CA2256388A1 - Durable hydrophilic coating for a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate - Google Patents
Durable hydrophilic coating for a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2256388A1 CA2256388A1 CA002256388A CA2256388A CA2256388A1 CA 2256388 A1 CA2256388 A1 CA 2256388A1 CA 002256388 A CA002256388 A CA 002256388A CA 2256388 A CA2256388 A CA 2256388A CA 2256388 A1 CA2256388 A1 CA 2256388A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- porous substrate
- coated
- polymeric material
- hydrophilic polymeric
- substrate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 103
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 56
- 229920001600 hydrophobic polymer Polymers 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 76
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 60
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000012736 aqueous medium Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 229920000098 polyolefin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000002745 absorbent Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000002250 absorbent Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- -1 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 abstract description 134
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 abstract description 21
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 abstract description 20
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 abstract description 8
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 abstract description 8
- 229920005594 polymer fiber Polymers 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 64
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 32
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 15
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 10
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 9
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229920000896 Ethulose Polymers 0.000 description 8
- 239000001859 Ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 8
- 235000019326 ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 8
- MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen peroxide Chemical compound OO MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 7
- 239000004745 nonwoven fabric Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000004833 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 125000001165 hydrophobic group Chemical group 0.000 description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 235000010420 locust bean gum Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 5
- IXPNQXFRVYWDDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-methyl-2,4-dioxo-1,3-diazinane-5-carboximidamide Chemical compound CN1CC(C(N)=N)C(=O)NC1=O IXPNQXFRVYWDDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acrylate Chemical compound [O-]C(=O)C=C NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 229920002148 Gellan gum Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229920000161 Locust bean gum Polymers 0.000 description 4
- CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M Methacrylate Chemical compound CC(=C)C([O-])=O CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 229960005069 calcium Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 235000010980 cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 4
- 125000001495 ethyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 4
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 4
- 125000002768 hydroxyalkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 4
- 239000000711 locust bean gum Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000010413 sodium alginate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000000661 sodium alginate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229940005550 sodium alginate Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920000936 Agarose Polymers 0.000 description 3
- DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propylene glycol Chemical compound CC(O)CO DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229960002713 calcium chloride Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000011148 calcium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- LLSDKQJKOVVTOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium chloride dihydrate Chemical compound O.O.[Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] LLSDKQJKOVVTOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 3
- 229940052299 calcium chloride dihydrate Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 125000002057 carboxymethyl group Chemical group [H]OC(=O)C([H])([H])[*] 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000003851 corona treatment Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000010492 gellan gum Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000000216 gellan gum Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920000591 gum Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 125000002496 methyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 3
- 150000004804 polysaccharides Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 3
- GPRLSGONYQIRFK-MNYXATJNSA-N triton Chemical compound [3H+] GPRLSGONYQIRFK-MNYXATJNSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000006677 Appel reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920002101 Chitin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004354 Hydroxyethyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000663 Hydroxyethyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- YFONKFDEZLYQDH-OPQQBVKSSA-N N-[(1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyindan-1-yl]-6-[(1R)-1-fluoroethyl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine Chemical compound C[C@@H](F)C1=NC(N)=NC(N[C@H]2C3=CC(C)=CC=C3C[C@@H]2C)=N1 YFONKFDEZLYQDH-OPQQBVKSSA-N 0.000 description 2
- PPBRXRYQALVLMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Styrene Chemical compound C=CC1=CC=CC=C1 PPBRXRYQALVLMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000010410 calcium alginate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000648 calcium alginate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229960002681 calcium alginate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- OKHHGHGGPDJQHR-YMOPUZKJSA-L calcium;(2s,3s,4s,5s,6r)-6-[(2r,3s,4r,5s,6r)-2-carboxy-6-[(2r,3s,4r,5s,6r)-2-carboxylato-4,5,6-trihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylate Chemical compound [Ca+2].O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H](C([O-])=O)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O2)C([O-])=O)O)[C@H](C(O)=O)O1 OKHHGHGGPDJQHR-YMOPUZKJSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 235000010418 carrageenan Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920001525 carrageenan Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical group [H]* 0.000 description 2
- 235000019447 hydroxyethyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- QMMOXUPEWRXHJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N pent-2-ene Chemical compound CCC=CC QMMOXUPEWRXHJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009832 plasma treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920000307 polymer substrate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000306 polymethylpentene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000011116 polymethylpentene Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000002759 woven fabric Substances 0.000 description 2
- KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-Acetamido-2-[(2S,3S,4R,5R,6R)-6-[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-acetamido-2,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@H]1[C@H](O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O3)C(O)=O)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)NC(C)=O)[C@@H](C(O)=O)O1 KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DAUQEQSACMZHDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropan-2-yl 2-methylprop-2-enoate Chemical compound CC(=C)C(=O)OC(F)(C(F)(F)F)C(F)(F)F DAUQEQSACMZHDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VZSRBBMJRBPUNF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-ylamino)-N-[3-oxo-3-(2,4,6,7-tetrahydrotriazolo[4,5-c]pyridin-5-yl)propyl]pyrimidine-5-carboxamide Chemical compound C1C(CC2=CC=CC=C12)NC1=NC=C(C=N1)C(=O)NCCC(N1CC2=C(CC1)NN=N2)=O VZSRBBMJRBPUNF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AWFYPPSBLUWMFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[5-[2-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-ylamino)pyrimidin-5-yl]-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]-1-(1,4,6,7-tetrahydropyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridin-5-yl)ethanone Chemical compound C1C(CC2=CC=CC=C12)NC1=NC=C(C=N1)C1=NN=C(O1)CC(=O)N1CC2=C(CC1)NN=C2 AWFYPPSBLUWMFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VAQFLAQXPPAYFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-fluoropropan-2-yl prop-2-enoate Chemical compound CC(C)(F)OC(=O)C=C VAQFLAQXPPAYFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000004398 2-methyl-2-butyl group Chemical group CC(C)(CC)* 0.000 description 1
- 125000005916 2-methylpentyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- QOXOZONBQWIKDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-hydroxypropyl Chemical group [CH2]CCO QOXOZONBQWIKDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000004917 3-methyl-2-butyl group Chemical group CC(C(C)*)C 0.000 description 1
- 125000005917 3-methylpentyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- SXIFAEWFOJETOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-hydroxy-butyl Chemical group [CH2]CCCO SXIFAEWFOJETOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-{[2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(phosphanyloxy)oxan-3-yl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxy-3-phosphanyloxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound O1C(C(O)=O)C(P)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(C(O)=O)OC(OP)C(O)C1O FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000215068 Acacia senegal Species 0.000 description 1
- NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylonitrile Chemical compound C=CC#N NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000247812 Amorphophallus rivieri Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000001206 Amorphophallus rivieri Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920013665 Ampacet Polymers 0.000 description 1
- GAWIXWVDTYZWAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N C[CH]O Chemical group C[CH]O GAWIXWVDTYZWAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002134 Carboxymethyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001661 Chitosan Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002307 Dextran Polymers 0.000 description 1
- JIGUQPWFLRLWPJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl acrylate Chemical compound CCOC(=O)C=C JIGUQPWFLRLWPJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001856 Ethyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZZSNKZQZMQGXPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl cellulose Chemical compound CCOCC1OC(OC)C(OCC)C(OCC)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(OC)C(CO)O1 ZZSNKZQZMQGXPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002907 Guar gum Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000084 Gum arabic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000569 Gum karaya Polymers 0.000 description 1
- HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Heparin Chemical compound OC1C(NC(=O)C)C(O)OC(COS(O)(=O)=O)C1OC1C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(O3)C(O)=O)OS(O)(=O)=O)C(CO)O2)NS(O)(=O)=O)C(C(O)=O)O1 HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002153 Hydroxypropyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 206010021639 Incontinence Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920002752 Konjac Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000168 Microcrystalline cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101000831256 Oryza sativa subsp. japonica Cysteine proteinase inhibitor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229940123973 Oxygen scavenger Drugs 0.000 description 1
- CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ozone Chemical compound [O-][O+]=O CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000282320 Panthera leo Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920002230 Pectic acid Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000412626 Penetes Species 0.000 description 1
- GOOHAUXETOMSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propylene oxide Chemical compound CC1CO1 GOOHAUXETOMSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001131 Pulp (paper) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- SMEGJBVQLJJKKX-HOTMZDKISA-N [(2R,3S,4S,5R,6R)-5-acetyloxy-3,4,6-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl]methyl acetate Chemical compound CC(=O)OC[C@@H]1[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H](O1)O)OC(=O)C)O)O SMEGJBVQLJJKKX-HOTMZDKISA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZNOZWUKQPJXOIG-XSBHQQIPSA-L [(2r,3s,4r,5r,6s)-6-[[(1r,3s,4r,5r,8s)-3,4-dihydroxy-2,6-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl]oxy]-4-[[(1r,3r,4r,5r,8s)-8-[(2s,3r,4r,5r,6r)-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-5-sulfonatooxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-4-hydroxy-2,6-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl]oxy]-5-hydroxy-2-( Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](OS([O-])(=O)=O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H]2OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O[C@H]1[C@H]([C@@H](CO)O[C@@H](O[C@@H]3[C@@H]4OC[C@H]3O[C@H](O)[C@@H]4O)[C@@H]1O)OS([O-])(=O)=O)[C@@H]2O ZNOZWUKQPJXOIG-XSBHQQIPSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000010489 acacia gum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000205 acacia gum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012644 addition polymerization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007605 air drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940072056 alginate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001400 block copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000007664 blowing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001124 body fluid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000010839 body fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 description 1
- 235000010948 carboxy methyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001768 carboxy methyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008112 carboxymethyl-cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009960 carding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000679 carrageenan Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940113118 carrageenan Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940117975 chromium trioxide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- WGLPBDUCMAPZCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium trioxide Inorganic materials O=[Cr](=O)=O WGLPBDUCMAPZCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GAMDZJFZMJECOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium(6+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Cr+6] GAMDZJFZMJECOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007859 condensation product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000004683 dihydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- LQZZUXJYWNFBMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N dodecan-1-ol Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCO LQZZUXJYWNFBMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000019325 ethyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920001249 ethyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000840 ethylene tetrafluoroethylene copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004216 fluoromethyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])(F)* 0.000 description 1
- 125000002485 formyl group Chemical class [H]C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010417 guar gum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000665 guar gum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960002154 guar gum Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229960002897 heparin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- IPCSVZSSVZVIGE-UHFFFAOYSA-N hexadecanoic acid Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(O)=O IPCSVZSSVZVIGE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002674 hyaluronan Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229960003160 hyaluronic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 1
- 235000010977 hydroxypropyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001863 hydroxypropyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000000959 isobutyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])(C([H])([H])[H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 125000001449 isopropyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])(*)C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 235000010494 karaya gum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010485 konjac Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000252 konjac Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000092 linear low density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004707 linear low-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004914 menses Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 125000005395 methacrylic acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940016286 microcrystalline cellulose Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000019813 microcrystalline cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008108 microcrystalline cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004108 n-butyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 125000001280 n-hexyl group Chemical group C(CCCCC)* 0.000 description 1
- 125000000740 n-pentyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 125000004123 n-propyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 229920001206 natural gum Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002736 nonionic surfactant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000010987 pectin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001814 pectin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001277 pectin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 125000003538 pentan-3-yl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(*)C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- ULDDEWDFUNBUCM-UHFFFAOYSA-N pentyl prop-2-enoate Chemical compound CCCCCOC(=O)C=C ULDDEWDFUNBUCM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PNJWIWWMYCMZRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N pent‐4‐en‐2‐one Natural products CC(=O)CC=C PNJWIWWMYCMZRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000001997 phenyl group Chemical group [H]C1=C([H])C([H])=C(*)C([H])=C1[H] 0.000 description 1
- 229920001618 poly(2-methyl styrene) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005593 poly(benzyl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001483 poly(ethyl methacrylate) polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001200 poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000196 poly(lauryl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920003214 poly(methacrylonitrile) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002285 poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000058 polyacrylate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001748 polybutylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001707 polybutylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000120 polyethyl acrylate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000139 polyethylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005020 polyethylene terephthalate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002620 polyvinyl fluoride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002981 polyvinylidene fluoride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005604 random copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003296 saliva Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 125000002914 sec-butyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(*)C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003724 sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010956 sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004408 titanium dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- RRLMGCBZYFFRED-UHFFFAOYSA-N undecyl prop-2-enoate Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCOC(=O)C=C RRLMGCBZYFFRED-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001285 xanthan gum Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000010493 xanthan gum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000230 xanthan gum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940082509 xanthan gum Drugs 0.000 description 1
- UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L zinc;1-(5-cyanopyridin-2-yl)-3-[(1s,2s)-2-(6-fluoro-2-hydroxy-3-propanoylphenyl)cyclopropyl]urea;diacetate Chemical compound [Zn+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O.CCC(=O)C1=CC=C(F)C([C@H]2[C@H](C2)NC(=O)NC=2N=CC(=CC=2)C#N)=C1O UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
- D06M15/00—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment
- D06M15/01—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment with natural macromolecular compounds or derivatives thereof
- D06M15/03—Polysaccharides or derivatives thereof
- D06M15/05—Cellulose or derivatives thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L15/00—Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, bandages, dressings or absorbent pads
- A61L15/16—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons
- A61L15/22—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons containing macromolecular materials
- A61L15/24—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds; Derivatives thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L15/00—Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, bandages, dressings or absorbent pads
- A61L15/16—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons
- A61L15/22—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons containing macromolecular materials
- A61L15/28—Polysaccharides or their derivatives
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L15/00—Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, bandages, dressings or absorbent pads
- A61L15/16—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons
- A61L15/42—Use of materials characterised by their function or physical properties
- A61L15/425—Porous materials, e.g. foams or sponges
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
- C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
- C08J9/00—Working-up of macromolecular substances to porous or cellular articles or materials; After-treatment thereof
- C08J9/36—After-treatment
- C08J9/40—Impregnation
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
- D06M10/00—Physical treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, e.g. ultrasonic, corona discharge, irradiation, electric currents, or magnetic fields; Physical treatment combined with treatment with chemical compounds or elements
- D06M10/02—Physical treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, e.g. ultrasonic, corona discharge, irradiation, electric currents, or magnetic fields; Physical treatment combined with treatment with chemical compounds or elements ultrasonic or sonic; Corona discharge
- D06M10/025—Corona discharge or low temperature plasma
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
- D06M15/00—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment
- D06M15/01—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment with natural macromolecular compounds or derivatives thereof
- D06M15/03—Polysaccharides or derivatives thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F13/00—Bandages or dressings; Absorbent pads
- A61F13/15—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators
- A61F13/51—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators characterised by the outer layers
- A61F13/511—Topsheet, i.e. the permeable cover or layer facing the skin
- A61F13/513—Topsheet, i.e. the permeable cover or layer facing the skin characterised by its function or properties, e.g. stretchability, breathability, rewet, visual effect; having areas of different permeability
- A61F13/51305—Topsheet, i.e. the permeable cover or layer facing the skin characterised by its function or properties, e.g. stretchability, breathability, rewet, visual effect; having areas of different permeability having areas of different permeability
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F13/00—Bandages or dressings; Absorbent pads
- A61F13/15—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators
- A61F13/51—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators characterised by the outer layers
- A61F2013/51059—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators characterised by the outer layers being sprayed with chemicals
- A61F2013/51066—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators characterised by the outer layers being sprayed with chemicals for rendering the surface hydrophilic
- A61F2013/51069—Absorbent pads, e.g. sanitary towels, swabs or tampons for external or internal application to the body; Supporting or fastening means therefor; Tampon applicators characterised by the outer layers being sprayed with chemicals for rendering the surface hydrophilic by hydrophilisation with plasma or corona discharge
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
- D06M2101/00—Chemical constitution of the fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, to be treated
- D06M2101/16—Synthetic fibres, other than mineral fibres
- D06M2101/18—Synthetic fibres consisting of macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10S428/903—Microfiber, less than 100 micron diameter
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/249921—Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
- Y10T428/249953—Composite having voids in a component [e.g., porous, cellular, etc.]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
- Y10T442/20—Coated or impregnated woven, knit, or nonwoven fabric which is not [a] associated with another preformed layer or fiber layer or, [b] with respect to woven and knit, characterized, respectively, by a particular or differential weave or knit, wherein the coating or impregnation is neither a foamed material nor a free metal or alloy layer
- Y10T442/2484—Coating or impregnation is water absorbency-increasing or hydrophilicity-increasing or hydrophilicity-imparting
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Laminated Bodies (AREA)
- Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
- Coating Of Shaped Articles Made Of Macromolecular Substances (AREA)
- Absorbent Articles And Supports Therefor (AREA)
- Manufacture Of Porous Articles, And Recovery And Treatment Of Waste Products (AREA)
- Orthopedics, Nursing, And Contraception (AREA)
- Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
Abstract
A coated porous substrate composed of a hydrophobic polymer which is substantially uniformly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric material. The substrate may be a sheet-like material, examples of which are foams, fibers, and fibrous webs. The fibrous webs desirably will be nonwoven webs. The coating on the substrate is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10 ~C to about 50 ~C and does not significantly suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated substrate may come in contact. The hydrophobic polymer may be a polyolefin, such as polyethylene or polypropylene. The hydrophilic polymeric material with which the polymer fibers are coated may be a polysaccharide or a modified polysaccharide. Also provided is a method of preparing a coated porous substrate which involves providing a porous substrate composed of a hydrophobic polymer. At least a portion of the substrate then is exposed to a field of reactive species. At least a portion of the porous substrate, including the portion exposed to the reactive species, is treated with a mixture which includes water and a hydrophilic polymeric material under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material.
Description
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 I:)URABLE HYDROPHILIC COATING FOR
A POROUS HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER SUBSTRATE
Background of the Invention s The present invention relates to a coated polymer substrate.
Polymers are used extensively to make a variety of products which include blown and cast films, extruded sheets, injection molded articles, foams, blow molded articles, extruded pipe, monofilaments, and nonwoven webs. Some of such polymers, 10 such as polyolefins, are naturally hydluphc~, and for many uses this property is either a positive attribute or at least not a disadvantage.
There are a number of uses for polymers, however, where their hydrophobic nature either limits their usefulness or requires some effort to modify the surface characteristics of the shaped articles made therefrom. By way of example, polyolefins, 15 such as polyethylene and polypropylene, are used to manufacture polymeric fabrics which are em~'oyed in the construction of such disposable absorbent articles as diapers, feminine care products, inconlinence products, training pants, wipes, and the like. Such polymeric fabrics often are nonwoven webs prepared by, for example, such processes as meltblowing, coforming, and spunbonding. Frequently, such polymeric20 fabrics need to be wettable by water or aqueous-based liquids. Welldbility can be obtained by spraying or otherwise coating (i.e., surface treating or topically treating) the fabric with a s-" raclanl solution during or after its rO" "alion, and then drying the web.
Some of the more common topically applied surfactants are nonionic surFactants, such as polyethoxylated octylphenols and condensation products of 25 propylene oxide with propylene glycol, by way of illusl,dlion only. These su,rdctc,nl~
are effective in rendering normally hyJ,uphab c polymeric fabrics water wettable.
However, the surfactant is readily removed from the fabric, often after only a single P-tposllre to an aqueous liquid. Such su,rdc,~a.)ls are effective in rendering the hydrophob.c polymeric fabric wettable by lowering the surface tension of the aqueous 30 liquid. Such a mechanis,n must involve at least partial removal of su,raclant from the surfaces of the fibers of which the fabric is composed.
Accordingly, there is a need for a coated porous hydrophobic substrate having a durable coating which is wettable by water without signiricanlly lowering the sur~ace tension of an aqueous medium to which the coated substrate may be exposed.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 SlJ,.. a,y of the In~e.~tion The present invention addt esses some of the difficulties and problems 5 rliscussed above by providing a coated substrate co"~posed of a hydrophobic polymer.
The surfaces of the substrate are subslan(ially unifo~ ly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric ~"alerial. The hydlùph~bic polymer may be, by way of iilU:.Ild~iOn only, a polyolefin. For exar,lple~, the polyolefin may be polyethylene or polypropylene.The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric ",alerial is durable to an ~ eous 10 medium at a te",perd(ure in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C. Moreover, the coating of the hydrùphil;c polymeric material does not sigr,i~icar,ll~ suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the substrate may come in contact.
In certain embodiments, the hydrophilicity of the coating of polymeric material will vary in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the substrate.
By way of example, the substrate may be a sheet-like malenal, such as a sheet of a foamed material. The sheet-like ",a(e~al also may be a fibrous web, such as a woven or nonwoven fabric or web. The fibrous web desirably will be a nonwoven web.
Also by way of example, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a polysac-charide. As another example, the polymeric ",a(eF,al may be a modified polysac-20 charide. When the hydrophilic polymeric ",a~erial is a polysaccharide, it may have aplurality of hydloph~bic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydluph~b c groups may be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccharide ba.,hL,one. The hydluphcbic groups may be adapted to provide an affinity of the polymeric rllal.arial for the hydl.phobic polymer of which the porous substrate is cofi,posed and the 2e hydrùph ''c groups may be ad~rted to render the polymeric material hydrophilic.
When the polymeric material is a modified polysaccharide, the hydluph~b:c groups may be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccharide backbone or pendant groups. The hydrophilic groups also may be pendant groups. For example, the modified polysa~l~aride may be, by way of e~.amFle only, a modified cellulose. For 30 exa"l~.'e, the h~clrùph~b'~ groups may be pendant monovalent alkyl groups, such as ethyl groups. As another exa,nple, the hydrophilic groups may be pendant monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups, such as hydroxyethyl groups.
The coated porous substrate of the present invention may be used as a ~r"ponenl of a cJisp,ose' IE absorbenl product. Examples of d is,:os-~le abso,Lenl CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 products include, by way of illusl(alion only, diapers; training pants; feminine care products, such as sanitary napkins and ~ar,lpons; incontinent care products; surgical gowns; surgical drapes; wipes; and the like.
The present invention also provides a method of preparing a coated porous 5 substrate which involves providing a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate and exposing at least a portion of the substrate to a field of reactive species. At least a portion of the substrate, including the portion exposed to a field of reactive species, then is treated with a mixture which includes water and a hydrophilic polymeric ",ale,ial as described above under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the 10 surfaces of the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material. The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C and the coating does notsignificantly depress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact. For example, the surface tension depression 15 of such an aqueous medium may be less than about 10 percent.
The field of reactive species may be, for example, a corona field. The field of reactive species also may be, again by way of example, a plasma field. The strength of the field of reactive species may vary in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the substrate.
If desired, s~hsequent to treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with the mixture comprising water and a hydrophilic polymeric material, a portion of the substrate may be exposed to a field of reactive species as described above.
Brief Description of the D~ s FIG. 1 is a plot of run-off in mJ and surface tension of the run-off liquid in dynes/cm, respectively, versus wash cycle number for a nonwoven fabric coated inaccordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the segmented electrode of a segmented electrode corona discharge appar&lus employed in an example.
FIG. 3 is diag~n,r"alic representation of a substrate having zones with different wettability and/or wicking characteristics.
.. . .
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Detailed Description of the l~ nt;GI~
As used herein, the term "porous hyd~ophabic polymer substrate" is meant to include any shaped article, provided it is porous and composed, in whole or in part, of 5 a hydrophobic polymer. For example, the substrate may be a sheet-like material, such as a sheet of a foamed material. The sheet-like material also may be a fibrous web, such as a woven or nonwoven fabric or web. The substrate also may include hyd,uphobic polymer fibers, Per se, or hydrophobic polymer fibers which have been formed into a fibrous web. The fibrous web desirably will be a nonwoven web, such 10 as, but not limited to, a meltblown web or a spunbonded web. The substrate also may be a laminate of two or more layers of a sheet-like material. For example, the layers may be independently selected from the group consis~ing of meltblown webs and spunbonded webs. However, other sheet-like materials may be used in addition to, or instead of, meltblown and spunbonded webs. In addition, the layers of the la",:nale 15 may be prepared from the same hyd,uphcbic polymer or different hydrophobic polymers.
The term "hydrophobic polymer" is used herein to mean any polymer resistant to wetting, or not readily wet, by water, i.e., having a lack of affinity for water.
Examples of hydrophobic polymers include, by way of illustration only, polyolefins, 20 such as polyethylene, poly(isobutene), poly(isoprene), poly(4-methyl-1 -pentene), polypropylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, ethylene-propylene-hexadiene copolymers, and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers; styrene polymers, such as poly(styrene), poly(2-methylstyrene), styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers having less than about 20 mole-percent acrylonitrile, and styrene-2,2,3,3,-tetrafluoropropyl methacrylate 25 copolymers; halogenated hydroca,bon polymers, such as poly(cl,lorol,irluoroethylene), chlo.-ol,irluoroethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymers, poly(hexafluoroprc,pylene), poly(tetrafluoroethylene), tetrafluoroethylene-ethylene copolymers, poly(trifluoroethyl-ene), poly(vinyl fluoride), and poly(vinylidene fluoride); vinyl polymers, such as poly(vinyl butyrate), poly(vinyl decanoate), poly(vinyl dodecanoate), poly(vinyl30 hexadecanoate), poly(vinyl hexanoate), poly(vinyl propionate), poly(vinyl octanoate), poly(heptafluoroisopropoxyethylene), poly(heptafluoroisoprt,poxypropylene), and poly-(methacrylonitrile); acrylic polymers, such as poly(~-butyl acetate), poly(ethyl acrylate), poly[(1-chlorodifluoromethyl)tetrafluoroethyl acrylate], poly[di(chlorofluoro,nell,yl)fluoro-methyl acrylate], poly(1,1-dihydroheptafluorobutyl acrylate), poly(1,1-dihydropenta-CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTAJS97/097~6 fluoroisopropyl acrylate), poly(1 ,1-dihydropentadecafluorocctyl acrylate), poly(heptafluoroisopropyl acrylate), poly[5-(heptafluoroisopropoxy)pentyl acrylate], poly[1 1-(heptafluoroisopropoxy)undecyl acrylate], poly~2-(heptafluoropropoxy)ethyl acrylate], and poly(nonafluoroisobutyl acrylate); methacrylic polymers, such as 5 poly(benzyl methacrylate), poly(~-butyl methacrylate), poly(isobutyl n~ell ,acrylate), poly(~-butyl methacrylate), poly(-butylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dodecyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate), poly(n-hexyl methacrylate), poly(phenyl ",e:~l)a~,lylate), poly(~-propyl methacrylate), poly(octadecyl methacrylate), poly(1, 1-dihydropentadecafluorooctyl methacrylate), poly-l0 (heptafluoroisopropyl methacrylate), poly(heptadecafluorooctyl methacrylate), poly(1-hydlotet,drluoroethyl methacrylate), poly(1,1-dihycl~otet,d~luoropropyl methacrylate), poly(1-hydrohexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate), and poly(-nonafluorobutyl methacrylate); and polyesters, such a poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate) .
The term "polyolefin" is used herein to mean a polymer prepared by the addition polymerization of one or more unsaturated monomers which contain only carbon and hydrogen atoms. Exar, ~F l~s of such polyolefins include polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(1-butene), poly(2-butene), poly(1-pentene), poly(2-pentene~,poly(3-methyl-1-pentene), poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), and the like. In addition, such 20 term is meant to include blends of two or more polyolefins and random and block copolymers prepared from two or more different unsaturated monomers. Because of their commercial importance, the most desired polyolefins are polyethylene and polypropylene.
The h~,drophobic polymer also may contain minor amounts of additives as is 25 customary in the art. For example, the hydrophobic polymer may contain piy,nenls, delustrants, antioxidanls, anlistatic agents, stabilizers, oxygen scavengers, and the like.
The term "durable" as used herein with reference to a coating of a hydrophilic polymeric material on the porous substrate means that the coated porous substrate 30 remains wettable after at least three exposures to an aqueous medium, such as water, saline, and urine and other body fluids.
One procedure for evaluating durability when the porous substrate is a fibrous web is a modified run-off test followed by washing and drying (a wash/dry cycle). The fibrous web typically will remain wettable for at least five cycles of exposing, washing, . , . . . ~ .. . . . . . . ...... .
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 and drying. Desirably, the coated porous substrate will remain wettable after being subjected to at least ten cycles.
The run-off test (exposure) and wash/dry procedure are described in U.S.
Patent No. 5,258,221 to Meirowitz et al. which is incorporated herein by reference.
5 Typically, a generally rectangular, 8-inch by 15-inch (about 20-cm by 38-cm) sample of a fibrous web, such as a nonwoven web, is mounted on top of an absorbent core composed of polypropylene, wood pulp fibers, and/or a superdbso,l,ent material. The resulting test assembly is centered on the inclined surface and held in place with tape at each corner of the assembly. The angle of the inclined surface is 45~ instead of the 10 30~ angle described in the patent. The funnel is located at approximately 7.8 inches (about 200 mm) from the bottom or lower edge of the test assembly. The valve of the funnel is located approximately 10 mm above the top surface of the test assembly.
One hundred ml of water having a temperature of 35~C is placed in the funnel. The valve of the funnel is opened to dispense the water over a period of about 15 seconds.
The amount of water which runs off and is collected in the collection means is determined and recorded. A fibrous web is typically considered to pass the modified run-off test if the amount of water collected in the collection means is less than an amount deemed appropriate for a given type of fibrous web. For example, when thefibrous web is a light-weight (e.g., having a basis weight of 0.6 ounces per square yard 20 or about 20 grams per square meter) spunbonded nonwoven web, the amount of water collected should be less than 20 ml.
The wash/dry cycle was modified by utilizing 500 ml, rather than one liter, of room-temperature water (about 23~C). Thus, the generally rectangular sample of coated porous substrate described above is placed in the 500 ml of water. The sample 25 is allowed to remain in the water for one minute while being agitated at 15-20 revolutions per minute by a mechanical shaker. The sample is removed from the water and excess liquid squeezed back into the wash water container. The sample is allowed to air dry ovemight and then is subjected to the modified run-off test described above. This process is repeated the desired number of times. The surface tension of 30 the wash water is determined after each wash/dry cycle with fresh water being used for each cycle. The surface tension of the water is determined according to ASTM Test Method D 1590-60 using a Fisher tensiometer (Fisher Scientific Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).
.... . . . .. . . ..
CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 As used herein, the term "hydrophilic polymeric ,i,ale.ial means that the polymeric material has a surface free energy such that the polymeric material iswettable by an aqueous medium. That is, an aqueous medium wets the hyd,upl~, !;
polymeric material with which the porous substrate is coated. For example, the surface free energy of the hydrophilic polymeric material may be at least about 50 dynes cm~'.
As another example, the surface free energy of the hydrophilic polymeric material may be in a range of from about 50 to about 72 dynes cm~'.
The term "aqueous medium" is used herein to mean any liquid medium of which water is a major component. Thus, the term includes water ~~ se and aqueous 10 solutions and dispersions. For example, the aqueous medium may be a liquid bodily discl,ar~e, such as urine, menses, and saliva.
As used herein, the term "wettable" and va~ialions thereof means wettable by an aqueous medium, i.e., the aqueous medium spreads over the surface of a substrate. The term is used interchangeably with the term "wettable by water" and 15 va(ialions thereof and has the same meaning.
As used herein, the phrase "affinity of the polymeric material for the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate" means that the hydrophilic polymeric material coats the substrate substantially uniformly (i.e., to an extent sufficient to permit the coated substrate to be wet by an aqueous medium), typically after first exposing the substrate 20 to a field of reactive species. The term "partial affinity" means that the polymeric material partially coats the porous substrate. The functional consequence of a partial affinity is that the coated porous substrate is only partially wettable.
The term "monovalent alkyl group" is used herein to mean a monovalent alkyl group having from 1 to about 6 carbon atoms. Examples of monovalent alkyl groups25 include, by way of illustration only, methyl, ethyl, 1-propyl, isopropyl, 1-butyl, 2-butyl, -butyl, 1-pentyl, 2-pentyl, 3-pentyl, 2-methyl-2-butyl, 3-methyl-2-butyl, 1-hexyl, 2-hexyl, 3-hexyl, 4-hexyl, 2,2 dimethylbutyl, 2,3-dimethylbutyl, 2-methylpentyl, 3-methylpentyl, 3-ethyl-2-butyl, and the like.
As used herein, the term "monovalent hydroxyalkyl group" means a monovalent 30 alkyl group as described above in which a hydrogen atom has been replaced with a hydroxy group. Examples of monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups include, also by way of illustration, hydroxyethyl, 2-hydroxypropyl, 3-hydroxypropyl, 1-hydroxy-2-propyl, 4-hydroxybutyl, 3-hydroxybutyl, 2-hydroxybutyl, 4-hydroxy-2-butyl, 3-hydroxy-2-butyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-2-propyl, 5-hydroxypentyl, 4-hydroxypentyl, 3-hydroxypentyl, 2-.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 hydroxypentyl, 5-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 4-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 3-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 5-hydroxy-3-pentyl, 4-hydroxy-3-pentyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-2-butyl, 3-hydroxymethyl-2-butyl, 3-methyl-1-hydroxy-2-butyl, 6-hydroxyhexyl, 4-hydroxy-2-hexyl, 1-hydroxy-3-hexyl, 2-hydroxy-4-hexyl, 2,2-dimethyl-4-hydroxybutyl, 2,3-dimethyl-1-butyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-5 pentyl, 2-methyl-4-hydroxypentyi, 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-butyl, and the like.
The terrn "pendant" is used herein with respect to the monovalent alkyl and hydroxyalky groups to mean that such groups are attached to the polymer backbonebut are not part of it. Thus, removal of the pendant groups will not alter the chemical structure of the backbone.
As already stated, the coated porous substrate of the present invention may include hydrophobic polymer fibers. Such fibers are substantially ur,iFG,-"ly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric material. As an example, the hydrophobic polymer fibers may be polyolefin fibers. For example, the polyolefin fibers may be polyethylene or polypropylene fibers.
The hydrophobic polymer fibers generally may be prepared by any known means. As a practical matter, however, the fibers usually will be prepared by a melt-extrusion process and formed into a fibrous web, such as a nonwoven web. The term "melt-extrusion process" as applied to a nonwoven web is meant to include a nonwoven web prepared by any melt-extrusion process for forming a nonwoven web in 20 which melt-extrusion to form fibers is followed by web fo",~dlion, typically concurrently, on a foraminous support. The temm includes, among others, such well-known processes as meltblowing, coforming, spu"boncli,-g, and the like. By way of illusl,ation only, such processes are exemplified by the f~"aw;,1g references:
(a) meltblowing references include, by way of example, U.S. Patent Nos.
25 3,016,599 to R. W. Perry, Jr., 3,704,198 to J. S. Prentice, 3,755,527 to J. P. Keller et al., 3,849,241 to R. R. Butin et al., 3,978,185 to R. R. Butin et al., and 4,663,220 to T.
J. Wisneski et al. See, also, V. A. Wente, "SuperFine Thermopl~stic Fibers", Industrial and En~ineerin~ Chemistrv, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1342-1346 (1956); V. A. Wente et al., "Manufacture of Superfine Organic Fibers", Navy Research Laboratory, Washington,30 D.C., NRL Report 4364 (111437), dated May 25, 1954, United States Department of Commerce, Office of Technical Services; and Robert R. Butin and Dwight T. Lohkamp, "Melt Blowing - A One-Step Web Process for New Nonwoven Products", Journal of the Technical Associalion of the Pulp and Paper Industry, Vol. 56, No.4, pp. 74-77 (1973);
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 (b) coforming ,efer~nces include U.S. Patent Nos. 4,100,324 to R. A.
Ander~on et al. and 4,118,531 to E. R. Hauser; and (c) spunbonding references include, among others, U.S. Patent Nos.
3,341,394 to Kinney, 3,655,862 to Dorschner et al., 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., 5 3,705,068 to Dobo et al., 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al., 3,8~3,651 to Porte, 4,064,605 to Akiyama et al., 4,091,140 to I la""on, 4,100,319 to Schwartz, 4,340,563 to Appel and hlo""an, 4,405,297 to Appel and Mo""an, 4,434,204 to Hartman et al., 4,627,811 to Greiser and Wagner, and 4,644,045 to Fowells.
Other methods for preparing nonwoven webs are, of course, known and may 10 be e",F'oycd. Such methods include air laying, wet laying, carding, and the like. In some cases it may be either desirable or necess~ry to stabilize the nonwoven web by known means, such as thermal point bonding, through-air bonding, and hydroentan-gling. In addition to nonwoven webs, the hydrophobic polymer fibers may be in the form of continuous filaments or staple fibers, as well as woven or knitted fabrics 15 prepared from such continuous filaments or staple fibers.
The coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 1 0~C to about 50~C and does not significantly suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the fibrous web may come in contact. For example, the surface tension of the aqueous20 medium may not be suppressed or lowered more than about 10 percent.
By way of illusl, dlion only, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a polysaccharide. The polysaccharide may have a plutality of hydrophobic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydrophobic groups may be =CH- and -CH2-groups in the polysaccharide backbone. The hydrophobic groups may be adapted to 25 provide an affinity of the polymeric material for the hydrophobic polymer of which the porous substrate is composed and the hydroph,' c groups may be adapted to renderthe polymeric material hydrophilic. ~xamples of polysaccharides include, for example, natural gums, such as agar, agarose, carrageenans, fu,-e"erdn, alginates, locust bean gum, gum arabic, guar gum, gum konjac, and gum karaya; microbial fermentation 30 products, such as gellan gum, xanthan gum, and dextran gum; cellulose, such as microcrystalline cellulose; and animal products, such as hyaluronic acid, heparin, chitin, and ch;~os~n.
Again by way of illustration only, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a modified polysaccharide. A modified polysacchatide also may have a plurality of ~ . ... .. .. ~ =
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/Og756 hydrophobic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydrophobic groupsmay be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccl~aride backbone, or pendant groups.The hydrophilic groups also may be pendant groups. Again, the hydrophobic groupsmay be adapted to provide an affinity of the polymeric material for the hydrophobic 5 polymer of which the porous substrate is composed and the hydrophilic groups may be adapted to render the polymeric material hydrophilic. By way of illustration only, examples of modified polysaccharides include modified cellu'~ses or cellulose derivatives, such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methyl cell~ se, ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxypropyl cel' ~'cse, ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, and 10 carboxymethyl cellulose; starch and pectin derivatives, such as carboxymethyl starch, starch aldehyde, and pectates; and animal product derivatives, such as carboxymethyl chitin and carboxymethyl chitosan.
Particularly useful types of polysaccharides and modified polysaccharides include, by way of illustration, agar; alginates; and modified celluloses, such as ethyl 15 hydroxyethyl cellulose. In modified polysaccharides, particularly in the useful type of modified polysaccharides just noted, the hydrophobic groups may be pendant monovalent alkyl groups. For example, such hydrophobic groups may be methyl or ethyl groups. As a further example, the hydrophilic groups may be pendant monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups. As yet another example, such hydrophilic groups 20 may be hydroxyethyl groups.
Finally, the hydrophilicity of the coating of polymeric material may vary in a cor,lr~lled manner across at least one dimension of the coated porous substrate. For example, a coated porous substrate may have a central region of higher hydrophilicity which extends, for example, along the length of the substrate, with regions of lower 25 hydrophilicity on both sides of the central region. Thus, the hydrophilicity of such a substrate would vary in a cor,lrolled manner across the width thereof. Other varialions coming within the scope of the present invention will be readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art.
Tuming now to the method for preparing a coated porous substrate, it involves 30 providing a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate and exposing at least a portion of the substrate to a field of reactive species. At least a portion of the substrate, including the portion exposed to the field of reactive species, then is treated with a mixture which includes water and a hydrophilic polymeric material as described above under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the surfaces of the porous substrate CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 with the hydrophilic polymeric ",atenal. The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric ~"ale,ial is durable to an ~queous medium at a tel"perd~.~re in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C and the coating does not siylliricanlly depress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.5 For example, the surface tension depression of such an aqueous medium may be less than about 10 percent. In some in~lances, it may be either helpful or necess~ry to crosslink the coating on the porous substrate to impart a desired level of durability.
The field of reactive species serves to increase the affinity of the hydrophilicpolymeric material for the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate. The field of reactive 10 species may be, by way of e~a",ple, a corona field. As another example, the field of reactive species may be a plasma field. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that exposure of the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate to a field ofreactive species results in alterations of the surfaces of the substrate, thereby temporarily raising the surface energy of the substrate. This, in turn, allows the lS penet,aliol1 of the treating solution into the porous substrate; that is, the porous substrate may be saturated with the treating solution.
Although exposure of the porous substrate to a field of reactive species is a desired method of temporarily raising the surface energy of the substrate, otherprocedures may be employed. For example, the porous substrate may be treated with 2 o ozone or passed through an oxidizing solution, such as an aqueous medium containing chromium trioxide and sulfuric acid. Care should be taken with such other procedures, however, to either prevent or minimize degradation of the porous substrate.
The strength of the field of reactive species may be varied in a cont,~"ed 25 manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web. Upon coating the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material, the extent or degree of hydrophilicity of the coating is directly p,opo,lional to the strength of the field. Thus, the hydloph' icity of the coating of polymeric material will vary in a conl,olled manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web.
The strength of the field of reactive species is readily varied in a controlled manner by known means. For example, a corona apparatus having a segmented electrode may be e",pl~yed, in which the distance of each segment from the sample to be treated may be varied independently. As another example, a corona apparatus having a gap-gradient electrode system may be utilized; in this case, one electrode . . ~ .
CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 WO 97/47801 PCTtUS97/09756 may be rotated about an axis which is normal to the length of the ele~,-.de. Other methods also may be employed; see, for example, "Fabricalion of a Continuous Wettability Gradient by Radio Frequency Plasma Discharge", W.G. Pitt, J. ColloidInterface Sci., 133, No. 1, 223 (1989); and "Wettability Gradient Surfaces Prepared by 5 Corona Discharge Treal,nenl", J . H. Lee, et al., Transactions of the 1 7th Annual Meetin~ of the societY for Bio~"dleri31s, May 1-5, 1991, page 133, Scottsdale, Arizona.
If desired, at least a portion of the porous substrate may be exrosed to a fieldof reactive species subsequent to treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with a mixture cG"~prising water and a polymeric ",alerial. Such post-exposure 10 typically increases the hydrophilicity of the coated porous substrate. Moreover, the strength of the field of reactive species in such post-exposure also may vary in a co"l,."ed manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web as already described. Such post-exposure may even enhance the durability of the coating through crosslinking.
The present invention is further described by the exa",F'ss which follow. Such examples, however, are not to be construed as limiting in any way either the spirit or the scope of the present invention.
Example 1 A 0.6 ounce per square yard or osy (about 20 grams per square meter or gsm) polypropylene spunbond fabric (Fabric A) was exposed to a corona discharge undera",~ ent conditions. The field strength of the corona was 24 wattslft2/min (about 1.6 Joules/cm2). Immediately following the corona treatment, the fabric was dipped in a 25 0.25 percent by weight aqueous solution of ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (Bermocol E481, Akzo Nobel), referred to hereinafter as Coating A. After co",F'--to saturation of the fabric, indicated by a change in color from white to translucent, the fabric was nipped between two rubber rollers in an Atlas labordtory wringer at 10 Ibs (about 4.~
kg) nip pressure. The coated fabric then was dried in an oven at 60~C for about 30 30 minutes.
Water absorption of the coated fabric was tested qualitatively by placing water drops on the surface of the fabric. An i"slantaneous absorption was observed which indicated that the fabric was substanlidlly uniformly coated with the ethyl hydroxyethyl cellu'~se (Coating A).
CA 022s6388 1998-ll-23 The coating on the fabric was tested for durability by subjecting the fabric to multiple exposures to water as described in the modified run-off test procedure. The data are su""na,i~ed in Table 1. In addition to durability, the coatings of the present invention do not lower the surface tension of the liquid to which the coated fabric is 5 exposed. To demonstrate that such is the case, the surface tension of the water nun-off was measured after each cycle performed in the durability test described above.
The results are included in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of Run-OffN~ash Test Results CYcle No. Run-Off (ml) SurfaceTensiona 1.2 66 3 0.5 67 4 2.0 67 1.0 66 6 3.0 66 7 2.0 67 8 2.5 66 9 1.5 66 2.0 66 aSurface tension of the wash water, in dynes/cm.
In order to better visualize the data in the table, they were plotted as run-off in ml (left y-axis) and surface tension of wash water (right y-axis), respectively, versus wash cycle number. The plot is shown as FIG. 1. The figure clearly indicates that ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose-coated fabric is durable to multiple exposures of 100 ml of 30 water.
By co",parison, a fabric coated with a typical surfactant (e.g., a polyethoxylated octylphenol, Triton~ X-102) will not perform well to multiple exposures since the surfactant is essentially washed off upon the first exposure to water. For example, a sample of virgin Fabric A was coated with Triton~ X-102 and subjected to the modified CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 run-off test procedure. The run-off prior to the first washing was 2 ml, whereas the run-off after the first washing was 90 ml.
FIG. 1 also shows that virtually no change in the surface tension of the wash water occurred. On the other hand, a signiricant drop in surface tension of the wash 5 water is observed with a Triton~) X-102 treated fabric. By way of example, the water from the first washing of the Triton@~ X-102 treated fabric had a surface tension of 54 dynes/cm, which is a drop of roughly 20 percent from the surface tension of the water used (see Table 1).
Example 2 The coating procedure of Example 1 was repeated, except that two other nonwoven fabrics, Fabrics B and C, were utilized and another ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (EHM100, Akzo Nobel), referred to hereinafter as Coating E~, also was 15 employed. Fabric B was a spunbond web composed of 50/50, eccentric sheath/core bicomponent, 1.3 denier (0.14 tex) fibers. The core consisted of Type 3445 poly-propylene (Exxon Chemical Americas, Houston, Texas 77079) and the sheath consisted of Aspun(~) 6811A linear low density polyethylene (The Dow Chemical Company). Each component contained 2 percent by weight of Ampacet 41438 20 titanium dioxide. Fabric C was a 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) meltblown web prepared from Himont PF015 polypropylene (Himont Incorporated, Wilmington, Delaware).
The coated fabrics then were tested for their ability to wick water against gravity (the vertical wicking test). The test utilized a 4.5-cm x 22.5-cm sample, with the longest dimension of the sample being parallel with the machine direction. The sample was 25 placed on a graduated sample holder and hung from a slide which was suspendedover a reservoir containing a saline solution. The slide was lowered into the saline solution until 2.5 cm of the sample was below the surface of the solution. A timer was started and the position of the wicking fluid front was observed and recorded as a function of time over a 30-minute period.
The results of the wicking test are summarized in Table 2. In this and some subsequent tables, "Coating Add-on" represents the amount of coating on the sample, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight of the sample. Ree~use of the low amounts involved, coating add-on is a calculated value. The sample was weighed, treated with the aqueous solution of a hydrophilic polymeric ",ale,ial, and weighed .. , .. . . .. . . ... _.~ , _ CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 again. Subtracting the dry weight from the wet weight gave the wet pick-up.
Multiplying the wet pick-up by the concentration of the hydrophilic polymeric material in the treating solution gave the amount of hydrophilic polymeric material in the sample.
That amount then was divided by the dry weight of the sample and the quotient 5 multiplied by 100 to give coating add-on. Thus, Coating Add-on = [(100)(Wet Wt. - Dry Wt.)(Concn.)]lDry wt.
Table 2 oSummary of Wicking Behavior of Coated Fabrics Coating Vertical Wickin~ Hei~ht (cm) Fabric Coatin~ Add-ona 5 min. 15 min. 30 min.
B --- --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 B B 0.1 9.5 10.5 10.5 B B 0.2 14.0 18.5 21.0 C A 0.2 14.0 20.0 21.0 B A 0.1 9.0 10.0 15.0 B A 0.2 12.5 14.5 15.0 C --- --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 C B 0.1 12.5 18.0 20.0 C B 0.2 13.0 18.5 20.0 C A 0.1 12.0 18.0 20.0 25 aE~r~ssed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
The data in Table 2 indicate the coated fabrics wick water well. The data also indicate that it is possible to tailor the wicking behavior of a fabric for a specific arr'~ation by selecting the appropriate coating material, add-on level, and web 30 structure.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 Example 3 The fabric employed in this example was Fabric D, a 2.5-osy (about 85 gsm) spunbond nonwoven web in which the fibers were side-by-side bicomponent fibers.
5 The components, which were present in approximately equal amounts, consisted of the polyethylene and polypropylene utilized for Fabric ~ (Example 2). The fabric was cut into a sample 8 inches (about 20 cm) by 10 inches (about 25 cm). The sample was oxidized in a Branson/lPC Model PM119 plasma treater at 80 watts of power in an air plasma at 0.6 torr for 5 minutes. The sample then was immersed for about 30 seconds 10 in a solution consisting of 3.97 9 of calcium chlcride dihydrate (Catalog No. 22,350-6, Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and 3,000 ml of water. The solution contained 0.1 percent by weight of calcium chloride. Excess solution was removed from the wetted fabric by vacuum extraction (i.e., passing the wetted fabric over a slot to which a vacuum was applied). The sample contained approximately 150 15 percent by weight wet pick-up (based on the dry weight of the sample) of the calcium chloride solution after vacuum extraction.
The still wet sample was dipped for about 30 seconds in a solution composed of 3.00 9 or 0.1 percent by weight of high viscosity sodium alginate (Catalog No.
A-7128, Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri) in 3,000 ml of water for about 20 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed from the wet sample by vacuum extraction.
The sample at this stage contained approximately 300 percent of both the calciumchloride and sodium alginate solutions, resulting in the formation of a calcium alginate gel (Coating C) on the fibers of the sample. The sample then was air dried over night at ambient temperature (about 20~-25~C).
The treated sample exhibited vertical wicking heights of 6.5 cm and 9.0 cm and 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of less than 2 percent. Surface tension depression was evaluated by placing a 1-inch by 9-inch (about 2.5-cm by about 23-cm) strip of coated fabric in 80 ml of water for 30 min. The surface tension of the water then was measured and compared with that of pure water;
30 the comparison was expressed as a percent change.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/Og756 Example 4 A 12-inch by 12-inch (about 30-cm by about 30-cm) sample of barrier grade 5 polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was oxidized in a plasma treater at 300 watts of power in an oxidizing plasma for 1 minute. The sample then was ir",-,er~ed in an aqueous solution of 0.3 percent by weight calcium chloride dihydrate for about 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed by passing the sample between the rolls of an Atlas laboratory wringer. The sample contained between 200 and 250 percent wet 10 pick-up of the calcium chioride solution.
The still wet sample then was dipped in a solution of 0.5 percent by weight of sodium polygalacturonate (Catalog No. P-1879, Sigma Chemical Company) in water for about 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed by passing the sample between the rolls of an Atlas laboratory wringer as before. The sample now contained from 200 15 to 250 percent by weight of a mixture of the calcium chloride and sodium polygalac-turonate solutions, resulting in the formation of a calcium polygalncturonate gel coating (Coating D). The sample was dried overnight at ambient temperature.
After the sample had dried, it was subjected to the vertical wicking test with saline solution. The solution reached a height of 11 cm in five minutes.
In the examples which follow (Examples 5-14), the coated fabrics were evaluated for vertical wicking of saline solution, for surface tension depression, and for run-off. Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. Therun-off and vertical wicking tests were carried out as described previously (Examples 1 and 2, respectively).
Example 5 A 7-inch by 10-inch (about 18-cm by 25-cm) sheet of 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was treated in a radio-frequency (RF) plasma generator (Branson/lPC Model PM119 plasma treater) at 50 watts of power and about 0.6 torr for 10 minutes under hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide vapor wasgenerated by placing a small beaker containing 30 percent aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution (Catalog No. 5240, Baxter Diagnostic Inc., McGaw, Illinois) in the vacuum chamber of the plasma unit. The sheet then was dipped into a 0.2 percent by ... .. .
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 weight aqueous agarose solution (Coating E, Aldrich Chemical Co.) maintained at 70~C, and squeezed through an Atlas laboratory wringer to achieve a 100 percent by weight wet pick-up. The web, which was completely saturated in the bath, was dried under ambient conditions to a constant weight. The treated web exhibited vertical 5 wicking heights of 13.5 cm and 20.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 4 percent.
Example 6 10 The procedure of Example 5 was carried out with Fabric B of Example 2; the fabric had a basis weight of 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm). The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 14.5 cm and 18.0 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 6 percent.
Example 7 The procedure of Example 5 was repeated, except that the fabric was dipped into an aqueous solution containing 0.2 percent by weight of a 90:10 mixture by weight of agar (American Bio-oryanics Co.) and carrageenan (Kappa-Carrageenan, FMC
20 Corporation) (Coating F). The fabric was completely saturated in the bath. The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 13 cm and 19 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 4 percent.
Example 8 The procedure of Example 5 was repeated, except that the fabric was dipped into an aqueous solution containing 0.3 percent by weight of gellan gum (Coating G, Gelrite~, Kelco Co.). The fabric was completely saturated in the bath. The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 7 cm and 11.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, 30 respe~ ely, and a surface tension depression of 9 percent.
Upon replacing the gellan gum solution with a 0.2 percent by weight solution of locust bean gum (Coating H, LBG, Aldrich Chemical Co.), the treated fabric exhibited a vertical wicking height of 2 cm in 60 min, and a surface tension depression of 0percent. Although the wicking result was not noteworthy, the coated web nevertheless CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 was wettable and the coating was durable. Accordingly, locust bean gum is an example of a material which is not as hydrophilic as the other polymeric materials employed in the exa",,~lEs. However, locust bean gum provides a means for impa,ling moderate hydrophilic character to a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate.
The procedure was repeated with both Fabric B and Fabric C and a variety of coatings and add-on levels. Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. The results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3 Summary of Results Coatin~ Wickin~ Ht. (cm) Fabric PTa Tvpe Add-Onb 5 min. 15 min. STDC
C pd le 0.1 10.0 16.5 8 C P 1 0.5 --- 19.0 5 C P E~ 0.2 13.5 20.5 4 C P F~ 0.2 13.0 19.0 4 B P E 0.2 14.5 18.0 6 B P F 0.2 13.0 19.0 0 C P Gh 03 70 11.5 9 B P G 0.3 14.5 18.0 10 aPre-treatment.
bExpressed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
CPercent surface tension depression.
dPlasma.
eA9an ~Agarose.
~Agar/ca"dgeenan.
hGellan gum.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Example 9 A treater at Faustel, Inc. (Germantown, Wisconsin) was used to continuously 5 surface-treat a roll of 24-inch (about 61-cm) wide fabric. The fabric was passed sequentially through an Enercon RF Corona treater (tuned to about 20 watts/ft2/min or about 1.3 Joules/cm2 energy input), a dip-and-squeeze coater, and a through-air drying oven before rewinding. A 1.5 osy polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was treated on-line at 15 ft/min. (about 7.6 cm/sec), wherein the coater contained a 0.3 percent by 10 weight agar (Coating 1, American Bio-Organics Co.) solution at 50~C, and drying was carried out at 40~C. The treated web exhibited vertical wicking heights of 5.5 cm and 8.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and 0 percent surface tension depression.
Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. The results are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4 Summary of Results Coatinq Wickinq Ht. (cm) Fabric PTa TYpe Add-Onb 5 min. 15 min. STDC
B oCd le 0 3 8.0 9.5 0 C OC I 0.3 9.0 12.5 0 aPre-treatment.
bExpressed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
25 CPercent surFace tension depression.
dOn-line corona.
eA9ar.
Ex~n"~le 10 A 7-inch by 10-inch (about 18-cm by 25-cm) sheet of 0.6 osy (about 20 gsm) polypropylene spunbond diaper liner (commercially produced at Kimberly-Clark Corporation's Berkeley mill) (Fabric A) was treated in a Branson Plasma generator for 5 minutes under hydrogen peroxide plasma as described in Example 3. The sheet CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 then was dipped into a 0.3 percent by aqueous solution of agar (Coating 1 American Bio-organics Co.) maintained at 70~C and squeezed through an Atlas laboratory ringer to achieve a 100 % wet pick-up. The web which was co",rlately wet out in the bath was dried under ambient conditions. The treated liner showed no surface tension 5 depression. The modified run-off test (Example 1) was conducted to examine thecoating durability. The results are shown in Table 5 which follows Example 11.
Example 1 1 o The procedure of Example 10 was repeated except that after the plasma treatment the sheet was sprayed with a hot 0.3 percent by aqueous agar (Coating 1 American Bio-organics Co.) solution using a laboratory glass sprayer to achieve approximately 100 percent by weight wet pick-up. The web was dried to constant weight under ambient conditions. The treated liner showed no surface tension depression. The treated liner was tested as described in Example 10. The results of the test for both Examples 10 and 11 are su"""ari~ed in Table 5 (in the table Dip-and-Nip ' refers to Example 10 and "Spray" refers to Example 11).
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Table 5 Summary of Run-off Test Results Run-off (~) Insult No. Dip-and-NiP sPrav 2 0.3 0.4 4 0 0.7 0.1 6 0 2.3 7 0.4 2.5 8 0.2 1.2 9 0.6 1.2 0.2 2.9 11 0.6 5.1 12 0.8 0.4 13 1.7 1.2 14 0.6 2.1 1 0.7 Example 12 A sheet of a metallocene polyolefin foam (OPCELL(g) LC31 foam, Sentinel Products Corp., Hyannis, Massachusetts) was cut to a thickness of 0.25 inch (about 0.6 cm). The foam was treated in a Plasma generator (Branson/PC Model PM119) at 80 Watts, 0.6 torr in an air plasma for 8 minutes. The foam then was saturated with a 0.2 percent by weight agar (Coating 1) solution at approximately 60~C. The foam was 30 vacuum extracted by passing it over a slot to which a vacuum was applied until an approximately 250 percent wet pick-up was achieved. All samples were air dried prior to testing. Drops of water placed on the foam absorbed into the structure within 1 minute, compared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread at all, even after 15 minutes.
... . . ..
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 The amount of fluid the material would hold also was determined. The sample was placed in water under a 110 gram weight for 5 minutes (the weight was necess~ry as the samples were buoyant). The amount of water retained by the foam per gram of foam is listed in Table 6 at the end of Example 15. As seen in the table the treated 5 material held twice as much fluid as the untreated foam.
Example 13 The procedure of Example 12 was repeated with agar (Coating 1) except that 10 the foam employed was a different metallocene polyolefin foam (OPCELL~9 LC33 foam Sentinel Products Corp.). The foam was vacuum extracted until the wet pick-up was approximately 100 percent. The sa",plEs were air dried prior to testing. Drops of water placed on the foam absorbed into the structure within 0.5 minute co""~ared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes.15 The amount of fluid contained in the foam was measured as described in Example 12 and is su"""ari,ed in Table 6 which follows Example 15. The treated foam held more water than the untreated material.
Example 14 The procedure of Example 12 was repeated except that after the plasma treatment the foam was saturated with a 0.4 percent by weight aqueous solution of calcium chloride dihydrate. Excess solution was removed from the wetted foam by vacuum extraction until the wet weight was approximately 150 percent of the dry 25 weight. The still wet foam then was dipped in a 0.3 percent by weight aqueoussolution of high viscosity sodium alginate. Excess solution was removed from the wet foam by vacuum extraction until the total wet weight was 300 percent of the dry weight.
The reaction product calcium alginate gel (Coating C) was present in the foam at this point. The foam then was air dried overnight at ambient temperature. Drops of water 30 placed on the foam went into the structure within 0.5 minute compared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes. The amount of fluid contained in the foam was measured and is summarized in Table 6 which follows Example 1::. The treated foam held over 3 times as much water as the untreated material.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Example 15 The foam of Example 13 was plasma treated as described in Example 12. The 5 foam then was saturated with a 0.4 percent by weight aqueous solution of calcium chloride dihydrate. Excess solution was removed from the wetted foam by vacuum extraction until the wet weight was approximately 150 percent of the dry weight. The still wet foam then was dipped in a 0.3 percent by weight ~queou-s solution of high viscosity sodium alginate. Excess solution was removed from the wet foam by vacuum 10 exl,d~;lion until the total wet weight was 300 percent of the dry weight. The reaction product calcium alg;,la~e gel (Coating C) was in the foam at this point. The foam then was air dried ovemight at a,~ nl temperature. Drops of water placed on the foam went into the structure instantly compared with untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes. The amount of fluid contained in the foam 15 was measured and is su~mari~ed in Table 6 which follows. The treated foam held more water than the untreated material.
Table 6 Summary of Foam Treatment Results Foam Coatin~ Fluid Retained LC31 None 2.57 LC31 la 6.20 LC31 Cb 9.04 LC33 None 7.06 LC33 1 11.91 LC33 C 17.30 aA9ar.
bCalcium alginate.
Example 16 This example describes the use of a segmented electrode corona discharge to generate variable wettability zones on the same nonwoven fabric.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 A 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) polypropylene meltblown fabric having a width of 14 inches (about 36 cm) (Fabric C) was coated with ethyl hydroxyethyl ce"u~Qse (Coating A) as described in Example 1. The coated fabric then was oxidized in a one inch zone along the length of the fabric; this was achieved by exposing the coated fabric to a 5 corona discharge equipped with a segmented elecl,ode (Flexydine System CorotecCorporation Farmington Connecticut) made of one-inch segments; the electrode is shown schematically in FIG. 2. In FIG. 2 a segmented electrode 20 viewed normal to the machine cross-direction consists of a plurality of independent segments 22. The center segment 22A is located closer to the ground electrode 24 in order to provide a 10 critical corona discharge gap 26. A coated fabric 28 separates the segmented electrode 20 from the ground electrode 24.
A corona discharge was generated by activating the center electrode 22A (FIG.
2) at an energy input of 24 watts/ft21min (about 1.6 Joules/cm2). This treatmentgenerated a central zone which was significantly more wettable than the adjacent15 zones which had not been exposed to a corona discharge. The zones resulting from the corona discharge are shown diag,~""nalically in FIG. 3. In FIG. 3 the nonwoven web 30 has a central zone 32 and two side zones 34 and 36 extending the length of the fabric.
The wettability of the fabrics was assessed by measuring their ability to wick 20 fluid against gravity (i.e. vertical wicking) as a function of time. The vertical wicking results are reported in Table 7.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Table 7 Vertical Wichiny Data for Zoned, Coated Polypropylene Nonwoven Webs s Vertical Wickin~ Heiqht (cm) Time (min) Central ZoneSide Zones 1.5 7.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 12.0 7.0 9.0 14.5 7.0 10.0 15.0 8.0 1 5.0 --- 9.0 aMaximum height.
As Table 7 clearly shows, the central zone (post-corona treated) wicks fluid higher and faster than the side zones.
For the purpose of measuring contact angles, the above procedure was repeated with polypropylene films in place of the nonwoven web. Measurements of contact angles on the films were preferable because the intrinsic wettability of these coatings can be compared more reliably, i.e., the effect of capillarily is not present in 20 films as would be the case in nonwoven fabrics. The contact angle was measured using the sessile water drop method (see, e.g., "The contact Angle and Interface Ener-getics", J.D. Andrade, L.M. Smith, and D.E. Gregonis, in Surface and InterfacialAspects of Biomedical Polymers, Vol. 1, edited by J.D. Andrade, 1985, Plenum Press, New York) and the results are reported in Table 8. Virgin film which had not been 25 either coated or exposed to a corona discharge was used as a control.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Table 8 Water Contact Angles for roly~ . o,~ylene Films Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Material Contact An~le (~) Control 97 Coated only (side zones) 30 Coated and corona 0 treated (central zone) Table 8 demonstrates the improvements in wettability resulting from the coating of ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, and such coating combined with a post-corona treatment.
The table also demonstrates the advantage in the post-corona treatment of the coated 15 film.
Further, the effect of corona post-oxidation was elucidated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the surface of the nonwoven web. The results of the XPS analysis are reported in Table 9 as the oxygen/carbon ratio (O/C).
Table 9 XPS Data for Polypropylene Nonwoven Webs Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Material O/C Atom-Percent Ratio Control 0.01 Coated only (side zones) 0.55 Coated and corona 0.75 treated (central zone) 30 The above table shows that the O/C ratio was higher for the central zone which had been subjected to a corona discharge, compared to the side zones which had not been subjected to a corona discharge.
The contact angle, vertical wicking, and XPS data correlate well and clearly indicate that the higher the oxidation level of the surface, as measured by XPS, the , CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97147801 PCTrUS97/097~6 lower the contact angle and the faster the vertical wicking rate. Most i,npo,l~nlly, the wettability behavior as related to fluid transport (i.e., vertical wicking) can be controlled in specific zones on the same nonwoven fabric.
Example 17 .
The procedure of Example 16 was repeated, except that the corona discharge was replaced with a radio-frequency glow ~;schars~e (RFGD). Typically, the coated fabric was placed between two movable aluminum sleeves so that a narrow zone 10 about one inch (about 2.5 cm) wide was exposed to the RFGD under the following conditions:
Power= 50Watts Pressure = 0.5 torr Gas = air 15Exposuretime = 5 minutes The vertical wicking results are s-"-lmari~ed in Table 10.
Table 10 Vertical Wicking Data for Polypropylene Nonwoven 20Webs Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl CQI~ Se With and Without a Post-RFGD Treatment Vertical Wickin~ Hei~ht (cm) Time ~min) Central ZoneSide Zones 1.5 6.0 3.5 3.0 8.5 4.5 5.0 12.0 7.0 10.0 15.0a 9.0 15.0 --- 11.5 3 o aMaximum height.
Upon comparing the data in Table 10 with the data in Table 7, it is evident that the RFGD post-treatment was approximately equivalent to the corona discharge post-treatment.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 Example 18 A sample of Fabric C (the 1.5 osy or 51 gsm, polypropylene meltblown web described in Example 2) was laminated to a sample of Fabric B (the spunbond web 5 composed of sheath/core bicomponent fibers also described in Example 2). The two fabrics were coated as described in Example 1. While still saturated with the coating solution the fabrics were placed together and the resulting sheet was passed through a laboratory wringer at a nip pressure of 10 Ibs (about 4.5 kg) to remove excesscoating solution. The laminate thus produced was allowed to dry in an oven until no lO further weight loss was observed typically at 60~C for 30 minutes. The la",indle then was tested for vertical wicking and its performance was compared to that of samples of the individual coated fabrics of which the laminate was composed. The results are su",ma, i~ed in Table 11.
Table 11 Vertical Wiching Data for Each No.,~oven Web and A Laminate of both Webs, All Being Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Vertical Wickin~ Heiqht (cm) Time (min) Laminate Fabric B FabricC
1.0 5.0 1.0 3.5 2.0 8.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 15.0 4.0 6.0 The laminate composed of both Fabrics B and C clearly provided superior wicking performance compared to the individual fabrics. Moreover the performance of the laminate suggests that an unexpected synergism results from the combination of the two fabrics.
While the specification has been described in detail with respect to specific e",bodi",ents thereof it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing may readily conceive of alterations to variations of and equivalents to these embodiments.
A POROUS HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER SUBSTRATE
Background of the Invention s The present invention relates to a coated polymer substrate.
Polymers are used extensively to make a variety of products which include blown and cast films, extruded sheets, injection molded articles, foams, blow molded articles, extruded pipe, monofilaments, and nonwoven webs. Some of such polymers, 10 such as polyolefins, are naturally hydluphc~, and for many uses this property is either a positive attribute or at least not a disadvantage.
There are a number of uses for polymers, however, where their hydrophobic nature either limits their usefulness or requires some effort to modify the surface characteristics of the shaped articles made therefrom. By way of example, polyolefins, 15 such as polyethylene and polypropylene, are used to manufacture polymeric fabrics which are em~'oyed in the construction of such disposable absorbent articles as diapers, feminine care products, inconlinence products, training pants, wipes, and the like. Such polymeric fabrics often are nonwoven webs prepared by, for example, such processes as meltblowing, coforming, and spunbonding. Frequently, such polymeric20 fabrics need to be wettable by water or aqueous-based liquids. Welldbility can be obtained by spraying or otherwise coating (i.e., surface treating or topically treating) the fabric with a s-" raclanl solution during or after its rO" "alion, and then drying the web.
Some of the more common topically applied surfactants are nonionic surFactants, such as polyethoxylated octylphenols and condensation products of 25 propylene oxide with propylene glycol, by way of illusl,dlion only. These su,rdctc,nl~
are effective in rendering normally hyJ,uphab c polymeric fabrics water wettable.
However, the surfactant is readily removed from the fabric, often after only a single P-tposllre to an aqueous liquid. Such su,rdc,~a.)ls are effective in rendering the hydrophob.c polymeric fabric wettable by lowering the surface tension of the aqueous 30 liquid. Such a mechanis,n must involve at least partial removal of su,raclant from the surfaces of the fibers of which the fabric is composed.
Accordingly, there is a need for a coated porous hydrophobic substrate having a durable coating which is wettable by water without signiricanlly lowering the sur~ace tension of an aqueous medium to which the coated substrate may be exposed.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 SlJ,.. a,y of the In~e.~tion The present invention addt esses some of the difficulties and problems 5 rliscussed above by providing a coated substrate co"~posed of a hydrophobic polymer.
The surfaces of the substrate are subslan(ially unifo~ ly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric ~"alerial. The hydlùph~bic polymer may be, by way of iilU:.Ild~iOn only, a polyolefin. For exar,lple~, the polyolefin may be polyethylene or polypropylene.The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric ",alerial is durable to an ~ eous 10 medium at a te",perd(ure in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C. Moreover, the coating of the hydrùphil;c polymeric material does not sigr,i~icar,ll~ suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the substrate may come in contact.
In certain embodiments, the hydrophilicity of the coating of polymeric material will vary in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the substrate.
By way of example, the substrate may be a sheet-like malenal, such as a sheet of a foamed material. The sheet-like ",a(e~al also may be a fibrous web, such as a woven or nonwoven fabric or web. The fibrous web desirably will be a nonwoven web.
Also by way of example, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a polysac-charide. As another example, the polymeric ",a(eF,al may be a modified polysac-20 charide. When the hydrophilic polymeric ",a~erial is a polysaccharide, it may have aplurality of hydloph~bic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydluph~b c groups may be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccharide ba.,hL,one. The hydluphcbic groups may be adapted to provide an affinity of the polymeric rllal.arial for the hydl.phobic polymer of which the porous substrate is cofi,posed and the 2e hydrùph ''c groups may be ad~rted to render the polymeric material hydrophilic.
When the polymeric material is a modified polysaccharide, the hydluph~b:c groups may be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccharide backbone or pendant groups. The hydrophilic groups also may be pendant groups. For example, the modified polysa~l~aride may be, by way of e~.amFle only, a modified cellulose. For 30 exa"l~.'e, the h~clrùph~b'~ groups may be pendant monovalent alkyl groups, such as ethyl groups. As another exa,nple, the hydrophilic groups may be pendant monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups, such as hydroxyethyl groups.
The coated porous substrate of the present invention may be used as a ~r"ponenl of a cJisp,ose' IE absorbenl product. Examples of d is,:os-~le abso,Lenl CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 products include, by way of illusl(alion only, diapers; training pants; feminine care products, such as sanitary napkins and ~ar,lpons; incontinent care products; surgical gowns; surgical drapes; wipes; and the like.
The present invention also provides a method of preparing a coated porous 5 substrate which involves providing a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate and exposing at least a portion of the substrate to a field of reactive species. At least a portion of the substrate, including the portion exposed to a field of reactive species, then is treated with a mixture which includes water and a hydrophilic polymeric ",ale,ial as described above under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the 10 surfaces of the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material. The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C and the coating does notsignificantly depress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact. For example, the surface tension depression 15 of such an aqueous medium may be less than about 10 percent.
The field of reactive species may be, for example, a corona field. The field of reactive species also may be, again by way of example, a plasma field. The strength of the field of reactive species may vary in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the substrate.
If desired, s~hsequent to treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with the mixture comprising water and a hydrophilic polymeric material, a portion of the substrate may be exposed to a field of reactive species as described above.
Brief Description of the D~ s FIG. 1 is a plot of run-off in mJ and surface tension of the run-off liquid in dynes/cm, respectively, versus wash cycle number for a nonwoven fabric coated inaccordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the segmented electrode of a segmented electrode corona discharge appar&lus employed in an example.
FIG. 3 is diag~n,r"alic representation of a substrate having zones with different wettability and/or wicking characteristics.
.. . .
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Detailed Description of the l~ nt;GI~
As used herein, the term "porous hyd~ophabic polymer substrate" is meant to include any shaped article, provided it is porous and composed, in whole or in part, of 5 a hydrophobic polymer. For example, the substrate may be a sheet-like material, such as a sheet of a foamed material. The sheet-like material also may be a fibrous web, such as a woven or nonwoven fabric or web. The substrate also may include hyd,uphobic polymer fibers, Per se, or hydrophobic polymer fibers which have been formed into a fibrous web. The fibrous web desirably will be a nonwoven web, such 10 as, but not limited to, a meltblown web or a spunbonded web. The substrate also may be a laminate of two or more layers of a sheet-like material. For example, the layers may be independently selected from the group consis~ing of meltblown webs and spunbonded webs. However, other sheet-like materials may be used in addition to, or instead of, meltblown and spunbonded webs. In addition, the layers of the la",:nale 15 may be prepared from the same hyd,uphcbic polymer or different hydrophobic polymers.
The term "hydrophobic polymer" is used herein to mean any polymer resistant to wetting, or not readily wet, by water, i.e., having a lack of affinity for water.
Examples of hydrophobic polymers include, by way of illustration only, polyolefins, 20 such as polyethylene, poly(isobutene), poly(isoprene), poly(4-methyl-1 -pentene), polypropylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, ethylene-propylene-hexadiene copolymers, and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers; styrene polymers, such as poly(styrene), poly(2-methylstyrene), styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers having less than about 20 mole-percent acrylonitrile, and styrene-2,2,3,3,-tetrafluoropropyl methacrylate 25 copolymers; halogenated hydroca,bon polymers, such as poly(cl,lorol,irluoroethylene), chlo.-ol,irluoroethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymers, poly(hexafluoroprc,pylene), poly(tetrafluoroethylene), tetrafluoroethylene-ethylene copolymers, poly(trifluoroethyl-ene), poly(vinyl fluoride), and poly(vinylidene fluoride); vinyl polymers, such as poly(vinyl butyrate), poly(vinyl decanoate), poly(vinyl dodecanoate), poly(vinyl30 hexadecanoate), poly(vinyl hexanoate), poly(vinyl propionate), poly(vinyl octanoate), poly(heptafluoroisopropoxyethylene), poly(heptafluoroisoprt,poxypropylene), and poly-(methacrylonitrile); acrylic polymers, such as poly(~-butyl acetate), poly(ethyl acrylate), poly[(1-chlorodifluoromethyl)tetrafluoroethyl acrylate], poly[di(chlorofluoro,nell,yl)fluoro-methyl acrylate], poly(1,1-dihydroheptafluorobutyl acrylate), poly(1,1-dihydropenta-CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTAJS97/097~6 fluoroisopropyl acrylate), poly(1 ,1-dihydropentadecafluorocctyl acrylate), poly(heptafluoroisopropyl acrylate), poly[5-(heptafluoroisopropoxy)pentyl acrylate], poly[1 1-(heptafluoroisopropoxy)undecyl acrylate], poly~2-(heptafluoropropoxy)ethyl acrylate], and poly(nonafluoroisobutyl acrylate); methacrylic polymers, such as 5 poly(benzyl methacrylate), poly(~-butyl methacrylate), poly(isobutyl n~ell ,acrylate), poly(~-butyl methacrylate), poly(-butylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dodecyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate), poly(n-hexyl methacrylate), poly(phenyl ",e:~l)a~,lylate), poly(~-propyl methacrylate), poly(octadecyl methacrylate), poly(1, 1-dihydropentadecafluorooctyl methacrylate), poly-l0 (heptafluoroisopropyl methacrylate), poly(heptadecafluorooctyl methacrylate), poly(1-hydlotet,drluoroethyl methacrylate), poly(1,1-dihycl~otet,d~luoropropyl methacrylate), poly(1-hydrohexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate), and poly(-nonafluorobutyl methacrylate); and polyesters, such a poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate) .
The term "polyolefin" is used herein to mean a polymer prepared by the addition polymerization of one or more unsaturated monomers which contain only carbon and hydrogen atoms. Exar, ~F l~s of such polyolefins include polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(1-butene), poly(2-butene), poly(1-pentene), poly(2-pentene~,poly(3-methyl-1-pentene), poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), and the like. In addition, such 20 term is meant to include blends of two or more polyolefins and random and block copolymers prepared from two or more different unsaturated monomers. Because of their commercial importance, the most desired polyolefins are polyethylene and polypropylene.
The h~,drophobic polymer also may contain minor amounts of additives as is 25 customary in the art. For example, the hydrophobic polymer may contain piy,nenls, delustrants, antioxidanls, anlistatic agents, stabilizers, oxygen scavengers, and the like.
The term "durable" as used herein with reference to a coating of a hydrophilic polymeric material on the porous substrate means that the coated porous substrate 30 remains wettable after at least three exposures to an aqueous medium, such as water, saline, and urine and other body fluids.
One procedure for evaluating durability when the porous substrate is a fibrous web is a modified run-off test followed by washing and drying (a wash/dry cycle). The fibrous web typically will remain wettable for at least five cycles of exposing, washing, . , . . . ~ .. . . . . . . ...... .
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 and drying. Desirably, the coated porous substrate will remain wettable after being subjected to at least ten cycles.
The run-off test (exposure) and wash/dry procedure are described in U.S.
Patent No. 5,258,221 to Meirowitz et al. which is incorporated herein by reference.
5 Typically, a generally rectangular, 8-inch by 15-inch (about 20-cm by 38-cm) sample of a fibrous web, such as a nonwoven web, is mounted on top of an absorbent core composed of polypropylene, wood pulp fibers, and/or a superdbso,l,ent material. The resulting test assembly is centered on the inclined surface and held in place with tape at each corner of the assembly. The angle of the inclined surface is 45~ instead of the 10 30~ angle described in the patent. The funnel is located at approximately 7.8 inches (about 200 mm) from the bottom or lower edge of the test assembly. The valve of the funnel is located approximately 10 mm above the top surface of the test assembly.
One hundred ml of water having a temperature of 35~C is placed in the funnel. The valve of the funnel is opened to dispense the water over a period of about 15 seconds.
The amount of water which runs off and is collected in the collection means is determined and recorded. A fibrous web is typically considered to pass the modified run-off test if the amount of water collected in the collection means is less than an amount deemed appropriate for a given type of fibrous web. For example, when thefibrous web is a light-weight (e.g., having a basis weight of 0.6 ounces per square yard 20 or about 20 grams per square meter) spunbonded nonwoven web, the amount of water collected should be less than 20 ml.
The wash/dry cycle was modified by utilizing 500 ml, rather than one liter, of room-temperature water (about 23~C). Thus, the generally rectangular sample of coated porous substrate described above is placed in the 500 ml of water. The sample 25 is allowed to remain in the water for one minute while being agitated at 15-20 revolutions per minute by a mechanical shaker. The sample is removed from the water and excess liquid squeezed back into the wash water container. The sample is allowed to air dry ovemight and then is subjected to the modified run-off test described above. This process is repeated the desired number of times. The surface tension of 30 the wash water is determined after each wash/dry cycle with fresh water being used for each cycle. The surface tension of the water is determined according to ASTM Test Method D 1590-60 using a Fisher tensiometer (Fisher Scientific Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).
.... . . . .. . . ..
CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 As used herein, the term "hydrophilic polymeric ,i,ale.ial means that the polymeric material has a surface free energy such that the polymeric material iswettable by an aqueous medium. That is, an aqueous medium wets the hyd,upl~, !;
polymeric material with which the porous substrate is coated. For example, the surface free energy of the hydrophilic polymeric material may be at least about 50 dynes cm~'.
As another example, the surface free energy of the hydrophilic polymeric material may be in a range of from about 50 to about 72 dynes cm~'.
The term "aqueous medium" is used herein to mean any liquid medium of which water is a major component. Thus, the term includes water ~~ se and aqueous 10 solutions and dispersions. For example, the aqueous medium may be a liquid bodily discl,ar~e, such as urine, menses, and saliva.
As used herein, the term "wettable" and va~ialions thereof means wettable by an aqueous medium, i.e., the aqueous medium spreads over the surface of a substrate. The term is used interchangeably with the term "wettable by water" and 15 va(ialions thereof and has the same meaning.
As used herein, the phrase "affinity of the polymeric material for the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate" means that the hydrophilic polymeric material coats the substrate substantially uniformly (i.e., to an extent sufficient to permit the coated substrate to be wet by an aqueous medium), typically after first exposing the substrate 20 to a field of reactive species. The term "partial affinity" means that the polymeric material partially coats the porous substrate. The functional consequence of a partial affinity is that the coated porous substrate is only partially wettable.
The term "monovalent alkyl group" is used herein to mean a monovalent alkyl group having from 1 to about 6 carbon atoms. Examples of monovalent alkyl groups25 include, by way of illustration only, methyl, ethyl, 1-propyl, isopropyl, 1-butyl, 2-butyl, -butyl, 1-pentyl, 2-pentyl, 3-pentyl, 2-methyl-2-butyl, 3-methyl-2-butyl, 1-hexyl, 2-hexyl, 3-hexyl, 4-hexyl, 2,2 dimethylbutyl, 2,3-dimethylbutyl, 2-methylpentyl, 3-methylpentyl, 3-ethyl-2-butyl, and the like.
As used herein, the term "monovalent hydroxyalkyl group" means a monovalent 30 alkyl group as described above in which a hydrogen atom has been replaced with a hydroxy group. Examples of monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups include, also by way of illustration, hydroxyethyl, 2-hydroxypropyl, 3-hydroxypropyl, 1-hydroxy-2-propyl, 4-hydroxybutyl, 3-hydroxybutyl, 2-hydroxybutyl, 4-hydroxy-2-butyl, 3-hydroxy-2-butyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-2-propyl, 5-hydroxypentyl, 4-hydroxypentyl, 3-hydroxypentyl, 2-.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 hydroxypentyl, 5-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 4-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 3-hydroxy-2-pentyl, 5-hydroxy-3-pentyl, 4-hydroxy-3-pentyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-2-butyl, 3-hydroxymethyl-2-butyl, 3-methyl-1-hydroxy-2-butyl, 6-hydroxyhexyl, 4-hydroxy-2-hexyl, 1-hydroxy-3-hexyl, 2-hydroxy-4-hexyl, 2,2-dimethyl-4-hydroxybutyl, 2,3-dimethyl-1-butyl, 2-hydroxymethyl-5 pentyl, 2-methyl-4-hydroxypentyi, 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-butyl, and the like.
The terrn "pendant" is used herein with respect to the monovalent alkyl and hydroxyalky groups to mean that such groups are attached to the polymer backbonebut are not part of it. Thus, removal of the pendant groups will not alter the chemical structure of the backbone.
As already stated, the coated porous substrate of the present invention may include hydrophobic polymer fibers. Such fibers are substantially ur,iFG,-"ly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric material. As an example, the hydrophobic polymer fibers may be polyolefin fibers. For example, the polyolefin fibers may be polyethylene or polypropylene fibers.
The hydrophobic polymer fibers generally may be prepared by any known means. As a practical matter, however, the fibers usually will be prepared by a melt-extrusion process and formed into a fibrous web, such as a nonwoven web. The term "melt-extrusion process" as applied to a nonwoven web is meant to include a nonwoven web prepared by any melt-extrusion process for forming a nonwoven web in 20 which melt-extrusion to form fibers is followed by web fo",~dlion, typically concurrently, on a foraminous support. The temm includes, among others, such well-known processes as meltblowing, coforming, spu"boncli,-g, and the like. By way of illusl,ation only, such processes are exemplified by the f~"aw;,1g references:
(a) meltblowing references include, by way of example, U.S. Patent Nos.
25 3,016,599 to R. W. Perry, Jr., 3,704,198 to J. S. Prentice, 3,755,527 to J. P. Keller et al., 3,849,241 to R. R. Butin et al., 3,978,185 to R. R. Butin et al., and 4,663,220 to T.
J. Wisneski et al. See, also, V. A. Wente, "SuperFine Thermopl~stic Fibers", Industrial and En~ineerin~ Chemistrv, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1342-1346 (1956); V. A. Wente et al., "Manufacture of Superfine Organic Fibers", Navy Research Laboratory, Washington,30 D.C., NRL Report 4364 (111437), dated May 25, 1954, United States Department of Commerce, Office of Technical Services; and Robert R. Butin and Dwight T. Lohkamp, "Melt Blowing - A One-Step Web Process for New Nonwoven Products", Journal of the Technical Associalion of the Pulp and Paper Industry, Vol. 56, No.4, pp. 74-77 (1973);
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 (b) coforming ,efer~nces include U.S. Patent Nos. 4,100,324 to R. A.
Ander~on et al. and 4,118,531 to E. R. Hauser; and (c) spunbonding references include, among others, U.S. Patent Nos.
3,341,394 to Kinney, 3,655,862 to Dorschner et al., 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., 5 3,705,068 to Dobo et al., 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al., 3,8~3,651 to Porte, 4,064,605 to Akiyama et al., 4,091,140 to I la""on, 4,100,319 to Schwartz, 4,340,563 to Appel and hlo""an, 4,405,297 to Appel and Mo""an, 4,434,204 to Hartman et al., 4,627,811 to Greiser and Wagner, and 4,644,045 to Fowells.
Other methods for preparing nonwoven webs are, of course, known and may 10 be e",F'oycd. Such methods include air laying, wet laying, carding, and the like. In some cases it may be either desirable or necess~ry to stabilize the nonwoven web by known means, such as thermal point bonding, through-air bonding, and hydroentan-gling. In addition to nonwoven webs, the hydrophobic polymer fibers may be in the form of continuous filaments or staple fibers, as well as woven or knitted fabrics 15 prepared from such continuous filaments or staple fibers.
The coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 1 0~C to about 50~C and does not significantly suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the fibrous web may come in contact. For example, the surface tension of the aqueous20 medium may not be suppressed or lowered more than about 10 percent.
By way of illusl, dlion only, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a polysaccharide. The polysaccharide may have a plutality of hydrophobic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydrophobic groups may be =CH- and -CH2-groups in the polysaccharide backbone. The hydrophobic groups may be adapted to 25 provide an affinity of the polymeric material for the hydrophobic polymer of which the porous substrate is composed and the hydroph,' c groups may be adapted to renderthe polymeric material hydrophilic. ~xamples of polysaccharides include, for example, natural gums, such as agar, agarose, carrageenans, fu,-e"erdn, alginates, locust bean gum, gum arabic, guar gum, gum konjac, and gum karaya; microbial fermentation 30 products, such as gellan gum, xanthan gum, and dextran gum; cellulose, such as microcrystalline cellulose; and animal products, such as hyaluronic acid, heparin, chitin, and ch;~os~n.
Again by way of illustration only, the hydrophilic polymeric material may be a modified polysaccharide. A modified polysacchatide also may have a plurality of ~ . ... .. .. ~ =
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/Og756 hydrophobic groups and a plurality of hydrophilic groups. The hydrophobic groupsmay be =CH- and -CH2- groups in the polysaccl~aride backbone, or pendant groups.The hydrophilic groups also may be pendant groups. Again, the hydrophobic groupsmay be adapted to provide an affinity of the polymeric material for the hydrophobic 5 polymer of which the porous substrate is composed and the hydrophilic groups may be adapted to render the polymeric material hydrophilic. By way of illustration only, examples of modified polysaccharides include modified cellu'~ses or cellulose derivatives, such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methyl cell~ se, ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxypropyl cel' ~'cse, ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, and 10 carboxymethyl cellulose; starch and pectin derivatives, such as carboxymethyl starch, starch aldehyde, and pectates; and animal product derivatives, such as carboxymethyl chitin and carboxymethyl chitosan.
Particularly useful types of polysaccharides and modified polysaccharides include, by way of illustration, agar; alginates; and modified celluloses, such as ethyl 15 hydroxyethyl cellulose. In modified polysaccharides, particularly in the useful type of modified polysaccharides just noted, the hydrophobic groups may be pendant monovalent alkyl groups. For example, such hydrophobic groups may be methyl or ethyl groups. As a further example, the hydrophilic groups may be pendant monovalent hydroxyalkyl groups. As yet another example, such hydrophilic groups 20 may be hydroxyethyl groups.
Finally, the hydrophilicity of the coating of polymeric material may vary in a cor,lr~lled manner across at least one dimension of the coated porous substrate. For example, a coated porous substrate may have a central region of higher hydrophilicity which extends, for example, along the length of the substrate, with regions of lower 25 hydrophilicity on both sides of the central region. Thus, the hydrophilicity of such a substrate would vary in a cor,lrolled manner across the width thereof. Other varialions coming within the scope of the present invention will be readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art.
Tuming now to the method for preparing a coated porous substrate, it involves 30 providing a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate and exposing at least a portion of the substrate to a field of reactive species. At least a portion of the substrate, including the portion exposed to the field of reactive species, then is treated with a mixture which includes water and a hydrophilic polymeric material as described above under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the surfaces of the porous substrate CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 with the hydrophilic polymeric ",atenal. The coating of the hydrophilic polymeric ~"ale,ial is durable to an ~queous medium at a tel"perd~.~re in a range of from about 10~C to about 50~C and the coating does not siylliricanlly depress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.5 For example, the surface tension depression of such an aqueous medium may be less than about 10 percent. In some in~lances, it may be either helpful or necess~ry to crosslink the coating on the porous substrate to impart a desired level of durability.
The field of reactive species serves to increase the affinity of the hydrophilicpolymeric material for the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate. The field of reactive 10 species may be, by way of e~a",ple, a corona field. As another example, the field of reactive species may be a plasma field. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that exposure of the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate to a field ofreactive species results in alterations of the surfaces of the substrate, thereby temporarily raising the surface energy of the substrate. This, in turn, allows the lS penet,aliol1 of the treating solution into the porous substrate; that is, the porous substrate may be saturated with the treating solution.
Although exposure of the porous substrate to a field of reactive species is a desired method of temporarily raising the surface energy of the substrate, otherprocedures may be employed. For example, the porous substrate may be treated with 2 o ozone or passed through an oxidizing solution, such as an aqueous medium containing chromium trioxide and sulfuric acid. Care should be taken with such other procedures, however, to either prevent or minimize degradation of the porous substrate.
The strength of the field of reactive species may be varied in a cont,~"ed 25 manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web. Upon coating the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material, the extent or degree of hydrophilicity of the coating is directly p,opo,lional to the strength of the field. Thus, the hydloph' icity of the coating of polymeric material will vary in a conl,olled manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web.
The strength of the field of reactive species is readily varied in a controlled manner by known means. For example, a corona apparatus having a segmented electrode may be e",pl~yed, in which the distance of each segment from the sample to be treated may be varied independently. As another example, a corona apparatus having a gap-gradient electrode system may be utilized; in this case, one electrode . . ~ .
CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 WO 97/47801 PCTtUS97/09756 may be rotated about an axis which is normal to the length of the ele~,-.de. Other methods also may be employed; see, for example, "Fabricalion of a Continuous Wettability Gradient by Radio Frequency Plasma Discharge", W.G. Pitt, J. ColloidInterface Sci., 133, No. 1, 223 (1989); and "Wettability Gradient Surfaces Prepared by 5 Corona Discharge Treal,nenl", J . H. Lee, et al., Transactions of the 1 7th Annual Meetin~ of the societY for Bio~"dleri31s, May 1-5, 1991, page 133, Scottsdale, Arizona.
If desired, at least a portion of the porous substrate may be exrosed to a fieldof reactive species subsequent to treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with a mixture cG"~prising water and a polymeric ",alerial. Such post-exposure 10 typically increases the hydrophilicity of the coated porous substrate. Moreover, the strength of the field of reactive species in such post-exposure also may vary in a co"l,."ed manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web as already described. Such post-exposure may even enhance the durability of the coating through crosslinking.
The present invention is further described by the exa",F'ss which follow. Such examples, however, are not to be construed as limiting in any way either the spirit or the scope of the present invention.
Example 1 A 0.6 ounce per square yard or osy (about 20 grams per square meter or gsm) polypropylene spunbond fabric (Fabric A) was exposed to a corona discharge undera",~ ent conditions. The field strength of the corona was 24 wattslft2/min (about 1.6 Joules/cm2). Immediately following the corona treatment, the fabric was dipped in a 25 0.25 percent by weight aqueous solution of ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (Bermocol E481, Akzo Nobel), referred to hereinafter as Coating A. After co",F'--to saturation of the fabric, indicated by a change in color from white to translucent, the fabric was nipped between two rubber rollers in an Atlas labordtory wringer at 10 Ibs (about 4.~
kg) nip pressure. The coated fabric then was dried in an oven at 60~C for about 30 30 minutes.
Water absorption of the coated fabric was tested qualitatively by placing water drops on the surface of the fabric. An i"slantaneous absorption was observed which indicated that the fabric was substanlidlly uniformly coated with the ethyl hydroxyethyl cellu'~se (Coating A).
CA 022s6388 1998-ll-23 The coating on the fabric was tested for durability by subjecting the fabric to multiple exposures to water as described in the modified run-off test procedure. The data are su""na,i~ed in Table 1. In addition to durability, the coatings of the present invention do not lower the surface tension of the liquid to which the coated fabric is 5 exposed. To demonstrate that such is the case, the surface tension of the water nun-off was measured after each cycle performed in the durability test described above.
The results are included in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of Run-OffN~ash Test Results CYcle No. Run-Off (ml) SurfaceTensiona 1.2 66 3 0.5 67 4 2.0 67 1.0 66 6 3.0 66 7 2.0 67 8 2.5 66 9 1.5 66 2.0 66 aSurface tension of the wash water, in dynes/cm.
In order to better visualize the data in the table, they were plotted as run-off in ml (left y-axis) and surface tension of wash water (right y-axis), respectively, versus wash cycle number. The plot is shown as FIG. 1. The figure clearly indicates that ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose-coated fabric is durable to multiple exposures of 100 ml of 30 water.
By co",parison, a fabric coated with a typical surfactant (e.g., a polyethoxylated octylphenol, Triton~ X-102) will not perform well to multiple exposures since the surfactant is essentially washed off upon the first exposure to water. For example, a sample of virgin Fabric A was coated with Triton~ X-102 and subjected to the modified CA 022~6388 l998-ll-23 run-off test procedure. The run-off prior to the first washing was 2 ml, whereas the run-off after the first washing was 90 ml.
FIG. 1 also shows that virtually no change in the surface tension of the wash water occurred. On the other hand, a signiricant drop in surface tension of the wash 5 water is observed with a Triton~) X-102 treated fabric. By way of example, the water from the first washing of the Triton@~ X-102 treated fabric had a surface tension of 54 dynes/cm, which is a drop of roughly 20 percent from the surface tension of the water used (see Table 1).
Example 2 The coating procedure of Example 1 was repeated, except that two other nonwoven fabrics, Fabrics B and C, were utilized and another ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (EHM100, Akzo Nobel), referred to hereinafter as Coating E~, also was 15 employed. Fabric B was a spunbond web composed of 50/50, eccentric sheath/core bicomponent, 1.3 denier (0.14 tex) fibers. The core consisted of Type 3445 poly-propylene (Exxon Chemical Americas, Houston, Texas 77079) and the sheath consisted of Aspun(~) 6811A linear low density polyethylene (The Dow Chemical Company). Each component contained 2 percent by weight of Ampacet 41438 20 titanium dioxide. Fabric C was a 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) meltblown web prepared from Himont PF015 polypropylene (Himont Incorporated, Wilmington, Delaware).
The coated fabrics then were tested for their ability to wick water against gravity (the vertical wicking test). The test utilized a 4.5-cm x 22.5-cm sample, with the longest dimension of the sample being parallel with the machine direction. The sample was 25 placed on a graduated sample holder and hung from a slide which was suspendedover a reservoir containing a saline solution. The slide was lowered into the saline solution until 2.5 cm of the sample was below the surface of the solution. A timer was started and the position of the wicking fluid front was observed and recorded as a function of time over a 30-minute period.
The results of the wicking test are summarized in Table 2. In this and some subsequent tables, "Coating Add-on" represents the amount of coating on the sample, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight of the sample. Ree~use of the low amounts involved, coating add-on is a calculated value. The sample was weighed, treated with the aqueous solution of a hydrophilic polymeric ",ale,ial, and weighed .. , .. . . .. . . ... _.~ , _ CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 again. Subtracting the dry weight from the wet weight gave the wet pick-up.
Multiplying the wet pick-up by the concentration of the hydrophilic polymeric material in the treating solution gave the amount of hydrophilic polymeric material in the sample.
That amount then was divided by the dry weight of the sample and the quotient 5 multiplied by 100 to give coating add-on. Thus, Coating Add-on = [(100)(Wet Wt. - Dry Wt.)(Concn.)]lDry wt.
Table 2 oSummary of Wicking Behavior of Coated Fabrics Coating Vertical Wickin~ Hei~ht (cm) Fabric Coatin~ Add-ona 5 min. 15 min. 30 min.
B --- --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 B B 0.1 9.5 10.5 10.5 B B 0.2 14.0 18.5 21.0 C A 0.2 14.0 20.0 21.0 B A 0.1 9.0 10.0 15.0 B A 0.2 12.5 14.5 15.0 C --- --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 C B 0.1 12.5 18.0 20.0 C B 0.2 13.0 18.5 20.0 C A 0.1 12.0 18.0 20.0 25 aE~r~ssed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
The data in Table 2 indicate the coated fabrics wick water well. The data also indicate that it is possible to tailor the wicking behavior of a fabric for a specific arr'~ation by selecting the appropriate coating material, add-on level, and web 30 structure.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 Example 3 The fabric employed in this example was Fabric D, a 2.5-osy (about 85 gsm) spunbond nonwoven web in which the fibers were side-by-side bicomponent fibers.
5 The components, which were present in approximately equal amounts, consisted of the polyethylene and polypropylene utilized for Fabric ~ (Example 2). The fabric was cut into a sample 8 inches (about 20 cm) by 10 inches (about 25 cm). The sample was oxidized in a Branson/lPC Model PM119 plasma treater at 80 watts of power in an air plasma at 0.6 torr for 5 minutes. The sample then was immersed for about 30 seconds 10 in a solution consisting of 3.97 9 of calcium chlcride dihydrate (Catalog No. 22,350-6, Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and 3,000 ml of water. The solution contained 0.1 percent by weight of calcium chloride. Excess solution was removed from the wetted fabric by vacuum extraction (i.e., passing the wetted fabric over a slot to which a vacuum was applied). The sample contained approximately 150 15 percent by weight wet pick-up (based on the dry weight of the sample) of the calcium chloride solution after vacuum extraction.
The still wet sample was dipped for about 30 seconds in a solution composed of 3.00 9 or 0.1 percent by weight of high viscosity sodium alginate (Catalog No.
A-7128, Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri) in 3,000 ml of water for about 20 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed from the wet sample by vacuum extraction.
The sample at this stage contained approximately 300 percent of both the calciumchloride and sodium alginate solutions, resulting in the formation of a calcium alginate gel (Coating C) on the fibers of the sample. The sample then was air dried over night at ambient temperature (about 20~-25~C).
The treated sample exhibited vertical wicking heights of 6.5 cm and 9.0 cm and 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of less than 2 percent. Surface tension depression was evaluated by placing a 1-inch by 9-inch (about 2.5-cm by about 23-cm) strip of coated fabric in 80 ml of water for 30 min. The surface tension of the water then was measured and compared with that of pure water;
30 the comparison was expressed as a percent change.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/Og756 Example 4 A 12-inch by 12-inch (about 30-cm by about 30-cm) sample of barrier grade 5 polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was oxidized in a plasma treater at 300 watts of power in an oxidizing plasma for 1 minute. The sample then was ir",-,er~ed in an aqueous solution of 0.3 percent by weight calcium chloride dihydrate for about 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed by passing the sample between the rolls of an Atlas laboratory wringer. The sample contained between 200 and 250 percent wet 10 pick-up of the calcium chioride solution.
The still wet sample then was dipped in a solution of 0.5 percent by weight of sodium polygalacturonate (Catalog No. P-1879, Sigma Chemical Company) in water for about 30 seconds. Excess solution was removed by passing the sample between the rolls of an Atlas laboratory wringer as before. The sample now contained from 200 15 to 250 percent by weight of a mixture of the calcium chloride and sodium polygalac-turonate solutions, resulting in the formation of a calcium polygalncturonate gel coating (Coating D). The sample was dried overnight at ambient temperature.
After the sample had dried, it was subjected to the vertical wicking test with saline solution. The solution reached a height of 11 cm in five minutes.
In the examples which follow (Examples 5-14), the coated fabrics were evaluated for vertical wicking of saline solution, for surface tension depression, and for run-off. Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. Therun-off and vertical wicking tests were carried out as described previously (Examples 1 and 2, respectively).
Example 5 A 7-inch by 10-inch (about 18-cm by 25-cm) sheet of 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was treated in a radio-frequency (RF) plasma generator (Branson/lPC Model PM119 plasma treater) at 50 watts of power and about 0.6 torr for 10 minutes under hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide vapor wasgenerated by placing a small beaker containing 30 percent aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution (Catalog No. 5240, Baxter Diagnostic Inc., McGaw, Illinois) in the vacuum chamber of the plasma unit. The sheet then was dipped into a 0.2 percent by ... .. .
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 weight aqueous agarose solution (Coating E, Aldrich Chemical Co.) maintained at 70~C, and squeezed through an Atlas laboratory wringer to achieve a 100 percent by weight wet pick-up. The web, which was completely saturated in the bath, was dried under ambient conditions to a constant weight. The treated web exhibited vertical 5 wicking heights of 13.5 cm and 20.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 4 percent.
Example 6 10 The procedure of Example 5 was carried out with Fabric B of Example 2; the fabric had a basis weight of 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm). The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 14.5 cm and 18.0 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 6 percent.
Example 7 The procedure of Example 5 was repeated, except that the fabric was dipped into an aqueous solution containing 0.2 percent by weight of a 90:10 mixture by weight of agar (American Bio-oryanics Co.) and carrageenan (Kappa-Carrageenan, FMC
20 Corporation) (Coating F). The fabric was completely saturated in the bath. The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 13 cm and 19 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and a surface tension depression of 4 percent.
Example 8 The procedure of Example 5 was repeated, except that the fabric was dipped into an aqueous solution containing 0.3 percent by weight of gellan gum (Coating G, Gelrite~, Kelco Co.). The fabric was completely saturated in the bath. The treated fabric exhibited vertical wicking heights of 7 cm and 11.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, 30 respe~ ely, and a surface tension depression of 9 percent.
Upon replacing the gellan gum solution with a 0.2 percent by weight solution of locust bean gum (Coating H, LBG, Aldrich Chemical Co.), the treated fabric exhibited a vertical wicking height of 2 cm in 60 min, and a surface tension depression of 0percent. Although the wicking result was not noteworthy, the coated web nevertheless CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 was wettable and the coating was durable. Accordingly, locust bean gum is an example of a material which is not as hydrophilic as the other polymeric materials employed in the exa",,~lEs. However, locust bean gum provides a means for impa,ling moderate hydrophilic character to a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate.
The procedure was repeated with both Fabric B and Fabric C and a variety of coatings and add-on levels. Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. The results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3 Summary of Results Coatin~ Wickin~ Ht. (cm) Fabric PTa Tvpe Add-Onb 5 min. 15 min. STDC
C pd le 0.1 10.0 16.5 8 C P 1 0.5 --- 19.0 5 C P E~ 0.2 13.5 20.5 4 C P F~ 0.2 13.0 19.0 4 B P E 0.2 14.5 18.0 6 B P F 0.2 13.0 19.0 0 C P Gh 03 70 11.5 9 B P G 0.3 14.5 18.0 10 aPre-treatment.
bExpressed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
CPercent surface tension depression.
dPlasma.
eA9an ~Agarose.
~Agar/ca"dgeenan.
hGellan gum.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Example 9 A treater at Faustel, Inc. (Germantown, Wisconsin) was used to continuously 5 surface-treat a roll of 24-inch (about 61-cm) wide fabric. The fabric was passed sequentially through an Enercon RF Corona treater (tuned to about 20 watts/ft2/min or about 1.3 Joules/cm2 energy input), a dip-and-squeeze coater, and a through-air drying oven before rewinding. A 1.5 osy polypropylene meltblown web (Fabric C) was treated on-line at 15 ft/min. (about 7.6 cm/sec), wherein the coater contained a 0.3 percent by 10 weight agar (Coating 1, American Bio-Organics Co.) solution at 50~C, and drying was carried out at 40~C. The treated web exhibited vertical wicking heights of 5.5 cm and 8.5 cm at 5 min and 15 min, respectively, and 0 percent surface tension depression.
Surface tension depression was evaluated as described in Example 3. The results are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4 Summary of Results Coatinq Wickinq Ht. (cm) Fabric PTa TYpe Add-Onb 5 min. 15 min. STDC
B oCd le 0 3 8.0 9.5 0 C OC I 0.3 9.0 12.5 0 aPre-treatment.
bExpressed as a percentage of sample dry weight.
25 CPercent surFace tension depression.
dOn-line corona.
eA9ar.
Ex~n"~le 10 A 7-inch by 10-inch (about 18-cm by 25-cm) sheet of 0.6 osy (about 20 gsm) polypropylene spunbond diaper liner (commercially produced at Kimberly-Clark Corporation's Berkeley mill) (Fabric A) was treated in a Branson Plasma generator for 5 minutes under hydrogen peroxide plasma as described in Example 3. The sheet CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 then was dipped into a 0.3 percent by aqueous solution of agar (Coating 1 American Bio-organics Co.) maintained at 70~C and squeezed through an Atlas laboratory ringer to achieve a 100 % wet pick-up. The web which was co",rlately wet out in the bath was dried under ambient conditions. The treated liner showed no surface tension 5 depression. The modified run-off test (Example 1) was conducted to examine thecoating durability. The results are shown in Table 5 which follows Example 11.
Example 1 1 o The procedure of Example 10 was repeated except that after the plasma treatment the sheet was sprayed with a hot 0.3 percent by aqueous agar (Coating 1 American Bio-organics Co.) solution using a laboratory glass sprayer to achieve approximately 100 percent by weight wet pick-up. The web was dried to constant weight under ambient conditions. The treated liner showed no surface tension depression. The treated liner was tested as described in Example 10. The results of the test for both Examples 10 and 11 are su"""ari~ed in Table 5 (in the table Dip-and-Nip ' refers to Example 10 and "Spray" refers to Example 11).
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Table 5 Summary of Run-off Test Results Run-off (~) Insult No. Dip-and-NiP sPrav 2 0.3 0.4 4 0 0.7 0.1 6 0 2.3 7 0.4 2.5 8 0.2 1.2 9 0.6 1.2 0.2 2.9 11 0.6 5.1 12 0.8 0.4 13 1.7 1.2 14 0.6 2.1 1 0.7 Example 12 A sheet of a metallocene polyolefin foam (OPCELL(g) LC31 foam, Sentinel Products Corp., Hyannis, Massachusetts) was cut to a thickness of 0.25 inch (about 0.6 cm). The foam was treated in a Plasma generator (Branson/PC Model PM119) at 80 Watts, 0.6 torr in an air plasma for 8 minutes. The foam then was saturated with a 0.2 percent by weight agar (Coating 1) solution at approximately 60~C. The foam was 30 vacuum extracted by passing it over a slot to which a vacuum was applied until an approximately 250 percent wet pick-up was achieved. All samples were air dried prior to testing. Drops of water placed on the foam absorbed into the structure within 1 minute, compared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread at all, even after 15 minutes.
... . . ..
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 The amount of fluid the material would hold also was determined. The sample was placed in water under a 110 gram weight for 5 minutes (the weight was necess~ry as the samples were buoyant). The amount of water retained by the foam per gram of foam is listed in Table 6 at the end of Example 15. As seen in the table the treated 5 material held twice as much fluid as the untreated foam.
Example 13 The procedure of Example 12 was repeated with agar (Coating 1) except that 10 the foam employed was a different metallocene polyolefin foam (OPCELL~9 LC33 foam Sentinel Products Corp.). The foam was vacuum extracted until the wet pick-up was approximately 100 percent. The sa",plEs were air dried prior to testing. Drops of water placed on the foam absorbed into the structure within 0.5 minute co""~ared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes.15 The amount of fluid contained in the foam was measured as described in Example 12 and is su"""ari,ed in Table 6 which follows Example 15. The treated foam held more water than the untreated material.
Example 14 The procedure of Example 12 was repeated except that after the plasma treatment the foam was saturated with a 0.4 percent by weight aqueous solution of calcium chloride dihydrate. Excess solution was removed from the wetted foam by vacuum extraction until the wet weight was approximately 150 percent of the dry 25 weight. The still wet foam then was dipped in a 0.3 percent by weight aqueoussolution of high viscosity sodium alginate. Excess solution was removed from the wet foam by vacuum extraction until the total wet weight was 300 percent of the dry weight.
The reaction product calcium alginate gel (Coating C) was present in the foam at this point. The foam then was air dried overnight at ambient temperature. Drops of water 30 placed on the foam went into the structure within 0.5 minute compared to untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes. The amount of fluid contained in the foam was measured and is summarized in Table 6 which follows Example 1::. The treated foam held over 3 times as much water as the untreated material.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Example 15 The foam of Example 13 was plasma treated as described in Example 12. The 5 foam then was saturated with a 0.4 percent by weight aqueous solution of calcium chloride dihydrate. Excess solution was removed from the wetted foam by vacuum extraction until the wet weight was approximately 150 percent of the dry weight. The still wet foam then was dipped in a 0.3 percent by weight ~queou-s solution of high viscosity sodium alginate. Excess solution was removed from the wet foam by vacuum 10 exl,d~;lion until the total wet weight was 300 percent of the dry weight. The reaction product calcium alg;,la~e gel (Coating C) was in the foam at this point. The foam then was air dried ovemight at a,~ nl temperature. Drops of water placed on the foam went into the structure instantly compared with untreated foam where the drop did not penetrate or spread even after 15 minutes. The amount of fluid contained in the foam 15 was measured and is su~mari~ed in Table 6 which follows. The treated foam held more water than the untreated material.
Table 6 Summary of Foam Treatment Results Foam Coatin~ Fluid Retained LC31 None 2.57 LC31 la 6.20 LC31 Cb 9.04 LC33 None 7.06 LC33 1 11.91 LC33 C 17.30 aA9ar.
bCalcium alginate.
Example 16 This example describes the use of a segmented electrode corona discharge to generate variable wettability zones on the same nonwoven fabric.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 A 1.5 osy (about 51 gsm) polypropylene meltblown fabric having a width of 14 inches (about 36 cm) (Fabric C) was coated with ethyl hydroxyethyl ce"u~Qse (Coating A) as described in Example 1. The coated fabric then was oxidized in a one inch zone along the length of the fabric; this was achieved by exposing the coated fabric to a 5 corona discharge equipped with a segmented elecl,ode (Flexydine System CorotecCorporation Farmington Connecticut) made of one-inch segments; the electrode is shown schematically in FIG. 2. In FIG. 2 a segmented electrode 20 viewed normal to the machine cross-direction consists of a plurality of independent segments 22. The center segment 22A is located closer to the ground electrode 24 in order to provide a 10 critical corona discharge gap 26. A coated fabric 28 separates the segmented electrode 20 from the ground electrode 24.
A corona discharge was generated by activating the center electrode 22A (FIG.
2) at an energy input of 24 watts/ft21min (about 1.6 Joules/cm2). This treatmentgenerated a central zone which was significantly more wettable than the adjacent15 zones which had not been exposed to a corona discharge. The zones resulting from the corona discharge are shown diag,~""nalically in FIG. 3. In FIG. 3 the nonwoven web 30 has a central zone 32 and two side zones 34 and 36 extending the length of the fabric.
The wettability of the fabrics was assessed by measuring their ability to wick 20 fluid against gravity (i.e. vertical wicking) as a function of time. The vertical wicking results are reported in Table 7.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 Table 7 Vertical Wichiny Data for Zoned, Coated Polypropylene Nonwoven Webs s Vertical Wickin~ Heiqht (cm) Time (min) Central ZoneSide Zones 1.5 7.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 12.0 7.0 9.0 14.5 7.0 10.0 15.0 8.0 1 5.0 --- 9.0 aMaximum height.
As Table 7 clearly shows, the central zone (post-corona treated) wicks fluid higher and faster than the side zones.
For the purpose of measuring contact angles, the above procedure was repeated with polypropylene films in place of the nonwoven web. Measurements of contact angles on the films were preferable because the intrinsic wettability of these coatings can be compared more reliably, i.e., the effect of capillarily is not present in 20 films as would be the case in nonwoven fabrics. The contact angle was measured using the sessile water drop method (see, e.g., "The contact Angle and Interface Ener-getics", J.D. Andrade, L.M. Smith, and D.E. Gregonis, in Surface and InterfacialAspects of Biomedical Polymers, Vol. 1, edited by J.D. Andrade, 1985, Plenum Press, New York) and the results are reported in Table 8. Virgin film which had not been 25 either coated or exposed to a corona discharge was used as a control.
CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O97/47801 PCTrUS97/09756 Table 8 Water Contact Angles for roly~ . o,~ylene Films Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Material Contact An~le (~) Control 97 Coated only (side zones) 30 Coated and corona 0 treated (central zone) Table 8 demonstrates the improvements in wettability resulting from the coating of ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, and such coating combined with a post-corona treatment.
The table also demonstrates the advantage in the post-corona treatment of the coated 15 film.
Further, the effect of corona post-oxidation was elucidated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the surface of the nonwoven web. The results of the XPS analysis are reported in Table 9 as the oxygen/carbon ratio (O/C).
Table 9 XPS Data for Polypropylene Nonwoven Webs Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Material O/C Atom-Percent Ratio Control 0.01 Coated only (side zones) 0.55 Coated and corona 0.75 treated (central zone) 30 The above table shows that the O/C ratio was higher for the central zone which had been subjected to a corona discharge, compared to the side zones which had not been subjected to a corona discharge.
The contact angle, vertical wicking, and XPS data correlate well and clearly indicate that the higher the oxidation level of the surface, as measured by XPS, the , CA 022~6388 1998-11-23 W O 97147801 PCTrUS97/097~6 lower the contact angle and the faster the vertical wicking rate. Most i,npo,l~nlly, the wettability behavior as related to fluid transport (i.e., vertical wicking) can be controlled in specific zones on the same nonwoven fabric.
Example 17 .
The procedure of Example 16 was repeated, except that the corona discharge was replaced with a radio-frequency glow ~;schars~e (RFGD). Typically, the coated fabric was placed between two movable aluminum sleeves so that a narrow zone 10 about one inch (about 2.5 cm) wide was exposed to the RFGD under the following conditions:
Power= 50Watts Pressure = 0.5 torr Gas = air 15Exposuretime = 5 minutes The vertical wicking results are s-"-lmari~ed in Table 10.
Table 10 Vertical Wicking Data for Polypropylene Nonwoven 20Webs Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl CQI~ Se With and Without a Post-RFGD Treatment Vertical Wickin~ Hei~ht (cm) Time ~min) Central ZoneSide Zones 1.5 6.0 3.5 3.0 8.5 4.5 5.0 12.0 7.0 10.0 15.0a 9.0 15.0 --- 11.5 3 o aMaximum height.
Upon comparing the data in Table 10 with the data in Table 7, it is evident that the RFGD post-treatment was approximately equivalent to the corona discharge post-treatment.
CA 022~6388 1998-ll-23 W O 97/47801 PCT~US97/09756 Example 18 A sample of Fabric C (the 1.5 osy or 51 gsm, polypropylene meltblown web described in Example 2) was laminated to a sample of Fabric B (the spunbond web 5 composed of sheath/core bicomponent fibers also described in Example 2). The two fabrics were coated as described in Example 1. While still saturated with the coating solution the fabrics were placed together and the resulting sheet was passed through a laboratory wringer at a nip pressure of 10 Ibs (about 4.5 kg) to remove excesscoating solution. The laminate thus produced was allowed to dry in an oven until no lO further weight loss was observed typically at 60~C for 30 minutes. The la",indle then was tested for vertical wicking and its performance was compared to that of samples of the individual coated fabrics of which the laminate was composed. The results are su",ma, i~ed in Table 11.
Table 11 Vertical Wiching Data for Each No.,~oven Web and A Laminate of both Webs, All Being Coated with Ethyl Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Vertical Wickin~ Heiqht (cm) Time (min) Laminate Fabric B FabricC
1.0 5.0 1.0 3.5 2.0 8.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 15.0 4.0 6.0 The laminate composed of both Fabrics B and C clearly provided superior wicking performance compared to the individual fabrics. Moreover the performance of the laminate suggests that an unexpected synergism results from the combination of the two fabrics.
While the specification has been described in detail with respect to specific e",bodi",ents thereof it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing may readily conceive of alterations to variations of and equivalents to these embodiments.
Claims (30)
1. A coated porous substrate which comprises:
a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate which is substantially uniformly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric material;
in which the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10°C to about 50°C; and the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material will not significantly suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.
a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate which is substantially uniformly coated with a hydrophilic polymeric material;
in which the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10°C to about 50°C; and the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material will not significantly suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.
2. The coated porous substrate of claim 1 in which the porous hydrophobic polymer substrate is a porous sheet-like material.
3. The coated porous substrate of claim 2 in which the porous sheet-like material is selected from the group consisting of foams fibers and fibrous webs.
4. The coated porous substrate of claim 3 in which the porous sheet-like material is a fibrous web comprised of polyolefin fibers.
5. The coated porous substrate of claim 1 in which the hydrophilic polymeric material is crosslinked.
6. The coated porous substrate of claim 1 in which the hydrophilic polymeric material is a polysaccharide.
7. The coated porous substrate of claim 1 in which the hydrophilic polymeric material is a modified polysaccharide.
8. The coated porous substrate of claim 7 in which the modified polysaccharide is a modified cellulose.
9. The coated porous substrate of claim 1 in which the hydrophilicity of the coating of the hydrophilic polymeric material varies in a controlled manner across at least one dimension thereof.
10. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 2.
11. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 4.
12. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 5.
13. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 6.
14. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 7.
15. A disposable absorbent product having as a component thereof the coated porous substrate of claim 9.
16. A method of preparing a coated porous substrate which comprises:
providing a porous substrate comprised of a hydrophobic polymer;
exposing at least a portion of the porous substrate to a field of reactive species;
and treating at least a portion of the porous substrate including the portion exposed to the field of reactive species with a mixture comprising water and a hydrophilic polymeric material under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material;
in which the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10°C to about 50°C; and the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material will not suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.
providing a porous substrate comprised of a hydrophobic polymer;
exposing at least a portion of the porous substrate to a field of reactive species;
and treating at least a portion of the porous substrate including the portion exposed to the field of reactive species with a mixture comprising water and a hydrophilic polymeric material under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the porous substrate with the hydrophilic polymeric material;
in which the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material is durable to an aqueous medium at a temperature in a range of from about 10°C to about 50°C; and the coating of hydrophilic polymeric material will not suppress the surface tension of an aqueous medium with which the coated porous substrate may come in contact.
17. The method of claim 16, in which the porous substrate is a porous sheet-like material.
18. The method of claim 17, in which the porous sheet-like material is selected from the group consisting of foams fibers and fibrous webs.
19. The method of claim 18, in which the porous sheet-like material is a fibrous web comprised of polyolefin fibers.
20. The method of claim 16 which further comprises crosslinking the hydrophilic polymeric material after treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with the mixture comprising water and a hydrophilic polymeric material.
21. The method of claim 16, in which the hydrophilic polymeric material is a polysaccharide.
22. The method of claim 16, in which the hydrophilic polymeric material is a modified polysaccharide.
23. The method of claim 22, in which the modified polysaccharide is a modified cellulose.
24. The method of claim 16, in which the field of reactive species is selected from the group consisting of a corona field and a plasma field.
25. The method of claim 24, in which the strength of the field of reactive species varies in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web.
26. The method of claim 16 which further comprises, subsequent to treating at least a portion of the porous substrate with a mixture comprising water and ahydrophilic polymeric material exposing a portion of the porous substrate to a field of reactive species.
27. The method of claim 26, in which the field of reactive species is selected from the group consisting of a corona field and a plasma field.
28. The method of claim 26, in which the strength of the field of reactive species varies in a controlled manner across at least one dimension of the fibrous web.
29. A laminate which comprises at least two layers of the coated fibrous web of claim 4.
30. The laminate of claim 29, in which the layers are independently selected from the group consisting of meltblown webs and spunbonded webs.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/665,172 | 1996-06-14 | ||
US08/665,172 US5814567A (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1996-06-14 | Durable hydrophilic coating for a porous hydrophobic substrate |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2256388A1 true CA2256388A1 (en) | 1997-12-18 |
Family
ID=24669021
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002256388A Abandoned CA2256388A1 (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1997-06-10 | Durable hydrophilic coating for a porous hydrophobic polymer substrate |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5814567A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0904446A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1153867C (en) |
AR (1) | AR007589A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU725443B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9709723A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2256388A1 (en) |
CO (1) | CO4850633A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997047801A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA975066B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113665182A (en) * | 2021-06-23 | 2021-11-19 | 浙江嘉衡纺织科技有限公司 | Preparation method of water-repellent antibacterial coated fabric |
Families Citing this family (82)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6818259B1 (en) * | 1989-10-31 | 2004-11-16 | The United States Of America As Represented By The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Porous article with surface functionality and method for preparing same |
US6049938A (en) | 1993-06-18 | 2000-04-18 | Jimison; James W. | Method and apparatus for cleaning and polishing fruits and vegetables |
US6296936B1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2001-10-02 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Coform material having improved fluid handling and method for producing |
EP1014842B1 (en) | 1997-01-31 | 2003-05-07 | Kao Corporation | Cleaning article impregnated with detergent |
KR19990000270A (en) | 1997-06-04 | 1999-01-15 | 박원훈 | Leukocyte removal filter coated with chitosan |
WO1999024174A1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-05-20 | Katoot Mohammad W | Method for modifying the surface of an object |
IL132212A (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2003-03-12 | Milliken & Co | Textile fabric with particle attracting finish |
BR9914807A (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2001-10-30 | Kimberly Clark Co | Porous substrates chemically treated and process to manufacture them |
US6376011B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2002-04-23 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Process for preparing superabsorbent-containing composites |
US6387495B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2002-05-14 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Superabsorbent-containing composites |
US7396783B2 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2008-07-08 | Sca Hygiene Products Ab | Fibrous structure and absorbent article comprising said fibrous structure |
DE60109026T2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2006-02-09 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., Neenah | PERMANENT WATERBANDABLE HIGH ABSORPTION FIBERS |
WO2002004083A2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2002-01-17 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Surface modified membranes and methods for producing the same |
US6531435B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2003-03-11 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Compositions for the inhibition of exoprotein production from Gram positive bacteria |
US6656913B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2003-12-02 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Inhibition of exoprotein production from gram positive bacteria |
US6599521B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2003-07-29 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent articles for the inhibition of exoprotein production from Gram positive bacteria |
US6676957B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2004-01-13 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Non-absorbent substrates for the inhibition of exoprotein production from gram positive bacteria |
US6579604B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2003-06-17 | Psiloquest Inc. | Method of altering and preserving the surface properties of a polishing pad and specific applications therefor |
US7059946B1 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2006-06-13 | Psiloquest Inc. | Compacted polishing pads for improved chemical mechanical polishing longevity |
AU2002225745A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-06-11 | Exigent | A method of altering and preserving the surface properties of a polishing pad and specific applications therefor |
MXPA03006774A (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2003-10-24 | Procter & Gamble | Coating compositions for modifying surfaces. |
US6548732B2 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-15 | Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. | Absorbent article having hydrophobic leak protection zones |
US6534548B1 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2003-03-18 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Isoprenoid compositions for the inhibition of exoprotein production from gram positive bacteria |
US20030135173A1 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2003-07-17 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Inhibition of exoprotein production in absorbent articles using aromatic compositions |
US6596290B2 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2003-07-22 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Inhibition of exoprotein production in non-absorbent articles using isoprenoid compositions |
US7022333B2 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2006-04-04 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Inhibition of exoprotein production in non-absorbent articles uisng aromatic compositions |
US7026354B2 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2006-04-11 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Aromatic compositions for the inhibition of exoprotein production from gram positive bacteria |
US8084046B2 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2011-12-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Inhibition of exoprotein production in absorbent articles using isoprenoids |
US8524884B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2013-09-03 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Outer layer material having entanglement of hydrophobic polymer hostblended with a maleated hydrophobic polymer co-host, and hydrophilic polymer guest |
US7662954B2 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2010-02-16 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Outer layer having entanglement of hydrophobic polymer host and hydrophilic polymer guest |
US6764566B1 (en) | 2001-12-12 | 2004-07-20 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Nonwoven filled film laminate with barrier properties |
US20050008839A1 (en) * | 2002-01-30 | 2005-01-13 | Cramer Ronald Dean | Method for hydrophilizing materials using hydrophilic polymeric materials with discrete charges |
US20030148684A1 (en) * | 2002-01-30 | 2003-08-07 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Method for hydrophilizing materials using charged particles |
US7018945B2 (en) * | 2002-07-02 | 2006-03-28 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Composition and method for treating fibers and nonwoven substrates |
US20040005457A1 (en) * | 2002-07-03 | 2004-01-08 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Methods of improving the softness of fibers and nonwoven webs and fibers and nonwoven webs having improved softness |
US6881375B2 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2005-04-19 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method of forming a 3-dimensional fiber into a web |
US7378566B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2008-05-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent core including folded substrate |
US7294591B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2007-11-13 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent composite including a folded substrate and an absorbent adhesive composition |
US7700500B2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2010-04-20 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Durable hydrophilic treatment for a biodegradable polymeric substrate |
US20040121675A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2004-06-24 | Kimberly-Clark Worklwide, Inc. | Treatment of substrates for improving ink adhesion to the substrates |
US7001562B2 (en) * | 2002-12-26 | 2006-02-21 | Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method for treating fibrous web materials |
US7226880B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2007-06-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Breathable, extensible films made with two-component single resins |
US7462494B2 (en) * | 2003-06-09 | 2008-12-09 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method for laser desorption mass spectrometry using porous polymeric substrates with particle fillers |
US7932196B2 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2011-04-26 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Microporous stretch thinned film/nonwoven laminates and limited use or disposable product applications |
US20050055885A1 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2005-03-17 | Psiloquest | Polishing pad for chemical mechanical polishing |
US7703456B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2010-04-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Facemasks containing an anti-fog / anti-glare composition |
US20050136242A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Porous substrates having one side treated at a higher concentration and methods of treating porous substrates |
US20050136773A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Treated nonwoven material |
US7687619B2 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2010-03-30 | Millipore Corporation | Room temperature stable agarose solutions |
EP2821135A1 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2015-01-07 | EMD Millipore Corporation | Porous adsorptive or chromatographic media |
WO2005078028A1 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2005-08-25 | Millipore Corporation | Method of forming polysaccharide structures |
WO2005077529A1 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2005-08-25 | Millipore Corporation | Porous adsorptive or chromatographic media |
EP2821124A1 (en) | 2004-02-05 | 2015-01-07 | EMD Millipore Corporation | Method of forming coated structures |
WO2005120594A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-22 | Dow Global Technologies Inc. | Polymers with odor control properties and method for their preparation |
US20060067990A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent articles for inhibiting the production of exoproteins |
US20060067991A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Non-absorbent articles for inhibiting the production of exoproteins |
DE102004052120A1 (en) * | 2004-10-26 | 2006-04-27 | Basf Ag | Process for producing multilayer fabrics, particles or fibers |
WO2006063284A2 (en) | 2004-12-10 | 2006-06-15 | Rhodia Inc. | Method for durable hydrophilization of a hydrophobic surface |
US8236385B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2012-08-07 | Kimberly Clark Corporation | Treatment of substrates for improving ink adhesion to the substrates |
US20060286334A1 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2006-12-21 | Batam, Llc | Absorbent non-woven mat having perforations or scoring |
KR100746819B1 (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2007-08-06 | 도레이새한 주식회사 | Radial nonweaven fiber having improved hydrophile property and the manufacturing method thereof |
US7678716B2 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2010-03-16 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Hydrogel-web composites for thermal energy transfer applications and methods of making the same |
US20080057811A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Multifunctional hydrogel-web composites for enhanced absorbency applications and methods of making the same |
TWI334237B (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2010-12-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Gas diffusion layer, manufacturing apparatus and manufacturing method thereof |
US9433922B2 (en) * | 2007-08-14 | 2016-09-06 | Emd Millipore Corporation | Media for membrane ion exchange chromatography based on polymeric primary amines, sorption device containing that media, and chromatography scheme and purification method using the same |
US20090130738A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-21 | Mikhail Kozlov | Media for membrane ion exchange chromatography |
US20090137043A1 (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2009-05-28 | North Carolina State University | Methods for modification of polymers, fibers and textile media |
US20110300370A1 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2011-12-08 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Coating method and coated article |
CN101812777B (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2012-11-28 | 山东俊富非织造材料有限公司 | Interval type hydrophilic nonwoven material and preparation method thereof |
WO2014186113A2 (en) | 2013-05-17 | 2014-11-20 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Easy-clean surface and method of making the same |
US9861348B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2018-01-09 | Access Closure, Inc. | Chitosan and polyethylene glycol copolymers and methods and devices for using same for sealing a vascular puncture |
WO2017074330A1 (en) * | 2015-10-28 | 2017-05-04 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Tunable surface wettability of fiber based materials |
US11098444B2 (en) | 2016-01-07 | 2021-08-24 | Tommie Copper Ip, Inc. | Cotton performance products and methods of their manufacture |
BR112018070715B1 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2022-10-04 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | ABSORBENT ARTICLE |
TWI615275B (en) * | 2016-11-14 | 2018-02-21 | 國立高雄大學 | Amphiphilic film structure having hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties |
CN109503876A (en) * | 2018-11-07 | 2019-03-22 | 江苏金羿射日新材料科技有限公司 | A kind of hydrophilically modified method of hydrophobic material |
CN112137421B (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2024-03-15 | 武汉苏泊尔炊具有限公司 | Paint and cooking utensil |
DE102020212866A1 (en) | 2020-10-12 | 2022-06-23 | Christof-Herbert Diener | Plasma treated cleaning and/or swab swab |
CN113293604B (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2022-09-13 | 珠海市华纶无纺布有限公司 | Antibacterial and hydrophilic non-woven fabric and preparation method and application thereof |
CN113279099B (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2022-08-09 | 厦门安踏体育用品有限公司 | Quick-drying cotton yarn and preparation method thereof, and quick-drying fabric and preparation method thereof |
CN114262249B (en) * | 2021-11-15 | 2022-09-23 | 西安近代化学研究所 | Composite explosive particles and preparation method thereof |
DE102023101636B3 (en) | 2023-01-24 | 2024-04-18 | Alexandra Plewnia | Process for producing a hydrophobic fiber, fiber, yarn and textile fabric |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3644081A (en) * | 1967-03-07 | 1972-02-22 | Asahi Chemical Ind | Process for the treatment of polyester fiberous materials |
GB1312431A (en) * | 1971-01-04 | 1973-04-04 | Commw Scient Ind Res Org | Cotton and other cellulose type fibres |
GB1447493A (en) * | 1973-02-01 | 1976-08-25 | Ici Ltd | Coated synthetic film materials electric circuit arrangements for energising electromagnetic |
DE2364628C3 (en) * | 1973-12-24 | 1980-10-16 | Hoechst Ag, 6000 Frankfurt | Process for the production of a hydrophilized structure from a water-insoluble polymer |
US4200558A (en) * | 1973-12-24 | 1980-04-29 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Method of producing hydrophilic articles of water-insoluble polymers |
DE2441781C3 (en) * | 1974-08-31 | 1980-12-04 | Hoechst Ag, 6000 Frankfurt | Process for improving the water absorption and absorbency of fiber materials |
DE2547650B2 (en) * | 1975-10-24 | 1981-01-22 | Hoechst Ag, 6000 Frankfurt | Flat, absorbent layer structure |
JPS5980442A (en) * | 1982-09-24 | 1984-05-09 | ベクトン・デイツキンソン・アンド・カンパニ− | Chemically modified surface for bonding large molecule |
DE3236432A1 (en) * | 1982-10-01 | 1984-04-05 | Basf Ag, 6700 Ludwigshafen | METHOD FOR PRODUCING POLYOXYBUTYLEN-POLYOXYALKYLENGLYKOLCARBONSAEUREDIESTER |
EP0111795B1 (en) * | 1982-12-03 | 1988-06-22 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | A method for increasing hydrophilicity of a fabric material of synthetic fibers |
JPS6185315A (en) * | 1984-10-04 | 1986-04-30 | Teikoku Seiyaku Kk | Sheet-like preparation |
GB8428876D0 (en) * | 1984-11-15 | 1984-12-27 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Diagnostic strips |
US4601911A (en) * | 1985-01-17 | 1986-07-22 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Method for increasing hydrophilicity of a fabric material of synthetic fibers |
GB8513152D0 (en) * | 1985-05-24 | 1985-06-26 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Diagnostic strips |
JPS62191569A (en) * | 1986-02-13 | 1987-08-21 | 東レ株式会社 | Plasma treatment of fiber structure |
JPS63301234A (en) * | 1987-06-02 | 1988-12-08 | Bio Meito:Kk | Rendering plastic surface hydrophilic |
US4996076A (en) * | 1988-03-24 | 1991-02-26 | Nippon Paint Co., Ltd. | Film forming method |
US5147343B1 (en) * | 1988-04-21 | 1998-03-17 | Kimberly Clark Co | Absorbent products containing hydrogels with ability to swell against pressure |
JPH026848A (en) * | 1988-06-24 | 1990-01-11 | Mitsubishi Acetate Co Ltd | Water-absorbing sheet |
US4964945A (en) * | 1988-12-09 | 1990-10-23 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Lift off patterning process on a flexible substrate |
US5258221A (en) * | 1990-12-17 | 1993-11-02 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Polyolefin article |
JPH05209348A (en) * | 1991-12-17 | 1993-08-20 | Tokushu Seishi Kk | Polyolefin sheet coated with pearl pigment |
US5294478A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-03-15 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Multi-layer absorbent composite |
-
1996
- 1996-06-14 US US08/665,172 patent/US5814567A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-06-09 ZA ZA9705066A patent/ZA975066B/en unknown
- 1997-06-10 BR BR9709723A patent/BR9709723A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-06-10 EP EP97928861A patent/EP0904446A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-06-10 CA CA002256388A patent/CA2256388A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-06-10 CN CNB971954879A patent/CN1153867C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-06-10 WO PCT/US1997/009756 patent/WO1997047801A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-06-10 AU AU33022/97A patent/AU725443B2/en not_active Expired
- 1997-06-11 CO CO97032244A patent/CO4850633A1/en unknown
- 1997-06-13 AR ARP970102619A patent/AR007589A1/en active IP Right Grant
-
1998
- 1998-07-02 US US09/109,678 patent/US5945175A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113665182A (en) * | 2021-06-23 | 2021-11-19 | 浙江嘉衡纺织科技有限公司 | Preparation method of water-repellent antibacterial coated fabric |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AR007589A1 (en) | 1999-11-10 |
WO1997047801A1 (en) | 1997-12-18 |
ZA975066B (en) | 1998-01-14 |
EP0904446A1 (en) | 1999-03-31 |
BR9709723A (en) | 1999-08-10 |
CO4850633A1 (en) | 1999-10-26 |
US5945175A (en) | 1999-08-31 |
AU725443B2 (en) | 2000-10-12 |
US5814567A (en) | 1998-09-29 |
CN1222207A (en) | 1999-07-07 |
CN1153867C (en) | 2004-06-16 |
AU3302297A (en) | 1998-01-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5814567A (en) | Durable hydrophilic coating for a porous hydrophobic substrate | |
EP1002153B1 (en) | Method and composition for treating substrates for wettability | |
US6028016A (en) | Nonwoven Fabric Substrates Having a Durable Treatment | |
CA1225013A (en) | Two-ply nonwoven fabric laminate | |
US4413032A (en) | Non-woven fabric with wick action | |
US6613703B1 (en) | Thermoplastic nonwoven web chemically reacted with a cyclodextrin compound | |
US6060410A (en) | Coating of a hydrophobic polymer substrate with a nonstoichiometric polyelectrolyte complex | |
US7700500B2 (en) | Durable hydrophilic treatment for a biodegradable polymeric substrate | |
US4588457A (en) | Two-ply nonwoven fabric laminate | |
US20100069864A1 (en) | Absorbent article with a strongly hydrophobic layer | |
US6433243B1 (en) | Water permeable porous layer materials treated with surfactant-modified cyclodextrins | |
WO2000050099A1 (en) | Layer materials treated with surfactant-modified hydrophobic odor control agents | |
US20040121680A1 (en) | Compositions and methods for treating lofty nonwoven substrates | |
US20040121675A1 (en) | Treatment of substrates for improving ink adhesion to the substrates | |
US6239047B1 (en) | Wettable soft polyolefin fibers and fabric | |
CA2212983A1 (en) | Wettable article | |
WO2000037736A2 (en) | Method of coating hydrophobic polymer fibers with poly(vinyl alcohol) | |
CA2207296A1 (en) | Surface modification of hydrophobic polymer substrate | |
KR100481906B1 (en) | A coated porous substrate, a disposable absorbent product and a laminate having said substrate, and a method of preparing said substrate | |
CA2262496C (en) | Method and composition for treating substrates for wettability | |
MXPA01005988A (en) | Method of coating hydrophobic polymer fibers with poly(vinyl alcohol) | |
WO2000050097A1 (en) | Water-absorbent materials treated with surfactant-modified cyclodextrins | |
MXPA01008662A (en) | Water-absorbent materials treated with surfactant-modified cyclodextrins | |
MXPA01008661A (en) | Layer materials treated with surfactant-modified hydrophobic odor control agents |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Discontinued |