Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20020049786 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 09/982,224
Publication date25 Apr 2002
Filing date18 Oct 2001
Priority date25 Jan 2000
Also published asCA2397762A1, EP1256051A1, EP1256051A4, US7484183, US8402392, US9053080, US20040225968, US20090100368, US20130159833, WO2001055831A1
Publication number09982224, 982224, US 2002/0049786 A1, US 2002/049786 A1, US 20020049786 A1, US 20020049786A1, US 2002049786 A1, US 2002049786A1, US-A1-20020049786, US-A1-2002049786, US2002/0049786A1, US2002/049786A1, US20020049786 A1, US20020049786A1, US2002049786 A1, US2002049786A1
InventorsJacobo Bibliowicz, Kreisel Carolyn, Robert Lipari, Ryan Rogers
Original AssigneeAutodesk, Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Collaboration framework
US 20020049786 A1
Abstract
One or more embodiments of the invention provide a collaboration framework for collaborating access to a drawing document on a network. A drawing document is stored on a server. Thereafter, a collaboration session comprised of two or more collaborators on a network is established. During the collaboration session, the server permits the two or more collaborators to work simultaneously across the network on the drawing document stored on the server. A command to modify the drawing document from a first collaborator is received by the server. The server then distributes the command to modify the drawing document to other collaborators in the session.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(57)
What is claimed is:
1. A method for collaborating access to a drawing document on a network, comprising:
storing a drawing document on a server;
receiving, in the server, a request to open the drawing document;
in response to the request, the server establishing a collaboration session, wherein during the collaboration session, the server permits two or more collaborators to work simultaneously across the network on the drawing document stored on the server;
receiving, in the server, a command to modify the drawing document from a first one of the collaborators in the collaboration session; and
the server distributing the command to modify the drawing document to other ones of the collaborators in the collaboration session.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the server maintaining a history of modifications to the drawing document.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the history is used to support an undo command.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the history is used to recommunicate modifications to the two or mote collaborators.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the server maintaining a record of the collaboration session including name, numbers, and statuses of the two or more collaborators.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the two or more collaborators all have write-access for the drawing document during the collaboration session.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the command is received in the server from a first collaborator pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
generating an identifier for the command;
distributing the identifier with the command to the other collaborators in the collaboration session.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document is supported.
12. A method for accessing a drawing document on a network, comprising:
joining an existing collaboration session comprised of a collaborator on a network, wherein during the collaboration session, collaborators in the collaboration session can work simultaneously across the network on a drawing document stored on a server; and
transmitting, to the server, a first command to modify the drawing document.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising receiving a second command to modify the document from the server wherein the command was originally transmitted from another collaborator.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the command comprises an undo command.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
16. The method of claim 12, further comprising displaying a collaboration palette that provides information relating to the collaborators in the collaboration session.
17. The method of claim 12, wherein the command is transmitted pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
18. The method of claim 12, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document is supported.
20. An system for collaborating access to a drawing document on a network comprising:
(a) a server connected to a network and having a memory and a data storage device coupled thereto;
(b) a drawing document stored on the server; and
(c) a computer program, performed by the server, the computer program configured to:
(i) receive a request to open the drawing document;
(ii) in response to the request, establishing a collaboration session, wherein during the collaboration session, the computer program permits two or more collaborators to work simultaneously across the network on the drawing document;
(iii) receive a command to modify the drawing document from a first one of the collaborators in the collaboration session; and
(iv) distribute the command to modify the drawing document to other ones of the collaborators in the collaboration session.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer program is further configured to maintain a history of modifications to the drawing document.
22. The system of claim 21, wherein the history is used to support an undo command.
23. The system of claim 21, wherein the history is used to recommunicate modifications to the two or more collaborators.
24. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer program is further configured to maintain a record of the collaboration session including name, numbers, and statuses of the two or more collaborators.
25. The system of claim 20, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
26. The system of claim 20, wherein the two or more collaborators all have write-access for the drawing document during the collaboration session.
27. The system of claim 20, wherein the command is received in the server from a first collaborator pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
28. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer program is further configured to:
generate an identifier for the command;
distribute the identifier with the command to the other collaborators in the collaboration session.
29. The system of claim 20, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
30. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer program supports an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document.
31. A system for accessing a drawing document on a network, comprising:
(a) a collaborator connected to a network and having a memory and a data storage device coupled thereto; and
(b) a computer program, performed by the collaborator, the computer program configured to:
(i) join an existing collaboration session comprised of a collaborator on a network, wherein during the collaboration session, collaborators in the collaboration session work simultaneously across the network on a drawing document stored on a server; and
(ii) transmit, to the server, a first command to modify the drawing document.
32. The system of claim 31, the computer program further configured to receive a second command to modify the document from the server wherein the command was originally transmitted from another collaborator.
33. The system of claim 31, wherein the command comprises an undo command.
34. The system of claim 31, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
35. The system of claim 31, further, wherein the computer program is further configured to display a collaboration palette that provides information relating to the collaborators in the collaboration session.
36. The system of claim 31, wherein the command is transmitted pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
37. The system of claim 31, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
38. The system of claim 31, wherein the computer program supports an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document.
39. An article of manufacture comprising a program storage medium readable by a computer and embodying one or more instructions executable by the computer to perform a method for collaborating access to a drawing document on a network, the method comprising:
storing a drawing document on a server;
receiving, in the server, a request to open the drawing document;
in response to the request, the server establishing a collaboration session, wherein during the collaboration session, the server permits two or more collaborators to work simultaneously across the network on the drawing document stored on the server;
receiving, in the server, a command to modify the drawing document from a first one of the collaborators in the collaboration session; and
the server distributing the command to modify the drawing document to other ones of the collaborators in the collaboration session.
40. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the method further comprises the server maintaining a history of modifications to the drawing document.
41. The article of manufacture of claim 40, wherein the history is used to support an undo command.
42. The article of manufacture of claim 40, wherein the history is used to recommunicate modifications to the two or more collaborators.
43. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the method further comprises the server maintaining a record of the collaboration session including name, numbers, and statuses of the two or more collaborators.
44. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
45. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the two or more collaborators all have write-access for the drawing document during the collaboration session.
46. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the command is received in the server from a first collaborator pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
47. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the method further comprises:
generating an identifier for the command;
distributing the identifier with the command to the other collaborators in the collaboration session.
48. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
49. The article of manufacture of claim 39, wherein the method further comprises providing an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document.
50. An article of manufacture comprising a program storage medium readable by a computer and embodying one or more instructions executable by the computer to perform a method for accessing a drawing document on a network, the method comprising:
joining an existing collaboration session comprised of a collaborator on a network, wherein during the collaboration session, collaborators in the collaboration session work simultaneously across the network on a drawing document stored on a server; and
transmitting, to the server, a first command to modify the drawing document.
51. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the method further comprises receiving a second command to modify the document from the server wherein the command was originally transmitted from another collaborator.
52. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the command comprises an undo command.
53. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the command comprises an extensible markup language (XML) command.
54. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the method further comprises displaying a collaboration palette that provides information relating to the collaborators in the collaboration session.
55. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the command is transmitted pursuant to a regularly transmitted command.
56. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the command specifies an object identifier for an object in the drawing document that is modified.
57. The article of manufacture of claim 50, wherein the method further comprises providing an extensible set of three dimensional modeling tools for modifying the drawing document.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is related to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned patent applications, which applications ate incorporated by reference herein:
  • [0002]
    Patent Cooperation Treaty Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US01 /02310, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO AND WORKING WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ON THE INTERNET”, by Douglas G. Look, et. al., Attorney Docket No. 30566.101-WO-U1, filed on Jan. 24, 2001, which application claims priority to United States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/177,988, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO AND WORKING WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ON THE INTERNET,” filed on Jan. 25, 2000, by Douglas G. Look, et. al., attorney's docket number 30566.101USP1.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0004]
    The present invention relates generally to computer-implemented drawing programs, and in particular, to a method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for multiple collaborators to simultaneously work on a drawing.
  • [0005]
    2. Description of the Related Art
  • [0006]
    The use of Computer Aided Design (CAD) application programs is well known in the art. CAD application programs are often expensive, complex, and difficult to learn how to use. Additionally, architects, contractors, engineers, owners, and other patties involved with a project (referred to as project participants or collaborators) are often mobile or at different locations. With new technology and the increased use of the Internet, project participants often have computers, Internet access, and personal digital assistants (PDAs). Further, the coordination and exchange of information between project participants can be increasingly complex.
  • [0007]
    Existing prior art applications allow a user to download a drawing, edit the drawing, and upload the drawing after completing the edits. Alternatively, prior art applications/features may allow the creation of a two-dimensional in-memory document where graphic information is transmitted from one client to another client during a session. However, in such prior art applications, to refer to a document in the future (i.e., to store the document), the document must be saved locally by a client and then uploaded later. Further, since only an in-memory document is used, there is no capability to undo a modification or to restore the document in the event of a network or computer failure. Further, only a primitive set of two-dimensional graphic manipulation tools is often provided.
  • [0008]
    Accordingly, existing prior art applications do not provide the ability for multiple users to collaborate on an actual stored document with a full set of modeling tools (in two and three dimensions).
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0009]
    One or more embodiments of the invention provide a method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for a collaboration framework that permits multiple users to simultaneously modify a document/workspace that is stored on a server across a network. Collaboration applications on multiple clients/collaborators communicate with a server application on a server.
  • [0010]
    The collaboration application provides a full set of three-dimensional drawing tools to manipulate a drawing and transmit such manipulations to the server application. The server application maintains a history of the manipulations and the collaborators in a session. Once a manipulation command is received by the server application from one collaborator, the server distributes the command to the remaining collaborators. Thereafter, the collaboration applications modify the local version of the drawing space in accordance with the command. The history maintained by the server may then be used by any one of the collaborators to rollback a modification (e.g., a modification made by another collaborator or themselves) or to rebuild a drawing space in the event of a network failure.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0011]
    Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
  • [0012]
    [0012]FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a hardware and software environment in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;
  • [0013]
    [0013]FIG. 2 illustrates a collaboration palette displayed in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;
  • [0014]
    [0014]FIG. 3 illustrates a dialog window and collaboration palette in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention; and
  • [0015]
    [0015]FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the use of the collaboration framework in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0016]
    In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which is shown, by way of illustration, several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0017]
    Overview
  • [0018]
    A collaboration framework provides the ability for multiple users to simultaneously modify a document across a network using a full set of tools. Client based applications generate specific messages (e.g., XML messages) which are communicated across a network to a server (e.g., via TCP/IP [transmission control protocol/internet protocol]). Once received by the server, the server manages the collaboration session by storing document changes and distributing the command to other collaborators. The server maintains a history of document changes so these can be recommunicated in the event of a network failure or temporary Internet outage. Additionally, the server may manage a record of the collaboration session including the name, number and status of collaborators, and similar information for the workspace being collaborated on.
  • [0019]
    Hardware Environment
  • [0020]
    [0020]FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a hardware and software environment in accordance with one or mote embodiments of the invention, and more particularly, illustrates a typical distributed computer system 100 using a network 102 to connect client computers/collaborators 104 to server computers 106. A typical combination of resources may include a network 102 comprising the Internet, LANs (local area networks), WANs (wide area networks), or the like, clients/collaborators 104 that are personal computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), or workstations, and servers 106 that are personal computers, workstations, minicomputers, or mainframes.
  • [0021]
    In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the network 102 connects collaborators 104 executing a collaboration application 108 to server computers 106 executing server applications 110. The collaboration application 108 enables collaborators 104 to communicate with other collaborators 104 and work on a document stored on/by server 106. The server application 110 may be a server 106 collaboration application that provides for storage of a commonly used document and enables the ability for multiple collaborators 104 to simultaneously work on the same document. Server application 110 may also be configured to manipulate data (e.g., a document) in database 114 through a database management system (OBMS) 112.
  • [0022]
    Generally, these components 108, 110, 112, and 114 all comprise logic and/or data that is embodied in or retrievable from device, medium, signal, or carrier, e.g., a data storage device, a data communications device, a remote computer or device coupled to the computer across a network or via another data communications device, etc. Moreover, this logic and/or data, when read, executed, and/or interpreted, results in the steps necessary to implement and/or use the present invention being performed.
  • [0023]
    Thus, embodiments of the invention may be implemented as a method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof. The term “article of manufacture” (or alternatively, “computer program product”) as used herein is intended to encompass logic and/or data accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media.
  • [0024]
    Those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this exemplary environment without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, those skilled in the art will recognize that any combination of the above components, or any number of different components, including different logic, data, different peripherals, and different devices, may be used to implement the present invention, so long as similar functions are performed thereby.
  • [0025]
    Collaboration Framework
  • [0026]
    Collaboration application 108 and server application 110 executing on client 104 and server 106 respectively, provide a collaboration framework that enables modifications to drawings to be shared in real time among a set of collaborators 104 (i.e., two or more users working simultaneously on the same document from different computers or other network 102 devices).
  • [0027]
    The collaboration framework provides the ability for all collaborators 104 to modify a document at the same time, with no need for permission to modify to be passed around among the collaborators 104. Once a collaborator 104 has joined a session, the collaborator 104 is likely on equal footing with all other collaborators 104. Thus, by default, anyone may join a collaboration session and begin collaborating with others that may already be working in the session. Alternatively, while multiple collaborators 104 may edit the document, another collaborator 104 may not have write access and may only have read capability to watch the modifications of other collaborators 104.
  • [0028]
    Collaboration Process
  • [0029]
    The initial user in a collaboration session opens a workspace or document to work on. Once opened, a collaboration palette may be displayed on the computer 104 by collaboration application 108. For example, the palette may be placed in the lower-right corner of the window representing collaboration application 108. Alternatively, when not in use, the palette may roll-up or be hidden from the user.
  • [0030]
    The collaboration palette provides information on the current collaborators/users 104 in the collaboration session. Thus, when a document is opened by a user, the user's name is added to the collaboration palette. Further, an access level may be assigned to the user. For example, a user's access level may default to “write-access”. Beyond this general information, the palette may not open or show any additional feedback when the initial user opens a workspace.
  • [0031]
    [0031]FIG. 2 illustrates a collaboration palette displayed in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. As illustrated, elements of the collaboration palette 200 may include a user image/icon 202. The icon 202 used for the user may be a standard 32×32 GIF (graphic image format) for all users.
  • [0032]
    In addition, the top line 204 of a data area of palette 200 may contain the user's name. Further, the second line 206 of the data area may contain the user's status. Each status type 206 may have an associated color. For example, the status types 206 and colors a user may have are joining (green), write-access (black), accidental disconnect (red), intentional disconnect (yellow), and working offline (blue). In order to show a status change, all of the status labels, except “joining,” may blink then disappear after a short duration. The joining status may remain until the user either connects or cannot connect to the workspace.
  • [0033]
    A user's status 206 may also reflect a controlled environment wherein a single user may be a moderator that has the ability to grant or deny access to new and existing users. FIG. 3 illustrates a dialog window in such a controlled environment. As illustrated, the status field 206 may identify the first user as a moderator. Further, when a new user attempts to join a session, the status field 206 may display a message such as “request write” to indicate that a user is requesting write access. Additionally, a dialog window 302 may be presented to the moderator that allows the moderator to grant or deny the new user permission to join the workspace as a collaborator 104. Advanced options may also be available such as allowing a user to join the session but with read-only capability.
  • [0034]
    A scroll bar may be activated on the palette if necessary to display additional information. Further, a palette titlebar 208 includes the title of the palette 200 and may flash for a short duration when the status of any collaborator 104 changes. The color the titlebar 208 flashes may depend on the new status of the collaborator.
  • [0035]
    When a second user opens a document or workspace, the workspace opens as usual on the user's computer 104, along with opening the collaboration palette 200 to signal the beginning of a collaboration session. However, the collaboration palette 200 automatically indicates that another user has the workspace open already.
  • [0036]
    The palette 200 also provides a mechanism for displaying the status 206 of the second user's connection to the workspace. When initially opened, the second user's status 206 likely reads “joining.” When the second user successfully joins the collaboration session, the status line 206 changes to “write-access.” Thereafter, if current users of the workspace have closed the collaboration palette 200, the titlebar 208 may flash to signify the addition of a user to the workspace.
  • [0037]
    As the workspace is being opened for a second user, a “glass plane” may be placed over the workspace, palettes 200, and menu. Further, in some embodiments, a user may not be able to cancel the open, or start to open another workspace until the current one is fully opened. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the palette 200 indicates that a first user (i.e., “Joe User”) has write-access and a second user (i.e., “User #2”) is joining the session.
  • [0038]
    Accordingly, as users join the session, each user's collaboration palette 200 indicates the addition of a user, with a status 206 of “joining.” When a user leaves the workspace on purpose, the user's status 206 (e.g., “left workspace”) may be shown in a specific color (e.g., yellow), and after some amount of time, the user's name 204 will be removed from the palette 200. Similarly, if a user leaves the workspace accidentally, the user's status 206 (e.g., “disconnected”) may be shown in a different color (e.g., red), and after some amount of time, the user's name 204 will be removed from the palette 200.
  • [0039]
    Once a session has begun, modifications to the drawing may be seen by any users in the session. For example, a pan or zoom operation performed on the workspace by a user will be reflected in other users' view of the workspace. Accordingly, the pan and zoom state of the workspace may be stored with the document. Thereafter, the next time the workspace is opened, the view will be the same as when it was last closed. Similarly, if the view of a 3D model is changed by a user, the other users' view of the model will be changed. Additionally, any action that causes data to be saved to the workspace will be seen by all of the users in the collaboration session. For example, creating new documents, moving documents, minimizing documents, and using tools on documents, are all actions that will be seen by everyone.
  • [0040]
    Additionally, the collaboration framework may provide communication capabilities such as chat and instant messaging to collaborators 104 in the session.
  • [0041]
    However, to preserve individual user's preferences, certain actions performed by a user may not be seen by other users in the session. For example, a user's palette 200 may not be part of the collaboration session. Thus, if a user moves his or her palette 200 or drawing tools from the upper left to the lower right, the collaborators 104 will not see a change in their view of the workspace. Further, any object selected by a collaborator 104 may not be seen in the other collaborator's 104 view of the workspace. However, any action done to the object that changes its data (e.g., color or size change) will be seen by the other users. Additionally, the activation of documents may not be seen by collaboration users. For example, if a user has “Drawing 1” active, and is actively placing strokes into it (which is seen by the other users), he or she will not see that another user may have a model document active. However, if the second user begins to rotate the model in the document, the result will be seen by all of the collaborators 104.
  • [0042]
    The loss of a network 102 connection by a user affects the way the user continues. When a single user of a workspace (i.e., no other collaborators 104 are members of the session) loses his or her network 102 connection, the user may be automatically switched to an offline mode during which the user may keep write-access while offline, and the server 106 marks the workspace as offline so it may not be edited by online users. When a user in a collaborative environment loses a connection, the remaining users will be notified that the user has timed-out with the disconnected status in the data field 106 of the palette. The disconnected user may also receive a dialog notice that the connection to the workspace has been lost, and the user has therefore been switched to read-only mode.
  • [0043]
    Colaboration Details
  • [0044]
    As described above, collaborators 104 participating in a session may all modify a drawing document that is stored in the server 106 wherein the drawing modifications are then reflected in the other collaborators' 104 views. To enable such capabilities, the collaboration framework provides for the transmission of commands to the client 104 and server 106 sides of the framework. The description below provides information regarding some of the commands that may be used including background information, implementation information, and formatting information, It should be noted that while the formatting information is described in terms of extensible markup language (XML), any acceptable format or formatting language may be used and the invention is not intended to be limited to XML formatted messages.
  • [0045]
    There are two types of command communication between clients 104 and server 106 in the framework 100: synchronous and asynchronous.
  • [0046]
    Synchronous commands are sent from the client 104 to the server 106, and processed immediately. The server's 106 response is a command response containing the processing results.
  • [0047]
    Asynchronous commands ate sent from the client 104 to the server 106, but are not necessarily processed immediately. The server 106 response to the client 104 may contain multiple command responses to earlier client 104 requests, collaboration state changes, collaboration user information, and other data waiting in the client's 104 outgoing message queue. As described below, a command referred to herein as “heartbeat” is an example of such an asynchronous command.
  • [0048]
    While strictly speaking, there may only be a single command type, there are three distinct types of command messages: Commands, Responses, and Heartbeats.
  • [0049]
    Commands initiate a request or an action. Commands may typically contain one or more <param\> sub-nodes. Usually, commands are a request from the client 104 to the server 106 to initiate an action or request data.
  • [0050]
    Responses are commands containing processing results and return data from previously issued commands. There is typically a one to one correspondence for a response to a specific command. For example, a “Version” command likely has a corresponding “Version” response command which is returned to the client 104 and contains data pertaining to the current version of the framework. Responses typically contain a <success\> sub-node, a <rspMsg\> sub-node, and one or more <return\> sub-nodes.
  • [0051]
    Heartbeats are asynchronous commands that can contain other commands, responses, or collaboration data.
  • [0052]
    As described above, messages may be implemented in any format. In one or more embodiments of the invention, messages are simple XML structures. Using a login command message from the client 104 as an example, the basic structure is shown below:
    <msg msgID=“1” sessID=“1” resID=“23058” retry=“0”>
    <cmd name=“Login”>
    <param name=“username” val=“joe smith” />
    <param name=“password” val=“JoesPswd” />
    </cmd>
    </msg>
  • [0053]
    The outermost node, <msg\>, wraps the entire message. A message tag may be required to contain the following attributes in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Attribute Name Values Meaning
    MsgID Any positive integer. Client 104 generated numeric identifier of the
    message. When the message is sent from the server
    106 to the client 104, the server 106 echoes the
    msgID number it is responding to. This pairs the
    client 104 request and server 106 response message
    with the same ID.
    SessID A valid session ID. the sessionID.
    ResID A valid resource ID. the resourceID.
    Retry A positive integer, or zero. number of times client has sent this message.
  • [0054]
    The first and only sub-node, <cmd\>, contains a single command. This single command may be a heartbeat command, which itself may contain sub-commands. The command node may contain multiple attributes including a name that specifies a unique command name for the command being sent.
  • [0055]
    Additionally, each <cmd\> node may contain one or more of the sub nodes described in Table 2, depending on it's type:
    TABLE 2
    Sub Node
    Name Contains Attributes
    Param A parameter for the Name - the parameter name.
    command. Val - the parameter's value.
    Filedata An XML file of a non- NONE.
    specific type. Currently used
    for user data, workspace files
    and Workspace Trees.
    Success Found only in response Val - return value. The constant names and values:
    commands, this contains a RESPONSE_SUCCESS = 0 × 0
    flag indicating whether the RESPONSE_LOGIN_REQUIRED = 0 × 1
    command was executed RESPONSE_FAILURE = 0 × 2
    successfully. If it was not, RESPONSE_RESOURCE_NOT_FOUND = 0 × 3
    the attribute contains a RESPONSE_INSUFFICIENT_PERMISSION = 0 × 4
    constant indicating the nature RESPONSE_DUPLICATE_NAME = 0 × 5
    of the failure. RESPONSE_BAD_TOKEN = 0 × 6
    RESPONSE_UNKNOWN_FILETYPE = 0 × 7
    RESPONSE_SYSTEM_FAILURE = 0 × 80
    Return Found only in response Name - the return parameter's name.
    commands, this contains Val - the value of the return parameter.
    return values for the previous
    commands. There may be
    more than one return node
    per response message.
    RspMsg Found only in response Val - the text of the response message.
    commands, this contains text
    corresponding to the result.
    It may be used for providing
    error description text to be
    displayed to the user, for
    example.
  • [0056]
    Accordingly, for each command, whether issued by a client 104 or a server 106, the command name is specified along with optional parameters. The following XML illustrates an example of a version command in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention:
    <!-- Client request command -->
    <cmd name=“Version”>
    <param name=“major” val=“1” />
    <param name=“minor” val=“1” />
    <param name=“revision” val=“2” />
    </cmd>
    <!-- Server response command -->
    <cmd name=“VersionResp”>
    <success val=“1” />
    <rspMsg val=“a resp mesage” />
    <return name=“VersionResp”>
    <param name=“major” val=“1” />
    <param name=“minor” val=“1” />
    <param name=“revision” val=“1” />
    </return>
    </cmd>
  • [0057]
    As illustrated, the client 104 request command name is “Version” and various parameters are specified. In response, the server 106 specifies the command name along with information described in Table 2 (i.e., a success with a value of 1, a response message with a value of “a resp message”, a return name with a value of “VersionResp”, and various parameters with values).
  • [0058]
    Synchronous Commands: Client Sent, Server Processed
  • [0059]
    Various synchronous commands may be processed in the framework 100 of the invention. The synchronous commands described below are commands sent by a client 104 and processed by a server 106.
  • [0060]
    Version Command
  • [0061]
    The “version” command results in a return of the current version number of the framework. The syntax for the command is:
    version( localmajor, localminor, localrevision : major,
       minor, revision, upgradeFlag, ChangesXML : success,
       message )
  • [0062]
    The “version” command is sent by the client 104 at startup, before attempting a login or displaying the main application window. Even if the client 104 has a stored session id, it should issue this command first.
  • [0063]
    The upgradeFlag indicates the result of the version check and can be VersionsIdentical (0), ServerUpgraded (1), ClientUpgradeAvailable (2), ClientUpgradeRequired (4). If the upgradeFlag has a VersionsIdentical value, no code in the framework 100 has been updated since the last time the client 104 collaboration application 108 was run. If the upgradeFlag has a ServerUpgraded value, the server 106 has new code that may affect the clients 104 perception of how the framework 100 works (faster save times, fixes, etc.), but there are no client 104 binary changes.
  • [0064]
    A value of ClientUpgradeAvailable means that there is a newer version of the client 104 available, but the client 104 is not required to get the newer version in order to work with the current version of the server 106 (i.e. no file formats or interfaces have changed). A value of ClientUpgradeRequited means that significant changes have occurred in the client 104 and file formats or interfaces with the server 106 have changed. Accordingly, the client 104 must upgrade before the client 104 can go online. Note that this does not necessarily mean the client 104 is forced to upgrade immediately. Instead, the client 104 may be able to work offline using the local cache until the user is ready to upgrade. However, if the client 104 desires to obtain data from the site/server 106, the client 104 must upgrade.
  • [0065]
    Also, any new features and/or noteworthy fixes that have been implemented since the version of the client 104 passed in will be returned in the ChangesXML parameters, and these changes can be displayed in the client 104. It may be possible to have some updates and not require an upgrade. For example, there may have been server-only changes that would be nice to let the user know about (e.g., a bug fix or improved performance). The ChangesXML may be useful to users when the value of upgradeFlag is ClientUpgradeAvailable, since the ChangesXML content is what provides the basis upon which the client 104 decides if the upgrade should be made (new features and fixes vs. risk assessment). Further, the ChangesXML value does not need to be overly verbose. For example, the ChangesXML value may comprise a short bulleted list containing only changes that the average user would care about, or possibly a hyperlink pointing to a page on a web site that may be accessed for more detailed information.
  • [0066]
    In response to the version command, an object is returned with the current version numbers that may be read from a local versions XML file. Alternatively, a data cache product may be used such that the version numbers are stored in a database 114 and read from the cache. Thereafter, collaboration application stores the returned major/minor/revision numbers and ensures that the returned numbers are used in the next version command.
  • [0067]
    The versions XML file may contain all changes over time (occasionally pruned manually) and will be read by the application server 110 at start time and stored globally into an efficiently searched data structure that may be keyed by major.minor.revision. Each one of the database 114 entries may have an upgradeFlag that will be set to one of the levels defined above. The upgradeFlag's values may be binary to ease in the use of a bitwise OR operation. Each entry may also contain any number of new feature/fix nodes, and each node might specify an attribute classifying the type (new feature vs. enhancement vs. fix, etc). When processing a version command, if the major/minor/revision passed in is lower than the current maximum parsed from the file, then an update has occurred and an upgrade may be required.
  • [0068]
    The upgradeFlag is determined by a simple bitwise OR operation of all upgradeFlags of the versions greater than the version passed in. The ChangesXML is built in a similar way, by combining all of the change nodes for the versions greater than the one passed in. If the provided version is not found, then the version has been pruned, and the earliest version in the data structure is used to determine the upgradeFlag and the ChangesXML.
  • [0069]
    The version command likely executes quickly and efficiently and avoids a Denial of Service attack, since no login is required. Accordingly, the version command does not perform any database 114 read operations, database 114 write operations, and only performs a single remote method invocation (RMI) call.
  • [0070]
    Login Command
  • [0071]
    The login command is executed by the client 104 at startup to logon to a session. In one or more embodiments, the login command is used when the user does not have a session id, or when the user determines that the sessionid that the user has is invalid. Such a login may be required in when the server 106 requires the client 104 to logon (e.g., during the processing of a loginrequired command from the server 106 [see below]). The syntax for the login command is:
    login( username, password : success, message, sessionID,
     userID, imageURL )
  • [0072]
    In response to a login command, the server 106 returns a new sessionID and the userlD to the client 104. The same user can be logged on multiple times and have multiple active sessionID's.
  • [0073]
    Open User Data Command
  • [0074]
    Once logged in pursuant to the login command, the client 104 will next transmit the Open User Data command. More particularly, if the client 104 has a cached sessionID from a previous instance, the client 104 will first try this sessionID. If the prior sessionID fails, the client 104 will receive a loginrequired command from the server 106 in response. The subsequent login (i.e., using the login command) provides a sessionid to be used with the Open User Data command. The Open User Data command opens specified user data for the client 104.
  • [0075]
    New Workspace Command
  • [0076]
    This command is used by a client 104 whenever the user selects an option to create a new workspace/document. The newworkspace command is executed before the closeworkspace command of an open workspace (if there is one open) is executed. If the newworkspace command is successful, the resourcelD of the new workspace is returned, and the workspace should be considered to be in a SoloPending state for the specified user.
  • [0077]
    Copy Workspace Command
  • [0078]
    The copy workspace command is issued by the client 104 whenever the user selects an option to copy a workspace.
  • [0079]
    Delete Workspace Command
  • [0080]
    The delete workspace command is issued by the client 104 whenever the user tries to delete a workspace that the user has opened. The delete workspace command is executed before the closing an open workspace. If successful, the deleted workspace will be gone and the user will have to select a workspace to work on or create a new workspace. The use of the delete workspace command may be restricted. For example, the delete workspace command may not execute if the workspace is in CollabPending or Collab state. Accordingly, in order to delete a workspace, the user must be the only person in the workspace. The syntax for the delete workspace command is:
  • deleteworkspace(userID, resourceID:success, message)
  • [0081]
    To enable the delete workspace command, the server 106 may ensure that the workspace is either open by nobody, or open by exactly the user trying to delete it. The user must also have the appropriate permissions. If all of these conditions have been complied with, then the delete workspace command will delete the workspace and remove the workspace from a ResourceSession. Once deleted, the workspace cannot be opened at a later time.
  • [0082]
    Open Workspace Command
  • [0083]
    The open workspace command is the backbone of collaboration, and occurs whenever the client 104 opens a new workspace. The command is issued by the client 104 before the closeworkspace command when switching workspaces. If the workspace is already open by two or more users (i.e., the workspace is in Collab state), then this user joins the collaboration session. If the workspace is open by only one person (i.e., the workspace is in Solo state), then a collaboration session is started (CollabPending state) and both clients 104 are synchronized. Once synchronized, the state changes to Collab. If the workspace is not open, the user (that is in SoloPending state) marks the workspace as open.
  • [0084]
    A workspace session and user's workspace session may be in one of the following states: 0-Solo Pending; 1-Solo; 2-Collab Pending; 3-Collab; or 4-Disconnected. When a workspace is not open, the workspace has no state. When the workspace is opened, the workspace transitions into Solo Pending, as does the workspace's user.
  • [0085]
    Upon the new user's/client's 104 heartbeat, the state is transitioned from Solo Pending to Solo. If another user opens the document, the state is transitioned to Collab Pending. Once the original client 104 confirms synchronization of the document, the state is transitioned to Collab. If another user joins, the workspace remains in Collab state, but the user is in Collab Pending until the first heartbeat is received, at which time the client 104 is transitioned into full Collab.
  • [0086]
    If at any point enough users close the workspace such that there is only one client 104 left, the state is transitioned into Solo Pending for that user and the workspace. Once this client 104 confirms synchronization of the document and started creating deltas, the state is transitioned into Solo for the workspace and the user. If at anytime a user is determined to have gone link dead, the user's state is changed to Disconnected. If at any time all users left in a workspace session are Disconnected, then the state of the document is changed to Disconnected. Once users have been disconnected for a sufficient time without returning, the disconnected users are removed from the session. If all users are removed from a session, the session is closed.
  • [0087]
    Close Workspace Command
  • [0088]
    The close workspace command is executed when a user closes a workspace. If the user is closing the workspace due to opening an existing or creating a new workspace, then the open or create commands are executed first, and the close executing after their success. If the user closes the application, closeworkspace is sent after the final save.
  • [0089]
    While processing this command, if the state is Collab then a collabuserinfo command may be placed in the CommandOut queues of the remaining workspace session users. If there is only one other workspace session user, then the state of the workspace session may be changed from Collab to Solo Pending.
  • [0090]
    Get Object IDs Command
  • [0091]
    The Get Object IDs command is issued by a client 104 to obtain a range of unique Object IDs the client 104 can use when creating application objects. A GetObjectIDs command with no parameters is requesting a default number of IDs. The default should be sufficient for typical online work, yet large enough to allow for sufficient IDs in the case of subsequent connection failures so the client 104 can keep working. A “quantity” parameter may be specified to request a specific quantity of Object ID's. Clients 104 can use numeric constants for typical quantities or simply specify a number for the quantity. The syntax for the Get Object IDs command is:
    getObjectIDs( userID : success, message, Object ID
       start, Object ID end )
  • [0092]
    In response to the command, the server 106 returns a range of object IDs that can be used by the client 104. In other words, a first/start object ID and a last/end object ID are returned by the server 106 for use by the client 104.
  • [0093]
    The GetObjectIDs command may or may not be utilized depending on the implementation. For example, if the GetObjectIDs command is not utilized, the server 106 may map object IDs as using a Mapped Objects command described in detail below.
  • [0094]
    Synchronous Responses Server Sent, Client Processed
  • [0095]
    The commands described below are synchronous commands/responses that are transmitted by a server 106 and processed by a client 104.
  • [0096]
    Login Required Response
  • [0097]
    The server 106 generates the login required command whenever processing a message or command and it is determined that the specified sessionID is missing or invalid (timed out). Upon receipt and execution, the client 104 sends a login command to the server 106 (see above).
  • [0098]
    System Failure Response
  • [0099]
    The server 106 generates the system failure response/command whenever an internal system failure occurs processing a message or command. Upon receipt of the system failure command, the client 104 takes appropriate measures to retry the command it received the system failure response message for.
  • [0100]
    Heartbeat Commands
  • [0101]
    Heartbeat messages are different from other commands, as they may contain sub commands and collaboration data. The heartbeat message uses two sub-nodes to contain the different types of data. These are the <transientcmd\> node, which contains zero or more commands and responses, and the <persistentcmd\> node, which contains actual collaboration data, i.e., the actions performed in the client 104 by the collaborators 104.
  • [0102]
    As an example, a heartbeat command demonstrating the full structure is shown below, although any individual heartbeat command may or may not have all the components shown below the <cmd\> node. The example shows a heartbeat command with a single SaveUserData sub-command, and a comment in the <persistentcmds\> section where a real message would have one or more client 104 collaboration commands:
    <cmd name=“Heartbeat” deltalevel=“45” beat=“1”
     strong=“0”>
    <transientcmds>
    <cmd name=“SaveUserData”>
    <param name=“file”
     val=“woof_tools.xml”>
    <filedata>
    <!-- user data file xml -->
    <filedata>
    </param>
    </cmd>
    </transientcmds>
    <persistentcmds deltalevel=“45>
    <!-- client collaboration commands -->
    </persistentcmds>
    </cmd>
  • [0103]
    The heartbeat </cmd> node may be required to contain the attributes identified in Table 3.
    TABLE 3
    Attribute Name Values Meaning
    DeltaLevel The current delta level. In solo See text.
    mode, this value is determined
    by the client 104 and echoed by
    the server 106 in the response.
    In collaboration mode, these
    are temporary IDs when sent
    from the client 104, and actual
    IDs when sent from the server
    106.
    Beat BEAT_TYPE_COLLAB = 1 A collaboration or solo beat.
    BEAT_TYPE_SOLO = 2
    Strong BEAT_STRONG = 1 The server 106 updates the client 104 last contacted
    BEAT_WEAK = 0 time on Strong beats, whether or not any other data
    is sent.
  • [0104]
    The heartbeat command is executed by the client 104 with a delay between heartbeats of N seconds, where N varies depending if the client 104 is collaborating or not. Tentatively heartbeats may beat execute every 10 seconds when solo and every 2 seconds when collaborating. Occasionally heartbeats will be strong. A strong heartbeat signifies that even if no data modification commands (referred to as delta commands) are sent in the heartbeat, the users' workspace session should be marked as active so that it does not timeout. For example, if a client 104 does not perform any modifications or is away from the keyboard for 20 minutes while in a collaborative session, the client 104 won't be generating any data but the strong heartbeats will keep the client's 104 workspace session alive.
  • [0105]
    The syntax for the heartbeat command is:
    heartbeat( userID, resourceID, deltaLevel, strongflag :
       transientcmds, persistentcmds [ deltalevel ] )
  • [0106]
    The heartbeat may contain either transient commands, persistent commands (i.e., delta commands), or both. Transient commands are executed immediately and persistent commands are stored for asynchronous processing by a separate server-side process. Some transient heartbeat commands are described below.
  • [0107]
    If the heartbeat comes from a solo user of the workspace, then the DeltaID's will already be present, and the specified DeltaLevel will represent the new DeltaLevel of the workspace. If the heartbeat comes from a collaborator 104, then none of the delta commands will have a DeltaID, and the server 106 is responsible for numbering them. In either case, the DeltaLevel of the workspace session needs to be updated. If the heartbeat comes from a collaborator 104, then the heartbeat response will contain any delta commands that the server 106 has received that are higher than the clients 104 specified DeltaLevel, and this will include new delta commands that the client 104 just sent. Accordingly, the heartbeat command enables the client 104 to receive the work done by another client 104 during a session.
  • [0108]
    If the client 104 is collaborating, then any new ObjectID's specified in the delta commands will be temporary and will be marked as such. Temporary ObjectIDs are mapped to real server-generated ObjectID's, and a persistent map is maintained for each user mapping the user's temporary ObjectID to the real ObjectID. When collaborating, the response to a user's heartbeat command will contain the same persistent commands that came up in the command, but with DeltaID's and real ObjectID's set in them, so that the client 104 can update itself.
  • [0109]
    Part of the persistent commands node is the delta level that the client 104 is currently at. In the collaborative case, there may be delta commands that a client 104 has received from other users that have been given DeltaID's that this client 104 may not yet have. Therefore, the response message may contain not only the updated DeltaID's that this client 104 generated, but it may also contain those DeltaIDs specified by other clients 104, all in the correct DeltaID order.
  • [0110]
    Depending on the implementation, the heartbeat processing may utilize a beat flag for the status of a particular client 104. The beat flag is utilized to maintain the appropriate state between clients 104 and to facilitate the collaboration between clients 104. Such heartbeat processing utilizing a beat flag is described in detail below.
  • [0111]
    Alternatively, instead of using a flag to maintain the state of a client 104, the heartbeat processing may result in the generation of several different collaboration transient commands that are sent to the client 104. If the client's 104 state is Solo but the sessions state is Collab Pending, then the client 104 may receive a collabstart command. If the client's 104 state is Collab but the sessions state is Solo Pending, then the client 104 may receive a collabstop command. If the client's 104 state is Joining but the sessions state is Collab, then the client 104 may receive a collabjoined command.
  • [0112]
    The user may also have other transient commands that have been queued up in a queue of outgoing commands for a particular user (referred to as a user's CommandOut queue) waiting for this heartbeat (for example, somebody may have joined the collaborative session, left the collaborative session, etc). These transient commands in the CommandOut queue ate sent from the server 106 to the client 104 in the response message, and marked in a record of the session as having been sent in this particular message ID.
  • [0113]
    A retry count for each message may also be maintained. During heartbeat processing, the retry count of the message may be checked. When the message is not a retry, message responses to all previous messages have been received and processed by the client. Therefore, if there are any transient commands in the CommandOut queue which are marked as sent in a previous message, such transient commands can be removed from the queue.
  • [0114]
    The following transient heartbeat commands are transmitted by a client 104 and processed by the server 106.
  • [0115]
    Save User Data
  • [0116]
    The save user data command is executed by the client 104 when a session is closed and optionally during sessions as user preferences/options change. The save user data command may execute based on an interval and a dirty flag. If the time interval has passed and the flag/preferences are dirty, then the preferences are saved.
  • [0117]
    The save user data command uses a user ID, filename, and file data as parameters. The filename should be a valid system file type, otherwise the operation to store/save the data may fail. If a failure occurs, a saveuserdatafailed command will likely be generated and returned in the response message.
  • [0118]
    Save Workspace Command
  • [0119]
    The save workspace command is generated by any client 104 that has a non-read-only workspace open. When solo, the client 104 is responsible for sending up all delta commands in the persistent section of a heartbeat command that will update the server 106 from the previous delta level to the new delta level specified. If any of the delta commands are missing, the save will fail.
  • [0120]
    In collaborative mode, the detaLevel is the latest server-approved delta level of the workspace that the client 104 is aware of. Therefore, the client 104 does not need to transmit persistent commands to update the workspace, since the server already has the delta levels. All clients 104 in a collaboration session may issue the saveworkspace command. Further, saves may occur at a regular interval (e.g., every 1 minute). Accordingly, solo saveworkspace commands come up pursuant to regular heartbeat intervals (e.g., 6 heartbeats), and when collaborating saveworkspace commands are likely issued at greater heartbeat intervals (e.g., every 30 heartbeats).
  • [0121]
    Collaboration Start Confirmation Command
  • [0122]
    As described above, various transient collaboration commands may or may not be utilized depending on the implementation. The collaboration start confirmation command may be generated by a client 104 upon receiving and executing a collabstart command. The command occurs only when going from the solo to collaborative mode (i.e., from 1 document viewer to 2). When the server 106 receives this command, the client 104 is signaling that the client 104 has stopped generating delta commands that have DeltaID's, and that it is now the servers 106 responsibility to generate the delta commands. The collaboration start confirmation command typically arrives in the same message as the clients 104 final solo saveworkspace. Subsequent to execution, heartbeats contain delta commands without DeltaID's, and all new ObjectID's are temporary.
  • [0123]
    Once the server 106 receives the start collaboration confirmation command, the user or users that are in the Joining state can be migrated to the Joined state (they are issued collabjoined commands), as well as placing collabuserinfo commands into the CommandOut queues of all users in the workspace session for all of the users that just Joined. The workspace session state may also be updated from CollabPending to Collab.
  • [0124]
    Collaboration Stop Confirmation Command
  • [0125]
    The collaboration stop confirmation command is generated by a client 104 upon receiving and executing a collabstop command from the server 106. This command is only executed when going from the collaborative mode to the solo mode (i.e., from 2 or more document viewers to 1). When the server 106 receives this command, the client 104 is signaling that the client 104 has started generating delta commands that have DeltaID's, and that it is no longer the servers' 106 responsibility to generate delta commands. Subsequently, heartbeats executed by the client 104 contain delta commands with client 104 generated DeltaID's, and all new ObjectID's are real and not temporary.
  • [0126]
    Once the server 106 receives the collaboration stop confirmation command, the user or user may be migrated from the Pending Solo state to the Solo state. Additionally, the workspace session state may be updated from SoloPending to Solo.
  • [0127]
    Collaboration Joined Formation Command
  • [0128]
    The collaboration joined formation command (referred to as collabjoinedconfirm) is generated by a client 104 upon receiving and executing a collabjoined command. A collabjoined command is only received when the user's state transitions from the collaborative pending state to the collaborative mode state. When the server 106 receives the collaboration joined formation command, the client 104 is signaling that the client 104 has received the collabjoined command and is now generating delta commands (unnumbered).
  • [0129]
    Once the server 106 receives the collaboration joined formation command, the user is likely migrated from the Pending Collab state to the Collab state.
  • [0130]
    Mopped Objects Command
  • [0131]
    Depending on the implementation, a mapped objects command may or may not be provided. For example, if a Get Object IDs command (as described above) are implemented, the Mapped Objects Command may not be utilized. As described above, the GetObjectIDs provides the client 104 with a pool of valid IDs which are guaranteed unique. Accordingly, there is no need for the server 106 to map the objects to IDs. However, without the GetObjectIDs command, such mapping may be necessary.
  • [0132]
    The purpose of the mapped objects command is so that the server 106 can truncate the real-to-temp ObjectID maps for each client's 104 workspace session once the client 104 has acknowledged that the real ID's have been received. Accordingly, the mapped objects command may only be used when in a collaborative mode. Further, the command is originally server 106 generated and simply forwarded back up to the server 106 by the client 104. By making a trip through the clients' 104 queues, once received by the server 106, any temporary ObjectID's in the command are no longer in use by the client 104. Accordingly, temporary ObjectIDs may be removed from a state map of the server 106.
  • [0133]
    The removal of a temporary ObjectIDs causes object mapping to run considerably faster when processing commands from active clients 104 who are generating numerous delta commands. Without the mapped objects command, the mapping table may continue to grow unchecked.
  • [0134]
    The execution of the mapped objects command may contain a series of elements, with a tempID and realID attribute/value pair. The elements are parsed and the tempID's are placed into a string. The string may then be transmitted to a single server 106 processor (along with the userlD and resourceID) that can efficiently delete all of the temporary objects efficiently.
  • [0135]
    In addition to transient commands sent by a client 104 and processed by a server 106, the following transient commands are transmitted by the server 106 and processed by a client 104.
  • [0136]
    Collaboration Start Command
  • [0137]
    The server 106 generates the collaboration start command while processing a heartbeat if the heartbeat originated from a solo client 104 and the state of the workspace session has been changed to Pending Collab. The collaboration start command signals that a collaborative session is beginning so that the client 104 can begin the transition from the solo state to the pending collaboration state. Once the client 104 has finished this transition, die client 104 will issue a collabstartconfirm command to the server 106 as described above.
  • [0138]
    Collaboration User Information Command
  • [0139]
    The server 106 generates the collaboration user information command in response to every heartbeat for a user in a collaborative session. This command contains all of the data regarding users currently in the session including disconnected (link dead) users. It is the client's 104 responsibility to compare the data structure to previously received data structures to figure out what users are new, what users are gone, what users had state changes, what users had icon changes, etc., and then render appropriately.
  • [0140]
    Collaboration Joined Command
  • [0141]
    The server 106 generates the collaboration joined command while processing a heartbeat command. If the heartbeat comes from a joining client 104 and the state of the workspace session is Collaborating, then this command is generated and returned on the heartbeat.
  • [0142]
    Collaboration Stop Command
  • [0143]
    The server 106 generates the collaboration stop command while processing a heartbeat command if the specified userID is the only user left in the workspace session. The command signals that the collaborative mode should stop, and that the client 104 should enter the pending solo mode and signal to the server 106 that the client 104 has sent up all of the client's 104 un-numbered delta commands.
  • [0144]
    Beat Flag
  • [0145]
    The various transient collaboration commands described above (e.g., Collaboration Start Confirmation Command, Collaboration Stop Confirmation Command, Collaboration joined Formation Command, Collaboration Start Command, Collaboration User Information Command, Collaboration joined Command, and Collaboration Stop Command) may not be utilized in one or more embodiments of the invention. Instead, a flag may be used in the Heartbeat command that maintains state information for clients 104.
  • [0146]
    At the server 106 level, the state of the workspace itself as well as the state of the client 104 may be considered. However, each client 104 only needs to keep track of their own state. The state may be described using the following values: 0=closed, 1=disconnected, 2=solo pending, 3=solo, 4=collab pending, and 5=collab.
  • [0147]
    Upon executing an open workspace command, the client 104 is placed in one of two states: solo pending or collab pending. The heartbeat command always echoes this state to the server 106. In turn, the server 106 will update the value of this flag after examining the state of the workspace and the state of the users in the session.
  • [0148]
    An example of three clients collaborating using the various flags are illustrated in Table 4.
    TABLE 4
    Server
    Work-
    Command Client1 Client2 Client3 space C1 C2 C3
    1. Client1 exe- 2 2 2
    cutes open work-
    space
    2. Client1 3 3 3
    heartbeats
    3. Client2 3 4 4 3 4
    executes open
    workspace
    4. Client1 4 4 4 4 4
    heartbeats
    5. Client2 4 (no 4 4 4
    heartbeats changes)
    4
    6. Client1 5 4 5 5 4
    heartbeats
    7. Client2 5 5 5 5 5
    heartbeats
    8. Client3 5 5 4 5 5 5 4
    executes open
    workspace
    9. Client3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
    heartbeats
    10. Client2 5 0 5 5 5 0 5
    executes
    close workspace
    11. Client3 5 0 0 2 5 0 0
    executes
    close workspace
    12. Client1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
    heartbeats
    13. Client1 3 0 0 3 3 0 0
    heartbeats
  • [0149]
    As illustrated in Table 4, the values in each row are the final values after successful execution of each command indicated. The first user in a workspace session must confirm (e.g., by issuing a heartbeat command with a collab pending flag) to synchronize all deltas and start a collaboration session. The client 104 always checks the flag returned from the server to determine whether it should change its current state or not.
  • [0150]
    The command executed in Table 4 and the actions taken may resemble the transient collaboration commands described above in the following manner:
  • [0151]
    Step 3 (Client2 executes open workspace) is the equivalent of the collab joined command (sent by the server 106).
  • [0152]
    Step 4 (Client1 heartbeats) is the equivalent of the collab start command (set by the server 106).
  • [0153]
    Step 6 (Client 1 heartbeats) is the equivalent of the collab start confirm command (sent by client 104).
  • [0154]
    Step 7 (Client2 heartbeats) is the equivalent of the collab joined confirm command (sent by client 104).
  • [0155]
    Step 12 (Client1 heartbeats) is the equivalent of the collab stop command (sent by server 106).
  • [0156]
    Step 13 (Client1 heartbeats) is the equivalent of the collab stop confirm command (sent by client 104).
  • [0157]
    By using the beat flag in this manner, transient collaboration commands are not needed between a client 104 and a server 106. Further, the beat flag provides a mechanism to maintain state information for each client 104 in a collaboration session without the use of extraneous communications between the client 104 and server 106.
  • [0158]
    Save User Data Failed Command
  • [0159]
    The server 106 generates the save user data failed command when the processing of a saveuserdata command fails for reasons other than system failure (system failures are handled separately and consistently for all commands/messages). For example, some causes for the saveuserdata command failing may include invalid filename specified or invalid userlD specified.
  • [0160]
    Save Workspace Failed Command
  • [0161]
    The server 106 generates the save workspace command when the processing of a saveworkspace command fails for reasons other than system failure. Failed commands due to system failures are handled separately and consistently for all commands/messages. For example, some of the causes for the failure of the saveworkspace command may include: invalid userlD specified, invalid resourcelD specified, no access, and possibly workspace not open.
  • [0162]
    Collaboration Flow
  • [0163]
    As described above, numerous commands may be used as part of the collaboration framework to enable multiple users to simultaneously access and modify an actual document that is stored on a server 106. Further, the collaboration application 108 and server application 110 enable the use of a full set of three-dimensional tools to modify a drawing while in a collaboration session.
  • [0164]
    The server 106 also maintains a history of all modifications to the document. Using the history, a client 104 may undo any client's 104 modification to a drawing document/workspace. Further, in the event of a network or system failure, the history can be used to rebuild/regenerate a document including all modifications on any client 104 by recommunicating commands received from a client 104 to collaborators 104 in a session. To provide such functionality, in addition to the history, the server 106 may maintain a record of the collaboration session including the name, numbers, and statuses of collaborators 104 in the session.
  • [0165]
    [0165]FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the use of the collaboration framework in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 402, a document/workspace is stored on a server 106. At step 404, a collaboration session is established. During a session, the server 106 permits two or more collaborators 104 on a network 102 to work simultaneously across the network on the drawing document stored on the server 106 (e.g., all of the collaborators 104 have write-access for the drawing document during the session). A collaboration palette may be displayed to collaborators 104 in the session that provides information relating to the collaborators 104 in the session (e.g., the name of each collaborator 104, status of each collaborator 104, an icon for each collaborator 104, etc.).
  • [0166]
    At step 406, the server 106 receives a command (e.g., an XML formatted command) to modify the drawing document from a collaborator 104 in the session. Such a command may be invoked pursuant to the collaborator's 104 use of a tool selected from a full set of drawing modification tools. The command may identify an object in the drawing document that the collaborator 104 has modified.
  • [0167]
    At step 408, the server 106 distributes the command to modify the drawing document to the other collaborators 104 in the session. Such a distribution may be pursuant to regularly transmitted commands (e.g., heartbeat commands as described above) received from collaborators 104 in the session. Further, as part of the command's distribution, an identifier may be assigned to the command and distributed with the command to the collaborators 104. The client 104 then uses the identifier to determine whether the command has already been reflected in its display or not.
  • [0168]
    Conclusion
  • [0169]
    This concludes the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention. The following describes some alternative embodiments for accomplishing the present invention. For example, any type of computer, such as a mainframe, minicomputer, or personal computer, or computer configuration, such as a timesharing mainframe, local area network, or standalone personal computer, could be used with the present invention.
  • [0170]
    The foregoing description of one or more embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5938724 *2 Apr 199717 Aug 1999Ncr CorporationRemote collaboration system that stores annotations to the image at a separate location from the image
US6057854 *28 Jul 19972 May 2000Micrografx, Inc.System and method of providing interactive vector graphics over a network
US6067551 *14 Nov 199723 May 2000Microsoft CorporationComputer implemented method for simultaneous multi-user editing of a document
US6195751 *24 Apr 199827 Feb 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Efficient, secure multicasting with minimal knowledge
US6342906 *2 Feb 199929 Jan 2002International Business Machines CorporationAnnotation layer for synchronous collaboration
US6608628 *5 Nov 199919 Aug 2003The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)Method and apparatus for virtual interactive medical imaging by multiple remotely-located users
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6917950 *10 Jan 200112 Jul 2005Intel CorporationModifying a shared resource
US7185056 *23 Dec 200227 Feb 2007Sony CorporationApparatus and method for sharing information between terminals on a network
US7424671 *2 Apr 20049 Sep 2008Justsystems Canada Inc.Methods and systems for enabling collaborative authoring of hierarchical documents
US7509577 *7 Mar 200324 Mar 2009Toshiba Corp OrationMethod and system for implementing a clipboard
US7693958 *20 Jun 20056 Apr 2010Microsoft CorporationInstant messaging with data sharing
US7712052 *31 Jul 20064 May 2010Microsoft CorporationApplications of three-dimensional environments constructed from images
US776484931 Jul 200627 Jul 2010Microsoft CorporationUser interface for navigating through images
US781866030 May 200619 Oct 2010Litera Technology LlcMethod of compound document comparison
US781867831 Oct 200219 Oct 2010Litera Technology LlcCollaborative document development and review system
US782608122 Sep 20052 Nov 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for receiving localized display elements at an imaging device
US787018530 Sep 200511 Jan 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device event notification administration
US787355329 Jul 200518 Jan 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for authorizing imaging device concurrent account use
US787371829 Jul 200518 Jan 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device accounting server recovery
US789527629 Jan 200722 Feb 2011Litera Technology LlcMethod of managing metadata in attachments to e-mails in a network environment
US790817831 Jul 200915 Mar 2011Paul NykampMethods for interactive and synchronous displaying session
US792010122 Sep 20055 Apr 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device display standardization
US793421729 Jul 200526 Apr 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing remote file structure access to an imaging device
US794174318 Aug 200610 May 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device form field management
US7945619 *29 Jun 200517 May 2011Jitendra ChawlaMethods and apparatuses for reporting based on attention of a user during a collaboration session
US796639630 Sep 200521 Jun 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for administrating imaging device event notification
US79695968 Oct 200428 Jun 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device document translation
US797081330 Sep 200528 Jun 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device event notification administration and subscription
US797861821 Nov 200612 Jul 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for user interface customization
US79834899 Jul 201019 Jul 2011Microsoft CorporationUser interface for navigating through images
US800118330 Sep 200516 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device related event notification
US800158629 Jul 200516 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential management and authentication
US800158729 Jul 200516 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential management
US800617621 Oct 200523 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging-device-based form field management
US800629229 Jul 200523 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential submission and consolidation
US800629329 Jul 200523 Aug 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential acceptance
US801523430 Sep 20056 Sep 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for administering imaging device notification access control
US80186108 Oct 200413 Sep 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device remote application interaction
US8019817 *25 May 200613 Sep 2011Canon Kabushiki KaishaCollaboration support system and control method thereof
US802313029 Jul 200520 Sep 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device accounting data maintenance
US802479229 Jul 200520 Sep 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential submission
US803257930 Sep 20054 Oct 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for obtaining imaging device notification access control
US803260830 Sep 20054 Oct 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device notification access control
US8035831 *8 Oct 200411 Oct 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device remote form management
US804967722 Sep 20051 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device display element localization
US805112530 Sep 20051 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for obtaining imaging device event notification subscription
US805114021 Oct 20051 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device control
US80605751 Feb 201115 Nov 2011Litera Technology LlcMethods and systems for managing metadata in email attachments in a network environment
US806092129 Jul 200515 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential authentication and communication
US806093029 Jul 200515 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential receipt and authentication
US806538430 Sep 200522 Nov 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device event notification subscription
US806908716 Feb 201029 Nov 2011Paul NykampMethods for interactive and synchronous display session
US806911728 May 200429 Nov 2011Adobe Systems IncorporatedAd hoc access rights in restricted-access electronic space
US810692218 Aug 200631 Jan 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device data display
US811594429 Jul 200514 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for local configuration-based imaging device accounting
US811594531 Aug 200514 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device job configuration management
US811594631 Aug 200514 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and sytems for imaging device job definition
US811594730 Sep 200514 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing remote, descriptor-related data to an imaging device
US812079329 Jul 200521 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for displaying content on an imaging device
US812079729 Jul 200521 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for transmitting content to an imaging device
US812079830 Sep 200521 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing access to remote, descriptor-related data at an imaging device
US812079930 Sep 200521 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for accessing remote, descriptor-related data at an imaging device
US81256668 Oct 200428 Feb 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device document management
US813603117 Mar 200913 Mar 2012Litera Technologies, LLCComparing the content of tables containing merged or split cells
US815642422 Sep 200510 Apr 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device dynamic document creation and organization
US817140412 Mar 20071 May 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for disassembly and reassembly of examination documents
US820107718 Aug 200612 Jun 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device form generation and form field data management
US8204935 *25 Jun 200719 Jun 2012West CorporationMethod and apparatus for providing egalitarian control in a multimedia collaboration session
US821303429 Jul 20053 Jul 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing remote file structure access on an imaging device
US8214423 *2 Jun 20063 Jul 2012Hewlett-Packard CompanyCAD system
US823032822 Sep 200524 Jul 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for distributing localized display elements to an imaging device
US823794629 Jul 20057 Aug 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device accounting server redundancy
US827000318 Aug 200618 Sep 2012Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for integrating imaging device display content
US831189416 Feb 201013 Nov 2012Reliable Tack Acquisitions LlcMethod and apparatus for interactive and synchronous display session
US834527228 Sep 20061 Jan 2013Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for third-party control of remote imaging jobs
US838109221 Feb 201219 Feb 2013Litera Technologies, LLCComparing the content between corresponding cells of two tables separate from form and structure
US838492529 Jul 200526 Feb 2013Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device accounting data management
US84284844 Mar 200523 Apr 2013Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for peripheral accounting
US851610525 Jan 200720 Aug 2013Cisco Technology, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for monitoring attention of a user during a conference
US852786423 Aug 20103 Sep 2013Litera Technologies, LLCMethod of compound document comparison
US8694896 *27 Aug 20108 Apr 2014Sony CorporationOnline story collaboration
US8762856 *11 Jul 200824 Jun 2014Reliable Tack Acquisitions LlcSystem and method for collaborative information display and markup
US8819136 *4 Jun 201226 Aug 2014Open Invention Network, LlcMethod and apparatus for providing egalitarian control in a multimedia collaboration session
US8892632 *4 Jun 201018 Nov 2014Microsoft CorporationClient-server interaction frequency control
US8924864 *23 Nov 200930 Dec 2014Foresight Imaging LLCSystem and method for collaboratively communicating on images and saving those communications and images in a standard known format
US8938679 *7 Mar 201420 Jan 2015Axure Software Solutions, Inc.Comment system for interactive graphical designs
US8943147 *15 Dec 201027 Jan 2015International Business Machines CorporationSending a chat context to a recipient
US8943417 *29 Apr 201127 Jan 2015Microsoft CorporationIntegrated collaborative user interface for a document editor program
US897769721 Nov 201210 Mar 2015Litera Technology LlcMethods and systems for removing metadata from an electronic document attached to a message sent from a mobile electronic device
US9046982 *3 Jul 20122 Jun 2015International Business Machines CorporationRepresenting a graphical user interface using a topic tree structure
US90528128 Dec 20149 Jun 2015Axure Software Solutions, Inc.System for exportable graphical designs with interactive linked comments between design and playback environments
US910500723 Apr 201011 Aug 2015Litéra Technologies, LLCCollaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US9110554 *14 Jun 201318 Aug 2015International Business Machines CorporationRepresenting a graphical user interface using a topic tree structure
US9122368 *11 Mar 20101 Sep 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcAnalysis of images located within three-dimensional environments
US915455220 Aug 20126 Oct 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcMethod and apparatus for cooperative file distribution with receiver determined quality of services
US9311490 *12 Jun 201412 Apr 2016Google Technology Holdings LLCDelivery of contextual data to a computing device while preserving data privacy
US948345114 Mar 20131 Nov 2016Scribestar Ltd.System and method for handling user editing history based on spawning, merging data structures of directed acyclic graph
US9519886 *30 Sep 201313 Dec 2016Box, Inc.Simultaneous editing/accessing of content by collaborator invitation through a web-based or mobile application to a cloud-based collaboration platform
US970413713 Sep 201311 Jul 2017Box, Inc.Simultaneous editing/accessing of content by collaborator invitation through a web-based or mobile application to a cloud-based collaboration platform
US975600221 Mar 20145 Sep 2017Litera Technologies, LLCSystems and methods for email attachments management
US9800473 *30 Jan 201524 Oct 2017Appdynamics LlcNetwork based virtual collaborative problem solving space
US9805482 *12 Oct 201231 Oct 2017Autodesk, Inc.Computer-implemented tutorial for visual manipulation software
US980709329 Jan 201531 Oct 2017Litera CorporationMethods and systems for remotely removing metadata from electronic documents
US20030145056 *23 Dec 200231 Jul 2003Sony CorporationApparatus and method for sharing information between terminals on a network
US20030225926 *30 May 20024 Dec 2003Sensemaking Technologies Corp.Collaboration envelopes: a method to improve collaborative sensemaking
US20040039995 *7 Mar 200326 Feb 2004Katie KuwataMethod and system for implementing a clipboard
US20040085354 *31 Oct 20026 May 2004Deepak MassandCollaborative document development and review system
US20040088647 *6 Nov 20026 May 2004Miller Adrian S.Web-based XML document processing system
US20040230560 *2 Apr 200418 Nov 2004Dethe ElzaMethods and systems for enabling collaborative authoring of hierarchical documents
US20040239494 *11 Sep 20032 Dec 2004Kennedy John F.Systems and methods for automatic energy analysis of buildings
US20060077411 *8 Oct 200413 Apr 2006Rono MathiesonMethods and systems for imaging device document translation
US20060077423 *8 Oct 200413 Apr 2006Rono MathiesonMethods and systems for imaging device remote application interaction
US20060077427 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for local configuration-based imaging device accounting
US20060077429 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential management and authentication
US20060077434 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential submission and consolidation
US20060077437 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential authentication and communication
US20060077440 *22 Sep 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for receiving localized display elements at an imaging device
US20060077442 *22 Sep 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device display element localization
US20060077445 *30 Sep 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing remote, descriptor-related data to an imaging device
US20060077449 *30 Sep 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for administering imaging device notification access control
US20060077453 *30 Sep 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device related event notification
US20060080123 *31 Aug 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device job configuration management
US20060080184 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for authorizing imaging device concurrent account use
US20060080731 *29 Jul 200513 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device credential acceptance
US20060090128 *29 Jul 200527 Apr 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for providing remote file structure access to an imaging device
US20060103588 *22 Sep 200518 May 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for imaging device dynamic document creation and organization
US20060198653 *4 Mar 20057 Sep 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for peripheral accounting
US20060265496 *2 Jun 200623 Nov 2006Stefan FreitagCAD system
US20060279474 *18 Aug 200614 Dec 2006Lum Joey PMethods and Systems for Imaging Device Data Display
US20060279475 *18 Aug 200614 Dec 2006Lum Joey PMethods and Systems for Integrating Imaging Device Display Content
US20060282548 *25 May 200614 Dec 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaCollaboration support system and control method thereof
US20070005694 *30 Jun 20054 Jan 2007Pando Networks, Inc.System and method for distributed multi-media production, sharing and low-cost mass publication
US20070005707 *20 Jun 20054 Jan 2007Microsoft CorporationInstant messaging with data sharing
US20070005752 *29 Jun 20054 Jan 2007Jitendra ChawlaMethods and apparatuses for monitoring attention of a user during a collaboration session
US20070091010 *21 Nov 200626 Apr 2007Richardson Tanna MMethods and Systems for User Interface Customization
US20070146823 *12 Mar 200728 Jun 2007Borchers Gregory EMethods and Systems for Document Manipulation
US20070208587 *22 Jan 20076 Sep 2007Arun SitaramanSystems, software, and methods for communication-based business process messaging
US20080005244 *25 Jun 20073 Jan 2008Todd VernonMethod and apparatus for providing egalitarian control in a multimedia collaboration session
US20080025646 *31 Jul 200631 Jan 2008Microsoft CorporationUser interface for navigating through images
US20080027985 *31 Jul 200631 Jan 2008Microsoft CorporationGenerating spatial multimedia indices for multimedia corpuses
US20080028341 *31 Jul 200631 Jan 2008Microsoft CorporationApplications of three-dimensional environments constructed from images
US20080034085 *25 Jan 20077 Feb 2008Jitendra ChawlaMethods and apparatuses for monitoring attention of a user during a conference
US20080070198 *17 Aug 200620 Mar 2008Chameleon Technologies CorporationComputerized method, system and machine-readable medium to enable a user to remotely perform a decorating session on an electronic image
US20080072225 *18 Sep 200720 Mar 2008Tetsuro NagatsukaInformation processing apparatus, information processing method, program, and recording medium
US20080256188 *29 Jan 200716 Oct 2008Deepak MassandMethod of removing metadata from email attachments
US20080301193 *30 May 20064 Dec 2008Deepak MassandMethod of compound document comparison
US20080313546 *11 Jul 200818 Dec 2008Paul NykampSystem and method for collaborative information display and markup
US20090164285 *20 Dec 200725 Jun 2009International Business Machines CorporationAuto-cascading clear to build engine for multiple enterprise order level parts management
US20090293003 *31 Jul 200926 Nov 2009Paul NykampMethods for Interactively Displaying Product Information and for Collaborative Product Design
US20100146404 *16 Feb 201010 Jun 2010Paul NykampMethods for interactive and synchronous display session
US20100169838 *11 Mar 20101 Jul 2010Microsoft CorporationAnalysis of images located within three-dimensional environments
US20100174678 *7 Jan 20098 Jul 2010Deepak MassandSystem and method for comparing digital data in spreadsheets or database tables
US20100191808 *16 Feb 201029 Jul 2010Paul NykampMethods for interactive and synchronous display session
US20100205533 *16 Feb 201012 Aug 2010Paul NykampMethods for interactive and synchronous display session
US20100235763 *23 Apr 201016 Sep 2010Litera Technology Llc.Collaborative hierarchical document development and review system
US20100241943 *17 Mar 200923 Sep 2010Litera Technology Llc.System and method for the comparison of content within tables separate from form and structure
US20100278435 *9 Jul 20104 Nov 2010Microsoft CorporationUser interface for navigating through images
US20100318530 *23 Aug 201016 Dec 2010Litera Technology Llc.Method of Compound Document Comparison
US20100325558 *27 Aug 201023 Dec 2010Eric EdwardsOnline story collaboration
US20110078589 *16 Sep 201031 Mar 2011Sungkyunkwan University Foundation For Corporate CollaborationMethod of networking multiple clients
US20110126127 *23 Nov 200926 May 2011Foresight Imaging LLCSystem and method for collaboratively communicating on images and saving those communications and images in a standard known format
US20110196930 *20 Apr 201111 Aug 2011Jitendra ChawlaMethods and apparatuses for reporting based on attention of a user during a collaboration session
US20110209052 *29 Apr 201125 Aug 2011Microsoft CorporationIntegrated collaborative user interface for a document editor program
US20110302237 *4 Jun 20108 Dec 2011Microsoft CorporationClient-Server Interaction Frequency Control
US20120158853 *15 Dec 201021 Jun 2012International Business Machines CorporationSending a chat context to a recipient
US20120290951 *27 Apr 201215 Nov 2012Shingo UtsukiContent sharing system
US20130100159 *12 Oct 201225 Apr 2013Autodesk, Inc.Computer-implemented tutorial for visual manipulation software
US20140013235 *3 Jul 20129 Jan 2014Intemational Business Machines CorporationRepresenting a graphical user interface using a topic tree structure
US20140208235 *19 Mar 201424 Jul 2014Addnclick, Inc.Dynamic information management system and method for content delivery and sharing in content-, metadata- & viewer-based, live social networking among users concurrently engaged in the same and/or similar content
US20140267105 *10 Mar 201418 Sep 2014Sharp Kabushiki KaishaDrawing device, display method, and recording medium
US20150082196 *30 Sep 201319 Mar 2015Box, Inc.Simultaneous editing/accessing of content by collaborator invitation through a web-based or mobile application to a cloud-based collaboration platform
US20150113639 *12 Jun 201423 Apr 2015Motorola Mobility LlcDelivery of contextual data to a computing device while preserving data privacy
US20160226719 *30 Jan 20154 Aug 2016AppDynamics Inc.Network based virtual collaborative problem solving space
CN102508840A *6 Sep 201120 Jun 2012微软公司Concurrent editing of online drawings
WO2007005809A2 *30 Jun 200611 Jan 2007Pando Networks, Inc.System and method for distributed multi-media production, sharing and low cost mass publication
WO2007005809A3 *30 Jun 20065 Apr 2007Pando Networks IncSystem and method for distributed multi-media production, sharing and low cost mass publication
WO2007079587A1 *15 Jan 200719 Jul 2007Diginiche Inc.System and method for collaborative information display and markup
WO2012033608A2 *15 Aug 201115 Mar 2012Microsoft CorporationConcurrent editing of online drawings
WO2012033608A3 *15 Aug 20113 May 2012Microsoft CorporationConcurrent editing of online drawings
Classifications
U.S. Classification715/211, 715/234
International ClassificationG06Q10/10, G06F17/50, G06F3/033, G06F3/048
Cooperative ClassificationG06F2217/74, G06F3/1454, G06F17/5004, G06Q10/10, G06F3/04812, G06F2217/04, G06F17/241, G06F3/0481
European ClassificationG06Q10/10, G06F17/50A, G06F3/0481
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
18 Oct 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: AUTODESK, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BIBLIOWICZ, JACOBO;KREISEL, CAROLYN E.;LIPARI, ROBERT;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012286/0596
Effective date: 20011018