CA2224021C - Method and apparatus for navigating close proximity routes with a vehicle navigation system - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for navigating close proximity routes with a vehicle navigation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2224021C CA2224021C CA002224021A CA2224021A CA2224021C CA 2224021 C CA2224021 C CA 2224021C CA 002224021 A CA002224021 A CA 002224021A CA 2224021 A CA2224021 A CA 2224021A CA 2224021 C CA2224021 C CA 2224021C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- maneuver
- partial route
- route
- distance
- generating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
- G01C21/26—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 specially adapted for navigation in a road network
- G01C21/34—Route searching; Route guidance
- G01C21/36—Input/output arrangements for on-board computers
- G01C21/3626—Details of the output of route guidance instructions
- G01C21/3658—Lane guidance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
- G01C21/26—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 specially adapted for navigation in a road network
- G01C21/34—Route searching; Route guidance
- G01C21/3453—Special cost functions, i.e. other than distance or default speed limit of road segments
- G01C21/3461—Preferred or disfavoured areas, e.g. dangerous zones, toll or emission zones, intersections, manoeuvre types, segments such as motorways, toll roads, ferries
Abstract
A method and apparatus are provided for generating a route from a source location to a destination in a vehicle navigation system. Initially, the system generates a first partial route from the source location to the end of the first partial route. The system then determines whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from a first maneuver at the end of the first partial route. Where the second maneuver is within the first distance, the system increases the cost associated with the second maneuver. The system then generates a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination, generation of the second partial route being based at least in part on the cost associated with the second maneuver.
Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NAVIGATING CLOSE PROXIMITY
ROUTES WITH A VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for ensuring that a route generated by a vehicle navigation system may be safely navigated by the user. More specifically, the present invention provides a vehicle navigation system which generates routes which are less likely to include consecutive maneuvers which are difficult and/or hazardous to execute.
Currently available vehicle navigation systems typically generate routes using variations of well known search algorithms in conjunction with commercially available map databases. Some algorithms attempt to generate optimum routes, i.e., shortest distance or shortest travel time, using a variety of techniques. Unfortunately, while these algorithms typically generate routes which obey,travel restrictions, e.g., one-way streets, and avoid prohibited maneuvers, they do not typically determine whether a maneuver is difficult to execute before including it in the generated route. Figs. 1-5 show several examples of troublesome consecutive maneuvers.
In Fig. 1, route 100 includes a right turn from road 102 to road 104, followed by a left turn onto road 106. The first maneuver, the right turn, places the vehicle in the far right lane of road 104 which is a four-lane, one-way road.
The left turn onto road 106 is less than 200 feet down the road from the intersection of roads 102 and 104, and must be executed from the far left lane of road 104. While these consecutive maneuvers are theoretically possible, the second maneuver, i.e., the left turn, is extremely difficult and potentially hazardous because so many lanes of traffic must be crossed in such a short distance. The situation becomes even more hazardous where, as is often the case, the user is relying heavily on the generated route because she is not familiar with the area.
Fig. 2 shows a similar situation except that road 204 is a two-way road. In this situation, the danger arises from entering the stream of traffic on road 204 from road 202, and stopping abruptly within a short distance for the purpose of making the required left turn onto road 206. Figs. 3 and 4 show situations similar to Figs. 1 and 2 except that the first maneuver is a left turn and the second is a right turn. Fig.
5 shows a situation in which the first maneuver involves exiting the westbound section of a freeway 502 and a second maneuver which is a left turn onto road 504 across oncoming traffic which is entering freeway 502. The difficulty and danger associated with such a scenario is self evident.
In view of the foregoing discussion, it is apparent that some means.for reducing the incidence of difficult and/or dangerous consecutive maneuvers in a generated route is desirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a method and appparatus are provided which determine whether two maneuvers are too closely spaced for the second maneuver to be included in the generated route. The vehicle navigation system of the present invention searches a map database for road segments to be included in the generated route. The system also generates a series of maneuver instructions to be communicated to the driver which correspond to the maneuvers in the generated route. After including a particular maneuver in the route, the search algorithm identifies a second maneuver which could potentially be included in the route. Depending on a number of factors, the system then determines whether the second maneuver is within some threshold distance of the first maneuver. The factors which determine this threshold distance may include, but are not limited to, whether the first and second maneuvers are in opposite directions (e. g., the first is right and the second is left), and the number of lanes, the width, and/or the speed limit of the road segment connecting the two maneuvers.
If, given these factors, the second maneuver is determined to be within the threshold distance, the cost associated with the second maneuver is increased so that the search algorithm is less likely to include that maneuver in the route. In this way, the incidence of potentially dangerous consecutive maneuvers in a generated route is reduced. It should be noted, however, that, according to this embodiment, the second maneuver is not entirely eliminated from consideration for inclusion in the route. This allows for the case where the second maneuver may be necessary to the completion of a route.
It should also be noted that a number of variations on the above-described embodiment are within the scope of the present invention. For example, according to another embodiment, the cost associated with the second maneuver is increased by a variable amount, the value of which is dependent on the distance between the first and second maneuvers. In yet another embodiment, the threshold distance is a fixed value for each of a number of categories in which the road segment connecting the two maneuvers might be included. That is, for example, if the road segment connecting the two maneuvers is part of a major surface street, the threshold distance could be 200 feet. If, however, the road segment is part of an expressway or freeway, the threshold distance could be 1000 feet. In still another embodiment, rather than increasing the cost of the maneuver, the system ignores the maneuver for route generation purposes.
Alternatively, the system prohibits access to the maneuver and/or its associated road segments.
Thus, according to the invention, a method and apparatus are provided for generating a route from a source location to a destination in a vehicle navigation system.
Initially, the system generates a first partial route from the source location to the end of the first partial route. The system then determines whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from a first maneuver at the end of the first partial route. Where the second maneuver is within the first distance, the system manipulates a parameter associated with the second maneuver (e. g., the cost). The system then generates a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination, generation of the second partial route being based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figs. 1-5 are a series of diagrams illustrating consecutive maneuvers which are potentially dangerous to execute;
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a vehicle navigation system for use with the present invention; and Figs. 7A and 7B are flowcharts illustrating operation of two specific embodiments of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention relates generally to commonly assigned United States Patents No. 5,345,382 to Kao for CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A RELATIVE HEADING SENSOR, No.
ROUTES WITH A VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for ensuring that a route generated by a vehicle navigation system may be safely navigated by the user. More specifically, the present invention provides a vehicle navigation system which generates routes which are less likely to include consecutive maneuvers which are difficult and/or hazardous to execute.
Currently available vehicle navigation systems typically generate routes using variations of well known search algorithms in conjunction with commercially available map databases. Some algorithms attempt to generate optimum routes, i.e., shortest distance or shortest travel time, using a variety of techniques. Unfortunately, while these algorithms typically generate routes which obey,travel restrictions, e.g., one-way streets, and avoid prohibited maneuvers, they do not typically determine whether a maneuver is difficult to execute before including it in the generated route. Figs. 1-5 show several examples of troublesome consecutive maneuvers.
In Fig. 1, route 100 includes a right turn from road 102 to road 104, followed by a left turn onto road 106. The first maneuver, the right turn, places the vehicle in the far right lane of road 104 which is a four-lane, one-way road.
The left turn onto road 106 is less than 200 feet down the road from the intersection of roads 102 and 104, and must be executed from the far left lane of road 104. While these consecutive maneuvers are theoretically possible, the second maneuver, i.e., the left turn, is extremely difficult and potentially hazardous because so many lanes of traffic must be crossed in such a short distance. The situation becomes even more hazardous where, as is often the case, the user is relying heavily on the generated route because she is not familiar with the area.
Fig. 2 shows a similar situation except that road 204 is a two-way road. In this situation, the danger arises from entering the stream of traffic on road 204 from road 202, and stopping abruptly within a short distance for the purpose of making the required left turn onto road 206. Figs. 3 and 4 show situations similar to Figs. 1 and 2 except that the first maneuver is a left turn and the second is a right turn. Fig.
5 shows a situation in which the first maneuver involves exiting the westbound section of a freeway 502 and a second maneuver which is a left turn onto road 504 across oncoming traffic which is entering freeway 502. The difficulty and danger associated with such a scenario is self evident.
In view of the foregoing discussion, it is apparent that some means.for reducing the incidence of difficult and/or dangerous consecutive maneuvers in a generated route is desirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a method and appparatus are provided which determine whether two maneuvers are too closely spaced for the second maneuver to be included in the generated route. The vehicle navigation system of the present invention searches a map database for road segments to be included in the generated route. The system also generates a series of maneuver instructions to be communicated to the driver which correspond to the maneuvers in the generated route. After including a particular maneuver in the route, the search algorithm identifies a second maneuver which could potentially be included in the route. Depending on a number of factors, the system then determines whether the second maneuver is within some threshold distance of the first maneuver. The factors which determine this threshold distance may include, but are not limited to, whether the first and second maneuvers are in opposite directions (e. g., the first is right and the second is left), and the number of lanes, the width, and/or the speed limit of the road segment connecting the two maneuvers.
If, given these factors, the second maneuver is determined to be within the threshold distance, the cost associated with the second maneuver is increased so that the search algorithm is less likely to include that maneuver in the route. In this way, the incidence of potentially dangerous consecutive maneuvers in a generated route is reduced. It should be noted, however, that, according to this embodiment, the second maneuver is not entirely eliminated from consideration for inclusion in the route. This allows for the case where the second maneuver may be necessary to the completion of a route.
It should also be noted that a number of variations on the above-described embodiment are within the scope of the present invention. For example, according to another embodiment, the cost associated with the second maneuver is increased by a variable amount, the value of which is dependent on the distance between the first and second maneuvers. In yet another embodiment, the threshold distance is a fixed value for each of a number of categories in which the road segment connecting the two maneuvers might be included. That is, for example, if the road segment connecting the two maneuvers is part of a major surface street, the threshold distance could be 200 feet. If, however, the road segment is part of an expressway or freeway, the threshold distance could be 1000 feet. In still another embodiment, rather than increasing the cost of the maneuver, the system ignores the maneuver for route generation purposes.
Alternatively, the system prohibits access to the maneuver and/or its associated road segments.
Thus, according to the invention, a method and apparatus are provided for generating a route from a source location to a destination in a vehicle navigation system.
Initially, the system generates a first partial route from the source location to the end of the first partial route. The system then determines whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from a first maneuver at the end of the first partial route. Where the second maneuver is within the first distance, the system manipulates a parameter associated with the second maneuver (e. g., the cost). The system then generates a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination, generation of the second partial route being based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figs. 1-5 are a series of diagrams illustrating consecutive maneuvers which are potentially dangerous to execute;
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a vehicle navigation system for use with the present invention; and Figs. 7A and 7B are flowcharts illustrating operation of two specific embodiments of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention relates generally to commonly assigned United States Patents No. 5,345,382 to Kao for CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A RELATIVE HEADING SENSOR, No.
5,359,529 to Snider for ROUTE GUIDANCE ON/OFF-ROUTE STATE
FILTER, No. 5,374,933 to Kao for POSITION CORRECTION METHOD
FOR VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM, and No. 5,515,283 to Desai et al. for METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING HIGHWAY ACCESS RAMPS FOR ROUTE
CALCULATION IN A VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM..
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a specific embodiment of a vehicle navigation system 10 for use with the present invention. Sensors 12 and 14 and GPS receiver 18 are coupled to computing means 20 through sensor/GPS interface 22. In typical embodiments, mileage sensor 12 comprises an odometer, and angular velocity sensor 14 comprises a gyroscope, or a differential odometer coupled to the wheels of the vehicle. A
global positioning system (GPS) data receiver 18 is provided for receiving signals from, for example, a satellite-based navigation system. Data from sensor/GPS interface 22 is transmitted to CPU 24, which performs calibration, signal 5 processing, dead-reckoning, vehicle positioning, and route guidance functions. A database containing map information may be stored in database medium 26, with software directing the operation of computing means 20 stored in main memory 28 for execution by CPU 24. Memory 28 may comprise read-only memory (ROM), or reprogrammable non-volatile memory such as flash memory or SRAM. System RAM 30 permits reading and writing of the information necessary to execute such software programs.
Database medium 26 may comprise non-volatile memory, a hard disk drive, CD-ROM, or an integrated circuit in which digitized map information has been stored. Output controller 32, which may comprise a graphics controller, receives data processed by CPU 24 and transmits the data to display console 40 which includes output communicator 34, usually comprising a display screen with associated audio electronics and audio speakers. The driver may input data, such as a desired destination, through user interface 36, typically comprising a keyboard.
The map database stored in database medium 26 preferably comprises positional data such as, for example, latitude and longitude coordinates, to describe road intersections or nodes, road segments, landmarks and points of interest, and other geographical information. The data base may further comprise data representing characteristics of roads or places on the map, such as road and place names, road features such as dividers, one-way restrictions, surface, speed limit, shape, elevation, and other properties.
According to specific embodiments of the invention, the map database includes cost values associated with individual nodes and road segments. These cost values correspond to the estimates of time intervals for traversing the respective node or segment. Node cost values take into consideration such information as, for example, whether the vehicle would encounter oncoming traffic, thus delaying a left turn maneuver. Segment costs reflect road segment characteristics such as speed limit and segment length, both of which affect the travel time along the segment. Also associated with each road in the map database is a link class which relates to the category or type of the road. For example, the highest level category of the hierarchy is the link class FREEWAY. The lowest level includes the link classes FRONTAGE and MISC which include, for example, frontage roads and alleys.
The vehicle navigation system of the present invention is operable to generate a route from a source location to a destination according to a variety of different methods. Some examples of such methods are described in the U. S . patents mentioned abo~te .
Fig. 7A is a flowchart 700 illustrating operation of a specific embodiment of the present invention. As discussed above, the system searches its map database for road segments to include in the generated route according to any of a variety of search algorithms (step 702) until the destination is reached (step 704). When a new maneuver has been included in the route (step 706) a threshold distance is determined (step 708). As long as no new maneuvers are encountered, the algorithm continues to search for road segments. The threshold distance is the distance within which a second maneuver would be considered potentially difficult or dangerous. The threshold distance may be-determined according to various embodiments of the invention. For example, the threshold distance may be a fixed distance, e.g., 200 feet.
Alternatively, the threshold distance may vary with the type of road segment which connects the two maneuvers: That is, the threshold distance for a freeway would be greater than that for a major surface street in a residential area.
FILTER, No. 5,374,933 to Kao for POSITION CORRECTION METHOD
FOR VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM, and No. 5,515,283 to Desai et al. for METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING HIGHWAY ACCESS RAMPS FOR ROUTE
CALCULATION IN A VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEM..
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a specific embodiment of a vehicle navigation system 10 for use with the present invention. Sensors 12 and 14 and GPS receiver 18 are coupled to computing means 20 through sensor/GPS interface 22. In typical embodiments, mileage sensor 12 comprises an odometer, and angular velocity sensor 14 comprises a gyroscope, or a differential odometer coupled to the wheels of the vehicle. A
global positioning system (GPS) data receiver 18 is provided for receiving signals from, for example, a satellite-based navigation system. Data from sensor/GPS interface 22 is transmitted to CPU 24, which performs calibration, signal 5 processing, dead-reckoning, vehicle positioning, and route guidance functions. A database containing map information may be stored in database medium 26, with software directing the operation of computing means 20 stored in main memory 28 for execution by CPU 24. Memory 28 may comprise read-only memory (ROM), or reprogrammable non-volatile memory such as flash memory or SRAM. System RAM 30 permits reading and writing of the information necessary to execute such software programs.
Database medium 26 may comprise non-volatile memory, a hard disk drive, CD-ROM, or an integrated circuit in which digitized map information has been stored. Output controller 32, which may comprise a graphics controller, receives data processed by CPU 24 and transmits the data to display console 40 which includes output communicator 34, usually comprising a display screen with associated audio electronics and audio speakers. The driver may input data, such as a desired destination, through user interface 36, typically comprising a keyboard.
The map database stored in database medium 26 preferably comprises positional data such as, for example, latitude and longitude coordinates, to describe road intersections or nodes, road segments, landmarks and points of interest, and other geographical information. The data base may further comprise data representing characteristics of roads or places on the map, such as road and place names, road features such as dividers, one-way restrictions, surface, speed limit, shape, elevation, and other properties.
According to specific embodiments of the invention, the map database includes cost values associated with individual nodes and road segments. These cost values correspond to the estimates of time intervals for traversing the respective node or segment. Node cost values take into consideration such information as, for example, whether the vehicle would encounter oncoming traffic, thus delaying a left turn maneuver. Segment costs reflect road segment characteristics such as speed limit and segment length, both of which affect the travel time along the segment. Also associated with each road in the map database is a link class which relates to the category or type of the road. For example, the highest level category of the hierarchy is the link class FREEWAY. The lowest level includes the link classes FRONTAGE and MISC which include, for example, frontage roads and alleys.
The vehicle navigation system of the present invention is operable to generate a route from a source location to a destination according to a variety of different methods. Some examples of such methods are described in the U. S . patents mentioned abo~te .
Fig. 7A is a flowchart 700 illustrating operation of a specific embodiment of the present invention. As discussed above, the system searches its map database for road segments to include in the generated route according to any of a variety of search algorithms (step 702) until the destination is reached (step 704). When a new maneuver has been included in the route (step 706) a threshold distance is determined (step 708). As long as no new maneuvers are encountered, the algorithm continues to search for road segments. The threshold distance is the distance within which a second maneuver would be considered potentially difficult or dangerous. The threshold distance may be-determined according to various embodiments of the invention. For example, the threshold distance may be a fixed distance, e.g., 200 feet.
Alternatively, the threshold distance may vary with the type of road segment which connects the two maneuvers: That is, the threshold distance for a freeway would be greater than that for a major surface street in a residential area.
Once a threshold distance is determined, a second maneuver is identified which could potentially be included in the generated route (step 710). If the second maneuver is within the threshold distance (step 712), the cost associated with that maneuver is increased to decrease the likelihood that the maneuver will be included in the generated route (step 714). The search algorithm then continues to generate the route based at least in part on this increased cost. If the second maneuver is not within the threshold distance, the algorithm continues to search for additional road segments in the usual-manner.
Fig. 7B is a flowchart 701 illustrating an alternate embodiment of the present invention. Steps 702 through 708 are substantially the same as discussed above with reference to Fig. 7A. However, once the threshold distance is determined, the.algorithm determines whether there any potential maneuvers within the threshold distance (step 711).
If there are none, the algorithm continues to search for additional road segments. If, however, potential maneuvers are identified within the threshold distance, the cost associated with each of the maneuvers is increased to decrease the likelihood that the maneuver will be included in the generated route (step 713). The search algorithm then continues to generate the route based at least in part on these increased costs.
The manner in which the costs associated with maneuvers are increased may vary according to different embodiments of the invention. For example, a fixed increment may be applied to the cost. Alternatively, the increment applied to the cost may vary according to the distance between the first and second maneuvers. Additionally, the magnitude of the increment may be dependent upon the type of road segment connecting the two maneuvers and/or the speed limit on that segment. It will be understood that the scope of the present invention includes but is not limited to these embodiments.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in the form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, the embodiments of the present invention have been described above with reference to manipulation of the cost associated with a second maneuver to effect the goal of avoiding inclusion of difficult or dangerous successive maneuvers in a generated route. However, it will be understood that the present invention would encompass a system in which the search algorithm is prohibited from including a second maneuver within a threshold distance of a first maneuver in a generated route. This may be accomplished by dramatically increasing the cost of the second maneuver. It could also be achieved through some other mechanism which causes the search algorithm to ignore the maneuver and its associated road segments. Such a mechanism might, for example, remove such maneuvers from the map database for the current search. Alternatively, the system might develop a list of such maneuvers which are prohibited from inclusion in the route, checking each new segment candidate against the list and eliminating any matches from consideration. These are only some of the many possibilities within the scope of the invention. In view of the foregoing discussion, the scope of the invention should therefore be determined by reference to the appended claims.
Fig. 7B is a flowchart 701 illustrating an alternate embodiment of the present invention. Steps 702 through 708 are substantially the same as discussed above with reference to Fig. 7A. However, once the threshold distance is determined, the.algorithm determines whether there any potential maneuvers within the threshold distance (step 711).
If there are none, the algorithm continues to search for additional road segments. If, however, potential maneuvers are identified within the threshold distance, the cost associated with each of the maneuvers is increased to decrease the likelihood that the maneuver will be included in the generated route (step 713). The search algorithm then continues to generate the route based at least in part on these increased costs.
The manner in which the costs associated with maneuvers are increased may vary according to different embodiments of the invention. For example, a fixed increment may be applied to the cost. Alternatively, the increment applied to the cost may vary according to the distance between the first and second maneuvers. Additionally, the magnitude of the increment may be dependent upon the type of road segment connecting the two maneuvers and/or the speed limit on that segment. It will be understood that the scope of the present invention includes but is not limited to these embodiments.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in the form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, the embodiments of the present invention have been described above with reference to manipulation of the cost associated with a second maneuver to effect the goal of avoiding inclusion of difficult or dangerous successive maneuvers in a generated route. However, it will be understood that the present invention would encompass a system in which the search algorithm is prohibited from including a second maneuver within a threshold distance of a first maneuver in a generated route. This may be accomplished by dramatically increasing the cost of the second maneuver. It could also be achieved through some other mechanism which causes the search algorithm to ignore the maneuver and its associated road segments. Such a mechanism might, for example, remove such maneuvers from the map database for the current search. Alternatively, the system might develop a list of such maneuvers which are prohibited from inclusion in the route, checking each new segment candidate against the list and eliminating any matches from consideration. These are only some of the many possibilities within the scope of the invention. In view of the foregoing discussion, the scope of the invention should therefore be determined by reference to the appended claims.
Claims (16)
1. A method for generating a route from a source location to a destination in a vehicle navigation system, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first and second maneuvers are connected by a road segment, the first distance being determined with regard to a characteristic of the road segment.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the characteristic comprises a number of lanes in the road segment.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the characteristic comprises a width of the road segment.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein the characteristic comprises a link class of the road segment.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of manipulating the parameter comprises increasing a cost associated with the second maneuver.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the cost is increased by a variable amount, the variable amount varying with a second distance between the first and second maneuvers.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of manipulating the parameter comprises prohibiting access to the second maneuver.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of manipulating the parameter causes the second maneuver to be ignored during the generation of the second partial route.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the first maneuver comprises exiting a highway and the second maneuver comprises an abrupt turn.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the first maneuver comprises a first turn in a first direction and the second maneuver comprises a second turn in a second direction, the first and second directions being substantially opposed.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the first direction is left and the second direction is right.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein the first direction is right and the second direction is left.
14. An apparatus for generating a route from a source location to a destination in a vehicle navigation system, the method comprising the steps of:
means for generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
means for determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
means for manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver where the second maneuver is within the first distance; and means for generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination, generation of the second partial route being based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
means for generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
means for determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
means for manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver where the second maneuver is within the first distance; and means for generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination, generation of the second partial route being based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
15. A vehicle navigation system, comprising:
a plurality of sensors for detecting a current vehicle position and a vehicle heading, and generating signals indicative thereof;
a database medium having geographic locations of a plurality of road segments and segment nodes stored therein;
a processor coupled to the sensors and the database medium for generating a route from a source location to a destination, the processor being operable to:
(a) generate a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
(b) determine whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
(c) where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulate a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and (d) generate a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver; and an output communicator coupled to the processor for communicating the route to a user of the vehicle navigation system.
a plurality of sensors for detecting a current vehicle position and a vehicle heading, and generating signals indicative thereof;
a database medium having geographic locations of a plurality of road segments and segment nodes stored therein;
a processor coupled to the sensors and the database medium for generating a route from a source location to a destination, the processor being operable to:
(a) generate a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
(b) determine whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
(c) where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulate a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and (d) generate a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver; and an output communicator coupled to the processor for communicating the route to a user of the vehicle navigation system.
16. A computer program product for determining a route from a source location to a destination, comprising:
a computer-readable medium; and a computer program mechanism embedded in the computer-readable medium for causing a computer to perform the steps of:
generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
a computer-readable medium; and a computer program mechanism embedded in the computer-readable medium for causing a computer to perform the steps of:
generating a first partial route from the source location to an end of the first partial route, the first partial route including a first maneuver;
determining whether a second maneuver is within a first distance from the first maneuver;
where the second maneuver is within the first distance, manipulating a parameter associated with the second maneuver; and generating a second partial route from the end of the first partial route to the destination based at least in part on the parameter associated with the second maneuver.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/761,868 US5910177A (en) | 1996-12-09 | 1996-12-09 | Navigating close proximity routes with a vehicle navigation system |
| US08/761,868 | 1996-12-09 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2224021A1 CA2224021A1 (en) | 1998-06-09 |
| CA2224021C true CA2224021C (en) | 2001-02-27 |
Family
ID=25063462
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002224021A Expired - Fee Related CA2224021C (en) | 1996-12-09 | 1997-12-05 | Method and apparatus for navigating close proximity routes with a vehicle navigation system |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5910177A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0846933B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3413087B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2224021C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69728501T2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104061938A (en) * | 2013-03-21 | 2014-09-24 | 高德信息技术有限公司 | Navigation method, apparatus and system |
Families Citing this family (54)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6112154A (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 2000-08-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for determining a route on a digitized road network stored in the memory of a navigation system |
| JP3412684B2 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2003-06-03 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Navigation device and recording medium of the device |
| JP3750400B2 (en) * | 1999-03-08 | 2006-03-01 | 株式会社ナビタイムジャパン | Traffic network route search method and apparatus |
| EP1099932B1 (en) * | 1999-05-25 | 2008-06-18 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Navigation device |
| US6266615B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2001-07-24 | Televigation, Inc. | Method and system for an interactive and real-time distributed navigation system |
| US6654683B2 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2003-11-25 | Jin Haiping | Method and system for real-time navigation using mobile telephones |
| US6405123B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2002-06-11 | Televigation, Inc. | Method and system for an efficient operating environment in a real-time navigation system |
| US6615131B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2003-09-02 | Televigation, Inc. | Method and system for an efficient operating environment in a real-time navigation system |
| EP2261605A3 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2013-08-07 | TeleNav, Inc. | Method and system for labelling a user's present location in a navigation system |
| JP4538895B2 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2010-09-08 | 株式会社デンソー | Route setting device and navigation device |
| US7805442B1 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2010-09-28 | Navteq North America, Llc | Method and system for representation of geographical features in a computer-based system |
| KR20070054266A (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2007-05-28 | 텔레비게이션 인크 | Navigation system for mobile environment |
| US6728634B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2004-04-27 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Destination route guiding method |
| US6640186B2 (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2003-10-28 | General Motors Corporation | Method and system for generating a list of maneuvers for navigation of a vehicle |
| DK1402457T3 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2011-05-02 | Caliper Corp | Traffic data management and simulation system |
| US7221287B2 (en) | 2002-03-05 | 2007-05-22 | Triangle Software Llc | Three-dimensional traffic report |
| US20040044465A1 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2004-03-04 | Nesbitt David W. | Automated route determination based on day of route traversal |
| US8560223B2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2013-10-15 | Mapquest, Inc. | Automated route determination |
| US7133771B1 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2006-11-07 | America Online, Inc. | Automated route determination to avoid a particular maneuver |
| JP4279532B2 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2009-06-17 | 株式会社アマダ | Mold apparatus and lower mold for use in processing method of molded product |
| US6807483B1 (en) | 2002-10-11 | 2004-10-19 | Televigation, Inc. | Method and system for prediction-based distributed navigation |
| US7321824B1 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2008-01-22 | Aol Llc | Presenting a travel route using more than one presentation style |
| US7474960B1 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2009-01-06 | Mapquest, Inc. | Presenting a travel route |
| US7818116B1 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2010-10-19 | Mapquest, Inc. | Presenting a travel route in a ground-based vehicle |
| JP4098106B2 (en) * | 2003-01-29 | 2008-06-11 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Vehicle navigation system |
| JP4165700B2 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2008-10-15 | パイオニア株式会社 | Route search system and method, navigation system, and computer program |
| US8892356B1 (en) * | 2003-06-19 | 2014-11-18 | Here Global B.V. | Method and system for representing traffic signals in a road network database |
| US9341485B1 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2016-05-17 | Here Global B.V. | Method and apparatus for representing road intersections |
| WO2005013063A2 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2005-02-10 | Landsonar, Inc. | System and method for determining recommended departure time |
| US7966003B2 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2011-06-21 | Tegic Communications, Inc. | Disambiguating ambiguous characters |
| US7539574B2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2009-05-26 | Denso Corporation | Vehicular navigation system |
| JP4148232B2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2008-09-10 | 株式会社デンソー | Route guidance device |
| JP4534838B2 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2010-09-01 | 株式会社デンソー | Navigation device and program for navigation device |
| DE102005022663A1 (en) * | 2005-05-17 | 2006-11-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Vehicle driver assistance method, by detecting lane filtering situation e.g. when lane ends, and alerting driver accordingly e.g. using voice output |
| KR20090064444A (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2009-06-18 | 아사히 가라스 가부시키가이샤 | Diffraction element and optical head device equipped therewith |
| US8050859B2 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2011-11-01 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Navigation apparatus |
| JP4651718B2 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2011-03-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Navigation device |
| DE102007018084A1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2008-10-23 | Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Routefinding system and method with route option to avoid dangerous turnarounds |
| JP5176738B2 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2013-04-03 | 船井電機株式会社 | Navigation device, guide route generation method, and guide route generation program |
| US8619072B2 (en) | 2009-03-04 | 2013-12-31 | Triangle Software Llc | Controlling a three-dimensional virtual broadcast presentation |
| US9046924B2 (en) | 2009-03-04 | 2015-06-02 | Pelmorex Canada Inc. | Gesture based interaction with traffic data |
| US8982116B2 (en) | 2009-03-04 | 2015-03-17 | Pelmorex Canada Inc. | Touch screen based interaction with traffic data |
| US8374792B2 (en) * | 2010-07-30 | 2013-02-12 | Primordial Inc. | System and method for multi-resolution routing |
| US8718910B2 (en) | 2010-11-14 | 2014-05-06 | Pelmorex Canada Inc. | Crowd sourced traffic reporting |
| CA2839866C (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2021-04-13 | Triangle Software Llc | System for providing traffic data and driving efficiency data |
| EP2533068B1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2018-08-08 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Near field navigation system |
| CA2883973C (en) | 2012-01-27 | 2021-02-23 | Edgar Rojas | Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials |
| US10223909B2 (en) | 2012-10-18 | 2019-03-05 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials |
| US9964414B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-05-08 | Caliper Corporation | Lane-level vehicle navigation for vehicle routing and traffic management |
| US9909894B2 (en) | 2016-01-07 | 2018-03-06 | Here Global B.V. | Componentized junction models |
| US10234294B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2019-03-19 | Here Global B.V. | Road geometry matching with componentized junction models |
| US10274331B2 (en) | 2016-09-16 | 2019-04-30 | Polaris Industries Inc. | Device and method for improving route planning computing devices |
| JP6769892B2 (en) * | 2017-02-22 | 2020-10-14 | クラリオン株式会社 | Navigation device, route search server, and route search method |
| US11237007B2 (en) * | 2019-03-12 | 2022-02-01 | Here Global B.V. | Dangerous lane strands |
Family Cites Families (37)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3845289A (en) * | 1972-07-18 | 1974-10-29 | Avon Inc | Method and apparatus employing automatic route control system |
| US4672565A (en) * | 1981-03-10 | 1987-06-09 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Direction detecting system for vehicles |
| JPS57169785A (en) * | 1981-04-13 | 1982-10-19 | Nissan Motor | Travelling guidance system for car |
| JPH0619276B2 (en) * | 1981-08-17 | 1994-03-16 | 工業技術院長 | Portable map display device assembly |
| JPS58151513A (en) * | 1982-03-05 | 1983-09-08 | Alps Electric Co Ltd | Present position updating display of moving body |
| US4797841A (en) * | 1983-11-28 | 1989-01-10 | Magnavox Government And Industrial Electronics Company | Method and apparatus for automatic calibration of magnetic compass |
| US4611293A (en) * | 1983-11-28 | 1986-09-09 | Magnavox Government And Industrial Electronics Company | Method and apparatus for automatic calibration of magnetic compass |
| US4796191A (en) * | 1984-06-07 | 1989-01-03 | Etak, Inc. | Vehicle navigational system and method |
| US4914605A (en) * | 1984-10-22 | 1990-04-03 | Etak, Inc. | Apparatus and method for displaying a map |
| US4734863A (en) * | 1985-03-06 | 1988-03-29 | Etak, Inc. | Apparatus for generating a heading signal for a land vehicle |
| JPH0650559B2 (en) * | 1985-04-03 | 1994-06-29 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Vehicle route guidance device |
| US4751512A (en) * | 1986-01-21 | 1988-06-14 | Oceanonics, Inc. | Differential navigation system for remote mobile users |
| US4831563A (en) * | 1986-07-01 | 1989-05-16 | Pioneer Electronic Corporation | Method of processing output data from geomagnetic sensor |
| US4862398A (en) * | 1986-11-18 | 1989-08-29 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Correcting method and correcting errors in a terrestrial magnetism heading sensor |
| US4737218A (en) * | 1986-12-29 | 1988-04-12 | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | Method of forming a fabric covered spline assembly |
| DE3715007A1 (en) * | 1987-05-06 | 1988-11-17 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE COURSE OF A LAND VEHICLE |
| WO1988008961A1 (en) * | 1987-05-11 | 1988-11-17 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Position detection system |
| DE3719017A1 (en) * | 1987-06-06 | 1988-12-15 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A DRIVING ROUTE BETWEEN A START POINT AND A DESTINATION POINT |
| NL8702087A (en) * | 1987-09-04 | 1989-04-03 | Philips Nv | VEHICLE NAVIGATION DEVICE WITH DISPLAY OF A SELECTED MAP ELEMENT ACCORDING TO A PRE-DEFINED REPRESENTATION STANDARD. |
| US4964052A (en) * | 1987-10-30 | 1990-10-16 | Nec Home Electronics Ltd. | Navigation device for use in a vehicle |
| JP2637446B2 (en) * | 1987-12-28 | 1997-08-06 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Navigation device |
| JPH01173824A (en) * | 1987-12-28 | 1989-07-10 | Aisin Aw Co Ltd | Navigation device for vehicle with help function |
| JP2680318B2 (en) * | 1987-12-28 | 1997-11-19 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Navigation device |
| JPH01214711A (en) * | 1988-02-23 | 1989-08-29 | Toshiba Corp | Navigation apparatus |
| JPH023900A (en) * | 1988-06-16 | 1990-01-09 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Present place displaying device for moving body |
| JPH07117420B2 (en) * | 1988-06-27 | 1995-12-18 | パイオニア株式会社 | Road data generation method in vehicle-mounted navigation device |
| JPH07119617B2 (en) * | 1988-07-05 | 1995-12-20 | マツダ株式会社 | Vehicle navigation system |
| US4918609A (en) * | 1988-10-11 | 1990-04-17 | Koji Yamawaki | Satellite-based position-determining system |
| US5060162A (en) * | 1988-12-09 | 1991-10-22 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Vehicle in-situ locating apparatus |
| US5287297A (en) * | 1989-11-02 | 1994-02-15 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Magnetic direction finder with correcting circuit |
| US5177685A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-01-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Automobile navigation system using real time spoken driving instructions |
| EP0485132B1 (en) * | 1990-11-06 | 1996-03-06 | Fujitsu Ten Limited | Direction sensor having an earth magnetism sensor and a rate gyro sensor and navigation system having this direction sensor |
| JPH04315913A (en) * | 1991-04-16 | 1992-11-06 | Pioneer Electron Corp | Vehicle bearing measuring device |
| DE4324215C2 (en) * | 1992-07-20 | 1999-05-12 | Aisin Aw Co | Voice navigation system for vehicles |
| US5931888A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1999-08-03 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Navigation system for vehicles with alternative route searching capabilities |
| US5612882A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1997-03-18 | Lefebvre; Rebecca K. | Method and apparatus for providing navigation guidance |
| JP3381459B2 (en) * | 1995-05-30 | 2003-02-24 | 株式会社デンソー | Travel guide device for vehicles |
-
1996
- 1996-12-09 US US08/761,868 patent/US5910177A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-12-05 EP EP97309824A patent/EP0846933B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-05 DE DE69728501T patent/DE69728501T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-05 CA CA002224021A patent/CA2224021C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-12-09 JP JP33834197A patent/JP3413087B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104061938A (en) * | 2013-03-21 | 2014-09-24 | 高德信息技术有限公司 | Navigation method, apparatus and system |
| CN104061938B (en) * | 2013-03-21 | 2017-11-10 | 高德信息技术有限公司 | A kind of air navigation aid, apparatus and system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US5910177A (en) | 1999-06-08 |
| EP0846933A2 (en) | 1998-06-10 |
| JPH10185602A (en) | 1998-07-14 |
| EP0846933B1 (en) | 2004-04-07 |
| DE69728501D1 (en) | 2004-05-13 |
| JP3413087B2 (en) | 2003-06-03 |
| DE69728501T2 (en) | 2005-04-14 |
| CA2224021A1 (en) | 1998-06-09 |
| EP0846933A3 (en) | 1999-12-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2224021C (en) | Method and apparatus for navigating close proximity routes with a vehicle navigation system | |
| US5928307A (en) | Method and apparatus for determining an alternate route in a vehicle navigation system | |
| EP0836074B1 (en) | Route guidance system and method for use in vehicle navigation | |
| US5731978A (en) | Method and apparatus for enhancing vehicle navigation through recognition of geographical region types | |
| EP0901001B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for displaying current position of a vehicle | |
| US5712788A (en) | Incremental route calculation | |
| US7031829B2 (en) | Car navigation system prioritizing automatic travel road | |
| US6118389A (en) | Automobile navigation apparatus and method for setting detours in the same | |
| US6456931B1 (en) | Indicating directions to destination and intermediate locations in vehicle navigation systems | |
| US6173232B1 (en) | Vehicle navigation system and a recording medium | |
| US7398155B2 (en) | Car navigation system | |
| US20060116815A1 (en) | In-vehicle navigation device | |
| US20080033643A1 (en) | Route retrieval apparatus | |
| US20070021910A1 (en) | Navigation apparatus | |
| JP4013797B2 (en) | Navigation device | |
| US6604048B2 (en) | Car navigation system and storage medium | |
| JP3941605B2 (en) | Car navigation system | |
| JP2544855B2 (en) | Vehicle guidance device | |
| JP2882250B2 (en) | Route guidance device | |
| JP2913857B2 (en) | Destination guidance device used for vehicle navigation | |
| JP2006177905A (en) | Navigation system | |
| JPH05157575A (en) | Present position correction in vehicle navigation system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20161205 |