US20030063190A1 - Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems - Google Patents

Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030063190A1
US20030063190A1 US10/314,546 US31454602A US2003063190A1 US 20030063190 A1 US20030063190 A1 US 20030063190A1 US 31454602 A US31454602 A US 31454602A US 2003063190 A1 US2003063190 A1 US 2003063190A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
die
alignment
image
images
pixel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/314,546
Inventor
Scott Young
Roger Kroeze
Curt Chadwick
Nicholas Szabo
Kent Douglas
Fred Babian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
KLA Corp
Original Assignee
KLA Instruments Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by KLA Instruments Corp filed Critical KLA Instruments Corp
Priority to US10/314,546 priority Critical patent/US20030063190A1/en
Publication of US20030063190A1 publication Critical patent/US20030063190A1/en
Priority to US11/180,348 priority patent/US20050254698A1/en
Priority to US12/221,806 priority patent/US20080304734A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • G06T7/001Industrial image inspection using an image reference approach
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/95Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
    • G01N21/956Inspecting patterns on the surface of objects
    • G01N21/95607Inspecting patterns on the surface of objects using a comparative method
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/95Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
    • G01N21/9501Semiconductor wafers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30108Industrial image inspection
    • G06T2207/30148Semiconductor; IC; Wafer

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to sub-pixel image alignment in wafer inspection machines, particularly to the alignment of images both prior to and subsequent to scanning. Two alternate methods are taught, one for laser scanning and the other for scanning with a linear array.
  • the most frequently used method for automatic inspection of photomasks or patterned semiconductor wafers utilizes comparison to detect defects.
  • two supposedly identical patterns are compared by scanning and digitizing the images.
  • the digitized images are then compared in high speed digital logic, or an image is compared with data stored in the CADS (Computer Aided Design System) database with data representing the desired pattern.
  • CADS Computer Aided Design System
  • Pat. No. 4,805,123 taught a method of achieving image subtraction by first reducing the registration error between the two images to less than a pixel.
  • the Specht method had the shortcoming that in re-registering (also known as resampling) the two images with respect to each other, interpolation of the scanned image was used, which in turn introduced errors in determining the intensities of the resulting pixels. These errors limited sensitivity (the smallest detectable defect).
  • the maximum intensity error determines the maximum detectable defect-to-pixel ratio. Since inspection speed, at a given sensitivity, defines the productivity of an inspection system, for a fixed sampling rate, it is desirable to maximize the pixel size. Therefore, to achieve the maximum throughput, one must minimize the registration error.
  • the present invention teaches methods for minimizing the registration error for the two most common scanning methods: scanning with a laser and scanning with a linear array.
  • the present invention is a method and apparatus, and variations of each, for inspecting a wafer defining at least one die thereon.
  • the present invention first obtains the electronic image equivalent of two die, and then determines the x and y offset between those electronic images. Prior to inspection for defects, those two electronic images are aligned by adjusting the x and y positions of one electronic image of one die with respect to the electronic image of the other die. Once that is accomplished, the those electronic images are compared to detect any defects that may exist on one of the die.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the pixelization of a surface by an inspection system and the mis-alignment between two images.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a diode array scanning system embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 a is the transparent reticle version of the system of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 3 a illustrates the scanning of multiple patterns from die-to-die inspection.
  • FIG. 3 b illustrates the scanning of a single pattern for die-to-database inspection.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a laser scanning system embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 a is the transparent reticle version of the system of FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 5 is a sketch of a signal that is representative of the signal applied to the acousto-optic deflector/driver of FIG. 4 to correct for coarse x-direction mis-alignment of the wafer of the stage.
  • the key to the present invention is the use of the same sampling points for both images, or the image of the die being viewed and the die equivalent in the data base, to be compared as will be seen from the following discussion.
  • FIGS. 3 a and 3 b illustrate the typical serpentine scanning technique for multiple patterns and for a single pattern, respectively.
  • a wafer 14 is scanned in a serpentine path 31 , sweeping out several dies 33 , 35 and 37 in die-to-die inspection, and in FIG. 3 b only a single die is scanned in serpentine path 31 ′ when die-to-database inspection is employed.
  • Each sweep of the path is designated a swath.
  • a typical swath may have a height of 500 to 2,000 pixels and may have a length of 500,000 pixels.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates two identical forms 20 and 30 superimposed on a grid that represents the boundaries of pixels 10 as defined by the inspection system of the present invention.
  • the nominal sampling point of each pixel is the center of that pixel however in reality the scanner measures the total light energy that falls on an area of approximately the size of a pixel 10 .
  • the idealized intensity value of each pixel is the normalized intensity value expressed as a percentage of the maximum.
  • FIG. 1 shows two identical geometric forms 20 and 30 , each consisting of a rectangle of opaque material (e.g., chromium) on a transparent medium, such as quartz.
  • opaque material e.g., chromium
  • pixels 40 A and 40 B have different measured values since the sampling points (the centers of the pixels) are not equidistant from the corresponding one of two forms 20 and 30 , respectively. Consequently, pixels 40 A and 40 B, as shown in FIG. 1 have measurable values of 76% and 92%, respectively.
  • the sampling points must nearly coincide with respect to the forms.
  • the registration error the relative displacement of the sampling points between the two forms 20 and 30 .
  • the defect detectors intensity threshold must be at least ⁇ I.
  • the minimum detectable defect size is merely D x times D y , where D x , and D y are the maximum x and y directional registration errors (see FIG. 1 for the D x and D y between forms 20 and 30 for example).
  • a coarse correction is made prior to sampling, the image is scanned and then stored in memory.
  • coarse correction in the X-direction is implemented by a mechanical movement of a mirror, while for laser scanning (FIG. 4)
  • X-directional coarse correction uses timing control of the sampling.
  • both scanning techniques use timing control of the sampling.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to minimize the intensity error caused by the registration error of sampling points with respect to the two forms to be compared whether die-to-die or die-to-data base.
  • the present invention is an improvement over the Specht method in that a coarse correction of the misregistration error is achieved in both X and Y prior to the scanning of the pattern, or patterns.
  • the residual error after coarse correction and subsequent to scanning is then further reduced by interpolation of the intensities. Since the residual alignment error after coarse correction is now small, the error contributed by interpolation is significantly smaller than when the Specht alignment and inspection method is used.
  • a larger pixel size, for a given minimum detectable defect and for a constant pixel rate translates into a higher throughput than in the prior art. Higher throughput produces more defect data which in turn results in more reliable diagnosis of the problems and better yield management.
  • One significant concept of the present invention is that one may employ a pixel that is significantly larger than the minimum detectable defect or even the minimum feature size (geometric figure on the mask or wafer), provided the two images are registered accurately with respect to each other.
  • the present invention relates to two different scanning embodiments and how improved registration may be achieved using the present invention. These scanning embodiments are: Scanning with a Diode (or TDI) Array, and Scanning with a Laser Beam. These two embodiments are discussed separately below. Additionally, it should be kept in mind that both embodiments lend themselves to scanning with both transmitted and reflected light, either separately or together in the same system.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a diode (or TDI) array scanning system using reflected light.
  • a wafer, or reticle, 14 is mounted on X/Y stage 50 , with X-Y scales 51 mounted thereon to determine stage position, and an illuminator (not shown) illuminates the area of wafer 14 under objective lens 52 .
  • the light reflected from wafer 14 travels through objective lens 52 , is reflected by tilted mirror 54 to lens 57 through which a portion of the wafer image is projected onto linear diode array 59 .
  • Mirror 54 shifts the image of wafer 14 onto diode array 59 by pivoting about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the paper under the control of piezo-electric actuator 56 with the shift occurring in the y-direction.
  • array 59 serially reads out a (y-directional) column of intensities which are digitized by A/D converter 58 .
  • This information flows from converter 58 into each of pixel memory 60 , first-in-first-out (FIFO) memory 64 and alignment computer 62 .
  • Pixel memory 60 is a two-dimensional memory of the width of a swath and a length somewhat greater than the widest (x-directional dimension) die to be inspected.
  • Pixel memory 60 is essentially also a FIFO memory, i.e. its input accepts a column of pixels at a time and outputs them at the other end.
  • Pixel memory 60 has output registers which are capable of shifting one pixel, on a command from alignment computer 62 , the data in either the x or y direction, prior to producing an output, similar to the method taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,203 by Levy et al.
  • the purpose of pixel memory 60 is to store pixel data from one die while the next die is being scanned so that the two dies can be compared.
  • This operation is illustrated by the following example.
  • the information flows into pixel memory 60 .
  • the information from die 33 is read from pixel memory 60 correctly aligned to the closest integer pixel to the image of die 35 .
  • Alignment computer 62 performs running alignment computation to determine the misalignment between the two data streams corresponding to the first swath across die 33 and the present time swath across die 35 .
  • the alignment error of these two data streams is computed as described by Specht. Integer alignment errors are corrected by the output registers of pixel memory 60 , while the fractional error is corrected by alignment corrector 66 by using resampling as discussed below.
  • the two data streams arrive at defect detector 74 aligned with a precision of such as 1/256 of a pixel is achievable.
  • alignment computer 62 In addition to the alignment correction commands fed to alignment corrector 66 and pixel memory 60 , alignment computer 62 produces three other signals. Two of these, one to stage drive 70 and a second to tilt mirror actuator 56 , are intended to provide low frequency alignment correction signals.
  • the signal to tilt mirror actuator 56 provides y-directional control, while the signal to stage drive 70 exercises control in the x-direction. The purpose of these is to make sure that the misalignment between die does not exceed the dynamic range that the correction system can rectify.
  • Alignment computer 62 also produces a strobe signal to initiate the readout of a column of pixels from linear diode sensor 59 .
  • stage 50 travels approximately at a constant speed, slightly varying the time between strobe pulses allows fine alignment in the x-direction.
  • the strobe is generated in alignment computer 62 by a phase-locked loop which derives its input from the x-directional alignment error and from a linear scale mounted on stage 50 that measures the position of stage 50 by alignment computer 62 .
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,926,489 by Danielson, et al. describes a similar implementation using a phase-locked loop.
  • FIFO memory 64 is a short memory of the same width as the swath height. Its purpose is to delay the flow of pixel information into defect detector 74 sufficiently to make sure that alignment computer 62 has enough image data to correct the alignment error, prior to the two image data streams reach defect detector 74 .
  • defect detector 74 the corresponding intensity values of the two images are compared and if the absolute value of the difference exceeds a predetermined threshold, an error flag is raised.
  • the error data is then sent to general purpose computer 72 (e.g. a Sun workstation), where adjacent defect locations are combined to permit a determination of the size and shape of the defects. This information is then used by yield management programs.
  • tilting mirror 54 and proper strobing of linear diode sensor 59 provide first order alignment corrections which reduce the needed dynamic range for the fine correction. Since the amount of error contributed by the resampling is a function of the dynamic range of the correction needed, the error intensity into defect detector 74 is smaller than would be achievable without correcting the alignment prior to sampling the image.
  • the subject invention may also be used to inspect transparent substrates, such as a reticle.
  • FIG. 2 a illustrates the system in that case.
  • Substrate 14 ′ a reticle, is illuminated from below and the only difference between this implementation and the one that uses transmitted light, is the location of the source of the illumination.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates such a laser scanner embodiment of the present invention.
  • Laser 80 directs coherent light to acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 which deflects the light in the y-direction, as described by Evelet in U.S. Pat. No. 3,851,951 (High Resolution Laser Beam Recorder with Self-focusing Acousto-optic Scanner).
  • the y-deflected light beam from acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 is then applied to beamsplitter 84 through which the laser beam passes and proceeds to lens 86 which focuses the laser beam on wafer 14 on X/Y stage 50 .
  • Some of the light incident on wafer 14 is then reflected back into lens 86 and proceeds to beamsplitter 84 , where portions of the reflected light are reflected to condenser lens 88 where it is refracted and collected on the surface of single diode sensor 90 .
  • the resultant electrical signal from diode 90 is then applied to A/D converter 100 .
  • the remaining components of the laser implementation, with the exception of alignment computer 62 ′, function as for the diode array implementation of FIG. 2.
  • pixel memory 60 alignment corrector 66 , FIFO 64 , defect detector 74 , general purpose computer 72 , stage drive 70 and X/Y stage 50 function as described above for the diode array implementation shown in FIG. 2 with stage 14 executing the same serpentine scanning travel as described previously with respect to FIG. 3.
  • A/D converter 100 and alignment computer 62 ′ perform additional functions that are necessary to control the operation of acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 .
  • Acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 is driven by a saw tooth signal (see FIG. 5) generated by alignment computer 62 ′. That saw tooth signal includes two components, a ramp 92 and variable time delay 96 between consecutive ramps.
  • X-directional coarse correction is implemented by varying time-delay 96 between successive ramps 92 , since the stage travels at a constant speed.
  • the timing of the start of ramp 92 is controlled by a phased-locked loop oscillator of alignment computer 62 ′ that derives its control signal from the x-directional alignment error determined by alignment computer 62 ′.
  • Alignment computer 62 ′ also generates strobe pulses to control when A/D converter 100 samples the video signal from diode sensor 90 . Since the laser beam sweeps across wafer 14 at a constant speed, the y-coordinates of the samples are determined by the timing of the strobe pulses.
  • These strobe pulses are also driven by the phase-locked loop oscillator of alignment computer 62 ′ which is controlled by the y-directional alignment error.
  • the fine corrections in both X and Y are executed in alignment corrector 66 , as discussed for the diode array embodiment of FIG. 2.
  • switch 61 and data base generator 63 are as discussed above for FIG. 2.
  • reticle 14 ′ is placed on stage 50 and the implementation is virtually identical to the one shown in FIG. 4 except that diode detector 90 is now under stage 50 to collect, via condenser lens 88 ′, the light transmitted through reticle 14 ′. In most instances, the inspection will be against the CADS database for which DataBase Generator 63 provides a simulated image.

Abstract

A method and apparatus, and variations of each, for inspecting a wafer defining at least one die thereon is disclosed. The present invention first obtains the electronic image equivalent of two die, and then determines the x and y offset between those electronic images. Prior to inspection for defects, those two electronic images are aligned by adjusting the x and y positions of one electronic image of one die with respect to the electronic image of the other die. Once that is accomplished, the those electronic images are compared to detect any defects that may exist on one of the die.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is related to sub-pixel image alignment in wafer inspection machines, particularly to the alignment of images both prior to and subsequent to scanning. Two alternate methods are taught, one for laser scanning and the other for scanning with a linear array. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • It is well known in the wafer inspection art that when two similar images are to be compared, sub-pixel alignment is often necessary to obtain the degree of accuracy that is desired. Traditionally that alignment was accomplished by digitally interpolating the image after scanning. [0002]
  • The most frequently used method for automatic inspection of photomasks or patterned semiconductor wafers utilizes comparison to detect defects. Typically, two supposedly identical patterns are compared by scanning and digitizing the images. The digitized images are then compared in high speed digital logic, or an image is compared with data stored in the CADS (Computer Aided Design System) database with data representing the desired pattern. [0003]
  • In the comparison process to detect differences between the two patterns some form of image subtraction is most frequently employed. However, image subtraction is contingent on sampling the two images (or the image and image data from the database) at nearly identical points for both images. [0004]
  • Early mask inspection systems, such as taught by Levy, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,203, were able to guarantee only a ±2½ pixel registration accuracy between the two images. Because of the limited registration accuracy, Levy required that the defect detection algorithm use feature extraction, followed by the matching of these features, rather than image subtraction. Some time later Levy, U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,455, taught area subtraction, but because of the limited registration accuracy computed the intensity difference at several possible registrations. If, for any of these registrations the absolute value of the intensities was less than a predetermined threshold, no defect was recorded at that particular pixel. Subsequently, Specht, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,123, taught a method of achieving image subtraction by first reducing the registration error between the two images to less than a pixel. However, the Specht method had the shortcoming that in re-registering (also known as resampling) the two images with respect to each other, interpolation of the scanned image was used, which in turn introduced errors in determining the intensities of the resulting pixels. These errors limited sensitivity (the smallest detectable defect). [0005]
  • As will be shown subsequently, the maximum intensity error determines the maximum detectable defect-to-pixel ratio. Since inspection speed, at a given sensitivity, defines the productivity of an inspection system, for a fixed sampling rate, it is desirable to maximize the pixel size. Therefore, to achieve the maximum throughput, one must minimize the registration error. The present invention teaches methods for minimizing the registration error for the two most common scanning methods: scanning with a laser and scanning with a linear array. [0006]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is a method and apparatus, and variations of each, for inspecting a wafer defining at least one die thereon. The present invention first obtains the electronic image equivalent of two die, and then determines the x and y offset between those electronic images. Prior to inspection for defects, those two electronic images are aligned by adjusting the x and y positions of one electronic image of one die with respect to the electronic image of the other die. Once that is accomplished, the those electronic images are compared to detect any defects that may exist on one of the die.[0007]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the pixelization of a surface by an inspection system and the mis-alignment between two images. [0008]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a diode array scanning system embodiment of the present invention. [0009]
  • FIG. 2[0010] a is the transparent reticle version of the system of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 3[0011] a illustrates the scanning of multiple patterns from die-to-die inspection.
  • FIG. 3[0012] b illustrates the scanning of a single pattern for die-to-database inspection.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a laser scanning system embodiment of the present invention. [0013]
  • FIG. 4[0014] a is the transparent reticle version of the system of FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 5 is a sketch of a signal that is representative of the signal applied to the acousto-optic deflector/driver of FIG. 4 to correct for coarse x-direction mis-alignment of the wafer of the stage.[0015]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • The key to the present invention is the use of the same sampling points for both images, or the image of the die being viewed and the die equivalent in the data base, to be compared as will be seen from the following discussion. [0016]
  • FIGS. 3[0017] a and 3 b illustrate the typical serpentine scanning technique for multiple patterns and for a single pattern, respectively. In FIG. 3a wafer 14 is scanned in a serpentine path 31, sweeping out several dies 33, 35 and 37 in die-to-die inspection, and in FIG. 3b only a single die is scanned in serpentine path 31′ when die-to-database inspection is employed. Each sweep of the path is designated a swath. A typical swath may have a height of 500 to 2,000 pixels and may have a length of 500,000 pixels.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates two [0018] identical forms 20 and 30 superimposed on a grid that represents the boundaries of pixels 10 as defined by the inspection system of the present invention. The nominal sampling point of each pixel is the center of that pixel however in reality the scanner measures the total light energy that falls on an area of approximately the size of a pixel 10. The idealized intensity value of each pixel is the normalized intensity value expressed as a percentage of the maximum. FIG. 1 shows two identical geometric forms 20 and 30, each consisting of a rectangle of opaque material (e.g., chromium) on a transparent medium, such as quartz. In this configuration, pixels 40A and 40B have different measured values since the sampling points (the centers of the pixels) are not equidistant from the corresponding one of two forms 20 and 30, respectively. Consequently, pixels 40A and 40B, as shown in FIG. 1 have measurable values of 76% and 92%, respectively.
  • Clearly, if pixel-to-pixel comparison is used for defect detection, the sampling points must nearly coincide with respect to the forms. It can readily be seen that the registration error (the relative displacement of the sampling points between the two [0019] forms 20 and 30) determines the maximum possible intensity difference between any two pixels to be compared. Assuming that ΔI is the maximum possible intensity difference attributable to the registration error, then the defect detectors intensity threshold must be at least ΔI. For binary images, i.e. where at every sampling point the transmittance is either 0 or 100%, the minimum detectable defect size (in terms of area) is merely Dx times Dy, where Dx, and Dy are the maximum x and y directional registration errors (see FIG. 1 for the Dx and Dy between forms 20 and 30 for example).
  • In the prior art, as stated above in the Background of the Invention section, registering the two images was accomplished by first scanning both images. Next, integer pixel misalignment was corrected as taught by Levy, by shifting the image in the digital memory the appropriate number of locations. Fractional pixel registration was achieved by resampling one of the images as taught by Specht. [0020]
  • In the present invention, for both scanning techniques, a coarse correction is made prior to sampling, the image is scanned and then stored in memory. For diode array scanning (FIG. 2) coarse correction in the X-direction is implemented by a mechanical movement of a mirror, while for laser scanning (FIG. 4) X-directional coarse correction uses timing control of the sampling. In the Y-direction, both scanning techniques use timing control of the sampling. [0021]
  • The purpose of the present invention is to minimize the intensity error caused by the registration error of sampling points with respect to the two forms to be compared whether die-to-die or die-to-data base. [0022]
  • The present invention is an improvement over the Specht method in that a coarse correction of the misregistration error is achieved in both X and Y prior to the scanning of the pattern, or patterns. The residual error after coarse correction and subsequent to scanning is then further reduced by interpolation of the intensities. Since the residual alignment error after coarse correction is now small, the error contributed by interpolation is significantly smaller than when the Specht alignment and inspection method is used. Hence, with the present invention, the two images used in image subtraction-are much better aligned with respect to each other and consequently the minimum detectable defect, as a percentage of the pixel size, is significantly smaller than as in the prior art. Consequently, a larger pixel size can be used for a given minimum detectable defect. A larger pixel size, for a given minimum detectable defect and for a constant pixel rate translates into a higher throughput than in the prior art. Higher throughput produces more defect data which in turn results in more reliable diagnosis of the problems and better yield management. [0023]
  • One significant concept of the present invention is that one may employ a pixel that is significantly larger than the minimum detectable defect or even the minimum feature size (geometric figure on the mask or wafer), provided the two images are registered accurately with respect to each other. [0024]
  • The present invention relates to two different scanning embodiments and how improved registration may be achieved using the present invention. These scanning embodiments are: Scanning with a Diode (or TDI) Array, and Scanning with a Laser Beam. These two embodiments are discussed separately below. Additionally, it should be kept in mind that both embodiments lend themselves to scanning with both transmitted and reflected light, either separately or together in the same system. [0025]
  • Diode (or TDI) Array Scanning [0026]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a diode (or TDI) array scanning system using reflected light. A wafer, or reticle, [0027] 14 is mounted on X/Y stage 50, with X-Y scales 51 mounted thereon to determine stage position, and an illuminator (not shown) illuminates the area of wafer 14 under objective lens 52. The light reflected from wafer 14 travels through objective lens 52, is reflected by tilted mirror 54 to lens 57 through which a portion of the wafer image is projected onto linear diode array 59. Mirror 54 shifts the image of wafer 14 onto diode array 59 by pivoting about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the paper under the control of piezo-electric actuator 56 with the shift occurring in the y-direction. Each time stage 14 travels the distance of a pixel, array 59 serially reads out a (y-directional) column of intensities which are digitized by A/D converter 58. This information flows from converter 58 into each of pixel memory 60, first-in-first-out (FIFO) memory 64 and alignment computer 62. Pixel memory 60 is a two-dimensional memory of the width of a swath and a length somewhat greater than the widest (x-directional dimension) die to be inspected. Pixel memory 60 is essentially also a FIFO memory, i.e. its input accepts a column of pixels at a time and outputs them at the other end. Pixel memory 60 has output registers which are capable of shifting one pixel, on a command from alignment computer 62, the data in either the x or y direction, prior to producing an output, similar to the method taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,203 by Levy et al. The purpose of pixel memory 60 is to store pixel data from one die while the next die is being scanned so that the two dies can be compared.
  • This operation is illustrated by the following example. Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3[0028] a as die 33 is scanned on the first pass across wafer 14, the information flows into pixel memory 60. Then, as the scanner starts to scan die 35, the information from die 33 is read from pixel memory 60 correctly aligned to the closest integer pixel to the image of die 35. Alignment computer 62 performs running alignment computation to determine the misalignment between the two data streams corresponding to the first swath across die 33 and the present time swath across die 35. The alignment error of these two data streams is computed as described by Specht. Integer alignment errors are corrected by the output registers of pixel memory 60, while the fractional error is corrected by alignment corrector 66 by using resampling as discussed below.
  • Overall, the two data streams, one from [0029] FIFO memory 64 and the other from alignment corrector 66, arrive at defect detector 74 aligned with a precision of such as 1/256 of a pixel is achievable.
  • In addition to the alignment correction commands fed to [0030] alignment corrector 66 and pixel memory 60, alignment computer 62 produces three other signals. Two of these, one to stage drive 70 and a second to tilt mirror actuator 56, are intended to provide low frequency alignment correction signals. The signal to tilt mirror actuator 56 provides y-directional control, while the signal to stage drive 70 exercises control in the x-direction. The purpose of these is to make sure that the misalignment between die does not exceed the dynamic range that the correction system can rectify. Alignment computer 62 also produces a strobe signal to initiate the readout of a column of pixels from linear diode sensor 59. Since stage 50 travels approximately at a constant speed, slightly varying the time between strobe pulses allows fine alignment in the x-direction. The strobe is generated in alignment computer 62 by a phase-locked loop which derives its input from the x-directional alignment error and from a linear scale mounted on stage 50 that measures the position of stage 50 by alignment computer 62. U.S. Pat. No. 4,926,489 by Danielson, et al., describes a similar implementation using a phase-locked loop.
  • [0031] FIFO memory 64 is a short memory of the same width as the swath height. Its purpose is to delay the flow of pixel information into defect detector 74 sufficiently to make sure that alignment computer 62 has enough image data to correct the alignment error, prior to the two image data streams reach defect detector 74.
  • In [0032] defect detector 74 the corresponding intensity values of the two images are compared and if the absolute value of the difference exceeds a predetermined threshold, an error flag is raised. The error data is then sent to general purpose computer 72 (e.g. a Sun workstation), where adjacent defect locations are combined to permit a determination of the size and shape of the defects. This information is then used by yield management programs.
  • The basic philosophy behind this embodiment of the present invention is that tilting [0033] mirror 54 and proper strobing of linear diode sensor 59 provide first order alignment corrections which reduce the needed dynamic range for the fine correction. Since the amount of error contributed by the resampling is a function of the dynamic range of the correction needed, the error intensity into defect detector 74 is smaller than would be achievable without correcting the alignment prior to sampling the image.
  • In the case where the comparison is die-to-data base, data is obtained from a die [0034] 14 on stage 50 with switch 61 in the position shown, then switch 61 is switched to the other position and data from data base generator 63 is connected to supply the second data set. The overall operation is therefore the same as described above.
  • The subject invention may also be used to inspect transparent substrates, such as a reticle. FIG. 2[0035] a illustrates the system in that case. Substrate 14′, a reticle, is illuminated from below and the only difference between this implementation and the one that uses transmitted light, is the location of the source of the illumination.
  • When the reticles, rather than wafers, are inspected, ordinarily the inspection is a comparison with the data base. The data base generator, at its output, produces a data stream that simulates the desired optical image. [0036] Switch 61 allows either the datastream from A/D converter 58 or from database generator 63 to flow into pixel memory 60.
  • Laser Scanning [0037]
  • The same general approach taught above with respect to FIG. 2 may also be used with laser scanning. The laser scanner here can be adapted from the implementation of the KLA 301 Reticle and Mask Inspection Unit, made by the assignee. FIG. 4 illustrates such a laser scanner embodiment of the present invention. [0038] Laser 80 directs coherent light to acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 which deflects the light in the y-direction, as described by Evelet in U.S. Pat. No. 3,851,951 (High Resolution Laser Beam Recorder with Self-focusing Acousto-optic Scanner). The y-deflected light beam from acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 is then applied to beamsplitter 84 through which the laser beam passes and proceeds to lens 86 which focuses the laser beam on wafer 14 on X/Y stage 50. Some of the light incident on wafer 14 is then reflected back into lens 86 and proceeds to beamsplitter 84, where portions of the reflected light are reflected to condenser lens 88 where it is refracted and collected on the surface of single diode sensor 90. The resultant electrical signal from diode 90 is then applied to A/D converter 100. The remaining components of the laser implementation, with the exception of alignment computer 62′, function as for the diode array implementation of FIG. 2. Consequently, pixel memory 60, alignment corrector 66, FIFO 64, defect detector 74, general purpose computer 72, stage drive 70 and X/Y stage 50 function as described above for the diode array implementation shown in FIG. 2 with stage 14 executing the same serpentine scanning travel as described previously with respect to FIG. 3.
  • In addition to the functions outlined above, A/[0039] D converter 100 and alignment computer 62′ perform additional functions that are necessary to control the operation of acousto-optic deflector/driver 82. Acousto-optic deflector/driver 82 is driven by a saw tooth signal (see FIG. 5) generated by alignment computer 62′. That saw tooth signal includes two components, a ramp 92 and variable time delay 96 between consecutive ramps. X-directional coarse correction is implemented by varying time-delay 96 between successive ramps 92, since the stage travels at a constant speed. The timing of the start of ramp 92 is controlled by a phased-locked loop oscillator of alignment computer 62′ that derives its control signal from the x-directional alignment error determined by alignment computer 62′. Alignment computer 62′ also generates strobe pulses to control when A/D converter 100 samples the video signal from diode sensor 90. Since the laser beam sweeps across wafer 14 at a constant speed, the y-coordinates of the samples are determined by the timing of the strobe pulses. These strobe pulses are also driven by the phase-locked loop oscillator of alignment computer 62′ which is controlled by the y-directional alignment error. The fine corrections in both X and Y are executed in alignment corrector 66, as discussed for the diode array embodiment of FIG. 2.
  • Also, for the die-to-data base situation, the use of [0040] switch 61 and data base generator 63 is as discussed above for FIG. 2.
  • For the laser scanner implementation using transmitted light as in FIG. 4[0041] a, reticle 14′ is placed on stage 50 and the implementation is virtually identical to the one shown in FIG. 4 except that diode detector 90 is now under stage 50 to collect, via condenser lens 88′, the light transmitted through reticle 14′. In most instances, the inspection will be against the CADS database for which DataBase Generator 63 provides a simulated image.
  • While the forgoing techniques are most beneficial in defect detection where image subtraction is used, all known techniques, such as those using feature extraction and comparison, specifically, operate more efficiently when registration errors are minimized. Of course, these methods may also be used when a single image is derived physically and is compared with computer generated data. Furthermore, these alignment techniques are useful in all image processing applications that depend on alignment. [0042]
  • While the present invention has been described in several embodiments and with exemplary routines and apparatus, it is contemplated that persons skilled in the art, upon reading the preceding descriptions and studying the drawings, will realize various alternative approaches to the implementation of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims be interpreted as including all such alterations and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope to the present invention and the appended claims. [0043]

Claims (2)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for inspecting a wafer defining at least one die thereon, said method comprising the steps of:
a. obtaining the electronic image equivalent of two die;
b. determining the x and y offset between the electronic images of said two die of step a.;
c. aligning said electronic images of said two die by adjusting the x and y positions of one electronic image of one die with respect to said electronic image of said other die;
d. comparing said electronic images from step c.;
e. identifying image differences between the two die compared in step d.
2. An apparatus to inspect a wafer defining at least one die thereon comprising:
an x-y stage to transport said die;
a scanner to obtain an electronic image equivalent of said at least one die as said x-y stage transports said die;
a first comparator coupled to said scanner to determine the x and y offset between the electronic images of two die;
an alignment computer to reposition said scanner to adjust the x and y positions of one electronic image of one die with respect to said electronic image of said other die;
a second comparator coupled to said scanner to compare said electronic images of said first and second die following the operation of said alignment computer; and
a defect detector coupled to said second comparator to identify defect differences between said electronic images compared by said second comparator.
US10/314,546 1995-10-02 2002-12-09 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems Abandoned US20030063190A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/314,546 US20030063190A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-12-09 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US11/180,348 US20050254698A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2005-07-13 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US12/221,806 US20080304734A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2008-08-07 Alignment correction prio to image sampling in inspection systems

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US53813795A 1995-10-02 1995-10-02
US08/884,466 US6141038A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-06-27 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US70294300A 2000-10-30 2000-10-30
US10/066,161 US20020075385A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-01-31 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US10/314,546 US20030063190A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-12-09 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/066,161 Continuation US20020075385A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-01-31 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/180,348 Continuation US20050254698A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2005-07-13 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030063190A1 true US20030063190A1 (en) 2003-04-03

Family

ID=24145667

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/884,466 Expired - Lifetime US6141038A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-06-27 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US10/066,161 Abandoned US20020075385A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-01-31 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US10/314,546 Abandoned US20030063190A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-12-09 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US11/180,348 Abandoned US20050254698A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2005-07-13 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US12/221,806 Abandoned US20080304734A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2008-08-07 Alignment correction prio to image sampling in inspection systems

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/884,466 Expired - Lifetime US6141038A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-06-27 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US10/066,161 Abandoned US20020075385A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2002-01-31 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/180,348 Abandoned US20050254698A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2005-07-13 Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US12/221,806 Abandoned US20080304734A1 (en) 1995-10-02 2008-08-07 Alignment correction prio to image sampling in inspection systems

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (5) US6141038A (en)
EP (1) EP0853856B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69634089T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1997013370A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050024391A1 (en) * 2003-07-31 2005-02-03 Niranjan Damera-Venkata Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
US20050225571A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2005-10-13 Collins David C Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
DE102007032958A1 (en) 2007-07-14 2009-01-15 Carl Zeiss Sms Gmbh Method for determining lithographically relevant mask defects
US10474133B2 (en) 2016-11-29 2019-11-12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Inspection device for inspecting wafer and method of inspecting wafer using the same

Families Citing this family (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0853856B1 (en) * 1995-10-02 2004-12-22 KLA-Tencor Corporation Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
JPH10164443A (en) * 1996-11-29 1998-06-19 Nikon Corp Solid-state image-pickup element camera
US6578188B1 (en) 1997-09-17 2003-06-10 Numerical Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for a network-based mask defect printability analysis system
US6757645B2 (en) 1997-09-17 2004-06-29 Numerical Technologies, Inc. Visual inspection and verification system
US7107571B2 (en) 1997-09-17 2006-09-12 Synopsys, Inc. Visual analysis and verification system using advanced tools
US7617474B2 (en) 1997-09-17 2009-11-10 Synopsys, Inc. System and method for providing defect printability analysis of photolithographic masks with job-based automation
US7093229B2 (en) 1997-09-17 2006-08-15 Synopsys, Inc. System and method for providing defect printability analysis of photolithographic masks with job-based automation
US6369888B1 (en) 1999-11-17 2002-04-09 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for article inspection including speckle reduction
JP3874996B2 (en) * 2000-05-30 2007-01-31 ファブソリューション株式会社 Device inspection method and apparatus
JP3266602B1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2002-03-18 洋一 奥寺 Address inquiry system, computer program product and method thereof
WO2002049080A2 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Kla Tencor Corporation Method and apparatus for inspecting a substrate
US6925202B2 (en) 2001-03-20 2005-08-02 Synopsys, Inc. System and method of providing mask quality control
US6873720B2 (en) 2001-03-20 2005-03-29 Synopsys, Inc. System and method of providing mask defect printability analysis
US6560766B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2003-05-06 Numerical Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for analyzing a layout using an instance-based representation
US6721928B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2004-04-13 Numerical Technologies, Inc. Verification utilizing instance-based hierarchy management
US7014955B2 (en) 2001-08-28 2006-03-21 Synopsys, Inc. System and method for indentifying dummy features on a mask layer
JP2003066341A (en) * 2001-08-28 2003-03-05 Nec Corp Reticle inspection device
US20030081826A1 (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-01 Tokyo Seimitsu (Israel) Ltd. Tilted scan for Die-to-Die and Cell-to-Cell detection
US6976240B2 (en) 2001-11-14 2005-12-13 Synopsys Inc. Simulation using design geometry information
JP3913555B2 (en) * 2002-01-17 2007-05-09 ファブソリューション株式会社 Film thickness measuring method and film thickness measuring apparatus
US7126681B1 (en) * 2002-04-23 2006-10-24 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Closed region defect detection system
US7043071B2 (en) 2002-09-13 2006-05-09 Synopsys, Inc. Soft defect printability simulation and analysis for masks
US7027143B1 (en) 2002-10-15 2006-04-11 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for inspecting reticles using aerial imaging at off-stepper wavelengths
US7123356B1 (en) 2002-10-15 2006-10-17 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for inspecting reticles using aerial imaging and die-to-database detection
US7379175B1 (en) 2002-10-15 2008-05-27 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for reticle inspection and defect review using aerial imaging
US7133119B1 (en) 2002-12-17 2006-11-07 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Systems for simulating high NA and polarization effects in aerial images
US20040120017A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 Miller Mindy Lee Method and apparatus for compensating for assembly and alignment errors in sensor assemblies
DE10307358B3 (en) * 2003-02-21 2004-10-07 Leica Microsystems Semiconductor Gmbh Semiconductor wafer scanning method in which camera and wafer relative movement and acceleration in both the scanning direction and the direction perpendicular take place simultaneously
KR101056142B1 (en) 2004-01-29 2011-08-10 케이엘에이-텐코 코포레이션 Computerized method for detecting defects in reticle design data
US20060045383A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2006-03-02 Picciotto Carl E Displacement estimation system and method
JP4904034B2 (en) 2004-09-14 2012-03-28 ケーエルエー−テンカー コーポレイション Method, system and carrier medium for evaluating reticle layout data
US7769225B2 (en) 2005-08-02 2010-08-03 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for detecting defects in a reticle design pattern
DE102005044502B8 (en) * 2005-09-16 2010-01-28 Suss Microtec Test Systems Gmbh Method for inspecting a plurality of repetitive structures
US7676077B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2010-03-09 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for utilizing design data in combination with inspection data
US7570796B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2009-08-04 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for utilizing design data in combination with inspection data
US8041103B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2011-10-18 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Methods and systems for determining a position of inspection data in design data space
US7369236B1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-05-06 Negevtech, Ltd. Defect detection through image comparison using relative measures
WO2008077100A2 (en) 2006-12-19 2008-06-26 Kla-Tencor Corporation Systems and methods for creating inspection recipes
US8194968B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2012-06-05 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods and systems for using electrical information for a device being fabricated on a wafer to perform one or more defect-related functions
US7962863B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2011-06-14 Kla-Tencor Corp. Computer-implemented methods, systems, and computer-readable media for determining a model for predicting printability of reticle features on a wafer
US7738093B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2010-06-15 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods for detecting and classifying defects on a reticle
US8213704B2 (en) 2007-05-09 2012-07-03 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods and systems for detecting defects in a reticle design pattern
US7796804B2 (en) 2007-07-20 2010-09-14 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods for generating a standard reference die for use in a die to standard reference die inspection and methods for inspecting a wafer
US7711514B2 (en) 2007-08-10 2010-05-04 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. Computer-implemented methods, carrier media, and systems for generating a metrology sampling plan
KR101448971B1 (en) 2007-08-20 2014-10-13 케이엘에이-텐코어 코오포레이션 Computer-implemented methods for determining if actual defects are potentially systematic defects or potentially random defects
US8139844B2 (en) 2008-04-14 2012-03-20 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods and systems for determining a defect criticality index for defects on wafers
KR101623747B1 (en) 2008-07-28 2016-05-26 케이엘에이-텐코어 코오포레이션 Computer-implemented methods, computer-readable media, and systems for classifying defects detected in a memory device area on a wafer
US8775101B2 (en) 2009-02-13 2014-07-08 Kla-Tencor Corp. Detecting defects on a wafer
US8204297B1 (en) 2009-02-27 2012-06-19 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods and systems for classifying defects detected on a reticle
US8112241B2 (en) 2009-03-13 2012-02-07 Kla-Tencor Corp. Methods and systems for generating an inspection process for a wafer
US8781781B2 (en) 2010-07-30 2014-07-15 Kla-Tencor Corp. Dynamic care areas
US9170211B2 (en) 2011-03-25 2015-10-27 Kla-Tencor Corp. Design-based inspection using repeating structures
US9087367B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2015-07-21 Kla-Tencor Corp. Determining design coordinates for wafer defects
US8831334B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2014-09-09 Kla-Tencor Corp. Segmentation for wafer inspection
US8826200B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2014-09-02 Kla-Tencor Corp. Alteration for wafer inspection
US9189844B2 (en) 2012-10-15 2015-11-17 Kla-Tencor Corp. Detecting defects on a wafer using defect-specific information
DE102012111835A1 (en) * 2012-12-05 2014-06-05 Hseb Dresden Gmbh inspection device
US9053527B2 (en) 2013-01-02 2015-06-09 Kla-Tencor Corp. Detecting defects on a wafer
US9134254B2 (en) 2013-01-07 2015-09-15 Kla-Tencor Corp. Determining a position of inspection system output in design data space
US9311698B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2016-04-12 Kla-Tencor Corp. Detecting defects on a wafer using template image matching
KR102019534B1 (en) 2013-02-01 2019-09-09 케이엘에이 코포레이션 Detecting defects on a wafer using defect-specific and multi-channel information
US9865512B2 (en) 2013-04-08 2018-01-09 Kla-Tencor Corp. Dynamic design attributes for wafer inspection
US9310320B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2016-04-12 Kla-Tencor Corp. Based sampling and binning for yield critical defects
KR102195231B1 (en) * 2013-08-23 2020-12-24 케이엘에이 코포레이션 Block-to-block reticle inspection
JP6293023B2 (en) * 2014-09-04 2018-03-14 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー Inspection method
US9864173B2 (en) * 2015-04-21 2018-01-09 Kla-Tencor Corporation Systems and methods for run-time alignment of a spot scanning wafer inspection system
MX2017015176A (en) 2015-05-29 2018-04-13 Cryovac Inc Oxygen scavenging films.
US11049745B2 (en) * 2018-10-19 2021-06-29 Kla Corporation Defect-location determination using correction loop for pixel alignment
US11113827B2 (en) 2019-09-23 2021-09-07 Kla Corporation Pattern-to-design alignment for one-dimensional unique structures
US11120546B2 (en) * 2019-09-24 2021-09-14 Kla Corporation Unsupervised learning-based reference selection for enhanced defect inspection sensitivity
JP7409988B2 (en) * 2020-07-29 2024-01-09 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー Pattern inspection device and method for obtaining alignment amount between contour lines

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3851951A (en) * 1974-01-16 1974-12-03 Isomet Corp High resolution laser beam recorder with self-focusing acousto-optic scanner
US4247203A (en) * 1978-04-03 1981-01-27 Kla Instrument Corporation Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus
US4579455A (en) * 1983-05-09 1986-04-01 Kla Instruments Corporation Photomask inspection apparatus and method with improved defect detection
US4644172A (en) * 1984-02-22 1987-02-17 Kla Instruments Corporation Electronic control of an automatic wafer inspection system
US4805123A (en) * 1986-07-14 1989-02-14 Kla Instruments Corporation Automatic photomask and reticle inspection method and apparatus including improved defect detector and alignment sub-systems
US4926489A (en) * 1983-03-11 1990-05-15 Kla Instruments Corporation Reticle inspection system
US5572598A (en) * 1991-08-22 1996-11-05 Kla Instruments Corporation Automated photomask inspection apparatus
US6141038A (en) * 1995-10-02 2000-10-31 Kla Instruments Corporation Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS57196377A (en) * 1981-05-27 1982-12-02 Hitachi Ltd Pattern recognizing method
US4618938A (en) * 1984-02-22 1986-10-21 Kla Instruments Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic wafer inspection
JPS63134939A (en) * 1986-11-27 1988-06-07 Canon Inc Pattern inspection device
JP3148353B2 (en) * 1991-05-30 2001-03-19 ケーエルエー・インストルメンツ・コーポレーション Electron beam inspection method and system
US5563702A (en) * 1991-08-22 1996-10-08 Kla Instruments Corporation Automated photomask inspection apparatus and method
JP3730263B2 (en) * 1992-05-27 2005-12-21 ケーエルエー・インストルメンツ・コーポレーション Apparatus and method for automatic substrate inspection using charged particle beam

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3851951A (en) * 1974-01-16 1974-12-03 Isomet Corp High resolution laser beam recorder with self-focusing acousto-optic scanner
US4247203A (en) * 1978-04-03 1981-01-27 Kla Instrument Corporation Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus
US4926489A (en) * 1983-03-11 1990-05-15 Kla Instruments Corporation Reticle inspection system
US4579455A (en) * 1983-05-09 1986-04-01 Kla Instruments Corporation Photomask inspection apparatus and method with improved defect detection
US4644172A (en) * 1984-02-22 1987-02-17 Kla Instruments Corporation Electronic control of an automatic wafer inspection system
US4805123A (en) * 1986-07-14 1989-02-14 Kla Instruments Corporation Automatic photomask and reticle inspection method and apparatus including improved defect detector and alignment sub-systems
US4805123B1 (en) * 1986-07-14 1998-10-13 Kla Instr Corp Automatic photomask and reticle inspection method and apparatus including improved defect detector and alignment sub-systems
US5572598A (en) * 1991-08-22 1996-11-05 Kla Instruments Corporation Automated photomask inspection apparatus
US6141038A (en) * 1995-10-02 2000-10-31 Kla Instruments Corporation Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050024391A1 (en) * 2003-07-31 2005-02-03 Niranjan Damera-Venkata Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
US7109981B2 (en) * 2003-07-31 2006-09-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
US20050225571A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2005-10-13 Collins David C Generating and displaying spatially offset sub-frames
DE102007032958A1 (en) 2007-07-14 2009-01-15 Carl Zeiss Sms Gmbh Method for determining lithographically relevant mask defects
US10474133B2 (en) 2016-11-29 2019-11-12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Inspection device for inspecting wafer and method of inspecting wafer using the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0853856A4 (en) 1998-12-16
US6141038A (en) 2000-10-31
US20050254698A1 (en) 2005-11-17
DE69634089T2 (en) 2005-12-08
EP0853856B1 (en) 2004-12-22
US20080304734A1 (en) 2008-12-11
WO1997013370A1 (en) 1997-04-10
DE69634089D1 (en) 2005-01-27
EP0853856A1 (en) 1998-07-22
US20020075385A1 (en) 2002-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6141038A (en) Alignment correction prior to image sampling in inspection systems
US6317512B1 (en) Pattern checking method and checking apparatus
US4926489A (en) Reticle inspection system
US5774224A (en) Linear-scanning, oblique-viewing optical apparatus
US4559603A (en) Apparatus for inspecting a circuit pattern drawn on a photomask used in manufacturing large scale integrated circuits
US4886958A (en) Autofocus system for scanning laser inspector or writer
US5095447A (en) Color overlay of scanned and reference images for display
US4531060A (en) Positioning method
US4912487A (en) Laser scanner using focusing acousto-optic device
US4985927A (en) Method of detecting and reviewing pattern defects
US5018210A (en) Pattern comparator with substage illumination and polygonal data representation
US5027132A (en) Position compensation of laser scan for stage movement
JPH10325711A (en) Method and apparatus for inspection as well as manufacture of semiconductor substrate
EP0485274B1 (en) Image data inspecting method and apparatus
US4969200A (en) Target autoalignment for pattern inspector or writer
US5046110A (en) Comparator error filtering for pattern inspector
JP4013510B2 (en) Defect inspection method and apparatus
JP3135063B2 (en) Comparative inspection method and apparatus
JP2000147749A (en) Image alignment method for reticle appearance inspection device
JP3257010B2 (en) Pattern inspection method and apparatus
US4984282A (en) Parallel processing of reference and guardband data
JP3223483B2 (en) Defect inspection method and device
JP2954381B2 (en) Pattern inspection method and apparatus
JPH0658215B2 (en) Method and apparatus for inspecting a pattern to be inspected on a semiconductor wafer
JP3316829B2 (en) Comparative inspection method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION