process the package for purposes other than moving it from one place to another. In contrast, “carrier specific” data elsewhere on the
label 20 functions merely for shipping purposes. -
Field 1 identifies the returns provider.Field 2 identifies the package destination. -
Field 3 represents the shipping origin of the package (customer's postal code), which permits assessment of shipping charges from where the customer drops off the package (the return package origin) to the returns center (or a nearby BMC) where it is pulled from the carrier. -
Field 4 identifies the merchant from whom the item was purchased. Or, as explained above, some party other than the merchant may be involved in the transaction leading to the return, such as a warranty or repair service. -
Field 5, a selector field, may be used for various purposes, such as to identify the label type, or to identify a shipping category, such as Priority Mail or customer-paid. -
Field 6 identifies the transaction involving the returned item in some manner. As explained above, often the merchant uses this field to correlate the return label to the original order, such as by filling the field with the invoice number. This field could also be used for data such as a customer number, product SKU, or other data. - If desired, one or more of the above-described fields could be omitted and another field used to link to the same information at the returns center. For example, Field 3 (the customer's postal code) could be omitted and
Field 6 used at the returns center to dynamically link to stored data that provides the customer's postal code. In this event,barcode 25 would equivalently be considered to contain “data representing at least the origin of the package and identification of the transaction”. - It should be understood that the barcode data in the example of FIG. 3 is minimal and additional data could be easily included. Additional data points that may be included in the
barcode 25 include data points falling into categories “transaction specific”, “merchant specific”, “customer specific”, “product specific”, “trading partner”, or “disposition” data. “Transaction specific” data identifies the transaction, such as by invoice number in the case of a purchase transaction. The “merchant specific” data identifies the merchant or some characteristic of the merchant. The “customer specific” identifies the customer or some characteristic of the customer. “Product specific” data identifies the package contents, such as by SKU number. “Trading partner” data describes a trading partner of the returns center, such as a liquidator or other service provider. “Disposition” data describes a disposition rule or final destination of the returned item. - Often, the merchant directly provides the return label (or data for generating the return label) to the customer. To this end, the returns provider provides the label specifications to the merchant, as well as a delivery address data file. This data file is used to correlate each customer's postal code to the returns provider location that is closest to the customer. The data file is made available to the merchant via data network access, such as by the internet.
- In the example of FIGS. 2 and 3, the data on the returns label20 is pre-printed. In other embodiments, the customer might fill in at least some of this data. For example,
label 20 could have a predetermined format, and the customer would be directed to fill in certain information such as the customer's address, the package invoice number, or a shipping destination. However, in general, regardless whetherlabel 20 is entirely pre-printed or all or partly filled by the customer, it is deemed to have a predetermined format, and prior to being shipped by the customer, to contain certain customer data as discussed in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3. - The various data elements described above in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3 can be used to implement the various returns services described herein, and some of these concepts may be implemented independently of others. For example, by using data representing the origin of the package (such as the customer's postal code), the returns center can perform reverse manifesting. By using data representing the original shipment (such as the identity of the merchant, the invoice, or the item), the returns center can dynamically route the package or notify the merchant or the customer about the status of the return.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a process of generating a return label, such as
return label 20. In the example of FIG. 4, thereturn label 20 is to be provided to the customer in the original shipment. InStep 41, the merchant enters the order information to an automated order processing system. InStep 42, the merchant determines whether the order is an exception item. InStep 43, the merchant receives BMC (bulk mail center) data, which as explained above, is used to determine the BMC closest to the customer. In other embodiments, where the carrier is not the USPS, the address of some other carrier station close to the customer is used. InSteps Steps - FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the
return label 20 by the customer. Steps 501-510 illustrates various alternative ways for the customer to obtain thelabel 20. InStep 501, the customer receives thelabel 20 with the invoice in the original shipment, as described above in connection with FIG. 4. The customer may merely detach the label (Step 509). - In
Step 502, the customer receives thelabel 20 by contacting customer service of the merchant, such as by phone call or email (Step 504). The label is then generated (Step 506) and emailed to the customer (Step 508). - In
Steps Steps 506 and 507) and the customer prints the label (Step 510). - In
Step 520, the customer prepares the return by filling out a return form and applying the return label to the package. InSteps - Steps530-536 illustrate how data from the return label can be used to facilitate tracking requests. In
Step 530, the package has been received at the returns center and scanned as described above in connection with FIG. 1. The data is stored and accessible by a tracking process, which may be part ofprocessing system 119. - In
Step 531, the customer makes a tracking request through customer service of the merchant. InStep 533, the request is processed, and the results communicated to the customer. InStep 532, the customer makes a tracking request via the merchant's website. InSteps - FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the use of
return label 20 for issuing credit to the customer. FIG. 6 is an expansion of one aspect of the returns center processing inStep 114 of FIG. 1. - In
Step 61, the package with the return label affixed is received at the returns center. It is assumed thatreturn label 20 has at least some means to correlate the package to the original order, such as an invoice number. InStep 62, the label is scanned and linked to the original order. InStep 63, the reason for the return is captured, such as by reading the return form. The reason for the return may be used to determine whether the customer is to bear shipping costs for the return, and hence the amount of credit to the customer. The return reason may be communicated to the merchant, in addition to other return information, usingprocessing system 119. InStep 64, the credit due the customer is calculated.Step 64 may involve accessing stored business rules of the merchant. InStep 65, data for implementing credit to the customer is delivered to the appropriate processing center. - FIG. 7 illustrates how the data on returns label20 can be used to implement “dynamic routing”. In
Step 71, the package is received at a returns center. InStep 72, at the returns center, usingprocessing system 119, data onbarcode 25 is linked to the merchant's specifications for routing the package to its final destination. InStep 73, the package is routed in accordance with whatever specifications are current at that time. For example, the original shipment data may indicate that a package contains a seasonal item. At the end of the season, these packages may then be routed to an outlet destination rather than a re-stock destination. As another example, for a returns center that handles packages for more than one merchant, the original shipment information might merely identify the merchant. The returns center can then match the packages of that merchant to the current rules for that merchant, such as by routing all packages to a particular destination.
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/659,465 US20040193436A1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2003-09-10 | Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US44614203P | 2003-02-10 | 2003-02-10 | |
US10/659,465 US20040193436A1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2003-09-10 | Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040193436A1 true US20040193436A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 |
Family
ID=32994329
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/659,465 Abandoned US20040193436A1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2003-09-10 | Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding |
US10/745,096 Active 2029-11-19 US9033230B2 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2003-12-23 | Reverse manifesting by returns service provider |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/745,096 Active 2029-11-19 US9033230B2 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2003-12-23 | Reverse manifesting by returns service provider |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20040193436A1 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040143518A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2004-07-22 | Newgistics, Inc. | On-line rules-based return processing |
US20060149577A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-06 | Newgistics, Inc. | System and method for the customized processing of returned merchandise |
US20070299791A1 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2007-12-27 | Dennis Mack | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns |
US20090164338A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Virtual Shelf With Single-Product Choice and Automatic Multiple-Vendor Selection |
US20090164273A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Product distribution system and method thereof |
US20090164339A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | 3d product display on internet with content or transaction data on back of image |
US20090164333A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for integrated payment and shipping information |
US20090164315A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Software System for Decentralizing eCommerce With Single Page Buy |
US20090164383A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for dynamic product pricing |
US7617133B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2009-11-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit |
US20110029429A1 (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2011-02-03 | Psi Systems, Inc. | System and method for processing a mailing label |
US8156007B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2012-04-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns |
US8620749B2 (en) | 2011-06-20 | 2013-12-31 | Glyde Corporation | Customized offers for E-commerce |
US9639822B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2017-05-02 | Psi Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting a mailed item |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8036905B2 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2011-10-11 | Newgistics, Inc. | Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products |
US8725656B1 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2014-05-13 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Freight rate manager |
US8321356B2 (en) * | 2000-05-18 | 2012-11-27 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | System and method for calculating real-time costing information |
US20040193438A1 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2004-09-30 | Stashluk Edward J. | Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning) |
US20070170716A1 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-07-26 | Cerkleski James J | Return label and tracking system |
US20080126218A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-05-29 | La La Media, Inc. | System and method for providing shipping services |
WO2008005581A2 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2008-01-10 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Compiled data for software applications |
US10134003B1 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2018-11-20 | Versata Development Group, Inc. | Multiple data source product inventory, disposition, and order management system |
US20090037271A1 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Anthony Jeremiah Bayne | Recommending the additional purchase of a lesser included part of an item, when the item is selected for purchase and is not to be delivered via the internet |
DE102007057985A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2009-03-19 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for transporting objects by means of marked containers |
US8489472B2 (en) * | 2008-05-08 | 2013-07-16 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Proactive monitoring and intervention capabilities in a package delivery system |
US8918341B2 (en) * | 2013-03-06 | 2014-12-23 | United States Postal Service | System and method for international merchandise return service |
US20160232487A1 (en) * | 2015-02-11 | 2016-08-11 | Ben Yonker | Package Delivery System, Service, Method and Application |
EP3292521A4 (en) | 2015-05-04 | 2018-09-19 | United States Postal Service | System and method for processing items for international distribution |
WO2019083890A1 (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2019-05-02 | Klearexpress Corporation | Delivering international shipped items |
US11281850B2 (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2022-03-22 | A9.Com, Inc. | System and method for self-filing customs entry forms |
US11392958B2 (en) * | 2018-07-11 | 2022-07-19 | Brightstar Corp. | Reverse logistics system for mobile devices and method |
US11157917B2 (en) | 2018-08-21 | 2021-10-26 | Shoppertrak Rct Corporation | Self-service product return using computer vision and artificial intelligence |
US10846678B2 (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2020-11-24 | Sensormatic Electronics, LLC | Self-service product return using computer vision and Artificial Intelligence |
US11314552B1 (en) * | 2020-12-08 | 2022-04-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic determination of reverse logistics |
Citations (83)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2001A (en) * | 1841-03-12 | Sawmill | ||
US10634A (en) * | 1854-03-14 | Movable tapering nozzle for the exhaust-pipes oe locomotives | ||
US23496A (en) * | 1859-04-05 | Improvement in bands for binding grain, hemp | ||
US32147A (en) * | 1861-04-23 | Clothes-drier | ||
US32143A (en) * | 1861-04-23 | Improvement in machines for dressing the leaves of agave americana | ||
US32573A (en) * | 1861-06-18 | Railroad-switch | ||
US32612A (en) * | 1861-06-25 | Hydraulic jack | ||
US37247A (en) * | 1862-12-23 | Improvement in reversible neckscarfs | ||
US47315A (en) * | 1865-04-18 | Improvement in mechanical movements | ||
US95306A (en) * | 1869-09-28 | Improvement in hoes | ||
US128915A (en) * | 1872-07-09 | Improvement in photographic camera-stands | ||
US138356A (en) * | 1873-04-29 | Improvement in billiard-cushions | ||
US152093A (en) * | 1874-06-16 | Improvement in railway-car brakes | ||
US178076A (en) * | 1876-05-30 | Improvement in metallic girders | ||
US684268A (en) * | 1901-05-27 | 1901-10-08 | Fritz H Koelling | Alining-bar for railway-tracks. |
US5515447A (en) * | 1994-06-07 | 1996-05-07 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for locating an acquisition target in two-dimensional images by detecting symmetry in two different directions |
US5715399A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1998-02-03 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Secure method and system for communicating a list of credit card numbers over a non-secure network |
US5715314A (en) * | 1994-10-24 | 1998-02-03 | Open Market, Inc. | Network sales system |
US5724424A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1998-03-03 | Open Market, Inc. | Digital active advertising |
US5727163A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1998-03-10 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Secure method for communicating credit card data when placing an order on a non-secure network |
US5812668A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-09-22 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US5815657A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1998-09-29 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic authorization utilizing an authorization instrument |
US5828840A (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 1998-10-27 | Verifone, Inc. | Server for starting client application on client if client is network terminal and initiating client application on server if client is non network terminal |
US5848399A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1998-12-08 | Burke; Raymond R. | Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home |
US5850446A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-12-15 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for virtual point of sale processing utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture |
US5860068A (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 1999-01-12 | Petabyte Corporation | Method and system for custom manufacture and delivery of a data product |
US5878139A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1999-03-02 | Citibank, N.A. | Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution |
US5889863A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-03-30 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for remote virtual point of sale processing utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US5899980A (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 1999-05-04 | Trivnet Ltd. | Retail method over a wide area network |
US5937394A (en) * | 1996-10-03 | 1999-08-10 | Jaesent, Inc. | System and method for pseudo cash transactions with credit back |
US5934424A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-08-10 | The University Of Connecticut | Centrifugal delayed resonator pendulum absorber |
US5960411A (en) * | 1997-09-12 | 1999-09-28 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US5963949A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-10-05 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method for data gathering around forms and search barriers |
US5963916A (en) * | 1990-09-13 | 1999-10-05 | Intouch Group, Inc. | Network apparatus and method for preview of music products and compilation of market data |
US5963924A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1999-10-05 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for the use of payment instrument holders and payment instruments in network electronic commerce |
US5970469A (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1999-10-19 | Supermarkets Online, Inc. | System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customers through a computer network |
US5978774A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 1999-11-02 | Nintendo Of American Inc. | Electronic registration system for product transactions |
US5983208A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-11-09 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for handling transaction results in a gateway payment architecture utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US5987132A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-11-16 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for conditionally accepting a payment method utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture |
US5987140A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1999-11-16 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for secure network electronic payment and credit collection |
US5984508A (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 1999-11-16 | Aveo, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for product return of software and other information |
US5999924A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-12-07 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and apparatus for producing sequenced queries |
US6002767A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-12-14 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for a modular gateway server architecture |
US6006225A (en) * | 1998-06-15 | 1999-12-21 | Amazon.Com | Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches |
US6016484A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 2000-01-18 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic payment instrument and certification of payment and credit collection utilizing a payment |
US6016480A (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2000-01-18 | Image Data, Llc | Merchandise return fraud prevention system and method |
US6029150A (en) * | 1996-10-04 | 2000-02-22 | Certco, Llc | Payment and transactions in electronic commerce system |
US6085172A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2000-07-04 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions |
US6188994B1 (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 2001-02-13 | Netcraft Corporation | Internet billing method |
US6192347B1 (en) * | 1992-10-28 | 2001-02-20 | Graff/Ross Holdings | System and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components |
US6246997B1 (en) * | 1998-03-26 | 2001-06-12 | International Business Machines Corp. | Electronic commerce site with query interface |
US20010032147A1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2001-10-18 | Siegel Philip S. | Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products |
US20010037247A1 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2001-11-01 | Enhance, Inc. | Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services, and exchange and escrow services |
US6321211B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2001-11-20 | Richfx, Inc. | Methods and systems for electronically accepting and exchanging an online gift |
US20010047315A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2001-11-29 | Siegel Philip S. | System and method for single-action returns of remotely purchased merchandise |
US6327576B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2001-12-04 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for managing expiration-dated products utilizing an electronic receipt |
US20020010689A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2002-01-24 | Andrew Tibbs | Method and system for generating and transmitting electronic shipping return labels |
US20020032573A1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2002-03-14 | Williams Daniel F. | Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service enterprise parcel shipping management |
US20020032612A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2002-03-14 | Williams Daniel F. | Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service parcel returns shipping management |
US20020077976A1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-20 | John Meyer | Bar coded bill payment system and method |
US20020082920A1 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2002-06-27 | Kermit Austin | System and methods for providing a multi-merchant loyalty program |
US20020083007A1 (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2002-06-27 | Sutherland Andrew V. | System and method for distributing postage over a public network, enabling efficient printing of postal indicia on items to be mailed and authenticating the printed indicia |
US20020095306A1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-07-18 | Smith Joshua R. | Personal mail piece tracing and tracking mechanism |
US20020128915A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2002-09-12 | Enhance, Inc. | Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services |
US6453352B1 (en) * | 1997-07-14 | 2002-09-17 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Integrated electronic commerce system and method |
US20020138356A1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Third party merchandise return system |
US20020152093A1 (en) * | 2001-03-14 | 2002-10-17 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | System and method for initiating returns over a network |
US20020178076A1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2002-11-28 | Ross Frederick L. | Local returns of remotely purchased merchandise with return code validation |
US6497408B1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2002-12-24 | Walker Digital, Llc | System and method for conducting and playing a supplemental lottery game |
US20030023496A1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-01-30 | De Mol Van Otterloo Maarten Joost | Method, computer programme, and device of handling data to be used for returning items |
US6526393B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2003-02-25 | Robert Alan Fredman | Time controlled pre-paid delivery |
US6536659B1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2003-03-25 | Returns Online, Inc. | Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources |
US6547136B1 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2003-04-15 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | Verifiable carrier payment method for returning merchandise |
US20030105704A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Sundel Michael B. | Method and apparatus for facilitating shipment of packages |
US6616189B2 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2003-09-09 | Premier Print & Services Group, Inc. | Sequentially placed shipping and packing label system |
US20040073435A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | Walter Rosenbaum | Method for handling return requested items |
US6757663B1 (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2004-06-29 | Nintendo Of America | Electronic registration system for product transactions |
US20040128265A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2004-07-01 | Holtz Lyn M. | Return mechandise processing system |
US6865560B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-03-08 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for reporting carrier delivery status to a mailer |
US20050203809A1 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2005-09-15 | Lowe's Companies, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales |
US6974928B2 (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2005-12-13 | Breakthrough Logistics Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient package delivery and storage |
US6980962B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2005-12-27 | Quixtar Investments, Inc. | Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity |
US7197475B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2007-03-27 | Catalog City, Inc. | Multi-vendor internet commerce system for e-commerce applications and methods therefor |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US60000A (en) * | 1866-11-27 | Philandek haklow | ||
US5943424A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-08-24 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System, method and article of manufacture for processing a plurality of transactions from a single initiation point on a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US7797164B2 (en) | 1996-10-02 | 2010-09-14 | Nintendo Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for enabling purchasers of products to obtain return information and to initiate product returns via an on-line network connection |
US6015167A (en) * | 1998-08-14 | 2000-01-18 | United Technologies Corporation | System and method of employing a single bar code for coordinating shipping and receiving information |
EP0999510A3 (en) | 1998-11-02 | 2003-10-22 | Ncr International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for automated item return processing |
JP2002541035A (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2002-12-03 | ユナイテッド パーセル サービス オブ アメリカ インコーポレイテッド | Internet parcel shipping system and method |
US20020010634A1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2002-01-24 | Anthony Roman | Reverse logistics processing |
US7062473B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2006-06-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and process for providing postal discounting |
US20010032141A1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2001-10-18 | Drattell Eric M. | Method of and apparatus for implementing a return center |
US20010032143A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-10-18 | Enhance, Inc. | Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services |
US20020019777A1 (en) | 1999-12-31 | 2002-02-14 | Schwab David Michael | Return of merchandize through third party locations |
WO2001071606A1 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2001-09-27 | Conxia, Inc. | Internet based warranty and repair service |
US6754637B1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2004-06-22 | Brian G. Stenz | Method and apparatus to manage network based return processing |
WO2001091012A1 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2001-11-29 | Jonathan Whitman | System and method for returning merchandise |
US7069236B1 (en) * | 2000-07-10 | 2006-06-27 | Canon Usa, Inc. | System and methods to effect return of a consumer product |
US8510171B2 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2013-08-13 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Electronic product registration system with customizable return/warranty programs |
US20040078346A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2004-04-22 | Amonette Thomas M | Return delivery charges weight averaging system |
US20030135432A1 (en) * | 2002-01-15 | 2003-07-17 | Mcintyre Henry F. | Method and apparatus for managing the delivery and return of goods |
US20030160097A1 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2003-08-28 | Gerald Steiner | Package and method for merchandise return via mail |
US7065492B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2006-06-20 | Laura Cinquini | Method and apparatus for providing a personal item drop off/return service at security checkpoints |
US7904391B2 (en) * | 2002-10-24 | 2011-03-08 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Methods of returning merchandise purchased by a customer from a vendor, computer implemented methods performed by a vendor, and return of merchandise processing apparatuses |
US20040215531A1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2004-10-28 | Stashluk Edward J. | Computer generated merchandise return labels with rules-based coding |
US20040193438A1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2004-09-30 | Stashluk Edward J. | Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning) |
-
2003
- 2003-09-10 US US10/659,465 patent/US20040193436A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-12-23 US US10/745,096 patent/US9033230B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (87)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2001A (en) * | 1841-03-12 | Sawmill | ||
US10634A (en) * | 1854-03-14 | Movable tapering nozzle for the exhaust-pipes oe locomotives | ||
US23496A (en) * | 1859-04-05 | Improvement in bands for binding grain, hemp | ||
US32147A (en) * | 1861-04-23 | Clothes-drier | ||
US32143A (en) * | 1861-04-23 | Improvement in machines for dressing the leaves of agave americana | ||
US32573A (en) * | 1861-06-18 | Railroad-switch | ||
US32612A (en) * | 1861-06-25 | Hydraulic jack | ||
US37247A (en) * | 1862-12-23 | Improvement in reversible neckscarfs | ||
US47315A (en) * | 1865-04-18 | Improvement in mechanical movements | ||
US95306A (en) * | 1869-09-28 | Improvement in hoes | ||
US128915A (en) * | 1872-07-09 | Improvement in photographic camera-stands | ||
US138356A (en) * | 1873-04-29 | Improvement in billiard-cushions | ||
US152093A (en) * | 1874-06-16 | Improvement in railway-car brakes | ||
US178076A (en) * | 1876-05-30 | Improvement in metallic girders | ||
US684268A (en) * | 1901-05-27 | 1901-10-08 | Fritz H Koelling | Alining-bar for railway-tracks. |
US5963916A (en) * | 1990-09-13 | 1999-10-05 | Intouch Group, Inc. | Network apparatus and method for preview of music products and compilation of market data |
US6192347B1 (en) * | 1992-10-28 | 2001-02-20 | Graff/Ross Holdings | System and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components |
US5848399A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1998-12-08 | Burke; Raymond R. | Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home |
US5724424A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1998-03-03 | Open Market, Inc. | Digital active advertising |
US5878139A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1999-03-02 | Citibank, N.A. | Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution |
US5515447A (en) * | 1994-06-07 | 1996-05-07 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for locating an acquisition target in two-dimensional images by detecting symmetry in two different directions |
US5715314A (en) * | 1994-10-24 | 1998-02-03 | Open Market, Inc. | Network sales system |
US5727163A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1998-03-10 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Secure method for communicating credit card data when placing an order on a non-secure network |
US5715399A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1998-02-03 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Secure method and system for communicating a list of credit card numbers over a non-secure network |
US6188994B1 (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 2001-02-13 | Netcraft Corporation | Internet billing method |
US5970469A (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1999-10-19 | Supermarkets Online, Inc. | System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customers through a computer network |
US6016484A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 2000-01-18 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic payment instrument and certification of payment and credit collection utilizing a payment |
US5815657A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1998-09-29 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic authorization utilizing an authorization instrument |
US5987140A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1999-11-16 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for secure network electronic payment and credit collection |
US5963924A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1999-10-05 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for the use of payment instrument holders and payment instruments in network electronic commerce |
US5850446A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-12-15 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for virtual point of sale processing utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture |
US5983208A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-11-09 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for handling transaction results in a gateway payment architecture utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US5812668A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-09-22 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US6002767A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-12-14 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for a modular gateway server architecture |
US5889863A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-03-30 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for remote virtual point of sale processing utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture |
US5987132A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1999-11-16 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for conditionally accepting a payment method utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture |
US5828840A (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 1998-10-27 | Verifone, Inc. | Server for starting client application on client if client is network terminal and initiating client application on server if client is non network terminal |
US6757663B1 (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2004-06-29 | Nintendo Of America | Electronic registration system for product transactions |
US5978774A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 1999-11-02 | Nintendo Of American Inc. | Electronic registration system for product transactions |
US6834268B2 (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2004-12-21 | Nintendo Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions |
US20010011231A1 (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2001-08-02 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Method and appatatus for efficient handling of product return transactions |
US6085172A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2000-07-04 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions |
US6018719A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2000-01-25 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Electronic registration system for product transactions |
US5937394A (en) * | 1996-10-03 | 1999-08-10 | Jaesent, Inc. | System and method for pseudo cash transactions with credit back |
US6029150A (en) * | 1996-10-04 | 2000-02-22 | Certco, Llc | Payment and transactions in electronic commerce system |
US5934424A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-08-10 | The University Of Connecticut | Centrifugal delayed resonator pendulum absorber |
US5984508A (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 1999-11-16 | Aveo, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for product return of software and other information |
US6453352B1 (en) * | 1997-07-14 | 2002-09-17 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Integrated electronic commerce system and method |
US5999924A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-12-07 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and apparatus for producing sequenced queries |
US6003024A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-12-14 | Amazon. Com | System and method for selecting rows from dimensional databases |
US5899980A (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 1999-05-04 | Trivnet Ltd. | Retail method over a wide area network |
US5960411A (en) * | 1997-09-12 | 1999-09-28 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US20020083007A1 (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2002-06-27 | Sutherland Andrew V. | System and method for distributing postage over a public network, enabling efficient printing of postal indicia on items to be mailed and authenticating the printed indicia |
US6016480A (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2000-01-18 | Image Data, Llc | Merchandise return fraud prevention system and method |
US5860068A (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 1999-01-12 | Petabyte Corporation | Method and system for custom manufacture and delivery of a data product |
US5963949A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-10-05 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method for data gathering around forms and search barriers |
US6246997B1 (en) * | 1998-03-26 | 2001-06-12 | International Business Machines Corp. | Electronic commerce site with query interface |
US6006225A (en) * | 1998-06-15 | 1999-12-21 | Amazon.Com | Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches |
US6980962B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2005-12-27 | Quixtar Investments, Inc. | Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity |
US7197475B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2007-03-27 | Catalog City, Inc. | Multi-vendor internet commerce system for e-commerce applications and methods therefor |
US6321211B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2001-11-20 | Richfx, Inc. | Methods and systems for electronically accepting and exchanging an online gift |
US6327576B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2001-12-04 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for managing expiration-dated products utilizing an electronic receipt |
US6526393B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2003-02-25 | Robert Alan Fredman | Time controlled pre-paid delivery |
US6865560B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-03-08 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for reporting carrier delivery status to a mailer |
US20020128915A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2002-09-12 | Enhance, Inc. | Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services |
US20010032147A1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2001-10-18 | Siegel Philip S. | Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products |
US20010037247A1 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2001-11-01 | Enhance, Inc. | Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services, and exchange and escrow services |
US6497408B1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2002-12-24 | Walker Digital, Llc | System and method for conducting and playing a supplemental lottery game |
US20010047315A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2001-11-29 | Siegel Philip S. | System and method for single-action returns of remotely purchased merchandise |
US20020032573A1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2002-03-14 | Williams Daniel F. | Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service enterprise parcel shipping management |
US20020032612A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2002-03-14 | Williams Daniel F. | Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service parcel returns shipping management |
US20020010689A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2002-01-24 | Andrew Tibbs | Method and system for generating and transmitting electronic shipping return labels |
US20020095306A1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-07-18 | Smith Joshua R. | Personal mail piece tracing and tracking mechanism |
US6536659B1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2003-03-25 | Returns Online, Inc. | Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources |
US20020082920A1 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2002-06-27 | Kermit Austin | System and methods for providing a multi-merchant loyalty program |
US6547136B1 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2003-04-15 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | Verifiable carrier payment method for returning merchandise |
US20020077976A1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-20 | John Meyer | Bar coded bill payment system and method |
US20020152093A1 (en) * | 2001-03-14 | 2002-10-17 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | System and method for initiating returns over a network |
US6974928B2 (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2005-12-13 | Breakthrough Logistics Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient package delivery and storage |
US20020138356A1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Third party merchandise return system |
US20020178076A1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2002-11-28 | Ross Frederick L. | Local returns of remotely purchased merchandise with return code validation |
US6616189B2 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2003-09-09 | Premier Print & Services Group, Inc. | Sequentially placed shipping and packing label system |
US20030023496A1 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-01-30 | De Mol Van Otterloo Maarten Joost | Method, computer programme, and device of handling data to be used for returning items |
US20030105704A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Sundel Michael B. | Method and apparatus for facilitating shipment of packages |
US20040128265A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2004-07-01 | Holtz Lyn M. | Return mechandise processing system |
US20040073435A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | Walter Rosenbaum | Method for handling return requested items |
US20050203809A1 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2005-09-15 | Lowe's Companies, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales |
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040143518A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2004-07-22 | Newgistics, Inc. | On-line rules-based return processing |
US8380584B2 (en) | 2000-03-24 | 2013-02-19 | Newgistics, Inc. | On-line rules-based return processing |
US7617133B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2009-11-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit |
US9984351B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2018-05-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit |
US8533126B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2013-09-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit |
US7958061B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2011-06-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit |
US8156007B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2012-04-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic determination of item returns |
US20060149577A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-06 | Newgistics, Inc. | System and method for the customized processing of returned merchandise |
US11645687B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2023-05-09 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns |
US10861067B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2020-12-08 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns |
US20070299791A1 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2007-12-27 | Dennis Mack | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns |
US20110173129A1 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2011-07-14 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and Methods for International Dutiable Returns |
US7937331B2 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2011-05-03 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns |
US20090164315A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Software System for Decentralizing eCommerce With Single Page Buy |
US8589253B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-11-19 | Glyde Corporation | Software system for decentralizing eCommerce with single page buy |
US20090164338A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Virtual Shelf With Single-Product Choice and Automatic Multiple-Vendor Selection |
US8244590B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2012-08-14 | Glyde Corporation | Software system for decentralizing ecommerce with single page buy |
US20090164383A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for dynamic product pricing |
US8447645B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-05-21 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for dynamic product pricing |
US20090164333A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for integrated payment and shipping information |
US7899716B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2011-03-01 | Glyde Corporation | System and method for integrated payment and shipping information |
US20090164273A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | Product distribution system and method thereof |
US8630923B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2014-01-14 | Glyde Corporation | Virtual shelf with single-product choice and automatic multiple-vendor selection |
US20090164339A1 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Glyde Corporation | 3d product display on internet with content or transaction data on back of image |
US9639822B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2017-05-02 | Psi Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting a mailed item |
US20110029429A1 (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2011-02-03 | Psi Systems, Inc. | System and method for processing a mailing label |
US11861945B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2024-01-02 | Psi Systems, Inc. | System and method for facilitating transaction data retrieval |
US8620749B2 (en) | 2011-06-20 | 2013-12-31 | Glyde Corporation | Customized offers for E-commerce |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20040194056A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 |
US9033230B2 (en) | 2015-05-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20040193436A1 (en) | Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding | |
US20040193438A1 (en) | Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning) | |
US20040215531A1 (en) | Computer generated merchandise return labels with rules-based coding | |
USRE42177E1 (en) | Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources | |
US11645687B2 (en) | Systems and methods for international dutiable returns | |
US20040181310A1 (en) | Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (data communications) | |
US20170316293A1 (en) | System and method for arranging shipment and insurance for an item | |
US20080255863A1 (en) | Method and computer program product for providing paperless customs documentation | |
US7426484B2 (en) | Consolidated shipping and distribution of multiple orders with returns | |
US7617133B1 (en) | Dynamic determination of item returns during transit | |
US6549891B1 (en) | Method for managing inventory | |
US6970855B2 (en) | Method and system for enterprise-level unassisted customer shipping | |
CA2537770C (en) | Return-shipping label usage | |
US20050149413A1 (en) | Systems and methods for virtual inventory management | |
KR20050008925A (en) | A method of managing a process of packing goods | |
US20060089869A1 (en) | Systems and methods for automated reporting of vendor non-compliance | |
JP3479881B2 (en) | Strategic Alliance Information Management System | |
JP2002207801A (en) | Method and system for managing transportation charge for international cargo | |
CN110852682A (en) | Package processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
US20070246523A1 (en) | Metered mail and online postage tracking | |
US20220327477A1 (en) | Parcel and freight shipment management system and process | |
US20210304116A1 (en) | Systems and methods for distributing items within a distribution network | |
JPH11175634A (en) | Physical distribution management system | |
Nichols | Computer Supplies Overnight: Distribution Operations At Daisytek International, Inc | |
Stukhart | Bar code standards |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NEWGISTICS, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STASHLUK, JR., EDWARD J.;STEVENS, MICHAEL J.;MILCH, JENNIFER A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015433/0695;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040330 TO 20040518 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COMERICA BANK, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0541 Effective date: 20060214 Owner name: COMERICA BANK,CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0541 Effective date: 20060214 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COMERICA BANK, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0958 Effective date: 20060214 Owner name: COMERICA BANK,CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0958 Effective date: 20060214 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NEWGISTICS, INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:COMERICA BANK;REEL/FRAME:025937/0166 Effective date: 20110307 |