US20020026296A1 - Method of automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents - Google Patents
Method of automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020026296A1 US20020026296A1 US09/934,907 US93490701A US2002026296A1 US 20020026296 A1 US20020026296 A1 US 20020026296A1 US 93490701 A US93490701 A US 93490701A US 2002026296 A1 US2002026296 A1 US 2002026296A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- data
- structural components
- components
- aircraft
- cabin
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/409—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by using manual input [MDI] or by using control panel, e.g. controlling functions with the panel; characterised by control panel details, by setting parameters
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/4097—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by using design data to control NC machines, e.g. CAD/CAM
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/15—Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/28—Fuselage, exterior or interior
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Definitions
- the invention relates to an automated method of planning, designing and configuring arrangements of various components, i.e. for defining the spatial arrangement of structural components relative to each other, and for optimizing the same with respect to the functional position and/or the number or quantity thereof.
- the invention further relates to an automated method of generating production documents, and especially construction or build documents such as drawings and/or parts lists for production integration and for documentation purposes. These methods especially pertain to the planning, design and production of an aircraft, for example.
- the cabin layout is the general basis or starting point for laying-out and designing the baggage compartments and the service channel.
- the service channel is arranged as a component of the aircraft cabin, below the right and left overhead baggage compartments.
- Various different units or devices are installed in the service channel, forming a rowed arranged of various passenger service units, oxygen supply boxes, lights, illuminatable indicators and displays, loudspeakers, air vents, video monitors or screens, selector switches such as attendant call buttons, etc., as requested by the particular customer, i.e. purchaser of the aircraft.
- These various devices installed in the service channel provide information, instructions, lighting, air, video entertainment, and oxygen in the case of an emergency, to the passengers in the aircraft.
- This conventional process is especially achieved by applying the knowledge and experience of the aircraft designer and builder at each stage, regarding the particular aircraft type and the production-related integration characteristics, such as for example, dimensions, doors, and requirements of the fabrication or production area, possible available systems and connections, the customer-specific cabin layout requirements, the class distribution or layout of the cabin, seat types, galley positions, toilet positions, specialized installations in the aircraft cabin, regulatory agency requirements, design requirements, ergonomics and comfort requirements (e.g. the reach distance of a seated passenger or air draft conditions), as well as commercial or economic demands.
- the required drawings are manually prepared by means of CAD systems, and the number of the various components is counted out and then manually documented in parts lists.
- the above objects have been achieved according to the invention in a method of automatically configuring an arrangement of several components, i.e. defining the spatial arrangement of the components relative to each other, and also optimizing the functional position and/or the number or quantity of the components.
- the method involves the following steps.
- the basic aircraft type underlying the construction documents or build documents is input into a configuration tool of a data processing system.
- the aircraft-specific geometry is stored in, and then automatically loaded and depicted from, a drawing module of the data processing system.
- the required geometric objects or components are determined and mathematically described, and position rules are mathematically depicted and stored, by means of a function and data analysis, and are then provided and combined with the aircraft-specific geometry in the drawing module of the data processing system.
- the objects or components on the one hand, as well as the aircraft-specific geometry on the other hand are automatically spatially configured relative to one another in an optimal manner according to a defined rule set that takes into account the particular customer requirements.
- a further detailed embodiment of the invention involves inputting project-related data and then generating production documents by means of a computer program in a generating tool of the data processing system.
- the production documents can be output as substantially conventional documents, such as drawings, parts lists, etc.
- a particular embodiment of the inventive method relates to the example of planning and designing the area of a service channel, e.g. for passenger service units, in an aircraft cabin.
- the required production documents preferably comprise documents for video preliminary investigations, plotter plans, assembly and installation construction documents or build documents such as drawings, parts lists, or the like.
- the data used to generate the drawings and other documents can also be provided as control data directly to numerically controlled production equipment and tools for carrying out at least some of the production steps.
- the specific cabin layout for a particular customer forms a basis for an automatic designing or laying-out of the installation components and the service channel, by inputting a position in the cabin (orientation input) into the project cabin layout, and then adding or combining this information with the aircraft-specific geometry.
- surrounding installations or components for the service channel that influence the cabin layout are parametrically described and then added or introduced to the total or overall project.
- the service channel will be automatically configured according to a defined rule set that takes into account the customer requirements.
- the cabin layout is the underlying basis for the automatic layout or design of the baggage compartments and the service channel.
- a so-called cabin component reference database with parametrically predefined components is provided for defining the cabin layout.
- the parametric definition of these components advantageously allows the respective definition of essentially any new components to be added to the reference database as needed or desired.
- any desired or required components can be selected out of this database by a user, and can then be inserted into the cabin layout simply by inputting the respective position and, if required, an orientation of each respective selected component.
- partial areas of the cabin in which special configurations are required and which cannot be automatically produced may advantageously be manually configured.
- An essential advantage of the method according to the invention is that the special knowledge which is necessary for the above mentioned and other similar construction tasks, and which constantly repeats itself while carrying out such tasks, is taken up, documented, and thereby retained or conserved and repeatedly brought into application in an automated method for generating production documents. Thereby, the aircraft designer and builder is relieved of the burden of routine tasks, because these routine tasks and knowledge are automated, and instead can apply his or her work efforts to the higher level design, assembly and construction tasks.
- inventive method includes a considerable reduction in project lead times and throughput and completion times, a reduction of construction effort and expense, an increase in the substantive productivity of the design and production personnel, as well as an increase in finished product quality. It is further advantageous that the inventive method makes it possible to very easily investigate, develop and compare different variations of design concepts and layouts for optimizing the results in view of aspects such as safety, customer needs and utilization, costs, ergonomics, and the like. Also, any conflicts or discrepancies of the design results relative to regulations and restrictions can be automatically monitored, tested and visualized.
- FIG. 1 is a process plan or flow chart for the automatic configuration of component arrangements and for the automatic preparation of production documents, for the area of a service channel in an aircraft cabin;
- FIG. 2 is a block model diagram of the general structure of a total system for carrying out the inventive method, including several associated elements or modules and databases, as well as the generated documents.
- the schematic flow diagram shown in FIG. 1 includes a left sequence or column of blocks 1 to 7 , which each respectively represent one respective method step of the inventive method for a single individual system.
- the flow diagram of FIG. 1 further includes a right column of blocks 10 to 16 , which each respectively represent an intermediate result and/or output, respectively associated with each one of the method step blocks 1 to 7 of the left column.
- the particular aircraft being worked on i.e. the particular aircraft type underlying and associated with the build and production documents
- the top block 1 which involves the first method step of selecting the project, e.g. the particular aircraft type and the design project that is to be carried out therein, for example the configuration of a service channel according to the desires or specifications of a particular customer.
- Carrying out the first method step of block 1 achieves an intermediate result that is illustrated or represented in block 10 , namely the selection and representation of a standard aircraft (A/C) from a set of available standard aircraft definitions.
- A/C standard aircraft
- Each standard aircraft definition relates to a particular aircraft type of the manufacturer, and includes, for example, a complete definition of all dimensions, positions, orientations, and relative arrangements of all parts or components making up the standard basic aircraft type, or at least the components and portions of the aircraft that are relevant for the selected project, for example of the passenger cabin interior.
- the second method step represented in block 2 relates to the design and construction of the general cabin layout, as given by the definition of individual components and assemblies in the cabin, such as galleys, toilets, storage areas, as well as electrical and electronic resources or other service resources.
- the intermediate result of this step of block 2 is indicated in the intermediate result block 11 , which represents an aircraft outfitted with a customer-specific cabin layout.
- Block 3 represents the third method step, which involves specifying the arrangement of fixedly defined and mandatory components, such as movable passenger class dividers, LCD display screens, or the like, which will have an influence on the possible or permissible configuration of other components.
- the intermediate result shown in block 12 is an aircraft outfitted with special customer-required components within the customer-specific cabin layout.
- the fourth method step shown in block 4 actually generates the arrangement of the components, such as passenger service units in the service channel, for example.
- the intermediate result of this step represented in block 13 is a proposal for the arrangement of these components, such as the passenger service units, within the customer-specific cabin layout.
- a manual local adaptation or adjustment of the proposal of block 13 as generated by method step 4 can be carried out in method step 5 .
- the intermediate result of such a special adjustment or adaptation is shown in block 14 and represents a customer-accepted new arrangement of the passenger service units in the service channel of the customer-specific cabin layout.
- method step 6 involves the preparation or generation of the production documents such as drawings, parts lists, and/or supplemental or completion lists.
- This sixth method step leads to the intermediate result shown in block 15 , namely the generated drawings, parts lists and completion lists.
- the final seventh step shown in block 7 involves the preparation or generation of the production plan, with a build plan, production contracts, materials lists, and the like, which are represented in the intermediate result block 16 .
- documents for other systems and components of the aircraft can be generated in the same method process as described above.
- such other systems and components of the aircraft may include an emergency lighting system comprising an escape path lighting system, a carpet layout plan with individual carpet piece or section drawings, electrical cabling, pipe and conduit arrangements, and the like. These individual systems of the aircraft are each respectively dealt with in individual modules.
- all of the modules 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 up to module X all are connected to and have access to the constant parameters defining the selected or input aircraft type, which are stored in a memory of an aircraft type database 17 .
- These data defining the general or standard aircraft type are always the same independent of the particular customer.
- each of the individual modules 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 up to X are connected to and access a common customer-specific cabin layout database 18 in which the customer-specific cabin layout is stored.
- the database 18 contains all data or parameters necessary for completely describing or defining all relevant cabin components and installations for a prescribed project, on which all of the modules are working concurrently or in common.
- Each module inputs certain parameters into the database 18 or queries and calls up those parameters that it needs from the database 18 .
- the relevant data defining individual components for generating the construction or build documents 23 and the parts lists 24 are stored in a component reference database 19 , to which each of the modules also has two-way access.
- each module automatically generates a solution proposal 26 , which is displayed or otherwise provided to the user.
- the user then has the possibility to manually modify or adjust this solution proposal 26 .
- This solution proposal which has been modified as necessary, is further coupled to a computer aided design (CAD) system 20 through a plot script which is not illustrated, i.e. the solution proposal is transferred to a parallel operating CAD system 20 , where it is displayed and then output as a substantially conventional drawing.
- the parts lists 24 and the production contracts 25 are also output and transferred through respective defined interfaces automatically into the available parts list system 21 and the production planning system 22 .
- CAD computer aided design
- the inventive method is used to automatically configure component arrangements, i.e. to automatically define the spatial arrangement of structural components relative to each other, and the optimization thereof with respect to their functional positions (for example the visibility and/or reachability of components that must be accessed by passengers) and/or with respect to regulations and other requirements limiting the allowable arrangements, and/or with respect to the quantity or number of the components.
- This method is an automated method in which the constantly repeated special knowledge of the designer and builder of a component arrangement (such as an aircraft cabin) is formulated as a system of data and rules, which is then documented and can be repeatedly called-up and applied as needed in an automated manner for repetitious similar applications or other applications that share similar components, restrictions, and the like.
Abstract
A method of automatically defining the spatial arrangement of structural components and optimizing the functional positions and/or quantities thereof is useful for design and production of an aircraft cabin. The basic aircraft type is input into a configuration tool of a data processing system. The aircraft-specific geometry is stored in, loaded from and represented by a drawing module of the system. The required components are geometrically defined by stored data and position rules, and are combined with the aircraft-specific geometry in the drawing module. The components and the aircraft-specific geometry are spatially optimally configured relative to each other according to a rule set which accounts for specific customer requirements, in the configuration tool. Production documents such as drawings and parts lists are automatically generated by a document generating tool of the system after inputting project-related data.
Description
- This application is based on and claims the priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Patent Application 100 41 031.6, filed on Aug. 22, 2000, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- The invention relates to an automated method of planning, designing and configuring arrangements of various components, i.e. for defining the spatial arrangement of structural components relative to each other, and for optimizing the same with respect to the functional position and/or the number or quantity thereof. The invention further relates to an automated method of generating production documents, and especially construction or build documents such as drawings and/or parts lists for production integration and for documentation purposes. These methods especially pertain to the planning, design and production of an aircraft, for example.
- For each individual customer of an aircraft manufacturer, specific production documents must be produced and provided, for defining the arrangements of various components of the aircraft, the integration thereof into the other structures of the aircraft, and for purposes of customer documentation. An example can be given in the context of the planning, design and production of a service or supply channel in an aircraft cabin (i.e. a channel below the overhead baggage compartments in the aircraft cabin, adapted to receive passenger service units (PSUs) and the like therein), as well as the passenger service and information units installed therein. In this context, the required production documents relate to preliminary video investigations (type, number and installation positions of video components), a plotter plan (an overview of connections of the passenger service channel components), as well as the installation drawings and parts lists relating to the passenger service units to be installed in the channel.
- For preparing these documents, the cabin layout is the general basis or starting point for laying-out and designing the baggage compartments and the service channel. In this context, the service channel is arranged as a component of the aircraft cabin, below the right and left overhead baggage compartments. Various different units or devices are installed in the service channel, forming a rowed arranged of various passenger service units, oxygen supply boxes, lights, illuminatable indicators and displays, loudspeakers, air vents, video monitors or screens, selector switches such as attendant call buttons, etc., as requested by the particular customer, i.e. purchaser of the aircraft. These various devices installed in the service channel provide information, instructions, lighting, air, video entertainment, and oxygen in the case of an emergency, to the passengers in the aircraft.
- It is known to manually rearrange and then document new constructions or arrangements of previously existing solutions or principles as well as available components to accommodate a particular arrangement required by a customer. This is achieved, for example, by using technical administrative systems (e.g. production planning systems—PPS) for preparing parts lists and the like, and by using computer aided design (CAD) systems for preparing drawings. Various design steps are carried out separately, and the various documents are prepared separately, using separate tools and support systems. In this manner, the spatial arrangements of the components is fixed and specified, often in an iterative manner involving revisions to accommodate the customer's requests as well as production limitations, ergonomics, economics, etc.
- This conventional process is especially achieved by applying the knowledge and experience of the aircraft designer and builder at each stage, regarding the particular aircraft type and the production-related integration characteristics, such as for example, dimensions, doors, and requirements of the fabrication or production area, possible available systems and connections, the customer-specific cabin layout requirements, the class distribution or layout of the cabin, seat types, galley positions, toilet positions, specialized installations in the aircraft cabin, regulatory agency requirements, design requirements, ergonomics and comfort requirements (e.g. the reach distance of a seated passenger or air draft conditions), as well as commercial or economic demands. The required drawings are manually prepared by means of CAD systems, and the number of the various components is counted out and then manually documented in parts lists.
- The above described conventional processes are rather inefficient and complicated, because they require separate steps that involve at least partial duplication of effort, and do not make use of common or overlapping information and requirements among the separate steps or processes. It also becomes difficult, time consuming and expensive to carry out design revisions as a result of customer requests, or to adapt a design proposal to manufacturing requirements or limitations, for example.
- In view of the above, it is an object of the invention to provide a method of the above described general type, whereby the arrangement of the components is automatically configured in an overall integrated manner, and to the extent required, production documents (such as drawings, parts lists, supplementing or completing evaluations, e.g. device and equipment lists or mass distribution plans) are automatically prepared by means of a data processing program. The invention further aims to avoid or overcome the disadvantages of the prior art, and to achieve additional advantages, as apparent from the present specification.
- The above objects have been achieved according to the invention in a method of automatically configuring an arrangement of several components, i.e. defining the spatial arrangement of the components relative to each other, and also optimizing the functional position and/or the number or quantity of the components. The method involves the following steps. The basic aircraft type underlying the construction documents or build documents is input into a configuration tool of a data processing system. The aircraft-specific geometry is stored in, and then automatically loaded and depicted from, a drawing module of the data processing system. The required geometric objects or components are determined and mathematically described, and position rules are mathematically depicted and stored, by means of a function and data analysis, and are then provided and combined with the aircraft-specific geometry in the drawing module of the data processing system. Finally, in the configuration tool of the data processing system, the objects or components on the one hand, as well as the aircraft-specific geometry on the other hand, are automatically spatially configured relative to one another in an optimal manner according to a defined rule set that takes into account the particular customer requirements.
- A further detailed embodiment of the invention involves inputting project-related data and then generating production documents by means of a computer program in a generating tool of the data processing system. Thereupon, the production documents can be output as substantially conventional documents, such as drawings, parts lists, etc.
- A particular embodiment of the inventive method relates to the example of planning and designing the area of a service channel, e.g. for passenger service units, in an aircraft cabin. In this context, the required production documents preferably comprise documents for video preliminary investigations, plotter plans, assembly and installation construction documents or build documents such as drawings, parts lists, or the like. The data used to generate the drawings and other documents can also be provided as control data directly to numerically controlled production equipment and tools for carrying out at least some of the production steps.
- Especially according to the invention, the specific cabin layout for a particular customer, with its particular layout and arrangement of components such as galleys, toilets, storage closets or cabinets, seats, and the like forms a basis for an automatic designing or laying-out of the installation components and the service channel, by inputting a position in the cabin (orientation input) into the project cabin layout, and then adding or combining this information with the aircraft-specific geometry. Moreover, surrounding installations or components for the service channel that influence the cabin layout, are parametrically described and then added or introduced to the total or overall project. Furthermore, for a prescribed configuration of the surrounding installations and a prescribed cabin layout, the service channel will be automatically configured according to a defined rule set that takes into account the customer requirements.
- The cabin layout is the underlying basis for the automatic layout or design of the baggage compartments and the service channel. In this context, according to the invention, a so-called cabin component reference database with parametrically predefined components is provided for defining the cabin layout. The parametric definition of these components advantageously allows the respective definition of essentially any new components to be added to the reference database as needed or desired. Via a user interface surface, any desired or required components can be selected out of this database by a user, and can then be inserted into the cabin layout simply by inputting the respective position and, if required, an orientation of each respective selected component. In addition to the automatic configuration of the service channel for a given baggage compartment configuration and a given cabin layout, partial areas of the cabin in which special configurations are required and which cannot be automatically produced, may advantageously be manually configured.
- Further detailed features and preferred embodiments of the invention are described in the remainder of this specification.
- An essential advantage of the method according to the invention is that the special knowledge which is necessary for the above mentioned and other similar construction tasks, and which constantly repeats itself while carrying out such tasks, is taken up, documented, and thereby retained or conserved and repeatedly brought into application in an automated method for generating production documents. Thereby, the aircraft designer and builder is relieved of the burden of routine tasks, because these routine tasks and knowledge are automated, and instead can apply his or her work efforts to the higher level design, assembly and construction tasks.
- Further advantages of the inventive method include a considerable reduction in project lead times and throughput and completion times, a reduction of construction effort and expense, an increase in the substantive productivity of the design and production personnel, as well as an increase in finished product quality. It is further advantageous that the inventive method makes it possible to very easily investigate, develop and compare different variations of design concepts and layouts for optimizing the results in view of aspects such as safety, customer needs and utilization, costs, ergonomics, and the like. Also, any conflicts or discrepancies of the design results relative to regulations and restrictions can be automatically monitored, tested and visualized.
- In order that the invention may be clearly understood, it will now be described in connection with an example embodiment, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a process plan or flow chart for the automatic configuration of component arrangements and for the automatic preparation of production documents, for the area of a service channel in an aircraft cabin; and
- FIG. 2 is a block model diagram of the general structure of a total system for carrying out the inventive method, including several associated elements or modules and databases, as well as the generated documents.
- The schematic flow diagram shown in FIG. 1 includes a left sequence or column of
blocks 1 to 7, which each respectively represent one respective method step of the inventive method for a single individual system. The flow diagram of FIG. 1 further includes a right column ofblocks 10 to 16, which each respectively represent an intermediate result and/or output, respectively associated with each one of themethod step blocks 1 to 7 of the left column. - At the start of the method, the particular aircraft being worked on, i.e. the particular aircraft type underlying and associated with the build and production documents, must be input into the system. This is represented in the
top block 1, which involves the first method step of selecting the project, e.g. the particular aircraft type and the design project that is to be carried out therein, for example the configuration of a service channel according to the desires or specifications of a particular customer. Carrying out the first method step ofblock 1 achieves an intermediate result that is illustrated or represented inblock 10, namely the selection and representation of a standard aircraft (A/C) from a set of available standard aircraft definitions. Each standard aircraft definition relates to a particular aircraft type of the manufacturer, and includes, for example, a complete definition of all dimensions, positions, orientations, and relative arrangements of all parts or components making up the standard basic aircraft type, or at least the components and portions of the aircraft that are relevant for the selected project, for example of the passenger cabin interior. - The second method step represented in
block 2 relates to the design and construction of the general cabin layout, as given by the definition of individual components and assemblies in the cabin, such as galleys, toilets, storage areas, as well as electrical and electronic resources or other service resources. The intermediate result of this step ofblock 2 is indicated in theintermediate result block 11, which represents an aircraft outfitted with a customer-specific cabin layout. -
Block 3 represents the third method step, which involves specifying the arrangement of fixedly defined and mandatory components, such as movable passenger class dividers, LCD display screens, or the like, which will have an influence on the possible or permissible configuration of other components. The intermediate result shown inblock 12 is an aircraft outfitted with special customer-required components within the customer-specific cabin layout. - As an alternative to designing and building a new cabin layout for particular customer needs, it is possible to load and utilize a pre-existing standard layout or an externally developed cabin layout. In any event, such an alternative layout can be read or loaded into the system carrying out the inventive method, through an interface with
block 2 orblock 3. - The fourth method step shown in
block 4 actually generates the arrangement of the components, such as passenger service units in the service channel, for example. The intermediate result of this step represented inblock 13 is a proposal for the arrangement of these components, such as the passenger service units, within the customer-specific cabin layout. - To the extent necessary, a manual local adaptation or adjustment of the proposal of
block 13 as generated bymethod step 4 can be carried out inmethod step 5. The intermediate result of such a special adjustment or adaptation is shown inblock 14 and represents a customer-accepted new arrangement of the passenger service units in the service channel of the customer-specific cabin layout. - Once the proposed special configuration and layout has been finalized and approved, method step6 (represented in block 6) involves the preparation or generation of the production documents such as drawings, parts lists, and/or supplemental or completion lists. This sixth method step leads to the intermediate result shown in
block 15, namely the generated drawings, parts lists and completion lists. - The final seventh step shown in
block 7 involves the preparation or generation of the production plan, with a build plan, production contracts, materials lists, and the like, which are represented in theintermediate result block 16. - In a further embodiment of the invention, documents for other systems and components of the aircraft can be generated in the same method process as described above. For example, such other systems and components of the aircraft may include an emergency lighting system comprising an escape path lighting system, a carpet layout plan with individual carpet piece or section drawings, electrical cabling, pipe and conduit arrangements, and the like. These individual systems of the aircraft are each respectively dealt with in individual modules.
- As shown schematically in FIG. 2, all of the
modules 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 up to module X all are connected to and have access to the constant parameters defining the selected or input aircraft type, which are stored in a memory of anaircraft type database 17. These data defining the general or standard aircraft type are always the same independent of the particular customer. Furthermore, each of theindividual modules 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 up to X are connected to and access a common customer-specificcabin layout database 18 in which the customer-specific cabin layout is stored. In other words, thedatabase 18 contains all data or parameters necessary for completely describing or defining all relevant cabin components and installations for a prescribed project, on which all of the modules are working concurrently or in common. Each module inputs certain parameters into thedatabase 18 or queries and calls up those parameters that it needs from thedatabase 18. Moreover, the relevant data defining individual components for generating the construction or builddocuments 23 and the parts lists 24 are stored in acomponent reference database 19, to which each of the modules also has two-way access. - As a result of the processing method being carried out, each module automatically generates a
solution proposal 26, which is displayed or otherwise provided to the user. The user then has the possibility to manually modify or adjust thissolution proposal 26. This solution proposal, which has been modified as necessary, is further coupled to a computer aided design (CAD)system 20 through a plot script which is not illustrated, i.e. the solution proposal is transferred to a paralleloperating CAD system 20, where it is displayed and then output as a substantially conventional drawing. The parts lists 24 and theproduction contracts 25 are also output and transferred through respective defined interfaces automatically into the availableparts list system 21 and theproduction planning system 22. - The inventive method is used to automatically configure component arrangements, i.e. to automatically define the spatial arrangement of structural components relative to each other, and the optimization thereof with respect to their functional positions (for example the visibility and/or reachability of components that must be accessed by passengers) and/or with respect to regulations and other requirements limiting the allowable arrangements, and/or with respect to the quantity or number of the components. This method is an automated method in which the constantly repeated special knowledge of the designer and builder of a component arrangement (such as an aircraft cabin) is formulated as a system of data and rules, which is then documented and can be repeatedly called-up and applied as needed in an automated manner for repetitious similar applications or other applications that share similar components, restrictions, and the like.
- Although the invention has been described with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be appreciated that it is intended to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the appended claims. It should also be understood that the present disclosure includes all possible combinations of any individual features recited in any of the appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. A method of automatically defining a spatial arrangement of structural components relative to each other within an installation space, using a data processing system including a configuration tool and a drawing module, comprising the steps:
a) inputting general parameters of a selected installation space into said configuration tool;
b) storing first data that define a space-specific geometry of said selected installation space, and then loading said first data and displaying said first data in said drawing module;
c) storing second data that respectively geometrically define structural components that are to be arranged in said selected installation space;
d) providing said second data together with said first data into said drawing module;
e) providing a rule set that defines at least customer-specific requirements of a customer for whom said structural components are to be arranged in said installation space; and
f) processing said first data and said second data together according to said rule set in said configuration tool so as to automatically define a spatial arrangement of said structural components relative to each other within said installation space.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said step f) further optimizes a configuration of said structural components relative to each other within said installation space with respect to at least one of a functional position of each one of said structural components and a quantity of said structural components arranged in said installation space.
3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said step c) comprises carrying out a functional and data analysis so as to mathematically describe said structural components and to mathematically represent said structural components according to position rules.
4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said data processing system further comprises a document generating tool including a processing program, and said method further comprises, using said generating tool, generating production documents including at least one of drawings, parts lists, materials lists, video preliminary examinations, plotter plans, installation plans, production plans, and production contracts, corresponding to said spatial arrangement defined in said step f).
5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein said production documents include said drawings, and further comprising transferring drawing data representing said drawings via a plot script from said document generating tool to a computer aided design (CAD) output system that outputs said drawings.
6. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising transferring said production documents via an interface from said document generating tool to a technical administrative system.
7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein said technical administrative system comprises a production planning system.
8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said selected installation space comprises at least one partial space within an aircraft cabin of a selected aircraft type.
9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein said at least one partial space within said aircraft cabin comprises a service channel in said aircraft cabin, said structural components to be installed in said service channel include any one or more of passenger service units, lights, air vents, loudspeakers, oxygen supply units, video monitors, informational displays, and control switches.
10. The method according to claim 9 , further comprising providing third data that respectively define additional cabin outfitting components including one or more of galleys, toilets, storage cabinets, passenger seats and baggage compartments arranged according to a customer-specified cabin layout, and wherein said step f) further includes processing said third data together with said first data and said second data according to said rule set to define said spatial arrangement of said structural components.
11. The method according to claim 10 , further comprising fourth data that respectively define surrounding components including one or more of cabin dividers, baggage compartments, video monitors, and display screens of which the arrangement will limit the possible range of variants of said spatial arrangement, and wherein said step f) further includes processing said fourth data together with said first data, said second data and said third data according to said rule set to define said spatial arrangement of said structural components.
12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein said surrounding components include said baggage compartments, which further serve as carriers for equipment and for electrical interfaces of said service channel.
13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein said fourth data define said baggage compartments as a row of successive ones of said baggage compartments, and wherein said processing in said step f) automatically adapts said fourth data defining said row of baggage compartments according to said rule set.
14. The method according to claim 10 , wherein said providing of said third data comprises selecting and reading out said third data from a cabin outfitting component reference database in which said third data are stored among data defining plural different available cabin outfitting components.
15. The method according to claim 9 , wherein said step c) comprises storing said second data in a component reference database that contains data defining plural different available structural components, and wherein said step d) of providing said second data comprises selecting and reading out said second data from said component reference database.
16. The method according to claim 9 , wherein said at least one partial space within said aircraft cabin further comprises another space other than said service channel in said aircraft cabin, and wherein said steps are carried out also for defining a spatial arrangement of other components within said another space.
17. The method according to claim 8 , wherein said step b) of storing and loading said first data comprises loading a data set defining a customer-approved preliminary cabin layout into said data processing system through a data input interface.
18. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said step c) comprises storing said second data in at least one reference database that contains parametric data defining various different structural components.
19. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said installation space is a space within a transport vehicle other than an aircraft.
20. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said installation space is an industrial plant, and said arrangement of structural components forms assembled equipment in said plant.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/706,967 US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2003-11-14 | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10041031.6 | 2000-08-22 | ||
DE10041031A DE10041031A1 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2000-08-22 | Process for the configuration of component arrangements and the generation of manufacturing documents |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/706,967 Division US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2003-11-14 | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020026296A1 true US20020026296A1 (en) | 2002-02-28 |
Family
ID=7653283
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/934,907 Abandoned US20020026296A1 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2001-08-22 | Method of automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
US10/706,967 Expired - Fee Related US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2003-11-14 | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/706,967 Expired - Fee Related US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2003-11-14 | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20020026296A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1182527A3 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0103449A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2355666A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE10041031A1 (en) |
Cited By (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020095417A1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2002-07-18 | Gordon Stephen L. | Computer implemented interactive ergonomics resource system |
US20020161563A1 (en) * | 2001-03-13 | 2002-10-31 | Naji Elabiad | System and method for performing vehicle interior configuration design |
US20040249521A1 (en) * | 2003-06-03 | 2004-12-09 | Diehl Avionik Systeme Gmbh | Aircraft cabin equipment control system |
US20050055180A1 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2005-03-10 | Pischke Gina C. | Method and system for seat placement |
US20050071138A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Conchi William R. | Method and system for seat placement |
US20050197881A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US20050197850A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US20050197872A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US20050197928A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Method and system for product layout display using assortment groups |
US20050209830A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | The Boeing Company | System and method for knowledge based interior development |
US20050216371A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-29 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2005-11-22 | Airbus Deutschland Gmbh | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
US20070233434A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-10-04 | Lee David J | Generic hard/soft 3D spatial collision detection method |
US20070233433A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-10-04 | Lee David J | Transforming airplane configuration requirements into intelligent spatial geometry |
US20080077850A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2008-03-27 | Gauthier Charles S | Content management via configuration set relationships in a content management system |
US7818193B1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2010-10-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Ship stowage aid analysis program |
US20110196655A1 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2011-08-11 | Sharma Anurag H K | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle |
US20120116727A1 (en) * | 2010-11-09 | 2012-05-10 | Hk Anurag Sharma | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle using delta storage |
US20120239354A1 (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2012-09-20 | Martin Sieben | System and method for configuring an aircraft passenger cabin |
US8280873B1 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2012-10-02 | Teradata Us, Inc. | System for capturing a business context of a user's interaction with a website and method for the same |
US8392231B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2013-03-05 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment definition |
US20130158955A1 (en) * | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | The Boeing Company | Customer Aircraft Customization System |
US20130246008A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Chao-Hsin Lin | Cabin airflow modeling |
US20150149124A1 (en) * | 2008-12-09 | 2015-05-28 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft system verification |
EP2960839A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-30 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Aircraft fleet configuration |
US9261874B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2016-02-16 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Method for configuration and/or equipment of a vehicle cabin, in particular of an aircraft |
US20160311535A1 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2016-10-27 | The Boeing Company | Method of determining a seating arrangement |
US9612725B1 (en) * | 2013-02-28 | 2017-04-04 | The Boeing Company | Nonconformance visualization system |
WO2017060507A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Aircraft reconfigurator for reconfiguring an aircraft configuration |
US20170139903A1 (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2017-05-18 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for increasing processor speed by creating rule engine rules from unstructured text |
US9870444B2 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2018-01-16 | The Boeing Company | Shop order status visualization system |
US9880694B2 (en) | 2013-05-09 | 2018-01-30 | The Boeing Company | Shop order status visualization system |
US10061481B2 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2018-08-28 | The Boeing Company | Methods and devices for visually querying an aircraft based on an area of an image |
US10331295B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2019-06-25 | The Boeing Company | Visualization of an object using a visual query system |
US10416857B2 (en) | 2013-05-09 | 2019-09-17 | The Boeing Company | Serial number control visualization system |
US10481768B2 (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2019-11-19 | The Boeing Company | Nonconformance identification and visualization system and method |
US10685147B2 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2020-06-16 | The Boeing Company | Non-conformance mapping and visualization |
Families Citing this family (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10235816A1 (en) | 2002-08-05 | 2004-02-26 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Process for specifying a processing sequence and associated units |
US7499838B2 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2009-03-03 | Contemporary Closet Classics | Method and system for automated custom design of a storage assembly |
DE102005055133A1 (en) | 2005-08-18 | 2007-02-22 | Pace Aerospace Engineering And Information Technology Gmbh | System for machine-aided design of technical devices |
US7987149B2 (en) | 2006-03-10 | 2011-07-26 | Trilogy Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. | Configuration mapping using a multi-dimensional rule space and rule consolidation |
US20080065348A1 (en) * | 2006-09-11 | 2008-03-13 | Dowd Joseph F | Duct geometry measurement tool |
US7827012B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2010-11-02 | The Boeing Company | System and method for controlling structural type integration |
EP2485170A3 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2012-12-19 | Sew-Eurodrive GmbH & Co. KG | Method and system for producing a construction drawing, method for producing a product and use of the method, and use of graphs |
EP1993072A1 (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2008-11-19 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for comparison of 3D computer model and as-built situation of an industrial plant |
US8244591B2 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2012-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Accounting for spatial and environmental factors in equipment order configurations |
US8195599B2 (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2012-06-05 | Adventium Enterprises | Inferring system-level properties |
FR2943029B1 (en) * | 2009-03-16 | 2011-02-25 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN IMPORTING AREA FOR A PART DURING THE GRAPHIC MODELING OF A VEHICLE |
FR2947771B1 (en) * | 2009-07-08 | 2011-10-21 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PASSENGER CABIN LAYOUT |
DE102009040731A1 (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2011-03-17 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Configuration-driven dynamic generation of product data for complex products |
US10254745B2 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2019-04-09 | Mechanical Software Technologies, Inc. | Computer-implemented automated design, modeling and manufacturing system for a project |
US9613458B2 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2017-04-04 | Mechanical Software Technologies, Inc. | Self drawing tool for a computer-implemented automated design, modeling and manufacturing system |
US8909501B2 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2014-12-09 | Eplan Partners, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for optimization of floor covering and system for user configuration and real time pricing information |
DE102013106587A1 (en) * | 2013-06-24 | 2014-12-24 | Hutchinson Aerospace GmbH | Method for collision checking and computer program product |
EP3101615A1 (en) | 2015-06-01 | 2016-12-07 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Topology and ontology generation system |
EP3101565A1 (en) * | 2015-06-01 | 2016-12-07 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Aircraft assembly system |
EP3101564A1 (en) | 2015-06-01 | 2016-12-07 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Component design system for generating aircraft component designs |
EP3460731A1 (en) * | 2017-09-21 | 2019-03-27 | Wolfgang Hildebrand | Method and system for reducing the fuel consumption of passenger planes in an air traffic system |
CN110298119B (en) * | 2019-07-02 | 2022-11-15 | 大连海事大学 | Man-machine interaction based rapid modeling method for ship residential area |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3867616A (en) * | 1968-09-03 | 1975-02-18 | Badger Co | Automated designing |
US4613866A (en) * | 1983-05-13 | 1986-09-23 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Three dimensional digitizer with electromagnetic coupling |
US5793648A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-08-11 | Freightliner Corporation | Method and system for automating control panel layout and wiring specifications for a vehicle manufacturing process |
US5945995A (en) * | 1995-06-08 | 1999-08-31 | Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. | CAD system which automatically creates a 3-dimensional solid model directly from a 2-dimensional drawing |
US6113644A (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2000-09-05 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for vehicle design using occupant reach zones |
US6282547B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2001-08-28 | Informix Software, Inc. | Hyperlinked relational database visualization system |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU8395491A (en) * | 1990-07-12 | 1992-02-04 | First Graphics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for designing a distribution system for a building |
EP0621545A3 (en) * | 1993-04-21 | 1995-12-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Computer-aided design and production system for component arrangement and pipe routing. |
DE10041031A1 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2002-03-21 | Airbus Gmbh | Process for the configuration of component arrangements and the generation of manufacturing documents |
US20020161563A1 (en) * | 2001-03-13 | 2002-10-31 | Naji Elabiad | System and method for performing vehicle interior configuration design |
-
2000
- 2000-08-22 DE DE10041031A patent/DE10041031A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2001
- 2001-07-04 EP EP01116152A patent/EP1182527A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-08-21 BR BR0103449-9A patent/BR0103449A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-08-21 CA CA002355666A patent/CA2355666A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-08-22 US US09/934,907 patent/US20020026296A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2003
- 2003-11-14 US US10/706,967 patent/US6968298B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3867616A (en) * | 1968-09-03 | 1975-02-18 | Badger Co | Automated designing |
US4613866A (en) * | 1983-05-13 | 1986-09-23 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Three dimensional digitizer with electromagnetic coupling |
US5945995A (en) * | 1995-06-08 | 1999-08-31 | Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. | CAD system which automatically creates a 3-dimensional solid model directly from a 2-dimensional drawing |
US5793648A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-08-11 | Freightliner Corporation | Method and system for automating control panel layout and wiring specifications for a vehicle manufacturing process |
US6113644A (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2000-09-05 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for vehicle design using occupant reach zones |
US6282547B1 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2001-08-28 | Informix Software, Inc. | Hyperlinked relational database visualization system |
Cited By (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6968298B2 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2005-11-22 | Airbus Deutschland Gmbh | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents |
US20020095417A1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2002-07-18 | Gordon Stephen L. | Computer implemented interactive ergonomics resource system |
US20020161563A1 (en) * | 2001-03-13 | 2002-10-31 | Naji Elabiad | System and method for performing vehicle interior configuration design |
US8280873B1 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2012-10-02 | Teradata Us, Inc. | System for capturing a business context of a user's interaction with a website and method for the same |
US7818193B1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2010-10-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Ship stowage aid analysis program |
US20040249521A1 (en) * | 2003-06-03 | 2004-12-09 | Diehl Avionik Systeme Gmbh | Aircraft cabin equipment control system |
US7130724B2 (en) * | 2003-06-03 | 2006-10-31 | Diehl Avionik Systeme Gmbh | Aircraft cabin equipment control system |
US20050055180A1 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2005-03-10 | Pischke Gina C. | Method and system for seat placement |
US20050071138A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Conchi William R. | Method and system for seat placement |
US7194391B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-03-20 | The Boeing Company | Method and system for seat placement |
US20050216371A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-29 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US8108270B2 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2012-01-31 | Sap Ag | Method and system for product layout display using assortment groups |
US8639548B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2014-01-28 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US20050197928A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Method and system for product layout display using assortment groups |
US20050197872A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US8392231B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2013-03-05 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment definition |
US8370184B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2013-02-05 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US8370185B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2013-02-05 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US20050197850A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US8285584B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2012-10-09 | Sap Ag | System and method for performing assortment planning |
US20050197881A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | System and method for assortment planning |
US20070233434A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-10-04 | Lee David J | Generic hard/soft 3D spatial collision detection method |
US20050209830A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | The Boeing Company | System and method for knowledge based interior development |
US8170843B2 (en) | 2004-03-18 | 2012-05-01 | The Boeing Company | Generic hard/soft 3D spatial collision detection method |
US8060345B2 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2011-11-15 | The Boeing Company | Transforming airplane configuration requirements into intelligent spatial geometry |
US20070233433A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-10-04 | Lee David J | Transforming airplane configuration requirements into intelligent spatial geometry |
US7529649B2 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2009-05-05 | The Boeing Company | System and method for knowledge based interior development |
US20080077850A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2008-03-27 | Gauthier Charles S | Content management via configuration set relationships in a content management system |
US7954048B2 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2011-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content management via configuration set relationships in a content management system |
US20150149124A1 (en) * | 2008-12-09 | 2015-05-28 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft system verification |
US20120239354A1 (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2012-09-20 | Martin Sieben | System and method for configuring an aircraft passenger cabin |
US8954301B2 (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2015-02-10 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | System and method for configuring an aircraft passenger cabin |
US8660822B2 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2014-02-25 | Airbus Engineering Centre India | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle |
US20110196655A1 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2011-08-11 | Sharma Anurag H K | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle |
US9261874B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2016-02-16 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Method for configuration and/or equipment of a vehicle cabin, in particular of an aircraft |
US9513622B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2016-12-06 | Tobias Schmidt-Schäffer | Method for configuration and/or equipment of a vehicle cabin, in particular of an aircraft |
US8849619B2 (en) * | 2010-11-09 | 2014-09-30 | Airbus Engineering Centre India | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle using delta storage |
US20120116727A1 (en) * | 2010-11-09 | 2012-05-10 | Hk Anurag Sharma | System and method for generating three dimensional functional space reservation systems of a vehicle using delta storage |
US20130158955A1 (en) * | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | The Boeing Company | Customer Aircraft Customization System |
US9058464B2 (en) * | 2011-12-16 | 2015-06-16 | The Boeing Company | Customer aircraft customization system |
US20130246008A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Chao-Hsin Lin | Cabin airflow modeling |
JP2013232176A (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-11-14 | Boeing Co:The | Cabin airflow modeling |
US9612725B1 (en) * | 2013-02-28 | 2017-04-04 | The Boeing Company | Nonconformance visualization system |
US10061481B2 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2018-08-28 | The Boeing Company | Methods and devices for visually querying an aircraft based on an area of an image |
US9870444B2 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2018-01-16 | The Boeing Company | Shop order status visualization system |
US10331295B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2019-06-25 | The Boeing Company | Visualization of an object using a visual query system |
US10481768B2 (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2019-11-19 | The Boeing Company | Nonconformance identification and visualization system and method |
US10416857B2 (en) | 2013-05-09 | 2019-09-17 | The Boeing Company | Serial number control visualization system |
US9880694B2 (en) | 2013-05-09 | 2018-01-30 | The Boeing Company | Shop order status visualization system |
US9783302B2 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2017-10-10 | The Boeing Company | Method of determining a seating arrangement |
US20160311535A1 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2016-10-27 | The Boeing Company | Method of determining a seating arrangement |
US20170109666A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2017-04-20 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Aircraft fleet configuration |
WO2015197873A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-30 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Aircraft fleet configuration |
EP2960839A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-30 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Aircraft fleet configuration |
WO2017060507A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Aircraft reconfigurator for reconfiguring an aircraft configuration |
US11120173B2 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2021-09-14 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Aircraft reconfigurator for reconfiguring an aircraft configuration |
US20170139903A1 (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2017-05-18 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for increasing processor speed by creating rule engine rules from unstructured text |
US9880863B2 (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2018-01-30 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for increasing processor speed by creating rule engine rules from unstructured text |
US10685147B2 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2020-06-16 | The Boeing Company | Non-conformance mapping and visualization |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20040153295A1 (en) | 2004-08-05 |
CA2355666A1 (en) | 2002-02-22 |
US6968298B2 (en) | 2005-11-22 |
DE10041031A1 (en) | 2002-03-21 |
BR0103449A (en) | 2002-03-26 |
EP1182527A2 (en) | 2002-02-27 |
EP1182527A3 (en) | 2004-02-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6968298B2 (en) | System for automatically configuring arrangements of components and automatically generating production documents | |
RU2594043C2 (en) | Method of configuring and/or equipment of vehicle passenger compartment, in particular of aircraft | |
CN102402721B (en) | Electrical load management system | |
US8954301B2 (en) | System and method for configuring an aircraft passenger cabin | |
Scheer | CIM Computer Integrated Manufacturing: Computer Steered Industry | |
US7526441B2 (en) | Parts list system used for part number management and method for preparing the same | |
US20070233433A1 (en) | Transforming airplane configuration requirements into intelligent spatial geometry | |
US20070106410A1 (en) | Systems and methods for production planning by visualizing products and resources in a manufacturing process | |
EP1081028A2 (en) | A computer-implemented method and apparatus for integrating vehicle manufacturing operations | |
JPH06187384A (en) | Designing method and designing-support system | |
US8131392B2 (en) | System and method for using manufacturing states of vehicle products for display of a manufacturing process | |
CN112699496A (en) | Maintainability design and analysis integrated system for spacecraft | |
US20170109666A1 (en) | Aircraft fleet configuration | |
CN115617236A (en) | Method and device for generating task package, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
DE102011117679A1 (en) | System for automated design and manufacture of Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) control panels, selects control panel enclosures dynamically as function of rules, components, and equipment to be controlled | |
Fuchs et al. | An Approach for Linking Heterogenous and Domain‐Specific Models to Investigate Cabin System Variants | |
Fuchs et al. | Formalized knowledge management for the aircraft cabin design process | |
Yusoof et al. | The effect of quick response manufacturing in factory layout: Assessment using Witness software | |
Bertram et al. | Scheduling on microcomputers using MICROBUS | |
CN111859548A (en) | Automatic layout method and system for airplane passenger cabin | |
Lindler | AutoSched tutorial | |
Lowry et al. | Regaining Space Leadership Through Control of Life Cycle Costs | |
Rickard et al. | Integration in hierarchical structures for batch process operations | |
Mario et al. | Integrated 3D-CAD Design Methods in Early Automotive Development Processes | |
박성준 et al. | Development of an Ergonomic Control Pannel Layout System and its Application |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |