EP0464546B1 - Production of high viscosity index lubricants - Google Patents

Production of high viscosity index lubricants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0464546B1
EP0464546B1 EP91110352A EP91110352A EP0464546B1 EP 0464546 B1 EP0464546 B1 EP 0464546B1 EP 91110352 A EP91110352 A EP 91110352A EP 91110352 A EP91110352 A EP 91110352A EP 0464546 B1 EP0464546 B1 EP 0464546B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
process according
wax
catalyst
weight percent
zeolite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP91110352A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0464546A1 (en
Inventor
Thomas Francis Degnan, Jr.
Dominick Nicholas Mazzone
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Oil Corp
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil Corp filed Critical Mobil Oil Corp
Publication of EP0464546A1 publication Critical patent/EP0464546A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0464546B1 publication Critical patent/EP0464546B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/58Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins
    • C10G45/60Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/64Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins characterised by the catalyst used containing crystalline alumino-silicates, e.g. molecular sieves
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/10Lubricating oil

Definitions

  • Mineral oil based lubricants are conventionally produced by a separative sequence carried out in the petroleum refinery which comprises fractionation of a paraffinic crude oil under atmospheric pressure followed by fractionation under vacuum to produce distillate fractions (neutral oils) and a residual fraction which, after deasphalting and severe solvent treatment may also be used as a lubricant basestock usually referred to as bright stock.
  • Neutral oils, after solvent extraction to remove low viscosity index (V.I.) components are conventionally subjected to dewaxing, either by solvent or catalytic dewaxing processes, to the desired pour point, after which the dewaxed lubestock may be hydrofinished to improve stability and remove color bodies.
  • the lube hydrocracking process which is well established in the petroleum refining industry, generally comprises an initial hydrocracking step carried out under high pressure in the presence of a bifunctional catalyst which effects partial saturation and ring opening of the aromatic components which are present in the feed.
  • the hydrocracked product is then subjected to dewaxing in order to reach the target pour point since the products from the initial hydrocracking step which are paraffinic in character include components with a relatively high pour point which need to be removed in the dewaxing step.
  • V.I. viscosity indices
  • High V.I. values have conventionally been attained by the use of V.I. improvers, e.g. polyacrylates, but there is a limit to the degree of improvement which may be effected in this way.
  • V.I. improvers tend to undergo degradation under the effects of high temperatures and high shear rates encountered in the engine, the more stressing conditions encountered in high efficiency engines resulting in even faster degradation of oils which employ significant amounts of V.I. improvers.
  • automotive lubricants which are based on fluids of high viscosity index and which are stable to the high temperature, high shear rate conditions encountered in modern engines.
  • Synthetic lubricants produced by the polymerization of olefins in the presence of certain catalysts have been shown to possess excellent V.I. values, but they are expensive to produce by the conventional synthetic procedures and usually require expensive starting materials. There is therefore a need for the production of high V.I. lubricants from mineral oil stocks which may be produced by techniques comparable to those presently employed in petroleum refineries.
  • lubricants should be highly paraffinic in nature since paraffins possess the desirable combination of low viscosity and high viscosity index.
  • Normal paraffins and slightly branched paraffins, e.g. n-methyl paraffins, are waxy materials which confer an unacceptably high pour point on the lube stock and are therefore removed during the dewaxing operations in the conventional refining process described above. It is, however, possible to process waxy feeds in order to retain many of the benefits of their paraffinic character while overcoming the undesirable pour point characteristic.
  • a severe hydrotreating process for manufacturing lube oils of high viscosity index is disclosed in Developments in Lubrication , PD 19(2), 221-228, S.
  • waxy feeds such as waxy distillates, deasphalted oils and slack waxes are subjected to a two-stage hydroprocessing operation in which an initial hydrotreating unit processes the feeds in blocked operation with the first stage operating under higher temperature conditions to effect selective removal of the undesirable aromatic compounds by hydrocracking and hydrogenation.
  • the second stage operates under relatively milder conditions of reduced temperature at which hydrogenation predominates, to adjust the total aromatic content and influence the distribution of aromatic types in the final product.
  • the viscosity and flash point of the base oil are then controlled by topping in a subsequent redistillation step after which the pour point of the final base oil is controlled by dewaxing in a solvent dewaxing (MEK-toluene) unit.
  • MEK-toluene solvent dewaxing
  • the slack waxes removed from the dewaxer may be reprocessed to produce a base oil of high viscosity index.
  • a slack wax produced by the dewaxing of a waxy feed is subjected to hydrocracking over a bifunctional hydrocracking catalyst at hydrogen pressures of 2,000 psig (13881 kPa) or higher, followed by dewaxing of the hydrocracked product to obtain the desired pour point.
  • Dewaxing is stated to be preferably carried out by the solvent process with recycle of the separated wax to the hydrocracking step.
  • the hydrocracking catalyst is typically a bifunctional catalyst containing a metal hydrogenation component on an amorphous acidic support.
  • the metal component is usually a combination of base metals, with one metal selected from the iron group (Group VIII) and one metal from Group VIB of the Periodic Table, for example, nickel in combination with molybdenum or tungsten.
  • Modifiers such as phosphorus or boron may be present, as described in GB 1,350,257, GB 1,342,499, GB 1,440,230, FR 2,123,235, FR 2,124,138 and EP 199,394. Boron may also be used as a modifier as described in GB 1,440,230.
  • the activity of the catalyst may be increased by the use of fluorine, either by incorporation into the catalyst during its preparation in the form of a suitable fluorine compound or by in situ fluoriding during the operation of the process, as disclosed in GB 1,390,359.
  • the amorphous catalysts are effective for the saturation of the aromatics under the high pressure conditions which are typically used (about 2,000 psig) their activity and selectivity for isomerization of the paraffinic components is not as high as might be desired; the relatively straight chain paraffins are not, therefore, isomerized to the less waxy isoparaffins of relatively high viscosity index but with low pour point properties, to the extent required to fully meet product pour point specifications.
  • the waxy paraffins which pass through the unit therefore need to be removed during the subsequent dewaxing step and recycled, thus reducing the capacity of the unit.
  • the restricted isomerization activity of the amorphous catalysts also limits the single-pass yields to a value below about 50 percent, with the corresponding waxy conversion being about 30 to 60%, even though higher yields would obviously enhance the efficiency of the process.
  • the product V.I. is also limited by the isomerization activity, typically to about 145 at 0°F (-18°C) pour point in a single pass operation.
  • the temperature requirement of the amorphous catalysts is also relatively high, at least in comparison to zeolite catalysts, typically being about 700 to 800°F (371 to 427°C).
  • the zeolite beta catalyst isomerizes the high molecular weight paraffins contained in the back end of the feed to less waxy materials while minimizing cracking of these components to materials boiling outside the lube range.
  • the waxy paraffins in the front end of the feed are removed in a subsequent dewaxing step, either solvent or catalytic, in order to achieve the target pour point.
  • the combination of paraffin hydroisomerization with the subsequent selective dewaxing process on the front end of the feed is capable of achieving higher product V.I. values than either process on its own and, in addition, the process may be optimized either for yield efficiency or for V.I. efficiency, depending upon requirements.
  • the lube yield also tends to be constrained by the low wax isomerisation selectivity at low conversions and by wax cracking out of the lube boiling range at high conversions: maximum lube yields are typically obtained in the 20 to 30 weight percent conversion range (343°C (650°F) + conversion). It would therefore be desirable to increase isomerization selectivity and simultaneously to reduce hydrocracking selectivity in order to improve lube yield while retaining the high V.I. numbers in the product.
  • the processes using amorphous catalysts can be regarded as inferior in terms of single pass conversion and overall yield because the amorphous catalysts are relatively non-selective for paraffin isomerization but have a high activity for cracking so that overall yield remains low and dewaxing demands are high.
  • the zeolite-catalyzed process is capable of achieving higher yields since the zeolite has a much higher selectivity for paraffin isomerization in the presence of polycyclic components but under the moderate hydrogen pressures used in the process, the aromatics are not effectively dealt with in lower quality feeds and operation is constrained by the differing selectivity factors of the zeolite at different conversion levels.
  • V.I. viscosity index
  • zeolite catalysts of controlled low acidity at high pressures which is capable of being operated with feeds of varying composition to produce high quality lube basestocks in good yield, producing low pour paint products with very high viscosity indices.
  • V.I. is dependent upon the composition of the feeds, especially its wax content, high V.I. values typically above about 140, usually in the range of 140 to 155, may be obtained with the preferred slack wax feeds with values of 143 to 147 being typical.
  • yields are higher and the dewaxing requirement for the product is markedly lower due to the effectiveness of the process in converting the waxy paraffins, mainly linear and near linear paraffins, to less waxy isoparaffins of high viscosity index.
  • a process for producing a high viscosity index lubricant having a viscosity index of at least 125, from a petroleum wax feed having a paraffin content of at least 40 weight % and a wax content of at least 50 weight percent comprises isomerizing waxy paraffins present in the feed in the presence of hydrogen at a hydrogen partial pressure of at least 6991 kPa (1000 psig) and in the presence of a low acidity zeolite isomerization catalyst having an alpha value of below 20 and comprising a noble metal hydrogenation component on a porous, zeolite support material, to isomerize waxy paraffins to less waxy isoparaffins.
  • the feed typically comprises a petroleum wax having a wax content of at least 60 weight percent and an aromatic content of from 5 to 20 weight percent, such as a slack wax having an aromatic content of from 8 to 12 weight percent.
  • a petroleum wax having a wax content of at least 60 weight percent and an aromatic content of from 5 to 20 weight percent such as a slack wax having an aromatic content of from 8 to 12 weight percent.
  • Deoiled waxes and solvent refined raffinates may also serve as feed.
  • the isomerization catalyst preferably comprises a zeolite beta isomerization catalyst having an alpha value not greater than 10, advantageously not greater than 5.
  • Suitable catalysts include boron-containing zeolite beta in which the boron is present as a framework component of the zeolite beta.
  • the zeolite is usually composited with a matrix material, and in a favored embodiment comprises from 0.5 to 2 weight percent platinum.
  • the hydroisomerization may be carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of 10451 to 17326 kPa (1500 to 2500 psig), the conversion to 343°C- (650°F-) product of not more than 30 weight percent, based on the feed to the isomerization step, suitably from 10 to 20 weight percent based on the feed to the isomerization step.
  • the temperature at which the isomerization step is carried out is preferably not greater than 427°C (800°F), preferably from 316 to 427°C (600 to 800°F).
  • the hydroisomerized product may be subjected to a dewaxing to achieve a target pour point, with a loss during the dewaxing of not more than 15 weight percent.
  • the product generally has a V.I. of 130 to 150.
  • the paraffins present in the feed are selectively converted to iso-paraffins of high V.I. but lower pour point so that a final lube product of good viscometric properties is produced with a minimal degree of subsequent dewaxing.
  • a low acidity zeolite hydroisomerization catalyst is employed, in which the zeolite component is zeolite beta in one of its low acidity forms.
  • a noble metal, preferably platinum, is used to provide hydrogenation-dehydrogenation functionality in this catalyst in order to promote the desired hydroisomerization reactions.
  • the process is well suited for upgrading waxy feeds such as slack wax with aromatic contents greater than about 15 weight percent to high viscosity index lubricating oils with high single pass yields and a limited requirement for product dewaxing.
  • Figures 1 and 2 are graphs illustrating the results of wax hydroprocessing experiments reported in the Examples.
  • the invention is capable of operation with a wide range of feeds of mineral oil origin to produce a range of lubricant products with good performance characteristics, especially of low pour point and high viscosity index.
  • the quality of the product and the yield in which it is obtained is dependent upon the quality of the feed and its amenability to processing by the present catalysts; products of the highest V.I. are obtained by using the preferred wax feeds described below but products with lower V.I. values may also be obtained from other feeds which contain a lower initial quantity of waxy components which are converted into high V.I. iso-paraffins by the isomerization catalyst.
  • the use of feeds with lower wax contents may also result in lower yields, particularly if the feed preparation or processing is carried out under conditions to maximise the V.I. since then it is necessary to remove the lower quality components at some point or another, with the concomitant effect on yield.
  • the feeds which may be used should have an initial boiling point which is no lower than the initial boiling point of the desired lubricant. Because this is usually about 650°F (about 343°C) or higher, the feed will normally be a 650°F+ (about 343°C+) fraction. Feeds of this type which may be used include vacuum gas oils as well as other high boiling fractions such as distillates from the vacuum distillation of atmospheric resids, and raffinates from the solvent extraction of such distillate fractions.
  • the feed may require preparation in order to be treated satisfactorily in the hydroisomerization step.
  • the preparation steps which are generally necessary are those which remove low V.I. components such as aromatics and polycyclic naphthenes. Removal of these materials will result in a feed for the hydroisomerization step which contains higher quantities of waxy paraffins which are then converted to high V.I., low pour point iso-paraffins.
  • the feed to the hydroisomerization step should have a V.I. of at least 130, although lower quality products may be produced by the use of feeds which have lower V.I. values.
  • Suitable pre-treatment steps for preparing feeds for the hydroisomerization are those which remove the aromatics and other low V.I. components from the initial feed.
  • Solvent extraction using a solvent such as furfural, phenol or N,N-dimethylformamide is suitable for this purpose, as is hydrotreatment, especially at high hydrogen pressures which are effective for aromatics saturation, e.g. 1500 psig (about 10,441 kPa) or higher.
  • Hydrotreatment may be preferred over solvent extraction in view of the losses which take place during the extraction process.
  • the preferred gas oil and distillate feeds are those which have a high wax content, as determined by ASTM D-3235, preferably over about 50 weight percent. Feeds of this type include, for example, certain South-East Asian and mainland China oils. These feeds usually have a high paraffin content, as determined by a conventional P/N/A analysis. The properties of typical feeds of this type are set out in Tables 1 and 2 below.
  • Petroleum waxes that is, waxes of paraffinic character are derived from the refining of petroleum and other liquids by physical separation from a wax-containing refinery stream, usually by chilling the stream to a temperature at which the wax separates, usually by solvent dewaxing, e.g., MEK/toluene dewaxing or by means of an autorefrigerant process such as propane dewaxing.
  • solvent dewaxing e.g., MEK/toluene dewaxing or by means of an autorefrigerant process such as propane dewaxing.
  • autorefrigerant process such as propane dewaxing.
  • the presence of lower boiling components is not to be excluded since they will be removed together with products of similar boiling range produced during the processing during the separation steps which follow the characteristic processing steps. Since these components will, however, load up the process units they are preferably excluded by suitable choice of feed cut point.
  • the end point of wax feeds will vary according to the characteristics of the stream from which the wax has been removed, with distillate (neutral) streams usually giving waxes with end points of not more than about 1050°F (about 565°C) but higher boiling wax feeds such as the petrolatum waxes, i.e. waxes separated from bright stock may also be employed, these waxes typically having end points up to about 1300°F (about 705°C).
  • the wax content of the preferred feeds is high, generally at least 50, more usually at least 60 to 80, weight percent with the balance from occluded oil comprising iso-paraffins, aromatics and naphthenics.
  • the non-wax content will normally not exceed about 40 weight percent of the wax and preferably will not exceed 25-30 weight percent.
  • These waxy, highly paraffinic wax stocks usually have low viscosities because of their relatively low content of aromatics and naphthenes although the high content of waxy paraffins gives them melting point and pour points which render them unacceptable as lubricants without further processing.
  • the preferred type of wax feeds are the slack waxes, that is, the waxy products obtained directly from a solvent dewaxing process, e.g. an MEK or propane dewaxing process.
  • the slack wax which is a solid to semi-solid product, comprising mostly highly waxy paraffins (mostly n- and mono-methyl paraffins) together with occluded oil, may be used as such or it may be subjected to an initial deoiling step of a conventional character in order to remove the occluded oil (Foots Oil) so as to form a harder, more highly paraffinic wax which may then be used as the feed.
  • the Foots Oil contains most of the aromatics present in the original slack wax and with these aromatics, most of the heteroatoms.
  • the deoiling step is desirable, therefore, because it removes the undesirable aromatics and heteroatoms which would otherwise pass through the hydroisomerization step and reduce the V.I. of the final product.
  • the oil content of de-oiled waxes maybe quite low and for this purpose, measurement of the oil content by the technique of ASTM D721 may be required for reproducibility, since the D-3235 test referred to above tends to be less reliable at oil contents below about 15 weight percent. At oil contents below about 10 percent, however, the advantage of the present zeolitic catalysts may not be as marked as with oil contents of from about 10 to 50 weight percent and for this reason, wax feeds conforming to this requirement will normally be employed.
  • compositions of some typical waxes are given in Table 3 below.
  • Table 3 Wax Composition - Arab Light Crude A B C D Paraffins, wt% 94.2 81.8 70.5 51.4 Mono-naphthenes, wt% 2.6 11.0 6.3 16.5 Poly-naphthenes, wt% 2.2 3.2 7.9 9.9 Aromatics, wt% 1.0 4.0 15.3 22.2
  • a typical slack wax feed has the composition shown in Table 4 below.
  • This slack wax is obtained from the solvent (MEK) dewaxing of a 300 SUS (65 cSt) neutral oil obtained from an Arab Light Crude.
  • Another slack wax suitable for use in the present process has the properties set out in Table 5 below. This wax is prepared by the solvent dewaxing of a 450 SUS (100cS) neutral raffinate:
  • paraffinic components present in the original wax feed possesses good V.I. characteristics but have relatively high pour points as a result of their paraffinic nature.
  • the objective of the hydroisomerization is, therefore, to effect a selective transformation of these paraffinic components to iso-paraffins which, while possessing good viscometric properties, also have higher pour points. This enables the pour point of the final product to be obtained without an excessive degree of dewaxing following the hydroisomerization.
  • the catalyst used in the hydroisomerization is one which has a high selectivity for the isomerization of waxy, linear or near linear paraffins to less waxy, isoparaffinic products.
  • Catalysts of this type are bifunctional in character, comprising a metal component on a large pore size, porous support of relatively low acidity. The acidity is maintained at a low level in order to reduce conversion to products boiling outside the lube boiling range during this stage of the operation.
  • an alpha value below 20 should be employed, with preferred values below 10, best results being obtained with alpha values below 5.
  • the alpha value is an approximate indication of the catalytic cracking activity of the catalyst compared to a standard catalyst.
  • the alpha test is described in US-A-3,354,078 and in J. Catalysis , 4 , 527 (1965); 6 , 278 (1966); and 61 , 395 (1980).
  • the experimental conditions of the test used to determine the alpha values referred to in this specification include a constant temperature of 538°C and a variable flow rate as described in detail in J. Catalysis , 61 , 395 (1980).
  • a preferred hydroisomerization catalyst for the second stage employs zeolite beta as a support since this zeolite has been shown to possess outstanding activity for paraffin isomerization in the presence of aromatics.
  • the low acidity forms of zeolite beta may be obtained by synthesis of a highly siliceous form of the zeolite, e.g. with a silica-alumina ratio above about 50:1 or, more readily, by steaming zeolites of lower silica-alumina ratio to the requisite acidity level.
  • Another method is by replacement of a portion of the framework aluminum of the zeolite with another trivalent element such as boron which results in a lower intrinsic level of acid activity in the zeolite.
  • the preferred zeolites of this type are those which contain framework boron, and normally at least 0.1 weight percent, preferably at least 0.5 weight percent, of framework boron is preferred in the zeolite.
  • the framework consists principally of silicon tetrahedrally coordinated and interconnected with oxygen bridges.
  • a minor amount of a trivalent element (alumina in the case of alumino-silicate zeolite beta) is usually also coordinated and forms part of the framework.
  • the zeolite also contains material in the pores of the structure although these do not form part of the framework constituting the characteristic structure of the zeolite.
  • frame boron is used here to distinguish between material in the framework of the zeolite which is evidenced by contributing ion exchange capacity to the zeolite, from material which is present in the pores and which has no effect on the total ion exchange capacity of the zeolite.
  • zeolites containing framework boron are known and are described, for example, in US-A-4,269,813 and 4,672,049.
  • the amount of boron contained in the zeolite may be varied by incorporating different amounts of borate ion in the zeolite forming solution, e.g., by the use of varying amounts of boric acid relative to the forces of silica and alumina.
  • the zeolite should contain at least 0.1 weight percent boron. Normally, the maximum amount of boron will be about 5 weight percent of the zeolite and in most cases not more than 2 weight percent of the zeolite.
  • the framework will normally include some alumina and the silica:alumina ratio will usually be at least 30:1, in the as-synthesized conditions of the zeolite.
  • a preferred zeolite beta catalyst is made by steaming an initial boron-containing zeolite containing at least 1 weight percent boron (as B2O3) to result in an ultimate alpha value no greater than about 10 and preferably no greater than 5.
  • the steaming conditions should be adjusted in order to attain the desired alpha value in the final catalyst and typically utilize atmospheres of 100 percent steam, at temperatures of from about 800 to about 1100°F (about 427 to 595°C). Normally, the steaming will be carried out for about 12 to 48 hours, typically about 24 hours, in order to obtain the desired reduction in acidity.
  • the use of steaming to reduce the acid activity of the zeolite has been found to be especially advantageous, giving results which are not achieved by the use of a zeolite which has the same acidity in its as-synthesized condition. It is believed that these results may be attributable to the presence of trivalent metals removed from the framework during the steaming operation which enhance the functioning of the zeolite in a manner which is not fully understood.
  • the zeolite will usually be composited with a matrix material to form the finished catalyst and for this purpose conventional non-acidic matrix materials such as alumina, silica-alumina and silica are suitable with preference given to silica as a non-acidic binder, although non-acidic aluminas such as alpha boehmite (alpha alumina monohydrate) may also be used, provided that they do not confer any substantial degree of acidic activity on the matrixed catalyst.
  • non-acidic aluminas such as alpha boehmite (alpha alumina monohydrate) may also be used, provided that they do not confer any substantial degree of acidic activity on the matrixed catalyst.
  • the use of silica as a binder is preferred since alumina, even if non-acidic in character, may tend to react with the zeolite under hydrothermal reaction conditions to enhance its acidity.
  • the zeolite is usually composited with the matrix in amounts from 80:20 to 20:80 by weight, typically from 80:20 to 50:50 zeolite:matrix. Compositing may be done by conventional means including mulling the materials together followed by extrusion or pelletizing into the desired finished catalyst particles.
  • a preferred method for extruding the zeolite with silica as a binder is disclosed in US-A-4,582,815. If the catalyst is to be steamed in order to achieve the desired low acidity, it is performed after the catalyst has been formulated with the binder, as is conventional.
  • the isomerization catalyst also includes a metal component in order to promote the desired hydroisomerization reactions which, proceeding through unsaturated transitional species, require mediation by a hydrogenation-dehydrogenation component.
  • a metal component in order to promote the isomerization activity of the catalyst, metals having a strong hydrogenation function are preferred and for this reason, platinum and the other noble metals such as palladium are given a preference.
  • the amount of the noble metal hydrogenation component is in the range 0.5 to 5 weight percent of the total catalyst, usually from 0.5 to 2 weight percent.
  • the platinum may be incorporated into the catalyst by conventional techniques including ion exchange with complex platinum cations such as platinum tetraammine or by impregnation with solutions of soluble platinum compounds, for example, with platinum tetraammine salts such as platinum tetraamminechloride.
  • the catalyst may be subjected to a final calcination under conventional conditions in order to convert the noble metal to the oxide form and to confer the required mechanical strength on the catalyst. Prior to use the catalyst may be subjected to presulfiding, by established techniques.
  • the conditions for the hydroisomerization are adjusted to achieve the objective of isomerizing the waxy, linear and near-linear paraffinic components in the feed to less waxy but high V.I. isoparaffinic materials of relatively lower pour point while minimizing conversion to non-lube boiling range products (usually 650°F- (345°C-) materials). Since the catalyst used has a low acidity, conversion to lower boiling products is usually at a relatively low level and by appropriate selection of severity, the operation of the process may be optimized for isomerization over cracking.
  • temperatures for the hydroisomerization will typically be in the range of about 600 to about 780°F (about 315 to 415°C) with 650°F+ (343°C+) conversion typically being from about 10 to 40 weight percent, more usually 12 to 30 weight percent, of the waxy feed.
  • temperatures may be used outside this range, for example, as low as about 500°F (260°C) and up to about 800°F (about 425°C) although the higher temperatures will usually not be preferred since they will be associated with a lower isomerization selectivity and the production of less stable lube products as a result of the hydrogenation reactions being thermodynamically less favored at progressively higher operating temperatures.
  • Space velocities will typically be in the range of 0.5 to 2 LHSV (hr ⁇ 1) although in most cases a space velocity of about 1 LHSV will be most favorable.
  • the hydroisomerization is operated at hydrogen partial pressures (reactor inlet) of at least 1000 psig (6991 kPa), usually 1000 to 3000 psig (6991 to 20771 kPa) and in most cases 1500-2500 psig (10451 to 17326 kPa). Hydrogen circulation rates are usually in the range of about 500 to 5000 SCF/Bbl (about 90 to 900 n.l.l. ⁇ 1).
  • Hydrogen circulation rates may need to be adjusted in accordance with the aromatic content of the feed and so with the temperature used in the hydroisomerization since higher temperatures will be associated with a higher level of cracking and, consequently, with a higher level of olefin production, some of which will be in the lube boiling range so that product stability will need to be assured by saturation.
  • Hydrogen circulation rates of at least 1000 SCF/Bbl (about 180 n.l.l. ⁇ 1) will normally provide sufficient hydrogen to compensate for the expected hydrogen consumption as well as to ensure a low rate of catalyst aging.
  • the isomerized product may therefore be subjected simply to a final dewaxing step in order to achieve the desired target pour point and usually there will be no need for any further finishing steps since a low unsaturates content, both of aromatics and of lube range olefins, results from the optimized processing in the two functionally separated steps of the process.
  • the product may be subjected to a final fractionation to remove lower boiling materials, followed by a final dewaxing step in order to achieve target pour point for the product.
  • the extent of dewaxing required is relatively small.
  • the loss during the final dewaxing step will be not more than 15-20 weight percent of the dewaxer feed and may be lower.
  • Either catalytic dewaxing or solvent dewaxing may be used at this point and if a solvent dewaxer is used, the removed wax may be recycled to the hydroisomerization for a second pass through the isomerization step.
  • the demands on the dewaxer unit for the product are relatively low and in this respect the present process provides a significant improvement over the process employing solely amorphous catalysts where a significant degree of dewaxing is required.
  • the high isomerization selectivity of the zeolite catalysts enables high single pass wax conversions to be achieved, typically about 80% as compared to 50% for the amorphous catalyst process so that unit throughput is significantly enhanced.
  • V.I. low pour point materials which are obtained in excellent yield. Besides having excellent viscometric properties they are also highly stable, both oxidatively and thermally and to ultraviolet light.
  • V.I. values in the range of 125 to 150 are typically obtained with the preferred wax feeds to the process and values if at least 140, typically 143 to 147, are readily achievable with product yields of at least 50 weight percent, usually at least 60 weight percent, based on the original wax feed, corresponding to wax conversion values of almost 80 and 90 percent, respectively.
  • Examples 1 and 2 directly following, illustrate the preparation of low acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalysts containing framework boron.
  • the calcined product had the following analysis and was confirmed to have the structure of zeolite beta by x-ray diffraction:
  • Example 1 An as-synthesized boron-containing zeolite beta of Example 1 was mulled and extruded with silica in a zeolite:silica weight ratio of 65:35, dried and calcined at 900°F (480°C) for 3 hours in nitrogen, followed by 1000°F (540°C) in air for three hours.
  • the resulting extrudate was exchanged with 1N ammonium nitrate solution at room temperature for 1 hour after which the exchanged catalyst was calcined in air at 1000°F (540°C) for 3 hours, followed by 24 hours in 100 percent steam at 1025°F (550°C).
  • the steamed extrudate was found to contain 0.48 weight percent boron (as B2O3), 365 ppm sodium and 1920 ppm Al2O3.
  • the steamed catalyst was then exchanged for 4 hours at room temperature with 1N platinum tetraammine chloride solution with a final calcination at 660°F (350°C) for three hours.
  • the finished catalyst contained 0.87 weight percent platinum and had an alpha value of 4.
  • a sample of an aluminosilicate zeolite beta with a bulk SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 40 was extruded with alumina to produce a 65% zeolite/35% Al2O3 (by weight) cylindrical extrudate. This material was then dried, calcined and steamed to reduce the alpha to 55. Platinum was incorporated by means of ion exchange using Pt(NH3)4Cl2, to a final Pt loading of 0.6 weight percent.
  • This Example illustrates a wax hydroisomerization process using a low acidity zeolite beta hydroisomerization catalyst.
  • the process was operated under both low (400 psig/2860 kPa) and high (1750 psig/12170 kPa) conditions.
  • a low acidity silica-bound zeolite beta catalyst prepared by the method described in Example 2 above was charged to a reactor in the form of 30/60 mesh (Tyler) particles and then sulfided using 2% H2S/98% H2 by incrementally increasing the reactor temperature up to 750°F (400°C) at 50 psig (445 kPa abs).
  • the feed was a slack wax having the properties set out in Table 6 below.
  • the slack wax feed was charged directly to the catalyst in concurrent downflow with hydrogen under the following conditions: LHSV, hr ⁇ 1 0.5 H2, Flow Rate, SCF/Bbl (n.l.l. ⁇ 1) 2500 (455) Total Pressure, psig (kPa abs) 400 and 1750 (2857 and 12159)
  • the temperature was varied in the range from 700 to 780°F (about 370 to 415°C) to give differing levels of wax conversion from 10 to 30 percent, as discussed below.
  • the results are shown in Table 8 below and in Figures 1 and 2.
  • the aluminosilicate zeolite beta catalyst of Example 3 was charged to the reactor and presulfided as described in Example 4 above and then used to hydroisomerize the same slack wax feed under the following conditions:
  • the temperature was varied from 650 to 750°F (about 345 to 400°C) to give differing levels of wax conversion from about 5 to 45 percent, as discussed below.
  • the results are given in Table 8 below and in Figures 1 and 2.
  • This Example illustrates the use of an amorphous catalyst in a single stage high pressure hydroprocessing operation.
  • a NiW/Al2O3 hydrocracking catalyst with the properties shown in Table 7 was used.
  • the catalyst was charged to a downflow reactor and sulfided as described in Example 4 above.
  • the catalyst was also fluorided using o-flouortoluene as a dopant (25 ppm) in the feed.
  • Hydrogen was fed to the reactor together with the same slack wax described in Example 4 in cocurrent downflow under the following conditions, again varying temperature from 700 to 780°F (about 370 to 415°C) to vary conversion from about 5 to 75 percent, under the following reaction conditions:
  • Figures 1 and 2 compare the yields and V.I. data as a function of the slack wax conversion, which is defined here as the new amount of feed converted to 650°F-(343°C-). Yield is determined by the amount of 650°F+ material remaining after solvent dewaxing to achieve a 0°F (-18°C) pour point product.

Description

  • Mineral oil based lubricants are conventionally produced by a separative sequence carried out in the petroleum refinery which comprises fractionation of a paraffinic crude oil under atmospheric pressure followed by fractionation under vacuum to produce distillate fractions (neutral oils) and a residual fraction which, after deasphalting and severe solvent treatment may also be used as a lubricant basestock usually referred to as bright stock. Neutral oils, after solvent extraction to remove low viscosity index (V.I.) components are conventionally subjected to dewaxing, either by solvent or catalytic dewaxing processes, to the desired pour point, after which the dewaxed lubestock may be hydrofinished to improve stability and remove color bodies. This conventional technique relies upon the selection and use of crude stocks, usually of a paraffinic character, which produce the desired lube fractions of the desired qualities in adequate amounts. The range of permissible crude sources may, however, be extended by the lube hydrocracking process which is capable of utilizing crude stocks of marginal or poor quality, usually with a higher aromatic content than the best paraffinic crudes. The lube hydrocracking process, which is well established in the petroleum refining industry, generally comprises an initial hydrocracking step carried out under high pressure in the presence of a bifunctional catalyst which effects partial saturation and ring opening of the aromatic components which are present in the feed. The hydrocracked product is then subjected to dewaxing in order to reach the target pour point since the products from the initial hydrocracking step which are paraffinic in character include components with a relatively high pour point which need to be removed in the dewaxing step.
  • Current trends in the design of automotive engines are associated with higher operating temperatures as the efficiency of the engines increases and these higher operating temperatures require successively higher quality lubricants. One of the requirements is of higher viscosity indices (V.I.) in order to reduce the effects of the higher operating temperatures on the viscosity of the engine lubricants. High V.I. values have conventionally been attained by the use of V.I. improvers, e.g. polyacrylates, but there is a limit to the degree of improvement which may be effected in this way. In addition, V.I. improvers tend to undergo degradation under the effects of high temperatures and high shear rates encountered in the engine, the more stressing conditions encountered in high efficiency engines resulting in even faster degradation of oils which employ significant amounts of V.I. improvers. Thus there is a continuing need for automotive lubricants which are based on fluids of high viscosity index and which are stable to the high temperature, high shear rate conditions encountered in modern engines.
  • Synthetic lubricants produced by the polymerization of olefins in the presence of certain catalysts have been shown to possess excellent V.I. values, but they are expensive to produce by the conventional synthetic procedures and usually require expensive starting materials. There is therefore a need for the production of high V.I. lubricants from mineral oil stocks which may be produced by techniques comparable to those presently employed in petroleum refineries.
  • In theory, as well as in practice, lubricants should be highly paraffinic in nature since paraffins possess the desirable combination of low viscosity and high viscosity index. Normal paraffins and slightly branched paraffins, e.g. n-methyl paraffins, are waxy materials which confer an unacceptably high pour point on the lube stock and are therefore removed during the dewaxing operations in the conventional refining process described above. It is, however, possible to process waxy feeds in order to retain many of the benefits of their paraffinic character while overcoming the undesirable pour point characteristic. A severe hydrotreating process for manufacturing lube oils of high viscosity index is disclosed in Developments in Lubrication, PD 19(2), 221-228, S. Bull et al, and in this process, waxy feeds such as waxy distillates, deasphalted oils and slack waxes are subjected to a two-stage hydroprocessing operation in which an initial hydrotreating unit processes the feeds in blocked operation with the first stage operating under higher temperature conditions to effect selective removal of the undesirable aromatic compounds by hydrocracking and hydrogenation. The second stage operates under relatively milder conditions of reduced temperature at which hydrogenation predominates, to adjust the total aromatic content and influence the distribution of aromatic types in the final product. The viscosity and flash point of the base oil are then controlled by topping in a subsequent redistillation step after which the pour point of the final base oil is controlled by dewaxing in a solvent dewaxing (MEK-toluene) unit. The slack waxes removed from the dewaxer may be reprocessed to produce a base oil of high viscosity index.
  • Processes of this type, employing a waxy feed which is subjected to hydrocracking over an amorphous bifunctional catalyst such as nickel-tungsten on alumina or silica-alumina are disclosed, for example, in GB-A-1,429,494, 1,429,291 and 1,493,620 and US-A-3,830,273, 3,776,839, 3,794,580 and 3,682,813. In the process described in GB 1,429,494, a slack wax produced by the dewaxing of a waxy feed is subjected to hydrocracking over a bifunctional hydrocracking catalyst at hydrogen pressures of 2,000 psig (13881 kPa) or higher, followed by dewaxing of the hydrocracked product to obtain the desired pour point. Dewaxing is stated to be preferably carried out by the solvent process with recycle of the separated wax to the hydrocracking step.
  • In processes of this kind, the hydrocracking catalyst is typically a bifunctional catalyst containing a metal hydrogenation component on an amorphous acidic support. The metal component is usually a combination of base metals, with one metal selected from the iron group (Group VIII) and one metal from Group VIB of the Periodic Table, for example, nickel in combination with molybdenum or tungsten. Modifiers such as phosphorus or boron may be present, as described in GB 1,350,257, GB 1,342,499, GB 1,440,230, FR 2,123,235, FR 2,124,138 and EP 199,394. Boron may also be used as a modifier as described in GB 1,440,230. The activity of the catalyst may be increased by the use of fluorine, either by incorporation into the catalyst during its preparation in the form of a suitable fluorine compound or by in situ fluoriding during the operation of the process, as disclosed in GB 1,390,359.
  • Although the process using an amorphous catalyst for the treatment of the waxy feeds has shown itself to be capable of producing high V.I. lubricants, it is not without its limitations. At best, the technique requires a significant dewaxing capability, both in order to produce the feed as well as to dewax the hydrocracked product to the desired pour point. The reason for this is that although the amorphous catalysts are effective for the saturation of the aromatics under the high pressure conditions which are typically used (about 2,000 psig) their activity and selectivity for isomerization of the paraffinic components is not as high as might be desired; the relatively straight chain paraffins are not, therefore, isomerized to the less waxy isoparaffins of relatively high viscosity index but with low pour point properties, to the extent required to fully meet product pour point specifications. The waxy paraffins which pass through the unit therefore need to be removed during the subsequent dewaxing step and recycled, thus reducing the capacity of the unit. The restricted isomerization activity of the amorphous catalysts also limits the single-pass yields to a value below about 50 percent, with the corresponding waxy conversion being about 30 to 60%, even though higher yields would obviously enhance the efficiency of the process. The product V.I. is also limited by the isomerization activity, typically to about 145 at 0°F (-18°C) pour point in a single pass operation. The temperature requirement of the amorphous catalysts is also relatively high, at least in comparison to zeolite catalysts, typically being about 700 to 800°F (371 to 427°C).
  • Another approach to the upgrading of waxy feeds to high V.I. lubricant basestocks is disclosed in US-A-4,919,788 and 4,975,177, in which a waxy feed, typically a waxy gas oil, a slack wax, or a deoiled wax, is hydroprocessed over a highly siliceous zeolite beta catalyst. Zeolite beta is known to be highly effective for the isomerization of paraffins in the presence of aromatics, as reported in US 4,419,220, and its capabilities are effectively exploited in the process of US 4,919,788 and 4,975,177 in a manner which optimizes the yield and viscometric properties of the products. The zeolite beta catalyst isomerizes the high molecular weight paraffins contained in the back end of the feed to less waxy materials while minimizing cracking of these components to materials boiling outside the lube range. The waxy paraffins in the front end of the feed are removed in a subsequent dewaxing step, either solvent or catalytic, in order to achieve the target pour point. The combination of paraffin hydroisomerization with the subsequent selective dewaxing process on the front end of the feed is capable of achieving higher product V.I. values than either process on its own and, in addition, the process may be optimized either for yield efficiency or for V.I. efficiency, depending upon requirements.
  • While this zeolite-catalyzed process has shown itself to be highly effective for dealing with highly paraffinic feeds, the high isomerization selectivity of the zeolite beta catalysts, coupled with its lesser capability to remove low quality aromatic components, has tended to limit the application of the process to feeds which contain relatively low quantities of aromatics: the aromatics and other polycyclic materials are less readily attacked by the zeolite with the result that they pass through the process and remain in the product with a consequent reduction in V.I. The lube yield also tends to be constrained by the low wax isomerisation selectivity at low conversions and by wax cracking out of the lube boiling range at high conversions: maximum lube yields are typically obtained in the 20 to 30 weight percent conversion range (343°C (650°F) + conversion). It would therefore be desirable to increase isomerization selectivity and simultaneously to reduce hydrocracking selectivity in order to improve lube yield while retaining the high V.I. numbers in the product.
  • In summary, therefore, the processes using amorphous catalysts can be regarded as inferior in terms of single pass conversion and overall yield because the amorphous catalysts are relatively non-selective for paraffin isomerization but have a high activity for cracking so that overall yield remains low and dewaxing demands are high. The zeolite-catalyzed process, by contrast, is capable of achieving higher yields since the zeolite has a much higher selectivity for paraffin isomerization in the presence of polycyclic components but under the moderate hydrogen pressures used in the process, the aromatics are not effectively dealt with in lower quality feeds and operation is constrained by the differing selectivity factors of the zeolite at different conversion levels.
  • We have now found that high quality, high viscosity index (V.I.) lubricants can be readily produced by a wax hydroisomerization process, using zeolite catalysts of controlled low acidity at high pressures, which is capable of being operated with feeds of varying composition to produce high quality lube basestocks in good yield, producing low pour paint products with very high viscosity indices. Although the product V.I. is dependent upon the composition of the feeds, especially its wax content, high V.I. values typically above about 140, usually in the range of 140 to 155, may be obtained with the preferred slack wax feeds with values of 143 to 147 being typical. Compared to the process using amorphous catalysts, yields are higher and the dewaxing requirement for the product is markedly lower due to the effectiveness of the process in converting the waxy paraffins, mainly linear and near linear paraffins, to less waxy isoparaffins of high viscosity index.
  • According to the present invention a process for producing a high viscosity index lubricant having a viscosity index of at least 125, from a petroleum wax feed having a paraffin content of at least 40 weight % and a wax content of at least 50 weight percent, comprises isomerizing waxy paraffins present in the feed in the presence of hydrogen at a hydrogen partial pressure of at least 6991 kPa (1000 psig) and in the presence of a low acidity zeolite isomerization catalyst having an alpha value of below 20 and comprising a noble metal hydrogenation component on a porous, zeolite support material, to isomerize waxy paraffins to less waxy isoparaffins. The feed typically comprises a petroleum wax having a wax content of at least 60 weight percent and an aromatic content of from 5 to 20 weight percent, such as a slack wax having an aromatic content of from 8 to 12 weight percent. Deoiled waxes and solvent refined raffinates may also serve as feed.
  • The isomerization catalyst preferably comprises a zeolite beta isomerization catalyst having an alpha value not greater than 10, advantageously not greater than 5. Suitable catalysts include boron-containing zeolite beta in which the boron is present as a framework component of the zeolite beta. The zeolite is usually composited with a matrix material, and in a favored embodiment comprises from 0.5 to 2 weight percent platinum.
  • The hydroisomerization may be carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of 10451 to 17326 kPa (1500 to 2500 psig), the conversion to 343°C- (650°F-) product of not more than 30 weight percent, based on the feed to the isomerization step, suitably from 10 to 20 weight percent based on the feed to the isomerization step. The temperature at which the isomerization step is carried out is preferably not greater than 427°C (800°F), preferably from 316 to 427°C (600 to 800°F).
  • The hydroisomerized product may be subjected to a dewaxing to achieve a target pour point, with a loss during the dewaxing of not more than 15 weight percent. The product generally has a V.I. of 130 to 150.
  • In the process, the paraffins present in the feed are selectively converted to iso-paraffins of high V.I. but lower pour point so that a final lube product of good viscometric properties is produced with a minimal degree of subsequent dewaxing. A low acidity zeolite hydroisomerization catalyst is employed, in which the zeolite component is zeolite beta in one of its low acidity forms. A noble metal, preferably platinum, is used to provide hydrogenation-dehydrogenation functionality in this catalyst in order to promote the desired hydroisomerization reactions. The process is well suited for upgrading waxy feeds such as slack wax with aromatic contents greater than about 15 weight percent to high viscosity index lubricating oils with high single pass yields and a limited requirement for product dewaxing.
  • The yield benefits associated with the use of the low acidity hydroisomerization catalysts at the high hydrogen pressure used according to the invention are unexpected since the use of high hydrogen pressures with catalysts of higher acidity has been shown to result in lower isomerization selectivity.
  • Drawings
  • In the accompanying drawings Figures 1 and 2 are graphs illustrating the results of wax hydroprocessing experiments reported in the Examples.
  • The invention is capable of operation with a wide range of feeds of mineral oil origin to produce a range of lubricant products with good performance characteristics, especially of low pour point and high viscosity index. The quality of the product and the yield in which it is obtained is dependent upon the quality of the feed and its amenability to processing by the present catalysts; products of the highest V.I. are obtained by using the preferred wax feeds described below but products with lower V.I. values may also be obtained from other feeds which contain a lower initial quantity of waxy components which are converted into high V.I. iso-paraffins by the isomerization catalyst. The use of feeds with lower wax contents may also result in lower yields, particularly if the feed preparation or processing is carried out under conditions to maximise the V.I. since then it is necessary to remove the lower quality components at some point or another, with the concomitant effect on yield.
  • The feeds which may be used should have an initial boiling point which is no lower than the initial boiling point of the desired lubricant. Because this is usually about 650°F (about 343°C) or higher, the feed will normally be a 650°F+ (about 343°C+) fraction. Feeds of this type which may be used include vacuum gas oils as well as other high boiling fractions such as distillates from the vacuum distillation of atmospheric resids, and raffinates from the solvent extraction of such distillate fractions.
  • The feed may require preparation in order to be treated satisfactorily in the hydroisomerization step. The preparation steps which are generally necessary are those which remove low V.I. components such as aromatics and polycyclic naphthenes. Removal of these materials will result in a feed for the hydroisomerization step which contains higher quantities of waxy paraffins which are then converted to high V.I., low pour point iso-paraffins. In order to produce the highest quality lubes, i.e. materials having a V.I. above 140, the feed to the hydroisomerization step should have a V.I. of at least 130, although lower quality products may be produced by the use of feeds which have lower V.I. values.
  • Suitable pre-treatment steps for preparing feeds for the hydroisomerization are those which remove the aromatics and other low V.I. components from the initial feed. Solvent extraction using a solvent such as furfural, phenol or N,N-dimethylformamide is suitable for this purpose, as is hydrotreatment, especially at high hydrogen pressures which are effective for aromatics saturation, e.g. 1500 psig (about 10,441 kPa) or higher. Hydrotreatment may be preferred over solvent extraction in view of the losses which take place during the extraction process.
  • The preferred gas oil and distillate feeds are those which have a high wax content, as determined by ASTM D-3235, preferably over about 50 weight percent. Feeds of this type include, for example, certain South-East Asian and mainland China oils. These feeds usually have a high paraffin content, as determined by a conventional P/N/A analysis. The properties of typical feeds of this type are set out in Tables 1 and 2 below. TABLE 1
    Minas Gas Oil
    Nominal boiling range, °C (°F) 345-540 (650-1000)
    API Gravity 33.0
    Hydrogen, wt% 13.6
    Sulfur, wt% 0.07
    Nitrogen, ppmw 320
    Basic Nitrogen, ppmw 160
    CCR 0.04
    Composition, wt%
    Paraffins
    60
    Naphthenes 23
    Aromatics 17
    Bromine No. 0.8
    KV, 100°C, cSt 4.18
    Pour Point, °C (°F) 46 (115)
    95% TBP, °C (°F) 510 (950)
    Figure imgb0001

    The preferred feeds for producing the products of the highest viscosity index are petroleum waxes which contain at least 50% wax, as determined by ASTM Test D-3235. In these feeds of mineral oil origin, the waxes are materials of high pour point, comprising straight chain and slightly branched chain paraffins such as methylparaffins.
  • Petroleum waxes, that is, waxes of paraffinic character are derived from the refining of petroleum and other liquids by physical separation from a wax-containing refinery stream, usually by chilling the stream to a temperature at which the wax separates, usually by solvent dewaxing, e.g., MEK/toluene dewaxing or by means of an autorefrigerant process such as propane dewaxing. These waxes have high initial boiling points above about 650°F (about 343°C) which render them extremely useful for processing into lubricants which also require an initial boiling point of at least 650°F (about 343°C). The presence of lower boiling components is not to be excluded since they will be removed together with products of similar boiling range produced during the processing during the separation steps which follow the characteristic processing steps. Since these components will, however, load up the process units they are preferably excluded by suitable choice of feed cut point. The end point of wax feeds will vary according to the characteristics of the stream from which the wax has been removed, with distillate (neutral) streams usually giving waxes with end points of not more than about 1050°F (about 565°C) but higher boiling wax feeds such as the petrolatum waxes, i.e. waxes separated from bright stock may also be employed, these waxes typically having end points up to about 1300°F (about 705°C).
  • The wax content of the preferred feeds is high, generally at least 50, more usually at least 60 to 80, weight percent with the balance from occluded oil comprising iso-paraffins, aromatics and naphthenics. The non-wax content will normally not exceed about 40 weight percent of the wax and preferably will not exceed 25-30 weight percent. These waxy, highly paraffinic wax stocks usually have low viscosities because of their relatively low content of aromatics and naphthenes although the high content of waxy paraffins gives them melting point and pour points which render them unacceptable as lubricants without further processing.
  • The preferred type of wax feeds are the slack waxes, that is, the waxy products obtained directly from a solvent dewaxing process, e.g. an MEK or propane dewaxing process. The slack wax, which is a solid to semi-solid product, comprising mostly highly waxy paraffins (mostly n- and mono-methyl paraffins) together with occluded oil, may be used as such or it may be subjected to an initial deoiling step of a conventional character in order to remove the occluded oil (Foots Oil) so as to form a harder, more highly paraffinic wax which may then be used as the feed. The Foots Oil contains most of the aromatics present in the original slack wax and with these aromatics, most of the heteroatoms. The deoiling step is desirable, therefore, because it removes the undesirable aromatics and heteroatoms which would otherwise pass through the hydroisomerization step and reduce the V.I. of the final product. The oil content of de-oiled waxes maybe quite low and for this purpose, measurement of the oil content by the technique of ASTM D721 may be required for reproducibility, since the D-3235 test referred to above tends to be less reliable at oil contents below about 15 weight percent. At oil contents below about 10 percent, however, the advantage of the present zeolitic catalysts may not be as marked as with oil contents of from about 10 to 50 weight percent and for this reason, wax feeds conforming to this requirement will normally be employed.
  • The compositions of some typical waxes are given in Table 3 below. TABLE 3
    Wax Composition - Arab Light Crude
    A B C D
    Paraffins, wt% 94.2 81.8 70.5 51.4
    Mono-naphthenes, wt% 2.6 11.0 6.3 16.5
    Poly-naphthenes, wt% 2.2 3.2 7.9 9.9
    Aromatics, wt% 1.0 4.0 15.3 22.2
  • A typical slack wax feed has the composition shown in Table 4 below. This slack wax is obtained from the solvent (MEK) dewaxing of a 300 SUS (65 cSt) neutral oil obtained from an Arab Light Crude.
    Figure imgb0002
  • Another slack wax suitable for use in the present process has the properties set out in Table 5 below. This wax is prepared by the solvent dewaxing of a 450 SUS (100cS) neutral raffinate:
    Figure imgb0003
  • The paraffinic components present in the original wax feed possesses good V.I. characteristics but have relatively high pour points as a result of their paraffinic nature. The objective of the hydroisomerization is, therefore, to effect a selective transformation of these paraffinic components to iso-paraffins which, while possessing good viscometric properties, also have higher pour points. This enables the pour point of the final product to be obtained without an excessive degree of dewaxing following the hydroisomerization.
  • The catalyst used in the hydroisomerization is one which has a high selectivity for the isomerization of waxy, linear or near linear paraffins to less waxy, isoparaffinic products. Catalysts of this type are bifunctional in character, comprising a metal component on a large pore size, porous support of relatively low acidity. The acidity is maintained at a low level in order to reduce conversion to products boiling outside the lube boiling range during this stage of the operation. In general terms, an alpha value below 20 should be employed, with preferred values below 10, best results being obtained with alpha values below 5.
  • The alpha value is an approximate indication of the catalytic cracking activity of the catalyst compared to a standard catalyst. The alpha test gives the relative rate constant (rate of normal hexane conversion per volume of catalyst per unit time) of the test catalyst relative to the standard catalyst which is taken as an alpha of 1 (Rate Constant = 0.016 sec ⁻¹). The alpha test is described in US-A-3,354,078 and in J. Catalysis, 4, 527 (1965); 6, 278 (1966); and 61, 395 (1980). The experimental conditions of the test used to determine the alpha values referred to in this specification include a constant temperature of 538°C and a variable flow rate as described in detail in J. Catalysis, 61, 395 (1980).
  • A preferred hydroisomerization catalyst for the second stage employs zeolite beta as a support since this zeolite has been shown to possess outstanding activity for paraffin isomerization in the presence of aromatics. The low acidity forms of zeolite beta may be obtained by synthesis of a highly siliceous form of the zeolite, e.g. with a silica-alumina ratio above about 50:1 or, more readily, by steaming zeolites of lower silica-alumina ratio to the requisite acidity level. Another method is by replacement of a portion of the framework aluminum of the zeolite with another trivalent element such as boron which results in a lower intrinsic level of acid activity in the zeolite. The preferred zeolites of this type are those which contain framework boron, and normally at least 0.1 weight percent, preferably at least 0.5 weight percent, of framework boron is preferred in the zeolite. In zeolites of this type, the framework consists principally of silicon tetrahedrally coordinated and interconnected with oxygen bridges. A minor amount of a trivalent element (alumina in the case of alumino-silicate zeolite beta) is usually also coordinated and forms part of the framework. The zeolite also contains material in the pores of the structure although these do not form part of the framework constituting the characteristic structure of the zeolite. The term "framework" boron is used here to distinguish between material in the framework of the zeolite which is evidenced by contributing ion exchange capacity to the zeolite, from material which is present in the pores and which has no effect on the total ion exchange capacity of the zeolite.
  • Methods for preparing high silica content zeolites containing framework boron are known and are described, for example, in US-A-4,269,813 and 4,672,049. As noted there, the amount of boron contained in the zeolite may be varied by incorporating different amounts of borate ion in the zeolite forming solution, e.g., by the use of varying amounts of boric acid relative to the forces of silica and alumina.
  • In low acidity zeolite beta catalysts, the zeolite should contain at least 0.1 weight percent boron. Normally, the maximum amount of boron will be about 5 weight percent of the zeolite and in most cases not more than 2 weight percent of the zeolite. The framework will normally include some alumina and the silica:alumina ratio will usually be at least 30:1, in the as-synthesized conditions of the zeolite. A preferred zeolite beta catalyst is made by steaming an initial boron-containing zeolite containing at least 1 weight percent boron (as B₂O₃) to result in an ultimate alpha value no greater than about 10 and preferably no greater than 5.
  • The steaming conditions should be adjusted in order to attain the desired alpha value in the final catalyst and typically utilize atmospheres of 100 percent steam, at temperatures of from about 800 to about 1100°F (about 427 to 595°C). Normally, the steaming will be carried out for about 12 to 48 hours, typically about 24 hours, in order to obtain the desired reduction in acidity. The use of steaming to reduce the acid activity of the zeolite has been found to be especially advantageous, giving results which are not achieved by the use of a zeolite which has the same acidity in its as-synthesized condition. It is believed that these results may be attributable to the presence of trivalent metals removed from the framework during the steaming operation which enhance the functioning of the zeolite in a manner which is not fully understood.
  • The zeolite will usually be composited with a matrix material to form the finished catalyst and for this purpose conventional non-acidic matrix materials such as alumina, silica-alumina and silica are suitable with preference given to silica as a non-acidic binder, although non-acidic aluminas such as alpha boehmite (alpha alumina monohydrate) may also be used, provided that they do not confer any substantial degree of acidic activity on the matrixed catalyst. The use of silica as a binder is preferred since alumina, even if non-acidic in character, may tend to react with the zeolite under hydrothermal reaction conditions to enhance its acidity. The zeolite is usually composited with the matrix in amounts from 80:20 to 20:80 by weight, typically from 80:20 to 50:50 zeolite:matrix. Compositing may be done by conventional means including mulling the materials together followed by extrusion or pelletizing into the desired finished catalyst particles. A preferred method for extruding the zeolite with silica as a binder is disclosed in US-A-4,582,815. If the catalyst is to be steamed in order to achieve the desired low acidity, it is performed after the catalyst has been formulated with the binder, as is conventional.
  • The isomerization catalyst also includes a metal component in order to promote the desired hydroisomerization reactions which, proceeding through unsaturated transitional species, require mediation by a hydrogenation-dehydrogenation component. In order to maximize the isomerization activity of the catalyst, metals having a strong hydrogenation function are preferred and for this reason, platinum and the other noble metals such as palladium are given a preference. The amount of the noble metal hydrogenation component is in the range 0.5 to 5 weight percent of the total catalyst, usually from 0.5 to 2 weight percent. The platinum may be incorporated into the catalyst by conventional techniques including ion exchange with complex platinum cations such as platinum tetraammine or by impregnation with solutions of soluble platinum compounds, for example, with platinum tetraammine salts such as platinum tetraamminechloride. The catalyst may be subjected to a final calcination under conventional conditions in order to convert the noble metal to the oxide form and to confer the required mechanical strength on the catalyst. Prior to use the catalyst may be subjected to presulfiding, by established techniques.
  • The conditions for the hydroisomerization are adjusted to achieve the objective of isomerizing the waxy, linear and near-linear paraffinic components in the feed to less waxy but high V.I. isoparaffinic materials of relatively lower pour point while minimizing conversion to non-lube boiling range products (usually 650°F- (345°C-) materials). Since the catalyst used has a low acidity, conversion to lower boiling products is usually at a relatively low level and by appropriate selection of severity, the operation of the process may be optimized for isomerization over cracking. At conventional space velocities of about 1, using a Pt/zeolite beta catalyst with an alpha value below 5, temperatures for the hydroisomerization will typically be in the range of about 600 to about 780°F (about 315 to 415°C) with 650°F+ (343°C+) conversion typically being from about 10 to 40 weight percent, more usually 12 to 30 weight percent, of the waxy feed. However, temperatures may be used outside this range, for example, as low as about 500°F (260°C) and up to about 800°F (about 425°C) although the higher temperatures will usually not be preferred since they will be associated with a lower isomerization selectivity and the production of less stable lube products as a result of the hydrogenation reactions being thermodynamically less favored at progressively higher operating temperatures. Space velocities will typically be in the range of 0.5 to 2 LHSV (hr⁻¹) although in most cases a space velocity of about 1 LHSV will be most favorable.
  • The hydroisomerization is operated at hydrogen partial pressures (reactor inlet) of at least 1000 psig (6991 kPa), usually 1000 to 3000 psig (6991 to 20771 kPa) and in most cases 1500-2500 psig (10451 to 17326 kPa). Hydrogen circulation rates are usually in the range of about 500 to 5000 SCF/Bbl (about 90 to 900 n.l.l.⁻¹). Since some saturation of aromatic components present in the original feed takes place in the presence of the noble metal hydrogenation component on the catalyst, hydrogen is consumed in the hydroisomerization even though the desired isomerization reactions are in hydrogen balance; for this reason, hydrogen circulation rates may need to be adjusted in accordance with the aromatic content of the feed and so with the temperature used in the hydroisomerization since higher temperatures will be associated with a higher level of cracking and, consequently, with a higher level of olefin production, some of which will be in the lube boiling range so that product stability will need to be assured by saturation. Hydrogen circulation rates of at least 1000 SCF/Bbl (about 180 n.l.l.⁻¹) will normally provide sufficient hydrogen to compensate for the expected hydrogen consumption as well as to ensure a low rate of catalyst aging.
  • The relatively low temperature conditions which are appropriate for the paraffin isomerization disfavor cracking reactions but are thermodynamically favorable for the saturation of any lube range olefins which may be formed by cracking, particularly in the presence of the highly active hydrogenation components on the catalyst. Because of this, the hydroisomerization is also effective for hydrofinishing the product so that product stability is improved, especially stability to ultraviolet radiation, a property which is frequently lacking in conventional hydrocracked lube products. The isomerized product may therefore be subjected simply to a final dewaxing step in order to achieve the desired target pour point and usually there will be no need for any further finishing steps since a low unsaturates content, both of aromatics and of lube range olefins, results from the optimized processing in the two functionally separated steps of the process. The product may be subjected to a final fractionation to remove lower boiling materials, followed by a final dewaxing step in order to achieve target pour point for the product.
  • Although a final dewaxing step will normally be necessary in order to achieve the desired product pour point, it is a notable feature of the present process that the extent of dewaxing required is relatively small. Typically, the loss during the final dewaxing step will be not more than 15-20 weight percent of the dewaxer feed and may be lower. Either catalytic dewaxing or solvent dewaxing may be used at this point and if a solvent dewaxer is used, the removed wax may be recycled to the hydroisomerization for a second pass through the isomerization step. The demands on the dewaxer unit for the product are relatively low and in this respect the present process provides a significant improvement over the process employing solely amorphous catalysts where a significant degree of dewaxing is required. The high isomerization selectivity of the zeolite catalysts enables high single pass wax conversions to be achieved, typically about 80% as compared to 50% for the amorphous catalyst process so that unit throughput is significantly enhanced.
  • The products from the process are high V.I., low pour point materials which are obtained in excellent yield. Besides having excellent viscometric properties they are also highly stable, both oxidatively and thermally and to ultraviolet light. V.I. values in the range of 125 to 150 are typically obtained with the preferred wax feeds to the process and values if at least 140, typically 143 to 147, are readily achievable with product yields of at least 50 weight percent, usually at least 60 weight percent, based on the original wax feed, corresponding to wax conversion values of almost 80 and 90 percent, respectively.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The following examples are given in order to illustrate various aspects of the present process. Examples 1 and 2, directly following, illustrate the preparation of low acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalysts containing framework boron.
  • Example 1
  • A boron-containing zeolite beta catalyst was prepared by crystallizing the following mixture at 285°F (140°C) for 13 days, with stirring:
    Boric Acid, g. 57.6
    NaOH, 50%, ml. 66.0
    TEABr, ml. 384
    Seeds, g. 37.0
    Silica, g. 332
    Water, g. 1020
    Notes:
    1. TEABr = Tetraethylammonium bromide, as 50% aqueous solution.
    2. Silica = Ultrasil (trademark)
  • The calcined product had the following analysis and was confirmed to have the structure of zeolite beta by x-ray diffraction:
    Figure imgb0004
  • Example 2
  • An as-synthesized boron-containing zeolite beta of Example 1 was mulled and extruded with silica in a zeolite:silica weight ratio of 65:35, dried and calcined at 900°F (480°C) for 3 hours in nitrogen, followed by 1000°F (540°C) in air for three hours. The resulting extrudate was exchanged with 1N ammonium nitrate solution at room temperature for 1 hour after which the exchanged catalyst was calcined in air at 1000°F (540°C) for 3 hours, followed by 24 hours in 100 percent steam at 1025°F (550°C). The steamed extrudate was found to contain 0.48 weight percent boron (as B₂O₃), 365 ppm sodium and 1920 ppm Al₂O₃. The steamed catalyst was then exchanged for 4 hours at room temperature with 1N platinum tetraammine chloride solution with a final calcination at 660°F (350°C) for three hours. The finished catalyst contained 0.87 weight percent platinum and had an alpha value of 4.
  • Example 3
  • A sample of an aluminosilicate zeolite beta with a bulk SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratio of 40 was extruded with alumina to produce a 65% zeolite/35% Al₂O₃ (by weight) cylindrical extrudate. This material was then dried, calcined and steamed to reduce the alpha to 55. Platinum was incorporated by means of ion exchange using Pt(NH₃)₄Cl₂, to a final Pt loading of 0.6 weight percent.
  • Example 4
  • This Example illustrates a wax hydroisomerization process using a low acidity zeolite beta hydroisomerization catalyst. The process was operated under both low (400 psig/2860 kPa) and high (1750 psig/12170 kPa) conditions.
  • A low acidity silica-bound zeolite beta catalyst prepared by the method described in Example 2 above was charged to a reactor in the form of 30/60 mesh (Tyler) particles and then sulfided using 2% H₂S/98% H₂ by incrementally increasing the reactor temperature up to 750°F (400°C) at 50 psig (445 kPa abs). The feed was a slack wax having the properties set out in Table 6 below. TABLE 6
    Properties of Slack Waxy Feed (30-35% oil)
    API Gravity 34.4
    Hydrogen, wt% 14.45
    Nitrogen, ppm 32
    Sulfur, wt% 0.125
    Water, ppm 44
    Simulated Distillation, °F (°C)
    0.5% 731 (388)
    5 791 (422)
    10 821 (438)
    20 854 (457)
    30 877 (469)
    40 899 (482)
    50 919 (493)
    60 940 (504)
    70 964 (518)
    80 989 (532)
    90 1019 (548)
    95 1040 (560)
    99.5 1084 (584)
    Unrecovered Amt. 0.0
  • The slack wax feed was charged directly to the catalyst in concurrent downflow with hydrogen under the following conditions:
    LHSV, hr⁻¹ 0.5
    H₂, Flow Rate, SCF/Bbl (n.l.l.⁻¹) 2500 (455)
    Total Pressure, psig (kPa abs) 400 and 1750 (2857 and 12159)
  • The temperature was varied in the range from 700 to 780°F (about 370 to 415°C) to give differing levels of wax conversion from 10 to 30 percent, as discussed below. The results are shown in Table 8 below and in Figures 1 and 2.
  • Example 5
  • The aluminosilicate zeolite beta catalyst of Example 3 was charged to the reactor and presulfided as described in Example 4 above and then used to hydroisomerize the same slack wax feed under the following conditions:
    Figure imgb0005
  • The temperature was varied from 650 to 750°F (about 345 to 400°C) to give differing levels of wax conversion from about 5 to 45 percent, as discussed below. The results are given in Table 8 below and in Figures 1 and 2.
  • Example 6
  • This Example illustrates the use of an amorphous catalyst in a single stage high pressure hydroprocessing operation.
  • A NiW/Al₂O₃ hydrocracking catalyst with the properties shown in Table 7 was used.
    Figure imgb0006
  • The catalyst was charged to a downflow reactor and sulfided as described in Example 4 above. The catalyst was also fluorided using o-flouortoluene as a dopant (25 ppm) in the feed. Hydrogen was fed to the reactor together with the same slack wax described in Example 4 in cocurrent downflow under the following conditions, again varying temperature from 700 to 780°F (about 370 to 415°C) to vary conversion from about 5 to 75 percent, under the following reaction conditions:
    Figure imgb0007
  • The lube yields and properties of the resulting lubes are shown in Table 8 below and in Figures 1 and 2. TABLE 8
    Lube Yields and Properties
    Example No. 4 5 4
    Catalyst 4α Pt/beta 55α Pt/beta NiW/alumina
    Pressure, psig 400 1750 400 2000 2000
    kPa 2857 12159 2857 12159 13881
    Lube yield, wt% 55-58 61 51 41 46
    KV, 38°C, cS 5.8 6.0 5.8 7.0 5.0
    Lube V.I. 135-137 133-134 127 121 142
  • Figures 1 and 2 compare the yields and V.I. data as a function of the slack wax conversion, which is defined here as the new amount of feed converted to 650°F-(343°C-). Yield is determined by the amount of 650°F+ material remaining after solvent dewaxing to achieve a 0°F (-18°C) pour point product.
  • The results summarized in Table 8 and shown in Figures 1 and 2 show that slack wax can be processed over a low acidity catalyst such as Pt/zeolite beta at high pressure without the yield and V.I. penalties incurred with a comparable but more acidic catalyst. These results show that the low acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalyst of Example 2 (4α) produces the highest yield for processing the raw slack wax, as shown by Example 4: the 4α Pt/zeolite beta catalyst produces as much as 15 percent more lube than the amorphous NiW/Al₂O₃ catalyst used in Example 6 and 10 to 20% more lube than the higher acidity 55α Pt/zeolite beta catalyst used in Example 5. Increasing the operating pressure of the hydroisomerization results in a significant yield loss in the case of the higher acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalyst used in Example 5, but results in a yield increase for the low acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalyst used in Example 4. Product V.I. is not as strongly affected by pressure with the low acidity Pt/zeolite beta as it is with the higher acidity Pt/zeolite beta catalyst.

Claims (15)

  1. A process for producing a high viscosity index lubricant having a viscosity index of at least 125 from a petroleum wax feed having a paraffin content of at least 40 wt.% and a wax content of at least 50 weight percent, which comprises isomerizing waxy paraffins present in the feed in the presence of hydrogen at a hydrogen partial pressure of at least 6991 kPa (1000 psig) and in the presence of a low acidity zeolite isomerization catalyst having an alpha value of below 20 and comprising a noble metal hydrogenation component, constituting 0:5 to 5 weight percent of total catalyst, on a porous, zeolite support material, to isomerize waxy paraffins to less waxy isoparaffins.
  2. A process according to claim 1 in which the feed comprises a petroleum wax having a wax content of at least 60 weight percent and an aromatic content of from 5 to 20 weight percent.
  3. A process according to claim 1 or claims 2 in which the petroleum wax comprises a slack wax having an aromatic content of from 8 to 12 weight percent.
  4. A process according to any preceding claim in which the isomerization catalyst comprises a zeolite beta isomerization catalyst having an alpha value not greater than 10.
  5. A process according to claim 4 in which the catalyst has an alpha value of not greater than 5.
  6. A process according to any preceding claim in which the isomerization catalyst comprises a boron-containing zeolite beta isomerization catalyst in which the boron is present as a framework component of the zeolite beta.
  7. A process according to any preceding claim in which the zeolite is composited with a matrix material.
  8. A process according to any preceding claim in which the isomerization catalyst comprises from 0.5 to 2 weight percent platinum.
  9. A process according to any preceding claim in which the hydroisomerization is carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of 10451 to 17326 kPa (1500 to 2500 psig).
  10. A process according to any preceding claim in which the isomerization step is carried out at a temperature not greater than 427°C (800°F).
  11. A process according to claim 10 in which the isomerization step is carried out at a temperature from 316 to 427°C (600 to 800°F).
  12. A process according to any preceding claim in which the hydroisomerized product is subjected to a dewaxing to achieve a target pour point.
  13. A process according to claim 12 wherein the loss during said dewaxing is not more than 15 weight percent.
  14. A process according to any preceding claim in which the product has a V.I. of 130 to 150.
  15. A process according to any preceding claim in which the feed comprises a de-oiled wax, a slack wax, or a solvent-refined raffinate.
EP91110352A 1990-07-05 1991-06-24 Production of high viscosity index lubricants Expired - Lifetime EP0464546B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US548701 1983-11-04
US54870190A 1990-07-05 1990-07-05

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0464546A1 EP0464546A1 (en) 1992-01-08
EP0464546B1 true EP0464546B1 (en) 1995-07-19

Family

ID=24190035

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91110352A Expired - Lifetime EP0464546B1 (en) 1990-07-05 1991-06-24 Production of high viscosity index lubricants

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0464546B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2954392B2 (en)
KR (1) KR0160780B1 (en)
AU (1) AU638336B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2045096C (en)
DE (1) DE69111315T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2077722T3 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6773578B1 (en) 2000-12-05 2004-08-10 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for preparing lubes with high viscosity index values
US7074320B2 (en) 1998-03-06 2006-07-11 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Preparing a high viscosity index, low branch index dewaxed oil
US7166756B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2007-01-23 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for hydrocarbon isomerization
US7875670B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-01-25 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Articles from plasticized polyolefin compositions
US7985801B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-07-26 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Fibers and nonwovens from plasticized polyolefin compositions
US7998579B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-08-16 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Polypropylene based fibers and nonwovens
US8003725B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-08-23 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Plasticized hetero-phase polyolefin blends
US8192813B2 (en) 2003-08-12 2012-06-05 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. Crosslinked polyethylene articles and processes to produce same
US8211968B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2012-07-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Plasticized polyolefin compositions
US8389615B2 (en) 2004-12-17 2013-03-05 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Elastomeric compositions comprising vinylaromatic block copolymer, polypropylene, plastomer, and low molecular weight polyolefin
US8513347B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2013-08-20 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Elastomeric compositions
US10829708B2 (en) 2016-12-19 2020-11-10 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition and method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition in high compression spark ignition engines

Families Citing this family (104)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0668342B1 (en) * 1994-02-08 1999-08-04 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Lubricating base oil preparation process
SG94676A1 (en) * 1994-02-08 2003-03-18 Shell Int Research Lubricating base oil preparation process
CN1078099C (en) * 1998-04-03 2002-01-23 中国石油化工集团公司 Catalyst containing crystal silicon-aluminate zeolite and noble metal and preparation process thereof
US6398946B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2002-06-04 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Process for making a lube base stock from a lower molecular weight feedstock
US6294077B1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-09-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Production of high viscosity lubricating oil stock with improved ZSM-5 catalyst
JP4723056B2 (en) * 2000-05-17 2011-07-13 出光興産株式会社 Lubricating base oil and method for producing the same
US6699385B2 (en) 2001-10-17 2004-03-02 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for converting waxy feeds into low haze heavy base oil
US7851418B2 (en) 2005-06-03 2010-12-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Ashless detergents and formulated lubricating oil containing same
GB0511320D0 (en) 2005-06-03 2005-07-13 Exxonmobil Chem Patents Inc Elastomeric structures
US20070093398A1 (en) 2005-10-21 2007-04-26 Habeeb Jacob J Two-stroke lubricating oils
US8299005B2 (en) 2006-05-09 2012-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil composition
US7863229B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2011-01-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating compositions
US7745544B2 (en) 2006-11-30 2010-06-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Catalytic epoxidation and hydroxylation of olefin/diene copolymers
US7615589B2 (en) 2007-02-02 2009-11-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Properties of peroxide-cured elastomer compositions
EP2390279A1 (en) 2009-12-17 2011-11-30 ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. Polypropylene composition with plasticiser for sterilisable films
US20140194333A1 (en) 2013-01-04 2014-07-10 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US20150099675A1 (en) 2013-10-03 2015-04-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Compositions with improved varnish control properties
US9506008B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2016-11-29 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US20150175923A1 (en) 2013-12-23 2015-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US20150175924A1 (en) 2013-12-23 2015-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US10190072B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2019-01-29 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
SG11201603480VA (en) 2013-12-23 2016-05-30 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US9885004B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2018-02-06 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US9896634B2 (en) 2014-05-08 2018-02-20 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition
US20150322367A1 (en) 2014-05-09 2015-11-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition
US10519394B2 (en) 2014-05-09 2019-12-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition while maintaining or improving cleanliness
US20150322368A1 (en) 2014-05-09 2015-11-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition
US20150322369A1 (en) 2014-05-09 2015-11-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition
US9506009B2 (en) 2014-05-29 2016-11-29 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection
US10689593B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2020-06-23 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Low viscosity lubricating oil compositions for turbomachines
US9944877B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2018-04-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition and method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition in high compression spark ignition engines
WO2016073149A1 (en) 2014-11-03 2016-05-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Low transition temperature mixtures or deep eutectic solvents and processes for preparation thereof
EP3237904A1 (en) 2014-12-24 2017-11-01 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Methods for determining condition and quality of petroleum products
SG11201702851YA (en) 2014-12-24 2017-07-28 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Methods for authentication and identification of petroleum products
US10000721B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2018-06-19 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection
US10781397B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2020-09-22 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection
SG11201704101UA (en) 2014-12-30 2017-07-28 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection
SG11201703986WA (en) 2014-12-30 2017-07-28 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Lubricating oil compositions containing encapsulated microscale particles
US9926509B2 (en) 2015-01-19 2018-03-27 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection and solubility
US10119093B2 (en) 2015-05-28 2018-11-06 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition and method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition in high compression spark ignition engines
EP3320060A1 (en) 2015-07-07 2018-05-16 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Composition and method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition in high compression spark ignition engines
US9951290B2 (en) 2016-03-31 2018-04-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricant compositions
US20180037841A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2018-02-08 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating engine oil for improved wear protection and fuel efficiency
WO2018027227A1 (en) 2016-08-05 2018-02-08 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Thermocleavable friction modifiers and methods thereof
US20180100120A1 (en) 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or minimizing electrostatic discharge and dielectric breakdown in electric vehicle powertrains
US20180100118A1 (en) 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for controlling electrical conductivity of lubricating oils in electric vehicle powertrains
US20180100114A1 (en) 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Low conductivity lubricating oils for electric and hybrid vehicles
JP2020503412A (en) 2016-12-30 2020-01-30 エクソンモービル リサーチ アンド エンジニアリング カンパニーExxon Research And Engineering Company Low viscosity lubricating oil composition for turbomachinery
WO2018144167A1 (en) 2017-02-01 2018-08-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating engine oil and method for improving engine fuel efficiency
WO2018144301A1 (en) 2017-02-06 2018-08-09 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low transition temperature mixtures and lubricating oils containing the same
US10793801B2 (en) 2017-02-06 2020-10-06 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low transition temperature mixtures and lubricating oils containing the same
WO2018156304A1 (en) 2017-02-21 2018-08-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions and methods of use thereof
US10876062B2 (en) 2017-03-24 2020-12-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Cold cranking simulator viscosity boosting base stocks and lubricating oil formulations containing the same
US10858610B2 (en) 2017-03-24 2020-12-08 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Cold cranking simulator viscosity boosting base stocks and lubricating oil formulations containing the same
US10738258B2 (en) 2017-03-24 2020-08-11 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency and energy efficiency
US10808196B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-10-20 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Cold cranking simulator viscosity reducing base stocks and lubricating oil formulations containing the same
WO2019014092A1 (en) 2017-07-13 2019-01-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Continuous process for the manufacture of grease
US20190031975A1 (en) 2017-07-21 2019-01-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving deposit control and cleanliness performance in an engine lubricated with a lubricating oil
US20190062667A1 (en) 2017-08-25 2019-02-28 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Ashless engine lubricants for high temperature applications
WO2019040580A1 (en) 2017-08-25 2019-02-28 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Ashless engine lubricants for high temperature applications
US20190085256A1 (en) 2017-09-18 2019-03-21 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydraulic oil compositions with improved hydrolytic and thermo-oxidative stability
US20190093040A1 (en) 2017-09-22 2019-03-28 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with viscosity and deposit control
WO2019089181A1 (en) 2017-10-30 2019-05-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine wear protection
US20190136147A1 (en) 2017-11-03 2019-05-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricant compositions with improved performance and methods of preparing and using the same
WO2019094019A1 (en) 2017-11-09 2019-05-16 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition while maintaining or improving cleanliness
US20190153351A1 (en) 2017-11-22 2019-05-23 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with oxidative stability in diesel engines
WO2019112711A1 (en) 2017-12-04 2019-06-13 Exxonmobil Research And Enginerring Company Method for preventing or reducing low speed pre-ignition
US20190185782A1 (en) 2017-12-15 2019-06-20 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions containing microencapsulated additives
US20190203151A1 (en) 2017-12-28 2019-07-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Flat viscosity fluids and lubricating oils based on liquid crystal base stocks
US20190203142A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with wear and sludge control
WO2019133255A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Grease compositions with improved performance comprising thixotropic polyamide, and methods of preparing and using the same
US20190203144A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubrication of oxygenated diamond-like carbon surfaces
US20190345407A1 (en) 2018-05-11 2019-11-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving engine fuel efficiency
US20190376000A1 (en) 2018-06-11 2019-12-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Non-zinc-based antiwear compositions, hydraulic oil compositions, and methods of using the same
US20190382680A1 (en) 2018-06-18 2019-12-19 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Formulation approach to extend the high temperature performance of lithium complex greases
WO2020023430A1 (en) 2018-07-23 2020-01-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with oxidative stability in diesel engines using biodiesel fuel
US20200032158A1 (en) 2018-07-24 2020-01-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with engine corrosion protection
US20200102519A1 (en) 2018-09-27 2020-04-02 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Low viscosity lubricating oils with improved oxidative stability and traction performance
WO2020096804A1 (en) 2018-11-05 2020-05-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions having improved cleanliness and wear performance
US20200165537A1 (en) 2018-11-28 2020-05-28 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with improved deposit resistance and methods thereof
US20200181525A1 (en) 2018-12-10 2020-06-11 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving oxidation and deposit resistance of lubricating oils
US20200199483A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with viscosity control
WO2020132166A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricating oil compositions with antioxidant formation and dissipation control
US20200199475A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Lubricant Compositions With Improved Wear Control
US20200199481A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Grease compositions having calcium sulfonate and polyurea thickeners
WO2020131310A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for improving high temperature antifoaming performance of a lubricating oil
US20200199485A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Grease compositions having polyurea thickeners made with isocyanate terminated prepolymers
WO2020131441A1 (en) 2018-12-19 2020-06-25 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Grease compositions having improved performance
US11629308B2 (en) 2019-02-28 2023-04-18 ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company Low viscosity gear oil compositions for electric and hybrid vehicles
JP2022525421A (en) 2019-03-20 2022-05-13 ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピア Lubricant composition
WO2020257379A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257376A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257373A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257375A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257370A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
US10712105B1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-07-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257374A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257378A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257371A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020257377A1 (en) 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Heat transfer fluids and methods of use
WO2020264534A2 (en) 2019-06-27 2020-12-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for reducing solubilized copper levels in wind turbine gear oils
US20230166635A1 (en) 2020-03-27 2023-06-01 ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company Monitoring health of heat transfer fluids for electric systems
US11760952B2 (en) 2021-01-12 2023-09-19 Ingevity South Carolina, Llc Lubricant thickener systems from modified tall oil fatty acids, lubricating compositions, and associated methods
CN113174275B (en) * 2021-04-30 2023-02-17 潍坊石大昌盛能源科技有限公司 Method for preparing lubricating oil base oil from coal-based Fischer-Tropsch synthetic wax

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4419220A (en) * 1982-05-18 1983-12-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic dewaxing process
AU5145885A (en) * 1984-12-27 1986-07-03 Mobil Oil Corp. Shape selective zeolite catalyst
US4975177A (en) * 1985-11-01 1990-12-04 Mobil Oil Corporation High viscosity index lubricants
AU603344B2 (en) * 1985-11-01 1990-11-15 Mobil Oil Corporation Two stage lubricant dewaxing process
US4764266A (en) * 1987-02-26 1988-08-16 Mobil Oil Corporation Integrated hydroprocessing scheme for production of premium quality distillates and lubricants
ES2076360T3 (en) * 1989-02-17 1995-11-01 Chevron Usa Inc ISOMERIZATION OF LUBRICATING OILS, WAXES AND OIL WAXES USING A SILICOALUMINOPHOSPHATE MOLECULAR SCREEN CATALYST.

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7074320B2 (en) 1998-03-06 2006-07-11 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Preparing a high viscosity index, low branch index dewaxed oil
US6773578B1 (en) 2000-12-05 2004-08-10 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for preparing lubes with high viscosity index values
US8003725B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-08-23 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Plasticized hetero-phase polyolefin blends
US7875670B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-01-25 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Articles from plasticized polyolefin compositions
US7985801B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-07-26 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Fibers and nonwovens from plasticized polyolefin compositions
US7998579B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-08-16 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Polypropylene based fibers and nonwovens
US8211968B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2012-07-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Plasticized polyolefin compositions
US8217112B2 (en) 2002-08-12 2012-07-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Plasticized polyolefin compositions
US7166756B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2007-01-23 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method for hydrocarbon isomerization
US8192813B2 (en) 2003-08-12 2012-06-05 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. Crosslinked polyethylene articles and processes to produce same
US8703030B2 (en) 2003-08-12 2014-04-22 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Crosslinked polyethylene process
US8389615B2 (en) 2004-12-17 2013-03-05 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Elastomeric compositions comprising vinylaromatic block copolymer, polypropylene, plastomer, and low molecular weight polyolefin
US8513347B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2013-08-20 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Elastomeric compositions
US10829708B2 (en) 2016-12-19 2020-11-10 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition and method for preventing or reducing engine knock and pre-ignition in high compression spark ignition engines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0464546A1 (en) 1992-01-08
AU638336B2 (en) 1993-06-24
ES2077722T3 (en) 1995-12-01
AU7910991A (en) 1992-01-09
DE69111315T2 (en) 1996-01-11
JP2954392B2 (en) 1999-09-27
KR0160780B1 (en) 1998-12-15
DE69111315D1 (en) 1995-08-24
KR920002748A (en) 1992-02-28
JPH04226593A (en) 1992-08-17
CA2045096A1 (en) 1992-01-06
CA2045096C (en) 2000-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0464546B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
US6190532B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
EP0464547B1 (en) Process for the production of high viscosity index lubricants
US5358628A (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
AU699046B2 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
US5885438A (en) Wax hydroisomerization process
US5976351A (en) Wax hydroisomerization process employing a boron-free catalyst
US5275719A (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
US6231749B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
AU767436B2 (en) Production of high viscosity lubricating oil stock with improved ZSM-5 catalyst
AU698961B2 (en) Wax hydroisomerization process
EP1789187B1 (en) Improved molecular sieve containing hydrodewaxing catalysts
AU706864B2 (en) Wax hydroisomerization process
EP1720961B1 (en) Process to continuously prepare two or more base oil grades and middle distillates
CA2203366A1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920624

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19921105

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69111315

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19950824

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2077722

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20100615

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20100617

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20100621

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20100607

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20100630

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100401

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20100630

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69111315

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69111315

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V4

Effective date: 20110624

BE20 Be: patent expired

Owner name: *MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 20110624

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20110623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110623

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110624

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110625

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20130723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110625