US20030073566A1 - Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons - Google Patents

Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030073566A1
US20030073566A1 US09/975,708 US97570801A US2003073566A1 US 20030073566 A1 US20030073566 A1 US 20030073566A1 US 97570801 A US97570801 A US 97570801A US 2003073566 A1 US2003073566 A1 US 2003073566A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
zeolite
oxide
catalyst
phase catalyst
zsm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/975,708
Inventor
Christopher Marshall
Michael Neylon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Chicago
Original Assignee
University of Chicago
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Chicago filed Critical University of Chicago
Priority to US09/975,708 priority Critical patent/US20030073566A1/en
Assigned to CHICAGO, THE UNIVERSITY OF reassignment CHICAGO, THE UNIVERSITY OF ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER L., NEYLON, MICHAEL K.
Assigned to ENERGY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF reassignment ENERGY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHICAGO, UNIVERSITY OF
Priority to PCT/US2002/028019 priority patent/WO2003031781A1/en
Priority to US10/384,344 priority patent/US7220692B2/en
Publication of US20030073566A1 publication Critical patent/US20030073566A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9404Removing only nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/9409Nitrogen oxides
    • B01D53/9413Processes characterised by a specific catalyst
    • B01D53/9418Processes characterised by a specific catalyst for removing nitrogen oxides by selective catalytic reduction [SCR] using a reducing agent in a lean exhaust gas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8621Removing nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/8625Nitrogen oxides
    • B01D53/8628Processes characterised by a specific catalyst
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/04Catalysts comprising molecular sieves having base-exchange properties, e.g. crystalline zeolites
    • B01J29/06Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof
    • B01J29/061Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof containing metallic elements added to the zeolite
    • B01J35/19
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/10Noble metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/104Silver
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/206Rare earth metals
    • B01D2255/2065Cerium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/20738Iron
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/20746Cobalt
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/20761Copper
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/20769Molybdenum
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/04Catalysts comprising molecular sieves having base-exchange properties, e.g. crystalline zeolites
    • B01J29/06Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof
    • B01J29/064Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof containing iron group metals, noble metals or copper
    • B01J29/072Iron group metals or copper

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) present in a lean burn exhaust by the selective catalyst reduction of NO x by a hydrocarbon with a bifunctional catalyst.
  • a large number of materials have been found to be catalyticly active for SCR.
  • metal-exchanged zeolites such as Cu-ZSM-5, Co-ZSM-5, and Fe-ZSM-5. These have been found to be very active for SCR using C 3 hydrocarbons, with Cu-ZSM-5 being the most active.
  • the zeolite-based materials lose much of their activity when water (common in exhaust streams) is added to the exhaust stream. The exact effects of water are not well known; it is speculated that either dealumination of the zeolite framework occurs which reduces the number of active sites, or that the metal sites agglomerate or are over-oxidized and lose their activity. While other catalysts that possess greater water stability have been found, such as metal-supported oxides, these tend to lack the desired activity seen by the metal zeolites, and produce large amounts of N 2 O (also a major pollutant).
  • the present invention is the development of bifunctional catalysts that combine active metal-exchanged zeolite phases along with metal oxide stabilizing phases that offer hydrothermal stability with sustained activity at low temperature for lean burn exhaust under SCR conditions.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a two part catalyst comprising a zeolite supported transition metal and a stabilizing oxide.
  • Still another object of this invention is to provide a method of remediating the concentration of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) in the exhaust from lean burn combustion in the presence of water in which the exhaust containing water and NO x is contacted with one or more of an alkane or alkene reductant or mixtures thereof at a temperature of not greater than about 600° C. with a two-part catalyst including a molecular sieve supported transition metal and a stabilizing metal oxide.
  • FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for a Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst and a CeO 2 /ZSM-5 catalyst. Closed symbols represent conversions under dry conditions, while open symbols represent conversions under wet (10% water) conditions;
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene zeolite supported copper catalysts stabilized with ceria illustrating various silicon to aluminum ratios;
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for copper supported zeolite stabilized with ZrO 2 and a copper supported zeolite stabilized with molybdenum oxide;
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for a cobalt supported zeolite and a cobalt supported zeolite stabilized with CeO 2 ;
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for copper supported zeolite stabilized with CeO 2 and ZrO 2 and a copper and cobalt supported zeolite;
  • FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for a copper supported mordenite and a copper supported mordenite stabilized with CeO 2 ;
  • FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO x and propene as a function of temperature for a physical mixture of Cu-ZSM-5 and CeO 2 and Cu-ZSM-5/CeO 2 .
  • zeolites a variety of molecular sieve materials are satisfactory including zeolites. Specifically, only zeolite Y, zeolite beta, mordenite, ferrierite, ZSM-5, and ZSM-12 have been used.
  • the molecular sieve should have a pore size of at least about 4 ⁇ .
  • any transition metal would be adequate to be supported by a molecular sieve in a wide variety of concentrations. However, commonly used transition metals are copper, cobalt, iron, molybdenum, vanadium and various combinations thereof.
  • the supporting oxides can be any one or more of the rare earth oxides (such as cerium oxide) and transition metal oxides (such as zirconium oxide, molybdenum oxide, vanadium oxide and niobium oxide).
  • pore size zeolites has been investigated and it is preferred that the pore size in the range of from about 4 ⁇ and up to about 8 ⁇ . In the art, these are referred to as medium pore and wide pore zeolites. Investigations have been conducted using various water concentrations up to about 20%. It is believed that the stabilizing oxide may be present in the catalyst in the range of from about 0.1% by weight to about 5% by weight including the molecular sieve. It is also believed that the typical exchange levels for the transition metal may be anywhere from about 25-100%. Moreover, a variety of ratios of silicon to aluminum have been tested in zeolites and found to be satisfactory. Silicon to aluminum ratios found to be satisfactory are generally between about 238 and about 17 to one. While the reductions herein use propene (C 3 H 6 ) any alkane or alkene between C 1 and C 16 is acceptable.
  • the bifunctional catalysts were synthesized in two distinct ways to vary the way the phases were mixed.
  • the methods used here can be easily extended to incorporate a number of oxides, such as the rare earth oxides, zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, the molybdenum oxides, the niobium oxides or combinations thereof, onto any transition metal-exchanged zeolite, including but not limited to Co-ZSM-5, Fe-ZSM-5, or Cu-ZSM-5 as well as the multimetallic-exchanged zeolites.
  • zeolites besides ZSM-5, such as zeolite Y, Beta zeolite, the others synthetic or natural zeolites, or other molecular-sieve-like materials, such as silica-aluminophosphate (SAPO) or MCM-41, could be used as the primary component of the metal support.
  • SAPO silica-aluminophosphate
  • Ceria was introduced by first diluting a ceria sol from 20 wt % to 0.01M. Two grams of the Cu-ZSM-5 was mixed with 40 ml of the ceria solution, and was stirred overnight at room temperature. The slurry was filtered, washed, dried, and then calcined using the same conditions above. This catalyst will be referred to as “CeO 2 /Cu-ZSM-5”.
  • Cu-ZSM-5/CeO 2 High surface area ceria was first prepared following traditional procedures. Five grams of cerium carbonate was slowly mixed with 4.5 ml of glacial acetic acid to produce cerium acetate. The sample was dried in a vacuum over at 100° C., the calcined in air at 425° C. to produce cerium oxide. The ceria was coated with a layer of Al 2 O 3 to act as a template by mixing 2 g of the ceria with 40 ml of a 0.01M Al 2 O 3 sol (diluted from a 20 wt % sol), stirring overnight, then filtering, washing, drying, and calcining in air at 500° C. as above.
  • the zeolite precursor solution was prepared by mixing a solution containing NaOH, dissolved Al foil, and H 2 O with tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) such that the molar concentrations in the final solution was 4:0.06:571:6:1 NaOH:Al:H 2 O:TEOS:TPAOH.
  • TEOS tetraethylorthosilicate
  • TPAOH tetrapropylammonium hydroxide
  • additional catalysts tested included: a Cu-ZSM-5 prepared similarly to CeO 2 /Cu-ZSM-5 but without ceria addition, and a quantity of the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst mixed in a equal weight ratio with the high surface area ceria prepared above. This latter catalyst was mixed by gentle grinding in a mortar for about 10 minutes.
  • the NO x conversion activity was performed as follows. Approximately 150 mg of sample was loaded into a quartz tube, and connected to a gas manifold system. Prior to reaction, the sample was pretreated in He at 500° C. for one hour. Gases were available as 5.025% NO in He, 3.0% C 3 H 6 in He, 4.96% O 2 in He, and pure He. The gases were controlled with Brooks 5850e mass flow controllers as to introduce a gas flow of 1000 ppm NO, 1000 ppm C 3 H 6 , 2% O 2 , and the balance He at a space velocity of approximately 30,000 hr-1.
  • reaction effluent was analyzed using an MTI micro gas chromatograph with molecular sieve 5A and poropak Q columns for the stationary and hydrocarbon gases, or with a California Analytical Instruments NO x detector, model HCLD-400, for the NO and NO 2 .
  • FIG. 1 The reduction of NO x and C 3 H 6 over Cu-ZSM-5 and ceria on ZSM-5 are shown on FIG. 1.
  • the zeolite supported copper shows a NO x conversion under wet conditions of just under 20% whereas the ceria and zeolite shows an NO x conversion under wet conditions of just under 10%.
  • a zeolite supported copper and ceria catalyst provides NO x conversions in the presence of water in excess of 40% at about 350° C. for both the silicon to aluminum ratios displayed in FIG. 2, that is a silicon to aluminum ratio of 67 and a silicon to aluminum ratio of 45. These conversions are outstanding. Only small amounts of NO 2 ( ⁇ 10 ppm) were observed, and no other nitrogen oxide species was present. Carbon dioxide was the only observable product from C 3 H 6 oxidation. The Cu-ZSM-5/CeO 2 catalyst had slightly lower maximum NOx activity than the Cu-ZSM-5. In all cases, the maximum NO x conversion approaches the temperature when the propene is nearly all consumed.
  • the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst shows significant loss in NO x and hydrocarbon conversion activity.
  • the CeO 2 /Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst shows improved NOx activity under wet conditions, possessing NO x conversion levels over 40%.
  • the ceria improves the Cu-ZSM-5 in two ways. First, it provides necessary water stability, most likely by drawing water away from the zeolite or active sites. Ceria also aids the NO x conversion reaction, based on improved activities with the CeO 2 /Cu-ZSM-5.
  • FIG. 3 shows similar data for a catalyst comprised of a zeolite supported copper with zirconia and a zeolite supported copper with molybdenum oxide.
  • zirconia containing catalyst is a superior performer at lower temperatures such as 400° C., whereas at 450° C. although the molybdenum containing catalyst is very good.
  • FIG. 4 shows a comparison of a cobalt and a combination of a zeolite supported cobalt with ceria. As can be seen from the data, without the ceria present there is little, if any, NO x under wet conditions whereas with the ceria present there is substantial conversion at 450° C.
  • FIG. 5 shows data for a variety of catalyst, the first being a zeolite supported copper with a combination of ceria and zirconia which shows excellent NO x conversions under wet conditions at about 400° C. and acceptable but less conversions at 350° C. Similarly, the copper cobalt supported zirconia with ceria shows excellent NO x conversions under wet conditions both at 400° and 350° C.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates comparisons of a mordenite supported copper and a mordenite supported copper with ceria under both wet and dry conditions. It is seen that the inventive catalyst, that is the copper supported mordenite with ceria has clearly superior activity at temperatures under 400° compared to the copper supported mordenite.
  • FIG. 7 shows data for a physical mixture of ceria and Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-ZSM-5 on ceria. Note that these catalysts were tested at a space velocity of 10,000 Hr ⁇ 1 and 20% water when present. The physical mixture of Cu-ZSM-5 and CeO 2 showed no loss in activity, but only a slight shift in temperature where the maximum activity occurred. In the case of Cu-ZSM-5/CeO 2 , there is still some loss of NO conversion, but not as great as the Cu-ZSM-5 alone, while hydrocarbon conversion remained high.

Abstract

This invention discloses a catalyst and process for removing nitrogen oxides from exhaust streams under lean burn conditions using hydrocarbons as the reductant. Catalysts consists of two phases, a metal exchanged molecular sieve and a stabilizing metal oxide associated with the molecular sieve.

Description

    CONTRACTUAL ORIGIN OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001] The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38 between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and The University of Chicago representing Argonne National Laboratory.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NO[0002] x) present in a lean burn exhaust by the selective catalyst reduction of NOx by a hydrocarbon with a bifunctional catalyst.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The combustion of fossil fuels unavoidably leads to the formation of nitrogen oxides (NO[0003] x), which if released to the atmosphere, can lead to acid rain and detrimental interactions with ozone. Increasing government regulations around the world have called for continued NOx emission reductions from both stationary and mobile sources, requiring new and improved technologies that can remove NOx from exhaust streams. While three-way catalysts have been optimized to reduce NOx emissions in rich-burn exhaust as from consumer automobiles, these catalysts are ineffective under lean-burn conditions, as usually observed with stationary sources or diesel engines. Reduction of NOx with ammonia has beer used industrially for stationary sources. However, it is less desirable (especially in transportation systems) due to the toxic nature of the ammonia which must be stored locally. Alternative catalytic processes have been investigated for operation under lean burn conditions, with the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with hydrocarbons being one of the most promising. These hydrocarbons are more readily available and pose less of a emission problem.
  • A large number of materials have been found to be catalyticly active for SCR. By far, the most investigated are metal-exchanged zeolites, such as Cu-ZSM-5, Co-ZSM-5, and Fe-ZSM-5. These have been found to be very active for SCR using C[0004] 3 hydrocarbons, with Cu-ZSM-5 being the most active. However, the zeolite-based materials lose much of their activity when water (common in exhaust streams) is added to the exhaust stream. The exact effects of water are not well known; it is speculated that either dealumination of the zeolite framework occurs which reduces the number of active sites, or that the metal sites agglomerate or are over-oxidized and lose their activity. While other catalysts that possess greater water stability have been found, such as metal-supported oxides, these tend to lack the desired activity seen by the metal zeolites, and produce large amounts of N2O (also a major pollutant).
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is the development of bifunctional catalysts that combine active metal-exchanged zeolite phases along with metal oxide stabilizing phases that offer hydrothermal stability with sustained activity at low temperature for lean burn exhaust under SCR conditions. [0005]
  • Accordingly, it is a principal object of this invention to provide an effective method and catalyst for the reaction of NO[0006] x in lean burn exhaust having water present.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a two part catalyst comprising a zeolite supported transition metal and a stabilizing oxide. [0007]
  • Still another object of this invention is to provide a method of remediating the concentration of nitrogen oxides (NO[0008] x) in the exhaust from lean burn combustion in the presence of water in which the exhaust containing water and NOx is contacted with one or more of an alkane or alkene reductant or mixtures thereof at a temperature of not greater than about 600° C. with a two-part catalyst including a molecular sieve supported transition metal and a stabilizing metal oxide.
  • The invention consists of certain novel features and a combination of parts hereinafter fully described, illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and particularly pointed out in the appended claims, it being understood that various changes in the details may be made without departing from the spirit, or sacrificing any of the advantages of the present invention.[0009]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For the purpose of facilitating an understanding of the invention, there is illustrated in the accompanying drawings a preferred embodiment thereof, from an inspection of which, when considered in connection with the following description, the invention, its construction and operation, and many of its advantages should be readily understood and appreciated. [0010]
  • FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0011] x and propene as a function of temperature for a Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst and a CeO2/ZSM-5 catalyst. Closed symbols represent conversions under dry conditions, while open symbols represent conversions under wet (10% water) conditions;
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0012] x and propene zeolite supported copper catalysts stabilized with ceria illustrating various silicon to aluminum ratios;
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0013] x and propene as a function of temperature for copper supported zeolite stabilized with ZrO2 and a copper supported zeolite stabilized with molybdenum oxide;
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0014] x and propene as a function of temperature for a cobalt supported zeolite and a cobalt supported zeolite stabilized with CeO2;
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0015] x and propene as a function of temperature for copper supported zeolite stabilized with CeO2 and ZrO2 and a copper and cobalt supported zeolite;
  • FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0016] x and propene as a function of temperature for a copper supported mordenite and a copper supported mordenite stabilized with CeO2; and
  • FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the conversion of NO[0017] x and propene as a function of temperature for a physical mixture of Cu-ZSM-5 and CeO2 and Cu-ZSM-5/CeO2.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • While the preferred embodiment is generally illustrated by reference to examples involving a catalyst composed of a zeolite supported copper metal impregnated with a ceria stabilizing oxide, it should be understood that a variety of molecular sieve materials are satisfactory including zeolites. Specifically, only zeolite Y, zeolite beta, mordenite, ferrierite, ZSM-5, and ZSM-12 have been used. The molecular sieve should have a pore size of at least about 4 Å. Moreover, any transition metal would be adequate to be supported by a molecular sieve in a wide variety of concentrations. However, commonly used transition metals are copper, cobalt, iron, molybdenum, vanadium and various combinations thereof. Also, the supporting oxides can be any one or more of the rare earth oxides (such as cerium oxide) and transition metal oxides (such as zirconium oxide, molybdenum oxide, vanadium oxide and niobium oxide). [0018]
  • Specifically, a wide variety of pore size zeolites has been investigated and it is preferred that the pore size in the range of from about 4 Å and up to about 8 Å. In the art, these are referred to as medium pore and wide pore zeolites. Investigations have been conducted using various water concentrations up to about 20%. It is believed that the stabilizing oxide may be present in the catalyst in the range of from about 0.1% by weight to about 5% by weight including the molecular sieve. It is also believed that the typical exchange levels for the transition metal may be anywhere from about 25-100%. Moreover, a variety of ratios of silicon to aluminum have been tested in zeolites and found to be satisfactory. Silicon to aluminum ratios found to be satisfactory are generally between about 238 and about 17 to one. While the reductions herein use propene (C[0019] 3H6) any alkane or alkene between C1 and C16 is acceptable.
  • Most of the examples investigated have been using the Cu-ZSM-5 and CeO[0020] 2 system. Besides physically mixing these catalysts, the bifunctional catalysts were synthesized in two distinct ways to vary the way the phases were mixed. The methods used here can be easily extended to incorporate a number of oxides, such as the rare earth oxides, zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, the molybdenum oxides, the niobium oxides or combinations thereof, onto any transition metal-exchanged zeolite, including but not limited to Co-ZSM-5, Fe-ZSM-5, or Cu-ZSM-5 as well as the multimetallic-exchanged zeolites. Furthermore, it is believed that other zeolites besides ZSM-5, such as zeolite Y, Beta zeolite, the others synthetic or natural zeolites, or other molecular-sieve-like materials, such as silica-aluminophosphate (SAPO) or MCM-41, could be used as the primary component of the metal support.
  • CeO[0021] 2/Cu-ZSM-5: Copper was ion exchanged with a ZSM-5 zeolite via typical means. A 0.01 M solution of Cu(NO3)2 was prepared, and 2 g of H-ZSM-5 (SiO2/Al2O3=80) was stirred into 40 ml of the solution. The slurry was stirred overnight at room temperature, then filtered, washed with distilled water, dried at 100° C. in a vacuum oven, then calcined in air at 500° C. for 3 hrs. Copper loadings can be adjusted by changing the concentration of the solution, the pH of mixing, or by repeated exchanges with the solution. Ceria was introduced by first diluting a ceria sol from 20 wt % to 0.01M. Two grams of the Cu-ZSM-5 was mixed with 40 ml of the ceria solution, and was stirred overnight at room temperature. The slurry was filtered, washed, dried, and then calcined using the same conditions above. This catalyst will be referred to as “CeO2/Cu-ZSM-5”.
  • Cu-ZSM-5/CeO[0022] 2: High surface area ceria was first prepared following traditional procedures. Five grams of cerium carbonate was slowly mixed with 4.5 ml of glacial acetic acid to produce cerium acetate. The sample was dried in a vacuum over at 100° C., the calcined in air at 425° C. to produce cerium oxide. The ceria was coated with a layer of Al2O3 to act as a template by mixing 2 g of the ceria with 40 ml of a 0.01M Al2O3 sol (diluted from a 20 wt % sol), stirring overnight, then filtering, washing, drying, and calcining in air at 500° C. as above. The zeolite precursor solution was prepared by mixing a solution containing NaOH, dissolved Al foil, and H2O with tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) such that the molar concentrations in the final solution was 4:0.06:571:6:1 NaOH:Al:H2O:TEOS:TPAOH. The solution was stirred at room temperature overnight, then approximately 40 ml was added to 2 g of the Al2O3 coated ceria in an autoclave. The autoclave was heated to 175° C. for 6 hrs under autogenic pressure. After rapid cooling, the sample was filtered, washed, dried, then calcined for 6 hrs in air at 500° C. to remove residual organic compounds. Copper was exchanged with the zeolite film/ceria following the methods listed above for CeO2/Cu-ZSM-5. The final catalyst will be referred to as “Cu-ZSM-5/CeO2”.
  • In addition to the catalysts above, additional catalysts tested included: a Cu-ZSM-5 prepared similarly to CeO[0023] 2/Cu-ZSM-5 but without ceria addition, and a quantity of the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst mixed in a equal weight ratio with the high surface area ceria prepared above. This latter catalyst was mixed by gentle grinding in a mortar for about 10 minutes.
  • The NO[0024] x conversion activity was performed as follows. Approximately 150 mg of sample was loaded into a quartz tube, and connected to a gas manifold system. Prior to reaction, the sample was pretreated in He at 500° C. for one hour. Gases were available as 5.025% NO in He, 3.0% C3H6 in He, 4.96% O2 in He, and pure He. The gases were controlled with Brooks 5850e mass flow controllers as to introduce a gas flow of 1000 ppm NO, 1000 ppm C3H6, 2% O2, and the balance He at a space velocity of approximately 30,000 hr-1. For water tests, water was pumped into the system with a syringe pump and the water and gas flows were adjusted to give the same concentration of gases above and 10% H2O. The reaction was allowed to proceed at 500° C. for 3 hrs prior to taking any readings. The reaction temperature was varied between 200 and 600° C. in 50° C. increments, allowing for at least 30 minutes at temperature before analyzing the effluent. The reaction effluent was analyzed using an MTI micro gas chromatograph with molecular sieve 5A and poropak Q columns for the stationary and hydrocarbon gases, or with a California Analytical Instruments NOx detector, model HCLD-400, for the NO and NO2.
  • The reduction of NO[0025] x and C3H6 over Cu-ZSM-5 and ceria on ZSM-5 are shown on FIG. 1. As can be seen, at about 350° C., the zeolite supported copper shows a NOx conversion under wet conditions of just under 20% whereas the ceria and zeolite shows an NOx conversion under wet conditions of just under 10%.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, it can be seen that the combination of a zeolite supported copper and ceria catalyst provides NO[0026] x conversions in the presence of water in excess of 40% at about 350° C. for both the silicon to aluminum ratios displayed in FIG. 2, that is a silicon to aluminum ratio of 67 and a silicon to aluminum ratio of 45. These conversions are outstanding. Only small amounts of NO2 (<10 ppm) were observed, and no other nitrogen oxide species was present. Carbon dioxide was the only observable product from C3H6 oxidation. The Cu-ZSM-5/CeO2 catalyst had slightly lower maximum NOx activity than the Cu-ZSM-5. In all cases, the maximum NOx conversion approaches the temperature when the propene is nearly all consumed.
  • Under wet conditions, the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst shows significant loss in NO[0027] x and hydrocarbon conversion activity. The CeO2/Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst shows improved NOx activity under wet conditions, possessing NOx conversion levels over 40%.
  • After reaction, the used catalysts were examined in the reactor prior to removal. It was noted that Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst showed significant discoloration throughout the bed, indicative of coking. However, with the other catalysts tested, it was observed that only a small fraction of the bed length was discolored, the rest of the bed remaining the same color as the original sample. [0028]
  • The ceria improves the Cu-ZSM-5 in two ways. First, it provides necessary water stability, most likely by drawing water away from the zeolite or active sites. Ceria also aids the NO[0029] x conversion reaction, based on improved activities with the CeO2/Cu-ZSM-5.
  • FIG. 3 shows similar data for a catalyst comprised of a zeolite supported copper with zirconia and a zeolite supported copper with molybdenum oxide. In these data it is clear that the zirconia containing catalyst is a superior performer at lower temperatures such as 400° C., whereas at 450° C. although the molybdenum containing catalyst is very good. [0030]
  • FIG. 4 shows a comparison of a cobalt and a combination of a zeolite supported cobalt with ceria. As can be seen from the data, without the ceria present there is little, if any, NO[0031] x under wet conditions whereas with the ceria present there is substantial conversion at 450° C.
  • FIG. 5 shows data for a variety of catalyst, the first being a zeolite supported copper with a combination of ceria and zirconia which shows excellent NO[0032] x conversions under wet conditions at about 400° C. and acceptable but less conversions at 350° C. Similarly, the copper cobalt supported zirconia with ceria shows excellent NOx conversions under wet conditions both at 400° and 350° C.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates comparisons of a mordenite supported copper and a mordenite supported copper with ceria under both wet and dry conditions. It is seen that the inventive catalyst, that is the copper supported mordenite with ceria has clearly superior activity at temperatures under 400° compared to the copper supported mordenite. [0033]
  • Finally in FIG. 7, shows data for a physical mixture of ceria and Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-ZSM-5 on ceria. Note that these catalysts were tested at a space velocity of 10,000 Hr[0034] −1 and 20% water when present. The physical mixture of Cu-ZSM-5 and CeO2 showed no loss in activity, but only a slight shift in temperature where the maximum activity occurred. In the case of Cu-ZSM-5/CeO2, there is still some loss of NO conversion, but not as great as the Cu-ZSM-5 alone, while hydrocarbon conversion remained high.
  • The date reported herein were for lean-burn combustion gases, that is combustion gases in which air or oxygen was present in greater than stoichiometric quantities. Moreover, all the data reported herein had between about 10 and 20% water present in the combustion gases. [0035]
  • While there has been disclosed what is considered to be the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is understood that various changes in the details may be made without departing from the spirit, or sacrificing any of the advantages of the present invention. [0036]

Claims (30)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A two phase catalyst comprising a molecular sieve having a pore size not less than about 4 Å supported transition metal and a stabilizing oxide.
2. The two phase catalyst of claim 1, wherein the molecular sieve is a zeolite of one or more of zeolite Y, zeolite beta, mordenite, ferrierite, ZSM-5, and ZSM-12.
3. The two phase catalyst of claim 2, wherein the transition metal is one or more of Cu, Co, Fe and Mo and the stabilizing oxide is one or more of the oxides of Ce, Zr, Mo, V and Nb.
4. The two phase catalyst of claim 1, wherein the two phases are a physical mixture.
5. The two phase catalyst of claim 1, wherein the zeolite is impregnated with the stabilizing oxide.
6. A two phase catalyst comprising a zeolite supported transition metal and a stabilizing oxide.
7. The two phase catalyst of claim 6, wherein the zeolite has a pore size not less than about 4 Å.
8. The two phase catalyst of claim 6, wherein the zeolite has a pore size in the range of from about 4 Å to about 8 Å.
9. The two phase catalyst of claim 6, wherein the zeolite is one or more of zeolite beta, mordenite, ferrierite, ZSM-5, ZSM-12, and zeolite Y.
10. The two phase catalyst of claim 7, wherein the transition metal is one or more of Cu, Co, Fe and Mo.
11. The two phase catalyst of claim 7, wherein the stabilizing oxide is one or more of the rare earth oxides, zirconium oxide, molybdenum oxide, vanadium oxide and niobium oxide.
12. The two phase catalyst of claim 10, wherein the stabilizing oxide one or more of the oxides of Ce, Zr, Mo, V and Nb.
13. The two phase catalyst of claim 12, wherein the transition metal includes Cu and the stabilizing oxide includes CeO2.
14. The two phase catalyst of claim 13, wherein the zeolite has both Al and Si and the Si to Al ratio is between about 238 and about 17.
15. The two phase catalyst of claim 6, wherein the two phases are a physical mixture.
16. The two phase catalyst of claim 6, wherein the stabilizing oxide is impregnated on the zeolite.
17. A method of remediating the concentration of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the exhaust from lean burn combustion in the presence of water comprising contacting the exhaust containing water and NOx with one or more of an alkane or alkene reductant or mixtures thereof at a temperature of not greater than about 600° C. with a two part catalyst comprising a molecular sieve having a pore size not less than about 4 Å supported transition metal and a stabilizing oxide.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the molecular sieve is a zeolite.
19. The catalyst of claim 18, wherein the zeolite has a pore size in the range of from about 4 Å to about 8 Å.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the zeolite is one or more of zeolite beta, mordenite, ferrierite, ZSM-5, ZSM-12, and zeolite Y.
21. The method of claim 17, wherein the transition metal is one or more of Cu, Co, Fe and Mo.
22. The method of claim 17, wherein the stabilizing oxide is one or more of the rare earth oxides, zirconium oxide, molybdenum oxide, vanadium oxide and niobium oxide.
23. The method of claim 18, wherein the stabilizing oxide is one or more of the oxides of Ce, Zr, Mo, V and Nb and the transition metal is one or more of Cu, Co, Fe and Mo.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the transition metal includes Cu and the stabilizing oxide includes CeO2.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the zeolite has both Al and Si and the Si to Al ratio is between about 238 and about 17.
26. The method of claim 17, wherein the reductant is a C1 to C16 hydrocarbon.
27. The method of claim 17, wherein nitrogen oxides are present in a concentration of the exhaust gas of not less than about 100 ppm.
28. The method of claim 17, wherein nitrogen oxides are present in a concentration of the exhaust gas in the range of from about 100 ppm to about 2000 ppm.
29. The method of claim 27, wherein the exhaust contacting the catalyst is at a temperature less than about 500° C.
30. The method of claim 27, wherein the exhaust contacting the catalyst is at a temperature less than about 350° C. and has water present in the exhaust at a concentration of not less than about 10% by volume.
US09/975,708 2001-10-11 2001-10-11 Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons Abandoned US20030073566A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/975,708 US20030073566A1 (en) 2001-10-11 2001-10-11 Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons
PCT/US2002/028019 WO2003031781A1 (en) 2001-10-11 2002-09-04 NOVEL CATALYST FOR SELECTIVE NOx REDUCTION USING HYDROCARBONS
US10/384,344 US7220692B2 (en) 2001-10-11 2003-03-07 Catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/975,708 US20030073566A1 (en) 2001-10-11 2001-10-11 Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/384,344 Continuation-In-Part US7220692B2 (en) 2001-10-11 2003-03-07 Catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030073566A1 true US20030073566A1 (en) 2003-04-17

Family

ID=25523299

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/975,708 Abandoned US20030073566A1 (en) 2001-10-11 2001-10-11 Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons
US10/384,344 Expired - Lifetime US7220692B2 (en) 2001-10-11 2003-03-07 Catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/384,344 Expired - Lifetime US7220692B2 (en) 2001-10-11 2003-03-07 Catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US20030073566A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003031781A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050100494A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 George Yaluris Ferrierite compositions for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050100493A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 George Yaluris Ferrierite compositions for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050232839A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 George Yaluris Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050230285A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 George Yaluris Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20070149385A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Ke Liu Catalyst system for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions
US20090057199A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2009-03-05 Michael Scott Ziebarth Compositions and Processes for Reducing NOx Emissions During Fluid Catalytic Cracking
WO2010099395A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Corning Incorporated Zeolite and redox oxide combined catalyst body
US20100221160A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Kaveh Adib Ceria-Zirconia-Zeolite Catalyst Body
WO2012168277A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2012-12-13 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Catalytic converter for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas of diesel engines
JP2013226543A (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-11-07 Hitachi Zosen Corp Method for purifying combustion exhaust gas, and denitration catalyst
WO2015167770A1 (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 Uop Llc Metal impregnated zeolite adsorbents, methods of making, and systems for using the same
CN105032395A (en) * 2015-05-29 2015-11-11 上海大学 Zirconium doped cerium vanadate denitration catalyst, preparation method and application
WO2016046129A1 (en) * 2014-09-22 2016-03-31 Treibacher Industrie Ag Thermally stable nh3-scr catalyst compositions
US20170007985A1 (en) * 2014-01-23 2017-01-12 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Catalytic converter
CN107790130A (en) * 2017-11-13 2018-03-13 重庆理工大学 One kind is used for SCR degraded NO catalyst
CN111389454A (en) * 2020-04-29 2020-07-10 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 Catalyst and method for preparing p-tolualdehyde from synthesis gas and toluene

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0318776D0 (en) * 2003-08-09 2003-09-10 Johnson Matthey Plc Lean NOx catalyst
GB0523135D0 (en) * 2005-11-14 2005-12-21 Johnson Matthey Plc Reducing coking over Ag/A1203 HC-SCR catalyst
DE102006037314A1 (en) * 2006-08-08 2008-02-14 Süd-Chemie AG Use of a catalyst based on zeolites in the reaction of oxygenates to lower olefins and processes for this purpose
JP5076192B2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2012-11-21 国立大学法人 岡山大学 Catalyst and method for purifying nitrogen oxides in diesel engine exhaust gas using unburned carbon
JP2008212845A (en) * 2007-03-05 2008-09-18 Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corp Carbon monoxide adsorbent, gas purification method, and gas purifier
KR100931106B1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-12-10 현대자동차주식회사 Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst and Its Manufacturing Method
US20110120100A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2011-05-26 General Electric Company Catalyst and method of manufacture
EP2335810B1 (en) * 2009-12-11 2012-08-01 Umicore AG & Co. KG Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas of diesel engines
US8617497B2 (en) * 2010-04-20 2013-12-31 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Mixed oxide materials for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in exhaust gases
US20110274607A1 (en) * 2010-05-04 2011-11-10 Technical University Of Denmark Vanadia-supported zeolites for scr of no by ammonia
US20120015801A1 (en) * 2010-07-15 2012-01-19 Airflow Catalyst Systems Process for preparation of a zeolite-based catalyst
US8987161B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2015-03-24 Ut-Battelle, Llc Zeolite-based SCR catalysts and their use in diesel engine emission treatment
EP2465606A1 (en) 2010-12-16 2012-06-20 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Zeolith-based catalytic converter with improved catalytic activity for reducing nitrogen oxides
CN102513127B (en) * 2011-11-21 2014-05-28 张远洋 Nitrogen monoxide catalyst with deep ammonia reduction function and preparation method thereof
GB201200784D0 (en) * 2011-12-12 2012-02-29 Johnson Matthey Plc Exhaust system for a lean-burn internal combustion engine including SCR catalyst
CN102698765B (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-04-09 南京工业大学 Compound denitration catalyst for selective reduction of NO (nitric oxide) by propylene, and preparation method thereof
CN108472638A (en) * 2015-11-17 2018-08-31 巴斯夫公司 Exhaust treating catalyst agent
GB201608643D0 (en) * 2016-05-17 2016-06-29 Thermo Fisher Scient Bremen Elemental analysis system and method
MX2019004771A (en) 2016-10-24 2019-08-05 Basf Corp Integrated scr catalyst and lnt for nox abatement.
US11202991B2 (en) * 2017-02-20 2021-12-21 Cataler Corporation Exhaust gas purifying catalyst
WO2018224651A2 (en) 2017-06-09 2018-12-13 Basf Se Catalytic article and exhaust gas treatment systems
JP7202051B2 (en) 2017-06-09 2023-01-11 ビーエーエスエフ コーポレーション Catalytic articles and exhaust gas treatment systems
CN111201075B (en) 2017-10-12 2023-02-03 巴斯夫公司 Combined NOx absorber and SCR catalyst
CA3081933A1 (en) 2017-11-10 2019-05-16 Basf Corporation Catalyzed soot filter with reduced ammonia oxidation
CN108435189B (en) * 2018-03-27 2021-01-08 山东师范大学 Samarium-doped iron-based denitration catalyst with water resistance and sulfur resistance and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5077253A (en) * 1987-12-28 1991-12-31 Mobil Oil Corporation Layered cracking catalyst and method of manufacture and use thereof
GB8814601D0 (en) * 1988-06-20 1988-07-27 Shell Int Research Process for preparation of zeolitic catalysts
US4962075A (en) * 1988-12-05 1990-10-09 Mobil Oil Corp. Zeolitic copper catalyst
DE3841990A1 (en) * 1988-12-14 1990-06-21 Degussa PROCESS FOR REDUCING STICK OXIDES FROM EXHAUST GASES
CA2024154C (en) * 1989-08-31 1995-02-14 Senshi Kasahara Catalyst for reducing nitrogen oxides from exhaust gas
US4973399A (en) * 1989-11-03 1990-11-27 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
CA2082937C (en) * 1990-05-14 1998-05-19 Howard L. Greene Catalysts for the destruction of halogenated organics
JP3098083B2 (en) * 1991-12-26 2000-10-10 マツダ株式会社 Exhaust gas purification catalyst
US5364606A (en) * 1993-03-01 1994-11-15 General Electric Company NOx reduction through the use of methane
DE69427932T2 (en) * 1993-05-10 2002-04-04 Sakai Chemical Industry Co Catalyst for the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides
US5851378A (en) * 1994-06-03 1998-12-22 Akzo Nobel Nv Hydrocracking catalyst comprising coated cracking component particles
US5676912A (en) * 1995-02-22 1997-10-14 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for exhaust gas NOx, CO, and hydrocarbon removal
US5935889A (en) * 1996-10-04 1999-08-10 Abb Lummus Global Inc. Catalyst and method of preparation
FR2770418B1 (en) * 1997-11-04 1999-12-03 Grande Paroisse Sa PROCESS FOR THE ELIMINATION IN GAS OF NOX NITROGEN OXIDES BY SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR) WITH AMMONIA ON ZEOLIC CATALYSTS WHICH DO NOT CAUSE THE FORMATION OF NITROGEN PROTOXIDE
US6143681A (en) * 1998-07-10 2000-11-07 Northwestern University NOx reduction catalyst

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050100493A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 George Yaluris Ferrierite compositions for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US9931595B2 (en) * 2003-11-06 2018-04-03 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Ferrierite composition for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050100494A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 George Yaluris Ferrierite compositions for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20100276337A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2010-11-04 George Yaluris Ferrierite composition for reducing nox emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050232839A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 George Yaluris Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050230285A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 George Yaluris Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US7918991B2 (en) 2005-04-27 2011-04-05 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20090057199A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2009-03-05 Michael Scott Ziebarth Compositions and Processes for Reducing NOx Emissions During Fluid Catalytic Cracking
US20070149385A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Ke Liu Catalyst system for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions
US9492811B2 (en) 2009-02-27 2016-11-15 Corning Incorporated Zeolite and redox oxide combined catalyst body
US10188985B2 (en) 2009-02-27 2019-01-29 Corning Incorporated Zeolite and redox oxide combined catalyst body
US10343117B2 (en) * 2009-02-27 2019-07-09 Corning Incorporated Ceria-zirconia-zeolite catalyst body
WO2010099395A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Corning Incorporated Zeolite and redox oxide combined catalyst body
US20100221160A1 (en) * 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 Kaveh Adib Ceria-Zirconia-Zeolite Catalyst Body
US20140041366A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2014-02-13 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Catalytic converter for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas of diesel engines
US9273578B2 (en) * 2011-06-07 2016-03-01 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Catalytic converter for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas of diesel engines
WO2012168277A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2012-12-13 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Catalytic converter for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas of diesel engines
JP2013226543A (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-11-07 Hitachi Zosen Corp Method for purifying combustion exhaust gas, and denitration catalyst
US11291975B2 (en) 2014-01-23 2022-04-05 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Catalytic converter
US10300461B2 (en) * 2014-01-23 2019-05-28 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Catalytic converter
US20170007985A1 (en) * 2014-01-23 2017-01-12 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Catalytic converter
US9452414B2 (en) 2014-04-30 2016-09-27 Uop Llc Metal impregnated zeolite adsorbents, methods of making, and systems for using the same
WO2015167770A1 (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 Uop Llc Metal impregnated zeolite adsorbents, methods of making, and systems for using the same
WO2016046129A1 (en) * 2014-09-22 2016-03-31 Treibacher Industrie Ag Thermally stable nh3-scr catalyst compositions
CN105032395A (en) * 2015-05-29 2015-11-11 上海大学 Zirconium doped cerium vanadate denitration catalyst, preparation method and application
CN107790130A (en) * 2017-11-13 2018-03-13 重庆理工大学 One kind is used for SCR degraded NO catalyst
CN111389454A (en) * 2020-04-29 2020-07-10 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 Catalyst and method for preparing p-tolualdehyde from synthesis gas and toluene

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7220692B2 (en) 2007-05-22
WO2003031781A1 (en) 2003-04-17
US20050101473A1 (en) 2005-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20030073566A1 (en) Novel catalyst for selective NOx reduction using hydrocarbons
CA2351815C (en) Exhaust gas purifying catalyst
CA2575338C (en) Catalyst and method for reduction of nitrogen oxides
Ogura et al. Catalytic activity of Ir for NO-CO reaction in the presence of SO2 and excess oxygen
US20140301931A1 (en) System and Method for Two and Three Way Mixed Metal Oxide ZPGM Catalyst
US5328672A (en) Method for purification of lean-burn engine exhaust gas
US5318760A (en) Exhaust treating system for lean-burn CNG engine
US6033641A (en) Catalyst for purifying the exhaust gas from the combustion in an engine or gas turbines and method of making and using the same
CN112041051B (en) Hydrocarbon trapping catalyst
EP0702997B1 (en) Process and system for the removal of nitrogen oxides using a catalytic membrane
WO2004022229A1 (en) Novel catalyst for selective nox reduction using hydrocarbons
Calis et al. Zeolites grown on wire gauze: a new structured catalyst packing for dustproof, low pressure drop deNOx processes
US7083765B2 (en) Catalysts for lean burn engine exhaust abatement
WO1996033004A1 (en) Nitrogen oxide-reducing catalyst and process for reducing nitrogen oxides in exhaust gas
US5593933A (en) Refractory oxides based silver-tungsten lean-NOx catalyst
US6143681A (en) NOx reduction catalyst
US6217838B1 (en) Process for reducing emissions of oxides of nitrogen in a medium which is super-stoichiometric in oxidizing agents
JP4194805B2 (en) Method for catalytic removal of nitrogen oxides and catalyst therefor
US20240123403A1 (en) Catalyst for the abatement of ammonia from the exhaust of gasoline internal combustion engines
JPH0679140A (en) Method for purifying combustion exhaust gas and catalyst using the method
JP2004068717A (en) Method for removing nitrogen oxide in contacting manner and its device
Neylon et al. Bifunctional Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by Hydrocarbons
JPH06254352A (en) Method for purifying waste combustion gas and catalyst used in this method
JP2008178880A (en) Method for catalytically removing nitrogen oxide and catalyst therefor
JP2004313915A (en) Method for subjecting nitrogen oxide to catalytic reduction and catalyst therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CHICAGO, THE UNIVERSITY OF, ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER L.;NEYLON, MICHAEL K.;REEL/FRAME:012477/0710

Effective date: 20011022

AS Assignment

Owner name: ENERGY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF, DISTRICT OF C

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:CHICAGO, UNIVERSITY OF;REEL/FRAME:012806/0615

Effective date: 20020227

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION