CA2764284C - A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery - Google Patents
A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2764284C CA2764284C CA2764284A CA2764284A CA2764284C CA 2764284 C CA2764284 C CA 2764284C CA 2764284 A CA2764284 A CA 2764284A CA 2764284 A CA2764284 A CA 2764284A CA 2764284 C CA2764284 C CA 2764284C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- blood glucose
- glucose level
- predefined
- delivery
- insulin formulation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M5/00—Devices for bringing media into the body in a subcutaneous, intra-vascular or intramuscular way; Accessories therefor, e.g. filling or cleaning devices, arm-rests
- A61M5/14—Infusion devices, e.g. infusing by gravity; Blood infusion; Accessories therefor
- A61M5/142—Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps
- A61M5/14244—Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps adapted to be carried by the patient, e.g. portable on the body
- A61M5/14276—Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps adapted to be carried by the patient, e.g. portable on the body specially adapted for implantation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M5/00—Devices for bringing media into the body in a subcutaneous, intra-vascular or intramuscular way; Accessories therefor, e.g. filling or cleaning devices, arm-rests
- A61M5/14—Infusion devices, e.g. infusing by gravity; Blood infusion; Accessories therefor
- A61M5/168—Means for controlling media flow to the body or for metering media to the body, e.g. drip meters, counters ; Monitoring media flow to the body
- A61M5/172—Means for controlling media flow to the body or for metering media to the body, e.g. drip meters, counters ; Monitoring media flow to the body electrical or electronic
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M5/00—Devices for bringing media into the body in a subcutaneous, intra-vascular or intramuscular way; Accessories therefor, e.g. filling or cleaning devices, arm-rests
- A61M5/14—Infusion devices, e.g. infusing by gravity; Blood infusion; Accessories therefor
- A61M5/168—Means for controlling media flow to the body or for metering media to the body, e.g. drip meters, counters ; Monitoring media flow to the body
- A61M5/172—Means for controlling media flow to the body or for metering media to the body, e.g. drip meters, counters ; Monitoring media flow to the body electrical or electronic
- A61M5/1723—Means for controlling media flow to the body or for metering media to the body, e.g. drip meters, counters ; Monitoring media flow to the body electrical or electronic using feedback of body parameters, e.g. blood-sugar, pressure
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
- G16H20/10—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients
- G16H20/17—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients delivered via infusion or injection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H40/00—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
- G16H40/60—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices
- G16H40/67—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices for remote operation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M5/00—Devices for bringing media into the body in a subcutaneous, intra-vascular or intramuscular way; Accessories therefor, e.g. filling or cleaning devices, arm-rests
- A61M5/14—Infusion devices, e.g. infusing by gravity; Blood infusion; Accessories therefor
- A61M5/142—Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps
- A61M2005/14208—Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps with a programmable infusion control system, characterised by the infusion program
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M2230/00—Measuring parameters of the user
- A61M2230/20—Blood composition characteristics
- A61M2230/201—Glucose concentration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/50—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Anesthesiology (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Diabetes (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Infusion, Injection, And Reservoir Apparatuses (AREA)
Abstract
A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery which accurately calculates a delivery amount based on a sensed biological state by adjusting an algorithm's programmable control parameters. The algorithm calculates a delivery amount having proportional, derivative, and basal rate components. The control parameters may be adjusted in real time to compensate for changes in a sensed biological state that may result from daily events. Safety limits on the delivery amount may be included in the algorithm. The algorithm may be executed by a computing element within a process controller for controlling closed loop infusion forumulation delivery. The biological state is sensed by a sensing device which provides a signal to the controller. The controller calculates an infusion formulation delivery amount based on the signal and sends commands to an infusion formulation delivery device which delivers an amount of infusion formulation determined by the commands.
Description
A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CLOSED LOOP INFUSION
FORMULATION DELIVERY
Background of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally, to infusion pump systems for the delivery of infusion formulations, and in particular, to a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for controlling the delivery of an infusion formulation to a body based in part on sensed blood glucose levels within the body.
FORMULATION DELIVERY
Background of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally, to infusion pump systems for the delivery of infusion formulations, and in particular, to a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for controlling the delivery of an infusion formulation to a body based in part on sensed blood glucose levels within the body.
2. Description of Related Art Infusion pumps have been used for the programmed delivery of measured doses of an infusion formulation. (An infusion formulation is defined in the present disclosure as the substance being delivered by the infusion pump.
This substance may comprise either a mixture of different components or it may be a single, pure substance, including, but not limited to drugs, dyes or other indicators,- nutrient, or the like.) A typical example of such use is the delivery of an insulin formulation to a patient. In the case where the infusion formulation is an insulin formulation, a sensing device may regulate the delivery of the insulin formulation by sensing the levels of blood glucose in the person. The delivery of the insulin formulation may be controlled by a control device associated with the pump having as an input a sensed blood glucose level. The control device may control activation of the pump to deliver an appropriate amount of the insulin formulation in accordance with the sensed blood glucose level. Insulin is a protein hormone normally formed within the human pancreas. Because it regulates carbohydrate (sugar) metabolism, insulin is required for normal metabolic function. More specifically, insulin helps the body metabolize glucose. To avoid medical problems such as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, blood glucose levels should be maintained within a specific range. A normal range for glucose in the human body may be between 85 and 120 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl). In a non-diabetic person, insulin is secreted by the pancreas in small amounts throughout the day (basal rate of insulin secretion). In addition, the amount of insulin secreted by the pancreas may be modified under certain circumstances. For example, the pancreas of a non-diabetic person normally secretes larger amounts of insulin (bolus rate of insulin secretion) when the person ingests a meal to prevent postprandial hyperglycemia, i.e., abnormally increased sugar content in the blood. In contrast to the non-diabetic person, a diabetic person's pancreas may not secrete the required amount of insulin.
Thus, the diabetic person has to somehow artificially introduce the insulin into the body. One method of introducing the insulin is by the conventional insulin formulation injection method using a syringe. Using this method, the body's blood glucose level may be monitored (for example, by checking a blood sample) and the amount of insulin to be injected may be adjusted accordingly. For example, after a meal the blood glucose level may be monitored and an appropriate amount of insulin may be injected into the bloodstream of the user. In the alternative, a diabetic person may choose to use an infusion pump such as the infusion pump described above. By using an infusion pump, a diabetic person may be able to adjust insulin delivery rates for the pump in accordance with the user's needs. These needs may be determined based on prior experience and/or the results of glucose monitoring (for example, by a sensing device in combination with a communication device). In addition, infusion pumps may be engineered to function as an artificial pancreas. Such an infusion pump may deliver a specific amount .of insulin formulation at specific intervals. As discussed above, a sensing device associated with the pump may monitor the blood glucose level of the user and the blood glucose level may then be used by the pump to automatically regulate the delivery of the insulin formulation. It is known to use as a control device a process controller for performing automatic regulation of the infusion pump. The process controller, for example a processor or other computing element, controls the process such that a process variable is maintained at a desired set point value (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "goal"). Such process controllers typically use a set of control parameters which have been determined through, for example, experimentation or calculation, to operate in an optimal manner to control the process variable. Although not the only possible technique, these control parameters are typically dependent on the anticipated range of differences ("error values") that result between the process variable and the set point during actual operation of the process.
Ordinarily, infusion formulation delivery systems utilize control systems having an input-response relationship. A system input, such as a sensed biological state, produces a physiological response related to the input.
Typically, the input (such as a sensed blood glucose level) is used to control some parameter associated with the response variable (such as an. insulin infusion rate or an amount of insulin). A process controller employed in the delivery of an insulin formulation typically executes a closed-loop algorithm that accepts and processes a blood glucose level input supplied to the controller by a sensing device. The closed-loop algorithm may adjust insulin formulation delivery as a function of, for example, the rate of change over time of the sensed glucose level. These closed-loop algorithms have many limitations. Some of these limitations result from the fact that a process controller employing a closed-loop algorithm to control the delivery of an insulin formulation may be restricted to only adding insulin formulation to the system. Once insulin formulation is added to the system, normally the controller cannot retrieve it. Additional limitations result from the fact that certain parameters affecting glucose production may not be adequately compensated for by these closed-loop algorithms. For example, certain daily events may significantly affect glucose production levels in the human body.
Thus, these events may also significantly affect the amount of insulin required to metabolize the glucose. Exercise, for example, has been shown to lower blood glucose levels in the human body. Thus, exercise may result in a dip in blood glucose levels and a corresponding decrease in the amount of insulin formulation delivered by the body. Longer or more strenuous exercise events may result in a greater dip in blood glucose level than shorter and less strenuous exercise events. Similarly, sleep and stress may affect the body's ability to burn carbohydrates and therefore may affect glucose levels. For example, glucose metabolism has been found to be slower in a sleep deprived state. In addition, elevations of certain stress hormones within the body may also result in slower glucose metabolism. Thus, longer or shorter periods of sleep or stress may result in more or less significant changes in glucose levels. Furthermore, the ingestion of certain medications may affect a user's sensitivity to insulin, i.e. a given amount of insulin may be more or less sufficient depending on whether or not a particular medication has been taken. An additional event that may significantly affect the production of glucose in the body is the ingestion of food. This results in part from the fact that during digestion carbohydrates are broken down into glucose that then enters the bloodstream. In addition, the amount and type of foods ingested affect the amount of glucose produced. Closed-loop algorithms employed for controlling delivery of an insulin formulation in response to sensed blood glucose levels may not adequately compensate for the affects such daily events may have on blood glucose levels. Thus, the diabetic person relying on such closed-loop algorithms may be at an increased risk of hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia.
Summary of the Disclosure Therefore, it is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide a closed-loop algorithm for controlling delivery of insulin formulation which more accurately calculates an infusion formulation delivery rate based on a level of blood glucose which is sampled in a body at predefined intervals. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide a closed-loop algorithm for controlling delivery of insulin formulation which may be adjusted in real time to more accurately determine whether a blood glucose level is rising or falling over a predetermined interval. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits for bolus delivery that may be compared with samples of blood glucose parameters at predefined intervals and which enable or disable bolus delivery based on the comparisons. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits on the amount of insulin formulation that may be stored in an accumulator during a predefined time interval. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits on the amount of insulin formulation that may be delivered to a user during a predefined time interval.
These and other advantages are accomplished according to embodiments of a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for delivering an infusion formulation. Components of the closed-loop algorithm calculate a present value of infusion formulation in a body as well as whether that value is rising or falling overall during a predefined time interval. The closed-loop algorithm includes an equation whose variables are programmable in real time. The variables may be used as control parameters which may be adjusted to adjust the algorithm to more accurately calculate the present value of infusion formulation in the body. Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a closed-loop algorithm for use with a proportional-derivative controller for delivering an insulin formulation which comprises an equation for calculating a proportional component, a derivative component, and a basal component of an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level. Control parameters within the closed-loop algorithm may be programmable in real time and may be adjusted to compensate for events which may significantly affect the blood glucose level. Depending upon the context of use, the invention may include various combinations of these features which function together to provide both adjustable control parameters and safety limits on the delivery of infusion formulation in response to a detected biological state.
Various embodiments of the invention include one or more of these features.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when read with the drawings and appended claims. Brief Description of the Drawings FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an infusion formulation delivery system utilizing a control system having an input-response relationship, according to preferred embodiments of the invention;
FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a general process performed by a closed-loop algorithm for adjusting infusion formulation delivery as a function of a change in a sensed biological state;
FIG. 3 shows the operation of a closed-loop algorithm used by a proportional-derivative controller;
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 400 illustrating a process for implementing a filter order, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5A shows a blood glucose response curve after a higher filter order for the falling side of the curve has been implemented, according to one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG 5B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve of FIG.
5A;
FIG. 6 shows flow diagram 600 to illustrate effects of implementing time windows, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 7 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of implementing a time window, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of implementing time windows, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 9 shows flow diagram which illustrates effects of increasing the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that \71O 03/023708 PCT/US02/28015 the blood glucose level is falling, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 10 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of a programmable trend gain on the present calculated value of the infusion formulation, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 11 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating a trend up gain and a trend down gain, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 12 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of disabled and enabled trend terms, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 13 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of disabled and enabled trend terms, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of the basal rate component, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 15 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of the basal rate component, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 16A shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating a process whereby a pump stroke volume is accumulated, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG 16B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve of FIG.
1 6A; and FIG. 17 shows a flow diagram illustrating a verification of the status of each bolus control parameter before a bolus delivery is executed, according to an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention In the following description of preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other, embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Environment of Use As discussed above, embodiments of the present invention relate to a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for controlling the delivery of an infusion formulation to a body based in part on a sensed biological state within the body. Embodiments of the invention may be employed in various infusion environments including, but not limited to a biological implant environment. In preferred embodiments, the closed-loop algorithm is employed for use in conjunction with a delivery device such as an infusion pump utilized in an implant environment within a human body.
However, other embodiments may be employed for use in other biological implant or non-implant environments, including but not limited to external infusion devices, pumps or the like. Furthermore, in example embodiments described herein, the closed-loop algorithm is employed for use in conjunction with an infusion pump configured for delivery of an insulin formulation used to regulate glucose levels in a diabetic user. However, other embodiments may be employed in the delivery of other infusion formulations having other pharmacological properties.
C)osed-Loop Control System A block diagram of an infusion formulation delivery system 100 utilizing a control system having an input-response relationship according to preferred embodiments of the invention is shown in FIG. 1. A sensor 102 generates a sensor signal 112 representative of a system parameter input 110 (such as a blood glucose level of a human body 108), and provides the sensor signal 1 1 2 to a controller 104. The controller 104 receives the sensor signal 1 12 and generates commands 114 that are communicated to the infusion formulation delivery device 106. The infusion formulation delivery device 106 then delivers the infusion formulation output 1 16 to the body 108 at a determined rate and amount in order to control the system parameter 110.
Sensor 102 may comprise a sensor, sensor electrical components for providing power to the sensor and generating the sensor signal 112, a sensor communication system for carrying the sensor signal 112 to controller 104, and a sensor housing for enclosing the electrical components and the communication system. Controller 104 may include one or more programmable processors, logic circuits, or other hardware, firmware or software components configured for implementing the control functions described herein, a controller communication system for receiving the sensor signal 1 12 from the sensor 102, and a controller housing for enclosing the controller communication system and the one or more programmable processors, logic circuits, or other hardware, firmware or software components. The infusion formulation delivery device 106 may include a suitable infusion pump, infusion pump electrical components for powering and activating the infusion pump, an infusion pump communication system for receiving commands from the controller 104, and an infusion pump housing for enclosing the infusion pump, infusion pump electrical components, and infusion pump communication system.
Closed-Loop Algorithm FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a general process performed by a closed-loop algorithm for adjusting infusion formulation delivery as a function of, for example, the rate of change over time of a sensed biological state. As shown in step 202, the closed-loop algorithm checks for changes in the biological state at timed intervals. A sensing device such as sensor 102 detects the change in glucose level and communicates the change to a control device such as controller 104 as an input to the closed-loop algorithm. If no change is detected, the closed-loop algorithm loops back to step 202, repeating this process until a change is detected. When a change occurs at step 204, the closed-loop algorithm determines the amount and/or rate of infusion formulation required based on the input and various parameters that have been programmed into the controller. Where the infusion formulation delivery system 100 shown in FIG. 1 includes a controller 104 used for controlling an insulin response to a sensed blood glucose level, the closed-loop algorithm may be of the proportional-derivative (PD) type. The use of a PD type closed-loop algorithm is advantageous, for example, when processing resources such as processor power and/or memory may be limited. In alternative embodiments, a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) type closed-loop algorithm may be used. PD controllers may utilize a closed-loop algorithm which computes both a proportional component and a derivative component of a response (output) to changes in a system parameter (input). For example, the proportional and derivative components may be combined to calculate an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered in response to a present sensed blood glucose level (system parameter input 110) within a body 108. The controller may then issue commands 114 to, for example, output a calculated amount of insulin formulation (output 116) to an infusion site, on or within the body 108 based on the present sensed blood glucose level. The magnitude of each component's contribution to the calculated amount of insulin formulation to be delivered to the infusion site may be expressed by a formula or equations, such as the following equations:
UP = a (G(t) -G-P) Equation 1 and UD = 0 dG/dt, Equation 2 where UP is the proportional component of the response, UD is'the derivative component of the response, a is a proportional gain coefficient, 13 is a derivative gain coefficient, G is a present blood glucose level, GsP is a desired blood glucose level or "set point" for the blood glucose level, and t is the time at which the blood glucose level is sensed. There is a desired blood glucose level GsP for each person which may be determined, for example, from experimentation or from the person's historical physiological data. The closed-loop control system may be designed to maintain the desired blood glucose level GsP for a particular person. It may do this, in part, by measuring the difference between the determined GsP and a blood glucose level G sensed at time t (G(t)). This difference is the blood glucose level error at time t that must be corrected. The proportional component expressed in Equation 1 determines whether the blood glucose level error is positive, negative, or zero, (i.e., whether G(t) is, respectively, higher, lower, or equal to GsP). Thus, GsP is subtracted from G(t). If G(t) is higher than Gsp, the controller 104 may generate an insulin formulation delivery command 114 to drive the infusion formulation delivery device 106 to provide insulin formulation (output 116) to the body 108. If G(t) is lower than Gsp, the controller 104 may reduce or stop delivery of the insulin formulation to the body 108 by the infusion formulation delivery device 106.
The result of subtracting Gsp from Guts is then multiplied by a proportional gain coefficient a. The derivative component dG/dt expressed in Equation 2 determines if the blood glucose level is presently rising or falling and at what rate of change. Thus, to determine the amount of infusion formulation to be delivered at any point in time (I(t)), the following standard equation may be used:
I(t) = a (Gcti -Gsp) + (3 dG/dt Equation 3 where I(t) is the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on the sensed blood glucose level at time t.
Example Operation Of A Closed-Loop Algorithm [00011 Referring now to FIG. 3, the operation of a closed-loop algorithm used by a PD controller is described. FIG. 3 illustrates a typical human blood glucose response to the ingestion of a meal. Shown in FIG. 3 is a graph of a blood glucose response curve 300 (on the y axis) as a function of time (on the x axis). This blood glucose response curve 300 is representative of blood glucose levels sensed at various sampling times as a system parameter 110 by a sensor 102, as shown in FIG. 1.
As shown in FIG. 3, after a person ingests a meal 302, there is typically a steady rise 304 in blood glucose level over time until the blood glucose level reaches a peak 306. It has been observed from experimentation that peak 306 may occur approximately 90 minutes after ingestion of the meal. After peak 306 has been reached, it has been observed that the blood glucose level then begins to decrease 308 over time. During the decline from the first peak 306, a second temporary rise 310 in blood glucose level has been observed. A second peak 312 results from this temporary rise 310. This second peak 312 may occur approximately 30 to 90 minutes after the occurrence of peak 306 and typically tends to occur 30 to 60 minutes after the occurrence of peak 306. After peak 312 has been reached, it has been observed that the blood glucose level then continues as before to decrease 314 over time. Although the reasons for this second, temporary rise 310 are not completely Understood at the present time, it is a consistently observable phenomenon that presents a problem for a closed-loop algorithm. To understand the problem, it is helpful to understand the response of a closed-loop algorithm at the various points of the response curve 300 shown in FIG.
3. As stated above, at point 302, the meal is ingested. As the blood glucose level rises 304 above the set point 316, a closed-loop algorithm may calculate both the amount by which the present blood glucose level exceeds the set point value (a proportional component) and may also determine that the blood glucose level is rising at a certain rate (a derivative component).
Thus, a closed-loop algorithm may calculate a result based on these two components which causes a command to issue from a controller associated with the algorithm to deliver a calculated amount of insulin at a time t on the response curve 300 corresponding to 304. At peak 306 of the response curve 300, the blood glucose level is neither rising nor falling, but the proportional component calculates that it is still above the set point and therefore the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may continue to issue commands to deliver more insulin formulation, although it may not be as large an amount as that issued at 304 on the response curve 300. At 308, the proportional component calculates that the. blood glucose level is still above the set point. However, now the blood glucose level is falling, and therefore the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may issue commands to deliver a decreased amount of insulin formulation based on the calculation of the derivative component. At 310, the proportional component calculates that the blood glucose level is still above the set point. The derivative component will calculate that the blood glucose level is rising again. At this point, the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may issue a command to deliver another significant amount of insulin based on this information although, seen globally, the blood glucose level is decreasing overall. Thus, because of this additional input of insulin formulation into the system, the risks of hypoglycemia to the user are increased.
Embodiments Of Closed-Loop Algorithms Preferred embodiments of the present invention address the limitations of a closed-loop algorithm exemplified above in relation to FIG. 3. Preferred embodiments of closed-loop algorithms more accurately determine the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level by including programmable control parameters which may be used to introduce discontinuities in the calculation of I(t) unlike the continuous calculations of l(t) performed by the closed-loop algorithm described above.
Embodiments of the present invention may be more effective at maintaining a desired blood glucose level for a particular user under circumstances where blood glucose level may be significantly affected by events such as, but not limited to meals; sleep, and exercise. As a result, the risk of hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia in the user may be reduced. In some embodiments of the present invention, the derivative component of the closed-loop algorithm (dG/dt) shown in Equation 2 above is referred to as the "trend term" and may be expressed as:
Trend term = (Gwtw - G(t-x))/x Equation 4 where x is a numerical value representing an increment of time. In some embodiments, the value of the trend term is calculated at predetermined intervals, for example each minute, and is used to determine the "trend" of G, i.e., whether the value of G is trending up or trending down during a timeframe determined by the term (t-x). Thus, by changing the value of x, the timeframe for sampling the trend may be lengthened or shortened. As an example, using Equation 4, if x = 10 minutes, the blood glucose level sensed 10 minutes prior in time to time t is subtracted from the blood glucose level sensed at time t. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, the value of x may be programmable. In alternative embodiments, linear regression or other curve-fitting techniques may be used. Generally, a shorter timeframe (and, thus, a smaller value of x) is preferred for trend calculation because the shorter the timeframe, the more responsive the infusion formulation delivery system may be to a rising or falling blood glucose level. However, this responsiveness must be balanced against noise susceptibility of the sensor signal, which may increase as the timeframe gets shorter. After the trend term is calculated, it is multiplied by the derivative gain coefficient P. The proportional gain coefficient a and derivative gain coefficient j3 (j3 is also referred to in the present disclosure as the "trend gain") may be chosen based, for example, on experimentation.
As an example, they may be chosen based on observations of the insulin response of several normal glucose tolerant users. An average of the values of these responses may then be taken. Alternatively, other statistical values besides an average value may be used, for example a maximum or minimum value, standard deviation value, or some other suitable value. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, both the proportional and derivative gain coefficients may be programmable. In addition, P may be programmed as one value when the trend is going up and a different value when the trend is going down (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "trend up" and "trend down" gains). It is believed that even if G(t) is equal to Gyp (in other words if the proportional component of the response is zero), a certain minimal amount of insulin formulation should still be delivered in order to maintain that condition. Thus, in some embodiments, in addition to Equation 1 and Equation 2 shown above, a basal insulin formulation delivery amount is included as a further component of the response. This basal component (Bo) represents, in some embodiments, a minimum amount of insulin formulation that would be delivered when G(t) is equal to or greater than Gyp (i.e., when the blood glucose level at time t is equal to or greater than the desired blood glucose level or set point) and without regard to the rate at which the blood glucose level is rising or falling. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, Bo may be programmable and may be selected from a programmable table of multiple Bo values based on certain criteria. By selecting Bo values from this programmable table, different values of Bo may be selected for different parts of the day (for example, dawn). Thus, different parts of the day may be treated differently than other parts of the day. Thus, to determine the amount of infusion formulation to be delivered at any point in time (I(t)) the following equation may be used by embodiments of the present invention:
I(t) = a (Gctf -Gsp) + (3 ((G(t) - Gtt-.))/x) + Bo Equation 5 Higher Order Filters For Down Trend Generally, the body's blood glucose level changes slowly compared to the rate at which the sensor 102 samples these levels. Therefore, high frequency signal components are typically noise. Referring again to FIG. 1, in some embodiments of the present invention sensor 102 may further include a filter. The filter may be used to reduce noise seen in sensor signal 112 in particular frequency bands prior to being received by controller 104.
In some embodiments, a low pass filter such as, but not limited to, a finite impulse response ("FIR") filter, is used for this purpose. This filter may be adjusted to pass lower frequencies and stop higher frequencies. By increasing the order of the FIR filter, a sharper cutoff in the frequency response of the low pass filter may be achieved. In one embodiment of the present invention, the order of the filter may be programmable and different orders of the filter may be implemented based on whether the blood glucose level response curve (for example, response curve 300 in FIG. 3) is rising or falling. FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 400 illustrating the process for implementing a filter order. As illustrated in flow diagram 400, in one embodiment the derivative component of Equation 5 may be sampled at step 402. If the derivative component of Equation 5 is a positive value or zero, i.e., if the blood glucose level is rising or at a peak, the filter order may be maintained as shown in step 404. If the derivative component of Equation 5 is a negative value, i.e., if the blood glucose level is falling, a higher order filter may be implemented at step 406. As a result of implementing a higher order filter when the blood glucose level is falling, the temporary peaks on the falling side of the response curve (such as peak 312 in FIG. 3) may be flattened, as illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B. FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the effects of this embodiment of the present invention on a response curve such as response curve 300. FIG. 5A shows a response curve 500 after the higher filter order for the falling side has been implemented according to one embodiment of the present invention described above. FIG 5B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve referred to in FIG. 5A by numeral 518. It can be seen from FIG. 5B that the second peak 512 (corresponding to second peak 312 in FIG. 3) has been flattened as a result of the higher order filter. Thus, the derivative component of the closed-loop algorithm may not detect as steep a rise and may reduce the amount of insulin formulation delivered as a result of this second peak 512. Therefore, as a result of implementing embodiments of the invention, the risk of hypoglycemia to the user may be reduced. Disabling Closed-Loop Algorithm During Predefined Time Window In another embodiment of the present invention, after a meal has been ingested by a user, the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level may be more accurately determined by establishing, for example from historical physiological data, a time window within which the temporary rise in blood glucose level occurs in the user. Once this time window has been established, embodiments of the present invention may disable any further commands from issuing from the controller (for example, commands 114 from controller 104 in FIG. 1), by, for example, programming start and stop times for the time window that may be used by the controller to suspend any further calculations of fits during the time window. FIG. 6 shows flow diagram 600 which illustrates the effects of implementing time windows, as described above. As illustrated in flow diagram 600, in one embodiment the current time t may be sampled and compared at step 602 to the programmed start and stop times to determine if time t is within the programmed time window. If time t is not within the programmed time window, the issuance of commands based on Equation 5 may be enabled at step 604. If time t is within the programmed time window, the issuance of commands based on Equation 5 may be disabled at step 606 until the programmed stop time. In this way, minimal or no additional insulin formulation may be delivered during the time window, as illustrated by the graph shown in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 700 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 702. For the purposes of illustration, it will be assumed that it has been established from the user's historical physiological data that the second rise occurs in the user at the time referred to by numeral 724. Thus, in the present example, the second peak 712 occurs approximately two hours after the meal is ingested. Thus, the time window for disabling commands from being issued by the controller may be set between a disable start time, referred to by numeral 726, and a disable stop time, referred to by numeral 728. After time 728 is reached, the controller commands may again be enabled. It can be seen from FIG. 7 that because the second rise 710 and resulting second peak 712 occur within the programmed time window, the second rise does not result in any increase in delivered insulin formulation. This discontinuity in the calculation of I(t) may thus cause l(t) to-be calculated based only on the global downward trend of response curve 700. Therefore, as a result of implementing one embodiment of the invention, the temporary rise 710 does not cause any increase in the amount of delivered insulin formulation, and the risk of hypoglycemia to the user is reduced.
Programmable Control Parameters For Equation 5 In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level may be more accurately determined by having control parameters in Equation 5 which are programmable. In some embodiments, higher accuracy is achieved by including some control parameters which may be programmable in real time, i.e., while the closed-loop control system is in operation.
Table 1 shows the control parameters within Equation 5 that may be programmable in different embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, all the control parameters shown in Table 1 are programmable. In one embodiment, the control parameters shown in Table 1 may be programmed in real time. Table 1 also includes example values for each control parameter.
Control Parameter Value Glucose Set Point (Gsp) 100 mg/dl Basal Rate (Bo) 0.5 units/hour Proportional Gain (a) 0.01 units/hour Trend Term 2 mg/dl/minute Trend Up Gain ((3) 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) Trend Down Gain (1i) 3.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) Table 1 Some embodiments of the present invention use the programmable control parameters shown in Table 1 to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm to compensate for changes in the blood glucose level that result from events such as, but not limited to, a meal event. The temporary rise in blood glucose level seen a period of time after the meal has been ingested is an example of a change in blood glucose level resulting from an event.
Other events that may require compensation for changes in the blood glucose level include, but are not limited to exercise, illness, stress, sleep and other events which may induce metabolic changes. Some embodiments may adjust the control parameters to compensate for the temporary rise so that it does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation. Thus, these embodiments decrease the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. In one embodiment, the timeframe of the trend term of Equation 4 may be lengthened by increasing the programmable value of x. This embodiment is illustrated by the graph shown in FIG. 8, which shows a human blood glucose response 800 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 802. A first timeframe wherein x =
minutes is referred to by numeral 804 and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. It can be seen that if a trend term is calculated at time t, the trend of the blood glucose level will be calculated as rising 808 for that defined timeframe. By increasing the value of x in the trend term, the timeframe may be lengthened in order to decrease the responsiveness of the infusion formulation delivery system and calculate a trend term that is more accurate in terms of whether the blood glucose level is globally rising or falling. This is illustrated by a second timeframe, referred to by numeral 806, wherein x = 30 minutes and defines a 30- minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. It can be seen that for the majority of the period encompassed by timeframe 806 the blood glucose level is trending downward. Thus, the overall calculation of the trend term will result in a negative value. Thus, by increasing the programmable value of x in order to define a longer timeframe in which to sample the trend, a more accurate calculation is made of I(t), thus reducing the risk of hypoglycemia to the user. In a further embodiment, the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 may be increased only for the falling side of blood glucose response curve 800. Thus, in this embodiment, the controller may be programmed to increase the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that the blood glucose level is falling.
In this manner, the better responsiveness of the shorter timeframe may be maintained while the blood glucose level is rising. FIG. 9 shows flow diagram 900, which illustrates effects of increasing the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that the blood glucose level is falling. The trend may be sampled at step 902 at time t and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling. If the trend is not falling, the timeframe may be maintained, as shown at step 904. If the trend is falling, the timeframe may be increased, as shown at step 906. In this way, the trend control parameter of the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that the temporary rise in the blood glucose level may have no effect on the overall, global trend of the blood glucose level over time. Thus, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 8 uses the programmable trend term parameter shown in Table 1 to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm such that the temporary rise in blood glucose level does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation and thus reduces the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. In other embodiments of.the present invention, the trend up and trend down gain control parameters may be used to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm such that the temporary rise in blood glucose level does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation. As stated above, the trend gain control parameter (3 may be chosen based on observations of the insulin response of several normal glucose tolerant users.
It has been determined through experimentation that the risk of hypoglycemia may be reduced by rapidly cutting off insulin formulation delivery to the user once it is determined that the trend is falling. In some embodiments, therefore, the trend gain may be programmable and may have a greater value when the trend is falling (trend down gain) and a lesser value when the trend is rising (trend up gain). FIG. 10 shows a flow diagram 1000 illustrating the effects of a programmable trend gain. The trend may be \%'O 03/023708 PCT/US02/28015 sampled at step 1002 at time t and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling. If the trend is not falling, the trend up gain may be used in Equation 5, as shown at step 1004. If the trend is falling, the trend down gain may be used in Equation 5, as shown at step 1006. In this way, the trend gain control parameter of the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that the temporary rise in the blood glucose level may have no effect on the overall, global trend of the blood glucose level over time. FIG.
11 illustrates why this may be advantageous in preventing the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation in response to the temporary, second rise in blood glucose level seen after a meal. FIG. 11 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1 100 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1102. Also shown in FIG. 11 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1106, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t,, the trend of the blood glucose level is sampled and is determined to be rising 1 104., Thus, the trend term will be some positive value. As an example, the trend term may have a value of 2 mg/dl/minute, as shown in Table 1 above. As seen in Equation 5, this value will be multiplied by the trend gain, and because it is positive, the trend up gain will be used. In this example, the trend up gain is chosen as 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute), as shown in Table 1. Thus, the derivative component of Equation 5 may be calculated as 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) * 2 mg/dl/minute = 2 units/hour. It can be seen, therefore, that because, in the present example, the trend is rising at a rate of 2 mg/dl/minute, an additional 2 units/hour of insulin formulation is added to the proportional component and the basal component of Equation 5. In contrast, when the trend is failing, a larger value of trend gain, i.e., the trend down gain, is used. Shown in FIG. 11 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1110, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t2 the trend of the blood glucose level is sampled and is determined to be falling 1108. Thus, the trend term will be some negative value. As an example, the trend term may have a value of -2 mg/dl/minute, as shown in Table 1 above. As seen in Equation 5, this value will be multiplied by the trend gain, and because it is negative, the trend down gain is used. In this example, the trend down gain is chosen as 3.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute), as shown in Table 1. Thus, the derivative component of Equation 5 may be calculated as 3.0 units/hour * (mg/di/minute) * -2 mg/dl/minute = -6 units/hour. It can be seen, therefore, that because in the present example the trend is falling at a rate of 2 mg/dl/minute, it is calculated that 6 units an hour should be subtracted from the current insulin formulation delivery rate.
In some embodiments, the trend down gain may be chosen such that the calculation of the derivative component of Equation 5 results in a high enough negative value to completely offset the other components of Equation 5 and, thus, to substantially cut off further delivery of insulin formulation during the down trend, even though the blood glucose level is currently above the set point 1 1 16. Thus, embodiments may use a high enough value for the trend down gain such that the temporary-rise in blood glucose level may have no effect, since the delivery of insulin formulation may be cut off at a time t before the temporary rise occurs. Thus, the risk of hypoglycemia to the user is reduced. In other embodiments of the present invention, the closed-loop algorithm advantageously disables the trend term from contributing to l(t) under certain circumstances in order to further reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. In one embodiment, the trend term of Equation 5 is disabled and does not contribute to I(t) unless the trend is rising and the user's goal blood glucose level has been reached.
This is illustrated in flow diagram 1200 shown in FIG. 12. The blood glucose level may be sampled at step 1202 and it may be determined whether or not the user's goal (set point) has been reached. If the goal has not been reached, the trend term may be disabled, as shown at step 1204.
If the goal has been reached, the trend term may be enabled, as shown at step 1206. In this way, the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that a significant amount of insulin formulation may not be delivered to the user unless the user's blood glucose level is both rising and, at the same time, above the user's blood glucose level set point, thus reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. FIG. 13 illustrates one embodiment. FIG. 13 shows a graph of a human blood. glucose response 1300 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1302. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1304, but is still below the user's set point value 1316. Thus, in one embodiment the derivative component of Equation 5 is disabled and .does not contribute to I(t). When the blood glucose level reaches the set point 1316 at time t, the derivative component of Equation 5 is enabled and begins to contribute to I(t). Shown in FIG. 13 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1306, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t the trend of the blood glucose level may be sampled to determine the difference between the blood glucose level at time t and at time t-1 0, as described -above in relation to FIG. 11.
Therefore, once the user's blood glucose level is both rising and above the set point, the trend term of Equation 4 (which is equivalent to the derivative component of Equation 5) may be calculated. An additional amount of insulin formulation determined by the calculation may then be delivered to the user to assist in metabolizing the blood glucose. In other embodiments of the present invention, the closed-loop algorithm advantageously enables and disables the basal bate Bo component of Equation 5, which may be a programmable control parameter (as shown in Table 1 above). In one embodiment, the basal rate component may be enabled or disabled based in part on whether the user's blood glucose level is above or below, respectively, the user's set point. As discussed above, the basal rate component Bo of Equation 5 represents, in some embodiments, a minimum amount of insulin formulation that would be delivered when the blood glucose level at time t is equal to or greater than the desired blood glucose level or set point and without regard to the rate at which the blood glucose level is rising or falling. Embodiments advantageously disable the basal rate component Bo of Equation 5 from contributing to l(t) when the blood glucose level falls below the set point and the trend term is falling. This may be done, for example, to substantially inhibit any further delivery of insulin formulation when the blood glucose level has fallen from a maximum value to a point below the set point. FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram 1400, illustrating the effects of the basal rate component of Equation 5. The blood glucose level may be sampled at step 1402 and it may be determined whether or not the user's blood glucose level is below the set point. If the blood glucose level is not below the set point, the, basal rate component of Equation 5 may be enabled, as shown at step 1404. If the blood glucose level is below the set point, the trend may be sampled and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling, as shown at step 1406. If the trend is not falling, the basal rate component of Equation 5 may be enabled, as shown at step 1404. If the trend is falling, the basal rate component of Equation 5 may be disabled, as shown at step 1408. In this way, the basal rate component of Equation 5 would be enabled when the blood glucose level sampled at time t is equal to or greater than the set point value regardless of the trend direction and would be disabled when the blood glucose level sampled at time t is less than the set point value and the trend is failing. FIG. 15 illustrates one embodiment. FIG. 15 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1500 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1502. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1504, but is below the user's set point 1516. Thus, according to the one embodiment, even though the user's blood glucose level is below the set point 1516, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled because the trend is not falling. The blood glucose level is still rising at 1506 and is now above the user's set point 1516. Thus, because the user's blood glucose level is both above the set point 1516 and rising, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled. According to one embodiment, under the conditions described above in relation to 1504 and 1506, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled and contributes to I(t). At 1508, the blood glucose level is falling, but is above the user's set point 1516. Thus, even though the user's blood glucose level is falling, it is still above the set point 1516 and, therefore, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled. At 1510, the blood glucose level is still falling and is now below the set point. Thus, because the blood glucose level is both falling and below the set point, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is disabled and does not contribute to l(t). Therefore, one embodiment substantially cuts off any insulin formulation, including the basal rate component, when the glucose level is both falling and below the set point.
In this way, embodiments reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Further embodiments of the present invention may include a programmable table of basal rate values. The closed-loop algorithm may be programmable to select particular basal rate values from the table to be used in calculating l(t) in Equation 5, for example, at particular times of the day. As an example, a different basal rate value may be selected at particular time intervals throughout the day. In one embodiment, the basal rate value may be updated every 30 minutes. In further embodiments, other control parameters within the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted differently at different times of the day. Thus, embodiments may advantageously adjust the basal rate based on daily events such as, but not limited to, meals, sleep, exercise, stress inducing events, ingested medications, and the like. In addition, embodiments enable the updating of basal rate values based on a particular user's historical physiological data. For example, a particular user may have a lower need for insulin at night. For that user the closed-loop algorithm may be programmed to use lower basal rate values at night.
Monitoring Biological States Other Than Blood Glucose Level [0002] In further embodiments of the present invention, the amount and/or rate of delivered insulin formulation may modified based on inputs from sensing devices that detect other biological states in lieu of or in addition to the sensed blood glucose level. For example, it has been observed that a user's blood oxygen levels may change based on whether the user is awake or sleeping. As discussed above, sleep is an event which may significantly affect blood glucose levels in particular users. Thus, embodiments may sense the blood oxygen level of a user to determine if the user is asleep and input this information to the closed-loop algorithm in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Similarly, it has been observed that body temperature may significantly affect blood glucose levels. Thus, one embodiment includes a temperature sensor which monitors body temperature and includes this information as an input to the controller in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Further embodiments of the present invention may include a sensing device for detecting whether or not a user is exercising. In one embodiment, an accelerometer or other device suitable for detecting motion may be used to detect motion as an indicator of current physical activity. As discussed above, exercise may significantly affect blood glucose levels in particular users. Thus, information from the exercise sensing device may be input to the controller in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Referring again to FIG. 1, in one embodiment sensor 102 may sense many biological states including, but not limited to, blood glucose level, blood oxygen level, and temperature. Sensor 102 may further include an exercise sensing device such as an accelerometer. In other embodiments, a separate blood glucose level sensor, blood oxygen level, temperature sensor and exercise sensing device may be used. Further embodiments may include sensors that detect various combinations of these and/or other biological states.
Reduction Of Accumulated Insulin Formulation An infusion pump for the delivery of an infusion formulation according to some embodiments has a fixed pump stroke volume, i.e., there is a certain minimum value of infusion formulation that must be accumulated before a pump stroke is executed, referred to in the present disclosure as a "pump stroke volume." Thus, if lit) is calculated on a periodic basis, for example each minute, then the calculated amount for each minute may be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume. These fractional parts may be stored, for example, in a chamber or reservoir within or adjacent to the infusion pump until an amount equal to the pump stroke volume has been accumulated. At that time, a pump stroke may be executed and the insulin formulation delivered. The process where a pump stroke volume is accumulated is illustrated with reference to FIGS. 16A and 16B. FIG. 16A
shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1600 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1602. FIG. 16B
shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve referred to in FIG.
15A by numeral 1608. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1604. At time ti, a first value for I(t) may be calculated using Equation 5. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as I(t) at time ti may be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume and may be stored in the accumulator. At time t2, a second value for I(t) may be calculated. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as l t) at time t2 may also be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume and may be added to the first value stored in the accumulator. At time t3, a third value for l(t) may be calculated, and so on. At time tn, an nth value of I(t) is calculated using Equation 5. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as lit) at time to is added to the accumulator, at which time the amount of insulin formulation in the accumulator is equivalent to a pump stroke volume. A pump stroke may now be executed to deliver the insulin formulation. Time t(n) may vary based on the pump stroke volume and the intervals at which I(t) is calculated. As stated above, a process controller employing a closed-loop algorithm to control the delivery of an insulin formulation may be restricted to adding insulin formulation to the system, i.e., a body. Once insulin formulation is added to the system, normally the controller cannot retrieve it. In further embodiments of the present invention, the accumulated volume of infusion formulation may be purged from the accumulation chamber or reservoir (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "accumulator") when the calculation of I(t) yields a result which shows that the blood glucose level is falling. Thus, although once delivered the infusion formulation may not be retrievable from the body, it may be retrieved from the accumulator before the pump stroke is executed.
In one embodiment, at any time before a pump stroke is executed, the controller may issue a command to purge the accumulator. For example, once it is determined that the blood glucose level is falling and delivery of further insulin formulation is not desirable, the amounts of insulin formulation that were calculated at times t, through to while the blood glucose level was rising may be purged from the accumulator once the blood glucose level begins to fall. Thus, the accumulator may be advantageously "zeroed out."
In addition, under circumstances involving high levels of blood glucose, the accumulator may be allowed to go negative, thus delaying the effect of future increases in blood glucose levels.
Programmable Control Parameters For Bolus Safety Limits In further embodiments of the present invention, a large amount of insulin formulation (a "bolus") may be delivered by the infusion formulation delivery device, independently of Equation 5, when a user has a blood glucose level that is above a predefined value and is rising at or.above a predefined rate, thus possibly indicating that a meal has been consumed. In other words, when the predefined criteria is met, the bolus amount may be delivered instead of a value of 1(t) calculated using Equation 5. In preferred embodiments, predefined bolus safety limits are included as control parameters for the closed-loop algorithm. In some embodiments, the bolus control parameters may be programmable in real time. Table 2 shows example bolus safety limit control parameters that may be programmable in different embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, all the control parameters shown in Table 2 are programmable. In one embodiment, the control parameters shown in Table 2 may be programmed in real time. Table 2 also includes example values for each control parameter.
Control Parameter Value Bolus amount Up to 25 units in increments of 0.2 units;
preferably 1-8 units Time between boluses One minute to 24 hours; preferably 30-60 minutes Bolus threshold 50-200 mg/dl; preferably 80-160 mg/dl Bolus trend Varies from individual to individual;
typically 1-5 mg/dl/min for humans;
preferably 2-4 mg/dl/min Table 2 Preferred embodiments of the present invention use the programmable control parameters shown in Table 2 to advantageously provide safety limits to be used in order to reduce the possibility of erroneously delivering a bolus by ensuring that the status of each control parameter is verified before a bolus delivery is executed by the infusion formulation delivery device. This is illustrated by flow diagram 17, shown in FIG. 17. As discussed above, the blood glucose level is sampled at intervals, for example every minute. In some embodiments, each time the blood glucose level is sampled, a check is performed by the closed-loop algorithm to determine the status of the control parameters shown in Table 2. In one embodiment, the closed-loop algorithm first determines if a bolus delivery feature is enabled 1702. This may be determined, for example, by comparing a predefined "bolus amount" control parameter value with zero. If the value is equal to zero, bolus delivery may be disabled 1704. If the value is greater than zero, the "time between boluses" control parameter may be checked 1706. The "time between boluses" control parameter determines whether or not a predefined time interval has been exceeded since the last bolus delivery. if the time interval between bolus deliveries has not been exceeded, bolus delivery may be disabled 1704. If the time interval between bolus deliveries has been exceeded, the "glucose threshold" control parameter may be checked 1708.
The "glucose threshold" control parameter determines whether or not a predefined blood glucose level has been reached. If the predefined blood glucose level has not been reached, the bolus delivery feature may be disabled 1704. If the predefined blood glucose level has been reached, then the "bolus trend" control parameter may be checked 1710. The "bolus trend" control parameter determines whether or not the blood glucose level is rising at a predefined rate. If the blood glucose level is not rising at the predefined rate, then the bolus delivery feature may be disabled 1704. If the blood glucose level is rising at the predefined rate, then the bolus delivery feature may, be enabled 1712. Also, according to an embodiment of the present invention, additional signal processing may be implemented to detect a signature of a meal, which may then be used to enable the bolus feature.
Thus, embodiments advantageously provide bolus safety limits to reduce the possibility of erroneously delivering a bolus by ensuring that predefined conditions for delivery of a bolus are met by testing predefined control parameters that are programmable. Thus, the closed-loop algorithm reduces the possibility of delivering too much insulin formulation as a bolus and thus reduces the risks of hypoglycemia to the user.
Programmable Control Parameters For Maximum Insulin Formulation Delivery Amounts In yet other embodiments of the present invention, additional safety limits may be used to ensure that no more than a predefined maximum amount of insulin formulation is stored in the accumulator at each sampling interval.
For example, when the sampling interval is one minute, a limit may be set on the maximum amount of insulin formulation that may be stored in the accumulator each minute. This amount may be programmable. Similarly, in yet a further embodiment, a limit may be set on the maximum amount of insulin formulation that may be delivered by the infusion formulation delivery device in one hour. This amount may also be programmable. Thus, by "clamping" the maximum amount that may be stored in the accumulator at each sampling period and the maximum amount that may be delivered to the body each hour, embodiments of the present invention reduce the possibility of delivering too much insulin formulation and thus reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. Accordingly, a number of aspects and features of preferred embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm described above may provide programmable control parameters for tuning the closed-loop algorithm to more accurately determine an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered in response to a sensed blood glucose level in order to reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. Additional aspects and features of preferred embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm may provide safety limits which reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. The aspects and features described above may be combined to provide maximum control and safety for a user. However, the foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description.
It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. For example, several embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm were described above in relation to a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal. These examples are meant to be illustrative and not limiting. The meal event is used as an example of an event which may lead to changes in insulin production by the, pancreas of a non-diabetic person, and for which the tuning of the closed-loop algorithm using control parameters may be advantageous. However, the meal event should not be considered to be a limitation on the events which may affect glucose levels in the human body, and thus on the events for which adjustable control parameters for tuning the closed-loop algorithm may be advantageous. Thus, the programmable control parameters may be adjusted to adjust the closed-loop algorithm to more accurately calculate the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered during or after other events which may affect the blood glucose response of a user. For example, The programmable control parameters may be adjusted to more accurately calculate the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered during or after exercise events, medication events, stress events, sleep events, and the like.
Having disclosed exemplary embodiments and the best mode, modifications and variations may be made to the disclosed embodiments while remaining within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This substance may comprise either a mixture of different components or it may be a single, pure substance, including, but not limited to drugs, dyes or other indicators,- nutrient, or the like.) A typical example of such use is the delivery of an insulin formulation to a patient. In the case where the infusion formulation is an insulin formulation, a sensing device may regulate the delivery of the insulin formulation by sensing the levels of blood glucose in the person. The delivery of the insulin formulation may be controlled by a control device associated with the pump having as an input a sensed blood glucose level. The control device may control activation of the pump to deliver an appropriate amount of the insulin formulation in accordance with the sensed blood glucose level. Insulin is a protein hormone normally formed within the human pancreas. Because it regulates carbohydrate (sugar) metabolism, insulin is required for normal metabolic function. More specifically, insulin helps the body metabolize glucose. To avoid medical problems such as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, blood glucose levels should be maintained within a specific range. A normal range for glucose in the human body may be between 85 and 120 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl). In a non-diabetic person, insulin is secreted by the pancreas in small amounts throughout the day (basal rate of insulin secretion). In addition, the amount of insulin secreted by the pancreas may be modified under certain circumstances. For example, the pancreas of a non-diabetic person normally secretes larger amounts of insulin (bolus rate of insulin secretion) when the person ingests a meal to prevent postprandial hyperglycemia, i.e., abnormally increased sugar content in the blood. In contrast to the non-diabetic person, a diabetic person's pancreas may not secrete the required amount of insulin.
Thus, the diabetic person has to somehow artificially introduce the insulin into the body. One method of introducing the insulin is by the conventional insulin formulation injection method using a syringe. Using this method, the body's blood glucose level may be monitored (for example, by checking a blood sample) and the amount of insulin to be injected may be adjusted accordingly. For example, after a meal the blood glucose level may be monitored and an appropriate amount of insulin may be injected into the bloodstream of the user. In the alternative, a diabetic person may choose to use an infusion pump such as the infusion pump described above. By using an infusion pump, a diabetic person may be able to adjust insulin delivery rates for the pump in accordance with the user's needs. These needs may be determined based on prior experience and/or the results of glucose monitoring (for example, by a sensing device in combination with a communication device). In addition, infusion pumps may be engineered to function as an artificial pancreas. Such an infusion pump may deliver a specific amount .of insulin formulation at specific intervals. As discussed above, a sensing device associated with the pump may monitor the blood glucose level of the user and the blood glucose level may then be used by the pump to automatically regulate the delivery of the insulin formulation. It is known to use as a control device a process controller for performing automatic regulation of the infusion pump. The process controller, for example a processor or other computing element, controls the process such that a process variable is maintained at a desired set point value (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "goal"). Such process controllers typically use a set of control parameters which have been determined through, for example, experimentation or calculation, to operate in an optimal manner to control the process variable. Although not the only possible technique, these control parameters are typically dependent on the anticipated range of differences ("error values") that result between the process variable and the set point during actual operation of the process.
Ordinarily, infusion formulation delivery systems utilize control systems having an input-response relationship. A system input, such as a sensed biological state, produces a physiological response related to the input.
Typically, the input (such as a sensed blood glucose level) is used to control some parameter associated with the response variable (such as an. insulin infusion rate or an amount of insulin). A process controller employed in the delivery of an insulin formulation typically executes a closed-loop algorithm that accepts and processes a blood glucose level input supplied to the controller by a sensing device. The closed-loop algorithm may adjust insulin formulation delivery as a function of, for example, the rate of change over time of the sensed glucose level. These closed-loop algorithms have many limitations. Some of these limitations result from the fact that a process controller employing a closed-loop algorithm to control the delivery of an insulin formulation may be restricted to only adding insulin formulation to the system. Once insulin formulation is added to the system, normally the controller cannot retrieve it. Additional limitations result from the fact that certain parameters affecting glucose production may not be adequately compensated for by these closed-loop algorithms. For example, certain daily events may significantly affect glucose production levels in the human body.
Thus, these events may also significantly affect the amount of insulin required to metabolize the glucose. Exercise, for example, has been shown to lower blood glucose levels in the human body. Thus, exercise may result in a dip in blood glucose levels and a corresponding decrease in the amount of insulin formulation delivered by the body. Longer or more strenuous exercise events may result in a greater dip in blood glucose level than shorter and less strenuous exercise events. Similarly, sleep and stress may affect the body's ability to burn carbohydrates and therefore may affect glucose levels. For example, glucose metabolism has been found to be slower in a sleep deprived state. In addition, elevations of certain stress hormones within the body may also result in slower glucose metabolism. Thus, longer or shorter periods of sleep or stress may result in more or less significant changes in glucose levels. Furthermore, the ingestion of certain medications may affect a user's sensitivity to insulin, i.e. a given amount of insulin may be more or less sufficient depending on whether or not a particular medication has been taken. An additional event that may significantly affect the production of glucose in the body is the ingestion of food. This results in part from the fact that during digestion carbohydrates are broken down into glucose that then enters the bloodstream. In addition, the amount and type of foods ingested affect the amount of glucose produced. Closed-loop algorithms employed for controlling delivery of an insulin formulation in response to sensed blood glucose levels may not adequately compensate for the affects such daily events may have on blood glucose levels. Thus, the diabetic person relying on such closed-loop algorithms may be at an increased risk of hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia.
Summary of the Disclosure Therefore, it is an advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide a closed-loop algorithm for controlling delivery of insulin formulation which more accurately calculates an infusion formulation delivery rate based on a level of blood glucose which is sampled in a body at predefined intervals. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide a closed-loop algorithm for controlling delivery of insulin formulation which may be adjusted in real time to more accurately determine whether a blood glucose level is rising or falling over a predetermined interval. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits for bolus delivery that may be compared with samples of blood glucose parameters at predefined intervals and which enable or disable bolus delivery based on the comparisons. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits on the amount of insulin formulation that may be stored in an accumulator during a predefined time interval. It is a further advantage of embodiments of the present invention to provide safety limits on the amount of insulin formulation that may be delivered to a user during a predefined time interval.
These and other advantages are accomplished according to embodiments of a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for delivering an infusion formulation. Components of the closed-loop algorithm calculate a present value of infusion formulation in a body as well as whether that value is rising or falling overall during a predefined time interval. The closed-loop algorithm includes an equation whose variables are programmable in real time. The variables may be used as control parameters which may be adjusted to adjust the algorithm to more accurately calculate the present value of infusion formulation in the body. Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a closed-loop algorithm for use with a proportional-derivative controller for delivering an insulin formulation which comprises an equation for calculating a proportional component, a derivative component, and a basal component of an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level. Control parameters within the closed-loop algorithm may be programmable in real time and may be adjusted to compensate for events which may significantly affect the blood glucose level. Depending upon the context of use, the invention may include various combinations of these features which function together to provide both adjustable control parameters and safety limits on the delivery of infusion formulation in response to a detected biological state.
Various embodiments of the invention include one or more of these features.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when read with the drawings and appended claims. Brief Description of the Drawings FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an infusion formulation delivery system utilizing a control system having an input-response relationship, according to preferred embodiments of the invention;
FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a general process performed by a closed-loop algorithm for adjusting infusion formulation delivery as a function of a change in a sensed biological state;
FIG. 3 shows the operation of a closed-loop algorithm used by a proportional-derivative controller;
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 400 illustrating a process for implementing a filter order, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5A shows a blood glucose response curve after a higher filter order for the falling side of the curve has been implemented, according to one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG 5B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve of FIG.
5A;
FIG. 6 shows flow diagram 600 to illustrate effects of implementing time windows, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 7 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of implementing a time window, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of implementing time windows, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 9 shows flow diagram which illustrates effects of increasing the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that \71O 03/023708 PCT/US02/28015 the blood glucose level is falling, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 10 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of a programmable trend gain on the present calculated value of the infusion formulation, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 11 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating a trend up gain and a trend down gain, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 12 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of disabled and enabled trend terms, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 13 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of disabled and enabled trend terms, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram illustrating effects of the basal rate component, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 15 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating effects of the basal rate component, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 16A shows a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal, illustrating a process whereby a pump stroke volume is accumulated, according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG 16B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve of FIG.
1 6A; and FIG. 17 shows a flow diagram illustrating a verification of the status of each bolus control parameter before a bolus delivery is executed, according to an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention In the following description of preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other, embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Environment of Use As discussed above, embodiments of the present invention relate to a closed-loop algorithm for use in conjunction with a process controller for controlling the delivery of an infusion formulation to a body based in part on a sensed biological state within the body. Embodiments of the invention may be employed in various infusion environments including, but not limited to a biological implant environment. In preferred embodiments, the closed-loop algorithm is employed for use in conjunction with a delivery device such as an infusion pump utilized in an implant environment within a human body.
However, other embodiments may be employed for use in other biological implant or non-implant environments, including but not limited to external infusion devices, pumps or the like. Furthermore, in example embodiments described herein, the closed-loop algorithm is employed for use in conjunction with an infusion pump configured for delivery of an insulin formulation used to regulate glucose levels in a diabetic user. However, other embodiments may be employed in the delivery of other infusion formulations having other pharmacological properties.
C)osed-Loop Control System A block diagram of an infusion formulation delivery system 100 utilizing a control system having an input-response relationship according to preferred embodiments of the invention is shown in FIG. 1. A sensor 102 generates a sensor signal 112 representative of a system parameter input 110 (such as a blood glucose level of a human body 108), and provides the sensor signal 1 1 2 to a controller 104. The controller 104 receives the sensor signal 1 12 and generates commands 114 that are communicated to the infusion formulation delivery device 106. The infusion formulation delivery device 106 then delivers the infusion formulation output 1 16 to the body 108 at a determined rate and amount in order to control the system parameter 110.
Sensor 102 may comprise a sensor, sensor electrical components for providing power to the sensor and generating the sensor signal 112, a sensor communication system for carrying the sensor signal 112 to controller 104, and a sensor housing for enclosing the electrical components and the communication system. Controller 104 may include one or more programmable processors, logic circuits, or other hardware, firmware or software components configured for implementing the control functions described herein, a controller communication system for receiving the sensor signal 1 12 from the sensor 102, and a controller housing for enclosing the controller communication system and the one or more programmable processors, logic circuits, or other hardware, firmware or software components. The infusion formulation delivery device 106 may include a suitable infusion pump, infusion pump electrical components for powering and activating the infusion pump, an infusion pump communication system for receiving commands from the controller 104, and an infusion pump housing for enclosing the infusion pump, infusion pump electrical components, and infusion pump communication system.
Closed-Loop Algorithm FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a general process performed by a closed-loop algorithm for adjusting infusion formulation delivery as a function of, for example, the rate of change over time of a sensed biological state. As shown in step 202, the closed-loop algorithm checks for changes in the biological state at timed intervals. A sensing device such as sensor 102 detects the change in glucose level and communicates the change to a control device such as controller 104 as an input to the closed-loop algorithm. If no change is detected, the closed-loop algorithm loops back to step 202, repeating this process until a change is detected. When a change occurs at step 204, the closed-loop algorithm determines the amount and/or rate of infusion formulation required based on the input and various parameters that have been programmed into the controller. Where the infusion formulation delivery system 100 shown in FIG. 1 includes a controller 104 used for controlling an insulin response to a sensed blood glucose level, the closed-loop algorithm may be of the proportional-derivative (PD) type. The use of a PD type closed-loop algorithm is advantageous, for example, when processing resources such as processor power and/or memory may be limited. In alternative embodiments, a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) type closed-loop algorithm may be used. PD controllers may utilize a closed-loop algorithm which computes both a proportional component and a derivative component of a response (output) to changes in a system parameter (input). For example, the proportional and derivative components may be combined to calculate an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered in response to a present sensed blood glucose level (system parameter input 110) within a body 108. The controller may then issue commands 114 to, for example, output a calculated amount of insulin formulation (output 116) to an infusion site, on or within the body 108 based on the present sensed blood glucose level. The magnitude of each component's contribution to the calculated amount of insulin formulation to be delivered to the infusion site may be expressed by a formula or equations, such as the following equations:
UP = a (G(t) -G-P) Equation 1 and UD = 0 dG/dt, Equation 2 where UP is the proportional component of the response, UD is'the derivative component of the response, a is a proportional gain coefficient, 13 is a derivative gain coefficient, G is a present blood glucose level, GsP is a desired blood glucose level or "set point" for the blood glucose level, and t is the time at which the blood glucose level is sensed. There is a desired blood glucose level GsP for each person which may be determined, for example, from experimentation or from the person's historical physiological data. The closed-loop control system may be designed to maintain the desired blood glucose level GsP for a particular person. It may do this, in part, by measuring the difference between the determined GsP and a blood glucose level G sensed at time t (G(t)). This difference is the blood glucose level error at time t that must be corrected. The proportional component expressed in Equation 1 determines whether the blood glucose level error is positive, negative, or zero, (i.e., whether G(t) is, respectively, higher, lower, or equal to GsP). Thus, GsP is subtracted from G(t). If G(t) is higher than Gsp, the controller 104 may generate an insulin formulation delivery command 114 to drive the infusion formulation delivery device 106 to provide insulin formulation (output 116) to the body 108. If G(t) is lower than Gsp, the controller 104 may reduce or stop delivery of the insulin formulation to the body 108 by the infusion formulation delivery device 106.
The result of subtracting Gsp from Guts is then multiplied by a proportional gain coefficient a. The derivative component dG/dt expressed in Equation 2 determines if the blood glucose level is presently rising or falling and at what rate of change. Thus, to determine the amount of infusion formulation to be delivered at any point in time (I(t)), the following standard equation may be used:
I(t) = a (Gcti -Gsp) + (3 dG/dt Equation 3 where I(t) is the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on the sensed blood glucose level at time t.
Example Operation Of A Closed-Loop Algorithm [00011 Referring now to FIG. 3, the operation of a closed-loop algorithm used by a PD controller is described. FIG. 3 illustrates a typical human blood glucose response to the ingestion of a meal. Shown in FIG. 3 is a graph of a blood glucose response curve 300 (on the y axis) as a function of time (on the x axis). This blood glucose response curve 300 is representative of blood glucose levels sensed at various sampling times as a system parameter 110 by a sensor 102, as shown in FIG. 1.
As shown in FIG. 3, after a person ingests a meal 302, there is typically a steady rise 304 in blood glucose level over time until the blood glucose level reaches a peak 306. It has been observed from experimentation that peak 306 may occur approximately 90 minutes after ingestion of the meal. After peak 306 has been reached, it has been observed that the blood glucose level then begins to decrease 308 over time. During the decline from the first peak 306, a second temporary rise 310 in blood glucose level has been observed. A second peak 312 results from this temporary rise 310. This second peak 312 may occur approximately 30 to 90 minutes after the occurrence of peak 306 and typically tends to occur 30 to 60 minutes after the occurrence of peak 306. After peak 312 has been reached, it has been observed that the blood glucose level then continues as before to decrease 314 over time. Although the reasons for this second, temporary rise 310 are not completely Understood at the present time, it is a consistently observable phenomenon that presents a problem for a closed-loop algorithm. To understand the problem, it is helpful to understand the response of a closed-loop algorithm at the various points of the response curve 300 shown in FIG.
3. As stated above, at point 302, the meal is ingested. As the blood glucose level rises 304 above the set point 316, a closed-loop algorithm may calculate both the amount by which the present blood glucose level exceeds the set point value (a proportional component) and may also determine that the blood glucose level is rising at a certain rate (a derivative component).
Thus, a closed-loop algorithm may calculate a result based on these two components which causes a command to issue from a controller associated with the algorithm to deliver a calculated amount of insulin at a time t on the response curve 300 corresponding to 304. At peak 306 of the response curve 300, the blood glucose level is neither rising nor falling, but the proportional component calculates that it is still above the set point and therefore the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may continue to issue commands to deliver more insulin formulation, although it may not be as large an amount as that issued at 304 on the response curve 300. At 308, the proportional component calculates that the. blood glucose level is still above the set point. However, now the blood glucose level is falling, and therefore the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may issue commands to deliver a decreased amount of insulin formulation based on the calculation of the derivative component. At 310, the proportional component calculates that the blood glucose level is still above the set point. The derivative component will calculate that the blood glucose level is rising again. At this point, the controller associated with the closed-loop algorithm may issue a command to deliver another significant amount of insulin based on this information although, seen globally, the blood glucose level is decreasing overall. Thus, because of this additional input of insulin formulation into the system, the risks of hypoglycemia to the user are increased.
Embodiments Of Closed-Loop Algorithms Preferred embodiments of the present invention address the limitations of a closed-loop algorithm exemplified above in relation to FIG. 3. Preferred embodiments of closed-loop algorithms more accurately determine the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level by including programmable control parameters which may be used to introduce discontinuities in the calculation of I(t) unlike the continuous calculations of l(t) performed by the closed-loop algorithm described above.
Embodiments of the present invention may be more effective at maintaining a desired blood glucose level for a particular user under circumstances where blood glucose level may be significantly affected by events such as, but not limited to meals; sleep, and exercise. As a result, the risk of hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia in the user may be reduced. In some embodiments of the present invention, the derivative component of the closed-loop algorithm (dG/dt) shown in Equation 2 above is referred to as the "trend term" and may be expressed as:
Trend term = (Gwtw - G(t-x))/x Equation 4 where x is a numerical value representing an increment of time. In some embodiments, the value of the trend term is calculated at predetermined intervals, for example each minute, and is used to determine the "trend" of G, i.e., whether the value of G is trending up or trending down during a timeframe determined by the term (t-x). Thus, by changing the value of x, the timeframe for sampling the trend may be lengthened or shortened. As an example, using Equation 4, if x = 10 minutes, the blood glucose level sensed 10 minutes prior in time to time t is subtracted from the blood glucose level sensed at time t. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, the value of x may be programmable. In alternative embodiments, linear regression or other curve-fitting techniques may be used. Generally, a shorter timeframe (and, thus, a smaller value of x) is preferred for trend calculation because the shorter the timeframe, the more responsive the infusion formulation delivery system may be to a rising or falling blood glucose level. However, this responsiveness must be balanced against noise susceptibility of the sensor signal, which may increase as the timeframe gets shorter. After the trend term is calculated, it is multiplied by the derivative gain coefficient P. The proportional gain coefficient a and derivative gain coefficient j3 (j3 is also referred to in the present disclosure as the "trend gain") may be chosen based, for example, on experimentation.
As an example, they may be chosen based on observations of the insulin response of several normal glucose tolerant users. An average of the values of these responses may then be taken. Alternatively, other statistical values besides an average value may be used, for example a maximum or minimum value, standard deviation value, or some other suitable value. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, both the proportional and derivative gain coefficients may be programmable. In addition, P may be programmed as one value when the trend is going up and a different value when the trend is going down (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "trend up" and "trend down" gains). It is believed that even if G(t) is equal to Gyp (in other words if the proportional component of the response is zero), a certain minimal amount of insulin formulation should still be delivered in order to maintain that condition. Thus, in some embodiments, in addition to Equation 1 and Equation 2 shown above, a basal insulin formulation delivery amount is included as a further component of the response. This basal component (Bo) represents, in some embodiments, a minimum amount of insulin formulation that would be delivered when G(t) is equal to or greater than Gyp (i.e., when the blood glucose level at time t is equal to or greater than the desired blood glucose level or set point) and without regard to the rate at which the blood glucose level is rising or falling. In some embodiments, as discussed in more detail below, Bo may be programmable and may be selected from a programmable table of multiple Bo values based on certain criteria. By selecting Bo values from this programmable table, different values of Bo may be selected for different parts of the day (for example, dawn). Thus, different parts of the day may be treated differently than other parts of the day. Thus, to determine the amount of infusion formulation to be delivered at any point in time (I(t)) the following equation may be used by embodiments of the present invention:
I(t) = a (Gctf -Gsp) + (3 ((G(t) - Gtt-.))/x) + Bo Equation 5 Higher Order Filters For Down Trend Generally, the body's blood glucose level changes slowly compared to the rate at which the sensor 102 samples these levels. Therefore, high frequency signal components are typically noise. Referring again to FIG. 1, in some embodiments of the present invention sensor 102 may further include a filter. The filter may be used to reduce noise seen in sensor signal 112 in particular frequency bands prior to being received by controller 104.
In some embodiments, a low pass filter such as, but not limited to, a finite impulse response ("FIR") filter, is used for this purpose. This filter may be adjusted to pass lower frequencies and stop higher frequencies. By increasing the order of the FIR filter, a sharper cutoff in the frequency response of the low pass filter may be achieved. In one embodiment of the present invention, the order of the filter may be programmable and different orders of the filter may be implemented based on whether the blood glucose level response curve (for example, response curve 300 in FIG. 3) is rising or falling. FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 400 illustrating the process for implementing a filter order. As illustrated in flow diagram 400, in one embodiment the derivative component of Equation 5 may be sampled at step 402. If the derivative component of Equation 5 is a positive value or zero, i.e., if the blood glucose level is rising or at a peak, the filter order may be maintained as shown in step 404. If the derivative component of Equation 5 is a negative value, i.e., if the blood glucose level is falling, a higher order filter may be implemented at step 406. As a result of implementing a higher order filter when the blood glucose level is falling, the temporary peaks on the falling side of the response curve (such as peak 312 in FIG. 3) may be flattened, as illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B. FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the effects of this embodiment of the present invention on a response curve such as response curve 300. FIG. 5A shows a response curve 500 after the higher filter order for the falling side has been implemented according to one embodiment of the present invention described above. FIG 5B shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve referred to in FIG. 5A by numeral 518. It can be seen from FIG. 5B that the second peak 512 (corresponding to second peak 312 in FIG. 3) has been flattened as a result of the higher order filter. Thus, the derivative component of the closed-loop algorithm may not detect as steep a rise and may reduce the amount of insulin formulation delivered as a result of this second peak 512. Therefore, as a result of implementing embodiments of the invention, the risk of hypoglycemia to the user may be reduced. Disabling Closed-Loop Algorithm During Predefined Time Window In another embodiment of the present invention, after a meal has been ingested by a user, the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level may be more accurately determined by establishing, for example from historical physiological data, a time window within which the temporary rise in blood glucose level occurs in the user. Once this time window has been established, embodiments of the present invention may disable any further commands from issuing from the controller (for example, commands 114 from controller 104 in FIG. 1), by, for example, programming start and stop times for the time window that may be used by the controller to suspend any further calculations of fits during the time window. FIG. 6 shows flow diagram 600 which illustrates the effects of implementing time windows, as described above. As illustrated in flow diagram 600, in one embodiment the current time t may be sampled and compared at step 602 to the programmed start and stop times to determine if time t is within the programmed time window. If time t is not within the programmed time window, the issuance of commands based on Equation 5 may be enabled at step 604. If time t is within the programmed time window, the issuance of commands based on Equation 5 may be disabled at step 606 until the programmed stop time. In this way, minimal or no additional insulin formulation may be delivered during the time window, as illustrated by the graph shown in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 700 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 702. For the purposes of illustration, it will be assumed that it has been established from the user's historical physiological data that the second rise occurs in the user at the time referred to by numeral 724. Thus, in the present example, the second peak 712 occurs approximately two hours after the meal is ingested. Thus, the time window for disabling commands from being issued by the controller may be set between a disable start time, referred to by numeral 726, and a disable stop time, referred to by numeral 728. After time 728 is reached, the controller commands may again be enabled. It can be seen from FIG. 7 that because the second rise 710 and resulting second peak 712 occur within the programmed time window, the second rise does not result in any increase in delivered insulin formulation. This discontinuity in the calculation of I(t) may thus cause l(t) to-be calculated based only on the global downward trend of response curve 700. Therefore, as a result of implementing one embodiment of the invention, the temporary rise 710 does not cause any increase in the amount of delivered insulin formulation, and the risk of hypoglycemia to the user is reduced.
Programmable Control Parameters For Equation 5 In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered based on a sensed blood glucose level may be more accurately determined by having control parameters in Equation 5 which are programmable. In some embodiments, higher accuracy is achieved by including some control parameters which may be programmable in real time, i.e., while the closed-loop control system is in operation.
Table 1 shows the control parameters within Equation 5 that may be programmable in different embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, all the control parameters shown in Table 1 are programmable. In one embodiment, the control parameters shown in Table 1 may be programmed in real time. Table 1 also includes example values for each control parameter.
Control Parameter Value Glucose Set Point (Gsp) 100 mg/dl Basal Rate (Bo) 0.5 units/hour Proportional Gain (a) 0.01 units/hour Trend Term 2 mg/dl/minute Trend Up Gain ((3) 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) Trend Down Gain (1i) 3.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) Table 1 Some embodiments of the present invention use the programmable control parameters shown in Table 1 to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm to compensate for changes in the blood glucose level that result from events such as, but not limited to, a meal event. The temporary rise in blood glucose level seen a period of time after the meal has been ingested is an example of a change in blood glucose level resulting from an event.
Other events that may require compensation for changes in the blood glucose level include, but are not limited to exercise, illness, stress, sleep and other events which may induce metabolic changes. Some embodiments may adjust the control parameters to compensate for the temporary rise so that it does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation. Thus, these embodiments decrease the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. In one embodiment, the timeframe of the trend term of Equation 4 may be lengthened by increasing the programmable value of x. This embodiment is illustrated by the graph shown in FIG. 8, which shows a human blood glucose response 800 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 802. A first timeframe wherein x =
minutes is referred to by numeral 804 and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. It can be seen that if a trend term is calculated at time t, the trend of the blood glucose level will be calculated as rising 808 for that defined timeframe. By increasing the value of x in the trend term, the timeframe may be lengthened in order to decrease the responsiveness of the infusion formulation delivery system and calculate a trend term that is more accurate in terms of whether the blood glucose level is globally rising or falling. This is illustrated by a second timeframe, referred to by numeral 806, wherein x = 30 minutes and defines a 30- minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. It can be seen that for the majority of the period encompassed by timeframe 806 the blood glucose level is trending downward. Thus, the overall calculation of the trend term will result in a negative value. Thus, by increasing the programmable value of x in order to define a longer timeframe in which to sample the trend, a more accurate calculation is made of I(t), thus reducing the risk of hypoglycemia to the user. In a further embodiment, the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 may be increased only for the falling side of blood glucose response curve 800. Thus, in this embodiment, the controller may be programmed to increase the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that the blood glucose level is falling.
In this manner, the better responsiveness of the shorter timeframe may be maintained while the blood glucose level is rising. FIG. 9 shows flow diagram 900, which illustrates effects of increasing the value of x in the trend term of Equation 4 when the trend term first indicates that the blood glucose level is falling. The trend may be sampled at step 902 at time t and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling. If the trend is not falling, the timeframe may be maintained, as shown at step 904. If the trend is falling, the timeframe may be increased, as shown at step 906. In this way, the trend control parameter of the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that the temporary rise in the blood glucose level may have no effect on the overall, global trend of the blood glucose level over time. Thus, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 8 uses the programmable trend term parameter shown in Table 1 to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm such that the temporary rise in blood glucose level does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation and thus reduces the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. In other embodiments of.the present invention, the trend up and trend down gain control parameters may be used to advantageously adjust the closed-loop algorithm such that the temporary rise in blood glucose level does not result in the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation. As stated above, the trend gain control parameter (3 may be chosen based on observations of the insulin response of several normal glucose tolerant users.
It has been determined through experimentation that the risk of hypoglycemia may be reduced by rapidly cutting off insulin formulation delivery to the user once it is determined that the trend is falling. In some embodiments, therefore, the trend gain may be programmable and may have a greater value when the trend is falling (trend down gain) and a lesser value when the trend is rising (trend up gain). FIG. 10 shows a flow diagram 1000 illustrating the effects of a programmable trend gain. The trend may be \%'O 03/023708 PCT/US02/28015 sampled at step 1002 at time t and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling. If the trend is not falling, the trend up gain may be used in Equation 5, as shown at step 1004. If the trend is falling, the trend down gain may be used in Equation 5, as shown at step 1006. In this way, the trend gain control parameter of the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that the temporary rise in the blood glucose level may have no effect on the overall, global trend of the blood glucose level over time. FIG.
11 illustrates why this may be advantageous in preventing the delivery of a significant amount of insulin formulation in response to the temporary, second rise in blood glucose level seen after a meal. FIG. 11 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1 100 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1102. Also shown in FIG. 11 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1106, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t,, the trend of the blood glucose level is sampled and is determined to be rising 1 104., Thus, the trend term will be some positive value. As an example, the trend term may have a value of 2 mg/dl/minute, as shown in Table 1 above. As seen in Equation 5, this value will be multiplied by the trend gain, and because it is positive, the trend up gain will be used. In this example, the trend up gain is chosen as 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute), as shown in Table 1. Thus, the derivative component of Equation 5 may be calculated as 1.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute) * 2 mg/dl/minute = 2 units/hour. It can be seen, therefore, that because, in the present example, the trend is rising at a rate of 2 mg/dl/minute, an additional 2 units/hour of insulin formulation is added to the proportional component and the basal component of Equation 5. In contrast, when the trend is failing, a larger value of trend gain, i.e., the trend down gain, is used. Shown in FIG. 11 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1110, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t2 the trend of the blood glucose level is sampled and is determined to be falling 1108. Thus, the trend term will be some negative value. As an example, the trend term may have a value of -2 mg/dl/minute, as shown in Table 1 above. As seen in Equation 5, this value will be multiplied by the trend gain, and because it is negative, the trend down gain is used. In this example, the trend down gain is chosen as 3.0 units/hour * (mg/dl/minute), as shown in Table 1. Thus, the derivative component of Equation 5 may be calculated as 3.0 units/hour * (mg/di/minute) * -2 mg/dl/minute = -6 units/hour. It can be seen, therefore, that because in the present example the trend is falling at a rate of 2 mg/dl/minute, it is calculated that 6 units an hour should be subtracted from the current insulin formulation delivery rate.
In some embodiments, the trend down gain may be chosen such that the calculation of the derivative component of Equation 5 results in a high enough negative value to completely offset the other components of Equation 5 and, thus, to substantially cut off further delivery of insulin formulation during the down trend, even though the blood glucose level is currently above the set point 1 1 16. Thus, embodiments may use a high enough value for the trend down gain such that the temporary-rise in blood glucose level may have no effect, since the delivery of insulin formulation may be cut off at a time t before the temporary rise occurs. Thus, the risk of hypoglycemia to the user is reduced. In other embodiments of the present invention, the closed-loop algorithm advantageously disables the trend term from contributing to l(t) under certain circumstances in order to further reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. In one embodiment, the trend term of Equation 5 is disabled and does not contribute to I(t) unless the trend is rising and the user's goal blood glucose level has been reached.
This is illustrated in flow diagram 1200 shown in FIG. 12. The blood glucose level may be sampled at step 1202 and it may be determined whether or not the user's goal (set point) has been reached. If the goal has not been reached, the trend term may be disabled, as shown at step 1204.
If the goal has been reached, the trend term may be enabled, as shown at step 1206. In this way, the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted in such a way that a significant amount of insulin formulation may not be delivered to the user unless the user's blood glucose level is both rising and, at the same time, above the user's blood glucose level set point, thus reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. FIG. 13 illustrates one embodiment. FIG. 13 shows a graph of a human blood. glucose response 1300 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1302. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1304, but is still below the user's set point value 1316. Thus, in one embodiment the derivative component of Equation 5 is disabled and .does not contribute to I(t). When the blood glucose level reaches the set point 1316 at time t, the derivative component of Equation 5 is enabled and begins to contribute to I(t). Shown in FIG. 13 is a timeframe, referred to by numeral 1306, wherein x = 10 minutes and defines a 10 minute timeframe extending back in time from time t. At time t the trend of the blood glucose level may be sampled to determine the difference between the blood glucose level at time t and at time t-1 0, as described -above in relation to FIG. 11.
Therefore, once the user's blood glucose level is both rising and above the set point, the trend term of Equation 4 (which is equivalent to the derivative component of Equation 5) may be calculated. An additional amount of insulin formulation determined by the calculation may then be delivered to the user to assist in metabolizing the blood glucose. In other embodiments of the present invention, the closed-loop algorithm advantageously enables and disables the basal bate Bo component of Equation 5, which may be a programmable control parameter (as shown in Table 1 above). In one embodiment, the basal rate component may be enabled or disabled based in part on whether the user's blood glucose level is above or below, respectively, the user's set point. As discussed above, the basal rate component Bo of Equation 5 represents, in some embodiments, a minimum amount of insulin formulation that would be delivered when the blood glucose level at time t is equal to or greater than the desired blood glucose level or set point and without regard to the rate at which the blood glucose level is rising or falling. Embodiments advantageously disable the basal rate component Bo of Equation 5 from contributing to l(t) when the blood glucose level falls below the set point and the trend term is falling. This may be done, for example, to substantially inhibit any further delivery of insulin formulation when the blood glucose level has fallen from a maximum value to a point below the set point. FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram 1400, illustrating the effects of the basal rate component of Equation 5. The blood glucose level may be sampled at step 1402 and it may be determined whether or not the user's blood glucose level is below the set point. If the blood glucose level is not below the set point, the, basal rate component of Equation 5 may be enabled, as shown at step 1404. If the blood glucose level is below the set point, the trend may be sampled and it may be determined whether or not the trend is falling, as shown at step 1406. If the trend is not falling, the basal rate component of Equation 5 may be enabled, as shown at step 1404. If the trend is falling, the basal rate component of Equation 5 may be disabled, as shown at step 1408. In this way, the basal rate component of Equation 5 would be enabled when the blood glucose level sampled at time t is equal to or greater than the set point value regardless of the trend direction and would be disabled when the blood glucose level sampled at time t is less than the set point value and the trend is failing. FIG. 15 illustrates one embodiment. FIG. 15 shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1500 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1502. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1504, but is below the user's set point 1516. Thus, according to the one embodiment, even though the user's blood glucose level is below the set point 1516, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled because the trend is not falling. The blood glucose level is still rising at 1506 and is now above the user's set point 1516. Thus, because the user's blood glucose level is both above the set point 1516 and rising, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled. According to one embodiment, under the conditions described above in relation to 1504 and 1506, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled and contributes to I(t). At 1508, the blood glucose level is falling, but is above the user's set point 1516. Thus, even though the user's blood glucose level is falling, it is still above the set point 1516 and, therefore, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is enabled. At 1510, the blood glucose level is still falling and is now below the set point. Thus, because the blood glucose level is both falling and below the set point, the basal rate component of Equation 5 is disabled and does not contribute to l(t). Therefore, one embodiment substantially cuts off any insulin formulation, including the basal rate component, when the glucose level is both falling and below the set point.
In this way, embodiments reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Further embodiments of the present invention may include a programmable table of basal rate values. The closed-loop algorithm may be programmable to select particular basal rate values from the table to be used in calculating l(t) in Equation 5, for example, at particular times of the day. As an example, a different basal rate value may be selected at particular time intervals throughout the day. In one embodiment, the basal rate value may be updated every 30 minutes. In further embodiments, other control parameters within the closed-loop algorithm may be adjusted differently at different times of the day. Thus, embodiments may advantageously adjust the basal rate based on daily events such as, but not limited to, meals, sleep, exercise, stress inducing events, ingested medications, and the like. In addition, embodiments enable the updating of basal rate values based on a particular user's historical physiological data. For example, a particular user may have a lower need for insulin at night. For that user the closed-loop algorithm may be programmed to use lower basal rate values at night.
Monitoring Biological States Other Than Blood Glucose Level [0002] In further embodiments of the present invention, the amount and/or rate of delivered insulin formulation may modified based on inputs from sensing devices that detect other biological states in lieu of or in addition to the sensed blood glucose level. For example, it has been observed that a user's blood oxygen levels may change based on whether the user is awake or sleeping. As discussed above, sleep is an event which may significantly affect blood glucose levels in particular users. Thus, embodiments may sense the blood oxygen level of a user to determine if the user is asleep and input this information to the closed-loop algorithm in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Similarly, it has been observed that body temperature may significantly affect blood glucose levels. Thus, one embodiment includes a temperature sensor which monitors body temperature and includes this information as an input to the controller in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Further embodiments of the present invention may include a sensing device for detecting whether or not a user is exercising. In one embodiment, an accelerometer or other device suitable for detecting motion may be used to detect motion as an indicator of current physical activity. As discussed above, exercise may significantly affect blood glucose levels in particular users. Thus, information from the exercise sensing device may be input to the controller in order to adjust the amount and/or delivery rate of insulin formulation based on this information. Referring again to FIG. 1, in one embodiment sensor 102 may sense many biological states including, but not limited to, blood glucose level, blood oxygen level, and temperature. Sensor 102 may further include an exercise sensing device such as an accelerometer. In other embodiments, a separate blood glucose level sensor, blood oxygen level, temperature sensor and exercise sensing device may be used. Further embodiments may include sensors that detect various combinations of these and/or other biological states.
Reduction Of Accumulated Insulin Formulation An infusion pump for the delivery of an infusion formulation according to some embodiments has a fixed pump stroke volume, i.e., there is a certain minimum value of infusion formulation that must be accumulated before a pump stroke is executed, referred to in the present disclosure as a "pump stroke volume." Thus, if lit) is calculated on a periodic basis, for example each minute, then the calculated amount for each minute may be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume. These fractional parts may be stored, for example, in a chamber or reservoir within or adjacent to the infusion pump until an amount equal to the pump stroke volume has been accumulated. At that time, a pump stroke may be executed and the insulin formulation delivered. The process where a pump stroke volume is accumulated is illustrated with reference to FIGS. 16A and 16B. FIG. 16A
shows a graph of a human blood glucose response 1600 for a user who has ingested a meal at the point in time referred to by numeral 1602. FIG. 16B
shows a magnified view of a portion of the response curve referred to in FIG.
15A by numeral 1608. The blood glucose level begins to rise 1604. At time ti, a first value for I(t) may be calculated using Equation 5. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as I(t) at time ti may be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume and may be stored in the accumulator. At time t2, a second value for I(t) may be calculated. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as l t) at time t2 may also be some fractional part of a pump stroke volume and may be added to the first value stored in the accumulator. At time t3, a third value for l(t) may be calculated, and so on. At time tn, an nth value of I(t) is calculated using Equation 5. The amount of insulin formulation calculated as lit) at time to is added to the accumulator, at which time the amount of insulin formulation in the accumulator is equivalent to a pump stroke volume. A pump stroke may now be executed to deliver the insulin formulation. Time t(n) may vary based on the pump stroke volume and the intervals at which I(t) is calculated. As stated above, a process controller employing a closed-loop algorithm to control the delivery of an insulin formulation may be restricted to adding insulin formulation to the system, i.e., a body. Once insulin formulation is added to the system, normally the controller cannot retrieve it. In further embodiments of the present invention, the accumulated volume of infusion formulation may be purged from the accumulation chamber or reservoir (also referred to in the present disclosure as the "accumulator") when the calculation of I(t) yields a result which shows that the blood glucose level is falling. Thus, although once delivered the infusion formulation may not be retrievable from the body, it may be retrieved from the accumulator before the pump stroke is executed.
In one embodiment, at any time before a pump stroke is executed, the controller may issue a command to purge the accumulator. For example, once it is determined that the blood glucose level is falling and delivery of further insulin formulation is not desirable, the amounts of insulin formulation that were calculated at times t, through to while the blood glucose level was rising may be purged from the accumulator once the blood glucose level begins to fall. Thus, the accumulator may be advantageously "zeroed out."
In addition, under circumstances involving high levels of blood glucose, the accumulator may be allowed to go negative, thus delaying the effect of future increases in blood glucose levels.
Programmable Control Parameters For Bolus Safety Limits In further embodiments of the present invention, a large amount of insulin formulation (a "bolus") may be delivered by the infusion formulation delivery device, independently of Equation 5, when a user has a blood glucose level that is above a predefined value and is rising at or.above a predefined rate, thus possibly indicating that a meal has been consumed. In other words, when the predefined criteria is met, the bolus amount may be delivered instead of a value of 1(t) calculated using Equation 5. In preferred embodiments, predefined bolus safety limits are included as control parameters for the closed-loop algorithm. In some embodiments, the bolus control parameters may be programmable in real time. Table 2 shows example bolus safety limit control parameters that may be programmable in different embodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, all the control parameters shown in Table 2 are programmable. In one embodiment, the control parameters shown in Table 2 may be programmed in real time. Table 2 also includes example values for each control parameter.
Control Parameter Value Bolus amount Up to 25 units in increments of 0.2 units;
preferably 1-8 units Time between boluses One minute to 24 hours; preferably 30-60 minutes Bolus threshold 50-200 mg/dl; preferably 80-160 mg/dl Bolus trend Varies from individual to individual;
typically 1-5 mg/dl/min for humans;
preferably 2-4 mg/dl/min Table 2 Preferred embodiments of the present invention use the programmable control parameters shown in Table 2 to advantageously provide safety limits to be used in order to reduce the possibility of erroneously delivering a bolus by ensuring that the status of each control parameter is verified before a bolus delivery is executed by the infusion formulation delivery device. This is illustrated by flow diagram 17, shown in FIG. 17. As discussed above, the blood glucose level is sampled at intervals, for example every minute. In some embodiments, each time the blood glucose level is sampled, a check is performed by the closed-loop algorithm to determine the status of the control parameters shown in Table 2. In one embodiment, the closed-loop algorithm first determines if a bolus delivery feature is enabled 1702. This may be determined, for example, by comparing a predefined "bolus amount" control parameter value with zero. If the value is equal to zero, bolus delivery may be disabled 1704. If the value is greater than zero, the "time between boluses" control parameter may be checked 1706. The "time between boluses" control parameter determines whether or not a predefined time interval has been exceeded since the last bolus delivery. if the time interval between bolus deliveries has not been exceeded, bolus delivery may be disabled 1704. If the time interval between bolus deliveries has been exceeded, the "glucose threshold" control parameter may be checked 1708.
The "glucose threshold" control parameter determines whether or not a predefined blood glucose level has been reached. If the predefined blood glucose level has not been reached, the bolus delivery feature may be disabled 1704. If the predefined blood glucose level has been reached, then the "bolus trend" control parameter may be checked 1710. The "bolus trend" control parameter determines whether or not the blood glucose level is rising at a predefined rate. If the blood glucose level is not rising at the predefined rate, then the bolus delivery feature may be disabled 1704. If the blood glucose level is rising at the predefined rate, then the bolus delivery feature may, be enabled 1712. Also, according to an embodiment of the present invention, additional signal processing may be implemented to detect a signature of a meal, which may then be used to enable the bolus feature.
Thus, embodiments advantageously provide bolus safety limits to reduce the possibility of erroneously delivering a bolus by ensuring that predefined conditions for delivery of a bolus are met by testing predefined control parameters that are programmable. Thus, the closed-loop algorithm reduces the possibility of delivering too much insulin formulation as a bolus and thus reduces the risks of hypoglycemia to the user.
Programmable Control Parameters For Maximum Insulin Formulation Delivery Amounts In yet other embodiments of the present invention, additional safety limits may be used to ensure that no more than a predefined maximum amount of insulin formulation is stored in the accumulator at each sampling interval.
For example, when the sampling interval is one minute, a limit may be set on the maximum amount of insulin formulation that may be stored in the accumulator each minute. This amount may be programmable. Similarly, in yet a further embodiment, a limit may be set on the maximum amount of insulin formulation that may be delivered by the infusion formulation delivery device in one hour. This amount may also be programmable. Thus, by "clamping" the maximum amount that may be stored in the accumulator at each sampling period and the maximum amount that may be delivered to the body each hour, embodiments of the present invention reduce the possibility of delivering too much insulin formulation and thus reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to the user. Accordingly, a number of aspects and features of preferred embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm described above may provide programmable control parameters for tuning the closed-loop algorithm to more accurately determine an amount of insulin formulation to be delivered in response to a sensed blood glucose level in order to reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. Additional aspects and features of preferred embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm may provide safety limits which reduce the risks of hypoglycemia to a user. The aspects and features described above may be combined to provide maximum control and safety for a user. However, the foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description.
It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. For example, several embodiments of the closed-loop algorithm were described above in relation to a graph of a human blood glucose response for a user who has ingested a meal. These examples are meant to be illustrative and not limiting. The meal event is used as an example of an event which may lead to changes in insulin production by the, pancreas of a non-diabetic person, and for which the tuning of the closed-loop algorithm using control parameters may be advantageous. However, the meal event should not be considered to be a limitation on the events which may affect glucose levels in the human body, and thus on the events for which adjustable control parameters for tuning the closed-loop algorithm may be advantageous. Thus, the programmable control parameters may be adjusted to adjust the closed-loop algorithm to more accurately calculate the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered during or after other events which may affect the blood glucose response of a user. For example, The programmable control parameters may be adjusted to more accurately calculate the amount of insulin formulation to be delivered during or after exercise events, medication events, stress events, sleep events, and the like.
Having disclosed exemplary embodiments and the best mode, modifications and variations may be made to the disclosed embodiments while remaining within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (48)
1. A method for delivering insulin formulation, the method comprising:
delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal component that comprises a predefined amount of insulin formulation that is delivered to maintain a target blood glucose level;
sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
comparing the sampled blood glucose level to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level is less than the predefined blood glucose level thresh-old.
delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal component that comprises a predefined amount of insulin formulation that is delivered to maintain a target blood glucose level;
sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
comparing the sampled blood glucose level to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level is less than the predefined blood glucose level thresh-old.
2. The method recited in claim 1, further comprising:
determining if a predefined time interval has been exceeded since a previous bolus delivery; and disabling the bolus delivery if the predefined time interval has not been exceeded.
determining if a predefined time interval has been exceeded since a previous bolus delivery; and disabling the bolus delivery if the predefined time interval has not been exceeded.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the sampled blood glucose level to the predefined blood glucose level threshold is performed independent of values other than the sampled blood glucose level and the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
4. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the basal rate component comprises an amount of insulin to deliver when the blood glucose level is at a desired level, to maintain the blood glucose level at the desired level.
5. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the plurality of components further includes a difference component based on the difference between a desired blood glucose level and the sampled blood glucose level.
6. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the plurality of components further includes a derivative component based on the rate at which the blood glucose level is changing.
7. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the plurality of components further includes a derivative component based on the rate at which the blood glucose level is changing and also based on whether or not the blood glucose level is rising.
8. The method recited in claim 1, wherein delivering an insulin formulation com-prises defining a delivery amount at a time (t) using the predefined delivery profile, including determining the plurality of components for the time (t) and adding the plurality of components determined for the time (t).
9. A method for delivering an insulin formulation, the method comprising:
delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal component;
sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
comparing the sampled blood glucose level to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level crosses the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal component;
sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
comparing the sampled blood glucose level to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level crosses the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
10. The method recited in claim 9, wherein disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile occurs if the sampled blood glucose level is less than the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
11. The method recited in claim 9, wherein the insulin formulation is delivered as a bolus.
12. The method recited in claim 11, further comprising:
determining if a predefined time interval has been exceeded since a previous bolus delivery; and disabling the bolus delivery if the predefined time interval has not been exceeded.
determining if a predefined time interval has been exceeded since a previous bolus delivery; and disabling the bolus delivery if the predefined time interval has not been exceeded.
13. The method recited in claim 11, further comprising:
determining a time window for disabling a calculation of a delivery rate of the insulin formulation;
sampling a current time;
determining if the current time is within the time window; and disabling the calculation of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
determining a time window for disabling a calculation of a delivery rate of the insulin formulation;
sampling a current time;
determining if the current time is within the time window; and disabling the calculation of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
14. The method recited in claim 13, wherein determining a time window further comprises providing programmable start and stop times for the time window.
15. The method recited in claim 14, wherein the programmable start and stop times for the time window are determined from historical physiological data.
16. The method recited in claim 13, further comprising enabling the calculation of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is not within the time window.
17. The method recited in claim 13, further comprising delivering a minimal insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
18. The method recited in claim 13, further comprising delivering no insulin formula-tion if the current time is within the time window.
19. The method recited in claim 9, further comprising delivering a bolus of insulin formulation if the sampled blood glucose level is greater than the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
20. The method recited in claim 9, further comprising:
calculating an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold;
determining a rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing; and delivering an amount of insulin formulation based on the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold and the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is chang-ing.
calculating an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold;
determining a rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing; and delivering an amount of insulin formulation based on the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold and the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is chang-ing.
21. The method recited in claim 20, further comprising introducing an adjustment into the amount of insulin formulation delivered, wherein the adjustment is not related to the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold or the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing.
22. The method recited in claim 21, wherein the adjustment is introduced via pro-grammable control parameters.
23. The method recited in claim 20, wherein determining a rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing occurs at predetermined intervals.
24. The method recited in claim 23, wherein the predetermined intervals are program-mable.
25. The method recited in claim 20, wherein delivering an an amount of insulin formulation comprises delivering a basal rate of insulin formulation.
26. The method recited in claim 20, further comprising calculating an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level is offset over time from the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
27. The method recited in claim 8, further comprising filtering out high frequency components of the sampled blood glucose level.
28. The method recited in claim 27, wherein filtering comprises filtering with a low pass filter.
29. A system for delivering an insulin formulation comprising:
an infusion device for delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with control commands based on a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal rate component;
a data acquisition unit for sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
a comparator for comparing the sampled blood glucose level acquired by the data acquisition unit to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and a controller configured to provide control commands to the infusion device including a command for disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level crosses the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
an infusion device for delivering an amount of insulin formulation in accordance with control commands based on a predefined delivery profile having a plurality of components, including a basal rate component;
a data acquisition unit for sampling a blood glucose level at predefined timed intervals;
a comparator for comparing the sampled blood glucose level acquired by the data acquisition unit to a predefined blood glucose level threshold; and a controller configured to provide control commands to the infusion device including a command for disabling delivery of the basal component of the delivery profile, if the sampled blood glucose level crosses the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
30. The system of claim 29, wherein the controller is configured to disable insulin formulation delivery if the sampled blood glucose level is less than the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
31. The system of claim 29, wherein the controller is configured to cause the insulin formulation to be delivered as a bolus.
32. The system of claim 31, wherein the data acquisition unit is further configured to determine if a predefined time interval has been exceeded since a previous bolus delivery; and wherein the controller disables the bolus delivery if the predefined time interval has not been exceeded.
33. The system of claim 31, wherein the data acquisition unit is further configured to determine if the sampled blood glucose level is rising at a predefined rate;
and wherein the controller disables the bolus delivery if the sampled blood glucose level is rising at a rate less than the predefined rate.
and wherein the controller disables the bolus delivery if the sampled blood glucose level is rising at a rate less than the predefined rate.
34. The system of claim 31, wherein the data acquisition unit is configured to sample a current time; and wherein the controller is configured to:
determine a time window for disabling a calculation of a delivery rate of the insulin formulation;
determine if the current time is within the time window; and disable the calculation of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
determine a time window for disabling a calculation of a delivery rate of the insulin formulation;
determine if the current time is within the time window; and disable the calculation of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
35. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is configured to provide program-mable start and stop times for the time window.
36. The system of claim 35, wherein the controller determines the programmable start and stop times for the time window from historical physiological data.
37. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is configured to enable the calcula-tion of the delivery rate of the insulin formulation if the current time is not within the time window.
38. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is configured to cause delivery of a minimal insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
39. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is configured to cause delivery of no insulin formulation if the current time is within the time window.
40. The system of claim 29, wherein the controller causes an insulin formulation to be delivered if the sampled blood glucose level is greater than the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
41. The system of claim 29, wherein the controller is further configured to:
calculate an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold;
determine a rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing; and deliver an amount insulin formulation based on the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold and the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing.
calculate an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold;
determine a rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing; and deliver an amount insulin formulation based on the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold and the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing.
42. The system of claim 41, wherein the controller is configured to cause an adjust-ment to be introduced into the amount of insulin formulation delivered not related to the amount which the sampled blood glucose level exceeds the predefined blood glucose level threshold or the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing.
43. The system of claim 42, wherein the controller is configured with programmable control parameters for introduction of the adjustment.
44. The system of claim 41, wherein the controller is configured to determine at predetermined intervals the rate at which the sampled blood glucose level is changing.
45. The system of claim 44, wherein the predetermined intervals are programmable.
46. The system of claim 41, wherein the controller is configured to calculate an amount by which the sampled blood glucose level is offset over time from the predefined blood glucose level threshold.
47. The system of claim 29, further comprising a filter for filtering out high frequency components of the sampled blood glucose level.
48. The system of claim 47, wherein the filter is a low pass filter.
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US31806201P | 2001-09-07 | 2001-09-07 | |
US60/318,062 | 2001-09-07 | ||
US33566401P | 2001-10-23 | 2001-10-23 | |
US60/335,664 | 2001-10-23 | ||
US10/033,173 US6740072B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2001-12-26 | System and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
US10/033,173 | 2001-12-26 | ||
CA2459398A CA2459398C (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-04 | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2459398A Division CA2459398C (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-04 | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2764284A1 CA2764284A1 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
CA2764284C true CA2764284C (en) | 2014-04-15 |
Family
ID=27364333
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2459398A Expired - Lifetime CA2459398C (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-04 | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
CA2764284A Expired - Lifetime CA2764284C (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-04 | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2459398A Expired - Lifetime CA2459398C (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-04 | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6740072B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002323575A1 (en) |
CA (2) | CA2459398C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003023708A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (585)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8480580B2 (en) | 1998-04-30 | 2013-07-09 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring device and methods of use |
US7890176B2 (en) * | 1998-07-06 | 2011-02-15 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating chronic pelvic pain |
US7806886B2 (en) | 1999-06-03 | 2010-10-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling insulin infusion with state variable feedback |
US6564105B2 (en) * | 2000-01-21 | 2003-05-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communicating between an ambulatory medical device and a control device via telemetry using randomized data |
US6582441B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2003-06-24 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Surgical insertion tool |
US20120191052A1 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2012-07-26 | Ip Holdings, Inc. | Intelligent activated skin patch system |
US8034026B2 (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2011-10-11 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Infusion pump assembly |
MXPA03010576A (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2004-05-27 | Deka Products Lp | Infusion set for a fluid pump. |
US8152789B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2012-04-10 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | System and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery |
US6827702B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2004-12-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Safety limits for closed-loop infusion pump control |
US8775196B2 (en) | 2002-01-29 | 2014-07-08 | Baxter International Inc. | System and method for notification and escalation of medical data |
US10173008B2 (en) | 2002-01-29 | 2019-01-08 | Baxter International Inc. | System and method for communicating with a dialysis machine through a network |
US20080172026A1 (en) | 2006-10-17 | 2008-07-17 | Blomquist Michael L | Insulin pump having a suspension bolus |
US8234128B2 (en) | 2002-04-30 | 2012-07-31 | Baxter International, Inc. | System and method for verifying medical device operational parameters |
AU2003245872A1 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2004-02-09 | M 2 Medical A/S | An infusion pump system, an infusion pump unit and an infusion pump |
US20050160858A1 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2005-07-28 | M 2 Medical A/S | Shape memory alloy actuator |
US7254449B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2007-08-07 | Advanced Bionics Corp | Systems and methods for providing power to one or more implantable devices |
KR101226540B1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2013-01-25 | 벡톤 디킨슨 앤드 컴퍼니 | System and method for initiating and maintaining continuous, long-term control of a concentration of a substance in a patient using a feedback or model-based controller coupled to a single-needle or multi-needle intradermal (ID) delivery device |
WO2004041330A2 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2004-05-21 | M 2 Medical A/S | A disposable wearable insulin dispensing device, a combination of such a device and a programming controller and a method of controlling the operation of such a device |
US7381184B2 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2008-06-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Sensor inserter assembly |
AU2003287926A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2004-07-14 | M2 Medical A/S | A disposable, wearable insulin dispensing device, a combination of such a device and a programming controller and a method of controlling the operation of such a device |
WO2004056411A2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2004-07-08 | M 2 Medical A/S | Flexible piston rod |
AU2003303597A1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2004-07-29 | Therasense, Inc. | Continuous glucose monitoring system and methods of use |
JP2006518758A (en) * | 2003-02-24 | 2006-08-17 | ピーエルシー システムズ インク. | Method and catheter system applicable to acute renal failure |
ES2737835T3 (en) | 2003-04-23 | 2020-01-16 | Valeritas Inc | Hydraulically driven pump for long-term medication administration |
US8066639B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2011-11-29 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Glucose measuring device for use in personal area network |
US7591801B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2009-09-22 | Dexcom, Inc. | Integrated delivery device for continuous glucose sensor |
US8065161B2 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2011-11-22 | Hospira, Inc. | System for maintaining drug information and communicating with medication delivery devices |
US9123077B2 (en) | 2003-10-07 | 2015-09-01 | Hospira, Inc. | Medication management system |
USD914881S1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2021-03-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor electronic mount |
US7753879B2 (en) | 2004-01-29 | 2010-07-13 | M2 Group Holdings, Inc. | Disposable medicine dispensing device |
EP1718198A4 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-06-04 | Therasense Inc | Method and system for providing data communication in continuous glucose monitoring and management system |
US8808228B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2014-08-19 | Dexcom, Inc. | Integrated medicament delivery device for use with continuous analyte sensor |
US7347854B2 (en) * | 2004-03-02 | 2008-03-25 | Infusion Systems, Llc | Method and apparatus for automatically modifying delivery profile of drug delivery system |
DE102004011135A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-29 | Disetronic Licensing Ag | Method and apparatus for calculating a bolus amount |
US20050261561A1 (en) * | 2004-05-24 | 2005-11-24 | Christopher W. Jones | Blood testing and therapeutic compound delivery system |
US7927313B2 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2011-04-19 | Baxter International Inc. | Medical device configuration based on recognition of identification information |
US20050277873A1 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-15 | Janice Stewart | Identification information recognition system for a medical device |
US8961461B2 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2015-02-24 | Baxter International Inc. | Multi-state alarm system for a medical pump |
US20050267555A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-01 | Marnfeldt Goran N | Engagement tool for implantable medical devices |
WO2006014425A1 (en) | 2004-07-02 | 2006-02-09 | Biovalve Technologies, Inc. | Methods and devices for delivering glp-1 and uses thereof |
US20080027513A1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2008-01-31 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Systems And Methods For Using A Butterfly Coil To Communicate With Or Transfer Power To An Implantable Medical Device |
US8452407B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2013-05-28 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods for treating gastrointestinal disorders |
US7291107B2 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2007-11-06 | Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. | Insulin bolus recommendation system |
US7727222B2 (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2010-06-01 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration system with taper down feature |
US7736354B2 (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2010-06-15 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration system with hydration state detection |
US7837667B2 (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2010-11-23 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration system with abnormal condition sensing |
US7938817B2 (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2011-05-10 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration system and method |
US7758563B2 (en) | 2004-09-09 | 2010-07-20 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration monitoring and maintenance system and method for use with administration of a diuretic |
US7758562B2 (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2010-07-20 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient hydration system with a redundant monitoring of hydration fluid infusion |
US11213621B2 (en) | 2004-09-09 | 2022-01-04 | Reprieve Cardiovascular, Inc. | Fluid therapy method |
US20070191716A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2007-08-16 | Daniel Goldberger | Blood monitoring system |
US20060229531A1 (en) * | 2005-02-01 | 2006-10-12 | Daniel Goldberger | Blood monitoring system |
WO2006047264A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-05-04 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Peripheral nerve stimulation to treat auditory dysfunction |
US7734340B2 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2010-06-08 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Stimulation design for neuromodulation |
US9358393B1 (en) | 2004-11-09 | 2016-06-07 | Andres M. Lozano | Stimulation methods and systems for treating an auditory dysfunction |
US7483746B2 (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2009-01-27 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. | Stimulation of the stomach in response to sensed parameters to treat obesity |
US20060161217A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-07-20 | Jaax Kristen N | Methods and systems for treating obesity |
US9327069B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2016-05-03 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating a medical condition by promoting neural remodeling within the brain |
US9095713B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2015-08-04 | Allison M. Foster | Methods and systems for treating autism by decreasing neural activity within the brain |
US20070038264A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2007-02-15 | Jaax Kristen N | Methods and systems for treating autism |
US9352145B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2016-05-31 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating a psychotic disorder |
US8515541B1 (en) | 2004-12-22 | 2013-08-20 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating post-stroke disorders |
US7869851B2 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2011-01-11 | Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. | System and method for determining insulin bolus quantities |
US7731657B2 (en) | 2005-08-30 | 2010-06-08 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor introducer and methods of use |
US20090105569A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2009-04-23 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Introducer Assembly and Methods of Use |
US9259175B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2016-02-16 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Flexible patch for fluid delivery and monitoring body analytes |
US10226207B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2019-03-12 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Sensor inserter having introducer |
US7697967B2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2010-04-13 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor insertion |
US8029441B2 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2011-10-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor transmitter unit configuration for a data monitoring and management system |
US8333714B2 (en) * | 2006-09-10 | 2012-12-18 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing an integrated analyte sensor insertion device and data processing unit |
US9788771B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2017-10-17 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Variable speed sensor insertion devices and methods of use |
US9743862B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2017-08-29 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Systems and methods for transcutaneously implanting medical devices |
US9398882B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2016-07-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor and data processing device |
US20090082693A1 (en) * | 2004-12-29 | 2009-03-26 | Therasense, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing temperature sensor module in a data communication system |
US9572534B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2017-02-21 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for on-skin or on-body mounting of medical devices |
US8571624B2 (en) * | 2004-12-29 | 2013-10-29 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for mounting a data transmission device in a communication system |
US7883464B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2011-02-08 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Integrated transmitter unit and sensor introducer mechanism and methods of use |
US20110054275A1 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Mounting Unit Having a Sensor and Associated Circuitry |
US8512243B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-08-20 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Integrated introducer and transmitter assembly and methods of use |
US7547281B2 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2009-06-16 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Algorithm sensor augmented bolus estimator for semi-closed loop infusion system |
US8956291B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2015-02-17 | Admetsys Corporation | Balanced physiological monitoring and treatment system |
US20060200205A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-07 | Haller Matthew I | Systems and methods for treating a patient with multiple stimulation therapies |
US7853321B2 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2010-12-14 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Stimulation of a stimulation site within the neck or head |
US7848803B1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2010-12-07 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for facilitating stimulation of one or more stimulation sites |
US8423155B1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2013-04-16 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for facilitating stimulation of one or more stimulation sites |
US7702385B2 (en) * | 2005-11-16 | 2010-04-20 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Electrode contact configurations for an implantable stimulator |
US7627383B2 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2009-12-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Implantable stimulator |
WO2006105794A1 (en) | 2005-04-06 | 2006-10-12 | M 2 Medical A/S | An actuator |
US7200504B1 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2007-04-03 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Measuring temperature change in an electronic biomedical implant |
US20060276771A1 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2006-12-07 | Galley Paul J | System and method providing for user intervention in a diabetes control arrangement |
US8105279B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2012-01-31 | M2 Group Holdings, Inc. | Dispensing fluid from an infusion pump system |
US8551046B2 (en) | 2006-09-18 | 2013-10-08 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Dispensing fluid from an infusion pump system |
WO2007038059A2 (en) * | 2005-09-26 | 2007-04-05 | M2 Medical A/S | Infusion pump with a drive having a ratchet and pawl combination |
US8409142B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2013-04-02 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Operating an infusion pump system |
US7534226B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2009-05-19 | M2 Group Holdings, Inc. | Dispensing fluid from an infusion pump system |
US8057436B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2011-11-15 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Dispensing fluid from an infusion pump system |
US9521968B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2016-12-20 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor retention mechanism and methods of use |
US20070088333A1 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2007-04-19 | G&L Consulting, Llc | Method and system for infusing an osmotic solute into a patient and providing feedback control of the infusing rate |
US7766829B2 (en) | 2005-11-04 | 2010-08-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing basal profile modification in analyte monitoring and management systems |
WO2007056592A2 (en) | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-18 | M2 Medical A/S | Method and system for manual and autonomous control of an infusion pump |
WO2007056504A1 (en) | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-18 | M2 Medical A/S | Infusion pump system |
US20070123801A1 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2007-05-31 | Daniel Goldberger | Wearable, programmable automated blood testing system |
US20080200838A1 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2008-08-21 | Daniel Goldberger | Wearable, programmable automated blood testing system |
US7729758B2 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2010-06-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Magnetically coupled microstimulators |
WO2007120363A2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2007-10-25 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Medical device insertion |
US11298058B2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2022-04-12 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor insertion |
US7610100B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2009-10-27 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating osteoarthritis |
US8114268B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-02-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and system for remedying sensor malfunctions detected by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy |
US7985330B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2011-07-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and system for detecting age, hydration, and functional states of sensors using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy |
US8114269B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-02-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | System and method for determining the point of hydration and proper time to apply potential to a glucose sensor |
US7736310B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2010-06-15 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | On-body medical device securement |
US11478623B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2022-10-25 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Infusion pump assembly |
US11497846B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2022-11-15 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Patch-sized fluid delivery systems and methods |
US10010669B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2018-07-03 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Systems and methods for fluid delivery |
US11027058B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2021-06-08 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Infusion pump assembly |
US11364335B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2022-06-21 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
EP2335754B1 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2013-12-18 | DEKA Products Limited Partnership | Patch-sized fluid delivery systems |
US7981034B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2011-07-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Smart messages and alerts for an infusion delivery and management system |
US7885698B2 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2011-02-08 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing continuous calibration of implantable analyte sensors |
US7777641B2 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2010-08-17 | Advanced Bionics, Llc | Systems and methods of facilitating communication between a first and second device |
JP2009532117A (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2009-09-10 | ヴァレリタス,エルエルシー | Multi-cartridge fluid dispensing device |
US8346335B2 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2013-01-01 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor calibration management |
US7801582B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-09-21 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring and management system and methods therefor |
US9392969B2 (en) | 2008-08-31 | 2016-07-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Closed loop control and signal attenuation detection |
US7618369B2 (en) | 2006-10-02 | 2009-11-17 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for dynamically updating calibration parameters for an analyte sensor |
US7653425B2 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2010-01-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing calibration of an analyte sensor in an analyte monitoring system |
US8473022B2 (en) | 2008-01-31 | 2013-06-25 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor with time lag compensation |
US8226891B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2012-07-24 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring devices and methods therefor |
US8374668B1 (en) | 2007-10-23 | 2013-02-12 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor with lag compensation |
US8478557B2 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2013-07-02 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing analyte monitoring system calibration accuracy |
US8140312B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2012-03-20 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for determining analyte levels |
US7620438B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2009-11-17 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for powering an electronic device |
US8092385B2 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2012-01-10 | Intellidx, Inc. | Fluid access interface |
US20080004601A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Analyte Monitoring and Therapy Management System and Methods Therefor |
US8401654B1 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2013-03-19 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and systems for treating one or more effects of deafferentation |
US9119582B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2015-09-01 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Integrated analyte sensor and infusion device and methods therefor |
US8504163B1 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2013-08-06 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Cranially mounted stimulation systems and methods |
US8634930B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2014-01-21 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | System for providing diabetic therapy |
US20110054391A1 (en) * | 2006-07-28 | 2011-03-03 | Ward W Kenneth | Analyte sensing and response system |
US8114023B2 (en) | 2006-07-28 | 2012-02-14 | Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center | Analyte sensing and response system |
US8206296B2 (en) | 2006-08-07 | 2012-06-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing integrated analyte monitoring and infusion system therapy management |
US8932216B2 (en) | 2006-08-07 | 2015-01-13 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and system for providing data management in integrated analyte monitoring and infusion system |
US20080039820A1 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2008-02-14 | Jeff Sommers | Medical Device With Septum |
US7445528B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2008-11-04 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Connector assemblies |
US8202267B2 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2012-06-19 | Medsolve Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for infusing liquid to a body |
US8075513B2 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2011-12-13 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Patient connection system for a balance hydration unit |
EP2092470A2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2009-08-26 | Hospira, Inc. | System and method for comparing and utilizing activity information and configuration information from mulitple device management systems |
US7347746B1 (en) | 2006-10-27 | 2008-03-25 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Receptacle connector assembly |
US20080306353A1 (en) * | 2006-11-03 | 2008-12-11 | Douglas Joel S | Calculation device for metabolic control of critically ill and/or diabetic patients |
US20080214919A1 (en) * | 2006-12-26 | 2008-09-04 | Lifescan, Inc. | System and method for implementation of glycemic control protocols |
US20080161754A1 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2008-07-03 | Medsolve Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for infusing liquid to a body |
US20080199894A1 (en) | 2007-02-15 | 2008-08-21 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection |
US8930203B2 (en) * | 2007-02-18 | 2015-01-06 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Multi-function analyte test device and methods therefor |
US8123686B2 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2012-02-28 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing rolling data in communication systems |
US20080228056A1 (en) | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Michael Blomquist | Basal rate testing using frequent blood glucose input |
WO2009081262A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2009-07-02 | Insuline Medical Ltd. | Drug delivery device with sensor for closed-loop operation |
EP2136863A2 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2009-12-30 | Insuline Medical Ltd. | Device for drug delivery and associated connections thereto |
US8622991B2 (en) | 2007-03-19 | 2014-01-07 | Insuline Medical Ltd. | Method and device for drug delivery |
US9220837B2 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2015-12-29 | Insuline Medical Ltd. | Method and device for drug delivery |
MX2009010000A (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2010-03-17 | Insuline Medical Ltd | Drug delivery device. |
CA2683721C (en) | 2007-04-14 | 2017-05-23 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device |
WO2008130897A2 (en) | 2007-04-14 | 2008-10-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system |
WO2009096992A1 (en) | 2007-04-14 | 2009-08-06 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system |
WO2008130896A1 (en) | 2007-04-14 | 2008-10-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system |
WO2008130898A1 (en) | 2007-04-14 | 2008-10-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system |
US8425469B2 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2013-04-23 | Jacobson Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods for controlled substance delivery network |
US8364273B2 (en) * | 2007-04-24 | 2013-01-29 | Dirk De Ridder | Combination of tonic and burst stimulations to treat neurological disorders |
US20080269714A1 (en) | 2007-04-25 | 2008-10-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Closed loop/semi-closed loop therapy modification system |
US20080269723A1 (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2008-10-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Closed loop/semi-closed loop therapy modification system |
US8434528B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2013-05-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Systems and methods for reservoir filling |
US8597243B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2013-12-03 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Systems and methods allowing for reservoir air bubble management |
US8323250B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2012-12-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Adhesive patch systems and methods |
US7959715B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2011-06-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Systems and methods allowing for reservoir air bubble management |
JP5102350B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2012-12-19 | メドトロニック ミニメド インコーポレイテッド | Reservoir filling / bubble management / infusion medium delivery system and method using the system |
US7963954B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2011-06-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Automated filling systems and methods |
US8613725B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2013-12-24 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir systems and methods |
US8461985B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2013-06-11 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system and methods |
US8665091B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2014-03-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and device for determining elapsed sensor life |
US7928850B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2011-04-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system and methods |
US8456301B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2013-06-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system and methods |
US9125548B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2015-09-08 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US10002233B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2018-06-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8260558B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2012-09-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8239166B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2012-08-07 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8444560B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2013-05-21 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8600681B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2013-12-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8560038B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2013-10-15 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8103471B2 (en) | 2007-05-14 | 2012-01-24 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system |
US8417311B2 (en) * | 2008-09-12 | 2013-04-09 | Optiscan Biomedical Corporation | Fluid component analysis system and method for glucose monitoring and control |
US7892199B2 (en) | 2007-05-21 | 2011-02-22 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Occlusion sensing for an infusion pump |
US7833196B2 (en) | 2007-05-21 | 2010-11-16 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Illumination instrument for an infusion pump |
US7981102B2 (en) | 2007-05-21 | 2011-07-19 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Removable controller for an infusion pump |
US7794426B2 (en) | 2007-05-21 | 2010-09-14 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump system with contamination-resistant features |
US7751907B2 (en) | 2007-05-24 | 2010-07-06 | Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. | Expert system for insulin pump therapy |
US8221345B2 (en) | 2007-05-30 | 2012-07-17 | Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. | Insulin pump based expert system |
WO2008150917A1 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2008-12-11 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Insertion devices and methods |
US20080306434A1 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-11 | Dexcom, Inc. | Integrated medicament delivery device for use with continuous analyte sensor |
DK2167168T3 (en) * | 2007-06-25 | 2017-06-06 | Hoffmann La Roche | INDIVIDUALIZED BASAL INSULIN ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM |
US8641618B2 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2014-02-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and structure for securing a monitoring device element |
US8085151B2 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2011-12-27 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Signal converting cradle for medical condition monitoring and management system |
US8160900B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2012-04-17 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring and management device and method to analyze the frequency of user interaction with the device |
US20090036753A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2009-02-05 | King Allen B | Continuous glucose monitoring-directed adjustments in basal insulin rate and insulin bolus dosing formulas |
US8834366B2 (en) | 2007-07-31 | 2014-09-16 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor calibration |
US9968742B2 (en) | 2007-08-29 | 2018-05-15 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Combined sensor and infusion set using separated sites |
US20120046533A1 (en) | 2007-08-29 | 2012-02-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Combined sensor and infusion sets |
US20090063402A1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and System for Providing Medication Level Determination |
US20090143725A1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2009-06-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method of Optimizing Efficacy of Therapeutic Agent |
WO2009032553A2 (en) | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-12 | Leon Dejournett | Catheter and computerized system for intravenous blood chemistry monitoring |
US7717903B2 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2010-05-18 | M2 Group Holdings, Inc. | Operating an infusion pump system |
US7828528B2 (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2010-11-09 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Occlusion sensing system for infusion pumps |
US7935076B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2011-05-03 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Activity sensing techniques for an infusion pump system |
US7879026B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2011-02-01 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Controlled adjustment of medicine dispensation from an infusion pump device |
US7935105B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2011-05-03 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Data storage for an infusion pump system |
US8287514B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2012-10-16 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Power management techniques for an infusion pump system |
US9452258B2 (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2016-09-27 | Dexcom, Inc. | Integrated insulin delivery system with continuous glucose sensor |
EP2205147A1 (en) | 2007-10-10 | 2010-07-14 | Optiscan Biomedical Corporation | Fluid component analysis system and method for glucose monitoring and control |
US8409093B2 (en) | 2007-10-23 | 2013-04-02 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Assessing measures of glycemic variability |
US8377031B2 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2013-02-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Closed loop control system with safety parameters and methods |
WO2009065527A2 (en) * | 2007-11-20 | 2009-05-28 | Tecpharma Licensing Ag | Administering device with profilierated basal rate |
US8517990B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2013-08-27 | Hospira, Inc. | User interface improvements for medical devices |
US20090164239A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Dynamic Display Of Glucose Information |
US8414563B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2013-04-09 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Pump assembly with switch |
US8900188B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2014-12-02 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Split ring resonator antenna adapted for use in wirelessly controlled medical device |
US10080704B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2018-09-25 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
RU2510758C2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2014-04-10 | Дека Продактс Лимитед Партнершип | Infusion pump assembly |
US10188787B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2019-01-29 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
US9456955B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2016-10-04 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
US8881774B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2014-11-11 | Deka Research & Development Corp. | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
US20090177147A1 (en) | 2008-01-07 | 2009-07-09 | Michael Blomquist | Insulin pump with insulin therapy coaching |
US20090177142A1 (en) | 2008-01-09 | 2009-07-09 | Smiths Medical Md, Inc | Insulin pump with add-on modules |
US8986253B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2015-03-24 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Two chamber pumps and related methods |
US8708961B2 (en) * | 2008-01-28 | 2014-04-29 | Medsolve Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for infusing liquid to a body |
US9220456B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2015-12-29 | Hygieia, Inc. | Systems, methods and devices for achieving glycemic balance |
US10624577B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2020-04-21 | Hygieia, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for alleviating glucotoxicity and restoring pancreatic beta-cell function in advanced diabetes mellitus |
CN103400028B (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2017-04-12 | 海吉雅有限公司 | Device for optimizing patient's insulin dosage regimen |
US8858501B2 (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2014-10-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir barrier layer systems and methods |
US9295776B2 (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2016-03-29 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir plunger head systems and methods |
US8597269B2 (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2013-12-03 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir seal retainer systems and methods |
US8206353B2 (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2012-06-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir barrier layer systems and methods |
TWI394580B (en) | 2008-04-28 | 2013-05-01 | Halozyme Inc | Super fast-acting insulin compositions |
US20090281519A1 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2009-11-12 | Rao R Harsha | Automated system and method for diabetes control |
US8924159B2 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2014-12-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing glycemic control |
US8591410B2 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2013-11-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing glycemic control |
US10089443B2 (en) | 2012-05-15 | 2018-10-02 | Baxter International Inc. | Home medical device systems and methods for therapy prescription and tracking, servicing and inventory |
US8057679B2 (en) | 2008-07-09 | 2011-11-15 | Baxter International Inc. | Dialysis system having trending and alert generation |
US20110137208A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2011-06-09 | Admetsys Corporation | Device and method for automatically sampling and measuring blood analytes |
US7959598B2 (en) | 2008-08-20 | 2011-06-14 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump systems and methods |
US9943644B2 (en) | 2008-08-31 | 2018-04-17 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Closed loop control with reference measurement and methods thereof |
US20100057040A1 (en) * | 2008-08-31 | 2010-03-04 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Robust Closed Loop Control And Methods |
US8734422B2 (en) | 2008-08-31 | 2014-05-27 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Closed loop control with improved alarm functions |
US8408421B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-04-02 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Flow regulating stopcocks and related methods |
US8650937B2 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2014-02-18 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Solute concentration measurement device and related methods |
US8986208B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2015-03-24 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor sensitivity attenuation mitigation |
US9180245B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2015-11-10 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | System and method for administering an infusible fluid |
US8223028B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2012-07-17 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Occlusion detection system and method |
US8066672B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2011-11-29 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Infusion pump assembly with a backup power supply |
US8262616B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2012-09-11 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Infusion pump assembly |
US8016789B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2011-09-13 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Pump assembly with a removable cover assembly |
US8267892B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2012-09-18 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Multi-language / multi-processor infusion pump assembly |
US8708376B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2014-04-29 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Medium connector |
US8554579B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2013-10-08 | Fht, Inc. | Management, reporting and benchmarking of medication preparation |
BRPI0916125A2 (en) | 2008-11-07 | 2015-11-03 | Insuline Medical Ltd | "treatment device" |
WO2010056718A2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2010-05-20 | Hygieia, Inc. | Apparatus and system for diabetes management |
GB2466183A (en) | 2008-12-09 | 2010-06-16 | Cambridge Entpr Ltd | Closed loop diabetes management system |
US9370621B2 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2016-06-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Needle insertion systems and methods |
US10045734B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-14 | Plc Medical Systems, Inc. | Fluid replacement device |
US8103456B2 (en) | 2009-01-29 | 2012-01-24 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Method and device for early signal attenuation detection using blood glucose measurements |
US9402544B2 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2016-08-02 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor and apparatus for insertion of the sensor |
WO2010093720A1 (en) | 2009-02-10 | 2010-08-19 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for delivering neural therapy correlated with patient status |
GR1007310B (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2011-06-10 | Αχιλλεας Τσουκαλης | Implantable biosensor with automatic calibration |
US8753290B2 (en) * | 2009-03-27 | 2014-06-17 | Intellectual Inspiration, Llc | Fluid transfer system and method |
US8497777B2 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2013-07-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system having an alert |
US8271106B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2012-09-18 | Hospira, Inc. | System and method for configuring a rule set for medical event management and responses |
EP2425209A4 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2013-01-09 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc | Method and system for providing real time analyte sensor calibration with retrospective backfill |
WO2010135670A2 (en) * | 2009-05-22 | 2010-11-25 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Safety layer for integrated insulin delivery system |
WO2010138856A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Medical device antenna systems having external antenna configurations |
AU2010255324A1 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2012-01-19 | F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ag | Device and method for adjusting basal delivery profile |
EP2440268A1 (en) * | 2009-06-09 | 2012-04-18 | Jacobson Technologies, LLC | Controlled delivery of substances system and method |
GR20090100384A (en) | 2009-07-08 | 2011-02-18 | Αχιλλεας Τσουκαλης | Insulin pump |
US8393357B2 (en) | 2009-07-08 | 2013-03-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir filling systems and methods |
WO2011008966A2 (en) | 2009-07-15 | 2011-01-20 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, systems and methods for an infusion pump assembly |
EP4309580A3 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2024-02-28 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Continuous analyte measurement system |
EP3173014B1 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2021-08-18 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Real time management of data relating to physiological control of glucose levels |
EP2724739B1 (en) | 2009-07-30 | 2015-07-01 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Portable infusion pump system |
US8356644B2 (en) | 2009-08-07 | 2013-01-22 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Transfer guard systems and methods |
US9314195B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2016-04-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte signal processing device and methods |
US8993331B2 (en) | 2009-08-31 | 2015-03-31 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system and methods for managing power and noise |
BR112012000220A2 (en) | 2009-08-31 | 2020-12-22 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | METHODS AND MEDICAL DEVICES |
WO2011026053A1 (en) | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Displays for a medical device |
WO2011026150A1 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-03 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Flexible mounting unit and cover for a medical device |
US8932256B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2015-01-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insertion device systems and methods |
US8308679B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2012-11-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Alignment systems and methods |
US8900190B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2014-12-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insertion device systems and methods |
CN102630159A (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2012-08-08 | 梅丁格有限公司 | Devices, systems and methods for quantifying bolus doses according to user parameters |
DK2482870T3 (en) | 2009-09-29 | 2018-04-16 | Admetsys Corp | Plant and method for distinguishing containers in the delivery of medicines |
EP2482720A4 (en) | 2009-09-29 | 2014-04-23 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc | Method and apparatus for providing notification function in analyte monitoring systems |
WO2011041531A1 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2011-04-07 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Interconnect for on-body analyte monitoring device |
US20110082356A1 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2011-04-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Analyte sensor apparatuses having interference rejection membranes and methods for making and using them |
US20110288388A1 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2011-11-24 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Multi-conductor lead configurations useful with medical device systems and methods for making and using them |
US8882701B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2014-11-11 | Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. | Advanced step therapy delivery for an ambulatory infusion pump and system |
US8771251B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2014-07-08 | Hospira, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and delivering patient therapy through electronic drug delivery systems |
US8660628B2 (en) | 2009-12-21 | 2014-02-25 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Analyte sensors comprising blended membrane compositions and methods for making and using them |
US8998858B2 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2015-04-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Alignment and connection systems and methods |
US8858500B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2014-10-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Engagement and sensing systems and methods |
US8998840B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2015-04-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Connection and alignment systems and methods |
US9039653B2 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2015-05-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Retention systems and methods |
US20120215163A1 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2012-08-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensing systems and methods |
US8435209B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2013-05-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Connection and alignment detection systems and methods |
EP2525848B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2016-08-03 | DEKA Products Limited Partnership | System for shape-memory alloy wire control |
USD924406S1 (en) | 2010-02-01 | 2021-07-06 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor inserter |
US10448872B2 (en) | 2010-03-16 | 2019-10-22 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Analyte sensor apparatuses having improved electrode configurations and methods for making and using them |
LT3766408T (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2022-07-11 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Medical device inserters |
US9326708B2 (en) | 2010-03-26 | 2016-05-03 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Ambient temperature sensor systems and methods |
USD669165S1 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2012-10-16 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump |
US8636711B2 (en) | 2010-06-14 | 2014-01-28 | Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center | Stabilized glucagon solutions and uses therefor |
US9215995B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2015-12-22 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensor systems having multiple probes and electrode arrays |
US11064921B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2021-07-20 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for on-skin or on-body mounting of medical devices |
US8945094B2 (en) | 2010-09-08 | 2015-02-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Apparatus and method for medication delivery using single input-single output (SISO) model predictive control |
CA2820070A1 (en) | 2011-01-27 | 2012-08-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insertion device systems and methods |
US8852152B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2014-10-07 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump systems and methods |
US10136845B2 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2018-11-27 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Devices, systems, and methods associated with analyte monitoring devices and devices incorporating the same |
US8454581B2 (en) | 2011-03-16 | 2013-06-04 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump systems and methods |
US9008744B2 (en) | 2011-05-06 | 2015-04-14 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and apparatus for continuous analyte monitoring |
US9993529B2 (en) | 2011-06-17 | 2018-06-12 | Halozyme, Inc. | Stable formulations of a hyaluronan-degrading enzyme |
EP2720713A2 (en) | 2011-06-17 | 2014-04-23 | Halozyme, Inc. | Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion methods with a hyaluronan degrading enzyme |
US8585657B2 (en) | 2011-06-21 | 2013-11-19 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Dispensing fluid from an infusion pump system |
US20130046281A1 (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2013-02-21 | Jonathan C. Javitt | Closed Loop Infusion Formulation Delivery System |
US9240002B2 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2016-01-19 | Hospira, Inc. | Systems and methods for a graphical interface including a graphical representation of medical data |
US8808230B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2014-08-19 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Occlusion detection for an infusion pump system |
WO2013059615A1 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2013-04-25 | Hospira, Inc. | Medical device update system |
US9317656B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2016-04-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Compatibility mechanisms for devices in a continuous analyte monitoring system and methods thereof |
US8710993B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2014-04-29 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Mitigating single point failure of devices in an analyte monitoring system and methods thereof |
WO2013078426A2 (en) | 2011-11-25 | 2013-05-30 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte monitoring system and methods of use |
FI4056105T3 (en) | 2011-12-11 | 2023-12-28 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc | Analyte sensor devices |
US10022498B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2018-07-17 | Icu Medical, Inc. | System for monitoring and delivering medication to a patient and method of using the same to minimize the risks associated with automated therapy |
WO2013134519A2 (en) | 2012-03-07 | 2013-09-12 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
US8603026B2 (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2013-12-10 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Dynamic pulse-width modulation motor control and medical device incorporating same |
US8523803B1 (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2013-09-03 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Motor health monitoring and medical device incorporating same |
US8603027B2 (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2013-12-10 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Occlusion detection using pulse-width modulation and medical device incorporating same |
JP6306566B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2018-04-04 | アイシーユー・メディカル・インコーポレーテッド | Air detection system and method for detecting air in an infusion system pump |
US9180242B2 (en) | 2012-05-17 | 2015-11-10 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Methods and devices for multiple fluid transfer |
US9493807B2 (en) | 2012-05-25 | 2016-11-15 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Foldover sensors and methods for making and using them |
US9238100B2 (en) | 2012-06-07 | 2016-01-19 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Device and method for training users of ambulatory medical devices |
US20140012115A1 (en) | 2012-07-03 | 2014-01-09 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Plasma deposited adhesion promoter layers for use with analyte sensors |
US8454557B1 (en) | 2012-07-19 | 2013-06-04 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
US8454562B1 (en) | 2012-07-20 | 2013-06-04 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
CA3089257C (en) | 2012-07-31 | 2023-07-25 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Patient care system for critical medications |
US8808269B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2014-08-19 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Reservoir plunger position monitoring and medical device incorporating same |
US9060745B2 (en) | 2012-08-22 | 2015-06-23 | Covidien Lp | System and method for detecting fluid responsiveness of a patient |
US8731649B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2014-05-20 | Covidien Lp | Systems and methods for analyzing changes in cardiac output |
EP2890297B1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2018-04-11 | Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. | Dropout detection in continuous analyte monitoring data during data excursions |
US9357937B2 (en) | 2012-09-06 | 2016-06-07 | Covidien Lp | System and method for determining stroke volume of an individual |
US9241646B2 (en) | 2012-09-11 | 2016-01-26 | Covidien Lp | System and method for determining stroke volume of a patient |
US20140081152A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc | System and method for determining stability of cardiac output |
US9968306B2 (en) | 2012-09-17 | 2018-05-15 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for providing adverse condition notification with enhanced wireless communication range in analyte monitoring systems |
EP2901153A4 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2016-04-27 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc | Method and apparatus for improving lag correction during in vivo measurement of analyte concentration with analyte concentration variability and range data |
US9375079B2 (en) | 2012-10-26 | 2016-06-28 | Baxter Corporation Englewood | Work station for medical dose preparation system |
KR101974258B1 (en) | 2012-10-26 | 2019-04-30 | 백스터 코포레이션 잉글우드 | Improved image acquisition for medical dose preparation system |
US10194840B2 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-02-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Microarray electrodes useful with analyte sensors and methods for making and using them |
US9427523B2 (en) | 2012-12-10 | 2016-08-30 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
US20140276536A1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Asante Solutions, Inc. | Infusion Pump System and Methods |
US8977348B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2015-03-10 | Covidien Lp | Systems and methods for determining cardiac output |
KR102212020B1 (en) * | 2013-01-14 | 2021-02-05 | 더 리전트 오브 더 유니버시티 오브 캘리포니아 | Daily periodic target-zone modulation in the model predictive control problem for artificial pancreas for type i diabetes applications |
US9295840B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2016-03-29 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for automatically programming patient therapy devices |
US9731133B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2017-08-15 | Nevro Corp. | Systems and methods for systematically testing a plurality of therapy programs in patient therapy devices |
US10426383B2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2019-10-01 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Muting glucose sensor oxygen response and reducing electrode edge growth with pulsed current plating |
US9895538B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2018-02-20 | Nevro Corp. | Systems and methods for deploying patient therapy devices |
US9320851B2 (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2016-04-26 | Medizinische Universitaet Graz | Infusion arrangement and method |
US9367098B2 (en) * | 2013-02-08 | 2016-06-14 | Htc Corporation | Power saving method for handheld mobile electronic device and device using the same |
US9308321B2 (en) | 2013-02-18 | 2016-04-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion device having gear assembly initialization |
US9446186B2 (en) | 2013-03-01 | 2016-09-20 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Operating an infusion pump system |
EP2964079B1 (en) | 2013-03-06 | 2022-02-16 | ICU Medical, Inc. | Medical device communication method |
US10357606B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2019-07-23 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | System and method for integration of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring |
US10201656B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2019-02-12 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Simplified insulin pump for type II diabetics |
US9173998B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-03 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | System and method for detecting occlusions in an infusion pump |
US10016561B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-07-10 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Clinical variable determination |
US9610444B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-04-04 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Erythropoeitin production by electrical stimulation |
US9492608B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-11-15 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Method and device utilizing insulin delivery protocols |
AU2014268355B2 (en) | 2013-05-24 | 2018-06-14 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Multi-sensor infusion system for detecting air or an occlusion in the infusion system |
EP3003441B1 (en) | 2013-05-29 | 2020-12-02 | ICU Medical, Inc. | Infusion system which utilizes one or more sensors and additional information to make an air determination regarding the infusion system |
ES2845748T3 (en) | 2013-05-29 | 2021-07-27 | Icu Medical Inc | Infusion system and method of use that prevent oversaturation of an analog-digital converter |
US9446187B2 (en) | 2013-06-03 | 2016-09-20 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
US9457141B2 (en) | 2013-06-03 | 2016-10-04 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
WO2015003145A1 (en) | 2013-07-03 | 2015-01-08 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus, system and method for fluid delivery |
US9561324B2 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2017-02-07 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
EP3786968A1 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2021-03-03 | Dexcom, Inc. | Time averaged basal rate optimizer |
US9402949B2 (en) | 2013-08-13 | 2016-08-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Detecting conditions associated with medical device operations using matched filters |
CN110047571B (en) | 2013-08-21 | 2023-10-27 | 美敦力迷你迈德公司 | Medical device and related updating method and system |
US9880528B2 (en) | 2013-08-21 | 2018-01-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Medical devices and related updating methods and systems |
US9889257B2 (en) | 2013-08-21 | 2018-02-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Systems and methods for updating medical devices |
EP3039596A4 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-04-12 | Hospira, Inc. | System and method of monitoring and managing a remote infusion regimen |
US9662436B2 (en) | 2013-09-20 | 2017-05-30 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Fail-safe drug infusion therapy system |
US20150122647A1 (en) | 2013-11-07 | 2015-05-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Enzyme matrices for use with ethylene oxide sterilization |
US10311972B2 (en) | 2013-11-11 | 2019-06-04 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Medical device system performance index |
US10042986B2 (en) | 2013-11-19 | 2018-08-07 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion pump automation system and method |
US10569015B2 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2020-02-25 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
US9849240B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2017-12-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Data modification for predictive operations and devices incorporating same |
US10105488B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2018-10-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Predictive infusion device operations and related methods and systems |
WO2015100340A1 (en) | 2013-12-26 | 2015-07-02 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Safety processor for wireless control of a drug delivery device |
GB2523989B (en) | 2014-01-30 | 2020-07-29 | Insulet Netherlands B V | Therapeutic product delivery system and method of pairing |
US9486580B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2016-11-08 | Aseko, Inc. | Insulin management |
US9898585B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2018-02-20 | Aseko, Inc. | Method and system for insulin management |
US9399096B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2016-07-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Automatic closed-loop control adjustments and infusion systems incorporating same |
US9861748B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2018-01-09 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | User-configurable closed-loop notifications and infusion systems incorporating same |
AU2015222800B2 (en) | 2014-02-28 | 2019-10-17 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion system and method which utilizes dual wavelength optical air-in-line detection |
EP3119284B1 (en) | 2014-03-17 | 2022-04-20 | PLC Medical Systems, Inc. | Fluid therapy system |
US10232113B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2019-03-19 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related methods and systems for regulating insulin on board |
JP6853669B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2021-03-31 | アイシーユー・メディカル・インコーポレーテッド | Patient treatment system with conditional alert forwarding |
US10274349B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2019-04-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Calibration factor adjustments for infusion devices and related methods and systems |
US10007765B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2018-06-26 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Adaptive signal processing for infusion devices and related methods and systems |
US10152049B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2018-12-11 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Glucose sensor health monitoring and related methods and systems |
AU2015266706B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2020-01-30 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion system and pump with configurable closed loop delivery rate catch-up |
US9724470B2 (en) | 2014-06-16 | 2017-08-08 | Icu Medical, Inc. | System for monitoring and delivering medication to a patient and method of using the same to minimize the risks associated with automated therapy |
US9629901B2 (en) | 2014-07-01 | 2017-04-25 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Glucagon administration system and methods |
WO2016019133A1 (en) | 2014-07-30 | 2016-02-04 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Temporary suspension for closed-loop medicament therapy |
US10137246B2 (en) | 2014-08-06 | 2018-11-27 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump assembly and method |
US9919096B2 (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2018-03-20 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method |
US9539383B2 (en) | 2014-09-15 | 2017-01-10 | Hospira, Inc. | System and method that matches delayed infusion auto-programs with manually entered infusion programs and analyzes differences therein |
US11107574B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2021-08-31 | Baxter Corporation Englewood | Management of medication preparation with formulary management |
AU2015339576B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2020-02-06 | Aseko, Inc. | Subcutaneous outpatient management |
US11081226B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2021-08-03 | Aseko, Inc. | Method and controller for administering recommended insulin dosages to a patient |
US9636453B2 (en) | 2014-12-04 | 2017-05-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Advance diagnosis of infusion device operating mode viability |
US9943645B2 (en) | 2014-12-04 | 2018-04-17 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods for operating mode transitions and related infusion devices and systems |
WO2016090091A1 (en) | 2014-12-05 | 2016-06-09 | Baxter Corporation Englewood | Dose preparation data analytics |
US11344668B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2022-05-31 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion system with concurrent TPN/insulin infusion |
US10265031B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-04-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related methods and systems for automatic alert clearing |
US10307535B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-06-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related methods and systems for preemptive alerting |
CN111905188B (en) | 2015-02-18 | 2022-07-22 | 英赛罗公司 | Fluid delivery and infusion device and method of use |
US10850024B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2020-12-01 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion system, device, and method having advanced infusion features |
SG11201707114XA (en) | 2015-03-03 | 2017-09-28 | Baxter Corp Englewood | Pharmacy workflow management with integrated alerts |
US10307528B2 (en) | 2015-03-09 | 2019-06-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Extensible infusion devices and related methods |
US9517344B1 (en) | 2015-03-13 | 2016-12-13 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for selecting low-power, effective signal delivery parameters for an implanted pulse generator |
US9878097B2 (en) | 2015-04-29 | 2018-01-30 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Operating an infusion pump system |
EP3294134B1 (en) | 2015-05-14 | 2020-07-08 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Inserter system for a compact medical device and corresponding method |
US10213139B2 (en) | 2015-05-14 | 2019-02-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for assembling an applicator and sensor control device |
CA2988094A1 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2016-12-01 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method with multiple drug library editor source capability |
US9999721B2 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2018-06-19 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Error handling in infusion devices with distributed motor control and related operating methods |
US10137243B2 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2018-11-27 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices with distributed motor control and related operating methods |
WO2016207206A1 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2016-12-29 | Gambro Lundia Ab | Medical device system and method having a distributed database |
WO2017011346A1 (en) | 2015-07-10 | 2017-01-19 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | System, device and method of dynamic glucose profile response to physiological parameters |
WO2017031440A1 (en) | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Aseko, Inc. | Diabetes management therapy advisor |
US10543314B2 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2020-01-28 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Personalized parameter modeling with signal calibration based on historical data |
US10201657B2 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2019-02-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods for providing sensor site rotation feedback and related infusion devices and systems |
WO2017035022A1 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2017-03-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Personalized parameter modeling methods and related devices and systems |
US10293108B2 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2019-05-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related patient ratio adjustment methods |
US10463297B2 (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2019-11-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Personalized event detection methods and related devices and systems |
US10117992B2 (en) * | 2015-09-29 | 2018-11-06 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related rescue detection methods |
US11666702B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2023-06-06 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Medical devices and related event pattern treatment recommendation methods |
US11501867B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2022-11-15 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Medical devices and related event pattern presentation methods |
US10964421B2 (en) * | 2015-10-22 | 2021-03-30 | Welch Allyn, Inc. | Method and apparatus for delivering a substance to an individual |
US10146911B2 (en) | 2015-10-23 | 2018-12-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Medical devices and related methods and systems for data transfer |
US20180369478A1 (en) * | 2015-11-18 | 2018-12-27 | Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. | Medical infusion pumps and systems |
US10300277B1 (en) | 2015-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | Nevro Corp. | Variable amplitude signals for neurological therapy, and associated systems and methods |
US10569016B2 (en) | 2015-12-29 | 2020-02-25 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | System and method for switching between closed loop and open loop control of an ambulatory infusion pump |
AU2016385454B2 (en) | 2016-01-05 | 2021-12-16 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Operating multi-modal medicine delivery systems |
US10449294B1 (en) | 2016-01-05 | 2019-10-22 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Operating an infusion pump system |
EP3374905A1 (en) | 2016-01-13 | 2018-09-19 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | User interface for diabetes management system |
CN112933333B (en) | 2016-01-14 | 2023-03-28 | 比格福特生物医药公司 | Adjusting insulin delivery rate |
USD809134S1 (en) | 2016-03-10 | 2018-01-30 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Infusion pump assembly |
US10324058B2 (en) | 2016-04-28 | 2019-06-18 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | In-situ chemistry stack for continuous glucose sensors |
ES2965136T3 (en) | 2016-05-10 | 2024-04-11 | Evonik Canada Inc | Implantable glucose sensors that have a biostable surface |
WO2017197024A1 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2017-11-16 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion pump system and method with common line auto flush |
US11298059B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2022-04-12 | PercuSense, Inc. | Analyte sensor |
US11179078B2 (en) | 2016-06-06 | 2021-11-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Polycarbonate urea/urethane polymers for use with analyte sensors |
WO2017214441A1 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2017-12-14 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Acoustic flow sensor for continuous medication flow measurements and feedback control of infusion |
AU2017295722B2 (en) | 2016-07-14 | 2022-08-11 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Multi-communication path selection and security system for a medical device |
US11617832B2 (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2023-04-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Portal system-based bionic pancreas |
US10765807B2 (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2020-09-08 | Insulet Corporation | Fluid delivery device with sensor |
EP3519011A4 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2020-05-20 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Medicine injection and disease management systems, devices, and methods |
US10561788B2 (en) | 2016-10-06 | 2020-02-18 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion systems and methods for automated exercise mitigation |
EP3329847A1 (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2018-06-06 | Inreda Diabetic B.V. | Apparatus for regulating the concentration of glucose in the blood of a person |
US11096624B2 (en) | 2016-12-12 | 2021-08-24 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Alarms and alerts for medication delivery devices and systems |
USD836769S1 (en) | 2016-12-12 | 2018-12-25 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Insulin delivery controller |
KR102476516B1 (en) | 2016-12-21 | 2022-12-09 | 감브로 룬디아 아베 | A medical device system that includes an information technology infrastructure with secure cluster domains supporting external domains. |
US10854324B2 (en) | 2016-12-21 | 2020-12-01 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion systems and methods for prospective closed-loop adjustments |
US10272201B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-04-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insertion site monitoring methods and related infusion devices and systems |
WO2018132723A1 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2018-07-19 | Mazlish Bryan | Insulin delivery methods, systems and devices |
US10583250B2 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2020-03-10 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | System and method for adjusting insulin delivery |
US10500334B2 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2019-12-10 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | System and method for adjusting insulin delivery |
WO2018132754A1 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2018-07-19 | Mazlish Bryan | System and method for adjusting insulin delivery |
US10758675B2 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2020-09-01 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | System and method for adjusting insulin delivery |
WO2018132765A1 (en) | 2017-01-13 | 2018-07-19 | Mazlish Bryan | Insulin delivery methods, systems and devices |
CA3050721A1 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2018-07-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Systems, devices and methods for analyte sensor insertion |
US10646649B2 (en) | 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and fluid identification apparatuses and methods |
US11207463B2 (en) | 2017-02-21 | 2021-12-28 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Apparatuses, systems, and methods for identifying an infusate in a reservoir of an infusion device |
US11134868B2 (en) | 2017-03-17 | 2021-10-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Metal pillar device structures and methods for making and using them in electrochemical and/or electrocatalytic applications |
WO2018175489A1 (en) | 2017-03-21 | 2018-09-27 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Methods, devices and system for providing diabetic condition diagnosis and therapy |
US11229406B2 (en) | 2017-03-24 | 2022-01-25 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Patient-specific glucose prediction systems and methods |
DK3618713T3 (en) | 2017-05-05 | 2022-01-24 | Lilly Co Eli | Control of physiological glucose in closed loop |
USD839294S1 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2019-01-29 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Display screen with graphical user interface for closed-loop medication delivery |
US11116898B2 (en) | 2017-06-26 | 2021-09-14 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Artificial pancreas integrated CGM architectures and designs |
US10856784B2 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-12-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensor initialization methods for faster body sensor response |
EP3651647A1 (en) | 2017-07-13 | 2020-05-20 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Multi-scale display of blood glucose information |
CN111246797A (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2020-06-05 | 德克斯康公司 | Pre-attached analyte sensors |
US11331022B2 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2022-05-17 | Dexcom, Inc. | Pre-connected analyte sensors |
US11901060B2 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2024-02-13 | Ypsomed Ag | Closed loop control of physiological glucose |
US10089055B1 (en) | 2017-12-27 | 2018-10-02 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Synchronized display of screen content on networked devices |
US20190223771A1 (en) | 2018-01-23 | 2019-07-25 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Implantable polymer surfaces exhibiting reduced in vivo inflammatory responses |
US11186859B2 (en) | 2018-02-07 | 2021-11-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Multilayer electrochemical analyte sensors and methods for making and using them |
US11583213B2 (en) | 2018-02-08 | 2023-02-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Glucose sensor electrode design |
US11220735B2 (en) | 2018-02-08 | 2022-01-11 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods for controlling physical vapor deposition metal film adhesion to substrates and surfaces |
EP3776801A4 (en) | 2018-04-10 | 2021-12-22 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | System and method for inductively charging a medical device |
WO2019209963A1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2019-10-31 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Apparatus and system for fluid delivery |
AU2019263490A1 (en) | 2018-05-04 | 2020-11-26 | Insulet Corporation | Safety constraints for a control algorithm-based drug delivery system |
US11367526B2 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2022-06-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Proactive patient guidance using augmented reality |
WO2019222499A1 (en) | 2018-05-16 | 2019-11-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Thermally stable glucose limiting membrane for glucose sensors |
ES2962660T3 (en) | 2018-07-17 | 2024-03-20 | Icu Medical Inc | Systems and methods to facilitate clinical messaging in a network environment |
AU2019306490A1 (en) | 2018-07-17 | 2021-02-04 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Updating infusion pump drug libraries and operational software in a networked environment |
US11139058B2 (en) | 2018-07-17 | 2021-10-05 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Reducing file transfer between cloud environment and infusion pumps |
US10964428B2 (en) | 2018-07-17 | 2021-03-30 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Merging messages into cache and generating user interface using the cache |
US10692595B2 (en) | 2018-07-26 | 2020-06-23 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Drug library dynamic version management |
AU2019309766A1 (en) | 2018-07-26 | 2021-03-18 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Drug library management system |
CN112714936A (en) | 2018-09-20 | 2021-04-27 | 美敦力泌力美公司 | Patient monitoring system and related recommendation method |
US11547799B2 (en) | 2018-09-20 | 2023-01-10 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Patient day planning systems and methods |
US10980942B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-04-20 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion devices and related meal bolus adjustment methods |
CN112789070A (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-05-11 | 英赛罗公司 | Mode of activity of the artificial pancreas System |
US10894126B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-01-19 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Fluid infusion system that automatically determines and delivers a correction bolus |
US11071821B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-07-27 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insulin infusion device with efficient confirmation routine for blood glucose measurements |
US11097052B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-08-24 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Insulin infusion device with configurable target blood glucose value for automatic basal insulin delivery operation |
WO2020077223A1 (en) | 2018-10-11 | 2020-04-16 | Insulet Corporation | Event detection for drug delivery system |
USD920343S1 (en) | 2019-01-09 | 2021-05-25 | Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface associated with insulin delivery |
US11439752B2 (en) | 2019-02-01 | 2022-09-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods and devices for occlusion detection using actuator sensors |
US11191899B2 (en) | 2019-02-12 | 2021-12-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion systems and related personalized bolusing methods |
US11464908B2 (en) | 2019-02-18 | 2022-10-11 | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for monitoring infusion sites for ambulatory infusion pumps |
US20200390973A1 (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2020-12-17 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Personalized closed loop optimization systems and methods |
CN113646847A (en) | 2019-04-16 | 2021-11-12 | 美敦力泌力美公司 | Personalized closed loop optimization system and method |
US10939488B2 (en) | 2019-05-20 | 2021-03-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and system for controlling communication between devices of a wireless body area network for an medical device system |
US11642454B2 (en) | 2019-06-06 | 2023-05-09 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Fluid infusion systems |
USD1002852S1 (en) | 2019-06-06 | 2023-10-24 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Analyte sensor device |
US11718865B2 (en) | 2019-07-26 | 2023-08-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods to improve oxygen delivery to implantable sensors |
US11523757B2 (en) | 2019-08-01 | 2022-12-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Micro-pillar working electrodes design to reduce backflow of hydrogen peroxide in glucose sensor |
US11883208B2 (en) | 2019-08-06 | 2024-01-30 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Machine learning-based system for estimating glucose values based on blood glucose measurements and contextual activity data |
WO2021026399A1 (en) | 2019-08-06 | 2021-02-11 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Machine learning-based system for estimating glucose values |
US20210060244A1 (en) | 2019-08-28 | 2021-03-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and system for verifying whether a non-medical client device is operating correctly with a medical device controlled by the non-medical client device and causing a notification to be generated |
US11654235B2 (en) | 2019-09-12 | 2023-05-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensor calibration using fabrication measurements |
US11565044B2 (en) | 2019-09-12 | 2023-01-31 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Manufacturing controls for sensor calibration using fabrication measurements |
EP4029031A1 (en) | 2019-09-12 | 2022-07-20 | Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. | Manufacturing controls for sensor calibration using fabrication measurements |
US11801344B2 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2023-10-31 | Insulet Corporation | Blood glucose rate of change modulation of meal and correction insulin bolus quantity |
US11213623B2 (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2022-01-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Infusion systems and related personalized bolusing methods |
US11241537B2 (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2022-02-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Contextual personalized closed-loop adjustment methods and systems |
US11935637B2 (en) | 2019-09-27 | 2024-03-19 | Insulet Corporation | Onboarding and total daily insulin adaptivity |
US11496083B2 (en) | 2019-11-15 | 2022-11-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Devices and methods for controlling electromechanical actuators |
US11278671B2 (en) | 2019-12-04 | 2022-03-22 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Infusion pump with safety sequence keypad |
US11957875B2 (en) | 2019-12-06 | 2024-04-16 | Insulet Corporation | Techniques and devices providing adaptivity and personalization in diabetes treatment |
US20210170103A1 (en) | 2019-12-09 | 2021-06-10 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods and systems for real-time sensor measurement simulation |
US11833329B2 (en) | 2019-12-20 | 2023-12-05 | Insulet Corporation | Techniques for improved automatic drug delivery performance using delivery tendencies from past delivery history and use patterns |
US11551802B2 (en) | 2020-02-11 | 2023-01-10 | Insulet Corporation | Early meal detection and calorie intake detection |
US11547800B2 (en) | 2020-02-12 | 2023-01-10 | Insulet Corporation | User parameter dependent cost function for personalized reduction of hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia in a closed loop artificial pancreas system |
US11324889B2 (en) | 2020-02-14 | 2022-05-10 | Insulet Corporation | Compensation for missing readings from a glucose monitor in an automated insulin delivery system |
US11607493B2 (en) | 2020-04-06 | 2023-03-21 | Insulet Corporation | Initial total daily insulin setting for user onboarding |
US11596359B2 (en) | 2020-04-09 | 2023-03-07 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Methods and systems for mitigating sensor error propagation |
WO2021216155A1 (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2021-10-28 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Analyte sensor quality measures and related therapy actions for an automated therapy delivery system |
US11583631B2 (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2023-02-21 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Intuitive user interface features and related functionality for a therapy delivery system |
US11690955B2 (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2023-07-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Continuous analyte sensor quality measures and related therapy actions for an automated therapy delivery system |
US20210345952A1 (en) * | 2020-05-06 | 2021-11-11 | Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Controlling operation of drug administration devices using surgical hubs |
US20210377726A1 (en) | 2020-05-27 | 2021-12-02 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Method and system for automatically associating a non-medical device with a medical device |
US20210393876A1 (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2021-12-23 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Default carbohydrate consumption counts based on characteristics of persons |
US11735305B2 (en) | 2020-06-26 | 2023-08-22 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Automatic configuration of user-specific data based on placement into service |
US11955210B2 (en) | 2020-06-26 | 2024-04-09 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Automatic configuration of user-specific data based on networked charger devices |
EP4185260A1 (en) | 2020-07-21 | 2023-05-31 | ICU Medical, Inc. | Fluid transfer devices and methods of use |
EP4189695A1 (en) | 2020-07-30 | 2023-06-07 | Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. | Automatic device configuration |
US11684716B2 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2023-06-27 | Insulet Corporation | Techniques to reduce risk of occlusions in drug delivery systems |
US20220031205A1 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2022-02-03 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensor identification and integrity check design |
US11839743B2 (en) | 2020-10-07 | 2023-12-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Graphic user interface for automated infusate delivery |
US20220133190A1 (en) | 2020-10-29 | 2022-05-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Glucose biosensors comprising direct electron transfer enzymes and methods of making and using them |
US11135360B1 (en) | 2020-12-07 | 2021-10-05 | Icu Medical, Inc. | Concurrent infusion with common line auto flush |
USD999913S1 (en) | 2020-12-21 | 2023-09-26 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc | Analyte sensor inserter |
US20220240823A1 (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2022-08-04 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Interference rejection membranes useful with analyte sensors |
CN116830208A (en) | 2021-02-02 | 2023-09-29 | 美敦力迷你迈德公司 | Dynamic adjustment of physiological data |
US11839744B2 (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2023-12-12 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Automated super bolus generation |
US11744946B2 (en) | 2021-02-18 | 2023-09-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Dynamic super bolus generation |
US11904140B2 (en) | 2021-03-10 | 2024-02-20 | Insulet Corporation | Adaptable asymmetric medicament cost component in a control system for medicament delivery |
US11904139B2 (en) | 2021-04-05 | 2024-02-20 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Closed-loop control in steady-state conditions |
US20220338768A1 (en) | 2021-04-09 | 2022-10-27 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Hexamethyldisiloxane membranes for analyte sensors |
US20230000447A1 (en) | 2021-06-30 | 2023-01-05 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Event-oriented predictions of glycemic responses |
US20230053254A1 (en) | 2021-08-13 | 2023-02-16 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Dry electrochemical impedance spectroscopy metrology for conductive chemical layers |
US11738144B2 (en) | 2021-09-27 | 2023-08-29 | Insulet Corporation | Techniques enabling adaptation of parameters in aid systems by user input |
US20230113175A1 (en) | 2021-10-08 | 2023-04-13 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Immunosuppressant releasing coatings |
US20230123613A1 (en) | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-20 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Sensors for 3-hydroxybutyrate detection |
WO2023102147A1 (en) | 2021-12-01 | 2023-06-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Mealtime delivery of correction boluses |
WO2023102498A1 (en) | 2021-12-01 | 2023-06-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Real-time meal detection based on sensor glucose and estimated plasma insulin levels |
US11439754B1 (en) | 2021-12-01 | 2022-09-13 | Insulet Corporation | Optimizing embedded formulations for drug delivery |
US20230172497A1 (en) | 2021-12-02 | 2023-06-08 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Ketone limiting membrane and dual layer membrane approach for ketone sensing |
US20240023849A1 (en) | 2022-07-20 | 2024-01-25 | Medtronic Minimed, Inc. | Acrylate hydrogel membrane for dual function of diffusion limiting membrane as well as attenuation to the foreign body response |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5190041A (en) * | 1989-08-11 | 1993-03-02 | Palti Yoram Prof | System for monitoring and controlling blood glucose |
US5101814A (en) * | 1989-08-11 | 1992-04-07 | Palti Yoram Prof | System for monitoring and controlling blood glucose |
US5139020A (en) | 1991-03-08 | 1992-08-18 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling the hemodynamic state of a patient based on systolic time interval measurements detecting using doppler ultrasound techniques |
US5497772A (en) * | 1993-11-19 | 1996-03-12 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Glucose monitoring system |
EP0672427A1 (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1995-09-20 | Siemens-Elema AB | System for infusion of medicine into the body of a patient |
US5474552A (en) * | 1994-06-27 | 1995-12-12 | Cb-Carmel Biotechnology Ltd. | Implantable drug delivery pump |
US5713856A (en) | 1995-03-13 | 1998-02-03 | Alaris Medical Systems, Inc. | Modular patient care system |
US5995860A (en) * | 1995-07-06 | 1999-11-30 | Thomas Jefferson University | Implantable sensor and system for measurement and control of blood constituent levels |
US6354299B1 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2002-03-12 | Neuropace, Inc. | Implantable device for patient communication |
US6453195B1 (en) | 2001-03-19 | 2002-09-17 | Medtronic, Inc. | Closed loop drug delivery system and remote management thereof |
US6544212B2 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2003-04-08 | Roche Diagnostics Corporation | Diabetes management system |
-
2001
- 2001-12-26 US US10/033,173 patent/US6740072B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-09-04 WO PCT/US2002/028015 patent/WO2003023708A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-09-04 AU AU2002323575A patent/AU2002323575A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-09-04 CA CA2459398A patent/CA2459398C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-09-04 CA CA2764284A patent/CA2764284C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20030060753A1 (en) | 2003-03-27 |
AU2002323575A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 |
WO2003023708A2 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
US6740072B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 |
CA2764284A1 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
CA2459398A1 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
CA2459398C (en) | 2012-04-03 |
WO2003023708A3 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10549036B2 (en) | System and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery | |
CA2764284C (en) | A system and method for providing closed loop infusion formulation delivery | |
US20130046281A1 (en) | Closed Loop Infusion Formulation Delivery System | |
US11213622B2 (en) | Usability features for integrated insulin delivery system | |
US11901060B2 (en) | Closed loop control of physiological glucose | |
EP1848323B1 (en) | Bolus estimator for semi-closed loop infusion system | |
JP6047097B2 (en) | Blood glucose control system | |
US7556613B2 (en) | Array and method for dosing a hormone regulating blood sugar in a patient | |
JP2016504119A (en) | Daily target range adjustment in model predictive control problems for artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes | |
WO2010135638A2 (en) | Methods for reducing false hypoglycemia alarm occurrence | |
US9242038B2 (en) | Diabetes therapy device enabling shifting of parameter profiles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20220906 |