Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040024309 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/427,472
Publication date5 Feb 2004
Filing date30 Apr 2003
Priority date15 Sep 1994
Also published asDE69531994T2, EP0951874A2, EP0951874A3, US5676673, US5800352, US5803089, US5873822, US6175756, US6341231, US6687531, US6694167, US6738656, US8473026, US20060036151, US20070083107
Publication number10427472, 427472, US 2004/0024309 A1, US 2004/024309 A1, US 20040024309 A1, US 20040024309A1, US 2004024309 A1, US 2004024309A1, US-A1-20040024309, US-A1-2004024309, US2004/0024309A1, US2004/024309A1, US20040024309 A1, US20040024309A1, US2004024309 A1, US2004024309A1
InventorsMaurice Ferre, Peter Jakab, James Tieman
Original AssigneeFerre Maurice R., Jakab Peter D., Tieman James S.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a patient's body
US 20040024309 A1
Abstract
A system is disclosed for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a patient's body and for displaying at least one of a plurality of prerecorded images of said body responsive to the position of said medical instrument. In one embodiment the system includes a reference unit secured from movement with respect to the patient's body such that said reference unit is substantially immobile with respect to a target operation site. The system also includes a remote unit for attachment to the medical instrument. A field generator may be associated with one of the units for generating a position characteristic field in an area including the target operation site. One or more field sensors may be associated with either of the units responsive to the presence of the position characteristic field for producing one or more sensor output signals representative of said sensed field. A position detector in communication with the sensor output signal produces position data representative of the position of the remote unit with respect to the reference unit. An output display in communication with the position detector displays at least one of the prerecorded images responsive to the position data.
Images(13)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(29)
We claim:
1. Apparatus for securing a reference unit to a patient's head, said apparatus comprising reference unit mounting means for mounting said reference unit to said apparatus, said reference unit for use in monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to said patient's head, and a nose bridge mounting element and two ear-mounting elements for attaching said reference unit to said patient's head.
2. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit mounting means includes means for releasably attaching said reference unit to said apparatus.
3. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said nose and ear mounting elements are disposed on a distal end of an elongated mounting arm.
4. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said apparatus further includes an elongated center member and two side members, each of said members being centrally attached to one another at first ends thereof, and said nose bridge mounting element being attached to said center member at a second end thereof and each of said ear mounting elements being attached to a respective side member at second ends thereof.
5. Apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein each of said center and side members is made of a structurally resilient material and is capable of accommodating a plurality of sizes of patient heads.
6. Apparatus as claimed in claim 5, wherein said structurally resilient material is plastic.
7. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes a field generator for generating a three dimensional position characteristic field.
8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 7, wherein said reference unit further includes a reference sensor for generating a feedback reference signal.
9. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes an electromagnetic field generator for generating an electromagnetic field.
10. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes a field sensor for sensing a three dimensional position characteristic field and for producing a sensor output responsive to the presence of said sensed field.
11. Apparatus as claimed in claim 10, wherein said reference unit further includes a reference sensor for generating an error detection signal.
12. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes an electromagnetic field sensor responsive to the presence of an electromagnetic field for producing a sensor output signal representative of said sensed electromagnetic field.
13. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes a signal transmitter for transmitting a reference signal to a signal receiver, said reference signal for use in detecting the position of said reference unit with respect to said signal receiver by comparing said signal to a second transmitted signal.
14. Apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein said reference unit further includes a second signal transmitter for transmitting said second transmitted signal.
15. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reference unit includes a signal receiver for receiving a reference signal from a signal transmitter, said reference signal for use in detecting the position of said reference unit with respect to said signal transmitter by comparing said signal to a second transmitted signal.
16. Apparatus as claimed in claim 15, wherein said reference unit further includes a second signal receiver for receiving said second transmitted signal.
17. Apparatus for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a patient's body, said apparatus including a reference unit removably attached to said medical instrument.
18. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit is removably insertable into said medical instrument.
19. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said medical instrument is an aspirating device.
20. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes a field generator for generating a three dimensional position characteristic field.
21. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit further includes a reference sensor for generating a feedback reference signal.
22. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes an electromagnetic field generator for generating an electromagnetic field.
23. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes a field sensor for sensing a three dimensional position characteristic field and for producing a sensor output responsive to the presence of said sensed field.
24. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit further includes a reference sensor for generating an error detection signal.
25. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes an electromagnetic field sensor responsive to the presence of an electromagnetic field for producing a sensor output signal representative of said sensed electromagnetic field.
26. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes a signal transmitter for transmitting a reference signal to a signal receiver, said reference signal for use in detecting the position of said reference unit with respect to said signal receiver by comparing said signal to a second transmitted signal.
27. Apparatus as claimed in claim 26, wherein said reference unit further includes a second signal transmitter for transmitting said second transmitted signal.
28. Apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reference unit includes a signal receiver for receiving a reference signal from a signal transmitter, said reference signal for use in detecting the position of said reference unit with respect to said signal transmitter by comparing said signal to a second transmitted signal.
29. Apparatus as claimed in claim 28, wherein said reference unit further includes a second signal receiver for receiving said second transmitted signal.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The invention relates to computer assisted medical surgery and in particular relates to systems for displaying prerecorded visual images during surgical operations.
  • [0002]
    Presently available medical imaging techniques such as CAT (Computerized Axial Tomography), MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), and PET (Position Emission Tomography), are known to be helpful not only for diagnostic purposes, but also for providing assistance during surgery. Prerecorded images may be displayed during surgical operations to provide the surgeon with illustrative reference mappings of pertinent portions of a patient's body.
  • [0003]
    Tracking systems for monitoring the position of a medical instrument have also been developed for use with image display systems. Generally, as the surgeon moves the medical instrument with respect to the patient's body, associated prerecorded images are displayed responsive to the movement of the instrument. Such tracking systems typically involve either the use of a passive articulated arm attached to the medical instrument, optical detection or ultrasonic detection.
  • [0004]
    Tracking systems using a passive articulated mechanical arm attached to a medical instrument are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,186,174 and 5,230,623. Generally, as the surgeon moves the surgical instrument with respect to the patient's body, micro recorders at the joints of the articulated arm record the respective amounts of movement of each arm member. The outputs of the micro recorders are processed and the position of the medical instrument with respect to the base of the articulated arm is thereby monitored. One or more prerecorded images are then displayed responsive to the movement of the surgical instrument. Such articulated arm tracking systems, however, require that the instrument be attached to a cumbersome mechanical arm. Also, although free movement of the tip of the arm in three dimensional space may be theoretically possible, the surgeon might experience difficulty positioning the instrument at certain locations and in desired orientations within the body.
  • [0005]
    Tracking systems using optical detection (video cameras and/or CCDs (Charge Coupled Devices)) have been proposed for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a reference unit as mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 5,230,623. Such systems, however, require that the reference unit and the instrument both be within the view of the camera. This not only limits the movement of the surgical staff, but also requires that at least a portion of the medical instrument remain outside the patient's body.
  • [0006]
    Tracking systems using ultrasonic detection are generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,230,623. Such systems, however, are disclosed to be used in a fashion similar to optical detection, i.e., triangulation of transmitted signals. The transmitted signals are sent from one or more senders to associated receiver(s), and the distances travelled by the signals are determined from either timing or amplitude changes. Again, the transmission path must remain unobstructed.
  • [0007]
    A further shortcoming common to each of the above tracking systems is that the patient must not move during the operation. Although the patient is likely to be generally anesthetized, the patient's body may be inadvertently moved by the surgical staff, or the surgeon may want to move the body for better positioning. If the body is moved after the tracking system has been initialized, then the tracking will be misaligned.
  • [0008]
    There is a need therefore for a system for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a patient's body that avoids these and other shortcomings of present devices.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0009]
    The invention relates to a system for monitoring the position of a medical instrument with respect to a patient's body and for displaying at least one of a plurality of prerecorded images of the body responsive to the position of the medical instrument. The system includes a reference unit, a remote unit, a position characteristic field generator, a field sensor, a position detection unit and an output display.
  • [0010]
    In one embodiment, the reference unit is secured from movement with respect to at least a portion of the patient's body such that the reference unit is substantially immobile with respect to a target operation site. The remote unit is attached to the medical instrument. The field generator is associated with one of the reference or remote units and generates a position characteristic field, such as a multiplexed magnetic field, in an area including the target operation site. The field sensor is associated with the other of the reference or remote units and is responsive to the presence of the field for producing a sensor output signal representative of the sensed field.
  • [0011]
    The position detection unit is in communication with the sensor-output signal and produces position data representative of the position of the remote unit with respect to the reference unit. The output display unit is in communication with the position detection unit for displaying at least one of the prerecorded images responsive to the position data.
  • [0012]
    The system further may include a registration unit in communication with a storage unit and the position data. The storage unit stores the plurality of prerecorded images of the body. Each prerecorded image is representative of a planar region within the body such that the plurality of planar regions represented by the prerecorded images define a first coordinate system. The registration unit correlates the position data of a second coordinate system (as defined by the position detection unit) with the plurality of prerecorded images of the first coordinate system, and identifies a desired prerecorded image associated with the position of the remote unit with respect to the patient's body.
  • [0013]
    The invention also relates to a reference unit that is attachable to a patient's head, and a medical instrument, such as an aspirating device, that is adapted to removably receive a position detection unit.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    The following detailed description of the invention may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a system of an embodiment of the invention;
  • [0015]
    [0015]FIG. 2 is a front view of the headset unit shown in FIG. 1;
  • [0016]
    [0016]FIG. 3 is a side view of the headset unit shown in FIG. 1 taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 2;
  • [0017]
    [0017]FIG. 4 is a rear view of a portion of the headset shown in FIG. 1 taken along line 4-4 of FIG. 3;
  • [0018]
    [0018]FIG. 5 is an exploded side view of the surgical instrument and remote sensor shown in FIG. 1;
  • [0019]
    [0019]FIG. 6 is an end view of the assembled surgical instrument and sensor shown in FIG. 1 taken along line 6-6 of FIG. 5;
  • [0020]
    [0020]FIG. 7 is a side view of another embodiment of a surgical instrument and sensor unit of the invention in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention;
  • [0021]
    [0021]FIG. 8 is a side view of the surgical instrument shown in FIG. 7;
  • [0022]
    [0022]FIG. 9 is an end view of the surgical instrument shown in FIG. 7;
  • [0023]
    [0023]FIG. 10 is an elevational view of the surgical instrument shown in FIG. 7;
  • [0024]
    [0024]FIG. 11 is a plan view of a remote sensor unit that is adapted to be used with the surgical instrument shown in FIGS. 7-10;
  • [0025]
    [0025]FIG. 12 is a side view of another surgical instrument together with the removable remote sensor unit shown in FIGS. 7 and 11;
  • [0026]
    [0026]FIG. 13 is a diagrammatic illustration of the system employed to prerecord CT images for use with the system of the invention;
  • [0027]
    [0027]FIG. 14 is diagrammatic illustration of a manual registration process of the invention;
  • [0028]
    [0028]FIG. 15 is an elevational view of the components of a fiducial marker system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
  • [0029]
    [0029]FIG. 16 is a plan view of the components of the system of FIG. 15 taken along line 16-16 thereof;
  • [0030]
    [0030]FIG. 17 is a flowchart-of the process of using the fiducial marker system of FIG. 15;
  • [0031]
    [0031]FIG. 18 is a side view of a headset unit in accordance with another embodiment of the invention;
  • [0032]
    [0032]FIG. 19 is an end view of the headset unit shown in FIG. 18 taken along line 19-19 thereof;
  • [0033]
    [0033]FIG. 20 is a plan view of a transmitter that is adapted to be used with the headset unit shown in FIG. 18;
  • [0034]
    [0034]FIG. 21 is a partial view of a portion of the headset shown in FIG. 16 taken along line 21-21 thereof;
  • [0035]
    [0035]FIG. 22 is a flow chart of an automatic registration process of the invention;
  • [0036]
    [0036]FIG. 23 is a diagrammatic view of the position detection components in accordance with a system of the invention;
  • [0037]
    [0037]FIGS. 24 and 25 are diagrammatic views of the principles of an error detection calculation process in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
  • [0038]
    [0038]FIGS. 26 and 27 are diagrammatic views of the errors detected by the process of FIGS. 24 an 25;
  • [0039]
    [0039]FIG. 28 is a diagrammatic view of another embodiment of the invention; and
  • [0040]
    FIGS. 29-32 are diagrammatic views of further embodiments of systems of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0041]
    As shown in FIG. 1, a system 10 of the invention includes a headset 12 mounted on a patient 14, a medical instrument 16, a control system 18 and a display 20. The control system 18 includes a position-detection unit 22, a registration unit 24, and an image storage unit 26.
  • [0042]
    The image storage unit 26 stores sets of prerecorded images such as CAT, MRI or PET scan images. Each set of images may be taken along, for example, coronal, sagittal or axial directions. As shown in FIG. 1, the display 20 shows three images, a coronal image 21 a, a sagittal image 21 b, and an axial image 21 c. Text information may also be displayed as shown at 21 d in FIG. 1.
  • [0043]
    As further shown in FIGS. 2-4, the headset 12 includes two ear mounts 28 on side members 30, and a nose bridge mount 32 on a center member 34. The headset 12 should be made of a resilient plastic such that it may be snugly attached to a patient's head, and may be provided in a variety of sizes. A primary objective of the headset is to provide a reference unit that may be easily attached to and removed from a patient's head wherein the headset may be repeatedly reattached in exactly the same place with a high degree of accuracy. In other embodiments, the side members 30 of the headset 12 may be rotationally attached to one another and the ear mounts 28 may be biased toward one another. Further, the center member 34 may be rotatable with respect to the side members 30 and biased toward the ear mounts 28 as well.
  • [0044]
    The headset 12 shown in FIGS. 1-4 also includes a reference unit 36 connected to the position detection unit 22 via communication lines 38. The reference unit 36 may be releasably attached to the headset 12 by conventional clamp or fastening means. In one embodiment the reference unit 36 may include a position characteristic field generator capable of generating a multidirectional field in three dimensions and may involve the use of either electromagnetic or ultrasonic waves. The position characteristic field differs from the transmit/receive triangulation system, in part, because it does not rely on the comparison of one transmitted signal with another as does triangulation. This permits the path between the field generator and the remote sensor to be obstructed by materials that do not significantly alter the generated field. For example, the position of the medical instrument could be identified even when the instrument is within the patient's body when the generated field is a magnetic field. Additionally, the reference unit may also include a reference sensor 37 to provide verification of proper system operation.
  • [0045]
    In the present embodiment the field generator includes three orthogonally disposed magnetic dipoles (e.g., current loops or electromagnets), and the orthogonally disposed magnetic fields generated by each of the three dipoles are mutually distinguishable from one another (e.g., via either phase, frequency, or time division multiplexing). The near-field characteristics of the multiplexed magnetic fields may be relied upon for position detection, for example as generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,054,881. In alternate embodiments the field generator may be located somewhere other than on the headset and the headset may include two field sensors 36,37. When the distance between the sensors 36,37 is known, the second sensor may be used to act as a backup or reference check for monitoring the proper operation of the system. If the sensed fields are inconsistent then an error signal is displayed and/or sounded.
  • [0046]
    In other embodiments the headset 12 may be employed in systems based on the triangulation of signals where the reference unit 36 includes one or more signal transmitters and/or one or more signal receivers. In such a triangulation system, position detection is achieved by comparing certain characteristics of one transmitted signal with those of a second transmitted signal to determine the relative distances travelled. The transmitted signals may be electromagnetic (e.g., radio, laser light or light emitting diodes) or may be ultrasonic. The position of the patient's head with respect to the surgical instrument may thereby be monitored.
  • [0047]
    As shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 the medical instrument 16 may be an aspirating device adapted to removably receive a remote sensor 40 for detecting, for example, the field generated by the position characteristic field generator. The sensor 40 may be held inside the instrument 16 by force fit sizing or through the use of a resilient snap member in the wall opening 42. Since an aspirating device is commonly used in most surgical operations, incorporating the remote sensor into the aspirating device provides the surgeon with a convenient position detection device that does not clutter the operation site with unnecessary items. The instrument 16 may further include a second backup field sensor 41 for system error detection as discussed above with reference to the sensor 37.
  • [0048]
    The remote sensors 40,41 are removable from the aspirating device and may be interchangeably inserted into any of a variety of specially adapted surgical instruments. In the illustrated embodiment, the remote sensors 40,41 are received through an opening 42 in the proximal end of the instrument 16, and are connected to the position detection unit 22 via communication lines 44. The sensors 40,41 may also each include three orthogonally disposed dipole sensing elements for detecting the presence of the field generated by the field generator. For example, in one embodiment, the field generator and the sensors each include three orthogonally disposed electrical wire loops. The generator produces an alternating current through one generator loop at a time thus generating a time division multiplexed alternating electromagnetic field. The sensor loop signals are each processed in synchronous timing with the generator loops to produce outputs responsive to each respective alternating electromagnetic field.
  • [0049]
    The distal end of the instrument 16 includes a rigid aspirating tube 46 having a flared tip 48. The position of the tip 48 with respect to the center of the remote sensor 40 is a known constant and may be easily seen by the surgeon during surgery. The aspirating tube 46 is in fluid communication with an aspirating catheter 50 through the proximal end of the instrument 16 via internal channel 52 and a connector element 54. The aspirating catheter 50 (shown in FIG. 1) is connected to a vacuum aspirating unit (not shown).
  • [0050]
    In operation, the position detection unit monitors the position of the medical instrument 16 with respect to the reference unit 36. The registration unit 24 correlates the changes in position of the instrument 16 with the spacial orientation of the stored images. As the surgeon moves the medical instrument 16, images appear on the display 20 responsive to the position of the medical instrument 16. This permits the surgeon to always have available the coronal, sagittal, and axial views associated with the precise location of the tip 48 of the instrument 16 regardless of whether the tip 48 is inside of the patient 14. Moreover, since the field generator is attached to the patient's head, the patient is free to be moved without loss of the tracking capabilities. The display 20 may further identify the location of the tip 48 on each of the displayed images as shown at 56 in FIG. 1. In other embodiments the orientation of the aspirating tube 46 may also be identified on the displayed images. In further embodiments, a three dimensional composite image may be displayed based on the prerecorded images.
  • [0051]
    As shown in FIGS. 7-11 another embodiment of a removable remote sensor unit 58 may be used with an aspirating device 60. The sensor unit 58, including two sensors 62,64 may be removably attached to the device 60 by first engaging recesses 66 on the unit 58 with fingers 68 on the device 60. A tounge 70 on the unit 58 is then received between hinge posts 72 on the device 60, and finally secured in place by rotating the lock 74 from an open position as shown in FIG. 8 to a closed position as shown in FIG. 7. The lock 74 includes a recessed area at 76 adapted to frictionally engage the tounge 70 on the sensor unit 58.
  • [0052]
    The sensor unit 58 further includes the ability to identify which of a plurality of medical instruments is attached to the sensor unit 58 at any time. Specifically, the unit 58 includes a plurality of Hall effect transistors 78, and the medical instrument 60 includes one or more tiny permanent magnets 80. By the number and/or positioning of the magnets 80, the transistors 78 identify which of the medical instruments is attached to the sensor unit 58.
  • [0053]
    For example, if all of the transistors 78 sense the presence of a magnet 80 then the instrument 60 shown in FIGS. 7-11 is known to be attached to the sensor unit 58 since the instrument 60 includes three magnets. If only two magnets 82 are sensed then the medical instrument attached to the sensor unit 58 is a different instrument 84 as shown in FIG. 12. If no magnets are sensed then it is known that the sensor unit 58 is not attached to any medical instrument. Knowing the identity of the attached medical instrument permits the system to automatically adjust the position detection unit to compensate for the differences in instrument tip position with respect to the position of the sensors 62,64 for a variety of medical instruments. The removably engageable feature of the sensor unit not only provides versatility, but also facilitates the use of sterilized medical instruments.
  • [0054]
    As illustrated in FIGS. 13 and 14 the registration process involves two fundamental steps: 1) recording the scan images of a predetermined orientation and 2) mapping the special orientation of the position detection system onto the recorded images. For example, the orientations of the prerecorded images may be in the sagittal (i-j plane), coronal (k-j plane) and/or axial (k-i plane) as shown in FIG. 13. The images may be digitally stored and the distance between each scanned image is recorded, as are the relative orientations of each set of images. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, in alternative embodiments certain of the images may be created from other images without the need to prerecord each of the sagittal, coronal and axial views. For example, by multiplanar reformatting the sagittal and coronal images may be created from the axial images.
  • [0055]
    In one embodiment, fiducial markers 90 are placed on the patient's head 14 prior to scanning with the scanner 92. The markers then appear on certain of the scanned images, and may be located by the position detection system as shown in FIG. 14. Specifically, when each marker 90 is sequentially located, for example with the tip 48 of a medical instrument 16, the user locates the same marker on the prerecorded images by using, for example a computer mouse. The user then controls the entering of the registration data through either a computer keyboard 94, a mouse, or a foot switch. In alternative embodiments the registration unit may scan each prerecorded digital image beginning from one corner until it locates the identified marker.
  • [0056]
    In further embodiments involving the use of fiducial markers that are placed on the patient's body (e.g., face) prior to recording the scan images, fiducial markers 90′ may be adhered to intermediate adhesive strips 91 which are directly adhered to the patient's skin 93 as shown in FIGS. 15 and 16.
  • [0057]
    The fiducial markers 90′ include a radiopaque element 95 and the strips 91 include a small puncture hole or other marker 97. With reference to FIG. 17, the process of using the fiducial markers 90′ begins (step 1700) by first placing the strips 91 on the patient's skin (step 1710). The fiducial markers 90′ are then placed on the strips 91 such that the radiopaque elements 95 align with the markers 97 on the strips 91 (step 1704). The scan images are then recorded (step 1706), and the fiducial markers 90′ may then be removed from the patient (step 1708). During manual registration the surgeon or technician may locate the markers 97 with the tip of a pointer (step 1710) and thereby record the positions of the fiducial marker radiopaque elements 95 with respect to the transmitter. The use of the intermediate strips 91 not only provides increased comfort to the patient after the image scanning and prior to surgery, but also facilitates accurate registration. Since the radiopaque elements 95 were centered directly on top of the markers 93, the accuracy of registration is enhanced because the user may now locate the smaller sized markers 93 instead of more indefinitely locating a portion of the larger sized radiopaque elements 95 with the pointer tip.
  • [0058]
    Once each of the markers has been located using the position detection unit, the registration unit generates, a mapping function to translate the position detection data (in x-y-z coordinates) to the stored image orientation data (in i-j-k coordinates). In particular, the mapping equation is determined by using Powell's method as follows.
  • [0059]
    The images points are each processed as a matrix of the form [ i r j r k r ] ( 1 )
  • [0060]
    and the collected sensor points are each processed as a matrix of the form [ x s y s z s ] ( 2 )
  • [0061]
    A computer processor then iteratively calculates the optimal values for the transformation matrices [ r 11 r 12 r 13 r 21 r 22 r 23 r 31 r 32 r 33 ] and [ t x t y t z ] ( 3 )
  • [0062]
    to solve the following equation: [ i r j r k r ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 13 r 21 r 22 r 23 r 31 r 32 r 33 ] [ x s y s z s ] + [ t x t y t z ] ( 4 )
  • [0063]
    such that (ic-ii)2+(jc-ji)2+(kc-ki)2 is a minimum for the summation of all of the collected image points. The optimization method employs distance minimization, and at least three image points are required for this method.
  • [0064]
    The optimal values for the transformation matrices comprise the transformation equation and may now be used to translate the position of the medical instrument with respect to the transmitter in the x-y-z coordinate system, to the appropriate orientation of the prerecorded images in the i-j-k coordinate system.
  • [0065]
    A further embodiment of the headset of the invention may be employed in an automatic registration process. For example, as shown in FIGS. 18 and 19 another embodiment of a headset 100 of the invention includes two ear mounts 28, side members 30, and a nose bridge mount 32 on center member 34 as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 2-4. The headset 100 further includes a center plate 102 on the center member 34. The center plate 102 is adapted to receive a transmitter 104 as shown in phantom in FIG. 19 and shown from the underside of the plate 102 in FIG. 21. The transmitter 104 includes two posts 106 and a key 108 that is free to rotate about a pin 110.
  • [0066]
    To install the transmitter 104 on the center plate 102, the key is passed through a longitudinal opening 112 in the plate 102, and the posts 106 are each received by post openings 114. One of the post openings 114 is preferably formed as a slot to provide a snug fit for the transmitter yet still accommodate variations between headsets due to manufacturing tolerances. The key 108 may then be rotated to lock the transmitter onto the outer facing surface of the plate 102. The transmitter 104 may then be removed from and reattached to identical headsets in the same location and orientation with a high degree of accuracy.
  • [0067]
    The headset 100 further includes very small (e.g., about 2 mm dia.) metal fiducial balls 116 secured within the center plate 102 as shown in FIG. 18. The automatic registration process locates the balls 116 on the prerecorded scan images, and knowing the spacial relationship between the balls 116 and the transmitter 104, automatically generates the mapping function to translate from the transmitter coordinate system to the image coordinate system.
  • [0068]
    Specifically and with reference to FIG. 22, the automatic registration process begins (step 2200) by loading the prerecorded images (step 2202) and then creating a three dimensional data set (step 2204). Pixels having an intensity within a certain range are then identified (step 2206), and groups of adjacent pixels are located (step 2208) and classified together as a single group. The volume of each group is calculated (step 2210) and groups not within a predefined range of volumes are rejected (step 2212). Groups not having at least one pixel with an intensity level of at least a certain amount are rejected (step 2214). If the number of groups remaining is less than the number of fiducial balls 116 (step 2216), e.g., 7, then the program ends having failed to provide automatic registration (steps 2218 and 2220).
  • [0069]
    The center of each group is then located and the distances between each group's center and the other centers are calculated and recorded in a matrix of at least 7 by 7 (step 2222). The known distances between the fiducial balls comprise a predefined 7 by 7 matrix. The program then compares each of the known distances with the various predefined distances between the fiducial balls, then generates a best fit approximation of the correlation between the sets of distances (step 2224). If the distance correlation provides an approximation outside of a preset tolerance (step 2226) then the program ends (steps 2218 and 2220) having failed to automatically generate the transformation matrices. If the correlation of distances is within tolerance and there are seven groups (step 2228) then the image data is, recorded in the image matrix (step 2230). If the number of groups is above seven, then a geometry correlation is performed comparing the geometry of the groups to the known geometry of the fiducial balls (step 2232). If the geometry correlation is successful (step 2234) then the transformation matrices are recorded (step 2230), and if not the program reports the error condition (step 2218).
  • [0070]
    Having successfully generated the image point matrix (step 2230), and since the sensor point matrix is based on the known layout of the fiducial markers with respect to the transmitter, the mapping equation may now be automatically generated as discussed above with reference to Powell's method.
  • [0071]
    In other embodiments wherein the patient is wearing a reference unit when the scan images are prerecorded the registration program may automatically locate portions of the reference unit itself on the scanned images, thereby identifying the orientation of the reference unit with respect to the scanned images. Again, since the relative orientation of the field generator with respect to the reference unit is known, the registration unit may then generate the appropriate mapping function. In further embodiments the surfaces of the patient's skin may be tracked such as by a laser light pointer or a movable tip pointer that is biased in a forward direction. The tracked surfaces may then be located on the stored images. In still further embodiments, the registration unit could be programmed to identify characteristic structures or features of the patient's body and thereby provide fully automatic registration. For example, the system might, knowing the size and shape of a headset, identify where the headset would be placed on the patient's head, even though it does not appear on the prerecorded images.
  • [0072]
    The position detection system may operate by any desired principle suitable for generating a field in which position detection may be achieved at any location within the field. For example, it has been found that the 3 Spaces Fastrak™ product sold by Polhemus, Incorporated of Colchester, Vermont operates via principles suitable for use in the present invention. This product uses three orthogonally disposed magnetic dipoles for both the transmitter and the sensor, and produces alternating electromagnetic fields of 8-14 kHz that are time division multiplexed.
  • [0073]
    Specifically and with reference to FIG. 23, both the magnetic field source 101 and the magnetic field sensor 103 include three orthogonally disposed coils as shown. An alternating electric current from an amplifier 105 is passed through each of the source coils one at a time generating sequential magnetic fields. A processing unit 107 generates the timing signals and controls a digital-to-analog converter 109. The magnetic fields induce voltages in the three coils of the sensor 103. The induced voltages are amplified by an amplifier 111, digitized by an analog-to-digital converter 113, and then processed by the processing unit 107.
  • [0074]
    The time division multiplexed excitation of the three coils of the source creates a unique magnetic field sequence throughout the field of the source. For every location in the field of the source, the six degree of freedom data can be calculated from the data present on the three coils of the sensor. The six degree of freedom information is then sent to a host computer 115.
  • [0075]
    The position of a sensor S with respect to the field generator defining a reference coordinate frame (X,Y,Z) may be produced by the 3 Space Fastrak™ product at a given time as a set of six values xs, ys, zs, ωazs, ωels, and ωros. The values xs, ys, and zs identify the position of the center of the sensor within the X,Y,Z coordinate reference frame, and the angles ωazs, ωels, and ωros identify the orientation of the-sensor S with respect to the X,Y,Z coordinate reference frame.
  • [0076]
    The value ωazs is the azimuth angle of the sensor. The azimuth angle identifies the amount of rotation of the X and Y reference axes together about the Z axis to a new position in which the X axis is aligned with the center of the sensor in the Z direction. The new positions of the X and Y axes are defined as X′ and Y′ respectively. The value ωels is the elevation angle of the sensor. The elevation angle identifies the amount of rotation of the X′ and Z axes together about the Y′ axis to a new position in which the X′ axis is aligned with the center of the sensor S. The new positions of the X′ and Z axes are defined as X″ and Z′ respectively.
  • [0077]
    The value ωros is the roll angle of the sensor. The roll angle identifies the amount of rotation of the Y′ and Z′ axes together about the X″ axis to a new position defining new axes Y″ and Z″ respectively. The sensor is oriented in the X″,Y″,Z″ reference frame, and this orientation is defined by the values ωazs, ωels, and ωros.
  • [0078]
    The combined power of all the sensor data is inversely proportional to the distance of the sensor from the source. The ratio between the sensor data components, created by the individual source coils, will determine the x, y, z position coordinate of the sensor. The ratio between the individual sensor coil data will determine the orientation of the sensor.
  • [0079]
    Because the medical instrument is free to move with respect to the transmitter at speeds that may be faster than the rate at which the electronics can process the information, the speed of the instrument should be monitored. If the speed of movement of the instrument is above a defined threshold, then inconsistent sensor readings should be ignored until the speed falls below the threshold. The speed may be monitored by calculating a weighted sum of the differences between each of the x, y, and z coordinates at successive time intervals t1 and t2.
  • [0080]
    The presence of a signal from another source, or the magnetic field of the eddy current in a conductive object, or the field distorting effect of a ferro-magnetic object will change the magnitude/direction of the original magnetic field of the source. This will result in an error in the sensor position/orientation.
  • [0081]
    In a preferred embodiment involving field integrity detection and with reference to FIGS. 1-3, a reference sensor 37 may be securely mounted on the transmitter assembly 12 at a fixed distance from the center of the transmitter 36. The location and orientation of this reference sensor should be determined through a calibration process under controlled conditions, and thereafter continuously calculated and verified. In certain embodiments a weighted sum of all six sensor output parameters xs, ys, Zs, ωazs, ωels, and ωros may be continuously monitored as an indication of compromised field integrity.
  • [0082]
    As also noted above and shown in FIGS. 7-12, the remote sensor 58 may include a plurality of sensors (62,64) the outputs of which are compared for error detection purposes. Potential error conditions that would be detectable by such a system include sensor failure where one sensor ceases to operate properly, as well as uneven localized field distortions in the area of the medical instrument.
  • [0083]
    It has further been found that simply comparing the sensor outputs may not sufficiently identify all types of error conditions that can occur, even if the distance between the sensors is taken into account. Such a potentially undetectable error condition may exist when a foreign ferromagnetic object enters the electromagnetic field and produces identical distortions at each of the sensors. This may be the case, for example if the foreign object has uniform ferromagnetic properties, if the foreign object approaches the two sensors from the same distance and at the same rate, and if the sensors are equidistant from the generator.
  • [0084]
    In this situation the outputs of the sensors would produce identical outputs and an error detection signal might therefore not be produced even though a foreign object would be in the electromagnetic field altering the electromagnetic field as well as the sensed position data. Although the use of additional sensors may reduce the risk of this occurring, it does not eliminate the possibility of an error condition being undetected.
  • [0085]
    It has been discovered that an error detection system sufficient to identify localized uniform distortions in the area of the medical instrument or headset may be designed using two sensors separated by a fixed distance as shown in FIGS. 7-12 and by monitoring the locations of two or more virtual points. As shown in FIG. 25, the sensors S1 and S2 are separated from each other by a distance 2d and for convenience defined to be positioned along an axis such as the Y axis as shown. Sensor S1 uniquely defines an X-Z plane in which it is located, and S2 uniquely defines an X-Z plane in which it is located as shown. A first virtual location va is chosen to be between the X-Z planes defined by the sensors, while a second virtual location vb is chosen to be outside of the X-Z planes defined by the sensors as shown in FIG. 11. The locations va and vb are virtual locations that are continuously calculated and compared with factory defined positions.
  • [0086]
    In the embodiment diagrammatically shown in FIGS. 24 and 25 the virtual points va (-d,-d,-d with respect to S2) and vb (d,d,d with respect to S2) are equidistant from S2. The sensor S2 is the protected sensor in this embodiment, and the sensor S1 is used as a reference to provide the error detection for S2 The magnitude of the resultant vector from S2 to va is the same as that from S2 to Vb but opposite in direction, and this magnitude is approximately one half of the distance between S1 and S2.
  • [0087]
    The locations of va and Vb in the reference coordinate system (i.e., with respect to S1) must be calculated and will be referred to as va1 and Vb1 The location (PS) and the orientation of the protected sensor (S1) with respect to the reference sensor must be determined. The attitude matrix (A) is calculated from the orientation values of the protected sensor: [ cos ω ? cos ω ? sin ω ? cos ω ? - sin ω ? cos ω ? - sin ω ? - sin ω ? - sin ω ? cos ω ? cos ω ? - cos ω ? + sin ω ? - sin ω ? - sin ω ? cos ω ? - sin ω ? cos ω ? - sin ω ? - cos ω ? + sin ω ? - sin ω ? sin ω ? - sin ω ? - cos ω ? - cos ω ? - cos ω ? cos ω ? - sin ω ? ] ? indicates text missing or illegible when filed ( 5 )
  • [0088]
    Then the locations of the virtual points are calculated as:
  • v a1 =Av a2 +PS
  • v b1 =Av b2 +PS
  • [0089]
    To establish a reference value for the virtual point location in the reference sensor coordinate system, a measurement is taken in a distortion free environment during factory calibration. These stored reference values are called vae and Vbe . Throughout the use of the system, the actual measured values of the virtual points (vam, vbm) are compared to the stored reference values for the virtual points (vae, vbe). If the distance between the established and measured location (Δ) for either virtual point is larger than a preset value (ε), then a field integrity violation message is displayed and normal operation of the system is suspended. In particular and with reference to FIG. 26
  • |v alm −v alm|>εor |vblm−vble
  • [0090]
    The operation is based in part on the principle that if the position error is being reduced by the orientation error at one virtual point, then the error will be increased at the other virtual point causing a field integrity violation signal to be generated. If for example, there is an error in the measured position and orientation of the protected sensor, then the measured value will have an error added to the established value. The field integrity checking is performed in this case as follows:
  • |((A e +A )v a2 +PS e +PS )−(A e v a2 +PS e)|>ε
  • or
  • |((A e +A )v b2 +PS e +PS )−(A e v b2 +PS e)|>ε
  • [0091]
    which equals
  • |A v a2 +PS |>ε
  • or
  • |A v b2 +PS |>ε
  • [0092]
    Substituting
  • A v a2 =OPS amΔand A v b2 =OPS bmΔ
  • [0093]
    this relationship may be diagrammatically illustrated as shown in FIG. 27. The tip location of the medical instrument should be initially defined with respect to the protected sensor (S2), and used in determining the position of the tip with respect to the source.
  • [0094]
    The integrity of the field generated by the field generator may be monitored as discussed above by positioning a reference sensor a fixed distance from the generator, and continuously monitoring its position for any changes. The calculations involved in the above field integrity detection analysis regarding the two sensors S1 and S2 may be performed for a transmitter and single sensor field integrity detection system. Specifically, the calculations may be performed by substituting the field transmitter for the protected sensor (S2), and by substituting the single sensor for the reference sensor (S1). These field integrity analyses may also be used to identify the half field of the operation environment.
  • [0095]
    As shown in FIG. 28 in alternative embodiments of the invention a reference unit 120, including a field generator 122, may be positioned a small distance away from the portion of the patient's body (such as the head) 14 on an articulated arm 124. A headset 12 including a reference sensor 126 may be attached to the patient's body, and the medical instrument 16 may include a remote sensor 40 as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 1-6. Once the field generator 122 is positioned at a convenient location it may be fixed in place by securing the joints of the articulated arm. The position of the patient with respect to the field generator may accordingly be monitored. The position of the instrument 16 with respect to the patient may also be determined and the system may then operate to display the appropriate prerecorded images as discussed below.
  • [0096]
    In various embodiments, the position of the field generator 88 may be adjusted during the surgical operation by moving the articulated joints. If neither the remote sensor 40 nor the reference sensor 126 are moved with respect to one another, then moving the field generator 122 should not affect the position detection system. If the accuracy of the system depends at all on the relative positions of the field generators 122 and the sensors 40, 126, then it may be desirable to move the field generator 122 during the surgical operation. This may be the case, for example, if the system relies on the near-field characteristics of a multiplexed magnetic field wherein it might be desirable to keep the sensors 40, 126 generally equidistant from the generator 122. In still further embodiments, the system may periodically prompt the user to reposition the generator 122 such as through visual cues on the display. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the relative positioning of the field generator and the one or more field sensors is in no way limited to those shown.
  • [0097]
    The monitoring of the position of the patient may be accomplished by means other than using a headset and reference sensor. For example, a camera 128 connected to an image processor 130 may be positioned to record the location of the field generator with respect to the target operation site of the patient as shown in FIG. 29. If either the patient or the field generator is moved, the image processor 130 will identify the amount of relative change in location and advise the position detection unit 22 accordingly. Additional cameras positioned to view the patient from a variety of directions may be employed in further embodiments.
  • [0098]
    As shown in FIG. 30 in an alternate embodiment, the system may include a flexible band 132 for secure attachment to a portion of a patient's body 14 (e.g., a head or chest). The band 132 includes field generator 134 and a reference sensor 136 that provides feedback to the signal generator in the position detection unit 22. The position detection unit 22 is connected via communication lines 138 to the flexible band 132, and is connected via communication lines 140 to a flexible medical instrument 142 having a remote sensor at its tip 144. Because the medical instrument 142 is not rigid, the sensor should be positioned sufficiently close to the tip of the instrument 142 to provide accurate position detection and monitoring within the patient's body. The display 20 may indicate the relative orientation of the instrument 142 on one or more images as shown.
  • [0099]
    As shown in FIGS. 31 and 32 a system of the invention may include a flexible medical instrument 150 having a sensor 152 at its distal tip 154, and a fiber optic endoscope 156 having a sensor 158 at it distal tip. 160. The fiber optic endoscope 156 is connected at its proximal end to a camera 162 which is in communication with an image processor 164. Because the field generator 134 on the reference band 132 may move, for example as the patient breaths, the location of the remote sensor 152 may appear to move when in fact the medical instrument 150 has not moved.
  • [0100]
    To correct for this problem, the fiber optic endoscope 156 can be used to monitor the position of the tip 154 of the instrument 150 with respect to the inside of the patient's body as shown. Any sensed movement of the sensor 152 with respect to the field generator 134 can be evaluated with reference to whether the tip 154 has moved with respect to the interior of the patient's body. If the camera observes that the tip 154 has not moved, but the sensor 152 indicates that it has moved, then the system can identify that such movement was due to the movement of the field generator and not the sensor 152. The system may then automatically correct for such variation. Further, the fiber optic endoscope 156 itself may include a sensor 158 for detecting whether the tip 160 of the fiber optic has moved. This should further enhance the accuracy of the correction system. Also, the camera 162 may provide continuous registration of the prerecorded images based on the internal structure of the patient's body.
  • [0101]
    It will be understood by those skilled in the art that numerous variations and modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3644825 *31 Dec 196922 Feb 1972Texas Instruments IncMagnetic detection system for detecting movement of an object utilizing signals derived from two orthogonal pickup coils
US3821469 *15 May 197228 Jun 1974Amperex Electronic CorpGraphical data device
US3868565 *30 Jul 197325 Feb 1975Jack KuipersObject tracking and orientation determination means, system and process
US4017858 *24 Feb 197512 Apr 1977Polhemus Navigation Sciences, Inc.Apparatus for generating a nutating electromagnetic field
US4182312 *20 May 19778 Jan 1980Mushabac David RDental probe
US4256112 *12 Feb 197917 Mar 1981David Kopf InstrumentsHead positioner
US4262306 *21 Nov 197914 Apr 1981Karlheinz RennerMethod and apparatus for monitoring of positions of patients and/or radiation units
US4314251 *30 Jul 19792 Feb 1982The Austin CompanyRemote object position and orientation locater
US4319136 *9 Nov 19799 Mar 1982Jinkins J RandolphComputerized tomography radiograph data transfer cap
US4328548 *4 Apr 19804 May 1982The Austin CompanyLocator for source of electromagnetic radiation having unknown structure or orientation
US4341220 *13 Apr 197927 Jul 1982Pfizer Inc.Stereotactic surgery apparatus and method
US4506676 *10 Sep 198226 Mar 1985Duska Alois ARadiographic localization technique
US4583538 *4 May 198422 Apr 1986Onik Gary MMethod and apparatus for stereotaxic placement of probes in the body utilizing CT scanner localization
US4638798 *10 Sep 198027 Jan 1987Shelden C HunterStereotactic method and apparatus for locating and treating or removing lesions
US4642786 *25 May 198410 Feb 1987Position Orientation Systems, Ltd.Method and apparatus for position and orientation measurement using a magnetic field and retransmission
US4651732 *11 Apr 198524 Mar 1987Frederick Philip RThree-dimensional light guidance system for invasive procedures
US4659971 *16 Aug 198521 Apr 1987Seiko Instruments & Electronics Ltd.Robot controlling system
US4660970 *15 Oct 198428 Apr 1987Carl-Zeiss-StiftungMethod and apparatus for the contact-less measuring of objects
US4722056 *18 Feb 198626 Jan 1988Trustees Of Dartmouth CollegeReference display systems for superimposing a tomagraphic image onto the focal plane of an operating microscope
US4723544 *9 Jul 19869 Feb 1988Moore Robert RHemispherical vectoring needle guide for discolysis
US4733969 *8 Sep 198629 Mar 1988Cyberoptics CorporationLaser probe for determining distance
US4737032 *26 Aug 198512 Apr 1988Cyberware Laboratory, Inc.Surface mensuration sensor
US4737794 *9 Dec 198512 Apr 1988Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationMethod and apparatus for determining remote object orientation and position
US4742356 *9 Dec 19853 May 1988Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationMethod and apparatus for determining remote object orientation and position
US4742815 *2 Jan 198610 May 1988Ninan Champil AComputer monitoring of endoscope
US4743770 *22 Sep 198610 May 1988Mitutoyo Mfg. Co., Ltd.Profile-measuring light probe using a change in reflection factor in the proximity of a critical angle of light
US4743771 *17 Jun 198510 May 1988View Engineering, Inc.Z-axis height measurement system
US4745290 *19 Mar 198717 May 1988David FrankelMethod and apparatus for use in making custom shoes
US4750487 *24 Nov 198614 Jun 1988Zanetti Paul HStereotactic frame
US4753528 *30 Aug 198528 Jun 1988Quantime, Inc.Laser archery distance device
US4804261 *27 Mar 198714 Feb 1989Kirschen David GAnti-claustrophobic glasses
US4805615 *2 Jul 198521 Feb 1989Carol Mark PMethod and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery
US4809694 *19 May 19877 Mar 1989Ferrara Vincent LBiopsy guide
US4821200 *2 Apr 198711 Apr 1989Jonkopings Lans LandstingMethod and apparatus for manufacturing a modified, three-dimensional reproduction of a soft, deformable object
US4821731 *8 Dec 198718 Apr 1989Intra-Sonix, Inc.Acoustic image system and method
US4822163 *26 Jun 198618 Apr 1989Robotic Vision Systems, Inc.Tracking vision sensor
US4825091 *1 Feb 198825 Apr 1989Carl-Zeiss-StiftungOptoelectronic distance sensor with visible pilot beam
US4829373 *3 Aug 19879 May 1989Vexcel CorporationStereo mensuration apparatus
US4836778 *26 May 19876 Jun 1989Vexcel CorporationMandibular motion monitoring system
US4838265 *21 Jan 198813 Jun 1989Cosman Eric RLocalization device for probe placement under CT scanner imaging
US4841967 *30 Jan 198427 Jun 1989Chang Ming ZPositioning device for percutaneous needle insertion
US4845305 *7 Jul 19884 Jul 1989National Starch And Chemical CorporationProcess for the preparation of isophthaladehyde
US4923459 *13 Sep 19888 May 1990Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaStereotactics apparatus
US4931056 *24 Oct 19885 Jun 1990Neurodynamics, Inc.Catheter guide apparatus for perpendicular insertion into a cranium orifice
US4945305 *11 Apr 198931 Jul 1990Ascension Technology CorporationDevice for quantitatively measuring the relative position and orientation of two bodies in the presence of metals utilizing direct current magnetic fields
US4991579 *10 Nov 198712 Feb 1991Allen George SMethod and apparatus for providing related images over time of a portion of the anatomy using fiducial implants
US5016639 *13 Feb 199021 May 1991Allen George SMethod and apparatus for imaging the anatomy
US5017139 *5 Jul 199021 May 1991Mushabac David RMechanical support for hand-held dental/medical instrument
US5027818 *18 May 19892 Jul 1991University Of FloridaDosimetric technique for stereotactic radiosurgery same
US5078140 *23 Sep 19867 Jan 1992Kwoh Yik SImaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system
US5086401 *11 May 19904 Feb 1992International Business Machines CorporationImage-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking
US5094241 *19 Jan 199010 Mar 1992Allen George SApparatus for imaging the anatomy
US5097839 *13 Feb 199024 Mar 1992Allen George SApparatus for imaging the anatomy
US5098426 *6 Feb 198924 Mar 1992Phoenix Laser Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for precision laser surgery
US5099846 *23 Dec 198831 Mar 1992Hardy Tyrone LMethod and apparatus for video presentation from a variety of scanner imaging sources
US5107839 *4 May 199028 Apr 1992Pavel V. HoudekComputer controlled stereotaxic radiotherapy system and method
US5119817 *19 Jan 19909 Jun 1992Allen George SApparatus for imaging the anatomy
US5178164 *29 Mar 199112 Jan 1993Allen George SMethod for implanting a fiducial implant into a patient
US5186174 *29 Jan 199016 Feb 1993G. M. PiaffProcess and device for the reproducible optical representation of a surgical operation
US5193106 *28 Aug 19909 Mar 1993Desena DanforthX-ray identification marker
US5197476 *11 Oct 199130 Mar 1993Christopher NowackiLocating target in human body
US5207688 *31 Oct 19914 May 1993Medco, Inc.Noninvasive head fixation method and apparatus
US5211164 *29 Mar 199118 May 1993Allen George SMethod of locating a target on a portion of anatomy
US5211165 *3 Sep 199118 May 1993General Electric CompanyTracking system to follow the position and orientation of a device with radiofrequency field gradients
US5224049 *21 May 199029 Jun 1993Mushabac David RMethod, system and mold assembly for use in preparing a dental prosthesis
US5230338 *22 Apr 199227 Jul 1993Allen George SInteractive image-guided surgical system for displaying images corresponding to the placement of a surgical tool or the like
US5230623 *10 Dec 199127 Jul 1993Radionics, Inc.Operating pointer with interactive computergraphics
US5279309 *27 Jul 199218 Jan 1994International Business Machines CorporationSignaling device and method for monitoring positions in a surgical operation
US5285787 *29 Sep 199215 Feb 1994Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaApparatus for calculating coordinate data of desired point in subject to be examined
US5288253 *7 Aug 199222 Feb 1994Nortrans Shipping And Trading Far East Pte Ltd.Single point mooring system employing a submerged buoy and a vessel mounted fluid swivel
US5299253 *10 Apr 199229 Mar 1994Akzo N.V.Alignment system to overlay abdominal computer aided tomography and magnetic resonance anatomy with single photon emission tomography
US5300080 *1 Nov 19915 Apr 1994David ClaymanStereotactic instrument guided placement
US5306271 *9 Mar 199226 Apr 1994Izi CorporationRadiation therapy skin markers
US5307072 *9 Jul 199226 Apr 1994Polhemus IncorporatedNon-concentricity compensation in position and orientation measurement systems
US5309913 *30 Nov 199210 May 1994The Cleveland Clinic FoundationFrameless stereotaxy system
US5330485 *18 May 199319 Jul 1994Clayman David ACerebral instrument guide frame and procedures utilizing it
US5383454 *2 Jul 199224 Jan 1995St. Louis UniversitySystem for indicating the position of a surgical probe within a head on an image of the head
US5389101 *21 Apr 199214 Feb 1995University Of UtahApparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization
US5391199 *20 Jul 199321 Feb 1995Biosense, Inc.Apparatus and method for treating cardiac arrhythmias
US5394875 *21 Oct 19937 Mar 1995Lewis; Judith T.Automatic ultrasonic localization of targets implanted in a portion of the anatomy
US5480439 *1 Feb 19942 Jan 1996Lunar CorporationMethod for periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement
US5483961 *29 Aug 199416 Jan 1996Kelly; Patrick J.Magnetic field digitizer for stereotactic surgery
US5517990 *8 Apr 199421 May 1996The Cleveland Clinic FoundationStereotaxy wand and tool guide
US5600330 *12 Jul 19944 Feb 1997Ascension Technology CorporationDevice for measuring position and orientation using non-dipole magnet IC fields
US5615132 *21 Jan 199425 Mar 1997Crossbow Technology, Inc.Method and apparatus for determining position and orientation of a moveable object using accelerometers
US5617857 *6 Jun 19958 Apr 1997Image Guided Technologies, Inc.Imaging system having interactive medical instruments and methods
US5622170 *4 Oct 199422 Apr 1997Image Guided Technologies, Inc.Apparatus for determining the position and orientation of an invasive portion of a probe inside a three-dimensional body
US5640170 *5 Jun 199517 Jun 1997Polhemus IncorporatedPosition and orientation measuring system having anti-distortion source configuration
US5718241 *7 Jun 199517 Feb 1998Biosense, Inc.Apparatus and method for treating cardiac arrhythmias with no discrete target
US5729129 *7 Jun 199517 Mar 1998Biosense, Inc.Magnetic location system with feedback adjustment of magnetic field generator
US5730130 *2 Jun 199524 Mar 1998Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc.Localization cap for fiducial markers
US5738096 *1 Feb 199614 Apr 1998Biosense, Inc.Cardiac electromechanics
US5752513 *7 Jun 199519 May 1998Biosense, Inc.Method and apparatus for determining position of object
US5755725 *6 Sep 199426 May 1998Deemed International, S.A.Computer-assisted microsurgery methods and equipment
US5769861 *12 Sep 199623 Jun 1998Brainlab Med. Computersysteme GmbhMethod and devices for localizing an instrument
US5868675 *10 May 19909 Feb 1999Elekta Igs S.A.Interactive system for local intervention inside a nonhumogeneous structure
US5871445 *7 Sep 199516 Feb 1999St. Louis UniversitySystem for indicating the position of a surgical probe within a head on an image of the head
US5891034 *7 Jun 19956 Apr 1999St. Louis UniversitySystem for indicating the position of a surgical probe within a head on an image of the head
US6071288 *6 Dec 19976 Jun 2000Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc.Apparatus and method for surgical stereotactic procedures
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6832985 *26 Jul 200221 Dec 2004Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. KgEndoscopic system with instrument position and orientation display
US765730021 Mar 20022 Feb 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Registration of human anatomy integrated for electromagnetic localization
US766062330 Jan 20039 Feb 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Six degree of freedom alignment display for medical procedures
US769797214 Jul 200313 Apr 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Navigation system for cardiac therapies
US77225654 Nov 200525 May 2010Traxtal, Inc.Access system
US775186515 Sep 20046 Jul 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US775186814 Nov 20056 Jul 2010Philips Electronics LtdIntegrated skin-mounted multifunction device for use in image-guided surgery
US776303513 Sep 200427 Jul 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Image guided spinal surgery guide, system and method for use thereof
US779703223 Sep 200214 Sep 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects
US780526914 Nov 200528 Sep 2010Philips Electronics LtdDevice and method for ensuring the accuracy of a tracking device in a volume
US781804425 Mar 200819 Oct 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US78310825 Jun 20069 Nov 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.System and method for image based sensor calibration
US783577816 Oct 200316 Nov 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation of a multiple piece construct for implantation
US783578421 Sep 200516 Nov 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for positioning a reference frame
US784025330 Sep 200523 Nov 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US784025418 Jan 200623 Nov 2010Philips Electronics LtdElectromagnetically tracked K-wire device
US785330513 May 200514 Dec 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Trajectory storage apparatus and method for surgical navigation systems
US788177016 Mar 20041 Feb 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Multiple cannula image guided tool for image guided procedures
US792532817 Dec 200712 Apr 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery
US795347127 Jul 200931 May 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for implantation between two vertebral bodies
US797134125 Mar 20085 Jul 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method of forming an electromagnetic sensing coil in a medical instrument for a surgical navigation system
US797467728 May 20095 Jul 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure
US799606419 Oct 20099 Aug 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.System and method for placing and determining an appropriately sized surgical implant
US799806219 Jun 200716 Aug 2011Superdimension, Ltd.Endoscope structures and techniques for navigating to a target in branched structure
US800092620 Apr 201016 Aug 2011OrthosensorMethod and system for positional measurement using ultrasonic sensing
US804605224 Mar 201025 Oct 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Navigation system for cardiac therapies
US805740711 Oct 200515 Nov 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Surgical sensor
US80601855 Oct 200915 Nov 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Navigation system for cardiac therapies
US807466231 Jul 200613 Dec 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Surgical communication and power system
US809854420 Apr 201017 Jan 2012Orthosensor, Inc.Method and system for enhancing accuracy in ultrasonic alignment
US810533921 Jul 201031 Jan 2012Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Image guided spinal surgery guide system and method for use thereof
US811229221 Apr 20067 Feb 2012Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for optimizing a therapy
US816565826 Sep 200824 Apr 2012Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for positioning a guide relative to a base
US817276231 Aug 20078 May 2012Proteus Biomedical, Inc.Simultaneous blood flow and hematocrit sensor
US817568116 Dec 20088 May 2012Medtronic Navigation Inc.Combination of electromagnetic and electropotential localization
US820031422 Jan 200712 Jun 2012British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanySurgical navigation
US823900111 Jul 20057 Aug 2012Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US82702533 Oct 201118 Sep 2012Orthosensor, Inc.Method and system for ultrasonic measurement and alignment
US8271069 *1 Jul 201018 Sep 2012Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US829057213 Sep 201016 Oct 2012Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects
US83206538 Nov 201027 Nov 2012Medtronic Navigation, Inc.System and method for image based sensor calibration
US83597301 Jul 201129 Jan 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method of forming an electromagnetic sensing coil in a medical instrument
US840161623 Sep 201119 Mar 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Navigation system for cardiac therapies
US8406845 *1 Sep 200526 Mar 2013University Of Tennessee Research FoundationMethod and apparatus for imaging tracking
US842164220 Jun 201116 Apr 2013NavisenseSystem and method for sensorized user interface
US84520682 Nov 201128 May 2013Covidien LpHybrid registration method
US84675892 Nov 201118 Jun 2013Covidien LpHybrid registration method
US846785115 Nov 201018 Jun 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for positioning a reference frame
US846785314 Nov 201118 Jun 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Navigation system for cardiac therapies
US84730322 Jun 200925 Jun 2013Superdimension, Ltd.Feature-based registration method
US849461327 Jul 201023 Jul 2013Medtronic, Inc.Combination localization system
US849461427 Jul 201023 Jul 2013Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaCombination localization system
US849480519 Jul 201123 Jul 2013OrthosensorMethod and system for assessing orthopedic alignment using tracking sensors
US85472481 Sep 20061 Oct 2013Proteus Digital Health, Inc.Implantable zero-wire communications system
US85485651 Feb 20101 Oct 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Registration of human anatomy integrated for electromagnetic localization
US85497321 Jul 20118 Oct 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method of forming an electromagnetic sensing coil in a medical instrument
US860301414 Aug 201110 Dec 2013Cerevast Therapeutics, Inc.Hands-free operator-independent transcranial ultrasound apparatus and methods
US861198318 Jan 200617 Dec 2013Philips Electronics LtdMethod and apparatus for guiding an instrument to a target in the lung
US86119846 Apr 201017 Dec 2013Covidien LpLocatable catheter
US861371413 Aug 201124 Dec 2013Cerevast Therapeutics, Inc.Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound apparatus
US863246121 Jun 200621 Jan 2014Koninklijke Philips N.V.System, method and apparatus for navigated therapy and diagnosis
US863489713 Dec 201021 Jan 2014Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Trajectory storage apparatus and method for surgical navigation systems
US863829619 May 201128 Jan 2014Jason McIntoshMethod and machine for navigation system calibration
US864490729 Apr 20104 Feb 2014Medtronic Navigaton, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US86606358 Mar 200725 Feb 2014Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for optimizing a computer assisted surgical procedure
US86630882 Dec 20094 Mar 2014Covidien LpSystem of accessories for use with bronchoscopes
US86965489 Jun 201115 Apr 2014Covidien LpEndoscope structures and techniques for navigating to a target in branched structure
US869668512 Mar 201015 Apr 2014Covidien LpEndoscope structures and techniques for navigating to a target in branched structure
US870618515 Nov 201022 Apr 2014Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation of a multiple piece construct for implantation
US87316417 May 201220 May 2014Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Combination of electromagnetic and electropotential localization
US876472514 Nov 20081 Jul 2014Covidien LpDirectional anchoring mechanism, method and applications thereof
US876843725 Oct 20061 Jul 2014Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Fluoroscopic image guided surgery system with intraoperative registration
US88148108 Oct 201026 Aug 2014Orthosensor Inc.Orthopedic method and system for mapping an anatomical pivot point
US883819914 Feb 200516 Sep 2014Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography
US884565516 Aug 201030 Sep 2014Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Instrument guide system
US886468610 Aug 201021 Oct 2014Orthosensor Inc.Virtual mapping of an anatomical pivot point and alignment therewith
US8892186 *12 Sep 201118 Nov 2014Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and system for detection and tracking of coronary sinus catheter electrodes in fluoroscopic images
US890592019 Sep 20089 Dec 2014Covidien LpBronchoscope adapter and method
US893220710 Jul 200913 Jan 2015Covidien LpIntegrated multi-functional endoscopic tool
US900875724 Sep 201314 Apr 2015Stryker CorporationNavigation system including optical and non-optical sensors
US90114488 Oct 201021 Apr 2015Orthosensor Inc.Orthopedic navigation system with sensorized devices
US90558811 May 200516 Jun 2015Super Dimension Ltd.System and method for image-based alignment of an endoscope
US908926114 Sep 200428 Jul 2015Covidien LpSystem of accessories for use with bronchoscopes
US911381317 Dec 201325 Aug 2015Covidien LpLocatable catheter
US911725820 May 201325 Aug 2015Covidien LpFeature-based registration method
US916810218 Jan 200627 Oct 2015Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing a container to a sterile environment
US918908320 Oct 201117 Nov 2015Orthosensor Inc.Method and system for media presentation during operative workflow
US9220467 *19 Sep 201229 Dec 2015Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and system for tracking catheters in 2D X-ray fluoroscopy using a graphics processing unit
US92718032 May 20131 Mar 2016Covidien LpHybrid registration method
US92718042 Mar 20151 Mar 2016Stryker CorporationMethod for tracking objects using optical and non-optical sensors
US939889221 Jun 200626 Jul 2016Koninklijke Philips N.V.Device and method for a trackable ultrasound
US945202231 Dec 201027 Sep 2016Orthosensor IncDisposable wand and sensor for orthopedic alignment
US945202331 Dec 201027 Sep 2016Orthosensor Inc.Operating room surgical field device and method therefore
US95045303 Feb 201429 Nov 2016Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US9532848 *16 Jun 20083 Jan 2017Othosoft, Inc.Computer-assisted surgery system and method
US95751402 Apr 200921 Feb 2017Covidien LpMagnetic interference detection system and method
US959715424 Feb 201421 Mar 2017Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for optimizing a computer assisted surgical procedure
US964251411 Apr 20149 May 2017Covidien LpEndoscope structures and techniques for navigating to a target in a branched structure
US96425712 Dec 20159 May 2017Orthosensor IncSystem and method for sensorized user interface
US965937424 Jul 201523 May 2017Covidien LpFeature-based registration method
US966199124 Aug 200630 May 2017Koninklijke Philips N.V.System, method and devices for navigated flexible endoscopy
US96686398 Jun 20126 Jun 2017Covidien LpBronchoscope adapter and method
US967542422 Jul 200913 Jun 2017Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Method for calibrating a navigation system
US968730713 Jan 201627 Jun 2017Stryker CorporationNavigation system and method for tracking objects using optical and non-optical sensors
US975708729 Jun 200912 Sep 2017Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and apparatus for perspective inversion
US20020156363 *21 Mar 200224 Oct 2002Hunter Mark W.Registration of human anatomy integrated for electromagnetic localization
US20020188172 *26 Jul 200212 Dec 2002Klaus IrionEndoscopic system
US20030073901 *5 Sep 200217 Apr 2003Simon David A.Navigational guidance via computer-assisted fluoroscopic imaging
US20030114752 *15 Oct 200219 Jun 2003Jaimie HendersonInstrument guidance method and system for image guided surgery
US20030117135 *23 Sep 200226 Jun 2003Martinelli Michael A.Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects
US20040087852 *6 Feb 20026 May 2004Edward ChenComputer-assisted surgical positioning method and system
US20040097805 *14 Jul 200320 May 2004Laurent VerardNavigation system for cardiac therapies
US20040097806 *19 Nov 200220 May 2004Mark HunterNavigation system for cardiac therapies
US20040152972 *25 Apr 20035 Aug 2004Mark HunterMethod and apparatus for post-operative tuning of a spinal implant
US20040171924 *5 Mar 20042 Sep 2004Mire David A.Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure
US20040181149 *7 Feb 200116 Sep 2004Ulrich LanglotzDevice and method for intraoperative navigation
US20040215071 *20 Aug 200328 Oct 2004Frank Kevin J.Method and apparatus for performing 2D to 3D registration
US20050059885 *13 Sep 200417 Mar 2005Tony MelkentImage guided spinal surgery guide, system and method for use thereof
US20050085714 *16 Oct 200321 Apr 2005Foley Kevin T.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation of a multiple piece construct for implantation
US20050085720 *15 Sep 200421 Apr 2005Jascob Bradley A.Method and apparatus for surgical navigation
US20050113809 *16 Mar 200426 May 2005Melkent Anthony J.Multiple cannula image guided tool for image guided procedures
US20050165292 *14 Feb 200528 Jul 2005Simon David A.Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography
US20050245817 *3 May 20043 Nov 2005Clayton John BMethod and apparatus for implantation between two vertebral bodies
US20050273004 *25 Jul 20058 Dec 2005Simon David AMethod and apparatus for perspective inversion
US20060025677 *11 Jul 20052 Feb 2006Verard Laurent GMethod and apparatus for surgical navigation
US20060058645 *1 Sep 200516 Mar 2006Komistek Richard DMethod and apparatus for imaging tracking
US20060084867 *30 Sep 200520 Apr 2006Tremblay Brian MMethod and apparatus for surgical navigation
US20060094958 *28 Oct 20044 May 2006Marquart Joel GMethod and apparatus for calibrating non-linear instruments
US20060122497 *14 Nov 20058 Jun 2006Glossop Neil DDevice and method for ensuring the accuracy of a tracking device in a volume
US20060170417 *25 Jan 20063 Aug 2006Rodgers Allan GDistributed array magnetic tracking
US20060173269 *14 Nov 20053 Aug 2006Glossop Neil DIntegrated skin-mounted multifunction device for use in image-guided surgery
US20060173291 *18 Jan 20063 Aug 2006Glossop Neil DElectromagnetically tracked K-wire device
US20060199159 *1 Mar 20057 Sep 2006Neuronetics, Inc.Head phantom for simulating the patient response to magnetic stimulation
US20060262961 *5 Jun 200623 Nov 2006Troy Holsing Et Al.System and method for image based sensor calibration
US20060278247 *31 Jul 200614 Dec 2006Mark W. Hunter Et Al.Surgical communication and power system
US20070032723 *21 Jun 20068 Feb 2007Glossop Neil DSystem, method and apparatus for navigated therapy and diagnosis
US20070055128 *24 Aug 20068 Mar 2007Glossop Neil DSystem, method and devices for navigated flexible endoscopy
US20070066887 *21 Sep 200522 Mar 2007Mire David AMethod and apparatus for positioning a reference frame
US20070166188 *18 Jan 200619 Jul 2007Eric RyterskiMethod and apparatus for providing a container to a sterile environment
US20070167722 *22 Jan 200719 Jul 2007British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanySurgical navigation
US20070167787 *21 Jun 200619 Jul 2007Glossop Neil DDevice and method for a trackable ultrasound
US20070249911 *21 Apr 200625 Oct 2007Simon David AMethod and apparatus for optimizing a therapy
US20080058630 *31 Aug 20076 Mar 2008Robertson Timothy LSimultaneous blood flow and hematocrit sensor
US20080071215 *4 Nov 200520 Mar 2008Traxtal Technologies Inc.Access System
US20080081982 *8 Mar 20073 Apr 2008Medtronic, Inc.Method And Apparatus For Optimizing A Computer Assisted Surgical Procedure
US20080097195 *17 Dec 200724 Apr 2008Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery
US20080119712 *20 Nov 200622 May 2008General Electric CompanySystems and Methods for Automated Image Registration
US20080171937 *25 Mar 200817 Jul 2008Surgical Navigation Technologies, IncMethod And Apparatus For Surgical Navigation
US20080172069 *25 Mar 200817 Jul 2008Surgical Navigation Technologies, IncMethod And Apparatus For Surgical Navigation
US20080262297 *1 May 200523 Oct 2008Super Dimension Ltd.System and Method for Image-Based Alignment of an Endoscope
US20080312529 *16 Jun 200818 Dec 2008Louis-Philippe AmiotComputer-assisted surgery system and method
US20090234217 *28 May 200917 Sep 2009Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Method And Apparatus For Preplanning A Surgical Procedure
US20090262111 *29 Jun 200922 Oct 2009Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Method and Apparatus for Perspective Inversion
US20090287443 *22 Jul 200919 Nov 2009Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Method for Calibrating a Navigation System
US20100022873 *5 Oct 200928 Jan 2010Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Navigation System for Cardiac Therapies
US20100041985 *19 Oct 200918 Feb 2010Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Navigational Guidance Via Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Imaging
US20100137707 *1 Feb 20103 Jun 2010Medtronic Navigation, IncRegistration of Human Anatomy Integrated for Electromagnetic Localization
US20100204575 *20 Apr 201012 Aug 2010Martin RocheMethod and system for enhancing accuracy in ultrasonic alignment
US20100204955 *20 Apr 201012 Aug 2010Martin RocheMethod and system for positional measurement using ultrasonic sensing
US20100210938 *24 Mar 201019 Aug 2010Medtronic Navigation, IncNavigation System for Cardiac Therapies
US20100210939 *29 Apr 201019 Aug 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and Apparatus for Surgical Navigation
US20100274124 *1 Jul 201028 Oct 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Method and Apparatus for Surgical Navigation
US20100286713 *21 Jul 201011 Nov 2010Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Image Guided Spinal Surgery Guide System And Method For Use Thereof
US20100305580 *16 Aug 20102 Dec 2010Medtronic Navigation, IncInstrument Guide System
US20100331671 *13 Sep 201030 Dec 2010Medtronic Navigation, IncMethod and System for Navigating a Catheter Probe in the Presence of Field-Influencing Objects
US20110032184 *8 Oct 201010 Feb 2011Martin RocheOrthopedic method and system for mapping an anatomical pivot point
US20110052008 *8 Nov 20103 Mar 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.System and Method for Image Based Sensor Calibration
US20110060220 *10 Aug 201010 Mar 2011Martin RocheVirtual mapping of an anatomical pivot point and alignment therewith
US20110077508 *13 Dec 201031 Mar 2011Medtronic Navigation, IncTrajectory Storage Apparatus And Method For Surgical Navigation Systems
US20110118593 *24 Jan 201119 May 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Multiple Cannula Image Guided Tool for Image Guided Procedures
US20110160572 *31 Dec 201030 Jun 2011OrthosensorDisposable wand and sensor for orthopedic alignment
US20110160583 *8 Oct 201030 Jun 2011OrthosensorOrthopedic Navigation System with Sensorized Devices
US20110160738 *31 Dec 201030 Jun 2011OrthosensorOperating room surgical field device and method therefore
US20110207997 *6 Apr 201025 Aug 2011Superdimension, Ltd.Locatable Catheter
US20120070046 *12 Sep 201122 Mar 2012Siemens CorporationMethod and System for Detection and Tracking of Coronary Sinus Catheter Electrodes in Fluoroscopic Images
US20120136626 *17 May 201031 May 2012Dirk MuchaMethod for generating position data of an instrument
US20130072788 *19 Sep 201221 Mar 2013Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and System for Tracking Catheters in 2D X-Ray Fluoroscopy Using a Graphics Processing Unit
USRE4219412 Jun 20061 Mar 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation
USRE4222612 Jun 200615 Mar 2011Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation
USRE4332831 Jan 200224 Apr 2012Medtronic Navigation, IncImage guided awl/tap/screwdriver
USRE439525 Oct 199029 Jan 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Interactive system for local intervention inside a non-homogeneous structure
USRE4430528 Feb 201118 Jun 2013Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation
USRE4640920 Apr 201523 May 2017Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Image guided awl/tap/screwdriver
USRE4642220 Apr 20156 Jun 2017Medtronic Navigation, Inc.Image guided awl/tap/screwdriver
WO2007025081A3 *24 Aug 20066 Dec 2007Traxtal IncSystem, method and devices for navigated flexible endoscopy
WO2009008894A2 *4 Sep 200715 Jan 2009Dimensions ImagingSystem and method for determining absolute position using a multiple wavelength signal
Classifications
U.S. Classification600/424
International ClassificationG06T3/00, G01B7/004, A61B19/00, A61B17/00, A61B5/06, A61B6/03
Cooperative ClassificationA61B5/062, A61B2017/00477, A61B2017/00464, A61B2017/00022, A61B6/032, A61B6/037, A61B2017/00482, A61B5/06, G06T3/0068, G01B7/004, A61B2090/363, A61B2090/0818, A61B90/10, A61B2034/2051, A61B2034/2068, A61B34/20, A61B90/36, A61B90/39, A61B90/361, A61B2090/3983, A61B90/14, A61B2090/3937, A61B90/98, A61B2034/2055, A61B2034/2072
European ClassificationG06T3/00R, A61B6/03B, A61B6/03D, A61B19/20D, A61B19/52H12, A61B19/52, A61B19/54, A61B5/06, G01B7/004
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
30 Sep 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LLC,
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014567/0262
Effective date: 20030925
18 Aug 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: VISUALIZATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:EMERALD MERGER CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016647/0028
Effective date: 20020212
Owner name: OEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., UTAH
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS NAVIGATION AND VISUALIZATION;REEL/FRAME:016648/0327
Effective date: 20020927
Owner name: GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS NAVIGATION AND VISULIZATION, DE
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:VISUALIZATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016648/0321
Effective date: 20020212