CA1250808A - Semen sexing - Google Patents
Semen sexingInfo
- Publication number
- CA1250808A CA1250808A CA000480328A CA480328A CA1250808A CA 1250808 A CA1250808 A CA 1250808A CA 000480328 A CA000480328 A CA 000480328A CA 480328 A CA480328 A CA 480328A CA 1250808 A CA1250808 A CA 1250808A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- spermatozoa
- fluorescence
- dye
- sorting
- stained
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Abstract
In a method for sorting spermatozoa, spermatozoa are stained with Hoechst 33342. The fluorescence distribution of stained spermatozoa is complex: non-motile spermatozoa display a higher fluorescence than motile spermatozoa. The fluorescence profile of the motile spermatozoa is bimodal, and enables the spermatozoa to be sorted into distinct populations of motile spermatozoa.
Description
SEMEN SEXING
The present invention relates to a method o sorting living spermatozoa, and, for exa~ple, to a method of sorting living spermatozoa according to sex; that is, according to whether the spermatozoa bear an X
or Y chromosome.
Throughout the following description, the lower case letters in parentheses refer to the following:
(a) Almquist, J.O., Flipse, R.J. & ~hacker, D.L. (1954) Diluters of bovine semen, IV. Fertility of bovine spermatozoa in heated homogenized milk and skimmed milk. J. Dairy Sci. 37 1303-1304.
(b) Dean, P.N.,Pinkel, D. & Mendelson, M.L. (1978) Hydrodynamic orientation of sperm heads for flow cytometry.
Biophys. J.23, 7-13.
(c) First, N.L. (1971) Collection and preservation of sperm. In Methods in Mammalian Embryology p. 15-35 Ed. J.C. Daniel, Jr. Freeman, San ! Francisco.
(d) Fulwyler, M.J. (1977) Hydrodynamic orientation oE cells. J. Histochem.
Cytochem. 25, 781-783.
(e) Gledhill, B.L., Lake, S. & Dean, P.~.
(1979) Flow cytometry and sorting of sperm and other male germ cells.
~0 In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, pp.
471-485. Eds M.R. Melamed. P.F. Mullaney ~ M.L. Mendelsohn. Wiley, New York.
(f) Herzenberg, L.A. & Herzenberg, L.A.
(1978) Analysis and separation using the fluorescence activated cell sorter.
In Handbook of Experimental Immunology 3rd edn, pp. 22.1 - 22.21. Ed. D.M.
Weir. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
(g) Herzenberg, L.A., Sweet, R.G., & Herzenberg, L.A. (1976) Fluorescence activated cell sorting. Sci. Am. 234, 108-117.
~h) Klasen, M. & Schmidt, M. (1981) An improved method for Y body identification and confirmation of a high incidence of YY sperm nuclei. Hum. Genet. 58, 155-161.
(i) Loken, M.R., Parks, D.R. & Herzenberg, I,.A. (1977) Identification of cell asymmetry and orientation by light scattering. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
25, 790-795.
(j) Lydon, M.J., Keeler, K.D. & Thomas, D.B. (1980) Vital DNA staining and cell sorting by flow micro-fluorometry.
J. cell. Physiol. 102. 175-181.
(k) Muller, W. & Gautier, F. (1975) Interaction of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acid A-I' specific non-intercalating DNA ligands. Eur. J. Biochem. 54, 385-394.
(l) Russell, W.C., Newman, C. & Williamson, D.H. (1975) A simple cytochemical technique for demonstration of DNA
in cells infected with my~plasma and viruses. Nature, Lond. 253, 46~-~6~.
`\
(m) Stovel, R.T., Sweet, R.G. & Herzenberg, L.A. (1978) A means for orienting flat cells in Elow systems. Biophys.
J. 23, 1-5, (n) Szabo, G., Jr, Kiss, A. & Damjanovich, S. (1981) Flow cytometric analysis of the uptake of Hoechst 33342 dye by human lymphocytes. Cytometry 2.
20-23~
(o) Tobey, R.A. & Crissman, H.A. (1975) Unique techniques for microfluorometry.
Expl. Cell Res. ~3, 235-239, (p) Van Dilla, M.A., Gledhill, B.L, Lake, S., Dean, P.N., Gray, J.W., Kachel, V., Barlogie, B. & Gohde, W. (1977) Measurement of mammalian sperm deoxy-ribonucleic acid by flow cytometry.
Problems and approaches. J. Histochem.
Cytochem. 25, 763-773.
Flow microfluorometry is a convenient method for measuring the DNA content of mammalian cells (o). Spermatozoa, by virtue of their ease of collection from many species, their homogeneity and their haploidy, are particularly suitable for such studies (p;e). To date, the majority of studies of the DNA content of spermatozoa have been carried out using fixed material stained with fluorochromes such as acridine orange, ethidium bromide, or mithramycin Recently, t~ bisben-zimidazole dyes Hoechst 33258, Hoechs 3342,and DAPI(4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) have been introduced as quantitative fluorescent stains for DNA. These dyes, although they bind tightly to DNA, do not intercalate into the molecule and hence are reputed not to disrupt its structure (k;l). ~hese fluorochrome dyes are consequently capable of being used as quantitativr vital stains ~'25~
for DNA: Hoechst 33258 and Hoechst 33342 have been used as vital stains to distinguish phases of the cell cycle.
Since spermatozoa are tail bearing and motile they orisntate with their long axis zlong the line of flow in a flow microfluorometry system (p). It has been concluded that an apparent bimodal DNA distribution in fixed acriflavine/Feulgen-stained bull sperm heads analyzed in such a system, is due to an orientation artefact (b)/ perhaps analogous to that previously described in (i) for the light scatter (size) artefact seen with chicken red blood cells (chicken RBC). Both of these artefacts can be by-passed ox removed by the use of an appropriate nozzle which will control the orientation of ~lattened particles such as sperm heads or chicken RBC relative to the laser beam of the flow microfluorometry system (m ; h). As an alternative approach, distribution artefacts can be tested by sorting the population into its separate components and then reanalyzing them independently: if an artefact is involved, each reanalyzed peak will give a bimodal peak similar to that observed originally.
Various aspects of the invention are as follows:
A method of sorting living spermatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of ~permatozoa, with a fluorochrome dye; subjecting the stained spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence; and sorting the spermatozoa according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith.
A method of sorting living spsrmatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of spermatozoa with a fluorochrome dye which binds tightly to DNA, does not intercalate the DNA molecule oP chromosomes and hence does not disrupt the structure of DNA molecules, subjecting the spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence and sorting the spermatozoa into different groups according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith, one group mainly comprising X-chromosome bearing spermatozoa; and another group mainly comprising Y-chromosome bearing sp~rmatozoa.
The dye m y be a bis'oenzimidaæole dye.
In an embodiment of the invention, the bisben-zimidazole dye Hoechst 33342 is used as a vital fluoresGent stain for DNA which allows spsrmatozoa to remain motil~ after analysis. The ~luorescence may be examined in detail using a commercially ~s~
1 available fluorescence-activated cell sorter.
For a better understanding of tha present invention, and to show h~w the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIGURE 1 is a graph showing the distribution of fluorescence of bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342;
FIGURE 2 is a graph showing the distribution of Figure 1, with a higher gain setting for the fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
FIGURE 3 is a graph showing the distribution of cockerel spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342 ~5 ~g/ml) in egg medium;
FIGURE 4 is a graph showing reanalysis of the peaks AI and AII in Figure 2;
FIGURES 5a to 5c are graphs showing the results of analysis with different orientations of the cells; and FIGURE 6 is a table showing the effect of an orientating no~zle on FACS analysis of chicken RBC (size~
and bull spermatozoa tfluorescence) compar~d to non-orientated cells.
In preparation for the analysis semen is collected, using an appropriate artificial vagina (c), from Fresian and Hereford bulls. Shortly after ejaculation, semen is added to 1-2 volumes of egg or milk medium at 20-22 C. Milk medium is made according to the method described in (a), which comprises: centrifuging pasteurized milk at 2000 g for 10 min; removing the cream; taking the underlying fat-free liquid from this slow speed spin; and pelleting the milk solids by centrifugation at 48000 g for 30 mins. The clear supernatant is then heated at 92-96C for 10 min, and 0.125 g D-fructose/ml and antibiotics (104 units penicillin ~ 10 mg streptomycin sulphate per 100 ml) is added when the supernatant has cooled.
The spermatozoa are washed twice by centrifugation ~^
l at lO00 g for 5 min followed by gentle resuspension of the pellet in sufficient fresh medium to give a concentration of, for example, 5 x 106 spermatozoa/ml.
Intact spermatozoa are then stained with Hoechst 33342 in milk medium at a concentration of 2 ~g/ml for bull spermatozoa and 5 ~g/ml for cockerel spermatozoa, at room temperature for 2-3 hours. The dye concentrations may be determined empirically from subjective assessment of optimal staining without overt cytotoxicity.
Flow microfluorometric analysis (g) is carried out using a fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (such as, for example, FACS II:Becton Dickinson Electronics Laboratories, Sunnyvale, California). The light source for the FACS may be a 16~-05 ultra violet-enhanced argon-ion laser, (Spectraphysics), operated at 20 mW in the u.v. range of wavelengths. Right-angle scatter of u.v. laser light is prevented from entering the fluorescence detector by a Wratten 2B filter. The FACS
is calibrated in the u.v. using glutaraldehyde-fixed chicken red blood cells (f~.
Samples of spermatozoa are analysed and sorted at room temperature (20-22C) at a rate of up to 3500-5000 cells/sec, except duxing orientation experimen~s in which the rate was reduced to <800 cells/sec. The sheath fluid is Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2;
containing Mg2+ and Ca2 ), but without stain.
The total fluorescence is calculated (in arbitrary units), ~or example by a computer. Such a computer is an LSI-ll based mini computer (Digital Equipment Corporation, MA, USA) linked to the FACS, which calculates the total fluorescence between channels l and 25~ as follows (I):
256no o~ cells in a channel x channel no.
Total fluorescence = ~
t 100 (I) Cells can be orientated in a single vertical plane .. ~
v~
1 at a predetermined angle to the ]aser beam by the method described in (m). A (wedge shaped) sample injection tube, with faces set at ~0C to the axis flow, has the effect of making a (central) stream ribbon-shaped within the sheath stream. Since the velocity of the sheath stream is considerably higher than that of the sample stream, the latter is drawn into a thin ribbon and the flattened cells within this sample become orientated into the plane of the ribbon.
Extrapolating from maximal flow rates which allow successful orientation of chicken red blood cells, it has been estimated, on the basis of cell (head) size and viscosity of the medium, that successful orientation of spermatozoa should occur providing that the flow rate does not exceed 800 cells/sec, when using a sample density of 5 x 106/mlO
When necessary, heads may be removed -Erom the spermatozoa in milk medium by ultra~sonication for 5-10 min in a MSE ultrasonicator.
A population of bull spermatozoa stained for a minimum of 2 hours with Hoechst 33342, (2~g/ml Hoechst 33342) in milk medium shows a complex distribution of fluorescence intensity, which is illustrated in Figure 1.
Data are given for spermatozoa in milk medium at ambient temperature (20-23 C) for 2 hours and those killed by being heated to 56C for 5 min. There are two pairs of peaks in the distribution, which have been labelled A and B respectively. When examined microscopically, cells from window B are non- (or only partly) motile, whereas spermatozoa sorted from window A show active forward motility. The likelihood that the B peaks represent dead or moribund spermatozoa was tested by submitting a sample of stained spermatozoa to 56 C for 5 min. This treatment left the spermatozoa totally immotile and when the fluorescence distribution of these immotile spermatozoa was examined the entire distribution was concentrated in the B peaks. A small peak seen between A and B in Figure 1 1 may represent spermatozoa in a transitory state between A and B or the presence of a small percentage of diploid spermatozoa (h).
Attention was concentrated on the A peaks of the fluorescence distribution of stained bull spermatozoa by running the FACS fluorescence gain at a higher setting (Figure 2) so that the B peaks moved off-scale. The low and high peaks of the observed bimodal fluorescence distribution of the A peaks (AI and AIII) contained approximately equal numbers of spermatozoa. The average fluorescence of spermatozoa in peak AII was approxiamtely 30~ higher than that in peak AI.
Qualitatively similar bimodal distributions are also obtained using the same procedures as outlined above for the bull, when analysing ejaculated rabbit, sheep, goat and human spermatozoa.
When cockerel spermatozoa (~0.5 x 4 ~m heads, ~ 8 ~m tails) were stained with H33342 the resulting fluorescence profile was quite different from that of bull spermatozoa (Figure 3). The monophasic distribution of fluorescence may reflect either the homogametic nature of male birds or be due to the absence of an orientation artefact in the cylindrically headed cockerel spermatozoa. The bimodal fluorescence distribution of bull spermatozoa may be due to a machine artefact, analogous to that observed for light scatter (size) analysis of chicken red blood cells, but reflect underlying biological or physiological differences. An investigation into the nature of the observed bimodality was carried out by an analysis-sort-reanalysis of stained spermatozoa and by the use of an "orientating" nozzle~
First, the living, Hoechst 33342-stained bull spermatozoa with a fluorescence distribution similar to that shown in Figure 2, were physically separated (sorted) into AI and AII population. Each separated population was then re-analysed and the respective fluorescence distributions are shown in Figure 4.
,51~ U~3 1 Although the peaks were not clearly unimodal, the spermatozoa from the AII fraction had a higher overall fluorescence than those from AI as would be expected if the spermatozoa in peak AI were from a population different from that of those in peak AII~ The low fluorescent peak appearing at approximately channel 30 for both populations in Figure 4 was due to spermatozoa from which the H33342 had leached. Fixation of spermatozoa with buffered formal-saline (pH 7.4) before or after staining or after they had been sorted failed to reduce the leakage of dye. In 17 experiments in which the spermato~oa in peaks AI and AII were separated, the total fluorescence intensity of the reanalysed AII
population was 15.~ ~ 2.9~ greater than that of the AI
population. For a comparison, the same experiment was performed using chicken RBC. It is known that the apparent bimodal size distri~ution of the chicken RBC is an artefact related to the orientation of individual cells to the laser beam. When the chicken RBC were sorted into two peaks on the basis of scatter, each separated peak gave the same bimodal distribution as the original, unsorted, material when reanalysed.
Second, an orientation nozzle similar to that decribed in (m) was used to analyse bull spermatozoa.
The efficiency of the nozzle was tested using a light-scatter analysis of chicken RBC (1200 cells/sec).
Figure 5 shows results using an orientating nozzle for (a) chicken RBC and (b, c) bull spermatozoaO In Figure 5a) peak 1 was obtained when the sample ribbon was parallel to the laser beam; peak 2 was obtained when the sample ribbon was at right angles to the laser beam; and peak 3 for randomly orientat0d cells. In Figure 5b) peak 1 was obtained when the heads of the spermatozoa were orientated edge on with respect to the laser beam and peak 2 when the sample was rotated through 90 in the axis of the flow (laser beam intersecting the broad side of head); randomly orientated cells are indicated by 3.
,.~, ~,2~U~
-10~
1 In Figure 5c) the bimodal distribution of fluorescence intensity of intact Hoechst 33342-stained bull spermatozoa was not affected by altering the orientation of the sample ribbon: the distributions of randomly orientated cells overlapped. The scatter distribution of chicken RBC (Figure 5a) was affected by orientating the cells with their edges parallel to or at right angles to the laser beam. A similar effect was observed when sperm heads were passed through the orientating nozzle and th effect on the fluorescence profile examined. Although bull spermatozoa have flattened heads, they did not display a biphasic scatter (size) profile similar to that seen when analysing chicken RBC. Nevertheless, the heads of bull spermatozoa could be positively orientated, since the resulting fluorescence profiles were monophasic and did not overlap; (Figure 5b). In contrast, the bimodal fluorescence distribution of intact bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342 was not altered by rotation of the nozzle ¦Figure 5c). The percentage of cells within each peak is shown in Figure 6.
Bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechs-t 33342 in milk or egg medium show a complex profile of fluorescence when analysed on the FACS. The observed fluorescence distribution of particles the size of spermatozoa (-2 x 5 x 10 ~m head, 40 ~m tail) can be divided into three main areas: (1) unstained material,
The present invention relates to a method o sorting living spermatozoa, and, for exa~ple, to a method of sorting living spermatozoa according to sex; that is, according to whether the spermatozoa bear an X
or Y chromosome.
Throughout the following description, the lower case letters in parentheses refer to the following:
(a) Almquist, J.O., Flipse, R.J. & ~hacker, D.L. (1954) Diluters of bovine semen, IV. Fertility of bovine spermatozoa in heated homogenized milk and skimmed milk. J. Dairy Sci. 37 1303-1304.
(b) Dean, P.N.,Pinkel, D. & Mendelson, M.L. (1978) Hydrodynamic orientation of sperm heads for flow cytometry.
Biophys. J.23, 7-13.
(c) First, N.L. (1971) Collection and preservation of sperm. In Methods in Mammalian Embryology p. 15-35 Ed. J.C. Daniel, Jr. Freeman, San ! Francisco.
(d) Fulwyler, M.J. (1977) Hydrodynamic orientation oE cells. J. Histochem.
Cytochem. 25, 781-783.
(e) Gledhill, B.L., Lake, S. & Dean, P.~.
(1979) Flow cytometry and sorting of sperm and other male germ cells.
~0 In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, pp.
471-485. Eds M.R. Melamed. P.F. Mullaney ~ M.L. Mendelsohn. Wiley, New York.
(f) Herzenberg, L.A. & Herzenberg, L.A.
(1978) Analysis and separation using the fluorescence activated cell sorter.
In Handbook of Experimental Immunology 3rd edn, pp. 22.1 - 22.21. Ed. D.M.
Weir. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
(g) Herzenberg, L.A., Sweet, R.G., & Herzenberg, L.A. (1976) Fluorescence activated cell sorting. Sci. Am. 234, 108-117.
~h) Klasen, M. & Schmidt, M. (1981) An improved method for Y body identification and confirmation of a high incidence of YY sperm nuclei. Hum. Genet. 58, 155-161.
(i) Loken, M.R., Parks, D.R. & Herzenberg, I,.A. (1977) Identification of cell asymmetry and orientation by light scattering. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
25, 790-795.
(j) Lydon, M.J., Keeler, K.D. & Thomas, D.B. (1980) Vital DNA staining and cell sorting by flow micro-fluorometry.
J. cell. Physiol. 102. 175-181.
(k) Muller, W. & Gautier, F. (1975) Interaction of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acid A-I' specific non-intercalating DNA ligands. Eur. J. Biochem. 54, 385-394.
(l) Russell, W.C., Newman, C. & Williamson, D.H. (1975) A simple cytochemical technique for demonstration of DNA
in cells infected with my~plasma and viruses. Nature, Lond. 253, 46~-~6~.
`\
(m) Stovel, R.T., Sweet, R.G. & Herzenberg, L.A. (1978) A means for orienting flat cells in Elow systems. Biophys.
J. 23, 1-5, (n) Szabo, G., Jr, Kiss, A. & Damjanovich, S. (1981) Flow cytometric analysis of the uptake of Hoechst 33342 dye by human lymphocytes. Cytometry 2.
20-23~
(o) Tobey, R.A. & Crissman, H.A. (1975) Unique techniques for microfluorometry.
Expl. Cell Res. ~3, 235-239, (p) Van Dilla, M.A., Gledhill, B.L, Lake, S., Dean, P.N., Gray, J.W., Kachel, V., Barlogie, B. & Gohde, W. (1977) Measurement of mammalian sperm deoxy-ribonucleic acid by flow cytometry.
Problems and approaches. J. Histochem.
Cytochem. 25, 763-773.
Flow microfluorometry is a convenient method for measuring the DNA content of mammalian cells (o). Spermatozoa, by virtue of their ease of collection from many species, their homogeneity and their haploidy, are particularly suitable for such studies (p;e). To date, the majority of studies of the DNA content of spermatozoa have been carried out using fixed material stained with fluorochromes such as acridine orange, ethidium bromide, or mithramycin Recently, t~ bisben-zimidazole dyes Hoechst 33258, Hoechs 3342,and DAPI(4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) have been introduced as quantitative fluorescent stains for DNA. These dyes, although they bind tightly to DNA, do not intercalate into the molecule and hence are reputed not to disrupt its structure (k;l). ~hese fluorochrome dyes are consequently capable of being used as quantitativr vital stains ~'25~
for DNA: Hoechst 33258 and Hoechst 33342 have been used as vital stains to distinguish phases of the cell cycle.
Since spermatozoa are tail bearing and motile they orisntate with their long axis zlong the line of flow in a flow microfluorometry system (p). It has been concluded that an apparent bimodal DNA distribution in fixed acriflavine/Feulgen-stained bull sperm heads analyzed in such a system, is due to an orientation artefact (b)/ perhaps analogous to that previously described in (i) for the light scatter (size) artefact seen with chicken red blood cells (chicken RBC). Both of these artefacts can be by-passed ox removed by the use of an appropriate nozzle which will control the orientation of ~lattened particles such as sperm heads or chicken RBC relative to the laser beam of the flow microfluorometry system (m ; h). As an alternative approach, distribution artefacts can be tested by sorting the population into its separate components and then reanalyzing them independently: if an artefact is involved, each reanalyzed peak will give a bimodal peak similar to that observed originally.
Various aspects of the invention are as follows:
A method of sorting living spermatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of ~permatozoa, with a fluorochrome dye; subjecting the stained spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence; and sorting the spermatozoa according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith.
A method of sorting living spsrmatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of spermatozoa with a fluorochrome dye which binds tightly to DNA, does not intercalate the DNA molecule oP chromosomes and hence does not disrupt the structure of DNA molecules, subjecting the spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence and sorting the spermatozoa into different groups according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith, one group mainly comprising X-chromosome bearing spermatozoa; and another group mainly comprising Y-chromosome bearing sp~rmatozoa.
The dye m y be a bis'oenzimidaæole dye.
In an embodiment of the invention, the bisben-zimidazole dye Hoechst 33342 is used as a vital fluoresGent stain for DNA which allows spsrmatozoa to remain motil~ after analysis. The ~luorescence may be examined in detail using a commercially ~s~
1 available fluorescence-activated cell sorter.
For a better understanding of tha present invention, and to show h~w the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIGURE 1 is a graph showing the distribution of fluorescence of bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342;
FIGURE 2 is a graph showing the distribution of Figure 1, with a higher gain setting for the fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
FIGURE 3 is a graph showing the distribution of cockerel spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342 ~5 ~g/ml) in egg medium;
FIGURE 4 is a graph showing reanalysis of the peaks AI and AII in Figure 2;
FIGURES 5a to 5c are graphs showing the results of analysis with different orientations of the cells; and FIGURE 6 is a table showing the effect of an orientating no~zle on FACS analysis of chicken RBC (size~
and bull spermatozoa tfluorescence) compar~d to non-orientated cells.
In preparation for the analysis semen is collected, using an appropriate artificial vagina (c), from Fresian and Hereford bulls. Shortly after ejaculation, semen is added to 1-2 volumes of egg or milk medium at 20-22 C. Milk medium is made according to the method described in (a), which comprises: centrifuging pasteurized milk at 2000 g for 10 min; removing the cream; taking the underlying fat-free liquid from this slow speed spin; and pelleting the milk solids by centrifugation at 48000 g for 30 mins. The clear supernatant is then heated at 92-96C for 10 min, and 0.125 g D-fructose/ml and antibiotics (104 units penicillin ~ 10 mg streptomycin sulphate per 100 ml) is added when the supernatant has cooled.
The spermatozoa are washed twice by centrifugation ~^
l at lO00 g for 5 min followed by gentle resuspension of the pellet in sufficient fresh medium to give a concentration of, for example, 5 x 106 spermatozoa/ml.
Intact spermatozoa are then stained with Hoechst 33342 in milk medium at a concentration of 2 ~g/ml for bull spermatozoa and 5 ~g/ml for cockerel spermatozoa, at room temperature for 2-3 hours. The dye concentrations may be determined empirically from subjective assessment of optimal staining without overt cytotoxicity.
Flow microfluorometric analysis (g) is carried out using a fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (such as, for example, FACS II:Becton Dickinson Electronics Laboratories, Sunnyvale, California). The light source for the FACS may be a 16~-05 ultra violet-enhanced argon-ion laser, (Spectraphysics), operated at 20 mW in the u.v. range of wavelengths. Right-angle scatter of u.v. laser light is prevented from entering the fluorescence detector by a Wratten 2B filter. The FACS
is calibrated in the u.v. using glutaraldehyde-fixed chicken red blood cells (f~.
Samples of spermatozoa are analysed and sorted at room temperature (20-22C) at a rate of up to 3500-5000 cells/sec, except duxing orientation experimen~s in which the rate was reduced to <800 cells/sec. The sheath fluid is Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2;
containing Mg2+ and Ca2 ), but without stain.
The total fluorescence is calculated (in arbitrary units), ~or example by a computer. Such a computer is an LSI-ll based mini computer (Digital Equipment Corporation, MA, USA) linked to the FACS, which calculates the total fluorescence between channels l and 25~ as follows (I):
256no o~ cells in a channel x channel no.
Total fluorescence = ~
t 100 (I) Cells can be orientated in a single vertical plane .. ~
v~
1 at a predetermined angle to the ]aser beam by the method described in (m). A (wedge shaped) sample injection tube, with faces set at ~0C to the axis flow, has the effect of making a (central) stream ribbon-shaped within the sheath stream. Since the velocity of the sheath stream is considerably higher than that of the sample stream, the latter is drawn into a thin ribbon and the flattened cells within this sample become orientated into the plane of the ribbon.
Extrapolating from maximal flow rates which allow successful orientation of chicken red blood cells, it has been estimated, on the basis of cell (head) size and viscosity of the medium, that successful orientation of spermatozoa should occur providing that the flow rate does not exceed 800 cells/sec, when using a sample density of 5 x 106/mlO
When necessary, heads may be removed -Erom the spermatozoa in milk medium by ultra~sonication for 5-10 min in a MSE ultrasonicator.
A population of bull spermatozoa stained for a minimum of 2 hours with Hoechst 33342, (2~g/ml Hoechst 33342) in milk medium shows a complex distribution of fluorescence intensity, which is illustrated in Figure 1.
Data are given for spermatozoa in milk medium at ambient temperature (20-23 C) for 2 hours and those killed by being heated to 56C for 5 min. There are two pairs of peaks in the distribution, which have been labelled A and B respectively. When examined microscopically, cells from window B are non- (or only partly) motile, whereas spermatozoa sorted from window A show active forward motility. The likelihood that the B peaks represent dead or moribund spermatozoa was tested by submitting a sample of stained spermatozoa to 56 C for 5 min. This treatment left the spermatozoa totally immotile and when the fluorescence distribution of these immotile spermatozoa was examined the entire distribution was concentrated in the B peaks. A small peak seen between A and B in Figure 1 1 may represent spermatozoa in a transitory state between A and B or the presence of a small percentage of diploid spermatozoa (h).
Attention was concentrated on the A peaks of the fluorescence distribution of stained bull spermatozoa by running the FACS fluorescence gain at a higher setting (Figure 2) so that the B peaks moved off-scale. The low and high peaks of the observed bimodal fluorescence distribution of the A peaks (AI and AIII) contained approximately equal numbers of spermatozoa. The average fluorescence of spermatozoa in peak AII was approxiamtely 30~ higher than that in peak AI.
Qualitatively similar bimodal distributions are also obtained using the same procedures as outlined above for the bull, when analysing ejaculated rabbit, sheep, goat and human spermatozoa.
When cockerel spermatozoa (~0.5 x 4 ~m heads, ~ 8 ~m tails) were stained with H33342 the resulting fluorescence profile was quite different from that of bull spermatozoa (Figure 3). The monophasic distribution of fluorescence may reflect either the homogametic nature of male birds or be due to the absence of an orientation artefact in the cylindrically headed cockerel spermatozoa. The bimodal fluorescence distribution of bull spermatozoa may be due to a machine artefact, analogous to that observed for light scatter (size) analysis of chicken red blood cells, but reflect underlying biological or physiological differences. An investigation into the nature of the observed bimodality was carried out by an analysis-sort-reanalysis of stained spermatozoa and by the use of an "orientating" nozzle~
First, the living, Hoechst 33342-stained bull spermatozoa with a fluorescence distribution similar to that shown in Figure 2, were physically separated (sorted) into AI and AII population. Each separated population was then re-analysed and the respective fluorescence distributions are shown in Figure 4.
,51~ U~3 1 Although the peaks were not clearly unimodal, the spermatozoa from the AII fraction had a higher overall fluorescence than those from AI as would be expected if the spermatozoa in peak AI were from a population different from that of those in peak AII~ The low fluorescent peak appearing at approximately channel 30 for both populations in Figure 4 was due to spermatozoa from which the H33342 had leached. Fixation of spermatozoa with buffered formal-saline (pH 7.4) before or after staining or after they had been sorted failed to reduce the leakage of dye. In 17 experiments in which the spermato~oa in peaks AI and AII were separated, the total fluorescence intensity of the reanalysed AII
population was 15.~ ~ 2.9~ greater than that of the AI
population. For a comparison, the same experiment was performed using chicken RBC. It is known that the apparent bimodal size distri~ution of the chicken RBC is an artefact related to the orientation of individual cells to the laser beam. When the chicken RBC were sorted into two peaks on the basis of scatter, each separated peak gave the same bimodal distribution as the original, unsorted, material when reanalysed.
Second, an orientation nozzle similar to that decribed in (m) was used to analyse bull spermatozoa.
The efficiency of the nozzle was tested using a light-scatter analysis of chicken RBC (1200 cells/sec).
Figure 5 shows results using an orientating nozzle for (a) chicken RBC and (b, c) bull spermatozoaO In Figure 5a) peak 1 was obtained when the sample ribbon was parallel to the laser beam; peak 2 was obtained when the sample ribbon was at right angles to the laser beam; and peak 3 for randomly orientat0d cells. In Figure 5b) peak 1 was obtained when the heads of the spermatozoa were orientated edge on with respect to the laser beam and peak 2 when the sample was rotated through 90 in the axis of the flow (laser beam intersecting the broad side of head); randomly orientated cells are indicated by 3.
,.~, ~,2~U~
-10~
1 In Figure 5c) the bimodal distribution of fluorescence intensity of intact Hoechst 33342-stained bull spermatozoa was not affected by altering the orientation of the sample ribbon: the distributions of randomly orientated cells overlapped. The scatter distribution of chicken RBC (Figure 5a) was affected by orientating the cells with their edges parallel to or at right angles to the laser beam. A similar effect was observed when sperm heads were passed through the orientating nozzle and th effect on the fluorescence profile examined. Although bull spermatozoa have flattened heads, they did not display a biphasic scatter (size) profile similar to that seen when analysing chicken RBC. Nevertheless, the heads of bull spermatozoa could be positively orientated, since the resulting fluorescence profiles were monophasic and did not overlap; (Figure 5b). In contrast, the bimodal fluorescence distribution of intact bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342 was not altered by rotation of the nozzle ¦Figure 5c). The percentage of cells within each peak is shown in Figure 6.
Bull spermatozoa stained with Hoechs-t 33342 in milk or egg medium show a complex profile of fluorescence when analysed on the FACS. The observed fluorescence distribution of particles the size of spermatozoa (-2 x 5 x 10 ~m head, 40 ~m tail) can be divided into three main areas: (1) unstained material,
(2) a pair of highly fluorescent peaks ~B) shown to consist of dead or moribund spermatozoa, and (3) a pair of peaks (AI and AII) with intermediate fluorescence which consist of spermatozoa with normal forward motility. Attention has been concentrated on peaks AI
and AII.
An increased staining of non-viable cells by ~oechst 33342 similar to that seen here for bovine spermatozoa has previously been reported for dead or dying lymphocytes stained with the same dye. It has been suggested (n) that the increased uptake of stain was due . - ' ' :~,~S~!~U~
1 to a breakdown of the integrity of the cell membrane at cell deathO This may be the mechanism responsible for ~he observed increase in fluorescence of dead spermatozoa although it is possible that the normally tightly packed D~A in the nucleus becomes disorga~ni~ed and this contributes to the increased staining. However, preliminary fluorometric studies suggest that a considerable increase in the fluorescence intensity of Hoechst 33342 occurs as the pH decreases, irrespective of whether the dye is bound to DNA, protein or is free in solution. This observation suggests that the B peaks may arise because of increased nuclear acidity at death.
The bimodal distribution observed in the Hoechst 33342 staining of viable spermatozoa (peaks A) is probably a consequence of the biologically different kinds of spermatozoa in the normal ejaculate.
Accordingly a comparison of the fluorescence profiles of mammalian and bird spermatozoa, which are heterogametic and homogametic respectively shows the cockerel spermatozoa to have a unimodal distribution, Figure 5 illustrates that although the heads of spermatozoa can be orientated, the bimodal fluorescence distribution of Hoechst 333~2-stained intact live spermatozoa is apparently independent of the orientation of the sperm heads around their long axis; and peaks AI and AII
(Figure ~), althoug~ not clearly unimodal, are of predictable fluorescence in that spermatozoa separated from peak AII fluoresce more brightly than those from AI:
a difference which averages at about 15%. If bimodality had a machine orientation artefact the separated population would be expected to have identical (bimodal) distributions.
Thus the observed bimodality of fluorescence distribution indicates the presence of two physiologically or biologically different sub-populations of viable spermatozoa. The sub-populations (AI and AII) may reflect spermatozoa at distinct stages of late ~l~t~
1 maturation or the difference between X- and Y- chromosome bearing spermatozoa. Experimental work with rabbits has yielded a 3.5:1 ratio of correct sex to incorrect sex, which is very close to the ratio which would be predicted from a theoretical estimate of the overlaps between the two sorted peaks. The above described method thus has a useful application in sorting spermatozoa according to whether they are X- or Y- chromosome bearing spermatozoa.
and AII.
An increased staining of non-viable cells by ~oechst 33342 similar to that seen here for bovine spermatozoa has previously been reported for dead or dying lymphocytes stained with the same dye. It has been suggested (n) that the increased uptake of stain was due . - ' ' :~,~S~!~U~
1 to a breakdown of the integrity of the cell membrane at cell deathO This may be the mechanism responsible for ~he observed increase in fluorescence of dead spermatozoa although it is possible that the normally tightly packed D~A in the nucleus becomes disorga~ni~ed and this contributes to the increased staining. However, preliminary fluorometric studies suggest that a considerable increase in the fluorescence intensity of Hoechst 33342 occurs as the pH decreases, irrespective of whether the dye is bound to DNA, protein or is free in solution. This observation suggests that the B peaks may arise because of increased nuclear acidity at death.
The bimodal distribution observed in the Hoechst 33342 staining of viable spermatozoa (peaks A) is probably a consequence of the biologically different kinds of spermatozoa in the normal ejaculate.
Accordingly a comparison of the fluorescence profiles of mammalian and bird spermatozoa, which are heterogametic and homogametic respectively shows the cockerel spermatozoa to have a unimodal distribution, Figure 5 illustrates that although the heads of spermatozoa can be orientated, the bimodal fluorescence distribution of Hoechst 333~2-stained intact live spermatozoa is apparently independent of the orientation of the sperm heads around their long axis; and peaks AI and AII
(Figure ~), althoug~ not clearly unimodal, are of predictable fluorescence in that spermatozoa separated from peak AII fluoresce more brightly than those from AI:
a difference which averages at about 15%. If bimodality had a machine orientation artefact the separated population would be expected to have identical (bimodal) distributions.
Thus the observed bimodality of fluorescence distribution indicates the presence of two physiologically or biologically different sub-populations of viable spermatozoa. The sub-populations (AI and AII) may reflect spermatozoa at distinct stages of late ~l~t~
1 maturation or the difference between X- and Y- chromosome bearing spermatozoa. Experimental work with rabbits has yielded a 3.5:1 ratio of correct sex to incorrect sex, which is very close to the ratio which would be predicted from a theoretical estimate of the overlaps between the two sorted peaks. The above described method thus has a useful application in sorting spermatozoa according to whether they are X- or Y- chromosome bearing spermatozoa.
Claims (9)
1. A method of sorting living spermatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of spermatozoa, with a fluorochrome dye; subjecting the stained spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence;
and sorting the spermatozoa according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith.
and sorting the spermatozoa according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the dye is a bisbenzimidazole dye.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the spermatozoa are of one of the following mammalian genera or families; bovidae; equidae; capridae; ovidae;
lagomorphidae; and hominidae.
lagomorphidae; and hominidae.
4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, when used to separate spermatozoa into different groups; one group mainly comprising X-chromosome bearing spermatozoa; and another group mainly comprising Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the spermatozoa are sorted by a flow microfluormetric process.
6. A method of sorting living spermatozoa, the method comprising: the vital staining of spermatozoa with a fluorochrome dye which binds tightly to DNA, does not intercalate the DNA molecule of chromosomes and hence does not disrupt the structure of DNA molecules;
subjecting the spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence and sorting the spermatozoa into different groups according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith, one group mainly comprising X-chromosome bearing spermatozoa; and another group mainly comprising Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa.
subjecting the spermatozoa to a light source which causes fluorescence and sorting the spermatozoa into different groups according to the fluorescence intensities associated therewith, one group mainly comprising X-chromosome bearing spermatozoa; and another group mainly comprising Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the dye is a bisbenzimidazole dye.
8. A method according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the spermatozoa are one of the following mammalian genera or families; bovidae; equidae; capridae; ovidae;
lagomorphidae, and hominidae.
lagomorphidae, and hominidae.
9. A method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the spermatozoa are sorted by a flow microfluorometric process.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA000480328A CA1250808A (en) | 1985-04-29 | 1985-04-29 | Semen sexing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA000480328A CA1250808A (en) | 1985-04-29 | 1985-04-29 | Semen sexing |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1250808A true CA1250808A (en) | 1989-03-07 |
Family
ID=4130382
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000480328A Expired CA1250808A (en) | 1985-04-29 | 1985-04-29 | Semen sexing |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA1250808A (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7713687B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2010-05-11 | Xy, Inc. | System to separate frozen-thawed spermatozoa into x-chromosome bearing and y-chromosome bearing populations |
US7723116B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2010-05-25 | Xy, Inc. | Apparatus, methods and processes for sorting particles and for providing sex-sorted animal sperm |
US7758811B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2010-07-20 | Inguran, Llc | System for analyzing particles using multiple flow cytometry units |
US7820425B2 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2010-10-26 | Xy, Llc | Method of cryopreserving selected sperm cells |
US7833147B2 (en) | 2004-07-22 | 2010-11-16 | Inguran, LLC. | Process for enriching a population of sperm cells |
US7838210B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2010-11-23 | Inguran, LLC. | Sperm suspensions for sorting into X or Y chromosome-bearing enriched populations |
US7855078B2 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2010-12-21 | Xy, Llc | High resolution flow cytometer |
US7929137B2 (en) | 1997-01-31 | 2011-04-19 | Xy, Llc | Optical apparatus |
US8137967B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2012-03-20 | Xy, Llc | In-vitro fertilization systems with spermatozoa separated into X-chromosome and Y-chromosome bearing populations |
US8486618B2 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2013-07-16 | Xy, Llc | Heterogeneous inseminate system |
US8497063B2 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2013-07-30 | Xy, Llc | Sex selected equine embryo production system |
US9422523B2 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2016-08-23 | Xy, Llc | System and method for sorting cells |
US11230695B2 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2022-01-25 | Xy, Llc | Sperm cell processing and preservation systems |
-
1985
- 1985-04-29 CA CA000480328A patent/CA1250808A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7929137B2 (en) | 1997-01-31 | 2011-04-19 | Xy, Llc | Optical apparatus |
US9422523B2 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2016-08-23 | Xy, Llc | System and method for sorting cells |
US7820425B2 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2010-10-26 | Xy, Llc | Method of cryopreserving selected sperm cells |
US7771921B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2010-08-10 | Xy, Llc | Separation systems of frozen-thawed spermatozoa into X-chromosome bearing and Y-chromosome bearing populations |
US9879221B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2018-01-30 | Xy, Llc | Method of in-vitro fertilization with spermatozoa separated into X-chromosome and Y-chromosome bearing populations |
US7713687B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2010-05-11 | Xy, Inc. | System to separate frozen-thawed spermatozoa into x-chromosome bearing and y-chromosome bearing populations |
US8652769B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2014-02-18 | Xy, Llc | Methods for separating frozen-thawed spermatozoa into X-chromosome bearing and Y-chromosome bearing populations |
US8137967B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2012-03-20 | Xy, Llc | In-vitro fertilization systems with spermatozoa separated into X-chromosome and Y-chromosome bearing populations |
US8497063B2 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2013-07-30 | Xy, Llc | Sex selected equine embryo production system |
US8486618B2 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2013-07-16 | Xy, Llc | Heterogeneous inseminate system |
US7855078B2 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2010-12-21 | Xy, Llc | High resolution flow cytometer |
US11230695B2 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2022-01-25 | Xy, Llc | Sperm cell processing and preservation systems |
US11261424B2 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2022-03-01 | Xy, Llc | Sperm cell processing systems |
US8748183B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2014-06-10 | Inguran, Llc | Method and apparatus for calibrating a flow cytometer |
US8664006B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2014-03-04 | Inguran, Llc | Flow cytometer apparatus and method |
US8709817B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2014-04-29 | Inguran, Llc | Systems and methods for sorting particles |
US8709825B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2014-04-29 | Inguran, Llc | Flow cytometer method and apparatus |
US7799569B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2010-09-21 | Inguran, Llc | Process for evaluating staining conditions of cells for sorting |
US10100278B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2018-10-16 | Inguran, Llc | Multi-channel system and methods for sorting particles |
US11104880B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2021-08-31 | Inguran, Llc | Photo-damage system for sorting particles |
US7758811B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2010-07-20 | Inguran, Llc | System for analyzing particles using multiple flow cytometry units |
US11718826B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2023-08-08 | Inguran, Llc | System and method for sorting particles |
US7723116B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2010-05-25 | Xy, Inc. | Apparatus, methods and processes for sorting particles and for providing sex-sorted animal sperm |
US7892725B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2011-02-22 | Inguran, Llc | Process for storing a sperm dispersion |
US7838210B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2010-11-23 | Inguran, LLC. | Sperm suspensions for sorting into X or Y chromosome-bearing enriched populations |
US7833147B2 (en) | 2004-07-22 | 2010-11-16 | Inguran, LLC. | Process for enriching a population of sperm cells |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
GB2145112A (en) | Sorting living spermatozoa | |
Keeler et al. | Flow microfluorometric analysis of living spermatozoa stained with Hoechst 33342 | |
CA1250808A (en) | Semen sexing | |
EP1608382B1 (en) | Process for the staining of sperm | |
EP2305172B1 (en) | Apparatus and methods for providing sex-sorted animal sperm | |
DE69434942T2 (en) | MULTIPURPOSE REAGENT SYSTEM FOR THE FAST LYSING OF FULL BLOOD SAMPLES | |
Crissman et al. | Staining of DNA in live and fixed cells | |
Ellsaesser et al. | Analysis of channel catfish peripheral blood leucocytes by bright-field microscopy and flow cytometry | |
Frabetti et al. | White cell apoptosis in packed red cells | |
WO2002041906A2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for producing gender enriched sperm | |
EP3492603B1 (en) | Methods of processing sperm for sex sorting | |
EP2269617A1 (en) | Process for enriching a population of sperm cells | |
WO1984001265A1 (en) | Method of treating collected mammal semen and separating sperm into x and y components | |
Van Wienen et al. | Single layer centrifugation with Androcoll-P can be scaled-up to process larger volumes of boar semen | |
Harrison et al. | Separation of haemopoietic cells for biochemical investigation. Preparation of erythroid and myeloid cells from human and laboratory-animal bone marrow and the separation of erythroblasts according to their state of maturation | |
Sowemimo‐Coker et al. | White cell subsets in apheresis and filtered platelet concentrates | |
US20110236923A1 (en) | Method for staining and sorting of a small volume of sperm | |
Keeler | Flow microfluorometric analysis of living spermatozoa | |
Jemionek et al. | Fractionation of mammalian bone marrow by counterflow centrifugation‐elutriation using a continuous albumin gradient: analysis of granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐forming units | |
Mir et al. | Sperm sexing by flow cytometry–past improvements and future prospects: A review |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |